From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Feb 14 04:52:44 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 260FEAA1E9E for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 04:52:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from tatiana.utanet.at (tatiana.utanet.at [IPv6:2001:938:1337:25::25:46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDF0B11CF for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 04:52:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=utanet.at; s=rev1; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:Subject:References:To; bh=y8TG+ykkg5Qj+IzVZMzU+BNWwcFAJrVTTRLFQQLBHg8=; b=CeAkucQNGklMJjX1DRFK5mfc/VfICfP5jnk/0E42jUtHZ2DYq+/iIPWhIx/K2ONBFwJybNUMq5MH27ZbPWw7+e7zlOdY0c46Q4Oalp+C2dc/tIRkw/795fBc/t0N7KjGyxtWzUrJw6CXmrVWqOG7bzhGoWMhU+/AkHV9UufDEEo=; Received: from plenty.xoc.tele2net.at ([213.90.36.8]) by tatiana.utanet.at with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1aUofp-0003aK-Bj for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 05:52:41 +0100 Received: from 62-47-168-55.adsl.highway.telekom.at ([62.47.168.55] helo=[10.0.0.93]) by plenty.xoc.tele2net.at with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1aUofp-0001dn-9y for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 05:52:41 +0100 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <56BFC341.2040100@utanet.at> Subject: Re: cups-base From: Walter Schwarzenfeld Message-ID: <56C00818.1020902@utanet.at> Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 05:52:40 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56BFC341.2040100@utanet.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 04:52:44 -0000 Sorry, the patch was against the "original" pkg-plist, instead the updated. Please, take this one https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207171 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Feb 14 05:25:41 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E9B6AA6D6D for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 05:25:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk0-x232.google.com (mail-vk0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 177791D38 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 05:25:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vk0-x232.google.com with SMTP id c3so86707832vkb.3 for ; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 21:25:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=jo7kTQsLixHE/WRMrhjcDKKVacqUYlZdnFA/9FWM6vU=; b=RTa5633C05A+oG+gUaYoi+vFdOgzLQBzsMo5alIV/ueE9icV4fcRcBGuz5ONTL+PGj 3YA1JWDUiMvZTm4FWe7zJBxr4C6mr2ejWOIhiGadEmkQc5nmiN0Utl6SQiiYXks5b3QB uV+OemNKqNyh+feO5a/6wdv4zYksFIT+YTDgQWg/zKU0yvZm3vod2SdEl38isgHsR2fE rUQzYBpMlzLY0qVcsutAH0qNPireB151Q6TWkEkVg3X76gv2g5m08CGlBdyapwTBZV+F /UEN2HevC35vCsl6OUPED4u1ptFuNPNUIh3TDrKZODFGYs7srXg6CQAKUr6IomHSptZK oa4A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=jo7kTQsLixHE/WRMrhjcDKKVacqUYlZdnFA/9FWM6vU=; b=irC/gE9JO2UoFlfZgctVIH/VSk58Dq1lV0c7K68RvEfmTkYz9GLcrjrm2BBLBJFSMm jceepuzG9GoASBNv5RTLTkMMo04N7VTwSdc6lTvf5HtVYctERy41f/AspmuRLaFVgA/h NbvfWXVMiwk1MWGgk8o2SaKgS5qjEGtbzuIDshe8LJIMjmNjzEAWAJbj+Hh/ZnToadjQ OFZVSDrrp7YkoBf+yJeloCFdAeLOphSiD9r9wnWx9uqCi5huIm2KpvaovSCf0a13l0e2 vi1wOfeH49VHoBlRyh47lFyigHU/NZzk9CNopAe9KvPZTccSc4aAC80+OW+JOov5djDq UbTg== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQzkew6KsE5k/ZWAvBX9XKZklPMVdd8PboKstS3EaxipXFFauUsq91aSwnOryUnPt5VCc9DH9CDI7Yn3Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.31.54.75 with SMTP id d72mr7890148vka.30.1455427539962; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 21:25:39 -0800 (PST) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.176.67.37 with HTTP; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 21:25:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20160210172907.GA14793@neutralgood.org> References: <56B9EDC7.1010403@ohlste.in> <56B9F2D6.1090107@marino.st> <20160210015708.GN71035@eureka.lemis.com> <56BAF8E0.7020604@marino.st> <20160210090136.GC46096@home.opsec.eu> <56BAFEBD.9000004@marino.st> <20160210172907.GA14793@neutralgood.org> Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 21:25:39 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: vHELTw2YQwW5gkMDKVC0nbaqVtE Message-ID: Subject: Re: synth documentation From: Kevin Oberman To: kpneal@pobox.com Cc: John Marino , Kurt Jaeger , FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 05:25:41 -0000 Real programmers toggle in all programs from the switch register. What do you mean, "Computers don't have switch registers any more"? Kids, ask you dad or grandpa what a "switch register" is (was). Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 9:29 AM, wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 10:11:25AM +0100, John Marino wrote: > > On 2/10/2016 10:01 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > >> I'm racking my brains and I can't find a single rational reason why > > >> somebody would refuse the package (especially if building it on an > Atom > > >> is the alternative). > > > > > > The famous paper from Ken Thompson: Reflections on trusting trust > > > > > > http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=358198.358210 > > > > > > > The source is publicly available on github. The only way that Thompson > > paper could apply is if a trojan is inserted at the FreeBSD package > > builder level. > > Or at your local level. See below. > > > So I guess [A] could say FreeBSD package builder is compromised > > (intentionally by FreeBSD project or unknown to all due a hacker). And > > I guess that could be possible, but the counter is: If you cant' trust > > packages built by FreeBSD, how can you trust the FreeBSD base not to > > have a trojan? > > > > Which would mean that only the people that *also* build FreeBSD from > > source would have a leg to stand on. > > > > So I will concede that case: If you accept no binaries at all from > > FreeBSD and only build base and packages from source, then you have a > > point. But still the response, "Then don't complain" applies. It's a > > conscious decision and consequences of decisions must be accepted. > > Well, no, actually there's no end of it. > > Can you trust the compiler used to compile FreeBSD from source? > > Can you trust your motherboard's firmware to not install patches onto > FreeBSD after compiling from source? (This is old hat on Windows to make > it easy for people to get the right drivers from a fresh install of > Windows.) > > Can you trust the update procedure for your board's firmware? > > Can you trust that there isn't a trojan in your CPU's microcode? > > Seriously, it never ends. You just have to pick a level and say you trust > everything below that. > -- > Kevin P. Neal http://www.pobox.com/~kpn/ > > "A pig's gotta fly." - Crimson Pig > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Feb 14 07:07:43 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12C24AA7193 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 07:07:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk0-x234.google.com (mail-vk0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDD0C180B for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 07:07:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vk0-x234.google.com with SMTP id e6so87256068vkh.2 for ; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 23:07:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Lfm/3OeO6KyUm6phjRW/2Fmk+6Q+oxnDMtT81y/huMo=; b=VUkS3AzriBHK7F9lKg0M8CcvXLtH+cGyBUVUAHnn6/tBbVyYGvaYiyVMBvCwPmaK7o Qu/B2TGHcj5H65nrg/ciwuZxY4Ui6ieX5QDn6gAK3dCsbVkIfJgy94VWCRmnJ+HuzxHs jBh2ZbubTeHe4UyaVp/jAqks82qaDME/X6iaNnXmKKGyaEzt+HlpGHIS/PQh/rkCesC6 ePUiDqrAMFVU3CHgRHvCVafvOCjSyRmnh6LuQcMO2J07dipJ2G29yMx8VVHCjSWbjhOH xT1O/0Ecuyj03Tm3vPwvBb4jQQVjYuXWYX+2jx6e/PzWUlkb8rpIvaQfns9sGTKbWx7S iqHg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Lfm/3OeO6KyUm6phjRW/2Fmk+6Q+oxnDMtT81y/huMo=; b=IWDmwcPRBfiVi+gnENtYraKbIzqQBtaqz81ugSj+jqHTg/C2zWvpFPgku6YHmXr/9s +6ovc9Dq9lJRodYdO4C0kCc/hK2Q8Dl/IBMRlSeh8Q4IJmLogjg+Brm/3vbzaIrqGyoA 8h+DgCpJlWya0mOT8wsDxeCl8Z8uXYrwCVoXKP9AQxnqtn0ojXx57sAwj5puI6o0Mr8r ncaLwtY4BOOnTKxY8ZYnaI26aGgAyG8o0hMXegmMMDlxzByFQJ6nPUmGmRSsY3qU7oDn Kz957BIttWkHCOrDDYNrsxhehJ1wMKsQLa/v6UiMXMahkLtl3PmnT+pWy6FtE3nETaLd i9OQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSKEEVfZgNWrfgHRRaOb6UcOl7wc7/eB+Oamu9xkO2AaKDfElV97n4GAaWOg4Kd2/OBF1Dr7kUbP6FxKw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.31.52.68 with SMTP id b65mr8303443vka.150.1455433661775; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 23:07:41 -0800 (PST) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.176.67.37 with HTTP; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 23:07:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20160210225715.GA7804@biertje.skysmurf.nl> References: <56B754A8.3030605@marino.st> <20160208064305.GB63030@server.rulingia.com> <56B8454F.8060605@marino.st> <1454923852.4807.19.camel@mathiaspicker.net> <56B8662A.2050502@marino.st> <56BBAFB7.9080509@marino.st> <20160210223156.GA7724@biertje.skysmurf.nl> <56BBBB33.7030200@marino.st> <20160210225715.GA7804@biertje.skysmurf.nl> Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 23:07:41 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: dJf6d7iApU54FTXstr63yTn3KK4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Removing documentation From: Kevin Oberman To: Alphons van Werven Cc: John Marino , Freddie Cash , Peter Jeremy , FreeBSD Mailing List , Mathias Picker Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 07:07:43 -0000 On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Alphons van Werven wrote: > John Marino wrote: > > > Well, if I make the assume that Kevin has been using portmaster, and > > that using Synth revealed 42 obsolete cached configurations, I would > > have to conclude PM doesn't do this anymore or does it very poorly and > > misses a large number of configs. > > Using the latest version of Portmaster, I feel confident in stating that > the "doesn't do this anymore" part appears to be false. My money is on > incomplete detection, i.e. detecting only a subset (but doing at least > that part correctly) of all possible kinds of option changes. > > However, I did not intend to sidetrack the discussion. As previously > mentioned, it's just an observation. > > Fonz > Well, I just tracked down the details for sysutils/tmux. I picked it because it was at the bottom of the list. I checked every update to the port going back to the version when the options file was created, 1.9a_1. Comparing that to the current version, there have been no options changes at all. Not to the options offered nor to the defaults. I am baffled as to what is going on. Looks like portmaster might be doing this a bit better than synth does. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Feb 14 07:25:41 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B77EBAA7A35 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 07:25:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk0-x235.google.com (mail-vk0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7036C115A for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 07:25:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vk0-x235.google.com with SMTP id k196so87850949vka.0 for ; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 23:25:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=OEJuSemPWoBIuoG8yHU43MbMatIbrkWakFCB3z4pnBk=; b=xSFvEg9oNeJT2rID+JpDsKxzhycAT/Vm2feQVpXC443vPID9QviINFS/3tiYiW+gUO pUX4nMqqTVCY2k3WNheKOYajAnOJms1SQcJSknPbgVTZX2tyJCEWfWw8UIPgPzX/i2T9 AiPcZz3rsajUOY9we04KDoWF6e9VK+F+1gMlMOAOVPDATPUERELDQS1SYww4T+bPWJZE XPSIOWboIIHPpq3da02LYD+GK/SDZhaTnYWMPG27z2cz8v/GKk1xdZxv0utWqE9RmarS cByn6z79hu/A9aCRYfblziwLnIBAthZUeGTKH7JZg2mr752XAfNFL4lP/ZR0HPsmaeBU /11w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=OEJuSemPWoBIuoG8yHU43MbMatIbrkWakFCB3z4pnBk=; b=c3fO3CQ/NopuLOfK3cTx6Ss2rCxvzoh75sag85B3hsi0oBJrhX+//yZpUA8BWqk2jm RVEu93MoF41VK6ufMByEhUvexGseXVERHyDPOj2vQpReAIK5LAy2uuT9zS6utoKC43yF RLJ0y0Vgg6rqvot/t8YvzakOHwcoCt7Liw3SLiDJNn0zsdFgLZmgSnNA6hftmDfP51Ls o4WMYfjUaT+uvy0mH8qNoS/OLDOQxnkWME9TSxbjNv7p+ZyzdaEbKxWIJ3UfexB2tqiT gqinOF5aP0jUGHYQXxQTl7XekCQj7KIhyKi7SnsnirFp2qouHLWO0DJr9JSBoOYWsY/v A4Gg== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTO53tIF9wH2pcn/GANbReLhlJKXkTgYONMD9IRneO/m3dsHtFpg8j+DzxqbifmdZkZDoW+KfCEqeZ70Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.31.173.18 with SMTP id w18mr7235680vke.31.1455434740311; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 23:25:40 -0800 (PST) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.176.67.37 with HTTP; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 23:25:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <56BF0577.7010808@sorbs.net> References: <56B754A8.3030605@marino.st> <56BCE01D.4010701@FreeBSD.org> <56BCE218.40403@marino.st> <56BCEC5F.4020007@marino.st> <56BDF2A3.9030100@ohlste.in> <56BE0CC5.50103@sorbs.net> <20160212190032.GD26283@home.opsec.eu> <56BF0577.7010808@sorbs.net> Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 23:25:40 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: BGIqq_NmI08Nj-yCtoA9p_CU4R0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Removing documentation From: Kevin Oberman To: Michelle Sullivan Cc: Kurt Jaeger , FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 07:25:41 -0000 On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 2:29 AM, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Michelle wrote: > > > >> ports (post pkg) from source: exactly the same problems as pre-pkg plus > >> occasionally the DB would get corrupted and then you have to nuke the > >> entire package system from orbit and reinstall all the ports. > >> > > > > Interestingly, I had my cases of strange dependencies chains, but > > I can't remember a case where the pkg-db was really trashed to no > > longer function. > > > > The more recent pkg versions are very robust for my use cases. > > > > > It was earlyish (first 6-9 months) in the "you're going to use this now > whether you like it or not and whether it works or not phase".. since > then I've made the ports system work with pkg_tools again so no longer > have anything to do with pkg. Its a good stop-gap until I can get the > build environment integrated into the CentOS one @ $employer. > > -- > Michelle Sullivan > http://www.mhix.org/ My experience is that pkg(8) has been wonderfully robust since 1.3. before 1.3 it was a real pain in the neck, though I never had a need to rebuild the DB, I did ave to do a bit of fix-up. I really, really wish Bapt had listened and held up the default to pkg for a bit. Much as I like it, it really was not ready for prime time when it became the default. The early issues chased too many people away. E.g. you. I've had exactly zero issues since shortly after 1.4 was released. 4.1 bit me rather painfully, but was quickly fixed, as I recall. (N.B. This is all from memory as my records and notes went away when I retired.) -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Feb 14 07:37:35 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED372AA7F9A for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 07:37:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsdml@marino.st) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C875114B3 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 07:37:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsdml@marino.st) Received: from [192.168.1.21] (248.Red-83-39-200.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [83.39.200.248]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1364643BE0; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 01:37:25 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: Removing documentation To: Kevin Oberman , Alphons van Werven References: <56B754A8.3030605@marino.st> <20160208064305.GB63030@server.rulingia.com> <56B8454F.8060605@marino.st> <1454923852.4807.19.camel@mathiaspicker.net> <56B8662A.2050502@marino.st> <56BBAFB7.9080509@marino.st> <20160210223156.GA7724@biertje.skysmurf.nl> <56BBBB33.7030200@marino.st> <20160210225715.GA7804@biertje.skysmurf.nl> Cc: Freddie Cash , Peter Jeremy , FreeBSD Mailing List , Mathias Picker From: John Marino Message-ID: <56C02EB2.9010201@marino.st> Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 08:37:22 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 07:37:36 -0000 On 2/14/2016 8:07 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote: > ery update to the port going back to the version when the options file > was created, 1.9a_1. Comparing that to the current version, there have > been no options changes at all. Not to the options offered nor to the > defaults. I am baffled as to what is going on. Looks like portmaster > might be doing this a bit better than synth does. Send me the tmux options file. The mystery should not be hard to crack. We can just look at the data. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Feb 14 08:58:07 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 938DDAA65E0 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 08:58:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81CA910D8 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 08:58:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 81B4AAA65DE; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 08:58:07 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81459AA65DD for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 08:58:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74DAD10D7 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 08:58:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u1E8w7oS066832 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 08:58:07 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u1E8w7Hj066831; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 08:58:07 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201602140858.u1E8w7Hj066831@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 08:58:07 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 08:58:07 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ devel/ocaml-lacaml | 7.2.6 | v8.0.2 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ net-mgmt/weathermap | 1.1.1 | 18.0.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Feb 14 11:25:20 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52242AA74E5 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 11:25:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michelle@sorbs.net) Received: from hades.sorbs.net (mail.sorbs.net [67.231.146.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 422FB1A02 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 11:25:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michelle@sorbs.net) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from isux.com (firewall.isux.com [213.165.190.213]) by hades.sorbs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.29.0 64bit (built Jul 9 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0O2J00K33C1JGC00@hades.sorbs.net> for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 03:32:14 -0800 (PST) Message-id: <56C06410.3070208@sorbs.net> Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 12:25:04 +0100 From: Michelle Sullivan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100301 SeaMonkey/1.1.19 To: Kevin Oberman Cc: Kurt Jaeger , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Removing documentation References: <56B754A8.3030605@marino.st> <56BCE01D.4010701@FreeBSD.org> <56BCE218.40403@marino.st> <56BCEC5F.4020007@marino.st> <56BDF2A3.9030100@ohlste.in> <56BE0CC5.50103@sorbs.net> <20160212190032.GD26283@home.opsec.eu> <56BF0577.7010808@sorbs.net> In-reply-to: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 11:25:20 -0000 Kevin Oberman wrote: > > My experience is that pkg(8) has been wonderfully robust since 1.3. before > 1.3 it was a real pain in the neck, though I never had a need to rebuild > the DB, I did ave to do a bit of fix-up. I really, really wish Bapt had > listened and held up the default to pkg for a bit. Much as I like it, it > really was not ready for prime time when it became the default. The early > issues chased too many people away. E.g. you. > Nailed it! -- Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/ From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Feb 14 11:37:41 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BE97AA7A84 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 11:37:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from killing@multiplay.co.uk) Received: from mail-wm0-x22f.google.com (mail-wm0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE87A1D67 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 11:37:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from killing@multiplay.co.uk) Received: by mail-wm0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id g62so22303504wme.1 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 03:37:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=multiplay-co-uk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OXJVn+HL0ZLHrZyzKXEaqeUQo0oYq3+/HNazDBjJs+k=; b=oAyQJb/uML6FXTCX93m/XsnHteu7ND3Bu1FazjOtMWieoa05oqv5an7QNCg4xcEbp3 r+gSVJltt3iV2lAVsTpFp0i5eJ5Ok/W4LlsGZY3bhquDUSSYioumUD3DFFJEVc8ygIpF uSC6HVcV48nSS2RooPX8oVKPEhCQJP1EWayC/wiXpMV0G4Dv6CSyvOmbYeYVM27NujgQ mPhvNxWZ5wHtLjKHQ6mpGw8p0SxdQu9G71Tzb/s0hitk68V/klEnpRsfmhTW7akaVfC9 e+2xa58CoVy0kGvHxe2rDLJczjcgY4xTabioPxldubEAw/09kZke6HPrdlWoQhzbpgwq JHCA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=OXJVn+HL0ZLHrZyzKXEaqeUQo0oYq3+/HNazDBjJs+k=; b=lLVCYSW0M//sEBHO3H6JFQczc/k+qx/U6kI0Db15VKesXLsD3rszMHIP928Y5VJ+w3 FfiRzEpGJSuRLQa12Z/3LGXQzYgbTEBx2rj9J7kdFjZpeKSdamnr2mO3KgqHr0NyNxQX QgovMNS3X2dTbcEnyaS+EO46RPNGEgV8/LQCHvtB9LjRoi1Yw5Td9B8ZlhKkVSykfrlg n+HYEGAgzG5G/qBJ/d/g/sYC3rOYd7OXhGHwzgEYs8YHYF/wSkesgu5xG3dF5poa3HDx 0DKttr3CH33cpmPf0pVfxImUlgl43h9U53Dyp2UOuhxXZXIHrchUYUDy6nL9dd9WtboF /YeA== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTQx258N1/UChcf7qY9V5PYU3qYosZaIicQI1US6g2ahf0z/0cGBG3PyWAAte1jZ3BZ X-Received: by 10.194.250.72 with SMTP id za8mr8120365wjc.4.1455449857759; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 03:37:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.10.1.58] (liv3d.labs.multiplay.co.uk. [82.69.141.171]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k4sm10664364wmc.12.2016.02.14.03.37.36 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 14 Feb 2016 03:37:36 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Removing documentation To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <56B754A8.3030605@marino.st> <56BCE01D.4010701@FreeBSD.org> <56BCE218.40403@marino.st> <56BCEC5F.4020007@marino.st> <56BDF2A3.9030100@ohlste.in> <56BE0CC5.50103@sorbs.net> <20160212190032.GD26283@home.opsec.eu> <56BF0577.7010808@sorbs.net> <56C06410.3070208@sorbs.net> From: Steven Hartland Message-ID: <56C06703.6010508@multiplay.co.uk> Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 11:37:39 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56C06410.3070208@sorbs.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 11:37:41 -0000 On 14/02/2016 11:25, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > Kevin Oberman wrote: >> My experience is that pkg(8) has been wonderfully robust since 1.3. before >> 1.3 it was a real pain in the neck, though I never had a need to rebuild >> the DB, I did ave to do a bit of fix-up. I really, really wish Bapt had >> listened and held up the default to pkg for a bit. Much as I like it, it >> really was not ready for prime time when it became the default. The early >> issues chased too many people away. E.g. you. >> > Nailed it! The problem with that is its a chicken and egg situation, without it hitting prime time it likely wouldn't have got the needed use to identify and subsequently fix the issues you're referring to; at the very least it would have slowed that process down :( Regards Steve From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Feb 14 16:15:11 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A9E3AA8A8F for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 16:15:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shantanna@hotmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC16815EA for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 16:15:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shantanna@hotmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E9592AA8A8E; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 16:15:10 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8EF3AA8A8D for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 16:15:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shantanna@hotmail.com) Received: from DUB004-OMC2S22.hotmail.com (dub004-omc2s22.hotmail.com [157.55.1.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BFB515E9 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 16:15:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shantanna@hotmail.com) Received: from emea01-db3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([157.55.1.136]) by DUB004-OMC2S22.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Sun, 14 Feb 2016 08:13:59 -0800 Received: from DBXPR04MB208.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.242.140.153) by DBXPR04MB206.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.242.140.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.403.16; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 16:13:59 +0000 Received: from DBXPR04MB208.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.15.144]) by DBXPR04MB208.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.15.144]) with mapi id 15.01.0409.017; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 16:13:58 +0000 From: SATRIANI Santana To: "ports@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Hiawatha v.10.1 is out. Please update pkg and port <3 Thread-Topic: Hiawatha v.10.1 is out. Please update pkg and port <3 Thread-Index: AQHRZ0K1QLqbcSc9zU6lPlanjs6htg== Importance: high X-Priority: 1 Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 16:13:58 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: FreeBSD.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;FreeBSD.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=hotmail.com; x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DBXPR04MB206; 23:6A+gLfNyJv6pxHoRLWQo1CyphiarsfiL6JWFVMZWumM33EGcYCBJJyXB9dvZ3TGskRtazQVsdRXXSE8iLrDxs+VaepuUTNlP6HtZV339NbLLE9cd+//sT1X2fm7XW7p07Uoau2jktGM3S9t5RJW4NeJJmQPs/gmFhcFknPX8PqEHsFXB59yjJyRIa5quVYKLHIw5rWLsTN/T3wsAbFEDXg==; 5:ySaNXiRYRRrsUwzL4SnjYn/6eKrVu9H2oxxp2oveTq5CdsEfGuzCzqbToo4qF9SyXoqOblq8/i6+9OD+d4I6c+S/mVybo+jlbsjKZp3oEQ1GLCUejLALn2NhgslYFtc77AuJ8hoJ8pGOT8h7sL0uUg==; 24:5ivb4cDe8weRcORpEgXiEOpbnwQS/xLZUi9xcjZ+dhchQAu+jpMUUUQejWyFUXmezucnn3vubJE6u27w3O5XycNeuhD82DZM6eftWmwdyw4= x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DBXPR04MB206; x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 832fe4f9-f4c0-47fe-678c-08d33559d6a4 x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(432015012)(82015046); SRVR:DBXPR04MB206; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DBXPR04MB206; x-forefront-prvs: 0852EB6797 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(7070004)(98900003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1901; SCL:1; SRVR:DBXPR04MB206; H:DBXPR04MB208.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:ovr; LANG:en; spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: <40927F6CF6591E4CBEB4096193FE8A55@eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: sct-15-1-409-15-msonline-outlook-b19e9.templateTenant X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 14 Feb 2016 16:13:58.7223 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DBXPR04MB206 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Feb 2016 16:13:59.0831 (UTC) FILETIME=[B687CA70:01D16742] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 16:15:11 -0000 SGVsbG8sDQoNCnRoZSBIaWF3YXRoYS1XZWJzZXJ2ZXIgdmVyc2lvbiAxMC4xIGlzIG91dCwgd2l0 aCBncmVhdCBmZWF0dXJlc8KgaHR0cHM6Lw0KL3d3dy5oaWF3YXRoYS13ZWJzZXJ2ZXIub3JnL2No YW5nZWxvZw0KwqANCkNhbiB5b3UgcGxlYXNlIHVwZGF0ZSBwYWNrYWdlIGFuZCBwb3J0Pw0KDQpU aGFua3MgaW4gYWR2YW5jZSBhbmQgwqBiZXN0IHJlZ2FyZHMuDQoNCkFsZXguDQo= From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Feb 14 16:49:00 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FC2FAA8ED1 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 16:49:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: from mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [IPv6:2001:aa8:fffb:1::3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.0x20.net", Issuer "mail.0x20.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 482381BEC; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 16:49:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [IPv6:2001:aa8:fffb:1::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.0x20.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10B816DF91B; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 17:48:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id u1EGmuke016341; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 17:48:56 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: (from lars@localhost) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id u1EGmt8P015359; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 17:48:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lars) Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 17:48:55 +0100 From: Lars Engels To: Richard Kuhns Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" , johans@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recent update of security/nettle broke security/keepassx2 Message-ID: <20160214164855.GA83790@e-new.0x20.net> References: <56BDEC41.4060502@wintek.com> <56BE0F6E.2080509@wintek.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56BE0F6E.2080509@wintek.com> X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 7.4 X-Operation-System: FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE-p23 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 16:49:00 -0000 --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 11:59:26AM -0500, Richard Kuhns wrote: > Apologies; it was apparently libgcrypt, not nettle. >=20 > On 02/12/16 09:29, Richard Kuhns wrote: > > Hi all, > >=20 > > After updating security/nettle, when I try to start keepassx2 I get: > >=20 > > : rjk$~; keepassx > > Ohhhh jeeee: Assertion `ctx->unused < 64' failed > > (salsa20.c:400:salsa20_do_encrypt_stream) > > Abort trap > >=20 I can confirm this. :-/ --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJWwK/3XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ4RjQwMDE3RTRERjUzMTI1N0FGRTUxNDlF NTRDQjM3RDNBMDg5RDZEAAoJEOVMs306CJ1tz5oIAIlgaBK5AXbiazkOTF76YiWW IfX+aH+teyt+e1m3qFmppWLgEeXrBZ0Vj7CvharMulUMxScTP04Smacfs/MV30iS r/iKs2rJR/L9BFalHLF7ukDVdvPiN9PWAL38O5YajZXCfMGL14FEHN7X0RU39LCZ tXX+gGJP9zbzhsyMbt58a7NWwPaWqh1DvnQejMWxwe/6kLTv6Ni8fX3OBI5ppwey Kj7Fcdusc/BjnX5kE7nwmNwrdITrvzfDF+fPfJ8/qSLFlp1u05lwOrhTRXQ2YvfI tCf6eNsH5VTBe+kDT6iYkTdBYi9Uuz1Tb1iledFnetsmELnhhghJOwDsp68r5CY= =r0Oc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Feb 14 16:56:26 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17115AA832C for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 16:56:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jason.unovitch@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ig0-x22e.google.com (mail-ig0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E058310B5; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 16:56:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jason.unovitch@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ig0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id 5so41424231igt.0; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 08:56:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=rTI3b+T3wbWG1PhXEM8PM4KrUkhLHlySsm/ixk0Tvg0=; b=JoUTOSvjz7b2WJ7VLL6tgMIXNA3CH1PGoDCqmbvJLlEYNUnDIgQNfca8G7SUCKKml2 Qa6kQfgWbzdwAqmgMVIUgk+hHU2CbecdogP+delP6I30saRXl4YKLGxCtf7N7tTP+hl5 PWAraixsxYsBZfmRQ5amrUAYVN9Vb4ZKeg8iBkNn1ZZ53OPsnTabELO/0hta+I4GlMh2 GmX8AyTx1hu5343Y7pMs/HBY64nQk5IONCYlBr77NgRRNrEi0FP4lc5w8WF3Te0kLY1n cXdIRLG22e886J4ZmPiFnQ48/4u1bUK3lsCF0hU67WySmvYESh3d3EEOs8yiqyDs7fGF IwSg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=rTI3b+T3wbWG1PhXEM8PM4KrUkhLHlySsm/ixk0Tvg0=; b=SnqWXcV2qJ5wtZDsezTtmyXPlc3mmVNkqhyQ4PU+x7dSPXn/M14olhsfWtMuADNSD/ BKZiIJiUR8R30ZHkH18COGis69XLu3RPmj9mDhmtsXfzZ+K78qs7CD3Idc+3CGbIE27E l74FckqalyOxKZylkHcShmZ0Jk0cK7uSB6hrdXNBHDXJq3oX5dIuvIPINnzMyLpQpFcS Ib8UVi9jPL+3Z+w1RxaJD4FHU+TUR4wEGR/A3cCHZm0K/BP3BNDWv/wXyC/xTRVJGvwc DNm4wkOvKmk2sNVC8zJut7D3QmWHP0H9/chid+H4LCxiNI/EgHxUF6iXswsj4AxIasDs GOyQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORJEvxkTrYkgb+NoJNxoynxOE5qqYSXrRkpL3vkCR+SaWKhncw6sVRYWBXpZFL+uRLCrlMKGXoXHv5B6g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.66.172 with SMTP id g12mr2539633igt.89.1455468985250; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 08:56:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.16.2 with HTTP; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 08:56:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20160214164855.GA83790@e-new.0x20.net> References: <56BDEC41.4060502@wintek.com> <56BE0F6E.2080509@wintek.com> <20160214164855.GA83790@e-new.0x20.net> Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 11:56:25 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Recent update of security/nettle broke security/keepassx2 From: Jason Unovitch To: Lars Engels Cc: Richard Kuhns , johans@freebsd.org, "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" , "Carlos J. Puga Medina" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 16:56:26 -0000 On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Lars Engels wrote: > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 11:59:26AM -0500, Richard Kuhns wrote: >> Apologies; it was apparently libgcrypt, not nettle. >> >> On 02/12/16 09:29, Richard Kuhns wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > After updating security/nettle, when I try to start keepassx2 I get: >> > >> > : rjk$~; keepassx >> > Ohhhh jeeee: Assertion `ctx->unused < 64' failed >> > (salsa20.c:400:salsa20_do_encrypt_stream) >> > Abort trap >> > > > I can confirm this. :-/ See https://bugs.FreeBSD.org/207042 and by extension https://bugs.FreeBSD.org/207107. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Feb 14 17:58:34 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8219AA8F78 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 17:58:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk0-x22d.google.com (mail-vk0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DD561081 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 17:58:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vk0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id c3so92510036vkb.3 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 09:58:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=v1mQ/dsTFh7tqZvtwDYbN+TNQePwWweABif5I8tryqA=; b=aZF6GpnKmol7+gHuFVNeeJyIoW8XLJ28Q/lMg/O86fiiEnLtJjEL/u7iypi2WkKQ4v 3GI+52r97LlHGw0632/yVKlIF72TLwIKo2gUFr+iuZkKv6COD2Xwb6QMo5UgFo60c4Mm buDB2H4V8+0SA1ZtwkFULfJpWvE8ZLTLzSP/OQOT8SdeJaTzHxjZ9vM2p6P4j91JjT2v jcrASDJwh7+ZIKsfLuZCjlRnz+KZ5aV1CCYbR/94wONEagOsPSQfrKiK4fz6QVu7d1fs M4eFS/xgl3seUrZFt2HdhlR9R5gaCCStpGFskE/5CrNcc40j4kfMr1huxq1ZyUQlmYKt OXUw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=v1mQ/dsTFh7tqZvtwDYbN+TNQePwWweABif5I8tryqA=; b=h1Xdj9wqhOOEj9GTEICCQKdZi5munfK4Lbq3LMmvFd7gsOoeh7MVabnebzajaPLQ9C 0dj5EDUTTGiAv53JTImtMrM6UzUQxMt16EsH0/5VqWNBRsl8ePucdS6VTGlq0a2pX6jE 5sTzUTCXVGebvj/Fc7jgxuOj16KLo16NDjJVlpSK0jdKcUziXRROFVUDe4ZqVHSTutCU 0MFsOg9hukeq78oL5b3J4MJ8vPsPw3IhTAxFwWfOOcHSPGhN/ftWvEUNld458+/tot6S K2ihNxjTeyCCHjzRvTnEbh2SfoQ2Z37kcDbng+Ur5s0RnhS+3fBYirRq6Dbu6hIVsAAb hV2g== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSyBg/vzTkX+1bILSKetiUm65JCmVzV2Chs0gewKj6qCmY+kX1bzdUHRLgqRLy78zlHrCdErjbFRhEZAQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.31.133.7 with SMTP id h7mr9802944vkd.32.1455472713555; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 09:58:33 -0800 (PST) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.176.67.37 with HTTP; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 09:58:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <56C06703.6010508@multiplay.co.uk> References: <56B754A8.3030605@marino.st> <56BCE01D.4010701@FreeBSD.org> <56BCE218.40403@marino.st> <56BCEC5F.4020007@marino.st> <56BDF2A3.9030100@ohlste.in> <56BE0CC5.50103@sorbs.net> <20160212190032.GD26283@home.opsec.eu> <56BF0577.7010808@sorbs.net> <56C06410.3070208@sorbs.net> <56C06703.6010508@multiplay.co.uk> Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 09:58:33 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: -AkPiR7HGMmKE4Vzw7Y3EqcdD5A Message-ID: Subject: Re: Removing documentation From: Kevin Oberman To: Steven Hartland Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 17:58:34 -0000 On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 3:37 AM, Steven Hartland wrote: > On 14/02/2016 11:25, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > >> Kevin Oberman wrote: >> >>> My experience is that pkg(8) has been wonderfully robust since 1.3. >>> before >>> 1.3 it was a real pain in the neck, though I never had a need to rebuild >>> the DB, I did ave to do a bit of fix-up. I really, really wish Bapt had >>> listened and held up the default to pkg for a bit. Much as I like it, it >>> really was not ready for prime time when it became the default. The early >>> issues chased too many people away. E.g. you. >>> >>> >> Nailed it! >> > The problem with that is its a chicken and egg situation, without it > hitting prime time it likely wouldn't have got the needed use to identify > and subsequently fix the issues you're referring to; at the very least it > would have slowed that process down :( > > Regards > Steve > Sorry, but I'm afraid not. There was spirited discussion at the time about the weaknesses and problems with pkg. It finally came to a head over portmaster. Its author and maintainer refused to put revisions to support pkg(8) because he felt strongly that issues with it had to be dealt with first. To be clear, I was one of those who wanted more development before making pkg the default. I really, really wanted pkg to help me deal with issues at work with maintaining FreeBSD that led to its replacement with Linux. As much as I wanted pkg, it seemed clear to me that it needed more work. Obviously, I was not on the winning side and there is no going back now that pkg has become a stable and robust tool that was critical to the growth of FreeBSD. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Feb 14 21:11:10 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52B69AA8061 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 21:11:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwestlun@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qg0-x234.google.com (mail-qg0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FB3B1275 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 21:11:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwestlun@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qg0-x234.google.com with SMTP id b67so98953657qgb.1 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 13:11:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:user-agent; bh=lCphjE4aq6baNQcpT4YdQ6oykCa4q1TB4MpqKxTK74U=; b=wT1by8elEMxwE9GjbK9I6B5ZLLj9Hm+9hOOmNOGjSZFl39KJplPQugjphmQo1HLO0d WVLHQHqU7kdGCo4pHSTPjaEP35wSwbH7HuKHxrSOcXcD1iz4+xtQSkTIY/2ZKaunxvSc hfn0NQstGwAuocxAsr/wIzlSZMKTfRrt5XUqH1uRkHBFsrhnrrSQUOFkHpBbEXozI7n2 gCczfuh/L9DToSrmglXNdZJyYrt7L92QoEe08PShdG5TTsn69kS4PeMYuId9u4z4H20l MElcyYUYMJvgoQ6tjacwHYonuYbZGOGsdLxy5xs5UV6weeyATmhrWJMPtMeVYz3RYBtT ixNA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:user-agent; bh=lCphjE4aq6baNQcpT4YdQ6oykCa4q1TB4MpqKxTK74U=; b=cTe/FYjkTqbmwb/PlG1d8jFXr+5Jws8m/plNdCSuPTRLugLWRV46re3eLUa3Wwulx+ GW/c0G6cZWhse66gyAl6ZiKrvPv4r+K8a/SIU2tScLbbOsZg5qQCr8ucNaXQJYr+WM6z jKOhtMlM4bRYWpkBJm2qqmlBbHAjXIySd8kUXzSfRBr3hGh+te0YTAgmRbimMW/mLC0g AYsu4gKVuTzqJWN5Gzi9d5g6rMUUatW6PDM8gG4S2V2WLHU+tkTyPd+GMGDAjnW+Chvp bTM7U+PrNiSAOdf8BVBgzdbMY8AbKOiVBDz/4IYLA5LsVRF/uH6G3310QuKPBjT0wL4T FIiw== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORzqwHBQI5KVmvjBT98uKJWt3Emdi4P5kYezGVMC74gBebs3RriTiWBwu6QHMAfeQ== X-Received: by 10.140.196.196 with SMTP id r187mr16930740qha.60.1455484269198; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 13:11:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from gmail.com (c-98-216-247-110.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [98.216.247.110]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o203sm9825985qho.15.2016.02.14.13.11.08 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 14 Feb 2016 13:11:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 16:11:07 -0500 From: Randy Westlund To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: PR ready for commit Message-ID: <20160214211107.GC3250@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="w7PDEPdKQumQfZlR" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 21:11:10 -0000 --w7PDEPdKQumQfZlR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline This is just waiting on a committer: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205052 Randy --w7PDEPdKQumQfZlR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWwO1rAAoJEGaweXjzNsmpZdkIAIZItl/7vhi7jb0Gawj2U9BK eykHnPFcun6qN6kWOcmXt6HX6jh+tdIlukqy6DXHkmrYcNTosTamVD0CtfkFaf2D Cn0fz1XK6jpr3eaTcL9bIVC9pGq+8Q7fY+XiOp8EXc8MNp/dJUk3r3hy5WVki+nX O64pbpkC+VcAqajlz2x1KoFG1cPlp1cPtTDR07gTTxM4RGEOSO2a2TvN4NnZOxH7 Oh0GPy9tN9SW0QAaplHtGA4+Y9CtBWTDZscNvA86iMifNk859bGRTMbC4gRy7K1G /pkrlFlm8Ccqn0gRJXNl2j4JPxk8WVNjiRGNlL5I1qzzMrV5QYHDj/Q7Zz4gxaI= =hzxj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --w7PDEPdKQumQfZlR-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Feb 14 21:48:55 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0809DAA9265 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 21:48:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@gmx.de) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EF7CDD0 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 21:48:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@gmx.de) Received: from [192.168.100.100] ([87.139.233.65]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M6jIK-1ZjYNk1iHE-00wVxA; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 22:35:32 +0100 Subject: Re: postfix-current is marked broken w.r.t SPF support, why? To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: Cc: Michael Grimm From: olli hauer Message-ID: <56C0F383.5010608@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 22:37:07 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Y3p2tVQ/sSKfCet5V2htskhTpUhoqR3RpRn8fVGOqHy33YcgF63 DVzONhnnfa9QiTY4Ub7r9zrR5KAp9Ig5Z+MkJSWgSyBe0GLsfWwMzXEbJhCbKlygETFdJOO 00Y+O315kwOQ5w2Mu9HqWJqqrfkUNWLWCRSMhaDHoA8TQdMok7cG4Va1dra5htZMwYxfJw8 9+ElBG7HNNfeDFWNK/mAw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:OdVIdtuK+sk=:rLQqR+x7SbwugnU9MvcHhr 4FSC+NquxQAzgJMQbLjmgKg1UpfVKEEOKnLKQausNlIp6+BQiKMpBhPRwuXPkOpD9QrWmws2X 4kvseDlZ4D4Ij/FamYv9KFq69c9a9zFEESlyQIhcdFLBBFHjLlDn4W/oDA4Majw1Pggy8DfIN JlnjadmMbJx7hv0h7n80IbdTvn6VsvBw8Okc5UTRlFFAnuS+dessYyoLkFSTkYiTjaXH9vCI5 6MJtyM5oFGBSVU30e5GjiAFPA1hXz27vI7ccBbcs8t/lDQfj/d+/BiJqlcyen2t8O1AxmL/K4 vR8pIjoZ9OyqWLKITsArkQypxg3WB9t6C0XP2/tWrctmOpflEb8H/toFgHn+f5SQPotYCar3a D+jQgsMSzsksEqHsR3LzY1dfuYZ9axz4344eXg+5q5q0Mua2CsnPBdCpln4Fl8hcTZ3oFMY/y 1DWcV7vE5jo0QG2UjovoZTyTac4+buKz3zmVfk51dAvO6Q3+GCed1Z1/UgTQNviIz1DZjMOpJ 5u1ZyNPTtVl++Q0M8dgcdJio5llMYR+CQzTUPzJLCXNsRWhltZ3o9XYUWZqrg6Oq+WcB4H3gE WydqDT4TDMNCnqfUUSjFPALgTrhj9KRNh84nVgyEGhVKtEPqBKQ2qJiFEv2h07ogqoPKBgcWX WVAp+42j38+Ju3Qv6W6aTgnh30a/sGM/qpyyjEMgh/967UfnyvyHQ7/dQUIV0TlWQ06QyPDC6 riuEhNzJrfM18+0+KA0mJ/8KhOAD2Zkpemb58hktMAGgcS8a/Uzh0+eB6Q+3w5fdkR+SQz1ZH wa2oFRs X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 21:48:55 -0000 On 2016-02-08 20:13, Michael Grimm wrote: > Hi — > > I am wondering why postfix-current is still marked broken regarding SPF support: > > | poudriere build log file excerpt: > | Finished build of mail/postfix-current: Ignored: is marked as broken: At the moment, SPF support is unavailable for postfix-3.0-20151003 > > Thus, I made a custom port removing this restriction in the Makefile, and that custom port compiles including SPF support: > > | mail> pkg query %do postfix-custom > | security/openssl > | devel/icu > | mail/dovecot2 > | mail/libspf2 > | devel/pcre > > | mail> pkg info | grep libspf > | libspf2-1.2.10_2 Sender Rewriting Scheme 2 C Implementation > > | mail> ldd `which postfix` > | /usr/local/sbin/postfix: > | ... > | libspf2.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libspf2.so.2 (0x8024a8000) > | ... > > I do not have a demand in using SPF at the moment, but I am only wondering whether this is a bug or feature. > > Any feedback is highly appreciated, > Michael Hi Michael, until now the patch will not apply clean and there is no new patch available. If we remove the BROKEN message users getting perhaps no notification if current will become the new default postfix ===> Fetching all distfiles required by postfix-current-3.0.20151003_1,4 for building => SHA256 Checksum OK for postfix/postfix-3.0.3.tar.gz. => SHA256 Checksum OK for postfix/postfix-2.8.0-libspf2-1.2.x-0.patch.gz. ===> Patching for postfix-current-3.0.20151003_1,4 ===> Applying distribution patches for postfix-current-3.0.20151003_1,4 1 out of 2 hunks failed--saving rejects to src/global/mail_params.c.rej 1 out of 7 hunks failed--saving rejects to src/smtpd/smtpd.c.rej 1 out of 3 hunks failed--saving rejects to src/smtpd/smtpd_check.c.rej *** Error code 1 -- olli From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Feb 14 22:37:46 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66964AA84EF for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 22:37:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from junovitch@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD03B92; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 22:37:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from junovitch@FreeBSD.org) Received: from Silverstone.nc-us.unovitch.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB2631A8A; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 22:37:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from junovitch@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 17:37:45 -0500 From: Jason Unovitch To: Randy Westlund Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PR ready for commit Message-ID: <20160214223745.GA33940@Silverstone.nc-us.unovitch.com> References: <20160214211107.GC3250@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-action=pgp-signed In-Reply-To: <20160214211107.GC3250@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 22:37:46 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 04:11:07PM -0500, Randy Westlund wrote: > This is just waiting on a committer: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205052 > > Randy Done! Thanks for the quick response on the requested QA and for taking over the port from ports@! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJWwQGyXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ0NURGNTQ1OTkzQkJFMzc3OTNDQUNERUU2 RkQ0OUMzMDE2MUNBQTZFAAoJEG/UnDAWHKpubDkH/iffQ7XFDaXO4J8rZhFiFsJP t2kAphW/dX+rJ95HvOowfOnltvqi3gz2C62A7ao7KmmLVGqKcYGXgOqcJz2Izp+9 6G3gKgEN/K2JeiwqatJebtRkPhJ6ELz2Q6hI9787G8IFguwHB+DqCz6pC+5yJRuI AMUC9RBzfZ6C0ckSoqcbLzyY+BfvObwpiXbr752ul8zN4koF4IJg8JG+QsPaR7qO 80uaYjV4dd2wB5BkeX+A9U1FUsLQWhgDr8FqoubqEmsA1krs/r8LUEo4f61MQIcG +hbWe9v1ehzgEIpPfzcJwSkjnbYp0yA/UR3jjuvPgkQLDbBalBd9ZGT68pvz+XQ= =aCdj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 15 06:29:58 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33F60AA8E76 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 06:29:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from royce.williams@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-x22a.google.com (mail-ob0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE88C1BD8 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 06:29:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from royce.williams@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ob0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id wb13so199864294obb.1 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 22:29:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=vUODy9/77+g8Kbxoowq5q4zhRgQmAiaI37DcJDqtfL4=; b=lz45lhWYuQZzlBe9FKGc/tmSkblrbjuoWKRCAVbXz6HhjyjlfH70eXdppn+BRuoh3s 2MH8jDfJ7jx9GyYRk1nfOonnC+B1K13ZmSV6AP0JjMOEDySM1NniwrIzvS/8NzMgOROb lX5hnkNgcaOu+VsnwaYmtcJuhZq3X3O9oozj64GWfKFHr2FdW/kAV0WfRLsORd5CeEWP 9XCE51SWjoNcN1+YCAdtTsp/76QQKYnLBgdv3LjrXEDdFgaIXF0mqJ8w4revpOrX426d 734V1dvDRVlgh/v6y5hcMGFYeo9onDiiXkdJxR0Vef/Z+rJEC96FzZpk+I+NQ884f/cZ eIwg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=vUODy9/77+g8Kbxoowq5q4zhRgQmAiaI37DcJDqtfL4=; b=FzamXFMbD4CJvBmkFNc39VjgG7hwMtlSnnSHyQ18Ck4QAezjG2qhB+lRcceCfTyyJW Mrf9xRAtcQ2ru7W7OndCaRPzS90agcLFxbKYKkdOneGC7HY8TaubzfM5A+hQ8WWwm3jP twwUfRt7l3KSN+Ak2gseSYWgGWEypEcMh+d6W5ZTf2GE6wN0Ilh+cHoLhtPfL1dAtOk+ d5eD2xEW3wWyvKnF/o1j0xCY1Rldjc2pKUDfe4rSQa6ZjlM+f2B/MaAFneeiXCycb4ED jsXpMZmtEeLgIrS/WJAMZAXD1XH4w91la1PXGESsM4t28/Q+0qL0DVJ0Sc7a/c2FqoZ1 2ZTg== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQpXXt1T/V3YQIDVh6n81kzCOua4qPE0E4k5A/02KrDDMkXUnT9b5hEVA42bN8aSC63+ifliCRdaydjaA== X-Received: by 10.202.187.11 with SMTP id l11mr10636829oif.55.1455517797380; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 22:29:57 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: royce.williams@gmail.com Received: by 10.202.169.198 with HTTP; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 22:29:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <56BE6161.5000103@marino.st> References: <56BE6161.5000103@marino.st> From: Royce Williams Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 21:29:27 -0900 X-Google-Sender-Auth: --hMnT2XQNLOEFDYNqDyS0L6Xn8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ports/pkg/OS integration 2.0 To: John Marino Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 06:29:58 -0000 On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:49 PM, John Marino wrote: > Royce wrote: >> It would be nice to be asked at the point of installing the system >> what kind of software management you want: >> >> [X] Install software from binary packages only >> [ ] Install software from ports only (compiling everything locally) >> [ ] Prefer packages, prompting me when default options change >> [ ] Prefer ports, but use packages if the port options are identical > > I can't tell if you realize that Synth already does this. > well, not the first one because if a person used binary packages *only* > then Synth has nothing to do. > > But there is definitely an option to use official FreeBSD packages > instead of building when they are "suitable" which includes identical > build options. > > So anyway, this wish is already here. That is pretty cool -- I will check it out. And this seemed topical (ignore the glitz, but the text is worthwhile): https://medium.com/@sdboyer/so-you-want-to-write-a-package-manager-4ae9c17d9527 Royce From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 15 09:06:13 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21E88AA65E3 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 09:06:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F8511614 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 09:06:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 103B9AA65E0; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 09:06:13 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FE15AA65DF for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 09:06:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0303D1613 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 09:06:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u1F96CZP066995 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 09:06:12 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u1F96CKJ066988; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 09:06:12 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201602150906.u1F96CKJ066988@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 09:06:12 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 09:06:13 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ devel/ocaml-lacaml | 7.2.6 | v8.0.4 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ net-mgmt/weathermap | 1.1.1 | 19.0.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 15 09:45:03 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2AA5AA8E8C for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 09:45:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: from anny.lostinspace.de (anny.lostinspace.de [IPv6:2a01:138:a006::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 870951DEA for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 09:45:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: from server.idefix.lan (aftr-88-217-181-205.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.181.205]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: idefix@fechner.net) by anny.lostinspace.