From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Sun Nov 6 10:23:30 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ACA4C33D93 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 10:23:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gljennjohn@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x22b.google.com (mail-wm0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F21F944; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 10:23:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gljennjohn@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id u144so21082871wmu.1; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 02:23:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vkW4hpMko7RJ7AbqUs+GnRY5i+8zlp59/AVStpWte60=; b=FwVGWs57SWoJJu+52paLg2jfQGCcv2RWiaq+KkNkzCKEv4L84qfs5K3qzI6hPJWby+ pcbaNA0p2+oK8AHJNqIEVyZvxZcSYmfHfo1lftmGY3UT4z3FcW88SuOUrLOKRFOfMOkQ fUWMyUtarWXNtu1tk+48ZoVXYivm6Q5orPULBjVFuXISZGV5jqxvHv5yJ1G0iyoU2xOT 7+6DfDqV5MtllnYTxdiNngcRtv95zBgp/4377Bp7RT9F7xsVuvfgx2t0/fChfWfFT96M iWX6PeDKo3yXm1upE+3LZnHPC0oHR29dJ6PE3pM8gC2bhlqVf/vaziyDmaZyAZKvACM6 EegQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vkW4hpMko7RJ7AbqUs+GnRY5i+8zlp59/AVStpWte60=; b=enQOUeyzGTyubxGlKGLEzyuf2aCMKY5tNx5e6yp152Rri+6ljkOM2znFQCcEbQ5Dli VCRzt4ch2sZ1rn/LAA835Zyb4fAhEtpBfVPm0LkE5gbkHNEv8SMa+PHn5X2Rm3aXiW2H 8Fzord/sMG7M04msjx/diTPJl5cA/ReKuoQb4Hfgeve0QPNXAvZTGUMEmXurLib5Ukbo YR0YoJz0anV8p30e3d9JymzhNFUrep8PoQYICs2nvodvKSRpQVmJHUpedk0YdiSIq8ZP sDvZT/hHkY7ekSYzqxLm1XsoUug+QN9ZNOSlj8hY5YM/OfunyaTLwnlQqgVZmGRdgsJO EPfw== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvdVegTsow6iLqvydvASBIKx7U6RipSnO7GDkpRGObrFbSUviRSiM+SFMSGQ+/oK0Q== X-Received: by 10.28.18.5 with SMTP id 5mr2044850wms.35.1478427808233; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 02:23:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from ernst.home (p578E2B18.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [87.142.43.24]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s133sm6848337wmd.19.2016.11.06.02.23.26 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sun, 06 Nov 2016 02:23:27 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2016 11:23:26 +0100 From: Gary Jennejohn To: Mark Johnston Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PQ_LAUNDRY Message-ID: <20161106112326.47238905@ernst.home> In-Reply-To: <20161106091230.4e365b55@ernst.home> References: <20161103182916.GA31178@wkstn-mjohnston.west.isilon.com> <20161105103128.78197d36@ernst.home> <20161105174148.GA75901@raichu> <20161106091230.4e365b55@ernst.home> Reply-To: gljennjohn@gmail.com X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.0 (GTK+ 2.24.29; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2016 10:23:30 -0000 On Sun, 6 Nov 2016 09:12:30 +0100 Gary Jennejohn wrote: > On Sat, 5 Nov 2016 10:41:48 -0700 > Mark Johnston wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 10:31:28AM +0100, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > > On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 11:29:16 -0700 > > > Mark Johnston wrote: > > > > Some more details and the diff for PQ_LAUNDRY can be viewed here: > > > > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D8302 > > > > > > > > We would like to commit it next week. Any additional comments, review, > > > > or testing would be welcome. > > > > > > > > > > In my use case, which is moving multi-gigabyte video files from > > > one file system to another, this seems to swap more than the > > > previous code did. Moving such large files with the previous > > > code seemed to recycle Inact more quickly and IIRC only a few 10s > > > of MB were swapped out. In my test this morning 125MB were > > > swapped out and Inact was not recycled as quickly. The overall > > > size of the files moved was about the same in the two tests. > > > > Are you computing the amount swapped out as the amount of memory swapped > > out minus the amount of swapins? Or is 125MB the amount of swap used > > after the test? Output from "sysctl vm.stats" taken before and after any > > test on both HEAD on PQ_LAUNDRY would be most useful. > > > > 125MB was the swap value showed by top after the files had all been > mv'd. But fairly soon after completion a few MB were swapped back in. > OK, on a level playing field there's no difference between the old and the new code. In fact, according to top the old code swapped out 272K and the new code swapped out 220K. An insignificant difference. The