From owner-freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Sun Feb 7 21:00:42 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pkg@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D64DFAA1CD1 for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2016 21:00:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB1521FBF for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2016 21:00:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id C7E63AA1CD0; Sun, 7 Feb 2016 21:00:42 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: pkg@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C789CAA1CCF for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2016 21:00:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A82E01FBC for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2016 21:00:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u17L01W0017702 for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2016 21:00:42 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201602072100.u17L01W0017702@kenobi.freebsd.org> From: bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org To: pkg@FreeBSD.org Subject: Problem reports for pkg@FreeBSD.org that need special attention Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2016 21:00:42 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2016 21:00:42 -0000 To view an individual PR, use: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users, which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. Status | Bug Id | Description ------------+-----------+--------------------------------------------------- New | 204480 | ports-mgmt/pkg Allow repo config to be embedded w New | 193995 | [PATCH] ports-mgmt/pkg: floating point exception New | 205003 | ports-mgmt/pkg: pkg segfault if extra colon is in 3 problems total for which you should take action. From owner-freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Wed Feb 10 17:30:18 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pkg@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08B4FAA49CA for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 17:30:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomek@ttmath.org) Received: from ttmath.org (ttmath.org [213.241.55.160]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AE8311F4 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 17:30:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomek@ttmath.org) Received: from s100.ttmath.org (user-94-254-240-26.play-internet.pl [94.254.240.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ttmath.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E6E9943E0445 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 18:29:28 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=ttmath.org; s=ttmath; t=1455125369; bh=1VjZkmkxN0IHIB1U/ZQ8I4iQHVfJiUNmOZOlzaYt8z8=; h=To:From:Subject:Date:From; b=f72HrMOjyy8tTllaNKBwUhjvhs/RtclzOhqOpeWUXOyVaWs/Jm3NQSvRDaTS5tl4X GptVvnpysAfQHnGWerNaEPJzhg8/UywLdnnLvYHCj3LOFzf4besqav2A7WDIuHpW1W aqaE0iHe5TNKKQqJmw1OtKKEwkb9hcwPkMYwLD+cgtul6bzJGnRfVfdKOuL/1hPcdQ Vr+iIXi4Gpx2E/rcufInuOpFYbdygAxFb6L6vCbP0T0BFjVW2sUxbHAMLas8ieWaEu 4Yq6dkImFFbREuqDakj4aFJQUUZZ+rypm25UVHTdTKJFyLm0byq/cO5WTpA47269bX Ig9QYkCmmVSCw== To: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org From: Tomasz Sowa Subject: pkg force to add a package X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <56BB7371.8070400@ttmath.org> Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 18:29:21 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 17:30:18 -0000 Hi Some questions about pkg. On one computer I have recompiled my ports, next I wanted to copy them to another machine so I created packages (for simplicity I'm showing only one package): /home/tomek# pkg create -f tar nettle-3.2 Creating package for nettle-3.2 It created nettle-3.2.tar package. On the other machine I have nettle installed but it was in an old version: [second_machine]/home/tomek# pkg info | grep nettle nettle-2.7.1 Low-level cryptographic library Let we see some files from the package: [second_machine]/home/tomek# pkg info -l nettle-2.7.1 | grep lib | head -n 