From owner-freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Sun Jun 28 21:00:36 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A1998FA83 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 21:00:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE1C71044 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 21:00:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id AD55D98FA82; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 21:00:36 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: emulation@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACD9798FA81 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 21:00:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 882BC1041 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 21:00:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t5SL0aqn022840 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 21:00:36 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201506282100.t5SL0aqn022840@kenobi.freebsd.org> From: bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Problem reports for emulation@FreeBSD.org that need special attention X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 21:00:36 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 21:00:36 -0000 To view an individual PR, use: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users, which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. Status | Bug Id | Description ------------+-----------+--------------------------------------------------- In Progress | 180790 | devel/linux_kdump prints BSD descriptions of errn Open | 199306 | suggestion: audio/linux-c6-openal-soft: make oss 2 problems total for which you should take action. From owner-freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Wed Jul 1 04:53:37 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F8A2991B54 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 04:53:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johannes@meixner.or.at) Received: from dd16522.kasserver.com (dd16522.kasserver.com [85.13.137.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 212C61436; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 04:53:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johannes@meixner.or.at) Received: from mx12.chaot.net (82.131.84.115.cable.starman.ee [82.131.84.115]) by dd16522.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A3F0A456007; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 06:53:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx12.chaot.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]); by mx12.chaot.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 55db5db6; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 07:53:25 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <55937245.3050609@meixner.or.at> Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 07:53:25 +0300 From: Johannes Jost Meixner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: AllanJude@FreeBSD.org, rene@FreeBSD.org, netchild@FreeBSD.org, dchagin@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: [CFH] Allan's 64bits CentOS ports OpenPGP: id=C18F24928F1D36EA4FA0B2EF496A9D706250D402 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 04:53:37 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 All, Allan could use some help reviewing his suite of CentOS 6.6 64bit ports. https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1746 What I'd like to see is, moving the Mk/ infrastructure to the point where it can support future, upcoming architectures -- think CentOS 7, recent Fedora version (only the ones that are supported for more than 6 months), etc. I saw a working port of CentOS7 on GitHub, and a working Port of Fedora 19 somewhere... but I don't recall the links. Check Basically, now that dchagin@ committed his 64bit src work, nothing should stop us in getting the ports userland up to scratch. I might not be around to doing it myself. Cheers, - -Johannes - -- Best regards, Johannes Meixner http://www.meixner.or.at -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVk3JCAAoJEElqnXBiUNQC5mMP/i+UzkuqvsCK1sfil8ygYD9d sR2RYPedatSnA8qPH+PMtJYdAhlLC3xcUsfb7oNOgpwNSajAoWB1DslE/nSHjLD2 brccaz/MBIcPJYS+BA3nhKWqri/7smWHOJahpo9K0JJX+VrhBxGtz4Uq+Noz81KB Rj9HnKDgQChCZXtgrFTAOAaXzuzESmzhWiWaLPEjkdyyCQFvAIJAGsiAKelhhRCx lamUF9xAoQiQnTZ7Gi7WkvxJauWNdd9RfROENXNrMV7wBZStXHLpewgSE+xT5xcz 9DsLw7w1wJn9vjs69PlysFMT9izqKwKqB2jG63hmBUaWevixm82gm5Olb0jz/jhd LIs/rQjddu8l/nWtnPoJ+R2LA6kChTl+9uBpie8TaM1fz8WdIk7vxyPZqZiFhkXz 4BZTUntFdKYoK4EYQs0lDrtqyCDIj5N+/UdFPx2F1OKp/q5va6SYZJ4sfZjbSVhV Q8sc6ewmgzO2RPzhCI8Hzqlz8XGrwkI2SClUbWShK7E3nRYfMBNjzV7Tgb/F0kh1 hYU+J2PLgu+DtJ1R+VxNl7iwM2M4NQAF5Q9rl65c5d5mdpw651k4X7oID1F+IgKs b85eTuJxOR6lxEXutwlYYlKWwXQ4x67BMqdVzQeRofU4WU3WZ5VQ5RKHPdwzFUpJ YXyYAsXIPnI79eDpLyKU =s5Vc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Wed Jul 1 10:16:58 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68CB9990BC1 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 10:16:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E6322849 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 10:16:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 4D684990BC0; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 10:16:58 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: