From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun May 1 05:16:04 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E494DB2460F for ; Sun, 1 May 2016 05:16:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC58D1B67 for ; Sun, 1 May 2016 05:16:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-216-66.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.216.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63A0024D97; Sun, 1 May 2016 07:16:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id u415G0Fw002010; Sun, 1 May 2016 07:16:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 1 May 2016 07:16:00 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Warren Block Cc: Manish Jain , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is 10.3 i386 jinxed ? Message-Id: <20160501071600.92753a93.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20160430084415.03be443d.freebsd@edvax.de> <5724604D.3020804@hotmail.com> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 May 2016 05:16:05 -0000 On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 14:46:09 -0600 (MDT), Warren Block wrote: > On Sat, 30 Apr 2016, Manish Jain wrote: > > > 2) The first time X started, xfce4-panel crashed > > 3) The second time, xfce-terminal crashed > > 4) The third time, trying to launch firefox rebooted the system. > > This sounds unlike my experience with xfce. > > Some of the Gateway NE56R models included Nvidia GPUs. Some special > thing might be needed to properly support that GPU. This might be at least a part of the occuring problems. I have tried the "nv" and "nouveau" drivers with my nVidia GPU, but the best results are from the (proprietary) "nvidia" driver which consists of a kernel module and the X component. Maybe it helps checking the actual hardware (GPU model number) and verify which driver will support it. However, using the VESA driver should be sufficient for typical desktop use (no "big 3D stuff"). Checking the other possible hardware-related problems should still be on the to-do list. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun May 1 05:22:51 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79227B24170 for ; Sun, 1 May 2016 05:22:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 436331F4B for ; Sun, 1 May 2016 05:22:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-216-66.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.216.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1021727632; Sun, 1 May 2016 07:22:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id u415MmRa002042; Sun, 1 May 2016 07:22:48 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 1 May 2016 07:22:48 +0200 From: Polytropon To: jd1008 Cc: FreeBSD Users Subject: Re: Support for Broadcom wifi devices Message-Id: <20160501072248.2b51d35e.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <57252B5C.9060704@gmail.com> References: <57252B5C.9060704@gmail.com> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 May 2016 05:22:51 -0000 On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 16:02:04 -0600, jd1008 wrote: > I understand that XXXXBSD distros have pretty much same drivers > as FreeBSD. > Just wondering if these BSD distros support the Broadcom wifi cards. Depends on _which_ cards you refer to. For example, "man bwn" or "man bwi" mention support for "Broadcom BCM43xx IEEE 802.11b/g" and provide a list of supported devices. There is additional support via NDIS. Those methods should be supported on all BSDs. Oh, and don't say "BSD distros", as you're basically saying "Berkeley Software Distribution distribution" with it, like "LCD display"... ;-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun May 1 09:14:02 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ED3DAD978D for ; Sun, 1 May 2016 09:14:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tzachi.g@velismedia.com) Received: from mail-yw0-x231.google.com (mail-yw0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4108C12B6 for ; Sun, 1 May 2016 09:14:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tzachi.g@velismedia.com) Received: by mail-yw0-x231.google.com with SMTP id o66so238813557ywc.3 for ; Sun, 01 May 2016 02:14:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=velismedia-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=pfTpQgxxel+or45nBSjRX9djhBPWUr8IVsT4/SaEFmw=; b=0d/a4lvOPC+OVw2PF4fpSHN4knGTnvng+ZnwjDlWaC9LDO4Ki70eVPJxR1rfWYOS4D tnzDEA6OEEzUD1M/v28klKcLMxPnIRqLcNba4LRqkoM5uAJ5S29+ZcXrfHLvlFhibLkE O1UgkZGh0IqSYOThUv70XoonnNez9dJB6GNYz3UEMl64u2kkm9vR54ZjOxAkzWVgsfeJ p2IfswoB6OnEHFQQR2UhGpD/T6zHrpwKnSGTpmhC13wpkxYMRDF9L31/p0L8FqkwFM46 ldFgbZQ3cdc8xCbEpEU+w/CVgD6avsQfFPX5JnqxesGDfa+ipIqs0t4Pa3IWnm6+eURH VRQg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=pfTpQgxxel+or45nBSjRX9djhBPWUr8IVsT4/SaEFmw=; b=CtJWt7+jrZm+Nq70CVcEc6/Y7zSmUwZEXocP0ZbH5U5OeBnItxC1iy6G2ZL+grTyYX 1IHZdWcbuS7Mxtip+qE3gAizAJdfWEJWg7oWXX+ODh+16TDMzr6ejh8LpzGGgVljSyDO pqWbvrzzGIPGTAVZEl3k2KWFxLLZK0Vi7UZVpcr3cuZOGppQCODoy1tBfKcAUKZAIB5Q I1Ni7Ochfshvv7i/Oc2o2MdEfU2KqsJ1ZYAbbnfPqcyvc9KJK8+iM5WaTHvoV8LOuo8e qNcOt6/w2Cln6Ejof46xn3hjhpCwGQRzzljMgHOQ6I/019E7cLLB+fVCGr09q539CKOq Pd8A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUU3Di77ClVNQ0BY8I+04MB1kKdqXiq/X0nJP22jCOElM6XNiVeRL9btmFt7SEAmqCAi5jwH9yBWejccw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.129.154.79 with SMTP id r76mr18313677ywg.86.1462094041145; Sun, 01 May 2016 02:14:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.37.208.69 with HTTP; Sun, 1 May 2016 02:14:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 1 May 2016 12:14:01 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Advertising Inquiry From: Tzachi Gujski To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 May 2016 09:14:02 -0000 Hello I'm Tj head of Software & Entertainment demand from Velis Media =E2=80=93 w= e are a company that specialize in monetizing ad-space inventory for publishers. I have been watching your website for quite some time and I know that we can achieve big success from a mutual collaboration with each other. Can you please send more details about your site? Contact me so we can benefit together. Have a great day Tj --=20 *Tj* *|* *Media Manager* *Phone: * *+972-3-509-2832* *Skype: * *Tzachi.g.velis* *Web:* www.velismedia.com *Linkedin: **Tzachi gujski* From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun May 1 09:29:13 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 599AAAD9A67 for ; Sun, 1 May 2016 09:29:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@yandex.com) Received: from forward17h.cmail.yandex.net (forward17h.cmail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:f35::a2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "forwards.mail.yandex.net", Issuer "Yandex CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA5841898 for ; Sun, 1 May 2016 09:29:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@yandex.com) Received: from smtp3h.mail.yandex.net (smtp3h.mail.yandex.net [84.201.186.20]) by forward17h.cmail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 8BDF3212D0 for ; Sun, 1 May 2016 12:29:09 +0300 (MSK) Received: from smtp3h.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3h.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 4C6321B4031C for ; Sun, 1 May 2016 12:29:09 +0300 (MSK) Received: by smtp3h.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id 1Jxc8m49u7-T8QeCoLF; Sun, 01 May 2016 12:29:08 +0300 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1462094948; bh=FqS2mty02cn4YbPnit5TkZiDeto8j0R6JGXApwstvW8=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Date:Content-Type:X-Mailer: Mime-Version; b=xlDHqyG3IxHTs7g0h7AaTMPn5lnBS+pup/2Mgt0x2FHQ5njAyH0DxwEc9BNQeiQbP HioSAbSTBPT0A3IPJy+JeYChjhiB17j9cFEfoWFmHm+IbYCmp6OIMpHhgYlcfHSAIE 6Nuca8MKbNcxu85PJxKM4GbqC4r07q+4bvGa370o= Authentication-Results: smtp3h.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.com X-Yandex-ForeignMX: US X-Yandex-Suid-Status: 1 0 Message-ID: <1462094945.3728.3.camel@yandex.com> Subject: dual layer DVD From: Stari Karp To: FreeBSD Questions Date: Sun, 01 May 2016 05:29:05 -0400 X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 May 2016 09:29:13 -0000 Hi! My system is  > FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE #1: Sun Apr 10 13:48:11 EDT > 2016/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  amd64 I have internal and external cdrom which both support burning on double (dual) layer DVD which works on FreeBSD 10.2 (amd64) but after upgrade to FreeBSD 10.3 I cannot do anymore: cd0 at ata3 bus 0 scbus2 target 0 lun 0 Apr 29 17:46:30 lumiwa kernel: cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI device Apr 29 17:46:30 lumiwa kernel: cd0: 150.000MB/s transfers (SATA 1.x, UDMA5, ATAPI 12bytes, PIO 8192bytes) Apr 29 17:46:30 lumiwa kernel: cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present cd1 at umass-sim1 bus 1 scbus4 target 0 lun 0 Apr 29 17:46:30 lumiwa kernel: cd1: Removable CD-ROM SCSI device Apr 29 17:46:30 lumiwa kernel: cd1: 40.000MB/s transfers Apr 29 17:46:30 lumiwa kernel: cd1: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present - tray closed Apr 29 17:46:30 lumiwa kernel: cd1: quirks=0x10<10_BYTE_ONLY> I didn't change anything. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun May 1 09:43:51 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17DF4AD9DE3 for ; Sun, 1 May 2016 09:43:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bourne.identity@hotmail.com) Received: from BLU004-OMC4S8.hotmail.com (blu004-omc4s8.hotmail.com [65.55.111.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "Microsoft IT SSL SHA2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEEE01ECF for ; Sun, 1 May 2016 09:43:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bourne.identity@hotmail.com) Received: from BLU436-SMTP195 ([65.55.111.137]) by BLU004-OMC4S8.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Sun, 1 May 2016 02:42:43 -0700 X-TMN: [2rPbMExeNuJg28jGfIYc+hh1eWe0vzGM] X-Originating-Email: [bourne.identity@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is 10.3 i386 jinxed ? To: Polytropon References: <20160430084415.03be443d.freebsd@edvax.de> <5724604D.3020804@hotmail.com> <20160430203426.a9d5841b.freebsd@edvax.de> CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu From: Manish Jain Date: Sun, 1 May 2016 15:11:12 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160430203426.a9d5841b.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 May 2016 09:42:41.0506 (UTC) FILETIME=[CE2A7420:01D1A38D] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 May 2016 09:43:51 -0000 On 05/01/16 00:04, Polytropon wrote: > On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 23:43:47 +0530, Manish Jain wrote: >> I reinstalled the whole system using xfce as the desktop. While things >> have improved, the system is still not workable. >> >> 1) The installer 'forgot' to place the boot code on the MBR. I had to >> use live CD + boot0cfg to fix that. > Use MBR only if needed. Today's preference is to use GPT for > partitioning. Compare: > > http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/disksetup.html > > Use MBR only if you have a valid reason as it probably has > reached the state of "not supported anymore". > > > >> 2) The first time X started, xfce4-panel crashed >> 3) The second time, xfce-terminal crashed >> 4) The third time, trying to launch firefox rebooted the system. > This (and especially the last problem) leads to the impression > that there is a _massive_ problem, it's probably not related to > the FreeBSD OS, and surely not to installed applications. Are > you sure there isn't a hardware problem lurking in the background? > Like... starting a web browser reboots the system... this simply > sounds totally wrong. > > > >> Overall, 10.3 i386 seems to have gremlins in the belly. What do I do ? > I have a 10.2 installation on an older Dell laptop, running Gnome 2, > no problems so far (but I haven't tried updating it yet, as I'm a > big fan of "never touch a running system", a symptom of lazyness > and "fat fingers"). :-) > > > >> Try some linux distro ? This is exactly what I have been trying to avoid. > Check out PC-BSD or try the Lxde desktop. Maybe you can also > settle for a less convoluted desktop, i.e. a window manager > that you like. > > > >> BTW, does anyone have any idea where can I get Windows XP drivers for >> the NE56R laptop ? > >From the manufacturer of course. :-) > > > >> If nothing else works, XP remains my fall-back option. > For offline use that's probably more or less okay. :-) > > I strongly suspect some hardware problem, quite possible RAM : there is a page fault at boot time and the report is in /var/crash. I am running memtest86+ for 24 hours, and will report results tomorrow. If memtest86+ detects no errors, I will paste the contents of the crash report for some expert to analyse. Regards Manish Jain From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun May 1 09:59:19 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44A99B0F1B2 for ; Sun, 1 May 2016 09:59:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from no-reply@academy.edu.sg) Received: from wp.asm.edu.sg (wp.asm.edu.sg [103.237.168.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3FC713D9 for ; Sun, 1 May 2016 09:59:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from no-reply@academy.edu.sg) Received: from Aventis-PC (bb219-74-113-2.singnet.com.sg [219.74.113.2]) by wp.asm.edu.sg (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E7F9CAF53A for ; Sun, 1 May 2016 17:49:31 +0800 (SGT) Organization: I can't remember what I read! Reply-To: no-reply@academy.edu.sg Message-ID: <37b6a85ea01fcc50722948ad00147a8d@academy.edu.sg> From: "=?windows-1252?Q?I_can't_remember_what_I_read!?=" To: Subject: =?windows-1252?Q?Master_the_Art_of_Reading, _Remembering_and_Retaining_Information_Like_A_Pro?= Date: Sun, 1 May 2016 17:31:33 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 May 2016 09:59:19 -0000 13 May 2016 (Fri) Having trouble viewing? Click Here High Impact Speed Reading & Dynamic Learning Techniques for Busy = Executives=20 and Business Professionals Scientifically Improve Your Reading Speed by 4 times and Improve = Efficiency=20 at Work =20 Course Information Date 13 May 2016 (Fri) =20 Venue 100 Orchard Road, Hotel Concorde =20 Time 9am to 5pm =20 Fees =20 $588 |=20 $235.20 After PIC Grant of 60% Inclusive of 2 coffee breaks, light refreshments and buffet lunch Register Now Download Registration Form Contact Ms Grace Zheng 6720 3333 or email: grace@aventisglobal.edu.sg Unsubscribe To unsubscribe, please click here =20 Read Faster, Memorize Better and Think Clearer Have you been overwhelmed with too much to read in the office?=C2 Do you = find=20 yourself struggling to manage new information and knowledge productively? = How=20 can you maximize your reading speed to get more information in less = time?In=20 this workshop you will learn on how you can do just that! Develop your = muscle=20 memory to read faster and comprehend better to achieve greater = productivity=20 and probability in your work. Speed reading is a learnable skill. With = the=20 right methodology and practice you can improve your reading speed by = almost=20 four times with better concentration and comprehension. The world is = changing=20 so rapidly that if you are not quick enough to learn, unlearn and relearn = at=20 the blink of an eye you will be redundant and a derelict. Whether you = want=20 to be a better leader or a more resourceful employee, you need to train = yourself=20 on how to get to the key information that you require fast and have the = ability=20 to synergize and synthesize them productively.=20 Let Industry Expert, Ms Sandra Daniel, help You this Essential Corporate = Survival=20 Skills.=20 Sandra Daniel holds a Master in Science (Training and Development) from = University=20 of Leicester (United Kingdom).=C2 She has been an adjunct tertiary = lecturer and=20 regional trainer since 2001. She is a specialist in areas of = communication=20 and speed reading=2E As a trainer, Sandra has been designing, developing and delivering = customized=20 programs to various statutory boards, government-based organizations and = private=20 business enterprises.=C2 Some of organizations that have engaged her = services=20 are the Singapore Police Force, Singapore Prisons, Ministry of Home = Affairs,=20 Ministry of Defence, Singapore Armed Forces, Singapore General Hospital, = Housing=20 & Development Board, Land Transport Authority and Central Provident Funds = Board.=C2=20 Besides lecturing Sandra is also a courseware developer for speed reading = from=20 the following Universities:=20 TUM (Asia) German Institute of Technology University of Glasgow Singapore Institute of Technology University of Liverpool University of Manchester University of Newcastle=20 To date, Sandra has published three books: Impactful Academic Writing Extremely Busy People=92s Guide to Read faster, Memorize better and Think = clearer How to think critically with Sun Tzu Art of War StratagemsSandra also = regularly=20 contributes articles on management and learning to Straits Times = Recruit.=C2=20 Key Takeaways By the end of this 1 day high impact workshop you will be able to: =95 Understand how our mind and brain works in processing information into = knowledge=20 from both the technical and psychological aspect.=20 =95 Supercharge your mind to think creatively and critically and = synthesize what=20 you have read effectively.=20 =95 Sieve and extract key information from various forms of reading = materials=20 such as email, reports, proposals, technical and scholarly text=20 =95 Understand how to control your emotional state of mind to optimize the = impact=20 on learning and memory=20 =95 Ground breaking approaches for mental preparation before, during and = after=20 reading to focus on maximum recall.=20 =95 Turbo-speed skim reading techniques which allows you to extract the = key essences=20 of the report or articles.=20 =95 Optimize your Alphabetics by increasing your peripheral vision using = mind=20 mapping to comprehend what is read.=20 =95 Increase your reading speed by using specific strategies depending on = purpose=20 and the type of reading material=20 =95 Self-help tests to stimulate interest in different information and = constantly=20 beat your personal best in reading speed and comprehension=20 =95 Memory techniques to power up your learning and reading capacity=20 TESTIMONIALS =93Sandra is an engaging and approachable trainer who keeps class = discussions=20 lively=94 =E2=80=93 Tan Si Min=93Friendly and knowledgeable trainer. = Highly recommended=94=20 - Patrick Chia, ITE REGISTER TODAY - Don't Miss this Great Opportunity Please contact Grace @ 6720 3333 | grace@aventisglobal.edu.sg for more = information=2E Date 13 May 2016 (Fri) Venue Hotel Concorde, Orchard Road Time 9.00am to 5.00pm Fee $588 | $235.20 after PIC grant of 60% (inclusive of 1 buffet lunch = and 2=20 light refreshments) Enquiries =20 Please contact Ms Grace Zheng(65) 6720 3333 or email: = grace@aventisglobal.edu.sg Over 100 Upcoming Courses Engage, motivate and inspire your team today! Check out our latest course = listing=20 or contact us @ 6720 3333 for A FREE Quotation for Customized In-house = training Save 60% or up to 400% Tax Rebate via Productivity and Innovation Credit = (PIC)=20 For more information, contact us or visit = http://www.iras.gov.sg/irashome/picredit.aspx From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun May 1 13:22:28 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E92CB29D7D for ; Sun, 1 May 2016 13:22:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x233.google.com (mail-wm0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D758117F for ; Sun, 1 May 2016 13:22:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x233.google.com with SMTP id v200so17938298wmv.1 for ; Sun, 01 May 2016 06:22:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=TygswxuSjtttzcuvw2/Ngdy2gOdKOAzsgo6yIKzyxic=; b=tSoUAWrJ9kUPGr1itL4/On4bMSbr6HqxJiP8yCRNlXnUm33zQGOyvzqmeyUuwZyZUL 3yl8BHcch2olhPqw+gRGvV4HwuymWcZX0KUUEKF1eCLjBmwT9TAdqVGExxG0Ad62T91y fkDCXGSjqlBQxeNKC6bT8/ewqi27dNLXw1BTHP6ewUThkf9BhUK8t9epHF8I1w+vw6g7 NtLiW82wzVQa7zL5IkfqkqbCZp3oZSpYGfTNE23P+WbRywMeW9/ZRraoMlRWtdQWIddl DbkVIMY6mEdQ1jaShk6VGS7uo59Wk9RNMPyPUzPBYHkR5Icu7vsLnYs/1D3jv9ZcxdGP 7wxQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TygswxuSjtttzcuvw2/Ngdy2gOdKOAzsgo6yIKzyxic=; b=gXOinSY1e58eBv1UlZOCOyGiZ94WU46SRvHIz7qUZcsKBu/nJcDHpeMVWesRRfOks+ zDPcptI3Gm/Ug+MdsDeFEWD29gPrImyrmD6B+08pMXZQ0Dkjnjpyjlzv8Tgk7JgMIun1 27S4Weq+6uxzLP+t1vlChmXH2w8YR9SYy3rgVQbT+ZRgooruBznSdwTIcpAJVBG4NvM2 grrkUfLX+YDVigdfbMy6z6f/KF5eCyoXLZZegrIxKXySJeSW7TRz0B/TtCMxAhLx6rLG ZE4CysaugED4BtBiBCxcEScSm1siMVZQUhzDIGvNSz+wv/m0bSn1wUAc0sm3yYCZSjgC x08A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWGSuidFm9MOg0axpmOjjbgPrNGNy7uAl8aN/Ker9lTphqmeBMlBx8JpT66yVJzgg== X-Received: by 10.28.149.205 with SMTP id x196mr14785173wmd.67.1462108946581; Sun, 01 May 2016 06:22:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com ([2.222.64.48]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 8sm13404652wms.14.2016.05.01.06.22.25 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 01 May 2016 06:22:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 1 May 2016 14:22:24 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Your beneficiary advice from Standard Chartered branch/subsidiary Message-ID: <20160501142224.5202c7b9@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <5724FF1F.7080806@gmail.com> References: <5724FF1F.7080806@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.29; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.2) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 May 2016 13:22:28 -0000 On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 12:53:19 -0600 jd1008 wrote: > Hope every subscriber sends these A*ols some dog nuggets :) :) And you have just delivered a copy of that spam to a lot of people whose spam filters filtered-out the original. If you really must reply to spam please don't quote the spam text - it'd bad for filters that use auto-training or per address reputations when people do this. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun May 1 13:48:01 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEE3FB283C7 for ; Sun, 1 May 2016 13:48:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@yandex.com) Received: from forward12h.cmail.yandex.net (forward12h.cmail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:f35::9d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "forwards.mail.yandex.net", Issuer "Yandex CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A4531AFC for ; Sun, 1 May 2016 13:48:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@yandex.com) Received: from smtp4h.mail.yandex.net (smtp4h.mail.yandex.net [84.201.186.21]) by forward12h.cmail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 83B5C20CCA for ; Sun, 1 May 2016 16:47:49 +0300 (MSK) Received: from smtp4h.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4h.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 36B6E2C02C5 for ; Sun, 1 May 2016 16:47:49 +0300 (MSK) Received: by smtp4h.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id PEMa2koAB5-lmaOVwSd; Sun, 01 May 2016 16:47:48 +0300 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1462110468; bh=fE9tQ9zqL583Ds98G93cXt0u8g3qhCSqGlj2jlxQ/fY=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=RZ3Svb9DyCYJ8VBxBuvTVTcKq8Sa2jwtsf/cgeEiZW6Tp3RskDdl1y9Z4UGPWjEFK ajKMkDo0iJHUB8NDa77YdQ40MkFv4ygdjEVu7HjfkE/Nwpuq4qptuY88nCN3SoWdCC BOX0XIy8tXp/lPCXNvblYejwYZ7HpQJQBJN0rsJo= Authentication-Results: smtp4h.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.com X-Yandex-ForeignMX: US X-Yandex-Suid-Status: 1 0 Message-ID: <1462110466.1406.5.camel@yandex.com> Subject: Re: dual layer DVD From: Stari Karp To: FreeBSD Questions Date: Sun, 01 May 2016 09:47:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1462094945.3728.3.camel@yandex.com> References: <1462094945.3728.3.camel@yandex.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 May 2016 13:48:01 -0000 On Sun, 2016-05-01 at 05:29 -0400, Stari Karp wrote: > Hi! > > My system is  > > FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE #1: Sun Apr 10 13:48:11 EDT > > 2016/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  amd64 > I have internal and external cdrom which both support burning on > double (dual) layer DVD which works on FreeBSD 10.2 (amd64) but after > upgrade to FreeBSD 10.3 I cannot do anymore: > cd0 at ata3 bus 0 scbus2 target 0 lun 0 > Apr 29 17:46:30 lumiwa kernel: cd0: > Removable CD-ROM SCSI device > Apr 29 17:46:30 lumiwa kernel: cd0: 150.000MB/s transfers (SATA 1.x, > UDMA5, ATAPI 12bytes, PIO 8192bytes) > Apr 29 17:46:30 lumiwa kernel: cd0: Attempt to query device size > failed: NOT READY, Medium not present > > cd1 at umass-sim1 bus 1 scbus4 target 0 lun 0 > Apr 29 17:46:30 lumiwa kernel: cd1: > Removable CD-ROM SCSI device > Apr 29 17:46:30 lumiwa kernel: cd1: 40.000MB/s transfers > Apr 29 17:46:30 lumiwa kernel: cd1: Attempt to query device size > failed: NOT READY, Medium not present - tray closed > Apr 29 17:46:30 lumiwa kernel: cd1: quirks=0x10<10_BYTE_ONLY> > > I didn't change anything. > > Thank you. > Update: I am usind dvdauthor and growisofs for backup video dvd and under FreeBSD 10.3 I have a problem with USB ports (my DVD burner which works good is external USB). I have installed FreeBSD on iMac and internal dvd doesn't works anymore. I tried to make a backup on OSX with dvdauthor and burn with growisofs and it works without problem. No errors. On FreeBSD 10.3 is copy to USB stick or from to the disk very slow: 6.6 MB/s but on OSX 27MB/s. And as I wrote before I didn't have any problems on FreeBSD 10.2 and earlier versions. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon May 2 09:41:22 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE74CB229C7 for ; Mon, 2 May 2016 09:41:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arnabbhowmick08@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi0-x236.google.com (mail-oi0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A64D6176A for ; Mon, 2 May 2016 09:41:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arnabbhowmick08@gmail.com) Received: by mail-oi0-x236.google.com with SMTP id x19so182768133oix.2 for ; Mon, 02 May 2016 02:41:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=Uri+e4VkPpnl10qH8oifFC+0pveLCSHFtMTUWvnJGhw=; b=F6jD06ZcnoiI+Ck5e/KnZ1xPzUb4hTDJPmkZY3upG/cjAnbsV3N8mzEnz+dmXYfgDY A4E0RwJfNM9LR/hKoM4YjesEliPmGC3qTrffCclE4Oh2lpVvh0ipVZPAJ+suOy0URV8t gNasckl4o4vOubVxH6ineOOhhfMTK338uqlgWPAOaDnvVMbPYjsV3KZkktXWst34qsjb Qpp9aXv/uILo9eFmssVW5JdJoX0aHXD6+tSShoFExUEULikQLS/dTaCWvHYIhDrRIxu+ kjkon/TdUbi0laV9Mw4D/dUtVYgEaDCjjjcdxyLGnw3rn1t4AFExAU6Szss1XNeyjfvL Ia6g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=Uri+e4VkPpnl10qH8oifFC+0pveLCSHFtMTUWvnJGhw=; b=nIzNBGhLsrrLKTv5PyLlUmOhMYVgtiJxdgdI7eVSIHFKWleMuNQt5+hBFQFyMTYFKU crc20KpYKsl8kParXVQHTSdRxNelljN721zn9dUtU5yWsidZXNbJ+ps1+Uakrmm5uAMO GqAv5cFUKaL/SHd6mXV9jv/xYbYFVLsNZ0Rafed0zNIXoSxVo5Z39enTgiMmS4Sk+Kaj JH6bYTDrWWojMZAsGsxaBv3fDGsHE/+/2jWYN2Cnw4jMOf7tERBa74ObEOj3/bxzts2F elhMyp6M9FrYzV2dtB2fi9Ih9bw+x87pmkyQH/jMADTdUKNO6mio7Q64YHlMRug2kdtl 6FMA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVzmWypjLJmz6EAhf47lL+DMQCIUuW1LikDfTFo3K5Jhz64/BB8jQaOOlCOcVmUt/lWPUsas4oIOKml8w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.60.138 with SMTP id j132mr12852960oia.201.1462182081909; Mon, 02 May 2016 02:41:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.157.17.116 with HTTP; Mon, 2 May 2016 02:41:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 15:11:21 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: pkg method failed From: Arnab Bhowmick To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 09:41:23 -0000 Today when i was downloading some package through pkg install method i git the following output root@arnab:/usr/home/ARNAB # pkg install opera Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. The following 7 package(s) will be affected (of 0 checked): New packages to be INSTALLED: opera: 12.16_6 gstreamer-plugins-good: 0.10.31_2,3 gstreamer-plugins-ogg: 0.10.36_1,3 gstreamer-plugins-theora: 0.10.36_1,3 gstreamer-plugins-vp8: 0.10.23_3,3 gstreamer-plugins-bad: 0.10.23_2,3 gstreamer-plugins-vorbis: 0.10.36_1,3 The process will require 53 MiB more space. 15 MiB to be downloaded. Proceed with this action? [y/N]: y Fetching opera-12.16_6.txz: 100% 13 MiB 109.3kB/s 02:04 pkg: cached package opera-12.16_6: size mismatch, fetching from remote Fetching opera-12.16_6.txz: 100% 13 MiB 139.7kB/s 01:37 pkg: cached package opera-12.16_6: size mismatch, cannot continue root@arnab:/usr/home/ARNAB # Can anyone say that why i got this massage? From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon May 2 13:16:30 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEF47B2917E for ; Mon, 2 May 2016 13:16:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bourne.identity@hotmail.com) Received: from BLU004-OMC4S24.hotmail.com (blu004-omc4s24.hotmail.com [65.55.111.163]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "Microsoft IT SSL SHA2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CDE21257 for ; Mon, 2 May 2016 13:16:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bourne.identity@hotmail.com) Received: from BLU437-SMTP28 ([65.55.111.135]) by BLU004-OMC4S24.