From owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Sun Jul 3 10:54:56 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1685B90343 for ; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 10:54:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fc.opsec.eu (fc.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200:4::4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9E662A3D for ; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 10:54:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@FreeBSD.org) Received: from pi by fc.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1bJf37-0008LX-A7 for freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2016 12:54:53 +0200 Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2016 12:54:53 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: kismet, which cards are supported ? Message-ID: <20160703105453.GT2369@fc.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2016 10:54:57 -0000 Hi! I've just tried to update net-mgmt/kismet, and at least it runs on my laptop, but it does not work on the WLAN interface. I've did this: cd /usr/local/etc vi kismet.conf ncsource=wlan0:type=radiotap_bsd Then it says: BSD interface set media command failed. The drivers for this device may not support radiotap operation. So my questions are: Which devices do support radiotap operation and what is radiotap operation ? -- pi@FreeBSD.org +49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Sun Jul 3 11:15:21 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81163B9069F for ; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 11:15:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from s3erios@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf0-x22e.google.com (mail-lf0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 039A42119; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 11:15:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from s3erios@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id f6so101809814lfg.0; Sun, 03 Jul 2016 04:15:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=to:subject:references:date:cc:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:from:message-id:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=x2GtbBuRkrUMVRhWExPw5RprAVYzXeqNvs3wyUhz70s=; b=nMi7eNd000c9eN1fR8CvyNZDExfmR9xYd0e0cYTvfmITkCHj+ao3xfzxNzJxHwUz8E CJ7iYr18ROtLzPudvl/XIENCo5FK2jBf+yxmouzNLbivuE9sriT1le0hOsnYmwz1LWp5 BfyrwkzK+XFO+1k+WR/mqqXnVlgWm1rNxnkajfM/2utSfA9NvglwIOSX/6aDD3ZL/OOw NsBsDc33ZJF2/5eJRa2l+pClSZLacoUqD5/5hOfOgK/2hTCs/zyhXDFXqVUgkhCUAaJ6 XtNqcUr0Pev91qTYi5Rer6tsmbKlDOQc3h0HxoNF2SZ36g4GNz15hAMDvgbYWLyTZ2mU tmAw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:to:subject:references:date:cc:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:from:message-id:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=x2GtbBuRkrUMVRhWExPw5RprAVYzXeqNvs3wyUhz70s=; b=dGWpThjxp7AJfRTeld4F898FFZc1GRrPcmL5G2/XxXsMe3Lp2AO6UdDpT7qRSNaeyN NXGcOTxCSqOcMArIfc0nOyglSI6sVRhVDg2LtDHtsN5BGIZt9cTDZmOBWGeBf2SkIacs kaQV0qBx97CIuKAK4Mk6hub/t+dpNRL2Y+kyFC3FNhkZ0g8KunsgEAEdDN8F4nZhyAEN Dc7zrfEHi++wNueFuxVxvdUee9Vs4Xx6cAtshqV9dZart+4rr3DBXWms+M667lYj2sPl rlAGMCYf2csiy5zFbFnn4NKiEa6BWrSiIAbgW1rUEwg8PKcKL9S5oa5xjsrbiTQgsqYt dwig== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKiX/x+V9Je0p5LNKygeQSdSWB/kfTsIV28B43Y0LBIZw3HiMOKJ+mmt2SC4ntuvQ== X-Received: by 10.25.154.136 with SMTP id c130mr1702228lfe.87.1467544518307; Sun, 03 Jul 2016 04:15:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (host-176-37-109-22.la.net.ua. [176.37.109.22]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z10sm1427753lfa.47.2016.07.03.04.15.17 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 03 Jul 2016 04:15:17 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: "Kurt Jaeger" Subject: Re: kismet, which cards are supported ? References: <20160703105453.GT2369@fc.opsec.eu> Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2016 14:15:15 +0300 Cc: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable From: "Andriy Voskoboinyk" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20160703105453.GT2369@fc.opsec.eu> User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.16 (FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2016 11:15:21 -0000 Sun, 03 Jul 2016 13:54:53 +0300 =D0=B1=D1=83=D0=BB=D0=BE =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0= =BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=BE Kurt Jaeger : Hi! Automatic mode switching is not supported since r178354; you should = manually create an interface with required mode: ifconfig wlan0 create wlandev wlanmode monitor up or just put this to rc.conf(5): wlans_=3D"wlan2" create_args_wlan2=3D"wlanmode monitor" ifconfig_wlan2=3D"up" > Which devices do support radiotap operation and what is radiotap = > operation ? AFAIK, radiotap(9) support is implemented in all wireless drivers. > Hi! > > I've just tried to update net-mgmt/kismet, and at least it runs > on my laptop, but it does not work on the WLAN interface. I've did thi= s: > > cd /usr/local/etc > vi kismet.conf > ncsource=3Dwlan0:type=3Dradiotap_bsd > > Then it says: > > BSD interface set media command failed. The drivers for this device= = > may > not support radiotap operation. > > So my questions are: > > Which devices do support radiotap operation and what is radiotap = > operation ? From owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Sun Jul 3 13:17:30 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4789DB8F979 for ; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 13:17:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fc.opsec.eu (fc.