4 /usr/local/lib/libhogweed.a /usr/local/lib/libhogweed.so /usr/local/lib/libhogweed.so.2 /usr/local/lib/libhogweed.so.2.5 Make sure those files belong to the nettle package: [second_machine]/home/tomek# pkg which /usr/local/lib/libhogweed.so.2 /usr/local/lib/libhogweed.so.2.5 /usr/local/lib/libhogweed.so.2 was installed by package nettle-2.7.1 /usr/local/lib/libhogweed.so.2.5 was installed by package nettle-2.7.1 Now I move the new nettle-3.2 to this machine and try to `pkg add` it: [second_machine]/home/tomek# pkg add nettle-3.2.tar [second_machine] Installing nettle-3.2... the most recent version of nettle-2.7.1 is already installed It reports me that I have the newest version installed, where the information (version) is taken from? is it normal behavior? So I have forced the installation: [second_machine]/home/tomek# pkg add -f nettle-3.2.tar [second_machine] Installing nettle-3.2... package nettle is already installed, forced install [second_machine] Extracting nettle-3.2: 100% Make sure it is really installed: [second_machine]/home/tomek# pkg info | grep nettle nettle-3.2 Low-level cryptographic library But what about the old files from nettle 2.7.1? [second_machine]/home/tomek# ll /usr/local/lib/libhogweed.so.2 /usr/local/lib/libhogweed.so.2.5 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 17 2 lip 2015 /usr/local/lib/libhogweed.so.2@ -> libhogweed.so.2.5 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 419229 2 lip 2015 /usr/local/lib/libhogweed.so.2.5 There are still there, may they belongs to some other package now? [second_machine]/home/tomek# pkg which /usr/local/lib/libhogweed.so.2 /usr/local/lib/libhogweed.so.2.5 /usr/local/lib/libhogweed.so.2 was not found in the database /usr/local/lib/libhogweed.so.2.5 was not found in the database No, they are orphans. And next question is: is it correct behavior? I would expect that either `pkg info | grep nettle` reports both: nettle-2.7.1 Low-level cryptographic library nettle-3.2 Low-level cryptographic library or if only nettle-3.2 is installed those files from 2.7.1 are uninstalled. Correct me if am wrong pls. -- Tomek From owner-freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Wed Feb 10 22:50:37 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pkg@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ED44AA4E36 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:50:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf0-x22d.google.com (mail-lf0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14BA01B68 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:50:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id 78so21353803lfy.3 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 14:50:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=nR8S50bWH8RrLR9G94Y+Q7H4JLuohcpNcURp3UaemSU=; b=Tb5ULmqPpQfjjD5MZimm7kh0tNpngZGIEh5bWy8bCuuzeHdmZm559T+6sQMJ9L6Szc ViizmgRNWB9aiMQe8AmuybwGq0d4Gzci5kQTdVv3p4Lq0agir+f7LdCc5cySUSQ11ldL nqrrz78TQ/1aDuSjSfnCJIJao36WEgDtE2dxp3m+SwvPxUt3Scg9lz38cBmKea4BBEZF AGadNN6OIitB6lKLkYYLVFK6PCe/8Q2KAsbn6b45tqFnutOwO7igAveeowKwOWSfJMbl B3I0asx2JB/E3KW+gzTGnkAC6gENODPOkOh7/3SdkXFjfWqS7ipnqmiKBxDhP7hOF9tG rllg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=nR8S50bWH8RrLR9G94Y+Q7H4JLuohcpNcURp3UaemSU=; b=U0FTcazRawb7qJyRCHtZ36huBKVESzPqB1Ov3HOrsjBwMmaECfOnHKPX2DiQIocecr CQ+BkIKrNc561TVCI4BKVReT8sogfzOtyZjyuwWMXvCIobHdUC9k6qx8InEppCFZmGEY bbq9gDJSg4qDQ0QB1dgI9y2hiItQXcFE/B882iasJfgtDfdT56c00ZZMVj9L6bpzMCxb 84kevCo2XzF4pJkPf+Bgl41OSs/GzREzFS01FQu8fj67ulHMV4zlIqjD6oyiI7K/DBcJ oKs0DJXVhOliktJ+MLUdV6IAQm4FMsMcA8fWHcVxuOYzohAlos9FS5v+Cnq/Hbs+tJiD gwSw== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORlckrAn9XxXT/CZ5MMrHFR/uyHuxtSpXANbCDfYCa6ha/b56PBd7NTKtgwYfhqaQ== X-Received: by 10.25.142.136 with SMTP id q130mr18362071lfd.56.1455144635235; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 14:50:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f4sm779359lbs.10.2016.02.10.14.50.34 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Feb 2016 14:50:34 -0800 (PST) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 23:50:32 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Tomasz Sowa Cc: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg force to add a package Message-ID: <20160210225031.GJ1141@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <56BB7371.8070400@ttmath.