From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Oct 23 00:44:16 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F21F0C13491 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 00:44:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@skysmurf.nl) Received: from mail.skysmurf.nl (spectrum.skysmurf.nl [83.162.175.214]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.skysmurf.nl", Issuer "mail.skysmurf.nl" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F41ACDD for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 00:44:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@skysmurf.nl) Received: from spectrum.skysmurf.nl (mail.skysmurf.nl [192.168.42.4]) by mail.skysmurf.nl (8.15.2/8.15.2) with SMTP id u9N0iB9W052263; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 02:44:11 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@skysmurf.nl) Received: by spectrum.skysmurf.nl (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 23 Oct 2016 02:44:11 +0200 Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 02:44:11 +0200 From: Alphons van Werven To: Mark Linimon Cc: andrew clarke , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/jive deleted Message-ID: <20161023004411.GA50949@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> References: <20161022024510.7cvnhc2fdh7h7arh@ozzmosis.com> <20161022113104.GA9380@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> <20161022161428.GA7234@lonesome.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161022161428.GA7234@lonesome.com> X-PGP-Key: http://www.skysmurf.nl/~fonz/fonz_pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 00:44:17 -0000 --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mark Linimon wrote: > Answering opposition/criticism with violence isn't exactly my style. I tend to take it as an indication that one has run out of rational arguments. Moreover, I think you'll find that the word you're looking for is . > It's not delusions of moral superiority. It's common decency. Decency is subject to personal and/or cultural opinion. Selectively suppressing matter that does not fit one's (moral, political, stylistic, religious, whatever) agenda *is* censorship. Simple as that. > There's no "censorship" if the FreeBSD developers make a collective > decision that they don't want to be associated with [snip derogative high horse description] > and that instead they would like to seem more welcoming to people that > don't look, think, and talk exactly like they do. Quite the opposite, in fact. If the FreeBSD developers make a collective decision that they don't want other people to be aware of software that isn't in line with exactly how they happen to look, think and talk, that's censorship. And it doesn't seem particularly welcoming to people with more liberal/relaxed attitudes than one's own. Fortunately, it's still possible to create one's own ports and to make the resulting packages available from one's own repositories. Therefore, I can't be bothered to be overly fussed when someone feels that FreeBSD ought to take a stance on morality. I find it unfortunate and think it's not the right way to go, but I'm accepting it and will gladly work around it, as is apparently necessary. Have a cookie, Fonz --=20 A.J. "Fonz" van Werven mailsig: Help! I'm a prisoner in a Chinese fortune cookie factory. --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJYDAfbAAoJEAfP7gJTaCe8ThYP/1HiyNf4lXTeA9hGxlL56rGk 2TCSbneZSNFYwhKoe4+Mu0CBK86WOpmlfufIrzOsvzcKiWARvDVmidXLG7tbp3RT R4hd7w7OfPDqdoN5zGyQdzLIJFGk7uJ6Qee4NeWfSFQghMQk/pAQtn12E4CVb+Cl U+4qnAGd0RDtzRgWt5eEUiAirNK55rjeUXdKIde3x6QeL1YBmK7nDBkaPRRjHcez qR0+mlMzul/qnxm8C2t17mxq+Lcp4FMG9Yt0EvOIiEL9STz9xdVG378i8lWyidQo NR9Z7Q5sbLS7zdX3TN87qhBFehym9wQjQ8S4Io4khn895U2StXQuNKpdMW/gW9qH zPvwvKkp1/A+Rfpv6wHEQZNehakpwwEDOyQRWnv/w12oerbdGzx7PjO3rtxaTMhq /ywM5IasFApNFUtlc6/g1PAs7m5NtxBwEH1bR2bkUDf4msAQAWNR0hyg2RHM728Z +tHu8mpK/ZAFweHOsh2PraNZPso/Q09XyOuY2FPupwP3B0ivGABawY6hvK5f8N/g Euhhodx3YfkQPcir2Ts1XembZJRUdssbfpWCpvvOHLbcdXhOEXAu7p7LN6LHHBTl bNQnyjIyFLlIJYyUEmKb1rokP3FfGSiGzRSY8HqqAb77LVwoTyerKlP9Jy2CrcUz O/szA4YseCzjh/pSatzK =dAMw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Oct 23 01:09:36 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48BEFC139BB for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 01:09:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from nskntqsrv02p.mx.bigpond.com (nskntqsrv02p.mx.bigpond.com [61.9.168.234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "InterMail Test Certificate", Issuer "Certificate Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF26CAAE for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 01:09:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from nskntcmgw07p ([61.9.169.167]) by nskntmtas06p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20161023001558.CBWK2096.nskntmtas06p.mx.bigpond.com@nskntcmgw07p> for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 00:15:58 +0000 Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org ([120.146.8.15]) by nskntcmgw07p with BigPond Outbound id yoFy1t00C0KTh7401oFylx; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 00:15:58 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=M5iwUHEs c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=4q38a75ucWZEoAuqF1Taiw==:117 a=4q38a75ucWZEoAuqF1Taiw==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=CH0kA5CcgfcA:10 a=RxopENSzjN-CafHQBrAA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id u9N0FtR7011181 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 11:15:58 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from localhost (dave@localhost) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id u9N0FsMZ011164 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 11:15:55 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) X-Authentication-Warning: aneurin.horsfall.org: dave owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 11:15:54 +1100 (EST) From: Dave Horsfall To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: misc/jive deleted In-Reply-To: <20161022113104.GA9380@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> Message-ID: References: <20161022024510.7cvnhc2fdh7h7arh@ozzmosis.com> <20161022113104.GA9380@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) X-Home-Page: http://www.horsfall.org/ X-Witty-Saying: "chmod 666 the_mode_of_the_beast" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 01:09:36 -0000 On Sat, 22 Oct 2016, Alphons van Werven wrote: > There used to be "offensive" (a term to be taken rather loosely in this > case) fortune cookies, but they got kicked out somewhere in 9.X. That > was the base system though; not the ports tree. Not to mention "fortune -o" (to get the obscene versions) and there were some beauties there... > Come to think of it, I'm quite (be it pleasantly) surprised to see that > deskutils/hot-babe is still allowed. I'm still half waiting for someone > with misguided delusions of moral superiority to delete that port, > thinking it's their decision to make that FreeBSD must not enable people > to display their system load as a cartoon woman in various stages of > undress. Or something along those lines. But I digress... I never cease to be astonished by censorship. > Anyway, if anyone misses this port, I'll be happy to maintain it > privately and make it available from a public repository, if only > because I strongly oppose censorship, so I would gladly help circumvent > what I consider to be a hopelessly outdated and even morally wrong > concept. Yes please; it seems to be marked as broken: aneurin% cd wmfortune aneurin% less *descr WMFortune outputs fortune messages, just as its name says. aneurin% make ===> wmfortune-0.241_3 is marked as broken: No public disfiles. *** [all] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/games/wmfortune. Sigh... -- Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer." From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Oct 23 03:12:41 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F6B0C1326C for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 03:12:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [192.108.105.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.soaustin.net", Issuer "StartCom Class 2 IV Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66DE016F1 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 03:12:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from lonesome.com (bones.soaustin.net [192.108.105.22]) by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F369512A9; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 22:12:38 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 22:12:37 -0500 From: Mark Linimon To: Alphons van Werven Cc: andrew clarke , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/jive deleted Message-ID: <20161023031237.GA9294@lonesome.com> References: <20161022024510.7cvnhc2fdh7h7arh@ozzmosis.com> <20161022113104.GA9380@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> <20161022161428.GA7234@lonesome.com> <20161023004411.GA50949@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161023004411.GA50949@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 03:12:41 -0000 On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 02:44:11AM +0200, Alphons van Werven wrote: > > > > Answering opposition/criticism with violence isn't exactly my style. So. If you say something that makes me want to plow my face into my hands, that's violence? Wow. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Oct 23 03:21:33 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F5A6C134FC for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 03:21:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@skysmurf.nl) Received: from mail.skysmurf.nl (spectrum.skysmurf.nl [83.162.175.214]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.skysmurf.nl", Issuer "mail.skysmurf.nl" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E95D318DF for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 03:21:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@skysmurf.nl) Received: from spectrum.skysmurf.nl (mail.skysmurf.nl [192.168.42.4]) by mail.skysmurf.nl (8.15.2/8.15.2) with SMTP id u9N3LTKa055507; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 05:21:29 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@skysmurf.nl) Received: by spectrum.skysmurf.nl (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 23 Oct 2016 05:21:29 +0200 Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 05:21:29 +0200 From: Alphons van Werven To: Mark Linimon Cc: andrew clarke , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/jive deleted Message-ID: <20161023032129.GA55397@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> References: <20161022024510.7cvnhc2fdh7h7arh@ozzmosis.com> <20161022113104.GA9380@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> <20161022161428.GA7234@lonesome.com> <20161023004411.GA50949@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> <20161023031237.GA9294@lonesome.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161023031237.GA9294@lonesome.com> X-PGP-Key: http://www.skysmurf.nl/~fonz/fonz_pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 03:21:33 -0000 --LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mark Linimon wrote: >>> >>=20 >> Answering opposition/criticism with violence isn't exactly my style. >=20 > If you say something that makes me want to plow my face into my hands, > that's violence? I stand corrected. Something got lost in translation there. Fonz --=20 A.J. "Fonz" van Werven mailsig: Help! I'm a prisoner in a Chinese fortune cookie factory. --LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJYDCy5AAoJEAfP7gJTaCe8ORgP/3ZjOV0Lbv9Y/5qx5SB7WAr4 dCrW4S3R2VKYBUEsUxxqal5hqh65lIlr419WfNWCI1ja6UXT7qJt1u4CQB70mgd0 C/Urow7nH4ljW9KmshQS3WpzvhOQAQbQMAu3AR6pkvFHqwQc+I2wQxXVvw1tao0j CMJIHx5zY3jqqmIe9QJh68Sp0DHDEZxG4vo4lRwIvE/l0TqSq4VMwW/N/OxGOl2Y ubyHOWF0fZ0USjaW5tBGgJAx7lhdxZEutlc0wGLAfeuqVgEXTLRTC5ujVhm5hye/ eKnhFpTvbenElxwni2knoLYtATwTe4DED3d7zlYTzgsjAaBCUV2xHHlnX23dW1XT /0MviaMv7fhvJNViGjYiIbovnDYSl3jSiFg/iw2hS6plb3yFBUkXRNa/JMfZ0Fgj Og6Y/cA0DXv3z1uiCQlvU9HRl+g/0ZOLcsMyD8E+9Eyl8BrkchErQDlAnBs8rosM y0TTRgnqEIp6YyGjf4Q/bn8wCz7s7q4WDOFLgETeBCAFUEOustpoh0m+KoSs522R FHoE24eXXmmImr/sKY8JMkHvvXjvq6Nl7NkNT7tFut6kO9zdKPGTUL2bHWxdBu+T RuHsc865uZLLc6K2S93K4ATJpf181i93igMUjc6Zgc+yLpotUMVRFhx3CejVbq5v zuLvPCCvCIXkkmG4VNp6 =QMuB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Oct 23 11:57:19 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 123EAC1EC49 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 11:57:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baho-utot@columbus.rr.com) Received: from cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com (cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.166.227]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "cdptpa-oedge", Issuer "cdptpa-oedge" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D09C1CDF for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 11:57:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baho-utot@columbus.rr.com) Received: from [76.181.114.47] ([76.181.114.47:41973] helo=raspberrypi.bildanet.com) by cdptpa-omsmta01 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.6.9.48312 r(Core:3.6.9.0)) with ESMTP id 31/DE-12962-795AC085; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 11:57:11 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.40] (helo=baho-utot.bildanet.com) by raspberrypi.bildanet.com with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1byHOp-00008E-BB; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 07:57:11 -0400 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Baho Utot Subject: Fails to build math/libqalculate Message-ID: <28720f79-b7a3-7dd8-7cf8-1870124ceeab@columbus.rr.com> Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 07:57:11 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.6:25 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 11:57:19 -0000 Sending this again as I have had mail server issues There is no src/Makefile.in only src/Makefile.am /usr/ports/math/libqalculate # make ===> License GPLv2 accepted by the user ===> Found saved configuration for libqalculate-0.9.10 ===> libqalculate-0.9.10 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found ===> Fetching all distfiles required by libqalculate-0.9.10 for building ===> Extracting for libqalculate-0.9.10 => SHA256 Checksum OK for Qalculate-libqalculate-v0.9.10_GH0.tar.gz. ===> Patching for libqalculate-0.9.10 ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for libqalculate-0.9.10 File to patch: No file found--skip this patch? [n] y 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to Oops.rej => Patch patch-src-Makefile.in failed to apply cleanly. => Patch(es) patch-libqalculate.pc.in applied cleanly. *** Error code 1 Stop. make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/math/libqalculate *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/ports/math/libqalculate From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Oct 23 13:02:33 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33D2EC1D939 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 13:02:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marko.cupac@mimar.rs) Received: from mail.mimar.rs (mail1.mimar.rs [193.53.106.128]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFA4E3C5 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 13:02:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marko.cupac@mimar.rs) Received: from mail1.mimar.rs (localhost [127.0.1.128]) by mail.mimar.rs (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2281B45BA212 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 15:02:22 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mimar.rs; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:mime-version :x-mailer:organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject :subject:from:from:date:date:received:received; s=mimar-0901; t= 1477227739; x=1479042140; bh=jhRNbKRB+dMvl15kM94TYkcq6dX4LdzszPg 91NtdsFM=; b=3AdYr6pH45SCDHj5pgmFPVDa7RZ1LFFlMwK8nOP+jAlO8nggjSl sUOTqvTFe6IPAdtOZqEDUp2H3ZtweronRjibSEmPtSlJm9IFaWNR5mmE9MF3+5km xbBfQdxgQu1xWer/KyhlswZbJI3Cp3ZTo4vcXz66bjUJH45RdaEq/+3A= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mimar.rs Received: from mail.mimar.rs ([127.0.1.128]) by mail1.mimar.rs (amavis.mimar.rs [127.0.1.128]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with LMTP id GtAIlM31uya1 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 15:02:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from efreet.kappastar.com (93-87-131-33.dynamic.isp.telekom.rs [93.87.131.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: marko.cupac@mimar.rs) by mail.mimar.rs (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9BA5745BA10E for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 15:02:19 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 15:02:15 +0200 From: Marko =?UTF-8?B?Q3VwYcSH?= To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/jive deleted Message-ID: <20161023150215.5c1ba333@efreet.kappastar.com> In-Reply-To: <20161022092738.GA5690@lonesome.com> References: <20161022024510.7cvnhc2fdh7h7arh@ozzmosis.com> <20161022092738.GA5690@lonesome.com> Organization: Mimar X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.0 (GTK+ 2.24.29; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 13:02:33 -0000 Hi, Who exactly was offended by the existence of misc/jive in ports? Were there any actual complaints? How many? Regards, --=20 Before enlightenment - chop wood, draw water. After enlightenment - chop wood, draw water. Marko Cupa=C4=87 https://www.mimar.rs/ From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Oct 23 13:41:17 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 932E5C1E580 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 13:41:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Received: from mx5.roble.com (mx5.roble.com [206.40.34.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx5.roble.com", Issuer "mx5.roble.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 879FDA01 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 13:41:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 06:41:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Roger Marquis To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Jive prejudices In-Reply-To: <20161022181202.F36710-100000@main.put.com> References: <20161022181202.F36710-100000@main.put.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 13:41:17 -0000 Louis Epstein wrote: > You really need to have a hands-off policy on what software people use. The meaning of this is unclear as anyone can still compile jive on their own outside of the ports tree. WRT ports, they should be subject to the same policies as base. The meta questions here are: A) does FreeBSD have a policy restricting software that promotes hatred, discrimination or violence (IMO it should) and, if so B) does jive violate that policy. Before we can have any substantive discussion of a particular port we should have consensus on policy. Roger From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Oct 23 14:17:27 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE466C1ED03 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 14:17:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rodperson@rodperson.com) Received: from mail1.g16.pair.com (unknown [IPv6:2607:f440::4227:4116]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D35C4D7C for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 14:17:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rodperson@rodperson.com) Received: from atomizer (c-73-174-28-246.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [73.174.28.246]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail1.g16.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 632D85D5A; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 10:17:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 10:17:19 -0400 From: Rod Person To: Roger Marquis Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Jive prejudices Message-ID: <20161023101719.7e4d7ea9@atomizer> References: <20161022181202.F36710-100000@main.put.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.0 (GTK+ 2.24.29; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 14:17:28 -0000 On Sun, 23 Oct 2016 06:41:10 -0700 (PDT) Roger Marquis wrote: > Louis Epstein wrote: > > You really need to have a hands-off policy on what software people > > use. > > The meaning of this is unclear as anyone can still compile jive on > their own outside of the ports tree. WRT ports, they should be > subject to the same policies as base. > > The meta questions here are: A) does FreeBSD have a policy restricting > software that promotes hatred, discrimination or violence (IMO it > should) and, if so B) does jive violate that policy. I usually stay out of these discussions, but anything that can used to create text or graphics can be used to promote hatred, discrimination or violence. Heck, someone could fork FreeBSD for some nefarious means, say embedding as a bomb controller. For one, I didn't even know of the existence of Jive till it was banned and I've been using FreeBSD since 1997. > Before we can have any substantive discussion of a particular port we > should have consensus on policy. > > Roger > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Rod http://www.rodperson.com He who knows himself to be one way and pretends it is another way is a thief who robs his own soul. The Mahabharata Sakuntala 25 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Oct 23 14:51:22 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71AEFC1E848 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 14:51:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from henk@signature.nl) Received: from ans.signature.nl (ans.signature.nl [IPv6:2a01:7c8:aab1:31a::160]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43B531A0 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 14:51:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from henk@signature.nl) Received: by ans.signature.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DA878731D01; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:51:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ans.signature.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D538D731D00 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:51:12 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:51:12 +0200 (CEST) From: Henk van Oers To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: misc/sword should be removed Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 14:51:22 -0000 A sword is a bladed weapon intended for slashing or thrusting. And also: "Framework for manipulating Bible texts" Is that what misc/jive does? You can not kill with a jive but you can kill with manipulating bible texts. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Oct 23 15:53:53 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6524FC17C5A for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 15:53:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FB241DF for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 15:53:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1byL5t-000OyE-M3; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 17:53:53 +0200 Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 17:53:53 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Marko Cupa?? Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/jive deleted Message-ID: <20161023155353.GW51420@home.opsec.eu> References: <20161022024510.7cvnhc2fdh7h7arh@ozzmosis.com> <20161022092738.GA5690@lonesome.com> <20161023150215.5c1ba333@efreet.kappastar.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161023150215.5c1ba333@efreet.kappastar.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 15:53:53 -0000 Hi! > Who exactly was offended by the existence of misc/jive in ports? Were > there any actual complaints? How many? One, in August. portmgr had a look at the port and decided on the removal. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Oct 23 16:03:50 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABD11C17F29 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:03:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 747209B1 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:03:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1byLFY-000P1G-5T; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:03:52 +0200 Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:03:52 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: "Mikhail T." Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/jive deleted Message-ID: <20161023160352.GX51420@home.opsec.eu> References: <20161022024510.7cvnhc2fdh7h7arh@ozzmosis.com> <20161022092738.GA5690@lonesome.com> <14ff8102-d360-507e-a03b-2ed07b4a5823@aldan.algebra.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <14ff8102-d360-507e-a03b-2ed07b4a5823@aldan.algebra.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:03:50 -0000 Hi! > Is this -- being more inclusive (whatever that means) -- > even a valid goal for a technical project? That depends on those working on the project. If they wonder why systems programming is so one-sided when it cames to age, gender, race, etc, then: yes, it becomes a goal. Please remember that there was another discussion at that time (August 2016), which caused the loss of relevant contributors because the project did not react in a manner that was seen sensible from all sides. I would not count one such action as a huge change of direction, but I would not welcome it either if the project started long discussions on on-sidedness and missed out on the technical ones. So, lets get back to technical stuff 8-} -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Oct 23 16:04:15 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72DBDC17F7D for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:04:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms-10.1blu.de (ms-10.1blu.de [178.254.4.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EDBBA53 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:04:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from [89.15.236.5] (helo=[10.60.96.5]) by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1byLFm-0007h2-59 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:04:06 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: Subject: Re: misc/jive deleted Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:04:04 +0200 User-Agent: Dekko/0.6.20; Qt/5.4.1; ubuntumirclient; Linux; MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <19a23a50-b957-407b-8f2b-25c8d1e44be4@unixarea.de> In-Reply-To: <20161023155353.GW51420@home.opsec.eu> References: <20161022024510.7cvnhc2fdh7h7arh@ozzmosis.com> <20161022092738.GA5690@lonesome.com> <20161023150215.5c1ba333@efreet.kappastar.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 89.15.236.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:04:15 -0000 I think, we should end this thread. The port was removed, sure with good=20 reasons. If someone wants to use it. he can pull out from svn the old port=20= and continue with it to maintain. matthias --=20 Sent from my Ubuntu phone http://www.unixarea.de/ From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Oct 23 16:05:09 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDD10C17FFB for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:05:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8122B19 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:05:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1byLGq-000P24-3I; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:05:12 +0200 Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:05:12 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Henk van Oers Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/sword should be removed Message-ID: <20161023160512.GY51420@home.opsec.eu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:05:10 -0000 Hi! > A sword is a bladed weapon intended for slashing or thrusting. To quote the pkg-descr: The SWORD Project is the CrossWire Bible Society's free Bible software project. Its purpose is to create cross-platform open-source tools, covered by the GNU General Public License, that allow programmers and Bible societies to write new Bible software more quickly and easily. > but you can kill with manipulating bible texts. Come on, isn't there some PR to work on 8-} ? -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Oct 23 16:14:25 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EE0AC1E300 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:14:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tingox@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf0-x22a.google.com (mail-lf0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B7A7FFC for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:14:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tingox@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id f134so14472323lfg.2 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 09:14:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=jkNw4kFPF64DLfJrPgLEakA8BN3O4ABaB2P93VY2bhc=; b=AsF2k6eKVpZlc0fDdjr7S4PbHKz/tx67reOP0OqBl/+zFp9RxgNlO6u3TJtDENPsqs Q3FPopViPRCnMIp8dLmEZg+VX6Sl205AG4PUd6O5mJodbkytsonLCHyjez1cmdlrxJzw hLDsAAENoU0PjTJ3c4fIdrqBsWWELUyalHPL3GM+K03zaE3c88SqmN8GU9ZWDn7bwgrF I4B02tZAyhiOQWUuIj4m/kwn2uVPGGFNbLC8QQSkiyeGVkU3lW4K7+yivDhB//UBhOho 7hEQzpEmJHlVoxDMFj6aKmoeMCdNrg3ohP+vGIEkQG5Wox93RufclggQ9ZKXkRvQPpOk bIxw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=jkNw4kFPF64DLfJrPgLEakA8BN3O4ABaB2P93VY2bhc=; b=Jtc/p51hB3OWyxcoh+NYQUotD+kJzAx4ht7WD8f3e5mqJ5v/znboppLTgSTTpwuJNj 6wXXCasFKKcBDrhQmcAgJuxWSS/towjm7b3yDqMyKShDwvLuR/d2TaaC1sNwtz4tzz1n sWq5kpcA0w9IZ73J1fzHOEvlldbia+vWT40gEy/YaWqICfFa3pEFCZNuCZiPl4vB/Ajv 3hC2uQ7b8v1gj0x5rYILLUHiE3KOjumczWcYgCn7HPgO2sXDVQWulrKSoZmuO72xM7cQ e5SFu9eyqyYSGweADbslzL7nN96T6wCw+NoNF2NYmpGvQ8erfLg4oLXkuHZernGf7GEV hdsA== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvdGMerIwwXAO5Uem9z8CZyp5nfyv6l2b4nZpHK5ufwtbOGs8eceUS0wk5ZdtuQkmTyfpSHMaK8Mlm2WuA== X-Received: by 10.25.141.3 with SMTP id p3mr3921621lfd.157.1477239261659; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 09:14:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.99.68 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 09:14:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20151112211638.GA98101@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20151113015559.GA69072@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <56458C5E.2030603@gwdg.de> <20151113072938.GA70183@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> From: Torfinn Ingolfsen Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:14:20 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: texlive appears broken To: FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:14:25 -0000 On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 7:48 AM, Chris H wrote: >> >> I actually was puzzled with texlive not installing and remembered >> seeing someone had issues with the new collate stuff. I simply >> tried the latter setting with a "Let's see what happens". It worked. >> >> Moral 1 of the story. Build ports with LC_ALL= and LC_COLLATE=C. > > Does this deserve an EN, or UPDATING notice? > > P.S. > Thanks for sharing this, Steve! FWIW, this is still not fixed. root@kg-v7# uname -a FreeBSD kg-v7.kg4.no 11.0-STABLE FreeBSD 11.0-STABLE #0 r307729: Fri Oct 21 22:34:13 CEST 2016 root@kg-v7.kg4.no:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 and an updated ports tree. I had to install texlive-base with root@kg-v7# LC_COLLATE=C portinstall -R texlive-base [...] Installing texlive-base-20150521_13... mktexlsr: Updating /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R... mktexlsr: Updating /usr/local/share/texmf-config/ls-R... mktexlsr: Updating /usr/local/share/texmf-dist/ls-R... mktexlsr: Updating /usr/local/share/texmf-local/ls-R... mktexlsr: Updating /usr/local/share/texmf-var/ls-R... mktexlsr: Done. ===> Cleaning for texlive-base-20150521_13 The funny thing is that none of the LC* variables are set in my environment, only LANG: root@kg-v7# env PAGER=more LANG=en_US.ISO8859-1 G_FILENAME_ENCODING=ISO-8859-1 MAIL=/var/mail/root PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/root/bin ENV=/root/.shrc OLDPWD=/usr/ports/lang/python27 PWD=/root TERM=xterm EXINIT=set showmode USER=root HOME=/root SHELL=/bin/sh BLOCKSIZE=K Is there a existing PR for this? OK, 21264 is close enough: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212624 I'll add comments to it. -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Oct 23 16:17:54 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C3D2C1E429 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:17:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from c.brinkhaus@t-online.de) Received: from mailout10.t-online.de (mailout10.t-online.de [194.25.134.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mailout00.t-online.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50BF61B2 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:17:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from c.brinkhaus@t-online.de) Received: from fwd00.aul.t-online.de (fwd00.aul.t-online.de [172.20.26.147]) by mailout10.t-online.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 5AC2641EF441; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:17:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from esprimo.local (EI1TU6ZcZhm+S8LwbKkDqFOr+0nY-3TIchSQLP9V3Gma1Hamx3i1oorzeCBNuJsgV0@[217.81.155.45]) by fwd00.t-online.de with (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) esmtp id 1byLSv-2CZX0K0; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:17:41 +0200 Received: from esprimo.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by esprimo.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id B882745CD8A; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:17:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from chris@localhost) by esprimo.local (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u9NGHbHF011354; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:17:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from chris) Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:17:37 +0200 From: Christoph Brinkhaus To: Roger Marquis Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Jive prejudices Message-ID: <20161023161737.GA6298@esprimo.local> References: <20161022181202.F36710-100000@main.put.com> <20161023155855.3F7F345CD8A@esprimo.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161023155855.3F7F345CD8A@esprimo.local> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.0 (2016-08-17) X-ID: EI1TU6ZcZhm+S8LwbKkDqFOr+0nY-3TIchSQLP9V3Gma1Hamx3i1oorzeCBNuJsgV0 X-TOI-MSGID: 655fff68-f7eb-4fd9-8065-0fe943f0eefd X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:17:54 -0000 On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 06:41:10AM -0700, Roger Marquis wrote: > Louis Epstein wrote: > > You really need to have a hands-off policy on what software people use. > > The meaning of this is unclear as anyone can still compile jive on their > own outside of the ports tree. WRT ports, they should be subject to the > same policies as base. > > The meta questions here are: A) does FreeBSD have a policy restricting > software that promotes hatred, discrimination or violence (IMO it > should) and, if so B) does jive violate that policy. I this case I have no idea why games as doom are in the ports tree. I would not miss jive and I would not miss stuff as doom, too. But where is the limit? > > Before we can have any substantive discussion of a particular port we > should have consensus on policy. Yes, this is correct. The cultures and measures what is offensive or not are different in different areas. Therefore it is difficult to find a common understanding. Kind regards, Christoph From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Oct 23 16:21:33 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C235C1E5B1 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:21:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x232.google.com (mail-wm0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C03D267A for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:21:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x232.google.com with SMTP id c78so72917346wme.1 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 09:21:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ZG5NJH7WpJwzs3pQc8TSq0X8HGQKdrdjj2yFfKt6Vek=; b=U2kdmOQJSHsBC2t8AW5d0mbuDJHg5ChzGHz818+yDO6ACc4tJvYh0Gi/iYwuueIrzp KSpXVFVZpJwVjRGLtMOBkhfu1IC/FlF42q+JuJN2rxvKbxGjKKX8P+Dgq0tP6cOmBcYm h87TvyprEtTlZV1t0y4my1fVpbIFwXHgK349bWPsdG4HVnJvXlhckcF1Fkyr1HMYJ5zk aoTGpFtdPImflMnbLzjmxZEYQF6WDTaTaM4e8Gx5eD55xeTUC6drkKLHVMUeMvkFiILc GPlYOE8WXMjALSjMCGBoEMOPs09qxBKLNTnyTrs7UmWyIL0WOwNn+RyC/AZO+1MKT7wL dKPA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ZG5NJH7WpJwzs3pQc8TSq0X8HGQKdrdjj2yFfKt6Vek=; b=CKnCeFPt2lG/WRfLgM4NOT+663dQaqwGCnuKIR4QHkLE+bAnsM3PiV4Sqr7QyyKl0E pEOYMyOHbAlOTg8WpQZRENKuq7AGVBQcjeHtvePO4LjcNeoL4JXXMkRnQw3IaMygpKNK kBFmc+vG3XNeVeccnzEdD8U1WszQXbNStZx0hju4hG94L88VLDv5m7oZykbF9HHRXKo7 oCTGqdPdM6QDpTwuQVBPA7QFxnawemuvDGVvUAYulBBnz2fVIpAThMgPcqXJIV3tLyog ceICSNHZeKYkLVNtQUH7GexstR7P9S2TQO12ZFiPxCM59NTxBJG8KOex5Wf1hqV+3jCd RCLg== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RkXSmLX1Tav1iZq1LoFNevx/EdQEPPiqpayCSec3zRofom5RyhpbPZF4kHwGVkkwg== X-Received: by 10.28.93.137 with SMTP id r131mr17676446wmb.2.1477239690834; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 09:21:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f4sm9965213wmd.15.2016.10.23.09.21.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 23 Oct 2016 09:21:30 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:21:29 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Torfinn Ingolfsen Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML Subject: Re: texlive appears broken Message-ID: <20161023162129.ldhgdhqsrosy7dmv@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20151112211638.GA98101@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20151113015559.GA69072@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <56458C5E.2030603@gwdg.de> <20151113072938.GA70183@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tfbaiv4aejxqr7cl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20161014 (1.7.1) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:21:33 -0000 --tfbaiv4aejxqr7cl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 06:14:20PM +0200, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 7:48 AM, Chris H wrote: > >> > >> I actually was puzzled with texlive not installing and remembered > >> seeing someone had issues with the new collate stuff. I simply > >> tried the latter setting with a "Let's see what happens". It worked. > >> > >> Moral 1 of the story. Build ports with LC_ALL=3D and LC_COLLATE=3DC. > > > > Does this deserve an EN, or UPDATING notice? > > > > P.S. > > Thanks for sharing this, Steve! >=20 > FWIW, this is still not fixed. > root@kg-v7# uname -a > FreeBSD kg-v7.kg4.no 11.0-STABLE FreeBSD 11.0-STABLE #0 r307729: Fri > Oct 21 22:34:13 CEST 2016 > root@kg-v7.kg4.no:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 >=20 > and an updated ports tree. > I had to install texlive-base with > root@kg-v7# LC_COLLATE=3DC portinstall -R texlive-base > [...] > Installing texlive-base-20150521_13... > mktexlsr: Updating /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R... > mktexlsr: Updating /usr/local/share/texmf-config/ls-R... > mktexlsr: Updating /usr/local/share/texmf-dist/ls-R... > mktexlsr: Updating /usr/local/share/texmf-local/ls-R... > mktexlsr: Updating /usr/local/share/texmf-var/ls-R... > mktexlsr: Done. > =3D=3D=3D> Cleaning for texlive-base-20150521_13 >=20 > The funny thing is that none of the LC* variables are set in my > environment, only LANG: >=20 > root@kg-v7# env > PAGER=3Dmore > LANG=3Den_US.ISO8859-1 > G_FILENAME_ENCODING=3DISO-8859-1 > MAIL=3D/var/mail/root > PATH=3D/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/root= /bin > ENV=3D/root/.shrc > OLDPWD=3D/usr/ports/lang/python27 > PWD=3D/root > TERM=3Dxterm > EXINIT=3Dset showmode > USER=3Droot > HOME=3D/root > SHELL=3D/bin/sh > BLOCKSIZE=3DK >=20 > Is there a existing PR for this? OK, 21264 is close enough: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D212624 > I'll add comments to it. >=20 This is not a bug with the new collation it is the ports it is mis interpretation of how collation works by some build system, in particular s= ome base tools on freebsd are locales aware while on their coreutils counter pa= rts they are not. One have to find what is that misusage (which would be a pain of something = like texlive and fix (and upstream) the change. Best regards, Bapt --tfbaiv4aejxqr7cl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJYDOMnAAoJEGOJi9zxtz5asxEQAJ9Y8w/SeIIYJH5e5jfs2LJo Th2d24+AQo9ZN+xxWBQ/JxhvT2L4l5jvadqI+WcifLU/KXYioKZbBW/s9WuK3WJm ixh+Sl0/vNRPKITixpWF0Rhz+3i/8+DEIswvunpyCsWASaCIvEXTFWrNBl6W85+j BGf5uU+6v4j5SfuR7i4srJrSH0nK+Y6+3opmZhwGObQbQTSG3Ma75sdcRT1LSAQo rirdjYtGAgIiVrfwfbTyZrNRs4BcW0McxoZ5thmyobd9tdLqaGHW1TLui2Yqhi1l jDtytAbdBQmcQCvmnpEK8PXI0RCd/aZfFxDcDLoop9SaftUSg69QUbwRKPu56DQF grSea6SSM/ZyOPLf8sg4oxHaGWLzkZEuX6bl+VlFM34+GfMkYbk9drX3X+Bna8Px fwpEQqQg+YhVQYgOLh21w4lVMCOu0iT7OIXlk16ZkM6GiihfekzXaVq0Ktoh/dTn iPS+p7pFwX2WsSjY9bGttBCBoWb9QsCq7X86+DF1cX/TsrBcWyoBsqIieyhJX5cZ mPDHfGE9b0KiInr5wcGzbEqithC2VNWt41SfNpiGjtNsJBNhJf6s+WJNm8tGz+DJ 13SntZwFxgH05+F5lIreev277490u4HYnBlVEetNGmEHX0lfEHR4FGu7hjUU7ZxY 6ZEjKqmklYTt6cwwmMS2 =p/XZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tfbaiv4aejxqr7cl-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Oct 23 16:22:55 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AEABC1E61D for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:22:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from henk@signature.nl) Received: from ans.signature.nl (ans.signature.nl [149.210.131.160]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4443583B for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:22:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from henk@signature.nl) Received: by ans.signature.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4BAA8731D01; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:22:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ans.signature.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32E23731D00; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:22:53 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:22:53 +0200 (CEST) From: Henk van Oers To: Kurt Jaeger cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/sword should be removed In-Reply-To: <20161023160512.GY51420@home.opsec.eu> Message-ID: References: <20161023160512.GY51420@home.opsec.eu> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:22:55 -0000 On Sun, 23 Oct 2016, Kurt Jaeger wrote: [ software that hurts _me_ ] > Come on, isn't there some PR to work on 8-} ? Yes, restore misc/jive. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Oct 23 16:23:27 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48290C1E662; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:23:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ua0-x22d.google.com (mail-ua0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00C8D8DE; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:23:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ua0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id m11so25520906uab.3; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 09:23:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=ae4MWJLHLx2MpxeupdwMazRcung/XL//p+JJ4ai0my0=; b=hmOJkh3UEjoiuZUG7l8ovrGaOT9TwMuXPOzt1EQPLqYsa8LKijk5BsjfAE4IZBmv2n /kVbvncQcyR6JYMe9JdPpZ5QGmDRI/NYcEXYBHz/6i3lTsDOD9fmMl/Ysus9gvWZPv8+ Kedzn47oqvmC9M0KIGQFMEkRBqqumMlKE9HH9DbIfD362eu+jaBiBMS/P7sdkoMKGr/3 oTi/rjGRslqIrDBc1HsuPHcyLLJeONG1Qoa0uzaC8o7f8vMd27TAt0frdip7ouC3XFTK 7FeorUeoxvEm95mvqyLA/ShA8WFwyhsyb1gLEL8rXkFoN/PegMTUJ5UCCGl1KjYEodq4 fhiA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ae4MWJLHLx2MpxeupdwMazRcung/XL//p+JJ4ai0my0=; b=NnTZyFton4wIVN0x6eyssTO7CsX+S3AuQO6MoBz2TfgDXz1bs9HAQsNGbv22xi4CdA EZbDi1sao2y0JaftfJR/aeuYdWOzSCBlfTlfnnh2pgVPNzmH5KRvgBmcCtaIaYww+LZP Abyquy0u4A0A/MKjaUFO2+ZVGZyg1wBzGqUbER6MZ00yuMsMr2WXROQ0tQkB9Px6ptQ2 jY7hY1ffiwJEajxjfK4E4leBpDyn1cxKGgUk0xHEXVLZvxDP1j68E91+vjane++ohWvc sP5d6JEzj99Bwr1AOJh3c9PUl62RWxLvJWH7P+OBzfqznqsOZqnhJpk8h5/AQ4qsDkrH 5BVQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvfTwoTRBoL4wqvjsk5IaF7e0+C1s4vFoNIyq1CQ5PL7sa/cp04YFLApESoASgMLZTEfIb0ppSc4Ijw/2w== X-Received: by 10.176.81.101 with SMTP id f34mr4774045uaa.7.1477239805958; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 09:23:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.103.90.133 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 09:23:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <28720f79-b7a3-7dd8-7cf8-1870124ceeab@columbus.rr.com> References: <28720f79-b7a3-7dd8-7cf8-1870124ceeab@columbus.rr.com> From: Kevin Oberman Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 09:23:25 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: qYqvnfPqbrb_Zutyq-r-sS6TnHY Message-ID: Subject: Re: Fails to build math/libqalculate To: Baho Utot Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML , Mailinglists FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:23:27 -0000 On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 4:57 AM, Baho Utot wrote: > Sending this again as I have had mail server issues > > There is no src/Makefile.in only src/Makefile.am > > > /usr/ports/math/libqalculate # make > ===> License GPLv2 accepted by the user > ===> Found saved configuration for libqalculate-0.9.10 > ===> libqalculate-0.9.10 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found > ===> Fetching all distfiles required by libqalculate-0.9.10 for building > ===> Extracting for libqalculate-0.9.10 > => SHA256 Checksum OK for Qalculate-libqalculate-v0.9.10_GH0.tar.gz. > ===> Patching for libqalculate-0.9.10 > ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for libqalculate-0.9.10 > File to patch: > No file found--skip this patch? [n] y > 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to Oops.rej > => Patch patch-src-Makefile.in failed to apply cleanly. > => Patch(es) patch-libqalculate.pc.in applied cleanly. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/math/libqalculate > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > make: stopped in /usr/ports/math/libqalculate > You seem to have a bogus file in the port directory as this port contains no patches. # ls /usr/ports/math/qalculate Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist Patches are placed in a "files" directory and thee is no such directory. I have also checked the repository and it has 0.9.10, but no FreeBSD patches. If you use svn to update your ports tree, I'd suggest: # rm /usr/ports/math/qalculate/* #svn up /usr/ports/math/qalculate/ If you use portsnap, this simply should not happen as it should remove any stale files. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Oct 23 16:28:14 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 471D2C1EA0E for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:28:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x22b.google.com (mail-wm0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC64BDC8 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:28:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id f193so73153605wmg.0 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 09:28:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=q1LhW3dvDSlLZZYqWJVVs/vj9fHPd4+f5mKLCtaghNY=; b=AhKjn1E15paWJK8ggErjIpz3OckFxYf00YcVavam2kPO6neJuVsEz8yjhAto/f9sTk YVUQmbbhjMZ9LYkQD1yHC80rFYrJ98mLfDKmHQNtNYPqw1xlqIb/ypoB+Tqxm3MnUvdX aqiU2sjt5xhoo/Fgyp6JEXWYfCm23Wx79Xn2kYe8thY+j2KdAs7KRL/kkm7GL68Oz412 UQEIQd+GI278XD4VIZH99tiGsGViNh1SCUUYRAfHbizIDuiNUEU/vyvYOmirgpWYVtAZ Mz9vk8ClvHYnLCFzOP6w0UyKE/YEhbcmav8uGyVUKB09r67DQs7lSkFNb043ZP0MgmTj qLEg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=q1LhW3dvDSlLZZYqWJVVs/vj9fHPd4+f5mKLCtaghNY=; b=iwj426sVkaSZvatzuvwmiRkkmpFCrVIiheUtWRtJnhU4l08sKTUkEgdvOxVPa01tNa QyzsxtUU4WdQeFXVbzCIfnSOqH3wbj0vcY08Zkc0siFJ0V5pJUOMTiLl7J7JxvnAvLdU OG7R4kOjgwPfQkGgujVW5N6f7GB/164P1YVP8Ow9+NBiPOSCFgMQ7UjkGwf/ncJgJcZu jwmQd1SHI1ZULIkZ/Dp830fRtJjglsDZ5CFOXr+aLXd4qxHsluLkcR8+xvqTp+HM+Tmc orbAzNfJu+Y+Yco4YIGx32ke3Zm5Bxu2eRGb3qBR5Y5cob4++veLrp7wZRGNRZSzviBe GS9Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvekv7dSxCXOTzWGU0jSKkJeCva9I5a/jBCLRFpN5EaVsgTshYTJAV93aLXf0q3prw== X-Received: by 10.194.5.97 with SMTP id r1mr8238749wjr.36.1477240089267; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 09:28:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 1sm9982991wmk.22.2016.10.23.09.28.08 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 23 Oct 2016 09:28:08 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:28:08 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Henk van Oers Cc: Kurt Jaeger , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/sword should be removed Message-ID: <20161023162807.wfcccml2gyqz2vxl@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20161023160512.GY51420@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vb3qpksuw7urlilv" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20161014 (1.7.1) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:28:14 -0000 --vb3qpksuw7urlilv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 06:22:53PM +0200, Henk van Oers wrote: >=20 > On Sun, 23 Oct 2016, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > [ software that hurts _me_ ] > > Come on, isn't there some PR to work on 8-} ? >=20 > Yes, restore misc/jive. >=20 Beside any discussion on wether or not misc/jives was offensive, note that = there is actually no upstream and no public distfile left for this port, this is = also a reason for it to be nuked. It is only available on various cache from various package systems which is clearly not an official upstream. Lets dead software die and move on. Best regards, Bapt --vb3qpksuw7urlilv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJYDOUBAAoJEGOJi9zxtz5aCF8P/ix2yyEb+RyXrrZLisj4KP9F TIXFuWGTk3AXdKQl1gmpkHbQ8YgiVbrMPYbiiK3vqhJu4Nz9MlUcuUeK1t2fM6uk oIc8DtANNwVVXLq2upqME0/Z3GYW4K6kLAUc6zt2xa/RThZzhmSgCw2ylufIGsQh qt9B+70Cwmvl350vIQ09ky4aLYi/KJwXQNUnAoX9tNwlTVTMCcm2OGmJmUh1Z8Jk v9PgoKrY+l19bU9SMalGclsXeHVCony8oOxnWO25JnDFvOe4jvi1PrYaopXQPHmO oYY8Ba9aD0WtFETGC2M+Xg1bl90L/Po1ceTu/jYrEn8DV6EO5qWit64jwd5XadmE +Nkx9dLt/OJVyZS8Gzjr5ENnbkcqEJEi4XTwQY58kxSgLFKPErgFKMVwIUrczYNc YgOYyC7z9RxX/WeCvDYZf8vKoX0NfKffrwNfSUw95Oc83z/6cSan0LAQ97yp9Fzm WTrW00EVXaBS5Ylipu8e030IceTutkJZMO0eCY+P+qSqY6fEnm5GN4AiTHEu/Wb3 PhgBhBBygcJBUP1vraxJcUUX4PJeyG8gLo9xAmIA0wZAnzjc4zwO9M3YDUGdCs63 WLa99yiu9dauAtX6Z9bGC5F3SxgC6E3XUvp2Z1sAhnUehG3Ab3KAI0HRw3NuSm5z GPUtC/j3AI3pq8uctoCL =dy/f -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vb3qpksuw7urlilv-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Oct 23 16:29:10 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D991C1EA6C for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:29:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@skysmurf.nl) Received: from mail.skysmurf.nl (spectrum.skysmurf.nl [83.162.175.214]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.skysmurf.nl", Issuer "mail.skysmurf.nl" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D14EDE82 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:29:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@skysmurf.nl) Received: from spectrum.skysmurf.nl (mail.skysmurf.nl [192.168.42.4]) by mail.skysmurf.nl (8.15.2/8.15.2) with SMTP id u9NGT6pB067156 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:29:06 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@skysmurf.nl) Received: by spectrum.skysmurf.nl (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:29:06 +0200 Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:29:06 +0200 From: Alphons van Werven To: FreeBSD ports mailing list Subject: Fwd: Re: Jive prejudices Message-ID: <20161023162906.GB66792@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f" Content-Disposition: inline X-PGP-Key: http://www.skysmurf.nl/~fonz/fonz_pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:29:10 -0000 --aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Louis Epstein wrote: > In any event,portmaster -a -i updates now abort because misc/jive is > detected on my system. >=20 > This goes beyond "We will no longer provide this application" to > "we will no longer let you upgrade your applications as long as you > have this one installed". To be fair, I strongly doubt this is deliberate policy. Portmaster itself is a port too. When pkg(7) hit the streets and other sweeping changes were made to the ports infrastructure, Portmaster had to be updated and that might still be an ongoing process. In any case, Port- master needs *some* way of dealing with broken(*) ports and I can imagine that this can get tricky when dependencies are involved. From the looks of it, Portmaster just takes the easy way out and simply bails completely when it encounters a broken port. However, wouldn't using the option "-x misc/jive" help for the time being? Jive *will* be kept available through alternative means in a way that Portmaster should be able to handle too. > You really need to have a hands-off policy on what software people use. To that I couldn't agree more. Fonz Ad (*): Here I mean broken in the broadest sense. Morality-fuelled censor- ship is rare, but occasionally ports are unfetchable, have security holes, fail to build or simply don't work. --=20 A.J. "Fonz" van Werven mailsig: Help! I'm a prisoner in a Chinese fortune cookie factory. --aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJYDOVSAAoJEAfP7gJTaCe8zfMP/i06KSD3bNPGFuBbH5t/c54F avnNvyC1BRAhGB/f6+l/zM/zhC6fw2GypS/6RJEuvWaYGv8m3J3Z7vSPpuQOZSmz g6FsJ5ss+/gRx+lrBr0JTAcvMF6LTaUhGkUBxlo/kqBUeXyLwHK4ygR4o+lbgGyw u2IQ5U5Zvupsv8d4/LTKfDKwCfzVRLMk0TDYM6uWyP1WLrcqTj8zjMWoD9gRGQd1 KxiRr/DcjNZEJ1y19hHhFASHIYaCJxMvbWdCFQUabdcfb3dbh4q8rW9a635ipIO9 gzv/Xr8KGL5KIaFbkVLjcNCuR5BwV5XeVPnUypRyokL4q3sJ8B3XWzG+23wMuh71 ghb2uvKh9kKetiH/H1KL9oMUZthUOWog3JHiitx9JdfpsJe8hMmHIWgipgrPcw4i MrtAg6I8uHP/dii02E9HLUo1/gRphNcsf7KaAUo/fhkPoLT0bWoVC+hp4iWBJm0k OK14Sb1+sBrXbu+7qPXDiZzU7GTa7cD3A66iKkJj5cvhdaMu1e43HIgpfDrXEN/7 gouXvFm15gXRLZphTV5pDOkDwOAXzdIgeRr/6xhFjhZzPhysY6kvQZiuksivAv+g 1+Fr9hKKELHW5F04PkP5fByBS27VbBK0JQhqgQVdvUK5zZhiJwxIXBwpvP9qG+qC RRwvo8gQ3T1iI9Jst88w =TtvR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Oct 23 16:37:57 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61EA4C1EDE1 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:37:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@skysmurf.nl) Received: from mail.skysmurf.nl (spectrum.skysmurf.nl [83.162.175.214]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.skysmurf.nl", Issuer "mail.skysmurf.nl" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1F9EA33 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:37:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@skysmurf.nl) Received: from spectrum.skysmurf.nl (mail.skysmurf.nl [192.168.42.4]) by mail.skysmurf.nl (8.15.2/8.15.2) with SMTP id u9NGbq0c067319; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:37:52 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@skysmurf.nl) Received: by spectrum.skysmurf.nl (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:37:52 +0200 Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:37:52 +0200 From: Alphons van Werven To: Dave Horsfall Cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Resurrecting games/wmfortune (Was: Re: misc/jive deleted) Message-ID: <20161023163752.GC66792@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> References: <20161022024510.7cvnhc2fdh7h7arh@ozzmosis.com> <20161022113104.GA9380@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yVhtmJPUSI46BTXb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key: http://www.skysmurf.nl/~fonz/fonz_pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:37:57 -0000 --yVhtmJPUSI46BTXb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dave Horsfall wrote: >> There used to be "offensive" (a term to be taken rather loosely in this= =20 >> case) fortune cookies, but they got kicked out somewhere in 9.X. That=20 >> was the base system though; not the ports tree. >=20 > Not to mention "fortune -o" (to get the obscene versions) and there were > some beauties there... That's actually what I meant :-) The funny thing to me is that fortune-o got removed, while murphy-o is still around. Moreover, there are a couple of aphorisms in there of which I honestly can't for the life of me fathom what could possibly be offensive about them, but that's a different matter altogether. > aneurin% cd wmfortune=20 > aneurin% less *descr > WMFortune outputs fortune messages, just as its name says. > aneurin% make > =3D=3D=3D> wmfortune-0.241_3 is marked as broken: No public disfiles. > *** [all] Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/ports/games/wmfortune. I've been doing some searching, but upstream games/wmfortune appears to have indeed vanished entirely. I still have what seems to be the latest distfile in my archives and I'd be happy to host it if this port still builds and works properly. Fonz --=20 A.J. "Fonz" van Werven mailsig: Help! I'm a prisoner in a Chinese fortune cookie factory. --yVhtmJPUSI46BTXb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJYDOdgAAoJEAfP7gJTaCe84n4P/ijZnslFVwjj54/BV3Qz3fqt h0Mb/KChzoT++dAUm25G5s66PmZamCR6Bg/SDn3pEThw+q5RfAkW5riuhxSqLliu HpIQ34+bHKPqQb/2+QBv6gBWrIDP7PSWdrhxh8NekjTZg6DqEaH/+dKCzCX4bSwV u5N4Fn1mmepe4DSWjV8OCeqI5LbZEtIXgATEPyZM31DDu2ST+B7YQYlzTzRzsLe7 hg3H+XPM2a/4RWGFkldRVPToNbIiMbgfox137+zwaE6XrnT4FONhZR+Jb4Vtp1+K 4twnr75T4fdAIxLGkzWGeqhPr4BbLe/sYN1rb3L2JztgcIgnYn+oUGiOf8el2vx2 PKMYi/CC1YDgEbad80d3ExK+PkaFnxaWyg2Gvdxf9kOZfCuKdByXDEn/0LxjELAj P/tdSZjY1+syhrYkfPLP3I5TFLrwa45vNJj6joxOtgNhLgCxCVy4j/RmEnhbCuAe 5p/S9ULAeA6tqqQWIOFhzOYrwnXWoNxHmSsVH9JZ5mRgWN4/ilBhiQ3u8RHi0WNv izgR8a4SyxUnF02BkHj2x9Ijj1nfOyIv4oaxdJCAuqLgY4KEUnLnURB/d8Y9ycFM +ahSfAcgYmZU+6+GjjcH3+mBWaBIWwnBfnHo/vhPC60JxFx28Djx5PW/niWxuaYA JRFBvz3uSlfuJeQYSohN =pTwV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yVhtmJPUSI46BTXb-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Oct 23 16:43:07 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 167D8C1E080 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:43:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from emorrasg@yahoo.es) Received: from nm33-vm1.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com (nm33-vm1.