Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 20:47:46 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: CFT/CFR: NUMA policy branch Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmo=y76JzK1RPdFy5bf%2B1x188emWq1%2BKe3xqDVJnDDyV=eA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmo=SnqXTF5m65haKqrVf699zinyXs%2BQdvR6V88CW7vooCw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAJ-Vmo=SnqXTF5m65haKqrVf699zinyXs%2BQdvR6V88CW7vooCw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, It's in a review, and I've addressed most of the feedback: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2559 I'd like to get more feedback before I commit this. I'm hoping to commit it next week so I can make a start on pushing numa awareness into KVA allocation and contigmalloc/busdma. Thanks! -adrian On 12 May 2015 at 18:32, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm at the point now where I think this part is done and I'd like to > get it more formally reviewed and ready for commit into -HEAD. > > Here's the branch: > > https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/compare/master...erikarn:local/adrian_numa_policy > > * added syscalls; > * added vm domain policy and iterators; > * per-process, per-thread and global system policy; > * added numactl - a tool to manipulate, fetch and start processes w/ policies;; > * added manpages for everything above. > > It's working fine for a handful of people who have been testing it. > I'd like to get some more wider testing and reporting. > > I'd like to wrap this up in a formal phabricator review in the next > few days and kick start it along. > > Thanks! > > > -adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmo=y76JzK1RPdFy5bf%2B1x188emWq1%2BKe3xqDVJnDDyV=eA>