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ed/6oDxOLijJh8b0" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56BB7371.8070400@ttmath.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:50:37 -0000 --ed/6oDxOLijJh8b0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 06:29:21PM +0100, Tomasz Sowa wrote: > Hi >=20 > Some questions about pkg. On one computer I have recompiled my ports, > next I wanted to copy them to another machine so I created packages > (for simplicity I'm showing only one package): > /home/tomek# pkg create -f tar nettle-3.2 > Creating package for nettle-3.2 > It created nettle-3.2.tar package. >=20 > On the other machine I have nettle installed but it was in an old > version: > [second_machine]/home/tomek# pkg info | grep nettle > nettle-2.7.1 Low-level cryptographic library >=20 > Let we see some files from the package: > [second_machine]/home/tomek# pkg info -l nettle-2.7.1 | grep lib | head -= n 4 > /usr/local/lib/libhogweed.a > /usr/local/lib/libhogweed.so > /usr/local/lib/libhogweed.so.2 > /usr/local/lib/libhogweed.so.2.5 >=20 > Make sure those files belong to the nettle package: > [second_machine]/home/tomek# pkg which /usr/local/lib/libhogweed.so.2 /us= r/local/lib/libhogweed.so.2.5 > /usr/local/lib/libhogweed.so.2 was installed by package nettle-2.7.1 > /usr/local/lib/libhogweed.so.2.5 was installed by package nettle-2.7.1 >=20 > Now I move the new nettle-3.2 to this machine and try to > `pkg add` it: > [second_machine]/home/tomek# pkg add nettle-3.2.tar=20 > [second_machine] Installing nettle-3.2... > the most recent version of nettle-2.7.1 is already installed >=20 > It reports me that I have the newest version installed, where the > information (version) is taken from? is it normal behavior? >=20 > So I have forced the installation: > [second_machine]/home/tomek# pkg add -f nettle-3.2.tar > [second_machine] Installing nettle-3.2... > package nettle is already installed, forced install > [second_machine] Extracting nettle-3.2: 100% >=20 > Make sure it is really installed: > [second_machine]/home/tomek# pkg info | grep nettle > nettle-3.2 Low-level cryptographic library >=20 > But what about the old files from nettle 2.7.1? > [second_machine]/home/tomek# ll /usr/local/lib/libhogweed.so.2 /usr/local= /lib/libhogweed.so.2.5 > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 17 2 lip 2015 /usr/local/lib/libhogweed.= so.2@ -> libhogweed.so.2.5 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 419229 2 lip 2015 /usr/local/lib/libhogweed.= so.2.5 >=20 > There are still there, may they belongs to some other package now? > [second_machine]/home/tomek# pkg which /usr/local/lib/libhogweed.so.2 /us= r/local/lib/libhogweed.so.2.5 > /usr/local/lib/libhogweed.so.2 was not found in the database > /usr/local/lib/libhogweed.so.2.5 was not found in the database >=20 > No, they are orphans. And next question is: is it correct behavior? > I would expect that either `pkg info | grep nettle` reports both: > nettle-2.7.1 Low-level cryptographic library > nettle-3.2 Low-level cryptographic library > or if only nettle-3.2 is installed those files from 2.7.1 > are uninstalled. Correct me if am wrong pls. >=20 Beside the error message being wrong, the issue is the fact you do use pkg = add (which is not supposed to be used in that case) pkg add is a basic tool supposed to mimic the old pkg_add for the ports tree usage (I don't know how to properly warn users about it) or for special oth= er cases. What you were looking for was pkg install ./nettle-3.2.tar which will repla= ce the old nettle already installed. and of course the error message from pkg add is mis leading and should be f= ixed. Best regards, Bapt --ed/6oDxOLijJh8b0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWu763AAoJEGOJi9zxtz5aS+8QANLlDTAFQt35wBKojzzw0b0J mOj7e0pLNro4kedG7mvFfERyBd4lqBvUpv3DCBeq+XRWEXGE+zBRhM6+Aj3RZfFQ T2UnxSRWdbpgRx3zkpOLB97D21UyDv/I1Kc5gaGuTF7Z6/B6aEsMwuld7FVf7KIo tLHUlJX3V11PV5Lxa6zUNPjNh/BP5SwOtIZBoUQKf+Hd1g/iy9V8nu7000Tc/kkz fCqDwEyUGQqmT6njldW/9z7b3a6kp9ogcbv1MZkI5lY5MulZv01wcwlD1HUTO2uN 3muwKEN6SspZ3oGJKeyH0Ioa3F56G/QuEEu1WfzNIMMDDrhGh/eSZuXFWQUqb8Tw wmkO05Vsr5hKownSM1lJ9N6yZz33BYkBG38axgCDuF5Wb8su6Z5x6f9aFACnCU4c 9JVGR1t1i03o631SK6lxOPwZy1TiUt78wrALpQsSMYNfaZ8ffkdiPtUivDYSMzX7 YjCR7bpM/kIrTVydFazFjLroCPrYqFa0RqHEK1Cjuje2lbwxyYb62Ppf0zTsI0R3 nnqtVAl6LUhaely7CePEedbabQKNaViSAv04ezgShs+REYnBl51nxfy3/MCvfiaZ OCfUkGtIaMKH8iahlVXZqLxur7gWpMGbvLZtopO3jx61JMcxI2s6ArYOfCQ3GZen hSV8rVbv0WqSy0AyHZCH =du/G -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ed/6oDxOLijJh8b0-- From owner-freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Wed Feb 10 22:55:37 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pkg@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71537AA5114 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:55:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DEFF1E10 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:55:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 5A016AA5113; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:55:37 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: pkg@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59991AA5112 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:55:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B8EA1E0F for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:55:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u1AMtaTr094846 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:55:37 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: pkg@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 206917] ports-mgmt/pkg: url: "file:///xxx" in repos.conf not working! Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:55:37 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: bapt@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pkg@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:55:37 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D206917 --- Comment #1 from Baptiste Daroussin --- for sure this is a bug. But I cannot reproduce the issue with file:/// I can with file:// and file:/ but not with file:/// the file:/// is used all over the place in the regression test, so I am very surprised that it fails for you. Would you be able to provide a ktrace -i /kdump output? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Wed Feb 10 22:57:16 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pkg@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E694BAA51DD for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:57:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C672B1E7C for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:57:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id C4979AA51DC; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:57:15 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: pkg@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB83CAA51DB for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:57:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-x232.google.com (mail-lb0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 329AA1E7B for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:57:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lb0-x232.google.com with SMTP id tk3so6495367lbb.3 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 14:57:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=MJXhWdRTXulPDJMj8igWxmRBnacOmvbhjOOVCMCZV24=; b=v34/hNEJ71yocpdS14C8GA1X1c+QaPomeuCe7h9D48L4W0kWnayd3Pl7QJjAIEGvhV IkYm9YBSSpFX22p/hT7p0p5j7w3FFKI+11XNiTcp0Ip3nX2YZT2OH1L7AbTO6OG4jVMj gvWoWHlYFnlA0sWHTYUZnvCTvuE7p4IWmItN6ozgqPWSPa9ZBVKLlIhlV0FQBrYQwz8U 7eTFislG++hMp9e9xR5HYhqTA+WKfp3XD0kSHH8AfJLwcODQ8sMsdJk9HhgTXtyot1h/ OOmlMQ2RMFRuW6pEenTZvihjfJ5RUeq6nNAmHBPbt5XJnNUh72cn6TWAgSsQbcd26Qny rA9Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=MJXhWdRTXulPDJMj8igWxmRBnacOmvbhjOOVCMCZV24=; b=d99Tl9bmYth85YkkHRsxMlAFKDSHEhObvcMaccUqCxDWTEq8Z+NeYA6KaZK4BWTSmO AeUGvUtyamRwL6sS9F4uxE+VAjzQ6vRo5OELhSG4yUWYZ7CaVTERqpG9fjXkZdy4BRjc IDTIlx3toyYDI/c19LZdGv/YPli5JO70WgBTac90lz8AWYz9MQkMjOf7tkcjFXTj8PvD dallUc7l7l+GOLwPyUCeauvJ28EFPriC1hfRl4Jz9VDIFjxvRJfOr6z/AEtrrVo0SIg8 /WhOhqwpqKlk6uV84cthNS+cCVf8CSrVamgRRbDbsxBBqjoYD6tvlutTXqeq3ZaLwXR7 HCyg== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOS6NLxnc+WFRMxH0S19EktAORLxci3Y8GW8lNTPLlY81PCeiflfXEOwT6CM0ss3JA== X-Received: by 10.112.145.131 with SMTP id su3mr17204275lbb.19.1455145032953; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 14:57:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ja4sm781990lbc.8.2016.02.10.14.57.