From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Sun Mar 27 21:01:14 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E068ADFB24 for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 21:01:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C4891AC8 for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 21:01:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u2RL01Dg072583 for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 21:01:13 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201603272101.u2RL01Dg072583@kenobi.freebsd.org> From: bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org To: freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.org Subject: Problem reports for freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.org that need special attention Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 21:01:13 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 21:01:14 -0000 To view an individual PR, use: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users, which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. Status | Bug Id | Description ------------+-----------+--------------------------------------------------- In Progress | 202321 | [bhyve,patch] More verbose error reporting in bhy New | 202322 | [bhyve,patch] add option to have bhyve write its 2 problems total for which you should take action. From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Mon Mar 28 17:29:56 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFC2FAE1102 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 17:29:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ultima1252@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk0-x233.google.com (mail-vk0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94837117C for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 17:29:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ultima1252@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vk0-x233.google.com with SMTP id e6so164413027vkh.2 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 10:29:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc; bh=X4q0T6VZ/Az3dhXA+x/dmInKnhATxDn44cobSU5f6ZE=; b=TRLaU0YZKLdHgMT5aphriDq5Ohk7H7nW/VWEsAhJl6xknEr5pi0HwM5s4NBOUN/GBs E8QGMahz7XWZfIDyRdoBX/6TY16gPbzn+Ng816xZHKGq4EHnGdret7/EtbOrkzaijyMN e7G6+stdV2HEH5VYP615EdsyIUovgIjgpH6cd8YS5eDjRR7rPZw335rX2Q12egU8Iiyx ZzWaVFJ+nR1DpyAGjMICqsm/LdGQKdDTD7PW4icdya769h6sJQv2Siv2A7yNjjFGae4F 6NMH7nfsbLMvTmgA5VFGpQPbjptvwuJXrqLJMpVCIviK91FgWd6xsErFcp80MEf7b8aG lGZw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:cc; bh=X4q0T6VZ/Az3dhXA+x/dmInKnhATxDn44cobSU5f6ZE=; b=Xhw/LoKX9K/e5nkYHscTes4SH/k8EipkioGKmWXkN+a0PC5RjyxrGcuDO6E9PdLo3K HPoLBb7VhqNr8I1tSv6AHShDUcos8tdj7VlHC0+1kzLlqcDHMHEbPegK57WyUowyaVAi kxV2FJRDXklVyJi/bdWj5qnjYkdss2qFNGQteqkeJGYIISK5Bg6HG4J/jGQPRywzvY9S a28sno65BUEPPW2kw5OyNGIUr15MTk0T/D9dNKChMGPI3QzzRrdkwuDWIDF8Qpr6hIyE J6PJOh+gqWwRI1fTStk4dMUhRkxWqHIeJD9qKdvxkvyL7cMXmkkwRaNCXv8LUlngcMs7 pchw== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJPlJ9C7+4/jShNN7/HnVYhYY+S1MiX7f2ksbi4fF2mVic6YFpX4K8oQYMRMPRuTf9UPMQOh9P2tvlMEw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.31.1.138 with SMTP id 132mt16095849vkb.140.1459186195645; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 10:29:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.31.194.194 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 10:29:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 13:29:55 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: sr-iov issues, reset_hw() failed with error -100 From: Ultima Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 17:29:57 -0000 Recently upgraded to r297351, once running iovctl -C -f /etc/iovctl.conf everything appears to work as it should. The main network interface ramains connected and pinging works fine. iovctl.conf PF { device : ix1; num_vfs : 31; } DEFAULT { passthrough : true; } VF-0 { passthrough : false; } VF-1 { passthrough : false; } Once vf's have been initialized, I have found none-passthrough vf's are unusable. # devctl attach pci0:129:0:129 devctl: Failed to attach pci0:129:0:129: Input/output error The dmesg spits out the same error as before, so it appears that the errors I was mentioning before is actually the none-passthrough vf's attempting to attach, but fails. /var/log/messages: ixv0: at device 0.131 on pci12 ixv0: Using MSIX interrupts with 2 vectors ixv0: ixgbe_reset_hw() failed with error -100 device_attach: ixv0 attach returned 5 ixv0: at device 0.129 on pci12 ixv0: Using MSIX interrupts with 2 vectors ixv0: ixgbe_reset_hw() failed with error -100 device_attach: ixv0 attach returned 5 On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Ultima wrote: > I have been interested in this when I first read about it in 2012. =] > > Can this be done in loader.conf? I have vmm_load="YES" > > I'm not sure if the vf's are usable, I have not actually tested the vf's. > The parent ix1 still shows no response. > > kldunload vmm > > kenv hw.vmm.force_iommu=1 > > kldload vmm > > iovctl -Cf /etc/iovctl.conf > > The same error messages appear, I currently on hmm i'm not sure, I > upgraded with git and it doesn't show rev(last time I use git for > source?) 8b372d1(master) > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Eric Joyner wrote: > >> I don't know if you're still interested in this, but did you do "kenv >> hw.vmm.force_iommu=1" before loading the vmm module? I think that might be >> necessary. >> >> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 5:12 PM Ultima wrote: >> >>> Yeah, still getting the -100 error, I do have sendmail disabled. I just >>> tested with sendmail up and running then add the VF's and it still shows >>> the error message. >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 8:04 PM, Eric Joyner wrote: >>> >>>> Are you still getting the -100 errors when trying to load the VF driver? >>>> >>>> I've tried SR-IOV on a system here, and I can confirm that traffic >>>> stops passing on the PF interface when you create a VF interface. That >>>> didn't used to happen, so I'm investigating why that is right now. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 8:09 AM Ultima wrote: >>>> >>>>> Decided to do some more tests, I actually have a second board with >>>>> sr-iov >>>>> capabilities that I used for awhile with vmware esxi. I decided to test >>>>> this out and unfortunately it won't activate, it is giving the no space >>>>> left on device error message. I double checked bios and all VT-d >>>>> related >>>>> options are enabled and have hw.ix.num_queues="4" in >>>>> /boot/loader.conf. Is >>>>> there anything else that may need to be set? .(It did work on vmware) >>>>> >>>>> For my second test, I moved the X540-AT1 to the board with the >>>>> X540-AT2. >>>>> It functioned with the same issues as the AT2 tho. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I don't think I listed the motherboards in question yet so ill list >>>>> them >>>>> now. >>>>> >>>>> S1200BTLRM - >>>>> >>>>> http://ark.intel.com/products/69633/Intel-Server-Board-S1200BTLRM?q=S1200BTLRM >>>>> MD80-TM0 >>>>> >>>>> - http://b2b.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=5146#ov >>>>> >>>>> I'm not sure if it will be of any help tho. >>>>> >>>>> Ultima >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list >>>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >>>>> freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>>> >>>> >>> > From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Tue Mar 29 13:16:42 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7044EAE1157 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 13:16:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mgamsjager@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ig0-x231.google.com (mail-ig0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 394EE1DAC for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 