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200:4::4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D4962E3A; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 13:17:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@FreeBSD.org) Received: from pi by fc.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1bJhH4-0008RF-4a; Sun, 03 Jul 2016 15:17:26 +0200 Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2016 15:17:26 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Andriy Voskoboinyk Cc: Kurt Jaeger , "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: kismet, which cards are supported ? Message-ID: <20160703131726.GV2369@fc.opsec.eu> References: <20160703105453.GT2369@fc.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2016 13:17:30 -0000 Hi! > Automatic mode switching is not supported since r178354; you should > manually create an interface with required mode: > > ifconfig wlan0 create wlandev wlanmode monitor up Thanks. On a laptop with FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE-p4 amd64 and this wlan hardware: iwn0@pci0:2:0:0: class=0x028000 card=0x13118086 chip=0x42398086 rev=0x35 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'Centrino Advanced-N 6200' class = network bar [10] = type Memory, range 64, base 0xf2400000, size 8192, enabled If I do this: ifconfig wlan0 wlanmode monitor this is the error message: ifconfig: wlanmode: bad value So I tested it on another laptop: With this card: wpi0@pci0:3:0:0: class=0x028000 card=0x10118086 chip=0x42278086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'PRO/Wireless 3945ABG [Golan] Network Connection' class = network bar [10] = type Memory, range 32, base 0xdfcff000, size 4096, enabled ifconfig wlan0 create wlandev wpi0 wlanmode monitor up worked, but: Jul 3 15:18:40 xdog kernel: wlan0: permanently promiscuous mode enabled Jul 3 15:18:41 xdog kernel: wpi0: could not set power mode Jul 3 15:18:41 xdog kernel: wpi0: error 35 settting channel Jul 3 15:18:42 xdog kernel: wpi0: wpi_cmd: cmd 119 not sent, busy Jul 3 15:18:42 xdog kernel: wpi0: could not set power mode Jul 3 15:18:42 xdog kernel: wpi0: error 35 settting channel Jul 3 15:18:43 xdog kernel: wpi0: wpi_cmd: cmd 119 not sent, busy Jul 3 15:18:43 xdog kernel: wpi0: could not set power mode Jul 3 15:18:43 xdog kernel: wpi0: error 35 settting channel Jul 3 15:18:44 xdog kernel: wpi0: wpi_cmd: cmd 119 not sent, busy [...] -- pi@FreeBSD.org +49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Sun Jul 3 13:50:33 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07FECB9014D for ; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 13:50:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from s3erios@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf0-x236.google.com (mail-lf0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F9A92953; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 13:50:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from s3erios@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf0-x236.google.com with SMTP id q132so103013045lfe.3; Sun, 03 Jul 2016 06:50:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=to:cc:subject:references:date:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:from:message-id:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=zTeL6DsHW2/q0regcpTkONeXPCNzt8NaQKYz1yoZ3Gc=; b=hIJr4QFdXqFwpTJNi3u4VRAJ6FXtyos/uW0BCXLl0JkU+U4u7NcsCxQssHQjtEJ5YG u8sdkckuTs530F5xKMg6m6lMjPgz1bt9KowhA59Iaj/1lk0/UrcFSZVGvFJqiMpnhGEY tikbI2XkSH2aNaFrjfEugxFtQCiXXx5qEO/QXBL6nWUuoy4WCt27v1dR4vBHA6UTHVC6 BKaEc2VZhXMTUOnEmUNopYNz5yDpyVPJMl+tl18vmJTyW5BBIjcZRE/8iRX8r7V4MTb5 m8M/WZ304fgT39UrfgcRqZ+bny75pPoUyNYipUXHX92ATApaStHrW6hqpJY61ddrg8jZ ZHTg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:to:cc:subject:references:date:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:from:message-id:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=zTeL6DsHW2/q0regcpTkONeXPCNzt8NaQKYz1yoZ3Gc=; b=CGasj3B9M6r1xieYjbL8rhZT3jUBfdGNSBldm/DjIgxdVFw9yTTmhOiYoCh7A4h2Yl kbmBXbjKSKCOmAVHTTvDntNNXde5xYI2VSO4sCuv65ljvaVdgHHcVbgDGmh5c7dy9Fm/ G5iOg39lsC66TjSxLUXxvColVWKqacsEu1MVW0QDHfK3x/jw5ce3MaImzG+1B5iWQImu IGFBxWnh+V9hmgcsWePeRf1FkqUf3bTl1has5ih+QOIgdd/er9Bi5eTaxOCxZpl+Guw6 w4hY1F41Yl0vyUxpf25orNGezMFSgYK/fHYTNgkE8BGiN+RcaHfHw5CgII3HHyTzV+3w i1Lw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIDRQHXvhZ8dVjKYDrQ4sQxy8tVcSzZhtnV2QneJuq7q1O/s/ofEw/PzieuXtgDpw== X-Received: by 10.25.17.210 