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F2C81AFFB4 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 10:45:01 +0100 (CET) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.1 anny.lostinspace.de 5F2C81AFFB4 Authentication-Results: anny.lostinspace.de; dmarc=none header.from=fechner.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=fechner.net; s=default; t=1455529501; bh=D8nrUgYntSx/2j+dqbT5bFXbDQnROBv2M5opC1DDznI=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=CCc/ydy9gLHgWqzaq9na3QGeYNHVUCaT7knaGZy89St/xgVsbBZmSrGT0cCXvfV2Y 9ZZIqXi+PJRHsWx91RmW5a3h4cflhqgUnRJUqmRERdrwk7BulfQu29VOAXzpmiSUAv GBcST8WwMOHWxjGmzsiNKYhJzzn2j+muPhlDJNTQ= Received: from [192.168.0.151] (aftr-88-217-181-205.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.181.205]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.idefix.lan (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DCE04D8AB8 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 10:45:00 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: New user/group in /usr/ports/UIDs and /usr/ports/GIDs To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <56BF0836.6050507@fechner.net> From: Matthias Fechner Message-ID: <56C19E13.70203@fechner.net> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 10:44:51 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56BF0836.6050507@fechner.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 09:45:03 -0000 Dear all, Am 13.02.2016 um 11:40 schrieb Matthias Fechner: > Yuri us are currently working on a new port for gogs: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205283 > > For this a new user and group is required. > I already checked the file and I would like to add the following files: > gogs:*:209:209::0:0:gogs user:/var/db/gogs/home:/bin/sh > > and > gogs:*:209: > > Could you please advise me, what kind of PR I should create and what > kind of approval is required? I created for this now: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207206 I hope it is fine in this way. Thanks. Gruß Matthias -- "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning." -- Rich Cook From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 15 09:49:22 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F361AA90DD for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 09:49:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15AB4102A; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 09:49:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1aVFmR-000Cv6-Mq; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 10:49:19 +0100 Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 10:49:19 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Matthias Fechner Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New user/group in /usr/ports/UIDs and /usr/ports/GIDs Message-ID: <20160215094919.GI26283@home.opsec.eu> References: <56BF0836.6050507@fechner.net> <56C19E13.70203@fechner.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56C19E13.70203@fechner.net> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 09:49:22 -0000 Hi! > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205283 [...] > I created for this now: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207206 The blocker for gogs is not the additional users, the blockers are the GH_TUPLE and the Uses/go.mk changes: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204772 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205282 -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 15 10:22:01 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1A70AA8581 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 10:22:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from smtp206.alice.it (smtp206.alice.it [82.57.200.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A84CE1498; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 10:22:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (79.42.55.85) by smtp206.alice.it (8.6.060.28) (authenticated as acanedi@alice.it) id 56139B831C00FEB0; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 11:15:42 +0100 Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTP id u1FAFdau069551; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 11:15:39 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) To: miwi@FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Andrea Venturoli Subject: mail/pear-Mail_Queue broken by devel/pear-10.1 Message-ID: <56C1A54B.20600@netfence.it> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 11:15:39 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 10:22:02 -0000 Hello. It seems mail/pear-Mail_Queue is broken since devel/pear was upgraded to 1.10.1. The message I get is: > PHP Fatal error: Cannot make static method PEAR::isError() non static in class Mail_Queue in /usr/local/share/pear/Mail/Queue.php on line 126 This is widely found on the web and even a patch seems to exist: http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=20976 Any plan to integrate this? bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 15 10:27:05 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53A36AA8701 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 10:27:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: from mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [217.69.76.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.0x20.net", Issuer "mail.0x20.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 151111732; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 10:27:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [IPv6:2001:aa8:fffb:1::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.0x20.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74EDC6DF91B; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 11:27:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id u1FAR147073588; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 11:27:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: (from lars@localhost) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id u1FAR0X3072670; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 11:27:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lars) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 11:26:59 +0100 From: Lars Engels To: Jason Unovitch Cc: Richard Kuhns , johans@freebsd.org, "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" , "Carlos J. Puga Medina" Subject: Re: Recent update of security/nettle broke security/keepassx2 Message-ID: <20160215102659.GC83790@e-new.0x20.net> References: <56BDEC41.4060502@wintek.com> <56BE0F6E.2080509@wintek.com> <20160214164855.GA83790@e-new.0x20.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1ccMZA6j1vT5UqiK" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 7.4 X-Operation-System: FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE-p23 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 10:27:05 -0000 --1ccMZA6j1vT5UqiK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 11:56:25AM -0500, Jason Unovitch wrote: > On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Lars Engels wrot= e: > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 11:59:26AM -0500, Richard Kuhns wrote: > >> Apologies; it was apparently libgcrypt, not nettle. > >> > >> On 02/12/16 09:29, Richard Kuhns wrote: > >> > Hi all, > >> > > >> > After updating security/nettle, when I try to start keepassx2 I get: > >> > > >> > : rjk$~; keepassx > >> > Ohhhh jeeee: Assertion `ctx->unused < 64' failed > >> > (salsa20.c:400:salsa20_do_encrypt_stream) > >> > Abort trap > >> > > > > > I can confirm this. :-/ >=20 > See https://bugs.FreeBSD.org/207042 and by extension > https://bugs.FreeBSD.org/207107. Thank you! --1ccMZA6j1vT5UqiK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJWwafzXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ4RjQwMDE3RTRERjUzMTI1N0FGRTUxNDlF NTRDQjM3RDNBMDg5RDZEAAoJEOVMs306CJ1twQYIAJusjQWgzJYW5sEEObkfGOlS Ll/yjA+XP4REE8v+xD+1NN6z0LdJXmiUuoudVBnuNLQWnz0JrnJy6OaEmelVaqfk 1ENdz8TYvfL++RvQC+5JA23HNlZhVvRm7yMeyrftTDX6+BvmBU43/Z5BxtJJjOow +LrJzJrNf8nIxjUt5jklsTYhwnM1M1+/mKD7Ops4tIPbQyAbqqOOmKoFTPJ1n5T8 ZJ5ELxhW480gopjvCgX49oP2XSgFkHqLMrCov1p8af/UAHhYK7zzvGlVXMUwrpgn 6fHioaZ2IJxRcneu+PxanIVL57C9XBDqOiLvcnDBepm2Kc7bNJ/vPoYq8UAHR30= =6sNY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1ccMZA6j1vT5UqiK-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 15 10:59:52 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AFEDAA95A7 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 10:59:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michelle@sorbs.net) Received: from hades.sorbs.net (mail.sorbs.net [67.231.146.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08E1411C0 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 10:59:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michelle@sorbs.net) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from isux.com (firewall.isux.com [213.165.190.213]) by hades.sorbs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.29.0 64bit (built Jul 9 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0O2L0002B5JDX800@hades.sorbs.net> for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 03:06:52 -0800 (PST) Message-id: <56C1AFA1.3060604@sorbs.net> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 11:59:45 +0100 From: Michelle Sullivan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100301 SeaMonkey/1.1.19 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Removing documentation References: <56B754A8.3030605@marino.st> <56BCE01D.4010701@FreeBSD.org> <56BCE218.40403@marino.st> <56BCEC5F.4020007@marino.st> <56BDF2A3.9030100@ohlste.in> <56BE0CC5.50103@sorbs.net> <20160212190032.GD26283@home.opsec.eu> <56BF0577.7010808@sorbs.net> <56C06410.3070208@sorbs.net> <56C06703.6010508@multiplay.co.uk> In-reply-to: <56C06703.6010508@multiplay.co.uk> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 10:59:52 -0000 Steven Hartland wrote: > On 14/02/2016 11:25, Michelle Sullivan wrote: >> Kevin Oberman wrote: >>> My experience is that pkg(8) has been wonderfully robust since 1.3. >>> before >>> 1.3 it was a real pain in the neck, though I never had a need to >>> rebuild >>> the DB, I did ave to do a bit of fix-up. I really, really wish Bapt had >>> listened and held up the default to pkg for a bit. Much as I like >>> it, it >>> really was not ready for prime time when it became the default. The >>> early >>> issues chased too many people away. E.g. you. >>> >> Nailed it! > The problem with that is its a chicken and egg situation, without it > hitting prime time it likely wouldn't have got the needed use to > identify and subsequently fix the issues you're referring to; at the > very least it would have slowed that process down :( You're wrong. It was the default in 10.x ... as people upgraded to 10.x it would have gotten more and more exposure, slowly and more controlled. The way it was forced down everyone's necks pushed it to 8.4 and 9.x systems as well as 10.x, this was a bad decision. It was a decision made by someone who doesn't live in the real world of production servers and production services... The results were the same as back in the 7.x days when the last "ports" change happened making it incompatible with previous versions of FreeBSD.... ...Systems out there stopped updating (getting updated)... ...Systems out there are now a security risk with 'FreeBSD' written on the front door... ...Some of the FreeBSD systems that were out there now run Solaris or CentOS.... (because we know that despite how much of a pain the fricken' butt and expensive to maintain, it's better than the expense connected when some developer out in their small world of running a blog server that thinks they know how to administer production servers says, "You know what we're just going to change the base way software (and therefore patch) management works in the OS across your production environment... because we need more people to test our software.") Anyhow, too late now the damage has been done and there is no way to get the goodwill back or repair that damage now. Regards, -- Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/ From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 15 13:56:54 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53C72AA9258 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 13:56:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from taro.utanet.at (taro.utanet.at [IPv6:2001:938:1337:25::25:45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 181FD12E4 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 13:56:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=utanet.at; s=rev1; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:Subject:References:To; bh=6ch2KdVkLzexPtoZp7GmJWk4knGJMj5FmF6Tuuko0Wc=; b=bDz87YKSU0hT248BLFD/nT7LXsBsnMRm3S2eXI5cjV1bJSFkXqTlzbXM47UCwIufjzRmbWo68wV3KQ5d3N9xigZCdo2jRX5F3HOmGsoRLEBiY1neO7rBe7QrUXIwkaFlgLMH6JNKNHtOVnyp/3Ld7hKKEIQUS6TWY7c+VEHYdvg=; Received: from pam.xoc.tele2net.at ([213.90.36.6]) by taro.utanet.at with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1aVJdy-0001ux-Cy for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 14:56:50 +0100 Received: from 91-115-92-62.adsl.highway.telekom.at ([91.115.92.62] helo=[10.0.0.93]) by pam.xoc.tele2net.at with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1aVJdy-0005qS-BG for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 14:56:50 +0100 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: Subject: Re: Hiawatha v.10.1 is out. Please update pkg and port <3 From: Walter Schwarzenfeld Message-ID: <56C1D921.4060601@utanet.at> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 14:56:49 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 13:56:54 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207212 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 15 14:42:13 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8B7BAA8754 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 14:42:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from miwi.fbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk0-x235.google.com (mail-vk0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 758B811BB for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 14:42:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from miwi.fbsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vk0-x235.google.com with SMTP id k196so109339602vka.0 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 06:42:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=jvo7T1cZADQxPV9K1xTIKvStABnpHsAkHSYdOTimd+Y=; b=yYOzf+O/DYElvlwJanmqHaKhG7MBylXbuQERdGIrPqTzqc9ROrTydXUtiyxWsTzOUa qPQgDctRYXQBaoQdAECQGVe5FvA12/IFZnxV0p/2XlxNbN2e2u+RmxKlx0hOPDJ8bS6a UEwZqx8wg7nVtFGGkRj9IPMASfiFy6dZjRNVwyxBLjzcj+LqV9OeSZ0oMQzVkQxXUdB9 ohL7e5oH0Fsbt3vUaYI4srXMNQ6dFRh1ANZXKHeDetab3uAvKLC2LOdijITCU+zBsxAg Zbolsh4vFcMUFkysSUimvUC5A1Bg3GP8sDlM57od+CXSalx1h/ZnFukoCt7ipTUO1KX1 GZJg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=jvo7T1cZADQxPV9K1xTIKvStABnpHsAkHSYdOTimd+Y=; b=ZAIIhfBaRigX8OtcbwqOhqK4RsqGx8x/Zto6za0U1UXxh2qX90zoGCZDI9dUaBBYOP oXAgQ6k69iOYmrGuiiWGRKHjzl8PTX+IXOuGI/KLcYyGkA8lq0P3ZPxbP3KisauL8U2P g1kwLZOaSrdp+VEAy8HSHDtr5Oedd2MUsVYX76Xey/IbnR+SOgYVUhLzTBegVHmzC6cP LiRiL7AnAykMqQaiufsRowuvXMQHoTi/lTyNK4AnlPDZExH1r5mb24UTitoMHXftQKok UY6UzS8Eso89b9GN9PJVXUP7ZgY6qeEzTFiDKKXcqXp2ybMIeKhWHlnBcY4f+3PKf0za gw5A== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORcK1CFYtoOyYcXgt6EwB82Lqwo/lHkL0aYNtsOUbJviboE3BSdhpwy5ObwjvtfEeRtjRpYdf+qWD5bJA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.31.5.84 with SMTP id 81mr13770390vkf.123.1455547332569; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 06:42:12 -0800 (PST) Sender: miwi.fbsd@gmail.com Received: by 10.176.7.70 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 06:42:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <56C1A54B.20600@netfence.it> References: <56C1A54B.20600@netfence.it> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 22:42:12 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: D4zd9zywQbSHny1ikkCPcqYEewQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: mail/pear-Mail_Queue broken by devel/pear-10.1 From: Martin Wilke To: Andrea Venturoli Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 14:42:13 -0000 Hi, I'll have a look, thanks for your report. - Martin On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 6:15 PM, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Hello. > > It seems mail/pear-Mail_Queue is broken since devel/pear was upgraded to > 1.10.1. > > The message I get is: > >> PHP Fatal error: Cannot make static method PEAR::isError() non static in >> class Mail_Queue in /usr/local/share/pear/Mail/Queue.php on line 126 >> > > This is widely found on the web and even a patch seems to exist: > http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=20976 > > Any plan to integrate this? > > bye & Thanks > av. > -- +-----------------oOO--(_)--OOo-------------------------+ With best Regards, Martin Wilke (miwi_(at)_FreeBSD.org) Mess with the Best, Die like the Rest From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 15 14:49:36 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54838AA8C25 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 14:49:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsdml@marino.st) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36F8B147B for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 14:49:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsdml@marino.st) Received: from [192.168.1.21] (211.Red-88-1-221.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [88.1.221.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2103943BF0; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 08:49:32 -0600 (CST) To: FreeBSD Mailing List , Michelle Sullivan From: John Marino Subject: Removing documentation X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <56C1E579.30303@marino.st> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:49:29 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 14:49:36 -0000 Michelle wrote: > The way it was forced down everyone's necks pushed it to 8.4 and 9.x > systems as well as 10.x, this was a bad decision. It was a decision > made by someone who doesn't live in the real world of production servers > and production services... Michelle, I sympathize, but you're also not taking any responsibility for that situation. All those transitions were announced years in advance. I seem to recall you were completely unaware of those plans, and if that is accurate, it's something you should have been aware of as the administrator of real world production servers. There was always the option of freezing the tree and pulling in the security updates manually until you were ready to migrate to pkg(8) too. So there were other options and from my vantage point, you were in control of your destiny. (Heck, I'm sure you could have found "consultants" to keep old trees working to your specifications for not nearly what it cost to migrate.) Anyway, I understand the frustration but I think there is plenty of blame to go around. John From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 15 15:03:29 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 509A5AA9419 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:03:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: from anny.lostinspace.de (anny.lostinspace.de [IPv6:2a01:138:a006::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17E291FB3 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:03:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: from server.idefix.lan (aftr-88-217-181-205.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.181.205]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: idefix@fechner.net) by anny.lostinspace.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D5F281B1D78 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:03:25 +0100 (CET) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.1 anny.lostinspace.de D5F281B1D78 Authentication-Results: anny.lostinspace.de; dmarc=none header.from=fechner.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=fechner.net; s=default; t=1455548606; bh=0Plj1gt/zYdQ/NfH4X24pFK6NslCSIBjx/Q5fBPATyc=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=WIS5hGqMDNnNZ6C64pdrzNEyv2NK3sIhPZsQEtyh8fkQQd6C5Aw5kVyMEGUpp9r0L gxG+GPigB0hkCcL3Q31T9HNt2iemlosOKZc2bB074dPPZJrN2dN7Xb7p6PaslPYleb IKa/ZxkSEa3CFY5Fa7L140O2WKMQ9m7c6Qh1Dbx8= Received: from [192.168.0.151] (aftr-88-217-181-205.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.181.205]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.idefix.lan (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 651F8DA464 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:03:25 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: New user/group in /usr/ports/UIDs and /usr/ports/GIDs To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <56BF0836.6050507@fechner.net> <56C19E13.70203@fechner.net> <20160215094919.GI26283@home.opsec.eu> From: Matthias Fechner Message-ID: <56C1E8B3.8090301@fechner.net> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:03:15 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160215094919.GI26283@home.opsec.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:03:29 -0000 Am 15.02.2016 um 10:49 schrieb Kurt Jaeger: > The blocker for gogs is not the additional users, the blockers are > the GH_TUPLE and the Uses/go.mk changes: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204772 > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205282 it is not blocking in a hard way. But if you have it installed you deinstall it and reinstall it again, you maybe get permission problems, because the UID/GID for the gogs user can change. This could break in bad case the update process and the user has to manually correct the UID/GUID of the repository stored on the system. I think it is better to have a fixed UID/GUID for this really nice tool. Or is that not correct? Matthias -- "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning." -- Rich Cook From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 15 15:24:44 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4762AAA801D for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:24:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1033E1305 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:24:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1aVL13-000DTS-Ff; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:24:45 +0100 Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:24:45 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Matthias Fechner Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New user/group in /usr/ports/UIDs and /usr/ports/GIDs Message-ID: <20160215152445.GK26283@home.opsec.eu> References: <56BF0836.6050507@fechner.net> <56C19E13.70203@fechner.net> <20160215094919.GI26283@home.opsec.eu> <56C1E8B3.8090301@fechner.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56C1E8B3.8090301@fechner.net> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:24:44 -0000 Hi! > Am 15.02.2016 um 10:49 schrieb Kurt Jaeger: > > The blocker for gogs is not the additional users, the blockers are > > the GH_TUPLE and the Uses/go.mk changes: > > > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204772 > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205282 > > it is not blocking in a hard way. > But if you have it installed you deinstall it and reinstall it again, > you maybe get permission problems, because the UID/GID for the gogs user > can change. That's a valid point. Is there a reason for the gogs user to have /bin/sh instead of /usr/sbin/nologin ? -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 15 16:59:58 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37B50AA8B2D for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:59:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Received: from mx5.roble.com (mx5.roble.com [206.40.34.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx5.roble.com", Issuer "mx5.roble.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AEDE1F16 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:59:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 08:59:50 -0800 (PST) From: Roger Marquis To: John Marino cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Removing documentation In-Reply-To: <56C1E579.30303@marino.st> References: <56C1E579.30303@marino.st> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:59:58 -0000 > Michelle wrote: >> The way it was forced down everyone's necks pushed it to 8.4 and 9.x >> systems as well as 10.x, this was a bad decision. It was a decision >> made by someone who doesn't live in the real world of production servers >> and production services... It was actually worse than that. Those of us who questioned the wisdom of such disruptive and backwards-incompatible changes being implemented mid-release instead of at a release boundry were A) ignored, B) told that there were not enough (developer) resources, and C) even the announcement was unprofessional and lacked justification for the rush job: There comes a time in the life cycle of just about every software package that it has bee re-evaluated, refreshed, deprecated or just retired. It is time that we bid farewell to the old pkg_* software that has been part of FreeBSD since the beginning, and has served us well. After years of development, testing, and playing, pkg(8) has become a suitable replacement. "there comes a time"? "time that we bid farewell"? These are not suitable criteria IMO for dropping support of mission-critical subsystems. The FreeBSD Foundation SHOULD have played a part in insuring a smoother transition to pkgng (much less portsng and, gack, rcng) but this doesn't seem to have been on their radar. >From my perspective as an advocate and long-time user (since 2.0.5) this marked a low-point in the viability of FreeBSD vis-a-vis other FOSS distributions. Thankfully, going forward from FreeBSD 11 the release cycle has been lengthened and base is going to be packaged. Those of use who support large numbers of dev and production systems can at least expect that future upgrades won't be as time-consuming or, hopefully, as buggy. John Marino wrote: > Michelle, I sympathize, but you're also not taking any responsibility > for that situation. All those transitions were announced years in > advance. I seem to recall you were completely unaware of those plans, > and if that is accurate, it's something you should have been aware of as > the administrator of real world production servers. I believe this is factually incorrect. We were aware but the decisions were being made by core developers who were not, apparently, interested in our concerns or the expected fallout. > There was always the option of freezing the tree and pulling in the > security updates manually until you were ready to migrate to pkg(8) too. Sure, if you can afford to pay a full-time core dev there's the option of backporting but even this was made impractical by the simultaneous deprecation of the pre-ng ports tree, make version and pkg format. There are lots of reasons why Linux has effectively eclipsed BSD including device drivers, unattended deployments and install menus but 8.X's wholesale throwing of so many of us under the bus was by far the worst. IMO, Roger Marquis From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 15 17:14:09 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4255FAA94F6 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:14:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsdml@marino.st) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1849C1D12 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:14:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsdml@marino.st) Received: from [192.168.1.21] (211.Red-88-1-221.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [88.1.221.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3399A43BC2; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 11:14:05 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: Removing documentation To: Roger Marquis References: <56C1E579.30303@marino.st> <20160215165952.6199743BFA@shepard.synsport.net> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List From: John Marino X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <56C2075A.5000409@marino.st> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:14:02 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160215165952.6199743BFA@shepard.synsport.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:14:09 -0000 On 2/15/2016 5:59 PM, Roger Marquis wrote: > It was actually worse than that. Those of us who questioned the wisdom > of such disruptive and backwards-incompatible changes being implemented > mid-release instead of at a release boundry were A) ignored, B) told that > there were not enough (developer) resources, and C) even the announcement > was unprofessional and lacked justification for the rush job: This makes no sense. Ports are not tied to base releases. And you think lack of developer resources is an invalid reason? > There comes a time in the life cycle of just about every software > package that it has bee re-evaluated, refreshed, deprecated or just > retired. > > It is time that we bid farewell to the old pkg_* software that has been > part of FreeBSD since the beginning, and has served us well. After > years of development, testing, and playing, pkg(8) has become a > suitable replacement. > > "there comes a time"? "time that we bid farewell"? These are not > suitable criteria IMO for dropping support of mission-critical > subsystems. The FreeBSD Foundation SHOULD have played a part in insuring > a smoother transition to pkgng (much less portsng and, gack, rcng) but > this doesn't seem to have been on their radar. You know good and well that people kick the can down the road FOREVER. You could have announced it 3 years ahead and people would still scream NOT YET! NOT YET! This would NEVER happen in Linux! It doesn't matter where you draw the line, you will never get everyone to respect it. It's never enough time. >> From my perspective as an advocate and long-time user (since 2.0.5) this > marked a low-point in the viability of FreeBSD vis-a-vis other FOSS > distributions. Thankfully, going forward from FreeBSD 11 the release > cycle has been lengthened and base is going to be packaged. Those of use > who support large numbers of dev and production systems can at least > expect that future upgrades won't be as time-consuming or, hopefully, as > buggy. "large numbers of dev and production systems" (push to memory stack) > I believe this is factually incorrect. We were aware but the decisions > were being made by core developers who were not, apparently, interested > in our concerns or the expected fallout. So you chose to ignore the deadlines in the hopes the pleading would work? You intentionally did not prepare against the published timetable? >> There was always the option of freezing the tree and pulling in the >> security updates manually until you were ready to migrate to pkg(8) too. > > Sure, if you can afford to pay a full-time core dev there's the option of > backporting but even this was made impractical by the simultaneous > deprecation of the pre-ng ports tree, make version and pkg format. No, it's not fully time. You just said "large numbers of dev and production systems", so I am pretty confident the business case would have been there for this. It's a business, right? You aren't talking about a shoestring hobby. > There are lots of reasons why Linux has effectively eclipsed BSD > including device drivers, unattended deployments and install menus but > 8.X's wholesale throwing of so many of us under the bus was by far the > worst. And now the fully circle. This is FreeBSD's Godwin's law. You know the discussion is over when somebody says that "[issue] of the day" is the root cause of BSD being eclipsed by Linux. Since I've heard [issue] replaced about 200 times, I'm kind of doubting it. I guess it's purpose is to make everyone involved with "[issue]" to feel personally responsible and oh what could have been if you hadn't of made the wrong decision.... From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 15 17:20:57 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D83F5AA9748 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:20:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0A191FEB for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:20:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1aVMpX-000Dcu-4V; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:20:59 +0100 Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:20:59 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Roger Marquis Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Removing documentation Message-ID: <20160215172059.GL26283@home.opsec.eu> References: <56C1E579.30303@marino.st> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:20:57 -0000 Hi! > The FreeBSD Foundation SHOULD have played a part in insuring > a smoother transition to pkgng (much less portsng and, gack, rcng) but > this doesn't seem to have been on their radar. I don't know if it was on their radar, but I saw at that time that the community lost users due to the technical debt of the old pkg_* stuff. And it lost developers because the old way was too burdensome. > I believe this is factually incorrect. We were aware but the decisions > were being made by core developers who were not, apparently, interested > in our concerns or the expected fallout. Those two are seperate things: - Being interested - having enough communication bandwidth (== time to spend on mailing lists argueing back and forth) So, what should a poor core developer do, given this choice ? I don't think that too many core developers were left doing the work. > > There was always the option of freezing the tree and pulling in the > > security updates manually until you were ready to migrate to pkg(8) too. > Sure, if you can afford to pay a full-time core dev there's the option of > backporting but even this was made impractical by the simultaneous > deprecation of the pre-ng ports tree, make version and pkg format. So, if it was too burdensome for the whole project to support two trees (that probably was the estimate for the core developers involved [and I'm not one of them]), why, do you think, would it have worked for a sub-fraction of the project ? > There are lots of reasons why Linux has effectively eclipsed BSD > including device drivers, unattended deployments and install menus but > 8.X's wholesale throwing of so many of us under the bus was by far the > worst. Indeed, it was a cruel choice. Someone had to decide. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 15 17:31:46 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9A79AA9C18 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:31:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michelle@sorbs.net) Received: from hades.sorbs.net (mail.sorbs.net [67.231.146.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D41D864 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:31:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michelle@sorbs.net) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from isux.com (firewall.isux.com [213.165.190.213]) by hades.sorbs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.29.0 64bit (built Jul 9 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0O2L00069NODX800@hades.sorbs.net> for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 09:38:41 -0800 (PST) Message-id: <56C20B76.805@sorbs.net> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:31:34 +0100 From: Michelle Sullivan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100301 SeaMonkey/1.1.19 To: John Marino Cc: Roger Marquis , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Removing documentation References: <56C1E579.30303@marino.st> <20160215165952.6199743BFA@shepard.synsport.net> <56C2075A.5000409@marino.st> In-reply-to: <56C2075A.5000409@marino.st> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:31:46 -0000 John Marino wrote: > On 2/15/2016 5:59 PM, Roger Marquis wrote: > >> It was actually worse than that. Those of us who questioned the wisdom >> of such disruptive and backwards-incompatible changes being implemented >> mid-release instead of at a release boundry were A) ignored, B) told that >> there were not enough (developer) resources, and C) even the announcement >> was unprofessional and lacked justification for the rush job: >> > > This makes no sense. Ports are not tied to base releases. > And you think lack of developer resources is an invalid reason? > Actually it made perfect sense... (for a change) ... make pkgng the default on 10.x and allow people to use either on 8.4 and 9.x ... this made perfect sense... Make base packaging using similar/same tools as part of 11+ makes perfect sense... ....No, though... arbitrary date set, f**k real users, f**k whether it works or not, because we need people to put it in production so we can test our buggy software... > > >> There comes a time in the life cycle of just about every software >> package that it has bee re-evaluated, refreshed, deprecated or just >> retired. >> >> It is time that we bid farewell to the old pkg_* software that has been >> part of FreeBSD since the beginning, and has served us well. After >> years of development, testing, and playing, pkg(8) has become a >> suitable replacement. >> >> "there comes a time"? "time that we bid farewell"? These are not >> suitable criteria IMO for dropping support of mission-critical >> subsystems. The FreeBSD Foundation SHOULD have played a part in insuring >> a smoother transition to pkgng (much less portsng and, gack, rcng) but >> this doesn't seem to have been on their radar. >> > > You know good and well that people kick the can down the road FOREVER. > You could have announced it 3 years ahead and people would still scream > NOT YET! NOT YET! This would NEVER happen in Linux! > > It doesn't matter where you draw the line, you will never get everyone > to respect it. It's never enough time. > Line drawn - at the next major version... that's an easy win... people can complain, but they can't argue that it isn't a good decision because they can choose... upgrade/don't upgrade... we didn't get the chance to choose ... it was forced down peoples necks... working or not. Fortunately I was able to get the old system working again... and in fact keep it up to date until about 3 months ago... (and only stopped there because I have other things to do - will go back to it again later.) >>> From my perspective as an advocate and long-time user (since 2.0.5) this >>> >> marked a low-point in the viability of FreeBSD vis-a-vis other FOSS >> distributions. Thankfully, going forward from FreeBSD 11 the release >> cycle has been lengthened and base is going to be packaged. Those of use >> who support large numbers of dev and production systems can at least >> expect that future upgrades won't be as time-consuming or, hopefully, as >> buggy. >> > > "large numbers of dev and production systems" (push to memory stack) > > > > >> I believe this is factually incorrect. We were aware but the decisions >> were being made by core developers who were not, apparently, interested >> in our concerns or the expected fallout. >> > > So you chose to ignore the deadlines in the hopes the pleading would > work? You intentionally did not prepare against the published timetable? > Well I didn't know - despite following the conversations on the public lists - until 3 weeks before the event that the change was going to deliberately and irrevocably break the old systems... again... > > >>> There was always the option of freezing the tree and pulling in the >>> security updates manually until you were ready to migrate to pkg(8) too. >>> >> Sure, if you can afford to pay a full-time core dev there's the option of >> backporting but even this was made impractical by the simultaneous >> deprecation of the pre-ng ports tree, make version and pkg format. >> > > No, it's not fully time. You just said "large numbers of dev and > production systems", so I am pretty confident the business case would > have been there for this. > > It's a business, right? You aren't talking about a shoestring hobby. > Dunno about Roger, but I am and I had been campaigning internally about getting support for FreeBSD as a platform and support for the foundation in the way of devs and/or cash... that is *never* going to happen now. Money has been allocated and sent to Redhat (nothing to do with me, but the pkgng debacle left me without legs to argue the case, so the decision makers stuffed that.) >> There are lots of reasons why Linux has effectively eclipsed BSD >> including device drivers, unattended deployments and install menus but >> 8.X's wholesale throwing of so many of us under the bus was by far the >> worst. >> > > And now the fully circle. This is FreeBSD's Godwin's law. You know the > discussion is over when somebody says that "[issue] of the day" is the > root cause of BSD being eclipsed by Linux. Since I've heard [issue] > replaced about 200 times, I'm kind of doubting it. I guess it's purpose > is to make everyone involved with "[issue]" to feel personally > responsible and oh what could have been if you hadn't of made the wrong > decision.... > That I can't (and won't) comment on, but I will tell you that's the reason all new servers I manage are being installed with CentOS+paid support contract and not FreeBSD+donation. The bed was made by people, they can sleep in it. Michelle -- Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/ From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 15 17:32:28 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C205BAA9D5D for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:32:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Received: from mx5.roble.com (mx5.roble.com [206.40.34.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx5.roble.com", Issuer "mx5.roble.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8AD2976 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:32:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 09:32:28 -0800 (PST) From: Roger Marquis To: John Marino cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Removing documentation In-Reply-To: <56C2075A.5000409@marino.st> References: <56C1E579.30303@marino.st> <20160215165952.6199743BFA@shepard.synsport.net> <56C2075A.5000409@marino.st> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:32:28 -0000 > This makes no sense. Ports are not tied to base releases. > And you think lack of developer resources is an invalid reason? There was no mid-release issue with base as far as I know. The issue was with ports and by extension pkgng (and related -ngs). > You know good and well that people kick the can down the road FOREVER. > You could have announced it 3 years ahead and people would still scream > NOT YET! NOT YET! This would NEVER happen in Linux! The announcement was dated Feb 3 2014, leaving all of 7 months until the planned deprecation. Even if you could make a case that pkgng was ready (it wasn't) 7 months is far less than the 2 calendar year and dozens of person-year cycles required by some infrastructure-critical production environments. It's even farther from the 7+ years that other FOSS distributions support their releases. > It's a business, right? You aren't talking about a shoestring hobby. There's no need to shoot the messenger here. I may be expressing an opinion but it is one that is shared by all of my colleagues: developers, administrators and managers alike. Roger From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 15 17:40:40 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F5ADAA809E for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:40:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsdml@marino.st) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E313C1B for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:40:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsdml@marino.st) Received: from [192.168.1.21] (211.Red-88-1-221.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [88.1.221.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A3EE43BAF; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 11:40:37 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: Removing documentation To: Roger Marquis References: <56C1E579.30303@marino.st> <20160215165952.6199743BFA@shepard.synsport.net> <56C2075A.5000409@marino.st> <20160215173229.2574943BC2@shepard.synsport.net> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List From: John Marino X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <56C20D93.5030009@marino.st> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:40:35 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160215173229.2574943BC2@shepard.synsport.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:40:40 -0000 On 2/15/2016 6:32 PM, Roger Marquis wrote: >> This makes no sense. Ports are not tied to base releases. >> And you think lack of developer resources is an invalid reason? > > There was no mid-release issue with base as far as I know. The issue was > with ports and by extension pkgng (and related -ngs). ports are developed independently. They do not follow release schedules. Ports have to support all supported releases, that's the only connection. To say ports support has to coincide with a base release schedule shows a lack of understanding of ports development process. It also doesn't account for 3 concurrent releases (or 2 releases and -CURRENT) which are not synchronized. > was dated Feb 3 2014, leaving all of 7 months until the planned > deprecation. Even if you could make a case that pkgng was ready (it > wasn't) 7 months is far less than the 2 calendar year and dozens of > person-year cycles required by some infrastructure-critical production > environments. It's even farther from the 7+ years that other FOSS > distributions support their releases. what FOSS distributions support releases for 7+ years for gratis? One pays for that kind of support. Did your organization offer to pay for extended support? >> It's a business, right? You aren't talking about a shoestring hobby. > > There's no need to shoot the messenger here. I may be expressing an > opinion but it is one that is shared by all of my colleagues: developers, > administrators and managers alike. All your colleagues, developers, administrators, and managers want enterprise level support without paying any money at all? They *all* think volunteers provide that level of support just because? This is not messenger-shooting, this is wondering what kind of place has expectations like that. I've never worked at a place like that. John From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 15 17:42:03 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76BBFAA816C for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:42:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arcade@b1t.name) Received: from limbo.b1t.name (limbo.b1t.name [78.25.32.206]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3564BE27 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:42:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arcade@b1t.name) Received: from [172.29.1.160] (unknown [172.29.1.160]) by limbo.b1t.name (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 86F80B2 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 19:41:53 +0200 (EET) Subject: Re: ftp/pure-ftpd mysql auth from jail not working? To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20160213155046.020932af@efreet> From: Volodymyr Kostyrko Message-ID: <56C20DE0.6010807@b1t.name> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 19:41:52 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; DragonFly x86_64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/42.0 SeaMonkey/2.39 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160213155046.020932af@efreet> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:42:03 -0000 Marko Cupa=C4=87 wrote: > Hi, > > I have working pure-ftpd server on vmware-based 9.3-RELEASE-p33. It > authenticates virtual users from mysql server over tcp, and chroots the= m > to their directories. > Any idea why the same configuration does not work in jail-based host? I can only guess wide: there's no connection to database. Whether you=20 missed the difference between 'localhost' and '127.0.0.1' or the jail=20 misses network connection to the server. Try connecting to the mysql=20 database directly with a commandline client. --=20 Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 15 17:48:27 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 801ECAA8574 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:48:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Received: from mx5.roble.com (mx5.roble.com [206.40.34.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx5.roble.com", Issuer "mx5.roble.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76F0C103A for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:48:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 09:48:26 -0800 (PST) From: Roger Marquis To: Kurt Jaeger cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Removing documentation In-Reply-To: <20160215172059.GL26283@home.opsec.eu> References: <56C1E579.30303@marino.st> <20160215172059.GL26283@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:48:27 -0000 > So, if it was too burdensome for the whole project to support > two trees (that probably was the estimate for the core developers > involved [and I'm not one of them]), why, do you think, would > it have worked for a sub-fraction of the project ? Thanks Kurt, for cutting to the core issue. It's one that has dogged FreeBSD for some time now i.e., to either A) manage change-control with a long term perspective with the goal of growing or at least retaining the installed base of end-users or B) with a short-term perspective for the benefit of our generous and skilled developers. >From a strictly end-user perspective I'd prefer if the skew went a little more towards former (long-term planning) for both selfish (more FreeBSD jobs) and shared (more stability, better security, fewer bugs) goals. There's no getting around the budget, however, and hope that FreeBSD's long-term viability plays a larger part in at least the Foundation's efforts. Roger From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 15 17:53:15 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A4A7AA893F for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:53:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsdml@marino.st) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B90D914B4 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:53:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsdml@marino.st) Received: from [192.168.1.21] (211.Red-88-1-221.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [88.1.221.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE64143BBF; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 11:53:11 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: Removing documentation To: Michelle Sullivan References: <56C1E579.30303@marino.st> <20160215165952.6199743BFA@shepard.synsport.net> <56C2075A.5000409@marino.st> <56C20B76.805@sorbs.net> Cc: Roger Marquis , FreeBSD Mailing List From: John Marino X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <56C21085.3020809@marino.st> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:53:09 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56C20B76.805@sorbs.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:53:15 -0000 On 2/15/2016 6:31 PM, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > Actually it made perfect sense... (for a change) ... make pkgng the > default on 10.x and allow people to use either on 8.4 and 9.x ... this > made perfect sense... Make base packaging using similar/same tools as > part of 11+ makes perfect sense... It might make sense if you had zero knowledge of how ports are developed and made the assumption they are synchronized to three base branches. They aren't. One ports tree, developed independently. > ....No, though... arbitrary date set, f**k real users, f**k whether it > works or not, because we need people to put it in production so we can > test our buggy software... Even with asterisks, I'm not happy with swear words like this on a mail list. Can we keep it cleaner? > Line drawn - at the next major version... that's an easy win... people > can complain, but they can't argue that it isn't a good decision because > they can choose... upgrade/don't upgrade... we didn't get the chance to > choose ... it was forced down peoples necks... working or not. > Fortunately I was able to get the old system working again... and in > fact keep it up to date until about 3 months ago... (and only stopped > there because I have other things to do - will go back to it again later.) See above, ports isn't tied to base releases and never has been AFAIK. There were technical options to extend the time, the simplest being: Don't update the ports tree! Bring in security updates manually is a lot easier than migrating 50 servers and it's not that big a deal for a few months, and as I said, I am sure your organisation could have paid a reasonable amount for somebody to do it for you. > Well I didn't know - despite following the conversations on the public > lists - until 3 weeks before the event that the change was going to > deliberately and irrevocably break the old systems... again... As I said, I sympathize, but are you really going to point the fingers at others before yourself here? > Dunno about Roger, but I am and I had been campaigning internally about > getting support for FreeBSD as a platform and support for the foundation > in the way of devs and/or cash... that is *never* going to happen now. > Money has been allocated and sent to Redhat (nothing to do with me, but > the pkgng debacle left me without legs to argue the case, so the > decision makers stuffed that.) And the next linux-related fiasco experiences can be traced back to a rash and technically questionable decision by all involved. Good luck I guess. And what was the cost of the transition and what will be the TCO over the next 10 years? None of that money would have been better spent on the encumbent system. That's really hard to believe. > That I can't (and won't) comment on, but I will tell you that's the > reason all new servers I manage are being installed with CentOS+paid > support contract and not FreeBSD+donation. The bed was made by people, > they can sleep in it. And you probably spent magnitudes more than just getting a consultant to help for a few months for a few hours a month. It's easy to say foundation would have gotten money but harder to believe if they never got a donation in the past when everything was working okay, right? John From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 15 17:55:19 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A4CBAA8B03 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:55:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dr.klepp@gmx.at) Received: from vie01a-qmta-at51-3.mx.upcmail.net (vie01a-qmta-at51-3.mx.upcmail.net [62.179.121.