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Mon, 2 May 2016 06:15:22 -0700 X-TMN: [h3bqmopON3JO/pDqZECdecF671ldFpz4] X-Originating-Email: [bourne.identity@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is 10.3 i386 jinxed ? To: Polytropon References: <20160430084415.03be443d.freebsd@edvax.de> <5724604D.3020804@hotmail.com> <20160430203426.a9d5841b.freebsd@edvax.de> <5725CF38.4090007@hotmail.com> CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu From: Manish Jain Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 18:45:14 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5725CF38.4090007@hotmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 May 2016 13:15:19.0725 (UTC) FILETIME=[AD11EDD0:01D1A474] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 13:16:30 -0000 On 05/01/16 15:11, Manish Jain wrote: > On 05/01/16 00:04, Polytropon wrote: >> On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 23:43:47 +0530, Manish Jain wrote: >>> I reinstalled the whole system using xfce as the desktop. While things >>> have improved, the system is still not workable. >>> >>> 1) The installer 'forgot' to place the boot code on the MBR. I had to >>> use live CD + boot0cfg to fix that. >> Use MBR only if needed. Today's preference is to use GPT for >> partitioning. Compare: >> >> http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/disksetup.html >> >> Use MBR only if you have a valid reason as it probably has >> reached the state of "not supported anymore". >> >> >> >>> 2) The first time X started, xfce4-panel crashed >>> 3) The second time, xfce-terminal crashed >>> 4) The third time, trying to launch firefox rebooted the system. >> This (and especially the last problem) leads to the impression >> that there is a _massive_ problem, it's probably not related to >> the FreeBSD OS, and surely not to installed applications. Are >> you sure there isn't a hardware problem lurking in the background? >> Like... starting a web browser reboots the system... this simply >> sounds totally wrong. >> >> >> >>> Overall, 10.3 i386 seems to have gremlins in the belly. What do I do ? >> I have a 10.2 installation on an older Dell laptop, running Gnome 2, >> no problems so far (but I haven't tried updating it yet, as I'm a >> big fan of "never touch a running system", a symptom of lazyness >> and "fat fingers"). :-) >> >> >> >>> Try some linux distro ? This is exactly what I have been trying to >>> avoid. >> Check out PC-BSD or try the Lxde desktop. Maybe you can also >> settle for a less convoluted desktop, i.e. a window manager >> that you like. >> >> >> >>> BTW, does anyone have any idea where can I get Windows XP drivers for >>> the NE56R laptop ? >> >From the manufacturer of course. :-) >> >> >> >>> If nothing else works, XP remains my fall-back option. >> For offline use that's probably more or less okay. :-) >> >> > > I strongly suspect some hardware problem, quite possible RAM : there > is a page fault at boot time and the report is in /var/crash. I am > running memtest86+ for 24 hours, and will report results tomorrow. If > memtest86+ detects no errors, I will paste the contents of the crash > report for some expert to analyse. > > Regards > Manish Jain > I ran memtest86+ for about 30 hours, doing 65 passes. No errors detected. So I rebooted, but I continue to get page fault and launching xfce-terminal rebooted the system. I am pasting the top few lines of the crash report here. If anybody would like the complete report (something like 2500 lines), please email me separately. If anybody would further like to have the core file itself (something like 120 MB), please let me know. // core.txt << Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 fault virtual address = 0x34 fault code = supervisor write, page not present instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc0dffdd6 stack pointer = 0x28:0xf0598720 frame pointer = 0x28:0xf0598720 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 1033 (xfce4-terminal) trap number = 12 panic: page fault cpuid = 0 KDB: stack backtrace: #0 0xc0b7be92 at kdb_backtrace+0x52 #1 0xc0b3c1db at vpanic+0x11b #2 0xc0b3c0bb at panic+0x1b #3 0xc10650cb at trap_fatal+0x30b #4 0xc1065435 at trap_pfault+0x355 #5 0xc1064b04 at trap+0x674 #6 0xc104f96a at calltrap+0x6 #7 0xc105af1f at pmap_extract_and_hold+0x17f #8 0xc0dec302 at vm_fault_quick_hold_pages+0xb2 #9 0xc0bfae75 at vn_io_fault1+0x285 #10 0xc0bfaaf3 at vn_rdwr+0x273 #11 0xc0bfb066 at vn_rdwr_inchunks+0xb6 #12 0xc0ad904d at elf32_coredump+0xabd #13 0xc0b3fe92 at sigexit+0xbc2 #14 0xc0b4064e at postsig+0x2de #15 0xc0b8fc28 at ast+0x548 #16 0xc10505b5 at doreti_ast+0x1b Uptime: 1m20s Physical memory: 1854 MB Dumping 115 MB: 100 84 68 52 36 20 4 // core.txt >> Any help in getting my laptop to work properly will be greatly appreciated. Thank you. Regards Manish Jain From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon May 2 19:14:23 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50764B2AD5C for ; Mon, 2 May 2016 19:14:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brandon.wandersee@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io0-f181.google.com (mail-io0-f181.google.com [209.85.223.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29A4D1A32 for ; Mon, 2 May 2016 19:14:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brandon.wandersee@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io0-f181.google.com with SMTP id 190so1460632iow.1 for ; Mon, 02 May 2016 12:14:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=icIR7DkxyoyVr59AdpfJ4n5+VA/CfjdIld8ep97IhBE=; b=VGxzOSXJi9kaSqMIp4sHd9TGgE3w/QltAdUCaqNPUeoUdYIWE+ZQ7yD//ZnryH/0KU POd2Pitwj4sJ3ZF9cFmmM1J5jWqHei1qvt2kbYZaAMfHlmFB/JW65q80GGBtPTd5mGmP 8YiL75puVkU+kcnEeM0omqpjBN9vsX60VoJppERftS7HDGqonoYxUDHoPOVo4Mg3+ZW/ avfTI9EbfBiExRAL3S9/BNiQ5TCanQOWCoUVapuuEdwgmYYhrecTsPJ/rK2aslHrkfV+ 5sz//xt3+d3jHUUBFZn43mYsYncSScOvnaNBBg/SDkrBNRhpZlFP2YjDZjGPmVpu5GSQ 5wpQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUgaRMbPaGLIdNbG935IL4boLBr/CkLVfCv7PuryeYZSy2fv5fJEAgIxI7CB1xt1w== X-Received: by 10.107.130.71 with SMTP id e68mr45560791iod.175.1462201532065; Mon, 02 May 2016 08:05:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from WorkBox.Home.gmail.com (63-231-164-200.mpls.qwest.net. [63.231.164.200]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c134sm18410506ioe.40.2016.05.02.08.05.30 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 02 May 2016 08:05:30 -0700 (PDT) References: User-agent: mu4e 0.9.16; emacs 24.5.1 From: Brandon J. Wandersee To: Arnab Bhowmick Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg method failed In-reply-to: Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 10:05:56 -0500 Message-ID: <861t5k8ppn.fsf@WorkBox.Home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 19:14:23 -0000 Arnab Bhowmick writes: > Today when i was downloading some package through pkg install method i git > the following output > > root@arnab:/usr/home/ARNAB # pkg install opera > Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. > All repositories are up-to-date. > The following 7 package(s) will be affected (of 0 checked): > > New packages to be INSTALLED: > opera: 12.16_6 > gstreamer-plugins-good: 0.10.31_2,3 > gstreamer-plugins-ogg: 0.10.36_1,3 > gstreamer-plugins-theora: 0.10.36_1,3 > gstreamer-plugins-vp8: 0.10.23_3,3 > gstreamer-plugins-bad: 0.10.23_2,3 > gstreamer-plugins-vorbis: 0.10.36_1,3 > > The process will require 53 MiB more space. > 15 MiB to be downloaded. > > Proceed with this action? [y/N]: y > Fetching opera-12.16_6.txz: 100% 13 MiB 109.3kB/s 02:04 > pkg: cached package opera-12.16_6: size mismatch, fetching from remote > Fetching opera-12.16_6.txz: 100% 13 MiB 139.7kB/s 01:37 > pkg: cached package opera-12.16_6: size mismatch, cannot continue > root@arnab:/usr/home/ARNAB # > > Can anyone say that why i got this massage? The message claims that the size of the package as recorded in the database doesn't match the size of the package that was downloaded. Try deleting the package from the pkg cache or clearing the pkg cache entirely, then forcibly updating the package database. If that doesn't clear the error, there may indeed be something wrong with the package. -- :: Brandon J. Wandersee :: brandon.wandersee@gmail.com :: -------------------------------------------------- :: 'The best design is as little design as possible.' :: --- Dieter Rams ---------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon May 2 19:38:18 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC670B2A9C5 for ; Mon, 2 May 2016 19:38:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdm7dv@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ig0-x233.google.com (mail-ig0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 970F81FC7 for ; Mon, 2 May 2016 19:38:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdm7dv@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ig0-x233.google.com with SMTP id s8so1706824ign.0 for ; Mon, 02 May 2016 12:38:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=5B+zAktLOat0VcoAAaQWiN34ZFApCiUH6CuK6Fi6Bqo=; b=E6iTsHMqgCRVOdLx3orSBugTY+qAd/Ei4eZSyNSiSFzHH2BEIzMXwnZk2VqnAnhJTf /Z+J0Fc56wQ3Bltz54VrGCe0sZwfVk9JHqP2iI1PWN/uFc5qqBSI7QiPMNrUqXedaPOC c28/h+hVRHzbPFIL8Ii4UYCV7EmDLXwoqDyCZemr/AdO8kkp2FW/6tWrJ05/+1xv6c3L N3QmZDde7QzSAjfcUSlW05ruNZknCsiE0DTv+jr/L5lo7xK+BdURs+H3arYQ17p8ofR7 ZXVCUNCuUXxr+FdnDvQWXYhZNR5Ky5aOCgmCDbbsvxMUPcQQpT/lwSI5WMTdLTllWvym 0HAg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=5B+zAktLOat0VcoAAaQWiN34ZFApCiUH6CuK6Fi6Bqo=; b=Fu/2Gft6AX4sUJik43ZGAAAxRPvWnVyyCkdrAXTF6D7cCdPFqXqT9/Frd3co3nLHWJ 64+Nvf0O6cixXFqX0li88s0/jx61XG/HqTC7FJoNnKNB3Zd7X1sZ0oHxguDP4T9Hqa4n 5sI4IXtP/bge8qb2cJIVW52IjlzVt2jg+KzPuVqZs3LyZGK7UlM8npIY6uifM7IdabEp Y1TnjngRaoyLDolAjkEzcDCJlDmGcXOSIma4SMLIU/AEk/F6VRr32iKRacZfvz/hDNKY uRa2QKQtOury10SsFdQ+WHCSj9zEZG7XdCNG5EhWmoBtWM1oS4iq6zAvFyg4uj/ub/WW YuVA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWQxi6E40gGj2SUqpjsuh20E9LERz0Qg4uyvHKodCSG3D7HF2PSkWRfxA845yjEloKOFUBm7Q6dwZcPtg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.100.2 with SMTP id eu2mr22892979igb.89.1462217898170; Mon, 02 May 2016 12:38:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.107.11.220 with HTTP; Mon, 2 May 2016 12:38:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 15:38:18 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: pkg method failed From: Jonathan Moore To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, arnabbhowmick08@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 19:38:18 -0000 Hi, Try pkg update -f Jonathan Moore From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon May 2 19:43:56 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A025DB2AB77 for ; Mon, 2 May 2016 19:43:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sebastian@wolfgarten.com) Received: from waldfest.wolfgarten.com (waldfest.wolfgarten.com [144.76.61.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CAD41332 for ; Mon, 2 May 2016 19:43:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sebastian@wolfgarten.com) Received: from waldfest (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by waldfest.wolfgarten.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C182963C75; Mon, 2 May 2016 21:43:48 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at wolfgarten.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.514 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.514 tagged_above=-9999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, BODY_RULE_1=1, TW_LR=0.077, TW_RW=0.077, TW_WX=0.077, TW_XR=0.077, TW_ZF=0.077, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from waldfest.wolfgarten.com ([127.0.0.1]) by waldfest (waldfest.wolfgarten.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Fa0QxRIgpuMe; Mon, 2 May 2016 21:43:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.159] (unknown [84.119.55.188]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by waldfest.wolfgarten.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 14B5363C6D; Mon, 2 May 2016 21:43:44 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=wolfgarten.com; s=mail; t=1462218224; bh=ltmgTrsxRoEZ5gE78Je9reSxoQYDc9NJkEg4iTQ5meg=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:References:To; b=daNrh5laCBxN+fzY+3spfmpvbickFBD3QOqHmOCJ3hAhK0je1Ze/kbtf1rHavh9Ir 8QDKYgAp0whBm89NvdScu30QRiJwBXqwITE3iIFAqHG5a0NpntWcVZmUpoz4A1rhm0 /ZcN686okIgxPDPgYLl/VotmYU2ZYCGLdFAMATa0= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: ZFS migration - New pool lost after reboot From: Sebastian Wolfgarten In-Reply-To: <72087b33-53f9-e298-1441-4988c2a5ecb3@fechner.net> Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 21:43:43 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <2D936447-34C1-471B-8787-8075B19F8B28@wolfgarten.com> References: <0A383C91-FCBA-4B9E-A95A-157A13708125@wolfgarten.com> <72087b33-53f9-e298-1441-4988c2a5ecb3@fechner.net> To: Matthias Fechner , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 19:43:56 -0000 Hi Matthias, dear list, I have build a new VM to test this further without affecting my live = machine. When doing all these steps (including the amendment of = loader.conf on the new pool), my system will boots up with the old pool. = Any ideas why? Here is what I did: 1) Create required partitions on temporary hard disk ada2 gpart create -s GPT ada2 gpart add -t freebsd-boot -s 128 ada2 gpart add -t freebsd-swap -s 4G -l newswap ada2 gpart add -t freebsd-zfs -l newdisk ada2 gpart bootcode -b /boot/pmbr -p /boot/gptzfsboot -i 1 ada2 2) Create new pool (newpool) zpool create -o cachefile=3D/tmp/zpool.cache newpool gpt/newdisk 3) Create snapshot of existing zroot pool and copy it over to new pool=20= zfs snapshot -r zroot@movedata zfs send -vR zroot@movedata | zfs receive -vFd newpool zfs destroy -r zroot@movedata 4) Make the new pool bootable =09 zpool set bootfs=3Dnewpool/ROOT/default newpool 5) Mount new pool and prepare for reboot cp /tmp/zpool.cache /tmp/newpool.cache zpool export newpool zpool import -c /tmp/newpool.cache -R /mnt newpool cp /tmp/newpool.cache /mnt/boot/zfs/zpool.cache in /mnt/boot/loader.conf the value of kern.geom.label.gptid.enable=3D=840=93= changed to =842"=20 zfs set mountpoint=3D/ newpool/ROOT reboot After the reboot, the machine is still running of the old zfs striped = mirror but I can mount the newpool without any problems: root@vm:~ # cat /boot/loader.conf kern.geom.label.gptid.enable=3D"0" zfs_load=3D"YES" root@vm:~ # zpool import -c /tmp/newpool.cache -R /mnt newpool root@vm:~ # cd /mnt root@vm:/mnt # ls -la total 50 drwxr-xr-x 19 root wheel 26 May 2 23:33 . drwxr-xr-x 18 root wheel 25 May 2 23:37 .. -rw-r--r-- 2 root wheel 966 Mar 25 04:52 .cshrc -rw-r--r-- 2 root wheel 254 Mar 25 04:52 .profile -rw------- 1 root wheel 1024 May 2 01:45 .rnd -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 6197 Mar 25 04:52 COPYRIGHT drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 47 Mar 25 04:51 bin -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 9 May 2 23:27 bla drwxr-xr-x 8 root wheel 47 May 2 01:44 boot drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 2 May 2 01:32 dev -rw------- 1 root wheel 4096 May 2 23:21 entropy drwxr-xr-x 23 root wheel 107 May 2 01:46 etc drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 52 Mar 25 04:52 lib drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 4 Mar 25 04:51 libexec drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 2 Mar 25 04:51 media drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 2 Mar 25 04:51 mnt drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 2 May 2 23:33 newpool dr-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 2 Mar 25 04:51 proc drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 147 Mar 25 04:52 rescue drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 7 May 2 23:27 root drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 133 Mar 25 04:52 sbin lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Mar 25 04:52 sys -> usr/src/sys drwxrwxrwt 6 root wheel 7 May 2 23:33 tmp drwxr-xr-x 16 root wheel 16 Mar 25 04:52 usr drwxr-xr-x 24 root wheel 24 May 2 23:21 var drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 2 May 2 01:32 zroot root@vm:/mnt # cd boot root@vm:/mnt/boot # cat loader.conf kern.geom.label.gptid.enable=3D"2" zfs_load=3D=84YES" My question is: How do I make my system permanently boot off the newpool = such that I can destroy the existing zroot one? Many thanks for your help, it is really appreciated. Best regards Sebastian > Am 29.04.2016 um 10:25 schrieb Matthias Fechner : >=20 > Am 28.04.2016 um 23:14 schrieb Sebastian Wolfgarten: >> 5) Mount new pool and prepare for reboot >>=20 >> cp /tmp/zpool.cache /tmp/newpool.cache >> zpool export newpool >> zpool import -c /tmp/newpool.cache -R /mnt newpool >> cp /tmp/newpool.cache /mnt/boot/zfs/zpool.cache >> zfs set mountpoint=3D/ newpool/ROOT >> reboot >=20 > I think you forgot to adapt vfs.zfs.mountfrom=3D in /boot/loader.conf = on the new pool? >=20 >=20 >=20 > Gru=DF > Matthias >=20 > --=20 >=20 > "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to > build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying = to > produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning." -- > Rich Cook From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon May 2 20:42:59 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A78D4B2ABEE for ; Mon, 2 May 2016 20:42:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sebastian@wolfgarten.com) Received: from waldfest.wolfgarten.com (waldfest.wolfgarten.com [144.76.61.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36D4916E5 for ; Mon, 2 May 2016 20:42:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sebastian@wolfgarten.com) Received: from waldfest (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by waldfest.wolfgarten.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AB6B63D5F; Mon, 2 May 2016 22:42:58 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at wolfgarten.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.514 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.514 tagged_above=-9999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, BODY_RULE_1=1, TW_LR=0.077, TW_RW=0.077, TW_WX=0.077, TW_XR=0.077, TW_ZF=0.077, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from waldfest.wolfgarten.com ([127.0.0.1]) by waldfest (waldfest.wolfgarten.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id UuLOvTsNkLbY; Mon, 2 May 2016 22:42:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.159] (unknown [84.119.55.188]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by waldfest.wolfgarten.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EDEDA63D59; Mon, 2 May 2016 22:42:47 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=wolfgarten.com; s=mail; t=1462221769; bh=TRmax8iCpgIR+eoTY3GGPY1W/dpc1qw9O9uDRfqlPQU=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:References:To; b=RfktB6Ran4UG8C6g4Vpcbnps3/52yO06naYzLElNykdkOrdrzX26Zh5ygRyE/Wqtx 5eb5KfcijZZ8LJcLiZd2Oo13jLIzDzXSolH6Tc2f1hgibFX4yKlKovZC++PC14Cozm oYAzRLGpASWxBnzBj3jmiScnrWTJ2wrlb2OVCrAg= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: ZFS migration - New pool lost after reboot From: Sebastian Wolfgarten In-Reply-To: <2D936447-34C1-471B-8787-8075B19F8B28@wolfgarten.com> Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 22:42:47 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <6E1B2BCF-3B5C-4D18-9152-FE68711B2B43@wolfgarten.com> References: <0A383C91-FCBA-4B9E-A95A-157A13708125@wolfgarten.com> <72087b33-53f9-e298-1441-4988c2a5ecb3@fechner.net> <2D936447-34C1-471B-8787-8075B19F8B28@wolfgarten.com> To: Matthias Fechner , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 20:42:59 -0000 Hi, just to follow-up on my own email earlier on - I managed to get the new = pool booting by amending /boot/loader.conf as follows: root@vm:~ # cat /boot/loader.conf vfs.root.mountfrom=3D"zfs:newpool/ROOT/default" kern.geom.label.gptid.enable=3D"2" zfs_load=3D"YES" However, when rebooting I can see he is using the new pool however I am = running into issues as he can=92t seem to find some essential files in = /usr: Mounting local file systems eval: zfs not found eval: touch not found /etc/rc: cannot create /dev/null: No such file or directory /etc/rc: date: not found Here is what =84zfs list=93 looks like: root@vm:~ # zfs list NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT newpool 385M 5.41G 19K /mnt/zroot newpool/ROOT 385M 5.41G 19K /mnt newpool/ROOT/default 385M 5.41G 385M /mnt newpool/tmp 21K 5.41G 21K /mnt/tmp newpool/usr 76K 5.41G 19K /mnt/usr newpool/usr/home 19K 5.41G 19K /mnt/usr/home newpool/usr/ports 19K 5.41G 19K /mnt/usr/ports newpool/usr/src 19K 5.41G 19K /mnt/usr/src newpool/var 139K 5.41G 19K /mnt/var newpool/var/audit 19K 5.41G 19K /mnt/var/audit newpool/var/crash 19K 5.41G 19K /mnt/var/crash newpool/var/log 44K 5.41G 44K /mnt/var/log newpool/var/mail 19K 5.41G 19K /mnt/var/mail newpool/var/tmp 19K 5.41G 19K /mnt/var/tmp zroot 524M 26.4G 96K /zroot zroot/ROOT 522M 26.4G 96K none zroot/ROOT/default 522M 26.4G 522M / zroot/tmp 74.5K 26.4G 74.5K /tmp zroot/usr 384K 26.4G 96K /usr zroot/usr/home 96K 26.4G 96K /usr/home zroot/usr/ports 96K 26.4G 96K /usr/ports zroot/usr/src 96K 26.4G 96K /usr/src zroot/var 580K 26.4G 96K /var zroot/var/audit 96K 26.4G 96K /var/audit zroot/var/crash 96K 26.4G 96K /var/crash zroot/var/log 103K 26.4G 103K /var/log zroot/var/mail 96K 26.4G 96K /var/mail zroot/var/tmp 92.5K 26.4G 92.5K /var/tmp=20 I am assuming I have to amend the zfs parameters for the mount points = but I can=92t seem to figure out what=92s wrong. I tried things like: zfs set mountpoint=3D/usr newpool/usr zfs set mountpoint=3D/tmp newpool/tmp zfs set mountpoint=3D/var newpool/var Unfortunately this did not solve the issue. Any ideas? Many thanks. Best regards Sebastian > Am 02.05.2016 um 21:43 schrieb Sebastian Wolfgarten = : >=20 > Hi Matthias, > dear list, >=20 > I have build a new VM to test this further without affecting my live = machine. When doing all these steps (including the amendment of = loader.conf on the new pool), my system will boots up with the old pool. = Any ideas why? >=20 > Here is what I did: >=20 > 1) Create required partitions on temporary hard disk ada2 > gpart create -s GPT ada2 > gpart add -t freebsd-boot -s 128 ada2 > gpart add -t freebsd-swap -s 4G -l newswap ada2 > gpart add -t freebsd-zfs -l newdisk ada2 > gpart bootcode -b /boot/pmbr -p /boot/gptzfsboot -i 1 ada2 >=20 > 2) Create new pool (newpool) >=20 > zpool create -o cachefile=3D/tmp/zpool.cache newpool gpt/newdisk >=20 > 3) Create snapshot of existing zroot pool and copy it over to new pool=20= > zfs snapshot -r zroot@movedata > zfs send -vR zroot@movedata | zfs receive -vFd newpool > zfs destroy -r zroot@movedata >=20 > 4) Make the new pool bootable > =09 > zpool set bootfs=3Dnewpool/ROOT/default newpool >=20 > 5) Mount new pool and prepare for reboot >=20 > cp /tmp/zpool.cache /tmp/newpool.cache > zpool export newpool > zpool import -c /tmp/newpool.cache -R /mnt newpool > cp /tmp/newpool.cache /mnt/boot/zfs/zpool.cache > in /mnt/boot/loader.conf the value of kern.geom.label.gptid.enable=3D=84= 0=93 changed to =842"=20 > zfs set mountpoint=3D/ newpool/ROOT > reboot >=20 > After the reboot, the machine is still running of the old zfs striped = mirror but I can mount the newpool without any problems: >=20 > root@vm:~ # cat /boot/loader.conf > kern.geom.label.gptid.enable=3D"0" > zfs_load=3D"YES" > root@vm:~ # zpool import -c /tmp/newpool.cache -R /mnt newpool > root@vm:~ # cd /mnt > root@vm:/mnt # ls -la > total 50 > drwxr-xr-x 19 root wheel 26 May 2 23:33 . > drwxr-xr-x 18 root wheel 25 May 2 23:37 .. > -rw-r--r-- 2 root wheel 966 Mar 25 04:52 .cshrc > -rw-r--r-- 2 root wheel 254 Mar 25 04:52 .profile > -rw------- 1 root wheel 1024 May 2 01:45 .rnd > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 6197 Mar 25 04:52 COPYRIGHT > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 47 Mar 25 04:51 bin > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 9 May 2 23:27 bla > drwxr-xr-x 8 root wheel 47 May 2 01:44 boot > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 2 May 2 01:32 dev > -rw------- 1 root wheel 4096 May 2 23:21 entropy > drwxr-xr-x 23 root wheel 107 May 2 01:46 etc > drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 52 Mar 25 04:52 lib > drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 4 Mar 25 04:51 libexec > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 2 Mar 25 04:51 media > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 2 Mar 25 04:51 mnt > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 2 May 2 23:33 newpool > dr-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 2 Mar 25 04:51 proc > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 147 Mar 25 04:52 rescue > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 7 May 2 23:27 root > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 133 Mar 25 04:52 sbin > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Mar 25 04:52 sys -> usr/src/sys > drwxrwxrwt 6 root wheel 7 May 2 23:33 tmp > drwxr-xr-x 16 root wheel 16 Mar 25 04:52 usr > drwxr-xr-x 24 root wheel 24 May 2 23:21 var > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 2 May 2 01:32 zroot > root@vm:/mnt # cd boot > root@vm:/mnt/boot # cat loader.conf > kern.geom.label.gptid.enable=3D"2" > zfs_load=3D=84YES" >=20 > My question is: How do I make my system permanently boot off the = newpool such that I can destroy the existing zroot one? >=20 > Many thanks for your help, it is really appreciated. >=20 > Best regards > Sebastian >=20 >> Am 29.04.2016 um 10:25 schrieb Matthias Fechner : >>=20 >> Am 28.04.2016 um 23:14 schrieb Sebastian Wolfgarten: >>> 5) Mount new pool and prepare for reboot >>>=20 >>> cp /tmp/zpool.cache /tmp/newpool.cache >>> zpool export newpool >>> zpool import -c /tmp/newpool.cache -R /mnt newpool >>> cp /tmp/newpool.cache /mnt/boot/zfs/zpool.cache >>> zfs set mountpoint=3D/ newpool/ROOT >>> reboot >>=20 >> I think you forgot to adapt vfs.zfs.mountfrom=3D in /boot/loader.conf = on the new pool? >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> Gru=DF >> Matthias >>=20 >> --=20 >>=20 >> "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to >> build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying = to >> produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning." = -- >> Rich Cook >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon May 2 21:45:37 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E78EDB2B180 for ; Mon, 2 May 2016 21:45:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: from anny.lostinspace.de (anny.lostinspace.de [IPv6:2001:608:a02::33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8525314E9 for ; Mon, 2 May 2016 21:45:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: from server.idefix.lan (unknown [IPv6:2001:a61:128c:9501:dacb:8aff:febf:62dd]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: idefix@fechner.net) by anny.lostinspace.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8CE223EE3A3; Mon, 2 May 2016 23:45:34 +0200 (CEST) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.1 anny.lostinspace.de 8CE223EE3A3 Authentication-Results: anny.lostinspace.de; dmarc=none header.from=fechner.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=fechner.net; s=default; t=1462225534; bh=rZNle+7F/FVrTTW4auzg8udey53teBUHJakZPFrNSOE=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=QMp2TGu14YtWTrAizUsKfliZ9ETjF3oqIu+284hLn4Ynsxdz0R+zibNy59zSqwE2R 2eyi7XL6OMoz7JLx0Tulkt7OK9ShOYProo8I6UMUpnXYux3SAVx6Gwzt5Q5UiUR3nQ oVm1BJi1ZqsIyvqFBvYtNt1Q4Fm5TQMrVVHuQszw= Received: from [192.168.0.151] (aftr-88-217-181-97.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.181.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.idefix.lan (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3AC0B2AE7A3; Mon, 2 May 2016 23:45:31 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: ZFS migration - New pool lost after reboot To: Sebastian Wolfgarten , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <0A383C91-FCBA-4B9E-A95A-157A13708125@wolfgarten.com> <72087b33-53f9-e298-1441-4988c2a5ecb3@fechner.net> <2D936447-34C1-471B-8787-8075B19F8B28@wolfgarten.com> <6E1B2BCF-3B5C-4D18-9152-FE68711B2B43@wolfgarten.com> From: Matthias Fechner Message-ID: <72d62e46-59f4-5e6f-2bf6-8ac1ba808f02@fechner.net> Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 23:45:25 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6E1B2BCF-3B5C-4D18-9152-FE68711B2B43@wolfgarten.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 21:45:38 -0000 Am 02.05.2016 um 22:42 schrieb Sebastian Wolfgarten: > root@vm:~ # zfs list > NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT > newpool 385M 5.41G 19K /mnt/zroot > newpool/ROOT 385M 5.41G 19K /mnt > newpool/ROOT/default 385M 5.41G 385M /mnt > newpool/tmp 21K 5.41G 21K /mnt/tmp > newpool/usr 76K 5.41G 19K /mnt/usr > newpool/usr/home 19K 5.41G 19K /mnt/usr/home > newpool/usr/ports 19K 5.41G 19K /mnt/usr/ports > newpool/usr/src 19K 5.41G 19K /mnt/usr/src > newpool/var 139K 5.41G 19K /mnt/var > newpool/var/audit 19K 5.41G 19K /mnt/var/audit > newpool/var/crash 19K 5.41G 19K /mnt/var/crash > newpool/var/log 44K 5.41G 44K /mnt/var/log > newpool/var/mail 19K 5.41G 19K /mnt/var/mail > newpool/var/tmp 19K 5.41G 19K /mnt/var/tmp > zroot 524M 26.4G 96K /zroot > zroot/ROOT 522M 26.4G 96K none > zroot/ROOT/default 522M 26.4G 522M / > zroot/tmp 74.5K 26.4G 74.5K /tmp > zroot/usr 384K 26.4G 96K /usr > zroot/usr/home 96K 26.4G 96K /usr/home > zroot/usr/ports 96K 26.4G 96K /usr/ports > zroot/usr/src 96K 26.4G 96K /usr/src > zroot/var 580K 26.4G 96K /var > zroot/var/audit 96K 26.4G 96K /var/audit > zroot/var/crash 96K 26.4G 96K /var/crash > zroot/var/log 103K 26.4G 103K /var/log > zroot/var/mail 96K 26.4G 96K /var/mail > zroot/var/tmp 92.5K 26.4G 92.5K /var/tmp > > I am assuming I have to amend the zfs parameters for the mount points but I can’t seem to figure out what’s wrong. I tried things like: > > zfs set mountpoint=/usr newpool/usr > zfs set mountpoint=/tmp newpool/tmp > zfs set mountpoint=/var newpool/var zfs set mountpoint=none newpool/ROOT zfs set mountpoin=/ newpool/ROOT/default zfs set mountpoin=/tmp newpool/tmp zfs set mountpoin=/usr newpool/usr zfs set mountpoin=/var newpool/var Gruß Matthias -- "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning." -- Rich Cook From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue May 3 03:20:32 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D02B2B8E1 for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 03:20:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nervoso@k1.com.br) Received: from outbound1f.ore.mailhop.org (outbound1f.ore.mailhop.org [52.26.49.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD42A1892 for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 03:20:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nervoso@k1.com.br) X-MHO-User: dab4f5e1-10dd-11e6-9de8-1b78d5a2543b X-Report-Abuse-To: https://support.duocircle.com/support/solutions/articles/5000540958-duocircle-standard-smtp-abuse-information X-Originating-IP: 186.228.82.163 X-Mail-Handler: DuoCircle Outbound SMTP Received: from mailserver2.k1.com.br (unknown [186.228.82.163]) by outbound1.ore.mailhop.org (Halon Mail Gateway) with ESMTPSA; Tue, 3 May 2016 03:19:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lenzinote.lenzicasa (179.184.51.72.static.gvt.net.br [179.184.51.72] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mailserver2.k1.com.br (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u433JHOx034893 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 3 May 2016 00:19:19 -0300 (BRT) (envelope-from nervoso@k1.com.br) Message-ID: <1462245544.65124.28.camel@k1.com.br> Subject: Re: Why is FreeBSD+GNOME not working on my Pentium laptop ? From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9rgio?= de Almeida Lenzi To: Manish Jain , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 00:19:04 -0300 In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 03:20:33 -0000 I have a full working gnome2 clone mate 12.2 for freebsd 10.3 running  in i386 the mate have full libreoffice, and about 600 packages you can have an idea at http://www.k1.com.br/screenshots you can install everything with only one command  pkg install -y mate then... pkg install -y libreoffice all you have to do is create a file named dist32.conf in the /etc/pkg directory, remove the FreeBSD.conf and install mate WARNING... be shure you have NO PACKAGES installed in the machine..    to delete all packages use: pkg delete -fay it will not remove your home directory nor the operating system ==================the dist32.conf ================ DIST32: {   url: http://dist32.k1.com.br/${ABI},   enabled: yes } ============================================ from time to time, use the command pkg upgrade -y to keep your system up to date if the upgrade remove some packages (due to incompatibilities).   a pkg install -y mate  would reinstall it Hope I could help##SELECTION_END## From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue May 3 08:48:18 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89187B2A4CF for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 08:48:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from c.pilka@asconix.com) Received: from aibo.runbox.com (aibo.runbox.com [91.220.196.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16C08133C for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 08:48:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from c.pilka@asconix.com) Received: from [10.9.9.212] (helo=mailfront12.runbox.com) by bars.runbox.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1axVgT-0001SO-NT for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 10:27:57 +0200 Received: from s1853520284.blix.com ([185.35.202.84] helo=[10.3.10.126]) by mailfront12.runbox.com with esmtpsa (uid:865152 ) (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) id 1axVg8-0008Bn-Co for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 10:27:36 +0200 From: Christoph Pilka Subject: pkg audit systemwide vs pkg audit packagewise Message-Id: <1D71A8D8-2CD8-4C89-93BB-A53F48BE8588@asconix.com> Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 10:27:36 +0200 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 08:48:18 -0000 Hi, I have a sort of weird behaviour when it comes to pkg audits. Same = system: #~ pkg audit -F tells me: Fetching vuln.xml.bz2: 100% 595 KiB 609.6kB/s 00:01 =20 0 problem(s) in the installed packages found. but running pkg audit for a specific package, e.g. bash: #~ pkg audit -F bash tells me: Fetching vuln.xml.bz2: 100% 595 KiB 609.6kB/s 00:01 =20 bash is vulnerable:=09 Affected versions: < 4.3.25_2 bash -- remote code execution CVE: CVE-2014-6278 CVE: CVE-2014-6277 WWW: = https://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/freebsd/512d1301-49b9-11e4-ae2c-c80aa9043978.htm= l bash is vulnerable: Affected versions: < 4.3.27_1 bash -- out-of-bounds memory access in parser CVE: CVE-2014-7187 CVE: CVE-2014-7186 WWW: = https://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/freebsd/4a4e9f88-491c-11e4-ae2c-c80aa9043978.htm= l bash is vulnerable: Affected versions: > 4.3 : < 4.3.25_1 > 4.2 : <=3D 4.2.48 > 4.1 : <=3D 4.1.12 > 4.0 : <=3D 4.0.39 > 3.2 : <=3D 3.2.52 > 3.1 : <=3D 3.1.18 > 3.0 : <=3D 3.0.17 bash -- remote code execution vulnerability CVE: CVE-2014-7169 CVE: CVE-2014-6271 WWW: = https://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/freebsd/71ad81da-4414-11e4-a33e-3c970e169bc2.htm= l 1 problem(s) in the installed packages found. That's confusing, especially because no one of the version numbers in = the CVE's listed above does actually match the version of bash that is = installed on the system: #~ pkg info bash | grep ^Version Version : 4.3.42_1 Am I doing something wrong or is it actually a bug? Cheerio, Chris= From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue May 3 11:44:14 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B93AB2B846 for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 11:44:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodsb02@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x235.google.com (mail-wm0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52B861D0E for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 11:44:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodsb02@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x235.google.com with SMTP id g17so33946260wme.1 for ; Tue, 03 May 2016 04:44:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=ms0ekZP/+LKMy9ZehVE5CtHrmvbpWQmPXjuGx57wgUU=; b=DUVxJtw5BkqruKjnBFiYlEQEVkpMmV1BfKrPOFQeWPvATlWO3tr5xc4MN8dZ1m9ZDu NhH5GZMfTrIlVxCehDizicKLp7nBpH4z1mbM+2tp+Q5wTjcD0OjAtbssg+NGzQO+aaI5 kVf0ARjBxH4YJ9IL+byQ4tRSOIcqn0kr+LbaHj/l3q8lNuFiiaEmf/G17HAyqypGXUL0 L5Fyh4MBZ9bFOlZcVUA9KkV7XAtu6cndu6Jb+vHVzeSjiC42aLKRu4M+nTMGXrsclnVq P9o//FN01Rp4bT0Waoovj95Nu/oAdpiqalDYHGruL1eOphkZYqf2kb2FY4n2Dlj6oAWd pfwA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=ms0ekZP/+LKMy9ZehVE5CtHrmvbpWQmPXjuGx57wgUU=; b=U8zCM0flUCuBLUb6LeMy1TMIDRaPvfMNkDzpb7I+rxuKeSJWAHNUZIN8mgkoaFabf5 sRXmNh9xAtKgwS0IE1tzO6Hv3/9BhtCToHPrq4ZQYgh1f4WdL4YTzVPR5p8TQq+ej+J7 yiwZ1Z1VmBalmVFY6TQaE+K7dH8igHbKA0F+zeAZQtWJe9tfjjAyeJZUhQZ8TcareY/I mXN9DvME9O+NVEGs/51036eWssIylSRjPLQZWyFVTF2Ix83c2be99W7YQC/S1zkv8mfW hwRILc/EUM7kB01yRTFd/oHvaqPAfpEUFRl8g20wc8c609Wpt16QgiCFTD67T7xFCqRc CIVQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FV0pSzfi7q/5UHSMQs0zKoLNq33gbq/NOugSOyTzqVEJRkIvLWZleqpa+deO3NgPdPLOucKiRR6isN8fA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.203.138 with SMTP id kq10mr2410502wjc.155.1462275852811; Tue, 03 May 2016 04:44:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.16.201 with HTTP; Tue, 3 May 2016 04:44:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1D71A8D8-2CD8-4C89-93BB-A53F48BE8588@asconix.com> References: <1D71A8D8-2CD8-4C89-93BB-A53F48BE8588@asconix.com> Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 13:44:12 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: pkg audit systemwide vs pkg audit packagewise From: Ben Woods To: Christoph Pilka Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 11:44:14 -0000 On Tuesday, 3 May 2016, Christoph Pilka wrote: > Hi, > > I have a sort of weird behaviour when it comes to pkg audits. Same system: > > #~ pkg audit -F > > tells me: > > Fetching vuln.xml.bz2: 100% 595 KiB 609.6kB/s 00:01 > 0 problem(s) in the installed packages found. > > but running pkg audit for a specific package, e.g. bash: > > #~ pkg audit -F bash > > tells me: > > Fetching vuln.xml.bz2: 100% 595 KiB 609.6kB/s 00:01 > bash is vulnerable: > Affected versions: > < 4.3.25_2 > bash -- remote code execution > CVE: CVE-2014-6278 > CVE: CVE-2014-6277 > WWW: > https://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/freebsd/512d1301-49b9-11e4-ae2c-c80aa9043978.html > > bash is vulnerable: > Affected versions: > < 4.3.27_1 > bash -- out-of-bounds memory access in parser > CVE: CVE-2014-7187 > CVE: CVE-2014-7186 > WWW: > https://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/freebsd/4a4e9f88-491c-11e4-ae2c-c80aa9043978.html > > bash is vulnerable: > Affected versions: > > 4.3 : < 4.3.25_1 > > 4.2 : <= 4.2.48 > > 4.1 : <= 4.1.12 > > 4.0 : <= 4.0.39 > > 3.2 : <= 3.2.52 > > 3.1 : <= 3.1.18 > > 3.0 : <= 3.0.17 > bash -- remote code execution vulnerability > CVE: CVE-2014-7169 > CVE: CVE-2014-6271 > WWW: > https://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/freebsd/71ad81da-4414-11e4-a33e-3c970e169bc2.html > > 1 problem(s) in the installed packages found. > > That's confusing, especially because no one of the version numbers in the > CVE's listed above does actually match the version of bash that is > installed on the system: > > #~ pkg info bash | grep ^Version > > Version : 4.3.42_1 > > Am I doing something wrong or is it actually a bug? > > Cheerio, > Chris > Hi Chris, Whilst this behaviour is not described in the pkg-audit(8) man page, it appears that when "pkg audit" is run without a specific package name it only shows vulnerabilities that affect the install versions of packages, whilst when fun with a specific package is shows all vulnerabilities whether the installed package versions are affected or not. If you review the output of "pkg audit -F bash" you will notice that none of the vulnerabilities affect your installed version of bash 4.3.42_1. Regards, Ben -- -- From: Benjamin Woods woodsb02@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue May 3 16:08:56 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83A91B2C92C for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 16:08:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bourne.identity@hotmail.com) Received: from BLU004-OMC4S5.hotmail.com (blu004-omc4s5.hotmail.com [65.55.111.144]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "Microsoft IT SSL SHA2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51A9F1A2D for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 16:08:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bourne.identity@hotmail.com) Received: from BLU436-SMTP21 ([65.55.111.137]) by BLU004-OMC4S5.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Tue, 3 May 2016 09:07:48 -0700 X-TMN: [2BBI+snFg8bOO+VtyxZAgT5lAtWFkFK1] X-Originating-Email: [bourne.identity@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is 10.3 i386 jinxed ? To: Polytropon References: <20160430084415.03be443d.freebsd@edvax.de> <5724604D.3020804@hotmail.com> <20160430203426.a9d5841b.freebsd@edvax.de> <5725CF38.4090007@hotmail.com> <572752E2.2040708@hotmail.com> CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu From: Manish Jain Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 21:37:36 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <572752E2.2040708@hotmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 May 2016 16:07:46.0735 (UTC) FILETIME=[EEC81BF0:01D1A555] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 16:08:56 -0000 On 05/02/16 18:45, Manish Jain wrote: > > On 05/01/16 15:11, Manish Jain wrote: >> On 05/01/16 00:04, Polytropon wrote: >>> On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 23:43:47 +0530, Manish Jain wrote: >>>> I reinstalled the whole system using xfce as the desktop. While things >>>> have improved, the system is still not workable. >>>> >>>> 1) The installer 'forgot' to place the boot code on the MBR. I had to >>>> use live CD + boot0cfg to fix that. >>> Use MBR only if needed. Today's preference is to use GPT for >>> partitioning. Compare: >>> >>> http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/disksetup.html >>> >>> Use MBR only if you have a valid reason as it probably has >>> reached the state of "not supported anymore". >>> >>> >>> >>>> 2) The first time X started, xfce4-panel crashed >>>> 3) The second time, xfce-terminal crashed >>>> 4) The third time, trying to launch firefox rebooted the system. >>> This (and especially the last problem) leads to the impression >>> that there is a _massive_ problem, it's probably not related to >>> the FreeBSD OS, and surely not to installed applications. Are >>> you sure there isn't a hardware problem lurking in the background? >>> Like... starting a web browser reboots the system... this simply >>> sounds totally wrong. >>> >>> >>> >>>> Overall, 10.3 i386 seems to have gremlins in the belly. What do I do ? >>> I have a 10.2 installation on an older Dell laptop, running Gnome 2, >>> no problems so far (but I haven't tried updating it yet, as I'm a >>> big fan of "never touch a running system", a symptom of lazyness >>> and "fat fingers"). :-) >>> >>> >>> >>>> Try some linux distro ? This is exactly what I have been trying to >>>> avoid. >>> Check out PC-BSD or try the Lxde desktop. Maybe you can also >>> settle for a less convoluted desktop, i.e. a window manager >>> that you like. >>> >>> >>> >>>> BTW, does anyone have any idea where can I get Windows XP drivers for >>>> the NE56R laptop ? >>> >From the manufacturer of course. :-) >>> >>> >>> >>>> If nothing else works, XP remains my fall-back option. >>> For offline use that's probably more or less okay. :-) >>> >>> >> >> I strongly suspect some hardware problem, quite possible RAM : there >> is a page fault at boot time and the report is in /var/crash. I am >> running memtest86+ for 24 hours, and will report results tomorrow. If >> memtest86+ detects no errors, I will paste the contents of the crash >> report for some expert to analyse. >> >> Regards >> Manish Jain >> > > I ran memtest86+ for about 30 hours, doing 65 passes. No errors > detected. So I rebooted, but I continue to get page fault and > launching xfce-terminal rebooted the system. I am pasting the top few > lines of the crash report here. If anybody would like the complete > report (something like 2500 lines), please email me separately. If > anybody would further like to have the core file itself (something > like 120 MB), please let me know. > > // core.txt << > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 > fault virtual address = 0x34 > fault code = supervisor write, page not present > instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc0dffdd6 > stack pointer = 0x28:0xf0598720 > frame pointer = 0x28:0xf0598720 > code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b > = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 > processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 > current process = 1033 (xfce4-terminal) > trap number = 12 > panic: page fault > cpuid = 0 > KDB: stack backtrace: > #0 0xc0b7be92 at kdb_backtrace+0x52 > #1 0xc0b3c1db at vpanic+0x11b > #2 0xc0b3c0bb at panic+0x1b > #3 0xc10650cb at trap_fatal+0x30b > #4 0xc1065435 at trap_pfault+0x355 > #5 0xc1064b04 at trap+0x674 > #6 0xc104f96a at calltrap+0x6 > #7 0xc105af1f at pmap_extract_and_hold+0x17f > #8 0xc0dec302 at vm_fault_quick_hold_pages+0xb2 > #9 0xc0bfae75 at vn_io_fault1+0x285 > #10 0xc0bfaaf3 at vn_rdwr+0x273 > #11 0xc0bfb066 at vn_rdwr_inchunks+0xb6 > #12 0xc0ad904d at elf32_coredump+0xabd > #13 0xc0b3fe92 at sigexit+0xbc2 > #14 0xc0b4064e at postsig+0x2de > #15 0xc0b8fc28 at ast+0x548 > #16 0xc10505b5 at doreti_ast+0x1b > Uptime: 1m20s > Physical memory: 1854 MB > Dumping 115 MB: 100 84 68 52 36 20 4 > > // core.txt >> > > Any help in getting my laptop to work properly will be greatly > appreciated. Thank you. > > Regards > Manish Jain > I found what is the problem, with the help of Ultimate Boot CD. UBCD says the video memory is corrupt. Does that mean I have to trash the entire laptop, or is there some way to replace the video memory ? Thanks for any help. Regards Manish Jain From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue May 3 16:18:49 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EC2AB2CC1B for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 16:18:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25AD01FDC for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 16:18:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-216-66.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.216.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4060E3CEF9; Tue, 3 May 2016 18:18:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id u43GIdp8002100; Tue, 3 May 2016 18:18:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 18:18:39 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Manish Jain Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu Subject: Re: Is 10.3 i386 jinxed ? Message-Id: <20160503181839.2aacad7e.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20160430084415.03be443d.freebsd@edvax.de> <5724604D.3020804@hotmail.com> <20160430203426.a9d5841b.freebsd@edvax.de> <5725CF38.4090007@hotmail.com> <572752E2.2040708@hotmail.com> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 16:18:49 -0000 On Tue, 3 May 2016 21:37:36 +0530, Manish Jain wrote: > I found what is the problem, with the help of Ultimate Boot CD. UBCD > says the video memory is corrupt. Ha! As assumed, it looked too much like hardware error... > Does that mean I have to trash the > entire laptop, or is there some way to replace the video memory ? Depends. There are laptops where the GPU memory is allocated from the installed memory modules that serve as RAM. Other models have dedicated chips for the GPU which are independent. In such a case, you probably cannot replace them. But if it's the first case mentioned, exchange the RAM modules. The memtest results usually are "false-negative" because the GPU memory is already "cut off" from the cells available as regular RAM, so those do not get tested. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue May 3 16:35:02 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E3CFB2B138 for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 16:35:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bourne.identity@hotmail.com) Received: from BLU004-OMC4S13.hotmail.com (blu004-omc4s13.hotmail.com [65.55.111.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "Microsoft IT SSL SHA2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1827C1D5F for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 16:35:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bourne.identity@hotmail.com) Received: from BLU436-SMTP187 ([65.55.111.137]) by BLU004-OMC4S13.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Tue, 3 May 2016 09:34:55 -0700 X-TMN: [+CaVFn0NLNbUD8A+KqWMJSvPcUXIIM8t] X-Originating-Email: [bourne.identity@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is 10.3 i386 jinxed ? To: Polytropon References: <20160430084415.03be443d.freebsd@edvax.de> <5724604D.3020804@hotmail.com> <20160430203426.a9d5841b.freebsd@edvax.de> <5725CF38.4090007@hotmail.com> <572752E2.2040708@hotmail.com> <20160503181839.2aacad7e.freebsd@edvax.de> CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu From: Manish Jain Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 22:04:15 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160503181839.2aacad7e.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 May 2016 16:34:46.0330 (UTC) FILETIME=[B422B1A0:01D1A559] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 16:35:02 -0000 On 05/03/16 21:48, Polytropon wrote: > On Tue, 3 May 2016 21:37:36 +0530, Manish Jain wrote: >> I found what is the problem, with the help of Ultimate Boot CD. UBCD >> says the video memory is corrupt. > Ha! As assumed, it looked too much like hardware error... > > > >> Does that mean I have to trash the >> entire laptop, or is there some way to replace the video memory ? > Depends. > > There are laptops where the GPU memory is allocated from the > installed memory modules that serve as RAM. Other models have > dedicated chips for the GPU which are independent. In such a > case, you probably cannot replace them. But if it's the first > case mentioned, exchange the RAM modules. The memtest results > usually are "false-negative" because the GPU memory is already > "cut off" from the cells available as regular RAM, so those do > not get tested. > > In case the video RAM is part of a dedicated chip, then should it not be possible to replace the chipset ? With PC's, this is possible, I know. But laptops, I have no idea. Regards Manish Jain From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue May 3 16:41:09 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 797CBB2B595 for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 16:41:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 313001457 for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 16:41:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-216-66.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.216.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9DB93CF65; Tue, 3 May 2016 18:41:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id u43Gf6Xr002161; Tue, 3 May 2016 18:41:06 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 18:41:06 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Manish Jain Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu Subject: Re: Is 10.3 i386 jinxed ? Message-Id: <20160503184106.06e44565.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20160430084415.03be443d.freebsd@edvax.de> <5724604D.3020804@hotmail.com> <20160430203426.a9d5841b.freebsd@edvax.de> <5725CF38.4090007@hotmail.com> <572752E2.2040708@hotmail.com> <20160503181839.2aacad7e.freebsd@edvax.de> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 16:41:09 -0000 On Tue, 3 May 2016 22:04:15 +0530, Manish Jain wrote: > > On 05/03/16 21:48, Polytropon wrote: > > On Tue, 3 May 2016 21:37:36 +0530, Manish Jain wrote: > >> I found what is the problem, with the help of Ultimate Boot CD. UBCD > >> says the video memory is corrupt. > > Ha! As assumed, it looked too much like hardware error... > > > > > > > >> Does that mean I have to trash the > >> entire laptop, or is there some way to replace the video memory ? > > Depends. > > > > There are laptops where the GPU memory is allocated from the > > installed memory modules that serve as RAM. Other models have > > dedicated chips for the GPU which are independent. In such a > > case, you probably cannot replace them. But if it's the first > > case mentioned, exchange the RAM modules. The memtest results > > usually are "false-negative" because the GPU memory is already > > "cut off" from the cells available as regular RAM, so those do > > not get tested. > > > > > > In case the video RAM is part of a dedicated chip, then should it not be > possible to replace the chipset ? With PC's, this is possible, I know. > But laptops, I have no idea. I have not yet seen a laptop where the GPU was "a module" that could be replaced easily. It's usually glued+soldered onto the mainboard, as it is not intended to be replaced. That kind of memory also doesn't come in sockets, so it's probably impossible to replace. The common solution is to replace the mainboard, which implies to replace the whole laptop. :-) Still it might be possible that such "modular laptop mainboards" do exist. It's just that _I_ haven't seen one... -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue May 3 17:15:38 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B31C0B2C19D for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 17:15:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8197C1C87 for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 17:15:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u43HFVcP010075 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 3 May 2016 11:15:31 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id u43HFU07010065; Tue, 3 May 2016 11:15:31 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 11:15:30 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Manish Jain cc: Polytropon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu Subject: Re: Is 10.3 i386 jinxed ? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20160430084415.03be443d.freebsd@edvax.de> <5724604D.3020804@hotmail.com> <20160430203426.a9d5841b.freebsd@edvax.de> <5725CF38.4090007@hotmail.com> <572752E2.2040708@hotmail.com> <20160503181839.2aacad7e.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 03 May 2016 11:15:31 -0600 (MDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 17:15:38 -0000 On Tue, 3 May 2016, Manish Jain wrote: > > On 05/03/16 21:48, Polytropon wrote: >> On Tue, 3 May 2016 21:37:36 +0530, Manish Jain wrote: >>> I found what is the problem, with the help of Ultimate Boot CD. UBCD >>> says the video memory is corrupt. >> Ha! As assumed, it looked too much like hardware error... >> >> >> >>> Does that mean I have to trash the >>> entire laptop, or is there some way to replace the video memory ? >> Depends. >> >> There are laptops where the GPU memory is allocated from the >> installed memory modules that serve as RAM. Other models have >> dedicated chips for the GPU which are independent. In such a >> case, you probably cannot replace them. But if it's the first >> case mentioned, exchange the RAM modules. The memtest results >> usually are "false-negative" because the GPU memory is already >> "cut off" from the cells available as regular RAM, so those do >> not get tested. >> >> > > In case the video RAM is part of a dedicated chip, then should it not be > possible to replace the chipset ? With PC's, this is possible, I know. But > laptops, I have no idea. Possible, yes, but in a notebook it will be soldered to the motherboard, so replacing it would require hot-air rework equipment and experience. Replacing the motherboard is simpler, although sometimes not simple, even if you have done it before. Neither method is likely to be practical. The term is "BER": beyond economic repair. Replacement of the system will be cheaper. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue May 3 17:47:21 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EED8FB2CB2A for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 17:47:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bourne.identity@hotmail.com) Received: from BLU004-OMC4S3.hotmail.com (blu004-omc4s3.hotmail.com [65.55.111.142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "Microsoft IT SSL SHA2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF5F01FB1 for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 17:47:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bourne.identity@hotmail.com) Received: from BLU437-SMTP76 ([65.55.111.135]) by BLU004-OMC4S3.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Tue, 3 May 2016 10:46:14 -0700 X-TMN: [cTm6hJ/eaWAoV61oZ5CxsnFwDcnet5RM] X-Originating-Email: [bourne.identity@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is 10.3 i386 jinxed ? To: Warren Block References: <20160430084415.03be443d.freebsd@edvax.de> <5724604D.3020804@hotmail.com> <20160430203426.a9d5841b.freebsd@edvax.de> <5725CF38.4090007@hotmail.com> <572752E2.2040708@hotmail.com> <20160503181839.2aacad7e.freebsd@edvax.de> CC: Polytropon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu From: Manish Jain Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 23:16:02 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 May 2016 17:46:12.0654 (UTC) FILETIME=[AEFBD4E0:01D1A563] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 17:47:22 -0000 On 05/03/16 22:45, Warren Block wrote: > On Tue, 3 May 2016, Manish Jain wrote: > >> >> On 05/03/16 21:48, Polytropon wrote: >>> On Tue, 3 May 2016 21:37:36 +0530, Manish Jain wrote: >>>> I found what is the problem, with the help of Ultimate Boot CD. UBCD >>>> says the video memory is corrupt. >>> Ha! As assumed, it looked too much like hardware error... >>> >>> >>> >>>> Does that mean I have to trash the >>>> entire laptop, or is there some way to replace the video memory ? >>> Depends. >>> >>> There are laptops where the GPU memory is allocated from the >>> installed memory modules that serve as RAM. Other models have >>> dedicated chips for the GPU which are independent. In such a >>> case, you probably cannot replace them. But if it's the first >>> case mentioned, exchange the RAM modules. The memtest results >>> usually are "false-negative" because the GPU memory is already >>> "cut off" from the cells available as regular RAM, so those do >>> not get tested. >>> >>> >> >> In case the video RAM is part of a dedicated chip, then should it not >> be possible to replace the chipset ? With PC's, this is possible, I >> know. But laptops, I have no idea. > > Possible, yes, but in a notebook it will be soldered to the > motherboard, so replacing it would require hot-air rework equipment > and experience. Replacing the motherboard is simpler, although > sometimes not simple, even if you have done it before. > > Neither method is likely to be practical. The term is "BER": beyond > economic repair. Replacement of the system will be cheaper. > > Is there any way I can find out whether the video RAM is part of the main memory or is it wired into a chip ? Regards Manish Jain From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue May 3 17:56:02 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E32AFB2CDAE for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 17:56:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A94F61737 for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 17:56:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-216-66.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.216.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 660BF276E8; Tue, 3 May 2016 19:55:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id u43Hts94002528; Tue, 3 May 2016 19:55:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 19:55:54 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Manish Jain Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is 10.3 i386 jinxed ? Message-Id: <20160503195554.4963634f.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20160430084415.03be443d.freebsd@edvax.de> <5724604D.3020804@hotmail.com> <20160430203426.a9d5841b.freebsd@edvax.de> <5725CF38.4090007@hotmail.com> <572752E2.2040708@hotmail.com> <20160503181839.2aacad7e.freebsd@edvax.de> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 17:56:03 -0000 On Tue, 3 May 2016 23:16:02 +0530, Manish Jain wrote: > Is there any way I can find out whether the video RAM is part of the > main memory or is it wired into a chip ? Check the documentation (technical handbook) of the laptop. In worst case, visual inspection of the mainboard might help. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue May 3 19:03:04 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AB54B2C67D for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 19:03:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: from mail-yw0-x234.google.com (mail-yw0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAE27171B for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 19:03:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: by mail-yw0-x234.google.com with SMTP id t10so38023439ywa.0 for ; Tue, 03 May 2016 12:03:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tenebras-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=dqzk4d5e7uyoeTDrMbOZrEqUJ4eg2HrYXJsXRaCAq/A=; b=xucMiT0VccQNPjXDOHdyN59u2cvCZ2uA+OAMQHk809Pn8OBWskUBGUCjRSjSkLOiW8 z6Hdny+804F07dq/qFTdpLMjK6XDNTNHZMwnUtubHcrU89tnaxKgwfX6p89rI1+DSRGB +Wz4lX1uYPBZi5ce+FGAt2rTNJL2i9g3bMK2V8fRmtkAenvBnTiIK0OELWX7XSnoe6qH QRwAUSaPrgPDmi03FhTX0dXStONKUzUaan00/vcRG56175PqayHNj3HlDfMOXxLb9jiI d3STaJV0kirB82rPp/ab4dH8QWPWEhB0bLabwEkPqzJ8fSf0daySJYZenR5nPRoJmRuM 4cfg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=dqzk4d5e7uyoeTDrMbOZrEqUJ4eg2HrYXJsXRaCAq/A=; b=KCSbM8k16x0naU0jv1baHddMoSmzfpqsgFdOYCafQglCSwT2h3lbWA+57cMTOaFFoT sd3CPIntJ8BGD1Edln+g11VfW7GZLm7CPlnGul7tUhTl1CMzNaqczXB+SGf18zyzd9AH dNOX9vpsQHVN6viOrTI6/0Dhj8CiGQRTRAaGnGoLwHVuuNPtWpZcaG0MQI02FYpvrcR8 61+Uki9rM2DWfaYqeGYCqgQUReNB5WOjhlMnhPucJJir1OXQcIeCpkBHiULsqfxCI2sw TLRL1OQAK06qOeY3QbV/JDozHWfEKzXPTyJbIZHnN5ayGXcYZ0Myidc+G0VwmUn89Te8 fbqg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVvWO6f5dhHiqdZDEL2kQHAw4SEiyM7MuRlxqC7A7MDEY18uSEF7rVCqRxM7wsdZNAh2NOZ9KQI+h/z1G7W MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.37.108.137 with SMTP id h131mr2171701ybc.83.1462302182911; Tue, 03 May 2016 12:03:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.37.224.15 with HTTP; Tue, 3 May 2016 12:03:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 12:03:02 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: MODULES_OVERRIDE deprecated in amd64? From: Michael Sierchio To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 19:03:04 -0000 I realize that most of my custom kernel builds have been for embedded devices and therefore i386. In building a monolithic kernel for AWS EC2 on amd64, I've noticed the MODULES_OVERRIDE="" directive does nothing. Is there an equivalent? - M From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue May 3 19:20:21 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8A57B2C9E8; Tue, 3 May 2016 19:20:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from solene@bsd.zplay.eu) Received: from bsd.zplay.eu (bsd.zplay.eu [62.210.240.224]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "bsd.zplay.eu", Issuer "StartCom Class 1 Primary Intermediate Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF6691D9E; Tue, 3 May 2016 19:20:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from solene@bsd.zplay.eu) Received: from localhost (bsd.zplay.eu [local]) by bsd.zplay.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id ba045b4d; Tue, 3 May 2016 21:13:36 +0200 (CEST) To: Polytropon Subject: Re: Is 10.3 i386 jinxed ? X-PHP-Originating-Script: 0:rcube.php MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 21:13:36 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Sol=C3=A8ne_Rapenne?= Cc: Manish Jain , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu, owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20160503184106.06e44565.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20160430084415.03be443d.freebsd@edvax.de> <5724604D.3020804@hotmail.com> <20160430203426.a9d5841b.freebsd@edvax.de> <5725CF38.4090007@hotmail.com> <572752E2.2040708@hotmail.com> <20160503181839.2aacad7e.freebsd@edvax.de> <20160503184106.06e44565.freebsd@edvax.de> Message-ID: <36305ba2e15bd80b2f6d73a82daa55e1@mail.zplay.eu> X-Sender: solene@bsd.zplay.eu User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 19:20:21 -0000 Le 2016-05-03 18:41, Polytropon a écrit : > On Tue, 3 May 2016 22:04:15 +0530, Manish Jain wrote: >> >> On 05/03/16 21:48, Polytropon wrote: >> > On Tue, 3 May 2016 21:37:36 +0530, Manish Jain wrote: >> >> I found what is the problem, with the help of Ultimate Boot CD. UBCD >> >> says the video memory is corrupt. >> > Ha! As assumed, it looked too much like hardware error... >> > >> > >> > >> >> Does that mean I have to trash the >> >> entire laptop, or is there some way to replace the video memory ? >> > Depends. >> > >> > There are laptops where the GPU memory is allocated from the >> > installed memory modules that serve as RAM. Other models have >> > dedicated chips for the GPU which are independent. In such a >> > case, you probably cannot replace them. But if it's the first >> > case mentioned, exchange the RAM modules. The memtest results >> > usually are "false-negative" because the GPU memory is already >> > "cut off" from the cells available as regular RAM, so those do >> > not get tested. >> > >> > >> >> In case the video RAM is part of a dedicated chip, then should it not >> be >> possible to replace the chipset ? With PC's, this is possible, I know. >> But laptops, I have no idea. > > I have not yet seen a laptop where the GPU was "a module" that could > be replaced easily. It's usually glued+soldered onto the mainboard, > as it is not intended to be replaced. That kind of memory also doesn't > come in sockets, so it's probably impossible to replace. The common > solution is to replace the mainboard, which implies to replace the > whole laptop. :-) > > Still it might be possible that such "modular laptop mainboards" do > exist. It's just that _I_ haven't seen one... Some laptop have dedicated cards, they call it MXM : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_PCI_Express_Module I have one laptop with a "discrete" nvidia MXM card (optimus technology) that I can remove or change. But usually, you find those cards on laptop with good video performance, sold as gamer laptop. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue May 3 19:25:43 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E85C1B2CB5C for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 19:25:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: from mail-yw0-x22e.google.com (mail-yw0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8C001122 for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 19:25:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: by mail-yw0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id t10so39551051ywa.0 for ; Tue, 03 May 2016 12:25:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tenebras-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=OsIKG0VphdVSAmDRTvEC7nsW+Ot9nLo3AJFYce2Pj4c=; b=yfwQFKTdLUlAA3ed4GaYThgSyMD5ppx9vOoEwB7qPruSU+wQQq7zHs1QzeFBSZ0Lr3 zxNcA9Z3slgxlbpwJl3r8xpl3Dv55bz4VL5uBcinPk+a7F8Rqq252gc8OfwzzB8Bd86s S0TvM1qAI3VADa6oWTqE3y6wAmsVHOigMcTkdQ/CV+JcdBm4t2BhXEr6shTvNTwIHXM4 1SnJmrNlnXLNY6JZ9Yys+ttXEFQaVzauabWs6KELCbMRAex1hFvF/mNpqi6uR5Yt5eTZ owlaiHHpaVItmvYjoHaoEe/shVoCiOOFGGkkrniN9G7IkAKEV/rpGW7l+Kjkf0FgdMao e05A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=OsIKG0VphdVSAmDRTvEC7nsW+Ot9nLo3AJFYce2Pj4c=; b=GYPBMhrd2//ZBh0hNAKO0cc5FD0nRLT3xNbmJ102mKEgbQC60kZOrDtqtUP2sWb2uq JQaVRrBl089hyUJPY4qdwiR17hGQk3cU/ej29IykJu2zXuBkEvHAgRMNGw5Q61WUhYUV YPuXeQ8o4eb422YZQ0Ck2SA9EvjG7+ZpOKIbaBg5rWdf6kKK/5I4QpyZvEElTlDoy+MI gNM7LB5i6CW0G5WRqFbmZU00h6+BftbBMUpGASupx7ln5GfQCnh2+fsG5JivOCikysSX 0MJ9saZLuW2hZxH5kqHAkkyONjSHwmK0Vrz8vqdFXLEheIZdRm42fae4Nt3IirRJbawk IVAQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWufuneBrsK6I5xJsBlOU/mhPOdCPpwv68DE3L5qrGo+9zKWvqcqftsbc0A8QzaGbf3zpofTOl6+OHx+5uT MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.37.108.137 with SMTP id h131mr2250019ybc.83.1462303542833; Tue, 03 May 2016 12:25:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.37.224.15 with HTTP; Tue, 3 May 2016 12:25:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 12:25:42 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: MODULES_OVERRIDE deprecated in amd64? From: Michael Sierchio To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 19:25:44 -0000 PS - I am aware of the /etc/make.conf option, WITHOUT_MODULES= TRUE, but my experience was that this gets applied after the MODULES_OVERRIDE list. - M On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Michael Sierchio wrote: > > I realize that most of my custom kernel builds have been for embedded > devices and therefore i386. In building a monolithic kernel for AWS EC2 on > amd64, I've noticed the MODULES_OVERRIDE="" directive does nothing. Is > there an equivalent? > > - M > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue May 3 19:42:29 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D34FB2CFDB for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 19:42:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BFB51E39 for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 19:42:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u43JgNS2047386 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 3 May 2016 13:42:23 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id u43JgMLh047383; Tue, 3 May 2016 13:42:22 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 13:42:22 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Manish Jain cc: Polytropon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu Subject: Re: Is 10.3 i386 jinxed ? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20160430084415.03be443d.freebsd@edvax.de> <5724604D.3020804@hotmail.com> <20160430203426.a9d5841b.freebsd@edvax.de> <5725CF38.4090007@hotmail.com> <572752E2.2040708@hotmail.com> <20160503181839.2aacad7e.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 03 May 2016 13:42:23 -0600 (MDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 19:42:29 -0000 On Tue, 3 May 2016, Manish Jain wrote: > Is there any way I can find out whether the video RAM is part of the main > memory or is it wired into a chip ? If it has an Intel GPU only, then video RAM is from system RAM. If it has an additional Nvidia or ATI/AMD GPU... it still probably uses the main RAM. If it has an additional GPU that is truly discrete, that could have its own RAM. So "does it have a second GPU?" is the first question. Posting the exact model number might help answer that. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue May 3 21:07:49 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A703B2C7CE for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 21:07:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sebastian@wolfgarten.com) Received: from waldfest.wolfgarten.com (waldfest.wolfgarten.com [144.76.61.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB8F1EF0 for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 21:07:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sebastian@wolfgarten.com) Received: from waldfest (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by waldfest.wolfgarten.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A62B873101; Tue, 3 May 2016 23:07:40 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at wolfgarten.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.822 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.822 tagged_above=-9999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, BODY_RULE_1=1, TW_ZF=0.077, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from waldfest.wolfgarten.com ([127.0.0.1]) by waldfest (waldfest.wolfgarten.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 7xGkr1bcBEl6; Tue, 3 May 2016 23:07:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.159] (unknown [84.119.55.188]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by waldfest.wolfgarten.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 89018730F6; Tue, 3 May 2016 23:07:35 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=wolfgarten.com; s=mail; t=1462309656; bh=r1oDJQ+9g+oOPaZuyvu8FHa8plFnmnw6sSbxGGchBI4=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=Ln7T+IF/kTYaC6TiL/Gs/1YQo46Sdidvcf0iP8hM7BgTCi/v3bqqewC+hIhW9EhT3 cTkkcQI/sqmXPpSLMWglQD0mlmGfu9+S2AB99z1dZXMWnN+OKCRSlyY+RrvPHbOdPK sbHZdamRBAQTqpIgQyRZlRaSoMcti/Wu3V1ZAjLw= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: ZFS migration - New pool lost after reboot From: Sebastian Wolfgarten In-Reply-To: <72d62e46-59f4-5e6f-2bf6-8ac1ba808f02@fechner.net> Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 23:07:35 +0200 Cc: Matthias Fechner Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <67E0F838-8BA7-475B-91D9-24B5B5640441@wolfgarten.com> References: <0A383C91-FCBA-4B9E-A95A-157A13708125@wolfgarten.com> <72087b33-53f9-e298-1441-4988c2a5ecb3@fechner.net> <2D936447-34C1-471B-8787-8075B19F8B28@wolfgarten.com> <6E1B2BCF-3B5C-4D18-9152-FE68711B2B43@wolfgarten.com> <72d62e46-59f4-5e6f-2bf6-8ac1ba808f02@fechner.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 21:07:49 -0000 Dear all, thanks to Matthias I already fixed most of the issues but there is one = thing I cannot fix yet. When trying to set the mount point for the / = file system, I am getting strange errors: root@vm:~ # zfs set mountpoint=3Dnone newpool/ROOT cannot open 'newpool/ROOT': dataset does not exist root@vm:~ # zpool import -c /tmp/newpool.cache -R /mnt newpool root@vm:~ # zfs set mountpoint=3Dnone newpool/ROOT cannot unmount '/mnt': Device busy root@vm:~ # zfs set mountpoint=3D/ newpool/ROOT/default cannot unmount '/mnt': Device busy root@vm:~ # zfs set mountpoint=3D/tmp newpool/tmp root@vm:~ # zfs set mountpoint=3D/usr newpool/usr root@vm:~ # zfs set mountpoint=3D/var newpool/var root@vm:~ # zfs set mountpoint=3Dnone newpool/ROOT cannot unmount '/mnt': Device busy root@vm:~ # zpool export newpool root@vm:~ # zfs set mountpoint=3Dnone newpool/ROOT cannot open 'newpool/ROOT': dataset does not exist So basically, when the pool is not mounted the system says =84dataset = does not exist=93 but when I mount it and try to change the mount point = it comes back with =84Device busy=93. Any ideas on how I am supposed to = set the mount point for the root file system (first & last line of the = commands listed above)? Many thanks. Kind regards Sebastian > Am 02.05.2016 um 23:45 schrieb Matthias Fechner : >=20 > Am 02.05.2016 um 22:42 schrieb Sebastian Wolfgarten: >> root@vm:~ # zfs list >> NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT >> newpool 385M 5.41G 19K /mnt/zroot >> newpool/ROOT 385M 5.41G 19K /mnt >> newpool/ROOT/default 385M 5.41G 385M /mnt >> newpool/tmp 21K 5.41G 21K /mnt/tmp >> newpool/usr 76K 5.41G 19K /mnt/usr >> newpool/usr/home 19K 5.41G 19K /mnt/usr/home >> newpool/usr/ports 19K 5.41G 19K /mnt/usr/ports >> newpool/usr/src 19K 5.41G 19K /mnt/usr/src >> newpool/var 139K 5.41G 19K /mnt/var >> newpool/var/audit 19K 5.41G 19K /mnt/var/audit >> newpool/var/crash 19K 5.41G 19K /mnt/var/crash >> newpool/var/log 44K 5.41G 44K /mnt/var/log >> newpool/var/mail 19K 5.41G 19K /mnt/var/mail >> newpool/var/tmp 19K 5.41G 19K /mnt/var/tmp >> zroot 524M 26.4G 96K /zroot >> zroot/ROOT 522M 26.4G 96K none >> zroot/ROOT/default 522M 26.4G 522M / >> zroot/tmp 74.5K 26.4G 74.5K /tmp >> zroot/usr 384K 26.4G 96K /usr >> zroot/usr/home 96K 26.4G 96K /usr/home >> zroot/usr/ports 96K 26.4G 96K /usr/ports >> zroot/usr/src 96K 26.4G 96K /usr/src >> zroot/var 580K 26.4G 96K /var >> zroot/var/audit 96K 26.4G 96K /var/audit >> zroot/var/crash 96K 26.4G 96K /var/crash >> zroot/var/log 103K 26.4G 103K /var/log >> zroot/var/mail 96K 26.4G 96K /var/mail >> zroot/var/tmp 92.5K 26.4G 92.5K /var/tmp >>=20 >> I am assuming I have to amend the zfs parameters for the mount points = but I can=92t seem to figure out what=92s wrong. I tried things like: >>=20 >> zfs set mountpoint=3D/usr newpool/usr >> zfs set mountpoint=3D/tmp newpool/tmp >> zfs set mountpoint=3D/var newpool/var >=20 > zfs set mountpoint=3Dnone newpool/ROOT > zfs set mountpoin=3D/ newpool/ROOT/default > zfs set mountpoin=3D/tmp newpool/tmp > zfs set mountpoin=3D/usr newpool/usr > zfs set mountpoin=3D/var newpool/var >=20 >=20 > Gru=DF > Matthias >=20 > --=20 >=20 > "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to > build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying = to > produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning." -- > Rich Cook > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue May 3 21:56:56 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B881B2C24F for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 21:56:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sebastian@wolfgarten.com) Received: from waldfest.wolfgarten.com (waldfest.wolfgarten.com [144.76.61.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3769C1C66 for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 21:56:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sebastian@wolfgarten.com) Received: from waldfest (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by waldfest.wolfgarten.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22A5A73206; Tue, 3 May 2016 23:56:55 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at wolfgarten.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.822 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.822 tagged_above=-9999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, BODY_RULE_1=1, TW_ZF=0.077, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from waldfest.wolfgarten.com ([127.0.0.1]) by waldfest (waldfest.wolfgarten.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id r9C5XsIUBcYO; Tue, 3 May 2016 23:56:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.159] (unknown [84.119.55.188]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by waldfest.wolfgarten.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 921FE73200; Tue, 3 May 2016 23:56:45 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=wolfgarten.com; s=mail; t=1462312606; bh=rfbDG1xF4S+5ATpkIWKMVGzJYNb+4UBTRtsXqBuOViM=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=u9dPX8KIqr9Xr711vPhGo2dySp4QH2e8vU5tNMrCb+VQbm9PYVBNj3nO9Glqs3UxG inDr8RZbGEpU8cB3k2mJiWn92DIJikr1WbLL4XOpF10NWcnMUZpi0wGcoUZdX1dIhV 2y4h/crfUgq1C4Yl0NnEYN2aF1pYyZd1IG3HBrKQ= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: ZFS migration - New pool lost after reboot From: Sebastian Wolfgarten In-Reply-To: <67E0F838-8BA7-475B-91D9-24B5B5640441@wolfgarten.com> Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 23:56:45 +0200 Cc: Matthias Fechner Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <5BD0B4F1-D9FE-4F8D-9D06-B75875DCC0DE@wolfgarten.com> References: <0A383C91-FCBA-4B9E-A95A-157A13708125@wolfgarten.com> <72087b33-53f9-e298-1441-4988c2a5ecb3@fechner.net> <2D936447-34C1-471B-8787-8075B19F8B28@wolfgarten.com> <6E1B2BCF-3B5C-4D18-9152-FE68711B2B43@wolfgarten.com> <72d62e46-59f4-5e6f-2bf6-8ac1ba808f02@fechner.net> <67E0F838-8BA7-475B-91D9-24B5B5640441@wolfgarten.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 21:56:56 -0000 Hi, to solve this one (for the archives maybe): root@vm:~ # zpool import -N newpool root@vm:~ # zfs set mountpoint=3D/ newpool/ROOT/default zfs set mountpoint=3Dnone newpool/ROOT zfs set mountpoint=3D/tmp newpool/tmp zfs set mountpoint=3D/usr newpool/usr zfs set mountpoint=3D/var newpool/var reboot Machine now starts like a charm with the new pool. Amazing. Thanks for all your help guys, this is very much appreciated. Best regards Sebastian > Am 03.05.2016 um 23:07 schrieb Sebastian Wolfgarten = : >=20 > Dear all, >=20 > thanks to Matthias I already fixed most of the issues but there is one = thing I cannot fix yet. When trying to set the mount point for the / = file system, I am getting strange errors: >=20 > root@vm:~ # zfs set mountpoint=3Dnone newpool/ROOT > cannot open 'newpool/ROOT': dataset does not exist > root@vm:~ # zpool import -c /tmp/newpool.cache -R /mnt newpool > root@vm:~ # zfs set mountpoint=3Dnone newpool/ROOT > cannot unmount '/mnt': Device busy > root@vm:~ # zfs set mountpoint=3D/ newpool/ROOT/default > cannot unmount '/mnt': Device busy > root@vm:~ # zfs set mountpoint=3D/tmp newpool/tmp > root@vm:~ # zfs set mountpoint=3D/usr newpool/usr > root@vm:~ # zfs set mountpoint=3D/var newpool/var > root@vm:~ # zfs set mountpoint=3Dnone newpool/ROOT > cannot unmount '/mnt': Device busy > root@vm:~ # zpool export newpool > root@vm:~ # zfs set mountpoint=3Dnone newpool/ROOT > cannot open 'newpool/ROOT': dataset does not exist >=20 > So basically, when the pool is not mounted the system says =84dataset = does not exist=93 but when I mount it and try to change the mount point = it comes back with =84Device busy=93. Any ideas on how I am supposed to = set the mount point for the root file system (first & last line of the = commands listed above)? >=20 > Many thanks. >=20 > Kind regards > Sebastian >=20 >> Am 02.05.2016 um 23:45 schrieb Matthias Fechner : >>=20 >> Am 02.05.2016 um 22:42 schrieb Sebastian Wolfgarten: >>> root@vm:~ # zfs list >>> NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT >>> newpool 385M 5.41G 19K /mnt/zroot >>> newpool/ROOT 385M 5.41G 19K /mnt >>> newpool/ROOT/default 385M 5.41G 385M /mnt >>> newpool/tmp 21K 5.41G 21K /mnt/tmp >>> newpool/usr 76K 5.41G 19K /mnt/usr >>> newpool/usr/home 19K 5.41G 19K /mnt/usr/home >>> newpool/usr/ports 19K 5.41G 19K /mnt/usr/ports >>> newpool/usr/src 19K 5.41G 19K /mnt/usr/src >>> newpool/var 139K 5.41G 19K /mnt/var >>> newpool/var/audit 19K 5.41G 19K /mnt/var/audit >>> newpool/var/crash 19K 5.41G 19K /mnt/var/crash >>> newpool/var/log 44K 5.41G 44K /mnt/var/log >>> newpool/var/mail 19K 5.41G 19K /mnt/var/mail >>> newpool/var/tmp 19K 5.41G 19K /mnt/var/tmp >>> zroot 524M 26.4G 96K /zroot >>> zroot/ROOT 522M 26.4G 96K none >>> zroot/ROOT/default 522M 26.4G 522M / >>> zroot/tmp 74.5K 26.4G 74.5K /tmp >>> zroot/usr 384K 26.4G 96K /usr >>> zroot/usr/home 96K 26.4G 96K /usr/home >>> zroot/usr/ports 96K 26.4G 96K /usr/ports >>> zroot/usr/src 96K 26.4G 96K /usr/src >>> zroot/var 580K 26.4G 96K /var >>> zroot/var/audit 96K 26.4G 96K /var/audit >>> zroot/var/crash 96K 26.4G 96K /var/crash >>> zroot/var/log 103K 26.4G 103K /var/log >>> zroot/var/mail 96K 26.4G 96K /var/mail >>> zroot/var/tmp 92.5K 26.4G 92.5K /var/tmp >>>=20 >>> I am assuming I have to amend the zfs parameters for the mount = points but I can=92t seem to figure out what=92s wrong. I tried things = like: >>>=20 >>> zfs set mountpoint=3D/usr newpool/usr >>> zfs set mountpoint=3D/tmp newpool/tmp >>> zfs set mountpoint=3D/var newpool/var >>=20 >> zfs set mountpoint=3Dnone newpool/ROOT >> zfs set mountpoin=3D/ newpool/ROOT/default >> zfs set mountpoin=3D/tmp newpool/tmp >> zfs set mountpoin=3D/usr newpool/usr >> zfs set mountpoin=3D/var newpool/var >>=20 >>=20 >> Gru=DF >> Matthias >>=20 >> --=20 >>=20 >> "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to >> build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying = to >> produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning." = -- >> Rich Cook >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed May 4 01:13:17 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2C5BB2A8C6 for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 01:13:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bourne.identity@hotmail.com) Received: from BLU004-OMC4S29.hotmail.com (blu004-omc4s29.hotmail.com [65.55.111.168]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "Microsoft IT SSL SHA2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CFE618A8 for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 01:13:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bourne.identity@hotmail.com) Received: from BLU436-SMTP253 ([65.55.111.135]) by BLU004-OMC4S29.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Tue, 3 May 2016 18:13:10 -0700 X-TMN: [szMnUdwMCPJE73HoKW0Wm4MhGREOdieB] X-Originating-Email: [bourne.identity@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is 10.3 i386 jinxed ? To: Warren Block References: <20160430084415.03be443d.freebsd@edvax.de> <5724604D.3020804@hotmail.com> <20160430203426.a9d5841b.freebsd@edvax.de> <5725CF38.4090007@hotmail.com> <572752E2.2040708@hotmail.com> <20160503181839.2aacad7e.freebsd@edvax.de> CC: Polytropon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu From: Manish Jain Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 06:42:57 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 May 2016 01:13:07.0958 (UTC) FILETIME=[1E268160:01D1A5A2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 01:13:18 -0000 On 05/04/16 01:12, Warren Block wrote: > On Tue, 3 May 2016, Manish Jain wrote: > >> Is there any way I can find out whether the video RAM is part of the >> main memory or is it wired into a chip ? > > If it has an Intel GPU only, then video RAM is from system RAM. If it > has an additional Nvidia or ATI/AMD GPU... it still probably uses the > main RAM. > > If it has an additional GPU that is truly discrete, that could have > its own RAM. > > So "does it have a second GPU?" is the first question. Posting the > exact model number might help answer that. > > The laptop is a Gateway NE56R. Looks to like it has dedicated chip for video RAM. You can look up this URL : https://panam.gateway.com/s/notebook/2012/Gateway/NE/NE56R/NE56Rsp2.shtml Thanks for all the help. Regards Manish Jain From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed May 4 02:12:55 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E24AB2C872 for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 02:12:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D374B125D for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 02:12:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u442CnDi046402 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 3 May 2016 20:12:49 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id u442CmL9046399; Tue, 3 May 2016 20:12:48 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 20:12:48 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Manish Jain cc: Polytropon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu Subject: Re: Is 10.3 i386 jinxed ? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20160430084415.03be443d.freebsd@edvax.de> <5724604D.3020804@hotmail.com> <20160430203426.a9d5841b.freebsd@edvax.de> <5725CF38.4090007@hotmail.com> <572752E2.2040708@hotmail.com> <20160503181839.2aacad7e.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 03 May 2016 20:12:49 -0600 (MDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 02:12:55 -0000 On Wed, 4 May 2016, Manish Jain wrote: > > On 05/04/16 01:12, Warren Block wrote: >> On Tue, 3 May 2016, Manish Jain wrote: >> >>> Is there any way I can find out whether the video RAM is part of the main >>> memory or is it wired into a chip ? >> >> If it has an Intel GPU only, then video RAM is from system RAM. If it has >> an additional Nvidia or ATI/AMD GPU... it still probably uses the main RAM. >> >> If it has an additional GPU that is truly discrete, that could have its own >> RAM. >> >> So "does it have a second GPU?" is the first question. Posting the exact >> model number might help answer that. >> >> > > The laptop is a Gateway NE56R. Looks to like it has dedicated chip for video > RAM. You can look up this URL : > https://panam.gateway.com/s/notebook/2012/Gateway/NE/NE56R/NE56Rsp2.shtml But that link shows how many variations there are of that one model. The exact model number should be printed on the system itself, probably on the bottom or in the battery compartment. Like a lot of other manufacturers, Gateway used to use an additional code after the main model number to identify the specific version. A quick search shows there are NE56R10u, NE56R20u, NE56R27u, and so on. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed May 4 02:16:43 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 625ADB2C9AD for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 02:16:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from haoqinjin@hotmail.com) Received: from BAY004-OMC1S5.hotmail.com (bay004-omc1s5.hotmail.com [65.54.190.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "Microsoft IT SSL SHA2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 407CC1510 for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 02:16:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from haoqinjin@hotmail.com) Received: from APC01-SG2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([65.54.190.59]) by BAY004-OMC1S5.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Tue, 3 May 2016 19:15:37 -0700 Received: from PU1APC01FT111.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.252.55) by PU1APC01HT132.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.253.187) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.472.8; Wed, 4 May 2016 02:15:32 +0000 Received: from KL1PR0101MB1141.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com (10.152.252.59) by PU1APC01FT111.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.252.236) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.477.4 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 4 May 2016 02:15:31 +0000 Received: from KL1PR0101MB1141.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com ([10.167.55.143]) by KL1PR0101MB1141.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com ([10.167.55.143]) with mapi id 15.01.0485.011; Wed, 4 May 2016 02:15:30 +0000 From: =?gb2312?B?usIgx9i9+g==?= To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" CC: "haoqinjin@163.com" Subject: URL error Report Thread-Topic: URL error Report Thread-Index: AQHRpaqgG1Be+ujO9U+1pPJ/vKcMjw== Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 02:15:30 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=softfail (sender IP is 25.152.252.59) smtp.mailfrom=hotmail.com; 163.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;163.com; dmarc=fail action=none header.from=hotmail.com; received-spf: SoftFail (protection.outlook.com: domain of transitioning hotmail.com discourages use of 25.152.252.59 as permitted sender) x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-tmn: [tq9bVM/KtvmvGA62hqzKNyEqHvjVYyok] x-eopattributedmessage: 0 x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:25.152.252.59; IPV:NLI; CTRY:GB; EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(98900003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:PU1APC01HT132; H:KL1PR0101MB1141.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com; FPR:; SPF:SoftFail; MLV:ovr; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en; x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 19b2e185-9206-43b3-cbd3-08d373c1f73a x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(5061506196)(5061507196)(1603103041)(1603101041)(1601125047); SRVR:PU1APC01HT132; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(432015012)(82015046); SRVR:PU1APC01HT132; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:PU1APC01HT132; x-forefront-prvs: 093290AD39 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: hotmail.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 04 May 2016 02:15:30.2454 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PU1APC01HT132 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 May 2016 02:15:37.0353 (UTC) FILETIME=[D8F6C790:01D1A5AA] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 04 May 2016 02:50:46 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 02:16:43 -0000 RGVhciBmcmVlYnNkIHRlYW0NCndoZW4gSSB3YXMgZG93bmxvYWQgaXNvIGZpbGUsSSBmb3VuZCBh IG1pc3Rha2UgYWJvdXQgVVJMDQoNCkVuZ2xpc3QgcGFnZQ0KaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZnJlZWJzZC5v cmcvd2hlcmUuaHRtbA0KDQpmdHA6Ly9mdHAuZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcvcHViL0ZyZWVCU0QvcmVsZWFz ZXMvaTM4Ni9pMzg2L0lTTy1JTUFHRVMvMTAuMy8NCg0KQ2hpbmVzZSBwYWdlDQpodHRwczovL3d3 dy5mcmVlYnNkLm9yZy96aF9DTi93aGVyZS5odG1sDQpmdHA6Ly9mdHAuZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcvcHVi L0ZyZWVCU0QvcmVsZWFzZXMvaTM4Ni9JU08tSU1BR0VTLzEwLjMvDQpUaGUgVVJMIGNhbid0IGJl IG9wZW4uDQoNCklzIGl0IGEgcHJvYmxlbT8NCg0KQmVzdCB3aXNoZXMhDQoNCmhhb3Fpbmppbg0K DQo= From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed May 4 03:20:10 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49D8CB2C834 for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 03:20:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bourne.identity@hotmail.com) Received: from BLU004-OMC4S11.hotmail.com (blu004-omc4s11.hotmail.com [65.55.111.