13:16:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mgamsjager@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ig0-x231.google.com with SMTP id sy18so1462958igc.1 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 06:16:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=gAMV/x3SXEh19x2h/5/ksLNyhp+zGu8crnYZh+0N7ec=; b=FwZ8tuZ+0XX1bNl86lAogACTVvnnwtmuhi5UUOBIxgIsnUsI22ILHEfiCgAfPfo+VL 1QP9Rvm7KRYaXNkRGWsjAWRNPrUKyiowRzYAc1dxN5xmwqLu6zDue6IFGO1jdyY0V5QX QMkmgi2CT1aS30kHPdrzq3k9J4S+UTH7jd9AYyPVsMwv3TVZSBYLb6yy1rKsiVyadKUV HokFc41AE23969rKpwDplofEKDmCy+Uc1i/4TW5zm1VfxHG+Hg4gAyCKh9BiIfsxU0Or CpAavmMKi+JkDRnvZWn0O+PE8MXfRYzchoacJqoPjzuGJvox1ZkgH1bDux3dMfsc6Qz+ BcOg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=gAMV/x3SXEh19x2h/5/ksLNyhp+zGu8crnYZh+0N7ec=; b=EWYjOR/oFnSB1YU/QLTyw00R5RxgMCMVN99nOyDPO71rRI3mswZne1gfBOjx4+QR5U Fa2fQGhyDotG72yJWotdORrc0beiStvY1SFIQxzRQe4D3LXPerQ9CSTrQLzmJRJ49xj6 wHqwt72cWMOAihR8hVRn7ZeHDuhg0IaXqQPxb41MM+Rj/FclVLgfxxzHDwjjlYZZHQGX GuHev0al0va67nv3+zJJCMz999vOTCpT6wHeIC/bWteLJj6jXiABjHBZ2VOS9pGoNNjH bUo2RAh8V7/M6ecOiL1DAvgKOYR4jD6qh/ChasX6pK5RDRrPQih+1+iK+qnuHhTLsTJr fNMw== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIGVPNbnSAn9TGmgEtQC/AJkMuAllRGcvpjgEX8Pcvg2F+FPKVMEnfUs2KqLfBcdbEm7Tn4VagiQhjrkQ== X-Received: by 10.50.131.233 with SMTP id op9mr16439091igb.0.1459257401434; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 06:16:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.176.147 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 06:16:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <550FF03B-3479-4A56-B493-6C29AFEA094E@wimsey.us> References: <550FF03B-3479-4A56-B493-6C29AFEA094E@wimsey.us> From: Matthias Gamsjager Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 15:16:11 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GSoC-Proposal] Porting bhyve on an ARMv8 platform To: "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 13:16:42 -0000 I had always the impression that there are only a hand full of students to take up a task. But I might be wrong at that. so when given the choice of breaking the rule and let someone do it again vs nobody doing it I know that I would pick. On 25 March 2016 at 14:43, David Wimsey wrote: > Because there are other people in the world who want to participate as > well and they deserve a chance too. Not a bad idea for Mihai to try > something different either. > > Its not like they don=E2=80=99t get enough applicants to fill all the slo= ts. > > > > On Mar 25, 2016, at 9:38 AM, Matthias Gamsjager > wrote: > > > > I wonder why this rule even exist? Because apparently projects will not > be > > done which seem a bigger issue when someone participating 3 times > > > > On 25 March 2016 at 11:50, Mihai Carabas > wrote: > > > >> Hi everyone, > >> > >> Unfortunatelly I have to officially retreat my proposal from GSoC due > >> to the fact that I participated three times in the past and they added > >> a new rule this year (you are not allowed to participate as a student > >> if you have been in the program three times already), so I'm not > >> eligible. > >> > >> I apologize to the FreeBSD organization members that manage the GSoC > >> program because I didn't read carefully this year's rules. > >> > >> Thank you, > >> Mihai Carabas > >> > >> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Mihai Carabas < > mihai.carabas@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>> Hi everyone, > >>> > >>> My name is Mihai Carabas and I'm a third year student at PhD in > >>> University POLITEHNICA from Bucharest, Romania. After some discussion= s > >>> with Peter Grehan about next steps in bhyve-arm, I came with a GSoC > >>> proposal for the project "Porting bhyve an an ARMv8 platform" which i= s > >>> publicly available here [1]. Any feedback on the proposal would be > >>> great. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Mihai > >>> > >>> [1] > >> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1t4gQ3bc69Zy5QDq1z50BdVkaniZsy47S-Et-h= JVwEZE/edit?usp=3Dsharing > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list > >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > >> freebsd-virtualization-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-virtualization-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Wed Mar 30 08:44:23 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAEA4AE0014 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 08:44:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from royger@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x243.google.com (mail-wm0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4732718D6 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 08:44:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from royger@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x243.google.com with SMTP id 139so12572836wmn.2 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 01:44:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=pCAl1f4xVM+ERUDAjvB4o7+gYHSDnsM1lnkXNQfwcQ8=; b=P4lIBYRb2HzU66q0UH+8wXL5A/FGmUosZ0aFTbVRwyepB3L7A552TSZc6s+19or95f 7vw/iT4V/GBT75445XKkWEYdH+23zr7vaUqHc/1X1Er16IdIWJGKjcl0xQjk5bBfk7bj 36k0GD4UMM+pdjMtqDFKK2juTrviB57cKT3aKUWcMylR0esCkYD5cCcwqU+alf2kxDy3 nstkbPWh2cKYmMuxueHLMhPiNphinPWzOVe3c7oZ6vuKnS+zdV+mYQTRhFak9QEZ1Hem g7IymB5BzxKRgmDemERoMZhO4L2h5410aa5yAk7LbEwLVNRLpzPiDCj/fnhHNXrvjpvT DO5w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to :message-id:references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=pCAl1f4xVM+ERUDAjvB4o7+gYHSDnsM1lnkXNQfwcQ8=; b=WnA9fNDEyerOnHVO8p8nWty6lc3/sUJFptn6vLjBGmQyR75Bae8MVqcLDJi+6ka305 yd2w6JNrZgtpn4o7chu3hJFFf7FNPpu05ZXruMfYrFeKqKeAK2xrj0+clnpokKpZepDw MUp75NHPwByg2Yo6FByFDJXmZ6q7yNfhWYrEO893ZE/e80e9zN4Es9UqFcJWlMvrDfoa o4FlMpvjhaYyOI8rioZuRmU8YMClLe2dPgOoDEerrugOA960NLbezzIMvblnqYwsDLPb pbTX3rdgGNFPbRpTs9ZmgDcmP1teM7A47lIhZPg/8kQq/l8yux1+AGyWbWyM3W862l0F m9Hg== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLNEVj1gNL5PCcX62uI6XmjrgmbBjr82mrGyqWi8uWUFoYx59JbDTbNIUrZXda/zg== X-Received: by 10.28.35.16 with SMTP id j16mr8577405wmj.78.1459327461926; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 01:44:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mac (83.Red-88-8-243.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net. [88.8.243.83]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 198sm3236177wml.22.2016.03.30.01.44.20 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 30 Mar 2016 01:44:21 -0700 (PDT) Sender: =?UTF-8?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=C3=A9?= Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 10:44:19 +0200 (CEST) From: =?UTF-8?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=C3=A9?= X-X-Sender: royger@mac To: brahmann cc: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/Xen on CURRENT, error: ELF start or entries are out of bounds. In-Reply-To: <56E14066.5080400@lifec0re.net> Message-ID: References: <56E14066.5080400@lifec0re.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (OSX 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 08:44:23 -0000 On Thu, 10 Mar 2016, brahmann wrote: > Hi all. > I'm trying to run XEN on latest current as dom0. > Did all by manual: http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/FreeBSD_Dom0 (except compiling > from git, cant compile tools, so just used ports xen/xen-tools/xen-kernel) > And stuck with such an error: > > --- > (XEN) elf_xen_addr_calc_check: ERROR: ELF start or entries are out of bounds. > Could not set up DOM0 guest OS > --- > > This only drops on console while xen kernel boots, all other strings are OK > according to manual. > Link to photo of speedy console log: http://imgur.com/a5b9CLE > If need details pls ask. > > Please, tell me where to look or what to do or at least guide me in the right > direction. Ed committed the fix to this a couple of days ago, as of r297242 this should be fixed. Roger.