with SMTP id 79mr1397411lfr.113.1467553830233; Sun, 03 Jul 2016 06:50:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (host-176-37-109-22.la.net.ua. [176.37.109.22]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l79sm1560716lfi.40.2016.07.03.06.50.28 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 03 Jul 2016 06:50:29 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: "Kurt Jaeger" Cc: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: kismet, which cards are supported ? References: <20160703105453.GT2369@fc.opsec.eu> <20160703131726.GV2369@fc.opsec.eu> Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2016 16:50:26 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable From: "Andriy Voskoboinyk" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20160703131726.GV2369@fc.opsec.eu> User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.16 (FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2016 13:50:33 -0000 Sun, 03 Jul 2016 16:17:26 +0300 =D0=B1=D1=83=D0=BB=D0=BE =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0= =BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=BE Kurt Jaeger : > Hi! > >> Automatic mode switching is not supported since r178354; you should >> manually create an interface with required mode: >> >> ifconfig wlan0 create wlandev wlanmode monitor up > > Thanks. On a laptop with > > FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE-p4 amd64 > > and this wlan hardware: > > iwn0@pci0:2:0:0: class=3D0x028000 card=3D0x13118086 chip=3D0x42= 398086 = > rev=3D0x35 > hdr=3D0x00 > vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' > device =3D 'Centrino Advanced-N 6200' > class =3D network > bar [10] =3D type Memory, range 64, base 0xf2400000, size 8192, = = > enabled > > If I do this: > > ifconfig wlan0 wlanmode monitor > > this is the error message: > > ifconfig: wlanmode: bad value wlanmode can be specified only at the creation time; try to destroy the interface first: ifconfig wlan0 down ifconfig wlan0 destroy and, then: ifconfig wlan0 create wlandev iwn0 wlanmode monitor up > > So I tested it on another laptop: > > With this card: > > wpi0@pci0:3:0:0: class=3D0x028000 card=3D0x10118086 chip=3D0x42= 278086 = > rev=3D0x02 hdr=3D0x00 > vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' > device =3D 'PRO/Wireless 3945ABG [Golan] Network Connection' > class =3D network > bar [10] =3D type Memory, range 32, base 0xdfcff000, size 4096, = = > enabled > > > ifconfig wlan0 create wlandev wpi0 wlanmode monitor up > > worked, but: > > Jul 3 15:18:40 xdog kernel: wlan0: permanently promiscuous mode enabl= ed > Jul 3 15:18:41 xdog kernel: wpi0: could not set power mode > Jul 3 15:18:41 xdog kernel: wpi0: error 35 settting channel > Jul 3 15:18:42 xdog kernel: wpi0: wpi_cmd: cmd 119 not sent, busy > Jul 3 15:18:42 xdog kernel: wpi0: could not set power mode > Jul 3 15:18:42 xdog kernel: wpi0: error 35 settting channel > Jul 3 15:18:43 xdog kernel: wpi0: wpi_cmd: cmd 119 not sent, busy > Jul 3 15:18:43 xdog kernel: wpi0: could not set power mode > Jul 3 15:18:43 xdog kernel: wpi0: error 35 settting channel > Jul 3 15:18:44 xdog kernel: wpi0: wpi_cmd: cmd 119 not sent, busy > [...] > There were numerous bugfixes for wpi(4) in 11.0 branch; can you upgrade = to = it? From owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Sun Jul 3 13:55:48 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 343E0B902F3 for ; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 13:55:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fc.opsec.eu (fc.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200:4::4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E41F52BC6; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 13:55:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@FreeBSD.org) Received: from pi by fc.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1bJhs7-000Btv-Qx; Sun, 03 Jul 2016 15:55:43 +0200 Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2016 15:55:43 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Andriy Voskoboinyk Cc: Kurt Jaeger , "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: kismet, which cards are supported ? Message-ID: <20160703135543.GW2369@fc.opsec.eu> References: <20160703105453.GT2369@fc.opsec.eu> <20160703131726.GV2369@fc.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2016 13:55:48 -0000 Hi! > wlanmode can be specified only at the creation time; > try to destroy the interface first: > > ifconfig wlan0 down > ifconfig wlan0 destroy > > and, then: > > ifconfig wlan0 create wlandev iwn0 wlanmode monitor up This worked on the laptop with the iwn0 interface! I'm surprised it was possible to destroy wlan0, but it worked! Thanks very much! -- pi@FreeBSD.org +49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Sun Jul 3 20:16:45 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 053C2B9071C for ; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 20:16:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D142924E7 for ; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 