Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 12 Dec 2016 22:09:22 +0100
From:      Roman Divacky <rdivacky@vlakno.cz>
To:        Mark Millard <markmi@dsl-only.net>
Cc:        FreeBSD Toolchain <freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org>, Justin Hibbits <chmeeedalf@gmail.com>, FreeBSD PowerPC ML <freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org>, nwhitehorn@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: clang 3.9.0 buildkernel on old powerpc64's vs. trying to build hwpmc_e500.o and the like. . .
Message-ID:  <20161212210922.GA27403@vlakno.cz>
In-Reply-To: <20161208221452.GA42380@vlakno.cz>
References:  <20161205161904.GA7889@vlakno.cz> <126E2EDE-9499-4103-A3DB-CC517105DAB2@dsl-only.net> <D3DE2D12-9885-4154-B680-6DA5A8B62A56@dsl-only.net> <D9C54972-8D21-4D55-A707-4FFC2BDCD9FE@dsl-only.net> <20161207190057.GA58950@vlakno.cz> <E1376C20-C1BD-418D-81C6-CDDE479342CA@dsl-only.net> <CE88C1F4-B9BD-4D45-8DF0-F1079C3257A5@dsl-only.net> <20161208185541.GA33364@vlakno.cz> <E49F7EE4-7A62-4601-98DC-4C4791B7158D@dsl-only.net> <20161208221452.GA42380@vlakno.cz>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ping.... Can you take a look Nathan?

Thanks! Roman

On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 11:14:52PM +0100, Roman Divacky wrote:
> I believe the code comes from sys/powerpc/aim/locore64.S and if you compare
> the different values from the disssembly with the .S code you can see
> it's __tocbase and TOC_REF().
> 
> I wonder if the assembly has the -mminimal-toc knowledge hardcoded in somehow.
> I am not sure what expectations the locore64.S has about the kernel layout that
> we're probably breaking.
> 
> I've CCed Nathan Whitehorn. Nathan, can you take a look please?
> 
> Thanks, Roman
> 
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 02:03:58PM -0800, Mark Millard wrote:
> > [I have dropped the patch related information and just have
> > failing-boot related information here.]
> > 
> > On 2016-Dec-8, at 10:55 AM, Roman Divacky <rdivacky at vlakno.cz> wrote:
> > 
> > > Can you try to investigate why it dies? I am not convinced -mminimal-toc
> > > would result in a boot failure. I think the kernel would fail to link.
> > 
> > I give information for both devel/powerpc64-binutils based
> > and for WITH_BINUTILS_BOOTSTRAP= based. They are different.
> > 
> > For using 2.25.1 of devel/powerpc64-binutils (a cross build):
> > (from camera image of screen)
> > 
> > . . . (omitted material) . . .
> > Type '?' for a list of commands, 'help' for more detailed help.
> > OK unload
> > OK boot ker390
> > /boot/ker390/kernel data=0xf851a8+0x42dd98 syms=[0x8+0xd6848+0x8+0xf1137]
> > /boot/entropy size=0x1000
> > Booting. . .
> > Kernel entry at 0x100160
> > 
> > Invalid memory access at   %SSR0: 00000000.001001b0   %SRR1:90000000.00003030
> > 
> > Apple PowerMac11,2 5.2.7f1 BootROM builtin on 09/30/005 at 15:31:03
> > . . . (omitted material) . . .
> >  ok
> > 0 >
> > 
> > The only options at this point are:
> > 
> > mac-boot
> > shut-down
> > 
> > 
> > From objdump for the above failing boot
> > but with notes added:
> > (Note: booting xtoolchain kernel starts at
> >        0000000000100120 instead; relative
> >        offsets are unchanged and the code
> >        is mostly the same.)
> > 
> > Disassembly of section .text:
> > 0000000000100160 <.__start> mfmsr   r20
> > 0000000000100164 <.__start+0x4> li      r21,1
> > 0000000000100168 <.__start+0x8> rldimi  r20,r21,63,0
> > 000000000010016c <.__start+0xc> mtmsrd  r20
> > 0000000000100170 <.__start+0x10> isync
> > 0000000000100174 <.__start+0x14> nop
> > 0000000000100178 <.__start+0x18> b       0000000000100180 <.__start+0x20>
> > 000000000010017c <.__start+0x1c> nop
> > 0000000000100180 <.__start+0x20> nop
> > 0000000000100184 <.__start+0x24> bl      0000000000100190 <.__start+0x30>
> > 0000000000100188 <.__start+0x28> .long 0x0
> > 000000000010018c <.__start+0x2c> .long 0xf8ce78    
> >   booting xtoolchain based kernel has: 0xfebeb8 above    <<<=== note
> > 0000000000100190 <.__start+0x30> mflr    r2
> > 0000000000100194 <.__start+0x34> ld      r1,0(r2)
> > 0000000000100198 <.__start+0x38> add     r2,r1,r2
> > 000000000010019c <.__start+0x3c> ld      r31,-32768(r2)
> > 00000000001001a0 <.__start+0x40> subf    r31,r31,r2
> > 00000000001001a4 <.__start+0x44> ld      r1,0(r2)            <<<=== !!!!!
