From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 29 09:01:00 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8E25AD4 for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 09:01:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D434B38D for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 09:01:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t2T910RV027471 for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 09:01:00 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t2T910Yi027462; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 09:01:00 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201503290901.t2T910Yi027462@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 09:01:00 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 09:01:01 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ finance/moneymanagerex | 0.9.9.0 | 1.0.0.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 29 13:54:26 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94997972 for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 13:54:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.grem.de (outcast.grem.de [213.239.217.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EBAFB3B5 for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 13:54:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24852 invoked by uid 89); 29 Mar 2015 13:47:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO bsd64.grem.de) (mg@grem.de@185.17.207.96) by mail.grem.de with ESMTPA; 29 Mar 2015 13:47:37 -0000 Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 15:47:34 +0200 From: Michael Gmelin To: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Subject: ca_root_nss and MD5 root certs Message-ID: <20150329154734.12cc6201@bsd64.grem.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) X-Face: $wrgCtfdVw_H9WAY?S&9+/F"!41z'L$uo*WzT8miX?kZ~W~Lr5W7v?j0Sde\mwB&/ypo^}> +a'4xMc^^KroE~+v^&^#[B">soBo1y6(TW6#UZiC]o>C6`ej+i Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEWJBwe5BQDl LASZU0/LTEWEfHbyj0Txi32+sKrp1Mv944X8/fm1rS+cAAAACXBIWXMAAAsTAAAL EwEAmpwYAAAAB3RJTUUH3wESCxwC7OBhbgAAACFpVFh0Q29tbWVudAAAAAAAQ3Jl YXRlZCB3aXRoIFRoZSBHSU1QbbCXAAAAAghJREFUOMu11DFvEzEUAGCfEhBVFzuq AKkLd0O6VrIQsLXVSZXoWE5N1K3DobBBA9fQpRWc8OkWouaIjedWKiyREOKs+3PY fvalCNjgLVHeF7/3bMtBzV8C/VsQ8tecEgCcDgrzjekwKZ7TwsJZd/ywEKwwP+ZM 8P3drTsAwWn2mpWuDDuYiK1bFs6De0KUUFw0tWxm+D4AIhuuvZqtyWYeO7jQ4Aea 7jUqI+ixhQoHex4WshEvSXdood7stlv4oSuFOC4tqGcr0NjEqXgV4mMJO38nld4+ xKNxRDon7khyKVqY7YR4d+Cg0OMrkWXZOM7YDkEfKiilCn1qYv4mighZiynuHHOA Wq9QJq+BIES7lMFUtcikMnkDGHUoncA+uHgrP0ctIEqfwLHzeSo+eUA66AqzwN6n 2ZHJhw6Qh/PoyC/QENyEyC/AyNjq74Bs+3UH0xYwzDUC4B97HgLocg1QLYgDDO1v f3UX9Y307Ew4AHh67YAFFsxEpkXwpXY3eIgMhAAE3R19L919nNnuD2wlPcDE3UeT L2ytEICQib9BXgS2fU8PrD82ToYO1OEmMSnYTjSqSv9wdC0tPYC+rQRQD9ESnldF CyqfmiYW+tlALt8gH2xrMdC/youbjzPXEun+/ReXsMCDyve3dZc09fn2Oas8oXGc Jj6/fOeK5UmSMPmf/jL+GD8BEj0k/Fn6IO4AAAAASUVORK5CYII= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 13:54:26 -0000 I noticed that recent versions of ca_root_nss removed root certificates that use an MD5 signature hash. Even though I think is is the Right Thing(tm) to do, it leads to problems when talking to systems that use certificates signed by one of those root CAs. Unfortunately there seem to be a lot of systems out there that rely on such a certificate, especially this one: 2 s:/C=US/O=thawte, Inc./OU=Certification Services Division/OU=(c) 2006 thawte, Inc. - For authorized use only/CN=thawte Primary Root CA i:/C=ZA/ST=Western Cape/L=Cape Town/O=Thawte Consulting cc/OU=Certification Services Division/CN=Thawte Premium Server CA/emailAddress=premium-server@thawte.com These sites still work in Chrome, I'm not certain what they're doing to verify. It's a bit problematic, as updating ca_root_nss effectively cuts one off other systems and APIs. Is there any recommended workaround (other than manually adding the root and locking the package)? Thanks, Michael -- Michael Gmelin From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 29 16:41:29 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5912562D for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 16:41:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.netplex.net (mail.netplex.net [204.213.176.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.netplex.net", Issuer "RapidSSL SHA256 CA - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06D0E924 for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 16:41:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11]) by mail.netplex.net (8.15.1/8.15.1/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id t2TGfL9U048628 for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 12:41:21 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.netplex.net) X-Greylist: Message whitelisted by DRAC access database, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (mail.netplex.net [204.213.176.9]); Sun, 29 Mar 2015 12:41:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 12:41:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net Reply-To: Daniel Eischen To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: USES vs BUILD_DEPENDS Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 16:41:29 -0000 I have a port which needs pod2man just to build the man file during installation. Why do I need USES= pod2man:perl5 just to build the port? It doesn't seem feasible to use BUILD_DEPENDS because there is no generic perl5 port. -- DE From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 29 16:53:08 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28825B65; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 16:53:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yh0-x230.google.com (mail-yh0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3AA2AD8; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 16:53:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhfw71 with SMTP id w71so423434yhf.2; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 09:53:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=RY9dKblnCMaVE8UASVXniul3+xT7AxzpeHZ6vNjDCVM=; b=bCmgkZpb/xU2VW9f1MInsDSA9esdoAW075a9ta7mEnria1+wwAHtuLoF3MtnGKSsoS Xx5awMtPLoN1R7QXguwhvRWkiNGBOogeAhjja8BkKGA0wSrsP0T4246Xp8ZELCFdBOdK pRoEON5hGSfG/0hFjnEUIeJ2cs/gYzimknOPqJzbRCkKvXUXExHRtnLv1UtDI3LgYXsM GgGSspRzBYN0+vLUYMFw2GrJ2uAJS0dxiAZRvO2Q3kkZ7VPpFp9phxr/Y2L1H4cGzM9g iSq2utnpfpJKN+tXQnu1Kho/sBpuK3BmclXePjBwKjg/bTS9tu+yfH0sUEzyiJEwm7x0 66bQ== X-Received: by 10.52.78.35 with SMTP id y3mr31973336vdw.5.1427647986932; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 09:53:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id jw4sm1431495vdb.12.2015.03.29.09.53.04 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 29 Mar 2015 09:53:05 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 18:53:01 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Daniel Eischen Subject: Re: USES vs BUILD_DEPENDS Message-ID: <20150329165301.GA91058@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="opJtzjQTFsWo+cga" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 16:53:08 -0000 --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 12:41:21PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > I have a port which needs pod2man just to build the man file > during installation. Why do I need USES=3D pod2man:perl5 just to > build the port? It doesn't seem feasible to use BUILD_DEPENDS > because there is no generic perl5 port. >=20 Have you tried using pod2mdoc ? Btw USES=3Dpod2man:perl5 does not exists :) Best regards, Bapt --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlUYLe0ACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EzsFwCfUvihOJzKMuoCPyNtMJ38KVCi vSIAnRtPOWJIJnk5L87KVjXgPp+8ZyC3 =NxBp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 29 17:12:39 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD21EFC7; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 17:12:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru [IPv6:2a01:4f8:131:60a2::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 914F0CF8; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 17:12:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:923f:2:3000:f315:6bac:7dba] (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:923f:2:3000:f315:6bac:7dba]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D643956403; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 20:12:31 +0300 (MSK) Message-ID: <55183293.4080104@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 20:12:51 +0300 From: Lev Serebryakov Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bryan Drewery , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How could I increase "runaway" timer for package build cluster? References: <54FB7119.4030208@FreeBSD.org> <5515FE0A.40702@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <5515FE0A.40702@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 17:12:39 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 28.03.2015 04:04, Bryan Drewery wrote: >> One of my ports (devel/gcc-arm-embedded) doesn't produce much >> output on build (output is redirected to log files), but takes >> severa hours to be built. >> >> Looks like pkg building cluster doesn't like such behavior. >> >> Could I notify build cluster (poudrere?) that this package takes >> a lot of time without output? >> > > Well, consider the user's perspective too. "Is anything actually > happening?" It says: "Performing step ${name}, log in ${path}" :) User could rub tail -f "${path}" on other console. > Can you modify it to produce output? Yep. It will be more than 1G (!) of output Triple-build of gcc, double-build of newlib and double-build of gdb is not a joke :) No everything go to log files step-by-step, and it is much simpler to debug build. Unfortunately, I could not think of way to get both output and log files, as "| tee" kills exit statuses :( - -- // Lev Serebryakov AKA Black Lion -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVGDKTXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRGOTZEMUNBMEI1RjQzMThCNjc0QjMzMEFF QUIwM0M1OEJGREM0NzhGAAoJEOqwPFi/3EePe8oP/1ziHjC6Xyfh+svGFO8g+VHR 8GLVAzxBxgTNE0ETS27QhSqp4s0Nu25LKd8YpQ/JeQ04qk5ip1p8m0bdT0HeUhKy keIJ7PvfBNF4kTro6FaYQTMbtilMInq5oUumKN6RJ9mB1gL5GGmDB7b/h6vrG3Ow 4u1R91ZU0NDZ8PhLYgxqGxZgXSWksMNiqij5dSA5l5vVpB+77sVcsegbezPxy/8b cn2oqPBAbFcd4UUYaNjD14Urnl7zSj+9Kg5ImRjV+p+cHgik4KS0v58uj3mkkwtS hmxATDG8HKNRSkM+bxahXGAP/P2F7yQsBNjpj1l8WSZOiyc/hJCovkskDIbByLXP AEAnTHpR4eY9X/Q1kBXaHudqZ62C2wNKY2o8JHjpIwUgXYNBM3m9V0FNiWSi4xMn wd2eoGd2S339DHrVYijQRYuuYUFf0L4ypfjQN3CFiMq+LmY2PbG8l1V/9E1xuQEz v9iQVJVcWDuqp4dugZMYSvlwPp+xQgJFgN979XrLmI9xADdgxbC9I8UHijWwdrEw UFgNUQyxKNJqpLFYc/VZtOQo2rZ8HpwTbiR8bbe1NihZosmH/sPQXAt2k6V5LowQ gqn7lSfnDPnjqSbl4VGUj+onQV7rgegPmAbi1cBZ1TmOcvNys5TrhPI8jfVPwntg ZyG2eLvVx48O44DeSwMN =910X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 29 17:16:31 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8866B24B; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 17:16:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.netplex.net (mail.netplex.net [204.213.176.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.netplex.net", Issuer "RapidSSL SHA256 CA - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A692D15; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 17:16:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11]) by mail.netplex.net (8.15.1/8.15.1/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id t2THGTGh001016; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 13:16:29 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.netplex.net) X-Greylist: Message whitelisted by DRAC access database, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (mail.netplex.net [204.213.176.9]); Sun, 29 Mar 2015 13:16:29 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 13:16:29 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net Reply-To: Daniel Eischen To: Baptiste Daroussin Subject: Re: USES vs BUILD_DEPENDS In-Reply-To: <20150329165301.GA91058@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Message-ID: References: <20150329165301.GA91058@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 17:16:31 -0000 On Sun, 29 Mar 2015, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 12:41:21PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: >> I have a port which needs pod2man just to build the man file >> during installation. Why do I need USES= pod2man:perl5 just to >> build the port? It doesn't seem feasible to use BUILD_DEPENDS >> because there is no generic perl5 port. >> > Have you tried using pod2mdoc ? No, I didn't know about it, I will check it out. I searched other ports (grep) and found pod2man used. My port's (internal) doc/Makefile uses pod2man. > Btw USES=pod2man:perl5 does not exists :) Sorry, I meant USES= perl5. -- DE From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 29 18:27:39 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED16D555; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 18:27:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.burggraben.net (smtp.burggraben.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:140:50a2::3:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "ns.exwg.net", Issuer "Christoph Moench-Tegeder" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A78C761D; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 18:27:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.burggraben.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B10460008D; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 20:27:35 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Scanned: by amavisd-new at exwg.net Received: from smtp.burggraben.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ns.burggraben.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fp6rFW6zfDVy; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 20:27:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from elch.exwg.net (dslb-088-066-045-156.088.066.pools.vodafone-ip.de [88.66.45.156]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "elch.exwg.net", Issuer "Christoph Moench-Tegeder" (not verified)) by smtp.burggraben.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 20:27:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: by elch.exwg.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9752C26; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 20:27:33 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 20:27:33 +0200 From: Christoph Moench-Tegeder To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: VirtualBox (sometimes) not starting/hanging after recent openssl updates Message-ID: <20150329182732.GA1415@elch.exwg.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 18:27:39 -0000 Hi, for reference, prior reports (not mine): https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation/2015-March/012381.html https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198952 I got bitten by the very same problem - "NS_ERROR_FACTORY_NOT_REGISTERED" when running VirtualBox "as usual", "VERR_INVALID_POINTER" and "environment corrupt" when using a DEBUG-enabled VirtualBox. As I was pretty sure I had a working VirtualBox 4.3.26 before, I tracked all the changes since the last successful VirtualBox use, and the only "significant" thing was that I upgraded my base system for FreeBSD-SA-15:06.openssl (and the fix for that, so I'm up-to-date with releng/10.1 (r280275). After some time of poking the source and adding more debug statements and asserts (debugging suid code...), I got the following backtrace in my core dump (abbreviated): (gdb) bt #0 0x00000008033257c5 in OPENSSL_ia32_cpuid () from /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.8 #1 0x0000000805f88eb9 in ?? () from /lib/libcrypto.so.7 #2 0x0000000805e8f84e in _init () from /lib/libcrypto.so.7 #3 0x00007fffffffc760 in ?? () #4 0x000000080060e6bf in ?? () from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 #5 0x0000000800612d87 in ?? () from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 #6 0x000000080060fad3 in ?? () from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 #7 0x00000000004042d9 in supR3HardenedMainInitRuntime (fFlags=3) Having different versions of a library calling each other (base openssl vs. ports openssl) is most certainly a bad thing. More digging showed that the libcryptos where pulled in by libcurl.so.4. That (curl) in turn links against ports openssl when found (there's even code in the Makefile to stop the build when one tries forcing the use of base openssl), but happily pulls in base openssl via it's dependencies. One instance of the base openssl was found in librtmp and could be solved by recompiling that. The other problem was with the use of "GSSAPI_BASE" (base system GSSAPI) in curl - which is the default, according to a curl-less machine in the corner. In the short run, people affected by the VirtualBox problem should check if /usr/local/lib/virtualbox/VBoxRT.so links against both (base and ports) libcryptos (use ldd) - if so, check libcurl (and if that does not help, the other shared libraries) for libcrypto mixup. In the slightly longer run - how do we want to fix this? I can imagine preventing the use of GSSAPI_BASE when ports openssl is detected - there's similar code already for preventing WITH_OPENSSL_BASE usage when ports openssl is installed. OTOH this will not help in case the "wrong" openssl is pulled in via some other dependency (librtmp in my case). Regards, Christoph -- Spare Space From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 29 23:02:41 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 652B69DE; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 23:02:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x233.google.com (mail-wi0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F02E2905; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 23:02:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibgn9 with SMTP id gn9so102118403wib.1; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 16:02:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=D31KukUfvGJROD3pnaE7NCzEbAT4HkjUckPG9uGdwBw=; b=pi35xAXOCsZE6stazmsvZTsCI8v6eyUTCUIMZ2PQKEJ5gpHFauCdyzgr8q28m3e8dJ aCbNWOyeeX9HMcmPRDOUX9qEXYgLkeFUyzzm6rsiC+fNfbzVhufu8tZFjB9cr8EYEtTa YZiaN4yLPF4IMlpkdwl7TLj9MAi6EaEj2VnWWCrNJ9W0uaS8of5y60g7ght/KM3MYpPI BiUwAPMPVoBpY7xN2qO6Djq/1txDdx4dAUXuPVg+Kdfc2LCdDhkihwGU2BxeTrRyBHYk 6PsisKkV/hoiBFbaifiBJbqtyz5SifD+UZNERPvTU/EYTJQ8dkZOCauX34GRvyEbYjfS ZjJg== X-Received: by 10.180.23.193 with SMTP id o1mr16583530wif.14.1427670159351; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 16:02:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.35.140 with HTTP; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 16:02:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Redeye T Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 07:02:19 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: FreeBSD Port: p5-NetAddr-IP-4.075 To: tobez@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 23:02:41 -0000 Dear Maintainer Tbez, I meet problem when install Port: p5-NetAddr-IP-4.075. The error records as below: /usr/ports/net-mgmt/p5-NetAddr-IP# make install ===> Building for p5-NetAddr-IP-4.075 --- subdirs --- --- subdirs --- --- blibdirs --- --- dynamic --- --- subdirs --- --- subdirs --- --- subdirs --- --- config --- --- subdirs --- --- blibdirs --- --- linkext --- --- subdirs --- --- dynamic --- --- subdirs --- --- subdirs --- make[3]: make[3]: don't know how to make config.h. Stop make[3]: stopped in /usr/ports/net-mgmt/p5-NetAddr-IP/work/NetAddr-IP-4.075/Lite/Util *** [subdirs] Error code 2 make[2]: stopped in /usr/ports/net-mgmt/p5-NetAddr-IP/work/NetAddr-IP-4.075/Lite 1 error make[2]: stopped in /usr/ports/net-mgmt/p5-NetAddr-IP/work/NetAddr-IP-4.075/Lite *** [subdirs] Error code 2 make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/net-mgmt/p5-NetAddr-IP/work/NetAddr-IP-4.075 1 error make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/net-mgmt/p5-NetAddr-IP/work/NetAddr-IP-4.075 ===> Compilation failed unexpectedly. Try to set MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes and rebuild before reporting the failure to the maintainer. *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/ports/net-mgmt/p5-NetAddr-IP I try to used set MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes to install it, but still no work. Could you help to check and repair it. Many thanks. With the best regards, Redeye *********************************************** From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 30 02:05:40 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CECA26D for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 02:05:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm17-vm5.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm17-vm5.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [216.39.63.135]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 084FEBD0 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 02:05:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bellsouth.net; s=s2048; t=1427680757; bh=nWqcvkqdelFG1ewGSl4I3BEDi3tU1MGEFPdFLWT0RLs=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:From:Subject; b=Lu02OBZwpNHgCJ6NWDnDdk3ZsQ9Tb9cL9a9kbYl6n6UyRO95ICIoBtQMr2aZk+7hDJbTtygzvjshpdx+Bps/97PBhG2xLi4SwGu2MK9MS04kSyeRhbL09BCk0aj7WTrnHXYCzboCR+yUBbTwXMMYDm6ByFqxN9FLjRzCw7bM26kKtCvD0+Tz4rRl7Fj/9/DjsaeITycS4jZGzWxXXBJ7klJCnA2zJtk/YDXRIuN0vgkYb4xLWsCTFN10uklALeBg0sdA7uTwugKoXoq0U7wKjmxaJxg8SQWa8T8h49g/Wqv5xj4l68nPEYZczMCDPPn88A3n6HXvQ5E3dnwPjUHR0w== Received: from [216.39.60.166] by nm17.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Mar 2015 01:59:17 -0000 Received: from [98.138.104.98] by tm2.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Mar 2015 01:59:17 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp118.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Mar 2015 01:59:16 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 918351.37244.bm@smtp118.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Message-ID: <918351.37244.bm@smtp118.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 01:59:16 +0000 (UTC) X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: 2Kl_CUkVM1lK_3pdsXbQWk_KicGWU6pxfYJ3Y3BW1xfPBE5 oYyJWvO_BrD17qaNrtW82OMKRbqhYVuQLL0VMvnH8EJ5VEdrAcqlPQyRi3FF z3hEF4TRGaG8sOkSunzjK3bf3mn5vYDVc1NTAB5H6xuPcznRSCq40WGs6fWw 5Cc4.hRw_WopM34m2HP3Kbba0ggiTYeJBJNF93SwoofcNu0_4AOW.mYgQeC9 eLnvO2vouZCgUHxzsoMjcuf862lloTxsGuhbQATVEr6aXaCQJwyGA0na0gyO p4itALS3yU0mdEJdE4bKq6.OGWkqdeQoYTMT8MBiHKxboZBYjuO1GvAgRhaQ VorvKb5xi.bo0EV_Wbg3N0F01TUAMZdchiq_WhIabDc0BAPocoRj301JXZso a23Po0fSl3EpSsnZuuSlNZ7raksm.OG9nRZAJzplo3wROT.ZNs8HXPxxNL0F JuDgzJhUdi_LaQ1oB0FgOzG23ea1zBwrV1vpAQNsIg4id4Y9kS_Z.2k484y7 ILsxD6HdrXEfBcdqIkpGU5P97weniQ5BMtuZIlm_KBOxo5W0c7SWMkol19wU - X-Yahoo-SMTP: Kz_aW1.swBBYof3zAD7.RWzXz9ZAQVDMml1VADsbgPT4Kq79LC0- From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: editors/abiword fails on not-really-missing dependency Cc: gnome@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 02:05:40 -0000 I tried to build editors/abiword, but it failed for lack of libwpg-0.1 and libwpd-0.8. pkg info -a | grep -n "libwp" produces 314:libwpd-0.9.9_2 Tools for importing and exporting WordPerfect(tm) documents 315:libwpg-0.2.2_3 Library and tools to work with WordPerfect Graphics (WPG) files So it looks like I have the required dependencies, but the configure script seemed to be looking for an earlier version. Relevant part of build log is configure: error: Package requirements ( libgsf-1 >= 1.12 libwpg-0.1 >= 0.1.0 libwpd-0.8 >= 0.8.0 ) were not met: Package libwpg-0.1 was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `libwpg-0.1.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable Package 'libwpg-0.1', required by 'world', not found Package 'libwpd-0.8', required by 'world', not found Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you installed software in a non-standard prefix. Alternatively, you may set the environment variables WPG_CFLAGS and WPG_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config. See the pkg-config man page for more details. ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. Is this a bug in the configure script or FreeBSD ports' patches? I could cd /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig and ln -s libwpg-0.2.pc libwpg-0.1.pc ln -s libwpd-0.9.pc libwpd-0.8.pc and thereby give the configure script what it's looking for, a kludge with no certainty of success. Maybe delete the symbolic links afterward. Tom From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 30 08:52:20 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C0FD48C; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 08:52:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x233.google.com (mail-ig0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0059FC28; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 08:52:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igcxg11 with SMTP id xg11so65874404igc.0; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 01:52:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=kkNyQ76XilrBZkol1SNGyteXUoX5JyPRHzpsH0Hil5g=; b=BFiPv9jIejCfIr+QfaHjE+PwL9yEmeps7k2/YkvvQKkzdojo/y/WfE1n3uIgsCzAP6 AfltyGFLi1lJRNoRUS+05eqWb2R7XUjwOsQ4lk6HVZUw0M7q5542BOxM8/uX9Ewq67dN R0FiCiUhM8zOuDTUWaKK3EuQgmNLZDM0jKk6bhbA/iLVU0TE0ImhaSOSk+nPsQ+Ag8i8 Jw2a7FHI20+wKxOjIIWjt9JAeA8O0BGkoGtpL4pfhN9bol2tEZUv0MYz2h52PqVCHPwP riWHdyid7XuIFb1uhZwtNQw/XeRxafQqfx/8U0N9XmnEmTvYvJE8ta6vd7uDLhybP+zG 3r6A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.18.38 with SMTP id a38mr47633176ioj.67.1427705539397; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 01:52:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.21.130 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 01:52:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 10:52:19 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: p5-NetAddr-IP-4.075 From: Sergei Vyshenski To: Redeye T Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Anton Berezin X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 08:52:20 -0000 Hi, The last update was submitted by me. I have just checked it again and can see no problems. Are you using ports tree updated as of today? Can you show the output of "uname -a"? Regards, Sergei On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 1:02 AM, Redeye T wrote: > Dear Maintainer Tbez, > > I meet problem when install Port: p5-NetAddr-IP-4.075. The error records as > below: > > /usr/ports/net-mgmt/p5-NetAddr-IP# make install > ===> Building for p5-NetAddr-IP-4.075 > --- subdirs --- > --- subdirs --- > --- blibdirs --- > --- dynamic --- > --- subdirs --- > --- subdirs --- > --- subdirs --- > --- config --- > --- subdirs --- > --- blibdirs --- > --- linkext --- > --- subdirs --- > --- dynamic --- > --- subdirs --- > --- subdirs --- > make[3]: make[3]: don't know how to make config.h. Stop > > make[3]: stopped in > /usr/ports/net-mgmt/p5-NetAddr-IP/work/NetAddr-IP-4.075/Lite/Util > *** [subdirs] Error code 2 > > make[2]: stopped in > /usr/ports/net-mgmt/p5-NetAddr-IP/work/NetAddr-IP-4.075/Lite > 1 error > > make[2]: stopped in > /usr/ports/net-mgmt/p5-NetAddr-IP/work/NetAddr-IP-4.075/Lite > *** [subdirs] Error code 2 > > make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/net-mgmt/p5-NetAddr-IP/work/NetAddr-IP-4.075 > 1 error > > make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/net-mgmt/p5-NetAddr-IP/work/NetAddr-IP-4.075 > ===> Compilation failed unexpectedly. > Try to set MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes and rebuild before reporting the failure to > the maintainer. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > make: stopped in /usr/ports/net-mgmt/p5-NetAddr-IP > > > I try to used set MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes to install it, but still no work. > Could you help to check and repair it. Many thanks. > > > With the best regards, > > Redeye > *********************************************** > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 30 10:26:09 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 075E2A8F for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 10:26:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x22f.google.com (mail-ie0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C24C6936 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 10:26:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iecvj10 with SMTP id vj10so113307499iec.0 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 03:26:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=TMYaCs57dK7r0Yex7NCyku4gpGoAuVE5WR4InjEVRU4=; b=MfnRdaiErCWVYM7hqMv+CD7n2ehZzQsdd4vxpDKYEn9ctuOr/ko6hVcMuBa1qWr8Mn AsyYAu9UUt1C3CTXm0nqMEWJxCqulEB5QqrMNqYQ7KDUcmKhe+D17xT4Sh3zujPpqx9A ML8YABrS2XK9MlVXqmqwiepfkxP6ArgN94sTaPJWA0nJkkJ0HsrxXinsXaac8DcYBjqE ESKwPs7Fqube8uXvZGlFvIS1OecmawPu2XlWZAgSo4ENDAXpKGUeK0uy+MCBPdm8w3Dd 6TnDTqPQwIqPsVy1UFyeGNVVGKfbKsctcweJq84ST4x7TqDP8jXTbQdKrtk1QyW393N5 012A== X-Received: by 10.107.14.141 with SMTP id 135mr47233217ioo.15.1427711168034; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 03:26:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.26.132 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 03:25:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Kostantinos Koukopoulos Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 13:25:47 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: devel/hub build failed on 8.4, how to proceed? To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 10:26:09 -0000 Hello, I'm maintaining devel/hub, and for the first time while doing so, a build has failed: http://beefy5.nyi.freebsd.org/data/84i386-default/382532/logs/hub-2.2.0.log I have a couple of questions about how I should proceed. First: are we (port maintainers) responsible for addressing this type of issue, where the build fails only on a legacy release of FreeBSD? Second, assuming we don't have the time to investigate the cause ourselves, is it acceptable to simply open an issue with the upstream provider? Third, if and when we have the time, is running a 8.4 jail on poudriere the easiest way to go about debugging the issue? Last, if anyone has any idea why a Golang build would fail with these errors please share it with me: /var/tmp/go-link-ejdAoV/go.o(.text+0x1cc44): In function `runtime.mallocinit': /usr/local/go/src/runtime/malloc.c:219: relocation truncated to fit: R_386_32 runtime.end /var/tmp/go-link-ejdAoV/go.o(.debug_info+0x10f493): In function `time.Time.IsZero': /usr/local/go/src/time/time.go:242: relocation truncated to fit: R_386_32 runtime.end Thank you, Konstantinos -- |/ |/ Konstantinos |\ |\ Koukopoulos VSRE messages are welcome*, Thanks! * for more information see: http://vsre.info From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 30 12:16:41 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3387A669 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 12:16:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-x234.google.com (mail-yk0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E58E182F for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 12:16:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ykek76 with SMTP id k76so59126448yke.0 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 05:16:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=V/uK5tdiKTbrzNgFZViNBCLOkt48qh1esVuy2ida/Kk=; b=bPad5ftxfvgwWcG+jNdQb83A00Wkdvy7oElL6k9KbWg0lmWaxYw/58NrnuIMX0dU8P DRW3himXOAhY88EWwIdStAloV4/CxM10y3y+cZy57SuUY4mdXMyiMLxQWabM5BRZLXZG XfmwEyUoA+esOnitERPhTu5AJxcTBJSubd9Lqt0cqNH4qC8gTHwA+cHsHBrAI6Eo0a1C pmJAv7sPS5Hwn1xhMBl9Wak0UAaPmTax5GK5Ti44pT5+1w/+asoKOLKyKALaUj6lx7cF Y1WbPOEAbhxBUZuq6k2waRHTjpNnd39ADu0m9+uNDRvFOZ6K/s6kxqdaxHVrn/+CPyxU 8dXg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.27.46 with SMTP id q14mr34327005vdg.29.1427717800055; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 05:16:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.244.113 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 05:16:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 15:16:40 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Galera ports From: Pavel Timofeev To: ports-list freebsd , horia@racoviceanu.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 12:16:41 -0000 Hi! I'm a bit surprised that we don't have ports for galera cluster. I want to discuss about them a little bit. In short about galera and how it works (how I understand it): it's a kind of cluster of MySQL-based DBs. They support MySQL, Percona and MariaDB right now. Web site http://galeracluster.com/. ~Components: 1. A special version of MySQL-based DB daemon, patched to work with wsrep API. It can be MySQL Galera Cluster, Percona XtraDB Cluster or MariaDB Galera CLuster. 2. A common "plugin" for them all, which is plugged in through my.cnf. It's called "Galera 3 wsrep provider library" usually. 3. Arbitrator - a DB daemon without data to prevent split-brain and etc. Cluster version of MySQL-based DB daemons are usually(always?) synced with non-cluster regular versions. We have a port only for #2 now - databases/galera (which is useless in such case, no?). There is no port for #3 at all. There are a couple of PRs to add #1 to ports tree, which were created about a year ago. No progress since then. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=galera. However, I'd like to discuss about something. It's just my thoughts. 1. As you can see those PRs are trying to add *-server and *-client ports for each of clustered MySQL-based DBs (I know, not for Percona). Is there any need to add another yet version of client? What's a reason to make *-client ports? Because nothing depends on *-server ports. IMO we should use regular ports for clients and add only a server part, as Linuxes does. For example, databases/mysql56-client for MySQL Galera Cluster. In such case a lot of work to add a dependency for new *-client is not needed. 2. How *-server ports should be named? At first glance the obvious names are: databases/mysql5[56]-galera-cluster databases/percona5[56]-xtradb-cluster databases/mariadb(55|100)-galera-cluster Not bad, but what about the same names, but without (galera|xtradb) word? Or without "cluster" word. Like databases/mysql56-cluster next to databases/mysql56-server and databases/mysql56-client. How do you think? From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 30 12:50:46 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DE94E4A; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 12:50:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.netplex.net (mail.netplex.net [204.213.176.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.netplex.net", Issuer "RapidSSL SHA256 CA - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 603D9BB2; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 12:50:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11]) by mail.netplex.net (8.15.1/8.15.1/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id t2UCoiT4019413; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 08:50:44 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.netplex.net) X-Greylist: Message whitelisted by DRAC access database, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (mail.netplex.net [204.213.176.9]); Mon, 30 Mar 2015 08:50:44 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 08:50:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net Reply-To: Daniel Eischen To: Baptiste Daroussin Subject: Re: USES vs BUILD_DEPENDS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20150329165301.GA91058@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 12:50:46 -0000 On Sun, 29 Mar 2015, Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Sun, 29 Mar 2015, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >> On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 12:41:21PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: >>> I have a port which needs pod2man just to build the man file >>> during installation. Why do I need USES= pod2man:perl5 just to >>> build the port? It doesn't seem feasible to use BUILD_DEPENDS >>> because there is no generic perl5 port. >>> >> Have you tried using pod2mdoc ? > > No, I didn't know about it, I will check it out. I searched other > ports (grep) and found pod2man used. My port's (internal) > doc/Makefile uses pod2man. pod2mdoc doesn't seem compatible with the way pod2man is used: pod2man --release="`cat .version`" --center="Foo" $*.pod in particular, the -r or --release option. -- DE From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 30 13:14:02 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B55E8A5; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 13:14:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (mx3.absolight.net [IPv6:2a01:678:2:100::25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25A69E8D; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 13:14:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75388BDC2E; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 15:13:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gw.in.absolight.net (gw-ecl.in.absolight.net [79.143.241.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gw.in.absolight.net", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 54C78BDC25; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 15:13:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ogg.in.absolight.net (ogg.in.absolight.net [79.143.241.239]) by gw.in.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22A3A6151; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 15:13:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ogg.in.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73FC42C2913; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 15:13:56 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 15:13:56 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Daniel Eischen , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USES vs BUILD_DEPENDS Message-ID: <3022863A97E394A287EA8014@ogg.in.absolight.net> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 13:14:02 -0000 +--On 29 mars 2015 12:41:21 -0400 Daniel Eischen wrote: | I have a port which needs pod2man just to build the man file | during installation. Why do I need USES= pod2man:perl5 just to | build the port? It doesn't seem feasible to use BUILD_DEPENDS | because there is no generic perl5 port. You need: USES=perl5 USE_PERL5=build Because that's the right way to say you need Perl to build your port. -- Mathieu Arnold From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 30 13:25:52 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AF61C31 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 13:25:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.unix-experience.fr (195-154-176-227.rev.poneytelecom.eu [195.154.176.227]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34093F9E for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 13:25:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.unix-experience.fr (unknown [192.168.200.21]) by smtp.unix-experience.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E597F28711 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 13:19:39 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: scanned by unix-experience.fr Received: from smtp.unix-experience.fr ([192.168.200.21]) by smtp.unix-experience.fr (smtp.unix-experience.fr [192.168.200.21]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BpGie4W23Q3h for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 13:19:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.unix-experience.fr (repo.unix-experience.fr [192.168.200.30]) by smtp.unix-experience.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D6DCC286F6 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 13:19:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=unix-experience.fr; s=uxselect; t=1427721578; bh=LkAwETWBdZcvZ87u+MgOLs0qP+sR3q2SN9Mgtz+sI3o=; h=Date:From:Subject:To; b=ea2nlpo60B8l1sZrPPL1kS/OQP9XfbXAuzJoypYMXn42UiDVZF+LJcwu0ICp7IGbG lOl7aSDGvRLH53SkZv5yWa6Hy57ZFOOTnNKaabKFHOinThuqsKyo5rshewMK8FODnK QVV3IZApRx1pNJ0YnowBnxrFWs1HBkHO1SY4PnCY= Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 13:19:37 +0000 Message-ID: <21472bbc7eb9b7b9f36e5d8baae79211@mail.unix-experience.fr> X-Mailer: RainLoop/1.8.0.250 From: "=?utf-8?B?TG/Dr2MgQmxvdA==?=" Subject: Update mail/rainloop To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 13:25:52 -0000 Hi,=0Arainloop port update has been updated since some days.=0ACan you do= a last check and merge ?=0A=0Ahttps://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug= .cgi?id=3D198374=0A=0ARegards,=0A=0ALo=C3=AFc Blot,=0AUNIX Systems, Netwo= rk and Security Engineer=0Ahttp://www.unix-experience.fr (http://www.unix= -experience.fr) From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 30 13:31:11 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 252DCFCB; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 13:31:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0BDECB; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 13:31:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEDD928426; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 15:31:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from illbsd.quip.test (ip-89-177-50-74.net.upcbroadband.cz [89.177.50.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9FC5F28428; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 15:30:59 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <55195013.3090509@quip.cz> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 15:30:59 +0200 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/35.0 SeaMonkey/2.32 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Macdonald , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, FreeBSD Questions , info Subject: Re: Proftpd bug, chroot does not allow for access to or creation of folders named 'lib' References: <551460C0.3060609@ifdnrg.com> In-Reply-To: <551460C0.3060609@ifdnrg.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 13:31:11 -0000 Paul Macdonald wrote on 03/26/2015 20:40: > > > AFFECTS > 10.1 > > BUG: > > Proftpd with chroot on does not allow for the creation of or > uploading to folders named 'lib' > > I have installed proftpd-basic_1.3.4a-5+deb7u2_armhf.deb onto a > raspberry pi to test if problem is upstream and can create and upload to > 'lib' folders there. > > As many wordpress plugins use such folders, this is quite problematic. > > I'd appreciate it if anyone else can test this ( i've tried on > several servers) I can confirm this problem on FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE i386 with proftpd-1.3.5_2 Is some patch available to fix this? (I cannot disable DefaultChroot) Miroslav Lachman -- [L] 257 "/" is the current directory [L] PASV [L] 227 Entering Passive Mode (192,168,105,10,218,51). [L] Opening data connection IP: 192.168.105.10 PORT: 55859 [L] LIST -al [L] 150 Opening ASCII mode data connection for file list [L] TLSv1 (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA 256 Bits) [L] 226 Transfer complete [L] List Complete: 607 bytes in 5,00s (0,00KB/s) [L] PASV [L] 227 Entering Passive Mode (192,168,105,10,218,51). [L] Opening data connection IP: 192.168.105.10 PORT: 55859 [L] STOR readme.txt [L] 150 Opening ASCII mode data connection for readme.txt [L] TLSv1 (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA 256 Bits) [L] 226 Transfer complete [i] readme.txt 50 575bytes/5,36(s)/0,00Kbps [i] Transfer queue complete [i] Transfered 1 file(s) - Total: 50 575 byte(s) in 5,36 (0,00 KBps) [L] PASV [L] 227 Entering Passive Mode (192,168,105,10,215,174). [L] Opening data connection IP: 192.168.105.10 PORT: 55214 [L] LIST -al [L] 150 Opening ASCII mode data connection for file list [L] TLSv1 (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA 256 Bits) [L] 226 Transfer complete [L] List Complete: 681 bytes in 5,00s (0,00KB/s) [L] CWD lib [L] 250 CWD command successful [L] PWD [L] 257 "/lib" is the current directory [L] PASV [L] 227 Entering Passive Mode (192,168,105,10,215,158). [L] Opening data connection IP: 192.168.105.10 PORT: 55198 [L] LIST -al [L] 150 Opening ASCII mode data connection for file list [L] TLSv1 (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA 256 Bits) [L] 226 Transfer complete [L] List Complete: 499 bytes in 5,00s (0,00KB/s) [L] PASV [L] 227 Entering Passive Mode (192,168,105,10,216,54). [L] Opening data connection IP: 192.168.105.10 PORT: 55350 [L] STOR readme.txt [L] 550 readme.txt: Permission denied [L] Transfer Failed From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 30 13:34:49 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF0172D8 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 13:34:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outbound.ifdnrg.com (outbound.ifdnrg.com [193.200.98.38]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F66D10D for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 13:34:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (host-78-148-107-194.as13285.net [78.148.107.194]) (authenticated bits=0) by outbound.ifdnrg.com (8.15.1/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t2UDYZgm050061 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 14:34:39 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from paul@ifdnrg.com) X-Authentication-Warning: outbound.ifdnrg.com: Host host-78-148-107-194.as13285.net [78.148.107.194] claimed to be [192.168.1.10] Message-ID: <551950EC.2030205@ifdnrg.com> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 14:34:36 +0100 From: Paul Macdonald User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Proftpd bug, chroot does not allow for access to or creation of folders named 'lib' References: <551460C0.3060609@ifdnrg.com> <55195013.3090509@quip.cz> In-Reply-To: <55195013.3090509@quip.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 13:34:49 -0000 On 30/03/2015 14:30, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > > I can confirm this problem on FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE i386 with > proftpd-1.3.5_2 > > Is some patch available to fix this? (I cannot disable DefaultChroot) > a bug report has been filed. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198938 -- ------------------------- Paul Macdonald IFDNRG Ltd Web and video hosting ------------------------- t: 0131 5548070 m: 07970339546 e: paul@ifdnrg.com w: http://www.ifdnrg.com ------------------------- IFDNRG 40 Maritime Street Edinburgh EH6 6SA ---------------------------------------------------- High Specification Dedicated Servers from £100.00pm ---------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 30 13:53:19 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D779057C for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 13:53:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 961693CF for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 13:53:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Yca7y-000HFS-Dm; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 15:53:18 +0200 Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 15:53:18 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Paul Macdonald Subject: Re: Proftpd bug, chroot does not allow for access to or creation of folders named 'lib' Message-ID: <20150330135318.GI62590@home.opsec.eu> References: <551460C0.3060609@ifdnrg.com> <55195013.3090509@quip.cz> <551950EC.2030205@ifdnrg.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <551950EC.2030205@ifdnrg.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 13:53:19 -0000 Hi! > > I can confirm this problem on FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE i386 with > > proftpd-1.3.5_2 > > > > Is some patch available to fix this? (I cannot disable DefaultChroot) > > > a bug report has been filed. > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198938 I've updated the PR with some short info what I found. Basically, there's a special case in src/fsio.c which explicitly denies writing to /etc and /lib in the chroot-case, refering to 3 year old AUSCERT warnings for proftpd with FreeBSD. Someone needs to check whether those warnings still apply to current-day proftpd and freebsd. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 30 14:11:23 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB2C3AF3 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 14:11:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (unknown [IPv6:2602:d1:b4d6:e600:4261:86ff:fef6:aa2a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDD3584B for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 14:11:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t2UEBSiI012748 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 07:11:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) To: In-Reply-To: References: <20150329165301.GA91058@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> , From: "Chris H" Subject: Re: USES vs BUILD_DEPENDS Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 07:11:34 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 14:11:24 -0000 On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 08:50:44 -0400 (EDT) Daniel Eischen wrote > On Sun, 29 Mar 2015, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > On Sun, 29 Mar 2015, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > >> On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 12:41:21PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > >>> I have a port which needs pod2man just to build the man file > >>> during installation. Why do I need USES= pod2man:perl5 just to > >>> build the port? It doesn't seem feasible to use BUILD_DEPENDS > >>> because there is no generic perl5 port. > >>> > >> Have you tried using pod2mdoc ? > > > > No, I didn't know about it, I will check it out. I searched other > > ports (grep) and found pod2man used. My port's (internal) > > doc/Makefile uses pod2man. > > pod2mdoc doesn't seem compatible with the way pod2man is used: > > pod2man --release="'cat .version'" --center="Foo" $*.pod > > in particular, the -r or --release option. Are you able to generate the man page on your own machine? Point being; you could simply pass a CONFIGURE_ARGS line that disables/turns off the option to create the man page, and put the man page you've created locally into files/, and add it to post-install: Just a thought. --Chris > > -- > DE > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 30 14:32:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C34D558D for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 14:32:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (unknown [IPv6:2602:d1:b4d6:e600:4261:86ff:fef6:aa2a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F925B52 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 14:32:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t2UEX5uL014419 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 07:33:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) To: In-Reply-To: References: From: "Chris H" Subject: Re: devel/hub build failed on 8.4, how to proceed? Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 07:33:11 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-id: <2f9b32561bce9916b208f3a6d3e5c200@ultimatedns.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 14:32:59 -0000 On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 13:25:47 +0300 Kostantinos Koukopoulos wrote > Hello, > I'm maintaining devel/hub, and for the first time while doing so, a build > has failed: > > http://beefy5.nyi.freebsd.org/data/84i386-default/382532/logs/hub-2.2.0.log > > I have a couple of questions about how I should proceed. First: are we > (port maintainers) responsible for addressing this type of issue, where the > build fails only on a legacy release of FreeBSD? Second, assuming we don't > have the time to investigate the cause ourselves, is it acceptable to > simply open an issue with the upstream provider? Third, if and when we have > the time, is running a 8.4 jail on poudriere the easiest way to go about > debugging the issue? Since you are the maintainer, the answer is ultimately your choice. But your answers to the above questions will largely determine the ultimate value of your port. :) You needn't open a pr(1). [personally] I would wait to see if the problem actually manifests itself in "real life". poudriere is one option. But there is no good reason you can't create a jail, use a VM, or use any other means to create a suitable environment as a test bed, to isolate the problem/issue. Lastly; If you truly believe the problem exists in the source, you should report it upstream. Unless you want to fix it for them. :) P.S. don't forget that you can always mark the port broken for ARCH, or OSVERSION, or any combination of the two. > > Last, if anyone has any idea why a Golang build would fail with these > errors please share it with me: > > /var/tmp/go-link-ejdAoV/go.o(.text+0x1cc44): In function > 'runtime.mallocinit': /usr/local/go/src/runtime/malloc.c:219: relocation > truncated to fit: R_386_32 runtime.end > /var/tmp/go-link-ejdAoV/go.o(.debug_info+0x10f493): In function > 'time.Time.IsZero': > /usr/local/go/src/time/time.go:242: relocation truncated to fit: > R_386_32 runtime.end Purely a guess; maybe not 100% 32bit compatible? But I have no idea. --Chris > > > Thank you, > Konstantinos > > -- > |/ |/ Konstantinos > |\ |\ Koukopoulos > > VSRE messages are welcome*, Thanks! > * for more information see: http://vsre.info > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 30 16:28:52 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72D08965; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 16:28:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.netplex.net (mail.netplex.net [204.213.176.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.netplex.net", Issuer "RapidSSL SHA256 CA - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2ED60B95; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 16:28:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11]) by mail.netplex.net (8.15.1/8.15.1/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id t2UGSnZQ024557; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 12:28:49 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.netplex.net) X-Greylist: Message whitelisted by DRAC access database, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (mail.netplex.net [204.213.176.9]); Mon, 30 Mar 2015 12:28:49 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 12:28:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net Reply-To: Daniel Eischen To: Mathieu Arnold Subject: Re: USES vs BUILD_DEPENDS In-Reply-To: <3022863A97E394A287EA8014@ogg.in.absolight.net> Message-ID: References: <3022863A97E394A287EA8014@ogg.in.absolight.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 16:28:52 -0000 On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > +--On 29 mars 2015 12:41:21 -0400 Daniel Eischen > wrote: > | I have a port which needs pod2man just to build the man file > | during installation. Why do I need USES= pod2man:perl5 just to > | build the port? It doesn't seem feasible to use BUILD_DEPENDS > | because there is no generic perl5 port. > > You need: > USES=perl5 > USE_PERL5=build > > Because that's the right way to say you need Perl to build your port. Ok, thanks! I'll try that. -- DE From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 30 16:50:01 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52756A39 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 16:50:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x230.google.com (mail-ie0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18B98E8C for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 16:50:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iedm5 with SMTP id m5so122929157ied.3 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 09:50:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=LjyomylvrsB6W3qSSsLIO70/rg/ozuqcNZxfYPSa9Sc=; b=o2xfMeQrVkH7zlM84pg/PUsMMbYDknFeg29EBxj7XEPDAC4RaCvJGXXcB3p8GevR/m Xa0ISqXour6NAGm6k20JAnj3eU5mriy+aDaOAztDvWaPaDIjsArfT/LfWlKL4JtMk2r3 uz6oFczmMO6GbjiqLW6igmXzl5X4T+oksvrXK6PCTWG0ZdhLXkYj+bv8+5dGfhB4tdzS W+OcGx57HsDz54VHbxK+WZ/t5aa4kRoOlRJ63wOeXdMpCMdVVprIJ07fb41U+/r/wIZE QDj523Bf/SNzRJQF41tmNbzL7kP5J0QdVbEhZJWNYSP5CJR6B+8en1ckEDik7imsDXY1 awOw== X-Received: by 10.42.67.19 with SMTP id r19mr37323352ici.30.1427734200461; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 09:50:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <002601d068a9$e89ed730$b9dc8590$@protys.cz> In-Reply-To: <002601d068a9$e89ed730$b9dc8590$@protys.cz> From: Ben Woods Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 16:49:59 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: mc-4.8.14 To: lazan@protys.cz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 16:50:01 -0000 Hi Jiri, I am having difficulty replicating this fault, however it is no doubt linked to the change made in 4.8.14 under MC bug report #2027. See here: http://www.midnight-commander.org/ticket/2027 Have you set a custom bash prompt in a .bashrc or .bash_profile or /etc/profile? If so, what have you set so that I can try and replicate this issue? Thanks, Ben On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 12:20 AM Jiri Lazansky wrote: > Dear maintainer: > > I tried to upgrade well working mc-4.8.13_3 to mc-4.8.14 on FreeBSD 9.3 > (AMD64) with subshell using the port misc/mc. My shell is 'bash'. > > The result was: > > 1. Very long start-up time > 2. Subshell not working (has not read ~/.bashrc). > > Following patch resolved the situation: > > ========================== > --- src/subshell.c.orig > +++ src/subshell.c > @@ -874,8 +874,7 @@ > { > case BASH: > g_snprintf (precmd, sizeof (precmd), > - " PROMPT_COMMAND=${PROMPT_COMMAND:+$PROMPT_COMMAND; > }'pwd>&%d;kill -STOP $$'\n", > - subshell_pipe[WRITE]); > + " PROMPT_COMMAND='pwd>&%d;kill -STOP $$'\n", > subshell_pipe[WRITE]); > break; > > case ZSH: > =========================== > > The output of 'mc -V' is > > GNU Midnight Commander 4.8.14 > Built with GLib 2.42.2 > Using the S-Lang library with terminfo database > With builtin Editor > With subshell support as default > With support for background operations > With mouse support on xterm > With support for X11 events > With internationalization support > With multiple codepages support > Virtual File Systems: cpiofs, tarfs, sfs, extfs, ftpfs, sftpfs, fish, smbfs > Data types: char: 8; int: 32; long: 64; void *: 64; size_t: 64; off_t: 64; > > Please analyse the reasons and try to update the port. > > Best regards > > Jiri Lazansky > > > > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 30 19:57:04 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C0AB9D2 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 19:57:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EF73C67 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 19:57:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Ycfnz-000Hkr-1U; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 21:57:03 +0200 Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 21:57:03 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Lo=EFc?= Blot Subject: Re: Update mail/rainloop Message-ID: <20150330195702.GJ62590@home.opsec.eu> References: <21472bbc7eb9b7b9f36e5d8baae79211@mail.unix-experience.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <21472bbc7eb9b7b9f36e5d8baae79211@mail.unix-experience.fr> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 19:57:04 -0000 Hi! > rainloop port update has been updated since some days. > Can you do a last check and merge ? > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198374 Done. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 30 21:22:41 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 827A64BA for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 21:22:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shell1.rawbw.com (shell1.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A691941 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 21:22:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from yuri.doctorlan.com (c-50-184-63-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.184.63.128]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t2ULKnDI014054 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 14:20:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host c-50-184-63-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.184.63.128] claimed to be yuri.doctorlan.com Message-ID: <5519BE2F.50407@rawbw.com> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 14:20:47 -0700 From: Yuri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Why pkg-install is run during port build? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 21:22:41 -0000 pkg-install is run once during port's 'make', and another time during port's 'make install'. Is this intended? pkg-install is for the package, and port make didn't build/install the package. Yuri From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 30 21:42:26 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 708DD889 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 21:42:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-f177.google.com (mail-ob0-f177.google.com [209.85.214.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A1B3C0E for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 21:42:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbec2 with SMTP id ec2so3938127obb.3 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 14:42:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=eC2gnhxgmGQ/pF0qnnwCgi/O8U6slRhSTk3YA6ONanA=; b=hMdYgQJnAZsaqfUJiz3MtObh5V0p2QkL4MwcJ4U8z4updRzb/7GFUDoAWZM1fg921A W7ZYPma8LmHdF3JRpQ/UbuIIBCRYTDLRAvp2yMbh0ubcmUI28eOiCB+E9xHsjZMYxOA5 VLIFeiSIbkVaTM+lc9L6R8VyI2maNv4Ry5qFfgAt0smZazV9k3awM+XAtl+PpORf2vHM a624Wh/lC+FTThF/CL8xhmBXLzMYaAL2UPk7/alor/7Jedp30Pf32U+Ds+8bPXL2c2Cv qJfgd4AWqPH+wkl5dctPUC40V7P4H06dGblqdlaZ29+KSe1gASJHcQkVqf89tBoNOGL9 lXag== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkSpCIEaEE4cEOm/u4gUyMDNfi9YuoJrQsSc5SBeEQEbH64x5fFxPQczjMzTtbnT8SC5ZK0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.158.101 with SMTP id wt5mr29321488obb.19.1427751744752; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 14:42:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.147.134 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 14:42:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.147.134 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 14:42:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5519BE2F.50407@rawbw.com> References: <5519BE2F.50407@rawbw.com> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 16:42:24 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Why pkg-install is run during port build? From: Matthew Donovan To: Yuri Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 21:42:26 -0000 With FreeBSD packages and ports are the same. As it is tje same database On Mar 30, 2015 4:22 PM, "Yuri" wrote: > pkg-install is run once during port's 'make', and another time during > port's 'make install'. > > Is this intended? pkg-install is for the package, and port make didn't > build/install the package. > > Yuri > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 30 21:50:26 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7D8530E for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 21:50:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shell1.rawbw.com (shell1.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D71CB7 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 21:50:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from yuri.doctorlan.com (c-50-184-63-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.184.63.128]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t2ULoPH9017601 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 30 Mar 2015 14:50:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host c-50-184-63-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.184.63.128] claimed to be yuri.doctorlan.com Message-ID: <5519C520.6080004@rawbw.com> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 14:50:24 -0700 From: Yuri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Donovan Subject: Re: Why pkg-install is run during port build? References: <5519BE2F.50407@rawbw.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 21:50:27 -0000 On 03/30/2015 14:42, Matthew Donovan wrote: > With FreeBSD packages and ports are the same. As it is tje same database No, package and port are different things. Ports are the recipes to build packages or install directly, they are in file system under /usr/ports, and packages are the collection of binaries that can be installed, located in the repository, like one that is being pointed to by /etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf My question is why pkg-install is run during the stage phase? Isn't this the wrong thing to do? I think only make install should run it. Yuri From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 30 22:56:13 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2817BF2 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 22:56:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A3DA6EE for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 22:56:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.41]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA29D33C46; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 18:56:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id B413D3983C; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 18:56:00 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Yuri Subject: Re: Why pkg-install is run during port build? References: <5519BE2F.50407@rawbw.com> <5519C520.6080004@rawbw.com> Reply-To: ports@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 18:56:00 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5519C520.6080004@rawbw.com> (yuri@rawbw.com's message of "Mon, 30 Mar 2015 14:50:24 -0700") Message-ID: <44bnjaaydb.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 22:56:13 -0000 Yuri writes: > On 03/30/2015 14:42, Matthew Donovan wrote: >> With FreeBSD packages and ports are the same. As it is tje same database > > No, package and port are different things. > Ports are the recipes to build packages or install directly, they are > in file system under /usr/ports, and packages are the collection of > binaries that can be installed, located in the repository, like one > that is being pointed to by /etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf > >From your first message I wasn't sure you were actually running the current ports/package tools (pkg(8)), but mentioning FreeBSD.conf tells us that you are. > My question is why pkg-install is run during the stage phase? Isn't > this the wrong thing to do? I think only make install should run it. The whole point of the stage phase is to install the port into a transitional area (STAGEDIR), from which a package is built. That package is what is actually installed into the real system. This is the "new" way of doing things, meaning it's been around in mainstream use for "only" a couple of years or so. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 30 23:17:05 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA79240E for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 23:17:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-x231.google.com (mail-yk0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E8D393A for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 23:17:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ykek76 with SMTP id k76so355092yke.0 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 16:17:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=u3VPlgfVIiKlYR+/AxtbALJ9SXycavf7mmEkdxYsfic=; b=RwKmwAufBiilM5b1AbWd8ssMPMWdzfp3PvxsqPvmYh+qwaGITLpuOFgYAy/oxCZI4s nh4pxI9/XG77npJ69PxxQIZm9sch3Z+T/Q/7xIWHflv4PICQKrZqNMP1gJkQrjCybIxo JqJnsR9VliPT5E6Unqo236eDH8Cf5O6+4MqYQJYZ4gDT5xjyizfVmJlURRH9GNcR4prZ v6cM6tzK0d10MHfU4TdMXxKWj2TKB6Ntcrv+S8V/Xo0RDhyRSkCAjDoBCdoFTsehDPFA iFIOFaq9MZKlM+WA2DAp3qAjsBY+BEivPlTVQCjvH+EjFj+c+SpAYLTQhPKaivJ/aitI Sxew== X-Received: by 10.53.7.72 with SMTP id da8mr21098647vdd.58.1427757424472; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 16:17:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id cf6sm2073883vdc.15.2015.03.30.16.17.02 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 30 Mar 2015 16:17:03 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 01:16:59 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why pkg-install is run during port build? Message-ID: <20150330231659.GB30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <5519BE2F.50407@rawbw.com> <5519C520.6080004@rawbw.com> <44bnjaaydb.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="98e8jtXdkpgskNou" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44bnjaaydb.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: Yuri X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 23:17:05 -0000 --98e8jtXdkpgskNou Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 06:56:00PM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Yuri writes: >=20 > > On 03/30/2015 14:42, Matthew Donovan wrote: > >> With FreeBSD packages and ports are the same. As it is tje same databa= se > > > > No, package and port are different things. > > Ports are the recipes to build packages or install directly, they are > > in file system under /usr/ports, and packages are the collection of > > binaries that can be installed, located in the repository, like one > > that is being pointed to by /etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf > > > From your first message I wasn't sure you were actually running the > current ports/package tools (pkg(8)), but mentioning FreeBSD.conf tells > us that you are. >=20 > > My question is why pkg-install is run during the stage phase? Isn't > > this the wrong thing to do? I think only make install should run it. >=20 > The whole point of the stage phase is to install the port into a > transitional area (STAGEDIR), from which a package is built. That > package is what is actually installed into the real system. >=20 > This is the "new" way of doing things, meaning it's been around in > mainstream use for "only" a couple of years or so. And pkg-install is not run at all during stage if some ports are explicitly doing that they should be fixed! Best regards, Bapt --98e8jtXdkpgskNou Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlUZ2WsACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ew+KACgvuhkBMxWUOa4Uf/LJ3GPpglN TEUAni0oNjiAgZRXz3jNqErcpXa29YoW =2E3J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --98e8jtXdkpgskNou-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 31 00:07:22 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2BF32C3; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 00:07:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shell1.rawbw.com (shell1.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73CB7E46; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 00:07:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from yuri.doctorlan.com (c-50-184-63-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.184.63.128]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t2V07La6031123 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 30 Mar 2015 17:07:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host c-50-184-63-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.184.63.128] claimed to be yuri.doctorlan.com Message-ID: <5519E538.6010106@rawbw.com> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 17:07:20 -0700 From: Yuri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Baptiste Daroussin , ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Why pkg-install is run during port build? References: <5519BE2F.50407@rawbw.com> <5519C520.6080004@rawbw.com> <44bnjaaydb.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <20150330231659.GB30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20150330231659.GB30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 00:07:23 -0000 On 03/30/2015 16:16, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > And pkg-install is not run at all during stage if some ports are explicitly > doing that they should be fixed! That was it, thanks, it was called explicitly. Yuri From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 31 09:37:56 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB9EA77B for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 09:37:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6AA2669 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 09:37:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t2V9buLp044715 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 09:37:56 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t2V9bu0D044714; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 09:37:56 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201503310937.t2V9bu0D044714@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 09:37:56 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 09:37:57 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ www/drupal6-chaos | 6.x-1.6 | 6.x-1.12 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ www/squid | 3.4.12 | 3.5.3 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 31 11:24:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A570A27 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 11:24:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.com (mout.gmx.com [74.208.4.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC99B236 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 11:24:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [108.70.50.7] by 3capp-mailcom-lxa13.server.lan (via HTTP); Tue, 31 Mar 2015 13:24:51 +0200 Message-ID: From: "side light" To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: emulators/pipelight, compiler Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 13:24:51 +0200 Importance: normal Sensitivity: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:VdEaMZntFvSFgYZxzf/ceQTLMlHZ7/IFNfntgpsAuPz H9+3PxToc9NEp8I7VewS5uU5UwExWlEk0Ie956NH84ZFeyv3QO IrTQrxTqjZwMZfU5CGG9xmffbh2lDtA6kocEe20+CxgjmV6naT Lael4/3n+AcTL3t+1TLBhLzMweo23KeNasoOcTR7mARCtVLk2u JA897JsYw27PIz0u2rTylL6b8dhWITcV9oQ+9iAQFgCPrsrzbM X09J9v/nz45Mtvgd6YYSS7bvS1V/zulkG/HS9pK0x4iTkcgmnV wnItxje9KvDx5Mb5U/ukwdtoboL X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 11:24:59 -0000 Hello, Is it possible to replace GCC with Clang in emulators/pipelight. Here's what I have for the diff file, and it compiled fine. The plugins still don't work, but perhaps this will make fixing it easier. Thank you. 32d31 < USE_GCC= yes 41c40 < USES= compiler:gcc-c++11-lib gmake shebangfix --- > USES= compiler:c++11-lib gmake shebangfix From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 31 13:48:25 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F03BBE0B for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 13:48:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yh0-x236.google.com (mail-yh0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A865E6D1 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 13:48:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhjf44 with SMTP id f44so3566688yhj.3 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 06:48:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=dbTL7LO2frhfwTlIn/l8HNAgHqE9frfFOFZ7mHauh4s=; b=egMnIQtO2pl4f3SSVB1AdhSZ8rk3xATPrMRPzd2HWbcQnYqEeJY8WSCC1z9oOqjpsE LX3g24BzQvDsRSf84dxJ2mkoHNJf9E7u3Mw4GREby4xqHasslrmKsDfTfyy3qsaFD1P0 rOgxIYJe6GSDzHPi+QcSl1OxCkoYo4qe2+Id775+/FHN9elYZ9nK07HmF8MmSZe9B/P5 COEYEWUSugjL6lEzv8+VO3130YpBGCNbzYiWuGA661mNjgZZiVN7fVe0KLUaQ6jerrMF aVNZDNFxf6VYaH/UZFz/W09oQSI6dP8bJFLB98sbvbeEMbVwm60+VTYalySdy8vh8IP9 7ccQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.27.46 with SMTP id q14mr38986231vdg.29.1427809704438; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 06:48:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.244.113 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 06:48:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4c18dec0d168e393ff5dddfdc65c7ec6@sdf.org> <20150228074951.GD62590@home.opsec.eu> <20150228110834.GF62590@home.opsec.eu> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 16:48:24 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Initial squid 3.5 port From: Pavel Timofeev Cc: ports-list freebsd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 13:48:26 -0000 Hi all! The squid35 port has been updated to lastest 3.5.3 release. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198089 This time it's a patch for the existing www/squid. Please, test it and write a feed back! IMO it's ready to import. 2015-03-20 11:43 GMT+03:00 Pavel Timofeev : > Hello! > > The new shar file squid35-20.03.15.shar was uploaded today. Look at > this PR https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198089. > You can find my comments about progress there. > > I'm asking people who is using www/squid: please, test it as much as possible! > > P.S. It's a new port (shar) now just for testing. Of course, it > will/can be converted to patch for www/squid when it's recognized as > ready. > > 2015-03-11 12:07 GMT+03:00 Pavel Timofeev : >> Hi! I've just made a small update there >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198089 >> >> 2015-02-28 15:30 GMT+03:00 Pavel Timofeev : >>> Ok, I'll do my best. >>> >>> 2015-02-28 14:08 GMT+03:00 Kurt Jaeger : >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>>> > Just in case, I uploaded it here https://yadi.sk/d/EcRxwc6BevgDc >>>>> >>>>> I've created >>>>> >>>>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198089 >>>>> >>>>> with that shar and I'm build-testing it right now. >>>> >>>> build testing: works on 10.1a, fails on 9.3a, 8.4i. >>>> >>>> poudriere build logs can be found at >>>> >>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~pi/logs/www__squid35* >>>> >>>> Older builds are with a custom config, newer builds with the generic config. >>>> >>>> Can you investigate the cause of the issue ? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 31 14:23:17 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1C117EC for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 14:23:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x22c.google.com (mail-wg0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BB3AC61 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 14:23:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgra20 with SMTP id a20so21075664wgr.3 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 07:23:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=euNXEULeL4Ju9qVNvuRA5XjhuaQYRJGwHLlOOCRmiJ0=; b=FqaON/SDGnQjoUMWTJmjQbZG61WZRf4QbQXyBLGNISDmH+z7gjZYDlNhQ6PxD4LjUa ZGJWV1Q2ywzFrAZrsiG/FjI3D4eUl9w28eQTLOMYobo6toQ6p59amN9b5qsmo1Rj3ktr YFexxveA8YhksqqMhkffIR6R2nqpN8goqshUtPT3ZbrEKDivZRUMmF1RjSpy+jwC8cmj 3Mk6TVvEM8QL21vdJUaRANXK4/7vp3n9nUq/jfKswuUlyOkMPjap7gsF/qcJloJCm4eq 5W59vtvlYX1cWBiCA7wLCaMNIYcr/F/Wc53vP1Moo3QtM0G1cpMttLGEjg+jnODN2p+B x6pA== X-Received: by 10.194.61.100 with SMTP id o4mr75015707wjr.28.1427811795816; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 07:23:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (athedsl-348538.home.otenet.gr. [85.72.217.24]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id a13sm20577771wjx.30.2015.03.31.07.23.14 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 31 Mar 2015 07:23:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <551AADD1.6060101@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 17:23:13 +0300 From: Konstantinos Koukopoulos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-ports Digest, Vol 619, Issue 2 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 14:23:17 -0000 On 31/03/2015 15:00, "Chris H" wrote: > Since you are the maintainer, the answer is ultimately your choice. But > your answers to the above questions will largely determine the ultimate > value of your port. > You needn't open a pr(1). [personally] I would wait to see if the > problem actually manifests itself in "real life". > poudriere is one option. But there is no good reason you can't create > a jail, use a VM, or use any other means to create a suitable > environment as a test bed, to isolate the problem/issue. Lastly; If you > truly believe the problem exists in the source, you should report it > upstream. Unless you want to fix it for them. > P.S. don't forget that you can always mark the port broken for > ARCH, or OSVERSION, or any combination of the two. thanks for your advice. I'll try and reproduce the failure, time permitting. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 31 15:00:30 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 730BD9A2 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 15:00:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x231.google.com (mail-ig0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44502E0 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 15:00:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igcxg11 with SMTP id xg11so19664122igc.0 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 08:00:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=NmJOJdHfhmIcK4X8OiKPMGbOS5L0Hkw4wUjG0ffLP0Q=; b=A8QYkydv1dvZXrLCvNhPFKILOWiXemZD0gLYFFOPFT4CNK7kOEnYb13uV43hhuGO83 fD+erGlhPRXYFE5m3s/KPXJs5GwVCiVccmcRAZgIuZVs+C2LuyGd3HBIfTvZQvNWmUb1 /+9kx8qeBogKWa6LvNgKE5OO5BlsWqUagjMt71AQGs2QU10+eZNS++Bz8qYTfyqIXMyV YwFXKbVtf7+rfx4ejAvnRXsWuk+7BwDiWXHTbybL+wwEVugZL+4fXedNAYjBTzO2FYUc hRNF2alO/B1BraRV6JzswRNXFSvc0kFSGN487359xjV+TNyz3eVVDFx1Z5xZgVFexj4E kE9g== X-Received: by 10.42.69.15 with SMTP id z15mr30855717ici.75.1427814029216; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 08:00:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ben Woods Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 15:00:28 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Update editors/abiword to 3.0.1 To: FreeBSD ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 15:00:30 -0000 I am trying to update editors/abiword from 2.8.6 to 3.0.1. Part way through compiling my new test port, I get the following errors: gmake[7]: Entering directory '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/editors/abiword/work/abiword-3.0.1/src/text/fmt/xp' CXX fl_Squiggles.lo CXX fb_Alignment.lo In file included from fb_Alignment.cpp:22: ./fb_Alignment.h:114:8: warning: private field 'm_iSpaceCountLeft' is not used [-Wunused-private-field] int m_iSpaceCountLeft; ^ ./fb_Alignment.h:115:8: warning: private field 'm_iSpaceCount' is not used [-Wunused-private-field] int m_iSpaceCount; ^ 2 warnings generated. CXX fb_ColumnBreaker.lo In file included from fb_ColumnBreaker.cpp:22: ./fb_ColumnBreaker.h:53:24: warning: private field 'm_pCurrentBlock' is not used [-Wunused-private-field] fl_BlockLayout * m_pCurrentBlock; ^ 1 warning generated. CXX fb_LineBreaker.lo CXX fg_Graphic.lo CXX fg_GraphicRaster.lo CXX fg_GraphicVector.lo CXX fl_AutoLists.lo CXX fl_AutoNum.lo CXX fl_BlockLayout.lo CXX fl_ContainerLayout.lo CXX fl_DocLayout.lo CXX fl_DocListener.lo CXX fl_FootnoteLayout.lo CXX fl_FrameLayout.lo CXX fl_Layout.lo CXX fl_SectionLayout.lo CXX fl_SelectionPreserver.lo CXX fl_TableLayout.lo CXX fl_TestRoutines.lo CXX fl_TOCLayout.lo In file included from fl_TOCLayout.cpp:32: ./fl_TOCLayout.h:82:20: warning: private field 'm_iStartAt' is not used [-Wunused-private-field] UT_sint32 m_iStartAt; ^ 1 warning generated. CXX fp_AnnotationRun.lo CXX fp_RDFAnchorRun.lo In file included from fp_RDFAnchorRun.cpp:23: In file included from ./fp_Run.h:33: In file included from ../../../../src/af/util/xp/ut_misc.h:39: In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/string:439: In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/algorithm:627: In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/memory:601: /usr/include/c++/v1/__functional_base:63:21: error: invalid operands to binary expression ('const PD_URI' and 'const PD_URI') {return __x < __y;} ~~~ ^ ~~~ /usr/include/c++/v1/map:457:17: note: in instantiation of member function 'std::__1::less::operator()' requested here {return static_cast(*this)(__x.__cc.first, __y.__cc.first);} ^ /usr/include/c++/v1/__tree:1573:29: note: in instantiation of member function 'std::__1::__map_value_compare, std::__1::less, true>::operator()' requested here if (__hint == end() || !value_comp()(*__hint, __v)) // check before ^ /usr/include/c++/v1/__tree:1912:36: note: in instantiation of member function 'std::__1::__tree, std::__1::__map_value_compare, std::__1::less, true>, std::__1::allocator > >::__find_leaf' requested here __node_base_pointer& __child = __find_leaf(__p, __parent, __v); ^ /usr/include/c++/v1/map:1779:25: note: in instantiation of member function 'std::__1::__tree, std::__1::__map_value_compare, std::__1::less, true>, std::__1::allocator > >::__insert_multi' requested here __tree_.__insert_multi(__e.__i_, *__f); ^ /usr/include/c++/v1/map:1612:13: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'std::__1::multimap, std::__1::allocator > >::insert, std::__1::__tree_node, void *> *, long> > >' requested here insert(__m.begin(), __m.end()); ^ ../../../../src/text/ptbl/xp/pd_DocumentRDF.h:198:18: note: in instantiation of member function 'std::__1::multimap, std::__1::allocator > >::multimap' requested here class ABI_EXPORT PD_RDFModelIterator ^ ../../../../src/af/util/xp/ut_string_class.h:124:17: note: candidate function not viable: no known conversion from 'const PD_URI' to 'const UT_String' for 1st argument ABI_EXPORT bool operator<(const UT_String& s1, const UT_String& s2); ^ ../../../../src/af/util/xp/ut_string_class.h:277:17: note: candidate function not viable: no known conversion from 'const PD_URI' to 'const UT_UTF8String' for 1st argument ABI_EXPORT bool operator<(const UT_UTF8String& s1, const UT_UTF8String& s2); ^ ../../../../src/af/util/xp/ut_string_class.h:394:6: note: candidate function not viable: no known conversion from 'const PD_URI' to 'const UT_UCS4String' for 1st argument bool operator<(const UT_UCS4String& s1, const UT_UCS4String& s2); ^ /usr/include/c++/v1/utility:419:1: note: candidate template ignored: could not match 'pair' against 'const PD_URI' operator< (const pair<_T1,_T2>& __x, const pair<_T1,_T2>& __y) ^ /usr/include/c++/v1/iterator:582:1: note: candidate template ignored: could not match 'reverse_iterator' against 'const PD_URI' operator<(const reverse_iterator<_Iter1>& __x, const reverse_iterator<_Iter2>& __y) ^ /usr/include/c++/v1/iterator:977:1: note: candidate template ignored: could not match 'move_iterator' against 'const PD_URI' operator<(const move_iterator<_Iter1>& __x, const move_iterator<_Iter2>& __y) ^ /usr/include/c++/v1/iterator:1293:1: note: candidate template ignored: could not match '__wrap_iter' against 'const PD_URI' operator<(const __wrap_iter<_Iter1>& __x, const __wrap_iter<_Iter2>& __y) _NOEXCEPT ^ 1 error generated. Makefile:823: recipe for target 'fp_RDFAnchorRun.lo' failed gmake[7]: *** [fp_RDFAnchorRun.lo] Error 1 gmake[7]: Leaving directory '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/editors/abiword/work/abiword-3.0.1/src/text/fmt/xp' Makefile:842: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed gmake[6]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[6]: Leaving directory '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/editors/abiword/work/abiword-3.0.1/src/text/fmt/xp' Makefile:529: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed gmake[5]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[5]: Leaving directory '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/editors/abiword/work/abiword-3.0.1/src/text/fmt' Makefile:528: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed gmake[4]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[4]: Leaving directory '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/editors/abiword/work/abiword-3.0.1/src/text' Makefile:1157: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed gmake[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[3]: Leaving directory '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/editors/abiword/work/abiword-3.0.1/src' Makefile:774: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/editors/abiword/work/abiword-3.0.1' Makefile:593: recipe for target 'all' failed gmake[1]: *** [all] Error 2 gmake[1]: Leaving directory '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/editors/abiword/work/abiword-3.0.1' *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/ports/editors/abiword Is this an issue with the new C++ stack libc++ referring to the std::__1 namespace, not just std::, as explained at the link below? https://wiki.freebsd.org/NewC++Stack Regards, Ben From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 31 18:22:42 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 233ABBD7 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 18:22:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x22e.google.com (mail-ie0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA050EE0 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 18:22:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iebmp1 with SMTP id mp1so16234093ieb.0 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 11:22:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=5o8E2krDshfMQSOlYBqFgeYLuIwqgHCx/5jF8BjzjUY=; b=rV0WhflYOhQbGEFiw22imDHAYQdRXZlmNTCpf20vRELyLioQG7SE9kOT5xwb/aqYAX SrNZzwD1WHtGfR91Jt5tFioJiHp4IqxgsCd0yJBWqESevZtBg1BEyRalWsH9+ZX4+ZBI riEQBlMs1G4KkP9ErdSULLQxZu655kAhiJIFm9/xO3Lu/cFMeeivYPCiDEsDC3gAZTo5 3fvoNrf3UzSTdvGq8ZENj+AB34CDBRhIGoB2ChArt6Y8k7dV4uZQ6wxf434eev+97J38 +Knhd/7E0zLJ9pLOX3BzS0Tm5mxAY+bAqi9F2qfU/b0vIU7RJoFAPcZd2LYJRbu4JIwJ gslA== X-Received: by 10.42.226.4 with SMTP id iu4mr13382391icb.51.1427826161117; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 11:22:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.134.92 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 11:22:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Gleb Popov <6yearold@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 21:22:10 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Update editors/abiword to 3.0.1 To: Ben Woods Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 18:22:42 -0000 On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Ben Woods wrote: > I am trying to update editors/abiword from 2.8.6 to 3.0.1. > > Part way through compiling my new test port, I get the following errors: > > gmake[7]: Entering directory > '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/editors/abiword/work/abiword-3.0.1/src/text/fmt/xp' > CXX fl_Squiggles.lo > CXX fb_Alignment.lo > In file included from fb_Alignment.cpp:22: > ./fb_Alignment.h:114:8: warning: private field 'm_iSpaceCountLeft' is > not used [-Wunused-private-field] > int m_iSpaceCountLeft; > ^ > ./fb_Alignment.h:115:8: warning: private field 'm_iSpaceCount' is not > used [-Wunused-private-field] > int m_iSpaceCount; > ^ > 2 warnings generated. > CXX fb_ColumnBreaker.lo > In file included from fb_ColumnBreaker.cpp:22: > ./fb_ColumnBreaker.h:53:24: warning: private field 'm_pCurrentBlock' > is not used [-Wunused-private-field] > fl_BlockLayout * m_pCurrentBlock; > ^ > 1 warning generated. > CXX fb_LineBreaker.lo > CXX fg_Graphic.lo > CXX fg_GraphicRaster.lo > CXX fg_GraphicVector.lo > CXX fl_AutoLists.lo > CXX fl_AutoNum.lo > CXX fl_BlockLayout.lo > CXX fl_ContainerLayout.lo > CXX fl_DocLayout.lo > CXX fl_DocListener.lo > CXX fl_FootnoteLayout.lo > CXX fl_FrameLayout.lo > CXX fl_Layout.lo > CXX fl_SectionLayout.lo > CXX fl_SelectionPreserver.lo > CXX fl_TableLayout.lo > CXX fl_TestRoutines.lo > CXX fl_TOCLayout.lo > In file included from fl_TOCLayout.cpp:32: > ./fl_TOCLayout.h:82:20: warning: private field 'm_iStartAt' is not > used [-Wunused-private-field] > UT_sint32 m_iStartAt; > ^ > 1 warning generated. > CXX fp_AnnotationRun.lo > CXX fp_RDFAnchorRun.lo > In file included from fp_RDFAnchorRun.cpp:23: > In file included from ./fp_Run.h:33: > In file included from ../../../../src/af/util/xp/ut_misc.h:39: > In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/string:439: > In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/algorithm:627: > In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/memory:601: > /usr/include/c++/v1/__functional_base:63:21: error: invalid operands > to binary expression ('const PD_URI' and 'const PD_URI') > {return __x < __y;} > ~~~ ^ ~~~ > /usr/include/c++/v1/map:457:17: note: in instantiation of member > function 'std::__1::less::operator()' requested here > {return static_cast(*this)(__x.__cc.first, > __y.__cc.first);} > ^ > /usr/include/c++/v1/__tree:1573:29: note: in instantiation of member > function 'std::__1::__map_value_compare std::__1::__value_type, std::__1::less, > true>::operator()' requested here > if (__hint == end() || !value_comp()(*__hint, __v)) // check before > ^ > /usr/include/c++/v1/__tree:1912:36: note: in instantiation of member > function 'std::__1::__tree, > std::__1::__map_value_compare PD_Object>, std::__1::less, true>, > std::__1::allocator > > >::__find_leaf' requested here > __node_base_pointer& __child = __find_leaf(__p, __parent, __v); > ^ > /usr/include/c++/v1/map:1779:25: note: in instantiation of member > function 'std::__1::__tree, > std::__1::__map_value_compare PD_Object>, std::__1::less, true>, > std::__1::allocator > > >::__insert_multi' requested here > __tree_.__insert_multi(__e.__i_, *__f); > ^ > /usr/include/c++/v1/map:1612:13: note: in instantiation of function > template specialization 'std::__1::multimap std::__1::less, std::__1::allocator PD_URI, PD_Object> > > > >::insert PD_Object>, std::__1::__tree_node PD_Object>, void *> *, long> > >' requested here > insert(__m.begin(), __m.end()); > ^ > ../../../../src/text/ptbl/xp/pd_DocumentRDF.h:198:18: note: in > instantiation of member function 'std::__1::multimap PD_Object, std::__1::less, > std::__1::allocator > > >::multimap' requested here > class ABI_EXPORT PD_RDFModelIterator > ^ > ../../../../src/af/util/xp/ut_string_class.h:124:17: note: candidate > function not viable: no known conversion from 'const PD_URI' to 'const > UT_String' for 1st argument > ABI_EXPORT bool operator<(const UT_String& s1, const UT_String& s2); > ^ > ../../../../src/af/util/xp/ut_string_class.h:277:17: note: candidate > function not viable: no known conversion from 'const PD_URI' to 'const > UT_UTF8String' for 1st argument > ABI_EXPORT bool operator<(const UT_UTF8String& s1, const UT_UTF8String& > s2); > ^ > ../../../../src/af/util/xp/ut_string_class.h:394:6: note: candidate > function not viable: no known conversion from 'const PD_URI' to 'const > UT_UCS4String' for 1st argument > bool operator<(const UT_UCS4String& s1, const UT_UCS4String& s2); > ^ > /usr/include/c++/v1/utility:419:1: note: candidate template ignored: > could not match 'pair' against > 'const PD_URI' > operator< (const pair<_T1,_T2>& __x, const pair<_T1,_T2>& __y) > ^ > /usr/include/c++/v1/iterator:582:1: note: candidate template ignored: > could not match 'reverse_iterator' against 'const > PD_URI' > operator<(const reverse_iterator<_Iter1>& __x, const > reverse_iterator<_Iter2>& __y) > ^ > /usr/include/c++/v1/iterator:977:1: note: candidate template ignored: > could not match 'move_iterator' against 'const > PD_URI' > operator<(const move_iterator<_Iter1>& __x, const move_iterator<_Iter2>& > __y) > ^ > /usr/include/c++/v1/iterator:1293:1: note: candidate template ignored: > could not match '__wrap_iter' against 'const > PD_URI' > operator<(const __wrap_iter<_Iter1>& __x, const __wrap_iter<_Iter2>& > __y) _NOEXCEPT > ^ > 1 error generated. > Makefile:823: recipe for target 'fp_RDFAnchorRun.lo' failed > gmake[7]: *** [fp_RDFAnchorRun.lo] Error 1 > gmake[7]: Leaving directory > '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/editors/abiword/work/abiword-3.0.1/src/text/fmt/xp' > Makefile:842: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed > gmake[6]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > gmake[6]: Leaving directory > '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/editors/abiword/work/abiword-3.0.1/src/text/fmt/xp' > Makefile:529: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed > gmake[5]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > gmake[5]: Leaving directory > '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/editors/abiword/work/abiword-3.0.1/src/text/fmt' > Makefile:528: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed > gmake[4]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > gmake[4]: Leaving directory > '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/editors/abiword/work/abiword-3.0.1/src/text' > Makefile:1157: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed > gmake[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > gmake[3]: Leaving directory > '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/editors/abiword/work/abiword-3.0.1/src' > Makefile:774: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed > gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > gmake[2]: Leaving directory > '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/editors/abiword/work/abiword-3.0.1' > Makefile:593: recipe for target 'all' failed > gmake[1]: *** [all] Error 2 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory > '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/editors/abiword/work/abiword-3.0.1' > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > make: stopped in /usr/ports/editors/abiword > > > Is this an issue with the new C++ stack libc++ referring to the std::__1 > namespace, not just std::, as explained at the link below? > https://wiki.freebsd.org/NewC++Stack > > Regards, > Ben > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Nope, the error is that there is no operator< for operands with types ('const PD_URI' and 'const PD_URI'). They, probably, should be implicitly casted to something else, but something goes wrong. What compiler are you building with? From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 31 18:47:47 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7043511 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 18:47:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shell1.rawbw.com (shell1.