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Feb 2016 14:57:11 -0800 (PST) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 23:57:09 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: chris@bsdjunk.com Cc: pkg@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Pkg new and older versions Message-ID: <20160210225709.GK1141@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OX2aLCKeO1apYW07" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:57:16 -0000 --OX2aLCKeO1apYW07 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 04:17:03AM +0000, chris@bsdjunk.com wrote: > Hi, >=20 > The latest support 9.x is 9.3 which has pkg. 8.x is EOL shouldn't we remo= ve the pkg-install message about doing a pkg2ng? >=20 Yes I think it is about time, I will remove it from next pkg release Best regards, Bapt --OX2aLCKeO1apYW07 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWu8BFAAoJEGOJi9zxtz5aKN0QAIpMPpLTbHHteKZ5frlgvHA5 9TyhjMJEMCXN+4pyiw+Q+Fa9dMAVij67gZRWu5BYsrr5y1t65L73tvRIoKKRd3eX W0sGNNZLhC1go9JV1dAu39TmVtKSfgQMK+dfHZGDCHgIAmXrMV5LuvQkOQ7oZQeJ Fj4/YiBL/ZrhDX11azuBWwh/CHMTDCqnTFEBtAIV9+5hNlMT4sagh3ZGwowGVApJ pWrS7H4olGmmTFffZBkavob8mXCeJNVgecVzruGtvMzYWWhS6i2rE6qdgqT44Cd0 t15rv3mTQloeJmuJOPbAH74N9is09GBm1rWuuPPvHJ38SKcbQyHsx/pvcOu9pq7B lCJZUf1T1VN1z1l4r404txXIzdlzQYaN0yvLfyiHgH19N3vNu4kbF22mXTkWxugR owfmii4/cfTNYyagbQdngFo0ATAtJQ4Op86/p5gMb/xGtCygFzKd8oKWVLxjvp3Z rkljlQ6+bWlAnd+tcI62sDxCRvhVq7Bce6voI4fWtbyePf1XSwzMTYL4gFXr1C9m dfCxEQ3J0kVrO9L3baB0AIgmA0/rs+M3iUGaEhke69p/URWSrgxLQlx0SU2ndZJ9 sfwJdMCwkdPmwOLR5e449EsdSuma67GsH9TWrIQvUBZGQIIH0k4Bnak4I490T35T aIV1eSQeA1HhImFfIQ+F =DUS9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OX2aLCKeO1apYW07-- From owner-freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Wed Feb 10 22:58:11 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pkg@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96CF7AA52A2 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:58:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 828461F66 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:58:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 80B5AAA52A1; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:58:11 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: pkg@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80553AA52A0 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:58:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7181F1F60 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:58:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u1AMwBNZ098130 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:58:11 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: pkg@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 206665] ports-mgmt/pkg : 1.6.3 building for RPI2 (arm) gets: passing 'size_t *' (aka 'unsigned int *') to type 'off_t *' (aka 'long long *') Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:58:11 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: bapt@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pkg@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:58:11 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D206665 Baptiste Daroussin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|New |In Progress --- Comment #3 from Baptiste Daroussin --- this is fixed in master will be in pkg 1.6.4 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Thu Feb 11 10:38:37 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pkg@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81BF0AA481D for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 10:38:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomek@ttmath.org) Received: from ttmath.org (ttmath.org [213.241.55.160]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDE29EF9; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 10:38:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomek@ttmath.org) Received: from s101.ttmath.org (ip18-41.krt.net.pl [91.217.18.