> >   booting xtoolchain based kernel has:   r1,-32760(r2) above <<<=== !!!!!
> > 00000000001001a8 <.__start+0x48> addi    r1,r1,16288
> > 00000000001001ac <.__start+0x4c> add     r1,r1,r31
> > 00000000001001b0 <.__start+0x50> std     r3,48(r1)
> >   SRR0 points at the above instruction
> > (I stopped comparing to the booting xtoolchain
> >  based code after this.)
> > 00000000001001b4 <.__start+0x54> std     r4,56(r1)
> > 00000000001001b8 <.__start+0x58> std     r5,64(r1)
> > 00000000001001bc <.__start+0x5c> std     r6,72(r1)
> > 00000000001001c0 <.__start+0x60> bl      00000000001001cc <.__start+0x6c>
> > 00000000001001c4 <.__start+0x64> .long 0x0
> > 00000000001001c8 <.__start+0x68> .long 0xf84ed4
> > 00000000001001cc <.__start+0x6c> mflr    r3
> > 00000000001001d0 <.__start+0x70> ld      r4,0(r3)
> > 00000000001001d4 <.__start+0x74> add     r3,r4,r3
> > 00000000001001d8 <.__start+0x78> mr      r4,r31
> > 00000000001001dc <.__start+0x7c> bl      0000000000b18ebc <.elf_reloc_self>
> > 00000000001001e0 <.__start+0x80> nop
> > 00000000001001e4 <.__start+0x84> ld      r3,48(r1)
> > 00000000001001e8 <.__start+0x88> ld      r4,56(r1)
> > 00000000001001ec <.__start+0x8c> ld      r5,64(r1)
> > 00000000001001f0 <.__start+0x90> ld      r6,72(r1)
> > 00000000001001f4 <.__start+0x94> mr      r4,r2
> > 00000000001001f8 <.__start+0x98> bl      0000000000b1e980 <.powerpc_init>
> > 00000000001001fc <.__start+0x9c> nop
> > 0000000000100200 <.__start+0xa0> mr      r1,r3
> > 0000000000100204 <.__start+0xa4> li      r3,0
> > 0000000000100208 <.__start+0xa8> std     r3,0(r1)
> > 000000000010020c <.__start+0xac> bl      00000000005c4af8 <.mi_startup>
> > 0000000000100210 <.__start+0xb0> nop
> > 0000000000100214 <.__start+0xb4> b       0000000000100214 <.__start+0xb4>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > For using WITH_BINUTILS_BOOTSTRAP= based binutils (a cross build):
> > (completes for buildkernel; fails for buildworld)
> > 
> > . . . (omitted material) . . .
> > Type '?' for a list of commands, 'help' for more detailed help.
> > OK unload
> > OK boot ker39a
> > /boot/ker39a/kernel data=0xfd6318+0x42dda8 syms=[0x8+0xd6860+0x8+0xf1193]
> > /boot/entropy size=0x1000
> > Booting. . .
> > Kernel entry at 0x100160
> > 
> > Invalid memory access at   %SSR0: 00000000.00000000   %SRR1:10000000.00081000
> > 
> > Apple PowerMac11,2 5.2.7f1 BootROM builtin on 09/30/005 at 15:31:03
> > . . . (omitted material) . . .
> >  ok
> > 0 >
> > 
> > The only options at this point are:
> > 
> > mac-boot
> > shut-down
> > 
> > The problem here is a different code order and a matching
> > wrong start address that does not track the difference.
> > (From objdump.) Note: the same 0(r2) vs. -32760(r2) oddity
> > exists in the start routine as well.