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "Microsoft IT SSL SHA2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01B171C6E for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 03:20:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bourne.identity@hotmail.com) Received: from BLU437-SMTP102 ([65.55.111.136]) by BLU004-OMC4S11.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Tue, 3 May 2016 20:19:01 -0700 X-TMN: [JjQX9Svr2vrzuOoqDz9KeEiy4hxcCrnD] X-Originating-Email: [bourne.identity@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is 10.3 i386 jinxed ? To: Warren Block References: <20160430084415.03be443d.freebsd@edvax.de> <5724604D.3020804@hotmail.com> <20160430203426.a9d5841b.freebsd@edvax.de> <5725CF38.4090007@hotmail.com> <572752E2.2040708@hotmail.com> <20160503181839.2aacad7e.freebsd@edvax.de> CC: Polytropon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu From: Manish Jain Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 08:47:57 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 May 2016 03:18:59.0772 (UTC) FILETIME=[B361DFC0:01D1A5B3] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 03:20:10 -0000 On 05/04/16 07:42, Warren Block wrote: > On Wed, 4 May 2016, Manish Jain wrote: > >> >> On 05/04/16 01:12, Warren Block wrote: >>> On Tue, 3 May 2016, Manish Jain wrote: >>> >>>> Is there any way I can find out whether the video RAM is part of >>>> the main memory or is it wired into a chip ? >>> >>> If it has an Intel GPU only, then video RAM is from system RAM. If >>> it has an additional Nvidia or ATI/AMD GPU... it still probably uses >>> the main RAM. >>> >>> If it has an additional GPU that is truly discrete, that could have >>> its own RAM. >>> >>> So "does it have a second GPU?" is the first question. Posting the >>> exact model number might help answer that. >>> >>> >> >> The laptop is a Gateway NE56R. Looks to like it has dedicated chip >> for video RAM. You can look up this URL : >> https://panam.gateway.com/s/notebook/2012/Gateway/NE/NE56R/NE56Rsp2.shtml > > But that link shows how many variations there are of that one model. > The exact model number should be printed on the system itself, > probably on the bottom or in the battery compartment. Like a lot of > other manufacturers, Gateway used to use an additional code after the > main model number to identify the specific version. A quick search > shows there are NE56R10u, NE56R20u, NE56R27u, and so on. > What is printed underneath is NE56R14l-B9502G32Mnks I can't be sure whether the l is actually l or I or 1 Regards Manish Jain From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed May 4 05:06:01 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A93CB2CC8D for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 05:06:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2798B16F5 for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 05:06:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u4455uSZ090098 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 3 May 2016 23:05:56 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id u4455tDO090095; Tue, 3 May 2016 23:05:55 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 23:05:55 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Manish Jain cc: Polytropon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu Subject: Re: Is 10.3 i386 jinxed ? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20160430084415.03be443d.freebsd@edvax.de> <5724604D.3020804@hotmail.com> <20160430203426.a9d5841b.freebsd@edvax.de> <5725CF38.4090007@hotmail.com> <572752E2.2040708@hotmail.com> <20160503181839.2aacad7e.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 03 May 2016 23:05:56 -0600 (MDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 05:06:01 -0000 On Wed, 4 May 2016, Manish Jain wrote: > What is printed underneath is NE56R14l-B9502G32Mnks > > I can't be sure whether the l is actually l or I or 1 Looks like this one: http://in.gateway.com/gw/en/IN/content/model/NX.Y1USI.005 Which does not have a separate GPU, and means that the bad memory would be in one of the removable DIMMs. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed May 4 07:12:29 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E6FB2CCA5 for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 07:12:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bourne.identity@hotmail.com) Received: from BLU004-OMC4S32.hotmail.com (blu004-omc4s32.hotmail.com [65.55.111.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "Microsoft IT SSL SHA2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13D601748 for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 07:12:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bourne.identity@hotmail.com) Received: from BLU436-SMTP136 ([65.55.111.136]) by BLU004-OMC4S32.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Wed, 4 May 2016 00:11:20 -0700 X-TMN: [cmN0LoUVAOZgYEpDn0JmD30lz8DnvA/u] X-Originating-Email: [bourne.identity@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is 10.3 i386 jinxed ? To: Warren Block References: <20160430084415.03be443d.freebsd@edvax.de> <5724604D.3020804@hotmail.com> <20160430203426.a9d5841b.freebsd@edvax.de> <5725CF38.4090007@hotmail.com> <572752E2.2040708@hotmail.com> <20160503181839.2aacad7e.freebsd@edvax.de> CC: Polytropon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu From: Manish Jain Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 12:41:06 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 May 2016 07:11:17.0756 (UTC) FILETIME=[271173C0:01D1A5D4] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 07:12:29 -0000 On 05/04/16 10:35, Warren Block wrote: > On Wed, 4 May 2016, Manish Jain wrote: > >> What is printed underneath is NE56R14l-B9502G32Mnks >> >> I can't be sure whether the l is actually l or I or 1 > > Looks like this one: > http://in.gateway.com/gw/en/IN/content/model/NX.Y1USI.005 > > Which does not have a separate GPU, and means that the bad memory > would be in one of the removable DIMMs. > > Something to cheer about, at last. But then why does not memtest86+ pick up any errors in 65 passes ? Regards Manish Jain From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed May 4 08:20:17 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13CC5B2D1AF for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 08:20:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB0881939 for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 08:20:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-216-66.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.216.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DCEB2451C; Wed, 4 May 2016 10:20:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id u448KCWL002177; Wed, 4 May 2016 10:20:12 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 10:20:12 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Manish Jain Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu Subject: Re: Is 10.3 i386 jinxed ? Message-Id: <20160504102012.4d57d3ca.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20160430084415.03be443d.freebsd@edvax.de> <5724604D.3020804@hotmail.com> <20160430203426.a9d5841b.freebsd@edvax.de> <5725CF38.4090007@hotmail.com> <572752E2.2040708@hotmail.com> <20160503181839.2aacad7e.freebsd@edvax.de> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 08:20:17 -0000 On Wed, 4 May 2016 12:41:06 +0530, Manish Jain wrote: > On 05/04/16 10:35, Warren Block wrote: > > On Wed, 4 May 2016, Manish Jain wrote: > > > >> What is printed underneath is NE56R14l-B9502G32Mnks > >> > >> I can't be sure whether the l is actually l or I or 1 > > > > Looks like this one: > > http://in.gateway.com/gw/en/IN/content/model/NX.Y1USI.005 > > > > Which does not have a separate GPU, and means that the bad memory > > would be in one of the removable DIMMs. > > > > > > > Something to cheer about, at last. But then why does not memtest86+ pick > up any errors in 65 passes ? As I mentioned earlier, this is a "false-negative" result. The portions of the RAM dedicated for the GPU are "cut away" quite eary, so memtest can only test what's left for "normal RAM". And those portions don't seem to have the error. The "GPU RAM" portions cannot be tested with memtest because it cannot access them: To the memtest access routine, the situation is as follows: Let's say there are 4 GB RAM, 1 GB dedicated for GPU, so for memtest there's 3 GB RAM to check. _Where_ this is located - well, that depends on how the system BIOS/EFI decides on where to place the GPU RAM segment ("internal addressing"). Let's assume you have two chips of 2 GB each, this _could_ be the layout: +--------------------+ Bank 0: |VVVFVVVVVV | 2 GB +----------^---------+ RAM address 00000000 here +--------------------+ Bank 1: | | 2 GB +--------------------+ Then memtest will check from 00000000 to the end of the 3 GB RAM, and the fault (F) is within the GPU RAM (V). It won't be tested. Maybe you could just swap the modules an re-run the test. However, it's hard to say _where_ the GPU RAM will end up, maybe at the beginning of bank 1? Maybe a "random choice"? Or maybe it isn't even one contiguous memory space? -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed May 4 08:24:37 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91453B2D4AA for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 08:24:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zmey20000@yahoo.com) Received: from nm34-vm2.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm34-vm2.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [72.30.239.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 583F01DE7 for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 08:24:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zmey20000@yahoo.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1462350269; bh=9GHptjsLGYbHCiVDD54jCnVAGLgNhXpfFP4cfYZlDrs=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=AR9VMJINsFcmvF6BMF2dCcljJkF4CIV3X5K/c97GMI6lmyN1Q0l461fLP2ZHpFHkMqqOpDetevqOxmspi7dCVFaKxdJM1aQvVyhBPG8ywu4n2TF16Llx0PWFJi05ijfG8RvLjBHPLzuZJvKZbUFTKfUqzVXWS/0jII7iu4d4/DO2hSkFYPrIquik2Wrq0XvpZm46Zmmu695LA0sYW0Htf8jCR75ROL8QdpQIUP+IElbCqFUPca5YPZUoBP3jV1ZGQKnuJ7T5bGU/+3vkqLVxGfrNTgsARZryMY0NT2KahSGHePsEjjcvOEqE+uiA8sFAnqiuvMrECnvixJcQF7ZRRg== Received: from [98.139.170.180] by nm34.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 May 2016 08:24:29 -0000 Received: from [98.139.212.192] by tm23.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 May 2016 08:24:29 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1001.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 May 2016 08:24:29 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 926069.52840.bm@omp1001.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-YMail-OSG: yExIqrYVM1lt_Khnmjn76o3kQb1sL2qCdSzejXVmckSe6Zj6sAYJm6XKvRELL98 I1hc2YvmJWpLNXwVQKR0cLBPI0d33KXkc0QOQthB39sy5m91yK3G8jMy7hapn6NEVZAVMTMi.jug emP7vw0ryFHNCR729UJQIxE4a0cWzaNDnkIRqHceYL1Ap89ogbLQk39N5MLP1HwbY31b5tVCUCc6 oAAjpEq8uRzS9hkduYcRfbu3_nR4bOaSxq3DAw334IjReZkBAKWSmBpkQE07Fp8S9xVjOsjZuWDe 8vCC38JdEq9C4Uvlbipt7.D5FlLxWeZpU9F8.9cLC1jak6suN0egppOmGkhxUldlTRpdRoELvtpS F2yj2SPq8JtiFxe46V80p124G7m05wp4kYe5soSv48bTaGtp5EDrKt7LrNGV.bQmVJgiJIFSPJtw Sp3C5dP.P9Ae8Mcwo0btZ84MjeJ21IX3CiFbVhv3sx.FQwHEsT.mgffSGDO9daTKNMTzoVXbNGK1 Kh4lAkL3xOw-- Received: from jws10666.mail.bf1.yahoo.com by sendmailws170.mail.bf1.yahoo.com; Wed, 04 May 2016 08:24:29 +0000; 1462350269.480 Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 08:24:24 +0000 (UTC) From: Mikhail Zakharov Reply-To: Mikhail Zakharov To: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List Message-ID: <582198723.7438364.1462350264479.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <609769253.4003715.1461843323413.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> References: <609769253.4003715.1461843323413.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD reliable dual-controller storage architecture contept MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 08:24:37 -0000 This is the second paper on the subject. Now we will try to add ZFS to our = system. See the result.=20 On Thursday, April 28, 2016 1:40 PM, Mikhail Zakharov via freebsd-quest= ions wrote: =20 Sharing my exploration on FreeBSD reliable dual-controller storage archite= cture contept.=EF=BB=BF Free to discuss and test. The BeaST | =C2=A0 | | =C2=A0 |=C2=A0 | =C2=A0 | =C2=A0 | =C2=A0 | =C2=A0 | =C2=A0 | | The BeaSTThe BeaST is the FreeBSD based dual-controller reliable storage = system concept with aim to implement ZFS and in-memory cache. FreeBSD based= dual-controller storage ... | |=C2=A0 | | =D0=9F=D1=80=D0=BE=D1=81=D0=BC=D0=BE=D1=82=D1=80=D0=B5=D1=82=D1=8C =D0=BD= =D0=B0 mezzantrop... | =D0=9F=D1=80=D0=B5=D0=B4=D0=B2=D0=B0=D1=80=D0=B8=D1= =82=D0=B5=D0=BB=D1=8C=D0=BD=D1=8B=D0=B9 =D0=BF=D1=80=D0=BE=D1=81=D0=BC=D0= =BE=D1=82=D1=80 =D1=81 =D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=BC=D0=BE=D1=89=D1=8C=D1=8E Yahoo | |=C2=A0 | | =C2=A0 | _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed May 4 08:31:34 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33FEFB2D798 for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 08:31:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zmey20000@yahoo.com) Received: from nm3-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm3-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.212.154]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE030104E for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 08:31:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zmey20000@yahoo.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1462350487; bh=MGdxf37+hRdwOsSGbmup04s1H6fdxe/ZYzZ+GGBdj0c=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=jhn0ukHAI8BpnWiFhOu22YbP9V8JkMgiKJQ/OpnjDVQ5OIOt9y5QRUYHg8cJuKuMn1nKwHmrBxBn39B6ke7CP9c1OZ3Z2LS0a+xOVXQl8pZa/yqcty6z8T7g5xuxklhyEs+HzfX0HiKO1xTtVCC4cla6EkwPScF+SaTKQ9fRatt/mjGBjyIqmA0wE8ZPnyppfUnA8CRxbKI7GDbTjLtm+XtkbBRfoSK6rYEci8Z/458MsE/rGoyQzF8Hb3ntkSvV5xMh6OqEU9vplr22xcAPiSJnoihCCiE86ALKnqHcBFsRveNtG3Xk+ny44CuGCD6CQkGSUFQq1nU6ptBNQzq2Jw== Received: from [98.139.215.143] by nm3.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 May 2016 08:28:07 -0000 Received: from [98.139.212.246] by tm14.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 May 2016 08:28:07 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1055.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 May 2016 08:28:07 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 52507.51039.bm@omp1055.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-YMail-OSG: PgVE.ZsVM1kdtkE7H5aPOngIpvrYGvpAWhXHlQqRfASAYzaQU8pyLalOLsb.ZJi Oz4kKXjABJysvEeOMC9CIPUYj7pdnhUieQ5aiA57elHxZ5WZbjbR8c4u.2yEhIIlGkB07cvO_n1X UerINg6kguCBMrQx7Q.xOLdGHTEp7MZqEgXXeg70W8ijOJL6g6yslnnesY1MyzOcBk8ZKXY8z0.O fe3LJzwWES.VM4ey3iCEFFkQCx3GDI3YTVtI3SfWRk2NQotLoDyi6SezMMb4CjYkc9HeLgfrDJUh mhzwniPeyryWhASGAvxzuQ5aqebQIeeZkd5GLI6z43z_eex3huxvgeFe7JQrIML76s2u0KSHnP.T UifPqXi6Wieb9Xlj6MunHUxVxN_XjyNcYvxvZZRmwrQQ9wXdMk2n24rd6FrDJXfw.f8C4A1bV0zz nKXkz.S76sMPaDfZc9xSXcGNzsb5_mdM4Wqu88ihRyv4XY8VlJFxzPgTGXBQ4P.EGeIph2BYXw1a _FmsHwsgoPQ-- Received: from jws10630.mail.bf1.yahoo.com by sendmailws118.mail.bf1.yahoo.com; Wed, 04 May 2016 08:28:06 +0000; 1462350486.602 Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 08:28:06 +0000 (UTC) From: Mikhail Zakharov Reply-To: Mikhail Zakharov To: Mikhail Zakharov , FreeBSD Questions Mailing List Message-ID: <945717021.7460074.1462350486345.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <582198723.7438364.1462350264479.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> References: <582198723.7438364.1462350264479.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD reliable dual-controller storage architecture contept MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 08:31:34 -0000 Beautiful. I have lost the link once again. https://mezzantrop.wordpress.co= m/2016/05/04/adding-zfs-to-the-freebsd-dual-controller-storage-concept/ =20 On Wednesday, May 4, 2016 10:24 AM, Mikhail Zakharov via freebsd-questi= ons wrote: =20 This is the second paper on the subject. Now we will try to add ZFS to our= system. See the result.=20 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 On Thursday, April 28, 2016 1:40 PM, Mikhail Zakharov via fre= ebsd-questions wrote: =20 Sharing my exploration on FreeBSD reliable dual-controller storage archite= cture contept.=EF=BB=BF Free to discuss and test. The BeaST | =C2=A0 | | =C2=A0 |=C2=A0 | =C2=A0 | =C2=A0 | =C2=A0 | =C2=A0 | =C2=A0 | | The BeaSTThe BeaST is the FreeBSD based dual-controller reliable storage = system concept with aim to implement ZFS and in-memory cache. FreeBSD based= dual-controller storage ... | |=C2=A0 | | =D0=9F=D1=80=D0=BE=D1=81=D0=BC=D0=BE=D1=82=D1=80=D0=B5=D1=82=D1=8C =D0=BD= =D0=B0 mezzantrop... | =D0=9F=D1=80=D0=B5=D0=B4=D0=B2=D0=B0=D1=80=D0=B8=D1= =82=D0=B5=D0=BB=D1=8C=D0=BD=D1=8B=D0=B9 =D0=BF=D1=80=D0=BE=D1=81=D0=BC=D0= =BE=D1=82=D1=80 =D1=81 =D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=BC=D0=BE=D1=89=D1=8C=D1=8E Yahoo | |=C2=A0 | | =C2=A0 | _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " =C2=A0=20 _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed May 4 08:34:09 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79FCAB2D890 for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 08:34:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com (mail-wm0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 089E312A4 for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 08:34:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x234.google.com with SMTP id e201so177344862wme.0 for ; Wed, 04 May 2016 01:34:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=Ec5x0MnjwrJxD7XHBJSNTmmIGi0fkYJxrmWjmFQ4aVo=; b=DQP8Vh5zBNKfXDrT6WtlV/5cQH9F0aypeox1WdHqFHbfu/VlAx7pgv53PXr7a7b3is BPANzR3AERPkQnPdSYhtwPpO61ClpC4IGG6dMSkYgnNH3Tiel7cQLz6JXMeO7rep/mj7 uQAhOpF8xgFdaRsddY9f1lQ23FOnTT0bOwsC4nZCwIOCZ5DSJYkZaSbDWvm/+N/Ar+9h 2s0RU8jvXtPCcdF2HzM+3FBEvRomYDMwQrzBDtBg1rhOzckk4uxGAKwywSKQvQhq0+Bu wA7ocH9ehP7KmFMr8EGng8padYZquryaEG5HctgmMjMVx8kDRzG1EjD8b9cwzMGBgIyX hNig== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=Ec5x0MnjwrJxD7XHBJSNTmmIGi0fkYJxrmWjmFQ4aVo=; b=ksSqal2F3krTq1a73EyyNYLCXqxcCi4j8B5rNWP8QmWiLQGu6KZkGf8dddTAg/jel+ O2zCUtcF6MOlbdqkj+Iz5m5ojZU+UOv64eUPgkpo4vwfn8eg/kiuJJFku9jN+OV+Cs5r CfAcKwKb3t8LGuriyIlO7secD0Ncr7pQCtJNekEURM/K9ySXKPHG+30PUq9RRGR2UMxy g6r7AwmoyeEL7cJwyNxvocHfd6Ad1s4F92wfu4MHAtLrV6Y/BgVQmXsLF4XFfcdiVmrT IrqPdcDXizEaSMsj0/6j2aYKbG9UBTMabbs2e6CkUjPxg8UCPL59qbe0QV+/4tPl8JaV WAGA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXkGddH51ZbMLaJwt2u15y6RW03Dt62aej8FC70Tbwy4reiE4fgfwJdOJIRzo2qiZT+eYIiegqiJHrSGA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.175.168 with SMTP id cb8mr7340297wjc.56.1462350847575; Wed, 04 May 2016 01:34:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.28.26.17 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2016 01:34:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160504102012.4d57d3ca.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20160430084415.03be443d.freebsd@edvax.de> <5724604D.3020804@hotmail.com> <20160430203426.a9d5841b.freebsd@edvax.de> <5725CF38.4090007@hotmail.com> <572752E2.2040708@hotmail.com> <20160503181839.2aacad7e.freebsd@edvax.de> <20160504102012.4d57d3ca.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 09:34:07 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is 10.3 i386 jinxed ? From: krad To: Polytropon Cc: Manish Jain , FreeBSD Questions , galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 08:34:09 -0000 usually there is an option in the bios somewhere to alter the allocation of ram to the video card. It can usually go from 64M-256M. Set it to the lowest setting to present as much of the ram to the OS. Then run memtest again. You may get different results. On 4 May 2016 at 09:20, Polytropon wrote: > On Wed, 4 May 2016 12:41:06 +0530, Manish Jain wrote: > > On 05/04/16 10:35, Warren Block wrote: > > > On Wed, 4 May 2016, Manish Jain wrote: > > > > > >> What is printed underneath is NE56R14l-B9502G32Mnks > > >> > > >> I can't be sure whether the l is actually l or I or 1 > > > > > > Looks like this one: > > > http://in.gateway.com/gw/en/IN/content/model/NX.Y1USI.005 > > > > > > Which does not have a separate GPU, and means that the bad memory > > > would be in one of the removable DIMMs. > > > > > > > > > > > > Something to cheer about, at last. But then why does not memtest86+ pick > > up any errors in 65 passes ? > > As I mentioned earlier, this is a "false-negative" result. The portions > of the RAM dedicated for the GPU are "cut away" quite eary, so memtest > can only test what's left for "normal RAM". And those portions don't seem > to have the error. The "GPU RAM" portions cannot be tested with memtest > because it cannot access them: To the memtest access routine, the situation > is as follows: Let's say there are 4 GB RAM, 1 GB dedicated for GPU, so > for memtest there's 3 GB RAM to check. _Where_ this is located - well, > that depends on how the system BIOS/EFI decides on where to place the > GPU RAM segment ("internal addressing"). Let's assume you have two chips > of 2 GB each, this _could_ be the layout: > > +--------------------+ > Bank 0: |VVVFVVVVVV | 2 GB > +----------^---------+ > RAM address 00000000 here > > +--------------------+ > Bank 1: | | 2 GB > +--------------------+ > > Then memtest will check from 00000000 to the end of the 3 GB RAM, and > the fault (F) is within the GPU RAM (V). It won't be tested. > > Maybe you could just swap the modules an re-run the test. However, it's > hard to say _where_ the GPU RAM will end up, maybe at the beginning of > bank 1? Maybe a "random choice"? Or maybe it isn't even one contiguous > memory space? > > > -- > Polytropon > Magdeburg, Germany > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed May 4 09:57:30 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B7E9B2DC73; Wed, 4 May 2016 09:57:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from solene@bsd.zplay.eu) Received: from bsd.zplay.eu (bsd.zplay.eu [62.210.240.224]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "bsd.zplay.eu", Issuer "StartCom Class 1 Primary Intermediate Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7826E1C9B; Wed, 4 May 2016 09:57:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from solene@bsd.zplay.eu) Received: from localhost (bsd.zplay.eu [local]) by bsd.zplay.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 593a37d4; Wed, 4 May 2016 11:57:25 +0200 (CEST) To: Manish Jain Subject: Re: Is 10.3 i386 jinxed ? X-PHP-Originating-Script: 0:rcube.php MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 11:57:25 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Sol=C3=A8ne_Rapenne?= Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: References: <20160430084415.03be443d.freebsd@edvax.de> <5724604D.3020804@hotmail.com> <20160430203426.a9d5841b.freebsd@edvax.de> <5725CF38.4090007@hotmail.com> <572752E2.2040708@hotmail.com> <20160503181839.2aacad7e.freebsd@edvax.de> Message-ID: <1add9a0c3e6d67a61c6910a861937bb1@mail.zplay.eu> X-Sender: solene@bsd.zplay.eu User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 09:57:30 -0000 Le 2016-05-04 09:11, Manish Jain a écrit : > On 05/04/16 10:35, Warren Block wrote: >> On Wed, 4 May 2016, Manish Jain wrote: >> >>> What is printed underneath is NE56R14l-B9502G32Mnks >>> >>> I can't be sure whether the l is actually l or I or 1 >> >> Looks like this one: >> http://in.gateway.com/gw/en/IN/content/model/NX.Y1USI.005 >> >> Which does not have a separate GPU, and means that the bad memory >> would be in one of the removable DIMMs. >> >> > > > Something to cheer about, at last. But then why does not memtest86+ > pick up any errors in 65 passes ? > > Regards > Manish Jain > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" If you have 2 memory module, you can try each one separately. If you encounter your problem with one and not the other one, you found the problem. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed May 4 10:37:21 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB306B2BB8A for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 10:37:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FBA41F36 for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 10:37:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u44AbG9V076681 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 4 May 2016 04:37:16 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id u44AbFdL076678; Wed, 4 May 2016 04:37:15 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 04:37:15 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Manish Jain cc: Polytropon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu Subject: Re: Is 10.3 i386 jinxed ? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20160430084415.03be443d.freebsd@edvax.de> <5724604D.3020804@hotmail.com> <20160430203426.a9d5841b.freebsd@edvax.de> <5725CF38.4090007@hotmail.com> <572752E2.2040708@hotmail.com> <20160503181839.2aacad7e.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 04 May 2016 04:37:16 -0600 (MDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 10:37:21 -0000 On Wed, 4 May 2016, Manish Jain wrote: > On 05/04/16 10:35, Warren Block wrote: >> On Wed, 4 May 2016, Manish Jain wrote: >> >>> What is printed underneath is NE56R14l-B9502G32Mnks >>> >>> I can't be sure whether the l is actually l or I or 1 >> >> Looks like this one: >> http://in.gateway.com/gw/en/IN/content/model/NX.Y1USI.005 >> >> Which does not have a separate GPU, and means that the bad memory would be >> in one of the removable DIMMs. >> >> > > > Something to cheer about, at last. But then why does not memtest86+ pick up > any errors in 65 passes ? Possibly because they are hidden by being in an area of memory that memtest86 can't test. Testing with only one DIMM could change that, or changing the amount of RAM allocated to video in the BIOS. Only change one thing at a time. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed May 4 13:12:07 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5772B2B875; Wed, 4 May 2016 13:12:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sebastian@wolfgarten.com) Received: from waldfest.wolfgarten.com (waldfest.wolfgarten.com [144.76.61.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7696B198A; Wed, 4 May 2016 13:12:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sebastian@wolfgarten.com) Received: from waldfest (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by waldfest.wolfgarten.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CD786B946; Wed, 4 May 2016 15:12:06 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at wolfgarten.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.823 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.823 tagged_above=-9999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, BODY_RULE_1=1, TW_ZF=0.077] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from waldfest.wolfgarten.com ([127.0.0.1]) by waldfest (waldfest.wolfgarten.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id JTANK6MWwkjR; Wed, 4 May 2016 15:11:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from webmail.wolfgarten.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by waldfest.wolfgarten.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DDC86B93D; Wed, 4 May 2016 15:11:58 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 15:11:58 +0200 From: sebastian@wolfgarten.com To: "Kevin P. Neal" Cc: Matthias Fechner , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS migration - New pool lost after reboot In-Reply-To: <20160504130332.GA84674@neutralgood.org> References: <0A383C91-FCBA-4B9E-A95A-157A13708125@wolfgarten.com> <72087b33-53f9-e298-1441-4988c2a5ecb3@fechner.net> <2D936447-34C1-471B-8787-8075B19F8B28@wolfgarten.com> <6E1B2BCF-3B5C-4D18-9152-FE68711B2B43@wolfgarten.com> <72d62e46-59f4-5e6f-2bf6-8ac1ba808f02@fechner.net> <67E0F838-8BA7-475B-91D9-24B5B5640441@wolfgarten.com> <20160504130332.GA84674@neutralgood.org> Message-ID: X-Sender: sebastian@wolfgarten.com User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 13:12:07 -0000 Dear Kevin, thanks a lot for your follow-up. Indeed the -N option solved my dilemma. Best regards Sebastian Am 2016-05-04 15:03, schrieb Kevin P. Neal: > On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 11:07:35PM +0200, Sebastian Wolfgarten wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> thanks to Matthias I already fixed most of the issues but there is one >> thing I cannot fix yet. When trying to set the mount point for the / >> file system, I am getting strange errors: >> >> root@vm:~ # zfs set mountpoint=none newpool/ROOT >> cannot open 'newpool/ROOT': dataset does not exist >> root@vm:~ # zpool import -c /tmp/newpool.cache -R /mnt newpool >> root@vm:~ # zfs set mountpoint=none newpool/ROOT >> cannot unmount '/mnt': Device busy >> root@vm:~ # zfs set mountpoint=/ newpool/ROOT/default >> cannot unmount '/mnt': Device busy >> root@vm:~ # zfs set mountpoint=/tmp newpool/tmp >> root@vm:~ # zfs set mountpoint=/usr newpool/usr >> root@vm:~ # zfs set mountpoint=/var newpool/var >> root@vm:~ # zfs set mountpoint=none newpool/ROOT >> cannot unmount '/mnt': Device busy >> root@vm:~ # zpool export newpool >> root@vm:~ # zfs set mountpoint=none newpool/ROOT >> cannot open 'newpool/ROOT': dataset does not exist >> >> So basically, when the pool is not mounted the system says „dataset >> does not exist“ but when I mount it and try to change the mount point >> it comes back with „Device busy“. Any ideas on how I am supposed to >> set the mount point for the root file system (first & last line of the >> commands listed above)? > > There's a middle ground you left out of your analysis. > > You can import a pool and not mount it. Use the "-N" option to zfs > import. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed May 4 18:13:43 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93B42B2D5A6 for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 18:13:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eto.freebsd@ethome.sk) Received: from smtpout6.dnsserver.eu (smtpout6.dnsserver.eu [92.240.253.144]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53B3C1A4A for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 18:13:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eto.freebsd@ethome.sk) Received: from [92.240.253.67] (helo=smtp3s109.dnsserver.eu) by smtpout6.dnsserver.eu with esmtp (Exim 4.84 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ay0vJ-0008BQ-82 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 04 May 2016 19:49:21 +0200 Received: from [80.242.44.220] (helo=eto-mona.office.smartweb.sk) by smtp3s109.dnsserver.eu with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.83 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ay0vL-0006v0-6Z for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 04 May 2016 19:49:23 +0200 Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 19:42:28 +0200 From: "Martin \"eto\" Misuth" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: php-fpm _and_ open_basedir = Necessary? Message-ID: <20160504194228.52047ab6@eto-mona.office.smartweb.sk> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: ethome.sk MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.242.44.220 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: eto.freebsd@ethome.sk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on smtp3s109.dnsserver.eu); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 18:13:43 -0000 On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 15:12:33 +0200 Andy Wodfer wrote: > Now I wonder - Is open_basedir even necessary when I run php with php-fpm > pools with their own users. From what I understand php-fpm does just this > (jail) the daemon/process to its specified virtualhost/user homedir (hope > this came out correctly). ? As far as I understand it, open_basedir is "poor mans jailing" courtesy of php. It's intended to solve path traversal problems in mass hosting configurations usual for ISPs (using virtual hosts), eg cross domain script read/write. Instead of relying on higher/lower layer (depending on your pov) of isolation provided by os, php runtime with open_basedir configured, changes behaviour of most php's IO related functions to prevent unintended directory traversal. Eg it "locks" php's IO (php userland fileops, include/require) into specific subtrees. Ofc this has no effect on anything spawned by php's system() call or on backticks operators, and I don't remember even if all IO functions in php runtime are open_basedir capable. Some consider it has dubious value, others think differently. Also remember that open_basedir "jails" only scripts and their IO, actual runtime has normal access capabilities and it has nothing to do with php-fpm chroot. Depending on how you have setup your php-fpm instances (chroot or jail, jail, jail + chroot, fpm-pool per jail, custom users) it might be turned off even. eto From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu May 5 00:14:53 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 368C7B2BA19 for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 00:14:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@schamschula.com) Received: from hapkido.dreamhost.com (hapkido.dreamhost.com [66.33.216.122]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DDFE1525 for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 00:14:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@schamschula.com) Received: from homiemail-a1.g.dreamhost.com (homie.mail.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.208]) by hapkido.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27F739ED81 for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 17:14:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a1.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a1.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68485348070 for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 17:14:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=schamschula.com; h=from :content-type:subject:message-id:date:to:mime-version; s= schamschula.com; bh=Zgpk06YBGVhZCKZ50xxeipaVg40=; b=hljzLIXxwLRe DLp5P1N3qTHy1XelEIGPrQKELsX71/bbfzYgz7Mqt70udYCQa6SoHNGPXXzxxzfK 6zxFtOFQ5NhDxS0uLexKTInlhjX02wDOvBARtrjjY+X2r3o7/XZsSsA2bRKz3Ms6 KMGwYvq/ucm0JS8MXNEtEeUBLXWZ0nQ= Received: from [10.0.1.75] (173-26-108-176.client.mchsi.com [173.26.108.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: lists@schamschula.com) by homiemail-a1.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F1B5234806F for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 17:14:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Marius Schamschula Subject: Not getting updates for openssl vulnerability Message-Id: <54A27A30-A279-408E-AAEF-61F950DCDF82@schamschula.com> Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 19:14:42 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 00:14:53 -0000 Hi all, I=92ve got FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE-p0 installed, but running freebsd-update fetch and freebsd-update install does not update openssl to version 1.0.1t,=20 Rather I get $ openssl version OpenSSL 1.0.1s-freebsd 1 Mar 2016 I also had a failure to install 10.3-RELEASE-p1:=20 I got the same issue as Update auf 10.3-RELEASE-p1 | BSDForen.de - Die = BSD-Community I=92ve tried rebooting, and then tried # freebsd-update -r 10.3-RELEASE-p2 upgrade Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 4 mirrors found. Fetching metadata signature for 10.3-RELEASE from update3.freebsd.org... = done. Fetching metadata index... done. Inspecting system... done. The following components of FreeBSD seem to be installed: kernel/generic world/base world/doc world/games world/lib32 The following components of FreeBSD do not seem to be installed: Does this look reasonable (y/n)? y Fetching metadata signature for 10.3-RELEASE-p2 from = update3.freebsd.org... failed. Fetching metadata signature for 10.3-RELEASE-p2 from = update5.freebsd.org... failed. Fetching metadata signature for 10.3-RELEASE-p2 from = update4.freebsd.org... failed. Fetching metadata signature for 10.3-RELEASE-p2 from = update6.freebsd.org... failed. No mirrors remaining, giving up. Any ideas? Marius -- Marius Schamschula From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu May 5 02:02:11 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF522B2D8FA for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 02:02:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from worldseo.bettersolution@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qk0-x248.google.com (mail-qk0-x248.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::248]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE96B104C for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 02:02:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from worldseo.bettersolution@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qk0-x248.google.com with SMTP id t184so168212715qkh.3 for ; Wed, 04 May 2016 19:02:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:message-id:date:subject:from:to; bh=kxcXI2ExWSmeCPe/rklSxe/A4ri1eg1l2bm3xw4b9A8=; b=huhhbJjftnFCECvjgZw8LhNFHKYIMygucMoLKapgCgMKfAmMmolF7o0qsc+ziB1jQk rqKGboSuSao457Ht7CvJqdF2wkPxq4zUuc/YmigkDrqsez0vXWU4vz5TYA9063vVo7G5 66nEr14O4uoRoB9Rl0503kRII7DY8D9kBIL1sWalkuVsS2hiqgnYWtLs6TRFg601i7Hu 31DFcu+cjhzi0Dn8LNLAVNTewRvgYWO0Xpw3n5c8Q2ZQSKEph8Gf/ASJV2oOEHFQkxoG smT/JwVc7ItSW1L3wEKa8cBgUZ0A/XoxAqx+iI/A/njqF4Av2shJ3UBHAjgE3n9yEwz4 niJw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:from:to; bh=kxcXI2ExWSmeCPe/rklSxe/A4ri1eg1l2bm3xw4b9A8=; b=RUzaP3rMpw19Ut5WxJ+6DDDBqFb4GWuy9EEXEzibDe4imKWI1XFYdHT16Qtv/gcNPk YnAUhnFJNuBwzafRGBHLFpgriKjGm9IKl5uuc22yBz0i3vr108Uk3x95/HOMBnipbiVA EtUgvaUhzJJdD5n66QtPaDs1TZcREiF0EvTyMQNFYT4HVJXWx/pdEYkQQkHLC/w/njaz Hp0wSJyqop/Md563KyKtsBkrw4Q2H2EmsPwmOIdU6RfVsjbEWaQuz7nTGGlP6xqIU+1V h0Hw/ipdd9H4v28jGoAcXTH0TfghWYm87vkHC3tqNcg1DTfUxCkEW3Qm/lDqL2g7IHPk omxw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVMQrHicUeumYO8oDLdVIqdrRpmSg8nzWRLz/xfW5umvaNiNJoRo8G35AVdRFb9In8jVhnAwFSw6+PHEw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.222.69 with SMTP id s66mr7592901qhb.2.1462413730818; Wed, 04 May 2016 19:02:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <001a11378540f0c66205320eba56@google.com> Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 02:02:10 +0000 Subject: Sub-CAD Services - Bangalore, India From: Ashley Lewis To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 02:02:12 -0000 *Dear owner of freebsd.org,* *I am Ashley Lewis-CAD Department Business Manager of the CAD company located in Bangalore,India.We are 4 year old company* *and mainly supporting CAD Conversion services support to global customers.We have full-time CAD Engineers experienced in* *different CAD Program.* *Our company specialized in providing CAD Virtual staffs for offshore customers.Our staff daily communicate with customers and * *assist offshore companies to reduce their workload.* *Below are the type of work carried on daily basis to offshore customers by our CAD Engineers:* *1. Sketches to 2D drawings* *2. 3D Model creation * *3. Creating assembly of parts.* *4. Creating exploded views.* *5. Creating BOM list.* *6. Updating Engineering change revisions.* *7. Entry of the products/catalogue/on-line CRM Entry* *Software proficiency: AutoCAD, Inventor and Solidworks* *Pricing Model:* *Full-time CAD Engineer price per Month = 1200$ USD [Paypal/BANK/Wire]* *Monthly 160hrs and weekly 5 days of working.* *Communication:* *Screenshare/Team viewer/Webex/Email/skype/messenger/Phone and also we can allocate direct line VOIP number.* *[Note: We keep all customer data confidential by signing NDA and we respect client privacy]* *We can also train our Engineers on custom tools as per your company standard.We also allocate Manger to monitor your working process * *to ensure smooth delivery.We are looking for long-term business so please consider our team as your Drawing office supporting partner.* *Thanks!* *Best Regards,* *Ashley Lewis* *Manager-CAD Department* *Bangalore,India* From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu May 5 09:56:26 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD888B2EE03 for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 09:56:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from elimek2@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi0-x22c.google.com (mail-oi0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86ADC1147 for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 09:56:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from elimek2@gmail.com) Received: by mail-oi0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id v145so96415710oie.0 for ; Thu, 05 May 2016 02:56:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=5UJYW+yox1vT+aA8iCWNSeqGP0oZsDsUZZ2opnJSDOo=; b=ORLv8GBCtCwhTXayho/WmuPl4qzhr/Xr4GHOg2pVCTsqkUhZGcGZ6/QfOZhlwoItuz GVOnxaVJ8MUio7IorCbHeOJMAfYsOonDIkHZDJTpVhaKzTQ7CUAkNuhnJQJhWdPw/w2j WXqdA7N0D4oG3Nom78LUd1QhlIEcQNvraPWmXxST0mUXufPsrSdv8Z+doVwtHOC1mkJS 0p1XIm2nKjwZNqILIgScWOSJOfubxth/MuYnbGx4HGTN303BdaYS4njEq87LJbr4uhGU oV2ECkX/vIFTphmyS9LEsfAp4KZwCLLF+gg5T0g7HYWFxrJnOq6Mr7MVTHKZsgHF3sxN kvKw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=5UJYW+yox1vT+aA8iCWNSeqGP0oZsDsUZZ2opnJSDOo=; b=gg55E/2G1ZInU9Kv4Ba5bILhAqoC3uegGihCxkF52YJoz1mME2eDKMrL3kzdsi9PP2 QRdGM61tVkjJ2adofQ7RV58pncX7C9/mP598sZ0u471WRxeMAXbT624ikHAJX6Lo3pUO BrqicAgnCwrA5SoeSyikwe8RMSEfj8kJ011N2ECm69sAmpspvpwwMHLhg78sNeWIYOg9 0vvZp+Fbt3O/mcqCil7LOO8KVqBkbyQcw8/qZ0l1B8lpofce3K2WwLjGuKQg24LYelf5 i1i0mUYzHCRiLlhlqyk0/H6QptTc9jpHueawW4wOJOaPrdqKGt29zz0UPIEF2o9nB9Sv IJMQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVVDxqnq8JWfAZm8qfIV2Zb8bqPBagGKg/VqJlCkTlCnA4S6cvv7VReD2RRE0nig16uJWusNoWP+F987g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.157.45.136 with SMTP id g8mr6675571otb.133.1462442185889; Thu, 05 May 2016 02:56:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.157.1.78 with HTTP; Thu, 5 May 2016 02:56:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 11:56:25 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: How can I release freebsd with apache php application files? From: Mathe Eliel To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 09:56:26 -0000 am happy to come to this great community of developers. I have a concern on releasing freebsd. I am making an application in php and html that interfaces some other applications on freebsd. Now I made a release by some commands provided by FreeBSD like make buildworld, make release, ... then I got the files: .iso and .img . Now, when I installed them, the php files that were written in the first system were not found and the /usr/local directory was empty. How can I release FreeBSD thus I may find all the files I added and all the ports or packages I downloaded? I was inspired by pfsense which is a fork of FreeBSD. Thank you very much. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu May 5 10:24:51 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC12CB2D6D4 for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 10:24:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8567314F3 for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 10:24:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-216-66.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.216.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDC4C24F07; Thu, 5 May 2016 12:24:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id u45AOfh6002286; Thu, 5 May 2016 12:24:41 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 12:24:41 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Mathe Eliel Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How can I release freebsd with apache php application files? Message-Id: <20160505122441.92fefb40.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 10:24:51 -0000 On Thu, 5 May 2016 11:56:25 +0200, Mathe Eliel wrote: > am happy to come to this great community of developers. I have a concern > on releasing freebsd. I am making an application in php and html that > interfaces some other applications on freebsd. Now I made a release by some > commands provided by FreeBSD like make buildworld, make release, ... then I > got the files: .iso and .img . Now, when I installed them, the php files > that were written in the first system were not found and the /usr/local > directory was empty. How can I release FreeBSD thus I may find all the > files I added and all the ports or packages I downloaded? I was inspired by > pfsense which is a fork of FreeBSD. Thank you very much. The key is that both PHP and your application files are not part of the FreeBSD OS. The "make release" procedure creates an installation media for FreeBSD, but it usually does not include "3rd party programs" which reside in the /usr/local subtree. For this component, you should create a port for your application, and define Apache, PHP (and what other utilities you might need) as dependencies. Then you can create a package. Add this package as well as the dependency packages to the installation media and have them installed via pkg (afterwards). Always keep in mind that /usr/local is _not_ part of the OS. This is pkg's domain. :-) Another solution, probably not "very correct", is to make an image from a system where you've installed FreeBSD, Apache, PHP, your application and its dependencies. Then you just use a script to prepare installation disks (partitioning and newfs), then extract those images to the desired partition(s) as needed. For creating a port, see the "FreeBSD Porter's Handbook": https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/ Probably "6.15. Web Applications, Apache and PHP" will help: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/using-php.html It's much easier than it sounds, and it will free you from lots of tasks including dependency tracking, package registration, configuration files, and updating. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu May 5 11:05:00 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D12EFB2E1F0 for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 11:05:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carlopmart@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com (mail-wm0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CE83143C for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 11:05:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carlopmart@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id g17so21568734wme.1 for ; Thu, 05 May 2016 04:05:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-disposition :user-agent; bh=UUgmp/cvjwizkEheoCT7pPi6MKvFaODInww2MTKF5Es=; b=wG9ZYkDrH2Y/v0y4EuMn6lX9ANaMuA6y9yKSQjt8L1+wFayl7Kp0/X1muhNeicy8UU z10PyXoZ71U7Nv4WutYT8GGUtwGCTFLOVMlUtcmWwqL+TqgNpWDNfl/sZzWJBVnkQZgL RIIFGaZt1N450uveKAMNSRNkby03yFDsRX3P7eXbcZV4y5tg/stg97H6Uoha5WNm+/s7 TQb7heTO+IfMMzgWzAe284TZsstP4uHK81nKf3w5KseylWTDYSY5tRRRUv8c/Vh1PJij TmFY3Hi2mrARLYyx3ecBEVcN112yMH+28UC4T4OtLTmR9NqTeLpofJwsNLbvZeLJ4MBa tAxQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version :content-disposition:user-agent; bh=UUgmp/cvjwizkEheoCT7pPi6MKvFaODInww2MTKF5Es=; b=EtYtZY0CXtFzSjRDj6qwTMwR8t32rvluvxna2ZIn5AG9s04EbSrgrl0v3S+vGYkSLz d7GvreCGAYJFLIhRIKwortulgFoKd/cSaOtCeTIKKaCqvR34k6lDIF3e+vAZeZ6u4ZJ1 COd+5dgDMwSqCSvWiK+Zwto+iUYZLKJM/fUFpCgYf/oQSIX3DLDdg7eGvmIajgoZF/P/ K69kEUJtGIWCFp0ECa5+oqZq/0D42dlrdK7bSsw83Z0Hl6BirYWtmfvulh5CnS9EIKmq ocb9cvAmmarZngDYsfjZTAPbqN2wIJGCFQPp8FKnk7FET+H4CLX1JeSamFpY8kNN3tnc rPrA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVhX0V/BhN/+wgR/VbByBbJb+FG427amFtAuMznz/7Puz/UPtFwvOEIUANq/Se90Q== X-Received: by 10.28.59.193 with SMTP id i184mr2814515wma.73.1462446298648; Thu, 05 May 2016 04:04:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from beagle.bcn.sia.es (217.red-83-34-45.dynamicip.rima-tde.net. [83.34.45.217]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g197sm2612695wme.15.2016.05.05.04.04.57 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 05 May 2016 04:04:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 11:04:50 +0000 From: "C. L. Martinez" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Using an external ports repo in poudriere Message-ID: <20160505110450.GA13380@beagle.bcn.sia.es> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 11:05:00 -0000 Hi all, How can I configure poudriere to use an external ports repo instead of FreeBSD's official repo? Thanks. -- Greetings, C. L. Martinez From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu May 5 11:26:35 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE695B2E806 for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 11:26:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hr@communicationworks.com.sg) Received: from wp.asm.edu.sg (wp.asm.edu.sg [103.237.168.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 500AE10B6 for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 11:26:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hr@communicationworks.com.sg) Received: from AventisAA-PC (unknown [182.55.215.239]) by wp.asm.edu.sg (Postfix) with ESMTPA id CED38BE8BA for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 19:26:21 +0800 (SGT) Organization: Be a Certified Trainer Reply-To: careers@aventisglobal.edu.sg Message-ID: <90dfd105486c037bead858d1001387c1@communicationworks.com.sg> From: "Be a Certified Trainer" To: Subject: =?windows-1252?Q?How_to_Earn_Extra_Income_as_a_Part-time_Coach_or_Certified_Trainer_-_Join_Now?= Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 18:43:29 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 11:26:36 -0000 BE A CERTIFIED TRAINER, COACH OR LECTURER =A0 =A0 10, 11 & 24 Jun 2016 Having trouble viewing?Click Here =A0 =A0 BE A CERTIFIED TRAINER, COACH OR LECTURER =A0 =A0 =20 Registration =A0 =A0 Date =A0 10, 11 & 24 Jun 2016 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Venue =A0 100 Orchard Road, Concorde Hotel Singapore =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Time =A0 9.00am to 5.00pm =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Fees =A0 =20 $2000 | $800 after PIC grant of 60% (Inclusive of 2 buffet lunch and = light=20 refreshments) =A0 =A0 Register Now =A0 Download Brochure=20 & Registration Form =A0 Contact Ame Goh at (65) 6720 3333 or email: ame@aventisglobal.edu.sg =A0 Unsubscribe To unsubscribe, please click here =A0 =A0 =20 Aventis Certified Professional Trainer (ACPT) Program =A0 A step by step approach to building fully empowered and self-directed = high=20 performance team using cutting-edge, evidence-based techniques and = practical=20 proven techniques=2E =A0 Rewarding Career Opportunities =A0 The training and development industry is expanding rapidly worldwide = worth=20 over=A0US$109.25 billion annually=A0accordingly to the latest ASTD Report. = Professional=20 Trainers also enjoy diverse career opportunities in challenging and = stimulating=20 settings and are sought after both locally and across the region However = to=20 excel as a professional trainer, you not only require good industry = knowledge=20 but also the ability to handle training with panache, flair and = professionalism=2E =A0 AVENTIS CERTIFIED PROFESSIONAL TRAINER PROGRAM (ACPT) =96 27th Run in = Singapore =A0 Gain a practical, how-to overview of the entire training function. Using = the=20 best in class practices and latest technique, discover proven training = techniques=20 in design and delivering world class Presentation, Facilitation and = Evaluation.=20 Besides emphasising on key training skills set, the program also aims to = equip=20 participants with the know how to design and deliver competency based = training=20 using time tested methodology=2E =A0 WHY YOU SHOULD ATTEND =A0 This program is ideal for both new trainers and experienced trainers who = have=20 not had formal education in training. It is also for those trainers who = need=20 a refresher to improve their classroom techniques and methods to transfer = learning=20 to work situations=2E =95 Elevate their training capabilities of seasoned trainers for = delivering powerful=20 training=20 =95 New trainers will gain a strong foundation in critical training = skills=20 =95 Functional managers seeking to obtain an introduction to the skills = and required=20 in the field of training and lecturing.=20 =95 Professionals and executives seeking to pursue a rewarding career in = training,=20 HR development, career management and other related fields.=20 =95 Practitioners responsible for OD and Project Management=20 =95 Educators including curriculum developers, educational counsellor, = tutors=20 or advisors.=20 =A0 WHAT TO EXPECT =A0 This is a structured program delivered in Step By Step approach over 2.5 = days=20 duration with a peer assessment exercise at the end of the program where = all=20 trainees will received an assessment report. The entire certification = program=20 can be completed over 2.5 days.=20 =95 The Training and Development Industry=20 =95 Why be a Professional Trainer?=20 =95 Professional Trainer: Are you really suitable?=20 =95 Professional Trainer Tool Kits=20 =95 Pre-Training Planning & Design=20 =95 Use audio & visual aids to improve sensory feels=20 =95 Engagement & Presentation Strategy=20 =95 Business Roadmap as a Professional Trainer=20 =95 Individual Coaching and Assessment =A0 AN INTENATIONALLY RESPECTED CERTIFICATION =A0 =95 Professional status and credential as a Certified Professional = Trainer=20 =95 Verification of your competency in Training and Teaching=20 =95 Greater self assurance and awareness=20 =95 Developing effective competencies that energise and engage your = participants=20 =95 Enhance market status and confidence to deliver impactful training=20 =95 International endorsement and recognition of your expertise that draws = clients=20 to you=20 =95 Access to Aventis network=99, resources and support through our = Institute and=20 corporate member base=20 =95 Competency building by staying ahead of peers by building a reputation = of=20 delivering impartial, professional trainings=20 =95 Enhance career options and employment opportunities using proven = business=20 management and marketing systems to structure your services, attract new = clients=20 =95 Provides transferable skills that can be used in various subject areas =A0 Exclusive Learning Experience To ensure maintain the quality of the Master Class, enrolment is capped = at=20 15 participants per session. Registrations are processed on a first-come, = first-served=20 basis=2E =A0 Testimonials "There is a plethora of training programmes in the market but Aventis's = ACPT=20 provides participants with a comprehensive programme covering not only = training=20 skills and tools but the knowledge to apply them effectively in any = topic-linked=20 training. Activities are stimulating and thought-provoking where one of = the=20 benefits includes acquiring realistic, hands-on learning tools that = improve=20 not only presentation skills but also increase participants' confidence = in=20 using them for future training. The master trainer is a dynamic presenter = who=20 knows his material very well and engaged us all with an innovative = approach=20 that made learning less complex and improved the skills of the entire = group=20 in a single programme." Dr Georgina, Management Consultant "Truly, I have gained tremendous insights in further developing my = knowledge=20 and learning experience from the inspiring and engaging lecturers who = have=20 exceeded expectations at Aventis School of Management. It was important = for=20 me to make the right choice in selection; an institution with friendly, = helpful=20 and professional support staff makes the learning more refreshing and = encouraging.=20 Besides these, sharing ideas and different viewpoints with interesting = working=20 professionals from various fields has indeed enhanced my learning journey = here." Ms Jane KF, Chief Steward SQ =A0 Limited Seats Only! Don't miss it! =A0 Enrolment is limited. To register, please kindly DOWNLOAD BROCHURE & = REGISTRATION=20 FORM and email/fax to Ms Ame Goh at ame@aventisglobal.edu.sg | +65 6720 2222 =A0 Date 10, 11 & 24 Jun 2016 Venue 100 Orchard Road, Concorde Hotel Singapore Time 9am to 5pm Fee $2000 | $800 after PIC grant of 60% (Inclusive of 2 buffet lunch and = light=20 refreshments) Contact Person =20 Ms Ame Goh | +65 6720 3333=20 =A0 Over 100 Upcoming Courses Engage, motivate and inspire your team today! Check out our latest course = listing=20 or contact us @ 6720 3333 for A FREE Quotation for Customized In-house = training =A0 Save 60% or up to 400% Tax Rebate via Productivity and Innovation Credit = (PIC)=20 For more information, contact us or visit = http://www.iras.gov.sg/irashome/picredit.aspx =A0 =A0 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu May 5 11:29:50 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A447B2E9EF for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 11:29:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.117.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD20F1329 for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 11:29:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com (unknown [85.199.232.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 938F22355 for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 11:29:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=infracaninophile.co.uk DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201601-infracaninophile; t=1462447779; bh=ZulxR1dWW2AQfAqALpOyq6iwmHmOSAwFlSw9Y1/0uas=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; z=Subject:=20Re:=20Using=20an=20external=20ports=20repo=20in=20poud riere|To:=20freebsd-questions@freebsd.org|References:=20<201605051 10450.GA13380@beagle.bcn.sia.es>|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman=20|Date:=20Thu,=205=20May=202016=2012:29: 28=20+0100|In-Reply-To:=20<20160505110450.GA13380@beagle.bcn.sia.e s>; b=DacDTVcA4N1tZnKT/Lg/Sp+e3Tj6eviqFMg7cOgLfwQe4fWooCdZqZiWsdNR1DUuW 6JnV9cm+dodcfS70/owyE8u6aALXBESOXh2OdJxlE6PiHdF7pwyl4UbhcvQzwB8G8y iRB6+DP1qXqowJofg9oC7VFHYN0/+j2G2VsPi5jA= Subject: Re: Using an external ports repo in poudriere To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20160505110450.GA13380@beagle.bcn.sia.es> From: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <05b76aca-31b7-5180-336b-d81af834e29f@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 12:29:28 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160505110450.GA13380@beagle.bcn.sia.es> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="I8xNCVskAjEKkTTBmBip2W1ng3I4sk3D6" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.1 at smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RDNS_NONE,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 11:29:50 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --I8xNCVskAjEKkTTBmBip2W1ng3I4sk3D6 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="nU3jpV8b5JV7w2NNw51oT9fB2op4RorxX" From: Matthew Seaman To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <05b76aca-31b7-5180-336b-d81af834e29f@infracaninophile.co.uk> Subject: Re: Using an external ports repo in poudriere References: <20160505110450.GA13380@beagle.bcn.sia.es> In-Reply-To: <20160505110450.GA13380@beagle.bcn.sia.es> --nU3jpV8b5JV7w2NNw51oT9fB2op4RorxX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 05/05/16 12:04, C. L. Martinez wrote: > How can I configure poudriere to use an external ports repo instead of= FreeBSD's official repo? Create a 'repo.conf' file in /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/ The file name can be anything ending in .conf -- all such are used, which makes it handy if you want to have multiple repos. See the REPOSITORY CONFIGURATION section in pkg.conf(5) for details. To turn off all use of the official FreeBSD repos, add a file /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/FreeBSD.conf with this contents: FreeBSD: { enabled: no } Use 'pkg -vv' to see what the resulting repository config comes out as. Cheers, Matthew --nU3jpV8b5JV7w2NNw51oT9fB2op4RorxX-- --I8xNCVskAjEKkTTBmBip2W1ng3I4sk3D6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXKy6YAAoJEABRPxDgqeTnqdUQAK/BRqvsoZkLVV4FuMcOT1NU +cZ3xjr3uPIq8spSJFSSCgkMqRi8QSBdNopD/+Y3vYCf+nPF6EGztnuBFDaSp4Fr ZM0qhKGJbwnf+zlheQfZo2TxUIKj7HcrkQ351vKsVJ4DzFTQCFFWM+IV/hIjbJDh IcAVEqgMEPfskpV0i0RWlbwbQv/KJaNIMxC2F9SuY1yvfNKH6QVpJ5enm3S92rOc eTROW1xcpauK3f5RczFbM6WNmyY/9TQIpd3BekVmRoklTcMsE3GEVd3JCFp113zI J3xrL6jqgFlVKSlknQhv7mRHtxr8HvZk5cm/gCsGEdLngh0ZHFvcADOJlXVlKk5i ARWf4CaZg04thakWx83/4K3+IKVTIaYbf9y3fu1OzBKtKCuVLzoWXK53nIuu3YZF CrJply1ydocDknHdjfA81/aX+PODaGT5PJ4orxr4Rrhq0KAzhLsQBiYPzaA2ZFfm +L87+swdqTSBoIyo+alT6yTwldEw6Yl7WcvNTIkAHURObYWEQvmzxR6N2Eks04B8 lfKMIAEnhKXEe1nFObOWa08SRjIVIEaacqTZAymxhGZzu3EtsfQBi11UeOf++01G +NSUBC7XfSGO+CcLyr4JUe12cF9hUboiiwYaQR/WI693R7h/Jg6WWWVzcYjcQhLf gVap2O1GB4fRW95Pv/1D =HQn2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --I8xNCVskAjEKkTTBmBip2W1ng3I4sk3D6-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu May 5 11:31:45 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6EADB2EABF for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 11:31:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from bede.qeng-ho.org (bede.