emulation@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CECF990BBF for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 10:16:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A0372848 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 10:16:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t61AGwM4007619 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 10:16:58 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 198541] www/linux-c6-flashplugin11 does not work with firefox 36 or opera 12 Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 10:16:57 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: xmj@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: emulation@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 10:16:58 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198541 Johannes Jost Meixner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|xmj@FreeBSD.org |emulation@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #5 from Johannes Jost Meixner --- Assign to emulation@ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Wed Jul 1 13:21:35 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC59599062C for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 13:21:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from netchild@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de [217.11.53.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 832DC207F; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 13:21:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from netchild@freebsd.org) Received: from outgoing.leidinger.net (p57BB9C3E.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.187.156.62]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 491DB83E402; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 15:20:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from webmail.leidinger.net (webmail.Leidinger.net [IPv6:fd73:10c7:2053:1::3:102]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by outgoing.leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 448C04425; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 15:20:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from www@localhost) by webmail.leidinger.net (8.14.9/8.14.4/Submit) id t61DKqNn023443; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 15:20:52 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from netchild@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: webmail.leidinger.net: www set sender to netchild@freebsd.org using -f Received: from 217.197.101.97 ([217.197.101.97]) by webmail.leidinger.net (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2015 15:20:52 +0200 Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 15:20:52 +0200 Message-ID: <20150701152052.Horde.XdxXFlk6nCjUyNqwVIVyVQ9@webmail.leidinger.net> From: Alexander Leidinger To: Johannes Jost Meixner Cc: AllanJude@freebsd.org, rene@freebsd.org, dchagin@freebsd.org, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFH] Allan's 64bits CentOS ports In-Reply-To: <55937245.3050609@meixner.or.at> User-Agent: Horde Application Framework 5 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_3aWGfFcnjRh72nuTOkd0XPh"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EBL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-EBL-MailScanner-ID: 491DB83E402.A7B21 X-EBL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-EBL-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, spamhaus-ZEN, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=0, required 6, autolearn=disabled) X-EBL-MailScanner-From: netchild@freebsd.org X-EBL-MailScanner-Watermark: 1436361657.76536@BAJGLQ8Mz8H7h5Bak/aZtw X-EBL-Spam-Status: No X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 13:21:36 -0000 This message is in MIME format and has been PGP signed. --=_3aWGfFcnjRh72nuTOkd0XPh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Quoting Johannes Jost Meixner (from Wed, 01=20=20 Jul=202015 07:53:25 +0300): > Allan could use some help reviewing his suite of CentOS 6.6 64bit ports. > > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1746 I had a quick look at comments on the top of the page and the diffs of=20= =20 bsd.linux-apps.mk=20and bsd.port.mk. What I'm missing here (I may have overlooked it, it's the first time I=20= =20 have=20a look at reviews.freebsd.org) is a short explanation for the=20=20 rationale=20of the design decissions (see my questions below). The very first questions which come to my mind are: - Why is this embeded into the existing ports instead of having it=20=20 as=20seperate ports? - Would seperate 64bit ports make the infrastructure less=20=20 convoluted/complicated=20(KISS)? Yes, more ports, but the Mk=20=20 infrsatructure=20is already at a complexity level where not much people=20= =20 are=20willing to touch it, and with this I fear it will be just too much. - Can I install 64bit and 32bit in parallel with this approach (I=20=20 have=20to admit, it depends if the 64bit linuxulator is going to a=20=20 different=20or the same /compat/linux directory but I haven't checked=20=20 that,=20and it depends on how centos is build in this regard, so no idea=20= =20 if=20this makes sense)? - Is it a good idea to play around with the portname here (ok, this=20=20 fits=20into the first question)? My concern