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1EFE23E for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 18:47:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from yuri.doctorlan.com (c-50-184-63-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.184.63.128]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t2VIlkpF014351 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 11:47:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host c-50-184-63-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.184.63.128] claimed to be yuri.doctorlan.com Message-ID: <551AEBD1.8050307@rawbw.com> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 11:47:45 -0700 From: Yuri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Replacing vlc with vlc-qt4 broke pkg upgrade Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 18:47:47 -0000 Few days ago vlc was replaced with vlc->qt4. I rebuilt all packages from my ports tree with poudriere, tried to 'pkg upgrade', and pkg fails to handle this: All repositories are up-to-date. Checking for upgrades (28 candidates): 100% Processing candidates (28 candidates): 100% Checking integrity... done (1 conflicting) pkg: Cannot solve problem using SAT solver: conflict rule: The following packages conflict with each other: vlc-2.2.0_3,4(r), vlc-qt4-2.2.0_3,4(r) dependency rule: package vlc(r) depends on: vlc(l)phonon-vlc(l) conflict rule: The following packages conflict with each other: vlc-2.2.0_3,4(r), vlc-2.2.0_3,4(r) upgrade rule: upgrade local vlc-2.2.0_2,4 to remote vlc-2.2.0_3,4 cannot install package vlc, remove it from request? [Y/n]: vlc is installed as automatic. Shouldn't pkg uderstand that vlc and vlc-qt are counterparts and should be substituted? There is no /usr/ports/UPDATING record for this. Is think such record should be added if pkg can't handle this. Or what is the solution? Yuri From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 31 19:03:29 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 954DDA04; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 19:03:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-x235.google.com (mail-yk0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D57063A; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 19:03:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ykeg184 with SMTP id g184so8203580yke.2; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 12:03:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:user-agent; bh=s9kSJ+ZgLSPn7H8kAlheHKUJt2qjwQu7ZIlbDe29zz0=; b=FKeWlP0Q4JkXN1S6t5mQpLyUcQNjSpnmeUqGrxM2UPEjQ2Gcf38BW7bX76NMG881hV xpMGEkbZe7ZvNK/BW1ja+vmu2E/HrO5PmLF4g1UzmOGV/7hzWfHpva/Gmjm6zRHU4Lkn QlcBPiSyUHCCIl+msz1gdX3LjWj+s7ysyZkYEnN3aXs0JIGXpDctKGakaYwFv0VY3u14 czTg6bpBJ5Ty4wXO2LuhEbjvHv5PjW0ty95q70ADbzxSsJrqGIJ5/7q7Qb+DqXaSSXeW 2z84XgOdob+6weT3+AX2srBNmLWZ5ekk+s9JFPoOXHFkfMOnJnZMshqeyR4Y07DAuO/8 0uEA== X-Received: by 10.52.149.65 with SMTP id ty1mr39737687vdb.67.1427828608444; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 12:03:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fa2sm761497vdd.17.2015.03.31.12.03.26 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 31 Mar 2015 12:03:27 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 21:03:23 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: pkg@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0 Message-ID: <20150331190323.GF30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HCdXmnRlPgeNBad2" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 19:03:29 -0000 --HCdXmnRlPgeNBad2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi all, We just released pkg 1.5.0 beta1 (in ports-mgmt/pkg-devel), Here is what happened since pkg 1.4.0: - pkg has grown with an initial support for provides/requires: this is a naive version but good enough to at least make major upgrade of php safer as well as making pear/pecl maintenance saner (note that this will need modifications in the ports tree) - Lots of new regression tests has been added, which allows us not less break your systems an unexpected way (do not worry there are still rooms for breakage) - Initial support for OS X - Initial support for NetBSD/EdjeBSD - Update most of the bundled third party software has been updated to their latest version - Improve the messages reported by pkg (and probably make some other worse) - Properly support file flags - Implement argument support for custom keywords - Extend setting credential via plist to allow to set file flags - Make credential syntax via plist more flexible allow to only defines the first fields and not latest for example @(user,,) can now be written just @(user) - pkg updating now supports case insensitive matching - pkg create now support a verbose mode - Add an option to change the default on question, until now the default answer was "No" with that option set it would be "Yes" - lots of fixes to pkg audit -r - Global memory usage reduction and speed up - Improvements and cleanup on pkg alias - pkg annotate --show --all has been fixed - Make pkg.h C++ friendly - Lots of improvements in the solver - Lots of fixes on 32 bits platforms - Add support for: pkg create -M ./plop.ucl -p ./plop.plist - New pkg -r that will install in the given rootdir without chrooting - Export PKG_ROOTDIR to scripts allow to make them as portable as possible - Stop trying to remove all installed package with the argument of pkg delete is a local file - Be more explicit about why the solver it going to reinstall, remove or upgrade (when possible) - Plenty of bug fixes - Plenty of new bugs Please test and report as much bugs as you can! We could be very grateful if regressions tests could be provided along with the bug reports :) Plan is to release 1.5.0 as soon as possible Best regards, Bapt --HCdXmnRlPgeNBad2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlUa73sACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ez5BwCbBc35ig3+qOqmpjisPCgYq384 wd8An1/W2kU5JZhNqR5Ldl66ni8XlmeG =uqMn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HCdXmnRlPgeNBad2-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 31 19:19:22 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFE525B9 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 19:19:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yh0-f51.google.com (mail-yh0-f51.google.com [209.85.213.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AD7A863 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 19:19:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhfw71 with SMTP id w71so6385062yhf.2 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 12:19:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:content-type:mime-version; bh=YyT7jrzydJfhCxnf6RUb5WgXEOuPdtdKcI0KQ6+AQTs=; b=k/I8tr6BWOu3pu3QYDfYNYcY+CCB27BSZDwIfaBjBzDw/k9SpRGMO85nALXj5WpkEu o3mVot9oeFoHxql6EOlr5x/GsCyLZ21MwJFy74iNt16L0/hb/IS6SrMcWroMt+BuPJ3q INnHECXPRw7RFlWtOD+eDfHSnn5jrh55uWZU4onXH7nhm8TMKah2EZfUrRf+q1+8Pb2Y tNpyQuSaHCC/Q7xUjbxwQBbjaMJGkMsmNdssin0/DCVzkjy2a2m7HnEs7w+0kjtJb010 7rIkl5bQjehyt5uOrehJtXbf7NLpfuMhUQJnXgLVEO1L9uze8a6iGdtgbyp++f+17gbi IfIQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkdw0L4lvtf5ftWbYoTPs9kBJNEyVFAzl9dYcGoivCcfh40rKdpLamHE//pp3W7IyQLdkHF X-Received: by 10.52.153.168 with SMTP id vh8mr39809183vdb.60.1427829554381; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 12:19:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.3.0.21] ([63.88.83.66]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id k10sm2521407vdi.18.2015.03.31.12.19.12 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 31 Mar 2015 12:19:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1427829555.3892.7.camel@hardenedbsd.org> Subject: Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0 From: Shawn Webb To: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 15:19:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20150331190323.GF30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20150331190323.GF30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Organization: HardenedBSD Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-o/MtVoTkUc7/Wutj888l" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.10-0ubuntu1~14.10.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: pkg@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 19:19:22 -0000 --=-o/MtVoTkUc7/Wutj888l Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 21:03 +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Hi all, >=20 > We just released pkg 1.5.0 beta1 (in ports-mgmt/pkg-devel), Hey Baptiste, Great work to you and all those involved in this project! I'm grateful to have such an awesome tool. For those of us who run our own package repos via Poudriere, what kinds of changes should we expect to make once pkg 1.5.0 is released? Do we need to do a full rebuild of our package repo? I'm also assuming that the upgrade path from 1.4.x to 1.5.0 will simply be as easy as running `pkg upgrade`, right? Thanks again for your hard work. Thanks, Shawn --=-o/MtVoTkUc7/Wutj888l Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCgAGBQJVGvMzAAoJEGqEZY9SRW7uaL8P/1GWA70SzZlXRhSKCHOtgeqk fvpB8lWQNpWWn2yywKNwYMjm1A/J0/xtd0gtsgumAjUbK0YnRt5exjSEWud7le7h eqo4uaFANMjAynIe0POyc7RNxlALgoA7wVe0Djg9oMAyPHvworuME0PRA9pjJbHU kjRVpAghEPWwxOEP2WcSANOK+tn3ciw3KmrwoGihh9K7oLSVxIvr8qyMhtmV4qfq pW8dON6V16pfrsXgob2UZfXwk9Lp9P58/uUjCpHX9bliSKuWv9bSdsVYFgmAC+7F 5YAtGAFwowcdNiXm80OTdfg4ts9FP4DtmniidXILgh2x0fC3FiXEka8Ipj5rx5rG 3Q0nGx0/PJPMez9dufV0X9hlm664Og3AQubc5K4W0FFLycwDzTnanBWjRxqsweHT fruqQFccVSZBcSsVQzpHZBW2mQAVc3sELNRjWRRrZYN957YdrXBJMzaovJ7Hkjge 2FPAns21D0HPIM1qdQKG/s3vSq6ddoX7qrYLszifffuUzEyqAHrPYxFRzPA36FMm jZJ813rZ/lwSX0nappSGve2TjQwYiApqzwLnUHPo/ogUg+W2IK00MwYzmgUTMWKp 7nBJyaRCUKyUm8EaE/laCYf4GCzyfbncJeL8et6aGq1JgdPoiDN2Dkw40hHvOf7W msRuOH2nIalzUkv2AADr =YEJA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-o/MtVoTkUc7/Wutj888l-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 31 19:20:36 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4B3F852; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 19:20:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.lifanov.com (mail.lifanov.com [206.125.175.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70F23884; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 19:20:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.lifanov.com (Postfix, from userid 58) id 310A41C9A29; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 15:11:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (vnat004.nandomedia.com [166.108.31.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.lifanov.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0238D1C87FC; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 15:11:46 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <551AF171.1040208@mail.lifanov.com> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 15:11:45 -0400 From: Nikolai Lifanov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Galera ports References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: spil.oss@gmail.com, horia@racoviceanu.com, ale@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 19:20:36 -0000 On 03/31/15 08:00, freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org wrote: > Hi! > I'm a bit surprised that we don't have ports for galera cluster. > I want to discuss about them a little bit. > > In short about galera and how it works (how I understand it): > it's a kind of cluster of MySQL-based DBs. They support MySQL, Percona > and MariaDB right now. > Web site http://galeracluster.com/. > ~Components: > 1. A special version of MySQL-based DB daemon, patched to work with > wsrep API. It can be MySQL Galera Cluster, Percona XtraDB Cluster or > MariaDB Galera CLuster. > 2. A common "plugin" for them all, which is plugged in through my.cnf. > It's called "Galera 3 wsrep provider library" usually. > 3. Arbitrator - a DB daemon without data to prevent split-brain and etc. > Cluster version of MySQL-based DB daemons are usually(always?) synced > with non-cluster regular versions. > > We have a port only for #2 now - databases/galera (which is useless in > such case, no?). > There is no port for #3 at all. > There are a couple of PRs to add #1 to ports tree, which were created > about a year ago. No progress since then. > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=galera. > > > However, I'd like to discuss about something. It's just my thoughts. > 1. As you can see those PRs are trying to add *-server and *-client > ports for each of clustered MySQL-based DBs (I know, not for Percona). > Is there any need to add another yet version of client? > What's a reason to make *-client ports? Because nothing depends on > *-server ports. > IMO we should use regular ports for clients and add only a server > part, as Linuxes does. For example, databases/mysql56-client for MySQL > Galera Cluster. In such case a lot of work to add a dependency for new > *-client is not needed. > 2. How *-server ports should be named? At first glance the obvious names are: > databases/mysql5[56]-galera-cluster > databases/percona5[56]-xtradb-cluster > databases/mariadb(55|100)-galera-cluster > Not bad, but what about the same names, but without (galera|xtradb) > word? Or without "cluster" word. > Like databases/mysql56-cluster next to databases/mysql56-server and > databases/mysql56-client. > > How do you think? I took a stab at this before: Percona XtraDB is the easiest to get working, since pre-patched sources are available from the same master site. The others need wsrep patches, which might not be sustainable to carry as separate ports. I would propose to add something like WSREP knob to existing mysql*-server ports that adds the extra patches and then make slaves with WSREP option selected. The Galera port proper was fixed not to crash on startup anymore in ports r373590, and I tested it as far as getting MySQL 5.6 cluster to start. I'm CC-ing relevant port maintainers to gauge the interest in adding an WSREP option to existing ports and creating slave ports with this option selected. This will make bsd.databases.mk less sprawly as well. Thoughts? - Nikolai Lifanov From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 31 19:23:23 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A48491F; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 19:23:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yh0-x234.google.com (mail-yh0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3350936; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 19:23:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhfw71 with SMTP id w71so6415754yhf.2; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 12:23:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Vy68YzEVUirPkMDLoYBQS7GpWKYZQ6gfk4duQF7L9C8=; b=IEzivNX80GwhKbMT5TpQlZJBye6gOm72fU9yUYlvWV5OxrnANfXJqVjQMHK8fjiJRE dY1loq9dVlvZVQInhUx5Q3RVPVJSuJe85A8kmEkC/kTjTW4NsT2p3aYhhpSG/hT+OeIq 4MUJWhyieLjSi2PuUL+uKfZPbK92cqnE8OQmuZPbThN2RnUx+9KlUw1sd8ILLMzq4MYd j6vkbquzM9WICgXtizAP1hXACfdJL0TRag1vfuseCJYHgQi1jQTh4pZiKRcl4NJiAOXd ThP1UiZRtOi9D5WnQastEchw1Axp42ihoxecsMTogACGkAWPllFd0PgmUo4RI95sAGYF xbhQ== X-Received: by 10.52.29.147 with SMTP id k19mr39765545vdh.56.1427829801812; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 12:23:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id d4sm2524080vdh.19.2015.03.31.12.23.19 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 31 Mar 2015 12:23:20 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 21:23:16 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Shawn Webb Subject: Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0 Message-ID: <20150331192315.GH30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20150331190323.GF30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <1427829555.3892.7.camel@hardenedbsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="JI+G0+mN8WmwPnOn" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1427829555.3892.7.camel@hardenedbsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: pkg@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 19:23:23 -0000 --JI+G0+mN8WmwPnOn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 03:19:15PM -0400, Shawn Webb wrote: > On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 21:03 +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > Hi all, > >=20 > > We just released pkg 1.5.0 beta1 (in ports-mgmt/pkg-devel), >=20 > Hey Baptiste, >=20 > Great work to you and all those involved in this project! I'm grateful > to have such an awesome tool. >=20 > For those of us who run our own package repos via Poudriere, what kinds > of changes should we expect to make once pkg 1.5.0 is released? Do we > need to do a full rebuild of our package repo? I'm also assuming that > the upgrade path from 1.4.x to 1.5.0 will simply be as easy as running > `pkg upgrade`, right? >=20 > Thanks again for your hard work. >=20 Add WITH_PKG=3Ddevel in your build make.conf then pkg upgrade will want you to upgrade to 1.4.99.16 (which is pkg 1.5.0 beta1) Best regards, Bapt --JI+G0+mN8WmwPnOn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlUa9CMACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EysoACfaDu+CsBJOmoge39tU0JHNF40 qHUAn1cU0+JaE5/GLU0SBjrW60fQmBx/ =Z7aK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --JI+G0+mN8WmwPnOn-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 31 22:31:09 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64E52D89 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 22:31:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x236.google.com (mail-ig0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2795C263 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 22:31:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igcau2 with SMTP id au2so32426117igc.0 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 15:31:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=F7hGbeE3ej4yIq1bCqHduhO6dKV6UEPGoZ9L88Uo0aU=; b=w3x9a1bugMJmhhQFvMdv/6r4SnRLDB4PbnpW93PHyUEAdTttysK5DVXmbcLJSZkk3+ /+Mw543uPc+jOp2cEu/6NGiQsbpJoxh+1S0ActFdTf7vDDZHiQJSOvDJrvH5dgJjdGZY VJM6Y6HUGdlrqiL4h7FwO0MVnBoNiATBIb8AYALKAkBdTiqZmTvbce4QkHgMDNRvcjOI kBQHRIt107yEQFcirtf28B0AEgQm4ULAZtmIhRKx6qgyWXhL5ilPewQnFxPB330Du1Mc vE1vhiNDEXtSE65zFbBmqkfYS8VEYVkf+FmOvIPa+z8IlMM7fKYz5DiJXaCQ9cdAmrni jI8w== X-Received: by 10.50.97.41 with SMTP id dx9mr7769503igb.1.1427841068488; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 15:31:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Ben Woods Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 22:31:08 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Update editors/abiword to 3.0.1 To: Gleb Popov <6yearold@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 22:31:09 -0000 Thanks for the feedback Gleb. I am compiling with clang 3.4.1 in FreeBSD 10.1 base. I have since spoken to an Abiword developer, who kindly helped me fix this issue with the following patch (which I will include in the PR I will submit to update this port): diff --git a/src/text/ptbl/xp/pd_DocumentRDF.cpp b/src/text/ptbl/xp/pd_DocumentRDF.cpp index 798e262..3406b88 100644 --- a/src/text/ptbl/xp/pd_DocumentRDF.cpp +++ b/src/text/ptbl/xp/pd_DocumentRDF.cpp @@ -570,6 +570,11 @@ bool PD_URI::operator==(const std::string& b) const return m_value == b; } +bool PD_URI::operator<(const PD_URI& b) const +{ + return m_value < b.m_value; +} + PD_URI PD_URI::prefixedToURI( PD_RDFModelHandle model ) const { @@ -611,11 +616,6 @@ bool PD_URI::write( std::ostream& ss ) const return true; } -bool operator<( PD_URI a, PD_URI b) -{ - return a.toString() < b.toString(); -} - bool operator<( std::pair< PD_URI, PD_URI > a, PD_URI b) { return a.first.toString() < b.toString(); diff --git a/src/text/ptbl/xp/pd_DocumentRDF.h b/src/text/ptbl/xp/pd_DocumentRDF.h index 66e9fd6..3e6b8ef 100644 --- a/src/text/ptbl/xp/pd_DocumentRDF.h +++ b/src/text/ptbl/xp/pd_DocumentRDF.h @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ class ABI_EXPORT PD_URI bool isValid() const; bool operator==(const PD_URI& b) const; bool operator==(const std::string& b) const; + bool operator<(const PD_URI& b) const; virtual bool read( std::istream& ss ); virtual bool write( std::ostream& ss ) const; Regards, Ben On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 2:22 AM Gleb Popov <6yearold@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Ben Woods wrote: > >> I am trying to update editors/abiword from 2.8.6 to 3.0.1. >> >> Part way through compiling my new test port, I get the following errors: >> >> gmake[7]: Entering directory >> '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/editors/abiword/work/abiword-3.0.1/src/text/fmt/xp' >> CXX fl_Squiggles.lo >> CXX fb_Alignment.lo >> In file included from fb_Alignment.cpp:22: >> ./fb_Alignment.h:114:8: warning: private field 'm_iSpaceCountLeft' is >> not used [-Wunused-private-field] >> int m_iSpaceCountLeft; >> ^ >> ./fb_Alignment.h:115:8: warning: private field 'm_iSpaceCount' is not >> used [-Wunused-private-field] >> int m_iSpaceCount; >> ^ >> 2 warnings generated. >> CXX fb_ColumnBreaker.lo >> In file included from fb_ColumnBreaker.cpp:22: >> ./fb_ColumnBreaker.h:53:24: warning: private field 'm_pCurrentBlock' >> is not used [-Wunused-private-field] >> fl_BlockLayout * m_pCurrentBlock; >> ^ >> 1 warning generated. >> CXX fb_LineBreaker.lo >> CXX fg_Graphic.lo >> CXX fg_GraphicRaster.lo >> CXX fg_GraphicVector.lo >> CXX fl_AutoLists.lo >> CXX fl_AutoNum.lo >> CXX fl_BlockLayout.lo >> CXX fl_ContainerLayout.lo >> CXX fl_DocLayout.lo >> CXX fl_DocListener.lo >> CXX fl_FootnoteLayout.lo >> CXX fl_FrameLayout.lo >> CXX fl_Layout.lo >> CXX fl_SectionLayout.lo >> CXX fl_SelectionPreserver.lo >> CXX fl_TableLayout.lo >> CXX fl_TestRoutines.lo >> CXX fl_TOCLayout.lo >> In file included from fl_TOCLayout.cpp:32: >> ./fl_TOCLayout.h:82:20: warning: private field 'm_iStartAt' is not >> used [-Wunused-private-field] >> UT_sint32 m_iStartAt; >> ^ >> 1 warning generated. >> CXX fp_AnnotationRun.lo >> CXX fp_RDFAnchorRun.lo >> In file included from fp_RDFAnchorRun.cpp:23: >> In file included from ./fp_Run.h:33: >> In file included from ../../../../src/af/util/xp/ut_misc.h:39: >> In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/string:439: >> In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/algorithm:627: >> In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/memory:601: >> /usr/include/c++/v1/__functional_base:63:21: error: invalid operands >> to binary expression ('const PD_URI' and 'const PD_URI') >> {return __x < __y;} >> ~~~ ^ ~~~ >> /usr/include/c++/v1/map:457:17: note: in instantiation of member >> function 'std::__1::less::operator()' requested here >> {return static_cast(*this)(__x.__cc.first, >> __y.__cc.first);} >> ^ >> /usr/include/c++/v1/__tree:1573:29: note: in instantiation of member >> function 'std::__1::__map_value_compare> std::__1::__value_type, std::__1::less, >> true>::operator()' requested here >> if (__hint == end() || !value_comp()(*__hint, __v)) // check before >> ^ >> /usr/include/c++/v1/__tree:1912:36: note: in instantiation of member >> function 'std::__1::__tree, >> std::__1::__map_value_compare> PD_Object>, std::__1::less, true>, >> std::__1::allocator > >> >::__find_leaf' requested here >> __node_base_pointer& __child = __find_leaf(__p, __parent, __v); >> ^ >> /usr/include/c++/v1/map:1779:25: note: in instantiation of member >> function 'std::__1::__tree, >> std::__1::__map_value_compare> PD_Object>, std::__1::less, true>, >> std::__1::allocator > >> >::__insert_multi' requested here >> __tree_.__insert_multi(__e.__i_, *__f); >> ^ >> /usr/include/c++/v1/map:1612:13: note: in instantiation of function >> template specialization 'std::__1::multimap> std::__1::less, std::__1::allocator> PD_URI, PD_Object> > >> >> >::insert> PD_Object>, std::__1::__tree_node> PD_Object>, void *> *, long> > >' requested here >> insert(__m.begin(), __m.end()); >> ^ >> ../../../../src/text/ptbl/xp/pd_DocumentRDF.h:198:18: note: in >> instantiation of member function 'std::__1::multimap> PD_Object, std::__1::less, >> std::__1::allocator > >> >::multimap' requested here >> class ABI_EXPORT PD_RDFModelIterator >> ^ >> ../../../../src/af/util/xp/ut_string_class.h:124:17: note: candidate >> function not viable: no known conversion from 'const PD_URI' to 'const >> UT_String' for 1st argument >> ABI_EXPORT bool operator<(const UT_String& s1, const UT_String& s2); >> ^ >> ../../../../src/af/util/xp/ut_string_class.h:277:17: note: candidate >> function not viable: no known conversion from 'const PD_URI' to 'const >> UT_UTF8String' for 1st argument >> ABI_EXPORT bool operator<(const UT_UTF8String& s1, const UT_UTF8String& >> s2); >> ^ >> ../../../../src/af/util/xp/ut_string_class.h:394:6: note: candidate >> function not viable: no known conversion from 'const PD_URI' to 'const >> UT_UCS4String' for 1st argument >> bool operator<(const UT_UCS4String& s1, const UT_UCS4String& s2); >> ^ >> /usr/include/c++/v1/utility:419:1: note: candidate template ignored: >> could not match 'pair' against >> 'const PD_URI' >> operator< (const pair<_T1,_T2>& __x, const pair<_T1,_T2>& __y) >> ^ >> /usr/include/c++/v1/iterator:582:1: note: candidate template ignored: >> could not match 'reverse_iterator' against 'const >> PD_URI' >> operator<(const reverse_iterator<_Iter1>& __x, const >> reverse_iterator<_Iter2>& __y) >> ^ >> /usr/include/c++/v1/iterator:977:1: note: candidate template ignored: >> could not match 'move_iterator' against 'const >> PD_URI' >> operator<(const move_iterator<_Iter1>& __x, const move_iterator<_Iter2>& >> __y) >> ^ >> /usr/include/c++/v1/iterator:1293:1: note: candidate template ignored: >> could not match '__wrap_iter' against 'const >> PD_URI' >> operator<(const __wrap_iter<_Iter1>& __x, const __wrap_iter<_Iter2>& >> __y) _NOEXCEPT >> ^ >> 1 error generated. >> Makefile:823: recipe for target 'fp_RDFAnchorRun.lo' failed >> gmake[7]: *** [fp_RDFAnchorRun.lo] Error 1 >> gmake[7]: Leaving directory >> '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/editors/abiword/work/abiword-3.0.1/src/text/fmt/xp' >> Makefile:842: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed >> gmake[6]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 >> gmake[6]: Leaving directory >> '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/editors/abiword/work/abiword-3.0.1/src/text/fmt/xp' >> Makefile:529: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed >> gmake[5]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 >> gmake[5]: Leaving directory >> '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/editors/abiword/work/abiword-3.0.1/src/text/fmt' >> Makefile:528: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed >> gmake[4]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 >> gmake[4]: Leaving directory >> '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/editors/abiword/work/abiword-3.0.1/src/text' >> Makefile:1157: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed >> gmake[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 >> gmake[3]: Leaving directory >> '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/editors/abiword/work/abiword-3.0.1/src' >> Makefile:774: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed >> gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 >> gmake[2]: Leaving directory >> '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/editors/abiword/work/abiword-3.0.1' >> Makefile:593: recipe for target 'all' failed >> gmake[1]: *** [all] Error 2 >> gmake[1]: Leaving directory >> '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/editors/abiword/work/abiword-3.0.1' >> *** Error code 1 >> >> Stop. >> make: stopped in /usr/ports/editors/abiword >> >> >> Is this an issue with the new C++ stack libc++ referring to the std::__1 >> namespace, not just std::, as explained at the link below? >> https://wiki.freebsd.org/NewC++Stack >> >> Regards, >> Ben >> > _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > Nope, the error is that there is no operator< for operands with types > ('const PD_URI' and 'const PD_URI'). They, probably, should be implicitly > casted to something else, but something goes wrong. What compiler are you > building with? > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 00:24:49 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82334F4B; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 00:24:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x22a.google.com (mail-ie0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4450DFCD; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 00:24:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iedfl3 with SMTP id fl3so34223702ied.1; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 17:24:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Zk+wc4diuCUDiVULFZk3aTtcfrvO2o1JwNyHJAPxaSA=; b=A/mUCE9xkFJtLAzrSwhW/5ecSAeAaXsaGZtPJ5898yxK3TCw8uxcEdHyhS+p9MtG4k MK12JbooX4l8dDRCycywOMDcE2HUfLq2DTAkD6xd0mf9tcXxz/XhNcq0QikXewsTRK5e Z8bC/t8yotYLHcnNGMkMV5ga+MeqJFu5O8Wsul/GMF3vQ4/C8t1C1i8G+OLyvo1yNKdA 7uIWPX5nqUt62tADTH98qidRKdq/ubI6uJSB2CqwhmOl9kEO5g4RnMLAVzDBJpQec0Ec G94p06wVS/oCv2nH9mWghAvgiQH9nBJA/iwQ8rGqoXRipdne48zO1woxtVil8ELuEexF vG7A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.43.95.5 with SMTP id ca5mr35851755icc.33.1427847888583; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 17:24:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.21.130 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 17:24:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150331192315.GH30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20150331190323.GF30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <1427829555.3892.7.camel@hardenedbsd.org> <20150331192315.GH30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 02:24:48 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0 From: Sergei Vyshenski To: Baptiste Daroussin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: pkg@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, Shawn Webb X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 00:24:49 -0000 Hi, On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Add WITH_PKG=devel in your build make.conf > then pkg upgrade will want you to upgrade to 1.4.99.16 (which is pkg 1.5.0 > beta1) > This does not work for me. # cat /etc/make.conf |grep PKG WITH_PKGNG=yes WITH_PKG=devel # pkg upgrade Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. Checking for upgrades (218 candidates): 100% Processing candidates (218 candidates): 100% Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) Your packages are up to date. # pkg -v 1.4.12 # pkg info |grep pkg pkg-1.4.12 Package manager Instead, the following succeded: # cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg-devel # make reinstall ... # pkg -v 1.4.99.16 All the best, Sergei From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 04:03:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 201C1D9B; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 04:03:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from st11p02mm-asmtp001.mac.com (st11p02mm-asmtpout001.mac.com [17.172.220.236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64D64D85; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 04:03:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fukuyama.hsd1.ca.comcast.net (c-73-162-13-215.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.162.13.215]) by st11p02mm-asmtp001.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.35.0 64bit (built Dec 4 2014)) with ESMTPSA id <0NM400F1D0MC1H40@st11p02mm-asmtp001.mac.com>; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 04:03:51 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.13.68,1.0.33,0.0.0000 definitions=2015-04-01_02:2015-03-31,2015-04-01,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1412110000 definitions=main-1504010039 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) Subject: Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0 From: Rui Paulo In-reply-to: Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 21:03:48 -0700 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Message-id: References: <20150331190323.GF30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <1427829555.3892.7.camel@hardenedbsd.org> <20150331192315.GH30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> To: Sergei Vyshenski X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) Cc: pkg@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin , current@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, Shawn Webb , ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 04:03:59 -0000 On Mar 31, 2015, at 17:24, Sergei Vyshenski = wrote: > Instead, the following succeded: > # cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg-devel > # make reinstall > ... > # pkg -v > 1.4.99.16 That is expected. WITH_PKG=3Ddevel is a make(1) option that only = affects ports (non-binary pkgs). -- Rui Paulo From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 04:29:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3F39253 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 04:29:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x233.google.com (mail-ie0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A737CF63 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 04:29:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iedm5 with SMTP id m5so33840417ied.3 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 21:29:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Cp6v9b3XJG0YsSnaNWXEnlPx1OmEKgBJcG9bs2yCBPQ=; b=M/Wp8n2P+MwtoHxnXoCKX1uInbyehYRNXC9jS5TaTFkqC9MyMPYj/3kA3CDDVRfgSm HffLP/hY4kZzW1QKjRU/zzcoYx6EHNyx1/qsF+iuOapWlSELOECCTlZub+oegXXti+3/ uL87o1EhtYF757clf2L8d6ImVgLB/qH1AvKjHJdOO/dtORzy+EvKJsqRrVv4SKJsD3nE 7FZCiMdp3lC0AeNrRTarzTwWRpj9iB5VymsWazW+n1J8KNuwK6vmcmLIj6mWHge2nB2o jaF+79GEt4Mp/SA0sC6MlO7xhQ3RFVrWcFZsrUMk9we06rqPtTsB5Mria/DGggtlpDpK VRhw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.33.136 with SMTP id h130mr61097583ioh.54.1427862546114; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 21:29:06 -0700 (PDT) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.107.174.86 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 21:29:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <551AEBD1.8050307@rawbw.com> References: <551AEBD1.8050307@rawbw.com> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 21:29:06 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Qo7nHO4WQZx0CfPCZD0l1ZjdpXU Message-ID: Subject: Re: Replacing vlc with vlc-qt4 broke pkg upgrade From: Kevin Oberman To: Yuri Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "ports@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 04:29:07 -0000 On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Yuri wrote: > Few days ago vlc was replaced with vlc->qt4. I rebuilt all packages from > my ports tree with poudriere, tried to 'pkg upgrade', and pkg fails to > handle this: > > All repositories are up-to-date. > Checking for upgrades (28 candidates): 100% > Processing candidates (28 candidates): 100% > Checking integrity... done (1 conflicting) > pkg: Cannot solve problem using SAT solver: > conflict rule: The following packages conflict with each other: > vlc-2.2.0_3,4(r), vlc-qt4-2.2.0_3,4(r) > dependency rule: package vlc(r) depends on: vlc(l)phonon-vlc(l) > conflict rule: The following packages conflict with each other: > vlc-2.2.0_3,4(r), vlc-2.2.0_3,4(r) > upgrade rule: upgrade local vlc-2.2.0_2,4 to remote vlc-2.2.0_3,4 > cannot install package vlc, remove it from request? [Y/n]: > > vlc is installed as automatic. Shouldn't pkg uderstand that vlc and vlc-qt > are counterparts and should be substituted? > > There is no /usr/ports/UPDATING record for this. Is think such record > should be added if pkg can't handle this. Or what is the solution? > > Yuri > > I don't see any information that vlc-qt4 has replaced vlc. It is just a version of vlc that will build using the old version of Qt. If you update vlc, it will install the required Qt5 ports. If you wish to stick to Qt4, you must tel the package system to replace vlc with vlc-qt4. I believe that the correct way to do this: % pkg set -o multimedia/vlc:multimedia/vlc-qt4 % pkg install multimedia/vlc-qt4 -- Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 05:54:44 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C88F5B7 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 05:54:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shell1.rawbw.com (shell1.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C6E2BF for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 05:54:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from yuri.doctorlan.com (c-50-184-63-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.184.63.128]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t315shGZ094937 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 31 Mar 2015 22:54:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host c-50-184-63-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.184.63.128] claimed to be yuri.doctorlan.com Message-ID: <551B8821.9040004@rawbw.com> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 22:54:41 -0700 From: Yuri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Replacing vlc with vlc-qt4 broke pkg upgrade References: <551AEBD1.8050307@rawbw.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Kevin Oberman X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 05:54:44 -0000 On 03/31/2015 21:29, Kevin Oberman wrote: > I don't see any information that vlc-qt4 has replaced vlc. It is just a > version of vlc that will build using the old version of Qt. If you update > vlc, it will install the required Qt5 ports. vlc in my case is an automatic dependency of multimedia/phonon-vlc which was recently switched to vlc-qt4. In such case 'pkg upgrade' should automatically delete vlc and install vlc-qt4, but pkg fails instead. Yuri From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 06:54:55 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11D8CB85 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 06:54:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (cl-1657.chi-02.us.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:4978:f:678::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6BF7AD1 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 06:54:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2]) by gw.catspoiler.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id t316sjih002139 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 22:54:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201504010654.t316sjih002139@gw.catspoiler.org> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 23:54:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Lewis Subject: github tags containing "/" To: ports@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 06:54:55 -0000 I'm working on a couple of new ports where I'm using fetching the distfiles from github. One quirk is that the tags start with a prefix of "tags/v". I'm setting PKGNAMEPREFIX=${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}. If I follow the example for in the Porters Handbook using DISTVERSIONPREFIX=tags/v then the distfile gets named ${PORTNAME}-tags/v${PORTVERSION}_GH0.tar.gz, which seems somewhat undesirable. This seems to be a bit misleading and risky because this port is just a python wrapper around another library that also has the same PORTNAME. That port hasn't been converted to fetch from github, and when it does it seems like there would be a chance of collisions. I seem to get better results by setting GH_TAGNAME=tags/v${PORTVERSION}. In that case, the distfile gets named ${GH_ACCOUNT}-${GH_PROJECT}-${PORTVERSION}-tags-v${PORTVERSION}_GH0.tar.gz. This seems to be excessively verbose, but safer. Thoughts? From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 07:00:04 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C867ED67 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 07:00:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FB9BB52 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 07:00:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t31704d8043602 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 07:00:04 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from bdrewery@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t31704BB043599 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 07:00:04 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery) Received: (qmail 7576 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2015 02:00:02 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.10.1.139?) (freebsd@shatow.net@10.10.1.139) by sweb.xzibition.com with ESMTPA; 1 Apr 2015 02:00:02 -0500 Message-ID: <551B977F.1030809@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 02:00:15 -0500 From: Bryan Drewery Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Don Lewis , ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: github tags containing "/" References: <201504010654.t316sjih002139@gw.catspoiler.org> In-Reply-To: <201504010654.t316sjih002139@gw.catspoiler.org> OpenPGP: id=6E4697CF; url=http://www.shatow.net/bryan/bryan2.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="D7nD1KUAtxmKob1k0T4rF1Pc0APotxXue" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 07:00:04 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --D7nD1KUAtxmKob1k0T4rF1Pc0APotxXue Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 4/1/2015 1:54 AM, Don Lewis wrote: > I'm working on a couple of new ports where I'm using fetching the > distfiles from github. One quirk is that the tags start with a prefix > of "tags/v". I'm setting PKGNAMEPREFIX=3D${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}. >=20 > If I follow the example for in the Porters Handbook using > DISTVERSIONPREFIX=3Dtags/v then the distfile gets named > ${PORTNAME}-tags/v${PORTVERSION}_GH0.tar.gz, > which seems somewhat undesirable. This seems to be a bit misleading > and risky because this port is just a python wrapper around another > library that also has the same PORTNAME. That port hasn't been > converted to fetch from github, and when it does it seems like there > would be a chance of collisions. >=20 > I seem to get better results by setting GH_TAGNAME=3Dtags/v${PORTVERSIO= N}. > In that case, the distfile gets named > ${GH_ACCOUNT}-${GH_PROJECT}-${PORTVERSION}-tags-v${PORTVERSION}_GH0.tar= =2Egz. > This seems to be excessively verbose, but safer. >=20 > Thoughts? >=20 Can you please be more specific on what port this is and possibly provide a patch? --=20 Regards, Bryan Drewery --D7nD1KUAtxmKob1k0T4rF1Pc0APotxXue Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVG5d/AAoJEDXXcbtuRpfPjt4H/2UAHF91EjSUJ91x7wyuWvEo RyfrP37uJTBKmsqH3m8RMCagTm0a0g49QDoeWuMiaSLOMXlZCxRLouV9h3uMuHsO HISu7HexH2yz/6NBYBZrmh5RYF2WXAcFzv9sFLXnO2IJEuh20+6QwcX9yRZml5AD LPL3bYomQPIXJiPOP6jC0DNpr3SFEyBvfuciy3KIGyx+Sst+ji1FFEbajvMYHpRy lqScQQl0+/gE/fOVG33Wv3kr4fRsVZj+vEt5egciJ27ea2T4UmVWQHPLU6thVIlA WG2oQ2t21IU1kymqdIJH0bRVdJE0N+tY5X2WZTA9o+gy1DZPnb8ZN2kPc0kBsOg= =T+NN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --D7nD1KUAtxmKob1k0T4rF1Pc0APotxXue-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 07:13:28 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 718101A5; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 07:13:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (cl-1657.chi-02.us.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:4978:f:678::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00F06D1A; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 07:13:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2]) by gw.catspoiler.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id t317DJCX002188; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 23:13:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201504010713.t317DJCX002188@gw.catspoiler.org> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 00:13:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Lewis Subject: Re: github tags containing "/" To: bdrewery@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <551B977F.1030809@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 07:13:28 -0000 On 1 Apr, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 4/1/2015 1:54 AM, Don Lewis wrote: >> I'm working on a couple of new ports where I'm using fetching the >> distfiles from github. One quirk is that the tags start with a prefix >> of "tags/v". I'm setting PKGNAMEPREFIX=${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}. >> >> If I follow the example for in the Porters Handbook using >> DISTVERSIONPREFIX=tags/v then the distfile gets named >> ${PORTNAME}-tags/v${PORTVERSION}_GH0.tar.gz, >> which seems somewhat undesirable. This seems to be a bit misleading >> and risky because this port is just a python wrapper around another >> library that also has the same PORTNAME. That port hasn't been >> converted to fetch from github, and when it does it seems like there >> would be a chance of collisions. >> >> I seem to get better results by setting GH_TAGNAME=tags/v${PORTVERSION}. >> In that case, the distfile gets named >> ${GH_ACCOUNT}-${GH_PROJECT}-${PORTVERSION}-tags-v${PORTVERSION}_GH0.tar.gz. >> This seems to be excessively verbose, but safer. >> >> Thoughts? >> > > Can you please be more specific on what port this is and possibly > provide a patch? The ports aren't in the tree yet. This is the Makefile for one of them: # $FreeBSD$ PORTNAME= wdns PORTVERSION= 0.6.0 #DISTVERSIONPREFIX= tags/v CATEGORIES= dns python PKGNAMEPREFIX= ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX} MAINTAINER= truckman@FreeBSD.org COMMENT= Python wrapper for dns/wdns LICENSE= APACHE20 BUILD_DEPENDS= cython:${PORTSDIR}/lang/cython LIB_DEPENDS= libwdns.so:${PORTSDIR}/dns/wdns USE_GITHUB= yes GH_ACCOUNT= farsightsec GH_PROJECT= pywdns GH_TAGNAME= tags/v${PORTVERSION} USE_PYTHON= distutils autoplist USES= pkgconfig python post-patch: ${REINPLACE_CMD} -e "1s+ python+ ${PYTHON_CMD}+" ${WRKSRC}/setup.py ${REINPLACE_CMD} -e "1s+ python+ ${PYTHON_CMD}+" ${WRKSRC}/gen_pywdns_constants .include From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 07:19:33 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 406F72AD for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 07:19:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.made4.biz (mail.made4.biz [IPv6:2001:41d0:2:c018::1:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01FA9D52 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 07:19:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 2a02-8428-011b-e000-0290-f5ff-fe9d-b78c.rev.sfr.net ([2a02:8428:11b:e000:290:f5ff:fe9d:b78c] helo=magellan.dumbbell.fr) by mail.made4.biz with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.85 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YdCvz-000PZy-0Z for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 09:19:31 +0200 Message-ID: <551B9BFD.2030604@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 09:19:25 +0200 From: =?windows-1252?Q?Jean-S=E9bastien_P=E9dron?