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org", Issuer "fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 571D91719 for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 11:31:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from arthur.home.qeng-ho.org (arthur.home.qeng-ho.org [172.23.1.2]) by bede.home.qeng-ho.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u45BKEQJ014330; Thu, 5 May 2016 12:20:14 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Subject: Re: Not getting updates for openssl vulnerability To: Marius Schamschula , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <54A27A30-A279-408E-AAEF-61F950DCDF82@schamschula.com> From: Arthur Chance Message-ID: <32b3e66f-baa0-d62d-0dd1-04ad9f484bf9@qeng-ho.org> Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 12:20:14 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <54A27A30-A279-408E-AAEF-61F950DCDF82@schamschula.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 11:31:45 -0000 On 05/05/2016 01:14, Marius Schamschula wrote: > Hi all, > > I’ve got FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE-p0 installed, but running > > freebsd-update fetch > > and > > freebsd-update install > > does not update openssl to version 1.0.1t, > > Rather I get > > $ openssl version > OpenSSL 1.0.1s-freebsd 1 Mar 2016 > > I also had a failure to install 10.3-RELEASE-p1: > > I got the same issue as Update auf 10.3-RELEASE-p1 | BSDForen.de - Die BSD-Community > > I’ve tried rebooting, and then tried > > # freebsd-update -r 10.3-RELEASE-p2 upgrade > Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 4 mirrors found. > Fetching metadata signature for 10.3-RELEASE from update3.freebsd.org... done. > Fetching metadata index... done. > Inspecting system... done. > > The following components of FreeBSD seem to be installed: > kernel/generic world/base world/doc world/games world/lib32 > > The following components of FreeBSD do not seem to be installed: > > Does this look reasonable (y/n)? y > > Fetching metadata signature for 10.3-RELEASE-p2 from update3.freebsd.org... failed. > Fetching metadata signature for 10.3-RELEASE-p2 from update5.freebsd.org... failed. > Fetching metadata signature for 10.3-RELEASE-p2 from update4.freebsd.org... failed. > Fetching metadata signature for 10.3-RELEASE-p2 from update6.freebsd.org... failed. > No mirrors remaining, giving up. I've got a different problem with update. I'm still on 10.2-R but although I can get to a mirror, there seems to be no update root@zotac:0# freebsd-version -ku 10.2-RELEASE-p14 10.2-RELEASE-p15 root@zotac:0# freebsd-update fetch Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 4 mirrors found. Fetching metadata signature for 10.2-RELEASE from update5.freebsd.org... done. Fetching metadata index... done. Inspecting system... done. Preparing to download files... done. No updates needed to update system to 10.2-RELEASE-p15. No sign of the 10.r-RELEASE-p16 that the latest security advisory and errata talk about. -- Moore's Law of Mad Science: Every eighteen months, the minimum IQ necessary to destroy the world drops by one point. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu May 5 11:46:07 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11BE6B2EE7C for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 11:46:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from avasout08.plus.net (avasout08.plus.net [212.159.14.20]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Bizanga Labs SMTP Client Certificate", Issuer "Bizanga Labs CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A455F1DB2 for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 11:46:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from curlew.milibyte.co.uk ([80.229.31.82]) by avasout08 with smtp id qbir1s0041mJoLY01bisLb; Thu, 05 May 2016 12:42:54 +0100 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=O6PEx0JW c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=cd0K7rcWwnZFf6xQxRobyA==:117 a=cd0K7rcWwnZFf6xQxRobyA==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=yrkiwgmsf1kA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=mgncRrKeR2X2J2wPPz4A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 Received: from curlew.lan ([192.168.1.13] helo=milibyte.co.uk) by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1ayHgA-0002fo-OT for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 05 May 2016 12:42:51 +0100 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 12:42:49 +0100 Message-ID: <3742178.aKMkPuQEMT@curlew.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.3 (FreeBSD/10.3-RELEASE; KDE/4.14.3; amd64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.1.13 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on curlew.lan X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Subject: Freebsd-update not upgrading to 10.3-RELEASE-p2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 11:46:07 -0000 As advised in FreeBSD-SA-16:17.openssl I've just attempted to run freebsd- update but it tells me that no updates are needed. This is the first time I've run freebsd-update since I upgraded to 10.3 on 30th April. The most recent revision shown in /usr/src/UPDATING is 20160329: 10.3-RELEASE so I would have expected freebsd-update to have taken me up to 10.3-RELEASE-p2 r299066. curlew:/home/mike% uname -a FreeBSD curlew.lan 10.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE #0 r297264: Fri Mar 25 02:10:02 UTC 2016 root@releng1.nyi.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 curlew:/home/mike% freebsd-version -ku 10.3-RELEASE 10.3-RELEASE-p1 -- Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu May 5 12:20:00 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 232AEB2EC8F for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 12:20:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.117.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D1091E18 for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 12:19:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com (unknown [85.199.232.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BDBF5237C for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 12:19:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/BDBF5237C; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral Subject: Re: Freebsd-update not upgrading to 10.3-RELEASE-p2 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <3742178.aKMkPuQEMT@curlew.lan> From: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <966a21fb-7463-6001-0b5e-8f45863eb35e@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 13:19:55 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3742178.aKMkPuQEMT@curlew.lan> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="46kR88outv0QObEGW7fSTGW4RuqTdTP04" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.1 at smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE, SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 12:20:00 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --46kR88outv0QObEGW7fSTGW4RuqTdTP04 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="hx5cao1p1N4p6lQJ0EcRX9jEBiS8bIQxS" From: Matthew Seaman To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <966a21fb-7463-6001-0b5e-8f45863eb35e@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Freebsd-update not upgrading to 10.3-RELEASE-p2 References: <3742178.aKMkPuQEMT@curlew.lan> In-Reply-To: <3742178.aKMkPuQEMT@curlew.lan> --hx5cao1p1N4p6lQJ0EcRX9jEBiS8bIQxS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 05/05/16 12:42, Mike Clarke wrote: > As advised in FreeBSD-SA-16:17.openssl I've just attempted to run freeb= sd- > update but it tells me that no updates are needed. >=20 > This is the first time I've run freebsd-update since I upgraded to 10.3= on 30th=20 > April. >=20 > The most recent revision shown in /usr/src/UPDATING is 20160329: 10.3-R= ELEASE=20 > so I would have expected freebsd-update to have taken me up to 10.3-REL= EASE-p2=20 > r299066. >=20 > curlew:/home/mike% uname -a > FreeBSD curlew.lan 10.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE #0 r297264: Fri Ma= r 25=20 > 02:10:02 UTC 2016 =20 > root@releng1.nyi.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > curlew:/home/mike% freebsd-version -ku > 10.3-RELEASE > 10.3-RELEASE-p1 Yes, this has been reported by many people in various different fora. There is a problem with freebsd-update(8) and the latest SA and ENs. You can be sure this has been bought to the attention of the responsible people, or will have been by the end of the day. People are looking into the problem right now, but we may need to wait on some others in California, where it is currently the small hours and they are almost certainly asleep. Cheers, Matthew --hx5cao1p1N4p6lQJ0EcRX9jEBiS8bIQxS-- --46kR88outv0QObEGW7fSTGW4RuqTdTP04 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXKzprAAoJEABRPxDgqeTnrZgQALI2KqpHEehFwKltrDmgvbB5 J5h123BWDpqJKrptOCCBD7NcqC3GfwwnGWLnCmZ2CVz3BpkE2FaSxV2cF6bqGyvq R6eBmTa9l5XbCneW8HoaCCfVXEKuEp8hmKjpCDRPiT1+W2ZYXvx9iGKcQaBnOyex ruZuhBLKJh0FfOvXEcAnRwzjSsyIJUYLdHxw0vWLxT3oGh5UMtqMRmzlH1x55dYc W/6IyZ6aJtJFy3ePVdAy3ZjSH4rz8N1q5jRDTVySUw7rxKp7m5d6yc9EBOWNsi3a VVR9p5mj73PbIOXXYut4hfJ0TybMvBrl86Xn7BHKOv0lwq4ld1sasjUKI3FdT4BT 4pT4fT6Yo7e2k0kmosFdgdfYQ3UU5G+e/TTNpq44BEvRc+m+2GuKxGW8N0a29+Cd Lgj9kY/UNq1ua5GabWeSp8r8YlfBpwLZATvdMP/mrx40yTZaj6QQPEDoA5ciufMW ahoCR6vhpA9sMB3g2JX5AjdNRiwerWH1OpZ6931Ki+wt0MUfnmVRziCaH9LhCOIG aIyRu2PiSiTkyhTLSU85b7LTzKDuFyYBQCAB9e581gVMoy3UImEGUfOMW42+IQkx eXzizdr5ZWs/jkJMjvC3XJVWi17wGTkq/ZWAGKWOcddTG6o5uovtQ0vH78qR+Sm8 Nqf4bsD50u3g/FBAEyce =LHz+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --46kR88outv0QObEGW7fSTGW4RuqTdTP04-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu May 5 13:08:07 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38084B2C8ED for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 13:08:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carlopmart@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x235.google.com (mail-wm0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF4BD13CA for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 13:08:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carlopmart@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x235.google.com with SMTP id e201so19859418wme.0 for ; Thu, 05 May 2016 06:08:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=JNgqNz401tdVD/YAESYduK0JZf9VZk6yQzCusMPTAvY=; b=k9aC1NVJc+H8NpxNzjI11pUv+o54m8pPBGFpZV7VbBlMxXA8uUdOzHpRAVcWMfOdJN Fc7+Ymj6cbM+PeDX4DOc9AW2ZAexT1x1njQ2qyHuxQ7A1n20EOt78JQ8HVYMjaOp9B4f 1xocd7l3RFoDpQKW2CWUB9P+KU0oPB0MiCu9qdZzSncZHZr8rvt8C6D3UykNSiCufhZb /zdbgI5kIPsn1AEnRFUGtsu6rukXNdWTj1qvdH0AKKozXbtcxo6Kj+HDkz44TDqabhrw OB1UpJQwIeRBUpkViLkl4t4J4tLIiCgsIWAn4XuBMj4/+2yVcoBI0ZyNR0jw99HNtC1z U68g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=JNgqNz401tdVD/YAESYduK0JZf9VZk6yQzCusMPTAvY=; b=LC86iI8KdGBte5zoKHB9H0NdIQ+jiDvNoGwxzwW+u1RT92TtcKJfzNnCLhEwhAMhvs rRkXY9cVShnQLnfXECgRTuBil8VzCRBoHlCjuwlFB7Cm5zp8Crjw70vrXoYVNnRWdj9x 8bYWzZx+jM0r+w6yySbxTIWqTEOip6ictk5sCoNFjzxpzaV4cTPt/kK7cqWMFKGQ4qP9 0y4nQnNlxRUIBoX/6IdJ5ykcGeE0J6K5VNb0sV9JWKR+Eu7RzIqbZqF0uip53kUGkfHB ejgMbq2pTw7mcOUSSM60DTC+aJUDoZa3AnvYhn/b3OEn/Ie2i3M4l9Xw9RCakYVeDUS2 G/iw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXbSbheniKxQTkkUEHYbMG/Bk9MGwk7GvAHGIqD28qxT1dQ0lBC5B3LXGkYShQZ2Q== X-Received: by 10.28.128.83 with SMTP id b80mr3476945wmd.89.1462453684560; Thu, 05 May 2016 06:08:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from beagle.bcn.sia.es (217.red-83-34-45.dynamicip.rima-tde.net. [83.34.45.217]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id wb10sm9691484wjc.8.2016.05.05.06.08.03 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 05 May 2016 06:08:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 13:07:59 +0000 From: "C. L. Martinez" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Using an external ports repo in poudriere Message-ID: <20160505130759.GB13380@beagle.bcn.sia.es> References: <20160505110450.GA13380@beagle.bcn.sia.es> <05b76aca-31b7-5180-336b-d81af834e29f@infracaninophile.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <05b76aca-31b7-5180-336b-d81af834e29f@infracaninophile.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 13:08:07 -0000 On Thu 5.May'16 at 12:29:28 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 05/05/16 12:04, C. L. Martinez wrote: > > > How can I configure poudriere to use an external ports repo instead of FreeBSD's official repo? > > Create a 'repo.conf' file in /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/ The file name can > be anything ending in .conf -- all such are used, which makes it handy > if you want to have multiple repos. See the REPOSITORY CONFIGURATION > section in pkg.conf(5) for details. > > To turn off all use of the official FreeBSD repos, add a file > /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/FreeBSD.conf with this contents: > > FreeBSD: { enabled: no } > > Use 'pkg -vv' to see what the resulting repository config comes out as. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > Thanks Matthew, but I think I haven't explained very well. I am referring to use a different ports repo when I need to build several packages with poudriere, not when I want to install them using pkg. To be more clear: when I launch the command "poudriere ports -c", is it possible to specify what, or more concise, from where ports will be downloaded?? Thanks. -- Greetings, C. L. Martinez From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu May 5 14:01:41 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CB3EB2DD6D for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 14:01:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vrwmiller@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-x231.google.com (mail-ob0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 028F819E6 for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 14:01:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vrwmiller@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ob0-x231.google.com with SMTP id n10so36671746obb.2 for ; Thu, 05 May 2016 07:01:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc; bh=AsUHyTnvdmVR02yzulGFsrLsoZIUAdLYTjUwHBKyCkQ=; b=qecGcxOLw2Dv1eDBAMEghR6OAkrhGgqF4jcRNjycSwKwyVxvRgeRVZSfHN+O8mrYLV PYQN5BdyiyJZsIgTkTGGx9PI6dBj4EkDQaRkPKVTLClKG/7oyAmPJlFsv7XXor8dZAxo rEQGCHimP2Qn88srOmksUuR/bbbNoSIn2dI8S7fcCSN19H3qNiCUlao/qfWwRTz2Xkns b0jjnQhif9wbsz8fQtuz1F0wtEBIBfEPUd415aTtgKcoGPw8FU9ys/pCEBChv+iWZE6g RSTuiAtEeiF/CG1alBq1p0xFzUlRGz3csEQEGWh/6tzUqqoPFIaWe16glz+bbJesxpi5 KlwQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=AsUHyTnvdmVR02yzulGFsrLsoZIUAdLYTjUwHBKyCkQ=; b=EQ+3Qi4OCcak4VvRFy4OdwANNHxXR+qHutG6TUASwCb2B7CDh5fy+vUx37W0m02TwZ l0WU42rAsWt9wGNaHSys2ul/2L/SFHMP81nq6O3GRo2YsJI+wf+ODXP5d5yf4lzJ7vqW xArxFTsD9VrsPJGbVaA05RIVtjFyOjjy0IzAK0RJKbBQkbO1IPlSxH2he116ESMXuu46 kv65AsYgLXIfWPvjWcPQGkS345BED1LAkDTsnwGkmddiz1FdgDD7s2tHpNSHdE1jGbXR hhUpKmwzHmb3VQoGKB16pE9RJgPwuiJHxSoYWRO/uqnZlGcAEsOD/s3+9Aiiazz53lMP p8MA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FV61RmiXbzTj96HaSOS9qQOdd07DCyGyUCrp89Z7eLwThyCebnCaE6ZjANoOzZ3yPlmSPQhOTRVgvTgLA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.197.165 with SMTP id iv5mr7292642obc.18.1462456900286; Thu, 05 May 2016 07:01:40 -0700 (PDT) Sender: vrwmiller@gmail.com Received: by 10.202.198.134 with HTTP; Thu, 5 May 2016 07:01:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160505130759.GB13380@beagle.bcn.sia.es> References: <20160505110450.GA13380@beagle.bcn.sia.es> <05b76aca-31b7-5180-336b-d81af834e29f@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20160505130759.GB13380@beagle.bcn.sia.es> Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 10:01:40 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: lKcMB-YgNIpDtW5C0ZXTmmMueTM Message-ID: Subject: Re: Using an external ports repo in poudriere From: Rick Miller To: "C. L. Martinez" Cc: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 14:01:41 -0000 On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 9:07 AM, C. L. Martinez wrote: > On Thu 5.May'16 at 12:29:28 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > On 05/05/16 12:04, C. L. Martinez wrote: > > > > > How can I configure poudriere to use an external ports repo instead > of FreeBSD's official repo? > > > > [ snip ] > > Thanks Matthew, but I think I haven't explained very well. I am referring > to use a different ports repo when I need to build several packages with > poudriere, not when I want to install them using pkg. > > To be more clear: when I launch the command "poudriere ports -c", is it > possible to specify what, or more concise, from where ports will be > downloaded?? Presumably, Poudriere is already installed and uses the default ports tree. You can point Poudriere to your privately hosted ports trees via /usr/local/share/common.sh by editing SVN_HOST or GIT_URL. -- Take care Rick Miller From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu May 5 14:58:22 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC790B2D09A for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 14:58:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carlopmart@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x233.google.com (mail-wm0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72F3A1C0C for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 14:58:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carlopmart@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x233.google.com with SMTP id n129so24003425wmn.1 for ; Thu, 05 May 2016 07:58:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=HZ+lQmCLwZOiCCB6hfvAR/cWo6IfeQ2WjzJJa5F6g3s=; b=CXnExVFJWR/Z2Gnxj+hTlT7aUpQRo/E5A+a9QioiIqoGwtxKNo2GBpnzvZM2amAACQ TaWhVieIahzLkNBuJvfp6yOqCUOkcQXlBgSanqanaWf0AzzJWqHKTZpJjzH3IP6li4DV rCDGDaCcWZVT5YFGEsYS7oPLie8TnXYy9zjCJOhSHbvXvfjpDh6NKURYlbevPnZJIu7e CC0J2WcEf3HPjTrq61szjh4czy+Xza8y78ZkmuRoWRK5tS4cxE/xL9om59S1LN7B08Pn 3/+fg5QFFgBVFEuBW0tvrq2FfZrbLn1Sz2skwacxWO0sIyVxqpJ1togGkGpxL0wNW3gO +CLg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=HZ+lQmCLwZOiCCB6hfvAR/cWo6IfeQ2WjzJJa5F6g3s=; b=IpHBAFwI2uFV2+vNGEMCmwoMxruGJ6jcldw9yB/8rjM5UFrO+k+z58GgTnbKAX2Cz/ 6eVX+RB7ngmvokQ4SveXQXWp2ythJo5XSTTdXksloC8B5Dd/qT/syT/GYJEgHGJ47EAa teT441VnDhGMRylrHHYvqfEm3DyN12hf2gyU/nPjnQMIl2fxcCiFd2vq4LY9DwUoy/d6 5tftbMppYIRSzeH1jUGLpyuxTqKmgn2xC9TlzYzBD6spPO3WHChZ3HfMviYI27f+FqKF zHLcktMnYakptXWNt/o4WeTLUEOVrrc3meY9wPjC9lMjp0ZznkoasMlaGxAdX0Sok5uE D8+w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXMzbPLDJpgGnngqBkdVXvxVDwlaPyYTA5bLPiVwWq5Uikqe18nzL3tr/mzKMJRDw== X-Received: by 10.194.242.65 with SMTP id wo1mr5737271wjc.54.1462460301021; Thu, 05 May 2016 07:58:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from beagle.bcn.sia.es (217.red-83-34-45.dynamicip.rima-tde.net. [83.34.45.217]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id us3sm10085386wjc.41.2016.05.05.07.58.19 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 05 May 2016 07:58:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 14:58:12 +0000 From: "C. L. Martinez" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Using an external ports repo in poudriere Message-ID: <20160505145811.GA17309@beagle.bcn.sia.es> References: <20160505110450.GA13380@beagle.bcn.sia.es> <05b76aca-31b7-5180-336b-d81af834e29f@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20160505130759.GB13380@beagle.bcn.sia.es> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 14:58:23 -0000 On Thu 5.May'16 at 10:01:40 -0400, Rick Miller wrote: > On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 9:07 AM, C. L. Martinez wrote: > > > On Thu 5.May'16 at 12:29:28 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > > On 05/05/16 12:04, C. L. Martinez wrote: > > > > > > > How can I configure poudriere to use an external ports repo instead > > of FreeBSD's official repo? > > > > > > [ snip ] > > > > Thanks Matthew, but I think I haven't explained very well. I am referring > > to use a different ports repo when I need to build several packages with > > poudriere, not when I want to install them using pkg. > > > > To be more clear: when I launch the command "poudriere ports -c", is it > > possible to specify what, or more concise, from where ports will be > > downloaded?? > > > Presumably, Poudriere is already installed and uses the default ports > tree. You can point Poudriere to your privately hosted ports trees via > /usr/local/share/common.sh by editing SVN_HOST or GIT_URL. > > > -- > Take care > Rick Miller Yep, that's what I am looking for ... Many Thanks Rick. -- Greetings, C. L. Martinez From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu May 5 17:31:51 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED2B4B2E68C for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 17:31:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from merlyn@geeks.org) Received: from mail.geeks.org (jacobs.geeks.org [204.153.247.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3F2F19C9 for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 17:31:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from merlyn@geeks.org) Received: from mail.geeks.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by after-clamsmtpd.geeks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78B73110236 for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 12:24:18 -0500 (CDT) Received: by mail.geeks.org (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 56F7B110235; Thu, 5 May 2016 12:24:18 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 12:24:18 -0500 From: Doug McIntyre To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Freebsd-update not upgrading to 10.3-RELEASE-p2 Message-ID: <20160505172418.GA50983@geeks.org> References: <3742178.aKMkPuQEMT@curlew.lan> <966a21fb-7463-6001-0b5e-8f45863eb35e@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <966a21fb-7463-6001-0b5e-8f45863eb35e@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 17:31:52 -0000 On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 01:19:55PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 05/05/16 12:42, Mike Clarke wrote: > > As advised in FreeBSD-SA-16:17.openssl I've just attempted to run freebsd- > > update but it tells me that no updates are needed. .. > Yes, this has been reported by many people in various different fora. > There is a problem with freebsd-update(8) and the latest SA and ENs. Hmm, nothing fixed yet, but to me, the update.freebsd.org site seems to have reverted back in time. Ie. I was able to do upgrades to 10.3-RELEASE-p1 over last weekend, but yet, the http://update.freebsd.org/10.3-RELEASE/amd64/latest.ssl lists 10.3-RELEASE-p0 as the latest.. :-( freebsd-update|amd64|10.3-RELEASE|0|8797efb5915e47a0a9bbcd69e1389d010a8041f8f1ca2c0dcfc0c4e4eca3fa8c|1525132800 Simularly, http://update.freebsd.org/10.2-RELEASE/amd64/latest.ssl is still stuck on 10.2-RELEASE-p15 freebsd-update|amd64|10.2-RELEASE|15|d0dab0d2567fd8b3a448781cf5486e2f0e2d46fb71adecdaf7f84a0e4d2dc95e|1483228800 And all mirrors of update?.freebsd.org are matching and identical as well. Something happened to update? Bad rollouts of 10.3-RELEASE-p2 and 10.2-RELEASE-p16? From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu May 5 18:20:16 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6455AB2E7C9 for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 18:20:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces+2732470-20d2-freebsd-questions=freebsd.org@sg.wixshoutout.com) Received: from o4.sg.wixshoutout.com (o4.sg.wixshoutout.com [167.89.77.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B9F91D21 for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 18:20:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces+2732470-20d2-freebsd-questions=freebsd.org@sg.wixshoutout.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=wixshoutout.com; h=content-type:from:list-unsubscribe:mime-version:subject:to; s=s1; bh=L3vewwpfyAXnvo7psN1WVmyKCw8=; b=r2fKnlH1DmHJVSXq4yT7CG0 VMr0pmoun5uz2Hf1tmPdyoVM5UM1pIQk1YVG1wuRGe17m3qi1lbRDv0Se4rveu6k 7z+4EVC9Y6+3HkytcoQ+jZkbefkEsWcA1CycZ5xcOjZxsT1mt6VxGnWOnKAO56gf fHYpT3iTrHUHW3ym+30o= Received: by filter0090p1las1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0090p1las1.32613.572B8EDF1E 2016-05-05 18:20:15.745609918 +0000 UTC Received: from MjczMjQ3MA (216-139-213-200.aus.us.siteprotect.com [216.139.213.200]) by ismtpd0008p1las1.sendgrid.net (SG) with HTTP id S0Z0it2cRp2RWXB1u13jSw for ; Thu, 05 May 2016 18:20:15.696 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 18:20:15 +0000 From: "PriceHouse Accounting" Mime-Version: 1.0 Precedence: Bulk Subject: Biz support in Estonia To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: X-SG-EID: FFnPVu6lb0A5TuepcCdqxLOfczNEIxluOZzq9GOc07pEC5NyNQH3ocOzh+EIJ1yg+IaLdQONAGNckn SX7CFvcScJFUFoFJdjOG9Vi2uzXIeBF1mzKDaa+3LA3NQvJghi0/evVX8zKmdt0xAGv9O+w2wDABof 3D8eQh85PhX9PMkuOMgI293mxS6vYCoN4GNsCppNizyguwdVHPk9Vb287VOswe7wkKZ+DYzHTB083l 0ZVZRrCqwys0nJqlFyU2wS X-SG-ID: NrBj8y1E2RHVMZO8PbtvIYehR6O3HfSMlq8ddug5Wi2jLMnOd1x7r+8lUDECUs9ITvHwOssRrfM4MO EOOM7GecMU6DZMELKFyav13dAELbYRFsDZhBILQ8BpddgnlJGh9yprlmGY/Ue6c5VUslu9NpCqjyTM 4qTYEDSJ40+aL4kOoOfpF+yxsnbaKYGfsitdeuAcQ+6RAgsNJ17Yolc7jfAZ1kjLrg4YHlmH3yLOK5 v/C+coWGn3DoP6WygZftweOaEg4xhM93DEreXmBnPSRmaoRLUELZyrpZAm+xqAMccAnPiA6hExkDVU q1GNbvwxpBBtth9tzFGiIbN0mWZmKw== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 18:20:16 -0000 =C2=A0 Business support in Estonia Company formation in EU Ready made VAT registered companies in EU VAT regis= tered shelf companies in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, UK, Poland Company liq= uidation in EU Accounting and payroll in Estonia Address services and mail = forwarding Legal services in Estonia Company repersentative services in Est= onia Company everyday management ( managing director service ) in Estonia = =C2=A0 Phone 372-5089-565 Email: info@vatnocorp.com www.vatnocorp.com w= ww.accounting100.com =C2=A0 Click on the link below to open the message in a browser: http://accounting100.com/so/7LI20u5a?cid=3D30ae0649-3bd4-465c-8bb5-0208acc5= 8745 You've received this email because you are a subscriber of this site http://www.accounting100.com/ If you feel you received it by mistake or wish to unsubscribe, click here http://www.wix.com/my-account/contacts/unsubscribe?metaSiteId=3D9a60d7b9-0b= ce-4a3d-87bc-ba265003c010&unsubscribeToken=3Dabcefd4d5885911e7f4ea863ecce18= 0388e169a39e4c714f1a99cb3376c2b706d52930165695c96b2236c897c392cd794113a98e1= 2684e2b874fe4c7543984680db954d276628467514fc6825f86d5d3445fe65559299dd1ed48= d4aea7087f26e2f327080a8f9661595d8b8733bbde509e7b1fccddfb045756bc9b914217b3c= 626975a9f02ca428004db106c4753140b81e83d635d95b74702c57c816559c563b810b5e390= 08180faf590f5a921b43b30fdaf3db1b7b0889a2473c0fb1b229b2e006d287cce8d36931401= 337910a0e4e8f1e7ad6bf0a2e76450249099195b2a35cbf4647944a399d6c6200af9924de29= 588fd3dc0d403ecb4dc08e12cd1f5cbd65e4019d8103581b064c7c1eb9b85b6a09d2dbc7364= 5c20d0df26936c847c4a18897fabd2162c2d0d1287ee7a5f017a3b614af219a8ff6a65fc8b0= cc50ddc50b96aac0d4f50a4e1705093e81f68069ce535a463180593f74c158db99a18319abb= 87b01afccc7af1ce50543108737dec7aebf6aef3efcdf1e180d8f34a2e76e10d096a5659dc1= c5771670e62f58fa7bd3&siteName=3Daccounting-estonia= From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu May 5 18:20:12 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F817B2E79E for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 18:20:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces+2732470-c431-questions=freebsd.org@sg.wixshoutout.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 099B91CEE for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 18:20:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces+2732470-c431-questions=freebsd.org@sg.wixshoutout.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 08F36B2E79D; Thu, 5 May 2016 18:20:12 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 086B0B2E79A for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 18:20:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces+2732470-c431-questions=freebsd.org@sg.wixshoutout.com) Received: from o4.sg.wixshoutout.com (o4.sg.wixshoutout.com [167.89.77.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD5F91CE7 for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 18:20:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces+2732470-c431-questions=freebsd.org@sg.wixshoutout.