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CE7A15F4 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:55:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dr.klepp@gmx.at) Received: from [172.31.218.20] (helo=vie01a-dmta-at52-2.mx.upcmail.net) by vie01a-pqmta-at51.mx.upcmail.net with esmtps (UNKNOWN:AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aVMs6-00011s-T9 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:23:38 +0100 Received: from [172.31.216.41] (helo=vie01a-pemc-psmtp-at50) by vie01a-dmta-at52.mx.upcmail.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aVMry-0004px-DA for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:23:30 +0100 Received: from t60.lan ([85.126.97.210]) by vie01a-pemc-psmtp-at50 with SMTP @ mailcloud.upcmail.net id JhPV1s00Z4YLlkt0BhPWDy; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:23:30 +0100 X-SourceIP: 85.126.97.210 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=D8nrUKlj c=1 sm=2 tr=0 a=/Ac8Q0O/YFE5LOLfUiYZVw==:117 a=/Ac8Q0O/YFE5LOLfUiYZVw==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=Lbou1ZqNHZ5FH4kc2foA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 From: dr.klepp@gmx.at To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Removing documentation Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:24:01 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 (enterprise35 0.20100827.1168748) References: <56C1E579.30303@marino.st> X-KMail-QuotePrefix: > MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201602151824.01176.dr.klepp@gmx.at> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:55:19 -0000 Am Montag, 15. Februar 2016 schrieb Roger Marquis: > There are lots of reasons why Linux has effectively eclipsed BSD > including device drivers, unattended deployments and install menus but > 8.X's wholesale throwing of so many of us under the bus was by far the > worst. Well, have you experience with "systemd"? That's the Linux nemesis that drives people to *BSD - including me. Nik -- Please do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing with the NSA. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 15 17:57:32 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF159AA8C81 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:57:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87D8818A7 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:57:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1aVNOw-000DiM-Vf; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:57:35 +0100 Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:57:34 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Roger Marquis Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Removing documentation Message-ID: <20160215175734.GM26283@home.opsec.eu> References: <56C1E579.30303@marino.st> <20160215172059.GL26283@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:57:32 -0000 Hi! > > So, if it was too burdensome for the whole project to support > > two trees (that probably was the estimate for the core developers > > involved [and I'm not one of them]), why, do you think, would > > it have worked for a sub-fraction of the project ? > > Thanks Kurt, for cutting to the core issue. It's one that has dogged > FreeBSD for some time now i.e., to either A) manage change-control with a > long term perspective with the goal of growing or at least retaining the > installed base of end-users or B) with a short-term perspective for the > benefit of our generous and skilled developers. I've never met bapt, who implemented pkg, or bdrewery, but from what I can see, implementing pkg was not a short-term project for them. It was the only way out from the technical burden of the old scheme, they saw the problem, and went to solve it. If someone A wants someone B else to work harder for his own benefit: You can always hope that B is doing it, but you can not expect it. And it's a bit strange to disparage such a person with a snide remark like 'short-term perspective'. It's always easy to argue from the sideline. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 15 18:02:12 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F86AA8F7A for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:02:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Received: from mx5.roble.com (mx5.roble.com [206.40.34.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx5.roble.com", Issuer "mx5.roble.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAB841C40 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:02:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 10:02:12 -0800 (PST) From: Roger Marquis To: John Marino cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Removing documentation In-Reply-To: <56C20D93.5030009@marino.st> References: <56C1E579.30303@marino.st> <20160215165952.6199743BFA@shepard.synsport.net> <56C2075A.5000409@marino.st> <20160215173229.2574943BC2@shepard.synsport.net> <56C20D93.5030009@marino.st> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:02:12 -0000 > Ports have to support all supported releases, that's the only connection. They have historically and for good reason. Cross-platform ports are FreeBSD's strongest feature, but it would not have taken a tremendous amount of effort to have supported both pre- and post- ng trees in tandem for say a year. > what FOSS distributions support releases for 7+ years for gratis? One > pays for that kind of support. Did your organization offer to pay for > extended support? We would have loved to if that option had been available. The cost would have been minuscule compared to doing the same with contractors and in-house devs. Now that Xinuos is around we at least have that option. > All your colleagues, developers, administrators, and managers want > enterprise level support without paying any money at all? They *all* > think volunteers provide that level of support just because? Please don't make so many assumptions. No BSD shop that I know of needs enterprise level support. Had that with Sun (SunSove) but they never had ports much less a good security track record. All we need is to be able to compile ports and patch the few kernel security issues that come up. It's not something beyond the abilities of our community (IMO) but rather more of a policy issue. Roger From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 15 18:27:36 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C45FAA9B92 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:27:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trashcan@ellael.org) Received: from mx1.enfer-du-nord.net (mx1.enfer-du-nord.net [IPv6:2001:41d0:1008:bcb:1:1:0:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC5A2F9D for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:27:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trashcan@ellael.org) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\)) Subject: Re: postfix-current is marked broken w.r.t SPF support, why? From: Michael Grimm In-Reply-To: <56C0F383.5010608@gmx.de> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 19:27:32 +0100 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <53A1B278-8D80-4DC4-AD6B-CBF6BA89A59A@ellael.org> References: <56C0F383.5010608@gmx.de> To: olli hauer X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99 at mail X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:27:36 -0000 Hi Olli =E2=80=94 On 14.02.2016, at 22:37, olli hauer wrote: > On 2016-02-08 20:13, Michael Grimm wrote: >> I am wondering why postfix-current is still marked broken regarding = SPF support: >>=20 >> | poudriere build log file excerpt: >> | Finished build of mail/postfix-current: Ignored: is marked as = broken: At the moment, SPF support is unavailable for = postfix-3.0-20151003 >>=20 >> Thus, I made a custom port removing this restriction in the Makefile, = and that custom port compiles including SPF support: >>=20 >> | mail> pkg query %do postfix-custom >> | security/openssl >> | devel/icu >> | mail/dovecot2 >> | mail/libspf2 >> | devel/pcre >>=20 >> | mail> pkg info | grep libspf >> | libspf2-1.2.10_2 Sender Rewriting Scheme 2 C = Implementation >>=20 >> | mail> ldd `which postfix` >> | /usr/local/sbin/postfix: >> | ... >> | libspf2.so.2 =3D> /usr/local/lib/libspf2.so.2 (0x8024a8000) >> | ... >=20 >=20 > Hi Michael, >=20 > until now the patch will not apply clean and there is no new patch = available. > If we remove the BROKEN message users getting perhaps no notification = if current will become the new default postfix >=20 >=20 > =3D=3D=3D> Fetching all distfiles required by = postfix-current-3.0.20151003_1,4 for building > =3D> SHA256 Checksum OK for postfix/postfix-3.0.3.tar.gz. > =3D> SHA256 Checksum OK for = postfix/postfix-2.8.0-libspf2-1.2.x-0.patch.gz. > =3D=3D=3D> Patching for postfix-current-3.0.20151003_1,4 > =3D=3D=3D> Applying distribution patches for = postfix-current-3.0.20151003_1,4 > 1 out of 2 hunks failed--saving rejects to = src/global/mail_params.c.rej > 1 out of 7 hunks failed--saving rejects to src/smtpd/smtpd.c.rej > 1 out of 3 hunks failed--saving rejects to src/smtpd/smtpd_check.c.rej > *** Error code 1 Oh, I see. I didn't realize before that this SPF support will patch = postfix and add functionality to deal with SPF in smptd, directly. But that patch is old and made for a postfix version 2.8.x no longer = supported upstream, and in addition, the author of postfix, Wietse, = clearly states [1] that: | Note: Postfix already ships with SPF support, in the form of a plug-in=20= | policy daemon. This is the preferred integration model, at least until=20= | SPF is mandated by standards.=20 And in postfix source's examples/smtpd-policy directory the README.SPF = states: | See http://www.openspf.org/Software for the current version of the | SPF policy daemon for Postfix. | | SPF support is also available via MILTER plugins, such as sid-milter | at http://sourceforge.net/projects/sid-milter/ which implements both | SenderID and SPF. Hmm, please don't get me wrong, but wouldn't it be "better" to create a = postfix28 port including that SPF patch for those in need of a smtpd = built-in SPF functionality and create a stable postfix port (next week = it will be 3.1) with just including libspf2 library and advise users to = go with Wietse's recommendations to leave that SPF part for policy = delegation? Especially with two ports available = (postfix-policyd-spf-perl-2.010_1 and = py27-postfix-policyd-spf-python-1.3.2_1), already. =20 Again, that's just my personal opinion, you are the maintainer, and: I = might have missed reasons why that might be a bad idea of mine. And, as = mentioned above, I don't even use SPF. I was only wondering, why postfix = stable is still 2.11 and came across postfix-current port with the = BROKEN issue. Thanks for all your work and regards, Michael [1] http://www.postfix.org/addon.html From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 15 19:19:35 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 916E4AA94AB for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 19:19:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Received: from mx5.roble.com (mx5.roble.com [206.40.34.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx5.roble.com", Issuer "mx5.roble.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 881CBCBB for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 19:19:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 11:19:34 -0800 (PST) From: Roger Marquis To: Kurt Jaeger cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Removing documentation In-Reply-To: <20160215175734.GM26283@home.opsec.eu> References: <56C1E579.30303@marino.st> <20160215172059.GL26283@home.opsec.eu> <20160215175734.GM26283@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 19:19:35 -0000 > I've never met bapt, who implemented pkg, or bdrewery, but from > what I can see, implementing pkg was not a short-term project for them. Short-term perspective != short-term project considering they're both relative to the ecosystem. > It was the only way out from the technical burden of the old scheme, > they saw the problem, and went to solve it. Perhaps we're not talking about the same thing here. Most of us fully support pkgng, it's devs and goals. We can't say this loud enough: Thanks Baptist! Thanks Brian! Thanks everyone who contributed! This is, however, tangental from discussions of how to implement change control for the greatest good and least pain. Such project management is critical IMO for the future viability of FreeBSD, its end-users and businesses that use it. >From another perspective it is a bit of a chicken and egg issue considering that devs by nature, myself included, enjoy new features and new code more than fixing bugs or long-term planning. Bugs aside I think we all would much rather be writing code or tweaking systems used by 100s of thousands rather than simply thousands. The point I'm trying to make is: A) a larger FreeBSD end-users is worth the effort, and B) the way to get there, IMO, is with fewer upgrade hassles and better end-user APIs MO perhaps but based on real world decisions at real world companies. > And it's a bit strange to disparage such a person with a snide remark > like 'short-term perspective'. It's always easy to argue from the > sideline. Definetly not on the sideline having spent the better part of 30 years years working with Unix and 21 with FreeBSD. For the sake of open discussion regarding substantive issues, however, I beg you take back or better substantiate such grossly unfair and inaccurate characterizations. Roger From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 15 20:40:17 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 642CBAA8856 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 20:40:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michelle@sorbs.net) Received: from hades.sorbs.net (mail.sorbs.net [67.231.146.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57E8B1E27 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 20:40:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michelle@sorbs.net) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from isux.com (firewall.isux.com [213.165.190.213]) by hades.sorbs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.29.0 64bit (built Jul 9 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0O2L00085WERX800@hades.sorbs.net> for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 12:47:17 -0800 (PST) Message-id: <56C237AC.7030305@sorbs.net> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 21:40:12 +0100 From: Michelle Sullivan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100301 SeaMonkey/1.1.19 To: John Marino Cc: Roger Marquis , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Removing documentation References: <56C1E579.30303@marino.st> <20160215165952.6199743BFA@shepard.synsport.net> <56C2075A.5000409@marino.st> <20160215173229.2574943BC2@shepard.synsport.net> <56C20D93.5030009@marino.st> In-reply-to: <56C20D93.5030009@marino.st> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 20:40:17 -0000 John Marino wrote: > On 2/15/2016 6:32 PM, Roger Marquis wrote: > >>> This makes no sense. Ports are not tied to base releases. >>> And you think lack of developer resources is an invalid reason? >>> >> There was no mid-release issue with base as far as I know. The issue was >> with ports and by extension pkgng (and related -ngs). >> > > ports are developed independently. They do not follow release > schedules. Ports have to support all supported releases, that's the > only connection. > Yeah, I'd agree with this... except... pkg_* tools don't exist on 10.x only pkgng... that makes it base os thing.. even if it's downloaded in/via ports.. So sorry don't claim it's only part of the ports system, because whilst it maybe built and administered there, the tools it replaced were removed from the base OS at the very beginning of 10.x... Michelle -- Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/ From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 15 21:10:04 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78A75AA9729 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 21:10:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42BB811A1 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 21:10:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1aVQPG-000E8z-5w for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 22:10:06 +0100 Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 22:10:06 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: How to set mariadb in /etc/make.conf DEFAULT_VERSIONS ? Message-ID: <20160215211006.GO26283@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 21:10:04 -0000 Hi! What is the correct way to set the DEFAULT_VERSIONS to mariadb in /etc/make.conf ? I looked at /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.default-versions.mk. In /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.database.mk it looks like 101m is a valid value, which would map to DEFAULT_VERSIONS= mysql=10.1m Would this work ? -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 15 21:23:58 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A279FAA9F07 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 21:23:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ricky1252@hotmail.com) Received: from SNT004-OMC3S31.hotmail.com (snt004-omc3s31.hotmail.com [65.55.90.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BF7E1C96 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 21:23:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ricky1252@hotmail.com) Received: from SNT146-W3 ([65.55.90.136]) by SNT004-OMC3S31.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Mon, 15 Feb 2016 13:22:52 -0800 X-TMN: [lwzS0AZPvsp5dr0B8PwlZBsD7uqvv4pM] X-Originating-Email: [ricky1252@hotmail.com] Message-ID: From: Ricky G To: Kurt Jaeger CC: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Subject: RE: How to set mariadb in /etc/make.conf DEFAULT_VERSIONS ? Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:22:51 -0500 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <20160215211006.GO26283@home.opsec.eu> References: <20160215211006.GO26283@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Feb 2016 21:22:52.0202 (UTC) FILETIME=[0718F0A0:01D16837] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 21:23:58 -0000 > Hi! >=20 > What is the correct way to set the DEFAULT_VERSIONS to mariadb > in /etc/make.conf ? >=20 > I looked at /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.default-versions.mk. >=20 > In /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.database.mk it looks like 101m is a valid value=2C > which would map to=20 >=20 > DEFAULT_VERSIONS=3D mysql=3D10.1m DEFAULT_MYSQL_VER=3D101m This is how I have it set.=20 Hope this helps Ricky = From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 15 21:28:17 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 782D3AA80CA for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 21:28:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsdml@marino.st) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56E951E67 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 21:28:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsdml@marino.st) Received: from [192.168.1.21] (211.Red-88-1-221.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [88.1.221.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F2E443C04; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:28:13 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: Removing documentation To: Michelle Sullivan References: <56C1E579.30303@marino.st> <20160215165952.6199743BFA@shepard.synsport.net> <56C2075A.5000409@marino.st> <20160215173229.2574943BC2@shepard.synsport.net> <56C20D93.5030009@marino.st> <56C237AC.7030305@sorbs.net> Cc: Roger Marquis , FreeBSD Mailing List From: John Marino X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <56C242EA.9050303@marino.st> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 22:28:10 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56C237AC.7030305@sorbs.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 21:28:17 -0000 On 2/15/2016 9:40 PM, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > Yeah, I'd agree with this... except... > > pkg_* tools don't exist on 10.x only pkgng... that makes it base os > thing.. even if it's downloaded in/via ports.. > > So sorry don't claim it's only part of the ports system, because whilst > it maybe built and administered there, the tools it replaced were > removed from the base OS at the very beginning of 10.x... What stopped you from installing pkg_* tools from the ports tree on 10.x? You're just talking about them being removed from base, but you weren't prohibited from using the tools until they were removed from the ports tree (and then you could have just frozen the tree while they were still present) Plus now you're in a weird place where you can freely migrate to the latest release (10.x) but can't freely migrate package tools? Michelle, it's seriously very weak to say ports are tied to releases because something moved out of base. Stuff moves out of base all the time (and actually not fast enough). JOhn From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 15 22:21:03 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89151AA9A6D for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 22:21:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 512D31D0E for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 22:21:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3CC628459; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 23:13:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from illbsd.quip.test (ip-86-49-16-209.net.upcbroadband.cz [86.49.16.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F359F28416; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 23:13:12 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <56C24D78.30602@quip.cz> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 23:13:12 +0100 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/35.0 SeaMonkey/2.32 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kurt Jaeger , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to set mariadb in /etc/make.conf DEFAULT_VERSIONS ? References: <20160215211006.GO26283@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <20160215211006.GO26283@home.opsec.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 22:21:03 -0000 Kurt Jaeger wrote on 02/15/2016 22:10: > Hi! > > What is the correct way to set the DEFAULT_VERSIONS to mariadb > in /etc/make.conf ? > > I looked at /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.default-versions.mk. > > In /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.database.mk it looks like 101m is a valid value, > which would map to > > DEFAULT_VERSIONS= mysql=10.1m > > Would this work ? I am not using 10.1, I am on 5.5 and have this in make.conf DEFAULT_VERSIONS=apache=2.4 perl5=5.20 mysql=5.5m php=5.5 python=3.4 pgsql=9.3 So if you want 10.1, you should use DEFAULT_VERSIONS=mysql=10.1m If somebody wants 10.0, then DEFAULT_VERSIONS=mysql=10.0m "m" is for MariaDB "p" is for Percona I think DEFAULT_MYSQL_VER=101m is wrong. bsd.detabase.mk has this warning: .if defined(DEFAULT_MYSQL_VER) WARNING+= "DEFAULT_MYSQL_VER is defined, consider using DEFAULT_VERSIONS=mysql=${DEFAULT_MYSQL_VER} instead" .endif Miroslav Lachman From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 15 22:37:24 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BDEAAA82D6 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 22:37:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ricky1252@hotmail.com) Received: from SNT004-OMC1S41.hotmail.com (snt004-omc1s41.hotmail.com [65.54.61.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8791824 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 22:37:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ricky1252@hotmail.com) Received: from SNT146-W29 ([65.55.90.7]) by SNT004-OMC1S41.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Mon, 15 Feb 2016 14:36:16 -0800 X-TMN: [2VyhXGa5fWmB097FZK38Buw7frY92tau] X-Originating-Email: [ricky1252@hotmail.com] Message-ID: From: Ricky G To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> CC: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Subject: RE: How to set mariadb in /etc/make.conf DEFAULT_VERSIONS ? Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:36:16 -0500 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <56C24D78.30602@quip.cz> References: <20160215211006.GO26283@home.opsec.eu>,<56C24D78.30602@quip.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Feb 2016 22:36:16.0874 (UTC) FILETIME=[487C8CA0:01D16841] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 22:37:24 -0000 > I think DEFAULT_MYSQL_VER=3D101m is wrong. bsd.detabase.mk has this warni= ng: >=20 > .if defined(DEFAULT_MYSQL_VER) > WARNING+=3D "DEFAULT_MYSQL_VER is defined=2C consider using=20 > DEFAULT_VERSIONS=3Dmysql=3D${DEFAULT_MYSQL_VER} instead" > .endif Ah=2C I didn't realize it was deprecated. I had set this some time ago. Cha= nging it now thanks =3D] Ricky = From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 15 22:44:34 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D26AAA86A5 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 22:44:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffreybouquet@yahoo.com) Received: from nm35-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm35-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [72.30.238.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6208EB04 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 22:44:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffreybouquet@yahoo.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1455576084; bh=54qqIIqoRhwHhZquGAezFSdViwjEjD/yLLUnljGF4/k=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject; b=Kr65X3G5AVSG5QJX2aSaZP2T8ZWeKYXvn/IjXVZqvsmDefkrfOxWWjEWAhU6MmN39fvUdvQ2uYcvMVkWXMAs5PyNoFtrGXV0fkxQGaD4lMqWdnQLjUFWRkanbKDX7DrsKHd3rbyVgLHHQPjHih+vSkTPfrOVASqzrOpnBMxrZRH6Eg/WrqrPrya9ykNl77cMsV/T22wX0PINawUtFlSSm3hqhZ/491duLnwRPf9PC01KlFwVBaHTI1a3SDj5MtSJ2QCmuFZ2QtBsJLuEmmSl2cVeQ4W+HHnuZvZgr1aAyw92w0Ovy40jGamhdGG+mxy6RsJi6ndSNxpi+si0qwXmcw== Received: from [98.139.170.180] by nm35.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Feb 2016 22:41:24 -0000 Received: from [98.139.213.11] by tm23.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Feb 2016 22:41:24 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp111.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Feb 2016 22:41:24 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 742050.86272.bm@smtp111.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: 3kuX4ZgVM1kdI.rcbhYvUrZsSR4JdJIsGXfvP_Ma5jNmYJL NkLCBb.e3ORGHjzAH5hjKtNEWsRe6SyOeBS1w40hRI.Wa8s2HaXLRLw.Zusy kLGiOOoy2On3Y1eqEFPZZzixGqQNf0lR2dUXFHspBozVt4AbQgQOgxcFAtiV _zY6_rNx8Zh5dCc6_Rehnm.X8bMgJNPNTuYcBb1Kaixe5V3MsyjqgvwXsZT9 A6fhmSOecPLIagoK6eCGqcz7l.nHFlB5UAWegv_Rwu9dLNc9HjZs3pE8DITJ PYlSB2gqG.U.nUfWV2bSg51nzX4aU5AnQ38wN9mWOObBDn6QSC6.aPL5XHn_ sIyG0bUP_tNYHOiW6ti06y5uRuEcQj99X2x6kw1OwK0yzWuHYszWXpaut9L2 p4kEyKbcOG1MNt5o7AN5qsMS5QhO7GwBYkQmfIjGsv6ZgPg9SWttgJO28b1M h4I2qYPjASsshkk4QFx445nBe15smBVIbrvPbojwPCEDSLQGxLAaxmCxOFb2 igmMTFeoV9TVF6uJrDsZ5WklJ3oGbRT6SB_ynog-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: 6IZaPQyswBAeyzp3urHRlQfBxGxx4Js3YAIn Subject: Re: Removing documentation To: Roger Marquis , John Marino References: <56C1E579.30303@marino.st> <20160215165952.6199743BFA@shepard.synsport.net> <56C2075A.5000409@marino.st> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List From: Jeffrey Bouquet X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <56C25413.2070502@yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 14:41:23 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56C2075A.5000409@marino.st> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 22:44:34 -0000 On 02/15/2016 09:32, Roger Marquis wrote: >> This makes no sense. Ports are not tied to base releases. >> And you think lack of developer resources is an invalid reason? > > There was no mid-release issue with base as far as I know. The issue was > with ports and by extension pkgng (and related -ngs). > >> You know good and well that people kick the can down the road FOREVER. >> You could have announced it 3 years ahead and people would still scream >> NOT YET! NOT YET! This would NEVER happen in Linux! > > The announcement > > > was dated Feb 3 2014, leaving all of 7 months until the planned > deprecation. Even if you could make a case that pkgng was ready (it > wasn't) 7 months is far less than the 2 calendar year and dozens of > person-year cycles required by some infrastructure-critical production > environments. It's even farther from the 7+ years that other FOSS > distributions support their releases. > Roger > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" IIRC pkg(ng) was why I joined the freebsd-current mailing list, arguing there several times against its abstraction from command-line pipe tricks on the /var/db/pkg subfiles... by portmaster etc... [ if not, it was the second issue posted about... ] .... Since upgraded all systems (almost all) to pkg. (Not without breakage, sorry to say, but did one or two reinstalls of the OS, thankfully not on often-used systems...) .... And have a near-seamless twice-weekly upgrade. ... However, I would surmise it best to eventually (as I stated before) re-enable the pkg_tools as a parallel subsystem ( sort of like a shadow fallback /var/db/pkg if one's sqlite3 file goes missing...) (or an urgent-upgrade path with portmaster -d -B -P -i -g (or something if the usual one is broken..) Or even a 'pkg runs in a sandbox 'pkg upgrade' AND portmaster -d -B -P -i -g and actually does the upgrade that completes without error... maybe examinable by the user However, that is all just a subset of the wish list here (like reverse engineering the MOVED portmanager and making it pkg-capable... ) And some schemes I postulate here may be more doable on paper than in practice... BTW made synth ccache-aware and ran it for the first time 'en masse' today. Unclear whether it with the build-only command, did actual installs or not, (some were listed as FAILED) but it sure was *pretty* ... (red, green...) to see. Apologies for treading off-topic. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 15 22:47:13 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5B39AA878C for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 22:47:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: from anny.lostinspace.de (anny.lostinspace.de [IPv6:2a01:138:a006::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BC68BC5 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 22:47:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: from server.idefix.lan (aftr-88-217-181-205.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.181.205]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: idefix@fechner.net) by anny.lostinspace.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A4CDB1B369E; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 23:47:10 +0100 (CET) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.1 anny.lostinspace.de A4CDB1B369E Authentication-Results: anny.lostinspace.de; dmarc=none header.from=fechner.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=fechner.net; s=default; t=1455576430; bh=cPZ9VkN7xaxBBOLKx4XbHzufg1RmMeqPQ4tI07CejHA=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=HyJPtWhTyNk01wP16CZizTeH9liixQ1YBLYa6mKPyuSnSpi1j3HZYOpUXOmioKqzU bSRezEqyLIv72WAQmeKi3Ib7uCrL74WLneSTfzZ/Qb7p5Rq6MQiXBsy6hiQibJZpxL rEpLTJXGo2ZIbngUVDzs+aXL4E2bWjRn6iDQjcOA= Received: from [192.168.0.151] (aftr-88-217-181-205.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.181.205]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.idefix.lan (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0D2D1DB22E; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 23:47:09 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: New user/group in /usr/ports/UIDs and /usr/ports/GIDs To: Kurt Jaeger References: <56BF0836.6050507@fechner.net> <56C19E13.70203@fechner.net> <20160215094919.GI26283@home.opsec.eu> <56C1E8B3.8090301@fechner.net> <20160215152445.GK26283@home.opsec.eu> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Matthias Fechner Message-ID: <56C25563.2090806@fechner.net> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 23:46:59 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160215152445.GK26283@home.opsec.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 22:47:13 -0000 Am 15.02.2016 um 16:24 schrieb Kurt Jaeger: >> it is not blocking in a hard way. >> But if you have it installed you deinstall it and reinstall it again, >> you maybe get permission problems, because the UID/GID for the gogs user >> can change. > > That's a valid point. > > Is there a reason for the gogs user to have /bin/sh instead > of /usr/sbin/nologin ? yes, the shell is required, because the user will login using public ssh key and then a git process is triggered to be able to push/pull via git. Gruß Matthias -- "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning." -- Rich Cook From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 15 22:51:26 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 042D0AA8965 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 22:51:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jim@ohlste.in) Received: from mail-qg0-x233.google.com (mail-qg0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB3D1DB5 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 22:51:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jim@ohlste.in) Received: by mail-qg0-x233.google.com with SMTP id b35so120735531qge.0 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 14:51:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ohlste-in.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yT/znsCN/1cjS0vJsSX5iJKwh+asP+XhR7hlSTEOPJY=; b=ytXtc7wOpmBZIryr5woLkEz0dPKrfotQk8rwrrqlIYWSbRy8+s3s/4AtFhjv2oACrI VRT17+TjYgC3vINXEp5gcGNMn81iR6b/8ZgUNne3JGlxSaQ10XKXZQCgvUhWf03+rucD YohEHg+SjkSTcfv/leFyElOBcs6khSTENemOack/QQy2pcdjINZjAj4KKfKlTqCxHQkN BDgg47wf2JIX5I+nBUGKx6sGtU92kPFSeZnrzUX7yMWcSp6qCvPDLArcuRxvmiXZ+4cu vRCD9UZ9K/C8y+eYAQSI7idNTYG+w+ORUaZ67tkKTRLA0xYdlO1xZDgbL0W+6aZcZstr Ut1g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=yT/znsCN/1cjS0vJsSX5iJKwh+asP+XhR7hlSTEOPJY=; b=BDcEf72Z8WaQ5zgp0kwPQ0dW33dp1/VBDq6dWpGlLti/RJ3rei3ZjK9qZSdYE9gf7r zmSzaRxubDQleUFgzqHbv9LywJpkrM7//OH45Ab0Jc2Q+TAWn0S3GDLMSYBYpDeMMcJs RgvuFXphTbxeBMW4dv/hTLrxIuUd7fVVrp89MYpfrIJ2Xj2ri11lxH+aEPJA4ntlAbA7 SEugu+J4F7g472is+ujVIsv8SHFaIeRn5bIE97LZXN++skGAo1wbfNvbQB2K9pMkVPuv cLh0vO0whvEBRuTpS4qI47GzVYxE3ecv+bFRJSgubMc89G/wrhkulnqrjzQZRB9NUwvz fhYA== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQH0EmNTfG6xJNJALj8nAcEMSnSD5V8xd/Jx01/fkSFSN8SorHNs2AVkKToaide+Q== X-Received: by 10.140.100.244 with SMTP id s107mr23037542qge.19.1455576684192; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 14:51:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.18] (pool-96-249-243-37.nrflva.fios.verizon.net. [96.249.243.37]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id q27sm11972398qki.47.2016.02.15.14.51.22 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 15 Feb 2016 14:51:23 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Removing documentation To: Michelle Sullivan , John Marino References: <56C1E579.30303@marino.st> <20160215165952.6199743BFA@shepard.synsport.net> <56C2075A.5000409@marino.st> <20160215173229.2574943BC2@shepard.synsport.net> <56C20D93.5030009@marino.st> <56C237AC.7030305@sorbs.net> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List From: Jim Ohlstein Message-ID: <56C25669.1010006@ohlste.in> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:51:21 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56C237AC.7030305@sorbs.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 22:51:26 -0000 Hello, On 2/15/16 3:40 PM, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > John Marino wrote: >> On 2/15/2016 6:32 PM, Roger Marquis wrote: >> >>>> This makes no sense. Ports are not tied to base releases. >>>> And you think lack of developer resources is an invalid reason? >>>> >>> There was no mid-release issue with base as far as I know. The issue was >>> with ports and by extension pkgng (and related -ngs). >>> >> >> ports are developed independently. They do not follow release >> schedules. Ports have to support all supported releases, that's the >> only connection. >> > Yeah, I'd agree with this... except... > > pkg_* tools don't exist on 10.x only pkgng... that makes it base os > thing.. even if it's downloaded in/via ports.. > > So sorry don't claim it's only part of the ports system, because whilst > it maybe built and administered there, the tools it replaced were > removed from the base OS at the very beginning of 10.x... This is like milking a dead cow here. Even if you get something out of it you're not going to drink it. If you want to be using a 2014 OS in 2022, then a RHEL derived system is the product for you. Enjoy it. I don't believe that there is an upgrade path in RHEL, so you'll either have to retire hardware or nuke your systems to upgrade. No one forced you to use 10.x before you were ready. 9 is still supported to this day. And as has been pointed out, pkg_ tools were in ports should you have wanted to continue to use them, and you could have kept them and frozen your ports tree, as has been pointed out. Could the pkg(8) roll out have been handled better? Yes! Hey, I'm not happy about Bush v Gore in 2000 but I'm not still crying about it. You're frustrated, angry, bitter, whatever. I'm terribly sorry but it's ime to move on. Red Hat, which is now your preferred product, is a for-profit company with over 8000 paid employees, many of whom are testing and testing and testing. They never update anything except at the point of a gun, and then only after extensive testing. On the plus side, it's stable. It never really changes. FreeBSD, on the other hand, is a comparatively small organization and an operating system that moves forward, though sometimes it's two steps forward and one back.. Some things need to be tested in the field to find out where and what needs to be changed/fixed/improved. That's the way it is. Was this an epic fail? That's a matter of opinion, though we all already know yours. The fact is that you had choices. You made those choices with your eyes open (if you didn't then shame on you!) and things didn't go as smoothly as you'd have liked. As I said, it's time to move on. Your arguments are specious. -- Jim Ohlstein "Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference." - Mark Twain From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 15 23:09:29 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5957AAA91B8 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 23:09:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from douglaswth@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-x233.google.com (mail-pa0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A5E414D1 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 23:09:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from douglaswth@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pa0-x233.google.com with SMTP id yy13so92097868pab.3 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:09:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:openpgp:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4oOIXXi4TdISLX4iUmNExb/5R+L82Xt+UYqqSa5ejpE=; b=CpDv+BUmgaa6TdQd+cpkrXZ8yxV+XmBK5RnCQgs2D654bDlIS9aF6VOhoh4KZJ8mj/ vtr3EJLXqE++PvO9Pp5WtShmsqg+7TvO3H5Mk5B9Y4DuldHLUycSbq3waI+mgg2FgWS3 wBKytrVpEP4T3tHfW9vW/99cYIqHYI3s8rpTgfdqWKjY0miZ4D+KCuxy34YUKc4t8K8O 8Q/Aqoxf1vWcOeJODW3ZCMwQML6Do3HFyyrxWJm7tCqwRZD6asVLPApD/dZpCN3zTycm ZbihjfDytKDmJAM8QBRaCqts2h62d7T/6ooFLGGxiHkLuZdRdzORx6DuVrWGf6ulr77e xpAQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:openpgp:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=4oOIXXi4TdISLX4iUmNExb/5R+L82Xt+UYqqSa5ejpE=; b=A+h1c2u430jV8boJw4JOjQF/FWU0/KyR3h6gq+CkGV7Y2lGxJ5/lOLn3SiH2pycY/n /YDH2b0gNHx+vEdcBF81x5NyJBLdT+4YFzlZLJOGmeIlyPi/sojxQ6Nw1oPZHQ8r3ACf QLl/F5hc5JejTBx2IrfYmzQx1R2tUjYEo9EfxfiwIcVHmOtuWvNL+TQDKqmmw19mrQKb FXiworx0AoG6Qe2YADQL3mzKmvSeA0B0hN8yQ6VoHN3RluhkuQCHzhCfKOF5TuyBMuOV 35D8iACgodd0A1tw/33uw4PcRIXsZoQQNQ36am7E8gGE3k4ljHeJqm9wj1xx2gtWGz7u Ourg== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORslPw379SX6IpJmcIVJNBfv071dizDNWkjFxgWVgIpRr5JS2P+KZ82Y7FWmy7YsQ== X-Received: by 10.66.159.136 with SMTP id xc8mr26944641pab.71.1455577768735; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:09:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2605:e000:1419:804e:fdb8:5c12:a4e6:e36f? ([2605:e000:1419:804e:fdb8:5c12:a4e6:e36f]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 17sm40811983pfp.96.2016.02.15.15.09.27 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:09:27 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: New user/group in /usr/ports/UIDs and /usr/ports/GIDs To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <56BF0836.6050507@fechner.net> <56C19E13.70203@fechner.net> <20160215094919.GI26283@home.opsec.eu> <56C1E8B3.8090301@fechner.net> <20160215152445.GK26283@home.opsec.eu> <56C25563.2090806@fechner.net> From: Douglas Thrift Openpgp: id=09C4DA9A5BB7640FFB409623627BA4D834176159 Message-ID: <56C25AAB.6000501@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:09:31 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56C25563.2090806@fechner.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 23:09:29 -0000 On 2/15/2016 2:46 PM, Matthias Fechner wrote: > Am 15.02.2016 um 16:24 schrieb Kurt Jaeger: >>> it is not blocking in a hard way. >>> But if you have it installed you deinstall it and reinstall it again, >>> you maybe get permission problems, because the UID/GID for the gogs user >>> can change. >> >> That's a valid point. >> >> Is there a reason for the gogs user to have /bin/sh instead >> of /usr/sbin/nologin ? > > yes, the shell is required, because the user will login using public ssh > key and then a git process is triggered to be able to push/pull via git. > > Gruß > Matthias > I mentioned this already on that ticket, but why use the user "gogs" instead of "git" which is already used by the gitosis and gitolite ports? That seems like a more standard thing to see in your git urls: git clone git@example.com vs git clone gogs@example.com -- Douglas William Thrift From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 15 23:44:54 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 624A1AAA009 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 23:44:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michelle@sorbs.net) Received: from hades.sorbs.net (mail.sorbs.net [67.231.146.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50EA180C for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 23:44:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michelle@sorbs.net) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from isux.com (firewall.isux.com [213.165.190.213]) by hades.sorbs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.29.0 64bit (built Jul 9 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0O2M0009N4YHX800@hades.sorbs.net> for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:51:55 -0800 (PST) Message-id: <56C262F2.8000807@sorbs.net> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 00:44:50 +0100 From: Michelle Sullivan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100301 SeaMonkey/1.1.19 To: John Marino Cc: Roger Marquis , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Removing documentation References: <56C1E579.30303@marino.st> <20160215165952.6199743BFA@shepard.synsport.net> <56C2075A.5000409@marino.st> <20160215173229.2574943BC2@shepard.synsport.net> <56C20D93.5030009@marino.st> <56C237AC.7030305@sorbs.net> <56C242EA.9050303@marino.st> In-reply-to: <56C242EA.9050303@marino.st> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 23:44:54 -0000 John Marino wrote: > On 2/15/2016 9:40 PM, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > >> Yeah, I'd agree with this... except... >> >> pkg_* tools don't exist on 10.x only pkgng... that makes it base os >> thing.. even if it's downloaded in/via ports.. >> >> So sorry don't claim it's only part of the ports system, because whilst >> it maybe built and administered there, the tools it replaced were >> removed from the base OS at the very beginning of 10.x... >> > > What stopped you from installing pkg_* tools from the ports tree on > 10.x? Which port, I wasn't even aware the pkg_* tools where there? Not forgetting they wouldn't actually work because the ports tree actively installs and uses pkg (no matter what options you have) so you're screwed regardless. > You're just talking about them being removed from base, but you > weren't prohibited from using the tools until they were removed from the > ports tree (and then you could have just frozen the tree while they were > still present) > Nice idea except there were a slew of vulnerabilities (notable openssl IIRC) which had to be patched... and IIRC it wasn't even back ported to the quarterly.. I know I asked for several patches to be put into the quarterly and they never were (and one of those patches was on a port I maintained.) > Plus now you're in a weird place where you can freely migrate to the > latest release (10.x) but can't freely migrate package tools? > Sorry? pre 8.4 pkg_* only. 8.4 + 9.x pkg_* or pkgng - user choice. 10.x pkgng only. Seems to be a good path to get people to switch without the pain. > Michelle, it's seriously very weak to say ports are tied to releases > because something moved out of base. Stuff moves out of base all the > time (and actually not fast enough). > Wasn't the point I was making, but people will jump on that to give weight to their argument. I was supporting someone else's notion that it would have been a lot more sensible and painless had it been done ... (eg like I suggested above) ... however it wasn't.. arbitrary date set... That said, you cannot deny.. 10.x didn't have working pkg_* tools (as in usable - because bapt (and others) made sure there were so many version checks so if you were on 10.x the ports tree would not use pkg_* tools even if you went to the source and compiled them like I did... seems to me like they had already chosen to go the way I suggested above, but too many people stayed clear of 10.0 so they forced the issue on everyone else... Here's the fact: I run configure and my systems, not some random wheeny that wants me to debug their software. I know the 'wheeny' is friends with people on here.. and a lot more respected by many than I ever will be when it comes to this mailing list, but I really don't care, I say it how it is, you may agree or disagree with me, I will respect you if you do, however you will never change my mind nor will I just shut up and go away whilst I have a single box affected (which means until they are all migrated.) Michelle -- Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/ From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 15 23:48:27 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8037AAA101 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 23:48:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baho-utot@columbus.rr.com) Received: from cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com (cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.166.225]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 814E7916 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 23:48:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baho-utot@columbus.rr.com) Received: from [75.187.32.8] ([75.187.32.8:50200] helo=raspberrypi.bildanet.com) by cdptpa-oedge01 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.5.0.35861 r(Momo-dev:tip)) with ESMTP id 3A/DB-31627-4C362C65; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 23:48:20 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.40] (helo=baho-utot.bildanet.com) by raspberrypi.bildanet.com with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aVSsO-0008Jb-9t for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:48:20 -0500 Subject: Re: Removing documentation Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List References: <56C1E579.30303@marino.st> <20160215165952.6199743BFA@shepard.synsport.net> <56C2075A.5000409@marino.st> <56C20B76.805@sorbs.net> From: Baho Utot Message-ID: <56C263C4.6000506@columbus.rr.com> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:48:20 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/42.0 SeaMonkey/2.39 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56C20B76.805@sorbs.