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0 References: <20150331190323.GF30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20150331190323.GF30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sArww0MiOSxWbnqRmERqxsGxCGdopiS9O" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 07:19:33 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --sArww0MiOSxWbnqRmERqxsGxCGdopiS9O Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 31.03.2015 21:03, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > - pkg has grown with an initial support for provides/requires: this is = a naive > version but good enough to at least make major upgrade of php safer a= s well as > making pear/pecl maintenance saner (note that this will need modifica= tions in > the ports tree) Thank you! --=20 Jean-S=E9bastien P=E9dron --sArww0MiOSxWbnqRmERqxsGxCGdopiS9O Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVG5wCXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NzA4N0ZEMUFFQUUwRTEyREJDNkE2RjAz OUU5OTc2MUE1RkQ5NENDAAoJEDnpl2Gl/ZTMJk8QAIWi3eEhxTK/JUzm5sSXG9JV dc+IGxvJsid8v8uzzMdH6EkuOLnWSd/yH3W0ZEtbjKOYhsQmuCtRgp/z6Q15hhF5 +V6+wvtsBgkd7m6SzJ0HwWBIMDQisLVhczWqGYSi9U4SAPrwgdt/rXXJGs60oJLt LaQI3pPtIwxt/trAaJFhRBLnZMC73wrHWQ4xFaDYmSI4fv0RL3ea4t0SruZcJQ2b 4Xsy3ISDroC+Gl0DBUrZAmW0CjyUr6GTVv2K5gc1WlVsVG8nu+6siNHE2voS/5or /t1AeRKRSqOwUKfJ4qirw8q1nqv+0y/NXJ2Ef71ju8N0hqgo/Kmli6FgoY4RAfKp tsI5IL6Bcml/rktescNUETTsRYUrP7UBhsw8LoZXIxeBUT1jhM5CfcVl15h0vQpV 79rDe9Hk0awc5b6KedQkSIa63pG5cmA23Yl1Dek2NG427+t/yFwGt3p8boy8pGo6 6MYt4K/SlApsDJPjHfsnBGkIB2y1OhMn5jPxzhRffsidjeDZ2iZ7DpNjlZ36xDIl 2kUcfmTzThOKU/YQOKVlIegpeP+yKdCFnvIIu0fFUGutGVnyM7C0KOK51wgjVhcm oUTow9WEAm0snxqoHtMjKrtRHT1dMPBGnaqoy586cPXyxMckIXPx0KfkO3eMllx1 plE+/9BPnf8Bi3HoF294 =Mq9w -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sArww0MiOSxWbnqRmERqxsGxCGdopiS9O-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 07:24:12 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 338F73A6 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 07:24:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15291E18 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 07:24:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t317OBlT053655 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 07:24:11 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from bdrewery@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t317OBKo053652 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 07:24:11 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery) Received: (qmail 4475 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2015 02:24:07 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.10.1.139?) (freebsd@shatow.net@10.10.1.139) by sweb.xzibition.com with ESMTPA; 1 Apr 2015 02:24:07 -0500 Message-ID: <551B9D24.5060200@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 02:24:20 -0500 From: Bryan Drewery Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Don Lewis Subject: Re: github tags containing "/" References: <201504010713.t317DJCX002188@gw.catspoiler.org> In-Reply-To: <201504010713.t317DJCX002188@gw.catspoiler.org> OpenPGP: id=6E4697CF; url=http://www.shatow.net/bryan/bryan2.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="n0VTrIOXOhKGgsLFVxeOj5RhEAigmHR0X" Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 07:24:12 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --n0VTrIOXOhKGgsLFVxeOj5RhEAigmHR0X Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 4/1/2015 2:13 AM, Don Lewis wrote: > On 1 Apr, Bryan Drewery wrote: >> On 4/1/2015 1:54 AM, Don Lewis wrote: >>> I'm working on a couple of new ports where I'm using fetching the >>> distfiles from github. One quirk is that the tags start with a prefi= x >>> of "tags/v". I'm setting PKGNAMEPREFIX=3D${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}. Wow it really has 'tags/' in the tags and 'branches/' in the branches. It has to be a bad conversion from SVN. Anyway it is intended to be supported fine... >>> >>> If I follow the example for in the Porters Handbook using >>> DISTVERSIONPREFIX=3Dtags/v then the distfile gets named >>> ${PORTNAME}-tags/v${PORTVERSION}_GH0.tar.gz, >>> which seems somewhat undesirable. This seems to be a bit misleading >>> and risky because this port is just a python wrapper around another >>> library that also has the same PORTNAME. That port hasn't been >>> converted to fetch from github, and when it does it seems like there >>> would be a chance of collisions. >>> >>> I seem to get better results by setting GH_TAGNAME=3Dtags/v${PORTVERS= ION}. >>> In that case, the distfile gets named >>> ${GH_ACCOUNT}-${GH_PROJECT}-${PORTVERSION}-tags-v${PORTVERSION}_GH0.t= ar.gz. >>> This seems to be excessively verbose, but safer. Just use GH_TAGNAME=3Dtags/v${PORTVERSION} for now. The DISTVERSIONPREFIX is supposed to work in this case as well. I'll look into it tomorrow. It is likely the same as https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D199069 which I realized earlier today. The DISTNAME you see is intentionally verbose so it is unique and avoids rerolled checksums on account/project renames or PORTVERSION changes or github-specific rerolls. It is intended to stand out as a GITHUB-generated file so it is not confused with other distributed files.= The DISTVERSIONPREFIX _not_ producing the same filename is a bug. --=20 Regards, Bryan Drewery --n0VTrIOXOhKGgsLFVxeOj5RhEAigmHR0X Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVG50kAAoJEDXXcbtuRpfPxeAH/RyiwwIg6TJQOshd2NYLaqoE rxgpmitaEwFjCrNFmecZ1vXCwWfOQtWZcx9LFZabQnXCwEUGaV2P52UbusA5YDav fs5c9KH3I+WdJHAyU/mNW0RR4HeTW4ZEUspejyHrlf9Gmf1TZRn6YIwiJGmkFqjY r0BtoyHsgq5HvEuUO9kfVH2sW3MOWnVHBK+TiIh23lLCl9qgyHleM4jl6M613WAq l30SZbjP0BINUsQkKXTgLcElJ/POSKSln0etGwG6mh5DyWs0/j++RIBVXP02FJIN aLAP5fRtIrOVxm2hsAz/piHtJaFkw/GVINEAYu8JlayHRpqpQ3sovxusgaiePp4= =23ja -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --n0VTrIOXOhKGgsLFVxeOj5RhEAigmHR0X-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 07:30:35 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9810A493; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 07:30:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (cl-1657.chi-02.us.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:4978:f:678::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27F44EC6; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 07:30:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2]) by gw.catspoiler.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id t317UQTX002225; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 23:30:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201504010730.t317UQTX002225@gw.catspoiler.org> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 00:30:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Lewis Subject: Re: github tags containing "/" To: bdrewery@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <551B9D24.5060200@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 07:30:35 -0000 On 1 Apr, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 4/1/2015 2:13 AM, Don Lewis wrote: >> On 1 Apr, Bryan Drewery wrote: >>> On 4/1/2015 1:54 AM, Don Lewis wrote: >>>> I'm working on a couple of new ports where I'm using fetching the >>>> distfiles from github. One quirk is that the tags start with a prefix >>>> of "tags/v". I'm setting PKGNAMEPREFIX=${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}. > > Wow it really has 'tags/' in the tags and 'branches/' in the branches. > It has to be a bad conversion from SVN. Anyway it is intended to be > supported fine... Yeah, trying to get "make fetch" working was quite entertaining. >>>> >>>> If I follow the example for in the Porters Handbook using >>>> DISTVERSIONPREFIX=tags/v then the distfile gets named >>>> ${PORTNAME}-tags/v${PORTVERSION}_GH0.tar.gz, >>>> which seems somewhat undesirable. This seems to be a bit misleading >>>> and risky because this port is just a python wrapper around another >>>> library that also has the same PORTNAME. That port hasn't been >>>> converted to fetch from github, and when it does it seems like there >>>> would be a chance of collisions. >>>> >>>> I seem to get better results by setting GH_TAGNAME=tags/v${PORTVERSION}. >>>> In that case, the distfile gets named >>>> ${GH_ACCOUNT}-${GH_PROJECT}-${PORTVERSION}-tags-v${PORTVERSION}_GH0.tar.gz. >>>> This seems to be excessively verbose, but safer. > > Just use GH_TAGNAME=tags/v${PORTVERSION} for now. Ok, will do. > The DISTVERSIONPREFIX is supposed to work in this case as well. I'll > look into it tomorrow. > > It is likely the same as > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199069 which I > realized earlier today. > > The DISTNAME you see is intentionally verbose so it is unique and avoids > rerolled checksums on account/project renames or PORTVERSION changes or > github-specific rerolls. It is intended to stand out as a > GITHUB-generated file so it is not confused with other distributed files. > > The DISTVERSIONPREFIX _not_ producing the same filename is a bug. Thanks! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 08:17:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4BC7C59 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 08:17:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.port22.net (berlin197.port22.net [217.172.180.128]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.port22.net", Issuer "AlphaSSL CA - SHA256 - G2" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6504A373 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 08:17:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.port22.net (agora.port22.net [10.0.0.100]) by mail.port22.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t3189YmO074413 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 10:09:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas@port22.net) Received: (from andreas@localhost) by agora.port22.net (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t3189YPK074412 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 10:09:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas@port22.net) X-Authentication-Warning: agora.port22.net: andreas set sender to andreas@port22.net using -f Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 10:09:34 +0200 From: Andreas Obermaier To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: boinc-client dependencies Message-ID: <20150401080934.GF31042@agora.port22.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 08:17:07 -0000 Hello port maintainers, I use boinc-client on 10.1-RELEASE-p6. I found that at least one MilkyWay@Home task needs libstdc++.so.6, so I had install lang/gcc to make it work. Mabye it makes sense to add lang/gcc as a dependency for boinc-client or just add a note that some BOINC projects or project tasks might require it. Thanks for your time. Best regards, Andreas Obermaier From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 09:15:33 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F7BD66D for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 09:15:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A7CEC96 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 09:15:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t319FXGo087001 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 09:15:33 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t319FXW8087000; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 09:15:33 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201504010915.t319FXW8087000@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 09:15:33 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 09:15:33 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ math/giacxcas | 1.1.0 | 1.2.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 11:34:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4C8519D for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 11:34:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from s119.web-hosting.com (server119.web-hosting.com [162.213.253.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B3D2E39 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 11:34:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=a1poweruser.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To; bh=pArWcpp0noJO17BU0GxTHpd2onH0GraL+r0wB229Ptg=; b=LKEMgXKxQuvokRkrtE1gLzi/ATOjcXraqkEvniig+qo0Ln2wUywf+z/QtsVThBHnpxTCDmghIVW3nfngHNHbHSuU6ec+HaeAICkztjg9x3BfmDyZ+B5PoJIsAtrvL91OznuYe8B1ekcabw8CU1glL7EnBfwfdESOYMA4dweBFRA=; Received: from cpe-76-190-244-6.neo.res.rr.com ([76.190.244.6]:1125 helo=JJBLaptop) by server119.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1YdG1F-000PEz-86 for ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 06:37:09 -0400 Reply-To: From: "joeb1" To: Subject: port maintainer wants to change port maintainer email address Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 06:37:13 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server119.web-hosting.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - a1poweruser.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server119.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: joeb1@a1poweruser.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 11:34:59 -0000 Hello, I maintain 4 different ports. The port maintainer email address listed with the ports have been harvested by spammers and I am now receiving over 100 spam emails per email address each day. The ports in question do not require update. Just want to change the maintainer email address. Is there some way this can be done without bumping the port version number? From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 11:42:58 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C2B27C0 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 11:42:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x22a.google.com (mail-ie0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0F25F25 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 11:42:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ierf6 with SMTP id f6so40163973ier.2 for ; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 04:42:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=cfi9w2RTdEIZSdsCOM2uRJueWCeMtIihLsh4NTlH3Dk=; b=seBNFwekxcB4usMDb9Y1jClGFKeeYIV/h7yYgWK2k42OP24gZ5kb7HT0huJmMW6c3J mz/ot06D6/xnvPFd2isVoNiAEZKaRynQA6Baj3AVrO9tqD1ylwQvBgpzdoDMsgtpQcwf lIRSWAfStUHfbHTlZdmKcRn6pYuEQj5Id5eTp3TVAVrW/qXZGID+LiQbNWr7xxGYTfxY Ka6VJdjEOpimrRDka4ncHlEVd1qA8vzgBh1c1eyAejqe4tpoL/Q5HjMxYHESmCXM4+/j ZOohhciUtpdZNMujSwAeSHyE8W/d65eZEPoEWTePNuVkF+XFR+VXWJAXAeMVMNohb3bx DFjA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.111.68 with SMTP id t4mr72793739icp.36.1427888576938; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 04:42:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.164.99 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 04:42:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 17:42:56 +0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: port maintainer wants to change port maintainer email address From: Muhammad Moinur Rahman <5u623l20@gmail.com> To: joeb1@a1poweruser.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 11:42:58 -0000 Submit patches in bugzilla with the diff from your new mail account. Login with your old mail account and approve the patches. Someone will take care of it. On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 4:37 PM, joeb1 wrote: > Hello, > > I maintain 4 different ports. The port maintainer email address listed with > the ports have been harvested by spammers and I am now receiving over 100 > spam emails per email address each day. > > The ports in question do not require update. Just want to change the > maintainer email address. > Is there some way this can be done without bumping the port version number? > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 11:53:52 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B6A6DBF for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 11:53:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm10-vm2.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm10-vm2.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [216.109.114.209]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44E5A89 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 11:53:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bellsouth.net; s=s2048; t=1427888907; bh=50ftUWhAqNA/N5/U8DtKqguIpSq/9FOzptW+CxCnJ14=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:From:Subject; b=H2/wOY9mBGXehy3PaTM9pIm5hGx7AS5Kw1OOHVELC/nYxipeCNNrXN9m5uMUopQQbTmO0ff9Pk9CAUcfSait7zumtD7paXcQmX3wtnMvbWgiS6yh2XHlK+ooPRbW1Bw3KqJQHM0/gTLznb0/3NgmNOyrzm6EA0Ca3FNELN9g9gvlC6SmvIo7KrA1Q4gMDOgZTSKSFWBTUEspBXY9hSm/k9RIBgNwqp8+ulpUalC6A3Ye+mDybwEJE99yHxnBxpzgJ6bmQj3m6UQin/GI8Sq0d5mhONa6cb2RrRq6AWBRqJKZmZDi6V/5E9IGnmb7lhVSHFEdgC/WyiqUuDdwQonrTA== Received: from [66.196.81.157] by nm10.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Apr 2015 11:48:27 -0000 Received: from [98.138.226.243] by tm3.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Apr 2015 11:48:27 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp114.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Apr 2015 11:48:27 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 212148.13892.bm@smtp114.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Message-ID: <212148.13892.bm@smtp114.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 11:48:27 +0000 (UTC) X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: tlmLAiUVM1lbWlbbpdj9gJkb25snXyOsZT7zmHUk5H7Rz9O CF4x7cxqp12v55nP2PCXSuiu4mTigE8Tp4XRvnop8KFIjLRjgunxMhHtU2LG mk1puTQf_qDO05ABE3mH.c0E1M8DQ7tS1v14qLoRWm97kcHAmFlz3nPhA7Uh 3Ou6qkW2RmbjVi60MOtYIj1o_3XVZ_lgsmHq5iyohSgvXJIOaiqH7LovfHWX 4Sie3wiY.vufqN5TaLnpM4zQrtv9FeZt2JXBBC36N2Kf2ulFr2E9BXfDc15V l2JmxBkSt1jpsZNIND.ED34pmYGnEBDEIlhJUr7ujj5w2sO1SlCRXm5.598S 6IkHsFgwqpXY64mQ5lWnNVDbToq5FPTq7CbcdUlhCMv9JnL1u5pEJ5GV5u9u k0Sc5jYcciSJa__3fkUyBoFdDHZEtWSlCg0r3kzyTgXIFdlbLs0dFkZqZYsN _gzNo8M2DnhC4CDA2IsHjTIq8MdIjGGbCiY5k6j6iEm1EJTjwOPzt7z.Utd1 l8IX6nLLSPa78nVqINv8LwOjp25Hb8YKsn7bEBpMW5b4GwMovEo9w2o3IGob y8PK8qoCu32bpZMjnHo1fTn2t8HgzqcVDaGysB8biSWSObOr8618vHw-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: Kz_aW1.swBBYof3zAD7.RWzXz9ZAQVDMml1VADsbgPT4Kq79LC0- From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0 References: <20150331190323.GF30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Cc: stable@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 11:53:52 -0000 Excerpt from Baptiste Daroussin: - Initial support for OS X - Initial support for NetBSD/EdjeBSD How would pkg-1.5.0 integrate with NetBSD pkgsrc? I didn't think there were any plans to port FreeBSD ports to NetBSD. Or is such a plan in the works? EdjeBSD should be EdgeBSD. A little spelling error can be critical when trying to find something on the Internet. Web site is edgebsd.org (I just went there). Tom From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 12:15:44 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AFB5B45; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 12:15:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-x22d.google.com (mail-yk0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1362336; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 12:15:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ykef74 with SMTP id f74so13366213yke.1; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 05:15:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=wF4oldX5FDUnjyltjHqpYFjbTiUF5GUuE0Pz9zfK3+s=; b=qdtcfw+PgyuqqoNJ5Bx1u2o9ikl4pIHSV6V8A1oJ8Lb7mzgHIGdnrbpmlviyVm3KqS 9YV1YdYZtw7iXdP5EcXay+Sr23QAldkhie5S5SFGrRA20tYlBkqK2BRiva8LH5I7v+W+ 1JzuZ4Vpj77wVA6mqjeKp6GyazsQA0tjcmuBP5sK9n2yWP/yA4G4dxftktsuA+6ltBRU nNzmmef9aAHWGJ51uRrnatyimQi72cA/C/8NR36RlJHbZMovmDPWa8FR0RSw5WYUluDB PcEIdSU5hkZ+cTHY18uDIRpnLsX9Qt80Sii2O9HvFniIoNYm/EjfZoVZncxZ2svUXRzv kt1A== X-Received: by 10.52.146.179 with SMTP id td19mr42052674vdb.8.1427890542796; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 05:15:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id cw4sm275900vdd.14.2015.04.01.05.15.40 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Apr 2015 05:15:41 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 14:15:37 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Thomas Mueller Subject: Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0 Message-ID: <20150401121537.GP30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20150331190323.GF30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <212148.13892.bm@smtp114.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3bc47Eih9dS+biPM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <212148.13892.bm@smtp114.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: stable@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 12:15:44 -0000 --3bc47Eih9dS+biPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 11:48:27AM +0000, Thomas Mueller wrote: > Excerpt from Baptiste Daroussin: >=20 > - Initial support for OS X > - Initial support for NetBSD/EdjeBSD >=20 > How would pkg-1.5.0 integrate with NetBSD pkgsrc? >=20 > I didn't think there were any plans to port FreeBSD ports to NetBSD. Or = is such a plan in the works? >=20 There are people looking at integrating pkg with pkgsrc yes, don't know the status, (pkg is already in pkgsrc-wip but no further integration for what I= do know And yes you are right it is EdgeBSD not EdjeBSD sorry. Best regards, Bapt --3bc47Eih9dS+biPM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlUb4WkACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Eya1ACeI6TC/Bn3jCMudXeXN4C0Krsz wMgAnik3eN+pOjO7AmIAsqUb2fS0l1ii =C+pT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3bc47Eih9dS+biPM-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 12:18:25 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1F6BF89 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 12:18:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mwork.nabble.com (mwork.nabble.com [162.253.133.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88DA5375 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 12:18:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from msam.nabble.com (unknown [162.253.133.85]) by mwork.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E03019658F0 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 05:18:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 05:17:48 -0700 (MST) From: timp To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1427890668998-6001898.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <551AF171.1040208@mail.lifanov.com> References: <551AF171.1040208@mail.lifanov.com> Subject: Re: Galera ports MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 12:18:25 -0000 > I would propose to add something like WSREP knob to existing mysql*-server ports that adds the extra patches and then make slaves with WSREP option selected That's a great idea, Nikolai! And I think databases/galera should be renamed to something more obvious, like databases/galera-plugin or something else. Next to databases/galera-arbitrator, for example. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Galera-ports-tp6001219p6001898.html Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 12:56:53 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42B2DD80; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 12:56:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ppsw-42.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-42.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F19729BC; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 12:56:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Received: from cpc16-cmbg15-2-0-cust60.5-4.cable.virginm.net ([86.5.162.61]:64772 helo=[192.168.0.7]) by ppsw-42.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.158]:465) with esmtpsa (PLAIN:dc552) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1YdICI-0003a9-6o (Exim 4.82_3-c0e5623) (return-path ); Wed, 01 Apr 2015 13:56:42 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) Subject: Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0 From: David Chisnall In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 13:56:38 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20150331190323.GF30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <1427829555.3892.7.camel@hardenedbsd.org> <20150331192315.GH30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> To: Rui Paulo X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) Sender: "Dr D. Chisnall" Cc: pkg@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin , Sergei Vyshenski , current@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, Shawn Webb , ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 12:56:53 -0000 On 1 Apr 2015, at 05:03, Rui Paulo wrote: >=20 > That is expected. WITH_PKG=3Ddevel is a make(1) option that only = affects ports (non-binary pkgs). Are you sure? I have it in make.conf on one of my systems where I never = build ports manually (and don't even have a ports tree installed) and = there I get this: $ pkg -v 1.4.99.13 In a jail on the same machine without the make.conf entry, I get the = stable version. This is how I've been testing pkg-devel for a while. = Is there a different recommended way? David From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 13:06:31 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D5CB378; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 13:06:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-x234.google.com (mail-qc0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37EFFAE1; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 13:06:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qcrf4 with SMTP id f4so27410749qcr.0; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 06:06:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=8Z3ES1odFmt6EIoGFA/JoDStksxbz56EqIzVIm180JY=; b=bQxYTgxA2zIDpPHnuL+wkfYL3TYGkpDlspsqibKDdwSQBuBCXyJGTIvVlqaF+PKUWJ SK51qRgP+oy2vJZ1WyQ6eHERBj2apeHpNsxUSyLSHmVAMAaFW/mtZTuo8FnoPRlxBeco 2Cgd/Rk4mByDOy5DhnU+D6z/KK2qYsPj3QDbzhQj1hq8VA3mOt05bRMTnR42+yH3Q6CP /S/gvbhj8E0lIgLeoG7Q3UxodBPijSalIL8awSJ54IatGflqojN0Gj6ke02TbqHCdCyM N1v3fihyBYzKSLiTFzReDTs2HwvLhaOFk+NLXIQ8xwlAu1XnjMgskU8DmvT9LK88vye+ gtrA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.232.15 with SMTP id d15mr56451949qhc.52.1427893590256; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 06:06:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.125.195 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 06:06:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 15:06:30 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: libdrm 2.4.58 upgrade fails From: Torfinn Ingolfsen To: FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: x11@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 13:06:31 -0000 Upgrading libdrm to version 2.4.58 fails: root@kg-v7# uname -a FreeBSD kg-v7.kg4.no 10.1-STABLE FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #0 r278322: Fri Feb 6 21:36:01 CET 2015 root@kg-v7.kg4.no:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 root@kg-v7# pv libdrm* [Reading data from pkg(8) ... - 488 packages found - done] libdrm-2.4.50 < needs updating (port has 2.4.58_1,1) root@kg-v7# portupgrade -R libdrm [...] buffers.c:163:15: warning: packed attribute is unnecessary for 'value' [-Wpacked] unsigned int value:24; ^ 1 warning generated. 1 warning generated. CCLD modetest libtool: link: cannot find the library `/usr/local/lib/libfontconfig.la' or unhandled argument `/usr/local/lib/libfontconfig.la' Makefile:418: recipe for target 'modetest' failed gmake[5]: *** [modetest] Error 1 gmake[5]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/graphics/libdrm/work/libdrm-2.4.58/tests/modetest' Makefile:824: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed gmake[4]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[4]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/graphics/libdrm/work/libdrm-2.4.58/tests' Makefile:742: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed gmake[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[3]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/graphics/libdrm/work/libdrm-2.4.58' Makefile:500: recipe for target 'all' failed gmake[2]: *** [all] Error 2 gmake[2]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/graphics/libdrm/work/libdrm-2.4.58' ===> Compilation failed unexpectedly. Try to set MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes and rebuild before reporting the failure to the maintainer. *** Error code 1 Stop. make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/graphics/libdrm *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/ports/graphics/libdrm ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade20150401-46550-1b6s0of env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade UPGRADE_PORT=libdrm-2.4.50 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=2.4.50 make ** Fix the problem and try again. ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) ! graphics/libdrm (libdrm-2.4.50) (unknown build error) Perhaps the port is looking for the wrong file? root@kg-v7# ll /usr/local/lib/libfontc* lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 22 Feb 6 23:47 /usr/local/lib/libfontconfig.so@ -> libfontconfig.so.1.8.0 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 22 Feb 6 23:47 /usr/local/lib/libfontconfig.so.1@ -> libfontconfig.so.1.8.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 262024 Feb 6 23:47 /usr/local/lib/libfontconfig.so.1.8.0* Trying a 'make' (after make clean) in the ports directory doesn't work either -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen, Norway From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 13:15:42 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D47E0713; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 13:15:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-x22f.google.com (mail-yk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 829C0C2D; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 13:15:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ykfa3 with SMTP id a3so9718832ykf.0; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 06:15:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Z0lDlu0dyPcx+lALNPNsvjmhZtyd05wYK6A5koxxGdU=; b=r2Yo47juUQvHIR6s1qh0DKRbxfmilzyBSm64+kRUXVgIIVL5uN51BO32pS8VAZi3Qh Tiob69paKZuLDfpv9KigIjOos/ChLL++SughSNsJRbZ24nnl39S2Q9Z8fc6E4iJmSvFg LVPzUGni1qrW5FVjBvHi0kMfD1xCHbE3fSltlp0u4I5HKSvW19pmYxA5M3u4pCP3XKPF GLoToBXrcdgt7wXpMVzFX0neubgka2/Rx5VDsDijSHpPN+TIO0LuWQQdwpFYXop8bzSW sByP7J/Dhz9Wi6eNRMQ0ZbBH7PjtQuiFc7YFhFiBsadiyaDAIE/HN4MJLMqRMF2XA492 Kj+A== X-Received: by 10.52.38.166 with SMTP id h6mr41892204vdk.80.1427894141784; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 06:15:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fa2sm296639vdd.17.2015.04.01.06.15.38 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Apr 2015 06:15:40 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 15:15:36 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: David Chisnall Subject: Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0 Message-ID: <20150401131536.GQ30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20150331190323.GF30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <1427829555.3892.7.camel@hardenedbsd.org> <20150331192315.GH30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yFH6hwN92mUA4HK5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: pkg@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, Sergei Vyshenski , current@freebsd.org, Rui Paulo , Shawn Webb , ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 13:15:43 -0000 --yFH6hwN92mUA4HK5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 01:56:38PM +0100, David Chisnall wrote: > On 1 Apr 2015, at 05:03, Rui Paulo wrote: > >=20 > > That is expected. WITH_PKG=3Ddevel is a make(1) option that only affec= ts ports (non-binary pkgs). >=20 > Are you sure? I have it in make.conf on one of my systems where I never = build ports manually (and don't even have a ports tree installed) and there= I get this: >=20 > $ pkg -v > 1.4.99.13 >=20 > In a jail on the same machine without the make.conf entry, I get the stab= le version. This is how I've been testing pkg-devel for a while. Is there= a different recommended way? >=20 That is because you enforced installing pkg-devel one day via: pkg install pkg-devel probably then it will stay on pkg-devel :) pkg itself is not aware of make.conf Best regards Bapt --yFH6hwN92mUA4HK5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlUb73gACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EyhkgCfaqp6t97I3ATVaInQuCOkvUrX Q/EAn3Te+4baGaRVFkcM0p09KU6C88N/ =J+VI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yFH6hwN92mUA4HK5-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 13:30:17 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF88FCC3; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 13:30:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (mx3.absolight.net [IPv6:2a01:678:2:100::25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF0FCD96; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 13:30:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCA94BDC30; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 15:30:11 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at absolight.net X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.975 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.975 tagged_above=-200 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.067, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL=0.692, NO_RELAYS=-0.001] Received: by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3AD9EBDC2E; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 15:30:11 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 15:30:11 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold To: ports@FreeBSD.org, ports-announce@FreeBSD.org Subject: New 2015Q2 branch Message-ID: <20150401133009.GA38000@prod2.absolight.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 13:30:18 -0000 --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, The 2015Q2 branch has been created. It means that the next update on the quarterly packages will be on the 2015Q2 branch A lot of things happened in the last three months: - pkg 1.4.12 - New USES: blaslapack, fonts, metaport, xfce - Removed keywords: @fc, @fontsdir - Default version of MySQL switched to 5.6 - Default version of PHP switched to 5.6 - Default version of Python 3 switched to 3.4 - Default version of Ruby switched to 2.1=20 - Firefox 37.0 - Firefox-esr 31.6.0 - Chromium 40.0.2214.115 - Ruby 2.1.5 - gcc 4.8.4 - Gnome 3.14.2 - Xorg 1.14.7 Next quarterly package builds will start on Wednesday 7th at 1:00 am UTC and should be available on your closest mirrors few days later. For those stat nerds out there, here's what happened during the last 3 mont= hs on head: Number of commits: 6796 Number of committers: 163 Diffstat: 16577 files changed, 868545 insertions(+), 500248 deletions(-) Most active committers: 1178 sunpoet 560 amdmi3 401 bapt 268 vanilla 254 adamw 234 marino 212 antoine 154 robak 136 kwm 118 jbeich and on the 2015Q1 branch: Number of commits: 140 Number of committers: 35 Diffstat: 491 files changed, 10582 insertions(+), 8491 deletions(-) Most active committers: 20 antoine 19 amdmi3 10 delphij 9 zi 8 rene 7 jbeich 6 xmj 5 rakuco 4 riggs 4 ohauer Regards, --=20 Mathieu Arnold With portmgr's hat on --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQJ8BAABCgBmBQJVG/LhXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQzQUI2OTc4OUQyRUQxMjEwNjQ0MEJBNUIz QTQ1MTZGMzUxODNDRTQ4AAoJEDpFFvNRg85IbucP/2qiZU9+53LmYJqRQvDUPtqW KO3GWiShJKHRp4F637WZKaShecVRVgnxNrKcrZV8gEpsbP/ypmSTO1nDOxH8kGZ7 UG+NlmhspSCGbsTjsAuILYLiKXKhZPcPrc3paXDzGww6Pj6QfH5a56QKcyWlm7Gl LEjv/vPTF/69Z9DYfYFlwofbzuqVfZcKH4FARh7QbjWBAzJobb1qSuF7OR2GkC/D sf3fJ9DG1vFsSlEK8uQ5lEKmjyfhD5Mk74UiiqVH9kXro8BX6VNiYF/D5njXIX0a DqA22+LKKsLUmVSkh33fFw4w25IUGjmozhMTQOKF0vPEF/Kw51ls8uOXJuE0KcEi nOJWbdqMmamvATYJKLD2n440dEHaa5Zru9dEyBis073Il4fRg/bQFwDrGBmUeo3X FI9DuBm0fUoGgbweYQbjpIYfMwsx54gJ0cQRabZ9pKY5voUlRlDMMPIdiGqiU75x 1qpsPa5LfvU+35dtFDIlHIC+8XpXkRlHLuKxn1g3AS20kwk/p81GylJDloKHDKGv K+fIAuc+xSqTj8tQEHm+jv3Su6ebj2ZdExElus6XnXI1FuK/UJhVVPHIE6l/7tVV t7kn+kEg0PsQgWBP+fwVU20NJdzJkMRTHuRtAPKAAVjPqch0iWEdWbhyp5UoFN+j XfUPm4nirtX15lVb8VCV =aQ+j -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 14:31:54 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33B50C16 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 14:31:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com (mail-wi0-f180.google.com [209.85.212.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C27996A8 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 14:31:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wiaa2 with SMTP id a2so68914128wia.0 for ; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 07:31:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Pw8A8TuKqvJF8c3et7hjXsNPGMMylz3ayssRk+aXr/I=; b=QfAom2UBOYPq9FoH+OI3eWgYrOAmd99kNVEgIMeh+fJK06GoheuAHXFHWP/Dgml4rm /jRMdpTSVrulCRv8rW7DYguzvnkdfa7NaGm3fJ/G7N8er4xpJfPI9HAxrDfAtCbby1AI FNnHwAvOvKagApMlpXPiE3+M7eQkagvd1D2YWa4+e4QxHbf4BALPqYkMYvEtuok4RnrA 2drbtM7870ABCnzHPhsPsGKPBdMaxc0y2NpFa7RtQWwNYu+dAUENbud7/jFKdmmB68a9 lW+Pr/aowOn5DycA3x58EXg42lZOdEk5cyEq7J8TJ3PPU312QXpWgs4qSJqyk72R5747 Hchg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmTaqXiBQJaX8rW+831ofgkmphOWIv5hwCRDtqEOx7a3nDNPkluvF7DOfQ6cT7h3TBUYXB4 X-Received: by 10.180.214.99 with SMTP id nz3mr15950738wic.82.1427898705694; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 07:31:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rsbsd.rsb ([78.162.15.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ad7sm17221631wid.21.2015.04.01.07.31.44 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Apr 2015 07:31:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 17:31:42 +0300 From: Beeblebrox To: Subject: databases/mysql-connector-java: Looks broken to me Message-ID: <20150401173142.1b36d256@rsbsd.rsb> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 14:31:54 -0000 I was getting indications that mysql connections through the com.mysql.jdbc= driver was not working. So I searched for a test method (included below) a= nd here are the results. * Server: mariadb100--10.0.17, jailed, tcp connection. Able to connect thro= ugh other drivers & using same params. * Client: mysql-connector-java-5.1.35 * Test code compiled with javac, $ java -cp . jdbc > com.mysql.jdbc.Driver Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: com.mysql.jdbc= .Driver # I compile with OPTIONS_UNSET=3D NLS at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:366) at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:355) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:354) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:425) at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:308) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:358) at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method) at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:191) at jdbc.main(jdbc.java:15) * Java Test Code: [code] import java.sql.*; import java.util.Properties; public class jdbc { // The JDBC Connector Class. private static final String dbClassName =3D "com.mysql.jdbc.Driver"; private static final String CONNECTION =3D "jdbc:mysql://192.168.2.110/mydb"; public static void main(String[] args) throws ClassNotFoundException,SQLException { System.out.println(dbClassName); // Class.forName(xxx) loads the jdbc classes and // creates a drivermanager class factory Class.forName(dbClassName); // Properties for user and password. Properties p =3D new Properties(); p.put("user","mydb"); p.put("password",""); // Now try to connect Connection c =3D DriverManager.getConnection(CONNECTION,p); System.out.println("It works !"); c.close(); } } [/code] --=20 FreeBSD_amd64_11-Current_RadeonKMS Please CC my email when responding, mail from list is not delivered. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 14:40:46 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C44FEF9A; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 14:40:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fep16.mx.upcmail.net (fep16.mx.upcmail.net [62.179.121.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC099793; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 14:40:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from edge03.upcmail.net ([192.168.13.238]) by viefep16-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.8.01.05.13 201-2260-151-135-20130320) with ESMTP id <20150401144043.GERG11799.viefep16-int.chello.at@edge03.upcmail.net>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 16:40:43 +0200 Received: from [192.168.0.23] ([178.84.134.112]) by edge03.upcmail.net with edge id Aegi1q02n2Rg3Ey01egjJE; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 16:40:43 +0200 X-SourceIP: 178.84.134.112 Message-ID: <551C036B.2010806@rainbow-runner.nl> Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 16:40:43 +0200 From: Koop Mast User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Torfinn Ingolfsen , FreeBSD Ports ML Subject: Re: libdrm 2.4.58 upgrade fails References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: x11@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 14:40:46 -0000 On 1-4-2015 15:06, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > 1 warning generated. > CCLD modetest > libtool: link: cannot find the library > `/usr/local/lib/libfontconfig.la' or unhandled argument > `/usr/local/lib/libfontconfig.la' > Makefile:418: recipe for target 'modetest' failed > gmake[5]: *** [modetest] Error 1 > gmake[5]: Leaving directory Please read ports/UPDATING entry 20140909 for instructions for a solution how to deal with missing .la files. -Koop From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 15:06:16 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E2CABB9 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 15:06:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x22c.google.com (mail-ig0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63B8AAA7 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 15:06:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igcau2 with SMTP id au2so50576363igc.0 for ; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 08:06:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=x2pA2KDovAkRSOkyGJlLehhDkU+GIi8oS8IZPY29Gag=; b=D0GJk27b4Td5378AcdzZhh1ZFvkNZPHQRTeDVA93mMtiQFuUtgrBtsY/o2c+gDLIqn VTft7VJkTZGWmv4KUpK/40jLjTQa2+hliMix130wjDTGZxNUWoWjg+kzAHP2EPC/1BsR uteXwloQVMjbQPyc61vEpfM6EwqwRksRy55Vz0JFecAhgIG9Ka9+0hw8g9f6HUX2j4h0 rjE0KmcMfJe7y/8lO/+fZA/9o7sUlo6PuWtjuISGoDLHD3FyMA6+r7O2qpWwxmeFXBaH KIuEA5POqf1r29Ix34pcGCP2RaKw+5iSbf93SKyHgSzh34aHZ5/5y0vaeDmr0tTfMgp6 xNfQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.3.167 with SMTP id e39mr24065395ioi.92.1427900775704; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 08:06:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.121.87 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 08:06:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 11:06:15 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: databases/py-sqlite3 Fails To Install From: Robert Simmons To: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 15:06:16 -0000 This port is failing to install at the moment. Is there a bug in autoplist? I've opened the following bug report: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199021 Using make makeplist seems to work around this problem, but is suboptimal. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 16:52:56 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C473A90F for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 16:52:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68C4F9AF for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 16:52:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com (no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id t31Gqnn6058233 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 17:52:49 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@freebsd.org) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=freebsd.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk t31Gqnn6058233 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/t31Gqnn6058233; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none; dkim-atps=neutral X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged) claimed to be ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com Message-ID: <551C2260.5050904@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 17:52:48 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: databases/mysql-connector-java: Looks broken to me References: <20150401173142.1b36d256@rsbsd.rsb> In-Reply-To: <20150401173142.1b36d256@rsbsd.rsb> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MO9llfmtwHWEsQ49H93o4KSQKWwwIDMb5" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.6 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 16:52:56 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --MO9llfmtwHWEsQ49H93o4KSQKWwwIDMb5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 04/01/15 15:31, Beeblebrox via freebsd-ports wrote: > I was getting indications that mysql connections through the com.mysql.= jdbc driver was not working. So I searched for a test method (included be= low) and here are the results. >=20 > * Server: mariadb100--10.0.17, jailed, tcp connection. Able to connect = through other drivers & using same params. > * Client: mysql-connector-java-5.1.35 > * Test code compiled with javac, $ java -cp . jdbc > > com.mysql.jdbc.Driver > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: com.mysql.= jdbc.Driver # I compile with OPTIONS_UNSET=3D NLS > at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:366) > at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:355) > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) > at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:354) > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:425) > at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:308) > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:358) > at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method) > at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:191) > at jdbc.main(jdbc.java:15) >=20 Thank you for the report. Unfortunately, I'm at a loss to fix this. The driver is supplied pre-compiled by Oracle -- we used to compile it, long ago, but then it grew some compatibility shims that meant bits of it needed compiling with different JDKs, something that couldn't be supported in the ports. I guess it's time to try recompiling it ourselves since java has moved on quite a lot since those days. Give me a while to test that please. Given that it's basically a .jar file downloaded from the net and copied into position, the OPTIONS_USET=3DNLS thing will have absolutely no effec= t on mysql-connector-java itself Cheers, Matthew --MO9llfmtwHWEsQ49H93o4KSQKWwwIDMb5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVHCJgXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQxOUYxNTRFQ0JGMTEyRTUwNTQ0RTNGMzAw MDUxM0YxMEUwQTlFNEU3AAoJEABRPxDgqeTnQ6cP/0YuPX5z0bE1Sr15huzjb9nc qczEAfwk6VkEPQgMs2ZrKtxZwkFQnQbpCDEyuy+4F6wXAqci682rfPceSgwM5juT McxEjqzueO8ORGpb02Fs5w55XHKfXSgwNcDr4WVa2mCU9thdQOi7QHLY/7mcOHGB O53KNZ79c87Rqtx62ozfsHYzRaWOLXncULLVh8rSlf6q9EneuC4sPTwxDSp3vURD fYlohCri09XQU/JYrpq9BbFBHAtOGdJIKiHtU+Q65uNiLTWFQZuZ0vNYnjP9FUoT Aso4VzE9Gm/sRztTdVEoHdUkRhUB7K53u768zynaKRvOqnLyz7v5hY0oh25IUIlz RslgtSh7L7gpePsP//b43FWC817HbOB8ZzxU3V5RgewuvOEE4/OFYlEmPH4w5rtr U4bKKFrS8Hm6dp7aQeA/CVQUR3s+gEa8OdL6IaSFKDsrq7e38Q5yi/V60cyAWlO8 IFbQhQ5xazBEEGhtYJNfujZ47RCx9tehrNC24sARuHOWZaOjA/bPENMOErP7ibn/ v30BPA18xiaT6PoMgVCtKwKhFE9cG2r9R1Mwu4UJTYT/9xLu64wuhkyR7e5p6u6d bvSHuDSlyUTxf8fp0awASojnLcU1QEz+ebtnCFjSHsDqjY84TUrGEQ3cLPA3Mr6Y uM6rc0kYLwpxAtSMxgd6 =HX89 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MO9llfmtwHWEsQ49H93o4KSQKWwwIDMb5-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 17:44:29 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4207F7D7 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 17:44:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f54.google.com (mail-wg0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFE28FC0 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 17:44:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgoe14 with SMTP id e14so61182878wgo.0 for ; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 10:44:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Kk0DR8v3Fh+YNae1Y3G1wpzeY4VOR9ZmAkLQcSjFnMM=; b=S8B45dtJr/NPYL4Koe7jViRHj96iBRzkD82REY/WaxH2GqMmafrRsCnvVQ6Vb0baS1 6IE8PC/+0D4M8XCpb/wSwy5iQgC9wcJwrOkZg+yt3Pxla31frkIE9I8Rf6zIa0jjRJ+N RVSo4fm5Y8aRhMOPHtrinD05UmVbsKjxvv41DWQMqrU6kf3WVhIJ3LHg3TiWarS++ots yhfRp/8Mjp5AEsl2DJBaVGbJafHBNjqpZVTiuYtrTWT568+792bO3KbC2Kri4NBgP/I5 h6yzk8C7OpY/ojHT2ykUEqzpSdWnZWduIq/hIVJYv4T7VInvmNdEMpnJIkaRxFuOfk8F S2Nw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnnjtibyzoU5l4frPzaoNt3wGtPgTIPyBFNyYE/9vtbcFJpJAHknswYvnCeAZi0LIgI3T0E X-Received: by 10.194.2.43 with SMTP id 11mr86618739wjr.104.1427910261219; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 10:44:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rsbsd.rsb ([78.162.21.90]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ew5sm26427166wic.14.2015.04.01.10.44.19 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Apr 2015 10:44:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 20:44:17 +0300 From: Beeblebrox To: Subject: Re: databases/mysql-connector-java: Looks broken to me Message-ID: <20150401204417.103dae16@rsbsd.rsb> In-Reply-To: <20150401173142.1b36d256@rsbsd.rsb> References: <20150401173142.1b36d256@rsbsd.rsb> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: matthew@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 17:44:29 -0000 Thanks Matt. I forgot to mention that my make.conf has these defined (however redundant = or ridiculous): JAVA_PREFERRED_PORTS=3D JAVA_PORT_NATIVE_OPENJDK_JDK_1_8 JAVA_PORT_VERSION=3D 1.8+ JAVA_DEFAULT?