From owner-freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Sun Sep 25 09:54:18 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ppc@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD7FEBE6563 for ; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 09:54:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luciano@vespaperitivo.it) Received: from baobab.bilink.net (baobab.bilink.net [212.45.144.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7736A1C62 for ; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 09:54:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luciano@vespaperitivo.it) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by baobab.bilink.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3shj9t1dFrz1cXL2 for ; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 11:54:26 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mcs.it Received: from baobab.bilink.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (baobab.mcs.it [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 11027) with ESMTP id wJyRuxnTTF83 for ; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 11:54:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hermes.mcs.it (hermes.mcs.it [192.168.132.21]) by baobab.bilink.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3shj9t0w6Vz1cXL0 for ; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 11:54:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mordeus (unknown [192.168.45.6]) by hermes.mcs.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF4B21B7515 for ; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 11:54:16 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 11:54:15 +0200 From: Luciano Mannucci To: freebsd-ppc@FreeBSD.org Subject: KVM Sparse CPU bug? X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.0 (GTK+ 2.24.29; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.1) X-Face: 4qPv4GNcD; h<7Q/sK>+GqF4=CR@KmnPkSmwd+#%\F`4yjKO3"C]p'z=(oWRnsYBQGM\5g:4skqQY0NnV'dM:Mm:^/_+I@a"; [-s=ogufdF"9ggQ'=y MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <3shj9t0w6Vz1cXL0@baobab.bilink.it> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the PowerPC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 09:54:18 -0000 Maybe it is a "top" problem... :) If I issue a "top -P" while compiling some ports I get: last pid: 93803; load averages: 10.89, 4.46, 2.81 up 2+20:55:38 11:45:53 126 processes: 20 running, 103 sleeping, 1 zombie, 2 lock CPU 0: 11.0% user, 0.0% nice, 76.4% system, 0.4% interrupt, 12.2% idle CPU 1: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle CPU 2: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle CPU 3: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle CPU 4: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle CPU 5: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle CPU 6: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle CPU 7: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle CPU 8: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle CPU 9: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle CPU 10: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle CPU 11: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle CPU 12: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle CPU 13: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle CPU 14: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle CPU 15: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle Mem: 164M Active, 1526M Inact, 531M Wired, 191M Buf, 693M Free Swap: 973M Total, 4920K Used, 968M Free PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 92363 root 1 78 0 102M 99888K CPU32 32 0:02 100.44% cc1 All CPUs but one are reported idle! Though the "Average load" is 10.86. The machine speed seems quit good, so I don't know whether it is a "top" bug or something wrong with the kernel. Any ideas on how to do a further check? Thanks again, Luciano. -- /"\ /Via A. Salaino, 7 - 20144 Milano (Italy) \ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN / PHONE : +39 2 485781 FAX: +39 2 48578250 X AGAINST HTML MAIL / E-MAIL: posthamster@sublink.sublink.ORG / \ AND POSTINGS / WWW: http://www.lesassaie.IT/