test scenario was as follows: 1) boot the box 2) start X 3) mount the source directory 4) start a bash script which copied the same set of files in a for-loop 5) start top and observe what happens Since all the files were either 4.3GB or 2GB cp didn't use mmap, but rather did read/write in a loop (if the comment in utils.c is still valid). My test yesterday did a `mv *`, but since mv used fastcopy(), which also does read/write in a loop, the pressure on the vm should have been very similar to cp. The major difference between today and yesterday was that I'd been running firefox and claws-mail for hours when I started the mv, so there was something to swap out. Since I'm not too eager to noodle around for hours before starting a test, let's just say that the new code appears to be no worse, or perhaps even better, than the old code. -- Gary Jennejohn From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Mon Nov 7 03:11:08 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9862DC32243 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 03:11:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alan.l.cox@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it0-x232.google.com (mail-it0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E439E3A; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 03:11:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alan.l.cox@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it0-x232.google.com with SMTP id e187so74606943itc.0; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 19:11:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=HrAur+984COJR5OIfYdieIozhTYP48GH5E+ZmEdIUVA=; b=m5YTq3gcdNRcjiKafgNULxiCGUDl11vKBpPCO6BhU4SKs0uuQKLyDsJyZYwWKXQYLI fD23GvzICqaqlSgFikjU2Apf9fRZG5qejBpsqfqJyAWFd9KaM/TC7UVEst+RAJ8xS/Ng rDkNNmurYjQh8TQdqvxYg1k9+aKjIE9CBO32pXbww/7p/86YWtcmV8axWhVODi/9Rn8L BzvYddvtkjhvHUgPEzE9vadm0h39XMEXA+uTZLNgrcIYKSClT+zFZwSxt/Ear4pXCBYJ m+WyVOJ3qMWdobavlNyzsVCbyBSQpelQkkVQKL1YG1O+gmKTIHJu1htGxH4f3dc3FG2D Q2QQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HrAur+984COJR5OIfYdieIozhTYP48GH5E+ZmEdIUVA=; b=epkU7O24qzjSdhrt5w57p4aVEwKHbXYKfpTTxmysB0unttF42wJ0a9L1dRIy2ruKCF a1GDXpsbnk9ct8W8NZixbEbITFChaczuTJ/zmAXeRsFPkJjq+0eHyX6E65rfg/MvAtxJ kzl+K1RnthZN5tG56kQMjMhlYaJeJAKP2YKBDSslSL9TZSXrzZtm/itxwPnhKQO7flb6 h9nArqT/0IioURuBcBZwEmT+ABVM1Tf9AUkGWOo+6VHFe5vnoxwINLrjGaRtB8O4oZoN I5vlQXd9B+Fn0YExCYJmxoDm4y3SgtKfHtwUkRV2crFQmxxtE4SSuv8SDhbvK2g2+Xl4 Ez1g== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvcqM650oSdeNd7Clh0CHY+51tvcJ4BDhWd8nzhBcj3UXFWvGToquIFRHV6LRw4GAmxyscdlM9r6xRvKSw== X-Received: by 10.107.157.201 with SMTP id g192mr6535414ioe.70.1478488267591; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 19:11:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.79.126.154 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 19:11:06 -0800 (PST) Reply-To: alc@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20161106112326.47238905@ernst.home> References: <20161103182916.GA31178@wkstn-mjohnston.west.isilon.com> <20161105103128.78197d36@ernst.home> <20161105174148.GA75901@raichu> <20161106091230.4e365b55@ernst.home> <20161106112326.47238905@ernst.home> From: Alan Cox Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2016 21:11:06 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: PQ_LAUNDRY To: gljennjohn@gmail.com Cc: Mark Johnston , FreeBSD Arch Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 03:11:08 -0000 On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 4:23 AM, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > On Sun, 6 Nov 2016 09:12:30 +0100 > Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > > On Sat, 5 Nov 2016 10:41:48 -0700 > > Mark Johnston wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 10:31:28AM +0100, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > > > On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 11:29:16 -0700 > > > > Mark Johnston wrote: > > > > > Some more details and the diff for PQ_LAUNDRY can be viewed here: > > > > > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D8302 > > > > > > > > > > We would like to commit it next week. Any additional comments, > review, > > > > > or testing would be welcome. > > > > > > > > > > > > > In my use case, which is moving multi-gigabyte video files from > > > > one file system to another, this seems to swap more than the > > > > previous code did. Moving such large files with the previous > > > > code seemed to recycle Inact