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com [212.82.97.106]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A31EE57 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:43:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from emorrasg@yahoo.es) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.es; s=s2048; t=1477240840; bh=3YpK8H481Tj8VCseQfcr+/v+JPz+ZAoSnAl9de0eF5o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From:Subject; b=kQq4kFR1QW8gUpKJvg1z5X5anbPdi6Cp/eTxrGCytyc60mNw+vmpcxZ1DJDp93Ck+5jcxKVs8WsI6qqCsYNocz2Hlovt+jhT8unF1FE663ks+qk1XR50bJ55TPWJ+5hazFopCXmKjfpFdsbKmTXy3+txGJ3SLlwYCLDV8cL8YpAqrKNZnOwDihf692e5PTe+KDMcMMWiEmt1lwJK+AJvdKU3WL0mrrB7VT1vHkVomh4JUXLlmPZhymMOzZq84MRICogJQN69wijJvJkb5hZG5Eanepve6980NDfDGsLGrJq9chCP1f3Hkaa5dCUQwV7bv7hFZ0xU4Zm4L8AGs7ppwg== Received: from [212.82.98.48] by nm33.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Oct 2016 16:40:40 -0000 Received: from [46.228.39.103] by tm1.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Oct 2016 16:40:40 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp140.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Oct 2016 16:40:40 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 475500.50310.bm@smtp140.mail.ir2.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: FMH1Ny8VM1lQUWNvbnWPSD5CsZYExOVPG_oEAy4Ygqz7II. q7EjUHrpz52FOtYcqP0Ap1gQPHKcswMJHq73NasG1TQFS.T1pAbRpDWLLMjx LhSFmvzOzDSzk6caPekd73VfTQe75CXoeVYRk4OrEjinxtI7RrjfcUSQWZP0 MZo0ImGC2waZ6mu3_IE_SxX7mmkkBAKd0zL3O_lE3r.I0p5xRWvcl57CoHFs jlEMJqXlB65bWSWRe9w0b0IArCp2d7aRLfQGI8aSQ4B85JItqKX.aE53ABRe ZAbRlaPo.ecRVBkJbqtW_krQSNdneqgkOWPhyJTiDRMmHW1FZ03TlTE3qLWq r9PxcclJ6oJHxe5l1vuubiSmyumU95yQBHxAbMOlgp69IlCxZpbzH7UtjBGF drem7p9OibdalXQpC.0bnqh01gCWk5SjHMi0MJx9MBja7kMpl0PdqyE2Gdtg zgyjtjU1oi7h7e2M7aAccmKyXMCxKwJRJ8Op.yYy_AdFWe13JQhuh5EPnbXN yCRNx9PbXrZhGTRVEiGKhHK51LJGOu1hfy_i7mT5ZCEQseCICsUUZ.6IX3JZ Y3waSZMVpDgbNX5aYNw-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: mX392iiswBAeJNdO_s.EW62LZDJR Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:40:37 +0200 From: Eduardo Morras To: Henk van Oers Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/sword should be removed Message-Id: <20161023184037.f3ab0b908f54b740906557b6@yahoo.es> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.29; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:43:07 -0000 On Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:51:12 +0200 (CEST) Henk van Oers wrote: > > A sword is a bladed weapon intended for slashing or thrusting. > > And also: "Framework for manipulating Bible texts" > > Is that what misc/jive does? > > You can not kill with a jive > but you can kill with manipulating bible texts. With gcc and Clang/LLVM you can create Windows from scratch ;) --- --- Eduardo Morras From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Oct 23 16:50:24 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F6BFC1E225; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:50:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from le@main.put.com) Received: from main.put.com (main.put.com [12.144.5.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10903F8B; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:50:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from le@main.put.com) Received: from main.put.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by main.put.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id u9NGno8i069121; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 12:50:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (le@localhost) by main.put.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) with ESMTP id u9NGnnEN069118; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 12:49:50 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 12:49:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Louis Epstein To: Alphons van Werven cc: , Subject: Re: Jive prejudices In-Reply-To: <20161023162556.GA66792@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> Message-ID: <20161023124730.H69026-100000@main.put.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:50:24 -0000 On Sun, 23 Oct 2016, Alphons van Werven wrote: > Louis Epstein wrote: > > > In any event,portmaster -a -i updates now abort because misc/jive is > > detected on my system. > > > > This goes beyond "We will no longer provide this application" to > > "we will no longer let you upgrade your applications as long as you > > have this one installed". > > To be fair, I strongly doubt this is deliberate policy. > > Portmaster itself is a port too. When pkg(7) hit the streets and other > sweeping changes were made to the ports infrastructure, Portmaster had to > be updated and that might still be an ongoing process. In any case, Port- > master needs *some* way of dealing with broken(*) ports and I can imagine > that this can get tricky when dependencies are involved. From the looks of > it, Portmaster just takes the easy way out and simply bails completely > when it encounters a broken port. Does it matter that I installed it with pkg rather than portmaster or make install? > However, wouldn't using the option "-x misc/jive" help for the time being? adding that before or after the -a -i leads to the same abort. > Jive *will* be kept available through alternative means in a way that > Portmaster should be able to handle too. > > > You really need to have a hands-off policy on what software people use. > > To that I couldn't agree more. > > Fonz > > Ad (*): Here I mean broken in the broadest sense. Morality-fuelled censor- > ship is rare, but occasionally ports are unfetchable, have security holes, > fail to build or simply don't work. > > A.J. "Fonz" van Werven -=-=- The World Trade Center towers MUST rise again, at least as tall as before...or terror has triumphed. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Oct 23 17:11:21 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DDD1C1E8E4 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 17:11:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [192.108.105.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.soaustin.net", Issuer "StartCom Class 2 IV Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05C97BFE for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 17:11:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from lonesome.com (bones.soaustin.net [192.108.105.22]) by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 32AB745; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 12:11:08 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 12:11:07 -0500 From: Mark Linimon To: Henk van Oers Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/sword should be removed Message-ID: <20161023171106.GA11626@lonesome.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 17:11:21 -0000 Thank you for your very nice troll. I was going to work on some FreeBSD stuff today but now I think I'll find something better to do. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Oct 23 18:02:02 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC10C1E7E7 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:02:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scratch65535@att.net) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF2E6C15 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:02:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scratch65535@att.net) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id CE7E5C1E7E4; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:02:02 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE227C1E7E3 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:02:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scratch65535@att.net) Received: from nm1-vm6.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm1-vm6.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [216.39.63.149]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A69D0C14 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:02:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scratch65535@att.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=att.net; s=s1024; t=1477245609; bh=fwoTE+aPZ6RHIHFk2WtPVZlf5eMgq/K8rRk5ltiBMPo=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From:Subject; b=f4IKfY2FLLuRcRRhELvXU8OPrIFr1GVAwHFAKGS/7y+opF/1kD4Cb9O0sbnNf6KOc55EKsX0vkswqyKiUDVo1+SLWEytve8bGuaA58NNoCBgUK5L03E3PKfMIW/UBJZav/5JrPrDD6v4B9e6SWQBeyEN2yzhuKmhGl7LD6DobHc= Received: from [216.39.60.166] by nm1.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Oct 2016 18:00:09 -0000 Received: from [67.195.22.118] by tm2.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Oct 2016 18:00:09 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp113.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Oct 2016 18:00:09 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 353954.9706.bm@smtp113.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: ClN3Th8VM1nmI8Vv0Y0HyrcuonJonHcqLsSL1GGe9OFkdtQ ZZ6zJdb63FS5MrUwHX48lwoSyne8pIy4aB_q4f3VW.58D_Y6VD4JYBAQTqCk CinRvZUUoFUxd5ZcUWLYoc7rlZLwkmKKx6AfdnnWXgWEZpiNCt0E8eRJhh2M phwgRjsu4iQSVdB96BxPK3LYQu4jw.yTGpwtsPpnndrGpgfiNmi.5sWcWuf3 CZvmEKJKNnGGbr8FGLD84EyFL_kdqBrHK0a03Hy0N0.VZq_W8H6rBg6GjPGu EHh.iNbv_g0w.2klbsHLcx50XE3O9LFeqRMJ6kI8v0M68nL8dhPTBAkoqnoi Z5sDAExLQ_eMXOJ7pQCgdWgEDDkq.uOkxxS5Km3fcGOcx5LC.nvAwR8OWeKZ e2TzXhjDA6PlrMszvS8rHci0MhUTl9V1K28BiuxPMB1z6RzDNrdeaFuc5944 X_V5ou7UL3ePLoHGGlDOSA0QiP4DhwNpPdSoSmIgZcGIV6II97iCBLq2h8H7 JZQEAne7C63QOXydNnFh3Y_LdRvrSiVTQdxGO_Ts0yzr08mxJyZpBB.HNQ2Q F X-Yahoo-SMTP: pPvqnOaswBBbYZLVYFzvU7GaowLcbNioPp.aF8KvOjZk From: To: freebsd-ports Subject: Re: Jive prejudices Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 14:00:12 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20161022181202.F36710-100000@main.put.com> <201610231341.u9NDfKpp008090@alpd679.prodigy.net> In-Reply-To: <201610231341.u9NDfKpp008090@alpd679.prodigy.net> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:02:03 -0000 For policy, I'd suggest the creation of a flag "Socially deprecated" that would leave it in the tree but clue people up that there's potentially something unsavory about it. On Sun, 23 Oct 2016 06:41:10 -0700 (PDT), Roger Marquis wrote: >Louis Epstein wrote: >> You really need to have a hands-off policy on what software people use. > >The meaning of this is unclear as anyone can still compile jive on their >own outside of the ports tree. WRT ports, they should be subject to the >same policies as base. > >The meta questions here are: A) does FreeBSD have a policy restricting >software that promotes hatred, discrimination or violence (IMO it >should) and, if so B) does jive violate that policy. > >Before we can have any substantive discussion of a particular port we >should have consensus on policy. > >Roger >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Oct 23 18:16:42 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4DC2C1EBD6 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:16:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scratch65535@att.net) Received: from nm1-vm7.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm1-vm7.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [216.39.63.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B06092FD for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:16:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scratch65535@att.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=att.net; s=s1024; t=1477246389; bh=gblXykzKOFAlR9m5kg9SUaoAP1qKKsx2fOS9cU1Rxus=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From:Subject; b=AB7Mil/iKlm39XjCAT3QC25elf1Rxztpsb2TzA/QcV5wXoKOn6mjVILS37CR2+zEdlpb8+PhCNpv6Uaww7Z4p3hAqxWM8izRO9qHb+SZGGDfpTM7fjGOUPJyPUlq7d0m/vIVYLpvdunkzOf780qzfc0TL80ef7Yf2sgvgskEr48= Received: from [216.39.60.169] by nm1.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Oct 2016 18:13:09 -0000 Received: from [67.195.22.116] by tm5.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Oct 2016 18:13:09 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp111.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Oct 2016 18:13:09 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 901637.18252.bm@smtp111.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: 4r2cErsVM1mns2MjXXvSqtiYkLvh3KYkB6Mse.eUEa7NVu0 r19QpUZTTw7yBi_4DuJ5TAD2goxCW.jducpwoBLYcNp3zm9dczYXK9UmtOgD LuzgahOps62c.v4tvpLILxvPf7_JS2iTcYeMNHv7.CRhmteTwHCzLWTdfDWh fsdX9K8ymdSyJqd6Hh.vapnEe2b06.hIjZEkxetVsrUjBw5dNMpn2Qv_aexe o5VUCJhZ1ejLqzi7I7cNYGQYCxPaCvaHobyC0759.4rjmoB..KzwVO_AQ3ZL ODSBYRJfqrSRIx5TZ6lyvWZNZoqA5DBdAMEuQuW8yro7HBeR3RA_ynvULI9W 1cPBnZ7BG6473w999N4l7_Oh3jNK9NAobluUbGiw2tzdbMDlR_ChLzoZR5uM mNZ8j1lpuN9dYFMzjMIGvlQrB10YR6kkiMjK68nJIoHG1Bzm9_5r7eidslgB GwmZkHqJ4vpG22BGuGlEdqvziPJJgXvAph2yXlwZh3xdDbtkVRZUArimeow9 TK6GsAWPHqUhdjdLo37kYvLm9LDI2juh5cyqBUT0htzdie1ylYxnvk1E- X-Yahoo-SMTP: pPvqnOaswBBbYZLVYFzvU7GaowLcbNioPp.aF8KvOjZk From: To: freebsd-ports Subject: Re: misc/jive deleted Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 14:13:12 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20161022024510.7cvnhc2fdh7h7arh@ozzmosis.com> <20161022092738.GA5690@lonesome.com> <20161023150215.5c1ba333@efreet.kappastar.com> <20161023155353.GW51420@home.opsec.eu> <19a23a50-b957-407b-8f2b-25c8d1e44be4@unixarea.de> In-Reply-To: <19a23a50-b957-407b-8f2b-25c8d1e44be4@unixarea.de> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:16:43 -0000 I've to disagree, Matthias. Technical people refusing to be part of the social world make themselves the tools of psychopaths. Then we have, as the mordant joke goes, the program nuke_germany being objected to not on humanitarian grounds, but because the program should be nuke_country with the target name being passed as an arg. On Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:04:04 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote: > >I think, we should end this thread. The port was removed, sure with good >reasons. If someone wants to use it. he can pull out from svn the old port >and continue with it to maintain. > >matthias From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Oct 23 18:23:52 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E40A0C1ED7E for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:23:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from piotr-l@netexpert.pl) Received: from serwer.netexpert.pl (serwer.netexpert.pl [81.210.116.233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7301B8A6 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:23:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from piotr-l@netexpert.pl) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by serwer.netexpert.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BD602414 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 20:15:51 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: antivirus at netexpert.pl Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: piotr-l@netexpert.pl) by serwer.netexpert.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AF9472403 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 20:15:35 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=netexpert.pl; s=2016; t=1477246537; bh=BR7VGRWIXc84gxU73Q+lpEKlByRZECy/jRhNobx0QPA=; h=To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=bHTZzyaJSc1T2dvCT38vuRKolxjJaN+vy9G/RikqPXSrSNwtsXi3aUg0BspcnPWC0 ml9CEQ9X+d6dMVUA/yH2mNWgF51wp1kjksEQMy07pXj1tlFKcorExqiJRInT4ejmIo YCxdTIGrU3Rl7KQzbfEKve4qUZrg9YS/41ucFn7o= To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Piotr Szafarczyk Subject: links not created by make install Message-ID: <7fe38187-dc34-3db4-63bb-f8ac8ae8f94c@netexpert.pl> Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 20:15:34 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:23:53 -0000 Hi All, Tell me where / how to diagnose the error please. I have got a system upgraded from 10.1. Problems started with rebuilding ports depending on perl. bin/perl5 and bin/perl5.20.3 were missing. It looks like port building does not create links (after perl the same was with postfix, freeze). Regular files are OK. Freeze is a simple port, best to investigate. Everything looks good at first: tar tvf work/pkg/freeze-2.5_2.txz ... /usr/local/bin/fcat ... /usr/local/bin/freeze link to /usr/local/bin/fcat [...] ls -l work/stage/usr/local/bin -r-xr-xr-x 4 root wheel 22912 Oct 23 17:30 fcat -r-xr-xr-x 4 root wheel 22912 Oct 23 17:30 freeze [...] cat work/.PLIST.flattened /usr/local/bin/fcat /usr/local/bin/freeze [...] However there are no freeze and unfreeze under bin after make install. Only fcat is in /usr/local/bin. While playing with the port I receive errors when deinstalling tries to remove links: [smtpin.ibles.waw.pl] [1/1] Deleting files for freeze-2.5_2: 9% freeze-2.5_2: missing file /usr/local/bin/freeze [...] I cannot find what is going wrong when installing (even with -d flags). How should I debug this? Where and how to look for a cause of this problem? Regards, Piotr From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Oct 23 18:30:13 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D02DC1EEFA for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:30:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms-10.1blu.de (ms-10.1blu.de [178.254.4.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FC0FA4F for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:30:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from [89.15.236.5] (helo=localhost.unixarea.de) by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1byNX7-0007yg-VR for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 20:30:10 +0200 Received: from localhost.my.domain (c720-r292778-amd64 [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.unixarea.de (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPS id u9NIU6mc002065 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 20:30:06 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.15.2/8.14.9/Submit) id u9NIU5sw002064 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 20:30:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 20:30:05 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/jive deleted Message-ID: <20161023183005.GA2011@c720-r292778-amd64> Reply-To: Matthias Apitz Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20161022024510.7cvnhc2fdh7h7arh@ozzmosis.com> <20161022092738.GA5690@lonesome.com> <20161023150215.5c1ba333@efreet.kappastar.com> <20161023155353.GW51420@home.opsec.eu> <19a23a50-b957-407b-8f2b-25c8d1e44be4@unixarea.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT r292778 (amd64) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 89.15.236.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:30:13 -0000 El día Sunday, October 23, 2016 a las 02:13:12PM -0400, scratch65535@att.net escribió: > I've to disagree, Matthias. Technical people refusing to be > part of the social world make themselves the tools of > psychopaths. Then we have, as the mordant joke goes, the program > nuke_germany being objected to not on humanitarian grounds, but > because the program should be nuke_country with the target name > being passed as an arg. I do not understand your reply. It already starts with top posting, what I do not understand. Your message itself, I do no understand either due to my poor English knowledge or the grammar and syntaxis of your lines. matthias -- Matthias Apitz, ✉ guru@unixarea.de, ⌂ http://www.unixarea.de/ ☎ +49-176-38902045 Einheitsfeier? Nein, danke! Kann ich bitte mein Land wiederhaben und am 7. Oktober feiern. Wie bitte? Warum? Weiterlesen: http://www.unixarea.de/privateEn.html From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Oct 23 18:32:13 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6472C1E128 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:32:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@waschbuesch.de) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD5BEDD4 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:32:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@waschbuesch.de) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id ACAE1C1E127; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:32:13 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC4D8C1E126 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:32:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@waschbuesch.de) Received: from relay.waschbuesch.it (relay.waschbuesch.it [IPv6:2a00:cba0:0:100::3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.waschbuesch.it", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FBC8DD1 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:32:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@waschbuesch.de) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=waschbuesch.de; s=dkim; h=To:References:Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Mime-Version: Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=n463cjwIjTQjJjCHDGpHlqos2geE3nqV/oENWD2L1Dk=; b=j8yKoMcjg8b6bZXoZL1fmzt6w 4kSc3ovqkvD40QYLstJdo1jK717AKDgjKZk9t63+heioTBUq4vJdYDNDoVR9UH+EbGSPVp1ztsyog hrWFgLCzhjDQeGp7qa30F53CG4y+ybfqRgp935hiWWL0fJLYVt9IcjjUtLmTW5Cyxo08c=; Received: by relay.waschbuesch.it with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim) (envelope-from ) id 1byNYu-000MtO-5b; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:32:00 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.0 \(3226\)) Subject: Re: Jive prejudices From: =?utf-8?Q?Martin_Waschb=C3=BCsch?= In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 20:32:00 +0200 Cc: freebsd-ports Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <348280F2-DA1F-491B-ABF7-66C8A9766AC8@waschbuesch.de> References: <20161022181202.F36710-100000@main.put.com> <201610231341.u9NDfKpp008090@alpd679.prodigy.net> To: scratch65535@att.net X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3226) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:32:13 -0000 > Am 23.10.2016 um 20:00 schrieb scratch65535@att.net: >=20 > For policy, I'd suggest the creation of a flag "Socially > deprecated" that would leave it in the tree but clue people up > that there's potentially something unsavory about it. As others have already said, it is unlikely that we could come up with a = definition of 'unsavory' that is universally accepted. Also, I doubt that anything technical we could come up with could = adequately address this issue as it is not technical in nature. I propose that no classification whatsoever be implemented. If at all necessary, we could have a disclaimer stating that it is no = endorsement of any kind whatsoever if a piece of software is in the = ports tree. Martin= From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Oct 23 18:41:53 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40702C1E2B0 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:41:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x22a.google.com (mail-wm0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2C40126 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:41:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id b80so68435317wme.1 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 11:41:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=p5NOz+Jq0TwqminWXvoCiVcThIuzabpTapdZTbiNjoo=; b=GCc8pkzByuLNVq3MR1bhfnqcZE1SH+57RAEcR02M+JZFGkMRmxy7NkQzXHOGG7QjZ6 DdmrsFmgz4K5gv81kEzdn0JivmEYdDvR1745ZHAC5jFzlJ+wXUTQ31A1CVYkCKRQUnNI d74ISlZgspGxgaaKlsCU7mDSLVtqQPJcmDa5YZ1FNk0BLjQv9+cqUSGnYWWBCDcai/Ja ZEIc6uVbc80Noo68/u22/a1keawtv59KVrRmYeqU3wbLiqhfzdkfd2fcxIbcPaHyhuZV TONkLIA+242YVJuvE8ixDJ/W8DndAcGJB93lIvvE9rgQtNbFDela1IiG+Rl3UllP2aEi /ccQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=p5NOz+Jq0TwqminWXvoCiVcThIuzabpTapdZTbiNjoo=; b=XbdpATCZ8eXsuk5sbYwySqSG5TA5UvlcLM31F0BEC5Y8jwlSCGf14ZsRJXnwRWUm+s B5JsRPqfCd22KpCP2ZJo6er/uEMWXjwy+f32sk+vu4NJ4dl0CSgrZcuKjycKgBCQZIuh LGlCJAtunMiWrn57CyBM9bNJ3UcRlb8OqMHsIl21K97k8fDsoJCdAAcDiQ4Zm8lY4QOG l1STHYolSgzrg9MsF2tQFs6kYvTRF+wGDRIfgBdUGJglGvhwOs1z+WX/NCQ2NpSVW4MX 7GobAiu/dgiTQndLYY5zeQw9ZJDxHNEGX5bXDTZcRB0QayDo25SJ10f781/T4teNIBOD jtbQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RlvmkIjZ1zFvSuhIGzrq+0YlHqmKj3V8mbXlvTST00Ux6qab4o7ezRW6UjWU9ll/g== X-Received: by 10.28.229.132 with SMTP id c126mr12038270wmh.110.1477248111247; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 11:41:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id xq9sm15075900wjb.35.2016.10.23.11.41.50 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 23 Oct 2016 11:41:50 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 20:41:50 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Piotr Szafarczyk Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: links not created by make install Message-ID: <20161023184150.5g4uafo7chacrnxk@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <7fe38187-dc34-3db4-63bb-f8ac8ae8f94c@netexpert.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wvdnk3vngfhr6jed" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7fe38187-dc34-3db4-63bb-f8ac8ae8f94c@netexpert.pl> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20161014 (1.7.1) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:41:53 -0000 --wvdnk3vngfhr6jed Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 08:15:34PM +0200, Piotr Szafarczyk wrote: > Hi All, >=20 > Tell me where / how to diagnose the error please. >=20 > I have got a system upgraded from 10.1. Problems started with rebuilding > ports depending on perl. bin/perl5 and bin/perl5.20.3 were missing. It lo= oks > like port building does not create links (after perl the same was with > postfix, freeze). Regular files are OK. >=20 > Freeze is a simple port, best to investigate. Everything looks good at > first: >=20 > tar tvf work/pkg/freeze-2.5_2.txz > ... /usr/local/bin/fcat > ... /usr/local/bin/freeze link to /usr/local/bin/fcat > [...] >=20 > ls -l work/stage/usr/local/bin > -r-xr-xr-x 4 root wheel 22912 Oct 23 17:30 fcat > -r-xr-xr-x 4 root wheel 22912 Oct 23 17:30 freeze > [...] >=20 > cat work/.PLIST.flattened > /usr/local/bin/fcat > /usr/local/bin/freeze > [...] >=20 > However there are no freeze and unfreeze under bin after make install. On= ly > fcat is in /usr/local/bin. >=20 > While playing with the port I receive errors when deinstalling tries to > remove links: > [smtpin.ibles.waw.pl] [1/1] Deleting files for freeze-2.5_2: 9% > freeze-2.5_2: missing file /usr/local/bin/freeze > [...] >=20 > I cannot find what is going wrong when installing (even with -d flags). >=20 > How should I debug this? Where and how to look for a cause of this proble= m? I have just tried with the current freeze pkg and I cannot reproduce, every= thing work fine: hardlinks are properly created and all the files are properly re= moved with pkg delete. Best regards, Bapt --wvdnk3vngfhr6jed Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJYDQRAAAoJEGOJi9zxtz5aun4P/34kSG67Jle/gFpMAUyle0PH DT+VBLIfzKYBw1vliHopJk8RgyEtXiSBTgCOD+ILDOWqAdWhdj4D2FlFPCPXvw+d KjRR2a6f4A2iqqKpS/hSr+ZOy6qIAyPPLUmo7nrcF1Qb7GTSh+Glu11tX9at6bu7 WueC81Dwbvfy9HuTxG3D8YQJTI9hKasrMqks5QnNg6W9gQROKqjYeyRaGPEa2PEb KAMLKEB/674ruDCgsyLUdqMoeZ29pEwlkPgEQxyrWLOCIIKGBEUzXYbWMW6aSHV6 1zrecmvlkUsrTGCLT4eUN9sLdpQztq5Rb2O3+/6oxRkQV5lsESAivWhvhnYZoGKP MaX4k5UHEuFsLgEbQXQPol6/pN7ALRcDEGZkho6W+m/TfXBX6Rcsfa4tbDgf0W7N 1PG1tTh8Pk4x6fT6X5gjJJ0qi1wZuv1ZHDsFwkBAoVEUg5BEkAgU1BuDt8Zxyb1b kAIgct2D4Xt0cNfyndMVxvbdgoV7HA8qV9WKosZOMbrMX1lOIAXXDjQ70Hi7Vuwt +Pl8Z45LY7rUMR2d2cud1WdUkdjTMxz3fPv5GjwWGlNqdH3XPjdoMsj3eDaAg9pe 5PrHY6bun9Ls2oZdrNJuReUuoDsb49bSQvATt0vSHKTpe735fvrmwe/WScV4oscb gIxaAGPM53otPbQkebjk =TV3b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wvdnk3vngfhr6jed-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Oct 23 19:45:32 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87D96C1EFFD for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 19:45:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scratch65535@att.net) Received: from nm3-vm5.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm3-vm5.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [216.39.63.121]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D981EA9 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 19:45:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scratch65535@att.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=att.net; s=s1024; t=1477251710; bh=dt+Mei4spfC6Rjs6LNGXAQaTJ69+8RqbefYsfJvUo0Y=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From:Subject; b=RODYB80QsA358itV6a4kA//h3UeU6DMYnyQ9ZhzrmFfXkRhWJfpPvZaDw8M8VBDTi2HJHRrK8hLUUxo9tDdddSYiWp3kIPyfibe5oHR2Qkpsk7Jzurw8D7Cx7g73W4upG+PmFdlTnjYPtQT+g7cCGc0t7tD5o8O9Qr0zvtoM+BU= Received: from [216.39.60.170] by nm3.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Oct 2016 19:41:50 -0000 Received: from [67.195.22.117] by tm6.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Oct 2016 19:41:50 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp112.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Oct 2016 19:41:50 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 901580.21129.bm@smtp112.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: JURabn8VM1npSGf0IhPifknB8TDOM9KLUGy5MGFfcrkkT6f bOMaq0cI7Qxw7qfzZ3voFoIrDEy_mn7zLxYjJeVA_uXrfZOF9Sq65sdtpP3N eS69TOG_HYx0fL1N4RosxE0S1ucsZ4qjYfwewmD5sA5n1JAPgEjknBMpJpl5 uS9FuqGCvjwvZ_TjCvMB.sCT.8wefDcJm4zb7qOZQT8euFBnlPPXAn7Cr4GV LklPC8lZoP0HRIRlJuB7D8IiaCdZbOabmZBOHIsaYgfbh8p7blXZXgdqnWzr VTIIhYmsWWGuVuXDFa4MlJmkS7YP12Nj_pnp8n5Y8m2Kdz8lWcG_tN23Aw2b hErAe4I.zr7.pRqIJNEy_5d1VpCAbA7CsBOvUxN807tKmW.w7uwWzdSBJxBM 8F2EVIMMl6N7YuKqkaeLjnp42rYOuDZys0jcIcFuFQNV5rdGngPlHFjBrb1U rGlR3mccyKbCCT2cgAjRJ6wVA8wwSxWrEKUh6QClXHCrm55BCpe4D2nUYSTS PY5vVPhTy0gTN3qeWeZ__4eXDltP_oJy7VIoeallHDTaIw6HnR.Qgf0bstja jxC6No90Sxeatzf4uGfdrRw-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: pPvqnOaswBBbYZLVYFzvU7GaowLcbNioPp.aF8KvOjZk From: To: freebsd-ports Subject: Re: misc/jive deleted Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 15:41:53 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20161022024510.7cvnhc2fdh7h7arh@ozzmosis.com> <20161022092738.GA5690@lonesome.com> <20161023150215.5c1ba333@efreet.kappastar.com> <20161023155353.GW51420@home.opsec.eu> <19a23a50-b957-407b-8f2b-25c8d1e44be4@unixarea.de> <20161023183005.GA2011@c720-r292778-amd64> In-Reply-To: <20161023183005.GA2011@c720-r292778-amd64> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 19:45:32 -0000 [Default] On Sun, 23 Oct 2016 20:30:05 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote: >El da Sunday, October 23, 2016 a las 02:13:12PM -0400, scratch65535@att.net escribi: > >> I've to disagree, Matthias. Technical people refusing to be >> part of the social world make themselves the tools of >> psychopaths. Then we have, as the mordant joke goes, the program >> nuke_germany being objected to not on humanitarian grounds, but >> because the program should be nuke_country with the target name >> being passed as an arg. > >I do not understand your reply. It already starts with top posting, what >I do not understand. Your message itself, I do no understand either due >to my poor English knowledge or the grammar and syntaxis of your >lines. > > matthias I'd be surprised if my top posting really prevented your being able to understand me, Matthias, :-) but let me try again, using different syntax. Technical people live in the consensual world, not in some special sanitised world where only bits and bytes are real. Because technical people live in the same world everyone else lives in, we must not pretend that social questions are someone else's problem. The reason we must not pretend is that psychopaths (those who have no conscience, and exploit other living creatures without hesitation or remorse) would use us for their purposes. And, like poleznye duraki / ntzliche Idioten, we would obey them willingly. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Oct 23 19:51:34 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8A13C1B0CB for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 19:51:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scratch65535@att.net) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA92F14C for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 19:51:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scratch65535@att.net) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id C9D14C1B0CA; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 19:51:34 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9799C1B0C8 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 19:51:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scratch65535@att.net) Received: from nm24-vm2.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm24-vm2.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [216.39.63.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0F4D14A for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 19:51:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scratch65535@att.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=att.net; s=s1024; t=1477252119; bh=ErhLm1uEusx8Q/Glv7ANSfLBR7VoHXO7TFa1WQPahPY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From:Subject; b=i4uPsK7iV521Lqo5/OtDk6fgEC3ChesKwjH+xrMHgxVv1k+OYacbsPIlGYG/b8qSDtMbXhtG5OGnNG1M7V2dgfP8hO/Kk5l+rGT45EIaMf2BA5IV9dnzIV0pT4eTnW2JCrgGoxBJ1ubMAL4cyhZ5Fn5UoR4cWGT4k1oXlX7m15Y= Received: from [216.39.60.171] by nm24.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Oct 2016 19:48:39 -0000 Received: from [67.195.23.148] by tm7.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Oct 2016 19:48:39 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp120.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Oct 2016 19:48:39 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 208410.57206.bm@smtp120.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: vElGidUVM1nbGZ1q5xqcE_OFP_6Y7dWsmvd.tGH.fDjb5yk A91BtzMlWqL5gTdRYQ.fL8j.qVD739oYNEIB8U_xANNOK0rD1qmbtEo2AaIh njsZSs_R_F1gD6oxMQV6rkvAUMeLCo22r2uohPBPSYcRJiDS_psO8Fl1PaGP YIqeXaYqBmmTV31zm3QG48X_kdGclw9qb8X0gvqHR6FTMLPegFMae.2u.gKQ czFzI4zPTf6FNHYzSRmugukTG2mLQBfmPu7FVHqEZGMtltSSmSX8IZZvvLC9 bJw6ejyjdKlYtJTCoUK2UUNvOhv_rufCMdHVPxi2vOQQPL8elccb2hexyVLS qkOliRcL70AswDXXcKog.3lOH58cfM28O.HMH_EDMUO8wy2boDq0x3WwbwkD .y.uBWUQNuB8snpdfZNn_nbpDkKkOev8EEi.FgSWIAJ57YC.e0XCck2mfLKH t4mQfOA8O3nHpTkSw5TZHqORq15e.XyRaa2NoCcWl_JvAiE13nOuH3pV0pEV 9ybN3Idgo9OpdxbVhLoCkZZtWmH9W6FDu2mBwkNWQkH4KHwYvebzMFiHETVN ZUNwiciElg2vwR5rHISLaxQ-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: pPvqnOaswBBbYZLVYFzvU7GaowLcbNioPp.aF8KvOjZk From: To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Martin_Waschb=FCsch?= Cc: freebsd-ports Subject: Re: Jive prejudices Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 15:48:41 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20161022181202.F36710-100000@main.put.com> <201610231341.u9NDfKpp008090@alpd679.prodigy.net> <348280F2-DA1F-491B-ABF7-66C8A9766AC8@waschbuesch.de> In-Reply-To: <348280F2-DA1F-491B-ABF7-66C8A9766AC8@waschbuesch.de> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 19:51:35 -0000 [Default] On Sun, 23 Oct 2016 20:32:00 +0200, Martin Waschbsch wrote: > >> Am 23.10.2016 um 20:00 schrieb scratch65535@att.net: >> >> For policy, I'd suggest the creation of a flag "Socially >> deprecated" that would leave it in the tree but clue people up >> that there's potentially something unsavory about it. > >As others have already said, it is unlikely that we could come up with a definition of 'unsavory' that is universally accepted. >Also, I doubt that anything technical we could come up with could adequately address this issue as it is not technical in nature. > >I propose that no classification whatsoever be implemented. > >If at all necessary, we could have a disclaimer stating that it is no endorsement of any kind whatsoever if a piece of software is in the ports tree. > >Martin We wouldn't need to come up with a definition: merely flagging it with "socially deprecated" would suffice. Or, I suppose, we could paraphrase Ed Dijkstra's (in)famous editor and flag them "Port considered harmful" :-) From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Oct 23 20:21:53 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02AD5C1B753 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 20:21:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Received: from mx5.roble.com (mx5.roble.com [206.40.34.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx5.roble.com", Issuer "mx5.roble.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDD95FC5 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 20:21:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 13:21:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Roger Marquis To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Jive prejudices In-Reply-To: <20161023101719.7e4d7ea9@atomizer> References: <20161022181202.F36710-100000@main.put.com> <20161023101719.7e4d7ea9@atomizer> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 20:21:53 -0000 Rod Person wrote: > anything that can used to create text or graphics can be used to promote > hatred, discrimination or violence "can used to" != "promotes" && "recursive logic" != "logic. Surely there are better arguments against deprecating jive. If PyCon can implement a Code of Conduct without substantive disagreement why shouldn't FreeBSD do the same for ports? It would not have to be universally agreed to but should be acceptable to a substantial majority. Note that this has nothing to do with any particular port. Most of us still have no idea what made jive unacceptable other than the fact that it was unmaintained and had no repository. IMO, Roger Ref: From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Oct 23 20:57:08 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EE0DC1E183 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 20:57:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from vms173007pub.verizon.net (vms173007pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.7]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82B96231 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 20:57:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from vz-proxy-l004.mx.aol.com ([64.236.82.151]) by vms173007.mailsrvcs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.32.0 64bit (built Jul 16 2014)) with ESMTPA id <0OFI00446NDJRZ30@vms173007.mailsrvcs.net> for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 14:56:12 -0500 (CDT) X-CMAE-Score: 0 X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=daDw5Tfe c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=eaPqxu9IKnv3tbb7QsXVMw==:117 a=CH0kA5CcgfcA:10 a=r77TgQKjGQsHNAKrUKIA:9 a=wlwR-xu1NAYH_klfVOAA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=adqX0pXGAAAA:8 a=9daolz63Cm6D9Q_HAKIA:9 a=3rNC4-iD-ZPQVFNB:21 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 Received: by 98.109.23.98 with SMTP id 1b8e6101; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 19:56:12 GMT Subject: Re: misc/jive deleted To: Kurt Jaeger References: <20161022024510.7cvnhc2fdh7h7arh@ozzmosis.com> <20161022092738.GA5690@lonesome.com> <14ff8102-d360-507e-a03b-2ed07b4a5823@aldan.algebra.com> <20161023160352.GX51420@home.opsec.eu> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: "Mikhail T." Message-id: <8a01de23-0e4a-b7d9-cd3b-d6e1e4f44c3f@aldan.algebra.com> Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 15:56:07 -0400 MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: <20161023160352.GX51420@home.opsec.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 20:57:08 -0000 On 22.10.2016 Mark Linimon wrote: > It's not delusions of moral superiority. It's common decency. If it was "decent" in 1997, when obrien added it, it must still be decent today, only 19 years later. Nothing has changed about "decency" since then. > juvenile junk that makes them look like a bunch of out-of-touch clueless old white guys Somebody got his metaphors mixed up -- if it is "juvenile", then "old guys" (of any color) just does not ring true. On 23.10.2016 12:03, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > So, lets get back to technical stuff 8-} Technically, the only reason to remove a port is due to a failure to build -- and that hasn't happened. Therefore, the removal was in error, which should be rectified. -mi From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Oct 23 22:06:56 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75C66C1E71A for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 22:06:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cmt@burggraben.net) Received: from smtp.burggraben.net (smtp.burggraben.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:140:50a2::3:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "ns.exwg.net", Issuer "Christoph Moench-Tegeder" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C86C9F8 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 22:06:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cmt@burggraben.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.burggraben.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA60B6002EE for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 00:06:52 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Scanned: by amavisd-new at exwg.net Received: from smtp.burggraben.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ns.burggraben.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4UwSNn6WMYKF for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 00:06:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from elch.exwg.net (elch.exwg.net [IPv6:2001:470:7120:1:922b:34ff:fe56:321]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "elch.exwg.net", Issuer "Christoph Moench-Tegeder" (verified OK)) by smtp.burggraben.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 00:06:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: by elch.exwg.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D9F60301EC; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 00:06:51 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 00:06:51 +0200 From: Christoph Moench-Tegeder To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/jive deleted Message-ID: <20161023220651.GB81703@elch.exwg.net> References: <20161022024510.7cvnhc2fdh7h7arh@ozzmosis.com> <20161022092738.GA5690@lonesome.com> <14ff8102-d360-507e-a03b-2ed07b4a5823@aldan.algebra.com> <20161023160352.GX51420@home.opsec.eu> <8a01de23-0e4a-b7d9-cd3b-d6e1e4f44c3f@aldan.algebra.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8a01de23-0e4a-b7d9-cd3b-d6e1e4f44c3f@aldan.algebra.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 22:06:56 -0000 ## Mikhail T. (mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com): > > It's not delusions of moral superiority. It's common decency. > If it was "decent" in 1997, when obrien added it, it must still be > decent today, only 19 years later. Nothing has changed about "decency" > since then. Oh, it has changed. And it keeps changing, that's how it goes with social norms, culture etc. Mark has already explained that at least some of the terms are clearly offensive. This offensivenes may be more obvious to him as a native speaker, especially given that one needs some background to understand what this program tried to "parodize" and where some of the terms are derived from. Why can't we accept that a program which may be well over 30 years old, hasn't seen any update since 20 years, is more or less lost since some time and has no technical value (it's just some parody of a text filter) can be removed from the tree? Anyone who needs this port can install it on their own. Regards, Christoph -- Spare Space From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Oct 23 23:06:20 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1679FC1E52B for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 23:06:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from land.berklix.org (land.berklix.org [144.76.10.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96C7EED for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 23:06:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p5B226E43.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [91.34.110.67]) (authenticated bits=128) by land.berklix.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPA id u9NN68OF031988 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 23:06:08 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id u9NN64KM072749 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 01:06:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id u9NN5qN0091649 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 01:06:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Message-Id: <201610232306.u9NN5qN0091649@fire.js.berklix.net> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/jive deleted From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.eu BSD Unix Linux Consultants, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.eu/free/ X-From: http://www.berklix.eu/~jhs/ In-reply-to: Your message "Sat, 22 Oct 2016 11:14:29 -0500." <20161022161428.GA7234@lonesome.com> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 01:05:52 +0200 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 23:06:20 -0000 Mark Linimon wrote: > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 01:31:04PM +0200, Alphons van Werven wrote: > > I'm still half waiting for someone with misguided delusions of moral > > superiority to delete that port, thinking it's their decision to make > > that FreeBSD must not enable people to display their system load as a > > cartoon woman in various stages of undress. > > > > It's not delusions of moral superiority. It's common decency. "Common decency" is disputable even in within USA; Europe is less infested with USA style prissy "political correctness", & other places less than Europe. Censorship of Global FreeBSD to USA norms is Offensive. > There's no "censorship" if the FreeBSD developers make a collective > decision that they don't want to be associated with juvenile junk Some will consider games/* & misc/jive etc juvenile, & other ports offensive for licence or many other reasons. Tolerate them all, Live & let live. The vast majority of commiters are innocent. Just a few ports butchers have degraded FreeBSD, removing working ports in last few years. Rather than delete or move sensitive ports to a new SUBDIR, causing disruption, & SVN work, Add a flag to bsd.port.mk like NO_CDROM eg SENSITIVE= (like a TV / Cinema adults only flag). > that makes them look like a bunch of out-of-touch clueless old white > guys; Inflamatory language degrades, Mature language builds. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix Sys Eng Consultant Munich Reply below, Prefix '> '. Plain text, No .doc, base64, HTML, quoted-printable. http://berklix.eu/brexit/#stolen_votes From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Oct 23 23:20:57 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92009C1E82F for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 23:20:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from land.berklix.org (land.berklix.org [144.76.10.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CE0E876; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 23:20:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p5B226E43.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [91.34.110.67]) (authenticated bits=128) by land.berklix.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPA id u9NNKprF032450; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 23:20:51 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id u9NNKmWI072791; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 01:20:48 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id u9NNKO19091819; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 01:20:36 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Message-Id: <201610232320.u9NNKO19091819@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Baptiste Daroussin cc: Henk van Oers , Kurt Jaeger , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/sword should be removed From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.eu BSD Unix Linux Consultants, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.eu/free/ X-From: http://www.berklix.eu/~jhs/ In-reply-to: Your message "Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:28:08 +0200." <20161023162807.wfcccml2gyqz2vxl@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 01:20:24 +0200 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 23:20:57 -0000 > Beside any discussion on wether or not misc/jives was offensive, note that = > there > is actually no upstream and no public distfile left for this port, this is = > also > a reason for it to be nuked. I have a distfile (as obviously do various others who have similarly just compiled for first time to see what censors want to destroy) I could put it on a public URL any time but no point until someone reports a search engine won't find it somewhere else. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix Sys Eng Consultant Munich Reply below, Prefix '> '. Plain text, No .doc, base64, HTML, quoted-printable. http://berklix.eu/brexit/#stolen_votes From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Oct 24 00:18:51 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5D3FC1E430 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 00:18:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from land.berklix.org (land.berklix.org [144.76.10.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61017C5A for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 00:18:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p5B226E43.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [91.34.110.67]) (authenticated bits=128) by land.berklix.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPA id u9O0IjZG034179; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 00:18:45 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id u9O0IfxX072910; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 02:18:41 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id u9O0INhu092108; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 02:18:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Message-Id: <201610240018.u9O0INhu092108@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Mark Linimon Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/sword should be removed From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.eu BSD Unix Linux Consultants, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.eu/free/ X-From: http://www.berklix.eu/~jhs/ In-reply-to: Your message "Sun, 23 Oct 2016 12:11:07 -0500." <20161023171106.GA11626@lonesome.com> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 02:18:23 +0200 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 00:18:51 -0000 Hi, Reference: > From: Mark Linimon > Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 12:11:07 -0500 Mark Linimon wrote Henk van Oers : > Thank you for your very nice troll. > > I was going to work on some FreeBSD stuff today but now I think > I'll find something better to do. Enjoy the break ! As you've pushed many ports deletions last years & it leaves scar tissue, writing your own new code could be more fun & productive. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix Sys Eng Consultant Munich Reply below, Prefix '> '. Plain text, No .doc, base64, HTML, quoted-printable. http://berklix.eu/brexit/#stolen_votes From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Oct 24 00:22:45 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AA5FC1E59E for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 00:22:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from land.berklix.org (land.berklix.org [144.76.10.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF0A4F53 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 00:22:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p5B226E43.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [91.34.110.67]) (authenticated bits=128) by land.berklix.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPA id u9O0MXVq034297; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 00:22:34 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id u9O0MUK9072925; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 02:22:30 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id u9O0MBV2092153; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 02:22:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Message-Id: <201610240022.u9O0MBV2092153@fire.js.berklix.net> To: scratch65535@att.net cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Jive prejudices From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.eu BSD Unix Linux Consultants, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.eu/free/ X-From: http://www.berklix.eu/~jhs/ In-reply-to: Your message "Sun, 23 Oct 2016 14:00:12 -0400." Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 02:22:11 +0200 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 00:22:45 -0000 scratch65535@att.net wrote: > For policy, I'd suggest the creation of a flag "Socially > deprecated" that would leave it in the tree but clue people up > that there's potentially something unsavory about it. Snap ! Seconded :-) Same as my Mon, 24 Oct 2016 01:05:52 +0200 SENSITIVE= but datestamps show you thought of it first :-) Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix Sys Eng Consultant Munich Reply below, Prefix '> '. Plain text, No .doc, base64, HTML, quoted-printable. http://berklix.eu/brexit/#stolen_votes From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Oct 24 02:10:10 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 148A5C1FC77 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 02:10:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF753128 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 02:10:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1byUiL-0008Ko-Ru; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 04:10:13 +0200 Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 04:10:13 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: "Julian H. Stacey" Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/jive deleted Message-ID: <20161024021013.GZ51420@home.opsec.eu> References: <20161022161428.GA7234@lonesome.com> <201610232306.u9NN5qN0091649@fire.js.berklix.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201610232306.u9NN5qN0091649@fire.js.berklix.net> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 02:10:10 -0000 Hi! > > that makes them look like a bunch of out-of-touch clueless old white > > guys; > > Inflamatory language degrades, Mature language builds. In a mail thread about jive that finding is very mature 8-} -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Oct 24 02:24:02 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9C54C1E0E9 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 02:24:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6722@twc.com) Received: from dnvrco-oedge-vip.email.rr.com (dnvrco-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.73.230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "dnvrco-oedge-vip.email.rr.com", Issuer "dnvrco-oedge-vip.email.rr.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FBBFAA7 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 02:24:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6722@twc.com) Received: from [74.134.208.22] ([74.134.208.22:51192] helo=localhost) by dnvrco-omsmta03 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.6.9.48312 r(Core:3.6.9.0)) with ESMTP id 0C/D8-05440-BB07D085; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 02:23:55 +0000 Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 02:23:35 +0000 Message-ID: <0C.D8.05440.BB07D085@dnvrco-omsmta03> From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/jive deleted References: <20161022024510.7cvnhc2fdh7h7arh@ozzmosis.com> <20161022092738.GA5690@lonesome.com> <14ff8102-d360-507e-a03b-2ed07b4a5823@aldan.algebra.com> <20161023160352.GX51420@home.opsec.eu> <8a01de23-0e4a-b7d9-cd3b-d6e1e4f44c3f@aldan.algebra.com> <20161023220651.GB81703@elch.exwg.net> X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.64.88:25 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 02:24:02 -0000 > Why can't we accept that a program which may be well over 30 years old, > hasn't seen any update since 20 years, is more or less lost since some > time and has no technical value (it's just some parody of a text filter) > can be removed from the tree? Anyone who needs this port can install it > on their own. > Regards, > Christoph I found misc/jive in NetBSD pkgsrc, and might build and install it in NetBSD, since it is small and my curiosity is aroused. But misc/jive does not like something particularly valuable or important. Regardive offensiveness, what I really find offensive is the notion of political correctness; people should not be so tongue-tied. Tom From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Oct 24 02:46:27 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0818AC1E46C for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 02:46:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sales06@hilinktech.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5B2D181 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 02:46:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sales06@hilinktech.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E235FC1E46B; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 02:46:26 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E047DC1E46A for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 02:46:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sales06@hilinktech.com) Received: from mx100.chinaemail.cn (mx100.chinaemail.cn [98.126.34.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.chinaemail.cn", Issuer "WoSign Class 3 OV Server CA G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4DB1180 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 02:46:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sales06@hilinktech.com) Received: from smtpc11.chinaemail.cn (unknown [47.89.177.93]) by mx100.chinaemail.cn (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DBF5C5CE0 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:31:53 +0800 (CST) Received: from s135z.chinaemail.cn (unknown [124.202.152.134]) by smtpc11.chinaemail.cn (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84F20C077F for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:31:52 +0800 (CST) Received: from iZ23ulyhpovZ (unknown [114.215.169.238]) (Authenticated sender: sales06@hilinktech.com) by s135z.chinaemail.cn (Bossmail) with ESMTP id CD01440AEC4 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:31:47 +0800 (CST) Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:31:48 +0800 (CST) From: Pauline To: ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <1926736366.1477276308.24851.cnxm@hilinktech.com> Subject: CWDM MUX Supplying --HiLink Tech China MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MailId-xm-cn: 1501060515 X-MID: 2093652102.3554832597.7.1477276307.919663.3917 X-Rate: Yes X-Real-From: sales06@hilinktech.com X-Rcpt: ,ports@freebsd.org, Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 02:46:27 -0000 =C2=A0=20 Hi ,friend ,=20 =C2=A0=20 Nice to email to you , this is Pauline from China .=20 We are the manufacturer of CWDM/DWDM Mux Module and SFP module.=C2=A0=20 1X2-18CH CWDM MUX/DEMUX . $13/per channel . ABS/LGX box and 19inch 1U rack= Type.=20 =C2=A0=20 Here are 1*16ch CWDM MUX picture for reference.=20 =C2=A0=20 If there any interest , can contact us ,dear.=20 =C2=A0=20 Best Wishes.