Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 00:17:12 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> To: juris <juris.kaminskis@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Bug 162859] [acpi] ACPI battery/acline monitoring partialy working (switching) Message-ID: <20150104234107.Q82172@sola.nimnet.asn.au> In-Reply-To: <bug-162859-13733-wjrXNSa1SW@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-162859-13733@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> <bug-162859-13733-wjrXNSa1SW@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 3 Jan 2015 11:45:05 +0000, bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org wrote: Please excuse this off-'zilla merely speculative response. No time, but I've spent (wasted?) some time chasing a couple of these outside the PR. > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=162859 > > --- Comment #14 from juris <juris.kaminskis@gmail.com> --- > Problem on /head/ branch is introduced with revision 216942. If true (in all cases) this is great news for those with a variety of HP laptops that have been experiencing partial - or in some cases complete after boot - failures in CMBAT monitoring since 9.0. And a Macbook Pro. So, reverting rev 216942 fixes it for you? On what FreeBSD version? If so, with scant comprehension of the code, questions that occur: a) did that revision fix some existing problem, the reverting of which might reestablish problem/s in other machines? jkim? b) what is it in various HP ACPI implementations that don't seem to be a reported problem on other hardware, particularly concerning EC handling? c) if this was wrong (for HPs), what would be right? (the hard one :) cheers, Ian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150104234107.Q82172>