more quickly and IIRC only a few 10s > > > > of MB were swapped out. In my test this morning 125MB were > > > > swapped out and Inact was not recycled as quickly. The overall > > > > size of the files moved was about the same in the two tests. > > > > > > Are you computing the amount swapped out as the amount of memory > swapped > > > out minus the amount of swapins? Or is 125MB the amount of swap used > > > after the test? Output from "sysctl vm.stats" taken before and after > any > > > test on both HEAD on PQ_LAUNDRY would be most useful. > > > > > > > 125MB was the swap value showed by top after the files had all been > > mv'd. But fairly soon after completion a few MB were swapped back in. > > > > OK, on a level playing field there's no difference between the old and > the new code. In fact, according to top the old code swapped out 272K > and the new code swapped out 220K. An insignificant difference. > > The test scenario was as follows: > 1) boot the box > 2) start X > 3) mount the source directory > 4) start a bash script which copied the same set of files in a for-loop > 5) start top and observe what happens > > Since all the files were either 4.3GB or 2GB cp didn't use mmap, but > rather did read/write in a loop (if the comment in utils.c is still valid). > > My test yesterday did a `mv *`, but since mv used fastcopy(), which > also does read/write in a loop, the pressure on the vm should have > been very similar to cp. > > The major difference between today and yesterday was that I'd been > running firefox and claws-mail for hours when I started the mv, so > there was something to swap out. > > Since I'm not too eager to noodle around for hours before starting > a test, let's just say that the new code appears to be no worse, or > perhaps even better, than the old code. > > The behavior that you describe is most likely a consequence of r254304 (and r254544). You can test this hypothesis by setting the sysctl vm.pageout_update_period to zero. From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Thu Nov 10 11:22:08 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72230C3A4BE; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 11:22:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citapm.icyb.net.ua (citapm.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FDB7155F; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 11:22:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citapm.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id NAA20375; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 13:22:05 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1c4nQj-0006dE-4Y; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 13:22:05 +0200 Subject: Re: SM bus ioctls incorrect in FreeBSD 11 To: Lewis Donzis References: <06929AC5-D350-4236-A813-56C862B58174@perftech.com> <1AA2BB21-0D6D-42F4-9CB2-3CBB00F389C6@perftech.com> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" From: Andriy Gapon Message-ID: <6a337a1d-45e7-d7f2-140c-7499c67b6c0a@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 13:21:09 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1AA2BB21-0D6D-42F4-9CB2-3CBB00F389C6@perftech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 11:22:08 -0000 On 14/10/2016 18:51, Lewis Donzis wrote: > Our opinion doesn’t count for much, but I like 2 or 4. Option 1 would > essentially obviate the entire purpose of changing the structure. Option 2 > basically finishes the job and makes it work properly. Option 3 is, as you > say, unappealing. I have no problem with Option 4, obviously we can change > our code back to the old way, but assuming there was a good reason for this > change in the first place, Option 2 seems more logical. > > But whatever y’all decide is fine with us, we’ll just change code to match at > the appropriate time. Anyone interested in the issue, could you please take a look at this review? https://reviews.freebsd.org/D8430 Thank you. -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Thu Nov 10 16:05:53 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E11BDC3ABFD; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 16:05:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it0-x234.google.com (mail-it0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9705118; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 16:05:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it0-x234.google.com with SMTP id u205so51314213itc.0; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 