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.118:25 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 23:48:27 -0000 Michelle Sullivan wrote: > John Marino wrote: >> On 2/15/2016 5:59 PM, Roger Marquis wrote: >> >>> It was actually worse than that. Those of us who questioned the wisdom >>> of such disruptive and backwards-incompatible changes being implemented >>> mid-release instead of at a release boundry were A) ignored, B) told that >>> there were not enough (developer) resources, and C) even the announcement >>> was unprofessional and lacked justification for the rush job: >>> >> This makes no sense. Ports are not tied to base releases. >> And you think lack of developer resources is an invalid reason? >> > Actually it made perfect sense... (for a change) ... make pkgng the > default on 10.x and allow people to use either on 8.4 and 9.x ... this > made perfect sense... Make base packaging using similar/same tools as > part of 11+ makes perfect sense... > > > ....No, though... arbitrary date set, f**k real users, f**k whether it > works or not, because we need people to put it in production so we can > test our buggy software... > >> >>> There comes a time in the life cycle of just about every software >>> package that it has bee re-evaluated, refreshed, deprecated or just >>> retired. >>> >>> It is time that we bid farewell to the old pkg_* software that has been >>> part of FreeBSD since the beginning, and has served us well. After >>> years of development, testing, and playing, pkg(8) has become a >>> suitable replacement. >>> >>> "there comes a time"? "time that we bid farewell"? These are not >>> suitable criteria IMO for dropping support of mission-critical >>> subsystems. The FreeBSD Foundation SHOULD have played a part in insuring >>> a smoother transition to pkgng (much less portsng and, gack, rcng) but >>> this doesn't seem to have been on their radar. >>> >> You know good and well that people kick the can down the road FOREVER. >> You could have announced it 3 years ahead and people would still scream >> NOT YET! NOT YET! This would NEVER happen in Linux! >> >> It doesn't matter where you draw the line, you will never get everyone >> to respect it. It's never enough time. >> > Line drawn - at the next major version... that's an easy win... people > can complain, but they can't argue that it isn't a good decision because > they can choose... upgrade/don't upgrade... we didn't get the chance to > choose ... it was forced down peoples necks... working or not. > Fortunately I was able to get the old system working again... and in > fact keep it up to date until about 3 months ago... (and only stopped > there because I have other things to do - will go back to it again later.) > >>>> From my perspective as an advocate and long-time user (since 2.0.5) this >>>> >>> marked a low-point in the viability of FreeBSD vis-a-vis other FOSS >>> distributions. Thankfully, going forward from FreeBSD 11 the release >>> cycle has been lengthened and base is going to be packaged. Those of use >>> who support large numbers of dev and production systems can at least >>> expect that future upgrades won't be as time-consuming or, hopefully, as >>> buggy. >>> >> "large numbers of dev and production systems" (push to memory stack) >> >> >> >> >>> I believe this is factually incorrect. We were aware but the decisions >>> were being made by core developers who were not, apparently, interested >>> in our concerns or the expected fallout. >>> >> So you chose to ignore the deadlines in the hopes the pleading would >> work? You intentionally did not prepare against the published timetable? >> > Well I didn't know - despite following the conversations on the public > lists - until 3 weeks before the event that the change was going to > deliberately and irrevocably break the old systems... again... > >> >>>> There was always the option of freezing the tree and pulling in the >>>> security updates manually until you were ready to migrate to pkg(8) too. >>>> >>> Sure, if you can afford to pay a full-time core dev there's the option of >>> backporting but even this was made impractical by the simultaneous >>> deprecation of the pre-ng ports tree, make version and pkg format. >>> >> No, it's not fully time. You just said "large numbers of dev and >> production systems", so I am pretty confident the business case would >> have been there for this. >> >> It's a business, right? You aren't talking about a shoestring hobby. >> > Dunno about Roger, but I am and I had been campaigning internally about > getting support for FreeBSD as a platform and support for the foundation > in the way of devs and/or cash... that is *never* going to happen now. > Money has been allocated and sent to Redhat (nothing to do with me, but > the pkgng debacle left me without legs to argue the case, so the > decision makers stuffed that.) > >>> There are lots of reasons why Linux has effectively eclipsed BSD >>> including device drivers, unattended deployments and install menus but >>> 8.X's wholesale throwing of so many of us under the bus was by far the >>> worst. >>> >> And now the fully circle. This is FreeBSD's Godwin's law. You know the >> discussion is over when somebody says that "[issue] of the day" is the >> root cause of BSD being eclipsed by Linux. Since I've heard [issue] >> replaced about 200 times, I'm kind of doubting it. I guess it's purpose >> is to make everyone involved with "[issue]" to feel personally >> responsible and oh what could have been if you hadn't of made the wrong >> decision.... >> > That I can't (and won't) comment on, but I will tell you that's the > reason all new servers I manage are being installed with CentOS+paid > support contract and not FreeBSD+donation. The bed was made by people, > they can sleep in it. > > Michelle What time of the month is it? I seem to of lost my place. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 15 23:59:02 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66707AAA698 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 23:59:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michelle@sorbs.net) Received: from hades.sorbs.net (mail.sorbs.net [67.231.146.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59276DD1 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 23:59:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michelle@sorbs.net) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from isux.com (firewall.isux.com [213.165.190.213]) by hades.sorbs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.29.0 64bit (built Jul 9 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0O2M0009Z5LYX800@hades.sorbs.net> for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:06:02 -0800 (PST) Message-id: <56C2663F.9070805@sorbs.net> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 00:58:55 +0100 From: Michelle Sullivan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100301 SeaMonkey/1.1.19 To: Jim Ohlstein Cc: John Marino , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Removing documentation References: <56C1E579.30303@marino.st> <20160215165952.6199743BFA@shepard.synsport.net> <56C2075A.5000409@marino.st> <20160215173229.2574943BC2@shepard.synsport.net> <56C20D93.5030009@marino.st> <56C237AC.7030305@sorbs.net> <56C25669.1010006@ohlste.in> In-reply-to: <56C25669.1010006@ohlste.in> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 23:59:02 -0000 Jim Ohlstein wrote: > Hello, > > On 2/15/16 3:40 PM, Michelle Sullivan wrote: >> John Marino wrote: >>> On 2/15/2016 6:32 PM, Roger Marquis wrote: >>> >>>>> This makes no sense. Ports are not tied to base releases. >>>>> And you think lack of developer resources is an invalid reason? >>>>> >>>> There was no mid-release issue with base as far as I know. The >>>> issue was >>>> with ports and by extension pkgng (and related -ngs). >>>> >>> >>> ports are developed independently. They do not follow release >>> schedules. Ports have to support all supported releases, that's the >>> only connection. >>> >> Yeah, I'd agree with this... except... >> >> pkg_* tools don't exist on 10.x only pkgng... that makes it base os >> thing.. even if it's downloaded in/via ports.. >> >> So sorry don't claim it's only part of the ports system, because whilst >> it maybe built and administered there, the tools it replaced were >> removed from the base OS at the very beginning of 10.x... > > This is like milking a dead cow here. Even if you get something out of > it you're not going to drink it. One of the reasons that over the last few months I have been ignoring most threads on here and IRC... just looking for something I need to know about only. > > If you want to be using a 2014 OS in 2022, then a RHEL derived system > is the product for you. Enjoy it. I don't believe that there is an > upgrade path in RHEL, so you'll either have to retire hardware or nuke > your systems to upgrade. I don't, I'm forced to now. > > No one forced you to use 10.x before you were ready. 9 is still > supported to this day. And as has been pointed out, pkg_ tools were in > ports should you have wanted to continue to use them, and you could > have kept them and frozen your ports tree, as has been pointed out. I don't have a 10.x box. I do still have 40+ 9.x boxes and a non-frozen ports tree where i have backported many of the new changes to the old pkg_* system ... just because in the immortal words "these changes cannot work with pkg_* tools, we needed to change everything to move forward." (or something very close to those words.) > > Could the pkg(8) roll out have been handled better? Yes! > Red Hat, which is now your preferred product, No, it's the product I have to use because that is now company policy. > is a for-profit company with over 8000 paid employees, many of whom > are testing and testing and testing. They never update anything except > at the point of a gun, and then only after extensive testing. On the > plus side, it's stable. It never really changes. FreeBSD, on the other > hand, is a comparatively small organization and an operating system > that moves forward, though sometimes it's two steps forward and one > back.. Some things need to be tested in the field to find out where > and what needs to be changed/fixed/improved. That's the way it is. Was > this an epic fail? That's a matter of opinion, though we all already > know yours. The fact is that you had choices. You made those choices > with your eyes open (if you didn't then shame on you!) I have very little choice because whilst my eyes were open, I missed one message ... *ONE* message that said (paraphrasing), "as of the EOL date the old tools will be broken" > and things didn't go as smoothly as you'd have liked. As I said, it's > time to move on. Your arguments are specious. > > Your assumptions about me and my motives are very specious. I have already moved on professionally (as in, in my job) and I replied to this thread only to let the original poster know there were not alone in their thoughts or arguments. Others, you included have persisted in telling me how and why I'm wrong without realising that if I amd wrong so are you, just as if I am right so are you because I am talking about my experience, observations and opinion, which are mine and mine alone, you will keep the argument going whilst ever you deny my observations and opinions. -- Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/ From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Feb 16 01:38:43 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FE8DAAA4B2 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 01:38:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hchan@enbala.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC7601CD9 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 01:38:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hchan@enbala.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id DBB48AAA4B1; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 01:38:42 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB2E5AAA4B0 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 01:38:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hchan@enbala.com) Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0135.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 652E81CD8 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 01:38:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hchan@enbala.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=enbala.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-enbala-com; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=GBagv137BtQgY0/aQ2VnVFYHgWjgPFmRzUlruHzdSFs=; b=L9IQU/rYsfmZvKwsmHPWU2dK37EU5NlawXLlsGtP/KyC1eKi+CpxXcCb/Tnppb9KMzK9nGoe7KEBeQAJcEjleaPDmmUb80F8bqxcgDV8C62jXbOA2K2egKyHNGIIIRT0tbU2adwkedT98jk4iijJThdgf+dE4kFz3EQms3K9eDk= Received: from CY1PR11MB0870.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.164.68.20) by CY1PR11MB0872.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.164.68.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.409.15; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 01:04:48 +0000 Received: from CY1PR11MB0870.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([10.164.68.20]) by CY1PR11MB0870.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([10.164.68.20]) with mapi id 15.01.0409.017; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 01:04:48 +0000 From: Henry Chan To: "ports@FreeBSD.org" Subject: textproc/xqilla shared lib question Thread-Topic: textproc/xqilla shared lib question Thread-Index: AdFoVTjdWdV3872aSrG0CB6XO2UzJw== Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 01:04:48 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: FreeBSD.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;FreeBSD.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=enbala.com; x-originating-ip: [75.98.203.252] x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; CY1PR11MB0872; 5:h4woch370QoSjL7Mb2sJv4XbUpEm7AkFLuX43YqN1ZTmbuF4treH3JnFNcJnCmO1pNqdquMEHnkytEPoywAodonQvbyEsIK8Xt3/afuTktZTpwoLdMxWkDS6vMF2YLoS2qjSalDjGEbCvmHqy47QKw==; 24:tJPGKypOXC/5wrGdTOFXQmNhpCQPPQx6A5h59zkzTcR4Qz1JGNT+EOfCKP7jaR75dlhEOF5m0FeoJmw8HnQOxQwRpScNSeGBqgbz5blpEyU= x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CY1PR11MB0872; x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 55632639-9522-497d-780d-08d3366d2adb x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(10201501046)(3002001); SRVR:CY1PR11MB0872; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:CY1PR11MB0872; x-forefront-prvs: 0854128AF0 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(54356999)(66066001)(77096005)(5003600100002)(15975445007)(50986999)(19625215002)(1730700002)(19580395003)(19580405001)(74316001)(5002640100001)(189998001)(92566002)(19300405004)(107886002)(5001960100002)(110136002)(86362001)(2906002)(10400500002)(76576001)(450100001)(2351001)(11100500001)(586003)(102836003)(790700001)(587094005)(6116002)(122556002)(3846002)(1096002)(1220700001)(5008740100001)(87936001)(229853001)(99286002)(16236675004)(40100003)(2501003)(3480700003)(3280700002)(3660700001)(16601075003)(33656002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CY1PR11MB0872; H:CY1PR11MB0870.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en; spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: enbala.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 16 Feb 2016 01:04:48.2889 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 3000ace2-80df-48f3-9ade-317f648d1040 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CY1PR11MB0872 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 01:38:43 -0000 Hello, I recently upgraded textproc/xqilla from version 2.3.0_3,1 to 2.3.2,1 and I= have noticed that my applications have stopped working. The main problem i= s that libxqilla.so.6 is not found after the upgrade, only libxqilla.so.4.2= .0 is available. Doing a pkg info for xqilla shows that libxqilla.so.4 is p= rovided. The pkg-plist also shows libxqilla.so.4. The main question is: Why did the version go from 6 to 4? Here is the pkg info for xqilla for both versions: Name : xqilla Version : 2.3.2,1 Installed on : Mon Feb 15 15:15:11 2016 PST Origin : textproc/xqilla Architecture : freebsd:10:x86:64 Prefix : /usr/local Categories : textproc Licenses : APACHE20 Maintainer : ports@FreeBSD.org WWW : http://xqilla.sourceforge.net Comment : XQuery and XPath2 library Options : DOXYGEN : off Shared Libs required: libtidy-0.99.so.0 libxerces-c-3.1.so Shared Libs provided: libxqilla.so.4 Annotations : repo_type : binary repository : FreeBSD Flat size : 16.1MiB Description : XQilla is an XQuery and XPath 2 library and command line utility written in C++, implemented on top of the Xerces-C library. Name : xqilla Version : 2.3.0_3,1 Installed on : Mon Nov 2 15:08:30 2015 PST Origin : textproc/xqilla Architecture : freebsd:10:x86:64 Prefix : /usr/local Categories : textproc Licenses : APACHE20 Maintainer : ports@FreeBSD.org WWW : http://xqilla.sourceforge.net Comment : XQuery and XPath2 library Options : DOCS : off Shared Libs required: libstdc++.so.6 libxerces-c-3.1.so Shared Libs provided: libxqilla.so.6 Annotations : repo_type : binary repository : qa Flat size : 17.6MiB Description : XQilla is an XQuery and XPath 2 library and command line utility written in C++, implemented on top of the Xerces-C library. Thanks Henry From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Feb 16 06:32:02 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8790AAA67C for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 06:32:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rhurlin@gwdg.de) Received: from fmailer.gwdg.de (fmailer.gwdg.de [134.76.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B25A41237 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 06:32:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rhurlin@gwdg.de) Received: from um-excht-a01.um.gwdg.de ([134.76.11.221] helo=email.gwdg.de) by mailer.gwdg.de with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1aVYyM-0002vB-Dm for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 07:18:54 +0100 Received: from pc028.nfv.nw-fva.de (134.76.242.1) by email.gwdg.de (134.76.9.210) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 07:18:54 +0100 To: From: Rainer Hurling Subject: graphics/qgis: commit of PR 206834 Message-ID: <56C2BF47.4030401@gwdg.de> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 07:18:47 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Level: - X-Virus-Scanned: (clean) by clamav X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 06:32:03 -0000 Hi committers, is someone willing to commit bug 206834 [1]? It is about activating some features by new options in QGIS and it is maintainer approved (by me). Thanks in advance. Best regards, Rainer Hurling [1] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206834 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Feb 16 07:01:54 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D176EAA92F7 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 07:01:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: from mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [IPv6:2001:aa8:fffb:1::3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.0x20.net", Issuer "mail.0x20.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C5231FF9 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 07:01:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [IPv6:2001:aa8:fffb:1::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.0x20.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7D786DF91B; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 08:01:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id u1G71pHl090904; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 08:01:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: (from lars@localhost) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id u1G71pc7090692; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 08:01:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lars) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 08:01:51 +0100 From: Lars Engels To: Rainer Hurling Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: graphics/qgis: commit of PR 206834 Message-ID: <20160216070151.GG83790@e-new.0x20.net> References: <56C2BF47.4030401@gwdg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HKEL+t8MFpg/ASTE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56C2BF47.4030401@gwdg.de> X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 7.4 X-Operation-System: FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE-p23 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 07:01:54 -0000 --HKEL+t8MFpg/ASTE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 07:18:47AM +0100, Rainer Hurling wrote: > Hi committers, >=20 > is someone willing to commit bug 206834 [1]? >=20 > It is about activating some features by new options in QGIS and it is=20 > maintainer approved (by me). >=20 > Thanks in advance. >=20 > Best regards, > Rainer Hurling >=20 >=20 > [1] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D206834 Hi Rainer, the commit is in with a MFH request set. Lars --HKEL+t8MFpg/ASTE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJWwsleXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ4RjQwMDE3RTRERjUzMTI1N0FGRTUxNDlF NTRDQjM3RDNBMDg5RDZEAAoJEOVMs306CJ1tegQIAIWs5aQVm/KK6GK8/eI4LXoc hUZhs39iEE9aNSoY6Jr46c6etf7YmNYQuw0sEzSdGXogdpWd7IHjhfIwfRGdgMGd I9ewkO+AaT+tIXBhbYXaZnBPEsPEMKEKfsmwof7nPuTIvhnYA6up2q+1LSgPaAef cXFm2X4e8x2RQJyAE+tMUoM6/k5FAIbZT/n0y1XPALJpWccMtHZPrs878+sdtVEE oGGOKQ24gzV4QmlU3PjMkoC2r0dxW7kTH/iHJA6l97ntAorniP11HifKAhwGMCId /jEdv9RR7uZSRyxf54ZJLypM+9GkQUiqdAXN1mCO3c7C+/HVbCGQJAa9OaQreEY= =gdhz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HKEL+t8MFpg/ASTE-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Feb 16 08:19:30 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D0A7AA03A2 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 08:19:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: from anny.lostinspace.de (anny.lostinspace.de [IPv6:2a01:138:a006::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2208B1037 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 08:19:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: from server.idefix.lan (aftr-88-217-181-61.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.181.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: idefix@fechner.net) by anny.lostinspace.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 65CFF1B5613 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 09:19:26 +0100 (CET) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.1 anny.lostinspace.de 65CFF1B5613 Authentication-Results: anny.lostinspace.de; dmarc=none header.from=fechner.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=fechner.net; s=default; t=1455610766; bh=6hn6aTevoTFv3UU55asJQrhYDI70bMs2wLLqBFS7b2w=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=T2ufuqk6/yYiXOJ5/RZeCOoMsrBJN5xxyaNkh48wfq/Jqfa+SDl1yjEBtHTa3OU7f fuRvTTZZHQkJ66n4zBUx0rHl8f9Ypb0Fn0N6G6i8Ai4lzD46k4BQBCC3cHBnFEoYUP CesrfqCuDjF1LPhGLkZ2ux1C1cBJYlzz0ZToKCDM= Received: from [192.168.0.151] (aftr-88-217-181-61.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.181.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.idefix.lan (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E53C3DE2BD for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 09:19:25 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: New user/group in /usr/ports/UIDs and /usr/ports/GIDs To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <56BF0836.6050507@fechner.net> <56C19E13.70203@fechner.net> <20160215094919.GI26283@home.opsec.eu> <56C1E8B3.8090301@fechner.net> <20160215152445.GK26283@home.opsec.eu> <56C25563.2090806@fechner.net> <56C25AAB.6000501@gmail.com> From: Matthias Fechner Message-ID: <56C2DB83.2090801@fechner.net> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 09:19:15 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56C25AAB.6000501@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 08:19:30 -0000 Am 16.02.2016 um 00:09 schrieb Douglas Thrift: > I mentioned this already on that ticket, but why use the user "gogs" > instead of "git" which is already used by the gitosis and gitolite > ports? That seems like a more standard thing to see in your git urls: > > git clone git@example.com vs git clone gogs@example.com I already answered it in the ticket: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207206#c2 hope that is fine. Gruß Matthias -- "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning." -- Rich Cook From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Feb 16 09:09:18 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DFBAAA8279 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 09:09:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C9151A53 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 09:09:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 4C35AAA8277; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 09:09:18 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BDCCAA8274 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 09:09:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FDDD1A52 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 09:09:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u1G99IcH057244 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 09:09:18 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u1G99IZu057239; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 09:09:18 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201602160909.u1G99IZu057239@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 09:09:18 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 09:09:18 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ audio/libebur128 | 1.0.3 | v1.1.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ net-mgmt/weathermap | 1.1.1 | 19.1.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Feb 16 11:04:29 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B8F6AA9E5E for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:04:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 219831026 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:04:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1aVdQi-000FWR-85; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 12:04:28 +0100 Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 12:04:28 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Matthias Fechner Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New user/group in /usr/ports/UIDs and /usr/ports/GIDs Message-ID: <20160216110428.GP26283@home.opsec.eu> References: <56BF0836.6050507@fechner.net> <56C19E13.70203@fechner.net> <20160215094919.GI26283@home.opsec.eu> <56C1E8B3.8090301@fechner.net> <20160215152445.GK26283@home.opsec.eu> <56C25563.2090806@fechner.net> <56C25AAB.6000501@gmail.com> <56C2DB83.2090801@fechner.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56C2DB83.2090801@fechner.net> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:04:29 -0000 Hi! > Am 16.02.2016 um 00:09 schrieb Douglas Thrift: > > I mentioned this already on that ticket, but why use the user "gogs" > > instead of "git" which is already used by the gitosis and gitolite > > ports? That seems like a more standard thing to see in your git urls: > > > > git clone git@example.com vs git clone gogs@example.com > > I already answered it in the ticket: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207206#c2 > > hope that is fine. Done. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Feb 16 11:35:44 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C63EFAAAC16 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:35:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: from anny.lostinspace.de (anny.lostinspace.de [IPv6:2a01:138:a006::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8949D108C for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:35:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: from server.idefix.lan (aftr-88-217-181-61.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.181.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: idefix@fechner.net) by anny.lostinspace.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6648D1B67ED for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 12:35:40 +0100 (CET) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.1 anny.lostinspace.de 6648D1B67ED Authentication-Results: anny.lostinspace.de; dmarc=none header.from=fechner.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=fechner.net; s=default; t=1455622540; bh=i1yzuGh+w7tWzKKTNbuKghOmUhd55X3kQ4UI+bWka7Q=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=Kf48h0UBsh176KW6SNVytBcIph+N6HyI6l+SxsJdTv5/N4oVqyPfOTo6JbSncNvLV Y/2H71Jg3CwbpcZJGKm5LII3IUgDsNCedDteNckYupMDkp6vP5qghcnStxog2Px1XG QZVk2AD0/LTj7TdtcApqLLoCIa3+dzl/ez+6rFXw= Received: from [192.168.0.151] (aftr-88-217-181-61.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.181.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.idefix.lan (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DA9A7DF631 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 12:35:39 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: New user/group in /usr/ports/UIDs and /usr/ports/GIDs To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <56BF0836.6050507@fechner.net> <56C19E13.70203@fechner.net> <20160215094919.GI26283@home.opsec.eu> <56C1E8B3.8090301@fechner.net> <20160215152445.GK26283@home.opsec.eu> <56C25563.2090806@fechner.net> <56C25AAB.6000501@gmail.com> <56C2DB83.2090801@fechner.net> <20160216110428.GP26283@home.opsec.eu> From: Matthias Fechner Message-ID: <56C30981.2010307@fechner.net> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 12:35:29 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160216110428.GP26283@home.opsec.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:35:44 -0000 Am 16.02.2016 um 12:04 schrieb Kurt Jaeger: > Done. Thanks a lot! Gruß Matthias -- "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning." -- Rich Cook From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Feb 16 12:32:19 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 959D9AA9312 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 12:32:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jim@ohlste.in) Received: from mail-qg0-x231.google.com (mail-qg0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A79C1AC1 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 12:32:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jim@ohlste.in) Received: by mail-qg0-x231.google.com with SMTP id y9so132538176qgd.3 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 04:32:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ohlste-in.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=k1oSWe7cio1Da+h2111y5lnS3LFWuDJs8EEbJ4KxFHk=; b=DDz+02BAmweQJ87i0t1UCJ+OVCDNnmwwbpUVeqR5zdUuNHVFQFr/xNLja1qgLLhiuk FFr97c6XhE/Gihp9UZqbLwL+NO2N147Kk/XvAMcDn3EHQUFDRzoZ4yIiWkR3/jPUthUc J+WwmF/DrGi7urgBwAD84wLOcwQJg5hXggPcx1MhI0tBjiMjjO+w3ZyL2bv2LCqo70K3 yAWqOhUYEkkDUHRQZYH4i/a3IjIM9da//4D9SP4q9aFns5vBTMESAPAWcrnkrwLpKGKT 7CASNkihdlbDJwbasyhNp1Z+S7a50ISmCyR/g1ZGLJ/qD4gBO7FSweoh+Y+46axxHq0D M3vQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=k1oSWe7cio1Da+h2111y5lnS3LFWuDJs8EEbJ4KxFHk=; b=LOOFKmNHOIp7vGqy7tuwq+C2Yd8TmoQyuqnXktExudKLSV6R86V6d5RB1zNXW0P3Qf GRa/M9Kt6VDSxWtyc0/HwUZaoK5Bt0J0dQHVMEJB5m4bdX7DZsWUHcDhQU+gDGBpkm/2 0HR1bvZndxxr8oGeMo0Idm9djAN8DCz/3pCMZs/342+ze4qBpBHVd/OpEWGxTXdCZXo5 4v489vdfLQ0W++fYgs30biLFUSppPvahrSVkH/KmubFDAjrAIeuMQTmCgseSCuOIcIJ/ tS+qvoh87Psm14Q5FlmtMQqlk9Rd3fEb2Zj+FniTmC04hGkz87taAKMU/ki9GwWeb9Vb Oz1Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSVIAe1B2WFJO/mkYDY7g9qlhIOtgRDP/mfNA+EFnd4X8etz6it1/PGgta+T0Kj3A== X-Received: by 10.140.92.111 with SMTP id a102mr26988858qge.92.1455625938220; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 04:32:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.18] (pool-96-249-243-37.nrflva.fios.verizon.net. [96.249.243.37]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id t187sm12945615qht.39.2016.02.16.04.32.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 16 Feb 2016 04:32:17 -0800 (PST) To: ports FreeBSD , miwi@FreeBSD.org, Kurt Jaeger From: Jim Ohlstein Subject: Recent update breaks php70-extensions Message-ID: <56C316D0.7000600@ohlste.in> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 07:32:16 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 12:32:19 -0000 Hello, A recent commit has resulted in at least two extensions not building: php70-imap and php70-openssl. Same ultimate error is seen in both: test: no: unexpected operator test: /usr/local: unexpected operator checking for pkg-config... no configure: error: Cannot find OpenSSL's ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. The missing file is present in the poudriere jail: # locate evp.h | grep jail /poudriere/jails/10amd64/usr/include/openssl/evp.h /poudriere/jails/10amd64/usr/src/crypto/heimdal/doc/doxyout/hcrypto/html/group__hcrypto__evp.html /poudriere/jails/10amd64/usr/src/crypto/heimdal/doc/doxyout/hcrypto/html/page_evp.html /poudriere/jails/10amd64/usr/src/crypto/openssl/crypto/evp/evp.h /poudriere/jails/10amd64/usr/src/sys/boot/efi/include/efidevp.h but not in the jail's /usr/local/include/openssl/ sub-directory where it should be since I have 'WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes' in the make.conf for that build. I have confirmed that OpenSSL port is present in that repo. Both extensions built properly previously. Not sure if it's the latest commit or the initial one as I had previously built these extensions from the pre-commit versions obtained from miwi@'s git repo. -- Jim Ohlstein "Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference." - Mark Twain From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Feb 16 12:51:43 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6346CAA9B83 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 12:51:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from miwi.fbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk0-x229.google.com (mail-vk0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DC68129F for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 12:51:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from miwi.fbsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vk0-x229.google.com with SMTP id e6so131770150vkh.2 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 04:51:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=xhGVPM1b8onWvQ20/laPFNRZKAH55IIsVVGKLSdUHUQ=; b=b1rqSSOXPQW68wbrXDDTODDBpjvn5llzDy5pCLGKw30cUHHtGa8H3TLG8iFW2LJ3he hc4opHzpISOcG480pgmssuf6hVjLzjZfUU1k2ZHxi4LPUC67bY0uqiVdQ8c3AwEU0qEa kLh0tsEE9t1kXe7N9ujCDDPHn03xFoh52RbTJ2sFfWonkgJoB7rjPPjzyI68e6BPyjgB lYCjgUge+4vTgv+7gg57T4CI5jd0NdTN1Kvb4/hVPpXcID/zU6t3qrfaii9y6YNUoqsM WrnaeF9XrI0KhIJw4r5iis5gWJPWnmV24Q7Oi6apNwlOsPUHTxflQo8hifLKjWL6YxKH vmig== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=xhGVPM1b8onWvQ20/laPFNRZKAH55IIsVVGKLSdUHUQ=; b=C7Uw2Vyd1yAONQ2mcGqtj3aoj3B4qnYkwVkf7/PnWrLN0Z8Il4KvzHt7IMnauB/PTx IRBgT3UJO9Z2CW3X61AVFHqcEpIJrE/7yrj7IK5uC21lUpXf1d3COU/ISByZABhvJj9S WT75ss7A7/LcSE4wqVl0gEPA5m9VK7bo4LacjXsRQxzaDNaNi4F2lrL+11LBSkQv0ILT hLNYt9KkorRGCAQlpTJYF9rtoTvS1s3Tg3fvyOfPQBs7YAzd0nbseWdj2713f16BiJOO a9ueBsKKaiRM39x+ncTWaVZnOEYYWmaULsL2D4Zzp1nsxDEMh/3ckTsSfToxwFUMhWDO scdQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSFyYprH8tTRlHIW81Bsm5Ulx593KHq1hEZNR55keNDPnSgql9TeckxYAz9LMkA36zjjKpyY86ldqTsZQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.31.141.2 with SMTP id p2mr17541361vkd.37.1455627101991; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 04:51:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.176.7.70 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 04:51:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.176.7.70 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 04:51:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <56C316D0.7000600@ohlste.in> References: <56C316D0.7000600@ohlste.in> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:51:41 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Recent update breaks php70-extensions From: Martin Wilke To: Jim Ohlstein Cc: ports FreeBSD , Kurt Jaeger Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 12:51:43 -0000 hi, please update your portstree i have fixed the problem around 30 mins ago. thanks On Feb 16, 2016 20:32, "Jim Ohlstein" wrote: > Hello, > > A recent commit has resulted in at least two extensions not building: > php70-imap and php70-openssl. Same ultimate error is seen in both: > > > test: no: unexpected operator > test: /usr/local: unexpected operator > checking for pkg-config... no > configure: error: Cannot find OpenSSL's > ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. > > > The missing file is present in the poudriere jail: > > # locate evp.h | grep jail > /poudriere/jails/10amd64/usr/include/openssl/evp.h > > /poudriere/jails/10amd64/usr/src/crypto/heimdal/doc/doxyout/hcrypto/html/group__hcrypto__evp.html > > /poudriere/jails/10amd64/usr/src/crypto/heimdal/doc/doxyout/hcrypto/html/page_evp.html > /poudriere/jails/10amd64/usr/src/crypto/openssl/crypto/evp/evp.h > /poudriere/jails/10amd64/usr/src/sys/boot/efi/include/efidevp.h > > but not in the jail's /usr/local/include/openssl/ sub-directory where it > should be since I have 'WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes' in the make.conf for that > build. I have confirmed that OpenSSL port is present in that repo. > > Both extensions built properly previously. Not sure if it's the latest > commit or the initial one as I had previously built these extensions from > the pre-commit versions obtained from miwi@'s git repo. > > -- > Jim Ohlstein > > > "Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the > difference." - Mark Twain > From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Feb 16 13:35:29 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A431AAAFAD for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 13:35:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jim@ohlste.in) Received: from mail-qg0-x234.google.com (mail-qg0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F019C1CBC for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 13:35:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jim@ohlste.in) Received: by mail-qg0-x234.google.com with SMTP id b67so132749024qgb.1 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 05:35:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ohlste-in.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JmPETuZgjxvuTZx8rRwTZCFJNdUBw2VS6eFWXnWwzI8=; b=FDEmxtDjm2SVTvlYbVtD5WI6A0sM46KYzZ8OMKeQ6ODDq1Zhtcv/Tn7F9DRpA1xNBH dPGa2NH4WJBl/ThvufzJNXp9vWiqyOiBocIg2SjSsJT8Md90mGE9LzKxf3wMsXcXVg/6 AkO6v3fUh5fACH1jVtIXmkbaGglGC3cAGx/jY5cwLA64VO2x/H8Fe9LPO2f7qtHUeW9W zLqhqp9Ntid3H0WndXjkL55Vx1oCgMF/rknXSPiAbiJm0FK4Oxpf8JBF+QWR57f3f+Jc 7xTN7jpsQZnCZ0P5RiFNGTWmZ+/DTVbGbH6gua4GtUTDd9qw+oakE1xscGDw9KytQzsA t4Xw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=JmPETuZgjxvuTZx8rRwTZCFJNdUBw2VS6eFWXnWwzI8=; b=Xqa1wct2F6jKyrxRWa8S0H/kIJmn9zALmka6IJM3s+GztnYl1U1Zx7F+sJgqeD05z8 3pJRsaNSH8oOhRCumEdOe8+qACatutM/6+8G7gz1HI2a0iisCtQeV+f70tlaO09ER9oF S/5pRAgJrsSaQ+ElEKDTiVwG2h6rl1uIrRV0hYahMsTtHHYw9tQ50u00hncc6SFFMO6P LbKVX25mQXIUQQzi2+6DhQIbreeDtavorqsvuRmKSi3waNauPGleE/19WCsUZAPQz/EH ks4GGjHPd1Tyn5EZHVGjspaOUHttlpa7MSjJAXdUHsChdY1MQdBWW2V28Itf/KmPP+A9 Cveg== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTjgRhav1XL4jp5g+XtsUaURTp9Zr2rkucxyCfr9lBQjmASnL3POe3b23XWNK7S1g== X-Received: by 10.140.82.146 with SMTP id h18mr27655989qgd.26.1455629727765; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 05:35:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.18] (pool-96-249-243-37.nrflva.fios.verizon.net. [96.249.243.37]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 197sm7494492qhr.36.2016.02.16.05.35.26 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 16 Feb 2016 05:35:27 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Recent update breaks php70-extensions To: Martin Wilke References: <56C316D0.7000600@ohlste.in> Cc: ports FreeBSD From: Jim Ohlstein Message-ID: <56C3259D.6080201@ohlste.in> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 08:35:25 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 13:35:29 -0000 Hello, On 2/16/16 7:51 AM, Martin Wilke wrote: > hi, > > please update your portstree i have fixed the problem around 30 mins ago. > > thanks That took care of that. There is another issue. When building the mysql extensions (I build both php70-mysqli and php70-pdo_mysql) a dependency on mysql-client is created for all extensions built through that. So using poudriere I see: [00:00:05] ====>> Checking packages for incremental rebuild needed [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting owncloud-8.2.2.txz: missing dependency: mariadb101-client-10.1.11 [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-bz2-7.0.3_2.txz: missing dependency: mariadb101-client-10.1.11 [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-bcmath-7.0.3_2.txz: missing dependency: mariadb101-client-10.1.11 [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-curl-7.0.3_2.txz: missing dependency: mariadb101-client-10.1.11 [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-ctype-7.0.3_2.txz: missing dependency: mariadb101-client-10.1.11 [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-calendar-7.0.3_2.txz: missing dependency: mariadb101-client-10.1.11 [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-dom-7.0.3_2.txz: missing dependency: mariadb101-client-10.1.11 [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-exif-7.0.3_2.txz: missing dependency: mariadb101-client-10.1.11 [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-fileinfo-7.0.3_2.txz: missing dependency: mariadb101-client-10.1.11 [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-extensions-1.1.txz: missing dependency: php70-bz2-7.0.3_2 [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-filter-7.0.3_2.txz: missing dependency: mariadb101-client-10.1.11 [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-ftp-7.0.3_2.txz: missing dependency: mariadb101-client-10.1.11 [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-gd-7.0.3_2.txz: missing dependency: mariadb101-client-10.1.11 [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-iconv-7.0.3_2.txz: missing dependency: mariadb101-client-10.1.11 [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-hash-7.0.3_2.txz: missing dependency: mariadb101-client-10.1.11 [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-imap-7.0.3_2.txz: missing dependency: mariadb101-client-10.1.11 etc. I don't recall that behavior from php56-extensions metaportw. > > On Feb 16, 2016 20:32, "Jim Ohlstein" > wrote: > > Hello, > > A recent commit has resulted in at least two extensions not > building: php70-imap and php70-openssl. Same ultimate error is seen > in both: > > > test: no: unexpected operator > test: /usr/local: unexpected operator > checking for pkg-config... no > configure: error: Cannot find OpenSSL's > ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. > > > The missing file is present in the poudriere jail: > > # locate evp.h | grep jail > /poudriere/jails/10amd64/usr/include/openssl/evp.h > /poudriere/jails/10amd64/usr/src/crypto/heimdal/doc/doxyout/hcrypto/html/group__hcrypto__evp.html > /poudriere/jails/10amd64/usr/src/crypto/heimdal/doc/doxyout/hcrypto/html/page_evp.html > /poudriere/jails/10amd64/usr/src/crypto/openssl/crypto/evp/evp.h > /poudriere/jails/10amd64/usr/src/sys/boot/efi/include/efidevp.h > > but not in the jail's /usr/local/include/openssl/ sub-directory > where it should be since I have 'WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes' in the > make.conf for that build. I have confirmed that OpenSSL port is > present in that repo. > > Both extensions built properly previously. Not sure if it's the > latest commit or the initial one as I had previously built these > extensions from the pre-commit versions obtained from miwi@'s git repo. > -- Jim Ohlstein "Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference." - Mark Twain From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Feb 16 15:41:25 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94BF9AAAA9C for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:41:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from miwi.fbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk0-x22c.google.com (mail-vk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5795912CB for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:41:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from miwi.fbsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id e185so136432631vkb.1 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 07:41:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=ezhu34DjV3IJrWQQBsySz+GHWrxJNgbrYXrktc2yPoE=; b=jLX8UzwudPChbGd1C1Vl0vMapsg1P/lM3iTdUfiaH/0NVQbNNOag9hpzENd26qOPHu Bp1Cva49ypMmtcg6E6K70uSJbE9ZphkTtjsu/PtLgtSBjqXIqQjuStChnT908t19Dlwo 0K1VhOcFwsfJEYm5OpfYIOjdQu0MKCfm1lPSFd8MynBiYonhpmDh4Nv24G68rTI9fB4e E8Q1PQyLc8/zlVWMjtSnSVEeER55xkdC2HUjw7RiFqAgLu645W0IJADjT2V9MtqkUyQw 03hkR+zcCTaz1MNv86ayltiIEhCoSbr9z/TRB7NntSL++ZercgIKS7hTJDaDGILOouKA zGDA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ezhu34DjV3IJrWQQBsySz+GHWrxJNgbrYXrktc2yPoE=; b=DbBpqfKgfzi0XSJvQtFarx+E5Bd6sQwrkcWKhCDjhjuw9paNPm1BgWsr76LpUwAg2O YCKUnwXLe0s6magj6y6HROyHlfH1ZDOZ6fcMwBtUOpKIT4WFF9mEG1rtwhxpohpu1gXW fKy/Osf40YrEm0PFmbizjrTQGlaX7oPlXFqmvyKBDf+a4pq+a/6rYNOJHIkXtfRMdN6g gJItIw1IeH9u5+Cw0JdClrzJgoQgGy2y2yx5JMgyUoDDzFwjqqAaihiLp1K/nR4rPeRg dE3i+ukI7sLvb9SqQGVIycL1dRyK6DBqkXzrOf86PuokCxXZz9Lg9xhXrr9nECi1Ge1p TViQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTbxxKzrHY+c3oWK/1gq0qJdLoW0u9PHwNsakN2EZmwBi2LkHl2W75QAD/GpdudTNdwC5hLeL/H8lwCWw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.31.141.2 with SMTP id p2mr18376733vkd.37.1455637284251; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 07:41:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.176.7.70 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 07:41:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <56C3259D.6080201@ohlste.in> References: <56C316D0.7000600@ohlste.in> <56C3259D.6080201@ohlste.in> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 23:41:24 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Recent update breaks php70-extensions From: Martin Wilke To: Jim Ohlstein Cc: ports FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:41:25 -0000 Hi, Can you please checkout the portstree again. It should be fixed in _3. Thanks. On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Jim Ohlstein wrote: > Hello, > > On 2/16/16 7:51 AM, Martin Wilke wrote: > >> hi, >> >> please update your portstree i have fixed the problem around 30 mins ago. >> >> thanks >> > > That took care of that. There is another issue. When building the mysql > extensions (I build both php70-mysqli and php70-pdo_mysql) a dependency on > mysql-client is created for all extensions built through that. So using > poudriere I see: > > [00:00:05] ====>> Checking packages for incremental rebuild needed > [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting owncloud-8.2.2.txz: missing dependency: > mariadb101-client-10.1.11 > [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-bz2-7.0.3_2.txz: missing dependency: > mariadb101-client-10.1.11 > [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-bcmath-7.0.3_2.txz: missing dependency: > mariadb101-client-10.1.11 > [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-curl-7.0.3_2.txz: missing dependency: > mariadb101-client-10.1.11 > [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-ctype-7.0.3_2.txz: missing dependency: > mariadb101-client-10.1.11 > [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-calendar-7.0.3_2.txz: missing dependency: > mariadb101-client-10.1.11 > [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-dom-7.0.3_2.txz: missing dependency: > mariadb101-client-10.1.11 > [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-exif-7.0.3_2.txz: missing dependency: > mariadb101-client-10.1.11 > [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-fileinfo-7.0.3_2.txz: missing dependency: > mariadb101-client-10.1.11 > [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-extensions-1.1.txz: missing dependency: > php70-bz2-7.0.3_2 > [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-filter-7.0.3_2.txz: missing dependency: > mariadb101-client-10.1.11 > [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-ftp-7.0.3_2.txz: missing dependency: > mariadb101-client-10.1.11 > [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-gd-7.0.3_2.txz: missing dependency: > mariadb101-client-10.1.11 > [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-iconv-7.0.3_2.txz: missing dependency: > mariadb101-client-10.1.11 > [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-hash-7.0.3_2.txz: missing dependency: > mariadb101-client-10.1.11 > [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-imap-7.0.3_2.txz: missing dependency: > mariadb101-client-10.1.11 > > etc. > > I don't recall that behavior from php56-extensions metaportw. > > > >> On Feb 16, 2016 20:32, "Jim Ohlstein" > > wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> A recent commit has resulted in at least two extensions not >> building: php70-imap and php70-openssl. Same ultimate error is seen >> in both: >> >> >> test: no: unexpected operator >> test: /usr/local: unexpected operator >> checking for pkg-config... no >> configure: error: Cannot find OpenSSL's >> ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. >> >> >> The missing file is present in the poudriere jail: >> >> # locate evp.h | grep jail >> /poudriere/jails/10amd64/usr/include/openssl/evp.h >> >> /poudriere/jails/10amd64/usr/src/crypto/heimdal/doc/doxyout/hcrypto/html/group__hcrypto__evp.html >> >> /poudriere/jails/10amd64/usr/src/crypto/heimdal/doc/doxyout/hcrypto/html/page_evp.html >> /poudriere/jails/10amd64/usr/src/crypto/openssl/crypto/evp/evp.h >> /poudriere/jails/10amd64/usr/src/sys/boot/efi/include/efidevp.h >> >> but not in the jail's /usr/local/include/openssl/ sub-directory >> where it should be since I have 'WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes' in the >> make.conf for that build. I have confirmed that OpenSSL port is >> present in that repo. >> >> Both extensions built properly previously. Not sure if it's the >> latest commit or the initial one as I had previously built these >> extensions from the pre-commit versions obtained from miwi@'s git >> repo. >> >> > -- > Jim Ohlstein > > > "Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the > difference." - Mark Twain > -- +-----------------oOO--(_)--OOo-------------------------+ With best Regards, Martin Wilke (miwi_(at)_FreeBSD.org) Mess with the Best, Die like the Rest From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Feb 16 16:36:04 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8B5CAAA3F2 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 16:36:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jim@ohlste.in) Received: from mail-qk0-x235.google.com (mail-qk0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB2CA1C53 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 16:36:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jim@ohlste.in) Received: by mail-qk0-x235.google.com with SMTP id x1so68432948qkc.1 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 08:36:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ohlste-in.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9xj5CTWjbyyeGZFT7ytYrJppF+w4SREWx6NbstXvqRE=; b=wO6+2kfz//+0XK98yil9INjYh5CHny6Qa6OyfNj7WfTyf+gHPJQAyRIAZH5qJlfd37 2siqINHKz2QNlkodZD53PApW5qwO5i/1SOB2qlhz/94UuK7OgoOwYUT001oNx6uq09Jn 50W+KlfjsDmsRyK5GDHpiD1CK/d3tDVX0sJxcHyQ739OQYg9v4RB5Y9cPdKHW5spqfyP G2ygnJbzG5EXOp3ij3wVcoaerK3z/NuqYWYITUy3Cs/qYXVrlDVvGyvx761vssrB6Sl7 bmNBya87ZsBWP1nhvQwmC8pgPrLSSdaxeOGQOhq+2bOsdUCt4PmIWk9Y6TiU03P1efkI EUrw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9xj5CTWjbyyeGZFT7ytYrJppF+w4SREWx6NbstXvqRE=; b=ILTyNAZ3pTj9iHUc0pS+2xddFv28VwnitoJA1TeOQS25uFbKAKbFiAt+cLCD6EsYUK G5ZNINokm6mUZD+GpMvwddnOlgcy/YZgbitfEry4S7Pt2ZOC3+6hUTCBevzr7DnQ8SFz 7pnmHMTM0ElalHzQXzcDwkZ1g4yEM+108pYxwLes8M04xlPZ3rMqkjQmKD2VE13FbqKr eWHbfFIHPzQ7P5NridXHG4hUAR+NXxZFe2l4SH3845vr4UXMFjskrDJ1alTx2mmgj0ls LtXXfmlVQlPdLfZoKHMd6Svv/1aucfytENyeyzmBJe/AfKzwMyUMFTON4iepi28VaocL Vm5w== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORawclWyPQflEeXqWd2xAuHm/7Z0FLBOCAWGngHN1jdWVlRJs99CIvSQX1bq8NLZg== X-Received: by 10.55.195.149 with SMTP id r21mr27554779qkl.59.1455640562422; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 08:36:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.18] (pool-96-249-243-37.nrflva.fios.verizon.net. [96.249.243.37]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 197sm7838852qhr.36.2016.02.16.08.36.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 16 Feb 2016 08:36:01 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Recent update breaks php70-extensions To: Martin Wilke References: <56C316D0.7000600@ohlste.in> <56C3259D.6080201@ohlste.in> Cc: ports FreeBSD From: Jim Ohlstein Message-ID: <56C34FF0.6010302@ohlste.in> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:36:00 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 16:36:04 -0000 Hello, On 2/16/16 10:41 AM, Martin Wilke wrote: > Hi, > > Can you please checkout the portstree again. It should be fixed in _3. > > Thanks. > Resolved. Thanks! > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Jim Ohlstein > wrote: > > Hello, > > On 2/16/16 7:51 AM, Martin Wilke wrote: > > hi, > > please update your portstree i have fixed the problem around 30 > mins ago. > > thanks > > > That took care of that. There is another issue. When building the > mysql extensions (I build both php70-mysqli and php70-pdo_mysql) a > dependency on mysql-client is created for all extensions built > through that. So using poudriere I see: > > [00:00:05] ====>> Checking packages for incremental rebuild needed > [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting owncloud-8.2.2.txz: missing dependency: > mariadb101-client-10.1.11 > [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-bz2-7.0.3_2.txz: missing > dependency: mariadb101-client-10.1.11 > [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-bcmath-7.0.3_2.txz: missing > dependency: mariadb101-client-10.1.11 > [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-curl-7.0.3_2.txz: missing > dependency: mariadb101-client-10.1.11 > [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-ctype-7.0.3_2.txz: missing > dependency: mariadb101-client-10.1.11 > [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-calendar-7.0.3_2.txz: missing > dependency: mariadb101-client-10.1.11 > [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-dom-7.0.3_2.txz: missing > dependency: mariadb101-client-10.1.11 > [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-exif-7.0.3_2.txz: missing > dependency: mariadb101-client-10.1.11 > [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-fileinfo-7.0.3_2.txz: missing > dependency: mariadb101-client-10.1.11 > [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-extensions-1.1.txz: missing > dependency: php70-bz2-7.0.3_2 > [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-filter-7.0.3_2.txz: missing > dependency: mariadb101-client-10.1.11 > [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-ftp-7.0.3_2.txz: missing > dependency: mariadb101-client-10.1.11 > [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-gd-7.0.3_2.txz: missing dependency: > mariadb101-client-10.1.11 > [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-iconv-7.0.3_2.txz: missing > dependency: mariadb101-client-10.1.11 > [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-hash-7.0.3_2.txz: missing > dependency: mariadb101-client-10.1.11 > [00:00:07] ====>> Deleting php70-imap-7.0.3_2.txz: missing > dependency: mariadb101-client-10.1.11 > > etc. > > I don't recall that behavior from php56-extensions metaportw. > > > > On Feb 16, 2016 20:32, "Jim Ohlstein" > >> wrote: > > Hello, > > A recent commit has resulted in at least two extensions not > building: php70-imap and php70-openssl. Same ultimate error > is seen > in both: > > > test: no: unexpected operator > test: /usr/local: unexpected operator > checking for pkg-config... no > configure: error: Cannot find OpenSSL's > ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. > > > The missing file is present in the poudriere jail: > > # locate evp.h | grep jail > /poudriere/jails/10amd64/usr/include/openssl/evp.h > > /poudriere/jails/10amd64/usr/src/crypto/heimdal/doc/doxyout/hcrypto/html/group__hcrypto__evp.html > > /poudriere/jails/10amd64/usr/src/crypto/heimdal/doc/doxyout/hcrypto/html/page_evp.html > > /poudriere/jails/10amd64/usr/src/crypto/openssl/crypto/evp/evp.h > /poudriere/jails/10amd64/usr/src/sys/boot/efi/include/efidevp.h > > but not in the jail's /usr/local/include/openssl/ sub-directory > where it should be since I have 'WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes' in the > make.conf for that build. I have confirmed that OpenSSL port is > present in that repo. > > Both extensions built properly previously. Not sure if it's the > latest commit or the initial one as I had previously built > these > extensions from the pre-commit versions obtained from > miwi@'s git repo. -- Jim Ohlstein "Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference." - Mark Twain From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Feb 16 19:08:24 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC70CAAA86D for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 19:08:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com (mail-wm0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A9211D18 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 19:08:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id g62so167021467wme.0 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:08:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=h7bVlCS8L3RNIFYEFLPqrMrIstdmYGwXhTlTFlmjFgk=; b=V3hdlyQaA9twXCIdWnLNpWj53JrP0fGA/t4lSTdaIVlEmVEPYbXkj+Ax+B8tMBRzf9 9/wVsWlu48P68CWWIi8a4xi17TCGB2yo+EnaYrGdgqvYa1Vvn+MZwbsJjf/jfe5y8mJB HX+/03HWSjlJOm8Q/OgNa7qV3ltOEUySutEOnwumQp9P2zztD/GgLgaNmUImxGT3+AzP tPnLL0ZnuMbojIet2VzVjskoQzce/43IcDel51HvNef5jufS1hl7iwSQ2VOBdFXwZTGB 13mE2xC9Hu7vDLE+6Ia+04mbdc4s/ysvVrn6ULWl08i0klSAhUHW5+YL5GOHnPWXLWNd +KWw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=h7bVlCS8L3RNIFYEFLPqrMrIstdmYGwXhTlTFlmjFgk=; b=ZW+6Js1zBFjZE1xDDcMtZSLpUOPkv9XBn3mMqUAO2Lkl6oCC/WiKOCGuggO7wUy1B3 oI6+vYve0UZ5JmerUnK217tfTZ3bQBxpweoRdb/0Du8LfI8C8eIMgqt8VvyTvVenkqPQ 29qDtww8KBzoprBpROTS/czw/YWWc4Kf2aHnK1BCb8ziIa0+l/+F0r0kJ3ZT2XnDh5Xk phN6th/FQqYJjGFnJlzqXdCjQehftdV3XUMcyEAajzE1/yh/i2EUDpLyNglYljYbdmzP HoE5G8hK3rTZ+6etDhWwm19SLyODPUjalo6pFRof2m8Aci6uhFzvyu3QHnLWxzIK7AY8 La2Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQnXU63MVLzX5N+Oc98pYJsYX/NxVrdSg8UnXDe3cFnwnanmNeizL9jmRFkLlsONP59NlZVo/pOP1WWMw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.28.30.198 with SMTP id e189mr20052152wme.60.1455649702979; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:08:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.27.46.71 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:08:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:08:22 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Looking committer for PR From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=C3=ADa?