=3D 1.8+ OVERRIDE_JAVA_VERSION=3D 1.8+ JAVA_OS=3D native JAVA_VERSION=3D 1.8+ JAVA_VENDOR=3D openjdk I wonder if these may have caused breakage yet I expect not since you advis= e that ports download the pre-compiled *.jar. Let me know if there's anything I can help with. Regards. PS: Please CC my email when responding, mail from list is not delivered. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 17:51:42 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F5BFC8E for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 17:51:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nschwqsrv01p.mx.bigpond.com (nschwqsrv01p.mx.bigpond.com [61.9.189.231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89AB9102 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 17:51:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nschwcmgw07p ([61.9.190.167]) by nschwmtas04p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20150401172229.NLXP11888.nschwmtas04p.mx.bigpond.com@nschwcmgw07p> for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 17:22:29 +0000 Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org ([120.146.8.15]) by nschwcmgw07p with BigPond Outbound id AhNV1q00D0KTh7401hNVoy; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 17:22:29 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=Os7NOlDt c=1 sm=1 a=4q38a75ucWZEoAuqF1Taiw==:17 a=IPki1kwjZaUA:10 a=wPDyFdB5xvgA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=jl1WCCbAAAAA:8 a=e9J7MTPGsLIA:10 a=TQf1RjA6AAAA:8 a=n95QO39KAnmEMeaBBkgA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=oRGrlLRogwYA:10 a=mubGGU8HZgEA:10 a=Q1BZa9I3V8eGkN6Q:21 a=OrlKH50wgKYnL8I8:21 a=4q38a75ucWZEoAuqF1Taiw==:117 Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t31HMRb0097676 for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 04:22:29 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from localhost (dave@localhost) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id t31HMQQw097673 for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 04:22:27 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) X-Authentication-Warning: aneurin.horsfall.org: dave owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 04:22:26 +1100 (EST) From: Dave Horsfall To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: port maintainer wants to change port maintainer email address In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) X-Witty-Saying: "chmod 666 the_mode_of_the_beast" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 17:51:42 -0000 On Wed, 1 Apr 2015, joeb1 wrote: > I maintain 4 different ports. The port maintainer email address listed > with the ports have been harvested by spammers and I am now receiving > over 100 spam emails per email address each day. Doesn't a1poweruser.com use spam filters such as the various DNSBLs? On a bad week, I may get 10 and reject 500. Can FreeBSD protect the email addresses somehow, such as requiring Javascript to decode them? I assume that the spam in question doesn't come straight from FreeBSD's servers of course (unlike a lot of other spam). -- Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer." http://www.horsfall.org/spam.html (and check the home page whilst you're there) From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 20:45:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 711D1D9C for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 20:45:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from avasout08.plus.net (avasout08.plus.net [212.159.14.20]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Bizanga Labs SMTP Client Certificate", Issuer "Bizanga Labs CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5854849 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 20:45:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from curlew.milibyte.co.uk ([84.92.153.232]) by avasout08 with smtp id Akik1q005516WCc01kil5U; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 21:42:46 +0100 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=GcuZnGnL c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:117 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:17 a=D7rCoLxHAAAA:8 a=0Bzu9jTXAAAA:8 a=4TIn5Tuy4E8A:10 a=e9J7MTPGsLIA:10 a=r77TgQKjGQsHNAKrUKIA:9 a=9iDbn-4jx3cA:10 a=cKsnjEOsciEA:10 a=gZbpxnkM3yUA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=x1pHzWAgVK79VjaDNZkA:9 a=bmER-7W8R7almxNt:21 a=S7iNZJWnxb3908rv:21 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=KGdqb3eytz8NAYsLjYsA:9 a=AB5iw9h85XrKXl2X:21 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=frz4AuCg-hUA:10 Received: from curlew.lan ([192.168.1.13] helo=milibyte.co.uk) by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1YdPT6-000CX8-NT for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 21:42:44 +0100 From: Mike Clarke To: 'FreeBSD Ports' Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 21:42:31 +0100 Message-ID: <4105121.J31zpxLvnq@curlew.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.3 (FreeBSD/10.1-RELEASE-p6; KDE/4.14.3; amd64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.1.13 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on curlew.lan X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Subject: Synchronising ports with package cluster X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 20:45:59 -0000 I use pkg upgrade to maintain most of my ports but a small number need to be built from source. To avoid problems I aim to keep my ports tree in sync with the snapshots used by the package cluster. Until a couple of weeks ago I was able to obtain the revision number of the ports snapshot by parsing the results of fetching beefy2.isc.freebsd.org/data/101amd64- default/.data.json. That server now appears to be only building 93amd64-default and 101amd64-quarterly. So now my ports are stuck at revision 381523 from about two weeks ago. Where can I now obtain the revision number for the ports tree used for the latest package build? Although the above method has worked in the past it's a bit of a bodge. The ideal way would be if this information could be accessed directly from the relevant package repository. Would it be possible to provide such a facility? -- Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 20:52:33 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00846D7; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 20:52:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-x22e.google.com (mail-qc0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95C5292A; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 20:52:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qcbii10 with SMTP id ii10so29505141qcb.2; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 13:52:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Fpusn7GT4Z2N6fbrMFSA2CtEurE2SZlxDYsdhCd07l0=; b=aLOSTMn+tPM9f2RC6U2FTju5qMPdkngHR5eOjuWaDhCyjjq8kvM8L1M1QGNAa65LTp 30mJoERlI8hWUEKFLPKuk/bbLHffprTLzoyypUqikKsSvyXI/ZaX/HgyGeikfFryMzBO cu/LnebYtKNF3/POtEVbgzL99dAcfyuc46Ix7CpuXK4a4VLIjDwV3g3GQGYQl1uJMZ7N QkCPO0S/EVwjMmTSlhniIxpYnRz1yvT/U9i5T6BvF6MFovfpEMh2qFc3IIqmVUY0m+Al /JrMdAkrGicH8XUiyvgdLIt1klqAMSXlCLC4qVWVX01Hui8zMbn/MWB7PpKUMt5tUnLS oPAA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.109.11 with SMTP id k11mr4543885qgf.53.1427921551677; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 13:52:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.125.195 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 13:52:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <551C036B.2010806@rainbow-runner.nl> References: <551C036B.2010806@rainbow-runner.nl> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 22:52:31 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: libdrm 2.4.58 upgrade fails From: Torfinn Ingolfsen To: FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: x11@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 20:52:33 -0000 Update, On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Koop Mast wrote: > > Please read ports/UPDATING entry 20140909 for instructions for a solution > how to deal with missing .la files. > Thanks for the hint, but it doesn't appear to be any missing ("not found in the database") files: root@kg-v7# find /usr/local/lib -name '*.la' | xargs grep -l 'libfontconfig\.la' | xargs pkg which /usr/local/lib/libcairo.la was installed by package cairo-1.10.2_7,2 /usr/local/lib/libcairo-gobject.la was installed by package cairo-1.10.2_7,2 /usr/local/lib/libcairo-script-interpreter.la was installed by package cairo-1.10.2_7,2 /usr/local/lib/libpoppler-cpp.la was installed by package poppler-0.24.5_1 /usr/local/lib/tumbler-1/plugins/tumbler-poppler-thumbnailer.la was installed by package xfce4-tumbler-0.1.30 /usr/local/lib/vlc/plugins/text_renderer/libfreetype_plugin.la was installed by package vlc-2.1.2_2,4 /usr/local/lib/libvte.la was installed by package vte-0.28.2 /usr/local/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.la was installed by package pango-1.34.1_1 /usr/local/lib/pango/1.8.0/modules/pango-basic-fc.la was installed by package pango-1.34.1_1 /usr/local/lib/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-svg.la was installed by package librsvg2-2.36.4 /usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libferret.la was installed by package gtk2-2.24.22_1 /usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgail.la was installed by package gtk2-2.24.22_1 /usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libcanberra-gtk-module.la was installed by package libcanberra-0.28_3 /usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/printbackends/libprintbackend-cups.la was installed by package gtk2-2.24.22_1 /usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/printbackends/libprintbackend-file.la was installed by package gtk2-2.24.22_1 /usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/printbackends/libprintbackend-lpr.la was installed by package gtk2-2.24.22_1 /usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/immodules/im-am-et.la was installed by package gtk2-2.24.22_1 /usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/immodules/im-cedilla.la was installed by package gtk2-2.24.22_1 /usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/immodules/im-cyrillic-translit.la was installed by package gtk2-2.24.22_1 /usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/immodules/im-inuktitut.la was installed by package gtk2-2.24.22_1 /usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/immodules/im-ipa.la was installed by package gtk2-2.24.22_1 /usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/immodules/im-multipress.la was installed by package gtk2-2.24.22_1 /usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/immodules/im-thai.la was installed by package gtk2-2.24.22_1 /usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/immodules/im-ti-er.la was installed by package gtk2-2.24.22_1 /usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/immodules/im-ti-et.la was installed by package gtk2-2.24.22_1 /usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/immodules/im-viqr.la was installed by package gtk2-2.24.22_1 /usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/immodules/im-xim.la was installed by package gtk2-2.24.22_1 /usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines/libpixmap.la was installed by package gtk2-2.24.22_1 /usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines/libxfce.la was installed by package gtk-xfce-engine-3.0.1 /usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines/libclearlooks.la was installed by package gtk-engines2-2.20.2_1 /usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines/libcrux-engine.la was installed by package gtk-engines2-2.20.2_1 /usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines/libhcengine.la was installed by package gtk-engines2-2.20.2_1 /usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines/libindustrial.la was installed by package gtk-engines2-2.20.2_1 /usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines/libmist.la was installed by package gtk-engines2-2.20.2_1 /usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines/libredmond95.la was installed by package gtk-engines2-2.20.2_1 /usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines/libglide.la was installed by package gtk-engines2-2.20.2_1 /usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines/libthinice.la was installed by package gtk-engines2-2.20.2_1 /usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines/libsvg.la was installed by package librsvg2-2.36.4 /usr/local/lib/libpoppler.la was installed by package poppler-0.24.5_1 /usr/local/lib/thunarx-2/thunar-apr.la was installed by package Thunar-1.6.3_1 /usr/local/lib/thunarx-2/thunar-sbr.la was installed by package Thunar-1.6.3_1 /usr/local/lib/thunarx-2/thunar-uca.la was installed by package Thunar-1.6.3_1 /usr/local/lib/thunarx-2/thunar-wallpaper-plugin.la was installed by package Thunar-1.6.3_1 /usr/local/lib/libpoppler-glib.la was installed by package poppler-glib-0.24.5 /usr/local/lib/libthunarx-2.la was installed by package Thunar-1.6.3_1 /usr/local/lib/libgailutil.la was installed by package gtk2-2.24.22_1 /usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.la was installed by package gtk2-2.24.22_1 /usr/local/lib/xfce4/session/splash-engines/libbalou.la was installed by package xfce4-session-4.10.1_2 /usr/local/lib/xfce4/session/splash-engines/libmice.la was installed by package xfce4-session-4.10.1_2 /usr/local/lib/xfce4/session/splash-engines/libsimple.la was installed by package xfce4-session-4.10.1_2 /usr/local/lib/xfce4/panel/plugins/libactions.la was installed by package xfce4-panel-4.10.1 /usr/local/lib/xfce4/panel/plugins/libapplicationsmenu.la was installed by package xfce4-panel-4.10.1 /usr/local/lib/xfce4/panel/plugins/libclock.la was installed by package xfce4-panel-4.10.1 /usr/local/lib/xfce4/panel/plugins/libdirectorymenu.la was installed by package xfce4-panel-4.10.1 /usr/local/lib/xfce4/panel/plugins/liblauncher.la was installed by package xfce4-panel-4.10.1 /usr/local/lib/xfce4/panel/plugins/libpager.la was installed by package xfce4-panel-4.10.1 /usr/local/lib/xfce4/panel/plugins/libseparator.la was installed by package xfce4-panel-4.10.1 /usr/local/lib/xfce4/panel/plugins/libshowdesktop.la was installed by package xfce4-panel-4.10.1 /usr/local/lib/xfce4/panel/plugins/libsystray.la was installed by package xfce4-panel-4.10.1 /usr/local/lib/xfce4/panel/plugins/libtasklist.la was installed by package xfce4-panel-4.10.1 /usr/local/lib/xfce4/panel/plugins/libwindowmenu.la was installed by package xfce4-panel-4.10.1 /usr/local/lib/xfce4/panel/plugins/libmixer.la was installed by package xfce4-mixer-4.10.0_4 /usr/local/lib/xfce4/panel/plugins/libcpugraph.la was installed by package xfce4-cpugraph-plugin-1.0.5_1 /usr/local/lib/xfce4/panel/plugins/libsystemload.la was installed by package xfce4-systemload-plugin-1.1.1_1 /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.la was installed by package gtk2-2.24.22_1 /usr/local/lib/libexo-1.la was installed by package libexo-0.10.2_2 /usr/local/lib/libxfce4kbd-private-2.la was installed by package libxfce4menu-4.10.0_4 /usr/local/lib/libxfce4ui-1.la was installed by package libxfce4menu-4.10.0_4 /usr/local/lib/libcanberra-gtk.la was installed by package libcanberra-0.28_3 /usr/local/lib/libwnck-1.la was installed by package libwnck-2.30.6_1 /usr/local/lib/libxfsm-4.6.la was installed by package xfce4-session-4.10.1_2 /usr/local/lib/libxfce4panel-1.0.la was installed by package xfce4-panel-4.10.1 /usr/local/lib/libgtksourceview-2.0.la was installed by package gtksourceview2-2.10.5_1 /usr/local/lib/libpolkit-gnome.la was installed by package policykit-gnome-0.9.2_6 /usr/local/lib/librsvg-2.la was installed by package librsvg2-2.36.4 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/filters/analyze.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/aai.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/art.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/avs.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/bgr.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/bmp.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/braille.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/cals.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/caption.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/cin.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/cip.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/clip.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/cmyk.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/cut.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/dcm.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/dds.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/debug.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/dib.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/dng.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/dot.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/dpx.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/ept.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/fax.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/fd.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/fits.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/fpx.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/gif.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/gradient.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/gray.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/hald.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/hdr.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/histogram.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/hrz.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/html.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/icon.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/info.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/inline.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/ipl.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/jbig.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/jnx.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/jp2.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/jpeg.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/label.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/mac.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/magick.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/map.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/mat.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/matte.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/meta.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/miff.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/mono.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/mpc.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/mpeg.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/mpr.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/msl.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/mtv.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/mvg.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/null.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/otb.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/palm.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/pattern.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/pcd.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/pcl.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/pcx.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/pdb.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/pdf.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/pes.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/pict.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/pix.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/plasma.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/png.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/pnm.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/pango.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/preview.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/ps.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/ps2.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/ps3.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/psd.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/pwp.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/raw.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/rgb.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/rla.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/rle.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/scr.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/sct.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/sfw.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/sgi.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/stegano.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/sun.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/svg.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/tga.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/thumbnail.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/tiff.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/tile.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/tim.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/ttf.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/txt.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/uil.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/url.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/uyvy.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/vicar.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/vid.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/viff.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/wbmp.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/webp.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/wmf.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/wpg.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/x.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/xbm.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/xc.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/xcf.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/xpm.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/xps.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/xwd.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/ycbcr.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/yuv.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/libMagick++.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/libMagickCore.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/libMagickWand.la was installed by package ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_5,1 /usr/local/lib/libunique-1.0.la was installed by package unique-1.1.6_5 Furthermore, how do I rebuiuld all these ports? They all refer to (have as dependency) the libdrm port, and therefore fail when I try to portupgrade them. Interesting situation. -- regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 20:59:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 388EC2EA; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 20:59:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shell1.rawbw.com (shell1.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 231E3964; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 20:59:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from yuri.doctorlan.com (c-50-184-63-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.184.63.128]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t31KxvJq074932 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 1 Apr 2015 13:59:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host c-50-184-63-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.184.63.128] claimed to be yuri.doctorlan.com Message-ID: <551C5C4C.5090707@rawbw.com> Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 13:59:56 -0700 From: Yuri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Pourdriere produces faulty build results due to bsd.openssl.mk bug Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Bryan Drewery X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 20:59:59 -0000 I found that packages produced by poudriere likely link with base openssl, while port make likely links with the port openssl. This is because of the lines in bsd.openssl.mk which check for the presence of openssl shared library and headers under PREFIX, and set WITH_OPENSSL_BASE when they aren't present. In case of port make files are likely present, and in case of poudriere build files are likely not present. Example is ftp/curl (with GSSAPI=NONE, OPENSSL=yes options). *Poudriere produces curl library, that causes VirtualBox to break* due to the openssl base vs. port conflicts. See recent emulation@ ML threads. Port make produces curl library that works fine with VirtualBox. I think both WITH_OPENSSL_BASE and WITH_OPENSSL_PORT should be retired, and code checking file presence also should be removed, and all ports should be made to build with an openssl port instead. Ports should never use base OpenSSL. Only <100 ports touch WITH_OPENSSL_... variables. Somebody who is able to make such decisions and has the commit bit should bit should look into this. Otherwise, massively faulty package repositories are produces. Yuri From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 21:17:05 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F40FD8B3; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 21:17:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hammer.pct.niksun.com (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BCFA1186; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 21:17:04 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <551C6051.4060803@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 17:17:05 -0400 From: Jung-uk Kim User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yuri , "ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Pourdriere produces faulty build results due to bsd.openssl.mk bug References: <551C5C4C.5090707@rawbw.com> In-Reply-To: <551C5C4C.5090707@rawbw.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Dirk Meyer , Bryan Drewery X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 21:17:05 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 04/01/2015 16:59, Yuri wrote: > I found that packages produced by poudriere likely link with base > openssl, while port make likely links with the port openssl. This > is because of the lines in bsd.openssl.mk which check for the > presence of openssl shared library and headers under PREFIX, and > set WITH_OPENSSL_BASE when they aren't present. In case of port > make files are likely present, and in case of poudriere build files > are likely not present. > > Example is ftp/curl (with GSSAPI=NONE, OPENSSL=yes options). > *Poudriere produces curl library, that causes VirtualBox to break* > due to the openssl base vs. port conflicts. See recent emulation@ > ML threads. Port make produces curl library that works fine with > VirtualBox. > > I think both WITH_OPENSSL_BASE and WITH_OPENSSL_PORT should be > retired, and code checking file presence also should be removed, > and all ports should be made to build with an openssl port instead. > Ports should never use base OpenSSL. > > Only <100 ports touch WITH_OPENSSL_... variables. Somebody who is > able to make such decisions and has the commit bit should bit > should look into this. Otherwise, massively faulty package > repositories are produces. [Adding the maintainer to CC] I know bsd.openssl.mk has been broken for very long time. For example, http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50108FEF.3030405 However, I am not sure whether entirely removing it is the best way going forward. Jung-uk Kim -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVHGBMAAoJEHyflib82/FGH5cIAJKuo+LsZ6LUWwgIOAqTRF5E OXlq/hBKa4JFqxzH3rQvwbuhpzLZglFf8cmxfOzqyv/soQhduddsh+ljodIfbfhH JrwScfdIc6bP1lWpX3kACtlEwe4cUxm81XJiTQk/WrCom+DppXtdV6EqOxyiTj0B UgiBYplQpihdUNgHIQL8USIQFeadZReOiUxNdNvc5EbIoO2QUbd3lAORQ96SZM5W PRZRFMZmLyQkCNdP8oaTYE1s+heN0Rul+JPNfovVuGOIjEkclqMUVCUzhQuB7/Do S+clMj88/sBhdoPMloThi0hI3lOgh+GjQb3McKoT7s5dhgVDEwqpfJrhS7TYYsQ= =oY1m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 21:21:21 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A173CB6 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 21:21:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E59A4C5B for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 21:21:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t31LLKP3043271 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 21:21:20 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from bdrewery@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t31LLKbQ043267 for ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 21:21:20 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery) Received: (qmail 44931 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2015 16:21:18 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.10.1.139?) (freebsd@shatow.net@10.10.1.139) by sweb.xzibition.com with ESMTPA; 1 Apr 2015 16:21:18 -0500 Message-ID: <551C615D.8050706@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 16:21:33 -0500 From: Bryan Drewery Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yuri , "ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Pourdriere produces faulty build results due to bsd.openssl.mk bug References: <551C5C4C.5090707@rawbw.com> In-Reply-To: <551C5C4C.5090707@rawbw.com> OpenPGP: id=6E4697CF; url=http://www.shatow.net/bryan/bryan2.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WdINNaRrbTxE6avAogRNblsR7eAfsp4JS" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 21:21:21 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --WdINNaRrbTxE6avAogRNblsR7eAfsp4JS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 4/1/2015 3:59 PM, Yuri wrote: > I found that packages produced by poudriere likely link with base > openssl, while port make likely links with the port openssl. > This is because of the lines in bsd.openssl.mk which check for the > presence of openssl shared library and headers under PREFIX, and set > WITH_OPENSSL_BASE when they aren't present. In case of port make files > are likely present, and in case of poudriere build files are likely not= > present. >=20 > Example is ftp/curl (with GSSAPI=3DNONE, OPENSSL=3Dyes options). *Poud= riere > produces curl library, that causes VirtualBox to break* due to the > openssl base vs. port conflicts. See recent emulation@ ML threads. Port= > make produces curl library that works fine with VirtualBox. >=20 > I think both WITH_OPENSSL_BASE and WITH_OPENSSL_PORT should be retired,= > and code checking file presence also should be removed, and all ports > should be made to build with an openssl port instead. Ports should neve= r > use base OpenSSL. >=20 > Only <100 ports touch WITH_OPENSSL_... variables. Somebody who is able > to make such decisions and has the commit bit should bit should look > into this. Otherwise, massively faulty package repositories are produce= s. >=20 > Yuri I've wanted this for a long time. I think we should just do it. --=20 Regards, Bryan Drewery --WdINNaRrbTxE6avAogRNblsR7eAfsp4JS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVHGFdAAoJEDXXcbtuRpfPqRwIAN4SQpXDtl6kR2BKsQuJ9pL4 hMUQ+tOudVYCdiSN5aodxJv90QRZV5S/yjVURTfhewIN3gubWV3ssohLdBL9oufI AOynhHxafhyoeOjtp7YdytC05uDVc4cZYA151J++VoLWkrnD5IhhL0268jPFjIm5 nm6g9xbVtoNN+ghH4K6lmpvnHfuVnhz6MJCOP1Q/Q9j1geSUHmiDrjTc1e1kh1nr 4WzFnnd34QOKZki1lFVlQBu+qEVEwKsbE48V83KbHHB4ZKQQL1xHbbav3J0KTCSY WjmYpZG+94FGyYLVeiKbUSYj/OU5tw6w/xZpYu+CMJqn+4vCJp3GSxlit/KqkTg= =S5di -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WdINNaRrbTxE6avAogRNblsR7eAfsp4JS-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 21:21:50 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FFF9D99; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 21:21:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shell1.rawbw.com (shell1.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 378C7C6A; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 21:21:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from yuri.doctorlan.com (c-50-184-63-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.184.63.128]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t31LLnuo077245 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 1 Apr 2015 14:21:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host c-50-184-63-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.184.63.128] claimed to be yuri.doctorlan.com Message-ID: <551C616C.8080503@rawbw.com> Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 14:21:48 -0700 From: Yuri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jung-uk Kim , "ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Pourdriere produces faulty build results due to bsd.openssl.mk bug References: <551C5C4C.5090707@rawbw.com> <551C6051.4060803@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <551C6051.4060803@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Dirk Meyer , Bryan Drewery X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 21:21:50 -0000 On 04/01/2015 14:17, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > I know bsd.openssl.mk has been broken for very long time. For example, > > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50108FEF.3030405 > > However, I am not sure whether entirely removing it is the best way > going forward. I mean, removing of the dependency on base. Ports should use only openssl port. If you think this isn't a good idea, and ports should still occasionally use base openssl, would you care to explain why you think so? Yuri From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 21:22:52 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68FA1E33; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 21:22:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-x236.google.com (mail-qc0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 219C5C7B; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 21:22:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qcbii10 with SMTP id ii10so30164009qcb.2; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 14:22:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=U0/fxgceCyXRLwwkMiDaFtCb3DCvycxGsU3tGGS5RpI=; b=tpfg0npD/XuhgE+hNOgWiZn2YduuwnvZjOPivsLffh30MSvVBmPEEe8+mhlqOFKNyf s/B+lBq3e1TlSFkF2Itx1vq6ClbP2dQ+zjZLVmPgwEyonLrkGtQnyVMISPlWcwUzGm7H S9N2+b6LFNGWbrMhFt2NxS/SfnorVZxDtRt5WpUNlbYrQVL9ZXws+ifavOvlEtkzywsj d0N72/5XgOXPnA9SD76BJoyS+fwviQaxW2/KvzDzXJNUsY0dygFp0Abml0//O0gx+y9P RSD4csbByNaPObqeCvsBYhXhypStREGswNBeulCkOn7MNcjukihb1THO0/uUVcP5ZVKZ OojA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.141.18.146 with SMTP id u140mr57531585qhd.48.1427923371306; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 14:22:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.125.195 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 14:22:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <551C036B.2010806@rainbow-runner.nl> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 23:22:51 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: libdrm 2.4.58 upgrade fails From: Torfinn Ingolfsen To: FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: x11@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 21:22:52 -0000 On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 10:52 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > Update, > > > Furthermore, how do I rebuiuld all these ports? They all refer to > (have as dependency) the libdrm port, and therefore fail when I try to > portupgrade them. I figured it out; I had to rebuild a few (about a handful) ports one by one (without upgrading dependencies, ie. 'portupgrade portname'), until I could successfully upgrade the libdrm port. "normal" portupgrade works now (it is still portupgrading, but it looks much better now). Thanks! -- Regards, Torfinn From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 21:32:38 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13287157; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 21:32:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hammer.pct.niksun.com (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 861A520C3; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 21:32:37 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <551C63F6.2050700@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 17:32:38 -0400 From: Jung-uk Kim User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yuri , "ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Pourdriere produces faulty build results due to bsd.openssl.mk bug References: <551C5C4C.5090707@rawbw.com> <551C6051.4060803@FreeBSD.org> <551C616C.8080503@rawbw.com> In-Reply-To: <551C616C.8080503@rawbw.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Dirk Meyer , Bryan Drewery X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 21:32:38 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 04/01/2015 17:21, Yuri wrote: > On 04/01/2015 14:17, Jung-uk Kim wrote: >> I know bsd.openssl.mk has been broken for very long time. For >> example, >> >> http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50108FEF.3030405 >> >> However, I am not sure whether entirely removing it is the best >> way going forward. > > I mean, removing of the dependency on base. Ports should use only > openssl port. > > If you think this isn't a good idea, and ports should still > occasionally use base openssl, would you care to explain why you > think so? I don't like to see adding "-Wl,-rpath,${LOCALBASE}/lib" to LDFLAGS for all ports depending on libcrypto, etc. If it is moved to separate directories first, then it makes some sense, though. Jung-uk Kim -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVHGPwAAoJEHyflib82/FGX8YIAIefRcO47zRHmojZ4E0gS15J Y4bWyCFFVpIjuEDW4kQ6mFK83lJz9DD+KWfn/FFJrxAvmFpKnw4jJ8UtqsH1KuRp o9fXPH6TGVZqvM33KCWSdDBKw/7Pu29gQjxnHmN5R8aa96oTYA7yR09BWAKcQs37 ZOrwJBcKKt03KZtvYYkc3GeK5oKKIuC1DNporYzoWFCKzrtzKDIUBJgPIePrWF6a QGvZe85D9nwk5WCoVAw26FHV4sGpd7DMFxgkm5EfiYVvte9El3rDrIRkLLxkYqzV C3M7pbuQ8Uf9gGUcuBnrfpWU42jVGNjvpq2w7sBQAJibeOh1TlwaDLNtS7H5ctU= =+7Bt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 21:32:51 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AA361E4; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 21:32:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.madpilot.net (grunt.madpilot.net [78.47.145.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4C55D6E; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 21:32:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail (mail [192.168.254.3]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3lHLN60cSjzZrR; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 23:32:38 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=madpilot.net; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :references:subject:subject:mime-version:user-agent:from:from :date:date:message-id:received:received; s=mail; t=1427923956; x=1429738357; bh=c96pgyQ4zk+AxTuJap0k4Mwg1odioP4BzakkokMkOfY=; b= cc2TM5ek7QXrZRUgFmGRE6cMrmArT1CEPAHFQr9LwNxrNVgdozRAzdQ2oMns4+AT D8yXPLT6TlxbCki/pVzBI6+kipUCMvoUdr7urbqdLgjAfHKcuNRlkNyzBaFI+6UL N1mbpGO/8fgpKKR+PG7RbSKai9S5XlKHISKPl9BMVWc= Received: from mail.madpilot.net ([192.168.254.3]) by mail (mail.madpilot.net [192.168.254.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YCg-MoA6Q_14; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 23:32:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tommy.madpilot.net (micro.madpilot.net [88.149.173.206]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 23:32:36 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <551C63F4.8050707@madpilot.net> Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 23:32:36 +0200 From: Guido Falsi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bryan Drewery , Yuri , "ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Pourdriere produces faulty build results due to bsd.openssl.mk bug References: <551C5C4C.5090707@rawbw.com> <551C615D.8050706@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <551C615D.8050706@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 21:32:51 -0000 On 04/01/15 23:21, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 4/1/2015 3:59 PM, Yuri wrote: >> I found that packages produced by poudriere likely link with base >> openssl, while port make likely links with the port openssl. >> This is because of the lines in bsd.openssl.mk which check for the >> presence of openssl shared library and headers under PREFIX, and set >> WITH_OPENSSL_BASE when they aren't present. In case of port make files >> are likely present, and in case of poudriere build files are likely not >> present. >> >> Example is ftp/curl (with GSSAPI=NONE, OPENSSL=yes options). *Poudriere >> produces curl library, that causes VirtualBox to break* due to the >> openssl base vs. port conflicts. See recent emulation@ ML threads. Port >> make produces curl library that works fine with VirtualBox. >> >> I think both WITH_OPENSSL_BASE and WITH_OPENSSL_PORT should be retired, >> and code checking file presence also should be removed, and all ports >> should be made to build with an openssl port instead. Ports should never >> use base OpenSSL. >> >> Only <100 ports touch WITH_OPENSSL_... variables. Somebody who is able >> to make such decisions and has the commit bit should bit should look >> into this. Otherwise, massively faulty package repositories are produces. >> >> Yuri > > I've wanted this for a long time. I think we should just do it. > As I said in another email, I agree on the idea. On the other hand some testing plan should be laid out before unleashing this change in the tree... -- Guido Falsi From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 21:35:20 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DC7A3E1 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 21:35:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.grem.de (outcast.grem.de [213.239.217.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 65915D95 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 21:35:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79188 invoked by uid 89); 1 Apr 2015 21:35:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.250.192?) (mg@grem.de@185.17.207.96) by mail.grem.de with ESMTPA; 1 Apr 2015 21:35:10 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Pourdriere produces faulty build results due to bsd.openssl.mk bug From: Michael Gmelin X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12D508) In-Reply-To: <551C615D.8050706@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 23:35:09 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: <551C5C4C.5090707@rawbw.com> <551C615D.8050706@FreeBSD.org> To: Bryan Drewery Cc: "ports@freebsd.org" , Yuri X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 21:35:20 -0000 > On 01 Apr 2015, at 23:21, Bryan Drewery wrote: > >> On 4/1/2015 3:59 PM, Yuri wrote: >> I found that packages produced by poudriere likely link with base >> openssl, while port make likely links with the port openssl. >> This is because of the lines in bsd.openssl.mk which check for the >> presence of openssl shared library and headers under PREFIX, and set >> WITH_OPENSSL_BASE when they aren't present. In case of port make files >> are likely present, and in case of poudriere build files are likely not >> present. >> >> Example is ftp/curl (with GSSAPI=NONE, OPENSSL=yes options). *Poudriere >> produces curl library, that causes VirtualBox to break* due to the >> openssl base vs. port conflicts. See recent emulation@ ML threads. Port >> make produces curl library that works fine with VirtualBox. >> >> I think both WITH_OPENSSL_BASE and WITH_OPENSSL_PORT should be retired, >> and code checking file presence also should be removed, and all ports >> should be made to build with an openssl port instead. Ports should never >> use base OpenSSL. >> >> Only <100 ports touch WITH_OPENSSL_... variables. Somebody who is able >> to make such decisions and has the commit bit should bit should look >> into this. Otherwise, massively faulty package repositories are produces. >> >> Yuri > > I've wanted this for a long time. I think we should just do it. +1 > > -- > Regards, > Bryan Drewery > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 21:35:58 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89A6E481; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 21:35:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (mx3.absolight.net [IPv6:2a01:678:2:100::25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46C77D9E; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 21:35:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BBB6BDC30; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 23:35:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from atuin.in.mat.cc (atuin.in.mat.cc [79.143.241.205]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 978E9BDC2E; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 23:35:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atuin.in.mat.cc (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CDB62E8237F; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 23:35:56 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 23:35:56 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Yuri , Jung-uk Kim , ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Pourdriere produces faulty build results due to bsd.openssl.mk bug Message-ID: <6704A8211DE1C1B9F242B3EE@atuin.in.mat.cc> In-Reply-To: <551C616C.8080503@rawbw.com> References: <551C5C4C.5090707@rawbw.com> <551C6051.4060803@FreeBSD.org> <551C616C.8080503@rawbw.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Dirk Meyer , Bryan Drewery X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 21:35:58 -0000 +--On 1 avril 2015 14:21:48 -0700 Yuri wrote: | On 04/01/2015 14:17, Jung-uk Kim wrote: |> I know bsd.openssl.mk has been broken for very long time. For example, |> |> http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50108FEF.3030405 |> |> However, I am not sure whether entirely removing it is the best way |> going forward. | | I mean, removing of the dependency on base. Ports should use only openssl | port. | | If you think this isn't a good idea, and ports should still occasionally | use base openssl, would you care to explain why you think so? There is only one port that will need openssl from base, and it's ports-mgmt/pkg, but it can be a special case. -- Mathieu Arnold From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 21:37:15 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECAB857D; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 21:37:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shell1.rawbw.com (shell1.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2D8DDB3; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 21:37:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from yuri.doctorlan.com (c-50-184-63-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.184.63.128]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t31LbEfI079100 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 1 Apr 2015 14:37:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host c-50-184-63-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.184.63.128] claimed to be yuri.doctorlan.com Message-ID: <551C6509.4010203@rawbw.com> Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 14:37:13 -0700 From: Yuri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Guido Falsi , Jung-uk Kim , "ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Pourdriere produces faulty build results due to bsd.openssl.mk bug References: <551C5C4C.5090707@rawbw.com> <551C6051.4060803@FreeBSD.org> <551C616C.8080503@rawbw.com> <551C636C.1090000@madpilot.net> In-Reply-To: <551C636C.1090000@madpilot.