=20 Pauline Chan=C2=A0=20 ---------------------------------------------------------------------=20 =C2=A0 Shenzhen HiLink Tech.Co.,Ltd =C2=A0=C2=A0=20 QSFP/SFP/BIDI SFP /XFP/ CWDM&DWDM MUX/DMMUX Optical Production Manufacturer= =C2=A0 =C2=A0=20 Phone : +86 15625275843 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0 Tel: +86 755 2335= 7706=20 E-mail/Skype : sales06@hilinktech.com=20 Adress : 5F Dongming Building, Minzhi , Baoan ,Shenzhen, China=20 =C2=A0=20 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Oct 24 05:07:18 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DDFDC1F399 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 05:07:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alfifi0227ab@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F240871 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 05:07:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alfifi0227ab@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 6BA8EC1F398; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 05:07:18 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B537C1F396 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 05:07:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alfifi0227ab@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-x241.google.com (mail-yw0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CEE1870 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 05:07:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alfifi0227ab@gmail.com) Received: by mail-yw0-x241.google.com with SMTP id u124so7250459ywg.1 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 22:07:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=v8DAia2cufqFhfezy5f3vxUPdKukCSNAiw3ci6qVx8k=; b=mapt61u7lSunsXkX8OOu88UfZeZiCbKT6u4dh1643dXa/hOMvumH0BJl25GxAcuGUJ 96i4rVRT+TRkX/EiU9KOtNWlGG/lExC2mdlksPVnflJZm7hnFVkhpBijEdTdZBDxb/a0 NhMkX5mqCcQTkeUYCjLkRnRRK6lntkNPcOvrKCt2tyL7d+S1RcHBm6nlGntdRIM/ai3m vQczs/+/doc6A/89NUrlIfbm2HlcsWnSxqG7LpIpXdU8MhBE5LETVB9bMPKFg/zRK/SG ilkAEy2JAj9oOfCf4KoHEDDCi6b7RQlQT4TpxUFBse5FaCBoW3Hs9jumxckjZlht81wa TvJQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=v8DAia2cufqFhfezy5f3vxUPdKukCSNAiw3ci6qVx8k=; b=eojhi40wreKGG1u4L7dogBcaz4YC7PgQ5nzNg3rDJe2bIb/IenvKLudTzOvmTYasCi ESEinVrHMtARzaJU9lG/R/ixVYXSyVdNPVcb6hkWZa5RMaT38p2xi4SzUsF3ExGdebfW bzsBaus4D/cJowKUVTc2Av6ogHyAz6s+JEEr6wRCvYbaJ+PMRWomkh5IktptDiHKIgfb xih2F5992JxHxHvKfutOJhd3ztev2yWSA381I2EDiOr+BsKGC29MmpEnhcPCLCJmG4x5 6sZF5Ku5DasqqX1rOgAt8pmna91m+cw6rSPrvcUDWvU0kERdyIyaXhTgeFQz4BLVpCwo +3Ug== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngveFSm5fYLEtyYCx4I8DBP8wXvTzsj0ADWVWjAorLysUvG4pv9z80pgj0dwzlYDyvoe69yd5lpVE71+pVQ== X-Received: by 10.36.106.133 with SMTP id l127mr932504itc.121.1477285637294; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 22:07:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.170.222 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 22:07:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.107.170.222 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 22:07:16 -0700 (PDT) From: =?UTF-8?B?2K/Yp9in2YrZhSDYs9i52YjZiNiv2Yo=?= Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 22:07:16 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: FreeBSD Port: graphics/aoi To: ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 05:07:18 -0000 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Oct 24 05:22:03 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE290C1F913; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 05:22:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsdkaffee@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf0-x244.google.com (mail-lf0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42727387; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 05:22:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsdkaffee@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf0-x244.google.com with SMTP id x79so9800533lff.2; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 22:22:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=3f5BsicAwARHA87ncX/lfVJyzBAEAOrkUZLaBg2NbeM=; b=rkAEFKK7geT6bGeQQncTfMIRGhtP3VVV5SJt6t+xYNYKZH8twNZwBX8aQGBB01eVSG yklLJKVecCeZml4OBuXX2UY+H7jVOPyA7vr6gtCWE/V3W89RMCmXVR924bLrqri93k1F dTgcqW4R1186i9ZjSfnABhV9TcNx2DalRK0DzJueG72DttedWLLrKhdPVX+Qxbw/jm+V DleVbRrlujv//aNIwonrVXZmw5UuoozJKCncybQNo6F3G58qkj5qJn/0L6HVnZQ73pz4 9g+1foUYahhIhubcSXGLFBmOqPdZY8qUrndB+LAgx78lKY/aiPyaOiMfcdg/qyN0+ALj F4zg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3f5BsicAwARHA87ncX/lfVJyzBAEAOrkUZLaBg2NbeM=; b=hHNCOij+1FYA8P6FUCONeDx2GM0y8Uiu8Ns2+DvwJW+IebbXgxAgWut8hFk1oxkVcf CE2syLeZ4+A1beh+Mndyq9t18hjOr+zq7c5/Y4njtEkhvZQCGGsj2TL0V/jVcjs5Jm0J kKJc8LuzGUB4TFbygTIuOxqqbchLZfogiKpYOolgoo/L6lAmv/5VPZHwh8w+PUr1Iik0 jiW/3clJTUWBP7D76zKKbZStV/rNVSq8YyF8Ays6Hq20bp0ozjuI6Mxbi/IX4sT4m4gC XwIlPYfgOxS48G9yI3RHvRQa4zoaX3IxoFe1mpbgmcrbX/c75SbRzYc1AgzEGLyoU43q 1FdQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvfV510fAJazyBfkO44g/qY+Y/01ZH5sAMj2IVGbV2Kmo4YJyEwTjS9hq1c9OhNWO89Fg4v2jd6SNakJ7A== X-Received: by 10.25.92.152 with SMTP id u24mr4919284lfi.114.1477286520175; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 22:22:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: bsdkaffee@gmail.com Received: by 10.25.18.167 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 22:21:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <28720f79-b7a3-7dd8-7cf8-1870124ceeab@columbus.rr.com> From: "Jason E. Hale" Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 01:21:59 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: YNzz_mnFFxWszmiv7BtDiS31EiY Message-ID: Subject: Re: Fails to build math/libqalculate To: Kevin Oberman , baho-utot@columbus.rr.com Cc: Mailinglists FreeBSD , FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 05:22:03 -0000 On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 4:57 AM, Baho Utot > wrote: > >> Sending this again as I have had mail server issues >> >> There is no src/Makefile.in only src/Makefile.am >> >> >> /usr/ports/math/libqalculate # make >> ===> License GPLv2 accepted by the user >> ===> Found saved configuration for libqalculate-0.9.10 >> ===> libqalculate-0.9.10 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found >> ===> Fetching all distfiles required by libqalculate-0.9.10 for building >> ===> Extracting for libqalculate-0.9.10 >> => SHA256 Checksum OK for Qalculate-libqalculate-v0.9.10_GH0.tar.gz. >> ===> Patching for libqalculate-0.9.10 >> ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for libqalculate-0.9.10 >> File to patch: >> No file found--skip this patch? [n] y >> 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to Oops.rej >> => Patch patch-src-Makefile.in failed to apply cleanly. >> => Patch(es) patch-libqalculate.pc.in applied cleanly. >> *** Error code 1 >> >> Stop. >> make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/math/libqalculate >> *** Error code 1 >> >> Stop. >> make: stopped in /usr/ports/math/libqalculate >> > > You seem to have a bogus file in the port directory as this port contains > no patches. > # ls /usr/ports/math/qalculate > Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist > > Patches are placed in a "files" directory and thee is no such directory. I > have also checked the repository and it has 0.9.10, but no FreeBSD patches. > > If you use svn to update your ports tree, I'd suggest: > # rm /usr/ports/math/qalculate/* > #svn up /usr/ports/math/qalculate/ > > If you use portsnap, this simply should not happen as it should remove any > stale files. > -- Hi, I am the maintainer of math/libqalculate and math/qalculate. Kevin, you are right that there is a stale patch file, but you are confusing libqalculate and qalculate. The OP seems to be having trouble with the former. There should be only one patch for math/libqalculate: files/patch-libqalculate.pc.in. Baho, as suggested by Kevin, something got messed up with your ports tree and you should checkout math/libqalculate again. If you have more trouble with it, you can contact me directly as I don't often look at this list. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Oct 24 05:34:41 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D776CC1FB8B for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 05:34:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dreamx@gmx.de) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D97BAFB for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 05:34:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dreamx@gmx.de) Received: from [192.168.1.11] ([109.100.29.30]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MGBdv-1cAvy31IKV-00F99I for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 07:34:32 +0200 Subject: Re: Jive prejudices To: FreeBSD ports References: <201610240022.u9O0MBV2092153@fire.js.berklix.net> From: Horatiu Moldovan Message-ID: <9cb5785d-2932-d52d-12f5-f0191a12f4a4@gmx.de> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 08:33:59 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201610240022.u9O0MBV2092153@fire.js.berklix.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:mhqhzaZGfr804qJAGQgcoydPO6P9x1lFWRFvhui3cTaAG4nMVRR zVw8UF1FBFrSOZQDWJAfRWm3Lj7fgRleL/UlXr8I9eZZYLUct38RHzfAtMVBWaf/jid/u5d MRO+J4IZc4poEZ9R5MaER05SxR+h9GbxWHd7WmKYHR1VawnJz9e02rk1x3T6sxQD/0rguLA 12LK1t/yd/K3pyt2z7mzA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:lmeOPkpl8u8=:SI7hCQeGfiBf+wvkDp9507 rWraSrNVjtl+2COaOPCKuzjEJ0hXlaZEz21TqcVYWKTDWd5DjNPbi+xeZsUwRkOVdCCE8qBug XbunB7axf+WxdRFLTapXBI8RoUParEuZmUUhqmWY+00X0Ihkc6V0vxhnOEb38MVgTtcWRYF3I hCPIywMXZKKEGj/L6PjqWHiVd0jTEeNJH+X58p9C7fMwfGHSul7p7t6i706mzST/LXIR08FD2 0azi24vf3PjPXT5HKu4miE1JGlJTF9yu2T7Na0V4U/uHPY08v0XYOPlIPWoWqUTB6vYdmWd6B 8IIcOnSfoxP9JygBZNwJqXD7VNcljNimEm7ncCKCLRhTnHOlyBXCO8Rd5GY2DJfR6LrTJp5Gv gHXS5yyKmkXt8HYHmn2IEUcALbIEviwwVzjfWOykYa1hYZeJmwwNnMpFZKuYZojha3hRLSqoP SWq1nbmvBqBvUOKCccabAAtCZjZ013SDu776bujhx2zVUNEzcvZ3qSFbPl8vIxHVPENrF+GIh iqxjui5gRfQBAy3yoFH7+zRUMF1fzB0halWD3JWrU6TGR/LaRQlaijLI10BuiOopMpW0p9f6H qlHOSWXebXqnu3m5jbHRBCDQgT0TX6zYYHrh7mwmffVWqa9p4HhDm2kfPegD+uMqEYtdbzrx/ neBm7WSoudHm2onbxMs0fHs+ECSIYh5Q1aew63tN2hm6ZzPJe3vP/MfsGbsaWvZUrnEVFIoZq s8O2dbWvxi/7ve5OL9heCggouIZlgo3b+hRLoFBWkWWnDI9WNjxLpu8w44jFgAYiz8CIbUYo0 5Ipi2Qr X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 05:34:41 -0000 On 24/10/2016 03:22, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > scratch65535@att.net wrote: >> For policy, I'd suggest the creation of a flag "Socially >> deprecated" that would leave it in the tree but clue people up >> that there's potentially something unsavory about it. > Snap ! Seconded :-) > > Same as my Mon, 24 Oct 2016 01:05:52 +0200 > SENSITIVE= > but datestamps show you thought of it first :-) > > Cheers, > Julian > -- > Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix Sys Eng Consultant Munich > Reply below, Prefix '> '. Plain text, No .doc, base64, HTML, quoted-printable. > http://berklix.eu/brexit/#stolen_votes > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Maybe off-topic, but I can't help wondering if we're close to the point when a port should be removed because someone finds a variable/type name "offensive". Am I being paranoid? Let's wait and see. --- H. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Oct 24 07:22:05 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19272C1F30D for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 07:22:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byshenknet@byshenk.net) Received: from v1.leiden.byshenk.net (v1.leiden.byshenk.net [37.97.209.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4ABAF36 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 07:22:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byshenknet@byshenk.net) Received: by v1.leiden.byshenk.net (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 6AB2B75939; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 09:16:32 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 09:16:32 +0200 From: Greg Byshenk To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/jive deleted Message-ID: <20161024071632.GB49429@v1.leiden.byshenk.net> References: <20161022161428.GA7234@lonesome.com> <201610232306.u9NN5qN0091649@fire.js.berklix.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201610232306.u9NN5qN0091649@fire.js.berklix.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.0 (2016-08-17) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 07:22:05 -0000 On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 01:05:52AM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Mark Linimon wrote: > > It's not delusions of moral superiority. It's common decency. > "Common decency" is disputable even in within USA; Europe is less > infested with USA style prissy "political correctness", & other > places less than Europe. Censorship of Global FreeBSD to USA norms > is Offensive. Point of information: I can't speak knowledgeably about the rest of the world, but Europe tends to have -more- stringent restrictions on abusive speech than does the USA. -- greg byshenk - gbyshenk@byshenk.net - Leiden, NL From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Oct 24 07:55:06 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 355CEC1F1A6 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 07:55:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglists@toco-domains.de) Received: from toco-domains.de (mail.toco-domains.de [176.9.39.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F244F143C for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 07:55:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglists@toco-domains.de) Received: from [0.0.0.0] (mail.toco-domains.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:150:50a5::6]) by toco-domains.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3BE251AAF018; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 09:54:56 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: misc/jive deleted To: Greg Byshenk , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20161022161428.GA7234@lonesome.com> <201610232306.u9NN5qN0091649@fire.js.berklix.net> <20161024071632.GB49429@v1.leiden.byshenk.net> From: Torsten Zuehlsdorff Message-ID: <841331bc-f2b7-0076-784b-6b52465a65ca@toco-domains.de> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 09:54:56 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161024071632.GB49429@v1.leiden.byshenk.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 07:55:06 -0000 On 24.10.2016 09:16, Greg Byshenk wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 01:05:52AM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: >> Mark Linimon wrote: > >>> It's not delusions of moral superiority. It's common decency. > >> "Common decency" is disputable even in within USA; Europe is less >> infested with USA style prissy "political correctness", & other >> places less than Europe. Censorship of Global FreeBSD to USA norms >> is Offensive. > > Point of information: I can't speak knowledgeably about the > rest of the world, but Europe tends to have -more- stringent > restrictions on abusive speech than does the USA. Just at a side note - this statement is far to general. It depends very heavenly on the country. There are around 50 different countries in Europe which differs quite a lot - some have more restrictions and some less than the USA. Its quite surprising. Greetings, Torsten From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Oct 24 08:40:31 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB65DC1E0C4 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 08:40:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byshenknet@byshenk.net) Received: from v1.leiden.byshenk.net (v1.leiden.byshenk.net [37.97.209.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 769B8922 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 08:40:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byshenknet@byshenk.net) Received: by v1.leiden.byshenk.net (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 6D6BF7593B; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:40:29 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:40:29 +0200 From: Greg Byshenk To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/jive deleted Message-ID: <20161024084029.GD49429@v1.leiden.byshenk.net> References: <20161022161428.GA7234@lonesome.com> <201610232306.u9NN5qN0091649@fire.js.berklix.net> <20161024071632.GB49429@v1.leiden.byshenk.net> <841331bc-f2b7-0076-784b-6b52465a65ca@toco-domains.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <841331bc-f2b7-0076-784b-6b52465a65ca@toco-domains.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.0 (2016-08-17) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 08:40:31 -0000 On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 09:54:56AM +0200, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: > On 24.10.2016 09:16, Greg Byshenk wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 01:05:52AM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > > >> "Common decency" is disputable even in within USA; Europe is less > >> infested with USA style prissy "political correctness", & other > >> places less than Europe. Censorship of Global FreeBSD to USA norms > >> is Offensive. > > > > Point of information: I can't speak knowledgeably about the > > rest of the world, but Europe tends to have -more- stringent > > restrictions on abusive speech than does the USA. > > Just at a side note - this statement is far to general. It depends very > heavenly on the country. There are around 50 different countries in > Europe which differs quite a lot - some have more restrictions and some > less than the USA. Its quite surprising. Yes, it is overly general, but it was in response to an equally overly-general statement. To my knowledge, it also is -generally- (though not univerally) true. (And, of course, the nature of such restrictions is highly variable from one state to another.) -- greg byshenk - gbyshenk@byshenk.net - Leiden, NL From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Oct 24 08:41:29 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D77C1C1E15E for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 08:41:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vlad-fbsd@acheronmedia.com) Received: from mail.irealone.com (fawn.irealone.com [IPv6:2001:1af8:4010:a07b:10::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A34EAAAB for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 08:41:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vlad-fbsd@acheronmedia.com) Received: by mail.irealone.com (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 46523612A0; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:41:26 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=acheronmedia.com; s=mail; t=1477298486; bh=8Lzzks39WPFciKfkMNExpnCdxpcFxjEV/3KKMW8rJpc=; h=To:Subject:Date:From:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=vwAunSrlnn44V2ygfxuDL11+8mLSUuLT8xBToLIVf8Bw0g3KkL2kl/dH57RE1uOSI IgEyvlkBF/XH6gtxNfm1OmpnCYFxu19XniyM2SypcU4lplMRzXtGocqIkJYQ3mO3kU ALjz5YNYRo5TbIPUY8zQuhR8smRifbLfkABvlJgM= To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Jive prejudices X-PHP-Originating-Script: 0:rcube.php MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:41:26 +0200 From: "Vlad K." Organization: Acheron Media In-Reply-To: <9cb5785d-2932-d52d-12f5-f0191a12f4a4@gmx.de> References: <201610240022.u9O0MBV2092153@fire.js.berklix.net> <9cb5785d-2932-d52d-12f5-f0191a12f4a4@gmx.de> Message-ID: X-Sender: vlad-fbsd@acheronmedia.com User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1.6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 08:41:29 -0000 On 2016-10-24 07:33, Horatiu Moldovan wrote: > Maybe off-topic, but I can't help wondering if we're close to the > point when a port should be removed because someone finds a > variable/type name "offensive". > Am I being paranoid? Let's wait and see. I was just wondering the same. In which case, we must remove security/sudo from the tree because it contains racial slurs. Yea, it's optional (INSULTS), but hey, so is installing any ports. (btw, if it isn't clear, I am _NOT_ complaining about sudo. don't you dare remove insults, that's its best feature! The "racial" ones can be patched out with INSULTS_CONFIGURE_ON+= --with-pc-insults, if anyone really WAS thinking about bringing a banhammer to that option...) -- Vlad K. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Oct 24 09:12:42 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 005ABC1EC06 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 09:12:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timp87@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x22e.google.com (mail-wm0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8611D1A6E for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 09:12:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timp87@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id c78so103512301wme.1 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 02:12:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=6A7RuuIXm2YfK4CYD8uPILly0C21rrFzcjBNMI+Mfic=; b=n86yqidvb7vxnE3Y8uwFt4uuFelXXZ+W0kCvGBxJA+LRKtl3MWNsAq2GblyKqUJJil XlyFZh8K9GBOVUl7XBqcNgY3Gg8FUA87ekR0U3vnNiCBSG20waPGTafnsKZWbv0u52pG JCwFDZsTJY3WXqBmzixtl35GcwSfOZUkmyfMUj+EjabzkFRJAG15YU+PDuGBzmypjPwD lYgj70cB0JOrs81jPhvNkYcTaJgQ5tOsm428OvNKdPuQ9mSVmftSmFTP7WCJg1i849f7 52hbjxo3B3sSjiPbKLjXbqZqUwTpVNFGwdcYMFR6V5TfFVZwu7jF/6QtG5/cwGMnyfAd JgvA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=6A7RuuIXm2YfK4CYD8uPILly0C21rrFzcjBNMI+Mfic=; b=k9d6RZmaegRo+ttJ01QpAfYJ1ipyi9eWD6kwBNO0Rp+pl39opF4T6JPAgJLlvZD5vK 09p80p+lYN50U4k2ZiWjwtrIgiuAh8gx2rdl+dgkHIP6sv25BB6G7vbV8qL4+sDr3WVt lxkRwe3ioyXOCgLhLzVP/eSF4UDdxd5gn1Ig0/YQqOEsXHsxUgyrqurhycNzJtxWS1WV nUUdSGK+kAiRwPeYxd8uG0NBBSSZn4+9hnO2LDRrxKKSHqrNeLyrG1Vhy16KTo4h4hFv jmngrANwDdzmrQT/iSGY0NI+p0Aq9GeMkAgpPupXYvbFfB5lQPxaUQN8O8j5HRU+gjk/ 1TnA== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngveVaBPlYeUYF9kXWg2IC++yrpdxQSfpwCfaEtEl/WrYO45fSItbFvhVjQe5yhgJY/mN7qaexndUp8DjCQ== X-Received: by 10.194.105.104 with SMTP id gl8mr12565655wjb.83.1477300356493; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 02:12:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.20.195 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 02:12:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Pavel Timofeev Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 12:12:35 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Vulnerabilities not included into FreeBSD vuxml To: ports-list freebsd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 09:12:42 -0000 Hello, everyone! I've found some vulnerabilities that are not included into freebsd vuxml (or how this service is called?) MySQL - http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2016-2881722.html#AppendixMSQL VirtualBox - http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2016-2881722.html#AppendixOVIR From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Oct 24 09:16:28 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C76ABC1ED47 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 09:16:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65F891CD1 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 09:16:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 602F3C1ED45; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 09:16:28 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F92BC1ED44 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 09:16:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3424B1CC1 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 09:16:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u9O9GSCO074316 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 09:16:28 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u9O9GS8r074305; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 09:16:28 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201610240916.u9O9GS8r074305@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 09:16:28 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 09:16:29 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ www/py-beaker | 1.8.0 | 1.8.1 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Oct 24 10:34:25 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6ABCC1F1D2 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:34:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C49BB73 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:34:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37E7428453; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 12:34:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from illbsd.quip.test (ip-86-49-16-209.net.upcbroadband.cz [86.49.16.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 71BF928450; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 12:34:16 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Advise requested when a repo split occurs To: Ultima , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Message-ID: <580DE3A7.3080908@quip.cz> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 12:34:15 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/42.0 SeaMonkey/2.39 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:34:25 -0000 Ultima wrote on 2016/10/22 21:14: > Hello, > > Some what recently a couple of the ports I maintain split into two, one > being -server, and the other being -client. The code was more or less > cloned then removed some make args/files that one would be used to enable > both. > > Currently the code is so similar it would be possible to create a slave > port and use the same patches, makefile and plist with minimal changes, > however I have no idea the direction this split may go and this maybe short > lived. So onto my topic for this post. > > Would it be better to create a new port with mostly duplicate code and > remove/add the little changes required? Or as previously stated make a > slave port and use the common code. > > I am struggling to decide on this and would appreciate opinions. I think it is fine to use slave port first. See some databases like MySQL or PostgreSQL. When server and client will diverge too much in the future, you can rework it as too separate ports. Miroslav Lachman From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Oct 24 11:15:31 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97EDDC1FACF for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:15:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com (mail-wm0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E850BAC for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:15:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x234.google.com with SMTP id f193so111659492wmg.0 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 04:15:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=PbeqgaAiLv47w1NPYI612yrOTAZ0pTKj84bH2Z0AW/g=; b=jGNQQvQMLGb6g8iUdy14Xch97zkJlaj4P6TXRzxPo9RuBeoabley30w5zcBYUeavXf ZbjKETWqd7B4fAWscoy7SYe73mRUhTOah15KwWuRIvgYC3CIfcCRymK2XOvkIZRCK4ab GQVoCmnAkmpa9SR9bbwZAMlpXYzSvW9b3YJQDJLOfUAgqwOARMyXISU31QzABAfjT+Fw J0MmUHNNYAzMuyTdGfv4qFrCs19X8WTVfLlzBnr26x3mKix/xWueih0bgnK8tl6a8wrU nrFcCagFuIN3m0DwsdCvzCoX4KjXgC2gQRWhUmuFFRGBGB+iGMpqoC8+77YPtBEyDak5 mtkw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PbeqgaAiLv47w1NPYI612yrOTAZ0pTKj84bH2Z0AW/g=; b=WxVoOyWZ9Y8hJ2h+siRRxMrxps9jDcEdM+bbotEnocrOmTLotm40OvgVAfTUkShUfT q9SdLUlYRZ0Gmlo/6+CKjNY/zgwRLDDLh4rBLTr3mRWsUDBtKnLUHK5yhNgtXYWkFSsL FGbKrg5OyHKspaQHdBakSMdAZowYfUdkWwovG1RyGJ+Xpi1xPkSbhE5NJjHYkfo+IlZ9 lkZ/5hjlkM5ZtaBTqJCcGaqhvJGntBcmkld5OlBfCdnWVy4nKzNDpk/c58sSYEcyLTes SuFMerlcx66is36UajtR7tcYub2Rx5l3ROLpGqGtGdv6E6cKbcP4ZEIcRckTskqC1Cby OB3Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvePdylSMBInfy/8Tu20jwTLkC80AoqgzBl2sbPLqOpJnt0YSiSOU2jGg8pvGS7Z5g== X-Received: by 10.194.43.74 with SMTP id u10mr11410310wjl.12.1477307726351; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 04:15:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.43.240] ([80.12.42.220]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 18sm14206949wmp.24.2016.10.24.04.15.25 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 24 Oct 2016 04:15:25 -0700 (PDT) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: David Demelier Subject: lighttpd does not pull OpenSSL dependency Message-ID: <2f756004-b35c-b9df-bcec-af596b100edb@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 13:15:16 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:15:31 -0000 Hello, Upgraded my system to 11.0-RELEASE-p1 and using 2016Q4 branch, I have a small issue regarding lighttpd dependency. The binary is linked against the OpenSSL port, but it is not listed as a dependency: /usr/local/sbin/lighttpd: libpcre.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libpcre.so.1 (0x800854000) libssl.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.8 (0x800acc000) libcrypto.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.8 (0x800d3f000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x80114c000) libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x801500000) The OpenSSL option is activated as well : pkg info lighttpd : lighttpd-1.4.41_1 Name : lighttpd Version : 1.4.41_1 Installed on : Mon Oct 24 12:52:45 2016 CEST Origin : www/lighttpd Architecture : freebsd:11:x86:64 Prefix : /usr/local Categories : www Licenses : BSD3CLAUSE Maintainer : pkubaj@anongoth.pl WWW : http://www.lighttpd.net/ Comment : Secure, fast, compliant, and flexible Web Server Options : ATTR : off BZIP2 : on DOCS : on FAM : off GDBM : off IPV6 : on LDAP : off LIBEV : off LUA : off MEMCACHED : off MYSQL : off MYSQLAUTH : off OPENSSL : on SPAWNFCGI : off VALGRIND : off WEBDAV : off Shared Libs required: libpcre.so.1 Annotations : cpe : cpe:2.3:a:lighttpd:lighttpd:1.4.41:::::freebsd11:x64:1 repo_type : binary repository : server What can I do to fix that? Thanks! -- David Demelier From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Oct 24 12:46:28 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE9BBC1E782 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 12:46:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank_s@bellsouth.net) Received: from nm23-vm4.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm23-vm4.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [216.39.63.111]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 859E0EE for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 12:46:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank_s@bellsouth.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bellsouth.net; s=s2048; t=1477313074; bh=vZQP+MKYhLSNQiKUvafMWmxcKZNTegSrp/eYXhHS6YU=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From:Subject; b=me0d4VXkgj0uLS5GwROKVVBUZ9hYxS6PPx3dbCIygNweulWdNo8nnVZ97VfpkTgtAieYq0Bjc5gGPjy2iZxchTZQjIbKSlJ11wKSbWiI5MUoHPXHVpluBS8tGIXymVfVL+eZZ/7y/Z9UJrnVl3z0CAT0W/97apS38kHFFa29ltH3mU5H57BlBDJtHI5LCvmwq+yZbqUh0IBKaKk4voSmQTICPYjwhLEpNI7Xn4hyM/OBi/Saac2pj8lQYMb+ScuI+hjBnB+KJo/Cik2ydngTEsJWe5d9NyUTOk7zND1qAFdKe4dlsxTXbPDwdVtrdddeA9MyU7HIvkyJfADMa0VidQ== Received: from [216.39.60.170] by nm23.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 24 Oct 2016 12:44:34 -0000 Received: from [67.195.22.117] by tm6.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 24 Oct 2016 12:44:33 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp112.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 24 Oct 2016 12:44:33 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 979033.24266.bm@smtp112.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: 5pv8y9UVM1nO0Rege.L6nlxkHUo1Vf.SuT8kf4LmNl3zIeT abb.FXw3jUyev7QIu0PLz_hzdeMKvOiR.qomZU07n2sTbXAgZwn5m5omu2mW bBiwSkRXtW6ZPMkAdZkuyHbAQTdchjrsxEDXC_BrnfK7HkJ46SLkxhouAOEq ChSAgDLwq_mEAQxA_bU0THfvmOm64L7SmedSocH.gHJV_72aZCWVS2zQ_iNT 9RG8gjcUQucCVIThl66ghiNEN21jxhwgckx2eNZTtd5M5JbKFeCeRYfIk3Dk 5WE_wja02grURpAwIDiNwg7Fhhs4t0WnlIlAknWAVAkt7SwFDfgZHaOPw2nU RIJLBCgEQM71P4GfUxDV1yS1sXnpo0EiihddBGk46nMn7mgkpZ6hm6OlvtFu AAXHPl3KIu6hv_7FXpC.7danP4KZdUcuO7kGaWyHCHU8FcYMjszTXCroQTZS pmVGNwEd5QH0fRg5xr6uNAixjBjYI3e0rx7flv.JKEYwxQcOxYiAo66aB6F6 e3xOA2RoqUl2tXCwEgG8U.luYOWvcCkTT_SqkA18ubXTCPX8nI.EAbQTqcNl FnMFn9A-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: TmsXsFWswBBnB9mQ34lk4J.M70s5.2IAIXRJzr.WC1vnog-- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 08:44:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Frank Seltzer X-X-Sender: frank_s@Ace.nina.org To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Deluge error Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 12:46:28 -0000 I upgraded libtorrent-rasterbar and py27-libtorrent-rasterbar and deluge no longer starts. The error output is: [ERROR ] 08:40:04 main:245 /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/libtorrent.so: Undefined symbol "_ZNK10libtorrent14announce_entry12can_announceEN5boost6chrono10time_pointINS2_12steady_clockENS2_8durationIlNS1_5ratioILl1ELl1000000000EEEEEEEb" Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/deluge/main.py", line 238, in start_daemon Daemon(options, args) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/deluge/core/daemon.py", line 141, in __init__ from deluge.core.core import Core File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/deluge/core/core.py", line 36, in from deluge._libtorrent import lt File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/deluge/_libtorrent.py", line 59, in import libtorrent as lt ImportError: /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/libtorrent.so: Undefined symbol "_ZNK10libtorrent14announce_entry12can_announceEN5boost6chrono10time_pointINS2_12steady_clockENS2_8durationIlNS1_5ratioILl1ELl1000000000EEEEEEEb" Have I fat-fingered something or is this a known problem? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Oct 24 12:57:01 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C475C1EA53 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 12:57:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank_s@bellsouth.net) Received: from nm26-vm4.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm26-vm4.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [216.39.63.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71FE3770 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 12:57:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank_s@bellsouth.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bellsouth.net; s=s2048; t=1477313664; bh=VKy6rGvOFPgxm1mlwIfAEn5IJFaNApS0RX4I6ozKYpQ=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From:Subject; b=BG/5d8khgBthHlgdXSABp+BekpKKPlx4EJ0TuddiZqIRtx+intnPjA2bwLJOU0FzdL73ougLPWoRCnJf3zN1B6oLgdoVwFMRav6/KnOj94A71+kZxNHI+kjEqaoRaMVfSMDlW7NdmgA9i7mdnHCFvIknnFMICtFnu7Sas1Y81kpN7IhxiWCx1LG+0mxgARBzaaMJbivASdOUZ/6Kf1Zex72IVb+EfqJVmQcSq2cN55DhUao7B1TFYPji24qcN7LDIxYhjPOPZ0+Zrht84Z4DwVDVERvKpYFGvbr2QOonDlP/eJVQgM+W8+HTVuA6fPlSL0QDKZW/csEhlqpHs6wH3Q== Received: from [216.39.60.175] by nm26.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 24 Oct 2016 12:54:24 -0000 Received: from [67.195.23.146] by tm11.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 24 Oct 2016 12:54:24 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp118.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 24 Oct 2016 12:54:24 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 386743.20344.bm@smtp118.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: Txj3xyoVM1l.mPUOGYOu6oxn7QW.YCan86lttYuTloYqe37 pn42H3UwYSZ8dOJam4MQ5f7PbUj4hIn56BG8le6jhhAv.USW.C.xY9d6DSjY m9Fn8lkFiAk61TDR6x6R1dnfpEY_1mJJL1PWxazpO1MMj58VzjeZ4K5aJGzz wSwEM_sLODjTalohtmf9lKDYUvpfSb2_QaPhe25cv3bVy2_rJyzHSxLcscGV 2FrkfqZ6G.5K7G.5RoxVREOBiPcrZkA1k6aRdrgIK9t9coIhvoi7Le3bcksB ZirzurlNmyIXemfetDTGS72CHqyluhdrOuW8Nx_Z3IefWlxgC61UObagBeMq nR2CKnxygZjGM6VcqFFdaFh33Ftd_aOX.E9vKbAwJO0p8auXj_NTyEj92Iib DkZu5Zukzukk5CwhJ.pAsxxmfQn0mmVbpmFjnvy.ItGNAZ4Q2j48noU553tA sMz26f5YQp9dp8oujorhTSIl3eXreR7sDUEujJ0OGYqMQfve7uf3K03ngVhg 1jkUFX1r4CBV6dFOpNWugIwkWAOZSKA-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: TmsXsFWswBBnB9mQ34lk4J.M70s5.2IAIXRJzr.WC1vnog-- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 08:54:22 -0400 (EDT) From: Frank Seltzer X-X-Sender: frank_s@Ace.nina.org To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Deluge error In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 12:57:01 -0000 On Mon, 24 Oct 2016, Frank Seltzer wrote: > I upgraded libtorrent-rasterbar and py27-libtorrent-rasterbar and deluge no > longer starts. The error output is: > > [ERROR ] 08:40:04 main:245 > /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/libtorrent.so: Undefined symbol > "_ZNK10libtorrent14announce_entry12can_announceEN5boost6chrono10time_pointINS2_12steady_clockENS2_8durationIlNS1_5ratioILl1ELl1000000000EEEEEEEb" > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/deluge/main.py", line 238, in > start_daemon > Daemon(options, args) > File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/deluge/core/daemon.py", line > 141, in __init__ > from deluge.core.core import Core > File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/deluge/core/core.py", line 36, > in > from deluge._libtorrent import lt > File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/deluge/_libtorrent.py", line > 59, in > import libtorrent as lt > ImportError: /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/libtorrent.so: Undefined > symbol > "_ZNK10libtorrent14announce_entry12can_announceEN5boost6chrono10time_pointINS2_12steady_clockENS2_8durationIlNS1_5ratioILl1ELl1000000000EEEEEEEb" > > Have I fat-fingered something or is this a known problem? I forgot to mention that I have rebuilt python27, py27\* and deluge. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Oct 24 12:59:50 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56D45C1EB0B for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 12:59:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mail.madpilot.net (grunt.madpilot.net [78.47.145.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18C4989F for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 12:59:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mail (mail [192.168.254.3]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3t2bwD6BQCzbDG; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:59:40 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=madpilot.net; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:date:message-id:from:from :references:subject:subject:received:received; s=mail; t= 1477313975; x=1479128376; bh=MB1DmrMAf/8uwbQwJ40/HytPpkQbEc2Lwg5 LmbkBDvw=; b=aSybzLH6dXHtb8bEJrtVD/V0yvghSViGYOIb5BQqurKgFuVH+hQ aaxYTbXsxd526yTR+bt6iqGEiBVcWTrkF1GMI9qaRycrGGOAscA+DFxmuEwcnd1l YW4wKLui21DuDmod27wVcZOUpcMoG9lJGRH+5TPYiuXBI9z/nlIsNen8= Received: from mail.madpilot.net ([192.168.254.3]) by mail (mail.madpilot.net [192.168.254.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oOU7U7Dxr37g; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:59:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tommy.madpilot.net (micro.madpilot.net [88.149.173.206]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:59:35 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: lighttpd does not pull OpenSSL dependency To: David Demelier , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <2f756004-b35c-b9df-bcec-af596b100edb@gmail.com> From: Guido Falsi Message-ID: Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:59:34 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2f756004-b35c-b9df-bcec-af596b100edb@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 12:59:50 -0000 On 10/24/16 13:15, David Demelier wrote: > Hello, > > Upgraded my system to 11.0-RELEASE-p1 and using 2016Q4 branch, I have a > small issue regarding lighttpd dependency. > > The binary is linked against the OpenSSL port, but it is not listed as a > dependency: > > /usr/local/sbin/lighttpd: > libpcre.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libpcre.so.1 (0x800854000) > libssl.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.8 (0x800acc000) > libcrypto.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.8 (0x800d3f000) > libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x80114c000) > libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x801500000) > [...] > > What can I do to fix that? Are you generating your own packages? What software are you using to do that? Are you using some directive to enable ports provided ssl library? A machine using my own generated packages using poudriere does not show such behavior using ports trunk: /usr/local/sbin/lighttpd: libpcre.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libpcre.so.1 (0x800857000) libssl.so.8 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.8 (0x800acf000) libcrypto.so.8 => /lib/libcrypto.so.8 (0x800e00000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x80126d000) libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x80160d000) A VM I have using official packages from 2016Q4 also gives the same output(apart from the offsets which are slightly different) when checking a just downloaded lighttpd package. So I'd conclude there's something wrong affecting your builds. What about a stray installation of a ports provided ssl library somewhere? More information will be needed to really help you. -- Guido Falsi From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Oct 24 14:06:51 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74BE5C1FB6B for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:06:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kitche@kitchetech.com) Received: from mail-qk0-x22a.google.com (mail-qk0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33CE2D72 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:06:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kitche@kitchetech.com) Received: by mail-qk0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id n189so239973342qke.0 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 07:06:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kitchetech-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=LqUYP7/eND1g3PHTa9gBeVg0AQodNYUsGybgIIrgW80=; b=gHZToOlmuUuewqd1dDxExKuR7uEWTTpeBVQaO00zY6wP0K/LORfORRGh9Ul9MWDOmq NeMhenEHm0niPNbTuHUpLsfxAI91TTy9S0uf3NDye8WlULkQJH04PKYsP5O4BxOdW/Kn iEQ1YLSl46IW8pwPD5jm1yufgahq3HaLrNTFvIxXRKgqzHG8NF+XKFzOEbDkeep7YX5h 88LJf8v2n7rm0oA8kvkixalsn1IQLn6xM7zG4XB7rKHfaydY6nsWTKhAraEE6BK5RATG 5gP94Ko4v/TBOKYvzo+gVDGnVdF0uCU4H0djzCOMCN+X4EP71+9BjJ3zPs9EeQ1pa7pt WiQw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LqUYP7/eND1g3PHTa9gBeVg0AQodNYUsGybgIIrgW80=; b=j2j5kET7iwO7LGtRkySBdJbnIfpZWkhz50Z2cAmtLn51uxllClQtCENZajXUIu4Iqv 5viqPhyvkDSn5OxEDpdySXMIVKArSWU0E3OR8bkMjG38UPsYdGrLutkguNd/saf2lMMA GUgIJ1178tjujF0vpWDTSstAbzkKft/H6Al/KIr0FZsOe2zLvnCFn7hCEPfXBnCArHRP G/XFIgqrDcavd5Y2tVf8XhnIZh/3kSwiG/5jSkGvahcva1FJF7dlUWOacyCHW2n07K5b /K1er2MIlg8fSKMDPGwuFj+GI95rbih+XD1GzHqYYYj9+3ocM3bw473pZQzou4M0iNjW QpJg== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngveVztiXLyh+Xhz8AaV7irPgeEB0Z2KV3An4/Oxa4bAhvmiZMhzn+ZRSJTU9MympMe4rkUZGIAzEi1/3eg== X-Received: by 10.107.160.20 with SMTP id j20mr12348677ioe.27.1477318010301; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 07:06:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.51.6 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 07:06:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.107.51.6 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 07:06:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <2f756004-b35c-b9df-bcec-af596b100edb@gmail.com> From: Matthew Donovan Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 09:06:49 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: lighttpd does not pull OpenSSL dependency To: Guido Falsi Cc: freebsd-ports , David Demelier Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:06:51 -0000 This might be due to you had port installed already and it got picked up first On Oct 24, 2016 7:59 AM, "Guido Falsi" wrote: > On 10/24/16 13:15, David Demelier wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Upgraded my system to 11.0-RELEASE-p1 and using 2016Q4 branch, I have a > > small issue regarding lighttpd dependency. > > > > The binary is linked against the OpenSSL port, but it is not listed as a > > dependency: > > > > /usr/local/sbin/lighttpd: > > libpcre.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libpcre.so.1 (0x800854000) > > libssl.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.8 (0x800acc000) > > libcrypto.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.8 (0x800d3f000) > > libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x80114c000) > > libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x801500000) > > > [...] > > > > What can I do to fix that? > > Are you generating your own packages? What software are you using to do > that? > > Are you using some directive to enable ports provided ssl library? > > A machine using my own generated packages using poudriere does not show > such behavior using ports trunk: > > /usr/local/sbin/lighttpd: > libpcre.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libpcre.so.1 (0x800857000) > libssl.so.8 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.8 (0x800acf000) > libcrypto.so.8 => /lib/libcrypto.so.8 (0x800e00000) > libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x80126d000) > libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x80160d000) > > A VM I have using official packages from 2016Q4 also gives the same > output(apart from the offsets which are slightly different) when > checking a just downloaded lighttpd package. > > So I'd conclude there's something wrong affecting your builds. What > about a stray installation of a ports provided ssl library somewhere? > > More information will be needed to really help you. > > -- > Guido Falsi > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Oct 24 14:28:20 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BFF8C1E10A for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:28:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ua0-x22c.google.com (mail-ua0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4AD2DF7 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:28:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ua0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id p103so637935uap.6 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 07:28:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=JcdIe4ja7Q4FblPBtnETsAc5n+tBN3REeSrREp4hCeQ=; b=r0zkBRpyCwivYYg/dXn+FZIPzGp02GwtducfL0S4cKa80epQdRooyL0nU8A8N0JeI/ uK9b8BXfO2ajfyBQV7J8lgqsLa+H+3KhpApJUSIaCyrVgbAd2JXjKj2hvYEZAd68g3SG 6fHcyutr4M654FwAgddgMJ8kmyU/Hq//mcPRT8m0LxKovbC6A/KfosdJ8Q8eNfoAMObh Mw2tD6GOH3nCtyoD23v9Clmj4sYbXBsHhkjMRXAyzrChzgk1qaakPKUZRjoZnRJ42Xtn mT/fRlRsVMVhZlhiH31JWX/aEcpd7gKV6VfNmXYvcuk6cnu8EPdXDMffHUmkikvh+NDM bKDw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=JcdIe4ja7Q4FblPBtnETsAc5n+tBN3REeSrREp4hCeQ=; b=eoHmeiomlP8Me0qwhZ48VePVwWhWwTSk/4VuKiwyS1oexQwoqDHHQLTZltvH5YvLNt Ole1dnfYDM1Z2qW1HtATI0bijlf4RC6zH+Q/PVz3JDNQeWbRVb3XVWw2LmemaesvxI7T MrkmL06vwJIWHNGr4ksJXxTqN8qhpuU5v98zI+umSVFabJx5gTSv4Uj2yWzgyknakEBT CoUiUkVUhlfHwxlG5KQOKyNTBQjI8FiguAIl3XTwmzzhCqH/cHOhnK7TNkK1DjjOfAsI Kg/3lNG0y24nLthOHxZS8IcMjubMkW/L8hXRsT4NGa9F09r3eGDMZcfofC4B2yr4GVFS apZA== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngve1NSB7PQl5KxPHrNXblTQ1KCyXJteCKDmhky4UdCt10/hW1i66lJXhCgzXuZktpOwBr5PAamViI1EGgQ== X-Received: by 10.176.2.213 with SMTP id 79mr8624930uah.162.1477319299017; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 07:28:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.9.196 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 07:28:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <2f756004-b35c-b9df-bcec-af596b100edb@gmail.com> From: David Demelier Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 16:28:18 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: lighttpd does not pull OpenSSL dependency To: Guido Falsi Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:28:20 -0000 2016-10-24 14:59 GMT+02:00 Guido Falsi : > Are you generating your own packages? What software are you using to do > that? Yes, I'm using poudriere. However I didn't upgrade poudriere for a while, maybe I should upgrade it too. The bulk build was clean at time I ran it, since it was an upgrade no packages were existing. > Are you using some directive to enable ports provided ssl library? If you mean some tunables in the make.conf files, no. > So I'd conclude there's something wrong affecting your builds. What > about a stray installation of a ports provided ssl library somewhere? I'm not sure to understand your question. The bulk build was clean (no package existing), I'll double check this evening if removing the lighttpd package to force a rebuild will fix that. -- Demelier David From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Oct 24 14:40:21 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 762B9C1E516 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:40:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca) Received: from doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (doctor.nl2k.ab.ca [204.209.81.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 594617CB for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:40:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca) Received: from doctor by doctor.nl2k.ab.ca with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1bygQ8-000DMt-Vd; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 08:40:12 -0600 Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 08:40:12 -0600 From: The Doctor To: Frank Seltzer Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Deluge error Message-ID: <20161024144012.GB43844@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:40:21 -0000 On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 08:44:31AM -0400, Frank Seltzer wrote: > I upgraded libtorrent-rasterbar and py27-libtorrent-rasterbar and deluge > no longer starts. The error output is: > > [ERROR ] 08:40:04 main:245 > /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/libtorrent.so: Undefined symbol > "_ZNK10libtorrent14announce_entry12can_announceEN5boost6chrono10time_pointINS2_12steady_clockENS2_8durationIlNS1_5ratioILl1ELl1000000000EEEEEEEb" > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/deluge/main.py", line 238, > in start_daemon > Daemon(options, args) > File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/deluge/core/daemon.py", > line 141, in __init__ > from deluge.core.core import Core > File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/deluge/core/core.py", line > 36, in > from deluge._libtorrent import lt > File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/deluge/_libtorrent.py", > line 59, in > import libtorrent as lt > ImportError: /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/libtorrent.so: > Undefined symbol > "_ZNK10libtorrent14announce_entry12can_announceEN5boost6chrono10time_pointINS2_12steady_clockENS2_8durationIlNS1_5ratioILl1ELl1000000000EEEEEEEb" > > Have I fat-fingered something or is this a known problem? I have getting some of these in libxul since FreeBSD 11 came out. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism Time for the USA to hold a referendum on its republic and vote to dissolve!! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Oct 24 15:10:00 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9311C1EF2C for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 15:10:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marko.cupac@mimar.rs) Received: from mail.mimar.rs (mail1.mimar.rs [193.53.106.128]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93D5EDA2 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 15:09:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marko.cupac@mimar.rs) Received: from mail1.mimar.rs (localhost [127.0.1.128]) by mail.mimar.rs (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B50545BA20D for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 17:09:49 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mimar.rs; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:mime-version :x-mailer:organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject :subject:from:from:date:date:received:received; s=mimar-0901; t= 1477321784; x=1479136185; bh=WCMo/ycpzYJYQLH09SZRPmboEVYudiaQ1wL TvzrEUW8=; b=t3pbqsR+y3JOqybrFAoG/dCD2zLZmZare97VwdCbe/GMuVBRBHh cTXQ8JfXnYaCu9pB2oeyL0tspTcvOvD0f5mN2inGf1ZHvDmPcE/tenYaWpDdOZ1a lxzDFQzlP2buL2xH+7YmB59l2nkmcmeNpcf1y8f0so8PoPdiuDv7xUyQ= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mimar.rs Received: from mail.mimar.rs ([127.0.1.128]) by mail1.mimar.rs (amavis.mimar.rs [127.0.1.128]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with LMTP id DdEWJRtdKPgr for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 17:09:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mephala.kappastar.com (nat-nat.kappastar.com [193.53.106.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: marko.cupac@mimar.rs) by mail.mimar.rs (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D114245BA10E for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 17:09:44 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 17:09:30 +0200 From: Marko =?UTF-8?B?Q3VwYcSH?= To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/jive deleted Message-ID: <20161024170930.19f31c2d@mephala.kappastar.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20161022024510.7cvnhc2fdh7h7arh@ozzmosis.com> Organization: Mimar X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.0 (GTK+ 2.24.29; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 15:10:00 -0000 On Sun, 23 Oct 2016 01:59:17 +1100 (EST) Dave Horsfall wrote: > Next thing you know, "valgirl" will be deleted from Usenet... Let's not forget about Corporate Bullshit Generator! http://cbsg.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/live Those poor C-suites must feel offended by such mockery! Not in freebsd ports, I know. But why stop there? --=20 Before enlightenment - chop wood, draw water. After enlightenment - chop wood, draw water. Marko Cupa=C4=87 https://www.mimar.rs/ From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Oct 24 15:31:28 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A77ADC1F8BE for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 15:31:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7016B115 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 15:31:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1byhDj-000Esd-Ou; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 17:31:27 +0200 Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 17:31:27 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Frank Seltzer Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Deluge error Message-ID: <20161024153127.GC51420@home.opsec.eu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 15:31:28 -0000 Hi! > I upgraded libtorrent-rasterbar and py27-libtorrent-rasterbar and deluge > no longer starts. The error output is: Please compare with the reports in https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212235 I think there's an issue somewhere, but I had no time to dig into this. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Oct 24 15:51:15 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4A8DC1F229 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 15:51:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [192.108.105.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.soaustin.net", Issuer "StartCom Class 2 IV Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC38D377 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 15:51:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from lonesome.com (bones.soaustin.net [192.108.105.22]) by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A96A716D; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:51:12 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:51:11 -0500 From: Mark Linimon To: "Mikhail T." Cc: Kurt Jaeger , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/jive deleted Message-ID: <20161024155111.GB15256@lonesome.com> References: <20161022024510.7cvnhc2fdh7h7arh@ozzmosis.com> <20161022092738.GA5690@lonesome.com> <14ff8102-d360-507e-a03b-2ed07b4a5823@aldan.algebra.com> <20161023160352.GX51420@home.opsec.eu> <8a01de23-0e4a-b7d9-cd3b-d6e1e4f44c3f@aldan.algebra.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8a01de23-0e4a-b7d9-cd3b-d6e1e4f44c3f@aldan.algebra.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 15:51:15 -0000 On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 03:56:07PM -0400, Mikhail T. wrote: > Technically, the only reason to remove a port is due to a failure to > build -- and that hasn't happened. Or: - expired, replaced by newer version - unfetchable - license does not allow anyone to package it - author requested(*) removal I have personally removed ports fitting each of these criteria at various times. I am sure I am missing some other criterion as well. So, your claim is simply false. mcl (*) ok, in one case, it was actually a demand, with the threat of legal action appended. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Oct 24 16:11:46 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A7D8C1FA90 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 16:11:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from vms173019pub.verizon.net (vms173019pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CF0B1C9 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 16:11:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from vz-proxy-l003.mx.aol.com ([64.236.82.155]) by vms173019.mailsrvcs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.32.0 64bit (built Jul 16 2014)) with ESMTPA id <0OFK00B5I7MOC5O0@vms173019.mailsrvcs.net> for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:11:16 -0500 (CDT) X-CMAE-Score: 0 X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=VvtTO6+n c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=i+tV1o3iWEoTTvx3QNPGxA==:117 a=CH0kA5CcgfcA:10 a=r77TgQKjGQsHNAKrUKIA:9 a=lGLOn1vgCoFmpd6m5TUA:9 a=JU8ITF1g_2jC8P5T:21 a=7rCowEAZj-cE7YgB:21 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=-FGs326eAAAA:8 a=WJlkcVQhRNGQmLtxS7MA:9 a=VCk3-YRGxcIJmuoK:21 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 Received: by 98.109.23.98 with SMTP id 4edb94af; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 16:11:16 GMT Subject: Re: misc/jive deleted To: Mark Linimon References: <20161022024510.7cvnhc2fdh7h7arh@ozzmosis.com> <20161022092738.GA5690@lonesome.com> <14ff8102-d360-507e-a03b-2ed07b4a5823@aldan.algebra.com> <20161023160352.GX51420@home.opsec.eu> <8a01de23-0e4a-b7d9-cd3b-d6e1e4f44c3f@aldan.algebra.com> <20161024155111.GB15256@lonesome.com> Cc: Kurt Jaeger , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: "Mikhail T." Message-id: Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 12:11:11 -0400 MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: <20161024155111.GB15256@lonesome.