From owner-freebsd-infiniband@freebsd.org Wed Apr 6 18:55:21 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-infiniband@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82C03B06EB5; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 18:55:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vijju.singh@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-x230.google.com (mail-ob0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CD911A76; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 18:55:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vijju.singh@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ob0-x230.google.com with SMTP id bg3so37507804obb.1; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 11:55:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=2CUhZ2T3ZKUJenrMfw1iWk51g5OkrZw3v3leDaeyWA8=; b=0Cs9g+HlLVC66AFbA0dn12+OATedqmHt9qTMD14l4is8kwRTCLrHSzG6OlDgQEBQ4I dAhivTikgZ7y6KNSoukpomVlP64wW5F9TmLffOf2jjoxce1xtU7YU131yWHEWfCoGleL zUxuQpv11BD0QsSl7FNEVa2/tYVbamdvXxIb4M3H/nS9m0+7cIWxJXiDtRQP/laHl22p nz2ivvtvxWlKIXQ0o3g4bO5ryAqAjILJYmxTNzNvvRmRFCF9LBp2t9EKvaY70FmZk5MG XiJiJhbqoVxK4zEAoMfS+0FeGmQyRAZ/EDin2AduEd+GrZCCSpag62qlPVdRxWL2AAMM iNUw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=2CUhZ2T3ZKUJenrMfw1iWk51g5OkrZw3v3leDaeyWA8=; b=QVirgyK0tvmV0UVuZ2AwLv28i9FsfxXFP7ClwWfRAbJUtzpRrpsOuzWWmMBYCP6coP Ko9KUWZOgoNt+Mpmb0VhGqOwCOhuvnHLVSWZsP08mh2hwKS43xbaOWKM8ArMyKpadp8h CnRkgnRsPN730vGDRmoFNkfHqVt/TH7deQqvrxBRNy+GV7xE97RkHdsZRWilAadRfX1E h4g+4to+m/n0MowynfWpntIkAIQMmz4aQ5cQDeX7XGn6HPlBw6WucWqb24SDoBknjRk5 /khbHU9hliZVUN3K4bu61YbOcQFT9iyQrH5OTk3b0LvupW1WTOo++FRFlWjBC6JPc4Uv Vh1w== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKOA/IU6rqrKv5uN4PEK+IS4cUE9MdHWIBEd/H5+ziim0OXzZlvyU4PSQrKZpWJyVoM8m3RzTFh+z27gA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.230.44 with SMTP id sv12mr17726137obc.17.1459968920681; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 11:55:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.157.41.37 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 11:55:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 11:55:20 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: IPv6 support in OFED From: Vijay Singh To: freebsd-infiniband@freebsd.org, "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-infiniband@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Infiniband on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 18:55:21 -0000 [Apologies for the cross-post] I see that the OFED stack supports IPv6 in many places, so I was wondering why we have this in rdma_listen(): int rdma_listen(struct rdma_cm_id *id, int backlog) { struct rdma_id_private *id_priv; int ret; id_priv = container_of(id, struct rdma_id_private, id); if (id_priv->state == CMA_IDLE) { >> ((struct sockaddr *) &id->route.addr.src_addr)->sa_family = AF_INET; ret = rdma_bind_addr(id, (struct sockaddr *) &id->route.addr.src_addr); if (ret) return ret; } Even for v4, should the caller already fill in the family? -vijay From owner-freebsd-infiniband@freebsd.org Thu Apr 7 07:03:03 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-infiniband@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A1EDB061C7; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 07:03:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from mail.turbocat.net (mail.turbocat.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:d16:4514::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBD351F68; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 07:03:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from laptop015.home.selasky.org (unknown [62.141.129.119]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.turbocat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 54AC71FE023; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 09:03:01 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: IPv6 support in OFED To: Vijay Singh , freebsd-infiniband@freebsd.org, "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" References: From: Hans Petter Selasky Message-ID: <570606E1.6060504@selasky.org> Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 09:06:09 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-infiniband@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Infiniband on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 07:03:03 -0000 On 04/06/16 20:55, Vijay Singh wrote: > [Apologies for the cross-post] > > I see that the OFED stack supports IPv6 in many places, so I was wondering > why we have this in rdma_listen(): > > int rdma_listen(struct rdma_cm_id *id, int backlog) > { > struct rdma_id_private *id_priv; > int ret; > > id_priv = container_of(id, struct rdma_id_private, id); > if (id_priv->state == CMA_IDLE) { >>> ((struct sockaddr *) &id->route.addr.src_addr)->sa_family = > AF_INET; > ret = rdma_bind_addr(id, (struct sockaddr *) > &id->route.addr.src_addr); > if (ret) > return ret; > } > > Even for v4, should the caller already fill in the family? > Hi, Try using the patchset from here: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-infiniband/2016-March/000190.html It has better IPv6 support. --HPS