08:05:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9pkvsjfuN7IcejQ/HGyqe2tTgpsFDPHDdNiWh6I5K2E=; b=f9SNmQ+ZjywFpCJxskg34Kt2h7y0CKvZjFoui3VEDf3cTEHehf1nfIhpUhseauVcbd NELDlh6/+z5DEWNV81YYc6WfSbMJ8fZOp8IlzjNRraZqtnVV/qOXBS9VpP8v/3l6EneX 2nZ1wYsoSJ983Z4IoplA2SzdywPAtWO70nOaVt2GiKo/O72EbfLTt8sCRsYcMO0ZDg3K GorSVFLOQ9XMEdLVZANDMWwM3EjruptZSGaM3IFOUAto3fn9ooWCCoX9nq1J9vSGxosd ERV8Jsg53frIOXi7lE2fWIbkxqH8AutB11jXoHF0ltF/FU4/58Cjj859enbZsRzy4M9n m1yQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9pkvsjfuN7IcejQ/HGyqe2tTgpsFDPHDdNiWh6I5K2E=; b=XTjGAMgs5Nd0C4oOkUuOp+/p8W37UVCSFqub7gfkCJuDln/vswek2a34wJk8t9TAUd /6L4OrM9WTkSMlFUgxryujboaxhl0M1LmBkuWfBjRfHgrgqv1cB/1Q1OqvXIPBRKfD+v rfe7fza3whEmVL0cBVgPZ27HIsCVItAhHesp9LYiORxH9m91VRko4CDKY9R25zm4WK9U 0I+N1PvfvRlkdKqB8V97hK6AFJ+PoPR+dBi+HCoRsDOMYd8PzTo5HRR6fUeDImt5zeua 95QVDiooACte5jJoojTSzGpQECqWlMrqyUj220qTMFGHQ2Z1RixmUV32hT8fFoxiPWsf 8nDw== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvcTOw+EbgY62MTq9HiS0sX7Zf4tAn3s/04z/QxVm5tPddY7IEsr5yPIki+oBs+Ke4AJmtVjJHuKQTSIug== X-Received: by 10.107.174.157 with SMTP id n29mr2596370ioo.177.1478793952327; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 08:05:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.36.39.134 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 08:05:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <6a337a1d-45e7-d7f2-140c-7499c67b6c0a@FreeBSD.org> References: <06929AC5-D350-4236-A813-56C862B58174@perftech.com> <1AA2BB21-0D6D-42F4-9CB2-3CBB00F389C6@perftech.com> <6a337a1d-45e7-d7f2-140c-7499c67b6c0a@FreeBSD.org> From: Adrian Chadd Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 08:05:51 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: SM bus ioctls incorrect in FreeBSD 11 To: Andriy Gapon Cc: Lewis Donzis , freebsd-current , "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 16:05:54 -0000 +10 on option 2. Hate to say it, but I'd rather this little corner of freebsd be "right" before it gets more heavily used. -a On 10 November 2016 at 03:21, Andriy Gapon wrote: > On 14/10/2016 18:51, Lewis Donzis wrote: >> Our opinion doesn=E2=80=99t count for much, but I like 2 or 4. Option 1= would >> essentially obviate the entire purpose of changing the structure. Optio= n 2 >> basically finishes the job and makes it work properly. Option 3 is, as = you >> say, unappealing. I have no problem with Option 4, obviously we can cha= nge >> our code back to the old way, but assuming there was a good reason for t= his >> change in the first place, Option 2 seems more logical. >> >> But whatever y=E2=80=99all decide is fine with us, we=E2=80=99ll just ch= ange code to match at >> the appropriate time. > > Anyone interested in the issue, could you please take a look at this revi= ew? > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D8430 > > Thank you. > > -- > Andriy Gapon > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Sat Nov 12 05:46:17 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38479C3C49E for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 05:46:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from www-data@ip-160-153-228-156.ip.secureserver.net) Received: from ip-160-153-228-156.ip.secureserver.net (ip-160-153-229-30.ip.secureserver.net [160.153.229.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEE961D97 for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 05:46:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from www-data@ip-160-153-228-156.ip.secureserver.net) Received: by ip-160-153-228-156.ip.secureserver.net (Postfix, from userid 33) id D4CE26643C; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 22:25:12 -0700 (MST) To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Banco Santander (Brasil) S.A: Informativo (82186) X-PHP-Originating-Script: 0:imo30.php X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 17.551210 From: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Reply-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailer: iGMail [www.ig.com.br] X-Originating-Email: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Sender: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-iGspam-global: Unsure, spamicity=0.570081 - pe=5.74e-01 - pf=0.574081 - pg=0.574081 Message-Id: <20161112052512.D4CE26643C@ip-160-153-228-156.ip.secureserver.net> Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 22:25:12 -0700 (MST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 05:46:17 -0000