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 16:11:46 -0000 On 24.10.2016 11:51, Mark Linimon wrote: > Or: > > - expired, replaced by newer version > - unfetchable > - license does not allow anyone to package it > - author requested(*) removal > > I have personally removed ports fitting each of these criteria at various > times. I am sure I am missing some other criterion as well. > > So, your claim is simply false. I stand corrected and apologize. Allow me to rephrase my argument: Technically, the only reasons to remove a port is due to one of the following reasons: * continuous failure to build * expiration, replaced by newer version * unfetchable * license does not allow anyone to package it * author requested(*) removal None of the above is applicable to jive. Therefore, for purely technical reasons, it ought to be put back. > I have personally removed ports fitting each of these criteria at various > times. I am sure I am missing some other criterion as well. Yes, I'm sure you could, eventually, think of others -- but, just as with the above list, none that would apply to jive. It is -- to my knowledge and yours, evidently -- the very first one removed for a patently non-technical reason of being "offensive". Now that we are done with the hairsplitting, and I shall put the port back as soon as I have a moment -- unless someone else beats me to it. I'd also like to ask portmgr@ to avoid taking such steps in the future -- inventing a policy in order to immediately act on it. Though we do not have a strict separation of powers, portmgr@ is primarily an executive body -- and should defer "lawmaking" to the wider audience of committers, however cantankerous we may be. Portmgr's mandate is to ensure, ports continue to build smoothly despite changes to the OS and other ports. Policing the contents is a regrettable overreach (a.k.a. "powergrab"). -mi From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Oct 24 16:46:12 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53A1AC1F420 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 16:46:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: from spindle.one-eyed-alien.net (spindle.one-eyed-alien.net [199.48.129.229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35191DBC for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 16:46:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: by spindle.one-eyed-alien.net (Postfix, from userid 3001) id C2AC45A9F09; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 16:46:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 16:46:05 +0000 From: Brooks Davis To: Grzegorz Junka Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 398 out of 1025 ports failed because of llvm37 compilation error Message-ID: <20161024164605.GD95989@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> References: <1597d053-f1bc-a3d5-c0ea-feb6c74824d2@gjunka.com> <1be00457-eca1-eea4-9538-ad4c63de9ab2@gjunka.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1be00457-eca1-eea4-9538-ad4c63de9ab2@gjunka.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.0 (2016-08-17) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 16:46:12 -0000 On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 05:44:39PM +0000, Grzegorz Junka wrote: > > On 22/10/2016 16:04, Grzegorz Junka wrote: > > How to fix it? > > > > [00:52:02] ====>> [02][00:42:43] Finished build of devel/llvm37: > > Failed: build > > > > Exception occurred: > > File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sphinx/environment.py", > > line 1261, in get_doctree > > doctree = pickle.load(f) > > EOFError > > The full traceback has been saved in /tmp/sphinx-err-naeTZg.log, if > > you want to report the issue to the developers. > > Disabling the documentation helped which probably means something is > wrong in that part of the port. There's a known, hard to reproduce, race condition in sphinx. Trying again generally works. :( -- Brooks From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Oct 24 18:11:49 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBF66C1FE8D for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 18:11:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from core-secretary@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:c4ea:bd49:619b:6cb3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BA67256 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 18:11:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from core-secretary@FreeBSD.org) Received: from liminal.local (unknown [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:1c1d:86a1:a200:b700]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 728E1E02F for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 18:11:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/728E1E02F; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral Subject: Re: misc/jive deleted To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20161022024510.7cvnhc2fdh7h7arh@ozzmosis.com> <20161022092738.GA5690@lonesome.com> <14ff8102-d360-507e-a03b-2ed07b4a5823@aldan.algebra.com> <20161023160352.GX51420@home.opsec.eu> <8a01de23-0e4a-b7d9-cd3b-d6e1e4f44c3f@aldan.algebra.com> <20161024155111.GB15256@lonesome.com> From: FreeBSD Core Secretary Message-ID: Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 19:11:31 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8EvV4e16nvJKF7X7E2RjLGFJduP8DdrH5" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE, SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 18:11:49 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --8EvV4e16nvJKF7X7E2RjLGFJduP8DdrH5 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="53r6EsfgwmefOEcLswvS7nXw7wvLkSevQ"; protected-headers="v1" From: FreeBSD Core Secretary To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: misc/jive deleted References: <20161022024510.7cvnhc2fdh7h7arh@ozzmosis.com> <20161022092738.GA5690@lonesome.com> <14ff8102-d360-507e-a03b-2ed07b4a5823@aldan.algebra.com> <20161023160352.GX51420@home.opsec.eu> <8a01de23-0e4a-b7d9-cd3b-d6e1e4f44c3f@aldan.algebra.com> <20161024155111.GB15256@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: --53r6EsfgwmefOEcLswvS7nXw7wvLkSevQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 24/10/2016 17:11, Mikhail T. wrote: > Now that we are done with the hairsplitting, and I shall put the port > back as soon as I have a moment -- unless someone else beats me to it. >=20 > I'd also like to ask portmgr@ to avoid taking such steps in the future > -- inventing a policy in order to immediately act on it. Though we do > not have a strict separation of powers, portmgr@ is primarily an > executive body -- and should defer "lawmaking" to the wider audience of= > committers, however cantankerous we may be. >=20 > Portmgr's mandate is to ensure, ports continue to build smoothly despit= e > changes to the OS and other ports. Policing the contents is a > regrettable overreach (a.k.a. "powergrab"). Hi, Mikhail and everyone else involved here, The misc/jive port was actually removed at the request of core@. Please can you raise your concerns with core privately, rather than letting this thread get out of hand (as it seems likely to do) in public. Cheers, Matthew, with hat core-secretary. --53r6EsfgwmefOEcLswvS7nXw7wvLkSevQ-- --8EvV4e16nvJKF7X7E2RjLGFJduP8DdrH5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJYDk7iXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRDMDdCRjVFMzEwQUU2NEJGNjEyMEIwRjYz NkE3QzA1RkUxRUNGOUJCAAoJEDanwF/h7Pm7QS4P/j3KwLh35dqCeZ1kr46ycD4s cFByOdj2UA8YJSK97P/JuGseOXypOBEkCddQPt3ENvDpRov9AwTEaA54VWHtj84x q/Hje+H2OusiyqgfAkor/dq9aSpAgJtm3XqPcptbUCun1xIhVghsYRZ9CmX3qjJM 9zxb1/eqVYF6Vm7UkCiLG6gQIVeVl4Nf2RuTbOvghqYkEJqkvEeeHcgnCNEd5EYh SVLbnFzddLlr96Tn/NK2DPxhG6hgEGzYZlY3rABQnRvL9UdXxlSFkLJCFrxMzg3S muVVIwUYxHCbX9TQgtViaiJUwqWmv8FxDP5SZFZNffi6gGpLCzRwHNtQjZqEfMM8 bluuhNIZg2MF/XaWK2ONbNg4xo6jPNf0k5X1vJ7s4+PwWxsBdzCcF1Egp2khEqul yfpbBWmfb6un8lS8kYgDmNNsF76IyFQB287iJEJQd6U3M7gtHxNAjWgpI62SDd+z 1Gz+HmGXolMGWEIEtLbuwowHRyZ4I2IhrlVyNQdRGrXY3dLqi72Y37A+8224LzdJ ca5h7n5W+gUnuQMgPC/Y7qd3866Yvc+YoR8QNVgdKMyS8vWbhNoS/cEqQ/ctwuXw hlnTKbFIG7juLBFjjhciWC/wODcz89WiZovOJS21mLT0Tt95To/oMxTVdriv+Z0e 5RKQG/eQRyIjR03QHGR0 =2VT7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8EvV4e16nvJKF7X7E2RjLGFJduP8DdrH5-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Oct 24 18:16:40 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36378C1F01A for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 18:16:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15530893 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 18:16:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 11C83C1F019; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 18:16:40 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 115DBC1F018 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 18:16:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x232.google.com (mail-wm0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE0D1891 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 18:16:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x232.google.com with SMTP id c78so129905370wme.1 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:16:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=6R1YSieQjEUiUJEvHI6InaAJHKoRJGjnBBPWgzKciMA=; b=FAXwDg9ER3h2M/K677G4gfMETvLPQn3Oh1SMmCK9IF39hdHYkmYvX5Q7Kbpib+9NNd pSb8OnPgTh5dwHdSj6WyidGL8+t03JwKxYDFx0tt08QRJzlvY9HL2LOj7PvEiVsVhP4h 1S2haqRWMoIz/+pmNpgmKhgSwEtqxDn0Fw+cbiUUB0wZ+pqLAdMFQ96XxrwYsKJMbGRh v3HRvzX58ILMciJJEUs0u4oRjrMUeNXtMnVEwO2pwLFdAtN62VEDDK4EGpZ67Y3P5csz Sb/NEITH6s1mJL8D98Y0kfcWS+DZudRWdfPfAYhJn3mIzfx71O86o2++NJCUKz5Ba0m+ 1KLQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6R1YSieQjEUiUJEvHI6InaAJHKoRJGjnBBPWgzKciMA=; b=dCxD29Ro1kXSJ7VLDSFd6Kz33UJ/n2vUJk6a6avTpkEa5F2in9hM4cJZ2A8layx3Jl BsJEEyrRUqJsXMU+4vEpakXJI2907JWQvlG5Lm7CwQouCOmm9/5cKWIjgvb/ivY1v6ou r34WGF+0pzS4YNIjYPq+fYDTCrmwpTxi4sDQWgzqNKkzA7p/OuKGLsJ3vQwSbKAyjnjo u15L+h5KS15mWcymQYgiUerANf3hbm4LZGD33ROjutAsEEyLx/4jZMlGA+zReI0KYK2d dvPGu853HqsPh6kxQceYcBym6hvybS0G2Q2JVN1us5O+CYoCfcAFFce5JJQtZKz0h+A9 Jn+A== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvdRXK8JXzqzi4mN2A9NiFBRwqmDnHHTFG3hDTFHCxSAEg/W0wII3ZwxvSG9COhnhA== X-Received: by 10.194.141.233 with SMTP id rr9mr12418289wjb.18.1477332995217; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:16:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.27] (AStrasbourg-652-1-85-85.w90-48.abo.wanadoo.fr. [90.48.176.85]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a1sm20645710wjl.28.2016.10.24.11.16.34 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:16:34 -0700 (PDT) To: ports@freebsd.org From: David Demelier Subject: www/redmine port status Message-ID: <605df76a-2ba1-5a24-de9b-9b65c1bd1c4b@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 20:16:28 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 18:16:40 -0000 Hi, I've been used the www/redmine port for years. Each time there is an upgrade, the port is broken. I've sent many patches at each upgrade to fix various issues. For example, the revision 351940 has fixed the folder permissions and some errors in the Gemfile. I've upgraded to the last version in 2016Q4 and: - permissions are wrong again (set to root:wheel) - the redmine rc script can not start because it uses an nonexistent user I encourage people to not use this port until the maintainers start testing the port before committing. I know there are several ways to start redmine, but please do not forget that the rc script is here for reasons and therefore, should work by starting 'service redmine start' with some small user configuration. At least with thin option enabled, the redmine user must be created (or use www eventually) and set the appropriate folder to that one as specified in the redmine guide [0] Kind regards, Keep up the good work anyway ;) [0]: http://www.redmine.org/projects/redmine/wiki/RedmineInstall#Step-8-File-system-permissions -- David Demelier From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Oct 24 18:22:30 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C16F9C1F255 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 18:22:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@jetcafe.org) Received: from fedex2.jetcafe.org (fedex2.jetcafe.org [205.147.26.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4E9AC2B for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 18:22:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@jetcafe.org) X-Envelope-To: Received: from [205.147.26.4] (hokkshideh.jetcafe.org [205.147.26.4]) by fedex2.jetcafe.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u9OILR4V027225 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:21:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dave@jetcafe.org) Subject: Inconsistency? (was Re: misc/jive deleted) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20161022161428.GA7234@lonesome.com> <201610232306.u9NN5qN0091649@fire.js.berklix.net> <20161024021013.GZ51420@home.opsec.eu> From: Dave Hayes Message-ID: <731fbd25-7c43-f2b1-088a-59efa0a7f61d@jetcafe.org> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:21:27 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161024021013.GZ51420@home.opsec.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -1 ( out of 5) ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin version 3.4.1 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 18:22:30 -0000 On 10/23/2016 19:10, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > In a mail thread about jive that finding is very mature 8-} Speaking of maturity and attempting to add consistency, can anyone in this thread explain why misc/jive is considered offensive and removed, but the FreeBSD daemon logo (on the main web page) is left there ... even though there are numerous searchable stories about that image being offensive to some religious people? Thank you for your cogent reply. :) -- Dave Hayes - Consultant - Altadena CA, USA - dave@jetcafe.org >>>> *The opinions expressed above are entirely my own* <<<< Enjoyment is not a goal, it is a feeling that accompanies important ongoing activity From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Oct 24 18:55:14 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75768C1FBE8 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 18:55:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mail.madpilot.net (grunt.madpilot.net [78.47.145.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34BD18C for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 18:55:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mail (mail [192.168.254.3]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3t2lpR2KVDzbDH; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 20:55:11 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=madpilot.net; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:date:message-id:from:from :references:subject:subject:received:received; s=mail; t= 1477335309; x=1479149710; bh=msh1UJW3TsnSGIw4Ppr7u2ifF4cddlUMkOI G3Hux3CE=; b=PeqbaFhk4ZyO5vkOc298ubwLVlx90xIAPWpv1QxUDhQZWPVBY9O akJqeT/qlhK2jQc90/oGmxnX1TKFeQxKoBoq4rZCaQgm4fIR4xhwJ7mKgaQyFt5S bjjxJFbbAocxkR05lOtN1lGnEjqu06L27wVcqP4LXhoZmy0OlrMSvOZc= Received: from mail.madpilot.net ([192.168.254.3]) by mail (mail.madpilot.net [192.168.254.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bd9g7Bpx5A6R; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 20:55:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tommy.madpilot.net (micro.madpilot.net [88.149.173.206]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 20:55:09 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: lighttpd does not pull OpenSSL dependency To: David Demelier References: <2f756004-b35c-b9df-bcec-af596b100edb@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Guido Falsi Message-ID: Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 20:55:08 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 18:55:14 -0000 On 10/24/16 16:28, David Demelier wrote: > 2016-10-24 14:59 GMT+02:00 Guido Falsi : >> Are you generating your own packages? What software are you using to do >> that? > > Yes, I'm using poudriere. However I didn't upgrade poudriere for a > while, maybe I should upgrade it too. The bulk build was clean at time > I ran it, since it was an upgrade no packages were existing. It culd be related. It's at least worth a try. > >> Are you using some directive to enable ports provided ssl library? > > If you mean some tunables in the make.conf files, no. > >> So I'd conclude there's something wrong affecting your builds. What >> about a stray installation of a ports provided ssl library somewhere? > > I'm not sure to understand your question. The bulk build was clean (no > package existing), I'll double check this evening if removing the > lighttpd package to force a rebuild will fix that. > I see but for some reason the port, while building, picked up a ports provided openssl library, it had to be there somehow for the port to pick that up. I have no idea how it could be there though. -- Guido Falsi From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Oct 24 19:03:41 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C0C0C1FFEA for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 19:03:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ruud@b-funky.nl) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFA3A9A7 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 19:03:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ruud@b-funky.nl) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id DC0E7C1FFE9; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 19:03:40 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBB55C1FFE8 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 19:03:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ruud@b-funky.nl) Received: from mail-wm0-x22a.google.com (mail-wm0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B69D9A6 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 19:03:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ruud@b-funky.nl) Received: by mail-wm0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id c78so120629370wme.0 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 12:03:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=b-funky-nl.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:message-id:date :cc:to; bh=d95otrIpqsKeKBUTG4xepw8PKhTclLyvwGjYk2u+tBk=; b=qqWuw8Ml2M8cK5/oZtlVqKds9Sk/Fy6WVLVEhj96MNNu85w2xhpBTlCKvP2xt8e8Zh BBVW0MWGD0+1rjsYBGCifUQIE9jzi8ZiQDKz9QnlvkUiA36EGQDoz3F8GgEOMHPpF8cr 36vJbxuGbqalBQhPTOCVKgnxj2PnO6gWAo+LaBlBVE1S0+mnPnwNBij1b4bWeWxRqUQz nnRYYuvWYJ6zLJzMex/zZ8qWcZxosvD1+rfsduJpfUk760SXkBXWLT+GkiVejmmpkA0e pYW3j4tJb5/kIY3Lz/gG3TnGEiOvBeLZ0uCy4nP14LB+qvIvsUTBgNtJN/zqxZIeYpat kYxg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:message-id:date:cc:to; bh=d95otrIpqsKeKBUTG4xepw8PKhTclLyvwGjYk2u+tBk=; b=dDX3M6tYotb+2q9BNwhQTXjHO8aDkYT5CC9YE+ex6U8O7kt4k6Nt4/RPvZThy5hde2 MjQh6mjIvv+AjAqRvjjuseFsYLA7RJ315kmaJfFkiunM65xDH3S7yBkIvcfND3ntW0+J E7z/V/TxNCtm8fSw4noAfwxxH+235qWKKbrwpC0zyDW3Trg3pMtLUJOm6+CqhO0MXUHW sLNX7MTaMbygZEUR7x0AtNtwr7V4Fx9UeZsSqchPo+SlX6tZMA6yALS1Ninjp8WKMPiR buaYDrWQlMIRrftciMaiaZd7jRtdJ2PljstekWd4geFbUz9H04rr2OLlFMhthtaOWsKd HKAg== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngve/rkFQ56OBeNx5rDv2tjKbUtj+9A6evP4dgK61UKGcTBjNLrDVqkgoRsbAyo8ODsAX X-Received: by 10.194.87.130 with SMTP id ay2mr12383492wjb.44.1477335818405; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 12:03:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.20.102.151] (53515705.cm-6-2b.dynamic.ziggo.nl. [83.81.87.5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a7sm20770503wjj.22.2016.10.24.12.03.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 24 Oct 2016 12:03:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Ruud Boon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.0 \(3226\)) Subject: FreeBSD Port: MailScanner-4.85.2 Message-Id: <8F8FB045-D814-46B9-992B-DF84FB97B63F@b-funky.nl> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 21:03:38 +0200 Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org To: kkobb@skylinecorp.com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3226) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 19:03:41 -0000 Hi, Thank you for maintaining! I=E2=80=99m wondering if there are any plans to update mailscanner to = 4.86.1-1 or v5. Best, Ruud= From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Oct 24 19:06:29 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4334C1F11B for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 19:06:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A433AAF9 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 19:06:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A0B29C1F11A; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 19:06:29 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0608C1F118 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 19:06:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 513AFAF8 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 19:06:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1bykZn-000FOg-4f; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 21:06:27 +0200 Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 21:06:27 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Ruud Boon Cc: kkobb@skylinecorp.com, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: MailScanner-4.85.2 Message-ID: <20161024190627.GD51420@home.opsec.eu> References: <8F8FB045-D814-46B9-992B-DF84FB97B63F@b-funky.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8F8FB045-D814-46B9-992B-DF84FB97B63F@b-funky.nl> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 19:06:29 -0000 Hi! > Thank you for maintaining! > I'm wondering if there are any plans to update mailscanner to 4.86.1-1 or v5. If you submit a patch via bugs.freebsd.org, that would be very helpful. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Oct 24 19:43:12 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC308C1FF65 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 19:43:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from le@main.put.com) Received: from main.put.com (main.put.com [12.144.5.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80CC76B9 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 19:43:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from le@main.put.com) Received: from main.put.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by main.put.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id u9OJg18i004230 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 15:43:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (le@localhost) by main.put.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) with ESMTP id u9OJg0Pp004227 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 15:42:01 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 15:42:00 -0400 (EDT) From: Louis Epstein To: Subject: Portmaster still be dissin' jive,bros Message-ID: <20161024153814.Y4005-100000@main.put.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 19:43:12 -0000 The technical issue persists that I can not update via portmaster because I installed misc/jive out of sheer curiosity over its unprecedented MOVED message. The abort sometimes happens before and sometimes after the first set of error messages relating to emulators/linux_base-c6 make problems (svn now skips that path as it "remains in conflict"). -=-=- The World Trade Center towers MUST rise again, at least as tall as before...or terror has triumphed. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Oct 24 20:08:35 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5E16C2062F for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 20:08:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bradleythughes@fastmail.fm) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E839388 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 20:08:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bradleythughes@fastmail.fm) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3D08207D6 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 16:08:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 24 Oct 2016 16:08:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.fm; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-sender; s=mesmtp; bh=WpfD6GF/fGSeY Qoik5yqCRQ6Ihc=; b=bmdtQbvGd+klC1xxpcT/Z6evDKfn1RCZ2wjb5yHaKse7y sAY/W2SvPPaCykH1KUAcV8xfWbTuEvR1TuDifoojIvZRakILJPpDFIzHmVsOfS4u I/WK6CKfaXiIDo5ElHL3PUR0defOrvZN0TEN+pyf1tRQIGu9SUwfwQle0oLvxk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-sender; s= smtpout; bh=WpfD6GF/fGSeYQoik5yqCRQ6Ihc=; b=QllA/Qm4XjswVSe6XVca e0kXO3VopzOwkjsvN3VKzU6SPeobbWMacnCoFLynefCSKYzmPe+tDapZW3BTYwOS x4sZNBNA5BgaePxEHks+t5TlE9Xo20mxz7oXabXxiWHwI/KAB5cetafJ5MKChsbt tFZYHG9HnCP73a0t+XoggWM= X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: JTMDEG2JsX4+9DFxA7rerbFn3zhpZHv4EKHAXjXC6AbU 1477339713 Received: from [10.0.0.112] (ti0081a400-2256.bb.online.no [80.213.211.215]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5D323CC083 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 16:08:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Bradley T. Hughes" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.0 \(3226\)) Subject: Multiple pending PRs, looking for a committer Message-Id: <79776124-8738-4C70-A73D-65F4D2BABF69@fastmail.fm> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 22:08:31 +0200 To: FreeBSD Ports X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3226) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 20:08:35 -0000 Howdy! I've got several PRs for a number of my ports that are in good order; = they just need to be committed. I'd be ever appreciative if someone = would do the honors :) https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D213353 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D213586 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D213602 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D213603 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D213604 -- Bradley T. Hughes bradleythughes@fastmail.fm From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Oct 24 20:53:53 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EBADC1FC06 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 20:53:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72FF5103 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 20:53:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 6D95BC1FC03; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 20:53:53 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D1A4C1FC02 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 20:53:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from shell1.rawbw.com (shell1.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FBCCFF for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 20:53:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from yuri.doctorlan.com (c-24-5-143-190.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.5.143.190]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id u9OKrk38013058 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 13:53:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host c-24-5-143-190.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.5.143.190] claimed to be yuri.doctorlan.com From: Yuri Subject: clang-38 produces an errors on 10.3, but succeeds on 11.0 To: "ports@freebsd.org" Message-ID: Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 13:53:45 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 20:53:53 -0000 Getting the error while trying to update graphics/aseprite (https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213756). Same clang-38 compiler, same port directory, but the outcome is different. On 10.3 this error is produced: > /usr/ports/graphics/aseprite/work/aseprite-1.1.9/src/observable/obs/slot.h:51:17: error: no matching constructor for initialization of 'std::function' > slot(F&& f) : f(std::forward(f)) { } On 11.0 build succeeds with both base and port clang-38. What can be causing this error on 10.3? Yuri From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Oct 24 22:01:26 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1593AC20D8F for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 22:01:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baho-utot@columbus.rr.com) Received: from cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com (cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.166.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "cdptpa-oedge", Issuer "cdptpa-oedge" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D071CE44 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 22:01:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baho-utot@columbus.rr.com) Received: from [76.181.114.47] ([76.181.114.47:42774] helo=raspberrypi.bildanet.com) by cdptpa-omsmta02 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.6.9.48312 r(Core:3.6.9.0)) with ESMTP id 25/9A-30921-DA48E085; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 22:01:18 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.40] (helo=baho-utot.bildanet.com) by raspberrypi.bildanet.com with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1bynIz-0000oM-LK; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 18:01:17 -0400 Subject: Re: Fails to build math/libqalculate To: "Jason E. Hale" , Kevin Oberman References: <28720f79-b7a3-7dd8-7cf8-1870124ceeab@columbus.rr.com> Cc: Mailinglists FreeBSD , FreeBSD Ports ML From: Baho Utot Message-ID: <866f30af-2cdf-58ff-a497-9c95faf6329f@columbus.rr.com> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 18:01:17 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.7:25 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 22:01:26 -0000 On 10/24/16 01:21, Jason E. Hale wrote: > On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 4:57 AM, Baho Utot >> wrote: >> >>> Sending this again as I have had mail server issues >>> >>> There is no src/Makefile.in only src/Makefile.am >>> >>> >>> /usr/ports/math/libqalculate # make >>> ===> License GPLv2 accepted by the user >>> ===> Found saved configuration for libqalculate-0.9.10 >>> ===> libqalculate-0.9.10 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found >>> ===> Fetching all distfiles required by libqalculate-0.9.10 for building >>> ===> Extracting for libqalculate-0.9.10 >>> => SHA256 Checksum OK for Qalculate-libqalculate-v0.9.10_GH0.tar.gz. >>> ===> Patching for libqalculate-0.9.10 >>> ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for libqalculate-0.9.10 >>> File to patch: >>> No file found--skip this patch? [n] y >>> 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to Oops.rej >>> => Patch patch-src-Makefile.in failed to apply cleanly. >>> => Patch(es) patch-libqalculate.pc.in applied cleanly. >>> *** Error code 1 >>> >>> Stop. >>> make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/math/libqalculate >>> *** Error code 1 >>> >>> Stop. >>> make: stopped in /usr/ports/math/libqalculate >>> >> You seem to have a bogus file in the port directory as this port contains >> no patches. >> # ls /usr/ports/math/qalculate >> Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist >> >> Patches are placed in a "files" directory and thee is no such directory. I >> have also checked the repository and it has 0.9.10, but no FreeBSD patches. >> >> If you use svn to update your ports tree, I'd suggest: >> # rm /usr/ports/math/qalculate/* >> #svn up /usr/ports/math/qalculate/ >> >> If you use portsnap, this simply should not happen as it should remove any >> stale files. >> -- > Hi, I am the maintainer of math/libqalculate and math/qalculate. > > Kevin, you are right that there is a stale patch file, but you are > confusing libqalculate and qalculate. The OP seems to be having > trouble with the former. There should be only one patch for > math/libqalculate: files/patch-libqalculate.pc.in. > > Baho, as suggested by Kevin, something got messed up with your ports > tree and you should checkout math/libqalculate again. If you have more > trouble with it, you can contact me directly as I don't often look at > this list. I deleted math/libqalculate and then did a svnlite up in the math subdirectory. That fixed the problem Thanks every one From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Oct 25 00:21:40 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1303BC1E2D4 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 00:21:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk0-x230.google.com (mail-vk0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D50C1821 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 00:21:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vk0-x230.google.com with SMTP id h85so4995075vkc.6 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 17:21:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=GsCrNSTBsmNVNibJn+ht0LTN1CoDl1y3waIJVK+j5es=; b=VjU4jlyn2LGcsN5Y4jI1jrk1CrYBU6pnWZ+bB6ObfBdpbn7h5/iYyp/8npp31UYXb2 o7qcN45BPyzkVjOLDGmOdmAQGptCp8lpS26WKuNnY4b+Xg6PWJ5GoFbEhTPdnKtNx6eI QNStnbR6v+ovP7qg+Xw13OkETvofdxSuvbd02c/yRGx2CVkfewjyQKYVMCWXcMBUob84 VQGRX1R6dvTFY/l1KMViR1fIj3sItkNr9SqxShjJtQkG0rasX4mmqiJ9YvcWMl13fnpZ ReDFHEI/vjyicqIGTelYnzl62a/zCCE2osBjcL9gJX/8IEAqev20CfB4L2AtQ3lKWTzd dAVA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GsCrNSTBsmNVNibJn+ht0LTN1CoDl1y3waIJVK+j5es=; b=c8xD5jI3rILUaNtjBKc9i9m0RKlc9dQuo16AApGlBUniwNkj2udA4MjTTrQTvbEKvD 2HiRkH+DMe+Ga+t+MFK50mFCsl/lo39L+QtFJfHrSeDSIq8VJOCBar4JqYysUgA+8WVS qrbGRiv4dgBVkG85Wk8lFqkUjBXJAWDDkiNG4F1PsRcAZQUVihFPx8kJw+SWP2/Qwmbs QQG+nBvEgYOD+NELTz698Q7ZVzHc8HxqQEeQ3fbcb85WVqUrFXQgA7wM0BeHcUztEeT5 +j1CJgtHE/QB4FYHQjDl839hlRsdXfGd7pK/L7VkauGwNoP2psFt1EzqXaX7aCndf+6a 3Fmg== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngveRNjUxYpl65YAtm69onyqCUicL3uhmaA+F+TdPq4EO77aG8CI1klKWR2ONV+UbBm5q1mB3BEien+gw0Q== X-Received: by 10.31.148.22 with SMTP id w22mr11410097vkd.87.1477354898761; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 17:21:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.103.90.133 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 17:21:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Kevin Oberman Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 17:21:38 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Q2TaRNEE24on2b4sEKLQzJbycZk Message-ID: Subject: Re: Vulnerabilities not included into FreeBSD vuxml To: Pavel Timofeev Cc: ports-list freebsd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 00:21:40 -0000 On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:12 AM, Pavel Timofeev wrote: > Hello, everyone! > > I've found some vulnerabilities that are not included into freebsd > vuxml (or how this service is called?) > > MySQL - http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/ > cpuoct2016-2881722.html#AppendixMSQL > VirtualBox - http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/ > cpuoct2016-2881722.html#AppendixOVIR > I don't use My SQL, but the list does not include any CVEs that are applicable to the versions currently in ports. Ot at least MySQL 5.5. and VirtualBox. (Packages lag a bit and I imagine that 5.5.53 (MySQL) and 5.1.8 (VB) may not be available in all repos for a couple of days.) -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Oct 25 01:23:50 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF17BC1F9EA for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 01:23:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Received: from mx5.roble.com (mx5.roble.com [206.40.34.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx5.roble.com", Issuer "mx5.roble.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C41A1A7C for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 01:23:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 18:23:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Roger Marquis To: Kevin Oberman cc: Pavel Timofeev , ports-list freebsd Subject: Re: Vulnerabilities not included into FreeBSD vuxml In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 01:23:50 -0000 >> MySQL - http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/ >> cpuoct2016-2881722.html#AppendixMSQL >> VirtualBox - http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/ >> cpuoct2016-2881722.html#AppendixOVIR >> > > I don't use My SQL, but the list does not include any CVEs that are > applicable to the versions currently in ports. Ot at least MySQL 5.5. and > VirtualBox. (Packages lag a bit and I imagine that 5.5.53 (MySQL) and 5.1.8 > (VB) may not be available in all repos for a couple of days.) Many of us see this as a major weakness in the FreeBSD security model. The fact that a port or package was deprecated after being installed is simply not a good reason for not listing it in the vulnxml. I say this from experience have had to inform more than one FreeBSD site that they were hosting known insecure software when they had previously trusted 'pkg audit'. Roger Marquis From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Oct 25 05:03:43 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD097C20B5F for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 05:03:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kendra@bamsibahamas.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA22BD77 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 05:03:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kendra@bamsibahamas.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A96F0C20B5D; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 05:03:43 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A90E8C20B5B for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 05:03:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kendra@bamsibahamas.com) Received: from gproxy4-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy4-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.23.142]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7BC32D71 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 05:03:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kendra@bamsibahamas.com) Received: (qmail 16189 invoked by uid 0); 25 Oct 2016 05:03:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw2) (10.0.90.83) by gproxy4.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 25 Oct 2016 05:03:43 -0000 Received: from box1351.bluehost.com ([50.87.249.151]) by cmgw2 with id zh3e1t00e3GkA6i01h3hyS; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:03:41 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=PIacp5aC c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=tQKDlwAnphHU+TknkZdw2A==:117 a=tQKDlwAnphHU+TknkZdw2A==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=CH0kA5CcgfcA:10 a=KXl77lDgDEgIEtoqJYcA:9 a=G_9QDpW-MYZVQ2LA47UA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=T2T6W8Qb02sA:10 a=CcBCmHInBOgA:10 a=uzwwHlY1AAAA:8 a=7XIvqYjj3gR6U49_9F0A:9 a=gMaDCUmcNB7aq9uc:21 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=5Vuk2RD0RF0A:10 a=Tq8_5CSxc88A:10 a=IjZwj45LgO3ly-622nXo:22 a=sB2r4fbGyCi_QBThiz1G:22 Received: from ip165.ip-94-23-146.eu ([94.23.146.165]:49522) by box1351.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.86_1) (envelope-from ) id 1byttj-0005jM-Od for ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:03:39 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Upgrading MailBox For ports@freebsd.org in Progress Verify Password To: ports@freebsd.org From: "Mail Activation" Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 07:03:37 -0700 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box1351.bluehost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - bamsibahamas.com X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 94.23.146.165 X-Exim-ID: 1byttj-0005jM-Od X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: ip165.ip-94-23-146.eu [94.23.146.165]:49522 X-Source-Auth: kendra@bamsibahamas.com X-Email-Count: 663 X-Source-Cap: YnJlYWt0aTE7YnJlYWt0aTE7Ym94MTM1MS5ibHVlaG9zdC5jb20= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: Mail message body X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 05:03:43 -0000 = = = Verify Your Mailbox = = Dear ports@freebsd.org Your mailbox has exceeded its mail-quota and due= for upgrade. = You can upgrade to extra 15GB plan now. Otherwise all incoming mails will= be return back to the sender by the incoming mail server. = Upgrade your Mailbox Now = From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Oct 25 08:31:09 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37A80C1F09A for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 08:31:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk0-x22a.google.com (mail-vk0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF0CE1A5F for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 08:31:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vk0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id 14so8125536vke.5 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 01:31:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ie3poCtgIOCBOpYFLmmwoMeHhsMIA32Teb9TYqj0blU=; b=GGC9szfiB9tqjR4NA3PnHwQp/amM0LqoeNDbGxOTO1j4vzxXF9lqLskypS4xt5qFdd zoqimDzIa+4a9zQEutx0ROVkwSsBxH+wp8JEEf8TQygm2bvv+U1eqFA36/hsIVW/r2RS Al8TPNNbaHa64gjthlISv1bz4sP1bLuQ8JShfZmWA4PExPZ4JgFletgjLv+MaVFhjMMD ls8qn5HAOnc/7Df3T9iIaa2x9jQRvI7oi0YuBAW3QogryN2z5JRztvPpFJMmphF5oWE2 2Dej2LKv3FB3FWvyKrcV178j1NEUmdO1fl5mvOLwe1wF/yrQR98yi7q2doxS6JVrHana BmKA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ie3poCtgIOCBOpYFLmmwoMeHhsMIA32Teb9TYqj0blU=; b=YKv33T40kYEthtyCMYvEE99D9/lf+7N84KEoyhX9SBqu6AT7cEmLg0L4Vs8YN24zMv HfV8ppzC3u3pXGBZMB/UA9Ss8JoZt+LJe+4idGoqQUNK/vtKojttG/mRejmAteVK9N22 pf+m4eN+zOKXy40Shubuqh4TVJUAKsiJ9/iEYYJOI9piC8CbzBOUuklDCaExNoTtFuw5 U836xEAydFrjCIsXmW6BaLFOZJi4tSYbcBrz6VzgHSf/d6DAUHF0vuJLG1EeDG7tastX Wyr7m6OWe8Q+eJN8A4xj8vDUjrDCReA05wP2dag0JdPnhRfjwqlG33Gz5lKrO7aKdMpy 9SWA== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvfdNntZk/Djv/LS8+uxg4+xvtpgKWzH+i7wpb1VbzqgV1pZsCwoXY1wmz+3FrL7xq8wqCV+SPo2fJgz3Q== X-Received: by 10.31.92.216 with SMTP id q207mr8710782vkb.147.1477384267912; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 01:31:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.9.196 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 01:31:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <731fbd25-7c43-f2b1-088a-59efa0a7f61d@jetcafe.org> References: <20161022161428.GA7234@lonesome.com> <201610232306.u9NN5qN0091649@fire.js.berklix.net> <20161024021013.GZ51420@home.opsec.eu> <731fbd25-7c43-f2b1-088a-59efa0a7f61d@jetcafe.org> From: David Demelier Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:31:07 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Inconsistency? (was Re: misc/jive deleted) To: Dave Hayes Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 08:31:09 -0000 2016-10-24 20:21 GMT+02:00 Dave Hayes : > On 10/23/2016 19:10, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >> >> In a mail thread about jive that finding is very mature 8-} > > > Speaking of maturity and attempting to add consistency, can anyone in this > thread explain why misc/jive is considered offensive and removed, but the > FreeBSD daemon logo (on the main web page) is left there ... even though > there are numerous searchable stories about that image being offensive to > some religious people? > > Thank you for your cogent reply. :) I'm a bit surprised to see so much traffic about the jive removal. I personally don't care about offensive software, users are free to not use it (sudo may have funny insults, disabled by default though). Perhaps marking it broken because it's offensive was inappropriate. However bapt pointed out some valuable reasons, the software is not maintained and has no more distfiles available and this was a good reason for being removed. And the daemon logo is a ball for several years now, not really a daemon anymore. :) Regards, -- Demelier David From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Oct 25 08:39:19 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C210CC1F278 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 08:39:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vmagerya@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf0-x235.google.com (mail-lf0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 437CD1E24 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 08:39:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vmagerya@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf0-x235.google.com with SMTP id x79so215657480lff.0 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 01:39:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2Ml4EPAoBpcL0jhsd3Gw09MpJ3WBPdozxcoAyhwYnto=; b=DuMMhm4gVXu+diECnGYMK6kmXp+npHiKeYT0+RTDdVNyUqTlpIXrdKJJV7tikr9SDe bUES6kSXqze4DYFVjmqPvYM99t4QnjW6nR12O6CbHKbiDAeS/kAD1B7X7UQu0eaSpqN7 vm03uudp4KFTOgChEbmzvGpsr0zbTl/TX79BdxRyhuJqrl/2B6flQsjdTwzz3MRUPmTm aBoSPvF/gSolTZASSJr3jFRZCPwMl7ewteskbsW71TK1kfH6H5T+w/gr+wqZ4TSK3Qrl uBRqlui8s+l/lxeswRtEqeQaaqq+sZddJjv5pcOPjrcPupjYM0nFHNb4NxQw6piAniev 9Gjw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2Ml4EPAoBpcL0jhsd3Gw09MpJ3WBPdozxcoAyhwYnto=; b=Y7rP+q1ZVzBKBCG1hEmKh0dEvjr3xknudF7a1L+d3H2N83wrmrPBKul0eXZ0FCYNJ6 GgCWQLf/d/N1NCixPnARObq4nUTon7vrcHy+2q1aerhuxA32W6lYpxzj9pefcJbrE92A XJ5X/cNsOV719/dWAAeoUDeHdmuBVCb8Y7gWouOX+1Svj66Uzqfy/EF8zPliorXQLhbM N1VbW2c8kbEw8/S9ps9z4sBqXRkDuu85twszziDlLCTfmVwSYrOT2bhtLxh8zm0jiz1Z nOC7ySXqqw6iHsHpDj9jcWpju6T5UDcqxB8Dwm6q9RQohMyNBS53Ecls/HYwSv/s1vUd AH0w== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvfuFNnfZKja3lgk4Ev1i+03ortGG+otcfYfB6rA1yF3z9igK3HfkM+GQpNFk3Oqfw== X-Received: by 10.25.234.141 with SMTP id y13mr9989652lfi.25.1477384757077; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 01:39:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.29.2.94] (altimet-gw.cs2.dp.wnet.ua. [217.20.178.249]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id g7sm3733296ljg.44.2016.10.25.01.39.15 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 25 Oct 2016 01:39:15 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Inconsistency? (was Re: misc/jive deleted) To: Dave Hayes , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20161022161428.GA7234@lonesome.com> <201610232306.u9NN5qN0091649@fire.js.berklix.net> <20161024021013.GZ51420@home.opsec.eu> <731fbd25-7c43-f2b1-088a-59efa0a7f61d@jetcafe.org> From: Vitaly Magerya Message-ID: Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 11:39:53 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <731fbd25-7c43-f2b1-088a-59efa0a7f61d@jetcafe.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 08:39:19 -0000 > can anyone in > this thread explain why misc/jive is considered offensive and removed I'd like to extend the question: is there a new policy about "offensive" ports not being allowed in the ports tree any longer? If so, could someone point me to it? If not, then, well, I don't know what to say. You leave me very confused. Was the removal arbitrary? Is someone working on updating ports tree policies? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Oct 25 09:06:26 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75BBFC20826 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 09:06:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63260AE4 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 09:06:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 6288DC20824; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 09:06:26 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62327C20823 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 09:06:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55D24AE3 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 09:06:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u9P96QAG058516 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 09:06:26 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u9P96Q84058513; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 09:06:26 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201610250906.u9P96Q84058513@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 09:06:26 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 09:06:26 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ graphics/py-gphoto2 | 1.2.0 | 1.5.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Oct 25 15:12:39 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9134C21B3D for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:12:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrew.fengler@scaleengine.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 952EC2FB for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:12:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrew.fengler@scaleengine.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 9493DC21B3C; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:12:39 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 943B2C21B3B for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:12:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrew.fengler@scaleengine.com) Received: from mx1.scaleengine.net (mx1.scaleengine.net [209.51.186.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 773502FA for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:12:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrew.fengler@scaleengine.com) Received: from [209.51.186.62] (unknown [209.51.186.62]) (Authenticated sender: andrew.fengler@scaleengine.com) by mx1.scaleengine.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 930E7B85D for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:12:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=scaleengine.com; s=dkim; t=1477408352; bh=r9oCGSj7gzUnAA6+OyCT9rREdhk5F4GHho9s1EHBFzM=; h=To:From:Subject:Date; b=X05Lnd8Vd27O0i7WYh1+ymOD0gS+CfvjkyIIkDkwrg3GojNiAu0cvkxxRMoniOSpo 98kjN7u+LIzhPJc/9pLH1p2ZVANWOJ9/FSaGyNdINsGqz8nIZZP2NWyfU1t4gEgkWm ZQfneWAI8sjobyiDwBD06kZw1y9yn+CiS9mi8CS4= To: ports@freebsd.org From: Andrew Subject: [Patch] net/rtg - maintainer timeout (bug 213293) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 11:12:30 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:12:39 -0000 Hi all, I have a patch for net/rtg languishing in bugzilla - https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213293 Could someone get this committed with maintainer timeout? Thanks, Andrew Fengler ScaleEngine Inc. Email: andrew.fengler@scalengine.com Phone: (800) 224-0095 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Oct 25 17:20:55 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12602C217CD for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:20:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0210A149 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:20:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 016BCC217CC; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:20:55 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 011B7C217CB for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:20:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD96F145 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:20:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1bz5PA-0000JK-Qq; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 19:20:52 +0200 Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 19:20:52 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Andrew Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Patch] net/rtg - maintainer timeout (bug 213293) Message-ID: <20161025172052.GE51420@home.opsec.eu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:20:55 -0000 Hi! > I have a patch for net/rtg languishing in bugzilla - > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213293 > > Could someone get this committed with maintainer timeout? I've made some OPTIONs and makepatch cleanups, added it to the PR. Can you run-test them if all is OK ? I've also ping'ed the maintainer about it. If we don't hear from him soonish, I can work it in. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Oct 25 20:58:09 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5662C216C7 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 20:58:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from nskntmtas06p.mx.bigpond.com (nskntmtas06p.mx.bigpond.com [61.9.168.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "InterMail Test Certificate", Issuer "Certificate Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4755D66D for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 20:58:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from nskntcmgw05p ([61.9.169.165]) by nskntmtas06p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20161025205759.KCTO2096.nskntmtas06p.mx.bigpond.com@nskntcmgw05p> for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 20:57:59 +0000 Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org ([120.146.8.15]) by nskntcmgw05p with BigPond Outbound id zwxz1t0060KTh7401wxzmv; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 20:57:59 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=Lc3BkWri c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=4q38a75ucWZEoAuqF1Taiw==:117 a=4q38a75ucWZEoAuqF1Taiw==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=CH0kA5CcgfcA:10 a=SASBNSonazibFmwJgmoA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id u9PKvw8m082061 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 07:57:59 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from localhost (dave@localhost) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id u9PKvvbB082058 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 07:57:58 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) X-Authentication-Warning: aneurin.horsfall.org: dave owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 07:57:57 +1100 (EST) From: Dave Horsfall To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: Inconsistency? (was Re: misc/jive deleted) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20161022161428.GA7234@lonesome.com> <201610232306.u9NN5qN0091649@fire.js.berklix.net> <20161024021013.GZ51420@home.opsec.eu> <731fbd25-7c43-f2b1-088a-59efa0a7f61d@jetcafe.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) X-Home-Page: http://www.horsfall.org/ X-Witty-Saying: "chmod 666 the_mode_of_the_beast" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 20:58:09 -0000 On Tue, 25 Oct 2016, David Demelier wrote: > I'm a bit surprised to see so much traffic about the jive removal. I'm not :-) > I personally don't care about offensive software, users are free to not > use it (sudo may have funny insults, disabled by default though). > Perhaps marking it broken because it's offensive was inappropriate. Which was the whole point of the argument. > However bapt pointed out some valuable reasons, the software is not > maintained and has no more distfiles available and this was a good > reason for being removed. So once the *technical* requirements have been met (as opposed to someone's delicate sensibilities being offended), it's OK to bring it back? Could be tricky, though, as the sources were posted to USENET some time in the 80s... > And the daemon logo is a ball for several years now, not really a daemon > anymore. :) Have you seen the FreeBSD home page? -- Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer." From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Oct 25 22:14:18 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A0A8C21B5E for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 22:14:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (unknown [IPv6:2602:304:b010:ef20::f2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gw.catspoiler.org", Issuer "gw.catspoiler.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D645E22 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 22:14:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2]) by gw.catspoiler.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u9PME6br070248; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:14:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201610252214.u9PME6br070248@gw.catspoiler.org> Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:14:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Lewis Subject: Re: lighttpd does not pull OpenSSL dependency To: mad@madpilot.net cc: demelier.david@gmail.com, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 22:14:18 -0000 On 24 Oct, Guido Falsi wrote: > On 10/24/16 16:28, David Demelier wrote: >> 2016-10-24 14:59 GMT+02:00 Guido Falsi : >>> Are you generating your own packages? What software are you using to do >>> that? >> >> Yes, I'm using poudriere. However I didn't upgrade poudriere for a >> while, maybe I should upgrade it too. The bulk build was clean at time >> I ran it, since it was an upgrade no packages were existing. > > It culd be related. It's at least worth a try. > >> >>> Are you using some directive to enable ports provided ssl library? >> >> If you mean some tunables in the make.conf files, no. >> >>> So I'd conclude there's something wrong affecting your builds. What >>> about a stray installation of a ports provided ssl library somewhere? >> >> I'm not sure to understand your question. The bulk build was clean (no >> package existing), I'll double check this evening if removing the >> lighttpd package to force a rebuild will fix that. >> > > I see but for some reason the port, while building, picked up a ports > provided openssl library, it had to be there somehow for the port to > pick that up. > > I have no idea how it could be there though. I don't think it is a package problem. I suspect that the runtime linker is picking up libssl from ports because it is detected first in the linker's search path. Then the question is, if DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=ssl=openssl is not in make.conf, then why is OpeSSL from ports installed? Nothing should be depending on it. If you do want to use OpenSSL from ports, then setting DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=ssl=openssl in make.conf and rebuilding all the packages that use ssl so that everything is consistent is the way to go. In that case, I think lighttpd will have its dependency on openssl from ports recorded. If you go that route, you'll run into problems with any ports that use GSSAPI and/or Kerberos, since using GSSAPI and/or Kerberos from base doesn't work when using OpenSSL from ports. Since I don't use GSSAPI here, I added this to make.conf for building packages: OPTIONS_SET=GSSAPI_NONE KRB_NONE OPTIONS_UNSET=GSSAPI_BASE KRB_BASE If you do need GSSAPI, then GSSAPI_HEIMDAL and GSSAPI_MIT are the other possible options. Ditto for Kerberos. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Oct 26 07:27:53 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFDF0C22233 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 07:27:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk0-x22d.google.com (mail-vk0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DFD0970 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 07:27:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vk0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id p81so1061721vkd.1 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 00:27:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=TXdej6UusCetUo8wvfYsxAs/kpqj2VmdlKcDgnTPb4E=; b=eK0jtxYAa64KLXoYb5jheZpCKoBrfan5BKsnelX2nafx9Bu3HwMSpWcZq8P9yfhtiJ +eBZJci0+1TkAjBo4jvGo8DUvcdhqIKwRQ15mCj4Z+wrwVxGWbjlVJMgNHZMuD3lpvg1 feImIl84xp9ugfHVjobtfiT8dmkCuUtrZie455MmVyExDN+83y29t9Leu9gZzGfBUDrC kifnW9FWdqd5F3a1Mbq9WMPFN0e7X4XbmXDYgFSV/IpaQXQR3iAZVwZWAHqwQvZRqEtg qG3YyT6O+aS53RjXSjivdfeKswqA1ccsJb5LVI/DyzFQViJrGWYtP+EV63EegyUhC8pC CZMw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=TXdej6UusCetUo8wvfYsxAs/kpqj2VmdlKcDgnTPb4E=; b=Xp4Iq5hv2wrWMPl4dDK+a3hxeHlnwE9To3uyiGoX7KFPVm6xJx7x98hKbfPo8XpZBW Tt28UWGY4RoZ6XivSaatWZAPtzH3LAco9alP+wKo6QG4to2DERlNd/gQOhgZFB9x1sIr qWfpqshZ9YfTSSxzWegE0WZlYBGH2cE1DYtx2UiZoD0EdINZtNW8Owlc1L0Zy8ejPIE7 TKfFpB6zBcF7gRKGUYmPwCWFW4kX+ogvuuX0TUtIFaEAnZnxSLLWXFcsHC1+FaDxkE+2 8b6TdLSECKNkQGZ89wXBmIESg8IdvttdZLT9IFdIu/P2AB/RH7ewA6h1yXLVADTzBOp6 w0iQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvdEjtDhBo9Q4JzfsSAUsCx1eIafSUNQCyfTmUGq3Vq413eTt/Z2Pbib7IQE2qLrtC+fTH+clpTws52gkA== X-Received: by 10.31.131.74 with SMTP id f71mr78494vkd.7.1477466872469; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 00:27:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.9.196 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 00:27:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20161022161428.GA7234@lonesome.com> <201610232306.u9NN5qN0091649@fire.js.berklix.net> <20161024021013.GZ51420@home.opsec.eu> <731fbd25-7c43-f2b1-088a-59efa0a7f61d@jetcafe.org> From: David Demelier Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 09:27:52 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Inconsistency? (was Re: misc/jive deleted) To: Dave Horsfall Cc: FreeBSD Ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 07:27:53 -0000 2016-10-25 22:57 GMT+02:00 Dave Horsfall : > Have you seen the FreeBSD home page? Well, I thought the OP was talking about the logo [0], not the home web page. Anyway, I think comparing religious and offensive content a bit offtopic. I think unless FreeBSD makes explicit antichrist statement, there is no problem having a daemon mascot. I have never heard any religious problem so far. Or then I missed something. Regards, [0]: https://www.freebsd.org/fr/logo.html (why the english version does not have them?) -- Demelier David From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Oct 26 07:33:00 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52AFCC223ED for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 07:33:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E1AFD84 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 07:33:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1bzIhj-0007H0-VJ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 09:32:55 +0200 Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 09:32:55 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: David Demelier Cc: Dave Horsfall , FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: Inconsistency? (was Re: misc/jive deleted) Message-ID: <20161026073255.GF51420@home.opsec.eu> References: <20161022161428.GA7234@lonesome.com> <201610232306.u9NN5qN0091649@fire.js.berklix.net> <20161024021013.GZ51420@home.opsec.eu> <731fbd25-7c43-f2b1-088a-59efa0a7f61d@jetcafe.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 07:33:00 -0000 Hi! > I think unless FreeBSD makes explicit antichrist statement, there is > no problem having a daemon mascot. I have never heard any religious > problem so far. Or then I missed something. Approx. 20 years ago (?), some FreeBSD developer with a old-style logo on a t-shirt was asked to leave some saloon in Texas because the logo suggested that they worship the antichrist. There was a job (in rec.humor.funny?) about it 8-} That's why this reference to the demon logo is made 8-} -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Oct 26 08:00:40 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 100ADC22D49 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 08:00:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rde@tavi.co.uk) Received: from kipling.tavi.co.uk (kipling.tavi.co.uk [81.187.145.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C95BFC22 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 08:00:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rde@tavi.co.uk) Received: from raksha.tavi.co.uk (raksha.tavi.co.uk [81.187.145.139]) by kipling.tavi.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id AABB775927 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 08:54:09 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 08:54:09 +0100 From: Bob Eager To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Inconsistency? (was Re: misc/jive deleted) Message-ID: <20161026085409.73178f2c@raksha.tavi.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20161026073255.GF51420@home.opsec.eu> References: <20161022161428.GA7234@lonesome.com> <201610232306.u9NN5qN0091649@fire.js.berklix.net> <20161024021013.GZ51420@home.opsec.eu> <731fbd25-7c43-f2b1-088a-59efa0a7f61d@jetcafe.org> <20161026073255.GF51420@home.opsec.eu> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.29; i386-portbld-freebsd10.3) Face: 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==== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 08:00:40 -0000 On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 09:32:55 +0200 Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > > I think unless FreeBSD makes explicit antichrist statement, there is > > no problem having a daemon mascot. I have never heard any religious > > problem so far. Or then I missed something. > > Approx. 20 years ago (?), some FreeBSD developer with a old-style > logo on a t-shirt was asked to leave some saloon in Texas > because the logo suggested that they worship the antichrist. > > There was a job (in rec.humor.funny?) about it 8-} > > That's why this reference to the demon logo is made 8-} > http://www.milk.com/true-stories/unix_for_the_masses.html From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Oct 26 08:46:13 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92F6BC2246B for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 08:46:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (prod2.absolight.net [79.143.243.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58728B1F; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 08:46:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27A5DBDCD0; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:46:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from atuin.in.mat.cc (atuin.in.mat.cc [79.143.241.205]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 026E8BDCAC; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:46:09 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: lighttpd does not pull OpenSSL dependency To: Don Lewis , mad@madpilot.net References: <201610252214.u9PME6br070248@gw.catspoiler.org> Cc: demelier.david@gmail.com, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Mathieu Arnold Organization: Absolight / The FreeBSD Foundation Message-ID: Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:46:08 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201610252214.u9PME6br070248@gw.catspoiler.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="spdUWi9sWJ74DW3mILI1EOqVoxwQ4ca3J" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 08:46:13 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --spdUWi9sWJ74DW3mILI1EOqVoxwQ4ca3J Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="E1VCrV1Ku6jWai3FqdsCpFTKlnowfK9vn"; protected-headers="v1" From: Mathieu Arnold To: Don Lewis , mad@madpilot.net Cc: demelier.david@gmail.com, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: lighttpd does not pull OpenSSL dependency References: <201610252214.u9PME6br070248@gw.catspoiler.org> In-Reply-To: <201610252214.u9PME6br070248@gw.catspoiler.org> --E1VCrV1Ku6jWai3FqdsCpFTKlnowfK9vn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le 26/10/2016 =C3=A0 00:14, Don Lewis a =C3=A9crit : > Then the question is, if DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=3Dssl=3Dopenssl is not in > make.conf, then why is OpeSSL from ports installed? Nothing should > be depending on it. Well, the problem is that many ports have WITH_OPENSSL_PORT defined, so, something could have brought it along. I have a git branch changing it to WANT_OPENSSL_PORT that will mark the port IGNOREd if using base OpenSSL, I should commit it one day. Also, I'll change the default for ports from base to openssl, one day. --=20 Mathieu Arnold --E1VCrV1Ku6jWai3FqdsCpFTKlnowfK9vn-- --spdUWi9sWJ74DW3mILI1EOqVoxwQ4ca3J Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJYEG1RXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQzQUI2OTc4OUQyRUQxMjEwNjQ0MEJBNUIz QTQ1MTZGMzUxODNDRTQ4AAoJEDpFFvNRg85IRQIP/0aD53rfzbEAeJD9w9hMmAEx +uXdY2tWHIxIIf9iLI6kGsIuU3Ce9lzRJTwZhFYblqnHEUHZUnGpMotgc9YgaYTq DuqzUUeEKAn26s/+7PID+PoNDb5BwoxN/e7vritoDOYqDLX1BSIWjWQyh992OQJ3 XvIo+B8lJ5ohgDGQ0uuwtFC6Lp7c2BlFJ08nJlLrosIdIuKE+Jz7wN/OF5qrZMmF ncbmULLHdFkHSQZAVcjvXvuVeN+kUAiCZM0yLYKjZmfqXHGPXBe9r/4k6HA9Cm51 9nhPKxz1vSgtkDCG+8Bd3ejans4evdcRI4CGJaNlePOZCEZS5zbIKYbk0RHtLaIV w0QTjZ6n1DBre+aU37UTomC29TZS4RLEn6cjf+jjvn40t+8+cq83WWDtU/Pg6uYd yfrx7jRRs1K39NyZQw/Z1zE5ppHl4A/5FbdMhMPT910W3m3B9oZSE4zKzptXCS4g pqmHbyM2FKoBQgAEhrjNs3EKPJuaeQGehm9+Qt3SAFcybHDBjY4wOmvGO/marLWf B/RMEcyPUWkt2gyzbLBUD1ioAN3Dq5bvH0icStfeK7BGHWw2Y/v4qN0Iwx5/UJmU ZXfVLj4tnydsS5s3OFifGHkC48vuENuoSVBUls9tPgNVb/AU9gjC6NJRsZogNqQU 3pXzj71vAs/seNuO1+N5 =czRr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --spdUWi9sWJ74DW3mILI1EOqVoxwQ4ca3J-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Oct 26 10:18:20 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82B35C1EF1E for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:18:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7024D974 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:18:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 6CC10C1EF1C; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:18:20 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ABAFC1EF1B for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:18:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5307F973 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:18:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u9QAIKVb071984 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:18:20 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u9QAIKOB071983; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:18:20 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201610261018.u9QAIKOB071983@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:18:20 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:18:20 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ emulators/mame | 0.166 | mame0179 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ emulators/mess | 0.166 | mame0179 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ www/drupal7 | 7.50 | 7.51 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Oct 26 10:56:41 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96803C2083E for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:56:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x235.google.com (mail-wm0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 277D1D33 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:56:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x235.google.com with SMTP id e69so20537102wmg.0 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 03:56:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ti0bLhxTHrOGKVEj/i9BmO/+PFgsY3nMY8AaJAxZPC0=; b=E6DE/NQM8VCqWVLVAKtqAP0zdT8jvis8/Xh3ov9EKsolcwj/zbwxAe1AYcjofSbBr/ 5q2XlgheRY5Apb3kOdK7tEBLu+ql22nSBPcNigS49aiPX11wdevbVW0oyZ3G6G1s5NV2 h3WUsg6ZjqoTrI6rVM4DHCq98JKRHKwAj56KJtzisz3jL2kb9R4Qj3OcTYzDdl12sCNo 1oCr6JZVlDNxRtGK00Bn+mOpRzQJGF84diVQuUzeImA7BUql/tNi00vkeKOPRY9T5E9x K5DbEPbO5KLmvXWIvKe8cVgdohLHrB6NX3mfWevq4aJIVKoBoukC5bCChOGAbuJJd84U kCoA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ti0bLhxTHrOGKVEj/i9BmO/+PFgsY3nMY8AaJAxZPC0=; b=RT9GFE8L7RgF0bHwwyJ+jsYsBsDGQ3OHsHLh2CJkwoqpeTVLCt1VN4zSA0s842dp8f a/mhnlxBi4QyyxvCFApfPShdLpEcNFl3UxTn1UqgFIuuEV5RvRZC17JShnq41eJtQFy5 mAQPD2PIbkJ30FMLwUrbeLqG0cfYQxIArgZrL6GIoCFKt2vt1WB+wIv0V7NrZL3yGmPB 55sCOB0+p8/9d1hkQLTNaTXnDs6bG56/XKh8Pert9a3U6/qclM6Pp0bjg5NziNP/2pIn iYlWSiMM9AuJOHKTTpR6ndjicNqBS5QisvnldcawWgRsf6L436hcwnZLyQYZdtT3EzHD UAUg== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvf0cdC9B7co7vtIAGge1QLFbqXXZBeKa9PDnlDFbfuzjNnqwBitRaATMQqtYqtbBw== X-Received: by 10.28.94.139 with SMTP id s133mr2347616wmb.1.1477479399317; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 03:56:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.43.240] ([80.12.35.24]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p9sm1977912wjs.11.2016.10.26.03.56.38 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 26 Oct 2016 03:56:38 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Inconsistency? (was Re: misc/jive deleted) To: Kurt Jaeger References: <20161022161428.GA7234@lonesome.com> <201610232306.u9NN5qN0091649@fire.js.berklix.net> <20161024021013.GZ51420@home.opsec.eu> <731fbd25-7c43-f2b1-088a-59efa0a7f61d@jetcafe.org> <20161026073255.GF51420@home.opsec.eu> Cc: Dave Horsfall , FreeBSD Ports From: David Demelier Message-ID: <37a3a078-8e5b-aa86-6c9a-8df6a15df059@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 12:56:30 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161026073255.GF51420@home.opsec.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:56:41 -0000 On 10/26/2016 09:32 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >> I think unless FreeBSD makes explicit antichrist statement, there is >> no problem having a daemon mascot. I have never heard any religious >> problem so far. Or then I missed something. > Approx. 20 years ago (?), some FreeBSD developer with a old-style > logo on a t-shirt was asked to leave some saloon in Texas > because the logo suggested that they worship the antichrist. Brilliant ! :-) > There was a job (in rec.humor.funny?) about it 8-} > > That's why this reference to the demon logo is made 8-} > From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Oct 26 12:28:48 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A98FC2224B for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 12:28:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A533B19 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 12:28:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tz@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 36D57C2224A; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 12:28:48 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36833C22249 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 12:28:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from toco-domains.de (mail.toco-domains.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:150:50a5::6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04D19B18 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 12:28:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [0.0.0.0] (mail.toco-domains.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:150:50a5::6]) by toco-domains.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C84E31AAF01A; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 14:28:45 +0200 (CEST) To: ports@freebsd.org Cc: Franco Fichtner From: Torsten Zuehlsdorff Subject: WIP: lang/php71 Message-ID: <649d4fb3-4c40-cae4-867d-bbd3637e6ae4@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 14:28:45 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 12:28:48 -0000 Aloha, PHP 7.1 RC5 was released and it will hopefully not too far until the full release. Therefore i started some work on the new port. Sadly i haven't had much time in the last, so its not too much. Currently i just added lang/php71, pet portlint a little and test a little of the basics. Of course all 60+ extensions are missing, but i centered my affords at the core. It should be relatively easy to add them. If you want to test or participate you can use my ports-tree copy from GitLab: $ git clone https://github.com/t-zuehlsdorff/freebsd-ports $ git checkout php71 Feel free to add what you want and do a pull request! Greetings, Torsten From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Oct 26 12:52:15 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF73EC2283F for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 12:52:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shoesoft@gmx.net) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31FF7E8A for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 12:52:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shoesoft@gmx.net) Received: from walrus.pepperland ([81.217.70.96]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M4GRv-1cqvqP1xK7-00rofH for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 14:52:06 +0200 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Stefan Ehmann Subject: pkg query %q: abi vs. arch Message-ID: <778bbd93-223b-d9a7-2789-de618d725330@gmx.net> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 14:52:05 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Wp07iHpAkHFnoLPaOXx0FWvBFKCGnNaD0EvFOkUZKism0gCEu73 4vfJ5UOKPGNOtk9wnhxer1yhzSzpgBjG0MmfuVU2BCMjSRFYDmOD2W0edo5o3g3ce2pT1+I IK6TqQ2ULbrktsLUGVE75KYvgoQf0sh87qK5ozgTmP8iMVby0Neh6as2P6fubNxMLR1KToc QMzYsZikfpVWXbJsurPaQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:UjzBHqgjL8Y=:M1XxJ7zc5bUjPTmOxKWuYP 050bbHrTKpwX6vJFfSkiqmxMYyrteGjkmcwUUNBHGM+DjKOBzv3l0SkDyfvVM+Wq+M95r8rYA xdoRlHJITH5MWjLLeW0IJ6r1BdEr3Ih6VSL4zgMCRTrX7vFL69I0SNSVu9S1s679ByG3xZZar 116QdMi+xOPvza6re2blf3I/3WEICEVCmnpjzT7S8EdT2NXM/lteNE8Y66pmoKJockpMquZeY Ol4zMucrVMIPOEOeALRy+BnN4iQONXXctfqPQSpht+rcmm7eyhRd5oIE4ZBrah7kiavaZsmCs NXKqBw5OP+WH+OLXYItpu8HoaYxIpjUs2kLmhBTOIZUkxkITCKKt61OiVTkwH+VvUA1s/kvK/ fOIDDlDDKKRjUwk21Zb1RbHLkXaGv6XD2vCQ5e1TBDQVsMm+Xr1Dm4VAZn1Wj/PzL4u3FwH00 wJO0kNz0XaUATM8D6osdJjX2up5NX9FrbYjRSaHlNfLqgqyW43kr+vH4nisb5V9TOeLlqjImX vC08RqFWeAaiXftV1YOAbMKYWl59DLpPE3Dyl2WaEAvjBRdZ/pSPxtNLL2fbvxMWVE9tCmykO TWvHVA90KUFlT5sOUAHoef9xpSoPi8w2AyWif8/w44rJAudi9im7aCTedQgRDaEJYj5rVA9cm XF6hpLdVHs74Q3ZuzLonYXYzgoTBbulroXd2KWLW6iw4R0pyCzEPbALh9Y6tGpCrehGJzr0Kk 0CQWtHMfjOH10lf8I6GNew726MM/hD0Y/h2Xz3Azl6nM7Fyt4xa37lEcG1u2xTdJ/gn++bALg 1xgsiz2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 12:52:15 -0000 pkg query doesn't work as expected: #pkg query -e '%q = freebsd:10:x86:64' '%o: %q' # pkg query -e '%q = FreeBSD:10:amd64' '%o: %q' dns/adns: freebsd:10:x86:64 ... It seems '%q' means abi for evaluations, but arch for queries. # pkg info -R adns ... abi = "FreeBSD:10:amd64"; arch = "freebsd:10:x86:64"; ... According to the man page it should be Architecture in both cases. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Oct 26 13:44:19 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29B6BC221DC for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 13:44:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk0-x22b.google.com (mail-vk0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D80D89F7; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 13:44:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vk0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id w72so4454924vke.6; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 06:44:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=eQrH8A8o+KcM6iGTk9aacCvSrmil689U1N8y6KEJvH4=; b=Xoi3xbP1Ku/gW/EBIfS8JcH2k3+0qNtHplPKvO2ENi/J6IlOeEqEWqtE8QyutPFJSV oQLUmNtrdli1W6kvW4y5Q1c5SgLt6261cy+/4wRn7RkJ29PCKjjM2Bs+KhRfXDYWWRCe UNna7J0zLfoZCsT5fVnq3IC7ZFgDvLVmRPyFaIfQITJK43oE1UlHLvbOpVGXHtatGYA1 2yiuWGkkY57kuuQgS05WNwFoAATc2V1ETy4gzrt1xQbvsDhfze5n5wY3H1Z0R2ZCOzf+ VMm/6geRIMmQBx31AGYhjdC+z6NFmw1vSZQRCGvyqSOvMOCt4Op1ilrIBZfmMGC4hQGS yZfA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=eQrH8A8o+KcM6iGTk9aacCvSrmil689U1N8y6KEJvH4=; b=AxiN0W+U2uhgj3o9lauUhDBoK73Uc8keGff3bX1BZ7uAJyyPhIhF6nKqOcE2il//2G 431cDwQ2eUOLDCFzDndxK03jjeLxPCWkGJApsiCid6qmMacihsCGf4DEES/IhAAyRE+c t01uUNFGr8AB0dHEQ4zlRnT6knQSRr/9b6ex3+V/KDT5IBdAZZhX2wQYnYt6EDq6Iliy dG9BmLGx+wBPyGr1iKZ1Bn5xaM+v94vfRPbLJBO8eunE2wJL3Oc8Y+f1wEsJQ9ecf7Ts GLBaUuoKYvfU+Nw459XEYJGkB44qVvLrjcjhxpfmze5+97TbHZ8YhKoxknDmHGkLECkt csFg== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvd+6XjxsuxoyIPyJckgcSDcCO0ZtuaZaM9PrxhH//Iz5fes0XaVgfgGSw4TmlleP4x5330Ann7ASEs7iA== X-Received: by 10.31.41.134 with SMTP id p128mr1094601vkp.68.1477489458063; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 06:44:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.9.196 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 06:44:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201610252214.u9PME6br070248@gw.catspoiler.org> From: David Demelier Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 15:44:17 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: lighttpd does not pull OpenSSL dependency To: Mathieu Arnold Cc: Don Lewis , mad@madpilot.net, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 13:44:19 -0000 2016-10-26 10:46 GMT+02:00 Mathieu Arnold : > Le 26/10/2016 =C3=A0 00:14, Don Lewis a =C3=A9crit : >> Then the question is, if DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=3Dssl=3Dopenssl is not in >> make.conf, then why is OpeSSL from ports installed? Nothing should >> be depending on it. > > Well, the problem is that many ports have WITH_OPENSSL_PORT defined, so, > something could have brought it along. I have a git branch changing it > to WANT_OPENSSL_PORT that will mark the port IGNOREd if using base > OpenSSL, I should commit it one day. > > Also, I'll change the default for ports from base to openssl, one day. I can help if needed. --=20 Demelier David From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Oct 26 20:15:03 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25AF0C2383E for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 20:15:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@m.jwh.me.uk) Received: from mail.zorins.co.uk (mail.zorins.co.uk [91.121.236.227]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8C36644 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 20:15:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@m.jwh.me.uk) Received: from jwhlaptop (unknown [185.100.249.0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mail@m.jwh.me.uk) by mail.zorins.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3t41Qp2YWMzFVSy; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 20:12:34 +0000 (UTC) From: "Joe Holden" To: "'Christian Weisgerber'" , References: <2E32FD64-2BF6-46CE-BAD2-39AF82E29E33@ellael.org> <56E1BA30.7090306@utanet.at> <010201d1ec8d$b1e53ef0$15afbcd0$@m.jwh.me.uk> In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: openntpd-5.7p4_2,2 depends on libressl-2.2.6 ?! Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 21:12:33 +0100 Message-ID: <01b001d22fc5$49cb78e0$dd626aa0$@m.jwh.me.uk> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AQIvN6KS+vQqJRmLmemR+74/UWObWgFPTjLKAP0Ko50Cc/SUgZ/bFphQ Content-Language: en-gb X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 20:15:03 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > ports@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Christian Weisgerber > Sent: 09 August 2016 15:18 > To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: openntpd-5.7p4_2,2 depends on libressl-2.2.6 ?! > > On 2016-08-02, "Joe Holden" wrote: > > > That is not a fix since it breaks at least nginx in the official repo, > > because nginx depends on openssl and openntpd depends on libre. > > > > Either the entire tree should move to a library supported by everything, or > > the openntpd port gets split into meta packages so that we don't need to > > return to a stage where everyone is building ports. > > > > Was this not even considered or tested? > > I put the blame on the people who thought it a good idea to have > FIVE only partially compatible SSL libraries in the tree: OpenSSL > in base, openssl, openssl-devel, libressl, libressl-devel. > Yes, it is a ridiculous situation but since there appears to be zero coordination between ports committers, probably expected. > Bernard Spil (brnrd) has worked hard on moving the entire tree to > LibreSSL, but the political will is missing. > > Like other software coming out of OpenBSD, OpenNTPD now requires > libtls for its https functionality. That's a new library with a > new API that doesn't exist in OpenSSL. The constraints check is a > standard feature of OpenNTPD. If you run OpenNTPD, you expect it > to be available. I have no intention of disabling this by default > and it requires libtls. > Breaking existing install bases because of an *optional* feature is really a shitty attitude, it is not OpenBSD, therefore does not need feature parity - it is a *port* of OpenNNTPD, by your logic I should be able to use rdomains in software ported from OpenBSD yes? While we're here, PF is from OpenBSD so I expect it to be the same as 6.0. > > (Cc naddy) > > Sorry, I somehow didn't get this. > > -- > Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Oct 26 20:26:58 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67D18C23A60 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 20:26:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [192.108.105.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.soaustin.net", Issuer "StartCom Class 2 IV Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37931D7C for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 20:26:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from lonesome.com (bones.soaustin.net [192.108.105.22]) by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2548927D3; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 15:26:49 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 15:26:48 -0500 From: Mark Linimon To: Joe Holden Cc: 'Christian Weisgerber' , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openntpd-5.7p4_2,2 depends on libressl-2.2.6 ?! Message-ID: <20161026202647.GA25050@lonesome.com> References: <2E32FD64-2BF6-46CE-BAD2-39AF82E29E33@ellael.org> <56E1BA30.7090306@utanet.at> <010201d1ec8d$b1e53ef0$15afbcd0$@m.jwh.me.uk> <01b001d22fc5$49cb78e0$dd626aa0$@m.jwh.me.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <01b001d22fc5$49cb78e0$dd626aa0$@m.jwh.me.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 20:26:58 -0000 On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 09:12:33PM +0100, Joe Holden wrote: > Yes, it is a ridiculous situation but since there appears to be zero > coordination between ports committers, probably expected. Thank you for making sure my motivation to work on fixing things stays at a nice, zero, level. You *do* know it is harder to fix things and coordinate with people rather than just bitch, correct? mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Oct 26 20:35:42 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84B66C23F61 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 20:35:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@m.jwh.me.uk) Received: from mail.zorins.co.uk (mail.zorins.co.uk [91.121.236.227]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 526DC7AE for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 20:35:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@m.jwh.me.uk) Received: from jwhlaptop (unknown [185.100.249.0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mail@m.jwh.me.uk) by mail.zorins.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3t41xR5yjGzFVSy; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 20:35:39 +0000 (UTC) From: "Joe Holden" To: "'Mark Linimon'" Cc: "'Christian Weisgerber'" , References: <2E32FD64-2BF6-46CE-BAD2-39AF82E29E33@ellael.org> <56E1BA30.7090306@utanet.at> <010201d1ec8d$b1e53ef0$15afbcd0$@m.jwh.me.uk> <01b001d22fc5$49cb78e0$dd626aa0$@m.jwh.me.uk> <20161026202647.GA25050@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <20161026202647.GA25050@lonesome.com> Subject: RE: openntpd-5.7p4_2,2 depends on libressl-2.2.6 ?! Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 21:35:39 +0100 Message-ID: <000901d22fc8$83f0d990$8bd28cb0$@m.jwh.me.uk> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AQIvN6KS+vQqJRmLmemR+74/UWObWgFPTjLKAP0Ko50Cc/SUgQFWfXrzAlNn692fvc6DQA== Content-Language: en-gb X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 20:35:42 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > ports@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Mark Linimon > Sent: 26 October 2016 21:27 > To: Joe Holden > Cc: 'Christian Weisgerber' ; freebsd- > ports@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: openntpd-5.7p4_2,2 depends on libressl-2.2.6 ?! > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 09:12:33PM +0100, Joe Holden wrote: > > Yes, it is a ridiculous situation but since there appears to be zero > > coordination between ports committers, probably expected. > > Thank you for making sure my motivation to work on fixing things stays > at a nice, zero, level. > Sorry, bad phrasing and much generalisation - most people are sensible. > You *do* know it is harder to fix things and coordinate with people > rather than just bitch, correct? > Quite, unfortunately easier said than done when any spare time that could be used to try and fix stuff is spent patching up existing things to make them work. > mcl > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Oct 26 20:48:10 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A8E8C2224D for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 20:48:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias.andree@gmx.de) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF347DCC for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 20:48:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias.andree@gmx.de) Received: from mandree.no-ip.org ([78.48.110.173]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MFgxF-1c4jvH425N-00Eg0A for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 22:48:07 +0200 Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost6.localdomain6 [IPv6:::1]) by apollo.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C911323CE75 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 22:48:05 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Portmaster still be dissin' jive,bros To: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" References: <20161024153814.Y4005-100000@main.put.com> From: Matthias Andree Message-ID: Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 22:48:05 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161024153814.Y4005-100000@main.put.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:uM6dNFpiWYePO3vyge0nlG6tiiUF4cgC+sJzjcnlfCCSWa0lDk7 ZAxFSR35cTHyiJdlL7i+E8s+lZjoe60kmoDl04rPFvnJZAzrDj/zuiXR/eWLitee6QU3jM5 c35JW0WkbjHoapd3TsaoTP5v0+C6KZXiyXi1gswi0C0lzoT5+0/kQTJg2OjgdoGqrP8hy5t goWxZ6tZaocIaHtt2bchA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:NpQafx8QuRE=:RoMxoADDFf/wHXYMVBVXy2 F5IWlyVVkuT+4sDFkUyhA6AQWwAPJx71CZBQVcFqIkgeP2UPnbuax01RDhq52Ce8MOrJJ/9by PwLLUqq/JcKY+rzZSrtpk73Ge/tz5khtb9U8+8Ncix6WDZAHJ7XGvNDH42GKIWB1dRj8xirgt s+5vbV+RSd+SaMKzZP/x6u0TY1V/yzwJCGY496ZHYKsykpLGRRdbTIBgdeJBEnOMQ01WG1ME/ fj/OtJOCJfvH6IF174PJUFI23b7NhGrNCu4RuiR8EtP/qL91F1MAmLEMY8lstuNTD/66hvhIA +gHLB/WrKV8kphaJV2xMZXkUXjkvoGA82On7FAQCwaZTajP9lxweY8MKv0fYzdG8AHgBuDk37 l40njGtu4CUTGj2azoHi0jSvrt8BZ0drc3h4UnMDwC0A8V+jm2vEH7wNVSb5LfCR4nB6eenw3 dihJA2oBjl428Xubc5OHDuKc7ayb4B+uCqO7E170H/NZhWacOlzr2UZhnB5GXigQLVBOY8lok 97lkxQYApyNI5zTGgY+YdxwKs4RzeeN1VQz4GDnkd0kbONSrv0Z3KtWzL351Cca0t59omk7IO JBqskYt+yyhb6fJEmyu3BMP5n0OxoDrtSadgz4rfeyxWJVrjDYFBoRCVoODhSyAHriaU9qW/O OTeZ9ZSWorzbwm6taCYVxXoARUBjBLdgqiQ1s3AEt3hwh0lJqmZ9tbcYua1vXPgq16I8Rddzg 2sIwUaC6JtlLXWB8hNii6Fxq9zgvgXAP9gb/ATrWjHe6uYRLSgAvzo38bY/j9ckuvxTfwvcM2 Q2gG4b7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 20:48:10 -0000 Am 24.10.2016 um 21:42 schrieb Louis Epstein: > The technical issue persists that I can not update via portmaster because > I installed misc/jive out of sheer curiosity over its unprecedented MOVED > message. workarounds wirth trying - but untested (alternative): 1. pkg delete -fy jive 2. run portmaster with an explicit set of ports, for instance in bash (other shells may not grok the POSIX $(...) ) portmaster -d $(pkg version -Ivl\<| cut -f1 -d\< | xargs pkg info -qo) or: bash -c 'portmaster -d $(pkg version -Ivl\<| cut -f1 -d\< | xargs pkg info -qo)' From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Oct 26 20:49:42 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C573CC222C3 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 20:49:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias.andree@gmx.de) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25CB3E8C for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 20:49:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias.andree@gmx.de) Received: from mandree.no-ip.org ([78.48.110.173]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LqV4f-1cU93X05dB-00e5Fm for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 22:49:34 +0200 Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost6.localdomain6 [IPv6:::1]) by apollo.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3997D23CE75 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 22:49:33 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Jive prejudices To: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" References: <20161023124730.H69026-100000@main.put.com> From: Matthias Andree Message-ID: Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 22:49:33 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161023124730.H69026-100000@main.put.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:f2dnNuHWqk99plKgd/36jHXVqGQV038PcwUR60iCRF/zS265uYx SRG8R8Qf8KM/p3xhR+LQjjOR1NwZr+ueYoIWu4OQ/QPrh3zafXG2CRgV+Sb+PdAwfVCu/x6 WdT+PRwOKPIs4Vua2WCTAlVTZnbfqtNh+kyF3k+7FdNjN6i840fPUf6ufN1AHqRY2vOgKsw dnTTKlgHWvykzkQgzEDvg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:SnG6JnuVNBg=:yhGBzKnIzQ0FhRSZF9+Or8 7/scd/VkxyOs15Y3pJO33RH2bYh2ci3eT0jadbfOL9Nu8PDu5x7ZtDUlOSiUATunovkBG9o8I mimt+07bH1RY/z1NwOcEM40qcKBUMKGps4REKqJ5CL8U1nXrNrwWdgGzEdhJU32sG16q4OyVA TD5g6JldMqDK3cRIwl8L3DMkC1b1V3o6MP8CNZK2NWv6DDeFayYtjMJdt8T8s9rg6ZP4ndl7k IrG8/jGHCA8Zvzl6xy3NFyGMsj24UZ1GPkfLKNNZzYSHInFcvtcUr4JbmmZJHAHvN8QNSBgQU qS8kKJD+UUOTOvM+gFlLK6pl50DFnlAYs93iK7Kz0bZ7/w2PgciA5bV0jRk9Mqs95wQT8Azys 5E1ptdTSNGO7dwwJNDkAn13qtecNo0vrT1m0HVpUp3g3TSYc+HHYqhpjEJ4HrMnmB5ge8ySNh RarnImH94I1FDwfO8tpRv0Qn0Q+eNNQ+q+vKQjqR3hWJ2tEmkDJRy33kuevtjeMbdSDMdmZgC T8NmQDtK3bMvvoXVzbgaoaySf3T0rQJ1I3h4ReYiF6oyQuUSVUQg2XQmMA0IQwewWeD7PJ7UM ykpr6dmkTo8WJvr8pJy4TiQuJ37Q3BW7w8gEmq7isv8M6+qchBZ1a9wZ6WImL/EbBEMl5KMhX wStumwcqVmq6K9sl5E6ewmtTnkF8186K5pOI4B4aXE5JY8oPa5+/mIkrRy2dvlYjp5M2OAhMK o1r29Ygv/ULjTAcFcuZSkoamSUssdfGLIIywIFrAeJk+zKtkPL+9s1Z12GpRwgdDBCtUJC/i8 K4nFUrG X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 20:49:42 -0000 Am 23.10.2016 um 18:49 schrieb Louis Epstein: > > On Sun, 23 Oct 2016, Alphons van Werven wrote: > >> Louis Epstein wrote: >> >>> In any event,portmaster -a -i updates now abort because misc/jive is >>> detected on my system. >>> >>> This goes beyond "We will no longer provide this application" to >>> "we will no longer let you upgrade your applications as long as you >>> have this one installed". >> To be fair, I strongly doubt this is deliberate policy. >> >> Portmaster itself is a port too. When pkg(7) hit the streets and other >> sweeping changes were made to the ports infrastructure, Portmaster had to >> be updated and that might still be an ongoing process. In any case, Port- >> master needs *some* way of dealing with broken(*) ports and I can imagine >> that this can get tricky when dependencies are involved. From the looks of >> it, Portmaster just takes the easy way out and simply bails completely >> when it encounters a broken port. > Does it matter that I installed it with pkg rather than portmaster or make > install? Irrelevant. No matter how a port got installed, they all end up being registered with and managed by pkg(7). From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Oct 26 23:01:59 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 252F3C23136 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 23:01:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dewaynegeraghty@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi0-x234.google.com (mail-oi0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E009CD3B for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 23:01:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dewaynegeraghty@gmail.com) Received: by mail-oi0-x234.google.com with SMTP id i127so17091284oia.2 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 16:01:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=fDfdrZ/o1KrbhulB53GuIp0XI7we6YPwl7zmk2PH5yE=; b=rvrE0Iqm4DFQT/DlHhfMvKvozulpvi9UjtKmacZqjCg365CnMcVkbGHDD3yHHr0YRq IfP1wqFhPJnhmXJpuEMSCSOMrWJNDzGmf+a7y3Shcfl+HaNAFWwuDwUR3ly52AL03rdp L7/7XG43wRusCup6jdSIL1vI6hXdfABv3kEcM2VcvuqaurPhRtTxbzj95a3yn7deGaCu CgvA4H6755p4nQcIFutpNZxshlvz2nE1/l2KsTTwHbohFvBRqi1Tv3ALWGWqeMxgUToE 2OQZGaSMpAYO96vj7O40/boGjAxUDXenwCl97KQFFqlMPUDIuWNV6/4PlsAhihri+u4c KkeQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=fDfdrZ/o1KrbhulB53GuIp0XI7we6YPwl7zmk2PH5yE=; b=auayCxARteu3QVyjqGQPcVeMw+GLsT1ySJuKAuzaJTt+H1ltSlGH95c1iLJjPHbZZ9 aXzRdrLOgHfd+I5i/doIPhlKMukwJfHiy/+Kc8yf0EdL+fqha5dQ03GbH7Zrbmc1VOw2 hbqNpeYFfw9CQDETe3/f/tL9fxXY+9iwUUIPWpdJVLgMAUS1vPexSytI4mJByjKkAkNd +MAaufjXNOkXoPyQD48Iha1m4E9c2QurnZOXnP5qD2OoDIiqasFElINFvOhacc+dpjks AaOJEVkBeujDTtzpD7JE1EYamakVYc0y5E6UYAsTyxFSCMkkHgBQFOrF+aSdmwXaDKfJ 0Xmw== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvc5AmL3/gCOzzIxb1YdxSerVjex4ByXV+ARkU2F2J1zMsZIuE57yZUbv4UNBgV/tM/7ff+xUcNrZOvFAA== X-Received: by 10.107.137.84 with SMTP id l81mr4540073iod.63.1477522917832; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 16:01:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.79.14.17 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 16:01:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Dewayne Geraghty Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 10:01:27 +1100 Message-ID: Subject: Problem with gcc5 std library when building ports To: ports-list freebsd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 23:01:59 -0000 Have spent a couple of days trying to build around 800 ports with gcc5. This one has me stumped! Can anyone help regarding the apparant absence of snprintf from std? Am I missing something, perhaps LDCONFIG or? I've looked in /usr/ports/Mk/ bsd.gcc.mk and /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk but this is an area that I'm unfamiliar, so nothing really stood out. If I change the compiler from gcc5 to clang everything compiles and runs correctly. I have in /etc/make.conf USE_GCC= 5 and to use clang, I just comment out the above. So everything is constant, on FreeBSD 10.3Stable (updated and rebuilt overnight) For example: /usr/ports/devel/jsoncpp (but many share this problem) g++5 -o buildscons/linux-gcc-FreeBSD/src/lib_json/json_reader.o -c -O2 -pipe -DOPENSSL_NO_SSL2 -DOPENSSL_NO_SSL3 -g0 -ggdb0 -DSTRIP_FBSDID -UDEBUGGING -UDEBUG -march=c3-2 -mtune=c3-2 -Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc5 -fno-strict-aliasing --std=c++11 -Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc5 -Iinclude src/lib_json/json_reader.cpp src/lib_json/json_reader.cpp: In member function 'std::__cxx11::string Json::Reader::getLocationLineAndColumn(Json::Reader::Location) const': src/lib_json/json_reader.cpp:34:18: error: 'snprintf' is not a member of 'std' #define snprintf std::snprintf And for completeness: # ldconfig -r | grep -E "gcc|\+" search directories: /lib:/usr/lib:/usr/lib/compat:/usr/local/lib:/usr/local/lib/gcc5:/usr/local/lib/heimdal:/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.20/mach/CORE 35:-lgcc_s.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 38:-lc++.1 => /usr/lib/libc++.so.1 126:-lcc1.0 => /usr/local/lib/gcc5/libcc1.so.0 127:-lgcc_s.1 => /usr/local/lib/gcc5/libgcc_s.so.1 128:-lstdc++.6 => /usr/local/lib/gcc5/libstdc++.so.6 129:-lcilkrts.5 => /usr/local/lib/gcc5/libcilkrts.so.5 130:-lssp.0 => /usr/local/lib/gcc5/libssp.so.0 131:-lquadmath.0 => /usr/local/lib/gcc5/libquadmath.so.0 132:-lgfortran.3 => /usr/local/lib/gcc5/libgfortran.so.3 133:-lobjc.4 => /usr/local/lib/gcc5/libobjc.so.4 134:-lgomp.1 => /usr/local/lib/gcc5/libgomp.so.1 135:-lgomp-plugin-host_nonshm.1 => /usr/local/lib/gcc5/libgomp-plugin-host_nonshm.so.1 136:-litm.1 => /usr/local/lib/gcc5/libitm.so.1 137:-latomic.1 => /usr/local/lib/gcc5/libatomic.so.1 Regards, Dewayne From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Oct 27 05:03:47 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F8BFC22755 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 05:03:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk0-x22b.google.com (mail-vk0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 077DDCC7 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 05:03:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vk0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id c126so6319485vkd.1 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 22:03:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=DdezXr7VwiLzy8z54ZyI7SeY6Esl33R8iyF0Ulgy9mc=; b=XFEJgRgJf8ifTXd84sprvrf9cOznmYY0Y6ULam7i47ZPKMfOxSz+QO7EhORt5/Q0a9 YkPAaU593bMROhbcAcXSo5WtR7qaSWrFbnKTyyhYrXaInKva8PCL1wInIwJjd54gxlL5 MUst29MC4L1vueAoaeM7SLIxybXxbvJnAz78iHmoSTptOaduWf2MsGB5UaXmkoFtVD0O GLwJK7rjVd+uSSZ8VJVMw676CJHl3a6h0z7toEa6okg9XG/NFbwlBBtLmuTbkX3aJAej d1aLVBF0IHA7Lvn74N0R26RtR9wAtd+uoLT/RCf/yCeD2pO/my5UtLcGCCjFkwMtn1Fi Jkgw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=DdezXr7VwiLzy8z54ZyI7SeY6Esl33R8iyF0Ulgy9mc=; b=gUM/oSdiMTPsxcsGDlBtWij5gHw118J9vxo3gL7DvptaunG7Y/rb1Ud3kQwhN/tkBQ srnVcG/EtP17aZuS2R3c3sDtgjnhOHHWURbAtb0Qp4DcCC7duPvFKVzJTeenU5OuPILV 40SDIJ6lf/OhpiOTjNUw60A4TFBUACk7izwB2W60c63c5CX1T4iOSNXbGtbXJqn8BmVP 82o2RGcPk1ZYnwxED5dLInkjrpCf+kZ9uOPEJZJV92OmNzJ0Kwo7ZomH83c071+qpoiu AaYLjKRlT1sgDw8jN27ydpJcO0a86D8lS8wLx8cNxJWK3DBKyFnZkOazfV+UPaT0ccfc 9ZAQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvfbjzvweLWt7BZ8tSM1jz1ZF/0fKepF51AoArRC7bufTgdeo9q3SnWGtZn2NUbd0Fr01hQ9TIf3acbwLA== X-Received: by 10.31.188.67 with SMTP id m64mr4503782vkf.155.1477544626220; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 22:03:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.103.90.133 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 22:03:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20161024153814.Y4005-100000@main.put.com> From: Kevin Oberman Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 22:03:45 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5DXyUQMjIw_N_R2YYHgbkeL3aao Message-ID: Subject: Re: Portmaster still be dissin' jive,bros To: Matthias Andree Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 05:03:47 -0000 On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 24.10.2016 um 21:42 schrieb Louis Epstein: > > The technical issue persists that I can not update via portmaster because > > I installed misc/jive out of sheer curiosity over its unprecedented MOVED > > message. > workarounds wirth trying - but untested (alternative): > > 1. pkg delete -fy jive > > 2. run portmaster with an explicit set of ports, for instance in bash > (other shells may not grok the POSIX $(...) ) > portmaster -d $(pkg version -Ivl\<| cut -f1 -d\< | xargs pkg info -qo) > or: bash -c 'portmaster -d $(pkg version -Ivl\<| cut -f1 -d\< | xargs > pkg info -qo)' > I have tested this and it works. First, don;t delete anything you want to keep. It.s not relevant. # make -C /usr/ports fetchindex (or get it in any ot the several other ways including building from scratch (slow).) # pkg version -vL= I do these steps in periodic every night. I also do 'svn up /usr/ports' in the periodic script, but you can also just update the out-of-date ports with 'svn up /usr/ports/class/port' for the ports listed as needing updating, Then run portmaster with the list of ports from the pkg above marked with '<' as needing update. Also note any marked '?' and take appropriate action. I quit doing 'portmaster -a' because it took so long to scan through all ports, but it also solves you problem. (portmaster may now be using the index and -a may not take so long.) -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Oct 27 05:47:17 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FCB0C222D5 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 05:47:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joneum@bsdproject.de) Received: from dd36626.kasserver.com (dd36626.kasserver.com [85.13.153.106]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 574A57D0 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 05:47:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joneum@bsdproject.de) Received: from dagobert.home.jochen-neumeister.de (p548945BC.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.137.69.188]) by dd36626.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8137B2E00A91 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 07:47:07 +0200 (CEST) To: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" From: Jochen Neumeister Subject: make makepatch Message-ID: <730bd5a8-d6c2-7e8f-5240-b7d4b6209884@bsdproject.de> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 07:47:06 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 05:47:17 -0000 I will update the net/wpa_gui. # portlint WARN: /usr/home/joneum/dev/ports/net/wpa_gui/files/patch-wpa_ctrl.c: patch was not generated using ``make makepatch''. It is recommended to use ``make makepatch'' when you need to [re-]generate a patch to ensure proper patch format. 0 fatal errors and 1 warning found. okay, i use "make makepatch", and copy the files from "work/.makepatch-tmp/archived-patches" to the "/files" folder, and start portlint. But, the same. what am i doing wrong? Cheers Jochen From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Oct 27 05:50:17 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F36D8C223A3 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 05:50:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de) Received: from host64.shmhost.net (unknown [IPv6:2a01:4f8:a0:51d6::108:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBB42982 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 05:50:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de) Received: from francos-mbp.homeoffice.local (ipservice-092-217-062-255.092.217.pools.vodafone-ip.de [92.217.62.255]) by host64.shmhost.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 995CC83AC4; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 07:50:15 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\)) Subject: Re: make makepatch From: Franco Fichtner In-Reply-To: <730bd5a8-d6c2-7e8f-5240-b7d4b6209884@bsdproject.de> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 07:50:15 +0200 Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: <730bd5a8-d6c2-7e8f-5240-b7d4b6209884@bsdproject.de> To: Jochen Neumeister X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at host64.shmhost.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 05:50:18 -0000 Hi Jochen, > On 27 Oct 2016, at 7:47 AM, Jochen Neumeister wrote: > > what am i doing wrong? Doesn't makepatch already place the new patches in files/? Cheers, Franco From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Oct 27 05:53:35 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1E1FC2252E for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 05:53:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joneum@bsdproject.de) Received: from dd36626.kasserver.com (dd36626.kasserver.com [85.13.153.106]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C506C7A for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 05:53:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joneum@bsdproject.de) Received: from dagobert.home.jochen-neumeister.de (p548945BC.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.137.69.188]) by dd36626.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7E99F2E0077C; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 07:53:33 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: make makepatch To: Franco Fichtner References: <730bd5a8-d6c2-7e8f-5240-b7d4b6209884@bsdproject.de> Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" From: Jochen Neumeister Message-ID: <6a431a63-7692-a667-5fa2-4de3d55d5189@bsdproject.de> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 07:53:33 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 05:53:35 -0000 On 27.10.2016 07:50, Franco Fichtner wrote: > Hi Jochen, > >> On 27 Oct 2016, at 7:47 AM, Jochen Neumeister wrote: >> >> what am i doing wrong? > Doesn't makepatch already place the new patches in files/? > No, make makepatch delete the patches into /files and: # make makepatch The previous patches have been placed here: /usr/home/joneum/dev/ports/net/wpa_gui/work/.makepatch-tmp/archived-patches Cheers Jochen From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Oct 27 06:08:54 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAFC7C227D9 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 06:08:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de) Received: from host64.shmhost.net (unknown [IPv6:2a01:4f8:a0:51d6::108:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5E65E3 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 06:08:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de) Received: from francos-mbp.homeoffice.local (ipservice-092-217-062-255.092.217.pools.vodafone-ip.de [92.217.62.255]) by host64.shmhost.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 101E783A9A; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:08:53 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\)) Subject: Re: make makepatch From: Franco Fichtner In-Reply-To: <6a431a63-7692-a667-5fa2-4de3d55d5189@bsdproject.de> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:08:53 +0200 Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1FA8BED7-A46D-43B8-AE74-C99229350352@lastsummer.de> References: <730bd5a8-d6c2-7e8f-5240-b7d4b6209884@bsdproject.de> <6a431a63-7692-a667-5fa2-4de3d55d5189@bsdproject.de> To: Jochen Neumeister X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at host64.shmhost.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 06:08:55 -0000 > On 27 Oct 2016, at 7:53 AM, Jochen Neumeister wrote: > > No, make makepatch delete the patches into /files and: If there are no patches in files/ maybe you have no patches applied in the work/ dir? Does running "make patch" before makepatch help? Cheers, Franco From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Oct 27 06:20:32 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F2D5C22B95 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 06:20:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E775C9B3 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 06:20:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1bze3B-000GZW-3M; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:20:29 +0200 Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:20:29 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Jochen Neumeister Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: make makepatch Message-ID: <20161027062029.GG51420@home.opsec.eu> References: <730bd5a8-d6c2-7e8f-5240-b7d4b6209884@bsdproject.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <730bd5a8-d6c2-7e8f-5240-b7d4b6209884@bsdproject.de> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 06:20:32 -0000 Hi! > # portlint > WARN: /usr/home/joneum/dev/ports/net/wpa_gui/files/patch-wpa_ctrl.c: > patch was not generated using ``make makepatch''. It is recommended to > use ``make makepatch'' when you need to [re-]generate a patch to ensure > proper patch format. > 0 fatal errors and 1 warning found. > > okay, i use "make makepatch", and copy the files from > "work/.makepatch-tmp/archived-patches" to the "/files" folder, and start > portlint. But, the same. > > what am i doing wrong? make makepatch places the corrected files into files/ and the prevision version to work/.makepatch-tmp/archived-patches. So, I'd suggest: make patch make makepatch mv work work.old portlint -AC and if portlint is silent, and all the necessary patches are in files/, you're done. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Oct 27 06:21:38 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25293C22D28 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 06:21:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from c.brinkhaus@t-online.de) Received: from mailout09.t-online.de (mailout09.t-online.de [194.25.134.84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mailout00.t-online.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D842CBEA for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 06:21:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from c.brinkhaus@t-online.de) Received: from fwd35.aul.t-online.de (fwd35.aul.t-online.de [172.20.27.145]) by mailout09.t-online.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 921174273A5F; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:21:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from esprimo.local (Ekq4hBZfrh0lLNYBHG2z58U7t7tJwstpQkB3OCH1d87KRkeNYH56VJgBB3rMR6vgzR@[217.81.159.182]) by fwd35.t-online.de with (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) esmtp id 1bze4A-2vaKMi0; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:21:30 +0200 Received: from esprimo.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by esprimo.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D92F45CD8A; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:21:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from chris@localhost) by esprimo.local (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u9R6LTVS008811; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:21:29 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from chris) Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:21:29 +0200 From: Christoph Brinkhaus To: Jochen Neumeister Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: make makepatch Message-ID: <20161027062129.GA2491@esprimo.local> References: <730bd5a8-d6c2-7e8f-5240-b7d4b6209884@bsdproject.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <730bd5a8-d6c2-7e8f-5240-b7d4b6209884@bsdproject.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-ID: Ekq4hBZfrh0lLNYBHG2z58U7t7tJwstpQkB3OCH1d87KRkeNYH56VJgBB3rMR6vgzR X-TOI-MSGID: 68189b33-e483-4fb6-8202-e4e7641e4f3b X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 06:21:38 -0000 On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 07:47:06AM +0200, Jochen Neumeister wrote: Hello Jochen! > I will update the net/wpa_gui. > > # portlint > WARN: /usr/home/joneum/dev/ports/net/wpa_gui/files/patch-wpa_ctrl.c: > patch was not generated using ``make makepatch''. It is recommended to > use ``make makepatch'' when you need to [re-]generate a patch to ensure > proper patch format. > 0 fatal errors and 1 warning found. The proper way should be to restore the original file wpa_ctrl.c as wps.ctrl.orig. Then "make makepatch" has something to compare and should generate the patch file. > > okay, i use "make makepatch", and copy the files from > "work/.makepatch-tmp/archived-patches" to the "/files" folder, and start > portlint. But, the same. For verification if everything is fine you should clean up everything by "make clean". The port should be now as original, but with your additional patch file. Now portlint should accept the patch. I hope I mentioned everything. Kind regards, Christoph From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Oct 27 06:28:05 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51280C22E19 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 06:28:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joneum@bsdproject.de) Received: from dd36626.kasserver.com (dd36626.kasserver.com [85.13.153.106]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AA73DC9 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 06:28:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joneum@bsdproject.de) Received: from dagobert.home.jochen-neumeister.de (p548945BC.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.137.69.188]) by dd36626.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F37992E00A2E; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:28:02 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: make makepatch To: Franco Fichtner References: <730bd5a8-d6c2-7e8f-5240-b7d4b6209884@bsdproject.de> <6a431a63-7692-a667-5fa2-4de3d55d5189@bsdproject.de> <1FA8BED7-A46D-43B8-AE74-C99229350352@lastsummer.de> Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" From: Jochen Neumeister Message-ID: <61b51cd8-18d2-8f70-77c7-ed7dd92c4a0c@bsdproject.de> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:28:02 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1FA8BED7-A46D-43B8-AE74-C99229350352@lastsummer.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 06:28:05 -0000 On 27.10.2016 08:08, Franco Fichtner wrote: >> On 27 Oct 2016, at 7:53 AM, Jochen Neumeister wrote: >> >> No, make makepatch delete the patches into /files and: > If there are no patches in files/ maybe you have no patches applied > in the work/ dir? Does running "make patch" before makepatch help? > > Hm that is interesting. make patch: there are 3 patches into /file make makepatch: now the 3 files are removed, but: make makepatch Generated patch-wpagui.cpp The previous patches have been placed here: /usr/home/joneum/dev/ports/net/wpa_gui/work/.makepatch-tmp/archived-patches Now I'm confused. After "make patch" and "make makepatch", there is only one "new" patch in files: /home/joneum/dev/ports/net/wpa_gui/files # ls patch-wpagui.cpp pkg-message.in and in work/.makepatch-tmp/archived-patches: # ls patch-os_unix.c patch-wpa_ctrl.c patch-wpagui.cpp Is this now right, that i can only use the new patch in /files? With "make clean" i delete the work folder and the old patches. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Oct 27 06:30:53 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9923CC22F76 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 06:30:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de) Received: from host64.shmhost.net (unknown [IPv6:2a01:4f8:a0:51d6::108:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61300FC3 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 06:30:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de) Received: from francos-mbp.homeoffice.local (ipservice-092-217-062-255.092.217.pools.vodafone-ip.de [92.217.62.255]) by host64.shmhost.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C600F83AC9; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:30:51 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\)) Subject: Re: make makepatch From: Franco Fichtner In-Reply-To: <61b51cd8-18d2-8f70-77c7-ed7dd92c4a0c@bsdproject.de> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:30:52 +0200 Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: <730bd5a8-d6c2-7e8f-5240-b7d4b6209884@bsdproject.de> <6a431a63-7692-a667-5fa2-4de3d55d5189@bsdproject.de> <1FA8BED7-A46D-43B8-AE74-C99229350352@lastsummer.de> <61b51cd8-18d2-8f70-77c7-ed7dd92c4a0c@bsdproject.de> To: Jochen Neumeister X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at host64.shmhost.