here is that some ports=20=20 played=20around with the port name in the past and got slowly converted=20= =20 to=20something without the name-mangling because we learned that it was=20= =20 not=20a good idea. Apart from that I have to admin that I don't like that=20=20 OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=20is used to check for 32bit or 64bit installs=20= =20 of=20the linux base. IMO it makes more sense to have a sort of "I want=20= =20 to=20have a XXbit linuxulator" variable: would be more end-user friendly=20= =20 and=20better self-explaining code (related to KISS). > What I'd like to see is, moving the Mk/ infrastructure to the point > where it can support future, upcoming architectures -- think CentOS 7, > recent Fedora version (only the ones that are supported for more than > 6 months), etc. > > I saw a working port of CentOS7 on GitHub, and a working Port of > Fedora 19 somewhere... but I don't recall the links. Check Can someone dig out the link for the CentOS7 port? 24th to 26th there=20=20 is=20the DevSummit in Essen/Germany and I thought about the possibility=20= =20 to=20have a look at CentOS7 ports (if I don't find something less=20=20 painful=20to work on) and it doesn't make sense to re-invent the wheel. Bye, Alexander. --=20 http://www.Leidinger.net=20Alexander@Leidinger.net: PGP 0xC773696B3BAC17DC http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild@FreeBSD.org : PGP 0xC773696B3BAC17DC --=_3aWGfFcnjRh72nuTOkd0XPh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: Digitale PGP-Signatur Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCAAGBQJVk+k0AAoJEDPaGvaaHuONJkcP/107IZyzAaSDGd+P6fDL1PaL DXSu+OygGsFMXgv5kugQlemeSHUx2vAOelpJd8NsbmZmEVawolhvSccPlbzgW3Vl rl6kqLLstz8U0RRSdAXUiX7IZb1oNyzguVtuQfB0qVX+xp2sZDaFLFrtCoOioNZe NUDhAXgBDRRa4id7oTep7AzIUhf9Mj8e3pLockDaTnb9fdk3jhzKB6YGZHnSXpZh jEaodvYmxvqCJoIlK70fmON1xWZpN+IzMfYYdQFMOk4lemejcPW1bjFMZ+k95pLN ARWIjc9RZ5jqLEme8i23lRTjcZYmUkZC4s3Mpz0eQg0aw0v5cTI9SjHgE6Z1RccS lG+IwMlRtTV8jHXDazWHl7JA512iwM76GsUo2OVJ3u7JujT66tpwio1oKXz241Gn JiL9G18GCSLkyqtoHNHaZg7hAaIXr1D9K5eYSros0aNH5B8leAM7ODy6ZZdB/Xnh UJrEdhrY7ITAxGD8i+pztlud+tTcLsHIelbX9QVdSQ/+BA0ntKaZot6G4DD3RI/d IgM6ZWGUWCX8pPXpJft73GgS5fxqni+Szj5+uLLH5eGUjj+WiVq9YkdaiVKG7Rah AckHuSPVg8rTUGBGMRX5AsU8ebBB5mn12RgKgvOaiSFUJIptwtEpxoPyj9Tq3EH1 Bnx9mjaXS3sRYkL5n7kf =cC4z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=_3aWGfFcnjRh72nuTOkd0XPh-- From owner-freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Wed Jul 1 18:14:58 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F05992B3C for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 18:14:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED8021FC0 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 18:14:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id EC4C1992B3B; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 18:14:57 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: emulation@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB8C1992B3A for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 18:14:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D82631FBF for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 18:14:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t61IEvR0015579 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 18:14:57 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 199306] suggestion: audio/linux-c6-openal-soft: make oss driver enabled by default Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 18:14:58 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: emulation@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 18:14:58 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199306 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD. |emulation@FreeBSD.org |org | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Thu Jul 2 13:06:03 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAFE3991E8A for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 13:06:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83C662615 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 13:06:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@FreeBSD.org) Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3767320C38 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 09:06:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 02 Jul 2015 09:06:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=hDj7/eH+wg5PzRh 5IrcvGioJmEg=; b=eURH9byUAbRNXyQIcuhpDqH5uXZIz4HZUuxAPz2YyZ7wtWT SNQCtJT84CDFVKwVvpGjI3iAjGzeLxd/HSVJ8oB1EaETy2r8+SxiKbla0WEdRT9M /rEsWlLRWG7E7IUqp3ku9gDrumDKQ8znogoRH5Ij+bs/QnFtty2m/YAoa7CY= Received: by web3.