= To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 19:08:24 -0000 Hi, Can a committer have a look at this PR? https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207114 Thanks! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Feb 16 19:23:56 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E25DAAB083 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 19:23:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from douglaswth@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-x22f.google.com (mail-pa0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E35F6DAD for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 19:23:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from douglaswth@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pa0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id ho8so109633649pac.2 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:23:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:openpgp:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Kj+W0BZSuZj1iydETtTIvKBf8D4lkppQRoxEODf8rfs=; b=0Y/a/GCwtPfM15cOA0JHWxb7Ij1/n/TXj6C0G+ZUU+u6Ll+fIYmyg9U/kC9giztOy6 SDO8sIXYUvklJ4ZnOu6O+k/iT9CK+OP4EyiG1MxYcUgOmsYVzBhpZCUeFBDQxP1uPIrO xpP+wOharr68Q3Y4drJlfrIH1m29ZegpvY6g0oCrt/0php+uIGjDYApzNgs3lYxdphqb IzkYr+WlRKhPZE7TV/QQQAoRYKw8mvoK/8JXQ7RYxVFHa4rSqfLZ6CtSKByWvSEtnH+K IKs9t+KiLaQieAnOwWRftswN6YpwFeDNQOIVMQoC7/h6igORc4vmLCUdFX8YpbR5v6Fy v4kw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:openpgp:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Kj+W0BZSuZj1iydETtTIvKBf8D4lkppQRoxEODf8rfs=; b=f7XjiWQeC4KON0rlYfRnZe75jaUo3Xjts8fOd2DCX1P1UCN/3e5zX1DJuEYCo3YvWM P+0v/GTATFeWmw93OM4x1hTOi54sSURa3LipY8ZL6zeUvFuy1gdlRzxpErBwc6k4GvZ+ rBPYLkuayY422+HD4ZVyA6XXl9LBcNZqhMiubcIfXFZBUDmYAT9qNA+0sldhDIB5G+HB mJwERUs+nU75qHxgD80vbr4rCIM2r9avlcyDO041Rgqzh1qCIemR1ggDovKFA71pujwI 0fJ++osSkijfHiugW5yD7Yssc0ICiSyvP/yfvO7AC9b1MbsrAwUB2+aaY62b+ZLqQwMS 6xsQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQh85fuBIHXx7QDcI5Vrf27sw/N5zo5N5e6euZ64cRulkSzWg1AfpAs7jVQC50puw== X-Received: by 10.66.101.36 with SMTP id fd4mr33844992pab.76.1455650635428; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:23:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.10.13.81] ([173.227.0.2]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id i13sm47516341pfi.95.2016.02.16.11.23.54 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:23:54 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: New user/group in /usr/ports/UIDs and /usr/ports/GIDs To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <56BF0836.6050507@fechner.net> <56C19E13.70203@fechner.net> <20160215094919.GI26283@home.opsec.eu> <56C1E8B3.8090301@fechner.net> <20160215152445.GK26283@home.opsec.eu> <56C25563.2090806@fechner.net> <56C25AAB.6000501@gmail.com> <56C2DB83.2090801@fechner.net> From: Douglas Thrift Openpgp: id=09C4DA9A5BB7640FFB409623627BA4D834176159 X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <56C37737.3040600@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:23:35 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56C2DB83.2090801@fechner.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 19:23:56 -0000 On 2/16/2016 12:19 AM, Matthias Fechner wrote: > Am 16.02.2016 um 00:09 schrieb Douglas Thrift: >> I mentioned this already on that ticket, but why use the user "gogs" >> instead of "git" which is already used by the gitosis and gitolite >> ports? That seems like a more standard thing to see in your git urls: >> >> git clone git@example.com vs git clone gogs@example.com > > I already answered it in the ticket: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207206#c2 > > hope that is fine. > > > Gruß > Matthias > Hello, While your arguments for user isolation make sense, they really only make sense if you were to be using gitolite or gitosis at the same time as gogs which I imagine would not be that common. I am not opposed to you having a gogs user on your system, but I think that the default user defined by the port should reflect a reasonable default for most people, and that user is git not gogs, even the gogs documentation directs you to use the git user. -- Douglas William Thrift From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Feb 16 19:44:51 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD321AAB788 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 19:44:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk0-x229.google.com (mail-vk0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7046A1BBC for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 19:44:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vk0-x229.google.com with SMTP id e6so143000078vkh.2 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:44:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=OAyZxOoKRdqcctuZcxDSQ6VVwvemxLaauvuCjG6KNqM=; b=uo7kW1gWHBk47fveTdi1DB0tjQ6nVxQStTBCSHoKVuHsy3V/EygCMf2l8pKBoNnwSi z9yXqd0xD0Wt0IDAEp2qK5gmIQMdfcNbqhv9Xd0ZC4KEwx/rDP16OMgtDNVesUZHRiHZ i+Y2UP/OvBK8DUXTu9LEF65jTChnPkm9v7Ea7t1m6SQ2N+xGRtPEiH1SpyVzOiBbUr25 Iozxr/XRRWN2MfGbO4Add2eEvAU91Q6V4EQhJ9D7w6tgq/nhXMIrIUpqnlxiIDBo6Uu1 2/3xBO6Op6WFN2ox24jo/rd//+mmrI4pebt1K574Kb/9E/90NjouKvy+zOIulv84WGRR YeGA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=OAyZxOoKRdqcctuZcxDSQ6VVwvemxLaauvuCjG6KNqM=; b=QNC/oNQItkdRXikchwOHI54zHO8gq6YY6MDkGUyFtuszWPruIxIF9F4H4cNArP+dHA nOEPQsgIbRnsn9xOyYEbqrZoCXLJxSCz7uBocm3QCfwA9VYtePQ73oqhfj7bW3iIa4Q/ Az40wcWsDXPVrASAA9529wxLZIymhrq5qU94DpIUp3sw92KV7BOB845nASPOlKyW8p5U jwh5qgc9cclbxgJJ8RJ3JQDbS9inAm0et/crUMUhPWWb4UTNoVl9GmwJRU2S1hZ8mDRY 5eJk86/hBz1oAN+7qOXpiuD19awWG1vTc9CUhnVOoBdXgH1nCm11Lns4gBZOKiDxMReD okaA== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTc2YZCnlIrZ8eu+VVHUIwFT+KNYS592McoUhEwlahdCMExyDiLGb0vhrDP7mIsVRHTCiGCZ8dOu/fIAA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.31.163.68 with SMTP id m65mr19198726vke.85.1455651890330; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:44:50 -0800 (PST) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.176.67.37 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:44:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20160216155722.GA63934@neutralgood.org> References: <56C1E579.30303@marino.st> <20160215165952.6199743BFA@shepard.synsport.net> <56C2075A.5000409@marino.st> <20160216155722.GA63934@neutralgood.org> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:44:50 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: BZoI-LiLxqJ6G9VYcKdyoU5DokI Message-ID: Subject: Re: Removing documentation From: Kevin Oberman To: kpneal@pobox.com Cc: John Marino , Roger Marquis , FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 19:44:51 -0000 On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 7:57 AM, wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 06:14:02PM +0100, John Marino wrote: > > And now the fully circle. This is FreeBSD's Godwin's law. You know the > > discussion is over when somebody says that "[issue] of the day" is the > > root cause of BSD being eclipsed by Linux. Since I've heard [issue] > > replaced about 200 times, I'm kind of doubting it. I guess it's purpose > > is to make everyone involved with "[issue]" to feel personally > > responsible and oh what could have been if you hadn't of made the wrong > > decision.... > > I was under the impression that what really hurt BSD vs Linux was the > AT&T vs UCB lawsuit. If that lawsuit hadn't happened Linus would not have > created Linux. He's said so himself. > -- > Kevin P. Neal http://www.pobox.com/~kpn/ > Yes, the license uncertainty of the period is why Linux exists and why it gained immediate popularity. Inertia can be a wonderful thing. But that was then and this is now and the popularity of Linux vs. BSD and of various distributions of them is driven by many factors. Linux has FAR more developers and has long been able to have support for newer devices much more quickly than BSD. This has, in turn, fed the growth of Linux. OTOH, BSD had become rather popular in the embedded systems space. Its license and strong support for servers and embedded systems has helped. I think systemd has been a big mistake for Linux and is moving many people to BSD, even those who had not previously used it. In recent years the distros seem to be intent on behaving like Windows. I look at the directions of e.g. Gnome and, to a lesser extent KDE as the result of devs who grew up with Windows as trying to make their environment more "Windows like". This is combined with a philosophy that allowing and even encouraging a wide variety of configuration changes as has traditionally been the norm for all UNIX-type systems was frightening off too many people. It is a combination of these and other factors that control the ebb and flow of OS and distro popularity. I think trying to be popular is best served by maximizing functionality and usability in general and for specific purposes. In general, I think FreeBSD is doing a pretty good job ATM and, while I don't always agree with everything, I think I'll probably continue using it as my OS of choice. I'll also continue to speak up when I disagree with the direction. I already see the looming battle over a future replacement of the init system with something both more functional and manageable. I think systemd went way too heavily toward "functional" and ignored the manageable side. I hope FreeBSD does better, especially in avoiding over-reach. I see much that I like (and a fair bit I don't) in launchd, for example and I really need to keep a better eye on what NextBSD is doing. It is certainly interesting and has some really good people working on it. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Feb 16 20:33:59 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 780ACAAAA71 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:33:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F96B1FE6 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:33:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5780028438; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 21:33:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from illbsd.quip.test (ip-86-49-16-209.net.upcbroadband.cz [86.49.16.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B9342842B; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 21:33:53 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <56C387B0.2070104@quip.cz> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 21:33:52 +0100 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/35.0 SeaMonkey/2.32 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kevin Oberman CC: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Removing documentation References: <56C1E579.30303@marino.st> <20160215165952.6199743BFA@shepard.synsport.net> <56C2075A.5000409@marino.st> <20160216155722.GA63934@neutralgood.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:33:59 -0000 Kevin Oberman wrote on 02/16/2016 20:44: [...] > I already see the looming battle over a future > replacement of the init system with something both more functional and > manageable. I think systemd went way too heavily toward "functional" and > ignored the manageable side. I hope FreeBSD does better, especially in > avoiding over-reach. > > I see much that I like (and a fair bit I don't) in launchd, for example and > I really need to keep a better eye on what NextBSD is doing. It is > certainly interesting and has some really good people working on it. I see "nosh" as really interesting replacement of init and rc.d https://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2015-10-2015-12.html#The-nosh-Project http://homepage.ntlworld.com./jonathan.deboynepollard/Softwares/nosh.html It seems straight forward and I hope I will have time to test it soon. Miroslav Lachman From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Feb 17 00:41:01 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05FD0AAA01E for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 00:41:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lukasz@wasikowski.net) Received: from mail.freebsd.systems (mail.freebsd.systems [IPv6:2001:41d0:2:1276::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C68EA177B for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 00:41:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lukasz@wasikowski.net) Received: from [192.168.168.1] (89-74-168-70.dynamic.chello.pl [89.74.168.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.freebsd.systems (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5714C1B2E for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 01:40:50 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=wasikowski.net; s=default; t=1455669650; bh=4px6KHyxBRjajpdHW8OvmNonXm1g/yImeXKDbeS8LwY=; h=To:From:Date; b=ZnFeibZFW67UZhYSCxT9X5Ay53NOHZGtAT8rM5A5GNyfUNQowDN99AhyodepI9Xsn aB9uXZJ8PUcd35vipOe/wF1sZyqvJ48JRWNr8ElLgJblMh0j05a6XOsLhsdQ6kUk7l L3qB8G5QWKzA2O9FJueMS7Fr38a7VHtzyukhFxzyuNCJ4GJJ7m+MjSOM5JneLYdg4g /223vWWg9eiM9Q3FDjQyykbZZXNiV8WJZ4VxZmhPn8Sm3T+goXNjofFHtQYQkbXqwh 75NHFhCbRtuy9nRF7vKI3XlWIPAO9zbN+EhaGmQZCc8REb/Bn3usJrNiNO5fSU7Kez KX06AeucZw+2w== To: FreeBSD Mailing List From: =?UTF-8?Q?=c5=81ukasz_W=c4=85sikowski?= Subject: Looking for commiter: dns/dnstracer: Build fails on 10.2-RELEASE-p2 amd64 Message-ID: <56C3C193.4010006@wasikowski.net> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 01:40:51 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 00:41:01 -0000 Hi, I'm looking for a commiter for this PR (working patch is included): https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202824 -- best regards, Lukasz Wasikowski From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Feb 17 03:02:40 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07E31AAB6C2 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 03:02:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@dougbarton.us) Received: from dougbarton.us (dougbarton.us [IPv6:2607:f2f8:ab14::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7A351139 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 03:02:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@dougbarton.us) Received: from [IPv6:2001:4830:1a00:8056:bc9e:e80f:20ae:6dfc] (unknown [IPv6:2001:4830:1a00:8056:bc9e:e80f:20ae:6dfc]) by dougbarton.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E2C5A3A0BD; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 03:02:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=dougbarton.us; s=dkim; t=1455678159; bh=YfJcVFgQpuTOKaC6srvGOTlrav9LcAsUdHx6qQ1wPqU=; h=To:Cc:From:Subject:Date; b=sOcidEjhSOb78rdPe5CTR96Y4iTggNlEOvmXDUVqY1L3v9bbCc/T9TnkXmm5CoZhR ECGREpt7JVDjuv5ravdtI4CI0LZAoGcbjnPRDk2lHLIiPu49WTUmEqQRJD32EpTxZ9 KcucLz7+zThp/VDfW6oJFtbGerwvM+S2X3qPpP1s= To: yuri@rawbw.com Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Doug Barton Subject: Error in Makefile for games/libretro-cores Openpgp: id=E3520E149D053533C33A67DB5CC686F11A1ABC84 Message-ID: <56C3E2CD.5070103@dougbarton.us> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 19:02:37 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rsvdFtt4oTrh4F0RbD5j3aCUgca8hfwnC" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 03:02:40 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --rsvdFtt4oTrh4F0RbD5j3aCUgca8hfwnC From: Doug Barton To: yuri@rawbw.com Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <56C3E2CD.5070103@dougbarton.us> Subject: Error in Makefile for games/libretro-cores Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable There is an error in the DISTFILES line in the games/libretro-cores=20 Makefile that breaks 'make describe'. I have no idea what the error is,=20 since the line is total gibberish, but if I comment it out the error=20 goes away. hope this helps, Doug --rsvdFtt4oTrh4F0RbD5j3aCUgca8hfwnC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWw+LOAAoJEFzGhvEaGryE6JkH/RAfzppDBDG+a47sECGOHQYF ivk9GDBkrB1zZiHH4EW9+WsR1523tk8L9OP17CwAfN+PVTzfSCkj3YlDE6kSEJA9 aG6rX0Eoz4claFBYLvV8W3iboA6UGv8roAtLdtNvt0UUwATpOIIyr7467lP2rjkQ YLykBEhH3kHkTeOQ5IfypwgQdo2De+L/JB6w1EnVXJo4bcZFDI1I++fYKwzsu+SS 9XKKxjNnRrIGn1ZTCGZC9h6I5v75Xx/aRpwYNldpoyrmaN/LkPhwVxH8VoSaz+Ts blejmP4wmBhN6ZZoZky9pDNNJFUVFAyfyelJLzBtpBuNyatNWGoQTc8fsU586f8= =7TeM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rsvdFtt4oTrh4F0RbD5j3aCUgca8hfwnC-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Feb 17 03:14:10 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AD8AAABAAE for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 03:14:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@dougbarton.us) Received: from dougbarton.us (dougbarton.us [IPv6:2607:f2f8:ab14::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31DAF1595; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 03:14:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@dougbarton.us) Received: from [IPv6:2001:4830:1a00:8056:bc9e:e80f:20ae:6dfc] (unknown [IPv6:2001:4830:1a00:8056:bc9e:e80f:20ae:6dfc]) by dougbarton.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A27CD3A0BD; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 03:14:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=dougbarton.us; s=dkim; t=1455678849; bh=XCf9VY7acR3GpPVA+9iwqKZYYCLXcZZeMXorvg9/i+k=; h=From:Subject:Cc:To:Date; b=l1t6pav2/pEdS4eCxJp6jxGaDw2AzY7Mk8Vadj+PUOAEetGB4qIMqzFN+2DsJR9XA uJAW1r4f+IUVdpHbsbUsvYwZuppa4J1xwzc6nO1JXTQTtZnjHDokme6uxayxrX4n/D i8zphkFYgGe1AZt1udi60u36EPQJ0X73hBb5uzPU= From: Doug Barton Subject: Makefile for devel/tcllibc causes error in cache-init Openpgp: id=E3520E149D053533C33A67DB5CC686F11A1ABC84 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org To: matthew@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <56C3E580.9010800@dougbarton.us> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 19:14:08 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HE0Ih3o2MTbGwbvqXNsp04DDqGQo2OEvi" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 03:14:10 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --HE0Ih3o2MTbGwbvqXNsp04DDqGQo2OEvi From: Doug Barton To: matthew@FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <56C3E580.9010800@dougbarton.us> Subject: Makefile for devel/tcllibc causes error in cache-init Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Matthew, When running cache-init for some time now I get this error: cache-init:devel/tcllibc (tcllibc-1.18_1) Error. RUN_DEPENDS=20 /var/ports/devel/tcllib -- dependency is not a port cache-init: /usr/ports/devel/tcllibc Error. Can't parse make output Interestingly I don't get that same error when I run 'make describe', so = I'm not quite sure what's happening. hope this helps, Doug --HE0Ih3o2MTbGwbvqXNsp04DDqGQo2OEvi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWw+WBAAoJEFzGhvEaGryE/qcIALOEA1Cx1RTn9slJrbPTKG7A QqukEqL0AZoaCI9H5BziA96VZv81rVg78oYgCg+rAVtsP/1IPNlBUAmyQDGsQx7Z dpwl1RXu+b4E4RJS+5Bo963KFys/ggPD3N5T0Gxv09s0j/faJIVK1gOymUTgwDsM AdS+zOV0k/exdaLX3PX5kwpJ4hWloc9eY8aLc69I7t+GcQvIbey8qNvmKtg9m5uP r+zMo6YMv78qE2MWxK2dr9CzPwWujKiN+Pewv0sAy2kplhH9nmpgKBNFvyGMvT3H g78wWhwNRqE2As1xdFxVChgHWCDR7gz9Dr0b+RY3/IKQ5YMZwfmNBQhgZa+od+w= =EkDI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HE0Ih3o2MTbGwbvqXNsp04DDqGQo2OEvi-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Feb 17 04:41:13 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00AC4AAAD2C for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 04:41:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC5061A9F for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 04:41:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1aVtvH-000Hgs-KW; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 05:41:07 +0100 Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 05:41:07 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: ??ukasz W??sikowski Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Looking for commiter: dns/dnstracer: Build fails on 10.2-RELEASE-p2 amd64 Message-ID: <20160217044107.GQ26283@home.opsec.eu> References: <56C3C193.4010006@wasikowski.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56C3C193.4010006@wasikowski.net> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 04:41:13 -0000 Hi! > I'm looking for a commiter for this PR (working patch is included): > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202824 Done. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Feb 17 05:47:35 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1B38AAA49B; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 05:47:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mouf.net (mouf.net [IPv6:2607:fc50:0:4400:216:3eff:fe69:33b3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mouf.net", Issuer "mouf.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0CC01107; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 05:47:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [10.0.1.97] (cpe-071-065-239-148.nc.res.rr.com [71.65.239.148] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mouf.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id u1H5lSN5077389 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 17 Feb 2016 05:47:34 GMT (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) To: ruby@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Steve Wills Subject: default ruby version Message-ID: <56C40970.4030003@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 00:47:28 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (mouf.net [199.48.129.64]); Wed, 17 Feb 2016 05:47:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=4.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mouf.net X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99 at mouf.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 05:47:36 -0000 Hi, Just FYI, baring any objections or major issues coming up, I plan to make Ruby 2.2 the default Ruby in the ports tree on March 1. Puppet users in particular probably want to migrate to sysutils/puppet4 or work on testing some sort of patch that makes puppet 3.x work with ruby 2.2 before then. Steve From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Feb 17 06:45:26 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D0D6AABCC7 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 06:45:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (static-24-113-41-81.wavecable.com [24.113.41.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06DB1988 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 06:45:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id u1H6P61A038808 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 22:25:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) To: In-Reply-To: References: From: "Chris H" Subject: Re: Hiawatha v.10.1 is out. Please update pkg and port <3 Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 22:25:13 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-id: <0d1e7f076760ac9a4d13e5b26f735373@ultimatedns.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 06:45:26 -0000 On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 16:13:58 +0000 SATRIANI Santana wrote > Hello, > > the Hiawatha-Webserver version 10.1 is out, with great features https:/ > /www.hiawatha-webserver.org/changelog >   > Can you please update package and port? > > Thanks in advance and  best regards. > > Alex. Done. Please see https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207212 for greater detail. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Feb 17 08:25:52 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4658AAAF52 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:25:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: from anny.lostinspace.de (anny.lostinspace.de [80.190.182.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76ECD1190 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:25:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: from server.idefix.lan (aftr-185-17-205-252.dynamic.mnet-online.de [185.17.205.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: idefix@fechner.net) by anny.lostinspace.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 004A91BCBB6 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 09:25:41 +0100 (CET) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.1 anny.lostinspace.de 004A91BCBB6 Authentication-Results: anny.lostinspace.de; dmarc=none header.from=fechner.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=fechner.net; s=default; t=1455697542; bh=tOID4iATvodm7Lwau+TQ9speiC7qgC+5vP2Ksss5Sew=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=YdYMFaqr3F79LrHtq2XcU/RGy3FGc/SAB0KyKN1vvH9J9wftKu2K66QqTQrD0DitY V3SbBSa6IschKrQ+t7dzqHKKjXZnCK76WqTRTppOWI2Qb5SVdzwOFMfMUb/ioZMo0w ZDncorXclV7I4mJs5L4u+eiVZOY3aWSbdEIRwkSk= Received: from [192.168.0.151] (aftr-185-17-205-252.dynamic.mnet-online.de [185.17.205.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.idefix.lan (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3AD90E3E5D for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 09:25:41 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: New user/group in /usr/ports/UIDs and /usr/ports/GIDs To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <56BF0836.6050507@fechner.net> <56C19E13.70203@fechner.net> <20160215094919.GI26283@home.opsec.eu> <56C1E8B3.8090301@fechner.net> <20160215152445.GK26283@home.opsec.eu> <56C25563.2090806@fechner.net> <56C25AAB.6000501@gmail.com> <56C2DB83.2090801@fechner.net> <56C37737.3040600@gmail.com> From: Matthias Fechner Message-ID: <56C42E79.4040300@fechner.net> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 09:25:29 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56C37737.3040600@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:25:52 -0000 Am 16.02.2016 um 20:23 schrieb Douglas Thrift: > While your arguments for user isolation make sense, they really only > make sense if you were to be using gitolite or gitosis at the same time > as gogs which I imagine would not be that common. I am not opposed to > you having a gogs user on your system, but I think that the default user > defined by the port should reflect a reasonable default for most people, > and that user is git not gogs, even the gogs documentation directs you > to use the git user. the default git user will not work, it has its homedir in /usr/local/git but gogs expect it on /var/db/gogs/home. I know, here is a second user generated but if I look on the pros and cons I think using a dedicated gogs user is here more secure (for security and also for the upgrade path in the future). Gruß Matthias -- "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning." -- Rich Cook From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Feb 17 08:32:50 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A88BAAB272 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:32:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.117.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9192B155A for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:32:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from liminal.local (liminal.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3636:3bff:fed4:b0d6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1CABE7D87; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:32:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/1CABE7D87; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral Subject: Re: Makefile for devel/tcllibc causes error in cache-init To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, dougb@dougbarton.us References: <56C3E580.9010800@dougbarton.us> From: Matthew Seaman X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <56C43027.5080201@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:32:39 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56C3E580.9010800@dougbarton.us> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XL5IGSLAJUsfSViG6792OIvfqwEuNQnOj" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99 at smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:32:50 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --XL5IGSLAJUsfSViG6792OIvfqwEuNQnOj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 17/02/2016 03:14, Doug Barton wrote: > Matthew, >=20 > When running cache-init for some time now I get this error: >=20 > cache-init:devel/tcllibc (tcllibc-1.18_1) Error. RUN_DEPENDS > /var/ports/devel/tcllib -- dependency is not a port > cache-init: /usr/ports/devel/tcllibc Error. Can't parse make output >=20 > Interestingly I don't get that same error when I run 'make describe', s= o > I'm not quite sure what's happening. Hmmm... I really should change that output. When cache-init says: Processing make describe output for path "/usr/ports": it is actually lying through its teeth. It hasn't run 'make describe' per-se for many, many years. Instead it uses 'make -V var1 -V var2 =2E...' to extract the values of numerous variables which provides equivalent information, and a bit more. > hope this helps, >=20 > Doug >=20 I can't reproduce this with cache-init on my system. Do you have any non-standard OPTIONS or make.conf settings that could affect this port? (I couldn't see any obvious OPTION knobs that might cause problems, but I didn't really look very hard.) Any local modifications to your ports tree? The only slightly odd looking thing was this RUN_DEPENDS line in devel/tcllibc: RUN_DEPENDS=3D ${PREFIX}/lib/tcllib/pkgIndex.tcl:${MASTERDIR} # PREFIX, not LOCALBASE Can you show me what this returns?: make -C /var/ports/devel/tcllibc -V RUN_DEPENDS -V MASTERDIR (I assume from your output above you have PORTSDIR=3D/var/ports ?) Cheers, Matthew --XL5IGSLAJUsfSViG6792OIvfqwEuNQnOj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJWxDAnXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATaOYP/j/JLOL/ehr82yhSg7+PqSoR +iDO4sbJDhE2Rbes7dDKh7xHwjx0qqxI5vF61vT8Yeuu1y2v/P3doXjPhHpFQFZB FglJIddHFTfIMacCA3VHp2wbPQ6KsgF5zqaPIc5qJT3mxex6F5Uu9WP5TpG0Wxjh JvD6f8sU7MT9ithpQZn66qMLySdsbg+G5HMODpY9N/gaOEGvwg6YAHhp9dt6boay pMfUOB/maEvrjr7lGzB+d3Te/NuOLJxBNAqqOtAS1GtmetGWeyzfsCMm3s8WxEh7 QazMeQp9Y//Yh7U9ckNDHd0xGZbIsoyKMOE5QTpjeIar3KXIDyryKxdIVAlG3GtZ UjS47AW2bDBYV04+cK4/UVG20aBrV7sbawonUUJ/op1QRIFkIZ67aloB6BjtCzg1 97N0BCAeVrwilIhvCejIrf0MGJlmL2Dp+zxsaeb9BzlFc3SAakaLpnpepALHRZJr e00nT5Xz5eT2ahJfxErO74ACnPi6NAb7eG4LB5xCm5jLhAst5ALKUXhn2Uw1X50C G/ARHlQp794tB0BBAs5ilQlVut+j5+LF/mTiiIScZfvYW3knnlwSK4b4pDWnptzz A9NjHCeN1KoG+eAjATkqah6f2odDbkYG9I8QptEYwpr6+sbatCtrmfB+pzatmfVI qYQXHibHJ9wisi5nEvKR =Xujl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XL5IGSLAJUsfSViG6792OIvfqwEuNQnOj-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Feb 17 08:43:42 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ED5AAAB6F0 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:43:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lukasz@wasikowski.net) Received: from mail.freebsd.systems (mail.freebsd.systems [5.196.167.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43F5A19DD for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:43:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lukasz@wasikowski.net) Received: from [192.168.138.100] (unknown [194.181.86.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.freebsd.systems (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 714531E82; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 09:43:38 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=wasikowski.net; s=default; t=1455698618; bh=SdyTEPmGGsZLAc4sK0UW0JNOE5kZN/S6F9txb0dIZxc=; h=To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=uAg4GpWL2k8vZ983QqFVEqoFrYid0hvNke9pWl22hljiBmJjTxcAfQtfS4wVV7X0D MqFGbb/cipkKmXJXfgwqc5P57bRwaQ69E8PJ+gbkWC/RQ+ZUT0Lg1qF99HMvDQwbZS IOnTQnvVVvt37xVJBL7gdgQ3gv0XOU/BM963RYoFfgr1nZ3RkB1f/kzTM1QRQW/Utu Pk6dVc31+Wjyoubp06OGyZYntByFBR2rGaLB1yhbACL2Iqlzkzw3EfjM7BFnmX7lRY +vewGWga5wUg4suJrC2M3gLnbA8wqv83ZFiPpWCsDL1d1Xc8PmLnpWYnWlaQfTQfp3 gzbVFhQGcS/tA== Subject: Re: Looking for commiter: dns/dnstracer: Build fails on 10.2-RELEASE-p2 amd64 To: Kurt Jaeger References: <56C3C193.4010006@wasikowski.net> <20160217044107.GQ26283@home.opsec.eu> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List From: =?UTF-8?Q?=c5=81ukasz_W=c4=85sikowski?= Message-ID: <56C432B5.2000406@wasikowski.net> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 09:43:33 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160217044107.GQ26283@home.opsec.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:43:42 -0000 W dniu 2016-02-17 o 05:41, Kurt Jaeger pisze: >> I'm looking for a commiter for this PR (working patch is included): >> >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202824 > > Done. Thank you. -- best regards, Lukasz Wasikowski From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Feb 17 08:53:12 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76DBEAABB72 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:53:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 660961D8D for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:53:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 65174AABB70; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:53:12 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64C04AABB6F for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:53:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 597151D8C for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:53:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u1H8rCP9007559 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:53:12 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u1H8rCqJ007558; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:53:12 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201602170853.u1H8rCqJ007558@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:53:12 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:53:12 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ net-mgmt/weathermap | 1.1.1 | 20.0.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Feb 17 09:30:40 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 554F7AAB014 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 09:30:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 259D4E9A; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 09:30:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id u1H96mCF098717 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 17 Feb 2016 01:06:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.14.2/Submit) with UUCP id u1H96lej098716; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 01:06:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from fbsd81 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA23911; Wed, 17 Feb 16 01:29:01 PST Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 01:28:55 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com (Perry Hutchison) To: avg@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: unexpected package dependency Message-Id: <56c43d57.Pot24goK72QkTKqk%perryh@pluto.rain.com> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 09:30:40 -0000 I had not expected to find gcc listed (in packagesite.yaml) as a dependency of the sysutils/cpuburn package. I can understand a _port_ needing gcc (at build time), but does the cpuburn _package_ actually require gcc at _runtime_? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Feb 17 11:39:09 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD022AAA785 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 11:39:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A2FBC32 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 11:39:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id NAA20643; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:39:00 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1aW0Rg-000Oko-AY; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:39:00 +0200 Subject: Re: unexpected package dependency To: Perry Hutchison References: <56c43d57.Pot24goK72QkTKqk%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org From: Andriy Gapon Message-ID: <56C45B9C.7090808@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:38:04 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56c43d57.Pot24goK72QkTKqk%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 11:39:09 -0000 On 17/02/2016 11:28, Perry Hutchison wrote: > I had not expected to find gcc listed (in packagesite.yaml) as a > dependency of the sysutils/cpuburn package. I can understand a > _port_ needing gcc (at build time), but does the cpuburn _package_ > actually require gcc at _runtime_? > I don't believe so. AFAIR, it builds static binaries. -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Feb 17 13:10:26 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A94E3AAB80F for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:10:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@xtaz.co.uk) Received: from mail.xtaz.uk (tao.xtaz.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:fe33::10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 720E51056; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:10:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@xtaz.co.uk) Received: by mail.xtaz.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E82A52111009; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:10:21 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xtaz.co.uk; s=mail; t=1455714622; bh=KxsCHIzz6Buo2tzPwtzW5EtipNeml8Bu0r0/T2E8YXk=; h=Date:From:To:Subject; b=LL/tmSnci6GNgzIF029yxex9Za9s13C7ABtCohnvN3ft8c8o1uEpdELCks+DYKROH q7Gfjmd295zfQYrkJl7pyUgmByf+G/UR90z5jEFl8PaPLTd6qgKGBOioHdlbynikdb +j4PbWL66Ri0PPHsAx9NlH3AB6Zy8iuBQ2FXRSkBjT78sit6E61/PtYLJrfZAMvOU1 9+rE9Qo+cc9KCxEtbd1+zMQTalYjxow+46s/vQviCnKYZ9AEM3tc5yCStFx5bmYfSY 588f3qyMJKPXIQifu3KWX6e9b28CCsywKEEcmSv+xbQUafJutXjsSEHtcPSSzCm6nX AYxYJfHhCCRVA== Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:10:21 +0000 From: Matt Smith To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, miwi@FreeBSD.org, freebsdml@marino.st Subject: PHP7 + Synth issue Message-ID: <20160217131021.GG97105@xtaz.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matt Smith , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, miwi@FreeBSD.org, freebsdml@marino.st MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:10:26 -0000 Hi guys, I'm using the ports-mgmt/synth package builder to build my packages. I just tried to build all of the packages for PHP7 from the new ports and came across an issue. If I set php=7.0 in DEFAULT_VERSIONS in the LiveSystem-make.conf (make.conf) then Synth bails out and refuses to build the repository. It does this: Scanning entire ports tree. progress: 5.93% culprit: comms/atslog Scan aborted because dependency could not be located. databases/php70-mysql (required dependency of comms/atslog) does not exist. It looks like it scans the port tree, come across a port that has USE_PHP=mysql in it and then bails because the port databases/php70-mysql does not exist. Obviously because mysql was removed from PHP7 in favour of mysqli. Is this a problem with the ports infrastructure or should I just not declare php=7.0 in the DEFAULT_VERSIONS? If I do this then it builds fine, but I guess that might cause other issues elsewhere. -- Matt From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Feb 17 13:17:09 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D61FAABBDC for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:17:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsdml@marino.st) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19DE513B4; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:17:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsdml@marino.st) Received: from [192.168.1.21] (153.Red-83-60-249.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [83.60.249.153]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 908FB43BB9; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 07:17:00 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: PHP7 + Synth issue To: Matt Smith , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, miwi@FreeBSD.org References: <20160217131021.GG97105@xtaz.uk> From: John Marino Message-ID: <56C472C9.9080708@marino.st> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:16:57 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160217131021.GG97105@xtaz.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:17:09 -0000 On 2/17/2016 2:10 PM, Matt Smith wrote: > Hi guys, I'm using the ports-mgmt/synth package builder to build my > packages. I just tried to build all of the packages for PHP7 from the > new ports and came across an issue. If I set php=7.0 in DEFAULT_VERSIONS > in the LiveSystem-make.conf (make.conf) then Synth bails out and refuses > to build the repository. It does this: > > Scanning entire ports tree. > progress: 5.93% > culprit: comms/atslog > Scan aborted because dependency could not be located. > databases/php70-mysql (required dependency of comms/atslog) does not exist. > > It looks like it scans the port tree, come across a port that has > USE_PHP=mysql in it and then bails because the port > databases/php70-mysql does not exist. Obviously because mysql was > removed from PHP7 in favour of mysqli. > > Is this a problem with the ports infrastructure or should I just not > declare php=7.0 in the DEFAULT_VERSIONS? If I do this then it builds > fine, but I guess that might cause other issues elsewhere. It seems like a problem with comms/atslog to me. You can work around it now by removing MYSQL as a default option for that port (either modifying the port itself or adding something in -make.conf to change it) atslog is not maintained. Another option is hiding the option if php>=7. Probably the easiest thing to do is turn off the option by default though. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Feb 17 13:24:23 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A8C2AABECC for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:24:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@xtaz.co.uk) Received: from mail.xtaz.uk (tao.xtaz.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:fe33::10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41FEE1941; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:24:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@xtaz.co.uk) Received: by mail.xtaz.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C868E2111009; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:24:20 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xtaz.co.uk; s=mail; t=1455715460; bh=TuA5WJKNnUi66PB2D5LvXPMXJh7ENHZwvL++r8bnBzc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=CLF/fklv+dORePv+O3XBIk+OBMr23IkVLD5/4KpTQvduLlnoF3A3/vYdRe5QvfQsn u5yeJftglcexg5XLFu89p3tJ9n0LmS7zYVb/d3Ovur4Ad7eQylhaFZrdk0A0W3D1M2 6FKVN8hQfUsvy/gbQ3JCMtZxvl94VdLtqVArOyR8HEdDh+PxdyX3EOjUx0+sXa7ZEl oyaStYqEgSlVYAu0HPvA3oFZ485OqAp/3mw8VEB2/VJ6/wZ4yytiIa4zuKLYiCjp+m eS4hEtrP9ed3ns/hG1rO3fQ49iCUrpDS+bmu3iwflaU1Kq4iBhYIHUSc+Ehdm6Sfkc s4I1CEJry0RyA== Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:24:20 +0000 From: Matt Smith To: John Marino Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, miwi@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: PHP7 + Synth issue Message-ID: <20160217132420.GH97105@xtaz.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matt Smith , John Marino , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, miwi@FreeBSD.org References: <20160217131021.GG97105@xtaz.uk> <56C472C9.9080708@marino.st> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56C472C9.9080708@marino.st> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:24:23 -0000 On Feb 17 14:16, John Marino wrote: > >It seems like a problem with comms/atslog to me. >You can work around it now by removing MYSQL as a default option for >that port (either modifying the port itself or adding something in >-make.conf to change it) > >atslog is not maintained. Another option is hiding the option if >php>=7. Probably the easiest thing to do is turn off the option by >default though. > The problem is that it isn't just that port. I've also seen it on databases/mysqldumper for example. It's going to affect all ports which have USE_PHP=mysql within them of which I suspect there are quite a lot. It might be impractical to do what you suggest with them all and I'm wondering if miwi as the maintainer of PHP7 has any thoughts of an official way of solving it. -- Matt From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Feb 17 13:27:21 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8422EAAA05D for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:27:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsdml@marino.st) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63CC31A34; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:27:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsdml@marino.st) Received: from [192.168.1.21] (153.Red-83-60-249.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [83.60.249.153]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0081743BB9; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 07:27:18 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: PHP7 + Synth issue To: Matt Smith , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, miwi@FreeBSD.org References: <20160217131021.GG97105@xtaz.uk> <56C472C9.9080708@marino.st> <20160217132420.GH97105@xtaz.uk> From: John Marino Message-ID: <56C47534.6000309@marino.st> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:27:16 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160217132420.GH97105@xtaz.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:27:21 -0000 On 2/17/2016 2:24 PM, Matt Smith wrote: > The problem is that it isn't just that port. I've also seen it on > databases/mysqldumper for example. It's going to affect all ports which > have USE_PHP=mysql within them of which I suspect there are quite a > lot. It might be impractical to do what you suggest with them all and > I'm wondering if miwi as the maintainer of PHP7 has any thoughts of an > official way of solving it. Yes, I agree with you in that case. The USE_PHP=mysql needs to handle the case of php 7.0. is mysqli inbuilt to php7? or does it require a different dependency so USE_PHP=mysql needs to switch depending on the php version? in any case, synth is involved only because it cause it first I guess. John From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Feb 17 13:39:53 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92DD5AAA6D5 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:39:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from teparybean2.exetel.com.au (teparybean2.exetel.com.au [220.233.0.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 584A6127D for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:39:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from phasia.kd.net.au ([220.233.10.47]) by teparybean2.exetel.com.au with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aW1we-0003qT-Sv for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 00:15:04 +1100 Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org (unknown [120.146.8.15]) by dermis.kd (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73ED2CDDE for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 00:15:03 +1100 (EST) Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id u1HDF1d2031244 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 00:15:03 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from localhost (dave@localhost) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id u1HDF1V5031241 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 00:15:01 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) X-Authentication-Warning: aneurin.horsfall.org: dave owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 00:15:00 +1100 (EST) From: Dave Horsfall To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: synth documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <56B9EDC7.1010403@ohlste.in> <56B9F2D6.1090107@marino.st> <20160210015708.GN71035@eureka.lemis.com> <56BAF8E0.7020604@marino.st> <20160210090136.GC46096@home.opsec.eu> <56BAFEBD.9000004@marino.st> <20160210172907.GA14793@neutralgood.