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 06:30:53 -0000 > On 27 Oct 2016, at 8:28 AM, Jochen Neumeister wrote: > > Is this now right, that i can only use the new patch in /files? With > "make clean" i delete the work folder and the old patches. If all the previous patches patch a single file, makepatch will generate the patch for the file, because it doesn't care about the ptch context, just the file. If you want, you can deconstruct the new patch file and push the individual chunks into their old files to silence portlint, but that only works if the patches do not depend on each other. Cheers, Franco From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Oct 27 08:28:27 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52EFEC23BA6 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:28:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40B1CEB0 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:28:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 401EFC23BA5; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:28:27 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FD03C23BA4 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:28:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3362BEAF for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:28:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u9R8SR1d095458 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:28:27 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u9R8SReF095457; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:28:27 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201610270828.u9R8SReF095457@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:28:27 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:28:27 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ net/p5-Net-Ping | 2.41 | 2.54 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Oct 27 08:33:24 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6839C23E2F for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:33:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from otacilio.neto@bsd.com.br) Received: from mail-vk0-x22a.google.com (mail-vk0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7154E2C3 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:33:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from otacilio.neto@bsd.com.br) Received: by mail-vk0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id d65so22809631vkg.0 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 01:33:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsd.com.br; s=capeta; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=HIbeuQj4kBZGmbGnJxPZBFBZCR9lpIEkwnR4rFhs4ec=; b=EnolhnQ21eEiTwxMLbQHAi5KTIEswlC49ge+ys9fig1w9glAsPw8j1W3z+BCVJI4Og QNG668hMQQ/o6J5BF+wHdOZaOWb+Jh6Wi7HmHygua+IkM9Lb4bzoJO57QxAZb9I9y/lb 2tEAEfWvmeY6lFMFBlqougPqotir6DsmpJ+WM= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HIbeuQj4kBZGmbGnJxPZBFBZCR9lpIEkwnR4rFhs4ec=; b=coC/OYwJ3MmkHmCvleBWzBIMO1unOZwQ2/DSYogslk8UPRcojY0tcKHGeZMdcX9fxN SKN/ldKHzrKVR0q32WrA/UCr2czLlApiVSH1oRe6H4/lG0Yk3PraW8T8SS35yd7e4Eyz lj6jkJpnpWx4SRC8vLEktV9scDuSphbvWH+nMFSjQkb+mHH+BNfw8CgFMmnn9Amz+8HL JVthNlPSVnpVv3CulPhoEj+o4KO3D6hUAVvBU0NwSjULBl5StUcflPST28Zdiq5ajTY9 DDH9W6stZmngDd4PwIbccvlzLfCiCb7Ia18yt717aRVyLhAFLrELHsrA9cVxB2U8PKh7 HEXw== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvd14NUIqKIh/gEod2a+BLkD5GD4Krh81hW0Tf6xjQ7r3RS3XfY1NjYNRx4PFRlx/t9gzllMOopBI3fxbQ== X-Received: by 10.31.84.130 with SMTP id i124mr4406119vkb.66.1477557203152; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 01:33:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <730bd5a8-d6c2-7e8f-5240-b7d4b6209884@bsdproject.de> <6a431a63-7692-a667-5fa2-4de3d55d5189@bsdproject.de> <1FA8BED7-A46D-43B8-AE74-C99229350352@lastsummer.de> <61b51cd8-18d2-8f70-77c7-ed7dd92c4a0c@bsdproject.de> In-Reply-To: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Otac=C3=ADlio_de_Ara=C3=BAjo_Ramos_Neto?= Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:33:12 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: make makepatch To: Franco Fichtner Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:33:24 -0000 Em qui, 27 de out de 2016 03:31, Franco Fichtner escreveu: > > > On 27 Oct 2016, at 8:28 AM, Jochen Neumeister > wrote: > > > > Is this now right, that i can only use the new patch in /files? With > > "make clean" i delete the work folder and the old patches. > > If all the previous patches patch a single file, makepatch will generate > the > patch for the file, because it doesn't care about the ptch context, just > the > file. > > If you want, you can deconstruct the new patch file and push the individual > chunks into their old files to silence portlint, but that only works if the > patches do not depend on each other. > > > Cheers, > Franco > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Here, the procedure that I use to make patches is the follow. If a previously patch to file that need be edited exists in files dir # make patch // do my modificativos #make makepatch If a previously patch to file that need be edited do not exists in files dir # make patch // to extracto and apply patches to others files # cp work/blabla/file wor/blabla/file.orig // do my modificativos # make makepatch So, a New patch is created in files dir In a hope that can help []'s -Otacilio > From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Oct 27 09:00:44 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88D29C225C7 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 09:00:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (prod2.absolight.net [79.143.243.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 273957CC; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 09:00:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E63FDBDCE3; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:00:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from atuin.in.mat.cc (atuin.in.mat.cc [79.143.241.205]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B2631BDCDE; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:00:40 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: lighttpd does not pull OpenSSL dependency To: David Demelier References: <201610252214.u9PME6br070248@gw.catspoiler.org> Cc: Don Lewis , mad@madpilot.net, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Mathieu Arnold Organization: Absolight / The FreeBSD Foundation Message-ID: <7fb24c94-1efa-d1b5-9028-8dec8330e543@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:00:39 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mwV4AgcVNbrT1auuOlhQbBO8MQiD5iuUC" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 09:00:44 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --mwV4AgcVNbrT1auuOlhQbBO8MQiD5iuUC Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="WSO0IUhAIaQj18n0dT1VaVm2bw0T65LE3"; protected-headers="v1" From: Mathieu Arnold To: David Demelier Cc: Don Lewis , mad@madpilot.net, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <7fb24c94-1efa-d1b5-9028-8dec8330e543@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: lighttpd does not pull OpenSSL dependency References: <201610252214.u9PME6br070248@gw.catspoiler.org> In-Reply-To: --WSO0IUhAIaQj18n0dT1VaVm2bw0T65LE3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le 26/10/2016 =C3=A0 15:44, David Demelier a =C3=A9crit : > 2016-10-26 10:46 GMT+02:00 Mathieu Arnold : >> Le 26/10/2016 =C3=A0 00:14, Don Lewis a =C3=A9crit : >>> Then the question is, if DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=3Dssl=3Dopenssl is not in >>> make.conf, then why is OpeSSL from ports installed? Nothing should >>> be depending on it. >> Well, the problem is that many ports have WITH_OPENSSL_PORT defined, s= o, >> something could have brought it along. I have a git branch changing it= >> to WANT_OPENSSL_PORT that will mark the port IGNOREd if using base >> OpenSSL, I should commit it one day. >> >> Also, I'll change the default for ports from base to openssl, one day.= > I can help if needed. Before changing the default, though, I need to change the way GSSAPI is handled, and create a DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=3Dgssapi=3D= and change all the ports with the USES=3Dgssapi that gives options to the= users. But I don't use all of that, so I need help figuring out which should be the default afterwards (it can't be base, because you can't mix base heimdal with non base openssl) --=20 Mathieu Arnold --WSO0IUhAIaQj18n0dT1VaVm2bw0T65LE3-- --mwV4AgcVNbrT1auuOlhQbBO8MQiD5iuUC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJYEcI4XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQzQUI2OTc4OUQyRUQxMjEwNjQ0MEJBNUIz QTQ1MTZGMzUxODNDRTQ4AAoJEDpFFvNRg85IOP0QAJfU2WgmuV1oEHNnFRaKT+hk uflpPzcIIBIQTGHMQSWx2vXAOdDqboCiI6FmjB9qk0CYYCjU+WLhq8gwrJxULHoz pBprDlCUsC0X348jYBvuHoFvmEsWpJDr5OxlMEN/1ca/HcHp+V+DQtIfJ7jGtSFk V2U7yt61kLXCrugcBWHIZ+W7gVswXqQIDuc92OfRuuMN2GbwlCuzvzxWPAaqmuJL ThFaG1SNCPHS6XlhqfRpIkzPRexmE0ohxJ1eyDKEVni6UFWsWmARSpLn22Yl+nW5 5h8LTxV31XDz8CDrHteDPDgpy9vxlRbrCwyqBhP0S1jHQMLc6dx8vcEQU7aQh3dv yNrz8jyA18w1YCJkZOSeF+nULF8vKLkimMI7I8i0QmOb3PD1ZorUzyeKWQGcX50K z1OnGPaPDgj9YxUeJ5TmDCrPz3Y9TrceF5DUT7fX2ZBxmgxX2ua+euMKGEZNtqkW C1N3TNmaU44NECYsgS/vZl3nt5z9goKnO/fTpx3cW9pcTT/kvfYeleXn1UqBWk+K 9KzNcTRiwsfdJpFaMnd71JBBpwxYxTSM/fLvlwgADFOQ4t3u3VsGFsleyQ3aoyCr Bx7U+TQFxH6uAESPOHC/+rw8Oyn251izAlqB8Iw/tFQq53g+Fm4KMQJutBRGf4qK FHrAHV2ZlE9MI7qZAK2n =x0Lz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mwV4AgcVNbrT1auuOlhQbBO8MQiD5iuUC-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Oct 27 09:17:41 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89C87C22ADE for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 09:17:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de) Received: from host64.shmhost.net (host64.kissl.de [213.239.241.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D23E1192; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 09:17:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de) Received: from francos-mbp.homeoffice.local (ipservice-092-217-062-255.092.217.pools.vodafone-ip.de [92.217.62.255]) by host64.shmhost.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2BA5883AC9; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:17:37 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\)) Subject: Re: lighttpd does not pull OpenSSL dependency From: Franco Fichtner In-Reply-To: <7fb24c94-1efa-d1b5-9028-8dec8330e543@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:17:35 +0200 Cc: David Demelier , Don Lewis , mad@madpilot.net, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <201610252214.u9PME6br070248@gw.catspoiler.org> <7fb24c94-1efa-d1b5-9028-8dec8330e543@FreeBSD.org> To: Mathieu Arnold X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at host64.shmhost.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 09:17:41 -0000 > On 27 Oct 2016, at 11:00 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: >=20 > Le 26/10/2016 =C3=A0 15:44, David Demelier a =C3=A9crit : >> 2016-10-26 10:46 GMT+02:00 Mathieu Arnold : >>> Le 26/10/2016 =C3=A0 00:14, Don Lewis a =C3=A9crit : >>>> Then the question is, if DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=3Dssl=3Dopenssl is not = in >>>> make.conf, then why is OpeSSL from ports installed? Nothing should >>>> be depending on it. >>> Well, the problem is that many ports have WITH_OPENSSL_PORT defined, = so, >>> something could have brought it along. I have a git branch changing = it >>> to WANT_OPENSSL_PORT that will mark the port IGNOREd if using base >>> OpenSSL, I should commit it one day. >>>=20 >>> Also, I'll change the default for ports from base to openssl, one = day. >> I can help if needed. >=20 > But I don't use all of that, so I need help figuring out which should = be > the default afterwards (it can't be base, because you can't mix base > heimdal with non base openssl) Having stripped Kerberos from base for our 11.0 builds makes for a nice test bed in places where GSSAPI is not yet in a port, but actually required, leading to quick build errors. gssapi:heimdal is the closes thing to base as far as we could see, and we've rolled out several OPNsense releases with both OpenSSL and Heimdal from ports that work nicely with external AD servers. Cheers, Franco= From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Oct 27 10:17:23 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DB97C232C9 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 10:17:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from garga.bsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qk0-x234.google.com (mail-qk0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B927B32B for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 10:17:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from garga.bsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qk0-x234.google.com with SMTP id z190so37178543qkc.2 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 03:17:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=qXX5ggGSZOUTvhpuWwSBMPnuaQzNTUMnYhdNXJdcpVM=; b=ypdOPqPkpegqxjKJJn3Q8zi14O7IcucE97+s8rOATJyrxeX5A2s78KUNWuGrtg0rb1 /xmufSaB8udsaqxiDJOegoZpwr4nn8aEcXuSFfLTDhSnrQXk7Eo3ls5SeKaMDXvRgc1k psMFOAdrQwkeEBsNfWwJSmGM1mCiNOwTl03Uzf0Ztmox2mh2tZb5BdZR2+csoFXHmPSC M/nEbDD8vrMB06Jib73GnKlaJdSq1ujO4ZJ+NNsWuw+j3T01pfPhpo2Tc1IuOG6TbzSR TxstSbPwcJMl6r111L4aU5MlY3pFCS+2KyZlYf3dXXSw2j2vtGlnaYD0QYVLU0Zfncy3 r0XQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=qXX5ggGSZOUTvhpuWwSBMPnuaQzNTUMnYhdNXJdcpVM=; b=Upi7YfYF3sNXpNQwabcp75X79OXJ5cflj6TkIiUJ3brJkh+lmxQhp2IqNgB65oOgFj OQSyg5wFMlCUDYoA0yS13v8lsll4/aQOhp3VNbZ1QpTtKB2NJ3FKf+/ljkCfGltZIEBU +lfFho/bKjRyMqRXeGMJ4lTMcCK9efw3lLJl0kNc2cG3RXYxwxOHWaaSTw/k3fnBrMw2 2/+kx9G+9KfABdFGJUQQprs40rmfWC3KZG+C6kvvMvxyR9fpeAjyXXPUin5pL6xktggU YJrhyZmINRVCYfaLt99mw1kU7T7vZ9aIE18XQ37ruR1spAp5ssvt2iireSO4KWoD6UhE Manw== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngve7Q6mGE9uxNx5i5smFaOwD+kpVs3d3L4M4qCMHF90OVEnAOsypwWkLocP4FgZy5g== X-Received: by 10.55.140.199 with SMTP id o190mr5201791qkd.299.1477563441956; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 03:17:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mbp-eth.home ([200.236.232.140]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i7sm253745qtc.8.2016.10.27.03.17.20 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 27 Oct 2016 03:17:21 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Renato Botelho From: Renato Botelho Message-Id: <62FE737B-001E-4DA7-95E7-1875CA70A8C6@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\)) Subject: Re: make makepatch Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:17:17 -0200 In-Reply-To: <20161027062029.GG51420@home.opsec.eu> Cc: Jochen Neumeister , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" To: Kurt Jaeger References: <730bd5a8-d6c2-7e8f-5240-b7d4b6209884@bsdproject.de> <20161027062029.GG51420@home.opsec.eu> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 10:17:23 -0000 > On 27 Oct 2016, at 04:20, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >=20 > Hi! >=20 >> # portlint >> WARN: /usr/home/joneum/dev/ports/net/wpa_gui/files/patch-wpa_ctrl.c: >> patch was not generated using ``make makepatch''. It is recommended = to >> use ``make makepatch'' when you need to [re-]generate a patch to = ensure >> proper patch format. >> 0 fatal errors and 1 warning found. >>=20 >> okay, i use "make makepatch", and copy the files from >> "work/.makepatch-tmp/archived-patches" to the "/files" folder, and = start >> portlint. But, the same. >>=20 >> what am i doing wrong? >=20 > make makepatch places the corrected files into files/ and > the prevision version to work/.makepatch-tmp/archived-patches. >=20 > So, I'd suggest: >=20 > make patch > make makepatch > mv work work.old > portlint -AC >=20 > and if portlint is silent, and all the necessary patches are in = files/, > you're done. I only suggest to replace =E2=80=98make patch=E2=80=99 by: # make extract do-patch There are several ports that changes files using REINPLACE_CMD in = post-patch: target, this way you will not run post-patch: and will not = risky to end up converting REINPLACE_CMD into static patches. -- Renato Botelho From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Oct 27 12:49:12 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFB8BC22737 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 12:49:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk0-x234.google.com (mail-vk0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 891A329B; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 12:49:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vk0-x234.google.com with SMTP id q126so27351350vkd.2; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 05:49:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=AEG2bhKojjbUnYqucVJYWbXRfOf5IWiHddedXmH1QCQ=; b=eG1EhmSex3rKxlM/vMx1iw37gYXya2XGc5pqUmONS5dTcVm6UM6kEXktrQ1EP6b8Lp NhuGAQ8mX2voqkEFfn6lLzcE8CFBqvDySNJ0KAjmbcre46T2FiIkGX3/X40P5QYKU4o9 MJ+bOtJLV7m/Zw4BfsLNTLHo9/yGouiFbtPKhZQgtZIbpmZ5y9tUinGtJPv6Zin4uj8h U4rtcmn7GktxLd7UpKoYPnW8JBBpR9UJpfPL7/LV9SdLngsKzNiWeScdW/EWZYx4E0ek 31EmJk+80k/DuSJ1eEUVt7BHAmCvTo+sCXvNl+L+zYmTRyO0Yy/yB6nbAsSxSjJVIn3S ob/g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=AEG2bhKojjbUnYqucVJYWbXRfOf5IWiHddedXmH1QCQ=; b=ivDWHghmbu3L9xVTRet1AJH2Y3dp2rxvAN6I49omEYNfyXBM1YK50uhZo3vlvTjhHp fTsHGiNB4X+p017tXNO79cSDUvzEUei93oslv5O3qiOJjE/G7EEZ4s+kSaNJn/InOoG1 Rh+G6UJ5yA71fX47vKVcritXN/ThOSjv7JE6ky6iPmLSfj6ZAhQu9xGB9F9dzK+QcJs0 JTUlGcYpAr03GhzQd7QzDUIrqdSpuyoG7JNkEqhaipMGwFJkdO9ry5qQSaFC4AdUnsYn 4lguWb08RqDXu5UlZ4iUB3o9zAw73pdlteBu5roIV+Ae3XnAbbkN9NvZJgdWne3+njZQ BV7g== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvfseGlsLw8Tw8vDLJxDzH6OfpbY5mTZ0/b37YqalafSBsX4rWaxSfTVyKOpnSi0x4Wu9Ynqpz+pP/oybg== X-Received: by 10.31.178.198 with SMTP id b189mr5655795vkf.70.1477572551532; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 05:49:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.9.196 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 05:49:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7fb24c94-1efa-d1b5-9028-8dec8330e543@FreeBSD.org> References: <201610252214.u9PME6br070248@gw.catspoiler.org> <7fb24c94-1efa-d1b5-9028-8dec8330e543@FreeBSD.org> From: David Demelier Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 14:49:10 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: lighttpd does not pull OpenSSL dependency To: Mathieu Arnold Cc: Don Lewis , mad@madpilot.net, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 12:49:12 -0000 2016-10-27 11:00 GMT+02:00 Mathieu Arnold : > Before changing the default, though, I need to change the way GSSAPI is > handled, and create a DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=gssapi= > and change all the ports with the USES=gssapi that gives options to the > users. > But I don't use all of that, so I need help figuring out which should be > the default afterwards (it can't be base, because you can't mix base > heimdal with non base openssl) I've just tested my lighttpd package into a fresh jail, it has not installed openssl and the lighttpd binary was using /usr/lib/libssl from base instead. There is indeed something wrong then, because if I install openssl, lighttpd will use one from /usr/local/lib which is terrible as we have no guarantee about openssl ABI compatibility. I don't know much linker options, but it is possible to make absolute shared library dependency ? Like -l/usr/lib/libssl.so instead of -lssl. Will this force lighttpd to use openssl from base? That's what I dislike in having some software in base and also in ports. We need to figure out that. Or the best is to avoid having too much software in base. For example, it's nice to have ssh in base, but I have no problem if we need to install it in the next years. This will also have the benefits of more recent versions. By the way, for what openssl is needed in base? Regards, -- Demelier David From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Oct 27 13:05:09 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92459C22CBA for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:05:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (prod2.absolight.net [79.143.243.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 533EE91; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:05:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84702BDD32; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 15:05:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ogg.in.absolight.net (ogg.in.absolight.net [79.143.241.239]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 68CB8BDD34; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 15:05:06 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: lighttpd does not pull OpenSSL dependency To: David Demelier References: <201610252214.u9PME6br070248@gw.catspoiler.org> <7fb24c94-1efa-d1b5-9028-8dec8330e543@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Don Lewis , mad@madpilot.net, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Mathieu Arnold Organization: Absolight / The FreeBSD Foundation Message-ID: Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 15:05:03 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="V5U7rfPG3CPpKoJDANdgIBGJ1joNMrwf4" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:05:09 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --V5U7rfPG3CPpKoJDANdgIBGJ1joNMrwf4 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="NNr7xb9vP6LpsHpk8pXkGxM3BnP5Ffd34"; protected-headers="v1" From: Mathieu Arnold To: David Demelier Cc: Don Lewis , mad@madpilot.net, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: lighttpd does not pull OpenSSL dependency References: <201610252214.u9PME6br070248@gw.catspoiler.org> <7fb24c94-1efa-d1b5-9028-8dec8330e543@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: --NNr7xb9vP6LpsHpk8pXkGxM3BnP5Ffd34 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le 27/10/2016 =C3=A0 14:49, David Demelier a =C3=A9crit : > 2016-10-27 11:00 GMT+02:00 Mathieu Arnold : >> Before changing the default, though, I need to change the way GSSAPI i= s >> handled, and create a DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=3Dgssapi=3D >> and change all the ports with the USES=3Dgssapi that gives options to = the >> users. >> But I don't use all of that, so I need help figuring out which should = be >> the default afterwards (it can't be base, because you can't mix base >> heimdal with non base openssl) > I've just tested my lighttpd package into a fresh jail, it has not > installed openssl and the lighttpd binary was using /usr/lib/libssl > from base instead. > > There is indeed something wrong then, because if I install openssl, > lighttpd will use one from /usr/local/lib which is terrible as we have > no guarantee about openssl ABI compatibility. > > I don't know much linker options, but it is possible to make absolute > shared library dependency ? Like -l/usr/lib/libssl.so instead of > -lssl. Will this force lighttpd to use openssl from base? Once you install openssl from ports, the ports framework will use it, always. If you do not want openssl from ports, do not install it. > That's what I dislike in having some software in base and also in > ports. We need to figure out that. Or the best is to avoid having too > much software in base. For example, it's nice to have ssh in base, but > I have no problem if we need to install it in the next years. This > will also have the benefits of more recent versions. Well, openssl should be moved to a private space in base, yes. > By the way, for what openssl is needed in base? With a quick run of ldd in base and a grep of libcrypto and libssl, I get= : /bin/ed /bin/red /lib/libcrypto.so.8 /sbin/hastctl /sbin/hastd /usr/bin/bdes /usr/bin/dc /usr/bin/drill /usr/bin/factor /usr/bin/hxtool /usr/bin/kadmin /usr/bin/kinit /usr/bin/kpasswd /usr/bin/ksu /usr/bin/ntpq /usr/bin/openssl /usr/bin/slogin /usr/bin/ssh-agent /usr/bin/ssh-keygen /usr/bin/ssh /usr/bin/string2key /usr/bin/svnlite /usr/bin/svnlitebench /usr/bin/svnlitemucc /usr/bin/svnliterdump /usr/bin/svnlitesync /usr/bin/telnet /usr/lib/libarchive.so.6 /usr/lib/libbsnmp.so.6 /usr/lib/libfetch.so.6 /usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.10 /usr/lib/libheimntlm.so.11 /usr/lib/libhx509.so.11 /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.11 /usr/lib/libmp.so.7 /usr/lib/libprivateldns.so.5 /usr/lib/libprivatessh.so.5 /usr/lib/libprivateunbound.so.5 /usr/lib/libradius.so.4 /usr/lib/libssl.so.8 /usr/sbin/auditdistd /usr/sbin/hostapd /usr/sbin/kstash /usr/sbin/ktutil /usr/sbin/ntp-keygen /usr/sbin/ntpd /usr/sbin/ntpdate /usr/sbin/ntpdc /usr/sbin/pkg /usr/sbin/ppp /usr/sbin/sntp /usr/sbin/sshd /usr/sbin/tcpdump /usr/sbin/uefisign /usr/sbin/unbound-anchor /usr/sbin/unbound-control /usr/sbin/unbound /usr/sbin/wpa_supplicant --=20 Mathieu Arnold --NNr7xb9vP6LpsHpk8pXkGxM3BnP5Ffd34-- --V5U7rfPG3CPpKoJDANdgIBGJ1joNMrwf4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJYEfuBXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQzQUI2OTc4OUQyRUQxMjEwNjQ0MEJBNUIz QTQ1MTZGMzUxODNDRTQ4AAoJEDpFFvNRg85I+vgP/RV+qGrCW1mt0FF1cINQOo/k EjXTAIpoSceKn+712NI2Y5gz5xbQHoqTYygVeWQ4NgF8ogd9MEzmfP/gcjseTviV i2+8ZseR1t6yhEBfUMyPFOeXSaJ1WH8OPH8mR/ecTKNt6m6LF3p1+K7sEz+ooM4l jds4ZbuaCX686EBCYk0rJ3W/qL+VgtHGAEthzR+76FJpkRJWgTi/dDwJLhJA7lOl cYZc64AcSSbIdu8K4q2wtpAjS6IAuqCFmVhuihA0WEC6twEISogTybgpe/f59/XP gi6DjD1c5fjDCksPwXt6Emhw83lZEHO4gqdJAMuWYknx6uIhu/v0uza5zK3BK6Fl aURV7pBRX/OR17df/0eXAJHsZS1I6I8bLB6VVS52lk8VwVQOGSUEb+6C9gnZCHC7 El459g/MHy2GLEFoi2Yh8LUCu6nbW7mtpKgtO1OrTn9CuyfFXkDIsCzEA3ufQ3Qy 6aJD8hf5taXMb1WkuYJQlVRHefotgX35Rb2uFnLUFbKWVJtEf95l7bXWrDB3DTzX uWFLtjWERGC7yUP7gvcKUMtrfBJbrjkqi8QRdQQcxSB7Sk3GRB4WXlqaw7gXb2nz 6D5YdAOsH4hLq7j1PaiyQ227GUH/QtZB8En3YCd7TRBaDigI2NiaGtVh2ctuLnsp wzUK1VAVcc4kAjCA85wu =pbj1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --V5U7rfPG3CPpKoJDANdgIBGJ1joNMrwf4-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Oct 27 15:10:07 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 098A8C24734 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 15:10:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from mail.infocus-llc.com (mail.infocus-llc.com [199.15.120.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCDD411E; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 15:10:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from draco.over-yonder.net (c-75-65-60-66.hsd1.ms.comcast.net [75.65.60.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.tarragon.infocus-llc.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3t4VSN0nd8ztM; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 10:00:36 -0500 (CDT) Received: by draco.over-yonder.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id 3t4VSM11nZz4X0; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 10:00:35 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 10:00:35 -0500 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: Mathieu Arnold Cc: David Demelier , Don Lewis , mad@madpilot.net, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lighttpd does not pull OpenSSL dependency Message-ID: <20161027150035.GP79735@over-yonder.net> References: <201610252214.u9PME6br070248@gw.catspoiler.org> <7fb24c94-1efa-d1b5-9028-8dec8330e543@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Editor: vi X-OS: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1-fullermd.4 (2016-04-27) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 15:10:07 -0000 On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 03:05:03PM +0200 I heard the voice of Mathieu Arnold, and lo! it spake thus: > > Once you install openssl from ports, the ports framework will use > it, always. That is absolutely not the case since OpenSSL in base was updated to .so.8 and ports wasn't re-bumped past it. Everything gets confused all the time. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209582 Even in an e.g. net/ntp rebuilt just now: % ldd /usr/local/sbin/ntpd | grep -E '(crypto|ssl)' libcrypto.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.8 (0x800cea000) libssl.so.8 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.8 (0x801ae6000) Just looking at a ldd through /usr/local I'm finding tons of things that are still linking to base libcrypto. STuff from ldns, nginx, Virtualbox, libwww, lots of X pieces... This makes me *EXTREMELY* nervous about upgrading _any_ systems where I'm using ports OpenSSL to stable/11. -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Oct 27 15:22:25 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEE5AC24A62 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 15:22:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matt.xtaz@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x22f.google.com (mail-wm0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EE7CBB2; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 15:22:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matt.xtaz@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id 140so29853909wmv.0; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:22:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=rtMhDamtuuA+JiHrdeHtJRB6RJa7XFspH6Hxp+S6fUY=; b=ovjx74brXe/TiWTnFPD9apVZPXHEq97r7JRi0cRSs8gaAY/E8wCJRqoaBzk/1emcFb LQ6VaFPRNBpxuX0osBJSrJTwsKKn+JpDwEWtMX40JaEYDJlV6qBZtOI2lmDujMAoyRSf Qx4aBgG8ZEc00WT7n0SZxbmvFl8m2hSt9E86q1auOXIZFgX9fUeI6OIRH6FlDOFE1mX2 XedBPYZnNo0fzEVdPEt13enAy+PEP4wEDtvk05IIsEIeqste/4l4sYj0nUHR5FmwM6t2 Us6KwlAXzmb58A88Bi1quwk0HdLOHVblIh52tbMjBeJEiYFfaSZTulBEfVid9EZLqUlG +XPg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=rtMhDamtuuA+JiHrdeHtJRB6RJa7XFspH6Hxp+S6fUY=; b=grsgNRQfn9oAcJnEOykrjOckgBGOJ7YjLQgoPUYaGfLBfFGC9sG0PX/06WMhRXEoj1 sC8r/G8smpVuin00lnmry7mKHu+Ac/ErWFMKBbTtnPI++uGf+vwLUem49tgd/S7wiv8m MzirlyYlySLqLvnUFqJ/taddS3YelLS9NlO/nQkyymg/h4cnR6P1vtXD9KlOfBKk6gJ8 0RpApNRGrregEKifm1wtQLWNIG5lIhimtCOhV/lsWQYSLcSnLlrTrxEnQs1cOckbjD80 TcX89gEdFkGSrvmDcjY3V+rgUdGNbi0wP7MgjOe9wfKvMMiPpAISdf0pyDly8Kt3PFBx PyUQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvcpsU/mTg8FzZzwvrpv5fhSjPcmHHi4agIxha+VUCdFiG7qDKoFgI8SHpbyj4dMrA== X-Received: by 10.28.111.13 with SMTP id k13mr1037390wmc.132.1477581732202; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:22:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xtaz.uk (tao.xtaz.uk. [2001:8b0:fe33::10]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 70sm3843631wmv.1.2016.10.27.08.22.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:22:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 16:22:09 +0100 From: Matt Smith To: "Matthew D. Fuller" Cc: Mathieu Arnold , David Demelier , Don Lewis , mad@madpilot.net, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lighttpd does not pull OpenSSL dependency Message-ID: <20161027152209.GA84543@xtaz.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matt Smith , "Matthew D. Fuller" , Mathieu Arnold , David Demelier , Don Lewis , mad@madpilot.net, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <201610252214.u9PME6br070248@gw.catspoiler.org> <7fb24c94-1efa-d1b5-9028-8dec8330e543@FreeBSD.org> <20161027150035.GP79735@over-yonder.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161027150035.GP79735@over-yonder.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 15:22:25 -0000 On Oct 27 10:00, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: >On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 03:05:03PM +0200 I heard the voice of >Mathieu Arnold, and lo! it spake thus: >> >> Once you install openssl from ports, the ports framework will use >> it, always. > >That is absolutely not the case since OpenSSL in base was updated to >.so.8 and ports wasn't re-bumped past it. Everything gets confused >all the time. > >https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209582 > >Even in an e.g. net/ntp rebuilt just now: > >% ldd /usr/local/sbin/ntpd | grep -E '(crypto|ssl)' > libcrypto.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.8 (0x800cea000) > libssl.so.8 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.8 (0x801ae6000) > >Just looking at a ldd through /usr/local I'm finding tons of things >that are still linking to base libcrypto. STuff from ldns, nginx, >Virtualbox, libwww, lots of X pieces... > >This makes me *EXTREMELY* nervous about upgrading _any_ systems where >I'm using ports OpenSSL to stable/11. > I don't see this on my system which is FreeBSD 11.0-STABLE #0 r307132 $ ldd /usr/local/sbin/ntpd | grep -E '(crypto|ssl)' libcrypto.so.38 => /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.38 (0x800cee000) libssl.so.39 => /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.39 (0x801aca000) Most likely because I have correctly declared the default version of the SSL library by putting DEFAULT_VERSIONS=ssl=libressl-devel in make.conf. Without declaring it specifically like that I wouldn't trust the system to do it automatically either. -- Matt From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Oct 27 15:23:57 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD6BCC24AF2 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 15:23:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from mail.infocus-llc.com (mail.infocus-llc.com [199.15.120.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B8ACCA9; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 15:23:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from draco.over-yonder.net (c-75-65-60-66.hsd1.ms.comcast.net [75.65.60.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.tarragon.infocus-llc.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3t4VzJ0bWfzy3; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 10:23:56 -0500 (CDT) Received: by draco.over-yonder.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id 3t4VzH2rKgz4XY; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 10:23:55 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 10:23:55 -0500 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: Matt Smith , Mathieu Arnold , David Demelier , Don Lewis , mad@madpilot.net, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lighttpd does not pull OpenSSL dependency Message-ID: <20161027152355.GQ79735@over-yonder.net> References: <201610252214.u9PME6br070248@gw.catspoiler.org> <7fb24c94-1efa-d1b5-9028-8dec8330e543@FreeBSD.org> <20161027150035.GP79735@over-yonder.net> <20161027152209.GA84543@xtaz.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161027152209.GA84543@xtaz.uk> X-Editor: vi X-OS: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1-fullermd.4 (2016-04-27) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 15:23:57 -0000 On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 04:22:09PM +0100 I heard the voice of Matt Smith, and lo! it spake thus: > > I don't see this on my system which is FreeBSD 11.0-STABLE #0 r307132 > > $ ldd /usr/local/sbin/ntpd | grep -E '(crypto|ssl)' > libcrypto.so.38 => /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.38 (0x800cee000) > libssl.so.39 => /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.39 (0x801aca000) > > Most likely because I have correctly declared the default version of the > SSL library by putting DEFAULT_VERSIONS=ssl=libressl-devel in make.conf. You're using libressl, which has a totally different SOVERSION, so it can't flip itself back and forth. openssl has the same SOVERSION. -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Oct 27 15:24:49 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BEC7C24B69 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 15:24:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matt.xtaz@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x236.google.com (mail-wm0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2DD1D8E; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 15:24:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matt.xtaz@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x236.google.com with SMTP id n67so51540809wme.1; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:24:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=TDji3/WQ3yPSWlJlfu1kvgv6NshcLqc2vNTJ5NMAl9I=; b=F7td2eXDjTiVfOd3585Qm5WEGvk/xoi5mpYe55p54qTlWWeHFYIt2Q1NqedRhACkuN RsRNXvGkGN5gBYqvORbHv7Ye+mD15VgnwdJsOHWskPofB9KVZkQbF/iZ3L5AtiWNU4Zw 06MgazvffzGvk+2gFX1dZDi4fWm6/SYIe1U1F4mMhbalrq/OjeOr//ihgUgVMC6L/xgy oArrYYzDNXNRpVXcRVSLmiH+xaFmvL272KKJJfwadTmsVVoLidESX/TY0XbSJGPioIhU XdyLYFEPML2P+88YEupXIXy6Oq4unwMzqdzXKS9kczVz/ZztqZWJUoHzUymYYN1D2cSw 8mOg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=TDji3/WQ3yPSWlJlfu1kvgv6NshcLqc2vNTJ5NMAl9I=; b=TpeJ6EtI1xujVkrGEXGxBBOdAQskzQ6gXQkNsvJgQsyIplnPKAmw91KYpsJc6gv2lu 73StQmRL2vhJoWgkbpmmpZfkANXr3UuK8wbK5IRjZMvgvdgPXJREjl7m/UedHtp1/WOt 8p4qQrJVf2/Ir3WiRhSr1QkSi/zdqvq5gzHCPluj0iOB5o1qiiTZ8Kf5uBLiwkvGhE8L aBSxtx0P0xHpo89l3YrKnd6y/hqEUOUBR/5fL5hU6Di4IolUn4c1NfQm5Pihuhl15Fik ptA/9u8er76tfDmKWyVD9aKBVPKDWOnCh678PFXznm2Grhi8QYTnZdJeJjH4AY78u4TR RVsg== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvcGLJcvIzAMUgjzr+wO0bSzqPHMhmiUAObjQyeSAQepshfeInzI2mZNUFBithCBnA== X-Received: by 10.28.71.140 with SMTP id m12mr13929911wmi.125.1477581886933; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:24:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xtaz.uk (tao.xtaz.uk. [2001:8b0:fe33::10]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o62sm3861241wmg.9.2016.10.27.08.24.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:24:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 16:24:45 +0100 From: Matt Smith To: "Matthew D. Fuller" , Mathieu Arnold , David Demelier , Don Lewis , mad@madpilot.net, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lighttpd does not pull OpenSSL dependency Message-ID: <20161027152445.GB84543@xtaz.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matt Smith , "Matthew D. Fuller" , Mathieu Arnold , David Demelier , Don Lewis , mad@madpilot.net, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <201610252214.u9PME6br070248@gw.catspoiler.org> <7fb24c94-1efa-d1b5-9028-8dec8330e543@FreeBSD.org> <20161027150035.GP79735@over-yonder.net> <20161027152209.GA84543@xtaz.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161027152209.GA84543@xtaz.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 15:24:49 -0000 On Oct 27 16:22, Matt Smith wrote: >I don't see this on my system which is FreeBSD 11.0-STABLE #0 r307132 > >$ ldd /usr/local/sbin/ntpd | grep -E '(crypto|ssl)' >libcrypto.so.38 => /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.38 (0x800cee000) >libssl.so.39 => /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.39 (0x801aca000) Oh never mind, I guess it's because the so revision is 38/39 whereas in openssl it's 8 the same as the base version. Sorry for the noise! -- Matt From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Oct 27 16:35:32 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DB09C23D14 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 16:35:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (prod2.absolight.net [79.143.243.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED3856D8; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 16:35:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 383E1BDCE4; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:35:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ogg.in.absolight.net (ogg.in.absolight.net [79.143.241.239]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ED57EBDCE2; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:35:28 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: lighttpd does not pull OpenSSL dependency To: "Matthew D. Fuller" References: <201610252214.u9PME6br070248@gw.catspoiler.org> <7fb24c94-1efa-d1b5-9028-8dec8330e543@FreeBSD.org> <20161027150035.GP79735@over-yonder.net> Cc: David Demelier , Don Lewis , mad@madpilot.net, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Mathieu Arnold Organization: Absolight / The FreeBSD Foundation Message-ID: Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:35:25 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161027150035.GP79735@over-yonder.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vSdo1CniQ40iIjHqI2AOINbft6DMUiigu" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 16:35:32 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --vSdo1CniQ40iIjHqI2AOINbft6DMUiigu Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="KN0ScMBnDcbKn9ffeDUnTvpNufHpLgw0K"; protected-headers="v1" From: Mathieu Arnold To: "Matthew D. Fuller" Cc: David Demelier , Don Lewis , mad@madpilot.net, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: lighttpd does not pull OpenSSL dependency References: <201610252214.u9PME6br070248@gw.catspoiler.org> <7fb24c94-1efa-d1b5-9028-8dec8330e543@FreeBSD.org> <20161027150035.GP79735@over-yonder.net> In-Reply-To: <20161027150035.GP79735@over-yonder.net> --KN0ScMBnDcbKn9ffeDUnTvpNufHpLgw0K Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le 27/10/2016 =C3=A0 17:00, Matthew D. Fuller a =C3=A9crit : > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 03:05:03PM +0200 I heard the voice of > Mathieu Arnold, and lo! it spake thus: >> Once you install openssl from ports, the ports framework will use >> it, always. > That is absolutely not the case since OpenSSL in base was updated to > .so.8 and ports wasn't re-bumped past it. Everything gets confused > all the time. Well, that is another problem, and you are right, OpenSSL's shlib should have been bumped, blame the former maintainer for that. I'll talk to the new maintainer about that. > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D209582 > > Even in an e.g. net/ntp rebuilt just now: > > % ldd /usr/local/sbin/ntpd | grep -E '(crypto|ssl)' > libcrypto.so.8 =3D> /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.8 (0x800cea000)= > libssl.so.8 =3D> /usr/lib/libssl.so.8 (0x801ae6000) > > Just looking at a ldd through /usr/local I'm finding tons of things > that are still linking to base libcrypto. STuff from ldns, nginx, > Virtualbox, libwww, lots of X pieces... > > This makes me *EXTREMELY* nervous about upgrading _any_ systems where > I'm using ports OpenSSL to stable/11. > > --=20 Mathieu Arnold --KN0ScMBnDcbKn9ffeDUnTvpNufHpLgw0K-- --vSdo1CniQ40iIjHqI2AOINbft6DMUiigu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJYEizPXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQzQUI2OTc4OUQyRUQxMjEwNjQ0MEJBNUIz QTQ1MTZGMzUxODNDRTQ4AAoJEDpFFvNRg85IvR8P/3PnPJIKzoD/zPXK/GYcsIbs q2lfZwiE/knj4eNTasfW3fSfzUjYUhCc4vOPy5CE84sW0GVsNJ18bhNKnZD/znQa /ZUl6v8Qpg9uUiu7bAbFCqdSSp0Ig6bYwdxmAjaMj+ELUNCFBCp2oIa+VrPV1+ap dip+zdzYm74bEekPzuLrZEvnG/QNUBXDuRTI5rzl6jCGip/urt7/mFuEEDjuuvLQ nG31JJ69vL6jPMp8APTcg/yp57BK/IYzl1KW/CJmJvizhnOv8Ih9Z68f3Dcqa5Xi yAuraDbu7cnaMSkc8yJd/LL73N7AWaxFqgRYik4Wo3ROcMJ5QNMkn5nd6YGwjJlW U6kcLcavcvk5QEsDeuggc2XjdyUva7W4HZm7KUSGIdC+S4euG4MPQs0yhgPphj6B 3YVnKnHd6znerTJpm3bea7P4O1CtmIr4gdZOE/7zccxV8wunqgk2Yd5JzEYifpKb 04ESbfswizgHXcttDTfZcy6EMM2D2W0nj428oUMYOR9a+fyDT3UMj9b07+mfkChF PqWGB0x6GhEoyaIhrLCiU3Am9LdJ2/v8Lod6hzvHECZBlDSXCgvZaEqEVfIzmpm5 ghjex6bJXEnKm3wEHe8xEyHSs7kpSvoQlw7bFBRnPWYSNFRmVGRAkKGgjkr39Hgr J8/nTIoL6Ll3g+pve2ZU =CciX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vSdo1CniQ40iIjHqI2AOINbft6DMUiigu-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Oct 27 18:22:15 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F118C2489D for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:22:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@waschbuesch.de) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16BF036C for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:22:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@waschbuesch.de) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 161F2C2489C; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:22:15 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15CD5C2489B for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:22:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@waschbuesch.de) Received: from relay.waschbuesch.it (relay.waschbuesch.it [IPv6:2a00:cba0:0:100::3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.waschbuesch.it", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD959369; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:22:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@waschbuesch.de) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=waschbuesch.de; s=dkim; h=To:References:Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Mime-Version: Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=pxIhShDpWDy7MZJbH0dodjGGwaH4AWSUY9oLPzFTc1I=; b=mAo1GcC8TXUe60jr4SytY/ag9 iF95C8oJIxzTPbk3J20F+MLSoevUNWEzQQZkUbJn3QQi6RG3A8aAbfcqQGugiy5HxPUzGSuFDwkWM 79sz/nbHq8+W3OZwA4gubjl9xF60XhcKk9rUJk4SqQboVuk/4ZawYtQdzN8vHM7U9lUss=; Received: by relay.waschbuesch.it with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim) (envelope-from ) id 1bzpJa-0006jt-5h; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:22:10 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\)) Subject: Re: WIP: lang/php71 From: =?utf-8?Q?Martin_Waschb=C3=BCsch?= In-Reply-To: <649d4fb3-4c40-cae4-867d-bbd3637e6ae4@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 20:22:09 +0200 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Franco Fichtner Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <508A6859-CE53-47DC-8F18-DBF6FD284585@waschbuesch.de> References: <649d4fb3-4c40-cae4-867d-bbd3637e6ae4@FreeBSD.org> To: Torsten Zuehlsdorff X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:22:15 -0000 > Am 26.10.2016 um 14:28 schrieb Torsten Zuehlsdorff : >=20 > Aloha, >=20 > PHP 7.1 RC5 was released and it will hopefully not too far until the = full release. Therefore i started some work on the new port. >=20 > Sadly i haven't had much time in the last, so its not too much. = Currently i just added lang/php71, pet portlint a little and test a = little of the basics. >=20 > Of course all 60+ extensions are missing, but i centered my affords at = the core. It should be relatively easy to add them. >=20 > If you want to test or participate you can use my ports-tree copy from = GitLab: >=20 > $ git clone https://github.com/t-zuehlsdorff/freebsd-ports > $ git checkout php71 >=20 > Feel free to add what you want and do a pull request! Thanks! I forked and am working on the php71-pgsql now. Is it a good = idea to do pull requests per port? E.g. after having them run through poudriere testport without hiccups? Martin= From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Oct 27 18:36:30 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4828FC24A4E for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:36:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from mail.infocus-llc.com (mail.infocus-llc.com [199.15.120.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18F8AB0E; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:36:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from draco.over-yonder.net (c-75-65-60-66.hsd1.ms.comcast.net [75.65.60.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.tarragon.infocus-llc.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3t4bFS4cJbz1Tp; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:36:28 -0500 (CDT) Received: by draco.over-yonder.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id 3t4bFS0B0hz4cc; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:36:28 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:36:27 -0500 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: Mathieu Arnold Cc: David Demelier , Don Lewis , mad@madpilot.net, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lighttpd does not pull OpenSSL dependency Message-ID: <20161027183627.GA35998@over-yonder.net> References: <201610252214.u9PME6br070248@gw.catspoiler.org> <7fb24c94-1efa-d1b5-9028-8dec8330e543@FreeBSD.org> <20161027150035.GP79735@over-yonder.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Editor: vi X-OS: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1-fullermd.4 (2016-04-27) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:36:30 -0000 On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 06:35:25PM +0200 I heard the voice of Mathieu Arnold, and lo! it spake thus: > > Well, that is another problem, and you are right, OpenSSL's shlib > should have been bumped, blame the former maintainer for that. I'll > talk to the new maintainer about that. The argument could be made that (a) OpenSSL 1.1.0 is gonna be released and brought into ports Any Day Now and it already has a different shlibver (and that would get us back on parity with upstream, for what that's worth), and (b) by the time 11-CURRENT (where you gotta expect bumps) becomes 11-STABLE, base openssl will be private-ized anyway. It's a good couple theories... -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Oct 27 18:40:21 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9040FC24B29 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:40:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (mx3.absolight.net [IPv6:2a01:678:2:100::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 301D6C76; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:40:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADD0DBDCDC; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 20:40:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from atuin.in.mat.cc (atuin.in.mat.cc [79.143.241.205]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 82362BDCD0; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 20:40:18 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: lighttpd does not pull OpenSSL dependency To: "Matthew D. Fuller" References: <201610252214.u9PME6br070248@gw.catspoiler.org> <7fb24c94-1efa-d1b5-9028-8dec8330e543@FreeBSD.org> <20161027150035.GP79735@over-yonder.net> <20161027183627.GA35998@over-yonder.net> Cc: David Demelier , Don Lewis , mad@madpilot.net, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Mathieu Arnold Organization: Absolight / The FreeBSD Foundation Message-ID: <90096ddd-be08-e716-9c85-ed2cfc6852dc@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 20:40:16 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161027183627.GA35998@over-yonder.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CWFLIPa2qE2j8t6TMh1AJ7u9Plw9aIclR" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:40:21 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --CWFLIPa2qE2j8t6TMh1AJ7u9Plw9aIclR Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="FhVena1SfBwQJMSnK58FQLnhklnepHVwJ"; protected-headers="v1" From: Mathieu Arnold To: "Matthew D. Fuller" Cc: David Demelier , Don Lewis , mad@madpilot.net, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <90096ddd-be08-e716-9c85-ed2cfc6852dc@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: lighttpd does not pull OpenSSL dependency References: <201610252214.u9PME6br070248@gw.catspoiler.org> <7fb24c94-1efa-d1b5-9028-8dec8330e543@FreeBSD.org> <20161027150035.GP79735@over-yonder.net> <20161027183627.GA35998@over-yonder.net> In-Reply-To: <20161027183627.GA35998@over-yonder.net> --FhVena1SfBwQJMSnK58FQLnhklnepHVwJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le 27/10/2016 =C3=A0 20:36, Matthew D. Fuller a =C3=A9crit : > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 06:35:25PM +0200 I heard the voice of > Mathieu Arnold, and lo! it spake thus: >> Well, that is another problem, and you are right, OpenSSL's shlib >> should have been bumped, blame the former maintainer for that. I'll >> talk to the new maintainer about that. > The argument could be made that (a) OpenSSL 1.1.0 is gonna be released > and brought into ports Any Day Now and it already has a different > shlibver (and that would get us back on parity with upstream, for what > that's worth), and (b) by the time 11-CURRENT (where you gotta expect > bumps) becomes 11-STABLE, base openssl will be private-ized anyway. > > It's a good couple theories... Yes, well, OpenSSL 1.1.0 was released, in late august, it was committed without any kind of test, and broke many things, which is why I reverted = it. So, yes, it could come along any day, but the shlib number is just an artificial number, it should have been bumped months ago, and it still has not. --=20 Mathieu Arnold --FhVena1SfBwQJMSnK58FQLnhklnepHVwJ-- --CWFLIPa2qE2j8t6TMh1AJ7u9Plw9aIclR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJYEkoSXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQzQUI2OTc4OUQyRUQxMjEwNjQ0MEJBNUIz QTQ1MTZGMzUxODNDRTQ4AAoJEDpFFvNRg85IILcQAJfoyTig/Ce5oJqZ2RJ43TcL rH1+U39I/8DqiCpWQ8oFDLYHiylNOgFYY4HTqEQf8w8TOCGtVkAj4JdZ6BOoS3wH bHu0bYq+/MQXHUJpzhoKwV684J2YnoD5bNwR+UGS9bsxdL5cGT1xN7ZxAdhu/nj+ ju0+RfkKE1tNLQZodYFoC0CmG3oJU+0wGhs2Q5WreBYDDUrF/w1au078z3DHK1ht geEl9t5z8oHmB30wtvNBGI9F/7iXZQdZaq/jUt/LSkMBeDgSnuuuMUX0+tBjo+lQ 3T9jpNwB3AkJO8Oofg3p1X4SQMUIdmdeNgX2KJfAvaJJ03Jw394CZSKfgWUgp5J9 aOQOqa49F7SF4Rc9ksFpWKVNrEENiNn2v0U7vctkhUubfP5zDkE5IM7jn81QhHAw Cr+dCJNWGsz2Mg4L+ngaijQKC9WaDm1y8LMz/53bFYA695WmFe6WQ8gJn2Lkdnb/ vdPsPhz7K/68e2bYVxtRf7zg2cl6c+MeW1M/87uAr9PAoVrj7bQ4UQ9gvTs12fzK Mjej/VUUjt9+2ohLY8RueSP09yciac0COCaXNW0BM9B/976Ye/stinFo+VsfSNgQ 6a87bzHUItA+WqKxUSBjqK4FntUyPsbw6T19LA5+UoMOk6BriszZ3uG9BZTkYWPA 6WGR7uUg0SxATO1k5sF8 =UBi8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --CWFLIPa2qE2j8t6TMh1AJ7u9Plw9aIclR-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Oct 28 02:07:54 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE89CC23905 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 02:07:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsdkaffee@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf0-x234.google.com (mail-lf0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61749C36 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 02:07:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsdkaffee@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf0-x234.google.com with SMTP id b81so45857462lfe.1 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 19:07:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=ZE/LAKqSmiqkNOf4i8c9DX/rZ2duKZtG3OXq6KsPX5E=; b=SrzRyJ2aoDcmIwa36Axxnsazl4R97/0BbgYMjHo/NvHoR3my7M9+TH1HoeFsejhNbm 7L7lao+mv2XiyMUMWmiBVYwzOQYA6qzj5bcWVFwzJl6oAf6bju0Pz5q78KwSBKy+umbX SKy/msuGJZ+vFE6KjYbOId4H8UcDq35YSiZPARhjJW4yqaYwk8x71bHMbUCDbmhB0ow9 YmsPh+hssbMnpCnrkLrxb+TtTEtRyicY/ZkXaPVAzWSeSn7RKV0I0uHFChZXVYXYTCtE oy0xV7hAKst/0RKEVGAr+qaSJkrmPxXASxti9sfhSIjhPHyQdGkYL6wyYysnD5cCaFPz fykg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ZE/LAKqSmiqkNOf4i8c9DX/rZ2duKZtG3OXq6KsPX5E=; b=MvrYnP35IwT68RrHJHj8aCIMLPzYio8ugpfJIGQ/GbF9aDE+NasMMk2lHF5hFFRkgB wLsCF+niIVBbobuhH0ejIewb3/4aIk+wugjm7dkEm1OwwHvX+eDgV8amlo5v0wwa3z4T 8Ah8y9WIXLwKgaZnMDypSVb3g15wczurnEb55gaFuEbQjztXb1YiqcuIt2uNxOEP92L1 Uv1r8ESRRU6KUTrkp2LXTefQDI7MNjoWHaQL3af5tzmfa4hWG18atBFFAomlIWhWrqq9 KlJOPo0Weu9ZgWNm+GvAKaCHvOkyJy+UEQbJBUNLAQxqQUlkC36n04oMFMGbTemmHxvs dCug== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvfyMjiscnomz0+uitg4iaO4DT2H6puHYSbTCMfu0HXGwhwQm8FxrnAfz2BfoihpjncZjccIIJgosj9g3g== X-Received: by 10.25.160.206 with SMTP id j197mr7653533lfe.114.1477620471960; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 19:07:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: bsdkaffee@gmail.com Received: by 10.25.201.215 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 19:07:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <61b51cd8-18d2-8f70-77c7-ed7dd92c4a0c@bsdproject.de> References: <730bd5a8-d6c2-7e8f-5240-b7d4b6209884@bsdproject.de> <6a431a63-7692-a667-5fa2-4de3d55d5189@bsdproject.de> <1FA8BED7-A46D-43B8-AE74-C99229350352@lastsummer.de> <61b51cd8-18d2-8f70-77c7-ed7dd92c4a0c@bsdproject.de> From: "Jason E. Hale" Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 22:07:51 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: -L55YWZUn9_IpWbRUpZpnpq8cl8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: make makepatch To: Jochen Neumeister Cc: Franco Fichtner , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 02:07:55 -0000 On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 2:28 AM, Jochen Neumeister wrote: > > > On 27.10.2016 08:08, Franco Fichtner wrote: >>> On 27 Oct 2016, at 7:53 AM, Jochen Neumeister wrote: >>> >>> No, make makepatch delete the patches into /files and: >> If there are no patches in files/ maybe you have no patches applied >> in the work/ dir? Does running "make patch" before makepatch help? >> >> > Hm that is interesting. > > make patch: there are 3 patches into /file > > make makepatch: now the 3 files are removed, but: > > make makepatch > Generated patch-wpagui.cpp > The previous patches have been placed here: > /usr/home/joneum/dev/ports/net/wpa_gui/work/.makepatch-tmp/archived-patches > > Now I'm confused. After "make patch" and "make makepatch", there is only > one "new" patch in files: > > /home/joneum/dev/ports/net/wpa_gui/files # ls > patch-wpagui.cpp pkg-message.in > > and in work/.makepatch-tmp/archived-patches: # ls > patch-os_unix.c patch-wpa_ctrl.c patch-wpagui.cpp > > Is this now right, that i can only use the new patch in /files? With > "make clean" i delete the work folder and the old patches. Here is the problem: The port redefines WRKSRC by setting WRKSRC_SUBDIR= wpa_supplicant/wpa_gui-qt4, but the two patches that did not get generated are outside of WRKSRC. The easiest thing to do is: 1) clean everything up 2) run "make patch" 3) add PATCH_WRKSRC= ${WRKDIR}/${DISTNAME} to the port Makefile 4) run "make makepatch" That should regenerate the patches and subsequently rename them. Remind the committer to do "svn mv" to rename the patches instead of deleting and re-adding them. Cheers, Jason From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Oct 28 08:26:15 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F68DC249D7 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 08:26:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CE359D4 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 08:26:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 2C187C249D6; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 08:26:15 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BC6EC249D5 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 08:26:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F1809D3 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 08:26:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u9S8QE4f087993 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 08:26:14 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u9S8QE4T087992; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 08:26:14 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201610280826.u9S8QE4T087992@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 08:26:14 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 08:26:15 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ net/p5-Net-Ping | 2.41 | 2.55 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ science/metaf2xml | 2.0 | 2.1 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Oct 28 09:17:59 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C70C24D5B for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 09:17:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cedric@precidata.com) Received: from ne6-sys-email.precidata.net (ne-6.precidata.com [157.26.74.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59D65C91 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 09:17:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cedric@precidata.com) Received: from ne6-sys-proxy.precidata.net (ne6-sys-proxy.precidata.net [127.1.0.13]) by ne6-sys-email.precidata.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 67ab432e; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 11:11:15 +0200 (CEST) From: Cedric Berger Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\)) Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 11:11:15 +0200 Subject: lighttpd 1.4.42 update does not work with FreeBSD 9.3 Message-Id: <1FFF4A75-E06F-492A-99E5-E381E0FB753C@precidata.