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ttmath.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1935843E0452; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 11:38:34 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=ttmath.org; s=ttmath; t=1455187114; bh=M2zvwexako8lWIz3hxI3Lw5R2v5DYDjq5v0YdDwb6Pw=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=lqHD7/7Kxi2zuoPt6uyu5VNM6cLyZSFjqWqst7LvVW7Y7vg8R6kdrUOKpfVxCAPiK 4ldL4FGBwooDFlEChgmiEqrOz9et6YLwm8LsUROaZNM1qmAatAPsuaIuU/eOpiRpfq 0KckcZ7EqaDnXTNlC5hKFBIvg6GABQ9sK1xUp/Z2yh5YOxqSU0Bxbla+r6FqAXeLcD /2aqIliNACEYgmPN883TMSrPBKXUGg3lWLyb8g0SxoDAzXoD2/cVMMotPZMpA8Sahg 0W1ZZEFYe2j+2e8uCKx1O8eZENapb5grrNZYNY8WXx0hS+r1zd7wLYhjpglqQSO9a6 oQGP/4u2I6mgg== Subject: Re: pkg force to add a package To: Baptiste Daroussin References: <56BB7371.8070400@ttmath.org> <20160210225031.GJ1141@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Cc: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org From: Tomasz Sowa X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <56BC65C6.5070204@ttmath.org> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 11:43:18 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160210225031.GJ1141@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 10:38:37 -0000 On 2016.02.10 23:50, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: [...] > What you were looking for was pkg install ./nettle-3.2.tar which will replace > the old nettle already installed. Thanks, it works almost well but...sample without the internet connection: [second_machine]/home/tomek# ls nettle* gnutls* gnutls-3.3.17.1_2.tar nettle-3.2.tar [second_machine]/home/tomek# pkg install -Uf ./nettle-3.2.tar The following 2 package(s) will be affected (of 0 checked): Installed packages to be UPGRADED: nettle: 2.7.1 -> 3.2 gnutls: 3.3.15 -> 3.3.17.1_2 The process will require 709 KiB more space. 2 MiB to be downloaded. Proceed with this action? [y/N]: y And it waits for something forever... When I connect to the internet then: [second_machine]/home/tomek# pkg install -Uf ./nettle-3.2.tar The following 2 package(s) will be affected (of 0 checked): New packages to be INSTALLED: nettle: 3.2 gnutls: 3.3.17.1_2 The process will require 11 MiB more space. 2 MiB to be downloaded. Proceed with this action? [y/N]: y [second_machine] Fetching gnutls-3.3.17.1_2.txz: 100% 2 MiB 327.1kB/s 00:06 Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) [second_machine] [1/2] Installing nettle-3.2... [second_machine] [1/2] Extracting nettle-3.2: 100% [second_machine] [2/2] Installing gnutls-3.3.17.1_2... [second_machine] [2/2] Extracting gnutls-3.3.17.1_2: 100% It seems nettle has been installed from the local package but gnutls has been downloaded from a remote repo. Is there an option to install all packages from my local disk? I was trying to use a wildcard but it gives me: [second_machine]# pkg install -Uf * pkg: /usr/home/tomek/penik/pakiety_2016.02.07/appstream-glib-0.4.1.tar is not a valid package: no manifest found pkg: No packages available to install matching 'appstream-glib-0.4.1' have been found in the repositories and I don't see an option to skip the broken package. -- Tomek From owner-freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Thu Feb 11 11:33:28 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pkg@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C4AAA4705 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 11:33:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from claudiu.vasadi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x22b.google.com (mail-wm0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C130B125E for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 