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) X-Home-Page: http://www.horsfall.org/ X-Witty-Saying: "chmod 666 the_mode_of_the_beast" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:39:53 -0000 On Sat, 13 Feb 2016, Kevin Oberman wrote: > What do you mean, "Computers don't have switch registers any more"? Real computers also have blinkenlights, and the more the better. -- Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer." From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Feb 17 13:44:17 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D506FAAAB0E for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:44:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from miwi.fbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk0-x22a.google.com (mail-vk0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F5131ACA for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:44:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from miwi.fbsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vk0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id e185so14398982vkb.1 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 05:44:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=9Uu6m06nZfwKFafhz1gARLZxJRfcgQv0xOnkdDzy6iU=; b=X8J70P+k6sqC6gLTdWDaYz4H3dY1i0WN8838aC/aY2XZOAZMJH7iWx70P/WgUB2sKo hM9+iySBRRJ8RldolKkcCPBXKIcyZC9EFaEbZLYTxZIafdM1RpSMb5ajvbMuuUcn3JM9 rDSpzzmlNafMQFiZOaVo5xCAjXddWndNpPqmlGOQobSd0FG/uX7rdbMWSZOAH/KtB2pB u0jnCX/MCfVr+10AHXeWSkNArW1J0FlXRhq4M7eoA+53bI19OK3xX8yV6Zlq9c0C3ayW gUs9zoioqIGL7wYkhSncZd8XMHI/XBa48TJdotOOBtYkBA0ysdnhdE8EzAkP8iyhU6id sL2Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=9Uu6m06nZfwKFafhz1gARLZxJRfcgQv0xOnkdDzy6iU=; b=gn4G5JV/GbPx8iETD7nI37YtGi629zsYWrAZ2sioIYMweob9eKXRsHoy5Czf1vEShF vO7LJ1o1rpWrhYrKXRA7saxaEq9Nf2nLx3nMV9idzGGKPez++lzQu4gluB0cF28XEZVU TkuDhniLODoRFQmLmcPc8onFexLaK0rjTPV5MenowOzkcVG5nxmghQFojKsgg+AvUIn5 IUEfvI636Gl66HQxrj2kQEZ1seOAgDR7XbQjfkJ/fvJ88OAHSYuflV/F8WzdRnQuwJiH MK6dlGmLHPg5YntREZ+deudJxr3AhTPLQ/Pns4tloet5L2jHPrCwgat7+DNY9H0IYBQq c7jg== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSEkKK+2Iz816DRbmr6h3Fum9JEFn2fL59EQVcXq5otWyyUNDuQ/XTZ7enha/JsbFjIVrpbGWbmMLB7hA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.31.5.84 with SMTP id 81mr1261801vkf.123.1455716656623; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 05:44:16 -0800 (PST) Sender: miwi.fbsd@gmail.com Received: by 10.176.7.70 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 05:44:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <56C47534.6000309@marino.st> References: <20160217131021.GG97105@xtaz.uk> <56C472C9.9080708@marino.st> <20160217132420.GH97105@xtaz.uk> <56C47534.6000309@marino.st> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 21:44:16 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 97qHGGKFCxcApPKrdiahI1n16C0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: PHP7 + Synth issue From: Martin Wilke To: John Marino Cc: Matt Smith , ports FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:44:17 -0000 Hi, The long term solution will be switching to mysqli or pdo_mysql which is provided by php70 (and php55/56), I am working right now on cleaning up the pecl ports, after that I'll go and check which port can switch already. - Martin On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 9:27 PM, John Marino wrote: > On 2/17/2016 2:24 PM, Matt Smith wrote: > > The problem is that it isn't just that port. I've also seen it on > > databases/mysqldumper for example. It's going to affect all ports which > > have USE_PHP=mysql within them of which I suspect there are quite a > > lot. It might be impractical to do what you suggest with them all and > > I'm wondering if miwi as the maintainer of PHP7 has any thoughts of an > > official way of solving it. > > Yes, I agree with you in that case. > The USE_PHP=mysql needs to handle the case of php 7.0. > > is mysqli inbuilt to php7? or does it require a different dependency so > USE_PHP=mysql needs to switch depending on the php version? > > in any case, synth is involved only because it cause it first I guess. > > John > -- +-----------------oOO--(_)--OOo-------------------------+ With best Regards, Martin Wilke (miwi_(at)_FreeBSD.org) Mess with the Best, Die like the Rest From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Feb 17 13:59:45 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 827C5AAB182 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:59:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsdml@marino.st) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6110D12FD; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:59:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsdml@marino.st) Received: from [192.168.1.21] (153.Red-83-60-249.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [83.60.249.153]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97A4643BC9; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 07:59:42 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: PHP7 + Synth issue To: Martin Wilke References: <20160217131021.GG97105@xtaz.uk> <56C472C9.9080708@marino.st> <20160217132420.GH97105@xtaz.uk> <56C47534.6000309@marino.st> Cc: Matt Smith , ports FreeBSD From: John Marino Message-ID: <56C47CCC.4060904@marino.st> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:59:40 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:59:45 -0000 On 2/17/2016 2:44 PM, Martin Wilke wrote: > Hi, > > The long term solution will be switching to mysqli or pdo_mysql which is > provided by php70 (and php55/56), I am working right now on cleaning up > the pecl ports, after that I'll go and check which port can switch already. > The problem with that approach is that his tree is broken now. His choice is don't build at all or don't use php 7.0. I think it's something that needs attention now unless the intent is to say, "don't use php7 yet, it is not ready for prime time" (which is possible) From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Feb 17 14:05:17 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 120D0AAB46A for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:05:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9CC21945 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:05:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1aW2jF-000IjI-Ux for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 15:05:17 +0100 Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 15:05:17 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: ports FreeBSD Subject: Re: PHP7 + Synth issue Message-ID: <20160217140517.GS26283@home.opsec.eu> References: <20160217131021.GG97105@xtaz.uk> <56C472C9.9080708@marino.st> <20160217132420.GH97105@xtaz.uk> <56C47534.6000309@marino.st> <56C47CCC.4060904@marino.st> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56C47CCC.4060904@marino.st> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:05:17 -0000 Hi! > > The long term solution will be switching to mysqli or pdo_mysql which is > > provided by php70 (and php55/56), I am working right now on cleaning up > > the pecl ports, after that I'll go and check which port can switch already. > The problem with that approach is that his tree is broken now. > His choice is don't build at all or don't use php 7.0. > > I think it's something that needs attention now unless the intent is to > say, "don't use php7 yet, it is not ready for prime time" (which is > possible) The PHP eco-system is so huge that one can say that even php56 is not yet ready for prime time 8-) So: Everyone knows that php70 has open issues, miwi and others are tracking them down, and if users/testers submit problem reports via bugzilla, it helps enormously. It will settle the next few weeks. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Feb 17 14:16:06 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE4ADAAB92B for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:16:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@xtaz.co.uk) Received: from mail.xtaz.uk (tao.xtaz.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:fe33::10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3A66103D for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:16:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@xtaz.co.uk) Received: by mail.xtaz.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2C48C2111014; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:16:03 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xtaz.co.uk; s=mail; t=1455718563; bh=vFzGew1TjXgiZ1hio223+IIZAvPeiYhmOAR5dmtqaAQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=rmEJ2BlGFlNGU3ULKBLr3ngwQprW7L91azl7ltOlCQ9IDnF6j+JxzHzrvqMJXaCO8 Xl6oiJhLGXPD3ozANQmASRQn4xoXVPwlWJFTGpRAr7x+zpN74yiBSzGkzrebtQ4b/B +8KnOPKraYBmh2aPS/mm48EBpTw2ww0OkZsUUU2fuUrGCbHBBGwkL1Iig79quTMgZj Lsew3Vhi6QOfXVw8X0wXVKKghVawiAf4HTtNB3BSpqGCdDgdjG5dxVXsfG156tJzpa sKfllmbyQCe7MkXr0xbfIuOEDddbJEQie/0ITb86GdFR/7dU18pCWCV8DAJ2eO701/ fzsP778g8jJ8g== Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:16:03 +0000 From: Matt Smith To: Kurt Jaeger Cc: ports FreeBSD Subject: Re: PHP7 + Synth issue Message-ID: <20160217141603.GI97105@xtaz.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matt Smith , Kurt Jaeger , ports FreeBSD References: <20160217131021.GG97105@xtaz.uk> <56C472C9.9080708@marino.st> <20160217132420.GH97105@xtaz.uk> <56C47534.6000309@marino.st> <56C47CCC.4060904@marino.st> <20160217140517.GS26283@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160217140517.GS26283@home.opsec.eu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:16:07 -0000 On Feb 17 15:05, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >Hi! > >> > The long term solution will be switching to mysqli or pdo_mysql which is >> > provided by php70 (and php55/56), I am working right now on cleaning up >> > the pecl ports, after that I'll go and check which port can switch already. > >> The problem with that approach is that his tree is broken now. >> His choice is don't build at all or don't use php 7.0. >> >> I think it's something that needs attention now unless the intent is to >> say, "don't use php7 yet, it is not ready for prime time" (which is >> possible) > >The PHP eco-system is so huge that one can say that even php56 is >not yet ready for prime time 8-) > >So: Everyone knows that php70 has open issues, miwi and others are >tracking them down, and if users/testers submit problem reports via >bugzilla, it helps enormously. > >It will settle the next few weeks. > I'll search bugzilla to see if there are any bug reports for this and if not I'll raise one then. I know php70 is very new so I was expecting problems. Synth is pretty new as well though so I thought I would let people know in case they were not aware of this type of breakage. Thanks, -- Matt From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Feb 17 14:26:04 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F569AABF45 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:26:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsdml@marino.st) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D7181A68; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:26:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsdml@marino.st) Received: from [192.168.1.21] (153.Red-83-60-249.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [83.60.249.153]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB76D43BC9; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:26:01 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: PHP7 + Synth issue To: Martin Wilke References: <20160217131021.GG97105@xtaz.uk> <56C472C9.9080708@marino.st> <20160217132420.GH97105@xtaz.uk> <56C47534.6000309@marino.st> <56C47CCC.4060904@marino.st> Cc: Matt Smith , ports FreeBSD From: John Marino Message-ID: <56C482F7.1040406@marino.st> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 15:25:59 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56C47CCC.4060904@marino.st> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:26:04 -0000 Matt wrote: > I'll search bugzilla to see if there are any bug reports for this and if > not I'll raise one then. > > I know php70 is very new so I was expecting problems. Synth is pretty > new as well though so I thought I would let people know in case they > were not aware of this type of breakage. I haven't confirmed it, but I expect that poudriere would have choked the same way when it scans comms/atslog or any similarly affected port. So synth is new for sure, but the result is expected and correct I think. John From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Feb 17 14:53:29 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF647AAADCC for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:53:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jim@ohlste.in) Received: from mail-qg0-x230.google.com (mail-qg0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71A59120E for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:53:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jim@ohlste.in) Received: by mail-qg0-x230.google.com with SMTP id y89so13177285qge.2 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 06:53:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ohlste-in.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/0al/aM+kdDm7GA2pMSMqsNlSmNx4xSXJdEBqQgQ6AU=; b=JojfN/WpP/+wjtfizuzNmaBHsyRk3JbnrgUtQHjXvD/iR6y2fhDv7YsVrBol8ZP63k UNoAnGMSzAwHit/i0w2svXf8MeebDSjIMfOtXnzySq84cuKpH3v+ggaYg3cL4tiwpPWk wt3dN/gG7RzhBQyPhaD55ERiKrix5lGfqMpZFSEPxcITx+Uyn4IdAtQ8dmLKLVCBUfQo cx2qdD5Px1ndlibr7RF49aj/XyDueJV6Y3jszThFfPvZCrrNjeWX+xNqeVCu5B41j57T +3VA/CHOtQusklx6gBNy/RdWfzvrkCzjXRSUYpPghSsoROzJ3WDJlpKH+o7sI2F5b/E7 UKBw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=/0al/aM+kdDm7GA2pMSMqsNlSmNx4xSXJdEBqQgQ6AU=; b=O905CWOdIZB0tupXqsR66LqLjMVf1pVcqxzqx+XES/W0DwnX2cF+KljRQ8U5i0dnnZ 4fG1jzTUMS47onsTte/IETUSxhrv4eE6ABknfxMmea4Qn3c1K3c3JcX5HcoicWYDPBrV ZkYO7M/dApYpgMhr6tvp1DAbnm5zQARl2//teZVhiQOHndNisYrtTw/F5XWL79H1QiKl ub8kBVp2dN1LfQA9yCiRLiKxW+ILGYkMVZ5Hq7hUbZiYeHGs7fxBooDuUS3PBi4Dgfbo Ilka8mTgqcrSeV2Vvh4rClMzQk58aNIhl+peZQtxuieWm+DPy4/0Q9AG7CIbvNDVgZCi MEDg== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORH3jZfELn2R27rWcsmumD4nLRQad3fA9m7UxKy5P4RezljggeT6kYZTKS37uNvCw== X-Received: by 10.141.23.207 with SMTP id z198mr2503479qhd.52.1455720807889; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 06:53:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.18] (pool-96-249-243-37.nrflva.fios.verizon.net. [96.249.243.37]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id d64sm15450443qgd.9.2016.02.17.06.53.27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 17 Feb 2016 06:53:27 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: PHP7 issue [was PHP7 + Synth issue] To: John Marino , Martin Wilke References: <20160217131021.GG97105@xtaz.uk> <56C472C9.9080708@marino.st> <20160217132420.GH97105@xtaz.uk> <56C47534.6000309@marino.st> <56C47CCC.4060904@marino.st> Cc: ports FreeBSD , Matt Smith From: Jim Ohlstein Message-ID: <56C48966.3010303@ohlste.in> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 09:53:26 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56C47CCC.4060904@marino.st> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:53:29 -0000 Hello, On 2/17/16 8:59 AM, John Marino wrote: > On 2/17/2016 2:44 PM, Martin Wilke wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The long term solution will be switching to mysqli or pdo_mysql which is >> provided by php70 (and php55/56), I am working right now on cleaning up >> the pecl ports, after that I'll go and check which port can switch already. php56-pdo_mysql has php56-mysql as a dependency. # pkg info -d php56-pdo_mysql php56-pdo_mysql-5.6.18: php56-5.6.18 php56-mysql-5.6.18 php56-pdo-5.6.18 This is not the case with php70-pdo_mysql. I have come across at least one port where you see the following in the Makefile: MYSQL_USE= MYSQL=client PHP=mysql,pdo_mysql where: MYSQL_USE= MYSQL=client PHP=pdo_mysql would suffice for PHP 5.6 and would not break PHP 7.0, assuming the correct extension is phpXx-pdo_mysql. >> > > The problem with that approach is that his tree is broken now. > His choice is don't build at all or don't use php 7.0. > > I think it's something that needs attention now unless the intent is to > say, "don't use php7 yet, it is not ready for prime time" (which is > possible) This is clearly not a Synth issue. Synth did its job correctly. PHP 7.0 is early and anyone who uses it in production uses it at their own peril. It's not the default PHP version, people have to actually opt-in to build PHP-based ports with it. As such, they need to have their eyes wide open. Sorting this all out will take awhile with over 100 pecl extensions alone and many more than that ports dependent on PHP. The only way to figure it out is to leave it in ports so people can test it against their apps. Again, anyone who uses it in production without testing is asking for trouble. -- Jim Ohlstein "Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference." - Mark Twain From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Feb 17 15:40:47 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3712AAA1F4 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 15:40:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D29DD1181 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 15:40:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from lowell-desk.lan (router.lan [172.30.250.2]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AB0933C1E for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 10:35:29 -0500 (EST) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id C4A5D39843; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 10:35:28 -0500 (EST) From: Lowell Gilbert To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Looking committer for PR References: Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 10:35:27 -0500 In-Reply-To: ("Fernando =?iso-8859-1?Q?Apestegu=EDa=22's?= message of "Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:08:22 +0100") Message-ID: <44mvqzs62o.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 15:40:48 -0000 Fernando Apestegu=EDa writes: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D207114 For what it's worth, this seems to be a trivial version upgrade. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Feb 17 15:45:45 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36E10AAA4C6 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 15:45:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zaphod@berentweb.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x231.google.com (mail-wm0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF2A914AB for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 15:45:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zaphod@berentweb.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x231.google.com with SMTP id c200so220352609wme.0 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 07:45:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=berentweb-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=EPJS1i+H/KDTIzn9XIR7e5ruA4szhljy2nR8QFyWbQY=; b=XKiQ70NdXWxyr/ydaUXJVhKvuCWyxgyBp0N5h0EVOgen9z/fv5HsC/DSh/2aVf9yuo Ql5Mo1g7wT50kicSww0bbdD8EAZGa2E4B/vtYbu5LR8En/tcKNBcec9NbDDOdqSyCCud gDhrJiCx0NY2RihyX5aCQ0jD+AN75VA8iDhd8QveE2T2huCWy8qNeibNDxfHY9F8qAQw R87to9PidYLaD48cFmEWaa40hXiCRkxFKz+SqCiNNQkdlsBf3QBsRhhs3sHsM6D5MQaF V3aaDASyedtFoZVWsqzL29nEaTxgtikZ/PUMgLg/zkZwFH0YfhFjt20TMJ1/u1vBjGG/ Phnw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EPJS1i+H/KDTIzn9XIR7e5ruA4szhljy2nR8QFyWbQY=; b=CR6gnusHAhUDJGjNnOHFy2RpKO07r39yA1asLO8MgOzfVhp3ojFfVOFUfKCg46YriG tw0Wev9phvXZEpCK5xAjMTtC3WNGUfxKHajRu1eCSR/rmuOblVTVmMFTzDSgH6CVxsFb wjwSEFdMmPAkIdDy/f2zL/jW6jOq/ggRHRppu8nF7sJ1x2KGI6O4IZsmxsEFr6eOewFY aOcCcO+zHvL/2YsvO9W84hBfsXoQF3zVBTve/Sjp5ES/S70U+XPW/0/U18zhd0aIKdyM llw4dzzCzRNQDef/wN/bNhPLSnXgCXC2FX1qxtedIiMAtatk2O47IUuELiecuNUa9QQ6 ClUg== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORzPWu/zN29flGAcHWqIpyNkDjLSnCv47N1MauRE9Rb/esUlsU+jNgBLoD4mTTFeg== X-Received: by 10.28.222.68 with SMTP id v65mr4603768wmg.66.1455723942845; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 07:45:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from rsbsd.rsb ([88.227.154.115]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z65sm29133287wmg.1.2016.02.17.07.45.41 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Feb 2016 07:45:41 -0800 (PST) Sender: "Raif S. Berent" Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 17:45:38 +0200 From: Beeblebrox To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: www/nghttp2 build failure Message-ID: <20160217174538.247af3c1@rsbsd.rsb> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 15:45:45 -0000 Latest version (nghttp2-1.7.1) fails to build. Usually I don't post such th= ings, but this failure causes "build-skipped" for a whole number of downstr= eam ports. Tail of poudriere log: gmake[4]: Leaving directory '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/nghttp2/work/nghttp2-1.= 7.1/src/includes' gmake[4]: Entering directory '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/nghttp2/work/nghttp2-1= .7.1/src' CXX libnghttpx_a-util.o CXX libnghttpx_a-http2.o CC libnghttpx_a-timegm.o CXX libnghttpx_a-app_helper.o CXX libnghttpx_a-ssl.o CXX libnghttpx_a-shrpx_config.o In file included from shrpx_config.cc:42: /usr/include/unistd.h:511:6: error: declaration of 'initgroups' has a diffe= rent language linkage int initgroups(const char *, gid_t); ^ ./shrpx.h:48:12: note: previous definition is here inline int initgroups(const char *user, gid_t group) { return 0; } ^ 1 error generated. Makefile:1542: recipe for target 'libnghttpx_a-shrpx_config.o' failed gmake[4]: *** [libnghttpx_a-shrpx_config.o] Error 1 gmake[4]: Leaving directory '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/nghttp2/work/nghttp2-1.= 7.1/src' Makefile:2380: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed gmake[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[3]: Leaving directory '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/nghttp2/work/nghttp2-1.= 7.1/src' Makefile:554: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/nghttp2/work/nghttp2-1.= 7.1' Makefile:463: recipe for target 'all' failed gmake[1]: *** [all] Error 2 gmake[1]: Leaving directory '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/nghttp2/work/nghttp2-1.= 7.1' *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/ports/www/nghttp2 --=20 FreeBSD_amd64_11-Current_RadeonKMS Please CC my email when responding, mail from list is not delivered. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Feb 17 15:53:03 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7D6BAAA8E8 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 15:53:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from tatiana.utanet.at (tatiana.utanet.at [IPv6:2001:938:1337:25::25:46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C8671A57 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 15:53:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=utanet.at; s=rev1; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:Subject:References:To; bh=L7/pHXMSDQwsDOhddzid6HzGjHk9DSv4thk4XHXpxso=; b=JLA9qylNfW47sqaSA0K1Nexz6SjdngsowFQQFRphJm2C4t8FnRwGAZ75F4aIK+m3tfNn5TWzYAYWVTtEG5J/yO2r6Ls9/AZFtvSJCSopBXZ7RtUovzBE1dQGy7yBinkxpNvGXea/HqfgpxBmWfOU+QZpCMT9s4e0KXayL/sV1tI=; Received: from patricia.xoc.tele2net.at ([213.90.36.9]) by tatiana.utanet.at with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1aW4PR-0000o0-D8 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:52:57 +0100 Received: from 62-47-170-27.adsl.highway.telekom.at ([62.47.170.27] helo=[10.0.0.93]) by patricia.xoc.tele2net.at with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1aW4PR-0004tb-BT for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:52:57 +0100 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20160217174538.247af3c1@rsbsd.rsb> Subject: Re: www/nghttp2 build failure From: Walter Schwarzenfeld Message-ID: <56C49758.3050804@utanet.at> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:52:56 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160217174538.247af3c1@rsbsd.rsb> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 15:53:03 -0000 There is a patch fixed it, needs only maintainer approval https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207222 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Feb 17 15:57:47 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9273AAAB75 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 15:57:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from mail.infocus-llc.com (mail.infocus-llc.com [199.15.120.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA0D21F7F for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 15:57:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from draco.over-yonder.net (c-75-65-60-66.hsd1.ms.comcast.net [75.65.60.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.tarragon.infocus-llc.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3q53VB5y1Xz3m; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 09:48:18 -0600 (CST) Received: by draco.over-yonder.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id 3q53VB1dvBz14y; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 09:48:18 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 09:48:18 -0600 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: Beeblebrox Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: www/nghttp2 build failure Message-ID: <20160217154818.GD497@over-yonder.net> References: <20160217174538.247af3c1@rsbsd.rsb> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160217174538.247af3c1@rsbsd.rsb> X-Editor: vi X-OS: FreeBSD X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99 at mail.tarragon.infocus-llc.com X-Virus-Status: Clean User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24-fullermd.4 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 15:57:48 -0000 On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 05:45:38PM +0200 I heard the voice of Beeblebrox via freebsd-ports, and lo! it spake thus: > > Latest version (nghttp2-1.7.1) fails to build. I looked at this a little when I ran into it earlier; the configure script only looks for initgroups() in grp.h (where it isn't) rather than unistd.h (where it is), so it doesn't find it, and dumps in a local definition. But the place it's used DOES pull in unistd.h, so it gets the conflict. A configure (.in maybe, since the port does autoreconf) patch would be called for, I presume. -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Feb 17 16:14:49 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4284DAAB320 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:14:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zaphod@berentweb.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x22a.google.com (mail-wm0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D02711BB1 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:14:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zaphod@berentweb.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id c200so221840152wme.0 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:14:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=berentweb-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=eDkfhyaHnsKVaadfL0y4FpNPH82Bt3VAqB0RSu9DQSM=; b=UZkOHNtkcIk1osHlkjZqlmAfZrY8OBfchni+v3eTYcPn206OOrp6GjwYd3x61sUx/y 5dgLgtsCX4OmTtH3b4DZiqz+91hcDtaEXFXM7zjqxKZYbFJzNxbVSXEm/GAU2jBllJul fUFo65Aou3J6SCLfx7GNlMIJ1XvZH9+i3CLWtgzZO+yMFu7x7SaRhip4goB/wfoOLeqE s2F5RqLvoO2nhtqp/T12shEtHgkT22Rs5mgkBm78ZsJLBHiErhn5bHFYk0HUNCOQXYrL oygkkFClm8QzJVBc+q7wXJ+1cBPkhe7lU0mBhpViRjVoZiYRii5BtDDOzcFXvhDgBxNo +2GQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=eDkfhyaHnsKVaadfL0y4FpNPH82Bt3VAqB0RSu9DQSM=; b=DGethb9Rf56+XVpqsjJdxnOXMuH7nCC1gHmp5CQJHx/uTZW8F/G940cW6uEIsrBtlC VLzbD31iOzWfDZijPGdnU5B/mt80Xo2XTsd1ybapq0eCSpgclmHBIiRn9xhz4LIjz1XL nD6zKVOUh9CNVhxtlrOyRuFL2iISnw3XiF4w9AlZCex4yF57vAeeARJP8z/4AxVnMDaE VRJBQEUZzyObTXzSBcMW2Oqn2gTCitISAIPYZVlBWAObsHiuLn4OeXsUmt3uaO8Cd4x0 L8OsAN7/1azeUwTUma5WtZbmzpt7oYxuD0NdSAS3/DfUUqo2hDs2SZ4MKZtrZC43gGvS 0N5A== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQkWk/PC1ru9hkY7/ZT+Zuf83fi4lXlqNu39a8qT2LDamF+xSNyfZruM4HgJtzRTQ== X-Received: by 10.194.90.229 with SMTP id bz5mr3022474wjb.143.1455725687222; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:14:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from rsbsd.rsb ([88.227.154.115]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e77sm26334182wma.18.2016.02.17.08.14.45 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:14:46 -0800 (PST) Sender: "Raif S. Berent" Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 18:14:43 +0200 From: Beeblebrox To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: "Matthew D. Fuller" Subject: Re: www/nghttp2 build failure Message-ID: <20160217181443.5629ce4b@rsbsd.rsb> In-Reply-To: <20160217154818.GD497@over-yonder.net> References: <20160217174538.247af3c1@rsbsd.rsb> <20160217154818.GD497@over-yonder.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:14:49 -0000 Thanks for this. It's good to know that I'm not the only one running into t= he error. > I looked at this a little when I ran into it earlier; the configure > script only looks for initgroups() in grp.h (where it isn't) rather > than unistd.h (where it is), so it doesn't find it, and dumps in a > local definition. But the place it's used DOES pull in unistd.h, so > it gets the conflict. A configure (.in maybe, since the port does > autoreconf) patch would be called for, I presume. Regards. --=20 FreeBSD_amd64_11-Current_RadeonKMS Please CC my email when responding, mail from list is not delivered. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Feb 17 19:57:09 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52D00AACCE8 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 19:57:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from douglaswth@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-x230.google.com (mail-pa0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23AEB1349 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 19:57:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from douglaswth@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pa0-x230.google.com with SMTP id ho8so17055086pac.2 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 11:57:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:openpgp:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=crGswJ05fa9bmGkRSoBkvwNhDo/1tHMl4DBT+nc6tbk=; b=MGnoCicQLuUfaLYbPGwSFPShesXw8uLZiGdNVkz7paeG/o8xwcqLVSMmqH7voUY4hN w9DZ2fJe6U/QDZJkocYnZMuS0fB9HVHfKmIH0KUmnhQk10j0ymaXaccMbULmQ6PswSDT 98TGeUMBCTGzjEpfrKEpNK5ghHggPIlltvZ/o3QwHOBC2hB5KhQlouBPyhxxaT5Sl9NL aD2Gi5yfVgr6v6LNHfA0msS8eCWs9+wyS3NXOoTrh1Rl0EV1iA5tHE3GPZejOoBP+Bzt sJNZ1YMzsjcu9krtNdZBzUX/4kYDRTtEy1URVvGlRz4a249p0k4esh4BBf22qz2dsFIf Y0Iw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:openpgp:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=crGswJ05fa9bmGkRSoBkvwNhDo/1tHMl4DBT+nc6tbk=; b=HBt3shITsj3c5uR6Xp3oTtnInlQXBuFFTRNDzIl1An9aNIymKJg/rsnAhjqSgW1Kcu k6XuButvC6ZxMkWduv83jZxQMBR49QoiW9Aqapg3MqXQz6r7CRMyB1HwvRxqEjY9RpSZ 7WWr8/zcbJ/ZZSh0ZO5s1oau130pYlW5lBjxQb/L/wEkVQHAavtM55lTukJ9+vT0F0ja vzqMiDtgams87aasCdmymWSQ6d8j0ICNrmf9mJrnfnAV/NBT4trH4MYpx3xbSp8z8wwV ucR6fpq84qrlRoDaHFbydlTg7jdgNEr2Ub6IEnPNLqU5NIwxpsHhoCa5jHXXtfIwudsF riew== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOS+Go7uZdwUAEq3bKx6vIGBV30baxhwpH1cXjUmEheVSLm8P/37kaXY/qdVzXuvXw== X-Received: by 10.66.120.200 with SMTP id le8mr4732589pab.61.1455739028651; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 11:57:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.10.13.81] ([173.227.0.2]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id fl9sm4518780pab.30.2016.02.17.11.57.07 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 17 Feb 2016 11:57:07 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: New user/group in /usr/ports/UIDs and /usr/ports/GIDs To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <56BF0836.6050507@fechner.net> <56C19E13.70203@fechner.net> <20160215094919.GI26283@home.opsec.eu> <56C1E8B3.8090301@fechner.net> <20160215152445.GK26283@home.opsec.eu> <56C25563.2090806@fechner.net> <56C25AAB.6000501@gmail.com> <56C2DB83.2090801@fechner.net> <56C37737.3040600@gmail.com> <56C42E79.4040300@fechner.net> From: Douglas Thrift Openpgp: id=09C4DA9A5BB7640FFB409623627BA4D834176159 X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <56C4D07E.8090107@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 11:56:46 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56C42E79.4040300@fechner.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 19:57:09 -0000 On 2/17/2016 12:25 AM, Matthias Fechner wrote: > Am 16.02.2016 um 20:23 schrieb Douglas Thrift: >> While your arguments for user isolation make sense, they really only >> make sense if you were to be using gitolite or gitosis at the same time >> as gogs which I imagine would not be that common. I am not opposed to >> you having a gogs user on your system, but I think that the default user >> defined by the port should reflect a reasonable default for most people, >> and that user is git not gogs, even the gogs documentation directs you >> to use the git user. > > the default git user will not work, it has its homedir in /usr/local/git > but gogs expect it on /var/db/gogs/home. > I know, here is a second user generated but if I look on the pros and > cons I think using a dedicated gogs user is here more secure (for > security and also for the upgrade path in the future). > > > Gruß > Matthias > The home directory should be configurable, that should not be a problem. I set up Gogs manually from source on my system and have a git user whose home directory is actually /home/git and I don't have any problems. I don't think this is going to really make sense for most people, the default is to have Git urls of the form git@example.com:user/repo.git not gogs@example.com:user/repo.git. I really don't see that there is a huge security issue unless someone is trying to run Gogs at the same time as Gitolite or Gitosis where they would probably just end up changing what users things run as. Also, I don't see what upgrading has to do with anything. I think that it would be a huge mistake to have a user other than git as the default for this port. Users can configure their systems as they see fit, but I think the port should ship a reasonable default and that reasonable default should not have any POLA violations. -- Douglas William Thrift From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Feb 17 20:24:27 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B1D0AAAA0F for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 20:24:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 236DE14C2 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 20:24:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aW8e0-0004RV-Ce for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 21:24:16 +0100 Received: from 217.31.70.82 ([217.31.70.82]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 21:24:16 +0100 Received: from chris by 217.31.70.82 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 21:24:16 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Christian Ullrich Subject: Installing multi-version ports with portmaster Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 21:24:10 +0100 Lines: 18 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.31.70.82 X-Mozilla-News-Host: news://news.gmane.org:119 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 20:24:27 -0000 Hello, how can I use portmaster to install multiple versions of a port, such as databases/py-psycopg2? My default Python version is set to 3.5, but I need psycopg2 for both versions. When I have py35-psycopg2 installed and do portmaster -m PYTHON_VERSION=python2.7 databases/py-psycopg2 , it replaces the 3.5 version with the 2.7 one, and vice versa. Running "make PYTHON_VERSION=python2.7 install" in the port directory works, but isn't there a way to make portmaster keep the other port? Thanks, -- Christian From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Feb 17 20:49:32 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D58BAAAB5F3 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 20:49:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from taro.utanet.at (taro.utanet.at [IPv6:2001:938:1337:25::25:45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 974A91FE5 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 20:49:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=utanet.at; s=rev1; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:Subject:References:To; bh=naRGSfXu+85bAssq+DaXLT5sGVSZu/iMOEcdoWD9Jkk=; b=l7LAgqjAwLVhxJ6aQNHfkAeJb9YIfF6TfEUWjeAUsVFN7WOF1n6aHXZW/Go25YhcaKXsFnarC2hvFbpTGiLF9bc00k5fzDTpdYuLmSBPuzskKV6osuuejGSGDP7l+mnDmdxcCLBRPG2Qk0eOCxq3iaMoxsv6pLpRwlC9lF/SqLk=; Received: from plenty.xoc.tele2net.at ([213.90.36.8]) by taro.utanet.at with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1aW92M-0005WX-6B for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 21:49:26 +0100 Received: from 62-47-170-27.adsl.highway.telekom.at ([62.47.170.27] helo=[10.0.0.93]) by plenty.xoc.tele2net.at with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1aW92M-0008L9-4R for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 21:49:26 +0100 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: Subject: Re: Installing multi-version ports with portmaster From: Walter Schwarzenfeld Message-ID: <56C4DCD2.50108@utanet.at> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 21:49:22 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 20:49:32 -0000 DEFAULT_VERSIONS=python=2.7 python2=2.7 python3=3.5 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Feb 17 21:49:59 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2406BAACDC7 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 21:49:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from t@tobik.me) Received: from new1-smtp.messagingengine.com (new1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.221]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0BF3156A for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 21:49:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from t@tobik.me) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E73D03E5E for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:49:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from web5 ([10.202.2.215]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:49:50 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tobik.me; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=Wbm KCrdQS2eszMi+TwRIAMj8zZY=; b=FTjMfJ1Oj4CliFsOYERbwbGALDtTSy2OrdU gwfE+ltYwd0k75BLr2AsvYyVkoLyjxOmw0DAxW2mQiXc7FYJfztC4d0IB1f+iSPt 08lbEsJOc4Qpxd3C7YRNZoYmSCGbLKgJA6O9xdep06w2s69bSZjb8aCIqHZxMZx/ YZ4HJ3D8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=WbmKCrdQS2eszMi+TwRIAMj8zZY=; b=OLnOP xANrUe8q9mYSsU7kfEYH5ykZhB1hzlSRkh9QXWX4QlNlkMcf49ahD7Q+MU35pCJr 7AZubS9vNGTGnea41Hu5yUdcbSiMwghk5nfTBXBmj8ifSKf64FzhikIi48Gi+XXI BoJtNnR1GJbS6O6Me/WmClJAK6XdIweMpaA+6w= Received: by web5.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 9F200AC5882; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:49:50 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1455745790.2821090.524255066.2A53B8CF@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: 7DJSC6kFKtkgU8UbuzaRKk4JsgB7xseCuNs+P3etHI4J 1455745790 From: Tobias Kortkamp To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-aeec9b65 Subject: Can someone take a look at these PRs? Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 22:49:50 +0100 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 21:49:59 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206846 (x11/rofi, issue confirmed and patch approved by maintainer) https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206488 (java/jd-gui, new port) https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206515 (www/dillo2, maintainer timeout) https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207236 (security/afl, update) Thanks :) From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Feb 17 22:50:39 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDD3CAAA83E for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 22:50:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from mail-wm0-x232.google.com (mail-wm0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FD071017 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 22:50:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: by mail-wm0-x232.google.com with SMTP id g62so384571wme.1 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:50:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bris-ac-uk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:message-id:to:subject:reply-to; bh=WLE//lTzVBPLOfQWH6iybJlt/NpnqEDXezbEbSJLVJk=; b=ouOZULS9CARIv8NmryC7Cj36mcT7+ewMpJV31R0i0nN2Uu8l3agYK1REB4ir3cEqBQ diMJcA8LOAosiz6nnOPi46fvXJUstB6uIHhhLVBQEnjB5KMBegBiujlIhMYRHDYa1MNT Sm1UXCuzDjh8Ozw1bM1sm0h/4QSNvpbzuJZBRcrApL9m6g/5HWlLmTJttp/97as5phgN 84GBxNxSIPwz6NvaoSPTumNCYr5SwZKGX1s5Ws9zy5BUryqJGuXnK9GCtbyXTU1VrMZ+ gva8+zuSJ5SeOXgNg0jYvX6XCr5oA+TpkPdueoeS2i5Il9TCYQ/H5xQ7all62ShiIoRC Ecdw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:subject:reply-to; bh=WLE//lTzVBPLOfQWH6iybJlt/NpnqEDXezbEbSJLVJk=; b=nBSlGwfNTO+3SiXMsTypAiyDJ0ySFK2HKFeLljVQt78Ah40W5Yd14LFjlA9iws5KQq 3bPYVAlpcgpu+DSsH/BpCCVliLitIW07oOCKoH9eV/qOsGlqX1qbf4iE11ChO2VUdx09 ozQC7SbQSrDMnklJpMlgrBIGx2w+XFqtS/BJ6Zzjua5SCsJ8LloeGar+zY5leYD+WJ+3 iQvZrN7ev5SMsHjqAJwy0IWBcLHh9FLDkC3g747vtCpoS/kH3w7XadYfVEbPLQqFIPV/ Kf0I7vq6zkqWIOmTwdG5vCU8kKkH5GjhUJG8H6xRfU1LrvVlQCNsPpcFidqFslFWOeop JPRA== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOT5UxKSPogJE/NgcmT63l3EolsEY3DAgRUoSVc49M2hKW3ocQKFZtUTiYji85gGvT7S X-Received: by 10.28.17.81 with SMTP id 78mr46833wmr.84.1455749437627; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:50:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk. [137.222.170.4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u201sm46381wmu.11.2016.02.17.14.50.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:50:37 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:50:37 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 22:50:36 GMT Received: from mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u1HMoarL063846; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 22:50:36 GMT (envelope-from mexas@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u1HMoa7n063845; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 22:50:36 GMT (envelope-from mexas) From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201602172250.u1HMoa7n063845@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> To: fortran@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: help make port for opencoarrays Reply-To: mexas@bris.ac.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 22:50:40 -0000 Please help/advise https://github.com/sourceryinstitute/opencoarrays It requires mpich built with at least gcc5.3, more specifically mpif90 built with gcc5.3 or gcc6. net/mpich has FORTRAN_USES=fortran, which I understand triggers lang/gcc. Is it a good idea (or at all possible) to add an option to net/mpich to choose a particular gcc version? Any other advice? Thanks Anton From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Feb 18 08:41:42 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34946AACED0 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 08:41:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: from mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [217.69.76.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.0x20.net", Issuer "mail.0x20.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF279ED0 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 08:41:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [IPv6:2001:aa8:fffb:1::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.0x20.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A7D06DF91B; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:41:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id u1I8fbNW097241; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:41:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: (from lars@localhost) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id u1I8fZqx096076; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:41:35 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lars) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:41:35 +0100 From: Lars Engels To: Tobias Kortkamp Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can someone take a look at these PRs? Message-ID: <20160218084135.GJ83790@e-new.0x20.net> References: <1455745790.2821090.524255066.2A53B8CF@webmail.messagingengine.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="u3bvv0EcKsvvYeex" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1455745790.2821090.524255066.2A53B8CF@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 7.4 X-Operation-System: FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE-p23 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 08:41:42 -0000 --u3bvv0EcKsvvYeex Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:49:50PM +0100, Tobias Kortkamp wrote: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D206515 (www/dillo2, > maintainer timeout) Committed this one. --=20 Lars --u3bvv0EcKsvvYeex Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJWxYO/XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ4RjQwMDE3RTRERjUzMTI1N0FGRTUxNDlF NTRDQjM3RDNBMDg5RDZEAAoJEOVMs306CJ1tWJEIAJwa/OQJX/kgUneDeWorMqvp TorY+7MB1ny5H6nHP4ZB3jnVyJ69bijWmhROSY8yz4Ys9EhJBfOpqitA+jYI4L37 dhcqayfW3cTd6awEyq2LtfQkWT+BVmkuVbCZj5Ek8x3jXYMMcy5ez6SwbVzvweBF 5GlGbHXMRfqKuhG22rF+qkqVI6JI69wc3MAcMCgg3M/MtLqY1I/x9L/eVYOl2bLJ cghd4Rc/Cc8fXDzg60EnRbr1tSqHv2+L+6ZWhHe9q9rLjRBtjfji8jfImAnRUDcw 3AmmS53TeZcwhqxC0JBdFSXjPYBCyWotFZHo1Z1rZATNiHHDkKdSEsi+nzujbUA= =i5YG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --u3bvv0EcKsvvYeex-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Feb 18 09:51:45 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF992AAC4BF for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:51:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52D2614F2 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:51:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3556F28453; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:51:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from illbsd.quip.test (ip-86-49-16-209.net.upcbroadband.cz [86.49.16.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7D3A628451; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:51:38 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <56C5942A.5090001@quip.cz> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:51:38 +0100 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/35.0 SeaMonkey/2.32 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Lewis CC: "freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: resurrect deprecated port print/pnm2ppa References: <54E0EEC9.80707@quip.cz> <20150222225800.GA97535@misty.eyesbeyond.com> In-Reply-To: <20150222225800.GA97535@misty.eyesbeyond.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:51:45 -0000 Greg Lewis wrote on 02/22/2015 23:58: > On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 08:08:57PM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote: >> Can somebody resurrect deprecated port print/pnm2ppa? >> >> It was deleted from the tree as "Unmaintained since 2001" but it is >> (was) still working fine and I am still using my good old printer HP >> DeskJet 710C through USB to LPT convertor (usb:/dev/ulpt0) with CUPS. > > Why don't you submit a PR with the resurrected port in it and yourself as > the maintainer? I'll take a look at it if you do. It seems like all it > really needs is someone to commit to maintaining it. Hi Greg, after more than a year I resurerected pnm2ppa port for my home use yesterday. It was lot of work for me - I did some port many years ago and converting this old port to staging was not easy for me. I tried to build it with "poudrier testport" and it succeeded. ====> Compressing man pages (compress-man) =========================================================================== ====> Running Q/A tests (stage-qa) ====> Checking for pkg-plist issues (check-plist) ===> Parsing plist ===> Checking for items in STAGEDIR missing from pkg-plist ===> Checking for items in pkg-plist which are not in STAGEDIR ===> No pkg-plist issues found (check-plist) ====>> Status for build print/pnm2ppa: package ====>> Checking for staging violations... done =================================================== ===> Building package for pnm2ppa-1.13_2 =========================================================================== ====>> Status for build print/pnm2ppa: install-mtree =================================================== =========================================================================== ====>> Status for build print/pnm2ppa: install ====>> Recording filesystem state for preinst... done =================================================== ===> Installing for pnm2ppa-1.13_2 ===> pnm2ppa-1.13_2 depends on executable: enscript - found ===> Checking if pnm2ppa already installed ===> Registering installation for pnm2ppa-1.13_2 [10_2_amd64-default] Installing pnm2ppa-1.13_2... To configure your printcap to print either ascii" or Postscript files, add the following lines to your" /etc/printcap file" lp|ascii|unix:\\" :lp=/dev/lpt0:\\" :sd=/var/spool/lpd:\\" :if=/usr/local/bin/asciippafilter:\\" :mx#0:\\" :sh:" ps:\\" :lp=/dev/lpt0:\\" :sd=/var/spool/ps:\\" :if=/usr/local/bin/ppafilter:\\" :mx#0:\\" :sh:" =========================================================================== ====>> Status for build print/pnm2ppa: deinstall ====>> Checking shared library dependencies 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libc.so.7] 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libm.so.5] =================================================== ===> Deinstalling for pnm2ppa ===> Deinstalling pnm2ppa-1.13_2 Updating database digests format: ...... done Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) Deinstallation has been requested for the following 1 packages (of 0 packages in the universe): Installed packages to be REMOVED: pnm2ppa-1.13_2 The operation will free 653 KiB. [10_2_amd64-default] [1/1] Deinstalling pnm2ppa-1.13_2... [10_2_amd64-default] [1/1] Deleting files for pnm2ppa-1.13_2: ...... done =========================================================================== ====>> Checking for extra files and directories [00:00:09] ====>> Installing from package [10_2_amd64-default] Installing pnm2ppa-1.13_2... [10_2_amd64-default] Extracting pnm2ppa-1.13_2: ...... done Message from pnm2ppa-1.13_2: To configure your printcap to print either ascii" or Postscript files, add the following lines to your" /etc/printcap file" lp|ascii|unix:\\" :lp=/dev/lpt0:\\" :sd=/var/spool/lpd:\\" :if=/usr/local/bin/asciippafilter:\\" :mx#0:\\" :sh:" ps:\\" :lp=/dev/lpt0:\\" :sd=/var/spool/ps:\\" :if=/usr/local/bin/ppafilter:\\" :mx#0:\\" :sh:" [00:00:09] ====>> Cleaning up ===> Cleaning for pnm2ppa-1.13_2 [00:00:09] ====>> Deinstalling package Updating database digests format: . done Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) Deinstallation has been requested for the following 1 packages (of 0 packages in the universe): Installed packages to be REMOVED: pnm2ppa-1.13_2 The operation will free 653 KiB. [10_2_amd64-default] [1/1] Deinstalling pnm2ppa-1.13_2... [10_2_amd64-default] [1/1] Deleting files for pnm2ppa-1.13_2: ...... done build of print/pnm2ppa ended at Wed Feb 17 23:44:50 CET 2016 build time: 00:00:08 [00:00:09] ====>> Cleaning up 10_2_amd64-default: removed 10_2_amd64-default-n: removed [00:00:09] ====>> Umounting file systems Usr: 7.140s Krnl: 3.021s Totl: 0:10.91s CPU: 93.1% swppd: 0 I/O: 71+9636 So what to do next to submit PR in right format? Should I send diff against old port version, or full archive of new version? Miroslav Lachman From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Feb 18 10:17:12 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C65E6AACFAA for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:17:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E5A21F8C for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:17:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aWLdz-0004Fx-Bw for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:17:07 +0100 Received: from 217.31.70.82 ([217.31.70.82]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:17:07 +0100 Received: from chris by 217.31.70.82 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:17:07 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Christian Ullrich Subject: Re: Installing multi-version ports with portmaster Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:17:01 +0100 Lines: 34 Message-ID: References: <56C4DCD2.50108@utanet.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.31.70.82 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 In-Reply-To: <56C4DCD2.50108@utanet.at> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:17:12 -0000 * Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: > DEFAULT_VERSIONS=python=2.7 python2=2.7 python3=3.5 Not really, no. [root@i9b ~]# portmaster -vd databases/py-psycopg2 ===>>> Currently installed version: py35-psycopg2-2.6.1_1 ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/databases/py-psycopg2 [...] ===> Cleaning for py35-psycopg2-2.6.1_1 ===>>> Waiting on fetch & checksum for databases/py-psycopg2 <<<=== /!\ WARNING /!\ Your requested default python version 2.7 is different from the installed default python interpreter version 3.5 ... and then it proceeds to reinstall for 3.5. If I give it PYTHON_VERSION=python2.7 explicitly, it still _replaces_ the 3.5 port with the 2.7 one. [root@i9b ~]# pkg info -og py\*-psycopg2 py27-psycopg2-2.6.1_1 databases/py-psycopg2 py35-psycopg2-2.6.1_1 databases/py-psycopg2 Can't portmaster deal with shared-origin ports? -- Christian From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Feb 18 10:36:23 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 467A7AAC6D4 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:36:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from info.aleksey@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-x232.google.com (mail-lb0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC068A54 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:36:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from info.aleksey@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lb0-x232.google.com with SMTP id x1so25633458lbj.3 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 02:36:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=l/wYw1KWK/AJz2kYh8lswgxEPSg9azOmGx+RpV/cXPA=; b=e8cvCvvH4MZA06SBNtmd2msmYQdyUDo0WkRUsUQzOO+8flfzfk739pYLIQDC2hN68N X3Bg5JriTW1z9iJ+E7Tj371uzL9+e/kHarsAkx/Fscc7VRu+F1VrG1qd937Ik+hIZZtb K+gg49a5NdXH8z0ogfYNhyKyxdWwdysnI+vKd6JXV5BRiNO69jV8f4uUg98y3cHExE5d K40IBt0KLrrVOtN47ldyqipbYAqwxRWArOu7W+M/72sq6atdxLxXKCBobjfta1QReLR8 BNU3Tp7PmAEO5LO67MJCkrRy6H2Qq0UKKSbuKL836esuXjloorbPpqEGgN9D3jtGKBzc as+A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=l/wYw1KWK/AJz2kYh8lswgxEPSg9azOmGx+RpV/cXPA=; b=THZ9j92vLG6tzj3A7dIJzZ250DIaNQ98IiPwNr/THr/7Ty/DkmKMeKvZAhoTz4tpaB t7VCt2O20Mld9SfYRIExjHu7QvvCQ0Px5UnmnLxP1TCnx+6pryRqLNUiJEgK6K+jEZAT GLlAIXdGbvirjJz62EPHx413mAp4Q+OY1jAfbChxRTOS7eguugtLJzu7qAwL199+72eN BhuEbjf+AR+ldp6uYUTPC+0v4Ih6G8/QwgCwwLYY0WoL7WPQ5fPVEOQTyYfwcnf1u69u nGmhjv7H+KJM0FsrJCTTHqfahK2eAMMRcZ0njkRDTcOSTeq0VUxrV6Eu+iPypLnt/LW7 VHJw== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORo03tiBO7EiV68EFQxV/bncndqVp2zjZ3Vt+7P7+mtRoaslytYQlwcm5zGOY0+vw== X-Received: by 10.112.12.233 with SMTP id b9mr2437651lbc.63.1455791780817; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 02:36:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from ca001.scriptpro.ru ([95.165.151.94]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id p124sm851480lfe.31.2016.02.18.02.36.20 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 18 Feb 2016 02:36:20 -0800 (PST) From: Aleksey A Nikitin X-Google-Original-From: Aleksey A Nikitin Received: from ca001.scriptpro.ru (ca001.ex [192.168.0.