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, pkubaj@anongoth.pl X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 09:17:59 -0000 Since the update 6 days ago, lighttpd 1.4.42 does not work on FreeBSD = 9.3 anymore. The binary fails to startup with: 2016-10-28 11:06:30: (plugin.c.227) dlopen() failed for: = /usr/local/lib/lighttpd/mod_cgi.so /usr/local/lib/lighttpd/mod_cgi.so: = Undefined symbol "pipe2=E2=80=9D=20 mod_cgi.c contains the following horror: #ifdef O_CLOEXEC #define pipe_cloexec(pipefd) pipe2((pipefd), O_CLOEXEC) #elif defined FD_CLOEXEC #define pipe_cloexec(pipefd) \ ( 0 =3D=3D pipe(pipefd) \ && 0 =3D=3D fcntl(pipefd[0], F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) \ && 0 =3D=3D fcntl(pipefd[1], F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) \ ? 0 \ : -1) #else #define pipe_cloexec(pipefd) pipe(pipefd) #endif Which of course is wrong, FreeBSD 9.3 has O_CLOEXEC but no pipe2. Thanks, Cedric From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Oct 28 09:28:35 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65DB8C24F14 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 09:28:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk0-x234.google.com (mail-vk0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10D8870; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 09:28:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vk0-x234.google.com with SMTP id q126so50046268vkd.2; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 02:28:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sYA8BTx1mhMmxyUc3NiGtuQcKiYC7+EWKA/VABbEV3Q=; b=BXG9RYIPLwiFFYJrSu2je2HdsXDCNAcJCbNiL9n+juDknbaJ1j9YcqaR/yUoePEkJ0 ZLwgcF/h7ePVaRc+pbBLF3ed7V9+ZTKxHYJ1azCFPxlRs5WWF83kqY5GKhCmzqBXjOqp nnmEmolkIVRRMatcIUiAi244Joi9fLiEvxdvrv+sDsH0KzHIhFPFPFbDX6+Z6kx5uj/6 vCxD5xyTRYbu1PeWH1viBor2Nkhdczx/4S+1Og+whkmUTCSaH4YgYrL7E+YfYdvfgddI 4C2tcnPkqDaQNB8hVVmm11JjQ1mEfgcr1Ad2bQpHKGx+zRXXttZqQgmPfVpsBqYm9Pyo ScvQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sYA8BTx1mhMmxyUc3NiGtuQcKiYC7+EWKA/VABbEV3Q=; b=Y6QctrRswqbwryWZTZ1Ej9RKle+b3ZI4B5oCdRt5kH1AJsWmNhtKaDjYPeT/u361SM 9M4EMPlh9YNUn0GPbaXAJGGCLqssC4JNLCMXjhS0V1/KqfInsVDQJ4RQ1zlKnbIVHBJ6 UU+2d2u/GyG5r6TT2MECXwKGD+BRAz2KhTlrNc9wUUqum5JmOJ2Oekn13QMWq9Jb/iJI EwieH4uYiIQTUMFYRjQitcALdRz5Bbw9ZeFPjo1wqfgEV5k7avqGdj3ggRVUuqOE7CT9 FGjsRRKt2hWuxfHNTPolGBdMDP1zglWYM/Zd3KFJJe8D5960laO/gzp9Xettv47WDocd R11Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvdpUtSOjVRvO2ctR08u+IKpcY62jg45CG5dEWVqLox7Nnj5KxAI8MUwuqImXzY60OHoOXN0/cwCUfBEBA== X-Received: by 10.31.131.74 with SMTP id f71mr11277149vkd.7.1477646914182; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 02:28:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.9.196 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 02:28:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201610252214.u9PME6br070248@gw.catspoiler.org> <7fb24c94-1efa-d1b5-9028-8dec8330e543@FreeBSD.org> <20161027150035.GP79735@over-yonder.net> From: David Demelier Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 11:28:33 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: lighttpd does not pull OpenSSL dependency To: Mathieu Arnold Cc: "Matthew D. Fuller" , Don Lewis , mad@madpilot.net, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 09:28:35 -0000 2016-10-27 18:35 GMT+02:00 Mathieu Arnold : > Le 27/10/2016 =C3=A0 17:00, Matthew D. Fuller a =C3=A9crit : >> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 03:05:03PM +0200 I heard the voice of >> Mathieu Arnold, and lo! it spake thus: >>> Once you install openssl from ports, the ports framework will use >>> it, always. >> That is absolutely not the case since OpenSSL in base was updated to >> .so.8 and ports wasn't re-bumped past it. Everything gets confused >> all the time. > > Well, that is another problem, and you are right, OpenSSL's shlib should > have been bumped, blame the former maintainer for that. I'll talk to the > new maintainer about that. What if we rename contrib libs that are used only in base? like: - /usr/lib/libfreebsd-(ssl|crypto) - /usr/lib/libfreebsd-kerberos* (don't know the name, I don't have access to a FreeBSD system ATM) And then, ports must always link to OpenSSL from ports or Kerberos, and so on that is in base but only for base tools. --=20 Demelier David From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Oct 28 10:05:04 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CDF3C236FE for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 10:05:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mail.madpilot.net (grunt.madpilot.net [78.47.145.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B48B11F; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 10:05:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mail (mail [192.168.254.3]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3t4zrk6XyqzbD2; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 12:04:54 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=madpilot.net; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:date:message-id:from:from :references:subject:subject:received:received; s=mail; t= 1477649089; x=1479463490; bh=NuZAaMYwDMfNEIhTO2+bF+GYigArsdD4KX4 ojwt81Y0=; b=cnO5c/P+4iZg3KW9S6e3WtGzcGF+beoMbaCWDMBGvS84xTqiAAo SWw8MndBLaxWkMKFTTdtJfD58dZ68G5T/TejvbqocEOn0NrEmde40heI3/nMlMJs eY6ZzqImbgup3+msRXK+iATFrG4XH3w2uaXBo3XCjHVXPyjW0iJxStbo= Received: from mail.madpilot.net ([192.168.254.3]) by mail (mail.madpilot.net [192.168.254.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yt-U6PGslmaJ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 12:04:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from marvin.madpilot.net (micro.madpilot.net [88.149.173.206]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 12:04:49 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: lighttpd does not pull OpenSSL dependency To: David Demelier , Mathieu Arnold References: <201610252214.u9PME6br070248@gw.catspoiler.org> <7fb24c94-1efa-d1b5-9028-8dec8330e543@FreeBSD.org> <20161027150035.GP79735@over-yonder.net> Cc: "Matthew D. Fuller" , Don Lewis , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Guido Falsi Message-ID: <04afcb45-0cd5-4a52-ca43-530fc2bf0576@madpilot.net> Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 12:04:48 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 10:05:04 -0000 On 10/28/16 11:28, David Demelier wrote: > 2016-10-27 18:35 GMT+02:00 Mathieu Arnold : >> Le 27/10/2016 à 17:00, Matthew D. Fuller a écrit : >>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 03:05:03PM +0200 I heard the voice of >>> Mathieu Arnold, and lo! it spake thus: >>>> Once you install openssl from ports, the ports framework will use >>>> it, always. >>> That is absolutely not the case since OpenSSL in base was updated to >>> .so.8 and ports wasn't re-bumped past it. Everything gets confused >>> all the time. >> >> Well, that is another problem, and you are right, OpenSSL's shlib should >> have been bumped, blame the former maintainer for that. I'll talk to the >> new maintainer about that. > > What if we rename contrib libs that are used only in base? > > like: > > - /usr/lib/libfreebsd-(ssl|crypto) > - /usr/lib/libfreebsd-kerberos* (don't know the name, I don't have > access to a FreeBSD system ATM) > > And then, ports must always link to OpenSSL from ports or Kerberos, > and so on that is in base but only for base tools. That's what "making the library private" in base means. Base already has some libraries in it which are "private", that means not exposed to binaries outside of base for compiling or linking against. -- Guido Falsi From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Oct 28 10:06:56 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E996C2377E for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 10:06:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from madpilot@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.madpilot.net (grunt.madpilot.net [78.47.145.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34EC31CA for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 10:06:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from madpilot@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail (mail [192.168.254.3]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3t4zv124V6zbD2; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 12:06:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.madpilot.net ([192.168.254.3]) by mail (mail.madpilot.net [192.168.254.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S8pRF-Ui32oa; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 12:06:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from marvin.madpilot.net (micro.madpilot.net [88.149.173.206]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 12:06:51 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: lighttpd 1.4.42 update does not work with FreeBSD 9.3 To: Cedric Berger , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, pkubaj@anongoth.pl References: <1FFF4A75-E06F-492A-99E5-E381E0FB753C@precidata.com> From: Guido Falsi Message-ID: Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 12:06:51 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1FFF4A75-E06F-492A-99E5-E381E0FB753C@precidata.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 10:06:56 -0000 On 10/28/16 11:11, Cedric Berger wrote: > Since the update 6 days ago, lighttpd 1.4.42 does not work on FreeBSD 9.3 anymore. > > The binary fails to startup with: > > 2016-10-28 11:06:30: (plugin.c.227) dlopen() failed for: /usr/local/lib/lighttpd/mod_cgi.so /usr/local/lib/lighttpd/mod_cgi.so: Undefined symbol "pipe2” > > mod_cgi.c contains the following horror: > > #ifdef O_CLOEXEC > #define pipe_cloexec(pipefd) pipe2((pipefd), O_CLOEXEC) > #elif defined FD_CLOEXEC > #define pipe_cloexec(pipefd) \ > ( 0 == pipe(pipefd) \ > && 0 == fcntl(pipefd[0], F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) \ > && 0 == fcntl(pipefd[1], F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) \ > ? 0 \ > : -1) > #else > #define pipe_cloexec(pipefd) pipe(pipefd) > #endif > > Which of course is wrong, FreeBSD 9.3 has O_CLOEXEC but no pipe2. > Please file a bug report about this. -- Guido Falsi From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Oct 28 13:19:34 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0111DC24715 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:19:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicolas@whisperingvault.net) Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (relay6-d.mail.gandi.net [IPv6:2001:4b98:c:538::198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95321C0 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:19:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicolas@whisperingvault.net) Received: from mfilter37-d.gandi.net (mfilter37-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.168]) by relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2493FB877 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:19:31 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter37-d.gandi.net Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([IPv6:::ffff:217.70.183.198]) by mfilter37-d.gandi.net (mfilter37-d.gandi.net [::ffff:10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oSKGiz9MU8Ow for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:19:30 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 10.58.1.148 Received: from webmail.gandi.net (webmail8-d.mgt.gandi.net [10.58.1.148]) (Authenticated sender: nicolas.raspail@whisperingvault.net) by relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6760FFB8EA for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:19:30 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_13bb232a288b555c6c2593fe80d80df3" Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:19:30 +0200 From: Nicolas To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Update to nzbget port Message-ID: <8efdb556aaf9dd75d23e7ba3dfd9dbd6@whisperingvault.net> X-Sender: nicolas@whisperingvault.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:19:34 -0000 --=_13bb232a288b555c6c2593fe80d80df3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Hi I have successfully updated the nzbget port to 0.17.1 and ran it without issues on FreeBSD 10.3 amd64. To compile it with clang 3.4, I have added the following things "-std=c++1y -stdlib=libc++" to the Makefile on the CPPFLAGS line. To create the package, I have removed the AUTHORS entry in pkg-plist I don't know if this is the best way to update the port. The diff is attached to this email If this is the correct way, I will submit it to bugzilla Regards Nicolas --=_13bb232a288b555c6c2593fe80d80df3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Type: text/x-diff; name=nzbget-0.17.diff Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=nzbget-0.17.diff; size=1436 SW5kZXg6IE1ha2VmaWxlCj09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT0KLS0tIE1ha2VmaWxlICAgIChyZXZpc2lvbiA0MjQ3 NjApCisrKyBNYWtlZmlsZSAgICAod29ya2luZyBjb3B5KQpAQCAtMiw4ICsyLDggQEAKICMgJEZy ZWVCU0QkCgogUE9SVE5BTUU9ICBuemJnZXQKLVBPUlRWRVJTSU9OPSAgIDE2LjQKLVBPUlRSRVZJ U0lPTj0gIDMKK1BPUlRWRVJTSU9OPSAgIDE3LjEKK1BPUlRSRVZJU0lPTj0gIDEKIERJU1RWRVJT SU9OUFJFRklYPSB2CiBDQVRFR09SSUVTPSAgICBuZXdzCgpAQCAtMjEsNyArMjEsNyBAQAogICAg ICAgIC0td2l0aC1saWJjdXJzZXMtbGlicmFyaWVzPSR7TkNVUlNFU0xJQn0KIENPTkZJR1VSRV9F TlY9IExPQ0FMQkFTRT0iJHtMT0NBTEJBU0V9IgogTUFLRV9KT0JTX1VOU0FGRT0gIHllcwotQ1BQ RkxBR1MrPSAtSSR7TE9DQUxCQVNFfS9pbmNsdWRlCitDUFBGTEFHUys9IC1JJHtMT0NBTEJBU0V9 L2luY2x1ZGUgLXN0ZD1jKysxeSAtc3RkbGliPWxpYmMrKwogTERGTEFHUys9ICAtbHB0aHJlYWQK IEJJTk1PREU9ICAgMDc1NQoKSW5kZXg6IGRpc3RpbmZvCj09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT0KLS0tIGRpc3RpbmZv ICAgIChyZXZpc2lvbiA0MjQ3NjApCisrKyBkaXN0aW5mbyAgICAod29ya2luZyBjb3B5KQpAQCAt MSwyICsxLDIgQEAKLVNIQTI1NiAobnpiZ2V0LW56YmdldC12MTYuNF9HSDAudGFyLmd6KSA9IDA3 MjI5ZWU1N2ExZGQxNmQxNTRjOTQ5NzA4ZjY2MzJlOTJiOTJhOWZiOGE2NTE4NjdjOTE1ZGE4MWNh ODFhZjYKLVNJWkUgKG56YmdldC1uemJnZXQtdjE2LjRfR0gwLnRhci5neikgPSAxNTkxMzA1CitT SEEyNTYgKG56YmdldC1uemJnZXQtdjE3LjFfR0gwLnRhci5neikgPSA0YjNjZjUwMGQ5YmI2ZTlh YjY1YjJjODQ1MTM1OGU2YzkzYWYwMzY4MTc2ZjE5M2VlYmFmY2ExN2Q3MjA5YzM5CitTSVpFIChu emJnZXQtMTcuMS1zcmMudGFyLmd6KSA9IDE2MDk5MzEKSW5kZXg6IHBrZy1wbGlzdAo9PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09Ci0tLSBwa2ctcGxpc3QgICAocmV2aXNpb24gNDI0NzYwKQorKysgcGtnLXBsaXN0ICAgKHdv cmtpbmcgY29weSkKQEAgLTEsNyArMSw2IEBACiBiaW4vbnpiZ2V0CiBAc2FtcGxlIGV0Yy9uemJn ZXQuY29uZi5zYW1wbGUKIEBjb21tZW50ICUlUE9SVERPQ1MlJSUlRE9DU0RJUiUlL0NPUFlJTkcK LSUlUE9SVERPQ1MlJSUlRE9DU0RJUiUlL0FVVEhPUlMKICUlUE9SVERPQ1MlJSUlRE9DU0RJUiUl L0NoYW5nZUxvZwogJSVQT1JURE9DUyUlJSVET0NTRElSJSUvUkVBRE1FCiAlJURBVEFESVIlJS9u emJnZXQuY29uZgo= --=_13bb232a288b555c6c2593fe80d80df3-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Oct 28 13:36:34 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFD22C24EE8 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:36:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@mat.cc) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C50AE2C for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:36:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@mat.cc) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 6BA41C24EE7; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:36:34 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B505C24EE6 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:36:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@mat.cc) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (mx3.absolight.net [IPv6:2a01:678:2:100::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB15CE2B for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:36:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@mat.cc) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4042CBDCE2 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:36:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ogg.in.absolight.net (ogg.in.absolight.net [79.143.241.239]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1FF20BDCD0 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:36:31 +0200 (CEST) Resent-From: Mathieu Arnold Resent-To: FreeBSD Ports list Resent-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:36:30 +0200 Resent-Message-ID: <5acef4bf-2b0e-1879-cd7d-c49f03e5ca72@mat.cc> Resent-User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 Received: from deliver ([unix socket]) by prod2.absolight.net (Cyrus v2.3.16) with LMTPA; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:28:05 +0200 X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.3 X-Original-To: freebsd@m.absolight.fr Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B790BDCD0 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:28:05 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at absolight.net X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -12.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.2 tagged_above=-200 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, DKIM_SIGNED=0.001, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VERIFIED=-2, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.596] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: prod2.absolight.net (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from prod2.absolight.net ([127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (prod2.absolight.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 20024) with ESMTP id wwfYOExmm9Wy for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:28:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:2]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6362EBDCE3 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:28:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACF1B6DE45 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:28:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vladimirtt@gmail.com) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7735F89A for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:28:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vladimirtt@gmail.com) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 75B761255; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:28:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69CA51254; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:28:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vladimirtt@gmail.com) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A54F899; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:28:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vladimirtt@gmail.com) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 489E51253; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:28:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47DC61252 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:28:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vladimirtt@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk0-x230.google.com (mail-vk0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BC00898 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:28:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vladimirtt@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vk0-x230.google.com with SMTP id c203so9919564vke.1 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 06:28:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=PEtofljrHs1Ye0SSoS2G/86mSrNy70+GW6q+RviKWjY=; b=c2OW/bNxExfedqGku/MiJrbWDbMuhvQ2aXxfW3peRN1hFk2qdzkhaYTZZqHuvoWvpx a2wJUPByxnq5Ce6uKQSIACSzWNKeEX/pMrZlPehbi0sIooz5eG1b3O9q1xblwOtlUfdd hyXmJ/Uc+utlZdEfPcGBMMK3oPGFrwit6CEIgHrod9dkkKoqaOcJnYVcSF4d4t3Icvgc 8dAUSG7+AbFVAgyxyA2ZtH3qNvCg2AUnpQ6PSrlBeWlRomu5+zWRXqS7ozeeX7VFVB9r 0TXCEWSx6sKVYjkmrG/8LVUoPPTKmJV8p0xOlZBBQkIcqu+P63E/tbei4vC5rf7UYq9Y cslw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=PEtofljrHs1Ye0SSoS2G/86mSrNy70+GW6q+RviKWjY=; b=jJDbuCHoXLtecSYm6jfE1zPk3WK0e3/gNXWJnpNpTssjTecHenSg44PhEdnuyilCoc NdT5+1e4OoauriKfrNGWVaqoG6fpIht/LUT3iedXAFKwI/0EhkBb7fZbF+F2h549EGh5 rsrtKOhr0x5FY1CINSOIzomhW+fyXgGTBFZDup6/MWtXj2yVf7ukGAZD1ihpe3ih0X+d 7LhhGxYdxoFLNjLppe12YernrhI5FwUjkYTYp3mNSurdxGrtqSLB7DBhn4Fxl/axsED7 c3mnfATYLfejYTYLGD/2aTIlg0+je+uVchsXA1uIlkiIPxRTh+j/31Ndv5+UnMT/CjUw k+Og== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvcl5jriMli27Kd4/qxZNpjpFTDVeBskfmM+waM2/xsDQbuDNS2Dxfp+ksQQYhV2Dz4rXOLyzCuzndI1Fg== X-Received: by 10.31.192.136 with SMTP id q130mr12050479vkf.138.1477661280982; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 06:28:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.73.212 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 06:28:00 -0700 (PDT) From: vladimirtt@gmail.com Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:28:00 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: New FreeBSD port To: portmgr@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:36:34 -0000 Hello FreeBSD Ports Management Team, recently i have ported a Linux application to FreeBSD for my personal needs. I think it could be of benefit of other FreeBSD users to have the application under the ports tree. What is the usual procedure to create a new FreeBSD port ? Best regards, Vladimir Terziev From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Oct 28 13:40:06 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E756C24058 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:40:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from papowell@astart.com) Received: from astart2.astart.com (wsip-72-214-30-30.sd.sd.cox.net [72.214.30.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04EC710B4 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:40:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from papowell@astart.com) Received: from laptop_103.private (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by astart2.astart.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id u9SDe42s059705 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 06:40:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from papowell@astart.com) Reply-To: papowell@astart.com Subject: Re: Inconsistency? (was Re: misc/jive deleted) References: <20161022161428.GA7234@lonesome.com> <201610232306.u9NN5qN0091649@fire.js.berklix.net> <20161024021013.GZ51420@home.opsec.eu> <731fbd25-7c43-f2b1-088a-59efa0a7f61d@jetcafe.org> <20161026073255.GF51420@home.opsec.eu> <37a3a078-8e5b-aa86-6c9a-8df6a15df059@gmail.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Patrick Powell Organization: Astart Technologies Message-ID: Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 06:40:04 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <37a3a078-8e5b-aa86-6c9a-8df6a15df059@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:40:06 -0000 On 10/26/16 03:56, David Demelier wrote: > On 10/26/2016 09:32 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >> Hi! >> >>> I think unless FreeBSD makes explicit antichrist statement, there is >>> no problem having a daemon mascot. I have never heard any religious >>> problem so far. Or then I missed something. >> Approx. 20 years ago (?), some FreeBSD developer with a old-style >> logo on a t-shirt was asked to leave some saloon in Texas >> because the logo suggested that they worship the antichrist. > Brilliant ! :-) >> There was a job (in rec.humor.funny?) about it 8-} >> >> That's why this reference to the demon logo is made 8-} >> > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I have an autographed T Shirt by the artist - Phil Foglio. Who also did the artwork for the MythAdventures (Graphic Novel) as well as others. When asked for an update at one of the San Diego Comic Cons, he just laughed hysterically and then politely said 'No!' See http://www.studiofoglio.com/ for examples of his work. -- Patrick Powell Astart Technologies papowell@astart.com 1530 Jamacha Rd, Suite X Network and System San Diego, CA 92019 Consulting 858-874-6543 FAX 858-751-2435 Web: www.astart.com From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Oct 28 13:41:02 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97959C241BF for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:41:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mizhka@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x235.google.com (mail-wm0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 447F812DA; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:41:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mizhka@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x235.google.com with SMTP id p190so11394987wmp.1; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 06:41:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=EAP/g29ohiMbXWEzGt1Gv0T7mtdDIsoKbloCGV9/wpw=; b=YXoXYpUl3pBV3hytzasKl5aaWoqlMvOhbMAu0qfw6viJTnyR20d/jKaLGyiaF8n3hs 5kTkQ65WhlxeyUdbGbffGZQBxOGetoIennEjx6rH2HXJBCcPzthXXsrQGGh9W2rc+RQX Xni2n3MqioadW4UqKuNgbtXNhQsWnnDRcau25BilNsDHAzRhVTdNgnXvDYH9sXddrt4l UMSyQ4iZkquprAAAG6jzSP+t7K5dfzN70BADwJxuzSdXD3dsmh+CKdYcfujxUtY+4DaF av+QrrlILw7D5wu+gnbEA7dGwRnWSZj1hpYNV9wI7e0ijF1oJWlZtB5sT7PyInAL/Rz4 c+0g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=EAP/g29ohiMbXWEzGt1Gv0T7mtdDIsoKbloCGV9/wpw=; b=hcEJYXIwiXT6TlwkaQLYDpZjIg1iOIP5tzModiGz63dX/GeUn+zxdLewVmvCm5mLGB +5g91MpnWU96IxWmeRM+jnJnTQhlEmClmL+xiJyPcUIvEZkkAcYaND2RbB026mpisWFM RmvJveP1N7Y84rBXHRbxYCFaUVOrbThmOBguRU2muJSzTK0VHh+TE9X23LbL8E+7rXIn oV1uT0WqBNMFFa01yC9rtfOlu7bqevY6DkvS+zokJPKa0zBrd77AHwscFJ4hEka4baOK lAYXdWb/ZMpf2rdIQyIxNSTfdSiopY44HTeHe4qt20FtPylXTOfMCZTG2qh6h9X939Nc Xs0w== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvdJux8XO2lrXVGSnDlg1m0UHUGAFJoxPh57XJ+HdjqLX6ZJ0N5tQNCGX14vjjrnRsxAAFAIz9rhQCrUnQ== X-Received: by 10.194.157.9 with SMTP id wi9mr11392012wjb.143.1477662060455; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 06:41:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.12.196 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 06:41:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Michael Zhilin Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:41:00 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: www/subsonic-standalone license To: jlh@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports Cc: joshruehlig@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:41:02 -0000 Hi, Issue: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213299 (created 20 days ago). License of www/subsonic-standalone is GPL [1], but actually this version of software (v.6) is available only as free binaries. Also it includes trial version of functionalities which can be purchased by subscription. Could you please look at this issue? Thank you in advance! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Oct 28 13:44:49 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B769EC2436F for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:44:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4DEB186F for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:44:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A435DC2436E; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:44:49 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3DE1C2436D for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:44:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 655881869 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:44:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1c07Sj-0001aB-GZ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:44:49 +0200 Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:44:49 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: vladimirtt@gmail.com Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New FreeBSD port Message-ID: <20161028134449.GK51420@home.opsec.eu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:44:49 -0000 Hello, > Hello FreeBSD Ports Management Team, > > recently i have ported a Linux application to FreeBSD for my personal > needs. I think it could be of benefit of other FreeBSD users to have the > application under the ports tree. > > What is the usual procedure to create a new FreeBSD port ? It's described in full in the Porters Handbook at https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.html There's a short intro called "Quick Porting" in section 3 of that handbook: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.html#quick-porting I'd suggest you have a look at that section, give it a first cut and ask additional questions in the list. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Oct 28 13:51:14 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20AD1C246BB for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:51:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from papowell@astart.com) Received: from astart2.astart.com (wsip-72-214-30-30.sd.sd.cox.net [72.214.30.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDF851D51 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:51:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from papowell@astart.com) Received: from laptop_103.private (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by astart2.astart.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id u9SDpCtY059740 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 06:51:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from papowell@astart.com) Reply-To: papowell@astart.com Subject: Re: Problem with gcc5 std library when building ports References: To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Patrick Powell Organization: Astart Technologies Message-ID: <4eeae082-de0a-65be-b934-9336a4acf8d4@astart.com> Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 06:51:12 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:51:14 -0000 On 10/26/16 16:01, Dewayne Geraghty wrote: > Have spent a couple of days trying to build around 800 ports with gcc5. > This one has me stumped! > > Can anyone help regarding the apparant absence of snprintf from std? Am I > missing something, perhaps LDCONFIG or? I've looked in /usr/ports/Mk/ > bsd.gcc.mk and /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk but this is an area that I'm > unfamiliar, so nothing really stood out. > > If I change the compiler from gcc5 to clang everything compiles and runs > correctly. I have in /etc/make.conf > USE_GCC= 5 > and to use clang, I just comment out the above. So everything is constant, > on FreeBSD 10.3Stable (updated and rebuilt overnight) > > For example: /usr/ports/devel/jsoncpp (but many share this problem) > g++5 -o buildscons/linux-gcc-FreeBSD/src/lib_json/json_reader.o -c -O2 > -pipe -DOPENSSL_NO_SSL2 -DOPENSSL_NO_SSL3 -g0 -ggdb0 -DSTRIP_FBSDID > -UDEBUGGING -UDEBUG -march=c3-2 -mtune=c3-2 -Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc5 > -fno-strict-aliasing --std=c++11 -Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc5 -Iinclude > src/lib_json/json_reader.cpp > > src/lib_json/json_reader.cpp: In member function 'std::__cxx11::string > Json::Reader::getLocationLineAndColumn(Json::Reader::Location) const': > src/lib_json/json_reader.cpp:34:18: error: 'snprintf' is not a member of > 'std' > #define snprintf std::snprintf > > And for completeness: > # ldconfig -r | grep -E "gcc|\+" > search directories: > /lib:/usr/lib:/usr/lib/compat:/usr/local/lib:/usr/local/lib/gcc5:/usr/local/lib/heimdal:/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.20/mach/CORE > 35:-lgcc_s.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 > 38:-lc++.1 => /usr/lib/libc++.so.1 > 126:-lcc1.0 => /usr/local/lib/gcc5/libcc1.so.0 > 127:-lgcc_s.1 => /usr/local/lib/gcc5/libgcc_s.so.1 > 128:-lstdc++.6 => /usr/local/lib/gcc5/libstdc++.so.6 > 129:-lcilkrts.5 => /usr/local/lib/gcc5/libcilkrts.so.5 > 130:-lssp.0 => /usr/local/lib/gcc5/libssp.so.0 > 131:-lquadmath.0 => /usr/local/lib/gcc5/libquadmath.so.0 > 132:-lgfortran.3 => /usr/local/lib/gcc5/libgfortran.so.3 > 133:-lobjc.4 => /usr/local/lib/gcc5/libobjc.so.4 > 134:-lgomp.1 => /usr/local/lib/gcc5/libgomp.so.1 > 135:-lgomp-plugin-host_nonshm.1 => > /usr/local/lib/gcc5/libgomp-plugin-host_nonshm.so.1 > 136:-litm.1 => /usr/local/lib/gcc5/libitm.so.1 > 137:-latomic.1 => /usr/local/lib/gcc5/libatomic.so.1 > > Regards, Dewayne > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Way way back in the early days of the standardization of the C library, the Great Minds decided that putting snprintf into the C library would not be done as it was 'not part of the deployed routines' or something similar. So they left in sprintf, which ended up causing more boundary overruns and attacks then any other routine. Don't get me started about strcpy, etc. etc. -- Patrick Powell Astart Technologies papowell@astart.com 1530 Jamacha Rd, Suite X Network and System San Diego, CA 92019 Consulting 858-874-6543 FAX 858-751-2435 Web: www.astart.com From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Oct 28 14:41:24 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2908FC24B15 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 14:41:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joshruehlig@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk0-x236.google.com (mail-vk0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D34FA95C; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 14:41:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joshruehlig@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vk0-x236.google.com with SMTP id q126so56222974vkd.2; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 07:41:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=IG5pSh6Ft2mpE/8w2yn1KCQvl05Xjd7Yz5nvgyAFZFY=; b=F88yKMjrSll4RUrfgwiNcavCPnV7j/6ERZoazaRzrAdC4arHGipQA4fTHVah1jO4lp VGFiSlaL/FHcPCMkNmE7nsU4mvcCdFXNUrhTZ/OfXwA9i8BtjaiMqWd05EQvKFed4IzP Ayd7jhwiTN4BVXRFe/UFE4YUlAfRgsC7tqhmagdlDzynazfvgjhqEXYvFtGaarXAEQpN EG+3cRq04zw1y3zsGeRfeAt5W1wv4neSg4gxFzicBQBkIM7sXGTAK0VuZnHTlbFfLah+ 4iLr3ZTNxuQZ+c/YbFfF/cjE8u3swqqxi40A8q0bPHkEYng+gM3DoiYwKeFomB0r20oa +UZA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=IG5pSh6Ft2mpE/8w2yn1KCQvl05Xjd7Yz5nvgyAFZFY=; b=EEXpu/JEihs4Vn+yCzdZ25sKydNmWDkhbUt960bC+FViZ9y3R9UrQ+bC0fWKAcNoIO oy56venVNNIdlJZuODRRugn6yaFs18PyjnNBc8UggGecC221QDFtWEwfMSU194jO6DXq ENn2yil1uuYt7PnU60XlJNFBRCgS/IM8BzzRI495BZMvAt+xdXGIekPsmy1JZ+rRNV/v y4RXpikhKVniQRPVej1T3iNl5/e8giqvUjcKDIthLWrEQT8D6NqbY+mRhkFBRIkPItR6 tHHiBBYGTqUrVfZU4Z8Z7iPndFF/UAmqQM73alRz74gC9Ercgk3S7Qcr5c+rYsZloKKy ZTfQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvciHjfCx1D8h48g7FwmeowTjNja0ybFtW7sfDOHcFpYBXXcQpjssSZjm/njy77YdfdcdFiuOUUNXvVc0w== X-Received: by 10.31.11.145 with SMTP id 139mr12594334vkl.141.1477665682954; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 07:41:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.159.48.84 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 07:41:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.159.48.84 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 07:41:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Joshua Ruehlig Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 07:41:22 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: www/subsonic-standalone license To: Michael Zhilin Cc: FreeBSD Ports , jlh@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 14:41:24 -0000 sure I'll take a look. I assume all I need to do is find and set the current license? On Oct 28, 2016 6:41 AM, "Michael Zhilin" wrote: > Hi, > > Issue: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213299 (created > 20 days ago). > > License of www/subsonic-standalone is GPL [1], but actually this version > of software (v.6) is available only as free binaries. Also it includes > trial version of functionalities which can be purchased by subscription. > > Could you please look at this issue? > > Thank you in advance! > From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Oct 28 14:57:41 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 792EFC24163 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 14:57:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de) Received: from host64.shmhost.net (host64.kissl.de [213.239.241.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DC6A1537; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 14:57:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de) Received: from francos-mbp.homeoffice.local (ipservice-092-217-062-255.092.217.pools.vodafone-ip.de [92.217.62.255]) by host64.shmhost.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DD24183A21; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:57:30 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\)) Subject: Re: www/subsonic-standalone license From: Franco Fichtner In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:57:28 +0200 Cc: Michael Zhilin , jlh@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Ports Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <25221A70-7B8F-4D10-AEEB-054FA7D58B0D@lastsummer.de> References: To: Joshua Ruehlig X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at host64.shmhost.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 14:57:41 -0000 > On 28 Oct 2016, at 4:41 PM, Joshua Ruehlig wrote: > > sure I'll take a look. I assume all I need to do is find and set the > current license? I would like to take this opportunity to ask why we have a maintainer drop whilst doing the upgrade of a free 5.3 to a proprietary 6.0. What's the logic in that? Wouldn't it be better to have keep 5.3 until it dies in dignity? Also, there is https://github.com/Libresonic/libresonic Cheers, Franco From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Oct 28 15:45:17 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5DBC257EF for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:45:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca) Received: from doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (doctor.nl2k.ab.ca [204.209.81.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C030C49 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:45:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca) Received: from doctor by doctor.nl2k.ab.ca with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1c09LH-000LoL-RS for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 09:45:15 -0600 Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 09:45:15 -0600 From: The Doctor To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Thread issues Message-ID: <20161028154515.GA83547@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:45:17 -0000 Script started on Fri Oct 28 09:40:37 2016 You have mail.=0D root@doctor:/usr/home/doctor # portmas=08=1B[K=08=1B[K=08=1B[K=08=1B[K=08= =1B[K=08=1B[K=08=1B[Kcd /usr/source/php-7.0.13RC!=0D=0D /usr/source/php-7.0.13RC!: No such file or directory.=0D root@doctor:/usr/home/doctor # cd /usr/source/php-7.0.13RC!=08=1B[K1=0D=0D root@doctor:/usr/source/php-7.0.13RC1 # portmaster math/fftw3-float ; portm= aster =08 math/fftw3 ; /bin/sh ./configphp ; less configphp=0D=0D =1B]0;portmaster: fftw3-float-3.3.3_2=07=0D =3D=3D=3D>>> Currently installed version: fftw3-float-3.3.3_2=0D =3D=3D=3D>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/math/fftw3-float=0D =0D =3D=3D=3D>>> Gathering distinfo list for installed ports=0D =0D =3D=3D=3D>>> Launching 'make checksum' for math/fftw3-float in background=0D =3D=3D=3D>>> Gathering dependency list for math/fftw3-float from ports=0D =3D=3D=3D>>> Initial dependency check complete for math/fftw3-float=0D =0D =1B]0;portmaster: fftw3-float-3.3.3_2=07=0D =3D=3D=3D>>> Starting build for math/fftw3-float <<<=3D=3D=3D=0D =0D =3D=3D=3D>>> All dependencies are up to date=0D =0D =3D=3D=3D> Cleaning for fftw3-float-3.3.5=0D =3D=3D=3D> License GPLv2 accepted by the user=0D =3D=3D=3D> Found saved configuration for fftw3-float-3.3.5=0D =3D=3D=3D> fftw3-float-3.3.5 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found= =0D =3D=3D=3D> Fetching all distfiles required by fftw3-float-3.3.5 for buildin= g=0D =3D=3D=3D> Extracting for fftw3-float-3.3.5=0D =3D> SHA256 Checksum OK for fftw-3.3.5.tar.gz.=0D =3D=3D=3D> Patching for fftw3-float-3.3.5=0D =3D=3D=3D> Applying extra patch /usr/ports/math/fftw3-float/../../math/fft= w3/files/extrapatch-tests_fftw-bench.c=0D =3D=3D=3D> Applying FreeBSD patches for fftw3-float-3.3.5=0D =3D=3D=3D> fftw3-float-3.3.5 depends on package: pkgconf>=3D0.9.10 - foun= d=0D =3D=3D=3D> fftw3-float-3.3.5 depends on executable: gcc48 - found=0D =3D=3D=3D> fftw3-float-3.3.5 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/as - found=0D =3D=3D=3D> fftw3-float-3.3.5 depends on package: perl5>=3D5.24<5.25 - fou= nd=0D =3D=3D=3D> fftw3-float-3.3.5 depends on shared library: libmpi.so - found= (/usr/local/mpi/openmpi/lib/libmpi.so)=0D =3D=3D=3D> Configuring for fftw3-float-3.3.5=0D configure: loading site script /usr/ports/Templates/config.site=0D checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c=0D checking whether build environment is sane... yes=0D checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... (cached) /bin/mkdir -p=0D checking for gawk... (cached) /usr/bin/awk=0D checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes=0D checking whether make supports nested variables... yes=0D checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no= =0D checking build system type... amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0=0D checking host system type... amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0=0D checking for gcc... gcc48=0D checking whether the C compiler works... yes=0D checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out=0D checking for suffix of executables... =0D checking whether we are cross compiling... no=0D checking for suffix of object files... o=0D checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes=0D checking whether gcc48 accepts -g... yes=0D checking for gcc48 option to accept ISO C89... none needed=0D checking whether gcc48 understands -c and -o together... yes=0D checking for style of include used by make... GNU=0D checking dependency style of gcc48... gcc3=0D checking for C compiler vendor... gnu=0D checking for gcc48 option to accept ISO C99... -std=3Dgnu99=0D checking for gcc48 -std=3Dgnu99 option to accept ISO Standard C... (cached)= -std=3Dgnu99=0D checking whether ln -s works... yes=0D checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... (cached) yes=0D checking how to print strings... printf=0D checking for a sed that does not truncate output... (cached) /usr/bin/sed=0D checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... (cached) /usr/bin/grep= =0D checking for egrep... (cached) /usr/bin/egrep=0D checking for fgrep... (cached) /usr/bin/fgrep=0D checking for ld used by gcc48 -std=3Dgnu99... /usr/local/bin/ld=0D checking if the linker (/usr/local/bin/ld) is GNU ld... yes=0D checking for BSD- or MS-compatible name lister (nm)... /usr/local/bin/nm=0D checking the name lister (/usr/local/bin/nm) interface... BSD nm=0D checking the maximum length of command line arguments... (cached) 262144=0D checking whether the shell understands some XSI constructs... yes=0D checking whether the shell understands "+=3D"... no=0D checking how to convert amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0 file names to amd64-portb= ld-freebsd11.0 format... func_convert_file_noop=0D checking how to convert amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0 file names to toolchain f= ormat... func_convert_file_noop=0D checking for /usr/local/bin/ld option to reload object files... -r=0D checking for objdump... /usr/local/bin/objdump=0D checking how to recognize dependent libraries... pass_all=0D checking for dlltool... dlltool=0D checking how to associate runtime and link libraries... printf %s\n=0D checking for archiver @FILE support... @=0D checking for strip... strip=0D checking for ranlib... /usr/local/bin/ranlib=0D checking command to parse /usr/local/bin/nm output from gcc48 -std=3Dgnu99 = object... ok=0D checking for sysroot... no=0D checking for mt... mt=0D checking if mt is a manifest tool... no=0D checking how to run the C preprocessor... cpp48=0D checking for ANSI C header files... (cached) yes=0D checking for sys/types.h... (cached) yes=0D checking for sys/stat.h... (cached) yes=0D checking for stdlib.h... (cached) yes=0D checking for string.h... (cached) yes=0D checking for memory.h... (cached) yes=0D checking for strings.h... (cached) yes=0D checking for inttypes.h... (cached) yes=0D checking for stdint.h... (cached) yes=0D checking for unistd.h... (cached) yes=0D checking for dlfcn.h... (cached) yes=0D checking for objdir... .libs=0D checking if gcc48 -std=3Dgnu99 supports -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions... no=0D checking for gcc48 -std=3Dgnu99 option to produce PIC... -fPIC -DPIC=0D checking if gcc48 -std=3Dgnu99 PIC flag -fPIC -DPIC works... yes=0D checking if gcc48 -std=3Dgnu99 static flag -static works... yes=0D checking if gcc48 -std=3Dgnu99 supports -c -o file.o... yes=0D checking if gcc48 -std=3Dgnu99 supports -c -o file.o... (cached) yes=0D checking whether the gcc48 -std=3Dgnu99 linker (/usr/local/bin/ld) supports= shared libraries... yes=0D checking whether -lc should be explicitly linked in... no=0D checking dynamic linker characteristics... freebsd11.0 ld.so=0D checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate=0D checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes=0D checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes=0D checking whether to build shared libraries... yes=0D checking whether to build static libraries... yes=0D checking for ocamlbuild... no=0D checking for mpicc... /usr/local/mpi/openmpi/bin/mpicc=0D checking for MPI_Init... yes=0D checking for mpi.h... yes=0D checking for mpirun... /usr/local/mpi/openmpi/bin/mpirun=0D checking size of MPI_Fint... 4=0D checking whether C compiler accepts -msse... yes=0D checking for ANSI C header files... (cached) yes=0D checking libintl.h usability... yes=0D checking libintl.h presence... yes=0D checking for libintl.h... yes=0D checking for malloc.h... (cached) no=0D checking for stddef.h... (cached) yes=0D checking for stdlib.h... (cached) yes=0D checking for string.h... (cached) yes=0D checking for strings.h... (cached) yes=0D checking for sys/time.h... (cached) yes=0D checking for unistd.h... (cached) yes=0D checking for limits.h... (cached) yes=0D checking c_asm.h usability... no=0D checking c_asm.h presence... no=0D checking for c_asm.h... no=0D checking intrinsics.h usability... no=0D checking intrinsics.h presence... no=0D checking for intrinsics.h... no=0D checking for stdint.h... (cached) yes=0D checking mach/mach_time.h usability... no=0D checking mach/mach_time.h presence... no=0D checking for mach/mach_time.h... no=0D checking sys/sysctl.h usability... yes=0D checking sys/sysctl.h presence... yes=0D checking for sys/sysctl.h... yes=0D checking altivec.h usability... no=0D checking altivec.h presence... no=0D checking for altivec.h... no=0D checking for an ANSI C-conforming const... yes=0D checking for inline... inline=0D checking for size_t... (cached) yes=0D checking whether time.h and sys/time.h may both be included... yes=0D checking for long double... (cached) yes=0D checking for hrtime_t... no=0D checking size of int... 4=0D checking size of unsigned int... 4=0D checking size of long... 8=0D checking size of unsigned long... 8=0D checking size of long long... 8=0D checking size of unsigned long long... 8=0D checking size of size_t... 8=0D checking size of ptrdiff_t... 8=0D checking for uintptr_t... (cached) yes=0D checking size of float... 4=0D checking size of double... 8=0D checking size of fftw_r2r_kind... 4=0D checking for working alloca.h... no=0D checking for alloca... yes=0D checking for working strtod... yes=0D checking for vprintf... (cached) yes=0D checking for _doprnt... no=0D checking for sin in -lm... yes=0D checking for BSDgettimeofday... no=0D checking for gettimeofday... (cached) yes=0D checking for gethrtime... no=0D checking for read_real_time... no=0D checking for time_base_to_time... no=0D checking for drand48... yes=0D checking for sqrt... yes=0D checking for memset... (cached) yes=0D checking for posix_memalign... yes=0D checking for memalign... no=0D checking for _mm_malloc... no=0D checking for _mm_free... no=0D checking for clock_gettime... (cached) yes=0D checking for mach_absolute_time... no=0D checking for sysctl... yes=0D checking for abort... yes=0D checking for sinl... yes=0D checking for cosl... yes=0D checking for snprintf... (cached) yes=0D checking whether sinl is declared... yes=0D checking whether cosl is declared... yes=0D checking whether sinq is declared... no=0D checking whether cosq is declared... no=0D checking whether memalign is declared... no=0D checking whether drand48 is declared... yes=0D checking whether srand48 is declared... yes=0D checking whether posix_memalign is declared... yes=0D checking for _rtc intrinsic... no=0D checking for isnan... yes=0D checking whether C compiler accepts -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3D4... yes=0D checking whether the stack is at least 8-byte aligned by gcc... checking wh= ether C compiler accepts -malign-double... yes=0D yes=0D checking for OpenMP flag of C compiler... -fopenmp=0D checking for Win32 threads... no=0D checking for the pthreads library -lpthreads... no=0D checking whether pthreads work without any flags... no=0D checking whether pthreads work with -Kthread... no=0D checking whether pthreads work with -kthread... no=0D checking for the pthreads library -llthread... no=0D checking whether pthreads work with -pthread... no=0D checking whether pthreads work with -pthreads... no=0D checking whether pthreads work with -mt... no=0D checking whether pthreads work with -mthreads... no=0D checking for the pthreads library -lpthread... no=0D checking whether pthreads work with --thread-safe... no=0D checking for pthread-config... no=0D configure: error: couldn't find threads library for --enable-threads=0D =3D=3D=3D> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly.=0D Please report the problem to jhale@FreeBSD.org [maintainer] and attach the= =0D "/usr/ports/math/fftw3-float/work/fftw-3.3.5/config.log" including the outp= ut=0D of the failure of your make command. Also, it might be a good idea to provi= de=0D an overview of all packages installed on your system (e.g. a=0D /usr/local/sbin/pkg-static info -g -Ea).=0D *** Error code 1=0D =0D Stop.=0D make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/math/fftw3-float=0D *** Error code 1=0D =0D Stop.=0D make: stopped in /usr/ports/math/fftw3-float=0D =0D =3D=3D=3D>>> make build failed for math/fftw3-float=0D =3D=3D=3D>>> Aborting update=0D =0D =0D =3D=3D=3D>>> You can restart from the point of failure with this command li= ne:=0D portmaster math/fftw3-float =0D =0D =1B]0;portmaster: fftw3-3.3.3_2=07=0D =3D=3D=3D>>> Currently installed version: fftw3-3.3.3_2=0D =3D=3D=3D>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/math/fftw3=0D =0D =3D=3D=3D>>> Gathering distinfo list for installed ports=0D =0D =3D=3D=3D>>> Launching 'make checksum' for math/fftw3 in background=0D =3D=3D=3D>>> Gathering dependency list for math/fftw3 from ports=0D =3D=3D=3D>>> Initial dependency check complete for math/fftw3=0D =0D =1B]0;portmaster: fftw3-3.3.3_2=07=0D =3D=3D=3D>>> Starting build for math/fftw3 <<<=3D=3D=3D=0D =0D =3D=3D=3D>>> All dependencies are up to date=0D =0D =3D=3D=3D> Cleaning for fftw3-3.3.5=0D =3D=3D=3D> License GPLv2 accepted by the user=0D =3D=3D=3D> Found saved configuration for fftw3-3.3.5=0D =3D=3D=3D> fftw3-3.3.5 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found=0D =3D=3D=3D> Fetching all distfiles required by fftw3-3.3.5 for building=0D =3D=3D=3D> Extracting for fftw3-3.3.5=0D =3D> SHA256 Checksum OK for fftw-3.3.5.tar.gz.=0D =3D=3D=3D> Patching for fftw3-3.3.5=0D =3D=3D=3D> Applying extra patch /usr/ports/math/fftw3/files/extrapatch-tes= ts_fftw-bench.c=0D =3D=3D=3D> Applying FreeBSD patches for fftw3-3.3.5=0D =3D=3D=3D> fftw3-3.3.5 depends on package: pkgconf>=3D0.9.10 - found=0D =3D=3D=3D> fftw3-3.3.5 depends on executable: gcc48 - found=0D =3D=3D=3D> fftw3-3.3.5 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/as - found=0D =3D=3D=3D> fftw3-3.3.5 depends on package: perl5>=3D5.24<5.25 - found=0D =3D=3D=3D> fftw3-3.3.5 depends on shared library: libmpi.so - found (/usr= /local/mpi/openmpi/lib/libmpi.so)=0D =3D=3D=3D> Configuring for fftw3-3.3.5=0D configure: loading site script /usr/ports/Templates/config.site=0D checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c=0D checking whether build environment is sane... yes=0D checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... (cached) /bin/mkdir -p=0D checking for gawk... (cached) /usr/bin/awk=0D checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes=0D checking whether make supports nested variables... yes=0D checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no= =0D checking build system type... amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0=0D checking host system type... amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0=0D checking for gcc... gcc48=0D checking whether the C compiler works... yes=0D checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out=0D checking for suffix of executables... =0D checking whether we are cross compiling... no=0D checking for suffix of object files... o=0D checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes=0D checking whether gcc48 accepts -g... yes=0D checking for gcc48 option to accept ISO C89... none needed=0D checking whether gcc48 understands -c and -o together... yes=0D checking for style of include used by make... GNU=0D checking dependency style of gcc48... gcc3=0D checking for C compiler vendor... gnu=0D checking for gcc48 option to accept ISO C99... -std=3Dgnu99=0D checking for gcc48 -std=3Dgnu99 option to accept ISO Standard C... (cached)= -std=3Dgnu99=0D checking whether ln -s works... yes=0D checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... (cached) yes=0D checking how to print strings... printf=0D checking for a sed that does not truncate output... (cached) /usr/bin/sed=0D checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... (cached) /usr/bin/grep= =0D checking for egrep... (cached) /usr/bin/egrep=0D checking for fgrep... (cached) /usr/bin/fgrep=0D checking for ld used by gcc48 -std=3Dgnu99... /usr/local/bin/ld=0D checking if the linker (/usr/local/bin/ld) is GNU ld... yes=0D checking for BSD- or MS-compatible name lister (nm)... /usr/local/bin/nm=0D checking the name lister (/usr/local/bin/nm) interface... BSD nm=0D checking the maximum length of command line arguments... (cached) 262144=0D checking whether the shell understands some XSI constructs... yes=0D checking whether the shell understands "+=3D"... no=0D checking how to convert amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0 file names to amd64-portb= ld-freebsd11.0 format... func_convert_file_noop=0D checking how to convert amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0 file names to toolchain f= ormat... func_convert_file_noop=0D checking for /usr/local/bin/ld option to reload object files... -r=0D checking for objdump... /usr/local/bin/objdump=0D checking how to recognize dependent libraries... pass_all=0D checking for dlltool... dlltool=0D checking how to associate runtime and link libraries... printf %s\n=0D checking for archiver @FILE support... @=0D checking for strip... strip=0D checking for ranlib... /usr/local/bin/ranlib=0D checking command to parse /usr/local/bin/nm output from gcc48 -std=3Dgnu99 = object... ok=0D checking for sysroot... no=0D checking for mt... mt=0D checking if mt is a manifest tool... no=0D checking how to run the C preprocessor... cpp48=0D checking for ANSI C header files... (cached) yes=0D checking for sys/types.h... (cached) yes=0D checking for sys/stat.h... (cached) yes=0D checking for stdlib.h... (cached) yes=0D checking for string.h... (cached) yes=0D checking for memory.h... (cached) yes=0D checking for strings.h... (cached) yes=0D checking for inttypes.h... (cached) yes=0D checking for stdint.h... (cached) yes=0D checking for unistd.h... (cached) yes=0D checking for dlfcn.h... (cached) yes=0D checking for objdir... .libs=0D checking if gcc48 -std=3Dgnu99 supports -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions... no=0D checking for gcc48 -std=3Dgnu99 option to produce PIC... -fPIC -DPIC=0D checking if gcc48 -std=3Dgnu99 PIC flag -fPIC -DPIC works... yes=0D checking if gcc48 -std=3Dgnu99 static flag -static works... yes=0D checking if gcc48 -std=3Dgnu99 supports -c -o file.o... yes=0D checking if gcc48 -std=3Dgnu99 supports -c -o file.o... (cached) yes=0D checking whether the gcc48 -std=3Dgnu99 linker (/usr/local/bin/ld) supports= shared libraries... yes=0D checking whether -lc should be explicitly linked in... no=0D checking dynamic linker characteristics... freebsd11.0 ld.so=0D checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate=0D checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes=0D checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes=0D checking whether to build shared libraries... yes=0D checking whether to build static libraries... yes=0D checking for ocamlbuild... no=0D checking for mpicc... /usr/local/mpi/openmpi/bin/mpicc=0D checking for MPI_Init... yes=0D checking for mpi.h... yes=0D checking for mpirun... /usr/local/mpi/openmpi/bin/mpirun=0D checking size of MPI_Fint... 4=0D checking whether C compiler accepts -msse2... yes=0D checking for ANSI C header files... (cached) yes=0D checking libintl.h usability... yes=0D checking libintl.h presence... yes=0D checking for libintl.h... yes=0D checking for malloc.h... (cached) no=0D checking for stddef.h... (cached) yes=0D checking for stdlib.h... (cached) yes=0D checking for string.h... (cached) yes=0D checking for strings.h... (cached) yes=0D checking for sys/time.h... (cached) yes=0D checking for unistd.h... (cached) yes=0D checking for limits.h... (cached) yes=0D checking c_asm.h usability... no=0D checking c_asm.h presence... no=0D checking for c_asm.h... no=0D checking intrinsics.h usability... no=0D checking intrinsics.h presence... no=0D checking for intrinsics.h... no=0D checking for stdint.h... (cached) yes=0D checking mach/mach_time.h usability... no=0D checking mach/mach_time.h presence... no=0D checking for mach/mach_time.h... no=0D checking sys/sysctl.h usability... yes=0D checking sys/sysctl.h presence... yes=0D checking for sys/sysctl.h... yes=0D checking altivec.h usability... no=0D checking altivec.h presence... no=0D checking for altivec.h... no=0D checking for an ANSI C-conforming const... yes=0D checking for inline... inline=0D checking for size_t... (cached) yes=0D checking whether time.h and sys/time.h may both be included... yes=0D checking for long double... (cached) yes=0D checking for hrtime_t... no=0D checking size of int... 4=0D checking size of unsigned int... 4=0D checking size of long... 8=0D checking size of unsigned long... 8=0D checking size of long long... 8=0D checking size of unsigned long long... 8=0D checking size of size_t... 8=0D checking size of ptrdiff_t... 8=0D checking for uintptr_t... (cached) yes=0D checking size of float... 4=0D checking size of double... 