From owner-ctm-users@freebsd.org Sat Nov 5 15:39:58 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ctm-users@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DEC6AF6D7A for ; Sat, 5 Nov 2016 15:39:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from land.berklix.org (land.berklix.org [144.76.10.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3C4DF07 for ; Sat, 5 Nov 2016 15:39:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p5083C144.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.131.193.68]) (authenticated bits=128) by land.berklix.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPA id uA5Fdkj5008207 for ; Sat, 5 Nov 2016 15:39:47 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id uA5FdniW023690 for ; Sat, 5 Nov 2016 16:39:49 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id uA5FdbMK005641 for ; Sat, 5 Nov 2016 16:39:49 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Message-Id: <201611051539.uA5FdbMK005641@fire.js.berklix.net> To: ctm-users@freebsd.org Subject: current ctm reports: Fatal error: Probably not a CTM-patch at all. From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.eu BSD Linux Unix Consultants, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://www.berklix.eu/free/ X-From: http://www.berklix.eu/~jhs/ Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2016 16:39:37 +0100 X-BeenThere: ctm-users@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: CTM User discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2016 15:39:58 -0000 Hi ctm-users@freebsd.org Anyone else seeing similar strangeness ? ... No problem running on 9.2-RELEASE, but on today's current : ( /usr/src .svn_revision 308280 .ctm_status src-cur 12727 ) after an installworld & kernel ) cd /usr/svn; cat .ctm_status svn-cur 5081 ctm -q /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.05[0-9][0-9][0-9].xz /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.05000.xz \ Fatal error: Probably not a CTM-patch at all. # Yes I know I dont need earlier deltas, but its a cut & paste # suggestion from my standard script # The point is, ctm always used to just skip past deltas it didnt need, # including those it now doesnt recognise as deltas. # ctm also fails on delta it does need, see below: # Both these fail: ctm /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.05082.xz ctm -v /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.05082.xz Fatal error: Probably not a CTM-patch at all. ctm: exit(65) Delta is not corrupt: cd /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur sha256 svn-cur.05082.xz SHA256 (svn-cur.05082.xz) = d2b20f44265cca77a811eb074abdbe58466bf72d8f5f3a39113a7b82a5a0b1b8 ssh ctm.berklix.org (or as no public login, ftp & sha256 localy) cd /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur sha256 svn-cur.05082.xz SHA256 (svn-cur.05082.xz) = d2b20f44265cca77a811eb074abdbe58466bf72d8f5f3a39113a7b82a5a0b1b8 Proof that its not delta at fault, but ctm command: cd /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur; pwd /.amd_mnt/fire/0s4/ftp/pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur cd /usr/svn;pwd /data/usr/ftp/pri/FreeBSD/development/FreeBSD-SVN ssh fire # 9.2 host cd /host/lapr/data/usr/ftp/pri/FreeBSD/development/FreeBSD-SVN ctm /0s4/ftp/pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.05082.xz ctm: .ctm_status: Permission denied # OK, i just auto apply deltas from /etc/aliases, hence # it complaining about ownerships, but not about delta content. ssh -l mailnull-csh localhost # still on 9.2 host cd /host/lapr/data/usr/ftp/pri/FreeBSD/development/FreeBSD-SVN ctm /0s4/ftp/pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.05082.xz > FS .ctm_status > SV svnadmin: E000045: Can't get exclusive lock on file 'base/db/txn-current-lock': Operation not supported Broken pipe # OK that's some NFS problem applying delta, but at least old # 9.2 ctm command accepts delta to apply, unlike current ctm Curiously I am not seeing same problem running on 12 current file system & 12 current bin/ctm, applying deltas to src-cur/ cat .ctm_status src-cur 12727 ctm -q /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/src-cur/src-*.1[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9].gz cat .ctm_status src-cur 12729 Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix Sys Eng Consultant Munich Reply below, Prefix '> '. Plain text, No .doc, base64, HTML, quoted-printable. http://berklix.eu/brexit/#stolen_votes