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by ca001.scriptpro.ru (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPA id u1IAaIOT004290 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 13:36:19 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from alex@ca001.ex) X-Authentication-Warning: ca001.scriptpro.ru: Host ca001.ex [192.168.0.2] claimed to be ca001.scriptpro.ru To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: java/eclipse Message-ID: <56C59EA2.2020801@ca001.ex> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 13:36:18 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:36:23 -0000 ===> Building for eclipse-4.5.1 [INFO] Scanning for projects... [INFO] Computing target platform for MavenProject: org.eclipse.jdt:org.eclipse.jdt:3.11.1-SNAPSHOT @ /usr/ports/java/eclipse/work/eclipse.platform.releng.aggregator-4.5.1/eclipse.jdt/org.eclipse.jdt/pom.xml [INFO] Adding repository http://download.eclipse.org/tools/orbit/downloads/drops/R20150821153341/repository [INFO] Adding repository http://download.eclipse.org/modeling/emf/emf/updates/2.11.x/base/S201508050538 [INFO] Adding repository http://download.eclipse.org/jetty/updates/jetty-bundles-9.x/9.2.13.v20150730 [INFO] Adding repository http://download.eclipse.org/rt/ecf/3.10.1/site.p2 [INFO] Adding repository http://download.eclipse.org/cbi/updates/license/1.0.1.v20140414-1359 [INFO] Fetching p2.index from http://download.eclipse.org/tools/ajdt/45/dev/update/ (0B at 0B/s) [INFO] Adding repository http://download.eclipse.org/tools/ajdt/45/dev/update [INFO] Fetching compositeContent.xml from http://download.eclipse.org/tools/ajdt/45/dev/update/ (0B at 0B/s) [INFO] Fetching content.jar from http://download.eclipse.org/tools/ajdt/45/dev/update/ajdt-e45-2.2.4.201602042048/ (0B of 14,01kB at 0B/s) [ERROR] Failed to resolve target definition /usr/ports/java/eclipse/work/eclipse.platform.releng.aggregator-4.5.1/eclipse.platform.releng.prereqs.sdk/eclipse-sdk-prereqs.target: Could not find "org.aspectj.runtime/1.8.5.20150128171000" in the repositories of the current location -> [Help 1] [ERROR] [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the -e switch. [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging. [ERROR] [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions, please read the following articles: [ERROR] [Help 1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/MavenExecutionException *** Error code 1 Stop. make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/java/eclipse *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/ports/java/eclipse From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Feb 18 15:51:07 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E9DDAADCFD for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 15:51:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from miwi.fbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk0-x22c.google.com (mail-vk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C15EF1B0B for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 15:51:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from miwi.fbsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id e185so48084915vkb.1 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 07:51:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Q8+XH4o9hRtn+ceYAlQnbWzX2EEUiqypZW8K1C3JryU=; b=GHp7JqwiynG9ARblz2rF/Um2GOjnCtSWpvWMQgwPtgXVPalw76b3Kv/lGptzRKUw/D oX0/J+QyUohd0Uozyv1dDhmMLZN86zTHFmXJL1HNCQZ9T+DFDc3A6f9cHBHl1YfcYg+9 2had3X0ePhxPt5nChKx9dbFH/DUATmZa7M8OAqXiOAHhWmIZTi8xINoM4A8E52nwlc4g gwOh9IILvtpPt95gWKy48317Vlas0bRX60TGwgGgYFv7dwd/yQciBW9WGV+Bb02IFFs1 AnJL/YWKi/f9mlXvvmnU4Uc9aIcMVEmlNjorr8ityVhzV5ABKl7vL0k6FhqVR8iuqARQ jJ/w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from :to:content-type; bh=Q8+XH4o9hRtn+ceYAlQnbWzX2EEUiqypZW8K1C3JryU=; b=TuFzmh2WdAkVBEnylLNNAe9E75dkQ03F9PqHaMfqFUOmKk6lG9GbPqwgos9xCfwhhk lAx+tk4eGU+2QYKNg/L7/dtvQ5IrmqP1vrwOO9ZTSd73zKyDy2f43dZum09tham58vrD 5cEamDgTpFoVEEaOZCrkdaIrbW+GxYwIWIPlCXy3qXmu4CNID8P3O2aSrmQf27XQTuYx YkbhINIkMRt178Kb9BC1JpRc/t9VNA7QmrgUl1hK4DF2ZpUOrju9aScD8u6JwTLcQWQT VIEPWX6r3gClk3UMdK3QE1iElNhRskaPwI2S87pu0a3RGNXLhSYYxyzHl9wgd/Y293OV ilcg== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQlZhn9jbU8tQWH+iDSl7ZoeJAP1lxzotRG2lzWdCtcMr0YTgPmHrDZGyzLrIBw1v1Gjx+pdhMJNnucRg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.31.164.13 with SMTP id n13mr6557087vke.64.1455810666012; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 07:51:06 -0800 (PST) Sender: miwi.fbsd@gmail.com Received: by 10.176.7.70 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 07:51:05 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 23:51:05 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: mSgvFZlU9R6Qx0sZ3FSBu3n0EEw Message-ID: Subject: Future of pecl ports From: Martin Wilke To: ports FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 15:51:07 -0000 Hi all, I've spent a lot of time on FreeBSD PHP and pecl ports this past week, and have also been thinking about the future of these ports. We now have 3 PHP versions in the tree (5.5, 5.6 and 7.0) and 7.0 is not backwards compatible. This means a separate set of PHP 7.0 specific versions of our PECL ports need to exist. We can also expect additional PHP 7.x versions in the future, which we currently expect will be backward compatible within all 7.x major version releases. a) Existing ports copied to create new ones named php70-pecl-name, or pecl-name-php70. pecl-name ports stay the same (only PHP 5.x) b) Existing ports copied to create new ones named php5-pecl-name or pecl-name-php5. Existing pecl-name ports then updated to support the latest (php70) version only. c) Existing ports copied to create new ones named php5-pecl-name or pecl-name-php5. Existing ports copied to create new ones named php70-pecl-name, or pecl-name-php70. pecl-name ports stay the same. We are left with pecl-name-php5 and pecl-name-php7. pecl-name ports go away. Regarding (a) and (b) above, even though today PHP 7 is far from being the 'default' version, at some point PHP 5.x will go away, and this will mean having to go through the the pecl-* ports tree and rename all the ports anyway. Given the above, I am leaning towards option (X), but I'd like to open a discussion and welcome your thoughts and feedback. -- +-----------------oOO--(_)--OOo-------------------------+ With best Regards, Martin Wilke (miwi_(at)_FreeBSD.org) Mess with the Best, Die like the Rest From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Feb 18 16:28:26 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C76B4AAB1F0 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 16:28:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from tatiana.utanet.at (tatiana.utanet.at [IPv6:2001:938:1337:25::25:46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73E53FC8 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 16:28:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=utanet.at; s=rev1; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:Subject:References:To; bh=egAu587S/hHOfXobS9XNudb9PlmhvnU+gPHSdu81EXM=; b=jMzla7PNnZHvVhoI6H6FMEsAK9Mj6ZPdRdenG0zgyESmCTt7mxlajpvB3oe4bl07STh2yPizFKcQqH9EBCxaOy9QYTwrqOZ2L/ouCPQVdlvMfMHFCYHrIki1+nv79DKfVCX8+f6NK5oBlKAg/M1oMwQAux8I2eUiKviPNz+WYIw=; Received: from patricia.xoc.tele2net.at ([213.90.36.9]) by tatiana.utanet.at with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1aWRRA-0002jA-5l for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:28:16 +0100 Received: from 62-47-169-151.adsl.highway.telekom.at ([62.47.169.151] helo=[10.0.0.93]) by patricia.xoc.tele2net.at with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1aWRRA-0004du-3z for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:28:16 +0100 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: Subject: Re: Installing multi-version ports with portmaster From: Walter Schwarzenfeld Message-ID: <56C5F11F.3050503@utanet.at> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:28:15 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 16:28:26 -0000 Sorry, but I find no py35-psycopg2 on my system only py-psycopg and py-psycopg2. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Feb 18 17:31:13 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFCFCAAD3CC for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:31:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mizhka@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf0-x234.google.com (mail-lf0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D0D87BB for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:31:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mizhka@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf0-x234.google.com with SMTP id 78so37431618lfy.3 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:31:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=WiCAeSXW+GCwIuhRa63GWg9Bgzvhjv4QjwXW8kGYapc=; b=nTm3mKyjNLKpFipj2fQ19kRWvspSJlBe7QGg+mA6k9dpftbK5n5VhqeYyQRZxStHkG KY/fYcDeszgGb32tn1cYHnQDLA/y/cQsaGqv60T1b9ND7Dy0dTZrF1Rgr1zWX0oeDdvz qgqv0RMRN/A9PoAt2+HLWaG+wyG7rPTrLgpC05LNz4n+xWAmhKl/Vn3jPINH9c/a1zlL HL8j4woOjSRBI+856+4p8sbZA3idADOUcl7BpqBtGwnaoY4Ic8fh1Q4WyQSMAxMHuf/v 0PewyEnkn/E0zEo6GAQ8UpjDp95WY7v2bSNRk0uoNYDEXzbkEeTHqRWNVwc6F9t3uOGs KABA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=WiCAeSXW+GCwIuhRa63GWg9Bgzvhjv4QjwXW8kGYapc=; b=QXmPjComwy3GED928DCWdvP6BwkgI65H1wjx1owPp3PKwISnxizZ2wl0TkqdURIGrM IdPvujab42Pgm7WbgpDEwh7I9m0jEYsBCSIGVWGcsS7rBNz2SsldTPvFk9WtTyll6Tyd lQjhnSE3U7DNS+kbbupNHuvHpEEUDDvbQW5Upg0zjzbNdAlyi3ZqT710HiMRCiEUfpkE GtUstZYtJ0rLVxBdh5lckEct3WJVBPhkT+OR4DDC6QXQbpgP7V0wP7hBRTPfMrZ+WCQC lPdR7nuXe5rKYf3/nWPiVxZX0612r7W+cfxEJ5iidfDYfasd7WdMEHnBCu+8jl3hlFii Uwvg== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORFmDUjKJ+E+3SCI+ZuXIu6MpyjkpmDYKduAinA9QqEczgUWweec2zSXGCvbWn3Zff581pYu8nWxWHNOA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.25.148.76 with SMTP id w73mr3154293lfd.31.1455816670905; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:31:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.73.104 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:31:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <56C59EA2.2020801@ca001.ex> References: <56C59EA2.2020801@ca001.ex> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 20:31:10 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: java/eclipse From: Michael Zhilin To: Aleksey A Nikitin Cc: freebsd-ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:31:14 -0000 Hi, Looks strange... Can you share full output of make? Thanks! On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Aleksey A Nikitin wrote: > ===> Building for eclipse-4.5.1 > [INFO] Scanning for projects... > [INFO] Computing target platform for MavenProject: > org.eclipse.jdt:org.eclipse.jdt:3.11.1-SNAPSHOT @ > > /usr/ports/java/eclipse/work/eclipse.platform.releng.aggregator-4.5.1/eclipse.jdt/org.eclipse.jdt/pom.xml > [INFO] Adding repository > > http://download.eclipse.org/tools/orbit/downloads/drops/R20150821153341/repository > [INFO] Adding repository > > http://download.eclipse.org/modeling/emf/emf/updates/2.11.x/base/S201508050538 > [INFO] Adding repository > > http://download.eclipse.org/jetty/updates/jetty-bundles-9.x/9.2.13.v20150730 > [INFO] Adding repository http://download.eclipse.org/rt/ecf/3.10.1/site.p2 > [INFO] Adding repository > http://download.eclipse.org/cbi/updates/license/1.0.1.v20140414-1359 > [INFO] Fetching p2.index from > http://download.eclipse.org/tools/ajdt/45/dev/update/ (0B at 0B/s) > [INFO] Adding repository > http://download.eclipse.org/tools/ajdt/45/dev/update > [INFO] Fetching compositeContent.xml from > http://download.eclipse.org/tools/ajdt/45/dev/update/ (0B at 0B/s) > [INFO] Fetching content.jar from > > http://download.eclipse.org/tools/ajdt/45/dev/update/ajdt-e45-2.2.4.201602042048/ > (0B of 14,01kB at 0B/s) > [ERROR] Failed to resolve target definition > > /usr/ports/java/eclipse/work/eclipse.platform.releng.aggregator-4.5.1/eclipse.platform.releng.prereqs.sdk/eclipse-sdk-prereqs.target: > Could not find "org.aspectj.runtime/1.8.5.20150128171000" in the > repositories of the current location -> [Help 1] > [ERROR] > [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the > -e switch. > [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging. > [ERROR] > [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions, > please read the following articles: > [ERROR] [Help 1] > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/MavenExecutionException > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/java/eclipse > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > make: stopped in /usr/ports/java/eclipse > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Feb 18 17:53:07 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E9EAAADD7C for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:53:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from info.aleksey@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf0-x233.google.com (mail-lf0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B42214CD for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:53:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from info.aleksey@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf0-x233.google.com with SMTP id j78so37907024lfb.1 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:53:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:date:message-id:to:subject:cc; bh=TRbaUH2z8ydg/lDvq9zjSklXTKkt9iAMGGzAh7q5srY=; b=kO8dARaukiZm8i/hzg6ypm7ozC463mZZZDO9fA1tGg9Gl2G0hx9mC7dz8siPMSYwJ4 ti67fV9HBQH3fzumLZdB2ixguWxsvUmc8P87WnBwo2gh3GEBr/OGX1C4W/JLMZwsl1GK c6lC+9R+ZV6ExHWwS0NiCHCqkQtkjlcq+U81guQRcW1yHEPK7DjsC4VKMmJ5U/577b4L tE3F9QchFOfm6VIg1EFCQcPBSjgauIi2CZLHdq7pmO6GnmrXRjlXFkLhM+9Fbt/jCYbO WJ4uk40cDOrNLX0v4/5wcwdLfvFKC7Pml+Hg/2NO32rZk8RxjB4Eebo97I9jhqT6EIVX TPAQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:message-id:to:subject:cc; bh=TRbaUH2z8ydg/lDvq9zjSklXTKkt9iAMGGzAh7q5srY=; b=HV7KPJrUj6P/AOzTtBZ7XdcAMhQ267bdmoFzCc9pW9jURKh/M+wiuJkXAtpdobHeXf Nqu8Hc/RKc6vynCuFTv/XP9BsLLNmYYVjxNjfIDGkw6JmJvSB4n+sFCUenx1g+ckADRn YPn0apPXzw7r9a9Jap5W8I7f8fLs5fmo7CTbILfEpad97m+mfbDU4xqAMXtzTyzaMKRs VSJ9W/wKtQzRlYicwaeTbAthJZU533qqOGiNRL8CMn5fYApy1hfg6Chkl/0BxaJ8Asry 8edVNvbZZzX54iFF1o+yCNx3cWtdJLMV3TUdUJuEHmnf7l8W1Y0J5RpAAAq9LjWVDl2n P+EQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQEAiOISuGEP89tTCd3tiaOyJsp99d7w9CF1uluQtGbM1mBG5j4dB6s8lM5k8Xk/g== X-Received: by 10.25.0.6 with SMTP id 6mr3216814lfa.132.1455817984887; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:53:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from ca001.scriptpro.ru ([95.165.151.94]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id o97sm1083674lfi.25.2016.02.18.09.53.03 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:53:03 -0800 (PST) From: Aleksey A Nikitin X-Google-Original-From: Aleksey A Nikitin Received: from ca001.scriptpro.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ca001.scriptpro.ru (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u1IHr2YB000213; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 20:53:02 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from alex@ca001.scriptpro.ru) Received: (from alex@localhost) by ca001.scriptpro.ru (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u1IHr1wU000212; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 20:53:01 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from alex) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 20:53:01 +0300 (MSK) Message-Id: <201602181753.u1IHr1wU000212@ca001.scriptpro.ru> To: mizhka@gmail.com Subject: java/eclipse Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:53:07 -0000 # make ===> License EPL accepted by the user ===> Found saved configuration for eclipse-4.5.1 ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found ===> Fetching all distfiles required by eclipse-4.5.1 for building ===> Extracting for eclipse-4.5.1 => SHA256 Checksum OK for eclipse/eclipse.platform.releng.aggregator-4.5.1.xz. => SHA256 Checksum OK for eclipse/eclipse-maven-repo-4.5.1.xz. ===> Patching for eclipse-4.5.1 ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for eclipse-4.5.1 No such line 88 in input file, ignoring Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file eclipse-platform-parent/pom.xml Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file eclipse.platform.releng.tychoeclipsebuilder/eclipse-junit-tests/pom.xml Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file eclipse.platform.releng.tychoeclipsebuilder/equinox.starterkit.product/pom.xml Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file eclipse.platform.releng.tychoeclipsebuilder/platform/platform.p2.inf Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file eclipse.platform.releng.tychoeclipsebuilder/platform/pom.xml Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file eclipse.platform.releng.tychoeclipsebuilder/platform.sdk/pom.xml Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file eclipse.platform.releng.tychoeclipsebuilder/rcp.config/build.properties Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file eclipse.platform.releng.tychoeclipsebuilder/sdk/pom.xml Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file eclipse.platform.releng.tychoeclipsebuilder/sdk/sdk.p2.inf Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file eclipse.platform.releng/features/org.eclipse.platform-feature/pom.xml Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file eclipse.platform.resources/pom.xml Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file eclipse.platform.swt/local-build/org.eclipse.swt.fragments.localbuild/META-INF/p2.inf Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file eclipse.platform.swt/bundles/org.eclipse.swt/META-INF/p2.inf Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file eclipse.platform.swt.binaries/pom.xml Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file eclipse.platform.team/pom.xml Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file eclipse.platform.ui/features/org.eclipse.e4.rcp/feature.xml Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file eclipse.platform.ui/features/org.eclipse.e4.rcp/pom.xml Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file rt.equinox.framework/bundles/org.eclipse.equinox.launcher/pom.xml Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file rt.equinox.framework/features/org.eclipse.equinox.executable.feature/feature.xml Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file rt.equinox.framework/features/org.eclipse.equinox.executable.feature/pom.xml Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file rt.equinox.framework/pom.xml Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file rt.equinox.p2/bundles/org.eclipse.equinox.p2.tests.reconciler.product/reconciler.product Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file eclipse.platform.releng/features/org.eclipse.platform-feature/feature.xml ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on file: /usr/local/share/java/maven33/bin/mvn - found ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on file: /usr/local/openjdk8/bin/java - found ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on executable: gmake - found ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on executable: pkgconf - found ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on file: /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/gnome-mime-data-2.0.pc - found ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on file: /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/glproto.pc - found ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on file: /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/dri2proto.pc - found ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on shared library: libcairo.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libcairo.so) ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on shared library: libwebkitgtk-1.0.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libwebkitgtk-1.0.so) ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on shared library: libwebkitgtk-3.0.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libwebkitgtk-3.0.so) ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on shared library: libatk-1.0.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libatk-1.0.so) ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on shared library: libesd.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libesd.so) ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on shared library: libgconf-2.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libgconf-2.so) ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on shared library: libglib-2.0.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so) ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on shared library: libgnomevfs-2.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so) ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on shared library: libgtk-x11-2.0.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so) ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on shared library: libgtk-3.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libgtk-3.so) ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on shared library: libart_lgpl_2.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libart_lgpl_2.so) ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on shared library: libbonobo-2.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libbonobo-2.so) ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on shared library: libbonoboui-2.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libbonoboui-2.so) ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on shared library: libglade-2.0.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libglade-2.0.so) ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on shared library: libgnome-2.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libgnome-2.so) ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on shared library: libgnomecanvas-2.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libgnomecanvas-2.so) ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on shared library: libgnomeui-2.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libgnomeui-2.so) ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on shared library: libIDL-2.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libIDL-2.so) ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on shared library: libxml2.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libxml2.so) ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on shared library: libORBit-2.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libORBit-2.so) ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on shared library: libpango-1.0.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libpango-1.0.so) ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on shared library: libGLU.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libGLU.so) ===> Configuring for eclipse-4.5.1 ===> Building for eclipse-4.5.1 [INFO] Scanning for projects... [INFO] Computing target platform for MavenProject: org.eclipse.jdt:org.eclipse.jdt:3.11.1-SNAPSHOT @ /usr/ports/java/eclipse/work/eclipse.platform.releng.aggregator-4.5.1/eclipse.jdt/org.eclipse.jdt/pom.xml [INFO] Adding repository http://download.eclipse.org/tools/orbit/downloads/drops/R20150821153341/repository [INFO] Adding repository http://download.eclipse.org/modeling/emf/emf/updates/2.11.x/base/S201508050538 [INFO] Adding repository http://download.eclipse.org/jetty/updates/jetty-bundles-9.x/9.2.13.v20150730 [INFO] Adding repository http://download.eclipse.org/rt/ecf/3.10.1/site.p2 [INFO] Adding repository http://download.eclipse.org/cbi/updates/license/1.0.1.v20140414-1359 [INFO] Fetching p2.index from http://download.eclipse.org/tools/ajdt/45/dev/update/ (0B at 0B/s) [INFO] Adding repository http://download.eclipse.org/tools/ajdt/45/dev/update [INFO] Fetching compositeContent.xml from http://download.eclipse.org/tools/ajdt/45/dev/update/ (0B at 0B/s) [INFO] Fetching content.jar from http://download.eclipse.org/tools/ajdt/45/dev/update/ajdt-e45-2.2.4.201602042048/ (0B of 14,01kB at 0B/s) [ERROR] Failed to resolve target definition /usr/ports/java/eclipse/work/eclipse.platform.releng.aggregator-4.5.1/eclipse.platform.releng.prereqs.sdk/eclipse-sdk-prereqs.target: Could not find "org.aspectj.runtime/1.8.5.20150128171000" in the repositories of the current location -> [Help 1] [ERROR] [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the -e switch. [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging. [ERROR] [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions, please read the following articles: [ERROR] [Help 1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/MavenExecutionException *** Error code 1 Stop. make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/java/eclipse *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/ports/java/eclipse From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Feb 18 18:01:01 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BAF8AAC155 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:01:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from tatiana.utanet.at (tatiana.utanet.at [IPv6:2001:938:1337:25::25:46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A96941D13 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:01:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=utanet.at; s=rev1; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:Subject:References:To; bh=JtAKyQBlqz4gb3DuFOPwTrbWQx0ytGmR7zktiB3uDdc=; b=T/LOOFNEBz9en4ULNY6d992/n15w2h0DgLrrSlMYdkHF+ufsT1scUlLed5sBiycb1bKGpaU9MYQEAqBzEew1O3kcYBqdS1rUAV2in/d+giOPS3d9qYWUlbeGq86ioEGiKT/tavINkcIxpVRneDhKyCeLVbMrO2f/kiafIzFMsH8=; Received: from paris.xoc.tele2net.at ([213.90.36.7]) by tatiana.utanet.at with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1aWSsm-0008Us-EX for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 19:00:52 +0100 Received: from 62-47-169-151.adsl.highway.telekom.at ([62.47.169.151] helo=[10.0.0.93]) by paris.xoc.tele2net.at with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1aWSsm-0001kD-Ci for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 19:00:52 +0100 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: Subject: Re: Installing multi-version ports with portmaster From: Walter Schwarzenfeld Message-ID: <56C606D2.4080600@utanet.at> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 19:00:50 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:01:01 -0000 )> py27-psycopg2-2.6.1_1 databases/py-psycopg2 py35-psycopg2-2.6.1_1 databases/py-psycopg2 Looks like you have copied the py27 port to py35 Have you add it to the database/Makefile? (and that is problematic, cause it could be overwritten by next update). From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Feb 18 19:27:30 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18C81AAC7D5 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 19:27:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mizhka@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf0-x236.google.com (mail-lf0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7942518CF for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 19:27:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mizhka@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf0-x236.google.com with SMTP id m1so40024001lfg.0 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:27:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=0/TIJu7ivL+Bgw+ppqeypjy2fnJ4iAr9KK3TWFNCgIk=; b=GmCzK6aAv3v5jfaKb99Ri2kCUjeVG1K7LajYtrj7w9DsciUlMLjrBCQ7j3OoVrfgca 9Iubq3GBQKiXs9ga/jvwfqWAP44H6zEyIjeqIp1Ivc3LTXNbXLbDceawESQCYrXT7cR/ hwWMJQ6ogBWqzRIGquCzRUzlItW6c+4C2YJzc7ZbyoIEegkWkpoXCTntd1h00cfJ7je0 GxnKJ9eocxwKB2BbOnZVVA+L+cxoxxZC+9Hg5A1VhX944webYKe/5FauPntZqsrtBEdX sjar0/8DyDlpMTslK4r4Zm75PwjXdwYOnnJ5OmQ/AB2tnMR7/4D1R+M451S5sUbc3nCk WJzA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=0/TIJu7ivL+Bgw+ppqeypjy2fnJ4iAr9KK3TWFNCgIk=; b=f+VueIkQ96WejuvNQVvDriGOVSzm6T+yxPUf7UkfIIxPiTXaiP1cWiphSkxTLjpbk5 h90+1EgJ9O3FyeSmVHGS+R5gHNm3RkJ6cC8FHRLlwzNg9y3mpRwB0vObqx7joYYv3BOz DIvHlD7r6W7eFUc5Ap/h+u9/JA4czQ7EBAbBIRM89ZmfeOnzm12xg5Oy+h9ULEXgwOyw 3kEXlFv03WDGfxxHCW1I4PLUbkh46XpZtIVU6L9gLFATVuHvEZfzdn7RJFzoT6ldf3Jw irNWnx5pyv3bHmfRE0fDWIgdNhb5QvOBPxsDwgsihLC8JoLtHR6PU0hANGe6P8i4KD32 APNQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOT6OSHf1nTVkegm60mUwnZJkPG/CjcYdKAKzEWxzfSShGTbtPPS3JjqKtaYbvJZnzsKPeSn78PwTEgZFQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.25.141.65 with SMTP id p62mr1165897lfd.10.1455823647458; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:27:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.73.104 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:27:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201602181753.u1IHr1wU000212@ca001.scriptpro.ru> References: <201602181753.u1IHr1wU000212@ca001.scriptpro.ru> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 22:27:27 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: java/eclipse From: Michael Zhilin To: Aleksey A Nikitin Cc: freebsd-ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 19:27:30 -0000 I've reproduced error. WA: turn off network. :) Thx! On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 8:53 PM, Aleksey A Nikitin wrote: > # make > ===> License EPL accepted by the user > ===> Found saved configuration for eclipse-4.5.1 > ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found > ===> Fetching all distfiles required by eclipse-4.5.1 for building > ===> Extracting for eclipse-4.5.1 > => SHA256 Checksum OK for > eclipse/eclipse.platform.releng.aggregator-4.5.1.xz. > => SHA256 Checksum OK for eclipse/eclipse-maven-repo-4.5.1.xz. > ===> Patching for eclipse-4.5.1 > ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for eclipse-4.5.1 > No such line 88 in input file, ignoring > Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file eclipse-platform-parent/pom.xml > Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file > eclipse.platform.releng.tychoeclipsebuilder/eclipse-junit-tests/pom.xml > Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file > eclipse.platform.releng.tychoeclipsebuilder/equinox.starterkit.product/pom.xml > Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file > eclipse.platform.releng.tychoeclipsebuilder/platform/platform.p2.inf > Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file > eclipse.platform.releng.tychoeclipsebuilder/platform/pom.xml > Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file > eclipse.platform.releng.tychoeclipsebuilder/platform.sdk/pom.xml > Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file > eclipse.platform.releng.tychoeclipsebuilder/rcp.config/build.properties > Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file > eclipse.platform.releng.tychoeclipsebuilder/sdk/pom.xml > Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file > eclipse.platform.releng.tychoeclipsebuilder/sdk/sdk.p2.inf > Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file > eclipse.platform.releng/features/org.eclipse.platform-feature/pom.xml > Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file eclipse.platform.resources/pom.xml > Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file > eclipse.platform.swt/local-build/org.eclipse.swt.fragments.localbuild/META-INF/p2.inf > Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file > eclipse.platform.swt/bundles/org.eclipse.swt/META-INF/p2.inf > Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file eclipse.platform.swt.binaries/pom.xml > Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file eclipse.platform.team/pom.xml > Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file > eclipse.platform.ui/features/org.eclipse.e4.rcp/feature.xml > Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file > eclipse.platform.ui/features/org.eclipse.e4.rcp/pom.xml > Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file > rt.equinox.framework/bundles/org.eclipse.equinox.launcher/pom.xml > Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file > rt.equinox.framework/features/org.eclipse.equinox.executable.feature/feature.xml > Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file > rt.equinox.framework/features/org.eclipse.equinox.executable.feature/pom.xml > Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file rt.equinox.framework/pom.xml > Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file > rt.equinox.p2/bundles/org.eclipse.equinox.p2.tests.reconciler.product/reconciler.product > Updating ECLIPSE_ARCH in file > eclipse.platform.releng/features/org.eclipse.platform-feature/feature.xml > ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on file: > /usr/local/share/java/maven33/bin/mvn - found > ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on file: /usr/local/openjdk8/bin/java - found > ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on executable: gmake - found > ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on executable: pkgconf - found > ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on file: > /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/gnome-mime-data-2.0.pc - found > ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on file: > /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/glproto.pc - found > ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on file: > /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/dri2proto.pc - found > ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on shared library: libcairo.so - found > (/usr/local/lib/libcairo.so) > ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on shared library: libwebkitgtk-1.0.so - > found (/usr/local/lib/libwebkitgtk-1.0.so) > ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on shared library: libwebkitgtk-3.0.so - > found (/usr/local/lib/libwebkitgtk-3.0.so) > ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on shared library: libatk-1.0.so - found > (/usr/local/lib/libatk-1.0.so) > ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on shared library: libesd.so - found > (/usr/local/lib/libesd.so) > ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on shared library: libgconf-2.so - found > (/usr/local/lib/libgconf-2.so) > ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on shared library: libglib-2.0.so - found > (/usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so) > ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on shared library: libgnomevfs-2.so - found > (/usr/local/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so) > ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on shared library: libgtk-x11-2.0.so - found > (/usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so) > ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on shared library: libgtk-3.so - found > (/usr/local/lib/libgtk-3.so) > ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on shared library: libart_lgpl_2.so - found > (/usr/local/lib/libart_lgpl_2.so) > ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on shared library: libbonobo-2.so - found > (/usr/local/lib/libbonobo-2.so) > ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on shared library: libbonoboui-2.so - found > (/usr/local/lib/libbonoboui-2.so) > ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on shared library: libglade-2.0.so - found > (/usr/local/lib/libglade-2.0.so) > ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on shared library: libgnome-2.so - found > (/usr/local/lib/libgnome-2.so) > ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on shared library: libgnomecanvas-2.so - > found (/usr/local/lib/libgnomecanvas-2.so) > ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on shared library: libgnomeui-2.so - found > (/usr/local/lib/libgnomeui-2.so) > ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on shared library: libIDL-2.so - found > (/usr/local/lib/libIDL-2.so) > ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on shared library: libxml2.so - found > (/usr/local/lib/libxml2.so) > ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on shared library: libORBit-2.so - found > (/usr/local/lib/libORBit-2.so) > ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on shared library: libpango-1.0.so - found > (/usr/local/lib/libpango-1.0.so) > ===> eclipse-4.5.1 depends on shared library: libGLU.so - found > (/usr/local/lib/libGLU.so) > ===> Configuring for eclipse-4.5.1 > ===> Building for eclipse-4.5.1 > [INFO] Scanning for projects... > [INFO] Computing target platform for MavenProject: > org.eclipse.jdt:org.eclipse.jdt:3.11.1-SNAPSHOT @ > /usr/ports/java/eclipse/work/eclipse.platform.releng.aggregator-4.5.1/eclipse.jdt/org.eclipse.jdt/pom.xml > [INFO] Adding repository > http://download.eclipse.org/tools/orbit/downloads/drops/R20150821153341/repository > [INFO] Adding repository > http://download.eclipse.org/modeling/emf/emf/updates/2.11.x/base/S201508050538 > [INFO] Adding repository > http://download.eclipse.org/jetty/updates/jetty-bundles-9.x/9.2.13.v20150730 > [INFO] Adding repository http://download.eclipse.org/rt/ecf/3.10.1/site.p2 > [INFO] Adding repository > http://download.eclipse.org/cbi/updates/license/1.0.1.v20140414-1359 > [INFO] Fetching p2.index from > http://download.eclipse.org/tools/ajdt/45/dev/update/ (0B at 0B/s) > [INFO] Adding repository > http://download.eclipse.org/tools/ajdt/45/dev/update > [INFO] Fetching compositeContent.xml from > http://download.eclipse.org/tools/ajdt/45/dev/update/ (0B at 0B/s) > [INFO] Fetching content.jar from > http://download.eclipse.org/tools/ajdt/45/dev/update/ajdt-e45-2.2.4.201602042048/ > (0B of 14,01kB at 0B/s) > [ERROR] Failed to resolve target definition > /usr/ports/java/eclipse/work/eclipse.platform.releng.aggregator-4.5.1/eclipse.platform.releng.prereqs.sdk/eclipse-sdk-prereqs.target: > Could not find "org.aspectj.runtime/1.8.5.20150128171000" in the > repositories of the current location -> [Help 1] > [ERROR] > [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the > -e switch. > [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging. > [ERROR] > [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions, > please read the following articles: > [ERROR] [Help 1] > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/MavenExecutionException > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/java/eclipse > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > make: stopped in /usr/ports/java/eclipse > From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Feb 18 22:21:19 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78598AAD948 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 22:21:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from taro.utanet.at (taro.utanet.at [IPv6:2001:938:1337:25::25:45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1271C3F8 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 22:21:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=utanet.at; s=rev1; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From:To; bh=SWlBMZanCoeJu57Kg64tRaSwDwLWKzNFDglL9jWYf6M=; b=FScCp997zAhmrbKSgbCpAvnch+Y3fW/d9lvAcNmRZW1mR0SOiDUBEHdG3YYTfYWt3QsUdHIjkmj+soHYd2w7BymFfKiojRJrdkAhM0uSAYX20wwFGYnl37LeqFgiq1/xlxfxF/XPITKVW+GluQg8Ovryk8o8/FKWipBz1CYINAk=; Received: from pam.xoc.tele2net.at ([213.90.36.6]) by taro.utanet.at with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1aWWwj-0006Dm-HG for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 23:21:13 +0100 Received: from 62-47-169-151.adsl.highway.telekom.at ([62.47.169.151] helo=[10.0.0.93]) by pam.xoc.tele2net.at with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1aWWwj-0007O0-Ec for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 23:21:13 +0100 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Walter Schwarzenfeld Subject: category customports X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <56C643D7.2010607@utanet.at> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 23:21:11 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 22:21:19 -0000 If I make an own port, I had it add to the category/Makefile. But this could be overwritten with the next update. If I make an own category I had it add to /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk under VALID_CATEGORIES. But this could also overwritten. (If I don't edit the Makefiles there are error messages from portmaster||,||synth, etc.) Is it considerable to make general a category customports or overlooked I something? It will be more simply, and good for the order in the ports tree. Better as the own port are spread over the whole ports-tree. (It only needs to make the category and add it to VALID_CATEGORIES. Without a category/Makefile, cause a empty Makefile on the server ports-tree would overwrite the users Makerfile. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Feb 18 22:39:40 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAE1CAAC1C5 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 22:39:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rde@tavi.co.uk) Received: from kipling.tavi.co.uk (kipling.tavi.co.uk [81.187.145.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B02FFB0 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 22:39:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rde@tavi.co.uk) Received: from raksha.tavi.co.uk (raksha.tavi.co.uk [81.187.145.139]) by kipling.tavi.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E0CA9CC45 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 22:29:51 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 22:29:51 +0000 From: Bob Eager To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: category customports Message-ID: <20160218222951.6f7a44da@raksha.tavi.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <56C643D7.2010607@utanet.at> References: <56C643D7.2010607@utanet.at> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.12.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; i386-portbld-freebsd10.1) Face: 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==== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 22:39:40 -0000 On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 23:21:11 +0100 Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: > If I make an own port, I had it add to the category/Makefile. But this > could be overwritten with the next update. I make my own category - 'local'. > If I make an own category I had it add to /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk > under VALID_CATEGORIES. But this could also overwritten. I add VALID_CATEGORIES+= local to the Makefiles. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Feb 18 22:39:42 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA371AAC1C8 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 22:39:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@skysmurf.nl) Received: from mail.skysmurf.nl (spectrum.skysmurf.nl [83.162.175.214]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.skysmurf.nl", Issuer "mail.skysmurf.nl" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D205FB4 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 22:39:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@skysmurf.nl) Received: from spectrum.skysmurf.nl (mail.skysmurf.nl [192.168.42.4]) by mail.skysmurf.nl (8.15.2/8.15.2) with SMTP id u1IMZkD8056356; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 23:35:46 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@skysmurf.nl) Received: by spectrum.skysmurf.nl (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 18 Feb 2016 23:35:46 +0100 Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 23:35:46 +0100 From: Alphons van Werven To: Walter Schwarzenfeld Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: category customports Message-ID: <20160218223546.GA56276@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> References: <56C643D7.2010607@utanet.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56C643D7.2010607@utanet.at> X-PGP-Key: http://www.skysmurf.nl/~fonz/fonz_pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 22:39:42 -0000 --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: > But this could be overwritten with the next update. [snip] > But this could also [sic] overwritten. You're using portsnap for your updates, I presume? Subversion will not override local changes (at least not without asking first). I have a tree here that contains local ports and locally modified ports. That's exactly why I use SVN instead of portsnap. You might get similar results if you use Git to update your tree, I don't know about that. HTH, AvW --=20 A.J. "Fonz" van Werven mailsig: Ob technicas difficultates, lux in fine cuniculum non operatur. --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWxkdCAAoJEAfP7gJTaCe8R8cQALbJLk4GREcMXoeeXdWdP1qo dNtTeHiHJzvvyC3pK22Vg2zOFNQwEZRh+kFUgn9HTgVlSVL3mRXDK2tStYprVRpL nZ2+xfbKdSsQ1R/Fwr78rluWGqTQuHB/Pa4kSV9pBud9QFTfbZ73z/JqN3s2cRBI +9OpveictrUC0F+VyokE6HIuLhg7gAd4yq3GXGH4wkxrdCp08CdGVbZwVZPrlZqz Em/unyx0Bum0M4o+dooYAiRq2gLycttW1xGcYdXKuNDcnfVFhnUx/f+6PULpsvbM gqJj9OI4v/2CEUy1969SxrjT34kdRfRziCnAGE9Ot3HHismyQTirTRc9oJsGN8f7 PrZqzNCT882b+qDg6oYIiMWzw/NDI+2OggGWkNitU7scoHN6PK2GpfYDEsTNw6HB 7431/fZvJg7alXYmpJNubVFF6gIFp4NduBkmtMyeoJ5OvYyrQYqZ0fXILqIGzC3k PJKVWRNKJZcAUNLNrFEC/M14UfLVt+BclsjbAsy64Mp5lmwClWev+4cDc/2uk5+O S302ZDvg4s+lG7MfYzGdaJd+tl2DseX/plwFbLIiI51WkzBaON+DTJAfsy9slH4c NVCzxgpolCJ2co3AmfMVpotGfabyyiPTy6JC5BOMiwSn2QVP8yloy8S328wG6FJb 0vcdkKbyEEs8O5hRZfcJ =JbIY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Feb 18 22:44:41 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B90F0AAC5FA for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 22:44:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from taro.utanet.at (taro.utanet.at [IPv6:2001:938:1337:25::25:45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D4AE161D for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 22:44:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=utanet.at; s=rev1; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:Subject:References:To; bh=zrqlfyaa45ABJfqrHs4gg4APP4W6HGXtSvBG0eRMC5o=; b=vEbFeVfeNDfww/yJuk/kTGavCtQQTZ2okyMzZlAFWvmRagb/Rv6slhvK1yO/+I3p8e/jD0zOVVs98gdg0gGJjQbHeoKMMC+fGz6+NoszLP+oXoS7YTprgA13tC1ww+2FtonxsVhrgFoyNb04F2HVp4i7EVhkcGYZ7FqIyyVvq2s=; Received: from patricia.xoc.tele2net.at ([213.90.36.9]) by taro.utanet.at with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1aWXJP-0002qT-0F for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 23:44:39 +0100 Received: from 62-47-169-151.adsl.highway.telekom.at ([62.47.169.151] helo=[10.0.0.93]) by patricia.xoc.tele2net.at with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1aWXJO-0004kp-Ul for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 23:44:38 +0100 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20160218223546.GA56276@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> Subject: Re: category customports From: Walter Schwarzenfeld Message-ID: <56C64956.9040205@utanet.at> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 23:44:38 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160218223546.GA56276@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 22:44:41 -0000 That's right, I use portsnap. I don't like svn. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Feb 19 00:17:54 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 059DAAAB3A3 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:17:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michelle@sorbs.net) Received: from hades.sorbs.net (mail.sorbs.net [67.231.146.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE7F9C3E for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:17:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michelle@sorbs.net) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from isux.com (firewall.isux.com [213.165.190.213]) by hades.sorbs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.29.0 64bit (built Jul 9 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0O2R00BEHQHBOY00@hades.sorbs.net> for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 16:24:49 -0800 (PST) Message-id: <56C65F27.5090802@sorbs.net> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 01:17:43 +0100 From: Michelle Sullivan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100301 SeaMonkey/1.1.19 To: Alphons van Werven Cc: Walter Schwarzenfeld , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: category customports References: <56C643D7.2010607@utanet.at> <20160218223546.GA56276@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> In-reply-to: <20160218223546.GA56276@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:17:54 -0000 Alphons van Werven wrote: > Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: > > >> But this could be overwritten with the next update. >> > [snip] > >> But this could also [sic] overwritten. >> > > You're using portsnap for your updates, I presume? Subversion will not > override local changes (at least not without asking first). I have a tree > here that contains local ports and locally modified ports. That's exactly > why I use SVN instead of portsnap. > > You might get similar results if you use Git to update your tree, I don't > know about that. > > HTH, > > AvW > > You know you can all run your own portsnap server to allow you to include local changes? -- Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/ From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Feb 19 00:59:52 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73BA3AACA1C for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:59:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from taro.utanet.at (taro.utanet.at [IPv6:2001:938:1337:25::25:45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38874A18 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:59:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=utanet.at; s=rev1; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:Subject:References:To; bh=ZYFxJ79gTOIL72oPuhPG7Wkyt0AoMqFPGD8pkfdRqF8=; b=rlFSMQsz4AfsL7YbDPNPgLLH1DuKSP3dZ3hnwpWIouohifDIivZvPCiMYW3MC/5kIPZFsB8nbmjbSRrAjdDsiA3iASoAQx5zbH81nRmaHDuFZT42UxdU6JntLH8aZHiOgfyWDn9eUHRwV3XoOnL9g7+pyoHh7JGjnEy6XrZqDh8=; Received: from paris.xoc.tele2net.at ([213.90.36.7]) by taro.utanet.at with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1aWZQC-00012V-5U for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 01:59:48 +0100 Received: from 62-47-169-151.adsl.highway.telekom.at ([62.47.169.151] helo=[10.0.0.93]) by paris.xoc.tele2net.at with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1aWZQC-0007yn-3f for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 01:59:48 +0100 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <56C65F27.5090802@sorbs.net> Subject: Re: category customports From: Walter Schwarzenfeld Message-ID: <56C66903.1030303@utanet.at> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 01:59:47 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56C65F27.5090802@sorbs.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:59:52 -0000 > You know you can all run your own portsnap server to allow you to include local changes? No, hoq ahouls rhat work? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Feb 19 01:00:41 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E578AACAC5 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 01:00:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from taro.utanet.at (taro.utanet.at [IPv6:2001:938:1337:25::25:45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7D40B99 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 01:00:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=utanet.at; s=rev1; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:Subject:References:To; bh=w2hddf6rqw6IWxvCZHAOcKJUQQCDU5SVUi/T6wz6j5E=; b=j1XNomaD2vs+fzegcoXdE8zdg3kF5CXeiWFClkSaaVYugny3cF8NbaG4gRikei9nyZpT5qa9oG4RxfdKbOV9bKf3Ocv7JuCK69deb4cryKxKx+exmQvXvm6GUlAVqc31DxuidW/8WhZiN3KC7846GENzphy9wvPkjJoW/5RNg9A=; Received: from patricia.xoc.tele2net.at ([213.90.36.9]) by taro.utanet.at with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1aWZR1-0001Bc-3o for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 02:00:39 +0100 Received: from 62-47-169-151.adsl.highway.telekom.at ([62.47.169.151] helo=[10.0.0.93]) by patricia.xoc.tele2net.at with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1aWZR1-0005uh-24 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 02:00:39 +0100 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <56C66903.1030303@utanet.at> Subject: Re: category customports From: Walter Schwarzenfeld Message-ID: <56C66935.2010306@utanet.at> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 02:00:37 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56C66903.1030303@utanet.