11:33:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from claudiu.vasadi@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id g62so17130636wme.0 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 03:33:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=x9ONIkulRP+VVZBWp6VhQQvFSyuWGUgLobvrsdVEJFo=; b=LmGg6OOYBa6w0UPsTgVd2vbkwax8O3L1VToTS5DmQreQW/DkVtlMjPJytFNFGKvWK3 I31vYgegw+uAso1sTeIRWtaXEOETHqJvHhQSgrC3jSJrm9CuqQeu0v/eP0q9q07FMRXd Z+axDP0rpqy6H/sL+g/KZibEav3FSi6rE8spfg5pRbAETm18AyCJS6v1PxJHsX2lYzK+ AO2t/pYv05Itb2YD79KUpWlV+89qov6yKUwNlX5Q0YjNIrQFm6QpZWxGQ63n5CpIMNPk YNaqM8x941uH+oeP9rPZZrhIFuYGdBmnX3IuXT7h8J59XGyn1WNlpG3d/enhx8cgK3H5 FHxg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=x9ONIkulRP+VVZBWp6VhQQvFSyuWGUgLobvrsdVEJFo=; b=ZrcoLAKsB6zpgNNv062k4v5UrPdwgx9vKCJqsL6MRkIFDeLO6YRsNHBKghFN/zrvk5 bPpvNbP0LKELVp9S3yLyruIynTlGrAaFUvOlvuCvZTBPO/Tm1u9mgxfNID7s24bB3wRr XHEWMBAlYc/KgdSG5hOAapQVLNR2mrT0SdqkJM8Ygves837r61SiwvuZvn1Lylgiiub7 LcZiud81m7uNVVTzJUwnFIgc3t5e5OTbr7u9ri0XClNQSVQBxjo+IKWWg96tXmAI0sl7 Wrt6Cg+dpOxgRu+lESNcgY8+xkChBvBxG76TafFdCvnyiT6XzlWHsm3jU/ujDwA0olTL O1sw== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTTMZ6s4lqMAPIUn9h6uDuafMoOmoDvSK/QrTPP2rQNFmWSUugylCo6Ko+hNfvIm0BDlMQrLkqzWRzcrw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.161.166 with SMTP id xt6mr48725060wjb.98.1455190405943; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 03:33:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.28.170.69 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 03:33:25 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 12:33:25 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: feature request: pkg history, info and rollback options From: claudiu vasadi To: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 11:33:28 -0000 Hello all, I would like to make a few feature requests -- taken from the same yum-related options. pkg history - to see a brief summary of who installed what, when. pkg history info - to get a detailed view of a given transaction id pkg rollback - to be able to rollback a transaction It would be really nice to have something like this in pkg. Is something similar on the roadmap? -- Best regards, Claudiu Vasadi From owner-freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Fri Feb 12 02:17:51 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pkg@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F08A4AA45DA for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 02:17:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9DA11383 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 02:17:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D8069AA45D9; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 02:17:51 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: pkg@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7989AA45D8 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 02:17:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C64841382 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 02:17:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u1C2HpYR021877 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 02:17:51 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: pkg@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 206665] ports-mgmt/pkg : 1.6.3 building for RPI2 (arm) gets: passing 'size_t *' (aka 'unsigned int *') to type 'off_t *' (aka 'long long *') Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 02:17:52 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: markmi@dsl-only.net X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pkg@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 02:17:52 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D206665 --- Comment #4 from Mark Millard --- (In reply to Baptiste Daroussin from comment #3) I did svnlite update -r408706 /usr/ports on the rpi2 and then portupgrade p= kg on it. During this processing I still got text about: incompatible pointer types passing 'size_t *' (aka 'unsigned int *') to parameter of type 'off_t *' (aka 'long long *') --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=