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Dirk Meyer , Bryan Drewery X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 21:37:16 -0000 On 04/01/2015 14:30, Guido Falsi wrote: > Some examples of things that could (and will) go wrong: > > - ports silently linking to base ssl due to weirdness in their build scripts > > - ports linking to other libraries in base which are linked to base ssl, > causing conflicts > > - ports interacting with base parts, which are using base ssl. I am going to write the stage-qa test checking for just that: no base libraries of certain kinds are mixed into the link list. Yuri From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 21:37:41 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40A6F61A; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 21:37:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.madpilot.net (grunt.madpilot.net [78.47.145.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8F4ADBA; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 21:37:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail (mail [192.168.254.3]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3lHLKV4fgnzZrM; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 23:30:22 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=madpilot.net; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :references:subject:subject:mime-version:user-agent:from:from :date:date:message-id:received:received; s=mail; t=1427923820; x=1429738221; bh=PY+rixI4it9sFUhTnFq6Pkso3P8HUXgofHVr6XURPiQ=; b= kkc2Rx6pnujSD8kiIzrLX5Hp6n5Iu7rwb9CW/kgJulnA6iqOisakFawb+9N77twg 2zBYKierH8wEd4w8S5h0els9OkcsPJ3wfrnSGyuq89Z4gsZQQk0XisXwO/eVQlFJ KzGCV0qnxxO12MxTJZ2Kq8NlLQQ+kYV8b40sfPehZE4= Received: from mail.madpilot.net ([192.168.254.3]) by mail (mail.madpilot.net [192.168.254.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u_dasoKon-wR; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 23:30:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tommy.madpilot.net (micro.madpilot.net [88.149.173.206]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 23:30:20 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <551C636C.1090000@madpilot.net> Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 23:30:20 +0200 From: Guido Falsi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yuri , Jung-uk Kim , "ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Pourdriere produces faulty build results due to bsd.openssl.mk bug References: <551C5C4C.5090707@rawbw.com> <551C6051.4060803@FreeBSD.org> <551C616C.8080503@rawbw.com> In-Reply-To: <551C616C.8080503@rawbw.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Dirk Meyer , Bryan Drewery X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 21:37:41 -0000 On 04/01/15 23:21, Yuri wrote: > On 04/01/2015 14:17, Jung-uk Kim wrote: >> I know bsd.openssl.mk has been broken for very long time. For example, >> >> http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50108FEF.3030405 >> >> However, I am not sure whether entirely removing it is the best way >> going forward. > > I mean, removing of the dependency on base. Ports should use only > openssl port. > > If you think this isn't a good idea, and ports should still occasionally > use base openssl, would you care to explain why you think so? I'm not in the position of taking such decisions, but based on some experience and quick tests I have discovered that changing the default would cause ports now working to break. I generally agree with your idea that ports should use ports ssl, but making this switch is more difficult than just changing a variable. Some real testing is needed, and just exp-runs would not suffice, most software would show misbehavior only at runtime. Some examples of things that could (and will) go wrong: - ports silently linking to base ssl due to weirdness in their build scripts - ports linking to other libraries in base which are linked to base ssl, causing conflicts - ports interacting with base parts, which are using base ssl. All this without accounting for eventual ports who do need older ssl to work, causing further mixing. I have experienced or seen reports about all tree examples. Also, you could have a look at this bug: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198788 -- Guido Falsi From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 21:40:00 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F5556D1; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 21:40:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1b.lautre.net (etna.lautre.net [80.67.160.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.lautre.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA49EDD4; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 21:39:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from graf.pompo.net (graf.pompo.net [78.225.128.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: thierry@pompo.net) by mx1b.lautre.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 930DD7E1AD; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 23:39:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: by graf.pompo.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8360D71E55E; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 23:39:54 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 23:39:54 +0200 From: Thierry Thomas To: Yuri Subject: Re: Pourdriere produces faulty build results due to bsd.openssl.mk bug Message-ID: <20150401213954.GA54595@graf.pompo.net> Mail-Followup-To: Yuri , "ports@freebsd.org" , Bryan Drewery References: <551C5C4C.5090707@rawbw.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="liOOAslEiF7prFVr" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <551C5C4C.5090707@rawbw.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE amd64 Organization: Kabbale Eros X-Face: (hRbQnK~Pt7$ct`!fupO(`y_WL4^-Iwn4@ly-.,[4xC4xc; y=\ipKMNm<1J>lv@PP~7Z<.t KjAnXLs: X-PGP: 0xF1C516B3C8359753 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: "ports@freebsd.org" , Bryan Drewery X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 21:40:00 -0000 --liOOAslEiF7prFVr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le mer 1 avr 15 =E0 22:59:56 +0200, Yuri =E9crivait=A0: > I found that packages produced by poudriere likely link with base=20 > openssl, while port make likely links with the port openssl. > This is because of the lines in bsd.openssl.mk which check for the=20 > presence of openssl shared library and headers under PREFIX, and set=20 > WITH_OPENSSL_BASE when they aren't present. In case of port make files=20 > are likely present, and in case of poudriere build files are likely not= =20 > present. On this subject, please read "Build packages in poudriere without OpenSSL in the base jail" at Regards, --=20 Th. Thomas. --liOOAslEiF7prFVr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVHGWqXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRFNTM2QkU4NTM4NTM5OUQwMEI2RkFBNzZG MUM1MTZCM0M4MzU5NzUzAAoJEPHFFrPINZdTq3MQALLC8Gbj7oHxvksiPSskOFt0 IPjx7AS4FmGXKW0bUwGkb+qEVPClYZ53Lscv8477AC9uvYAqc/vjgis0OqqIngiT GHOOgKxuhsXI8jx1iKUO5SVfQfYctvHmlpPEZlH1yFgKtbdoi/1SUvA0Q4jXuqvz qFeFG7FF11L3NQ7IEo5vVJ9vk/hrJSEoRr175V23Y9xn2NqZfB/V2CcAb/Fg2A1a u0CuFUba5LniIhFzHJQ03SfRQ40lURqPMkP5KXLY5H/ffBbOk4AvJZ8TR1jcVG5x xNAb3xTI6hfAMXbDUn+c8eJAZihi+KI1umVXAcqZYe0HPtJseePUaHcioCc+yznP VH7Wu9062tqocF/Doxg90R4ZHixidF14Lq842UU4zOs4FlSD/p/AclcOjehsBoj6 8+PV0ITcZtcESpAPiSLyUlxPgGfxvXbS1Y5voDFKKaUIOD8Tvw9WKIOKCQdK8l1Z OuPwkTiVqG6SiWrBkTYXTzVdmJn2Qlm788TBg4PgUWs1X+dqcTYg21HmdDFysOrp GGOwtbNp/dZfVJUS0X/1QulI9IFiKr+Zy1HPYaecazHs1r/ElNrrUG5IBI+K0eqm ajKJSiEUm9hfZpnIbuDx48Ht5RgFEqByADs9wpwv3DZ7TgCXoMSL8g/cd8Lr2F1+ JzFp2J36aBJBpnbTKeTC =SdOM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --liOOAslEiF7prFVr-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 21:42:54 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 842E97EF; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 21:42:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thyme.infocus-llc.com (thyme.infocus-llc.com [199.15.120.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 590D9E80; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 21:42:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from draco.over-yonder.net (c-75-65-60-66.hsd1.ms.comcast.net [75.65.60.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by thyme.infocus-llc.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A4DFE37B404; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 16:42:52 -0500 (CDT) Received: by draco.over-yonder.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id 3lHLbw0dPPz1vC; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 16:42:52 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 16:42:52 -0500 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: Guido Falsi Subject: Re: Pourdriere produces faulty build results due to bsd.openssl.mk bug Message-ID: <20150401214252.GC52331@over-yonder.net> References: <551C5C4C.5090707@rawbw.com> <551C6051.4060803@FreeBSD.org> <551C616C.8080503@rawbw.com> <551C636C.1090000@madpilot.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <551C636C.1090000@madpilot.net> X-Editor: vi X-OS: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23-fullermd.4 (2014-03-12) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.6 at thyme.infocus-llc.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: "ports@freebsd.org" , Yuri , Dirk Meyer , Jung-uk Kim , Bryan Drewery X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 21:42:54 -0000 On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 11:30:20PM +0200 I heard the voice of Guido Falsi, and lo! it spake thus: > > - ports linking to other libraries in base which are linked to base ssl, > causing conflicts On my system, libssl/libcrypto is used by: /usr/lib/libarchive.so /usr/lib/libbsnmp.so /usr/lib/libfetch.so /usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so /usr/lib/libgssapi_ntlm.so /usr/lib/libhdb.so /usr/lib/libheimntlm.so /usr/lib/libhx509.so /usr/lib/libkadm5clnt.so /usr/lib/libkadm5srv.so /usr/lib/libkafs5.so /usr/lib/libkdc.so /usr/lib/libkrb5.so /usr/lib/libmp.so /usr/lib/libradius.so /usr/lib/libssl.so /usr/lib/pam_krb5.so /usr/lib/pam_ksu.so /usr/lib/pam_radius.so /usr/lib/pam_ssh.so At a glance, I wouldn't be surprised to find libfetch/libarchive used somewhere in ports. But the krb5/gssapi bits may be the trickiest to unravel, considering how widely they wind up getting linked into stuff. -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 22:08:16 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA5DDF1; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 22:08:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.madpilot.net (grunt.madpilot.net [78.47.145.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E0E513A; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 22:08:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail (mail [192.168.254.3]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3lHM954LBwzZrM; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 00:08:09 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=madpilot.net; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :references:subject:subject:mime-version:user-agent:from:from :date:date:message-id:received:received; s=mail; t=1427926087; x=1429740488; bh=038HmK5soZEE/i9c4JsuwxmaJ/mEm7BVnvNFHFCTv/0=; b= RmhQ/gETNUqQsO3+I6+mjC9mRLascocAk/sBxUDz3DmNo8HTjjtNFacOIUcP68Bz 0fcpBT+VrClnKvvU8Z3qkIB9KJAtKY5W0jb42Q+SuJ1Bi8e0wFrh/tS4Udl4pApG aMcuJjs323IVg4bn+VAiCvVSRUiS9z3SZ/9DRqJHG/o= Received: from mail.madpilot.net ([192.168.254.3]) by mail (mail.madpilot.net [192.168.254.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DGVLHINhI1mw; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 00:08:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tommy.madpilot.net (micro.madpilot.net [88.149.173.206]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 00:08:07 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <551C6C47.1010209@madpilot.net> Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 00:08:07 +0200 From: Guido Falsi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yuri , Jung-uk Kim , "ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Pourdriere produces faulty build results due to bsd.openssl.mk bug References: <551C5C4C.5090707@rawbw.com> <551C6051.4060803@FreeBSD.org> <551C616C.8080503@rawbw.com> <551C636C.1090000@madpilot.net> <551C6509.4010203@rawbw.com> In-Reply-To: <551C6509.4010203@rawbw.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Dirk Meyer , Bryan Drewery X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 22:08:16 -0000 On 04/01/15 23:37, Yuri wrote: > On 04/01/2015 14:30, Guido Falsi wrote: >> Some examples of things that could (and will) go wrong: >> >> - ports silently linking to base ssl due to weirdness in their build >> scripts >> >> - ports linking to other libraries in base which are linked to base ssl, >> causing conflicts >> >> - ports interacting with base parts, which are using base ssl. > > I am going to write the stage-qa test checking for just that: no base > libraries of certain kinds are mixed into the link list. This would be good. What I am most worried about, though, are problems showing up at runtime only on specific configurations or use cases. This would help nailing them down. Check the last entry about asterisk in UPDATING too (I maintain it and that one did hit me on a server of mine) -- Guido Falsi From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 22:28:05 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8705AC62; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 22:28:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shell1.rawbw.com (shell1.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C3EE3BA; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 22:28:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from yuri.doctorlan.com (c-50-184-63-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.184.63.128]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t31MRwix084352 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 1 Apr 2015 15:27:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host c-50-184-63-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.184.63.128] claimed to be yuri.doctorlan.com Message-ID: <551C70ED.1040809@rawbw.com> Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 15:27:57 -0700 From: Yuri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Guido Falsi , Jung-uk Kim , "ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Pourdriere produces faulty build results due to bsd.openssl.mk bug References: <551C5C4C.5090707@rawbw.com> <551C6051.4060803@FreeBSD.org> <551C616C.8080503@rawbw.com> <551C636C.1090000@madpilot.net> <551C6509.4010203@rawbw.com> <551C6C47.1010209@madpilot.net> In-Reply-To: <551C6C47.1010209@madpilot.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Dirk Meyer , Bryan Drewery X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 22:28:05 -0000 On 04/01/2015 15:08, Guido Falsi wrote: > This would be good. > > What I am most worried about, though, are problems showing up at runtime > only on specific configurations or use cases. > > This would help nailing them down. Such stage-qa check will currently likely fail on many ports. It can help in testing after the removal of the said dependencies on base OpenSSL, and should be permanently enabled afterwards. Currently VirtualBox is broken when installed out of the default package repository. I also observed that rebuilding only curl locally doesn't help for other broken things, and one also needs to rebuild kde4-network, and maybe other things. So the problem is quite nasty. It has been triggered by some curl update during March. > > Check the last entry about asterisk in UPDATING too (I maintain it and > that one did hit me on a server of mine) Yes, things shouldn't need to be disabled just because of this conflict. Yuri From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 2 00:06:54 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C09516EC; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 00:06:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shell1.rawbw.com (shell1.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FDCC1000; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 00:06:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from yuri.doctorlan.com (c-50-184-63-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.184.63.128]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t3206rSj093362 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 1 Apr 2015 17:06:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host c-50-184-63-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.184.63.128] claimed to be yuri.doctorlan.com Message-ID: <551C881C.4080203@rawbw.com> Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 17:06:52 -0700 From: Yuri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Pourdriere produces faulty build results due to bsd.openssl.mk bug References: <551C5C4C.5090707@rawbw.com> In-Reply-To: <551C5C4C.5090707@rawbw.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Bryan Drewery X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 00:06:54 -0000 I implemented the new 'basemix' stage-qa test: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199106 Currently it complains about libssl.so libcrypto.so from base. Yuri From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 2 01:37:46 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 186FB604; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 01:37:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zoom.lafn.org (zoom.lafn.org [108.92.93.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1A20AEA; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 01:37:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.1.2] (static-71-177-216-148.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [71.177.216.148]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoom.lafn.org (8.14.7/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t321bb3H030636 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 1 Apr 2015 18:37:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) Subject: Re: Pourdriere produces faulty build results due to bsd.openssl.mk bug From: Doug Hardie In-Reply-To: <551C616C.8080503@rawbw.com> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 18:37:37 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <551C5C4C.5090707@rawbw.com> <551C6051.4060803@FreeBSD.org> <551C616C.8080503@rawbw.com> To: Yuri X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98 at zoom.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: "ports@freebsd.org" , Dirk Meyer , Jung-uk Kim , Bryan Drewery X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 01:37:46 -0000 > On 1 April 2015, at 14:21, Yuri wrote: >=20 > On 04/01/2015 14:17, Jung-uk Kim wrote: >> I know bsd.openssl.mk has been broken for very long time. For = example, >>=20 >> http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50108FEF.3030405 >>=20 >> However, I am not sure whether entirely removing it is the best way >> going forward. >=20 > I mean, removing of the dependency on base. Ports should use only = openssl port. >=20 > If you think this isn't a good idea, and ports should still = occasionally use base openssl, would you care to explain why you think = so? >=20 > Yuri Some of us don=E2=80=99t use the ports version of openssl because of the = issues with v1.xxx. =20= From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 2 07:53:21 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E57EDA7; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 07:53:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from m97177.qiye.163.com (m97177.qiye.163.com [220.181.97.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC0238D2; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 07:53:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ivy$dfhuasheng.net ( [36.44.194.76] ) by ajax-webmail-wmsvr17 (Coremail) ; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 15:53:13 +0800 (CST) X-Originating-IP: [36.44.194.76] Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 15:53:13 +0800 (CST) From: "Ivy Xu" To: bruscar@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: shiitake mushroom X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Coremail Webmail Server Version SP_ntes V3.5 build 20140422(26738.6344) Copyright (c) 2002-2015 www.mailtech.cn 163-hosting MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: X-CM-TRANSID: seCowADHFI1q9RxVFhpcAA--.128W X-CM-SenderInfo: hly1qv5ikxt2pkhqwhhqhw/1tbiKArPeVT+aOOQZwADsB X-Coremail-Antispam: 1U5529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7vcSsGvfC2KfnxnUU== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GBK Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 07:53:21 -0000 ZGVhciBzaXI6CmkgYW0gdmVyeSBoYXBweSBzZW5kIGVtYWlsIHRvIHlvdSAsaSBoZWFyaW5nIHlv dXIgbWVzc2VnZSBmcm9tIHRyYWRla2V5ICxhbmQga25vdyB5b3VyIGNvbXBhbnkgcHVyY2hhc2Ug d2FsbnV0IGFuZCBvdGhlciBnb29kcyAuCgoKbm93IGkgd2lsbCBpbnRyb2R1Y2Ugb3VyIGNvbXBh bnkgLG91ciBjb21wYW55IG1haW4gbWFudWZhY3R1cmUgYW5kIGV4cG9ydCAgYWdyaWN1bHR1cmFs IHByb2R1Y3RzLGZvciBleGFtcGxlICh3YWxudXQgLGFuZCB3YWxudXQga2VyZW50ICxkcmllZCBw ZXJzaW1tb24sc2hpaXRha2UgbXVzaHJvb24sIGNvcm51cyBvb2ZpY2luYWxpcy5ldGMgKQoKCm91 ciBjb21wYW55IG1haW4gbWFya2V0cyAoa29yZWEgLGphcGFuLHJ1c3NpYSAgZXRjCgoKaWYgeW91 IG5lZWQgdGhlc2UgZ29vZHMgb3RoZXIgb3RoZXIgYWdyaWN1bHR1cmFsIGdvb2RzICx0aGVuIHlv dSBjYW4gZGlyZWN0IGNvbnRhY3QgdXMgLGkgd2lsbCB0cnkgbXkgYmVzdCBoZWxwIHlvdSAKCgpp IGhvcGUgaSBjYW4gY29vcGVyYXRpaW9uIHdpdGggeW91ciBpbiBmdXR1cmUKCgp3YWl0aW5nIHlv dXIgcmVwbHlpbmcKCgpiZXN0IHJlZ2FyZHMKCgppdnkgeHUKaXZ5ODIxMDI3QGhvdG1haWwuY29t CndlYjp3d3cudHNpbmxpbmduYXRpdmVmb29kcy5jb20KTUI6Kzg2IDE1Mzg5MjE5OTk0CnFxOjQw MDEyOTkKc2t5cGU6aXZ5ODIxMDI3MQ== From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 2 08:48:26 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 450A9693; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 08:48:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vps.rulingia.com (vps.rulingia.com [103.243.244.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "vps.rulingia.com", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE3B3EC6; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 08:48:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server.rulingia.com (c220-239-242-83.belrs5.nsw.optusnet.com.au [220.239.242.83]) by vps.rulingia.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t328m4aN038984 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 2 Apr 2015 19:48:10 +1100 (AEDT) (envelope-from peter@rulingia.com) X-Bogosity: Ham, spamicity=0.000000 Received: from server.rulingia.com (localhost.rulingia.com [127.0.0.1]) by server.rulingia.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t328lvQ0073627 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 2 Apr 2015 19:47:57 +1100 (AEDT) (envelope-from peter@server.rulingia.com) Received: (from peter@localhost) by server.rulingia.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t328lv53073623; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 19:47:57 +1100 (AEDT) (envelope-from peter) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 19:47:57 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy To: bapt@freebsd.org Subject: r382777 has deleted a required backslash Message-ID: <20150402084757.GD91212@server.rulingia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+" Content-Disposition: inline X-PGP-Key: http://www.rulingia.com/keys/peter.pgp User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 08:48:26 -0000 --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable My latest nightly "make index" died at: --- describe.print --- make[5]: "/usr/ports/print/fontforge/Makefile" line 61: Unassociated shell = command "ftp://ftp.freetype.org/freetype/freetype2/:freetype" make[5]: Fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue=3D=3D=3D> print/fontfo= rge failed *** [describe.print] Error code 1 Looking at the Makefile, the problem is that the ftp.sunet.se URL has lost the backslash at the end of the line so make(1) thinks the next line is executable. =2Eif ${PORT_OPTIONS:MFREETYPE} MASTER_SITES+=3D http://sunsite.cnlab-switch.ch/ftp/mirror/freetype/freety= pe2/:freetype \ http://www.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/ftp.freetype.org/freetype2/= :freetype \ http://ftp.sunet.se/pub/text-processing/freetype/freetype2/:freety= pe ftp://ftp.freetype.org/freetype/freetype2/:freetype =09 --=20 Peter Jeremy --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVHQI9XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRFRUIyOTg2QzMwNjcxRTc0RTY1QzIyN0Ux NkE1OTdBMEU0QTIwQjM0AAoJEBall6Dkogs0ijUP/AqQ0i1iWPDm2EpzrsUKfcVZ qmvX0DD3JmkZt+F30qIlPSOxJ0IMh/xKSHRwJh0RMax6rv5mbZRjUum0DtDwdV7D OMx0tBAIbQS6Nrz0vuJH56k3NZfP97A+IQ+YaqWgQb3Cl+/bR/QRPaj/E8WYZcO1 kl/miH9fkCSmaCu6/NzNiZB1LwY7s8l5q0ZBOJ1YuaJTd01hjlh+6XipB8G2c1CZ A+jQpOsn+7h68jix199HdSu6gKmf1kdb8mnJx3CCEFLHSqMLdqdgtnBbsd2uO/l/ slNM2D9RQFfYf8rrcAiEkI7oVbkqR++igFYCMYKVP+2YKhUVzYZJfAjFuM+l98I/ +7mVr+k6dm0PW/Sw3FTsHtXgYylI6+ztLoZaFQHcpTIbHmrQbL/Gn76bdi4L2xVf IEEeE6YS4TNZGNjsKBOZSzGPgE14Vc7GMaswfOUdNpk/zEU8fUzrQuzK/C9L8hRI 3Sb5G3ZkRcIkGup+un+FdSPAY1+3pV743BUD8RKu+OaCevNX57LQ3NTqhzxIMitQ tHqlDLurwnbTjPDVLq+1+kN82s8auEKdm5CbtvsnZoAj7eCCGbOeL8mBneJcNJ77 AiKWFL4JqT6J2IZMCVjXUOI0oyAqzA+8nD1IPIavDvzp0VxDT7Qik1HNxBV3+ER+ Sj5RjmH8VAWB8Y08AJkP =k4Dh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 2 09:08:56 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B46DE62 for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 09:08:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yh0-x229.google.com (mail-yh0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49A61144 for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 09:08:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhjf44 with SMTP id f44so19380696yhj.3 for ; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 02:08:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:mime-version:content-type; bh=35P6kk8KTMQiOAjJPpM7XzNGqIVAWTSWiY8tpXdePMg=; b=V6248AnlqG1sWsOtsUGNX539LuJP4/mR/4pkj7GEpurNh4wypG3AqViNu91F9+zMfe kyJMuPvWZ8E4WgptQ69Ob+VZt+7r2sjP5oBzvqzvD66Z2pcADXhDgjI9nFs8I78h8cr+ RLLSSK6ab0pb2F0slo/0DJlxtYcI5qJ+hPWQs= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:reply-to:organization:mime-version:content-type; bh=35P6kk8KTMQiOAjJPpM7XzNGqIVAWTSWiY8tpXdePMg=; b=W3qsEwEIO8x36Dw8lvRM3016SV0YLBc5pcnBZ8hwFTAC1pr9B8yjBckZ9ayfsc7byW o54AvgT289uT77DBrIsC4oO9nAV5GCSfIP+/B+fWw4sl07k9xvAMzoFvwXulLiLDM99q ij46aprasxaZR/O/umnQYD1kX331sh/C9d3Hj+rQcYLmtrhAxQc/V9J/UqdHQn6b70RY TbfH39pv6wU9i3GSqdb7U8TgGgesVuyROt9lyrMRthlDSm9GU9cSEBEifyYDd+RSAvYW xr+0DCxEq0cA4jkY4QV9cO0/kimADS3FEv2H0IJu6VPwKNmU9NPPp9n1NcNcBgmc9Bzc tiGw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl7xjterlKjiiVOf/KrsUA8tIsb6V8+IlE2wvASrTqehFHgV/JUHesfjHD/VeicJhhtGBl6 X-Received: by 10.236.202.67 with SMTP id c43mr48318397yho.75.1427965735201; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 02:08:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-174-109-23-221.nc.res.rr.com. [174.109.23.221]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id o48sm3326908yhb.56.2015.04.02.02.08.54 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 02 Apr 2015 02:08:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3lHdqT4WGnz3DlXl for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 05:08:53 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.6 at scorpio.seibercom.net Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 05:08:42 -0400 From: Jerry To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Pourdriere produces faulty build results due to bsd.openssl.mk bug Message-ID: <20150402050842.2a7df866@seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: References: <551C5C4C.5090707@rawbw.com> <551C6051.4060803@FreeBSD.org> <551C616C.8080503@rawbw.com> Reply-To: FreeBSD Ports Organization: seibercom NET X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.1) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/ierJwYdAwjkHL=D6Or890LJ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 09:08:56 -0000 --Sig_/ierJwYdAwjkHL=D6Or890LJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 18:37:37 -0700, Doug Hardie stated: >Some of us don=E2=80=99t use the ports version of openssl because of the i= ssues with >v1.xxx.=20 What specific issue? --=20 Jerry --Sig_/ierJwYdAwjkHL=D6Or890LJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVHQcaAAoJEElTsHIJnX8ebUAH/A5peOiiUH67DGEIwWPam4bN vZac4ZrCQLbTnaR+H0XNt6WpYO/qsGwUbm/IeiM4t3eu1hkPnv2eJNVgcDL3zFkh eMFaBgApNUFe+VJkBbpnWCxUXdE8Ybkc0frzjSLxlWvz15mm43Z5d3zhMQ9s4CiA wChosKKDz9BntZskx3YtjdJEtymSD6dLGt8Sj+PwASvajs8w40fsUlMrsHvHxQWD h3FP7LsBUuCj85PccgpiwXN2deJgDCy4tN5PEEL7TuOwK+Uicn7xF+xiJ1AzbEMg hyI9T2z6Lc5IhAs/amTyoiG9/Jr5B3zKY36e2I+tgJsSVwSNVY3O49fKsHMuSX4= =w3pw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/ierJwYdAwjkHL=D6Or890LJ-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 2 14:08:02 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87407E01 for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 14:08:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from new2-smtp.messagingengine.com (new2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.224]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54C6A9D1 for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 14:08:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7546706 for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 10:07:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 02 Apr 2015 10:08:01 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=NgmRXkQ8UdB+UL8 u5BrWsA5EnBc=; b=WeuhATM/ZaTZ86b54+EVKKx+UAGWtNBMv4L4JUwFL9P4X8+ LTegmpiNQaZGNFPTX02zqDt3S4vEz2uL0R7rc5MB07KL8bLGoyP2CkYRqh1LIneR bHDp4uCrQwzWtivvNrkc/afThIUheEYZXLkjiwSII8sAScqGmFeqf5Z06mtg= Received: by web3.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id C6E6A115CC7; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 10:08:00 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1427983680.2035836.248559593.5ED876C6@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: v2yLUqjIhAJamf8TtwRZlWWxlE2gq0Ne7RGHiRmazKtw 1427983680 From: Mark Felder To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-0b3c2300 Subject: Re: Pourdriere produces faulty build results due to bsd.openssl.mk bug Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 09:08:00 -0500 In-Reply-To: <551C615D.8050706@FreeBSD.org> References: <551C5C4C.5090707@rawbw.com> <551C615D.8050706@FreeBSD.org> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 14:08:02 -0000 On Wed, Apr 1, 2015, at 16:21, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 4/1/2015 3:59 PM, Yuri wrote: > > I found that packages produced by poudriere likely link with base > > openssl, while port make likely links with the port openssl. > > This is because of the lines in bsd.openssl.mk which check for the > > presence of openssl shared library and headers under PREFIX, and set > > WITH_OPENSSL_BASE when they aren't present. In case of port make files > > are likely present, and in case of poudriere build files are likely not > > present. > > > > Example is ftp/curl (with GSSAPI=NONE, OPENSSL=yes options). *Poudriere > > produces curl library, that causes VirtualBox to break* due to the > > openssl base vs. port conflicts. See recent emulation@ ML threads. Port > > make produces curl library that works fine with VirtualBox. > > > > I think both WITH_OPENSSL_BASE and WITH_OPENSSL_PORT should be retired, > > and code checking file presence also should be removed, and all ports > > should be made to build with an openssl port instead. Ports should never > > use base OpenSSL. > > > > Only <100 ports touch WITH_OPENSSL_... variables. Somebody who is able > > to make such decisions and has the commit bit should bit should look > > into this. Otherwise, massively faulty package repositories are produces. > > > > Yuri > > I've wanted this for a long time. I think we should just do it. > What are the risks of something linking to OpenSSL in ports also requiring something from base which in turn... links in OpenSSL from base? From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 2 14:21:10 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56306338; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 14:21:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (unknown [IPv6:2602:d1:b4d6:e600:4261:86ff:fef6:aa2a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB76DB77; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 14:21:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t32ELDGk031919; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 07:21:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) To: pkg@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org, Baptiste Daroussin In-Reply-To: <20150331190323.GF30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20150331190323.GF30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> From: "Chris H" Subject: Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0 Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 07:21:19 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-id: <2ee112c1eb589c7cb08aa1c53680fadd@ultimatedns.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 14:21:10 -0000 On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 21:03:23 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin wrote > Hi all, > > We just released pkg 1.5.0 beta1 (in ports-mgmt/pkg-devel), > .. > Please test and report as much bugs as you can! > We could be very grateful if regressions tests could be provided along with > the bug reports :) > > Plan is to release 1.5.0 as soon as possible > > Best regards, > Bapt Hello, Baptiste. I just wanted to take the time to thank you for all the work you've put into this. Thanks! --Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 2 17:13:51 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E06E5AA for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 17:13:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from luigi.brtsvcs.net (luigi.brtsvcs.net [204.109.60.246]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27ADF389 for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 17:13:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from chombo.houseloki.net (unknown [IPv6:2601:7:2580:181:21c:c0ff:fe7f:96ee]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by luigi.brtsvcs.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 730542D4F8E; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 17:13:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2601:7:2580:181:baca:3aff:fe83:bd29] (unknown [IPv6:2601:7:2580:181:baca:3aff:fe83:bd29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by chombo.houseloki.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 972434AD; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 10:13:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <551D78BE.90109@bluerosetech.com> Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 10:13:34 -0700 From: Mel Pilgrim User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Clarke , 'FreeBSD Ports' Subject: Re: Synchronising ports with package cluster References: <4105121.J31zpxLvnq@curlew.lan> In-Reply-To: <4105121.J31zpxLvnq@curlew.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 17:13:51 -0000 On 2015-04-01 13:42, Mike Clarke wrote: > Where can I now obtain the revision number for the ports tree used for the latest > package build? > > Although the above method has worked in the past it's a bit of a bodge. The ideal > way would be if this information could be accessed directly from the relevant package > repository. Would it be possible to provide such a facility? This is has been asked for many times in many forms--from SVN branching to simply an extra bit of metadata provided by pkg itself. The usual answer is, "we'll put this in a future version," but it remains not implemented. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 2 17:19:09 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE6B9AAB; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 17:19:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 585903FE; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 17:19:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from walrus.pepperland ([81.217.76.60]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MC8iq-1YmUD71UB6-008pXR; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 19:19:01 +0200 Message-ID: <551D7A04.6090806@gmx.net> Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 19:19:00 +0200 From: Stefan Ehmann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "ports@freebsd.org" Subject: poudriere 3.1.2: bulk fails and deletes jail Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:LRE9/dfOVFAbZI6wuDbgolbClMWJloU6WEhbamVfNgBOHTJ/qzm fN7XmXBQV9hmFwheEIRCKHY54O+t/FAPuU54A1gWkxCyjYiAIsAUV8ijxsfYTF+/nmjTYe7 K6E/uJ62vztL5e6ySrGEmLDYCUUQ2sQoc9fGuoTcAevSYIPaqVfAFVQ8q+1ELHdaoh9AEbk icR6YMwQKsawrKpuYgVuQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Cc: bdrewery@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 17:19:09 -0000 The following commands work as expected with poudriere 3.1.1: # poudriere jail -c -v 10.1-RELEASE -a amd64 -j 101amd64 # poudriere bulk -j 10amd64 ports-mgmt/poudriere After upgrade to 3.1.2 it fails: # poudriere bulk -j 101amd64 ports-mgmt/poudriere [00:00:00] ====>> Creating the reference jail.../usr/local/share/poudriere/bulk.sh: cannot create /usr/local/poudriere/jails/101amd64/usr/.cpignore: No such file or directory /usr/local/share/poudriere/bulk.sh: cannot create /usr/local/poudriere/jails/101amd64/usr/lib/.cpignore: No such file or directory done [00:00:04] ====>> Mounting system devices for 101amd64-default [00:00:04] ====>> Mounting ports/packages/distfiles [00:00:04] ====>> Stashing existing package repository [00:00:04] ====>> Mounting packages from: /usr/local/poudriere/data/packages/101amd64-default [00:00:04] ====>> Copying /var/db/ports from: /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/options /usr/local/share/poudriere/bulk.sh: cannot create /usr/local/poudriere/data/.m/101amd64-default/ref/etc/make.conf: No such file or directory [00:00:04] ====>> Cleaning up [00:00:04] ====>> Umounting file systems And worse: The contents of the jail are deleted: # du -sh /usr/local/poudriere/jails/101amd64/ 4.0K /usr/local/poudriere/jails/101amd64/ The problem probably only occurs in specific configurations. Otherwise, I would have expected several reports by now. # diff poudriere.conf.sample poudriere.conf | grep \> > NO_ZFS=yes > USE_TMPFS=all > CHECK_CHANGED_DEPS=yes > PARALLEL_JOBS=1 > ALLOW_MAKE_JOBS=yes From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 2 17:20:16 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE51FC39 for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 17:20:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x22a.google.com (mail-ie0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 721095F7 for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 17:20:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iedfl3 with SMTP id fl3so83252844ied.1 for ; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 10:20:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=jR50RuzjPwbmYEY2ANx26Wm+yWqO7Cd2eVCiAzDaLzQ=; b=0PdWyWa3Q5l/amFtW5LwMvzstRLm0gdWA1lh4aaqdhtI+MomSsM+7B1y03svXODHIp uIEHS6yPimH7uWRTvcKhqyjJCHcOoa3s1I6bmDaqoQpwz7kBJjPNzmVGh5rTbMGxz8zg 643kT+vTtJxw0RGKDWaQmVqA4Ag/SdKvSh5WK5LOl7mjTlSwXefg9lHCJGxi0HVDXZ8n RnjJC2fd8CUHwgpO/k3dnbLMfX8MpaucayZMahoRzgOKnLntd8qkQrj5zir2AIgjVbKF Pogj2CjmODOwHk45cs3WDIHn5bNTp1GLqFajbx92vUeY9TRuRiKHFmNt1E19UtEN/B6z UcgQ== X-Received: by 10.50.129.9 with SMTP id ns9mr21368416igb.24.1427995215784; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 10:20:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.136.35 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 10:19:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Gleb Popov <6yearold@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 20:19:45 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Enlightenment To: cpet Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD ports list X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 17:20:16 -0000 On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 7:21 PM, cpet wrote: > On 2015-02-28 07:21, Amit Sengupta wrote: > >> Hi Chris, >> >> I have been using Enlightenment for a while now and I do like it the best >> of all Window Managers. However as you already know it has some quirks, so >> it would be great if someone takes the trouble of trying to fix them. I >> can >> send bug reports or related inputs if it helps. >> >> Regards >> Amit >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > Send issues on the github project named EPorts please. so once of us can > fix them. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Is this initiative still active? I've made a pull request and i have more patches in queue, but no one seems to be around. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 2 17:24:43 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17D06DE7 for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 17:24:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC14F6B8 for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 17:24:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t32HOgK4057825 for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 17:24:42 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from bdrewery@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t32HOgVM057823 for ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 17:24:42 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery) Received: (qmail 599 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2015 12:24:40 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.10.1.139?) (freebsd@shatow.net@10.10.1.139) by sweb.xzibition.com with ESMTPA; 2 Apr 2015 12:24:40 -0500 Message-ID: <551D7B69.5030304@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 12:24:57 -0500 From: Bryan Drewery Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stefan Ehmann , "ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: poudriere 3.1.2: bulk fails and deletes jail References: <551D7A04.6090806@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <551D7A04.6090806@gmx.net> OpenPGP: id=F9173CB2C3AAEA7A5C8A1F0935D771BB6E4697CF; url=http://www.shatow.net/bryan/bryan2.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cESxo6Qoj6v5p1WFbT6u2ddXaD2Jf0h8o" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 17:24:43 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --cESxo6Qoj6v5p1WFbT6u2ddXaD2Jf0h8o Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 4/2/2015 12:19 PM, Stefan Ehmann wrote: > The following commands work as expected with poudriere 3.1.1: >=20 > # poudriere jail -c -v 10.1-RELEASE -a amd64 -j 101amd64 > # poudriere bulk -j 10amd64 ports-mgmt/poudriere >=20 >=20 > After upgrade to 3.1.2 it fails: >=20 > # poudriere bulk -j 101amd64 ports-mgmt/poudriere > [00:00:00] =3D=3D=3D=3D>> Creating the reference > jail.../usr/local/share/poudriere/bulk.sh: cannot create > /usr/local/poudriere/jails/101amd64/usr/.cpignore: No such file or > directory > /usr/local/share/poudriere/bulk.sh: cannot create > /usr/local/poudriere/jails/101amd64/usr/lib/.cpignore: No such file or > directory > done > [00:00:04] =3D=3D=3D=3D>> Mounting system devices for 101amd64-default > [00:00:04] =3D=3D=3D=3D>> Mounting ports/packages/distfiles > [00:00:04] =3D=3D=3D=3D>> Stashing existing package repository > [00:00:04] =3D=3D=3D=3D>> Mounting packages from: > /usr/local/poudriere/data/packages/101amd64-default > [00:00:04] =3D=3D=3D=3D>> Copying /var/db/ports from: > /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/options > /usr/local/share/poudriere/bulk.sh: cannot create > /usr/local/poudriere/data/.m/101amd64-default/ref/etc/make.conf: No suc= h > file or directory > [00:00:04] =3D=3D=3D=3D>> Cleaning up > [00:00:04] =3D=3D=3D=3D>> Umounting file systems >=20 > And worse: The contents of the jail are deleted: > # du -sh /usr/local/poudriere/jails/101amd64/ > 4.0K /usr/local/poudriere/jails/101amd64/ >=20 >=20 > The problem probably only occurs in specific configurations. Otherwise,= > I would have expected several reports by now. >=20 > # diff poudriere.conf.sample poudriere.conf | grep \> >> NO_ZFS=3Dyes >> USE_TMPFS=3Dall >> CHECK_CHANGED_DEPS=3Dyes >> PARALLEL_JOBS=3D1 >> ALLOW_MAKE_JOBS=3Dyes I'll get a fix out later today or tomorrow. --=20 Regards, Bryan Drewery --cESxo6Qoj6v5p1WFbT6u2ddXaD2Jf0h8o Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVHXtpAAoJEDXXcbtuRpfPfqEH+wTTs3fwP3mhBKwemk2vooKG VNcedNAYNSY0DSNkgMPVIFP7QSR+JuMo71zCyOR+Ecf1B52Su+ROutGzDm4sS1hZ E1PIV/VXRgxht9tWhyns2bLP/D362aNZTNlZ7416E4RPl/hZ8jOYO7PfmvK6YoaV sxjKDcT22/yM2tEs9S9VRRL2QCdhOmb5i3AqNUR36r17l2tXQALkvNtUrFrsUNmI FPFha6LhskPo2FzumJ6dLdM6whBKDVxSB6B8xdzOSmaXADR8ZXDk48fZwXGtL5cS olLadYUE5dvYP8QZ8gDOtaBJ6Do+YBXj2lJXOvVWWmfaVZaL+TBuIIxwuiusDn8= =HNeB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cESxo6Qoj6v5p1WFbT6u2ddXaD2Jf0h8o-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 2 18:34:42 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CBA387E; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 18:34:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yh0-x22b.google.com (mail-yh0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C379ED9; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 18:34:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhjf44 with SMTP id f44so23032889yhj.3; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 11:34:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=y+0rE1NsQpkY9blkl7LGF7yJqn0NywcIF48/aYyFS3w=; b=lc/GBep//nfi8IckxkUBfEmvLE5AVwplgmzzot4b/Eii7RsN6mrEGOhOxDrLa2hjdO 865vQaC2woqRNHQzywgsUIV5IU5AEQMEFWnWP25RwlFXjFBMsKdYIgF2n0uh/7YA8kwq WTlcHoz9gNz12WVua+Inf85ViDX8ZQy5ZzelSxCMRse8HX/k9O1NxPih+a1odU6tTkdC SMDT62VAoMVDFObJ6BTTbG2aJYa0EVJzl74m/OlrQMTCMNi0FHT9P6SShRuzcqJF5qGb uPSJVgQ37uUUDmrOyMToUp3/NkoqQp00iGxnXHf87w9XxWH04b39MWDPKyYpy1Ux1sJE piDw== X-Received: by 10.52.255.171 with SMTP id ar11mr46817756vdd.36.1427999681149; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 11:34:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id xc11sm930862vdc.2.2015.04.02.11.34.38 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 02 Apr 2015 11:34:39 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 20:34:36 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Chris H Subject: Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0 Message-ID: <20150402183435.GB30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20150331190323.GF30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <2ee112c1eb589c7cb08aa1c53680fadd@ultimatedns.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="M5PHxtWZRXQUdpfa" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2ee112c1eb589c7cb08aa1c53680fadd@ultimatedns.