8=0D checking size of fftw_r2r_kind... 4=0D checking for working alloca.h... no=0D checking for alloca... yes=0D checking for working strtod... yes=0D checking for vprintf... (cached) yes=0D checking for _doprnt... no=0D checking for sin in -lm... yes=0D checking for BSDgettimeofday... no=0D checking for gettimeofday... (cached) yes=0D checking for gethrtime... no=0D checking for read_real_time... no=0D checking for time_base_to_time... no=0D checking for drand48... yes=0D checking for sqrt... yes=0D checking for memset... (cached) yes=0D checking for posix_memalign... yes=0D checking for memalign... no=0D checking for _mm_malloc... no=0D checking for _mm_free... no=0D checking for clock_gettime... (cached) yes=0D checking for mach_absolute_time... no=0D checking for sysctl... yes=0D checking for abort... yes=0D checking for sinl... yes=0D checking for cosl... yes=0D checking for snprintf... (cached) yes=0D checking whether sinl is declared... yes=0D checking whether cosl is declared... yes=0D checking whether sinq is declared... no=0D checking whether cosq is declared... no=0D checking whether memalign is declared... no=0D checking whether drand48 is declared... yes=0D checking whether srand48 is declared... yes=0D checking whether posix_memalign is declared... yes=0D checking for _rtc intrinsic... no=0D checking for isnan... yes=0D checking whether C compiler accepts -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3D4... yes=0D checking whether the stack is at least 8-byte aligned by gcc... checking wh= ether C compiler accepts -malign-double... yes=0D yes=0D checking for OpenMP flag of C compiler... -fopenmp=0D checking for Win32 threads... no=0D checking for the pthreads library -lpthreads... no=0D checking whether pthreads work without any flags... no=0D checking whether pthreads work with -Kthread... no=0D checking whether pthreads work with -kthread... no=0D checking for the pthreads library -llthread... no=0D checking whether pthreads work with -pthread... no=0D checking whether pthreads work with -pthreads... no=0D checking whether pthreads work with -mt... no=0D checking whether pthreads work with -mthreads... no=0D checking for the pthreads library -lpthread... no=0D checking whether pthreads work with --thread-safe... no=0D checking for pthread-config... no=0D configure: error: couldn't find threads library for --enable-threads=0D =3D=3D=3D> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly.=0D Please report the problem to jhale@FreeBSD.org [maintainer] and attach the= =0D "/usr/ports/math/fftw3/work/fftw-3.3.5/config.log" including the output of= =0D the failure of your make command. Also, it might be a good idea to provide= =0D an overview of all packages installed on your system (e.g. a=0D /usr/local/sbin/pkg-static info -g -Ea).=0D *** Error code 1=0D =0D Stop.=0D make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/math/fftw3=0D *** Error code 1=0D =0D Stop.=0D make: stopped in /usr/ports/math/fftw3=0D =0D =3D=3D=3D>>> make build failed for math/fftw3=0D =3D=3D=3D>>> Aborting update=0D =0D =0D =3D=3D=3D>>> You can restart from the point of failure with this command li= ne:=0D portmaster math/fftw3 =0D =0D configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --with-mysql=0D checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... /usr/bin/grep=0D checking for egrep... /usr/bin/grep -E=0D checking for a sed that does not truncate output... /usr/local/bin/gsed=0D checking build system type... x86_64-unknown-freebsd11.0=0D checking host system type... x86_64-unknown-freebsd11.0=0D checking target system type... x86_64-unknown-freebsd11.0=0D checking for cc... cc=0D checking whether the C compiler works... yes=0D checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out=0D checking for suffix of executables... =0D checking whether we are cross compiling... no=0D checking for suffix of object files... o=0D checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes=0D checking whether cc accepts -g... yes=0D checking for cc option to accept ISO C89... none needed=0D checking how to run the C preprocessor... cc -E=0D checking for icc... no=0D checking for suncc... no=0D checking whether cc understands -c and -o together... yes=0D checking how to run the C preprocessor... cc -E=0D checking for ANSI C header files... yes=0D checking for sys/types.h... yes=0D checking for sys/stat.h... yes=0D checking for stdlib.h... yes=0D checking for string.h... yes=0D checking for memory.h... yes=0D checking for strings.h... yes=0D checking for inttypes.h... yes=0D checking for stdint.h... yes=0D checking for unistd.h... yes=0D checking minix/config.h usability... no=0D checking minix/config.h presence... no=0D checking for minix/config.h... no=0D checking whether it is safe to define __EXTENSIONS__... yes=0D checking whether ln -s works... yes=0D checking for system library directory... lib=0D checking whether to enable runpaths... yes=0D checking if compiler supports -R... no=0D checking if compiler supports -Wl,-rpath,... yes=0D checking for gawk... no=0D checking for nawk... nawk=0D checking if nawk is broken... no=0D checking for bison... bison -y=0D checking for bison version... 2.7 (ok)=0D checking for re2c... re2c=0D checking for re2c version... 0.14.3 (ok)=0D checking whether to enable computed goto gcc extension with re2c... yes=0D checking whether re2c -g works... yes=0D checking whether to force non-PIC code in shared modules... no=0D checking whether /dev/urandom exists... yes=0D checking whether /dev/arandom exists... no=0D checking for global register variables support... no=0D checking for pthreads_cflags... =0D checking for pthreads_lib... =0D =0D =1B[1mConfiguring SAPI modules=1B[m=0D checking for Apache 2.0 handler-module support via DSO through APXS... [Fri= Oct 28 09:42:30.958639 2016] [so:warn] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] AH01574= : module unique_id_module is already loaded, skipping=0D AH00548: NameVirtualHost has no effect and will be removed in the next rele= ase /usr/local/etc/apache24/extra/httpd-vhosts.conf:644=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.138804 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.97 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit Se= rverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.139486 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.173 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit S= erverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.139593 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.172 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit S= erverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.139809 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.168 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit S= erverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.139935 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.167 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit S= erverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.140366 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.163 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit S= erverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.140470 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.161 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit S= erverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.140585 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.124 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit S= erverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.140686 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.160 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit S= erverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.141098 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.174 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit S= erverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.141724 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.156 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit S= erverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.141828 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.153 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit S= erverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.141936 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.170 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit S= erverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.142141 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.154 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit S= erverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.142269 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.151 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit S= erverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.142395 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.150 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit S= erverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.142804 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.153 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit S= erverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.142923 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.170 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit S= erverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.143344 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.144 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit S= erverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.143446 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.143 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit S= erverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.143551 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.142 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit S= erverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.143765 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.139 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit S= erverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.143964 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.137 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit S= erverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.144313 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.133 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit S= erverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.144419 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.132 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit S= erverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.144874 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.127 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit S= erverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.145106 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.118 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit S= erverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.145212 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.116 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit S= erverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.145324 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.122 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit S= erverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.145526 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.120 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit S= erverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.145625 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.119 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit S= erverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.145722 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.111 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit S= erverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.145927 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.108 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit S= erverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.146264 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.105 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit S= erverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.146365 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.104 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit S= erverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.146469 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.103 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit S= erverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.146568 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.102 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit S= erverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.146787 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.100 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit S= erverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.146884 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.99 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit Se= rverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.146983 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.98 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit Se= rverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.147081 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.95 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit Se= rverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.147184 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.93 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit Se= rverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.147280 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.92 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit Se= rverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.147377 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.90 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit Se= rverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.147490 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.88 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit Se= rverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.147589 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.87 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit Se= rverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.147684 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.85 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit Se= rverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.149350 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.69 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit Se= rverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.149476 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.68 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit Se= rverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.149573 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.67 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit Se= rverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.149781 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.65 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit Se= rverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.149879 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.62 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit Se= rverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.149974 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.61 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit Se= rverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.150412 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.56 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit Se= rverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.150510 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.55 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit Se= rverName=0D [Fri Oct 28 09:42:31.150819 2016] [core:error] [pid 83478:tid 34397585408] = (EAI 8)hostname nor servname provided, or not known: AH00549: Failed to res= olve server name for 204.209.81.51 (check DNS) -- or specify an explicit Se= rverName=0D configure: error: ZTS currently requires working POSIX threads. We were una= ble to verify that your system supports Pthreads.=0D =1B[?1h=1B=3D=0D#!/bin/bash=0D LIBS=3D"-lc" OPENSSL_NO_SSL2=3D1 OPENSSL_NO_SSL3=3D1 ./configure \=0D --prefix=3D/usr/local \=0D --localstatedir=3D/var \=0D --htmldir=3D/usr/local/www/apache24/data/php \=0D --enable-re2c-cgoto \=0D --with-apxs2=3D/usr/local/sbin/apxs \=0D --with-libxml-dir=3D/usr/local \=0D --with-openssl=3D/usr/local \=0D --with-zlib=3D/usr \=0D --with-bz2=3Dshared,/usr/ \=0D --enable-bcmath \=0D --enable-calendar \=0D --enable-session \=0D --enable-exif \=0D --without-iconv \=0D --without-mm \=0D --with-curl=3D/usr/local \=0D --with-db4=3D/usr/local/db5 \=0D --with-pcre-dir=3D/usr/local \=0D --with-openssl-dir=3D/usr/local \=0D --with-gd --enable-fpm \=0D --with-gettext=3D/usr/local \=0D --with-gmp=3Dshared,/usr/local \=0D --with-mhash=3D/usr \=0D --with-imap-ssl=3D/usr/source/imap-2007f \=0D --enable-mbstring \=0D --with-onig=3D/usr/local \=0D --with-mcrypt=3Dshared,/usr/local \=0D --with-mysql=3D/usr/local \=0D --with-mysqli=3D/usr/local/bin/mysql_config \=0D --with-mysql-sock=3D/tmp/mysql.sock \=0D --with-zlib-dir=3D/usr \=0D --with-iodbc=3Dshared,/usr/local \=0D --with-unixODBC=3Dshared,/usr/local \=0D --enable-opcache=3Dno --enable-pcntl=3Dno \=0D --with-pgsql=3D/usr/local/ \=0D --with-pdo-dblib=3D/usr/local \=0D --with-pdo-firebird=3D/usr/local \=0D --with-pdo-mysql=3D/usr/local \=0D --with-pdo-odbc=3DunixODBC \=0D --with-pdo-pgsql=3D/usr/local \=0D --enable-sockets \=0D --enable-soap \=0D --enable-sysvmsg \=0D --enable-sysvsem \=0D --enable-sysvshm \=0D --with-xsl=3Dshared,/usr/local \=0D --enable-zip \=0D --with-pcre-dir=3D/usr/local \=0D --with-pear=3D/usr/local \=0D --enable-maintainer-zts \=0D --with-tsrm-pthreads \=0D --enable-shared=3Dyes \=0D --enable-static=3Dno \=0D --with-gnu-ld \=0D --with-pic=0D =1B[7mconfigphp (END)=1B[m=1B[K=0D=1B[K=07=0D=1B[K=1B[7m(END)=1B[m=1B[K=0D= =1B[K=1B[?1l=1B>root@doctor:/usr/source/php-7.0.13RC1 # chow=08=1B[K=08=1B[= K=08=1B[K=08=1B[K=07=07exit=0D=0D exit=0D Script done on Fri Oct 28 09:42:49 2016 I tought FreeBSD is POSIX threads compliant. --=20 Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.= ab.ca God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist risi= ng!=20 http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism Time for the USA to hold a referendum on its republic and vote to dissolve!= !=20 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Oct 28 15:54:00 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 110E9C25A04 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:54:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joshruehlig@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk0-x229.google.com (mail-vk0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C589182; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:53:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joshruehlig@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vk0-x229.google.com with SMTP id q126so57982357vkd.2; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 08:53:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=A7qItdKuwLgMPFJBaUFcTnwBhGEzvFup0k9vfNfKzog=; b=M5+Nu2uES7s8clbtbnINzf/eLEq+Mu48zBAUzAxFU19WAKaF35tBZooEiKQXUf7iQz r5muULZESdhF7tF+dD8mK/JOokgaivql/2fDz+38780QqEG3Go+Teg6zbkLV5hj7KACI ftMroeAmKCt8scWNC2bhJBO0XzYBn+yFalryUwBqbuIIqhNsUw4r4HEHFj8Z9Llr3GFj D+F1JtK8+kF6/OtwYy187fq9vL1HDHwVXQrxViZ7ybwZNNCF11i7migvbdBUDm1y0dGL 6IVINt5LfL7bXAkSI8oJyCo26N1uX7RvXeBOg2B8TelL9uiEOd9laXmweDdgKbO0+vk5 7/Qw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=A7qItdKuwLgMPFJBaUFcTnwBhGEzvFup0k9vfNfKzog=; b=DA5wRlVFrObSU9Cqw8SMA9E4PkIzO6ICXKfhNPjou+ySunjIYWKg0Igurx4CkFACDr UXMDAaX3Z1nWlg8Cvvf9/gS0h2RSMwopOHzD8OIBjmwNb8oWjSXvMFW9lrh806Qyg5Je GfMjRtOztXe4xbdsB+rY3q4yCTwna8W4w+Kvbfo/v8ZFOD90TAGsMz8ao6UvbUS1/xIV DE2EtkMcU8Kdst+ruIso0Wi3i9xWS7GdWVRkxRGcieKNf9Ho911lvjm5FUX3H5wIq0ML uZVc6wp4itbF3uyU4LI12CFF6k2f/oXo9UV7WEJGohtlBnnbovljbRBy4ORCCUFbLnlC rASg== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvcXr7sTBcEIDO1bB2Ghvidqshjj+LoxDNw3/kqBkVpdnxIXhUQiHRTM2ArGtIr7Py5oE55QkWLQBI7zSg== X-Received: by 10.31.1.212 with SMTP id 203mr11703178vkb.99.1477670037812; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 08:53:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.159.48.84 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 08:53:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <25221A70-7B8F-4D10-AEEB-054FA7D58B0D@lastsummer.de> References: <25221A70-7B8F-4D10-AEEB-054FA7D58B0D@lastsummer.de> From: Joshua Ruehlig Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 08:53:57 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: www/subsonic-standalone license To: Franco Fichtner Cc: Michael Zhilin , jlh@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:54:00 -0000 Ohh, I realize earlier I'm not the maintainer and was only CC'ed on the first email. Regardless I'll go search to see if I can find the license for subsonic 6.0. Franco, what do you mean a maintainer drop? Also Madsonic, which is supposedly GPL based on their website is available. Thanks, Josh On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 7:57 AM, Franco Fichtner wrote: > > > On 28 Oct 2016, at 4:41 PM, Joshua Ruehlig > wrote: > > > > sure I'll take a look. I assume all I need to do is find and set the > > current license? > > I would like to take this opportunity to ask why we have a maintainer > drop whilst doing the upgrade of a free 5.3 to a proprietary 6.0. > > What's the logic in that? Wouldn't it be better to have keep 5.3 until > it dies in dignity? > > Also, there is https://github.com/Libresonic/libresonic > > > Cheers, > Franco > From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Oct 28 16:00:44 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE3FFC25B50 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:00:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.117.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 615F168A for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:00:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from zero-gravitas.local (unknown [85.199.232.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A54274393 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:00:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/A54274393; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral Subject: Re: Thread issues To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20161028154515.GA83547@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> From: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <9ab9c6cd-3084-7d0f-624d-b82820026f78@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 17:00:22 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161028154515.GA83547@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VSPtrHWllvfHatUSnkEgi09DkSrvwIA6c" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE, SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:00:44 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --VSPtrHWllvfHatUSnkEgi09DkSrvwIA6c Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="gg58kGOaxvnSjSxkRGOEMrDTuq4En3pxf"; protected-headers="v1" From: Matthew Seaman To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <9ab9c6cd-3084-7d0f-624d-b82820026f78@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Thread issues References: <20161028154515.GA83547@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> In-Reply-To: <20161028154515.GA83547@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> --gg58kGOaxvnSjSxkRGOEMrDTuq4En3pxf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2016/10/28 16:45, The Doctor wrote: > I tought FreeBSD is POSIX threads compliant. It is, but unlike linux you need to use -lpthread on the compilation command line to use all of the threading functionality. So the question is: why didn't configure succeed in its test for exactly that? > checking for the pthreads library -lpthreads... no > checking whether pthreads work without any flags... no > checking whether pthreads work with -Kthread... no > checking whether pthreads work with -kthread... no > checking for the pthreads library -llthread... no > checking whether pthreads work with -pthread... no > checking whether pthreads work with -pthreads... no > checking whether pthreads work with -mt... no > checking whether pthreads work with -mthreads... no > checking for the pthreads library -lpthread... no <<<----**** > checking whether pthreads work with --thread-safe... no > checking for pthread-config... no Cheers, Matthew --gg58kGOaxvnSjSxkRGOEMrDTuq4En3pxf-- --VSPtrHWllvfHatUSnkEgi09DkSrvwIA6c Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJYE3YcXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQxOUYxNTRFQ0JGMTEyRTUwNTQ0RTNGMzAw MDUxM0YxMEUwQTlFNEU3AAoJEABRPxDgqeTn5roP/2/SkmBoHZbLJO2/6LWWfnGN YeAed6sSlVU7QTwJc1l9+Daqalc81Bu1y29brAcBUprbYespL0ZAtWfcDHZJxFAw Mnzs6D9PuBQEM1+DvP3DiaSQxpyi/8FmbGRPAx0zoUCqVr1q+Im+PGpbR/+MOErB DQ8coD/6y8EvRaiRSWFZnX123DNcDa0vz3BwHvaVPcD5FSa0DLekAuicxUhvXBGk saOgmVeNJxoHvYFIn5uxgRDnZclB7g4CjK27B1HfBQClVhcrvyYRQjIyLS6ALprM 7SDDTfP7jXuOgCda64t4Au3f8H0cqZ0yGyyLatzOSqN3s4HNRBkgM2CQR9nlbYQ3 p/j6+2Nrj5ciOGL3rV+Z65od44tYWpjorBfB/xx+W4C/OU2t0J1mYeSWUkUfNcqe dJhHMEoxCZHcBrq+Dqiwp/8LT3qQLXK7c+bxYqkNVX7Gvf+Ql5Zgfr/32kwLj4K4 Mxex5/HwHQYZzNxrkHFymXLVnMA6kczVX/JlGFDGGM4ET4fjMJaW45F9bSI8WG7/ WTawh6qSmaoe0W87yr3nJE7ekDfi/YYS7xSKzf9lTFH+9jO/XLD10QMwmskWmdlE hbr4nlDXaV4XoDTk5Oc9QzTrYTRLScE3lwjfCeYi5e1Gt6Adrk0ETfFVajzkQRY0 NU8I0yo3801U7jfY9aZu =vRgd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VSPtrHWllvfHatUSnkEgi09DkSrvwIA6c-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Oct 28 16:09:07 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66784C25F78 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:09:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de) Received: from host64.shmhost.net (host64.kissl.de [213.239.241.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2ED79FC0; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:09:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de) Received: from francos-mbp.homeoffice.local (ipservice-092-217-062-255.092.217.pools.vodafone-ip.de [92.217.62.255]) by host64.shmhost.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D064283ACE; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 18:09:03 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\)) Subject: Re: www/subsonic-standalone license From: Franco Fichtner In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 18:09:01 +0200 Cc: jlh@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Ports , Michael Zhilin Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <943D0C76-1890-415C-BE61-4083E97F8635@lastsummer.de> References: <25221A70-7B8F-4D10-AEEB-054FA7D58B0D@lastsummer.de> To: Joshua Ruehlig X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at host64.shmhost.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:09:07 -0000 > On 28 Oct 2016, at 5:53 PM, Joshua Ruehlig = wrote: >=20 > Franco, what do you mean a maintainer drop? > Also Madsonic, which is supposedly GPL based on their website is = available. The maintainer resigned, but updated to 6.0 because there were no = distfiles, and the code seemed to be gone for 5.3 is now on GitHub: https://github.com/sindremehus/subsonic I don't know whether 6.0 is quintessential, but from a pure license = perspective it seems odd that everyone now has to use a proprietary license with no = options given even though we still have the original 5.3 *and* a fork which = could very well gain traction of a port was added as an alternative. Just for the record, I know this takes work. Not asking for it to be = done, simply wondering why this happened the way it did. Cheers, Franco= From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Oct 28 16:30:52 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8705EC24417 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:30:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joshruehlig@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ua0-x22b.google.com (mail-ua0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B9F6FD5; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:30:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joshruehlig@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ua0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id 64so52736870uap.3; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 09:30:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=uUKtuHnJaXl+cJPG96clA4T7KYY2XfUZXt1/kcvn9Kk=; b=Vgjz5jezupPO3ZxxpKVu704JjOa8TZRvNhHzJt3/y9um73q6WpF/Ammww4w2+17mZG O1ES+IvHJRzYrC/IpP+nSlttsHL/a6L+R+KiyGNIlG3KLc+ofj4OPj833KdF/qCjUQ1v rbO0Gz7pa5sS5vXWmuYXpTlkXjAMCnfGCyhztcHebBuPiV0Lk7Xk+dLQhUncPDlL3w00 xwgAKZ6tubCzAGmZFqRoSAlkGg0+OwG4Rq3QUxM4E5JfHNY5qq14i2aQAaUTrR9cXkgw DJfzRrABMwyaHGhFqwBsJixH6KHTnVe6MYKtD11ZHpNzQ94LTdMkINSOWVheOoMtVzkf 6HzA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=uUKtuHnJaXl+cJPG96clA4T7KYY2XfUZXt1/kcvn9Kk=; b=I2HnDuOLZ9He1fE+D8FPLfyaV/KfEVYec2lMn2rWYUPfkCEM5n8pQ/JFHTmYtScCx7 aihjqY7dBYziGVEPGmpFuxc2rjqhYiuT9GRx/t7qf7/hpfisDNVCm0pDY9r/LrbOCCOz G6Bu7KOKEJ4srzxLiqDuZUS5pBfRW5ZIJeWo04+l4oqOze2cN0jVjYtMYwjLU/Qrwq25 0bqe3ioFeHRTaDum930/hy4ZI7slCkggnaiUbAzspdrZp4t+hmbC1QveALso5ux3w1lj ehgVAboUz65zGgQyO7c+8j2X4zJN65Vh0g7EtDuAeaWECzBWMY9AsBJszrW7oUzC7cG9 Od6A== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngve0nBTzHZkIlZzq2w1ANzxFWqvAhtCJG087nR372ZSyMbNRhr68sPY4DJYKlazjx8VorUDmveHuFEKp3Q== X-Received: by 10.176.2.50 with SMTP id 47mr13416990uas.8.1477672251356; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 09:30:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.159.48.84 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 09:30:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <943D0C76-1890-415C-BE61-4083E97F8635@lastsummer.de> References: <25221A70-7B8F-4D10-AEEB-054FA7D58B0D@lastsummer.de> <943D0C76-1890-415C-BE61-4083E97F8635@lastsummer.de> From: Joshua Ruehlig Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 09:30:50 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: www/subsonic-standalone license To: Franco Fichtner Cc: jlh@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Ports , Michael Zhilin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:30:52 -0000 Did you read the post Michael linked? Version 6.0 is no longer GPLv3 because he added some code that couldn't be added to a GPL project. I don't believe the maintainer dropped the project. If a user wants to use a previous version they are free to modify the PORTVERSION, update the 'distinfo', and build the port. Also the 'www/subsonic' port is still on version 5.3 so people can use that as well. I could not find a license for version 6.0. I checked the README.TXT that came with the v6.0 jar and it does not seem to be up to date. It says subsonic is "free software" and under the GPL. I think we should remove the LICENSE line from the Makefile, not sure what else we should do. Thanks, Josh On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Franco Fichtner wrote: > > > On 28 Oct 2016, at 5:53 PM, Joshua Ruehlig > wrote: > > > > Franco, what do you mean a maintainer drop? > > Also Madsonic, which is supposedly GPL based on their website is > available. > > The maintainer resigned, but updated to 6.0 because there were no > distfiles, > and the code seemed to be gone for 5.3 is now on GitHub: > > https://github.com/sindremehus/subsonic > > I don't know whether 6.0 is quintessential, but from a pure license > perspective > it seems odd that everyone now has to use a proprietary license with no > options > given even though we still have the original 5.3 *and* a fork which could > very > well gain traction of a port was added as an alternative. > > Just for the record, I know this takes work. Not asking for it to be done, > simply wondering why this happened the way it did. > > > Cheers, > Franco From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Oct 28 16:31:06 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74DF9C2443C for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:31:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ashleydanielle263@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk0-x22a.google.com (mail-vk0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 308EEE6 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:31:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ashleydanielle263@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vk0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id q126so58858100vkd.2 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 09:31:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=J6lxg1Y7Z7k4V8CUahTcrujtFwwaKDE4wdGjicf85Vc=; b=Nr9w4VZdBD1sjQnXpKncxswT8xAgdGI/B/6Ybt6lug4Cqglho/gGooZGJAzZBbmb5t 8tqJ4HBuRDSvW+HvXiGzt+hXaXxV/UT31Er13F33ph6/cvOxKqHL6LxQS9wK5FkhhZ3u acRYh/GSk4Z9/sUyT6N2ECHiBP8HjuJsd+AFIKOGFQp7XRL4Ysh81KZ3TeqTptStrN/5 VLHj/roSbflza4Ch3Mug7HTAVNAdhbT+MZfEPw6aWETHlmESmEA2BRh9Nu6+Bwnc+Hiz Lc5/N6gNaPVVoWjp15So8uyPHZXY/2lKu52+QnGFawyzutolK97hnLli7J3GEkn9m+j9 SokQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=J6lxg1Y7Z7k4V8CUahTcrujtFwwaKDE4wdGjicf85Vc=; b=G4G7fzsCBLE6zRvDeRuB5va3NZT1SbTunkHpy1eV69q2d9y9qy1Md/8/Glq3p6lf7g tMWN1ux7acX11qnwd5q4RQjVb2kv4JOPvvGC18uwEFS+FViQoQcVxZcZ6Ndkc4HfyyP6 jKdV6mOgM+pOH18RY+We/mu5j/ArAlMG1FcQliCUxwjjHWFRnHkJi6Y2QPPrPEj34N3T tnexPpxLZhGiVK5CxU/vXwSbtDLAmpuA/6vdhmnVW5mAO6mRjWtKlWG3V9wgPwVgs+y4 R1Fl1mMJmWcPKqpaGnwkZUUrAoFO6jirUJ2zXK7H9D8kNJavKnudgjKHFbqVL3MtaQGm RdhA== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvfUIc/atJHIwYVXDfIBn4oqK+b2RvGhu6ckcIBMVMKxkjDrlc53dv6kZ24MsETF7u82IOblTpeKNMpD+w== X-Received: by 10.31.135.207 with SMTP id j198mr12042422vkd.60.1477672265114; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 09:31:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.176.64.129 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 09:31:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.176.64.129 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 09:31:04 -0700 (PDT) From: ashley brown Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 12:31:04 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Secret Shopper To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:31:06 -0000 Hello my name is ashley and im interested in the job. My phone number is 727-318-9147. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Oct 28 16:38:29 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E7C5C24708 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:38:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de) Received: from host64.shmhost.net (unknown [IPv6:2a01:4f8:a0:51d6::108:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54C37872; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:38:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de) Received: from francos-mbp.homeoffice.local (ipservice-092-217-062-255.092.217.pools.vodafone-ip.de [92.217.62.255]) by host64.shmhost.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E394783A21; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 18:38:25 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\)) Subject: Re: www/subsonic-standalone license From: Franco Fichtner In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 18:38:24 +0200 Cc: jlh@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Ports , Michael Zhilin Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <156461CF-298B-4C55-B36F-91BE4EE096D9@lastsummer.de> References: <25221A70-7B8F-4D10-AEEB-054FA7D58B0D@lastsummer.de> <943D0C76-1890-415C-BE61-4083E97F8635@lastsummer.de> To: Joshua Ruehlig X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at host64.shmhost.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:38:29 -0000 > On 28 Oct 2016, at 6:30 PM, Joshua Ruehlig = wrote: >=20 > I don't believe the maintainer dropped the project. I was talking about www/subsonic, sorry for the confusion: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D213298 > If a user wants to use a previous version they are free to modify the = PORTVERSION, update the 'distinfo', and build the port. Also the = 'www/subsonic' port is still on version 5.3 so people can use that as = well. That's impractical for users who use packages. :) Cheers, Franco= From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Oct 28 16:45:05 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71E67C24DCE for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:45:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vlad-fbsd@acheronmedia.com) Received: from mail.irealone.com (fawn.irealone.com [IPv6:2001:1af8:4010:a07b:10::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39D93E4E for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:45:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vlad-fbsd@acheronmedia.com) Received: by mail.irealone.com (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 4C76661258; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 18:45:01 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=acheronmedia.com; s=mail; t=1477673101; bh=xxzfQzl7ggdnWZMt1lbxVonKJ2Ab3xFaq4o9J0Sy9Mg=; h=To:Subject:Date:From:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=IyMyr6NqG6cbyPoPiExZ/SJ93SIxOVf5MWW3YaHpZHzLYQb+Wf7FaV1R8y2/7LXij twSEOhg7N3Rg4xAfExTMeq4CwOWQqnKfbFFJ5JWHCCQeM3ndhvmyfSYh13OB3lPXOC 6EAICb1LpvAA6EDcVCgBBVEc61l9y/4bZzDJhdrM= To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: www/subsonic-standalone license X-PHP-Originating-Script: 0:rcube.php MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 18:45:01 +0200 From: "Vlad K." Organization: Acheron Media In-Reply-To: <156461CF-298B-4C55-B36F-91BE4EE096D9@lastsummer.de> References: <25221A70-7B8F-4D10-AEEB-054FA7D58B0D@lastsummer.de> <943D0C76-1890-415C-BE61-4083E97F8635@lastsummer.de> <156461CF-298B-4C55-B36F-91BE4EE096D9@lastsummer.de> Message-ID: X-Sender: vlad-fbsd@acheronmedia.com User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1.6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:45:05 -0000 On 2016-10-28 18:38, Franco Fichtner wrote: > > I was talking about www/subsonic, sorry for the confusion: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213298 This bug shows the discussion I had with the Subsonic maintainer (who is, technically, until that patch is committed, still a maintainer) and carries the whole context. In short, the author of Subsonic has to specify what is the license of his product and include appropriate license in both the distributable/downloadable tarball and relevant source repositories. As it is at the moment, it all points to it still being GPL'd, despite his announcements on the forum post linked in the issue, because the downloadable tarballs, at the time, I checked, still carried a README saying it's GPL'd. A forum post is inadequate license change and the author should know better. His tarballs must include appropriate license whichever it is. IMHO, the FreeBSD ports tree cannot continue to carry that port, 6.0+ onward because afaik one cannot retroactively change the licene of previous releases, until the license is well known and port possibly RESTRICTED if the license requires it. For example see Oracle JRE ports that require you to manually download the distfiles and agree to Oracle's license apriori. -- Vlad K. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Oct 28 16:53:22 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D722C25045 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:53:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joshruehlig@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ua0-x22b.google.com (mail-ua0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13E9C3EB; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:53:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joshruehlig@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ua0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id 64so53235047uap.3; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 09:53:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=tbo5TSK+fH6JrH8F+dIdNX++BlTapHobRzBFf6p9a+A=; b=tKp4hXAqwD6LW3WLj6pC8r+rDae6cPfueGZAWgw/pJ/0hpM69yjakVj1g+xB/3nRJK NjsVGW8U37Ij8QwGVZtUvzqwBu66ciHMevhDW8Uqqvr9GLgcL9VY/dDyxj16D42afaju HF4xWHERIx/YpQjR3sz0tW41pcXe1ClGLVlnMlRr/Tb+8O9wQDquiVlhcquBYxufJpzr bQM5J+GhX9aChNaKHPq0jf2VJrmPRDpT9YgOm1GXqnslGySUsG6uEseMRWGcFkaarO8t zsRnhU2TJfitAXggSx77qgOyjDeNVNo9Ux6+JdsvDrjjTHDjaGN5Pz383zpuHtHXufV7 eMZA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=tbo5TSK+fH6JrH8F+dIdNX++BlTapHobRzBFf6p9a+A=; b=QKalpCbmxv4pjXAqwz1/hkW3mitkPV0L5zcatahJsGRgt5K7chFxddGG48q+esZU4f sxF1/VG2ko9Tiby2xLn1027wPWKF5NhQmDN9ccPoVPidsNW3efho0nIuv+S81ukYaD3S FeQ38wZ7QBS78cEapGU1/e6/tddpVzPF2ZjK1eg6Vt7oRT7f3cQA97OHnzH71r6FbfP9 KXOoh+DKwshuJ6Dou5TD7t1FPNjv91Qdkez3F2GeyrriRYl6GmwjKS826/DDPTyIG/Md qpoa1mvTsPE9dUYqFdLNXEB/U/ZdxUVFgV0u+3MfGY9smxLQ3197OCjlen0nBahfqcFh xGBw== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvdQ+vwKfLHTByVj+mxWwEQHXaJZXSwya5C7wylVWOiYd298KB+hrWRJwM7D2dFr6OjbMqo1j1sLtCB3IA== X-Received: by 10.176.2.50 with SMTP id 47mr13589404uas.8.1477673601224; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 09:53:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.159.48.84 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 09:53:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <156461CF-298B-4C55-B36F-91BE4EE096D9@lastsummer.de> References: <25221A70-7B8F-4D10-AEEB-054FA7D58B0D@lastsummer.de> <943D0C76-1890-415C-BE61-4083E97F8635@lastsummer.de> <156461CF-298B-4C55-B36F-91BE4EE096D9@lastsummer.de> From: Joshua Ruehlig Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 09:53:20 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: www/subsonic-standalone license To: Franco Fichtner Cc: jlh@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Ports , Michael Zhilin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:53:22 -0000 Ahh ok, sounds good. Sounds like we should just follow suit with whatever www/subsonic does. Which seems to be thus far to remove the LICENSE line. On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Franco Fichtner wrote: > > > On 28 Oct 2016, at 6:30 PM, Joshua Ruehlig > wrote: > > > > I don't believe the maintainer dropped the project. > > I was talking about www/subsonic, sorry for the confusion: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213298 > > > If a user wants to use a previous version they are free to modify the > PORTVERSION, update the 'distinfo', and build the port. Also the > 'www/subsonic' port is still on version 5.3 so people can use that as well. > > That's impractical for users who use packages. :) > > > Cheers, > Franco From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Oct 28 16:55:08 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C269EC250A2 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:55:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from naddy@mips.inka.de) Received: from mail.inka.de (quechua.inka.de [IPv6:2a04:c9c7:0:1073:217:a4ff:fe3b:e77c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C81E6DF for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:55:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from naddy@mips.inka.de) Received: from mips.inka.de (naddy@[127.0.0.1]) by mail.inka.de with uucp (rmailwrap 0.5) id 1c0AQs-0002E4-EB; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 18:55:06 +0200 Received: from lorvorc.mips.inka.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u9SGpU9N050014; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 18:51:30 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de) Received: (from naddy@localhost) by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u9SGpTEh050013; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 18:51:29 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from naddy) Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 18:51:29 +0200 From: Christian Weisgerber To: Joe Holden Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openntpd-5.7p4_2,2 depends on libressl-2.2.6 ?! Message-ID: <20161028165129.GA49754@lorvorc.mips.inka.de> References: <2E32FD64-2BF6-46CE-BAD2-39AF82E29E33@ellael.org> <56E1BA30.7090306@utanet.at> <010201d1ec8d$b1e53ef0$15afbcd0$@m.jwh.me.uk> <01b001d22fc5$49cb78e0$dd626aa0$@m.jwh.me.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <01b001d22fc5$49cb78e0$dd626aa0$@m.jwh.me.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:55:08 -0000 Joe Holden: > I should be able to use rdomains in software ported from OpenBSD yes? You should, yes. Rtables are equivalent to FIBs, see setfib(1/2), and the net/openntpd port supports "rtable" on FreeBSD. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Oct 28 20:14:40 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83EEEC25D0E for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 20:14:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcelbonnet@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-x22f.google.com (mail-yw0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 412F9B2F for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 20:14:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcelbonnet@gmail.com) Received: by mail-yw0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id w3so101063292ywg.1 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:14:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ElyGt46nmaIxQgZrY8Yiu8hIsdPvY14xfKdTOdkTpl4=; b=Wr/nbGU7wFq1ajDBHOF12dLIzhNKZIlNILtSzGtVMn7UDdNDj11Vf7BqN4O8TfFeu9 EH8Hlraux4I8NdyyX9HIGSPCjyKzzaIjYLuxUdSE8Tw8Eh1EW1PsB2dSZHLiVDmgUz+S wNgZ3QF/YwnZccOOOsbY47UkUTHyeOFphLt7vjvng93oW4I7GbYpwSlw6nI5tD5LFEa4 RBJ70Dm/pL3Oqy2yXLgnvXJ+gb3GcCwew6cQ4RtcXNV9fFqrOjAOrV7pIH1IOeCYmR/S SY7zM6K9S8gP9Pt9jdktIoJL1RPxVGqIShC2ximICV/nDprNwx4X4Db4ac7zIiQ9GfFt jh7w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ElyGt46nmaIxQgZrY8Yiu8hIsdPvY14xfKdTOdkTpl4=; b=e85uqs+fD8+KPW1Y/CEtbCQfEFcxqCa5sfHZyXZ0LAG0FoTXPK+ybVsEhpj1uja7H0 UCBemc2fXgAee6t/geieGzor3cJbK+cf6l1ufH7Z2Ngw1r2/MKECY5U46/d3fU0n8Ce8 SbwGT/7kXW1VxcwucBbg1bswe4TyJE+DTEEkt40La4cVUI6qzHs6o7BP35F8+OW8Ihx2 vsSjHLB4V5fD55vKUzmKxbsBvpDEHdpxOX+Bqj2menS0Q2RJybCRLHIbyld27rAbGWlQ +GJatRY3SBksWlsLKtcZpFqdQ13ESfqR+ajaGvjH0nV8VdltQJxsQudhB+upV7oz4EZu gaqA== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvcYlZELq2ltZo1FmtoEbo1tZq1ArmSH8y+fm1bL6Yh5VTlb+97ONFS6a1RiXkp37TnwEsLtQasKwXS8/A== X-Received: by 10.36.16.84 with SMTP id 81mr260929ity.113.1477685679199; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:14:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.79.27.197 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:14:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Marcel Bonnet Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 18:14:38 -0200 Message-ID: Subject: Using INSTALL_DATA to install header files to PREFIX/include/PORTNAME To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 20:14:40 -0000 Hello, porters! I've been reading the Porters Handbook, even the bsd.*.mk files... but I'm wondering: why the waf installer put all the installation files into STAGEDIR but the port system do not copy them all, just some of them to the PREFIX. Below the Makefile and pkg-plist. If do not type ${INSTALL_DATA} ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/include/sord-0/sord/sord.h ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/include/sord-0/sord/ them the this header is not copied to PREFIX. But the other files are installed normally . So, I don't understand why I have to say ${INSTALL_DATA} the file from and to its current directory. Am I'm doing something really wrong, but perhaps produced the desired effect? Now its working like a charm. The Makefile : do-install: (cd ${WRKSRC}/build && ${INSTALL_DATA} sord-0.pc \ ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/libdata/pkgconfig) ${REINPLACE_CMD} "s,^prefix=.*,prefix=${PREFIX}," ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/libdata/pkgconfig/sord-0.pc ${RM} ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/libdata/pkgconfig/sord-0.pc.bak (cd ${WRKSRC} && ${WAF_CMD} install) ${INSTALL_DATA} ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/include/sord-0/sord/sord.h ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/include/sord-0/sord/ ${INSTALL_DATA} ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/include/sord-0/sord/sordmm.hpp ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/include/sord-0/sord/ ${STRIP_CMD} ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/bin/sordi ${STRIP_CMD} ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/bin/sord_validate ${STRIP_CMD} ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/lib/libsord-0.so.0.12.2 $ cat pkg-plist bin/sordi bin/sord_validate include/sord-0/sord/sord.h include/sord-0/sord/sordmm.hpp lib/libsord-0.so lib/libsord-0.so.0 lib/libsord-0.so.0.12.2 libdata/pkgconfig/sord-0.pc man/man1/sordi.1.gz man/man1/sord_validate.1.gz The complete files are here: https://github.com/marcelbonnet/freebsd-ports/tree/ardour5.3/textproc/sord-0 Thanks, -- Marcel Bonnet github.com/marcelbonnet/ From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Oct 29 07:15:22 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18ED2C26843 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 07:15:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms-10.1blu.de (ms-10.1blu.de [178.254.4.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE0E9FEB; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 07:15:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from [88.217.117.137] (helo=localhost.unixarea.de) by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c0NrL-0000Tm-18; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 09:15:19 +0200 Received: from localhost.my.domain (c720-r292778-amd64 [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.unixarea.de (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPS id u9T7FIve002615 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 29 Oct 2016 09:15:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.15.2/8.14.9/Submit) id u9T7FHvk002614; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 09:15:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 09:15:17 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: doceng@FreeBSD.org Subject: bug in print/ghostscript9-agpl-base Message-ID: <20161029071517.GA2567@c720-r292778-amd64> Reply-To: Matthias Apitz Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, doceng@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT r292778 (amd64) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 88.217.117.137 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 07:15:22 -0000 Hello, It seems that we have a very old gs version, even in recent head we have only: gs GPL Ghostscript 9.16 (2015-03-30) Copyright (C) 2015 Artifex Software, Inc. All rights reserved. This software comes with NO WARRANTY: see the file PUBLIC for details. and there is a bug (and I do suffer from it) which was fixed upstream in July 2015: http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696072 Would it be possible to update the port and at least incorporate the fix for this bug? Thanks matthias -- Matthias Apitz, ✉ guru@unixarea.de, ⌂ http://www.unixarea.de/ ☎ +49-176-38902045 Einheitsfeier? Nein, danke! Kann ich bitte mein Land wiederhaben und am 7. Oktober feiern. Wie bitte? Warum? Weiterlesen: http://www.unixarea.de/privateEn.html From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Oct 29 09:35:23 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4196FC25662 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 09:35:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mazhe@alkumuna.eu) Received: from smtp1-g21.free.fr (smtp1-g21.free.fr [IPv6:2a01:e0c:1:1599::10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B9C0300 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 09:35:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mazhe@alkumuna.eu) Received: from yggdrasil.alkumuna.eu (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e35:8a74:6e70:232:36ff:fe5c:3a87]) by smtp1-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCF1EB0054C for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 11:35:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from freedom.alkumuna.eu ([IPv6:2a01:e35:8a74:6e70:62a4:4cff:fe54:b212]) (authenticated bits=0) by yggdrasil.alkumuna.eu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u9T9ZEIu002982 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 29 Oct 2016 11:35:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mazhe@alkumuna.eu) Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 11:35:14 +0200 From: Matthieu Volat To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Looking for commiter to review/commit matplotlib port patch Message-ID: <20161029113514.7dbab476@freedom.alkumuna.eu> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.0 (GTK+ 2.24.29; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/rPVe/=EiEcYtX/VMl__NlgC"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alkumuna.eu; s=default; t=1477733718; bh=qjJcFmeZn+I5eHQKQiMTQsf63R4/DNCAQjLZ+Qqs004=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=AWqOLdYsWUCaTFzUmHQwJeoQfAjRRQ/FOJR63Jopn+BsQISKAOovvxi/0qz/ct1YRK+6XLSuMExgny8JcRK4wdivKGNjqIfkmDvznok4VcS54zLvdM+GAhpTWKxQySb32cSuXciD0J+RuNZROBDEBFybz5LYTkY69HCGH5L20Po= X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 09:35:23 -0000 --Sig_/rPVe/=EiEcYtX/VMl__NlgC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, if a port commiter (one with interest in matplotlib and its Qt5 backend= ?) could have a look at this issue? https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D212763 Maintainer already ok'ed it! Thanks, -- Matthieu Volat --Sig_/rPVe/=EiEcYtX/VMl__NlgC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAlgUbVIACgkQ+ENDeYKZi35esACff1esgCuEnSq559CLzjoF1TTf JyAAnjJg1evvfVnp8ITH+/NZi/0pwAbe =jVzF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/rPVe/=EiEcYtX/VMl__NlgC-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Oct 29 17:05:33 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA39EC20238 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 17:05:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodsb02@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it0-x22e.google.com (mail-it0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C05FFB9; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 17:05:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodsb02@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id e187so22714217itc.0; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 10:05:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=LzzuDaz+6nQxG9JRYYPCIQ9WXVXQLi0MrM7PUGP75Q8=; b=xgCWBysPsz/tPQe1ko1Q+gCPhnf51lQ2WMCrzPxrIOU6VZs+7gK9QP6pgjjXV2Zp6Z afrKPpC+o6A6s0Fjt5hD7bjjznuNx7PhG0SWQnki0rOQ6Q4n7ySnjwDpSvF1baLY6z4/ P+r+fTtmk9skHHnZ7O7XQvCGLohdoZdiEYWrCpyYLW7HDalTwwI3CveF29jzrEQYVfIX Mgd5kdQfKJYn35u0qkgMhVtSgH1Du1QHHFv5xAawpKbv80X7xSWUCyjXnpGyYg4phMsT gv9FvEKHCmBeePzbaM2Yinv07Dkfc5NN5snTALE9PokjzxG/XTAASlZQCzBJOr99Npr1 a5Xg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LzzuDaz+6nQxG9JRYYPCIQ9WXVXQLi0MrM7PUGP75Q8=; b=nBOP+uHXfynduyhOiWgN2K0344uWMOPkE8WhmSYf1jitPSHczU4kUZY+3Ya+f4Kfpm GxdNZb+POaR4lv2ojvyEzEOhhDhJ7XsuB80u3Zhh1rJPRoYWooT72ztDIExWnDaLQhKS 7XBiiT/AugUxnPqDqb/7qgdWZiUBGlB2ddwlIkamyIjLJY5lvgABUOvUflaL8siZ8osQ EeKgcFHwAkk2bx8Lys1X7LfpxH7lROIJWnVXqiOXXn22MpY2RToBwBqqucJFUb13/FBe +1uXOOsn5X6jAqsNRT45WqNUt3EmPqGZtIuaTgVRCTFOxOgZke+Xo51ZOQbZEjU1k44B 3I7A== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvfgjRP1VcHGFTsCqhOSAs9duWYbz73Ojer3G7MR86vHIOkessxImzyEVNiB7fQ4YCPEGV8hRrHt+QZiWQ== X-Received: by 10.107.47.16 with SMTP id j16mr16595815ioo.108.1477760732818; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 10:05:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.79.67.196 with HTTP; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 10:05:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160906204506.GD23964@csarch> References: <57C6E416.50900@physics.org> <20160906204506.GD23964@csarch> From: Ben Woods Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 01:05:32 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Split irc/quassel into irc/quassel-client and irc/quassel-core To: Christian Schwarz Cc: FreeBSD ports , makc@freebsd.org, "Tobias C. Berner" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 17:05:33 -0000 On 7 September 2016 at 04:45, Christian Schwarz wrote: > > May I suggest just having a slave port for quassel-core? The client and > > mono appear to have the heaviest dependencies. > > > > Example at https://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/quassel-core.diff > (It's > > ready to commit, so if you're happy Max it can go in) > > > > Has anything happened about this? > > -- > Christian > Hi Christian, This split of irc/quassel into 2 parts (one for client and one for server) has now been completed in r424921: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=424921 Regards, Ben -- From: Benjamin Woods woodsb02@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Oct 29 20:07:04 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E527CC255A3 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 20:07:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from msa1.earth.yoonka.com (yoonka.com [185.24.122.233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "msa1.earth.yoonka.com", Issuer "msa1.earth.yoonka.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 979AF874 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 20:07:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from crayon2.yoonka.com (crayon2.yoonka.com [10.70.7.20]) (authenticated bits=0) by msa1.earth.yoonka.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u9TK6uUl068693 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 20:06:56 GMT (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Grzegorz Junka Subject: audio/openal-soft and lang/mono fail to build Message-ID: Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 20:06:56 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 20:07:05 -0000 audio/openal-soft: -- Could NOT find ALSA (missing: ALSA_LIBRARY ALSA_INCLUDE_DIR) -- Found OSS: /usr/include -- Could NOT find AudioIO (missing: AUDIOIO_INCLUDE_DIR) -- Found SoundIO: /usr/local/lib/libsndio.so -- Could NOT find QSA (missing: QSA_LIBRARY QSA_INCLUDE_DIR) -- Found PortAudio: /usr/local/lib/libportaudio.so -- Could NOT find PulseAudio (missing: PULSEAUDIO_LIBRARY PULSEAUDIO_INCLUDE_DIR) -- Found JACK: /usr/local/lib/libjack.so CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:988 (MESSAGE): Failed to enabled required JACK backend lang/mono: Stacktrace: ================================================================= Got a SIGSEGV while executing native code. This usually indicates a fatal error in the mono runtime or one of the native libraries used by your application. ================================================================= gmake[10]: *** [../../build/library.make:284: ../../class/lib/net_4_x/System.Reactive.Linq.dll] Abort trap gmake[10]: *** Deleting file '../../class/lib/net_4_x/System.Reactive.Linq.dll' gmake[9]: *** [../../build/rules.make:143: do-all] Error 2 gmake[8]: *** [../build/rules.make:223: System.Reactive.Linq] Error 2 gmake[8]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... Should I raise tickets for those? Grzegorz