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 0F7601004A1; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 09:06:02 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1435842362.1909278.313547865.569678E5@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: xpahfRwh7W04ACTlJpR/nirxl6w8f66h+9T1O5O5s0Sf 1435842362 From: Mark Felder To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-eecef38c Subject: Re: [CFH] Allan's 64bits CentOS ports Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 08:06:02 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20150701152052.Horde.XdxXFlk6nCjUyNqwVIVyVQ9@webmail.leidinger.net> References: <20150701152052.Horde.XdxXFlk6nCjUyNqwVIVyVQ9@webmail.leidinger.net> X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 13:06:03 -0000 On Wed, Jul 1, 2015, at 08:20, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > - Can I install 64bit and 32bit in parallel with this approach (I > have to admit, it depends if the 64bit linuxulator is going to a > different or the same /compat/linux directory but I haven't checked > that, and it depends on how centos is build in this regard, so no idea > if this makes sense)? I think CentOS & friends still support installing 32bit and 64bit RPMs side by side. If I'm correct about that we would probably want to only have one unified /compat/linux directory. That's really just one of a few reasons I can think of for keeping it unified... From owner-freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Fri Jul 3 03:17:32 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B354994388 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 03:17:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5954110D for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 03:17:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E2312994386; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 03:17:31 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: emulation@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1AF6994385 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 03:17:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF5791105 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 03:17:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t633HVKZ006165 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 03:17:31 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 201296] [hyper-v] HyperV and fstab not automapping swap using uuid's Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 03:17:31 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: emulation@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 03:17:32 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201296 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|HyperV and fstab not |[hyper-v] HyperV and fstab |automapping swap using |not automapping swap using |uuid's |uuid's Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org |emulation@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #1 from Mark Linimon --- You're fine, "kern" is as close of a place as we have ATM. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Fri Jul 3 05:27:08 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6B77993993 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 05:27:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABD242A89 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 05:27:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A8DBD993992; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 05:27:08 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: emulation@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A855F993991 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 05:27:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94D372A88 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 05:27:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t635R8xU047121 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 05:27:08 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 201299] Merge Linux Emulation (lemul) to stable/10 branch for 10.2-RELEASE Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 05:27:08 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: feature, needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable10? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 05:27:08 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201299 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |emulation@FreeBSD.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Fri Jul 3 17:15:39 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 642A7994C5A for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 17:15:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xmj@freebsd.org) Received: from dd16522.kasserver.com (dd16522.kasserver.com [85.13.137.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A8C82293 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 17:15:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xmj@freebsd.org) Received: from mx12.chaot.net (82.131.84.115.cable.starman.ee [82.131.84.115]) by dd16522.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 957518D4002; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 19:15:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx12.chaot.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]); by mx12.chaot.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id fa1cee39; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 20:15:34 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <5596C336.10602@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 20:15:34 +0300 From: Johannes Jost Meixner Reply-To: xmj@chaot.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: abi CC: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dchagin/lemul panic References: <54CCB0C0.5080605@abinet.ru> In-Reply-To: <54CCB0C0.5080605@abinet.