Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 00:41:29 +0800 From: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> To: Zaphod Beeblebrox <zbeeble@gmail.com>, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: SIG_WINCH ... getting out of our current state of disarray. Message-ID: <570A8239.4070603@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <CACpH0McpQyAFSJjxDc52g6481OzY9xdPULD13bp9_i%2BsbSkW4A@mail.gmail.com> References: <CACpH0McpQyAFSJjxDc52g6481OzY9xdPULD13bp9_i%2BsbSkW4A@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 4/04/2016 10:21 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: > So... here's the scenario... I'm running vi in screen on a server. I > resize my window. > > Now... screen seems to deliver the resize SIG_WINCH fine to the process... > but it seems BSD (and I don't use enough linux to have checked) only > delivers SIG_WINCH to the foreground process. > > Is it _bad_? to deliver SIG_WINCH to other terminal group processes? > Surely a shell knows that it started a process and should wait, but > something CTRL-Z'd or &'d might be a special case... dunno. > > Anyways... it seems that this would be something good to have happen. As > it is... i find myself resizing a window multiple times to the same size > just to get SIG_WINCH delivered to the now running application. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I've never worked this out.. I often end up doign ^Z and then stty to set he size, and then fg. having screen or tmux in ht emix makes it even worse..
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?570A8239.4070603>