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: pkg@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 18:34:42 -0000 --M5PHxtWZRXQUdpfa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 07:21:19AM -0700, Chris H wrote: > On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 21:03:23 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin = wrote >=20 > > Hi all, > >=20 > > We just released pkg 1.5.0 beta1 (in ports-mgmt/pkg-devel), > >=20 > .. > > Please test and report as much bugs as you can! > > We could be very grateful if regressions tests could be provided along = with > > the bug reports :) > >=20 > > Plan is to release 1.5.0 as soon as possible > >=20 > > Best regards, > > Bapt > Hello, Baptiste. > I just wanted to take the time to thank you for all the > work you've put into this. >=20 > Thanks! Thanks much appreciated, I want to share that with vsevolod@ and az@ who al= so spent a lot of time working on it! Best regards, Bapt --M5PHxtWZRXQUdpfa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlUdi7sACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ey5swCfdKpeuPQVO9BZ+omMLazlxbah j98Anj7o/onniMjkNextkcE3z6iPTefD =Bunk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --M5PHxtWZRXQUdpfa-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 2 20:19:16 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF959EDF; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 20:19:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-x22c.google.com (mail-yk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7788EDBF; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 20:19:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ykfa3 with SMTP id a3so20800656ykf.0; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 13:19:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:user-agent; bh=6l9NnMXE3bz0GUSFhEdpHCAgBVrNBr+C163T58k5Pgo=; b=KntTaUdeALk0api47/waRq31b+mHYDj5zqYNeWw5fyLfQVtZ4PcA5GjWlXscIBLvh4 Nz74Sc5ZnTCHevWo8D6A6CkAUDpB5w9QUQVUpy7FDz0LMbEv62p13wI6CafR9AmF0oP7 ztOVKwHdaMgEY/g0I3USeOKnfOLYdM6LR1W3wgmSji4kDKfoTjpzTYQzFO3LG2oXMXdB HsvnDEWWP+CTJvnhaTiACYvWMbUbYG0Q8YO72eqtLaRK0NhWqkQhG54GQCjyN+QtNdgN dGcKy41mtMsSm0i6WBwPcyosoZIiHhibZxcw3NYvWJa18g/PT25xmChKVu+GwmxDAkrs xgRQ== X-Received: by 10.52.243.170 with SMTP id wz10mr44582823vdc.25.1428005955572; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 13:19:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id jr8sm960223vdb.25.2015.04.02.13.19.13 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 02 Apr 2015 13:19:14 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 22:19:10 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: pkg@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Share your pkg aliases Message-ID: <20150402201909.GD30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cUq9BFDytUJq8bQY" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 20:19:16 -0000 --cUq9BFDytUJq8bQY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi, For pkg 1.5.0 we do plan to provide a default pkg.conf full of useful aliases, of course this is subjective, if you think you have added some useful aliases into your pkg.conf please share those so we can add them directly into the next release. Best regards, Bapt --cUq9BFDytUJq8bQY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlUdpD0ACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ey6lwCgjatwA5jA0byEiAY98mrJJFcS ojwAnRPCgVR4+zO3dp7jXvz6fjHJ5/+g =/IPz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cUq9BFDytUJq8bQY-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 2 20:55:01 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A073F74 for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 20:55:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from clavin1.langille.org (clavin.langille.org [162.208.116.86]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "clavin.langille.org", Issuer "StartCom Class 2 Primary Intermediate Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D6352D3 for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 20:55:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from (clavin1.int.langille.org (clavin1.int.unixathome.org [10.4.7.7]) (Authenticated sender: hidden) with ESMTPSA id 97ED93C11 ; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 20:54:58 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: security/py-kerberos From: Dan Langille In-Reply-To: <5515D45E.2010803@micite.net> Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 16:54:57 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <1432E901-3CE0-40D2-A061-47D3626666F7@langille.org> References: <5515CD55.3040203@micite.net> <7AC0D3B1-32EB-4732-BD7F-7258FD068992@langille.org> <5515D20D.4010802@micite.net> <5515D279.8090406@micite.net> <4FF6BD31-447E-4EE0-8A66-8385D686424D@langille.org> <5515D45E.2010803@micite.net> To: Roland van Laar X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) Cc: ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 20:55:01 -0000 > On Mar 27, 2015, at 6:06 PM, Roland van Laar = wrote: >=20 > On 27-03-15 23:02, Dan Langille wrote: >>> On Mar 27, 2015, at 5:58 PM, Roland van Laar = wrote: >>>=20 >>> On 27-03-15 22:56, Roland van Laar wrote: >>>> On 27-03-15 22:39, Dan Langille wrote: >>>>>> On Mar 27, 2015, at 5:36 PM, Roland van Laar = wrote: >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> On 27-03-15 21:11, Dan Langille wrote: >>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> Why does security/py-kerberos require security/krb5? >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> I ask because we already have Kerberos in base. Why do we need = two installations of Kerberos? >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> I'm confused. :/ >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> I ask because I just added security/py-requests-kerberos to the = tree. >>>>>> py-kerberos depends on gssapi/gssapi_generic.h. >>>>>> This file isn't included in the base kerberos, but it is in the = security/krb5 port. >>>>> I see. >>>>>=20 >>>>> So we need it only for compiling, not for running? >>>> ;-) I haven't tried running it without the krb5 package. >>> The resulting python module is: kerberos.so. >>> Which actually depends on libkrb5support.so from security/krb5 >>> See: >>>=20 >>> # ldd ./kerberos.so >>> ./kerberos.so: >>> libpython2.7.so.1 =3D> /usr/local/lib/libpython2.7.so.1 = (0x801606000) >>> libgssapi_krb5.so =3D> /usr/local/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so = (0x8019c1000) >>> libkrb5.so =3D> /usr/local/lib/libkrb5.so (0x801c08000) >>> libk5crypto.so =3D> /usr/local/lib/libk5crypto.so (0x801ee8000) >>> libcom_err.so =3D> /usr/local/lib/libcom_err.so (0x802117000) >>> libc.so.7 =3D> /lib/libc.so.7 (0x80081f000) >>> libthr.so.3 =3D> /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x80231a000) >>> libintl.so.9 =3D> /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.9 (0x80253f000) >>> libutil.so.9 =3D> /lib/libutil.so.9 (0x802748000) >>> libm.so.5 =3D> /lib/libm.so.5 (0x80295a000) >>> libkrb5support.so =3D> /usr/local/lib/libkrb5support.so = (0x802b82000) >> That looks like what I found on my server after installing. >>=20 >>>>> I want to avoid having two Kerberos installed on the server. :) >> I wonder why it needs security/krb5 and can't use Kerberos from base. = It seems odd to me... >=20 > In what way is it odd? > The base kerberos is a different one than the MIT one. > py-kerberos is developed by Apple for their calendarserver software = and I think they just > used the MIT implementation. Here's a patch so it works with Base and with heimdal too. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D199123 =E2=80=94=20 Dan Langille http://langille.org/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 2 22:19:47 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9B8BC3B for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 22:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tatiana.utanet.at (tatiana.utanet.at [IPv6:2001:938:1337:25::25:46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 755FAE24 for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 22:19:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=utanet.at; s=rev1; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=pr9m4kyDr2ccZm2DJrSjMZl4CzZy+Zeb+0fQp+zSyp4=; b=QTWPcIqmu0wGZRbRnvgcaNqM4POYQEbezxAxUqUBSHpZOX+5iND5KENb+Tp09EqL2R+zGMtGao8CUi7GCZNFWCkr0+NCJQ9cEt2nJd5f7NTRq2HXyzge4Bw3cWhN/ESLBAznnAqOMs9UNDzG+yhHkcqlcpdTos9Euz7nYi5I+dA=; Received: from paris.xoc.tele2net.at ([213.90.36.7]) by tatiana.utanet.at with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YdnSj-0004JR-4L for ports@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 00:19:45 +0200 Received: from 188-23-11-21.adsl.highway.telekom.at ([188.23.11.21] helo=[10.0.0.36]) by paris.xoc.tele2net.at with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YdnSj-0002AS-2X for ports@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 00:19:45 +0200 Message-ID: <551DC078.5090201@utanet.at> Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 00:19:36 +0200 From: Walter Schwarzenfeld User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: handbrake Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 22:19:48 -0000 Hallo !! handbrake-0.10-1 fails to compile (it seems on all systems) with this error message: ../contrib/ffmpeg/module.rules:2: recipe for target 'contrib/ffmpeg/.stamp.configure' failed gmake[1]: *** [contrib/ffmpeg/.stamp.configure] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/multimedia/handbrake/work/HandBrake-0.10.1/build' *** Error code 1 antoine marked it as broken. But if I put this in the Makefile, it works: libvpx.so:${PORTSDIR}/multimedia/libvpx \ libx264.so:${PORTSDIR}/multimedia/libx264 seens the two lines are missing. greetings Walter Schwarzenfeld From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 3 05:30:15 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63760FAC for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 05:30:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x242.google.com (mail-ie0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B68C21E for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 05:30:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iery20 with SMTP id y20so4511887ier.1 for ; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 22:30:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=iWjc2EHTdJ/b03xYFaQKqeG/BnFZKGyRzKEIXnbuzXw=; b=C3GbhjugEw4s1nsBCgprS7yVA6Qy26V90oA+ZR1fYvbzXcsc/xthF1qST8z+DzObcR o7zl9wIB97kp5rki4kHQmKqczYebhnK4/vP+09pql3AvlSHmsCrL41lTCiWJreq2pvlI eteUzPVFacyYXyhoDFvT1wcbPuXVPPpMyRxV7pQi+rr1nLBCr/2U5nb8V0185qlZIZjY ziUhxlR8+yox2UmAh7z1jFxmNwuCll4DH+u6miIBrGY2KUCps0i2uTapT20+C+//6I48 7abWWWIgStMNS+eGdBxLhLDt1hn9eFn9TQWXhKUmQB7EI0DLbV4vvF8mnSASMecZRi3U rwew== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.56.106 with SMTP id z10mr25509975igp.8.1428039014051; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 22:30:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.233.10 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 22:30:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 21:30:14 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Is Your Website Penalized By Google? From: David Sage To: ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 05:30:15 -0000 Hello, I am David Sage Business Development Manager from Kanti SEO Technology. I want to let you know about updated Google search engine guidelines. Today we analyzed your web site and found your website's promotion work is not following updated search engine guidelines. It=E2=80=99s our duty to inform= the web site owner or administrator to run their web site with Google updated guidelines. I found your web site isn=E2=80=99t updated with Google latest = penguin and Panda updates, so it has been penalized and filtered by Google so your keyword ranking is down. There are no strong and quality back links for website. Back links are removing day by day, you can check. No quality article content available on web pages. Now Google gives priority to quality and relevant contents. The Website contains white hat, it=E2=80=99s= good. Website Meta elements are not added perfectly. Posting fresh article content on Blog section is very important and it=E2=80=99s not done. Do HTM= L and XML site map perfectly for website. Most important Google webmaster tools set up file on server and analytic code set up on each web page. Both ONPAGE and OFFPAGE SEO are unprofessional and unnatural. Google avoids your website so you no keyword is in good position on SERP. A website can be recovered easily after implementation. Please check your website yourself again. If you are not interested then write us "NO", so that we will never email you. *Thanks Regards,* *David Sage* *Business Development Manager* *Kanti SEO Technology* *Skype:kantitech* *Mob:+91 7787015658* *www.kantitech.com * From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 3 05:46:46 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D36EA177 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 05:46:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x22d.google.com (mail-ig0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A1743DC for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 05:46:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ignm3 with SMTP id m3so60475991ign.0 for ; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 22:46:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=SAWaEp0QI3g7fgdxk1TgSqU4F+Z/YwDYldwGI6X1bOE=; b=twerGuZgWSzQeL7CrgjD9LyO8PX3jUy0fXgEL3VVDa22MIIu9Ta7OrQGOzRQR4LU0h uhSWWRrNRx50rms/j5aVlF6gOZZ80CnrTsnpba6QCY41mCJIGO7rMwR0ZCvGvCmAMj4s zxMk6GO9IceigTdnwp8v4UoP6uX28Ql4Ow/u5O6RrC7cQ3+PCz5Hvn8EPIK6C7icOVhI ve5vWOv8bWSpMnu2n7SLsjOY8EXLn7VVwE4VDUHjyqvsxhTaj620MrUw/KXRPwgVzGEq 4CmnRBZV0bESStL/SNxOqs32Q0Z0T1Wgj0lCCGXnul8T+2NapGm3p+C7sBKgFquRnvSH a1mA== X-Received: by 10.43.6.65 with SMTP id oj1mr1713996icb.75.1428040005867; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 22:46:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ben Woods Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 05:46:45 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: How do I specify port opt1 requires opt2 To: FreeBSD ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 05:46:46 -0000 I am working on modifying a port, and was wondering how do I specify that selecting port option1 requires that option2 is also selected? Note that in my example it is perfectly acceptable to have option2 selected without option1. Thanks in advance, Ben From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 3 06:36:54 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41A1A863; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 06:36:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-x230.google.com (mail-qc0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE094A0A; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 06:36:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qcay5 with SMTP id y5so83871878qca.1; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 23:36:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=kXDgy6pY8J/PIWl30HE+rsRgqmXBK0cwImYVlSxDTtA=; b=S5T0Wl2DFSIfvxHsMomPMHFu7CMWstS6ZI/AzMg96XwF+2dvtFxn2xfiamy9OcngCl JxNZHP0JLLDmUF40d/L2AWSCbKraeK0TKZHfoRLrA/OgL5JyfUjAFGx0OIdI6XlTVvPI VL0yD3waQnHdOW06VNBjd75dwy7feOVAq1HKnS76Rbe1uCk/fzLikqKTpQK7bFFidHY0 jesADgx3tJivNbklfVXLAOHDQ7zXj27BLvVCnN8exfgOaX8Bp2AVK60exZ1QoA7n6NhT ghc+mNEYjrD6T7Ju0tjEXPY8g/qCTCN7LmTX3rJDWTnIrBmyty8G/h0yadQEcTWb6QUz bUOg== X-Received: by 10.55.31.83 with SMTP id f80mr1691908qkf.57.1428043013016; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 23:36:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20150402201909.GD30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20150402201909.GD30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> From: Henry Hu Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 06:36:52 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Share your pkg aliases To: Baptiste Daroussin , pkg@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 06:36:54 -0000 On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:19 PM Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Hi, > > For pkg 1.5.0 we do plan to provide a default pkg.conf full of useful > aliases, > of course this is subjective, if you think you have added some useful > aliases > into your pkg.conf please share those so we can add them directly into the > next > release. > I have two aliases: alias: { "locked": "query -e '%k == 1' %n", "leaf": "query -e '%#r == 0' '%n auto: %a'", } The first one queries the locked packages, and the second one queries the leaf packages. > > Best regards, > Bapt > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 3 06:53:28 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9334A4F; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 06:53:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yh0-x231.google.com (mail-yh0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A97F7BCC; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 06:53:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhla23 with SMTP id a23so11613434yhl.1; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 23:53:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=YnKwrsOfGzDJ2gNCRZIR6pVtuwNDYCH06HHNm2mxS7o=; b=A7Nbc0z7begzo03UE6fK+skgOY4OI6xN3r7cTDgsS0qIYOndmxtmpY8vAOAYcLa3XK jNWVW63tg9crIe+87vkRqoqeQCWTKO2tnojgoyfmHiKfICn1HXdv4ZZDW4oqf13Fj9hL iAo4gtXt8deQ8Hw5rx9sAEJf61+ZcLmsQrHP3NI1rhN5a4Q6yVN1+jf1dIVZcd0ub4My C1guRdI1BV1CO6OxNRfd3ATdpBK5obnqHqonJJRFWQ9I/RCm+X15Y7lCVT78K7cvaH/B aXKL8Rk7xlJz58xyeuj8ZG7ag4MSBZ6uKQ3HUC9rdlg5tI/pYHZtD0PbNM3tpGCEUIHU IIrg== X-Received: by 10.52.157.193 with SMTP id wo1mr627229vdb.61.1428044007799; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 23:53:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ew3sm1211380vdb.4.2015.04.02.23.53.25 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 02 Apr 2015 23:53:26 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 08:53:22 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Henry Hu Subject: Re: Share your pkg aliases Message-ID: <20150403065322.GI30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20150402201909.GD30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YtWd7p+F4osuzCU+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: pkg@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 06:53:29 -0000 --YtWd7p+F4osuzCU+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 06:36:52AM +0000, Henry Hu wrote: > On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:19 PM Baptiste Daroussin wrot= e: >=20 > > Hi, > > > > For pkg 1.5.0 we do plan to provide a default pkg.conf full of useful > > aliases, > > of course this is subjective, if you think you have added some useful > > aliases > > into your pkg.conf please share those so we can add them directly into = the > > next > > release. > > >=20 > I have two aliases: > alias: { > "locked": "query -e '%k =3D=3D 1' %n", > "leaf": "query -e '%#r =3D=3D 0' '%n auto: %a'", > } > The first one queries the locked packages, and the second one queries the > leaf packages. Thanks How is locked different from pkg lock -l ? Best regards, Bapt --YtWd7p+F4osuzCU+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlUeOOIACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EwinwCgusZ/iBXDA65+iD5E1lhQRS5M iJMAoLxxzZypsoZJS3PmzyPV/f9z1iOD =vPsd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YtWd7p+F4osuzCU+-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 3 07:15:54 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 823EADF8; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 07:15:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-x22c.google.com (mail-qc0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 393ABDA1; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 07:15:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qcbii10 with SMTP id ii10so61947264qcb.2; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 00:15:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=tSHYC6O3aSx0y6x7OUGP8gWQY1E3Bs+oEVqMKsosB6Q=; b=iRtIBqiCFe3V/dCBW7EColf22Xouv14Sj95hMz5+PD4fxRLXdufrckHn3Op9fTVpo4 6rD/Pjzfbr1Fa1wmtW1Lsc8CXXwJGdhPLrwT/iD7ktSz+b51qaoR3Uyr33u0JSTfixAl PojsTKeQuTsQDCrQuDZlneSuBnTS8MtmHY5yg45RFUHcb8xCoESD+9IYEoZfnBKvkRQ1 fzD7Uj+8fyn8uYQlnZFcC78xOAzEbOhhbA4UhVowzoyEmXYAWAf5qtj/KcMDWCoKBHY8 eJOzwQ/UCrPSw5SoqjfddwFm6+zE+hKM3AbA9X18ekizxySC85PvS/EQOSO3AlPgPJYa X5NA== X-Received: by 10.140.149.150 with SMTP id 144mr1252727qhv.16.1428045353349; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 00:15:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20150402201909.GD30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20150403065322.GI30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20150403065322.GI30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> From: Henry Hu Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 07:15:52 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Share your pkg aliases To: Baptiste Daroussin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: pkg@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 07:15:54 -0000 On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 2:53 AM Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 06:36:52AM +0000, Henry Hu wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:19 PM Baptiste Daroussin > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > For pkg 1.5.0 we do plan to provide a default pkg.conf full of useful > > > aliases, > > > of course this is subjective, if you think you have added some useful > > > aliases > > > into your pkg.conf please share those so we can add them directly into > the > > > next > > > release. > > > > > > > I have two aliases: > > alias: { > > "locked": "query -e '%k == 1' %n", > > "leaf": "query -e '%#r == 0' '%n auto: %a'", > > } > > The first one queries the locked packages, and the second one queries the > > leaf packages. > > Thanks > > How is locked different from pkg lock -l ? > Basically the same... I'm not aware of pkg lock -l. > > Best regards, > Bapt > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 3 09:03:31 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6629774 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 09:03:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1754A4B for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 09:03:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t3393V8a010909 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 09:03:31 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t3393ViS010907; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 09:03:31 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201504030903.t3393ViS010907@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 09:03:31 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 09:03:31 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ www/drupal6-webform | 6.x-3.17 | 6.x-3.23 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 3 11:25:18 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4B749C6; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 11:25:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [IPv6:2001:aa8:fffb:1::3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38C46B3B; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 11:25:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [IPv6:2001:aa8:fffb:1::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.0x20.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C1006A6002; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 13:25:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id t33BPFPq037115; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 13:25:15 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: (from lars@localhost) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id t33BPEQo036080; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 13:25:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lars) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 13:25:14 +0200 From: Lars Engels To: Baptiste Daroussin Subject: Re: Share your pkg aliases Message-ID: <20150403112514.GK20473@e-new.0x20.net> References: <20150402201909.GD30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YZ2gLtJL3Gv805BH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150402201909.GD30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 7.4 X-Operation-System: FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE-p23 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: pkg@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 11:25:18 -0000 --YZ2gLtJL3Gv805BH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 10:19:10PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Hi, >=20 > For pkg 1.5.0 we do plan to provide a default pkg.conf full of useful ali= ases, > of course this is subjective, if you think you have added some useful ali= ases > into your pkg.conf please share those so we can add them directly into th= e next > release. myports: rquery -e '%m =3D lme@FreeBSD.org' %o, # Show ports maintained by= me unmaintained: query -e '%m =3D ports@FreeBSD.org' %o, # Show unmaintained p= orts csearch: search -U -c, # Search a port's short description --YZ2gLtJL3Gv805BH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJVHniaXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ4RjQwMDE3RTRERjUzMTI1N0FGRTUxNDlF NTRDQjM3RDNBMDg5RDZEAAoJEOVMs306CJ1tBAQH/RNc0ASHjJMo31ZvJQDriEAJ DwCw3+sT+/p8ZVs3mMcnJsSSP/3TN4LGq6uCkjdX1LGpAFDz+LVbgjmOFklZCahy SjT+vc54Ux4BcJzWeeGccpRZWtl7tfQoYNZvSb1yhtgezhR8LAfERVKVeJKVHfBN JAL3WMHm5sLgE04AzBDDKRE0v5lv32sCnAGyctwNqXLbkx7yfzYEkmbd0tWWS9dm Yb2YbstLLPOJAeqxJmHvfHRlN0ewUNxNCozHGwPJrBmjCkny2fHz2Y3zz2oirVoy j9AQ9C0040qFS87TxMKZUyYlitcVeRrIik8wxtElYPH8QQHg+BLJPd9x3R5t1ow= =9R/x -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YZ2gLtJL3Gv805BH-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 3 13:12:37 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7E41C26; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 13:12:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (mx3.absolight.net [IPv6:2a01:678:2:100::25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76D36883; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 13:12:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBCA2BDC5A; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 15:12:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gw.in.absolight.net (gw-ecl.in.absolight.net [79.143.241.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gw.in.absolight.net", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B5734BDC56; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 15:12:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ogg.in.absolight.net (ogg.in.absolight.net [79.143.241.239]) by gw.in.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54AD16151; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 15:12:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ogg.in.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFC7E30711D; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 15:12:34 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 15:12:34 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Baptiste Daroussin , pkg@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Share your pkg aliases Message-ID: <736E71149C562A8AAF3B00A6@ogg.in.absolight.net> In-Reply-To: <20150402201909.GD30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20150402201909.GD30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 13:12:37 -0000 +--On 2 avril 2015 22:19:10 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: | Hi, | | For pkg 1.5.0 we do plan to provide a default pkg.conf full of useful | aliases, of course this is subjective, if you think you have added some | useful aliases into your pkg.conf please share those so we can add them | directly into the next release. leaf = "query -e \"%#r == 0\" \"%n-%v\""; noauto = "query -e \"%a == 0\" \"%n-%v\""; -- Mathieu Arnold From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 3 13:32:31 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 833B52A1; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 13:32:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qg0-x229.google.com (mail-qg0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4067DA61; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 13:32:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qgej70 with SMTP id j70so6757753qge.2; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 06:32:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=PZjyDZaHyndlcAZ7gWeWEQ1hmkRt8cQ9/sHHPrVNHgM=; b=ZJO8BQ7UG3OQXYSsAlx1rx71uF6Br+hhqs2WEV/71cEKvon4i0iqWcvVQG7A7XQwCq xpB9u2ZUeXugUpnk8vQbQ/PrelvAbEVczvoinOYOuEzclSfJsm2oC63NUhtaeOEPbQCk QSaJl8WCXm6S+jJVLZI9PSuYWHEJQqSFQ0xU4ANyBHpUGq5tWgjA3DXhlr0LFg5p2FSs DeMHI0j8JLoTLEnTQc8YNu9w/Tm2c+SEhEI6+loYKwcxoYPd4KBY8R3WVOfV2NwUkDkV mGeSE0xCPtiHLEtc/11HrsPgNZz6LBwyyQElnHEKTPaz0kR7Ube9VxXM1HwkXc0m6sw8 mbIw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.238.79 with SMTP id j76mr2711236qhc.83.1428067950317; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 06:32:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.200.66 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 06:32:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150402183435.GB30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20150331190323.GF30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <2ee112c1eb589c7cb08aa1c53680fadd@ultimatedns.net> <20150402183435.GB30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 14:32:30 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0 From: Big Lebowski To: Baptiste Daroussin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: pkg@freebsd.org, "ports@FreeBSD.org Ports" , stable@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, Chris H X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 13:32:31 -0000 >> I just wanted to take the time to thank you for all the >> work you've put into this. >> >> Thanks! > > Thanks much appreciated, I want to share that with vsevolod@ and az@ who also > spent a lot of time working on it! > Indeed, HUGE THANKS for what you guys are doing with pkg - I cant wait to see that OS X integration in action (and other things as well), you rock! S. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 3 13:35:45 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48F37652; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 13:35:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-x22e.google.com (mail-qc0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 016E8AAA; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 13:35:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qcbii10 with SMTP id ii10so66549447qcb.2; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 06:35:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=duRQMzT+07L9hdxPjQphgMDWg61TfcbO1Z74fszP6C4=; b=bRIu6Ijyur55MI9uG+BMI3x1owsCSK0PrBVqjgEiSItIpLjVDBjnj0fB2fRa6nxcOs 0zXKsGIBiSR/s17075w9hS8UUvi+VZPqdwSFEi4p++3guZKSSYD2ss8d11U9BptYh9Vf bSDgSzNskDjs2k796Cvez0DP6jI21SPSyUb6TpuRI1Od3T/XlnqTxHPtWV6IICsPrdDJ Pw06Kzof981mCifBwMK9Sn/Rm/JEO1s2t6XsFsnJJ30Gi0e26HLTjqMdI5iBYE5wkFqv UuyfU2F03RfkCDUfFFltbOhAfgbHzlKvhi9tRK43z9DHF6SOvl7Yq5chHwYo2GdTHT31 f2sA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.55.49.143 with SMTP id x137mr4382411qkx.72.1428068143988; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 06:35:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.200.66 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 06:35:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150331190323.GF30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20150331190323.GF30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 14:35:43 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0 From: Big Lebowski To: Baptiste Daroussin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: pkg@freebsd.org, "ports@FreeBSD.org Ports" , stable@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 13:35:45 -0000 > > Please test and report as much bugs as you can! > We could be very grateful if regressions tests could be provided along with the > bug reports :) > Mine just did something like that: foobar# uname -a FreeBSD foobar.org 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #0 r280994M: Thu Apr 2 20:16:53 CEST 2015 root@pd.valinor.palantiri.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FOOBAR amd64 foobar [uname -a] ~/ 15-04-03 3:33PM foobar# pkg --version 1.4.99.15 foobar [pkg --version] ~/ 15-04-03 3:33PM foobar# pkg version Child process pid=41119 terminated abnormally: Segmentation fault foobar [pkg version] ~/ 15-04-03 3:33PM foobar# pkg version -t 0.2.o.git20150311 0.2.o.20150402 < foobar [pkg version -t 0.2.o.git20150311 0.2.o.20150402] ~/ 15-04-03 3:33PM pd# From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 3 14:34:40 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C042EEF; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 14:34:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-x22a.google.com (mail-yk0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E8FF118; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 14:34:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ykeg184 with SMTP id g184so29640141yke.2; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 07:34:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Zuqs+D0vkczQTXh1i7YLEiBBmuLHAxjYyUVJl99hXBY=; b=KuiftkJNgo/z/ezC42yjo8zTi6i8H5zsVd2uDyMd7s/RDJUygF3q1TwDtxiiQhbbn+ zaoeAA5buFgVqKizqTeOGN4f7i7H8ZavcuZeiGnQzYQR6f1HzysrJb0+2uo8VYLs74mO 8P7ySCIMxu8CkcFZ8Z9+DJNy5lS1/umCNfOKEhgrLdy8y9yy/r8BO3Vfg9JMkbRIxjMb qprTb2YSfUxK39hcBOG4gA7f1epA0PDcMH4NoFsnwRhH2RrweQn2iT9tSQm4S+BCapN1 b7OnQjABp5PQd0BILsDYxKY6cYK6k4yfZUO45Pg//KugPqXjyLDDJa53T+o+IDF8ZEEt s42Q== X-Received: by 10.52.243.41 with SMTP id wv9mr1504131vdc.20.1428071679382; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 07:34:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id yr19sm1346719vdc.8.2015.04.03.07.34.36 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 03 Apr 2015 07:34:37 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 16:34:33 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Big Lebowski Subject: Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0 Message-ID: <20150403143433.GJ30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20150331190323.GF30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ohWw6IXhY39HKnGA" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: pkg@freebsd.org, "ports@FreeBSD.org Ports" , stable@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 14:34:40 -0000 --ohWw6IXhY39HKnGA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 02:35:43PM +0100, Big Lebowski wrote: > > > > Please test and report as much bugs as you can! > > We could be very grateful if regressions tests could be provided along = with the > > bug reports :) > > >=20 > Mine just did something like that: >=20 > foobar# uname -a > FreeBSD foobar.org 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #0 r280994M: Thu > Apr 2 20:16:53 CEST 2015 > root@pd.valinor.palantiri.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FOOBAR amd64 > foobar [uname -a] ~/ > 15-04-03 > 3:33PM > foobar# pkg --version > 1.4.99.15 > foobar [pkg --version] ~/ > 15-04-03 > 3:33PM > foobar# pkg version > Child process pid=3D41119 terminated abnormally: Segmentation fault > foobar [pkg version] ~/ > 15-04-03 > 3:33PM > foobar# pkg version -t 0.2.o.git20150311 0.2.o.20150402 > < > foobar [pkg version -t 0.2.o.git20150311 0.2.o.20150402] ~/ > 15-04-03 > 3:33PM > pd# Let me fix that :) Best regards, Bapt --ohWw6IXhY39HKnGA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlUepPkACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EwSpwCdGFKpk1xhzMoKLCy6elFTDM4P cvEAnjwvWkUzrx6DXoczN0ZocpVFbiIj =rktF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ohWw6IXhY39HKnGA-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 3 18:48:36 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BFD868A for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 18:48:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (mx3.absolight.net [IPv6:2a01:678:2:100::25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D28C81B6 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 18:48:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0324ABDC25; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 20:48:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from atuin.in.mat.cc (atuin.in.mat.cc [79.143.241.205]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B9474BDC1F; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 20:48:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atuin.in.mat.cc (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8BE92EB69D2; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 20:48:32 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 20:48:32 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Mel Pilgrim , Mike Clarke , 'FreeBSD Ports' Subject: Re: Synchronising ports with package cluster Message-ID: <528E328C28D3DCE6AB98B284@atuin.in.mat.cc> In-Reply-To: <551D78BE.90109@bluerosetech.com> References: <4105121.J31zpxLvnq@curlew.lan> <551D78BE.90109@bluerosetech.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 18:48:36 -0000 +--On 2 avril 2015 10:13:34 -0700 Mel Pilgrim wrote: | On 2015-04-01 13:42, Mike Clarke wrote: |> Where can I now obtain the revision number for the ports tree used for |> the latest package build? |> |> Although the above method has worked in the past it's a bit of a bodge. |> The ideal way would be if this information could be accessed directly |> from the relevant package repository. Would it be possible to provide |> such a facility? | | This is has been asked for many times in many forms--from SVN branching | to simply an extra bit of metadata provided by pkg itself. The usual | answer is, "we'll put this in a future version," but it remains not | implemented. Do feel free to provide a patch, adding this to, say, the repo metadata. -- Mathieu Arnold From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 3 18:49:58 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 157E6722 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 18:49:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (mx3.absolight.net [IPv6:2a01:678:2:100::25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9E101C2 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 18:49:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12569BDC5A for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 20:49:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from atuin.in.mat.cc (atuin.in.mat.cc [79.143.241.205]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 33A29BDC30 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 20:49:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atuin.in.mat.cc (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8F622EB69F1 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 20:49:54 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 20:49:54 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Pourdriere produces faulty build results due to bsd.openssl.mk bug Message-ID: <39EB43284C708BF6D95925A1@atuin.in.mat.cc> In-Reply-To: <1427983680.2035836.248559593.5ED876C6@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <551C5C4C.5090707@rawbw.com> <551C615D.8050706@FreeBSD.org> <1427983680.2035836.248559593.5ED876C6@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 18:49:58 -0000 +--On 2 avril 2015 09:08:00 -0500 Mark Felder wrote: | On Wed, Apr 1, 2015, at 16:21, Bryan Drewery wrote: |> On 4/1/2015 3:59 PM, Yuri wrote: |> > I found that packages produced by poudriere likely link with base |> > openssl, while port make likely links with the port openssl. |> > This is because of the lines in bsd.openssl.mk which check for the |> > presence of openssl shared library and headers under PREFIX, and set |> > WITH_OPENSSL_BASE when they aren't present. In case of port make files |> > are likely present, and in case of poudriere build files are likely not |> > present. |> > |> > Example is ftp/curl (with GSSAPI=NONE, OPENSSL=yes options). |> > *Poudriere produces curl library, that causes VirtualBox to break* due |> > to the openssl base vs. port conflicts. See recent emulation@ ML |> > threads. Port make produces curl library that works fine with |> > VirtualBox. |> > |> > I think both WITH_OPENSSL_BASE and WITH_OPENSSL_PORT should be retired, |> > and code checking file presence also should be removed, and all ports |> > should be made to build with an openssl port instead. Ports should |> > never use base OpenSSL. |> > |> > Only <100 ports touch WITH_OPENSSL_... variables. Somebody who is able |> > to make such decisions and has the commit bit should bit should look |> > into this. Otherwise, massively faulty package repositories are |> > produces. |> > |> > Yuri |> |> I've wanted this for a long time. I think we should just do it. |> | | What are the risks of something linking to OpenSSL in ports also | requiring something from base which in turn... links in OpenSSL from | base? Like gssapi from base, yes, we would need to only link with gssapi from ports. There is also the problems of ports linking with libpkg.so and libcrypto.so... (like net-snmp) -- Mathieu Arnold From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 3 18:51:58 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6197D8A1 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 18:51:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (mx3.absolight.net [IPv6:2a01:678:2:100::25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21FAA270 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 18:51:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71A38BDC5E; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 20:51:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from atuin.in.mat.cc (atuin.in.mat.cc [79.143.241.205]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 59A92BDC5A; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 20:51:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atuin.in.mat.cc (Postfix) with ESMTP id C11662EB6A40; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 20:51:55 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 20:51:55 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Ben Woods , FreeBSD ports Subject: Re: How do I specify port opt1 requires opt2 Message-ID: <49565FCAB7E8FD98176737C0@atuin.in.mat.cc> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 18:51:58 -0000 +--On 3 avril 2015 05:46:45 +0000 Ben Woods wrote: | I am working on modifying a port, and was wondering how do I specify that | selecting port option1 requires that option2 is also selected? | | Note that in my example it is perfectly acceptable to have option2 | selected without option1. This functionnality is coming, it's being discussed in but for now, you'll have to do some testing in your Makefile and either add an IGNORE or force the other option. -- Mathieu Arnold From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 3 19:47:34 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28E8FB4C; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 19:47:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-x22c.google.com (mail-lb0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DB9BA14; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 19:47:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lbdc10 with SMTP id c10so84079525lbd.2; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 12:47:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=3xdcMIsR3o/4OlpRIxYQt2n2Sip/EXVhHkI8G7R5BZw=; b=05CPcLlopA9sA+abFaacs5rvywXCH0Qwpi7WDGKeZSf2cQEwv9g2vesGRRRXMI3vwb ovpllAUiYWmQRqPZA3525ROwUZCgfJ0P3ZIqcq9Qz5nNns/vOfHyRVJjDWg4Gkx+yTjx Au7HiKBzMAAyyzA7eu0zTAR6QTHnkm0VYtPZx1zl41PT5hizP3Ai/4Pm5+yAST/sUmjz jgCh/HmAsCUWJFDOaos5SNqJSl8S7bkDl9fyKpicABOlSvCLrcvQ6/49iZHL5gDT2HGF fcRjIq6OZSGorBNMJVrPJvx9QgcSyy6R6b+tJm8uLnFThg0yzAypAzYesbP044yYyt6J kcug== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.44.161 with SMTP id f1mr3435489lam.26.1428090451768; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 12:47:31 -0700 (PDT) Sender: crodr001@gmail.com Received: by 10.112.108.168 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 12:47:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150402201909.GD30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20150402201909.GD30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 12:47:31 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: rsXX1EZZ6XnyvCOuJAJK-jP0cDQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: Share your pkg aliases From: Craig Rodrigues To: Baptiste Daroussin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: pkg , "ports@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 19:47:34 -0000 On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Hi, > > For pkg 1.5.0 we do plan to provide a default pkg.conf full of useful > aliases, > of course this is subjective, if you think you have added some useful > aliases > into your pkg.conf please share those so we can add them directly into the > next > release. > I notice that there is a /usr/local/etc/bash_completion.d/_pkg.bash file which implements tab completion for pkg commands. Is there a way to make this file get picked up by default when ports-mgmt/pkg is installed, instead of having to edit .bashrc? It's a minor thing, but tab completions are really nice for usability. bash shell users can use this, but zsh also has a way to read bash completion scripts. -- Craig From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 3 22:31:41 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67E71A08 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 22:31:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-x22b.google.com (mail-qc0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F0B9C8C for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 22:31:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qcay5 with SMTP id y5so96915316qca.1 for ; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 15:31:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:content-type:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=mqCHvo2+A1a7EPfe5mu7RYqjMLIcGNcXpdihq8zThik=; b=Tl4S/IDcvmruKkR/pykiFGEW+50DaH9wJFAF8IbnFmL3/yECT7k4OkMsycW4KG+63k qan0FUcEVXSWBIgA9h/UoudpJ9gAujECFwACnv0fxGuRtDUN7ZqjDbkpZ+xGZ93cz3Le 643Qt2OKYpvcKTd6ucyeTHaDRXhGMYZtrjBrLNPlEMbM6jsmi44rbZYZL36E7dDyx9rJ 1Zl6oz3d2m0b29R0ZQxCmtGF42SIFVibVKhFf3u+5Q9WKKwdrh5Nyxr9HA6b4VHq5SjG 8mXAl74fAHbMmQcP6bWDoK+Cto2/lYazZgs0v7I9/a/XY8B9vdUkiQ43tb2Yhn0QhnEN Iidg== X-Received: by 10.55.25.34 with SMTP id k34mr8368851qkh.12.1428100300117; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 15:31:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lumiwa (d-ptld-bng2-71-161-123-105.ngn.east.myfairpoint.net. [71.161.123.105]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id b87sm6536606qkb.38.2015.04.03.15.31.39 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 03 Apr 2015 15:31:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1428100297.1549.4.camel@gmail.com> Subject: blender 2.74 From: ajtiM To: "ports@freebsd.org" Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 18:31:37 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.11 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 22:31:41 -0000 Hi! I did install Blender 2.74 on my FreeBSD 10.1 (amd64) without a problem but it doesn't want to start. When I run from terminal I got: "blender Two passes with the same argument (-alloca-hoisting) attempted to be registered! Writing: /tmp/blender.crash.txt Segmentation fault (core dumped)" In /tmp/blender.crash.txt is just: # Blender 2.74 (sub 0), Unknown revision # backtrace Thank you. -- ajtiM ----- http://www.redbubble.com/people/lumiwa https//www.facebook.com/pages/Lumiwa-FARM/775292915882930 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 4 03:06:10 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11E5D595; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 03:06:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x22c.google.com (mail-ie0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C96EE97F; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 03:06:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iedfl3 with SMTP id fl3so114514678ied.1; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 20:06:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=c1Ro1dmqQM6loeeTsDO8j3gVAjQqvWpL2ireCoP7d98=; b=eEJD8rqSEJqrXSnu52z+/IL5FKSlXlYeArpCzwFyXIiZCSJubhAQJLWchC0wsgkYV9 pmTrr531BGm7MrH+uGPseVRmvUd0XgZ33TGDvzM2LHtXbTg8akRjKRG5xulevE+bXwxH ntRo+QD0YJnDoaVH6jnTlIGZAHW5vYD00yGXCnyVh0Uy1p0AT75qgcK7q9+Fzz/8czqh 4wIPFBN+VMQY/oFXpwJqJmxLXAGPenwPY+2Rls4/9Y6wOKV6MTua7L702oA7/BH9QI4h GGPNnoFJ0HOWjL7vRVFPuVzcg3vFjyEZR52awwSh0sjflOo6hgKqWcwCZXLvA0kdeMLJ 4fEw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.91.10 with SMTP id n10mr7331410icm.23.1428116769191; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 20:06:09 -0700 (PDT) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.107.174.86 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 20:06:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <49565FCAB7E8FD98176737C0@atuin.in.mat.cc> References: <49565FCAB7E8FD98176737C0@atuin.in.mat.cc> Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 20:06:09 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: yD3ue3RKsaQiNa_EMBsdZuAd_1U Message-ID: Subject: Re: How do I specify port opt1 requires opt2 From: Kevin Oberman To: Mathieu Arnold Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: Ben Woods , FreeBSD ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2015 03:06:10 -0000 On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > > > +--On 3 avril 2015 05:46:45 +0000 Ben Woods wrote: > | I am working on modifying a port, and was wondering how do I specify that > | selecting port option1 requires that option2 is also selected? > | > | Note that in my example it is perfectly acceptable to have option2 > | selected without option1. > > This functionnality is coming, it's being discussed in > but for now, > you'll have to do some testing in your Makefile and either add an IGNORE or > force the other option. > > -- > Mathieu Arnold > What I have done in the past is to put "(Forces option OPTION)" in the description line and then either set opt2 in the IF block for opt1 or simply set the opt2 flag, if that is all opt2 requires, in that block. -- Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 4 03:15:30 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC02A6FF; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 03:15:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x22d.google.com (mail-ig0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB8B2A66; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 03:15:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igcau2 with SMTP id au2so73541455igc.1; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 20:15:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=GUsPeYG5/BT/6sYY2N3/B2t67X92IzczqviS3YuBwxQ=; b=BlSKMoIpNYQiIk0p0mQQ2GuRtxb01WaXTI+ZaFN2CBzCUUCWtVv1o0Yqo+0qITZAJX 0IupTTPyc5Df/yHvk3bfsMQNAACg4FMVaQJxxlRPxoKXRZROG3UtqQRq7aHf1w4QvZME GGrwpntYhVPNEBZPT3fVvaG4Xox37t31/dh2KCSjj1IctB37/6R72ILsyci9SgXGtbVf TMXCLvrq7RvkFekcCnkooqJfy2dDwrb6qoNSG0KX29GuDg5fDYHuLsBpIGG+4J5Fi54z J+I36gXfeam01if7i5x5xS/VL2owx9mhqAm7lYx5QPNVBrqfQYNER3PGAvjV5TcItYMI xWAg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.62.112 with SMTP id x16mr2141697igr.32.1428117329845; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 20:15:29 -0700 (PDT) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.107.174.86 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 20:15:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20150402201909.GD30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 20:15:29 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Drq9tkDLYM8Jt5yyjMc2Ii9hjCY Message-ID: Subject: Re: Share your pkg aliases From: Kevin Oberman To: Craig Rodrigues Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: pkg , "ports@freebsd.org" , Baptiste Daroussin X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2015 03:15:31 -0000 On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Baptiste Daroussin > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > For pkg 1.5.0 we do plan to provide a default pkg.conf full of useful > > aliases, > > of course this is subjective, if you think you have added some useful > > aliases > > into your pkg.conf please share those so we can add them directly into > the > > next > > release. > > > > I notice that there is a /usr/local/etc/bash_completion.d/_pkg.bash file > which implements tab completion > for pkg commands. Is there a way to make this file get picked up > by default when ports-mgmt/pkg is installed, > instead of having to edit .bashrc? > > It's a minor thing, but tab completions are really nice for usability. > bash shell users can use this, but zsh also has a way to read bash > completion scripts. > > -- > Craig > And I keep meaning to write a tcsh completion script for pkg. Maybe I'll get to at least a basic one next week. I see that bash completion scripts are quite different, but I'll see if the _pkg.bash file can at least get me started. It does more than I'd probably get done in the first pass. -- Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 4 04:45:36 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36682630 for ; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 04:45:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16C292F3 for ; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 04:45:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t344jZ6G094167 for ; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 04:45:35 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from bdrewery@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t344jZfe094164 for ports@freebsd.org; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 04:45:35 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery) Received: (qmail 86735 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2015 23:45:33 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.10.1.139?) (freebsd@shatow.net@10.10.1.139) by sweb.xzibition.com with ESMTPA; 3 Apr 2015 23:45:33 -0500 Message-ID: <551F6C80.5070009@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 23:45:52 -0500 From: Bryan Drewery Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stefan Ehmann , "ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: poudriere 3.1.2: bulk fails and deletes jail References: <551D7A04.6090806@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <551D7A04.6090806@gmx.net> OpenPGP: id=F9173CB2C3AAEA7A5C8A1F0935D771BB6E4697CF; url=http://www.shatow.net/bryan/bryan2.