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 17:15:39 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 (comments inlined, as always) On 01/31/2015 12:38, abi wrote: > Hello. > > This is my first port to mailing lists, so if I do something wrong, > don't blame me. I tried to test lemul branch to see how things are > getting better with linux emulation. > > The first program I started (it wants epoll, so crashes under > RELENG) resulted in panic somewhere deep in linuxulator code. > http://i.imgur.com/1CfRhpd.png So that we can debug this panic, the following would be helpful: Which program did you use? Where did you get it from? Which svn revision was your kernel built from? Can you reproduce it? If so, could you use sysutils/panicmail to send it in please? > > Maybe this can point to possible bug. I compiled amd64 version of > lemul. _______________________________________________ > freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation To > unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-emulation-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" - -- Johannes Meixner | FreeBSD Committer xmj@FreeBSD.org | http://people.freebsd.org/~xmj -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVlsMxAAoJEPyeKTcbGw0LkhwIAMOp7nc2cNbk4PaHlfNe3Onm t9IJkQaLFBVgHNaEllSxELAPfImHF4DOK+iQL6IxyQgQSHpWar1DX9Lu9fM9m/7L vRdEJ/hnEMsV/oWTBuTVPIgMYHahBB5pKhaQvpGsEs5QTUIYEu1LUiT+QTHjZPu7 Yy8vdSstfa0jpdrUi1wI5L42u3Wp5x41Pl9yfcZMDwmUKVk8R9itS21eN3nfc9Mh u76shaCgFvxI19CXj9o4Xf0PyqNPP77qhrJXzF58gN8ojAvOQDclrxWYBT/UH4f/ SQ/6Y276rw3emKj74ioR3Tk9WHU8tCEPR6JNyEeNjgPYLH32MgbVyv1Nb7yiY1w= =+XbO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Fri Jul 3 17:55:31 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F7D69942E3 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 17:55:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abi@abinet.ru) Received: from abinet.ru (abinet.ru [95.211.88.160]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31AA81C50 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 17:55:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abi@abinet.ru) Received: from [10.0.0.1] (unknown [5.18.175.218]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by abinet.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A25AAFEA7; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 17:46:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=abinet.ru; s=dkim; t=1435945576; bh=WNOaU+ciOnSYlbCtenQQyowHiPwlND375+XbI00vG6I=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=Ir5k/YOg1/X5ofKFgvPBt1vOV5z3LFQWlEqmLL2YdqLWte3R2VzNgyzGoHc/CGVni 1Z1/+/Frk+gIeFoudn1xyguTSWxfZwmiXlOu8p7mzqqV1zOYGKn36KoGAg7C4hNm7c JTYTW7ovyMyoz2sX+r+2O3rXGwjwAwgFP2VdVnwA= Message-ID: <5596CA67.1070305@abinet.ru> Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 20:46:15 +0300 From: abi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: xmj@chaot.net CC: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dchagin/lemul panic References: <54CCB0C0.5080605@abinet.ru> <5596C336.10602@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <5596C336.10602@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.4 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,RDNS_NONE, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Report: * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid * 1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on postfix.abinet.ru X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 17:55:31 -0000 This one is obsolete. That was steam crash and it was resolved with Dmitri. Unfortunately, we have to wait until someone implements pi mutexes as all pulseaudio linked stuff crashes without it. On 03/07/2015 20:15, Johannes Jost Meixner wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > (comments inlined, as always) > On 01/31/2015 12:38, abi wrote: >> Hello. >> >> This is my first port to mailing lists, so if I do something wrong, >> don't blame me. I tried to test lemul branch to see how things are >> getting better with linux emulation. >> >> The first program I started (it wants epoll, so crashes under >> RELENG) resulted in panic somewhere deep in linuxulator code. >> http://i.imgur.com/1CfRhpd.png > So that we can debug this panic, the following would be helpful: > > Which program did you use? > > Where did you get it from? > > Which svn revision was your kernel built from? > > Can you reproduce it? > > If so, could you use sysutils/panicmail to send it in please? > > >> Maybe this can point to possible bug. I compiled amd64 version of >> lemul. _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation To >> unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-emulation-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > - -- > Johannes Meixner | FreeBSD Committer > xmj@FreeBSD.org | http://people.freebsd.org/~xmj > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2 > > iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVlsMxAAoJEPyeKTcbGw0LkhwIAMOp7nc2cNbk4PaHlfNe3Onm > t9IJkQaLFBVgHNaEllSxELAPfImHF4DOK+iQL6IxyQgQSHpWar1DX9Lu9fM9m/7L > vRdEJ/hnEMsV/oWTBuTVPIgMYHahBB5pKhaQvpGsEs5QTUIYEu1LUiT+QTHjZPu7 > Yy8vdSstfa0jpdrUi1wI5L42u3Wp5x41Pl9yfcZMDwmUKVk8R9itS21eN3nfc9Mh > u76shaCgFvxI19CXj9o4Xf0PyqNPP77qhrJXzF58gN8ojAvOQDclrxWYBT/UH4f/ > SQ/6Y276rw3emKj74ioR3Tk9WHU8tCEPR6JNyEeNjgPYLH32MgbVyv1Nb7yiY1w= > =+XbO > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----