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=wixshoutout.com; h=content-type:from:list-unsubscribe:mime-version:subject:to; s=s1; bh=rJZeRTH+ImAvNyYwskJENiREoKo=; b=Qh1acRcv1lr5Cam2EEnOrZE xAiy2maTGQFePfSHtkt10j8LhxOfw9Vt4Cjsv0a75iXlPrnVNp5RfFBPvGcz0rwR hj93vvOpZZsAJFqnXYbPc+cROSnKLqQ7t7ny7fRuQWt6a7zQLxETUUslsnDTIPOU 5t042f3iy63EwlJcDQz0= Received: by filter0163p1las1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0163p1las1.14476.572B8EDA26 2016-05-05 18:20:10.721209146 +0000 UTC Received: from MjczMjQ3MA (216-139-209-190.aus.us.siteprotect.com [216.139.209.190]) by ismtpd0011p1las1.sendgrid.net (SG) with HTTP id A6QHYffmTaaxyAEf7E6R-g for ; Thu, 05 May 2016 18:20:10.831 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 18:20:10 +0000 From: "PriceHouse Accounting" Mime-Version: 1.0 Precedence: Bulk Subject: Biz support in Estonia To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: X-SG-EID: kupi+C8b7X4XcIgkd08EEI9U+3nO0snAQOkGcdEKlYptwOP0gGIUB25anSMkTuDPvltLiiFqe33/YE 17usPuV4TQSSzDIJKbjCMGy6hsIZhwzmgJ+fgNpMW4m4BaB8FCdDPpM8R/Do+Fs5ZRRl12/fOivpBn TxWi/wkPpBoC2RrD3dFNZxhX8h+2xWafmM9CslP6HNTUoQIH2KHiDAQNeBZCZfPcEa+muudrs+7TFE 0= X-SG-ID: NrBj8y1E2RHVMZO8PbtvIYehR6O3HfSMlq8ddug5Wi2jLMnOd1x7r+8lUDECUs9ITvHwOssRrfM4MO EOOM7GecMU6DZMELKFyav13dAELbYRFsDZhBILQ8BpddgnlJGh3pF4GXJjB+8J5CP+Vwgjbcp3MLnb luo0Mwjw4/P9bMJ2LFxs75q6MhrxX4xyLAKM2N4ZHzeq4FaRfcQYyPA28GxOUev/YwdzPpfug4QnUI ARV8wiNNNFvaVKYnuSrtgmSiKNai3VeCNiEk5X5ltvk02PY3UQzD4pp0/0APscYp9H7Jz08K5Q+dra HQygqa50oud09Iga+raDMCXZJaexnA== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 18:20:12 -0000 =C2=A0 Business support in Estonia Company formation in EU Ready made VAT registered companies in EU VAT regis= tered shelf companies in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, UK, Poland Company liq= uidation in EU Accounting and payroll in Estonia Address services and mail = forwarding Legal services in Estonia Company repersentative services in Est= onia Company everyday management ( managing director service ) in Estonia = =C2=A0 Phone 372-5089-565 Email: info@vatnocorp.com www.vatnocorp.com w= ww.accounting100.com =C2=A0 Click on the link below to open the message in a browser: http://accounting100.com/so/7LI20u5a?cid=3D91d1a23f-f193-401a-a8f5-46a8ac3f= a1b2 You've received this email because you are a subscriber of this site http://www.accounting100.com/ If you feel you received it by mistake or wish to unsubscribe, click here http://www.wix.com/my-account/contacts/unsubscribe?metaSiteId=3D9a60d7b9-0b= ce-4a3d-87bc-ba265003c010&unsubscribeToken=3Dabcefd4d5885911e7f4ea863ecce18= 0388e169a39e4c714f1a99cb3376c2b706d52930165695c96b2236c897c392cd794113a98e1= 2684e2b874fe4c7543984680db954d276628467514fc6825f86d5d3445fe65559299dd1ed48= d4aea7087f26e2f327080a8f9661595d8b8733bbde509e7b1fccddfb045756bc9b914217b3c= 626975a9f02ca428004db106c4753140b81e83d635d95b74702c57c816559c563b810b5e390= 08180faf590f5a921b43b30fdaf3db1b7b0889a2473c0fb1b229b2e006d287cce8d36931401= 337910a0e4e8f1e7ad6bf0a2e76450249099195b2a35cbf4647944a399d6c6200af9924de29= 588fd3dc0d403ecb4dc08e12cd1f5cbd65e4019d8103581b064c7c1eb9b85b6a86f54cddfc9= c35ea5d8b4a7e225e936a33b95984d4b6a447c2ac5db1a7bbce133cec8097fffb30d80066c4= 8ca0c6cb292569e6e1b3e4a2566723cdf5a14697dbbaf95d5a55e671acdef2db3aa6b1cefe1= dcbc705b8383c3e342355a37be32a71c1a4f936084134e4bbb184b1bb47c3531ce2f4c9e760= 91b8f03c5f55ea83a623&siteName=3Daccounting-estonia= From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu May 5 21:46:30 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 045F3B2F4B2 for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 21:46:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@yandex.com) Received: from forward8h.cmail.yandex.net (forward8h.cmail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:f35::e8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "forwards.mail.yandex.net", Issuer "Yandex CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B402B1A78 for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 21:46:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@yandex.com) Received: from smtp2h.mail.yandex.net (smtp2h.mail.yandex.net [84.201.187.145]) by forward8h.cmail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 4C55C22149 for ; Fri, 6 May 2016 00:46:25 +0300 (MSK) Received: from smtp2h.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2h.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 0DE8E170011E for ; Fri, 6 May 2016 00:46:24 +0300 (MSK) Received: by smtp2h.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id V8KdBUOeQ8-kNeeMnqT; Fri, 06 May 2016 00:46:24 +0300 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1462484784; bh=OEqRFcUccvQc9yEsmY7IQVPyoRAErdTmaQ/kgY7y220=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=hE1wVeXp/UmTDizHQ+uyBC5aY03LJQn79VkeYs50nmOjJpDYIVUGm3h14gncKFys1 npyhuKrY8bgWfAYborNkbRz5J0S0Vm6mPV55yB422gIEtD7+PrL2EzApn92oRG+9v8 D4y8E7P+eNNcidJFN9QnyjIo28FIYXyV1sQZ9aKs= Authentication-Results: smtp2h.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.com X-Yandex-ForeignMX: US X-Yandex-Suid-Status: 1 0 Message-ID: <1462484781.53148.3.camel@yandex.com> Subject: Re: Not getting updates for openssl vulnerability From: Stari Karp To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 17:46:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: <54A27A30-A279-408E-AAEF-61F950DCDF82@schamschula.com> References: <54A27A30-A279-408E-AAEF-61F950DCDF82@schamschula.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 21:46:30 -0000 On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 19:14 -0500, Marius Schamschula wrote: > Hi all, > > I’ve got FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE-p0 installed, but running > > freebsd-update fetch > > and > > freebsd-update install > > does not update openssl to version 1.0.1t,  > > Rather I get > > $ openssl version > OpenSSL 1.0.1s-freebsd  1 Mar 2016 > > I also had a failure to install 10.3-RELEASE-p1:  > > I got the same issue as Update auf 10.3-RELEASE-p1 | BSDForen.de - > Die BSD-Community > > I’ve tried rebooting, and then tried > > # freebsd-update -r 10.3-RELEASE-p2 upgrade > Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 4 mirrors found. > Fetching metadata signature for 10.3-RELEASE from > update3.freebsd.org... done. > Fetching metadata index... done. > Inspecting system... done. > > The following components of FreeBSD seem to be installed: > kernel/generic world/base world/doc world/games world/lib32 > > The following components of FreeBSD do not seem to be installed: > > Does this look reasonable (y/n)? y > > Fetching metadata signature for 10.3-RELEASE-p2 from > update3.freebsd.org... failed. > Fetching metadata signature for 10.3-RELEASE-p2 from > update5.freebsd.org... failed. > Fetching metadata signature for 10.3-RELEASE-p2 from > update4.freebsd.org... failed. > Fetching metadata signature for 10.3-RELEASE-p2 from > update6.freebsd.org... failed. > No mirrors remaining, giving up. > > Any ideas? > > Marius > -- > Marius Schamschula > And I got: freebsd-update fetch Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 4 mirrors found. Fetching metadata signature for 10.3-RELEASE from update6.freebsd.org... done. Fetching metadata index... done. Inspecting system... done. Preparing to download files... done. No updates needed to update system to 10.3-RELEASE-p0. uname -a shows: 10.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE #1: Sun Apr 10 13:48:11 EDT 2016    bla@bla.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  amd64 There are no RELEASE-p0 as is above. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri May 6 03:14:20 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69156B2EC13 for ; Fri, 6 May 2016 03:14:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chrisagent@yeah.net) Received: from m208-177.yeah.net (m208-177.yeah.net [123.58.177.208]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 901771734 for ; Fri, 6 May 2016 03:14:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chrisagent@yeah.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yeah.net; s=s110527; h=Date:From:Message-ID:Subject:MIME-Version; bh=5CK7C wQxv28z0Z4TY7LpIDj1jLhjSpMYJ9dOL37ijew=; b=mBsYj+E++U2jFsdNwI11p 4VUHnmYPBSv7pkWcrxr4SiXBOGv7EPzRIsRrvFBKdFMZrbo7PYXOB+PzXfibSGLJ FOyggt6q7ad38+z6IA1lmEeKVEaKmjm3ApdI9iFOvwOBmcApk3d9wDPGWeUQUY2M gtukfC6fY2lA+gjtiUx2uo= Received: from chrisagent$yeah.net ( [115.210.143.202] ) by ajax-webmail-sdy2 (Coremail) ; Fri, 6 May 2016 10:39:21 +0800 (GMT+08:00) Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 10:39:31 +0800 From: "chrisagent" Reply-to: "chrisyiwu" To: "freebsd-questions" Message-ID: <4f7b728c.9f4e2.15483ef0b8e.Coremail.chrisagent@yeah.net> Subject: Re:A new market in April MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NetEase Flash Mail 2.4.1.20 X-Priority: 1 (Highest) X-CM-HeaderCharset: UTF-8 X-Originating-IP: [115.210.143.202] X-CM-TRANSID: 2lUQrAD3beHaAyxX5o4ZAA--.51897W X-CM-SenderInfo: 5fkux2hdjh03o61htxgoqh3/1tbiDw9gqVH7dvL07AACs9 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1U5529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7vcSsGvfC2KfnxnUU== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 03:14:20 -0000 SGksIA0KVGhpcyBpcyBDaHJpc3RpbmEgZnJvbSBQQVJUTkVSIEdST1VQIGluIFlpd3UsQ2hpbmEu DQoyMDE2IGlzIHRoZSBtb3N0IGNoYWxsZW5naW5nIHllYXIgYWxsIG92ZXIgdGhlIHdvcmxkLCBl dmVyeWJvZHkgbmVlZHMgdG8gaW1wcm92ZSB0aGVpciBjb21wZXRpdGl2ZW5lc3MuIA0KU28gSSBz aW5jZXJlbHkgaW52aXRlIHlvdSBhbmQgeW91ciBwdXJjaGFzZSB0ZWFtIHRvIFlpd3UgV2hvbGVz YWxlIE1hcmtldC4gQmVjYXVzZToNCjEsSGVyZSB5b3UgaGF2ZSBtb3JlIGNob2ljZXMNClRoZXJl JyByZSBtb3JlIHRoYW4gMjAsMDAwIHN1cHBsaWVycyBmcm9tIGFsbCBvdmVyIENoaW5hLg0KMixT bWFsbCBtaW5pbXVtIG9yZGVyIHF1YW50aXR5DQpZb3UgY2FuIG1peCBvdmVyIDEwMCBwcm9kdWN0 cyBwZXIgY29udGFpbmVyLCBzbyBhcyB0byByZWR1Y2UgaW52ZW50b3J5IHJpc2suDQozLENvbXBl dGV0aXZlIHByaWNlDQpCZWNhdXNlIHRoZSBpdGVtcyBhcmUgY29uY2VudHJhdGVkLCBzbyB5b3Ug Y2FuIGdldCBiZXR0ZXIgcHJpY2UgcmVsYXRpdmVseS4NCkRlYXIgLCBzdWNoIGEgU2FmZSwgRWZm aWNpZW50LCBMZXNzIENvc3QgTWFya2V0LCB3aHkgbm90IGNvbWU/IFJlbWVtYmVyIFlvdXIgUGFy dG5lciBHcm91cCB3aWxsIGhlbHAgeW91IGFycmFuZ2UgZXZlcnl0aGluZyBoZXJlLg0KU28gdGVs bCBtZSwgd2hlbiB5b3UgY29tZT8gTWF5IG9yIEp1bmU/DQpCZXN0IFJlZ2FyZHMsDQpDaHJpc3Rp bmENCg0KMjAxNi0wNS0wNg0KDQoNCg0KIA0KQ2hyaXN0aW5hDQpTYWxlcyBSZXAuDQpQYXJ0bmVy IEludGVybmF0aW9uYWwgVHJhZGluZyBDby4sIExURA0KwrcgU2FmZSDCtyBMb25nIFRlcm0gwrcg UmVsaWFibGUgQnVzaW5lc3MgUGFydG5lciANCl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fDQpDb250YWN0IGluZm86DQpNb2JpbGU6Kzg2IDE1MjY4NjY0 MjE5IHwgRW1haWw6IGRlcDAxQHBhcnRuZXIwMDEuY29tIA0KV2hhdHNhcHA6Kzg2IDE1MjY4NjY0 MjE5IHwgV2ViOiB3d3cucGFydG5lcnlpd3UuY29tDQpUZWw6ICs4NiA1NzkgODk5NCA4NzUyIHwg RkFYOiArODYgNTc5IDgzODEgNjA4NiA= From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri May 6 18:12:13 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D44B3194B for ; Fri, 6 May 2016 18:12:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bourne.identity@hotmail.com) Received: from BLU004-OMC4S3.hotmail.com (blu004-omc4s3.hotmail.com [65.55.111.142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "Microsoft IT SSL SHA2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B5A61FCF for ; Fri, 6 May 2016 18:12:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bourne.identity@hotmail.com) Received: from BLU436-SMTP183 ([65.55.111.136]) by BLU004-OMC4S3.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Fri, 6 May 2016 11:12:06 -0700 X-TMN: [t4/FzuKEUnZnS3eKv0uZgxt8Sj2ZquRkjkHIC6NUsw4=] X-Originating-Email: [bourne.identity@hotmail.com] Message-ID: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Manish Jain Subject: Possible bug: USB keyboard's keys become sticky Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 23:41:47 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 May 2016 18:12:03.0727 (UTC) FILETIME=[CABC09F0:01D1A7C2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 18:12:13 -0000 Hi, I would like to report a possible bug on my amd64 system running FreeBSD 10.2. While typing with the X server running, keys of my keyboard become 'sticky': pressing 'A' once results in multiple (dozens, sometimes hundreds) of 'A'. This nuisance usually stops by itself and the key gets 'unstuck' automatically after a couple of seconds. This happens only under FreeBSD (not Linux, not Windows) and only under the X server (not when typing on the console when there is no X). This kind of bug gives leeway to kernel developers to blame X developers, and the other way round too! -- Regards, Manish Jain From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri May 6 19:24:29 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D8ABB31C09 for ; Fri, 6 May 2016 19:24:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from web@umich.edu) Received: from mail-yw0-x233.google.com (mail-yw0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 677BB19D5 for ; Fri, 6 May 2016 19:24:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from web@umich.edu) Received: by mail-yw0-x233.google.com with SMTP id g133so200627298ywb.2 for ; Fri, 06 May 2016 12:24:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=umich.edu; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:mime-version :content-disposition:user-agent; bh=Q4rauXzBuPVKvpWBAVDx5c48CNBzCvwqPsEuF7kHYew=; b=QzvftCQm1ljDaX4YahxbEsfde3DBCjH5qO2GRdMV9pRxFP/Nv/o24ZgHgW6b3jcQKp VWAiweZipSaABGsQFgpe3c0G2OKzUjEejDYms0Qw5n9lbVEnUeNGTm5Y1JbfOSiAdiso ICx/3NtSo5f61y2kynMuVDpU6yFTv+nP5tl9c= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-disposition:user-agent; bh=Q4rauXzBuPVKvpWBAVDx5c48CNBzCvwqPsEuF7kHYew=; b=iegFoinRqrpaA9Axbt9l7Bcs2ju6lI6JWbIbJjJt3nKoiUhSlVzG21KE7v5jFxOicR xSy/bf99/zM7meuPhXWI5iuyoZ/N0PrI7Dsk9MEklSKaXGiWY9aHplxf9U0C8Nea47c0 Y9c8d2ucywWerIKiiLFHE4lOxmXaHB4f85ec4om0LYVwce7gdpfk96maFSlhUn7CqUme O9VaxPVSk4P8AcDc+jK//kHfZjygJ6Z+8UO2OT47cI9AyFFtpr4lbxmOI+MhOVIC7Y9l gWf9DFpTRgb+Dcvcp6t0RdCRt8F7eWE5NRFGo0Vb+VHAsHVklK2h2EVHZgET+XsEnKe6 pAsQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FW7hBt1JAtnvEgFUUL8qcUxmUUUkDX0L7O2FqmqD0BGilXc22xDe3DleOLCkS9MgT2W X-Received: by 10.129.77.4 with SMTP id a4mr13324191ywb.71.1462562668412; Fri, 06 May 2016 12:24:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (adsl-68-252-134-230.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net. [68.252.134.230]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i133sm9661396ywe.4.2016.05.06.12.24.27 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 06 May 2016 12:24:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 15:24:26 -0400 From: William Bulley To: Manish Jain Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Possible bug: USB keyboard's keys become sticky Message-ID: <20160506192426.GN695@dell4> Mail-Followup-To: Manish Jain , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 19:24:29 -0000 According to Manish Jain on Fri, 05/06/16 at 14:11: > > I would like to report a possible bug on my amd64 system running FreeBSD > 10.2. While typing with the X server running, keys of my keyboard become > 'sticky': pressing 'A' once results in multiple (dozens, sometimes hundreds) > of 'A'. This nuisance usually stops by itself and the key gets 'unstuck' > automatically after a couple of seconds. This happens only under FreeBSD > (not Linux, not Windows) and only under the X server (not when typing on the > console when there is no X). This kind of bug gives leeway to kernel > developers to blame X developers, and the other way round too! Ditto here. It is a minor annoyance, but does happen randomly. I had thought it was some sort of firmware bug with my USB keyboard. Now I no longer think that. I've seen it under 10.2-STABLE and 10.3-STABLE: unix% pkg info xorg linux-c6-xorg-libs-7.4_4 Xorg libraries (Linux CentOS 6.7) xorg-7.7_2 X.Org complete distribution metaport xorg-apps-7.7_2 X.org apps meta-port xorg-cf-files-1.0.5_1 X.org cf files for use with imake builds xorg-docs-1.7.1,1 X.org documentation files xorg-drivers-7.7_3 X.org drivers meta-port xorg-fonts-7.7_1 X.org fonts meta-port xorg-fonts-100dpi-7.7 X.Org 100dpi bitmap fonts xorg-fonts-75dpi-7.7 X.Org 75dpi bitmap fonts xorg-fonts-cyrillic-7.7 X.Org Cyrillic bitmap fonts xorg-fonts-miscbitmaps-7.7 X.Org miscellaneous bitmap fonts xorg-fonts-truetype-7.7_1 X.Org TrueType fonts xorg-fonts-type1-7.7 X.Org Type1 fonts xorg-libraries-7.7_2 X.org libraries meta-port xorg-macros-1.19.0 X.Org development aclocal macros xorg-server-1.17.4,1 X.Org X server and related programs My kernel is up to date (rebuilt on 5/5/2016). Regards, web... -- /"\ ASCII RIBBON / William Bulley \ / CAMPAIGN AGAINST / X HTML E-MAIL AND / E-MAIL: web@umich.edu / \ LISTSERV POSTINGS / 72 characters width template ----------------------------------------->| From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri May 6 20:38:06 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2EC3B2CBF1 for ; Fri, 6 May 2016 20:38:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bourne.identity@hotmail.com) Received: from BLU004-OMC4S36.hotmail.com (blu004-omc4s36.hotmail.com [65.55.111.175]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "Microsoft IT SSL SHA2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A9F81C9B for ; Fri, 6 May 2016 20:38:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bourne.identity@hotmail.com) Received: from BLU436-SMTP152 ([65.55.111.137]) by BLU004-OMC4S36.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Fri, 6 May 2016 13:37:59 -0700 X-TMN: [CcvDSJzCrwChIHHVOUtsHJMFybQzdMP0nmj3e/Qq7e4=] X-Originating-Email: [bourne.identity@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Subject: Re: Possible bug: USB keyboard's keys become sticky To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20160506192426.GN695@dell4> From: Manish Jain Date: Sat, 7 May 2016 02:07:19 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160506192426.GN695@dell4> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 May 2016 20:37:35.0721 (UTC) FILETIME=[1F689590:01D1A7D7] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 20:38:06 -0000 On 05/07/16 00:54, William Bulley wrote: > According to Manish Jain on Fri, 05/06/16 at 14:11: >> I would like to report a possible bug on my amd64 system running FreeBSD >> 10.2. While typing with the X server running, keys of my keyboard become >> 'sticky': pressing 'A' once results in multiple (dozens, sometimes hundreds) >> of 'A'. This nuisance usually stops by itself and the key gets 'unstuck' >> automatically after a couple of seconds. This happens only under FreeBSD >> (not Linux, not Windows) and only under the X server (not when typing on the >> console when there is no X). This kind of bug gives leeway to kernel >> developers to blame X developers, and the other way round too! > Ditto here. It is a minor annoyance, but does happen randomly. > > I had thought it was some sort of firmware bug with my USB keyboard. > > Now I no longer think that. > With the amount of typing I have to do everyday, the annoyance is not minor. Once every 5 minutes - on an average, I have to delete a whole lot of junk. Regards Manish Jain From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri May 6 21:15:39 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98305B2D698 for ; Fri, 6 May 2016 21:15:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dnewman@networktest.com) Received: from mail5.networktest.com (mail5.networktest.com [IPv6:2607:f740:c::3c9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8668514E2 for ; Fri, 6 May 2016 21:15:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dnewman@networktest.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail5.networktest.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACF5C1023F3 for ; Fri, 6 May 2016 13:15:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail5.networktest.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail5.networktest.com [127.0.0.1]) (maiad, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01396-04 for ; Fri, 6 May 2016 13:15:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dhcp130.eng.networktest.com (ns.networktest.com [12.20.174.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: dnewman@networktest.com) by mail5.networktest.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 869B31023F1 for ; Fri, 6 May 2016 13:15:35 -0700 (PDT) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: David Newman Subject: graphics/cairo compile error Message-ID: <149f822c-0ecc-4bb0-14e3-7d02ac5fb3e0@networktest.com> Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 14:15:38 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 21:15:39 -0000 On 10.3-RELEASE on amd64, the graphics/cairo port fails to compile with the error pasted below. On previous systems where I've built cairo, I haven't needed to set MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes. Is there another workaround? Thanks! dn ===> cairo-1.14.6,2 depends on package: pkgconf>=0.9.10 - found ===> cairo-1.14.6,2 depends on package: libGL>0 - not found ===> libGL-11.1.2 depends on executable: makedepend - found ===> libGL-11.1.2 depends on package: libclc>=0.0.r222830 - not found ===> libclc-0.2.0.20151006 depends on executable: clang37 - not found ===> Building for llvm37-3.7.1_2 [9/2965] Building X86GenAsmMatcher.inc... [10/2965] Building X86GenDAGISel.inc... FAILED: lib/Target/X86/X86GenDAGISel.inc.tmp cd /usr/ports/devel/llvm37/work/.build/lib/Target/X86 && /usr/ports/devel/llvm37/work/.build/bin/llvm-tblgen -gen-dag-isel -I /usr/ports/devel/llvm37/work/llvm-3.7.1.src/lib/Target/X86 -I /usr/ports/devel/llvm37/work/llvm-3.7.1.src/lib/Target -I /usr/ports/devel/llvm37/work/llvm-3.7.1.src/include /usr/ports/devel/llvm37/work/llvm-3.7.1.src/lib/Target/X86/X86.td -o /usr/ports/devel/llvm37/work/.build/lib/Target/X86/X86GenDAGISel.inc.tmp [11/2965] Building X86GenAsmMatcher.inc... ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed. ===> Compilation failed unexpectedly. Try to set MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes and rebuild before reporting the failure to the maintainer. *** Error code 1 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat May 7 08:08:19 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99931B31A7C for ; Sat, 7 May 2016 08:08:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antoniocunha51@yahoo.se) Received: from nm19-vm4.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com (nm19-vm4.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com [212.82.96.237]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAA6018B6 for ; Sat, 7 May 2016 08:08:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antoniocunha51@yahoo.se) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.se; s=s2048; t=1462608362; bh=QMfWwQCXaygaTRxTtFTVWJ/Mz143Lu+OMBMfacmzmlw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:References:From:Subject; b=KsVuJ+1+8dCYxN5YJcbnYs/XZKXJkKK6F8DnuyQ0o/Ipcoxw/yuY9XPr10aHkoJHeg1KA2u6Djzv+ICxzFUknwQSMtjD5BUPBqKxJArqFcEGGTbbaO9mQ/K3NyS3DRVrfoIgiicISqhGP6f8YbswUvo4uIuWQgETDuj8M6EcV5iCGPa3v7EjwsLgb5s3c5alcqgLM39ccSm1tXT0sLwic80N6ObYCaC6zdfFgCIclqa95w4ZqznlGOP4DmhVwv1YOG8xRurUkcAyD6sgtiSG7hE+XORRJlwt1PA9gBlHTWojRZq+z1hApzQY1mqIP526vLFP49AY65qCHZKGeIk4qA== Received: from [212.82.98.126] by nm19.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 May 2016 08:06:02 -0000 Received: from [212.82.98.70] by tm19.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 May 2016 08:06:02 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1007.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 May 2016 08:06:02 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 306434.39052.bm@omp1007.mail.ir2.yahoo.com X-YMail-OSG: y9keqC4VM1n431nVgywnsQslxdXWe_mzHFOBqU7B2.g8iVYLE4KB6NlKLrCM8sZ D3Bx_Dc58TVVRAB_OmyX_bNoJC3cQVdp5_1itGUsIOjysKnjCpInY9dnhEM6RFlfbLd9r_O9KfH2 umIFADHIH6u9viF9mieupeVDMZ_zK3g7_caA_p1RIaxsqZkbN6euJrlCZPN35NJiaSZNUv1MV5I6 WSfRpRda0FSMpTU.wESefWu4zWvW2Rt0.z7rnIaI51q6uo14e6oaDIKqEHlCypYoV7fXfmXleTeV dFOPBbijnR70CL8MRTWgqObEkwY4dOay2QVPL5VN4lqJbuvjjJ9bcb845n7cA0Z3rmx85QFoZz0y 8fpqu9buFX6Cy7Zafjjw7hSCi0zHh0kfNUxwVlhlKK5GSJ0C0fH7N_IljliVJA_eFDLNDjKNeUx2 i38RBTKit59yOtV.OwEUANbm1HbBjCdADptmH60WLkNkCnPbwyIUCBRPAMAzYgNEfkmX8pGwL8ay ET_9vlfV72UOyZSs- Received: from jws11198.mail.ir2.yahoo.com by sendmailws103.mail.ir2.yahoo.com; Sat, 07 May 2016 08:06:01 +0000; 1462608361.857 Date: Sat, 7 May 2016 08:05:49 +0000 (UTC) From: Antonio Cunha Reply-To: Antonio Cunha To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Message-ID: <1505127977.177199.1462608349443.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Subject: timercounter MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1505127977.177199.1462608349443.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 May 2016 08:08:19 -0000 Hi, How does the kernel decides for which timer should be used? In my case I have a arm cpuand tthe following:kern.timecounter.tick: 1 kern.timecounter.choice: CPU Timer(1000) dummy(-1000000) kern.timecounter.hardware: CPU TimerThis do not work well at all, it runs to fast. Some can explain how this works? From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat May 7 14:38:11 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA416B31E4E for ; Sat, 7 May 2016 14:38:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC0191A9D for ; Sat, 7 May 2016 14:38:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A7D94B31E4D; Sat, 7 May 2016 14:38:11 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5394B31E4B for ; Sat, 7 May 2016 14:38:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CBD81A9C for ; Sat, 7 May 2016 14:38:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id u47Ec4Zc045073 for ; Sun, 8 May 2016 00:38:05 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Sun, 8 May 2016 00:38:04 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ failure Message-ID: <20160508002242.K16195@sola.nimnet.asn.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 May 2016 14:38:11 -0000 Hi, the other night I followed a link in net@ to read some commits: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/share/examples/jails/ I'd looked at 4 of the 7 files there when suddenly, attempts to access others failed, after "you are leaving an encrypted page .." to receive: Data Transfer Interrupted The connection to svnweb.freebsd.org has terminated unexpectedly. Some data may have been transferred. Nor could (or can) I access the home page, https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ I hope this isn't another insufferably patronising attempt to protect me from myself, for read-only access, by removing sslv3 & TLS v1.0 cyphers? This is an older Seamonkey on an 8.2 system, my main development laptop for non-FreeBSD software. I'm in no position to upgrade it presently. cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat May 7 17:38:05 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 691DFB327A2 for ; Sat, 7 May 2016 17:38:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brandon.wandersee@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F3DF14AA for ; Sat, 7 May 2016 17:38:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brandon.wandersee@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 4E83EB327A1; Sat, 7 May 2016 17:38:05 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E26AB327A0 for ; Sat, 7 May 2016 17:38:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brandon.wandersee@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io0-f181.google.com (mail-io0-f181.google.com [209.85.223.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27DC314A9 for ; Sat, 7 May 2016 17:38:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brandon.wandersee@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io0-f181.google.com with SMTP id f89so140557350ioi.0 for ; Sat, 07 May 2016 10:38:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=FkJg/H8OVVho8r0HgKzdlfhFimSO4Rk/at/o5wHn7Jk=; b=jX4r/FC1YjA3DGRve2NHSoDdh4aFy/zev3Z0LAw3C57x2Ni7zz44ySnnqnIsdWn2qn nY3JgA0qbB0wSPq6bV0fxO6ji9/Ia/tXaWaPxux/zd+iQSlejmrDzUJjDdGcCRw7auap 9csDsph7612RjXlMnKCHQ26Y9PKn0JpwSBgrZf9VEY5DtiZuA3ycePhV6VHyAhHWukN8 v4/FCLIu29yzUYGxvS2q6fc8qc/8yCoLAZ+o9TwJQlrwEli0GpOCMF7P9lVnFbZj+sJy KvydoH8t91GiluNDU0mN1RvAPChCVom11N9ubLBFpZIDqrw4ayUgTue9NCOqPeJ5GG1m 8q/Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUU2Tvk1QUclNguoSDNFkC5JdJqNFu34wBNLEq28WwLulbY0YbN8iiH5u7Bp7wEtw== X-Received: by 10.107.3.30 with SMTP id 30mr28422541iod.49.1462642678278; Sat, 07 May 2016 10:37:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from WorkBox.Home.gmail.com (63-231-152-155.mpls.qwest.net. [63.231.152.155]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id tp9sm7070802igc.22.2016.05.07.10.37.56 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 07 May 2016 10:37:57 -0700 (PDT) References: <20160508002242.K16195@sola.nimnet.asn.au> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.16; emacs 24.5.1 From: Brandon J. Wandersee To: Ian Smith Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ failure In-reply-to: <20160508002242.K16195@sola.nimnet.asn.au> Date: Sat, 07 May 2016 12:37:57 -0500 Message-ID: <868tzl22h6.fsf@WorkBox.Home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 May 2016 17:38:05 -0000 Ian Smith writes: > I'm in no position to upgrade it presently. This is the same thing you said the last time you commented on this topic. That was almost a year ago.[1] So you know what the solution is, and have had a year to undertake it... [1]: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2015-July/267109.html -- :: Brandon J. Wandersee :: brandon.wandersee@gmail.com :: -------------------------------------------------- :: 'The best design is as little design as possible.' :: --- Dieter Rams ---------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat May 7 19:09:16 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A1BCB31C94 for ; Sat, 7 May 2016 19:09:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from TERRY@glaver.org) Received: from server.glaver.org (server.glaver.org [204.141.35.63]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67A501340 for ; Sat, 7 May 2016 19:09:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from TERRY@glaver.org) Received: from glaver.org by glaver.org (PMDF V6.6-x12 #37010) id <01PZWE83AJTS004AIV@glaver.org> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 07 May 2016 15:07:40 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 07 May 2016 14:55:48 -0500 (EST) From: Terry Kennedy Subject: "Best" SAMBA version for FreeBSD 10.3-STABLE + ZFS? To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <01PZWENN9ZK4004AIV@glaver.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=us-ascii X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 May 2016 19:09:16 -0000 I will be updating systems from older FreeBSD versions w/ the samba36 port to 10.3-STABLE and a newer SAMBA port. https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/FAQ says "The most recent release is always the recommended version for production use." samba44 just hit the ports tree today, with a commit message of "Port is NOT fully tested, don't use in the production(yet)." As far as I can tell, all of the samba4* ports have the "WARNING! This port is still experimental" note in their README.FreeBSD.in files. Complicating things is that SAMBA is currently serving large ZFS pools (ranging from 32TB to 128TB) to Windows clients. There are various warn- ings about ZFS in the samba4* ports, but they seem to be related to pro- visioning and possibly ZFS-on-root. Is this likely to affect me? Also, what is the status of the "inconsistent directory on rename / delete"? A year or so ago I was following this discussion on the SAMBA lists. It seemed that the prevailing point of view was "your operating system is broken" because FreeBSD doesn't guarantee the same file order when re-traversing a directory after a deletion. Various patches were proposed for this, but I stopped following the discussion before the is- sue got resolved (if it did get resolved). Considering all of the above, what is the current best version for SAMBA deployment on 10.3-STABLE? Should I wait some time and then try samba44? Go with samba43 now? Something else? Terry Kennedy http://www.glaver.org New York, NY USA