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 01:00:41 -0000 typos ... How should that work? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Feb 19 02:52:53 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5B67AADD5A for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 02:52:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E12B9ED; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 02:52:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id u1J2SulN022561 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:28:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.14.2/Submit) with UUCP id u1J2SuGQ022560; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:28:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from fbsd81 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA07377; Thu, 18 Feb 16 17:55:31 PST Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:55:25 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com (Perry Hutchison) To: avg@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: unexpected package dependency Message-Id: <56c6760d.nR7fjvuf3gEK3yNY%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <56c43d57.Pot24goK72QkTKqk%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <56C45B9C.7090808@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <56C45B9C.7090808@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 02:52:53 -0000 Andriy Gapon wrote: > On 17/02/2016 11:28, Perry Hutchison wrote: > > I had not expected to find gcc listed (in packagesite.yaml) as a > > dependency of the sysutils/cpuburn package. I can understand a > > _port_ needing gcc (at build time), but does the cpuburn _package_ > > actually require gcc at _runtime_? > > I don't believe so. AFAIR, it builds static binaries. So would the inclusion of gcc in the "deps" for sysutils/cpuburn (in packagesite.yaml) be caused by a problem with the way the dependencies are specified in the port, or with the way they are handled by the package-generation mechanism? (I'm trying to figure out which to file a PR against -- and I'm not all that familiar with pkgng details.) From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Feb 19 07:25:27 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D541AAD45F for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 07:25:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06D1411E6 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 07:25:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1aWfRL-000NOx-UB; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 08:25:23 +0100 Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 08:25:23 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Tobias Kortkamp Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can someone take a look at these PRs? Message-ID: <20160219072523.GW26283@home.opsec.eu> References: <1455745790.2821090.524255066.2A53B8CF@webmail.messagingengine.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1455745790.2821090.524255066.2A53B8CF@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 07:25:27 -0000 Hi! > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206488 (java/jd-gui, > new port) Done. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Feb 19 07:49:03 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D4A7AAD4AD for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 07:49:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melvyn@magemana.nl) Received: from fire.magemana.nl (magemana.nl [IPv6:2a01:7c8:aaae:25e::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D4701B0A for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 07:49:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melvyn@magemana.nl) Received: by fire.magemana.nl (Postfix, from userid 1003) id EB0754AB898; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 08:48:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.magemana.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6D654AB4D9; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 08:48:54 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 08:48:54 +0100 (CET) From: Melvyn Sopacua To: Walter Schwarzenfeld cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: category customports In-Reply-To: <56C643D7.2010607@utanet.at> Message-ID: References: <56C643D7.2010607@utanet.at> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 07:49:03 -0000 Hi, the short answer: echo 'VALID_CATEGORIES=local' >> /etc/make.conf On Thu, 18 Feb 2016, Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: > If I make an own port, I had it add to the category/Makefile. But this > could be overwritten with the next update. > If I make an own category I had it add to /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk > under VALID_CATEGORIES. There is a Mk/bsd.local.mk for a reason. While it technically is under version control to provide a template (hopefully that changes at some point), it should not be comitted to unless strictly necessary. Two reasons to use the bsd.local.mk: 1) You use various make.conf files to build for different machines or testing options (use: `env __MAKE_CONF=/etc/test.conf make ...`) and putting it in bsd.local.mk centralizes it. One could also make a /etc/make.shared.conf in this case. Either / or. 2) You wish to set VALID_CATEGORIES based on some other (early available) variable. This is the better case for using this file as it is intended for extra logic, not extra configuration. Hope this helps, From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Feb 19 08:18:20 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB784AAB616 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 08:18:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from taro.utanet.at (taro.utanet.at [IPv6:2001:938:1337:25::25:45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F6131996 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 08:18:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=utanet.at; s=rev1; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:Subject:References:To; bh=okIaj7j2Tw+/J/ME7Y15n9vddDCvBb1kxv5esRsT4Wk=; b=mIPNuDjuoDYLBqIlRR67EASyOViZ8zCdK9C7imp+5a51z4T+khFfcUunJRKplvxkfgtfNMf/cGJs1ONYVs5ujQ3TVECzo7c6MdOxvYwYOWdufvF8PJWRRXkxRAVrnSnbvErNikj6x+bX9tiMr9amarwyhIqKSkLwUoD8jxVGFds=; Received: from pam.xoc.tele2net.at ([213.90.36.6]) by taro.utanet.at with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1aWgGU-0007l3-Ds for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:18:14 +0100 Received: from 62-47-169-151.adsl.highway.telekom.at ([62.47.169.151] helo=[10.0.0.93]) by pam.xoc.tele2net.at with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1aWgGU-0001mL-C6 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:18:14 +0100 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: Subject: Re: category customports From: Walter Schwarzenfeld Message-ID: <56C6CFC3.5000909@utanet.at> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:18:11 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 08:18:20 -0000 Thanks -> echo 'VALID_CATEGORIES=local' >> /etc/make.conf is he simpelst way. Seems to work. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Feb 19 09:01:39 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4E2AAAD7AD for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:01:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rde@tavi.co.uk) Received: from kipling.tavi.co.uk (kipling.tavi.co.uk [81.187.145.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98BF2181B for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:01:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rde@tavi.co.uk) Received: from raksha.tavi.co.uk (raksha.tavi.co.uk [81.187.145.139]) by kipling.tavi.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA1549CC45 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:01:36 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:01:36 +0000 From: Bob Eager To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: category customports Message-ID: <20160219090136.5f02542d@raksha.tavi.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <56C6CFC3.5000909@utanet.at> References: <56C6CFC3.5000909@utanet.at> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.12.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; i386-portbld-freebsd10.1) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAMFBMVEUwXjFLc0vD0cS7y7zw9PDZ4tkWSRaVrZZ+m39qi2tXfVj////7+/utwK4IPggAOAAJUUA7AAABKklEQVQ4jWPYjQMwDFYJp0NKEKCNJmEf9h8CsimXiL2e33s3/e7F7K2Cs3f3dCMkQkMKj4YuCY3K3iR+e7fMaiSjvkX0/5cFGrWpe2uLzOpaExUVqMS/8PX/Re5ey960OLBTZpFA8+IlSBKPQ92zNyUUBsosN58uIY0k8f+/ONCoYytkVuhWzVwNkYiYbqk5M3NmOVBi41YZ8RsGF7shEtFb5KJ3r969CyixM7OTPeFUxG2IxLO8/9/SvqXlc+/x3h295YzLlj2nIRJQj//nRvc5TEIal8RsXBLVuCQwIgoq/u80DomP6HEOk/iOS+IJLonZOCT+ReOQ+Lkbh0QKLonbOCR+7MYhsRqHBJrVcIl/1TgklqKLQyQ+tGKIgyQOqXpjig94diZRAgAXmDX6jyWafAAAAABJRU5ErkJggg====== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:01:39 -0000 On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:18:11 +0100 Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: > Thanks -> echo 'VALID_CATEGORIES=local' >> /etc/make.conf is he > simpelst way. Seems to work. Don't you mean: VALID_CATEGORIES+=local ?? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Feb 19 09:14:43 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A62BAADDBB for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:14:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A08A1FEB for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:14:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 389E9AADDB9; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:14:43 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38491AADDB8 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:14:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D7C51FEA for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:14:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u1J9EhbT034870 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:14:43 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u1J9Eh7x034868; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:14:43 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201602190914.u1J9Eh7x034868@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:14:43 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:14:43 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ databases/py-apsw | 3.9.2 | 3.11.0-r1 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ devel/ocaml-lacaml | 7.2.6 | v8.0.5 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ net-mgmt/weathermap | 1.1.1 | 21.0.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Feb 19 09:27:07 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAC0AAAC3E2 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:27:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from taro.utanet.at (taro.utanet.at [IPv6:2001:938:1337:25::25:45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B023518CF for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:27:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=utanet.at; s=rev1; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:Subject:References:To; bh=KJG1iqdepHvwjjVSF5Y92bxgDmaNvpv77YdjmoYS0fw=; b=HZ52ruBsdRG9SRGuXhmCfkqu1dqPNjCJnxr4qUtg+RZRicQgLKEYKLA09g1fryOzVd0UqtEkilvfMj+PQ3DWxiViWn6c+fWhCe6sYMzvp3/3CUv5hk/GrYNiigWVxs714xxIVWwtr5I9c3z8kEYN7SRjUiRmjsK8CM01XZ0XxXA=; Received: from paris.xoc.tele2net.at ([213.90.36.7]) by taro.utanet.at with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1aWhL5-0001IO-Kx for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 10:27:03 +0100 Received: from 62-47-169-151.adsl.highway.telekom.at ([62.47.169.151] helo=[10.0.0.93]) by paris.xoc.tele2net.at with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1aWhL5-0005Hc-JE for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 10:27:03 +0100 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20160219090136.5f02542d@raksha.tavi.co.uk> Subject: Re: category customports From: Walter Schwarzenfeld Message-ID: <56C6DFE5.20903@utanet.at> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 10:27:01 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160219090136.5f02542d@raksha.tavi.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:27:08 -0000 Seems to work without "+", but looks like the right syntax with it. Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Feb 19 10:23:04 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22FD0AAE095 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 10:23:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michelle@sorbs.net) Received: from hades.sorbs.net (mail.sorbs.net [67.231.146.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18153152A for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 10:23:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michelle@sorbs.net) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from isux.com (firewall.isux.com [213.165.190.213]) by hades.sorbs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.29.0 64bit (built Jul 9 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0O2S00F1SII39Q00@hades.sorbs.net> for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 02:30:06 -0800 (PST) Message-id: <56C6ED01.3060802@sorbs.net> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 11:22:57 +0100 From: Michelle Sullivan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100301 SeaMonkey/1.1.19 To: Walter Schwarzenfeld Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: category customports References: <56C66903.1030303@utanet.at> <56C66935.2010306@utanet.at> In-reply-to: <56C66935.2010306@utanet.at> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 10:23:04 -0000 Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: > typos ... How should that work? > > Very easily - but wouldn't necessarily solve your issue without a lot more work... as someone else pointed out you can use VALID_CATEGORIES+=local in your /etc/make.conf file... The '+' if you didn't realise is to append it on anything already defined (which would probably limited to anything you use on the command line.) Anyhow I have a svn repository locally which is a match to the public one. I have my own svn repo with my local copy of my version of ports which supports pkg_* tools. I have a perl script that (mostly) correctly patches my local ports tree with the changes from the public tree whilst not screwing over the makefiles that build packages using pkg_* tools. The local version also includes ports for pkg_* tools on 10.x and 11.x and other interesting stuff I was working on like a pkgng version, bmake etc that could bootstrap pkgng onto 6.x and 7.x... (this doesn't work at the moment and probably never will because rather than finishing, $employer has decided to drop FreeBSD completely - well mandate it's not used which forces me to drop it.) I have the scripts to create the portsnap files which I currently publish on a publicly accessible server so my own servers can get it. So if you have the time and/or desire/or need, you can create your own portsnap distributable tree with your own version of ports. Regards, -- Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/ From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Feb 19 12:14:16 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9713AAD80F for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 12:14:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 482254ac@razorfever.net) Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com (ironport2-out.teksavvy.com [206.248.154.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 943E31034 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 12:14:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 482254ac@razorfever.net) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DUBQA731xV/0StpUVcghV7AVODfK41AQUGhBCNbQmBSwuHOTkUAQEBAQEBAYEKhEwVHiI2AgUWCwILAwIBAgEnMQgBAYgomy+PXaQ/BIEhhHWJXmiCUoFFBYwwhkCEMY4+jWCBRSOEFiCCeAEBAQ X-IPAS-Result: A0DUBQA731xV/0StpUVcghV7AVODfK41AQUGhBCNbQmBSwuHOTkUAQEBAQEBAYEKhEwVHiI2AgUWCwILAwIBAgEnMQgBAYgomy+PXaQ/BIEhhHWJXmiCUoFFBYwwhkCEMY4+jWCBRSOEFiCCeAEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,465,1427774400"; d="scan'208";a="193615024" Received: from 69-165-173-68.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO mail.razorfever.net) ([69.165.173.68]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 19 Feb 2016 07:13:07 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (mail.razorfever.net [192.168.0.4]) by mail.razorfever.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id u1JCD4N1017464 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 07:13:06 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from 482254ac@razorfever.net) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: "Derek (freebsd lists)" <482254ac@razorfever.net> Subject: Pulling from github as a vendorized dependency in poudriere Message-ID: <56C706D0.2000006@razorfever.net> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 07:13:04 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mail.razorfever.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 12:14:16 -0000 Hi, I'm attempting to port a project over, and it is dependent on a "vendorizing" program, which then pulls in the source of the dependencies to build. (The final artifact is statically linked, so there shouldn't be a problem as far as installing unversioned libraries outside of the package/ports framework, for example.) My port works fine in my local ports tree, and also I can build the project by hand without the port no problem. When I try to use poudriere testport, and it's time to pull in the dependencies (as part of a build step), I get: fatal: unable to access 'https://github.com/foo/bar': Couldn't connect to server Is there something in poudriere that makes the network special? i.e. do build scripts not have network access in that context? I can provide more specifics on my project: - The vendorizing program is "gb vendor" - I have PATCH_DEPENDS on gb, and git - The pre-patch step runs `make deps`, a target which ultimately runs `gb vendor restore`, the step that gives the error message, and the build fails I can provide more detail, but would like to know if I'm doing something horribly wrong first (i.e. trying to access the network with gb as a make target, versus some other way to do this). Thanks! Derek From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Feb 19 17:16:51 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99F0CAAEF3E for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 17:16:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from verify@promailservices.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 893031EA2 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 17:16:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from verify@promailservices.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 86894AAEF3D; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 17:16:51 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 861D8AAEF3C for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 17:16:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from verify@promailservices.com) Received: from u17828947.onlinehome-server.com (u17828947.onlinehome-server.com [IPv6:2607:f1c0:835:5c00::2a:f8a6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66ACA1EA1 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 17:16:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from verify@promailservices.com) Received: from [45.32.218.216] (unknown [45.32.218.216]) by u17828947.onlinehome-server.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0127D4504D for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 03:45:34 +1100 (EST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Security Update Code:SYUK0303 To: ports@FreeBSD.org From: "Securityt Upgrade" Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 16:45:33 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: Mail message body X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 17:16:51 -0000 = Dear ports@FreeBSD.org Your mailbox quota is full. This may lead to email system failure and you will not be able to receive m= ore mails henceforth. To continue using your mailbox, you need to upgrade your mailbox quota imme= diatey. This service is free. = = Upgrade Mailbox Quota Here = Once your account upgrade is completed, your mailbox will work effectively. = Mail Center 2016=20 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Feb 19 19:16:54 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA55AAE335 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 19:16:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: from spindle.one-eyed-alien.net (spindle.one-eyed-alien.net [199.48.129.229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DF2C1307 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 19:16:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: by spindle.one-eyed-alien.net (Postfix, from userid 3001) id C5CCA5A9F2A; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 19:16:46 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 19:16:46 +0000 From: Brooks Davis To: "Derek (freebsd lists)" <482254ac@razorfever.net> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Pulling from github as a vendorized dependency in poudriere Message-ID: <20160219191646.GA75742@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> References: <56C706D0.2000006@razorfever.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="liOOAslEiF7prFVr" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56C706D0.2000006@razorfever.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 19:16:54 -0000 --liOOAslEiF7prFVr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 07:13:04AM -0500, Derek (freebsd lists) wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I'm attempting to port a project over, and it is dependent on a=20 > "vendorizing" program, which then pulls in the source of the=20 > dependencies to build. (The final artifact is statically linked,=20 > so there shouldn't be a problem as far as installing unversioned=20 > libraries outside of the package/ports framework, for example.) >=20 > My port works fine in my local ports tree, and also I can build=20 > the project by hand without the port no problem. >=20 > When I try to use poudriere testport, and it's time to pull in=20 > the dependencies (as part of a build step), I get: >=20 > fatal: unable to access 'https://github.com/foo/bar': Couldn't=20 > connect to server >=20 > Is there something in poudriere that makes the network special?=20 > i.e. do build scripts not have network access in that context? >=20 > I can provide more specifics on my project: >=20 > - The vendorizing program is "gb vendor" > - I have PATCH_DEPENDS on gb, and git > - The pre-patch step runs `make deps`, a target which ultimately=20 > runs `gb vendor restore`, the step that gives the error message,=20 > and the build fails >=20 > I can provide more detail, but would like to know if I'm doing=20 > something horribly wrong first (i.e. trying to access the network=20 > with gb as a make target, versus some other way to do this). When you run "gb vendor", what stage does that happen in? IIRC poudriere only configures network access during the fetch stage so you must find a way to run it as part of the fetch process or capture and emulate its result. -- Brooks --liOOAslEiF7prFVr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWx2odAAoJEKzQXbSebgfAxDsH/3CGUp6IVyTSVQ+52MRB1cYx KexCMKCM3cFMjmcxEaUbhOiB3UYI5gWuzzzOIKcm/gFJwICsA7F9x10JI5nR58sC TAoThalyZB8FaJnmlmoLTXedCQIAUtm9C4Io8moC7L/S3h8rKtVLYDkQC751Cf8g OyN/YvV7VEPQEcOBYMmSCCpis6kvEnehyoBzsAWIOKBjay8Kjd49Kae9SH/WH9A0 F3cnmdWeXvv7HthpwSQaySbPWt1m3gopnsRPjnXL6Wg5nAfNuxoopJS9EHyfHUYn bCB5QQovbFtkC3++xEqj7FDWUkSFguKxX6TlodN4xevGbpK6IrXs8QVSXwJ/NlU= =xkSr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --liOOAslEiF7prFVr-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Feb 19 22:05:50 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C0A0AAD255 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 22:05:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bdrewery@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F013915BF; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 22:05:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bdrewery@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.xzibition.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5ACC1D4E; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 22:05:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bdrewery@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.xzibition.com (localhost [172.31.3.2]) by mail.xzibition.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DC061889A; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 22:05:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.xzibition.com Received: from mail.xzibition.com ([172.31.3.2]) by mail.xzibition.com (mail.xzibition.com [172.31.3.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with LMTP id 2WpRULUGo98y; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 22:05:47 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: poudriere: success(?) despite "ELF interpreter /lib/ld-linux.so.2 not found, error 2"? DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 mail.xzibition.com D235F18884 To: David Wolfskill , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20160213152404.GK1364@albert.catwhisker.org> From: Bryan Drewery Openpgp: id=F9173CB2C3AAEA7A5C8A1F0935D771BB6E4697CF; url=http://www.shatow.net/bryan/bryan2.asc Organization: FreeBSD Message-ID: <56C791C8.1060405@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 14:06:00 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160213152404.GK1364@albert.catwhisker.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nLPCd835sDlGNBbN28wJBI5WVOolnPcUA" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 22:05:50 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --nLPCd835sDlGNBbN28wJBI5WVOolnPcUA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2/13/2016 7:24 AM, David Wolfskill wrote: > This morning, I just happened to glance at the xterm where poudriere > was running, and noticed a message I wasn't expecting: >=20 > ELF interpreter /lib/ld-linux.so.2 not found, error 2 Some linux port is trying to execute something at the wrong time. It may even be during the dependency phase. Typically if a port is executing something it is specifically made to ignore any errors doing so and use a fallback value. I've seen it forever and haven't worried too much about it. --=20 Regards, Bryan Drewery --nLPCd835sDlGNBbN28wJBI5WVOolnPcUA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWx5HIAAoJEDXXcbtuRpfPg+gH+wVYDj5dH3PzYAkXQdZ6nVKp a0I73lSa6aFsl0nQVvaq4Ly/HBt1BoyPWtERW9XywR2258E78hj9FeQf5B9rvrtJ Js5CngW/RqyWsG5VNwo7YuNeuofnsEbNQoyMGOsDrY5yjha67v2LSnVPm/vosDxq D0LIB3IMtN+9AU8S+JS1JmYVKepEKLob1PYvc376i+E/e8yPYoAaK5IuQ4/v51SU z99AvpZsnPem2tmOA6QSAjZDC0YfYLn6tNaYhShQQyv3OEdcNf9qjIY30BdwImPx ZQi1X/lspVp5+/9fftPtapqbfKLROQVxy/C0knvnh26DICeT7/B8ha+8O7ZZrBU= =zBR0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nLPCd835sDlGNBbN28wJBI5WVOolnPcUA-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Feb 20 01:42:43 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C9F9AAE7FD for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 01:42:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 482254ac@razorfever.net) Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com (ironport2-out.teksavvy.com [206.248.154.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1444B17A6 for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 01:42:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 482254ac@razorfever.net) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ByGgA731xV/0StpUVcghV7VF6xUwEFBgh8AU+QKQmBWoV3AoE8ORQBAQEBAQEBgQqEIwEBBDgeHgQRCxgJFg8JAwIBAgEnHhMIAQGIKA3PFgEBCAEBAQEaBIYWhCKBAoMPgX0WhBcBBItEbIZAhDGOPo1ggUUjhBYgMQGCRgEBAQ X-IPAS-Result: A0ByGgA731xV/0StpUVcghV7VF6xUwEFBgh8AU+QKQmBWoV3AoE8ORQBAQEBAQEBgQqEIwEBBDgeHgQRCxgJFg8JAwIBAgEnHhMIAQGIKA3PFgEBCAEBAQEaBIYWhCKBAoMPgX0WhBcBBItEbIZAhDGOPo1ggUUjhBYgMQGCRgEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,465,1427774400"; d="scan'208";a="193681252" Received: from 69-165-173-68.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO mail.razorfever.net) ([69.165.173.68]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 19 Feb 2016 20:42:41 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (mail.razorfever.net [192.168.0.4]) by mail.razorfever.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id u1K1gdXE027691 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 20:42:40 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from 482254ac@razorfever.net) Subject: Re: Pulling from github as a vendorized dependency in poudriere To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <56C706D0.2000006@razorfever.net> <20160219191646.GA75742@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> From: "Derek (freebsd lists)" <482254ac@razorfever.net> Message-ID: <56C7C48F.4070905@razorfever.net> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 20:42:39 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160219191646.GA75742@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mail.razorfever.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 01:42:43 -0000 On 16-02-19 02:16 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 07:13:04AM -0500, Derek (freebsd lists) wrote: >> I can provide more detail, but would like to know if I'm doing >> something horribly wrong first (i.e. trying to access the network >> with gb as a make target, versus some other way to do this). > > When you run "gb vendor", what stage does that happen in? IIRC > poudriere only configures network access during the fetch stage so you > must find a way to run it as part of the fetch process or capture and > emulate its result. > Thanks for the quick response - much appreciated. Indeed, I was doing it in the post-extract stage, as there is some patching that happens to the pulled-in sources from there, and the vendor information is extracted from the tarball. I see now, poudriere wants "no network", as you mention: https://fossil.etoilebsd.net/poudriere/doc/trunk/doc/design.mkd I wonder, with the rise of vendorizing tools, ala composer, gb, npm, virtualenv (possibly?), etc, etc... - are the assumptions about the build steps of ports still valid? i.e. - is there a make vendor target somewhere between either extract, and patch, or patch and build (that doesn't yet exist), where network access is still useful? Rhetorical - I'm sure it's come up before (and will do more digging to this effect). Better yet - how do other ports deal with this? Would love to hear from some maintainers who are happy with what they've done to handle this - if anyone is available? Even just the port name would be great. My current plan is to shoehorn a custom fetch/extract/patch into the port Makefile, based on Brooks' valued information, but it doesn't feel great. Thanks again - most helpful! Derek From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Feb 20 06:20:55 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B492AAEC71 for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 06:20:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-src@helfman.org) Received: from mail-ig0-x22a.google.com (mail-ig0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4F371BE1 for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 06:20:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-src@helfman.org) Received: by mail-ig0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id 5so50947736igt.0 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 22:20:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=helfman-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc; bh=6EfIxPT9tPJ9eXmuKGK1Mx3/G5x0Pljlt6+D4YWMKtg=; b=Ezz6tPIJ27ECqaLVVwpbmCRlxefZ4n3LLhOMFcu0uTtn6kVbMET9X230EIAGh7R1L9 zuKZjUqSTkzQdWzhkvH2P+FEViXdwbLrNIz526G2wSNtu1C6r0y7TV/bmtS2RImZm9Nj eZKfjezvFJeGnGNBfsjKFDdtqyrtckVLR5sTJS2JCHMpae/bQv3/80xJs5jUmSft7Ptw 7h7WdRs+DBEQmYn9oLWBn81RLFsNwp7ylMWFYdH/OWC+86Jc1vPTltqxlPuV3bIVAOvM knwYEEdgVPTiDbKE6Zruc3GE3wLWZt5rbp6cSOKFuzwmudF8LVIcwJ0bld/iXhsCtcr4 dLLw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=6EfIxPT9tPJ9eXmuKGK1Mx3/G5x0Pljlt6+D4YWMKtg=; b=WnGpXKAnFaotMREDuo4fgzFLZrXj/ZTv1JURpxXPgeDVHPwGDBHYbtQ1p2hJq2qzoe htacQgcA1Lumyv4AZH3VRauYSuF0Hzg4DQwiLvBcr9O7KA0qPSCohyzwY58h3hTICd43 JhZZ32E6ONRq9YFOW2hz5BQScIMlpm45RA1MClNViyTXZVf9t0el8vgnIryUOXTaS2Ip LZn2XBo6AeM9UqVIhUGqOLDpOvAneUrlAO2PtAgn8Oxxgkxtxhe8yRgMFZQojlXXY9nh 63eLlDVcYFrx3jWE4SKkCYs/BYZyZRoL5SQUw6KME3dLvcIy6E+IVZmFVlFiqNEBLsST JwtQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOShvz1UmkEf7kaj4BLEzWOqVboP+P7cE98VjWk+OpaOqOcNSErmjPoXsCfOWNnKH0RlcrbWqrgUW3CQDg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.79.165 with SMTP id k5mr802937igx.79.1455949253861; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 22:20:53 -0800 (PST) Sender: bsd-src@helfman.org Received: by 10.107.142.4 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 22:20:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <56C5942A.5090001@quip.cz> References: <54E0EEC9.80707@quip.cz> <20150222225800.GA97535@misty.eyesbeyond.com> <56C5942A.5090001@quip.cz> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 22:20:53 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: dTB-LMQ9xe4a1_QAUnEdT4eA9t0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: resurrect deprecated port print/pnm2ppa From: Jason Helfman To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Cc: Greg Lewis , "freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 06:20:55 -0000 On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 1:51 AM, Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> wrote: > Greg Lewis wrote on 02/22/2015 23:58: >> >> On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 08:08:57PM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote: >>> >>> Can somebody resurrect deprecated port print/pnm2ppa? >>> >>> It was deleted from the tree as "Unmaintained since 2001" but it is >>> (was) still working fine and I am still using my good old printer HP >>> DeskJet 710C through USB to LPT convertor (usb:/dev/ulpt0) with CUPS. >> >> >> Why don't you submit a PR with the resurrected port in it and yourself as >> the maintainer? I'll take a look at it if you do. It seems like all it >> really needs is someone to commit to maintaining it. > > > Hi Greg, > after more than a year I resurerected pnm2ppa port for my home use > yesterday. It was lot of work for me - I did some port many years ago and > converting this old port to staging was not easy for me. I tried to build it > with "poudrier testport" and it succeeded. > > ====> Compressing man pages (compress-man) > =========================================================================== > ====> Running Q/A tests (stage-qa) > ====> Checking for pkg-plist issues (check-plist) > ===> Parsing plist > ===> Checking for items in STAGEDIR missing from pkg-plist > ===> Checking for items in pkg-plist which are not in STAGEDIR > ===> No pkg-plist issues found (check-plist) > ====>> Status for build print/pnm2ppa: package > ====>> Checking for staging violations... done > =================================================== > ===> Building package for pnm2ppa-1.13_2 > =========================================================================== > ====>> Status for build print/pnm2ppa: install-mtree > =================================================== > =========================================================================== > ====>> Status for build print/pnm2ppa: install > ====>> Recording filesystem state for preinst... done > =================================================== > ===> Installing for pnm2ppa-1.13_2 > ===> pnm2ppa-1.13_2 depends on executable: enscript - found > ===> Checking if pnm2ppa already installed > ===> Registering installation for pnm2ppa-1.13_2 > [10_2_amd64-default] Installing pnm2ppa-1.13_2... > To configure your printcap to print either ascii" > or Postscript files, add the following lines to your" > /etc/printcap file" > > lp|ascii|unix:\\" > :lp=/dev/lpt0:\\" > :sd=/var/spool/lpd:\\" > :if=/usr/local/bin/asciippafilter:\\" > :mx#0:\\" > :sh:" > > ps:\\" > :lp=/dev/lpt0:\\" > :sd=/var/spool/ps:\\" > :if=/usr/local/bin/ppafilter:\\" > :mx#0:\\" > :sh:" > > =========================================================================== > ====>> Status for build print/pnm2ppa: deinstall > ====>> Checking shared library dependencies > 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libc.so.7] > 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libm.so.5] > =================================================== > ===> Deinstalling for pnm2ppa > ===> Deinstalling pnm2ppa-1.13_2 > Updating database digests format: ...... done > Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) > Deinstallation has been requested for the following 1 packages (of 0 > packages in the universe): > > Installed packages to be REMOVED: > pnm2ppa-1.13_2 > > The operation will free 653 KiB. > [10_2_amd64-default] [1/1] Deinstalling pnm2ppa-1.13_2... > [10_2_amd64-default] [1/1] Deleting files for pnm2ppa-1.13_2: ...... done > =========================================================================== > ====>> Checking for extra files and directories > [00:00:09] ====>> Installing from package > [10_2_amd64-default] Installing pnm2ppa-1.13_2... > [10_2_amd64-default] Extracting pnm2ppa-1.13_2: ...... done > Message from pnm2ppa-1.13_2: > To configure your printcap to print either ascii" > or Postscript files, add the following lines to your" > /etc/printcap file" > > lp|ascii|unix:\\" > :lp=/dev/lpt0:\\" > :sd=/var/spool/lpd:\\" > :if=/usr/local/bin/asciippafilter:\\" > :mx#0:\\" > :sh:" > > ps:\\" > :lp=/dev/lpt0:\\" > :sd=/var/spool/ps:\\" > :if=/usr/local/bin/ppafilter:\\" > :mx#0:\\" > :sh:" > [00:00:09] ====>> Cleaning up > ===> Cleaning for pnm2ppa-1.13_2 > [00:00:09] ====>> Deinstalling package > Updating database digests format: . done > Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) > Deinstallation has been requested for the following 1 packages (of 0 > packages in the universe): > > Installed packages to be REMOVED: > pnm2ppa-1.13_2 > > The operation will free 653 KiB. > [10_2_amd64-default] [1/1] Deinstalling pnm2ppa-1.13_2... > [10_2_amd64-default] [1/1] Deleting files for pnm2ppa-1.13_2: ...... done > build of print/pnm2ppa ended at Wed Feb 17 23:44:50 CET 2016 > build time: 00:00:08 > [00:00:09] ====>> Cleaning up > 10_2_amd64-default: removed > 10_2_amd64-default-n: removed > [00:00:09] ====>> Umounting file systems > > Usr: 7.140s Krnl: 3.021s Totl: 0:10.91s CPU: 93.1% swppd: 0 I/O: > 71+9636 > > > So what to do next to submit PR in right format? > Should I send diff against old port version, or full archive of new version? > > Miroslav Lachman Yes, a diff against the port prior to it's deletion. This way it can be resurrected and patched. Thanks! -jgh -- Jason Helfman | FreeBSD Committer jgh@FreeBSD.org | http://people.freebsd.org/~jgh | The Power to Serve From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Feb 20 07:02:06 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A276FAAF883 for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 07:02:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Robert.Burmeister@utoledo.edu) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89022C0D for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 07:02:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Robert.Burmeister@utoledo.edu) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 85B40AAF882; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 07:02:06 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B7F7AAF881 for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 07:02:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Robert.Burmeister@utoledo.edu) Received: from smtpin2.utoledo.edu (smtpin2.utoledo.edu [131.183.2.214]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "*.utoledo.edu", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G2" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00CB3C0C for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 07:02:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Robert.Burmeister@utoledo.edu) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2EZAwC+DshWfn8Dt4NeGQEBAg8BAQIGAQEBAYRFvDaHUUwBAQEBAQEEDgEBFjMvhEMEJBUbKxAgAgUWCwILAwIBAgFLDQgBAYgOCAWdEI9bikgBhEZ7hReJPII0gToFh1OGSz2ILJZ/hVKOSIRkiEkBfAEBAQ X-IPAS-Result: A2EZAwC+DshWfn8Dt4NeGQEBAg8BAQIGAQEBAYRFvDaHUUwBAQEBAQEEDgEBFjMvhEMEJBUbKxAgAgUWCwILAwIBAgFLDQgBAYgOCAWdEI9bikgBhEZ7hReJPII0gToFh1OGSz2ILJZ/hVKOSIRkiEkBfAEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,474,1449550800"; d="scan'208";a="394799725" Received: from dlpint01.utoledo.edu ([131.183.3.127]) by smtpin2.utoledo.edu with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 20 Feb 2016 02:01:53 -0500 Received: from MSGAPP10.utad.utoledo.edu (msgapp10.utad.utoledo.edu [131.183.3.6]) by dlpint01.utoledo.edu (RSA Interceptor) for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 02:01:33 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.66] (76.238.202.78) by Email.Utoledo.Edu (131.183.3.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 02:01:32 -0500 Message-ID: <56C80F60.4000808@UToledo.edu> Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 02:01:52 -0500 From: Robert Burmeister User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120306 Thunderbird/3.1.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Subject: FreeBSD Port: databases/firebird25-client X-Priority: 2 (High) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [76.238.202.78] X-RSA-Inspected: yes X-RSA-Classifications: public X-RSA-Action: allow X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 07:02:06 -0000 FreeBSD 10.3 Beta2 i386. databases/firebird25-client 2.5.4_3 does not build on i386, and stops with a segmentation fault. firebird25-client 2.5.2_3 and earlier built fine, firebird25-client 2.5.4_3 never has. After successfully compiling FreeBSD 10.3 Beta2, Firefox, LibreOffice and 1016 other ports, firebird25-client is the only thing that won't build; so I doubt it is a physical problem with my build box. Can someone help get this fixed before 10.3 release? > echo create database \'msg.fdb\'\; | ../gen/firebird/bin/isql-fb_static > Use CONNECT or CREATE DATABASE to specify a database > for sn in ../src/msgs/msg.sql ../src/msgs/facilities2.sql > ../src/msgs/locales.sql ../src/msgs/sqlstates.sql ../src/msgs/history2.sql > ../src/msgs/messages2.sql ../src/msgs/symbols2.sql > ../src/msgs/system_errors2.sql ../src/msgs/transmsgs.fr_FR.sql > ../src/msgs/transmsgs.de_DE.sql; do (echo $sn; > ../gen/firebird/bin/isql-fb_static -i $sn msg.fdb) || exit; done > ../src/msgs/msg.sql > ../src/msgs/facilities2.sql > ../src/msgs/locales.sql > ../src/msgs/sqlstates.sql > ../src/msgs/history2.sql > ../src/msgs/messages2.sql > ../src/msgs/symbols2.sql > ../src/msgs/system_errors2.sql > Segmentation fault > ../gen/Makefile.refDatabases:91: recipe for target 'msg.timestamp' failed > gmake[4]: *** [msg.timestamp] Error 139 > gmake[4]: Leaving directory > '/usr/ports/databases/firebird25-client/work/Firebird-2.5.4.26856-0/gen' > Makefile:278: recipe for target 'ref_databases' failed > gmake[3]: *** [ref_databases] Error 2 > gmake[3]: Leaving directory > '/usr/ports/databases/firebird25-client/work/Firebird-2.5.4.26856-0/gen' > Makefile:6: recipe for target 'firebird_basic' failed > gmake[2]: *** [firebird_basic] Error 2 > gmake[2]: Leaving directory > '/usr/ports/databases/firebird25-client/work/Firebird-2.5.4.26856-0' > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/databases/firebird25-client > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > make: stopped in /usr/ports/databases/firebird25-client From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Feb 20 08:01:49 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAEDDAAED4F for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:01:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2B04200 for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:01:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1aX2U7-0002ns-2b; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 09:01:47 +0100 Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 09:01:47 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Tobias Kortkamp Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can someone take a look at these PRs? Message-ID: <20160220080147.GX26283@home.opsec.eu> References: <1455745790.2821090.524255066.2A53B8CF@webmail.messagingengine.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1455745790.2821090.524255066.2A53B8CF@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:01:49 -0000 Hi! > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207236 (security/afl, > update) Done. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Feb 20 09:29:04 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F4C7AAEEFA for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 09:29:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: from anny.lostinspace.de (anny.lostinspace.de [IPv6:2a01:138:a006::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 650BB614 for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 09:29:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: from server.idefix.lan (aftr-88-217-181-35.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.181.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: idefix@fechner.net) by anny.lostinspace.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5BC1A1D04AB for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 10:29:00 +0100 (CET) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.1 anny.lostinspace.de 5BC1A1D04AB Authentication-Results: anny.lostinspace.de; dmarc=none header.from=fechner.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=fechner.net; s=default; t=1455960540; bh=dsKvVoakSt1ucX4sX8U90UK4dJK0UhGM7BHwbX3zNYE=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=hTWU/8BW8RVMZ4avcqEmzCSx37tC+9AWvI7Axu2whDnIjL1PAAnSnKHRRJwlIbTUL 84CKmkCmfw2VdcmIuq1sxqsX6HSE/j4nwNj0ckIvaikFn3z4J3U7p7uqQC9d99FRrw RexUiIKvVAUV/WTlrKfXO2/XQp7cQCjmDKCKY3aU= Received: from [192.168.0.151] (aftr-88-217-181-35.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.181.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.idefix.lan (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0E092F3F2C for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 10:28:58 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Pulling from github as a vendorized dependency in poudriere To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <56C706D0.2000006@razorfever.net> <20160219191646.GA75742@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> <56C7C48F.4070905@razorfever.net> From: Matthias Fechner Message-ID: <56C831D6.2020206@fechner.net> Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 10:28:54 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56C7C48F.4070905@razorfever.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 09:29:04 -0000 Am 20.02.2016 um 02:42 schrieb Derek (freebsd lists): > My current plan is to shoehorn a custom fetch/extract/patch into the > port Makefile, based on Brooks' valued information, but it doesn't feel > great. I faced the same problem with creating a port for gogs. Yuri implemented a nice way to get this solved: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205283 Maybe you can use a similar approach for your problem. Gruß Matthias -- "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning." -- Rich Cook From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Feb 20 11:26:10 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 703EFAAE5E9 for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 11:26:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3523D1648 for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 11:26:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1aX5fu-0002zE-1G; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 12:26:10 +0100 Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 12:26:10 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Tobias Kortkamp Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can someone take a look at these PRs? Message-ID: <20160220112609.GY26283@home.opsec.eu> References: <1455745790.2821090.524255066.2A53B8CF@webmail.messagingengine.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1455745790.2821090.524255066.2A53B8CF@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 11:26:10 -0000 Hi! > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206846 (x11/rofi, > issue confirmed and patch approved by maintainer) Done. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Feb 20 15:48:02 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E84EAAEB21 for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 15:48:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vladimir.pushkar@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 309BB1DDF for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 15:48:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vladimir.pushkar@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 2DC50AAEB20; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 15:48:02 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D4BBAAEB1E for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 15:48:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vladimir.pushkar@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-x230.google.com (mail-lb0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA2F51DDE for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 15:48:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vladimir.pushkar@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lb0-x230.google.com with SMTP id bc4so62148829lbc.2 for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 07:48:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=QwisyoUgwXnTYiDYm8y8Fdd7s7/ZerQPMdo/vtcRWEs=; b=jM33uJlBugW8PSxhXiRmI5pO61PZV59k1PsBAY7P8KDFsEZAU16bjkDYRbpUPBQ5Tp KMmdiTNZmWA9xP4/+6eftMLyQBVyjhHFbklVZ7Qbab5j3STNI+JI2fJDmQV51igz/Ds7 XHaI8UH+b9s452Jqyt4l2E1Hd0mEU50C4VO8M+Ht5k7YJiKAOZ1IoiO4fZyiwevvSQXE CYsiY6XR5mn5X7nZH9zavi4fC4NDU/wRKuYPZ1w+c50aYt+JBNia6Vh5Wo9GAwp7QnNy MIj/QeFVk0e2LOUDgJ0nPrs5azds3SsvtU9x5N3+lLb9ZtWQSApCW0sOEgz7jduPmNjy 5ILA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=QwisyoUgwXnTYiDYm8y8Fdd7s7/ZerQPMdo/vtcRWEs=; b=a8Ama1OfIoZMR/SxyabV5yZvCKeLjm4G9OiKZUg8ISSn+gI8tRvMYsZJdi21osFaqP yw0qdw9Ny/S7PC0T3Go6DJhicKSeBkPi4NwKiq3Pw9pHcs4bMI0fGMyk7IFrCKY6n6kd CAuZ1k7lHss0/wGggj29i1h0DGhEEYRYWiftTdE7oX+dMGZ48qZk5n87DtYCNqZRfDxr PYmbHriMXtZ1FVId5aOKNrUYc9OiUz8ZuxPoifErpUApmGHd1UnOrJ9RrJ1nuLbjcpVn QX6qFCTu7D5Uxd3PTjD876JqSJHAf/gNEhSPbmG+dKVjLpOIe9xYQcgY9Zg8ysclhegA D7wA== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTUuD1gFz4o5jA+0O5z2ybRNvctKNrRf4BwBvlBlgauI9NSXZ8POG0W9WI/CMCWZ4fXTRQFZ7sksyvntg== X-Received: by 10.112.235.71 with SMTP id uk7mr7149265lbc.39.1455983279781; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 07:47:59 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.42.138 with HTTP; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 07:47:19 -0800 (PST) From: Vladimir Pushkar Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 17:47:19 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: openvmps port To: ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 15:48:02 -0000 Regarding to bug: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=136376 I have created new port with version 1.4.06 which correctly builds and run on amd64. Please make it available in ports again. Port archive in attachment. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Feb 20 17:02:09 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E60B3AAEB10 for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 17:02:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D76DB77C for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 17:02:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D6419AAEB0E; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 17:02:09 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5DA0AAEB0B for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 17:02:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A24177B for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 17:02:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1aXAv3-0003RR-DA; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 18:02:09 +0100 Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 18:02:09 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Vladimir Pushkar Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openvmps port Message-ID: <20160220170209.GA26283@home.opsec.eu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 17:02:10 -0000 Hi! > Regarding to bug: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=136376 > I have created new port with version 1.4.06 which correctly builds and run > on amd64. Done. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go !