Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 12 Dec 2015 20:44:38 -0500
From:      Jason Unovitch <jason.unovitch@gmail.com>
To:        Dryice Liu <dryice@freebsd.org>
Cc:        ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-branches@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r403581 - branches/2015Q4/sysutils/py-salt
Message-ID:  <23438DAC-7CC7-4CA4-A862-5F8CA0DB2F2F@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <m26103d8zx.fsf@freebsd.org>
References:  <201512120313.tBC3DNQf013915@repo.freebsd.org> <20151212124157.GB46628@Silverstone.nc-us.unovitch.com> <m26103d8zx.fsf@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On December 12, 2015 9:41:54 AM EST, Dryice Liu <dryice@freebsd.org> wrote:
>Jason Unovitch <junovitch@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 03:13:23AM +0000, Dryice Dong Liu wrote:
>>> Author: dryice
>>> Date: Sat Dec 12 03:13:23 2015
>>> New Revision: 403581
>>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/403581
>>>
>>> Log:
>>>   MFH: r403109
>>>
>>>   Update to 2015.8.3
>>>
>>>   PR:		205043
>>>   Submitted by: Christer Edwards <christer.edwards@gmail.com>
>(maintainer)
>>>   Approved by:	portmgr (feld)
>>
>> Please keep in mind the implied SVN task here... neither SVN nor
>> Tools/scripts/mfh will tell you if prior commits are actually needed
>to
>> build.  Here the port is failing to build after this with the
>following
>> error since the prior commits were required.
>>
>> ===>  Patching for py27-salt-2015.8.3
>> ===>  Applying FreeBSD patches for py27-salt-2015.8.3
>> Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
>> 4 out of 4 hunks ignored--saving rejects to
>salt/utils/__init__.py.rej
>> => Patch patch-salt__utils____init__.py failed to apply cleanly.
>> => Patch(es) patch-salt__grains__core.py applied cleanly.
>> *** [do-patch] Error code 1
>
>You are right. This is my mistake. Thanks for fixing it.
>
>
>Dryice

Don't worry about it. Think "learning opportunity" instead of "mistake". It was an easy fix and certainly one that shows why we all review each others work.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQFHBAEBCgAxKhxKYXNvbiBVbm92aXRjaCA8amFzb24udW5vdml0Y2hAZ21haWwu
Y29tPgUCVmzNaQAKCRBv1JwwFhyqbuyPB/9moLK6Q3HZb82XDZOXvZTGvfs1N5v/
6HiwLrcUkFlVvUIW8H09mgXKLqrBQKSIu01kC5TbmbTNrz8KIq/h4IZR8ORylWti
KRu8gIxStJbe14UKN1mZTPmFQPWcxzDTDmQIQ3Qg/8s0m+xt6yppRJHePHa+0dyg
EtoDs2KLCMESh+eSkHR/s8zJd5iyOuOHrpYN0Hwuw4YH4LuZVRoiLWQMRcPyBdlW
gw4TGCBtcBy6xQ5Godb4BgbL16pPxsb+ZBzl/veezau32zRJcVn4++6VS0nCOU2v
KaRemy6XOJcSA9vLQHD0lS6/LKDhIknW/9y7gU9albk8KrYLmbI6LIPi
=PCwp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?23438DAC-7CC7-4CA4-A862-5F8CA0DB2F2F>