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k87dTpAREnbbaKMvaWK5sJ2ShcUA9mTLv" Cc: bdrewery@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2015 04:45:36 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --k87dTpAREnbbaKMvaWK5sJ2ShcUA9mTLv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 4/2/2015 12:19 PM, Stefan Ehmann wrote: > The following commands work as expected with poudriere 3.1.1: >=20 > # poudriere jail -c -v 10.1-RELEASE -a amd64 -j 101amd64 > # poudriere bulk -j 10amd64 ports-mgmt/poudriere >=20 >=20 > After upgrade to 3.1.2 it fails: >=20 > # poudriere bulk -j 101amd64 ports-mgmt/poudriere > [00:00:00] =3D=3D=3D=3D>> Creating the reference > jail.../usr/local/share/poudriere/bulk.sh: cannot create > /usr/local/poudriere/jails/101amd64/usr/.cpignore: No such file or > directory > /usr/local/share/poudriere/bulk.sh: cannot create > /usr/local/poudriere/jails/101amd64/usr/lib/.cpignore: No such file or > directory > done > [00:00:04] =3D=3D=3D=3D>> Mounting system devices for 101amd64-default > [00:00:04] =3D=3D=3D=3D>> Mounting ports/packages/distfiles > [00:00:04] =3D=3D=3D=3D>> Stashing existing package repository > [00:00:04] =3D=3D=3D=3D>> Mounting packages from: > /usr/local/poudriere/data/packages/101amd64-default > [00:00:04] =3D=3D=3D=3D>> Copying /var/db/ports from: > /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/options > /usr/local/share/poudriere/bulk.sh: cannot create > /usr/local/poudriere/data/.m/101amd64-default/ref/etc/make.conf: No suc= h > file or directory > [00:00:04] =3D=3D=3D=3D>> Cleaning up > [00:00:04] =3D=3D=3D=3D>> Umounting file systems >=20 > And worse: The contents of the jail are deleted: > # du -sh /usr/local/poudriere/jails/101amd64/ > 4.0K /usr/local/poudriere/jails/101amd64/ >=20 >=20 > The problem probably only occurs in specific configurations. Otherwise,= > I would have expected several reports by now. >=20 > # diff poudriere.conf.sample poudriere.conf | grep \> >> NO_ZFS=3Dyes >> USE_TMPFS=3Dall >> CHECK_CHANGED_DEPS=3Dyes >> PARALLEL_JOBS=3D1 >> ALLOW_MAKE_JOBS=3Dyes 3.1.3 is now out which fixes this. Sorry about that. --=20 Regards, Bryan Drewery --k87dTpAREnbbaKMvaWK5sJ2ShcUA9mTLv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVH2yAAAoJEDXXcbtuRpfPvdoIALpNzPaYA3ZxZ8x0r3ehXjBT aUSDEdTI8bC98zl2l+zBjKSwtROvHWRBgHH8OtfI6RF+ANBTTYZ6vMY4sLj3DQt1 5bPQlOxoNoDqcAnKOohmap2ynoEdiSbvWEjyLRJrNDJOYXQ3tTzCu6HVlqKPuz3K mvL+7h3VndSQgQvZ7Cr7Qf27AK8/0aszVU4tRsM0DHQ4UYkHkOqaw4hy7lhuDeqV oUXc+P9StkPlbDVJOlmuDDxec5SVx8XhhAvgRZO8Ea4+TGcYLmelbK7C5CzKwtjX rAxawDNN5Laf7Mhmo9s9lIQXM39mvuustncLTHw8YB+7mai2B0rxkq+JWhFlONk= =lFat -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --k87dTpAREnbbaKMvaWK5sJ2ShcUA9mTLv-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 4 06:03:45 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 490FBF17; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 06:03:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x236.google.com (mail-ig0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EDE4B86; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 06:03:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igblo3 with SMTP id lo3so19946611igb.0; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 23:03:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=JfBU41FgjZTOB3K75y5XJwBIOL/a/BiUXaKtTEyNIsc=; b=jEW5AQ8mpstW+HUxPHej3jB4YsyxN/Ok+jhkEyzr/QyPcVXo+ra1nGN3Lu7tz0bPqv ZRJycVTfFVmO88l0196nCvfF1fU8JkSpRLPYgMiRPqZGcXc14YNUOuIHgB1Euz7V4wmT vivPyoFWRs2t++EUPQctTqtXRq6nMnbr96yn+0hnochVm1q8XYwggv1RYltDeSTKkSLK 3NVWXo6+XSzSmbPQfXAGDx+tJlhaWbM7qEps05aMuMw66Ot5jx5XfX+X0mSPabre0uON WTs1VRaIRuIzX/QG0C146WnX6VtXVykbixn+2mjJItsP7F8aZJUyGZ80y8o9HflZRm3M bQlg== X-Received: by 10.43.24.139 with SMTP id re11mr7898993icb.11.1428127424385; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 23:03:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <918351.37244.bm@smtp118.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <918351.37244.bm@smtp118.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> From: Ben Woods Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2015 06:03:43 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: editors/abiword fails on not-really-missing dependency To: Thomas Mueller , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: gnome@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2015 06:03:45 -0000 I have just submitted a bug report which includes a patch to update abiword to the latest upstream release version 3.0.1. This fixes the issues you have identified in your email. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199156 I would be greatful if you could test this patch to the port and confirm it fixes your issue. Regards, Ben On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 10:05 AM Thomas Mueller wrote: > I tried to build editors/abiword, but it failed for lack of libwpg-0.1 and > libwpd-0.8. > > pkg info -a | grep -n "libwp" produces > > 314:libwpd-0.9.9_2 Tools for importing and exporting > WordPerfect(tm) documents > 315:libwpg-0.2.2_3 Library and tools to work with > WordPerfect Graphics (WPG) files > > So it looks like I have the required dependencies, but the configure > script seemed to be looking for an earlier version. > > Relevant part of build log is > > configure: error: Package requirements ( libgsf-1 >= 1.12 libwpg-0.1 >= > 0.1.0 libwpd-0.8 >= 0.8.0 ) were not met: > > Package libwpg-0.1 was not found in the pkg-config search path. > Perhaps you should add the directory containing `libwpg-0.1.pc' > to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable > Package 'libwpg-0.1', required by 'world', not found > Package 'libwpd-0.8', required by 'world', not found > > Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you > installed software in a non-standard prefix. > > Alternatively, you may set the environment variables WPG_CFLAGS > and WPG_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config. > See the pkg-config man page for more details. > ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. > > > Is this a bug in the configure script or FreeBSD ports' patches? > > I could cd /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig and > ln -s libwpg-0.2.pc libwpg-0.1.pc > ln -s libwpd-0.9.pc libwpd-0.8.pc > > and thereby give the configure script what it's looking for, a kludge with > no certainty of success. > > Maybe delete the symbolic links afterward. > > Tom > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 4 07:01:58 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACF4B7E0 for ; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 07:01:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.141]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 451FC12 for ; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 07:01:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ppp118-210-45-229.lns20.adl2.internode.on.net (HELO leader.local) ([118.210.45.229]) by ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 04 Apr 2015 17:31:50 +1030 Message-ID: <551F8C5D.2080908@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2015 17:31:49 +1030 From: Shane Ambler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ajtiM , "ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: blender 2.74 References: <1428100297.1549.4.camel@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1428100297.1549.4.camel@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2015 07:01:58 -0000 On 04/04/2015 09:01, ajtiM wrote: > Hi! > > I did install Blender 2.74 on my FreeBSD 10.1 (amd64) without a problem > but it doesn't want to start. When I run from terminal I got: > > "blender > Two passes with the same argument (-alloca-hoisting) attempted to be > registered! > Writing: /tmp/blender.crash.txt > Segmentation fault (core dumped)" > > > In /tmp/blender.crash.txt is just: > # Blender 2.74 (sub 0), Unknown revision > > # backtrace > 2.74 hasn't been added to ports yet, are you compiling yourself? The error looks familiar, I think it was from different llvm versions being used. blender needs to use the same llvm/clang version as osl. -3.4 Check your LLVM_* settings in cmake. -- FreeBSD - the place to B...Software Developing Shane Ambler From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 4 07:48:10 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05D66DAC for ; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 07:48:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x230.google.com (mail-ig0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFCDB3DC for ; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 07:48:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igcau2 with SMTP id au2so112907614igc.0 for ; Sat, 04 Apr 2015 00:48:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=9v1mBvY6LphmHMbyPvyxI8fANZdAbDKa/ZxLAP0RT2s=; b=VzMUsyNfGkQsWz/RSvU9YfSus2Sh63nvrGGZ2YKqygbOryAybp+dJ1vfO1JMLLVI2A Ol5XtezwWO8aSdBm/NtU0Lf4Rn0nZcunH75czp3frOqvYi1pKS7MSsCJaEM2QNnAkX9n Lx5Q0wA9Nvqn6hpxjN4M2viDQNuUWmBFK18EF+5Rg6kTKzT9LCkOaMdV1MLmXyr417Wu Lw/7ABYU9D9d/RLNypwV0QnQXGhCZjdMdygFCPw5Ww6cst0MxvHt5yNbWCtbel+FuVAd L/tF9BT9268FwgGJcqQeMv9z3bH10+MiRriCiVHiSwxw0T9ZS9vr1lIdf6hsIGUknMoD Eucw== X-Received: by 10.43.55.12 with SMTP id vw12mr8024668icb.30.1428133689155; Sat, 04 Apr 2015 00:48:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1428100297.1549.4.camel@gmail.com> <551F8C5D.2080908@ShaneWare.Biz> In-Reply-To: <551F8C5D.2080908@ShaneWare.Biz> From: Ben Woods Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2015 07:48:08 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: blender 2.74 To: Shane Ambler , ajtiM , "ports@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2015 07:48:10 -0000 Actually, blender 2.74 hit the ports tree earlier today. https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=383098 On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 3:02 PM Shane Ambler wrote: > On 04/04/2015 09:01, ajtiM wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I did install Blender 2.74 on my FreeBSD 10.1 (amd64) without a problem > > but it doesn't want to start. When I run from terminal I got: > > > > "blender > > Two passes with the same argument (-alloca-hoisting) attempted to be > > registered! > > Writing: /tmp/blender.crash.txt > > Segmentation fault (core dumped)" > > > > > > In /tmp/blender.crash.txt is just: > > # Blender 2.74 (sub 0), Unknown revision > > > > # backtrace > > > > 2.74 hasn't been added to ports yet, are you compiling yourself? > > The error looks familiar, I think it was from different llvm versions > being used. blender needs to use the same llvm/clang version as osl. -3.4 > > Check your LLVM_* settings in cmake. > > > -- > FreeBSD - the place to B...Software Developing > > Shane Ambler > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 4 08:27:00 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61ECAA9A for ; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 08:27:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA85996F for ; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 08:26:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from walrus.pepperland ([81.217.76.60]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M2Glc-1ZTw353t48-00sADJ; Sat, 04 Apr 2015 10:21:32 +0200 Message-ID: <551F9F0B.10405@gmx.net> Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2015 10:21:31 +0200 From: Stefan Ehmann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bryan Drewery , "ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: poudriere 3.1.2: bulk fails and deletes jail References: <551D7A04.6090806@gmx.net> <551F6C80.5070009@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <551F6C80.5070009@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:81yqRUgW7tqB14Gc8DDUAxs4u/91RnjClCEk9f8YQhCunECnWm0 A+O0hAMFWZIRAQA55el2tMKal5wFcRNV9yXXwEeB+7RO64vZnWryfmZh1cE5c427/8D7bDY JsN2c1G2JGdH1TZO9r0710gNlIGW6qJzV9DLfTanNc8ID3H6ZEd9fec4RB2AJhjJh5DobJt n8UBRtiCXsQJMfQdlN/QA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2015 08:27:00 -0000 On 04.04.2015 06:45, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 4/2/2015 12:19 PM, Stefan Ehmann wrote: >> The following commands work as expected with poudriere 3.1.1: >> >> # poudriere jail -c -v 10.1-RELEASE -a amd64 -j 101amd64 >> # poudriere bulk -j 10amd64 ports-mgmt/poudriere >> >> >> After upgrade to 3.1.2 it fails: >> >> # poudriere bulk -j 101amd64 ports-mgmt/poudriere >> [00:00:00] ====>> Creating the reference >> jail.../usr/local/share/poudriere/bulk.sh: cannot create >> /usr/local/poudriere/jails/101amd64/usr/.cpignore: No such file or >> directory >> /usr/local/share/poudriere/bulk.sh: cannot create >> /usr/local/poudriere/jails/101amd64/usr/lib/.cpignore: No such file or >> directory >> done ... > > 3.1.3 is now out which fixes this. Sorry about that. Thanks for the fix! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 4 08:50:41 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D280E4A1; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 08:50:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (mx3.absolight.net [IPv6:2a01:678:2:100::25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92840B72; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 08:50:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F36B8BDC64; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 10:50:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from atuin.in.mat.cc (atuin.in.mat.cc [79.143.241.205]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id CB6F6BDC5E; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 10:50:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atuin.in.mat.cc (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BE9E2EBFD8E; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 10:50:38 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2015 10:50:38 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Craig Rodrigues , Baptiste Daroussin Subject: Re: Share your pkg aliases Message-ID: <79DCE8388D31F662B15D7B4A@atuin.in.mat.cc> In-Reply-To: References: <20150402201909.GD30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: pkg , ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2015 08:50:41 -0000 +--On 3 avril 2015 12:47:31 -0700 Craig Rodrigues wrote: | On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Baptiste Daroussin | wrote: | |> Hi, |> |> For pkg 1.5.0 we do plan to provide a default pkg.conf full of useful |> aliases, |> of course this is subjective, if you think you have added some useful |> aliases |> into your pkg.conf please share those so we can add them directly into |> the next |> release. |> | | I notice that there is a /usr/local/etc/bash_completion.d/_pkg.bash file | which implements tab completion | for pkg commands. Is there a way to make this file get picked up | by default when ports-mgmt/pkg is installed, | instead of having to edit .bashrc? | | It's a minor thing, but tab completions are really nice for usability. | bash shell users can use this, but zsh also has a way to read bash | completion scripts. It's picked up automatically when you install shells/bash-completion. -- Mathieu Arnold From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 4 08:51:42 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7467E556 for ; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 08:51:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (mx3.absolight.net [IPv6:2a01:678:2:100::25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 339D0B7F for ; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 08:51:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B9DBBDC56; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 10:51:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from atuin.in.mat.cc (atuin.in.mat.cc [79.143.241.205]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 74CCABDC44; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 10:51:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atuin.in.mat.cc (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60B7F2EBFDC3; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 10:51:40 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2015 10:51:40 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Kevin Oberman Subject: Re: How do I specify port opt1 requires opt2 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <49565FCAB7E8FD98176737C0@atuin.in.mat.cc> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Ben Woods , FreeBSD ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2015 08:51:42 -0000 +--On 3 avril 2015 20:06:09 -0700 Kevin Oberman wrote: | On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: | |> |> |> +--On 3 avril 2015 05:46:45 +0000 Ben Woods wrote: |> | I am working on modifying a port, and was wondering how do I specify |> | that selecting port option1 requires that option2 is also selected? |> | |> | Note that in my example it is perfectly acceptable to have option2 |> | selected without option1. |> |> This functionnality is coming, it's being discussed in |> but for now, |> you'll have to do some testing in your Makefile and either add an IGNORE |> or force the other option. |> |> -- |> Mathieu Arnold |> | | What I have done in the past is to put "(Forces option OPTION)" in the | description line and then either set opt2 in the IF block for opt1 or | simply set the opt2 flag, if that is all opt2 requires, in that block. But that means you'll need to include bsd.port.options.mk, which will have to parse bsd.port.mk a second time, which is slow. And also, that you're not using options helpers. -- Mathieu Arnold From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 4 10:39:43 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D001A90; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 10:39:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vn0-x22b.google.com (mail-vn0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c0f::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEA7976D; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 10:39:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vnbf129 with SMTP id f129so183894vnb.11; Sat, 04 Apr 2015 03:39:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=3knSgL4HsHT3cfNIaRmftgoPtCQngUgO6Q3G9aEZ+Gw=; b=enejexoQ+ejbYfAT0xHKkkHyGpzDcGlBkYNqf+dc9K3VZIy2bnkfS8Vmi3X3FGfGgE CKhOlA6SorMRBRM4n/UfdPHH4DN4zmxYxxmwSzpswNArUq2xqg0qWLEugUJhgYu2mI7G 1sZS5+RXvCQKl1a5tRGYfQM5weUUvArgqaEvdw2wwJpRTPCoqdV3s8mO/tMSdCFw08qW 4+RMiwlRAerzU113PoRpaqgXfZHtToFjR+wWZfxtnL+jsbRtFuL3cfXU7I5HTM303erB 8Oa54lFTa7PxgKRaEX5KrNhU9dy7U+ITiOjZ9ySfzls8qb39VUB+L5PSa2yqMSZVwoVz GYIQ== X-Received: by 10.52.61.137 with SMTP id p9mr3601340vdr.68.1428143981950; Sat, 04 Apr 2015 03:39:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ci3sm1710796vdd.3.2015.04.04.03.39.39 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 04 Apr 2015 03:39:40 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2015 12:39:36 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Kevin Oberman Subject: Re: Share your pkg aliases Message-ID: <20150404103936.GA20155@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20150402201909.GD30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wac7ysb48OaltWcw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: Craig Rodrigues , pkg , "ports@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2015 10:39:43 -0000 --wac7ysb48OaltWcw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 08:15:29PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Craig Rodrigues > wrote: >=20 > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Baptiste Daroussin > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > For pkg 1.5.0 we do plan to provide a default pkg.conf full of useful > > > aliases, > > > of course this is subjective, if you think you have added some useful > > > aliases > > > into your pkg.conf please share those so we can add them directly into > > the > > > next > > > release. > > > > > > > I notice that there is a /usr/local/etc/bash_completion.d/_pkg.bash file > > which implements tab completion > > for pkg commands. Is there a way to make this file get picked up > > by default when ports-mgmt/pkg is installed, > > instead of having to edit .bashrc? > > > > It's a minor thing, but tab completions are really nice for usability. > > bash shell users can use this, but zsh also has a way to read bash > > completion scripts. > > > > -- > > Craig > > >=20 > And I keep meaning to write a tcsh completion script for pkg. Maybe I'll > get to at least a basic one next week. I see that bash completion scripts > are quite different, but I'll see if the _pkg.bash file can at least get = me > started. It does more than I'd probably get done in the first pass. that would be much appreciated :) Best regards, Bapt --wac7ysb48OaltWcw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlUfv2gACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EwHAQCfUWifZ9OLwu/xmlQY6Q7A5TZ6 ASAAnRPKoryTgkrUkUfqip46JG0YJXLd =tRj6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wac7ysb48OaltWcw-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 4 11:14:21 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A31AD32B for ; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 11:14:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-x22c.google.com (mail-qc0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58CB4A97 for ; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 11:14:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qcyk17 with SMTP id k17so2849828qcy.1 for ; Sat, 04 Apr 2015 04:14:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :content-type:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5mW4PWz/fzgAbV49Es0KgAT1swCGha4mek9hcPhyfkc=; b=QtyuRTgvZQGIrSM3yf2iSfdt/KBqv7ZfJLG3GTVZAebh1dt5w3atmXb4diqQ4ckTrk emE5XlqcILpj0QBD5f7+D2HWI+P4vPDiVPfvDbpLvX40EBCd4IQhhZUK99UHwqwY05ah dL/he8C7jwWgzihSHDrRqP4/xHY6mw78Krl5utPYW6YU1hIR07ebBgvpRx8+FUpOwUhK jLTRD7fIM2mTh2iSpiKSctE8MDdRu0T+RE6JoGylZAtdvTZRkI0v/FEQRz8b9EQrc4h1 kjh57rexdPXqR3wrHohPuWSbRi+niHglw8D2vY3CkCxwrl9bw1ihM8tk1ybGDYGqfLKX pNZg== X-Received: by 10.140.150.151 with SMTP id 145mr7524163qhw.100.1428146060503; Sat, 04 Apr 2015 04:14:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lumiwa (d-ptld-bng2-71-161-123-105.ngn.east.myfairpoint.net. [71.161.123.105]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id m202sm7572705qhb.30.2015.04.04.04.14.19 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 04 Apr 2015 04:14:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1428146059.56997.5.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: blender 2.74 From: ajtiM To: Shane Ambler Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2015 07:14:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: <551F8C5D.2080908@ShaneWare.Biz> References: <1428100297.1549.4.camel@gmail.com> <551F8C5D.2080908@ShaneWare.Biz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.11 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "ports@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2015 11:14:21 -0000 On Sat, 2015-04-04 at 17:31 +1030, Shane Ambler wrote: > On 04/04/2015 09:01, ajtiM wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I did install Blender 2.74 on my FreeBSD 10.1 (amd64) without a problem > > but it doesn't want to start. When I run from terminal I got: > > > > "blender > > Two passes with the same argument (-alloca-hoisting) attempted to be > > registered! > > Writing: /tmp/blender.crash.txt > > Segmentation fault (core dumped)" > > > > > > In /tmp/blender.crash.txt is just: > > # Blender 2.74 (sub 0), Unknown revision > > > > # backtrace > > > > 2.74 hasn't been added to ports yet, are you compiling yourself? > > The error looks familiar, I think it was from different llvm versions > being used. blender needs to use the same llvm/clang version as osl. -3.4 > > Check your LLVM_* settings in cmake. > > Yes, I did compile by myself and I found the same error happened before. I use portmaster and it build Clang 3.4 too. -- ajtiM ----- http://www.redbubble.com/people/lumiwa https//www.facebook.com/pages/Lumiwa-FARM/775292915882930 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 4 11:51:32 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A55BE7C for ; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 11:51:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.555servers.com (111servers.com [103.14.120.89]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4558CE03 for ; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 11:51:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from NS3-555-COM ([127.0.0.1]) by 555servers.com with MailEnable ESMTP; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 17:08:23 +0530 Subject: FREE, Pay for driving on toll road, invoice #000916112 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2015 11:38:23 +0000 From: "E-ZPass Support" Reply-To: "E-ZPass Support" Message-ID: <4efa4baea2dffa17911735079b814431@111servers.com> X-Priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2015 11:51:32 -0000 Dear Free, You have a debt to pay for using a toll road. Please, do not forget to service your debt. The invoice is attached to this email. Regards, Morris Mcgee, E-ZPass Manager. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 4 16:32:12 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC13FB96 for ; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 16:32:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-x236.google.com (mail-lb0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D443C19 for ; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 16:32:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lbbug6 with SMTP id ug6so94550123lbb.3 for ; Sat, 04 Apr 2015 09:32:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=LUzpCws1DKfU6YG7A2Ya37yOhvDsGdqs/FOAQ6TQJn4=; b=Xf83kQXR9PSIZIrqoukpUK7wIifmCCnl6d08DoKCYMijsNUZbNsMWPKTq7SQ6yFank Q62q9wyPi/BkD2Xrl0Bl4FMZ5Pd8xd6q3dIVUvykk3jE3IjJTIwMS/lQWJ2vEnB0M0u4 olNinZl/ndGYX0c7KtK/HXFRrWUpAZqL/oGxgomBANMxhl5qhXao+DjXE/iD4WEec47K 9iuvqFDuPXaDHPmcGWPP8KSgFLlHRhgPyAWrYuvxxzeU4tXtiPpmhqWcuizmBYHxrBib o2J0gGfQVYtGdvLjpGs6dboOxXn04RGw+6fxMDH3hFlEbdV3V8NJoU0kgyfdu5KUajAN HJow== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.139.99 with SMTP id qx3mr6634260lbb.44.1428165130466; Sat, 04 Apr 2015 09:32:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.4.226 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 09:32:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2015 13:32:10 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Blender 2.74 cannot compile on FreeBSD 10.1 From: pipolandi tpbbb To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2015 16:32:12 -0000 Hello, I'm having problems trying to compile blender 2.74 from ports. After upgrading my list ports I'm not able to upgrade blender doing "portmaster graphics/blender". This is the last part of the error output: [ 9%] Generating node_add_closure.oso > Shared object "libraw_r.so.9" not found, required by > "libOpenImageIO.so.1.4" > --- intern/cycles/kernel/shaders/node_add_closure.oso --- > *** [intern/cycles/kernel/shaders/node_add_closure.oso] Error code 1 > > make[4]: stopped in /usr/ports/graphics/blender/work/.build > 1 error > > make[4]: stopped in /usr/ports/graphics/blender/work/.build > --- intern/cycles/kernel/shaders/CMakeFiles/cycles_osl_shaders.dir/all --- > *** [intern/cycles/kernel/shaders/CMakeFiles/cycles_osl_shaders.dir/all] > Error code 2 > > make[3]: stopped in /usr/ports/graphics/blender/work/.build > A failure has been detected in another branch of the parallel make > > make[4]: stopped in /usr/ports/graphics/blender/work/.build > --- intern/cycles/kernel/CMakeFiles/cycles_kernel.dir/all --- > *** [intern/cycles/kernel/CMakeFiles/cycles_kernel.dir/all] Error code 2 > > make[3]: stopped in /usr/ports/graphics/blender/work/.build > 2 errors > > make[3]: stopped in /usr/ports/graphics/blender/work/.build > *** [all] Error code 2 > > make[2]: stopped in /usr/ports/graphics/blender/work/.build > 1 error > > make[2]: stopped in /usr/ports/graphics/blender/work/.build > ===> Compilation failed unexpectedly. > Try to set MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes and rebuild before reporting the failure to > the maintainer. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/graphics/blender > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > make: stopped in /usr/ports/graphics/blender > > ===>>> make build failed for graphics/blender > ===>>> Aborting update > Thanks in advance :) From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 4 16:36:17 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E470C7D for ; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 16:36:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mwork.nabble.com (mwork.nabble.com [162.253.133.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05E2BC48 for ; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 16:36:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from msam.nabble.com (unknown [162.253.133.85]) by mwork.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDF1319BD6E2 for ; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 09:36:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2015 09:36:10 -0700 (MST) From: pipolandi To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1428165370116-6002716.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: Blender 2.74 cannot compile on FreeBSD 10.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2015 16:36:17 -0000 I forgot to say that libraw is installed. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Blender-2-74-cannot-compile-on-FreeBSD-10-1-tp6002715p6002716.html Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 4 18:05:13 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DE85E0E; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 18:05:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x22a.google.com (mail-la0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B25DA6A7; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 18:05:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lagg8 with SMTP id g8so96598961lag.1; Sat, 04 Apr 2015 11:05:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=BP1a4Mec576pcQQJF7sCormEcONiDzmYPncyQYlXO1k=; b=ktI2R7hv/P9vEG+u2QDkOPVOJBO0DKeU4lAbVkOs1YClkH4BHz/Iy7tTWtC39glxXM kwGFsO/OCnehwxGdw7OjN8NW042Jzj110lkaA2BFdBxgeyZOGaBMjoBMHPjpVJA5y46f dShSkD8dP6qhhJeHEPdEtDPtzT5xOHETQ4srSkfkAoQup4zz0ExYyVP3SfUXN9+Ci/KB 5rObFF5u4yeZWlKgqDiAWx3cgCdJ4+r/FZ4zYHyHTaaFuuhjxF45Gb6jI1Vup4FFL5LI k9JrOY4pjrgdx6AWg+CihW15ZZHs5DH2lPwo6l+lYWAjDe9fG5BmYj7cKnoBNIvp/b3q snyg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.36.169 with SMTP id r9mr6824982laj.29.1428170710766; Sat, 04 Apr 2015 11:05:10 -0700 (PDT) Sender: crodr001@gmail.com Received: by 10.112.108.168 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 11:05:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <79DCE8388D31F662B15D7B4A@atuin.in.mat.cc> References: <20150402201909.GD30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <79DCE8388D31F662B15D7B4A@atuin.in.mat.cc> Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2015 11:05:10 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: C1aw9mlCBc1QBqeF7b1-oVBu9Pc Message-ID: Subject: Re: Share your pkg aliases From: Craig Rodrigues To: Mathieu Arnold Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: pkg , "ports@freebsd.org" , Baptiste Daroussin X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2015 18:05:13 -0000 On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 1:50 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > +--On 3 avril 2015 12:47:31 -0700 Craig Rodrigues| > | It's a minor thing, but tab completions are really nice for usability. > | bash shell users can use this, but zsh also has a way to read bash > | completion scripts. > > It's picked up automatically when you install shells/bash-completion. > > Cool. shells/bash-completion *does* work with pkg. It would be cool if shells/bash-completion was automatically installed when the bash port is installed, so that the average user does not have to do any other setup, and things *just work* out of the box. It would also give the pkg developers incentive to keep the bash completion updated and in sync as new pkg sub commands and command flags are added. I just tried zsh, and it looks like the pkg completions work by default with zsh. Very nice! -- Craig From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 4 18:18:48 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC8B4E6; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 18:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vn0-x234.google.com (mail-vn0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c0f::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97F07830; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 18:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vnbg62 with SMTP id g62so427198vnb.7; Sat, 04 Apr 2015 11:18:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=K1IDAiSFc/zgq83MpGjyZuMsLOURIOGKyaTaAA0bKD8=; b=zL+qFab02lzCAIWmURIZNwFb4KgV2dl/Jg147V8WRk/9Q3dKNwW+m8ybjCqTeZ6W+F u5ldVso5apdTu02rON5DCz1F3/tpNrJFCMZGCM2OThY1EMEtLI+W/kz/x5B+M2mpMBZF ZX1i425uQoOBlNUk1CYtk7SVlASDn89+ET0ahe5fQte4S8cA3fa4Y6Uk67eFe0EEQMgT WR5bE21kKKGhz+I+YXs4xizhlRpjE4CWKTyhcOH1+AhViEhb75vD/j/H3PrmF4+McQpM HUXEjz5mcxf0SzUrlbtM01sLok89I6/Jtl9wzwNm9+J3ME+hn4u2O95ZG0WdXJkcMQvO Q05Q== X-Received: by 10.52.113.10 with SMTP id iu10mr4537279vdb.88.1428171526584; Sat, 04 Apr 2015 11:18:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fa2sm1851085vdd.17.2015.04.04.11.18.44 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 04 Apr 2015 11:18:45 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2015 20:18:40 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Craig Rodrigues Subject: Re: Share your pkg aliases Message-ID: <20150404181840.GD20155@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20150402201909.GD30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <79DCE8388D31F662B15D7B4A@atuin.in.mat.cc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="d9ADC0YsG2v16Js0" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: Mathieu Arnold , pkg , "ports@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2015 18:18:48 -0000 --d9ADC0YsG2v16Js0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Apr 04, 2015 at 11:05:10AM -0700, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 1:50 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: >=20 > > +--On 3 avril 2015 12:47:31 -0700 Craig Rodrigues| > > | It's a minor thing, but tab completions are really nice for usability. > > | bash shell users can use this, but zsh also has a way to read bash > > | completion scripts. > > > > It's picked up automatically when you install shells/bash-completion. > > > > > Cool. shells/bash-completion *does* work with pkg. > It would be cool if shells/bash-completion was automatically installed > when the bash port is installed, so that the average user does not have > to do any other setup, and things *just work* out of the box. >=20 > It would also give the pkg developers incentive to keep the bash completi= on > updated and in sync as new pkg sub commands and command flags are > added. None of the pkg developpers are using bash or bash completion so ... we are accepting patches... you might understand that the number of people involve= d in pkg(8) is pretty low, and lot of work is still needed on the pkg front. I won't personnally spend my time on bash completion because I have imho wa= y too many things to do. >=20 > I just tried zsh, and it looks like the pkg completions work by default > with zsh. Very nice! That is a problem with bash, completion is not officially part of the proje= ct Best regards, Bapt --d9ADC0YsG2v16Js0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlUgKwAACgkQ8kTtMUmk6ExxlwCgmd7FZxqCTu2PGKCUbnki6JkH jswAn2rnrf3IB0+X834ooK5huKiljkiV =9u4v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --d9ADC0YsG2v16Js0-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 4 19:00:58 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 539A2C29; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 19:00:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x230.google.com (mail-la0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB0EFC90; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 19:00:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by layy10 with SMTP id y10so158164lay.0; Sat, 04 Apr 2015 12:00:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=XIlrl4tugD10bQBGhK83E2A6TC84osp5uiyGLyGDHUU=; b=rnYJkT+GUj5hgdHK29jS/XaJsoeFK9jvprftl7krP65qTu3KTMRVWMo6XspM1bgLkE 9tA+yCItmTC3FKgJfTpeHgRrQp+xdOQpuOZGcA+kPMhO0zDfyzOHrQV6gFuHdUGHL+zq wFoNo2af9ai+l7c3VOU/lRooT1YHDWxsctfq+016YX95IsL248B83X8jj0pdz5WVhDnW QWqDfplMELbE7M/ZyutGkBRdE/A0PkaLd26AwsylyAmb07QiACvDF9NmJzBrcNPXFldF pL6Xc+DgqgMzsJg+wdFxJujhGPrZ6OjIh3XIM5TEy6ZqSrempcsCxSky/7wnowy7fBBA Vytw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.26.209 with SMTP id n17mr6998884lbg.84.1428174055873; Sat, 04 Apr 2015 12:00:55 -0700 (PDT) Sender: crodr001@gmail.com Received: by 10.112.108.168 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 12:00:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150404181840.GD20155@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20150402201909.GD30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <79DCE8388D31F662B15D7B4A@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20150404181840.GD20155@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2015 12:00:55 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: skmztYmwqBeFGz-HyrIr0-qImSY Message-ID: Subject: Re: Share your pkg aliases From: Craig Rodrigues To: Baptiste Daroussin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: Mathieu Arnold , pkg , "ports@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2015 19:00:58 -0000 On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Sat, Apr 04, 2015 at 11:05:10AM -0700, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 1:50 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > > > > > +--On 3 avril 2015 12:47:31 -0700 Craig Rodrigues| > > > | It's a minor thing, but tab completions are really nice for > usability. > > > | bash shell users can use this, but zsh also has a way to read bash > > > | completion scripts. > > > > > > It's picked up automatically when you install shells/bash-completion. > > > > > > > > Cool. shells/bash-completion *does* work with pkg. > > It would be cool if shells/bash-completion was automatically installed > > when the bash port is installed, so that the average user does not have > > to do any other setup, and things *just work* out of the box. > > > > It would also give the pkg developers incentive to keep the bash > completion > > updated and in sync as new pkg sub commands and command flags are > > added. > > None of the pkg developpers are using bash or bash completion so ... we are > That may be true, but I see that a few pkg committers use zsh. One thing that I can see that the pkg project could do is instead of having separate completion files for bash and zsh, only have one for bash. zsh can grok bash completions. That way you will only have one file to maintain, and zsh and bash users can test it and benefit from it. For example, right now, if I "pkg install tmux", if I use zsh as my shell, it groks the bash completions that come with the tmux port. I agree with you that it is unfortunate that bash completions is not part of bash itself. Maybe we can add a dependency to shells/bash if bash is installed, it installs the bash-completion port as well. It's a minor thing, but improves the out of the box user experience of the command-line. -- Craig From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 4 19:05:34 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C135BD49; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 19:05:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vn0-x22b.google.com (mail-vn0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c0f::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BF61D3A; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 19:05:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vnbf1 with SMTP id f1so13323vnb.5; Sat, 04 Apr 2015 12:05:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=jhrIf9i3O91Ds5O5CumtsqhGry1O4yq7d4lSm85qYsk=; b=qEIG2OLUJqaQMiv9nbuDo/0DxAZx9x/S5tPRxe6TDaZ+zKMANOaz428Urrs2RB9Qk3 VJOn9n0sCvpq7dZtpowPPbdw6kTsRts90NAwqXatZ6cgx8EIzBbqc4gGQDetOWuYULX9 UOl/dZPmUm/KRyENmvE+E70QTE7MO1x7xGbuRBVsMXpAzqI1/R0JS8YRu2f59Hj7bqzJ Zty77Lan4S7HffG5eKYtSMJzWYgcRMFCR5+qXnQLb3VIDvShC6N/s3QeUMKyRbYs3nxG NiKxjfonJ0f2O8YwNSThj+WwamdH+TZFw1Iga3HO6H/LeaSls+Jl4vcVzXK4+tNdmZLg 3sUg== X-Received: by 10.52.254.2 with SMTP id ae2mr4650148vdd.33.1428174333534; Sat, 04 Apr 2015 12:05:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id cw4sm1869036vdd.14.2015.04.04.12.05.30 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 04 Apr 2015 12:05:31 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2015 21:05:27 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Craig Rodrigues Subject: Re: Share your pkg aliases Message-ID: <20150404190527.GF20155@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20150402201909.GD30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <79DCE8388D31F662B15D7B4A@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20150404181840.GD20155@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Pgaa2uWPnPrfixyx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: Mathieu Arnold , pkg , "ports@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2015 19:05:34 -0000 --Pgaa2uWPnPrfixyx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Apr 04, 2015 at 12:00:55PM -0700, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Baptiste Daroussin > wrote: >=20 > > On Sat, Apr 04, 2015 at 11:05:10AM -0700, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 1:50 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrot= e: > > > > > > > +--On 3 avril 2015 12:47:31 -0700 Craig Rodrigues| > > > > | It's a minor thing, but tab completions are really nice for > > usability. > > > > | bash shell users can use this, but zsh also has a way to read bash > > > > | completion scripts. > > > > > > > > It's picked up automatically when you install shells/bash-completio= n. > > > > > > > > > > > Cool. shells/bash-completion *does* work with pkg. > > > It would be cool if shells/bash-completion was automatically installed > > > when the bash port is installed, so that the average user does not ha= ve > > > to do any other setup, and things *just work* out of the box. > > > > > > It would also give the pkg developers incentive to keep the bash > > completion > > > updated and in sync as new pkg sub commands and command flags are > > > added. > > > > None of the pkg developpers are using bash or bash completion so ... we= are > > >=20 >=20 > That may be true, but I see that a few pkg committers use zsh. >=20 > One thing that I can see that the pkg project could do is > instead of having separate completion files for bash and zsh, > only have one for bash. zsh can grok bash completions. > That way you will only have one file to maintain, and zsh and bash users > can test it and benefit from it. >=20 > For example, right now, if I "pkg install tmux", if I use zsh as my shell, > it groks the bash completions that come with the tmux port. >=20 > I agree with you that it is unfortunate that bash completions is not > part of bash itself. Maybe we can add a dependency to > shells/bash if bash is installed, it installs the bash-completion port as > well. >=20 > It's a minor thing, but improves the out of the box user experience of the > command-line. As a maintainer of zsh, and heavy user of zsh I will never base any complet= ion for zsh on bash completion, for simple reasons I consider bash completion hackish, and most of the time inefficient on zsh. We are speaking of opensource software, if bash users want to see their completion improved then they should just provide patches. I am a zsh guy a= nd I do not update zsh completion because of ENOTIME already so... Best regards, Bapt --Pgaa2uWPnPrfixyx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlUgNfcACgkQ8kTtMUmk6ExFLACfQ51OcujjxF8mtKOl12XGZtgO QHsAoLUo9A3Nt2ZzXMAikv5j0OIbq8kG =/qDP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Pgaa2uWPnPrfixyx--