> > 
> > Disassembly of section .text:
> > 0000000000100160 <.__start-0x2030> std     r2,40(r1)
> > 0000000000100164 <.__start-0x202c> addis   r2,r2,1
> > 0000000000100168 <.__start-0x2028> addi    r2,r2,-8
> > 000000000010016c <.__start-0x2024> b       0000000000b2c8e0 <.cpu_switch>
> > 0000000000100170 <.__start-0x2020> std     r2,40(r1)
> > 0000000000100174 <.__start-0x201c> addis   r2,r2,1
> > 0000000000100178 <.__start-0x2018> addi    r2,r2,-8
> > 000000000010017c <.__start-0x2014> b       0000000000ade6c8 <.sf_buf_alloc>
> > 0000000000100180 <.__start-0x2010> std     r2,40(r1)
> > 0000000000100184 <.__start-0x200c> addis   r2,r2,1
> > 0000000000100188 <.__start-0x2008> addi    r2,r2,-8
> > 000000000010018c <.__start-0x2004> b       0000000000a83f78 <.vm_fault_hold>
> > 0000000000100190 <.__start-0x2000> std     r2,40(r1)
> > 0000000000100194 <.__start-0x1ffc> addis   r2,r2,1
> > 0000000000100198 <.__start-0x1ff8> addi    r2,r2,-8
> > 000000000010019c <.__start-0x1ff4> b       0000000000b1f1e8 <.fill_regs32>
> > 00000000001001a0 <.__start-0x1ff0> std     r2,40(r1)
> > 00000000001001a4 <.__start-0x1fec> addis   r2,r2,1
> > 00000000001001a8 <.__start-0x1fe8> addi    r2,r2,-8
> > 00000000001001ac <.__start-0x1fe4> b       0000000000b1a7e4 <.casueword32>
> > 00000000001001b0 <.__start-0x1fe0> std     r2,40(r1)
> > 00000000001001b4 <.__start-0x1fdc> addis   r2,r2,1
> > 00000000001001b8 <.__start-0x1fd8> addi    r2,r2,-8
> > 00000000001001bc <.__start-0x1fd4> b       0000000000a8fa30 <.kmap_free_wakeup>
> > . . .
> > 0000000000102190 <.__start> mfmsr   r20
> > 0000000000102194 <.__start+0x4> li      r21,1
> > 0000000000102198 <.__start+0x8> rldimi  r20,r21,63,0
> > 000000000010219c <.__start+0xc> mtmsrd  r20
> > 00000000001021a0 <.__start+0x10> isync
> > 00000000001021a4 <.__start+0x14> nop
> > 00000000001021a8 <.__start+0x18> b       00000000001021b0 <.__start+0x20>
> > 00000000001021ac <.__start+0x1c> nop
> > 00000000001021b0 <.__start+0x20> nop
> > 00000000001021b4 <.__start+0x24> bl      00000000001021c0 <.__start+0x30>
> > 00000000001021b8 <.__start+0x28> .long 0x0
> > 00000000001021bc <.__start+0x2c> .long 0xfc8e48
> > 00000000001021c0 <.__start+0x30> mflr    r2
> > 00000000001021c4 <.__start+0x34> ld      r1,0(r2)
> > 00000000001021c8 <.__start+0x38> add     r2,r1,r2
> > 00000000001021cc <.__start+0x3c> ld      r31,-32768(r2)
> > 00000000001021d0 <.__start+0x40> subf    r31,r31,r2
> > 00000000001021d4 <.__start+0x44> ld      r1,0(r2)   <<< same 0 vs. -32760 oddity!!!
> > 00000000001021d8 <.__start+0x48> addi    r1,r1,16288
> > 00000000001021dc <.__start+0x4c> add     r1,r1,r31
> > 00000000001021e0 <.__start+0x50> std     r3,48(r1)
> > 00000000001021e4 <.__start+0x54> std     r4,56(r1)
> > 00000000001021e8 <.__start+0x58> std     r5,64(r1)
> > 00000000001021ec <.__start+0x5c> std     r6,72(r1)
> > 00000000001021f0 <.__start+0x60> bl      00000000001021fc <.__start+0x6c>
> > 00000000001021f4 <.__start+0x64> .long 0x0
> > 00000000001021f8 <.__start+0x68> .long 0xfd4014
> > 00000000001021fc <.__start+0x6c> mflr    r3
> > 0000000000102200 <.__start+0x70> ld      r4,0(r3)
> > 0000000000102204 <.__start+0x74> add     r3,r4,r3
> > 0000000000102208 <.__start+0x78> mr      r4,r31
> > 000000000010220c <.__start+0x7c> bl      0000000000101a20 <begin+0x1a20>
> > 0000000000102210 <.__start+0x80> ld      r2,40(r1)
> > 0000000000102214 <.__start+0x84> ld      r3,48(r1)
> > 0000000000102218 <.__start+0x88> ld      r4,56(r1)
> > 000000000010221c <.__start+0x8c> ld      r5,64(r1)
> > 0000000000102220 <.__start+0x90> ld      r6,72(r1)
> > 0000000000102224 <.__start+0x94> mr      r4,r2
> > 0000000000102228 <.__start+0x98> bl      00000000001019a0 <begin+0x19a0>
> > 000000000010222c <.__start+0x9c> ld      r2,40(r1)
> > 0000000000102230 <.__start+0xa0> mr      r1,r3
> > 0000000000102234 <.__start+0xa4> li      r3,0
> > 0000000000102238 <.__start+0xa8> std     r3,0(r1)
> > 000000000010223c <.__start+0xac> bl      00000000005c6b28 <.mi_startup>
> > 0000000000102240 <.__start+0xb0> nop
> > 0000000000102244 <.__start+0xb4> b       0000000000102244 <.__start+0xb4>
> > 
> > 
> > Who is most appropriate to send such information to for powerpc64?
> > 
> > ===
> > Mark Millard
> > markmi at dsl-only.net



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20161212210922.GA27403>