20:16:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u63KGi6h004446 for ; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 20:16:44 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 210799] if_bwi broken Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2016 20:16:44 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: wireless X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: josla972@student.liu.se X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2016 20:16:45 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D210799 Bug ID: 210799 Summary: if_bwi broken Product: Base System Version: 10.3-RELEASE Hardware: ppc OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: wireless Assignee: freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.org Reporter: josla972@student.liu.se After I upgraded from FreeBSD 9.0 to 10.3-RELEASE on my Mac Mini G4, I found that "kldload if_bwi" would make the system unstable, and if I included it = to be loaded in loader.conf, I could not even boot. This used to work just fin= e. Digging through the commits the bwi folder of the git clone of freebsd, I f= ound the issue: commit ad311f67aaa6771c007f5046d032924146784a23 Author: mav Date: Tue Apr 21 11:27:50 2015 +0000 MFC r280347: Remove MAXBSIZE use from drivers where it has nothing to d= o. In some cases limits are just not needed, in others -- DFLTPHYS is the right constant to use instead. diff --git a/sys/dev/bwi/if_bwi.c b/sys/dev/bwi/if_bwi.c index 911e49e..6ce433c1 100644 --- a/sys/dev/bwi/if_bwi.c +++ b/sys/dev/bwi/if_bwi.c @@ -1915,7 +1915,7 @@ bwi_dma_alloc(struct bwi_softc *sc) lowaddr, /* lowaddr */ BUS_SPACE_MAXADDR, /* highaddr */ NULL, NULL, /* filter, filterar= g */ - MAXBSIZE, /* maxsize */ + BUS_SPACE_MAXSIZE, /* maxsize */ BUS_SPACE_UNRESTRICTED, /* nsegments */ BUS_SPACE_MAXSIZE_32BIT, /* maxsegsize */ BUS_DMA_ALLOCNOW, /* flags */ Reverting this commit made the system stable, if_bwi started working, and I could boot again. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Sun Jul 3 22:42:03 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49B8CB90894 for ; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 22:42:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 333102FE0 for ; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 22:42:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u63Mg34I023288 for ; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 22:42:03 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 210799] if_bwi broken Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2016 22:42:03 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: wireless X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: adrian@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2016 22:42:03 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D210799 Adrian Chadd changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |adrian@freebsd.org --- Comment #1 from Adrian Chadd --- * Can you try bwn on -HEAD and see if it works? I fixed a whole bunch of is= sues and I'd like to move things ot use it. * Is this okay: Index: sys/dev/bwi/if_bwi.c =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D --- sys/dev/bwi/if_bwi.c (revision 302306) +++ sys/dev/bwi/if_bwi.c (working copy) @@ -1899,7 +1899,7 @@ lowaddr, /* lowaddr */ BUS_SPACE_MAXADDR, /* highaddr */ NULL, NULL, /* filter, filterar= g */ - BUS_SPACE_MAXSIZE, /* maxsize */ + 65536, /* maxsize */ BUS_SPACE_UNRESTRICTED, /* nsegments */ BUS_SPACE_MAXSIZE_32BIT, /* maxsegsize */ 0, /* flags */ --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Mon Jul 4 20:01:06 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50A6BB91213 for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2016 20:01:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40D7F25B7 for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2016 20:01:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u64K1660007904 for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2016 20:01:06 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 210799] if_bwi broken Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2016 20:01:06 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: wireless X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: josla972@student.liu.se X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2016 20:01:06 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D210799 --- Comment #2 from josla972@student.liu.se --- I guess you mean bwi and not bwn? I am not sure if I can build the HEAD ver= sion of the module and run it on my 10.3-RELEASE system, but if that it possible= I could give it a go. Regarding your patch submission, if you are asking me, I would personally prefer a define with a proper name. If MAXBSIZE is a no-go, then perhaps DFLTPHYS is better as suggested by mav. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Mon Jul 4 20:03:01 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9C85B9132C for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2016 20:03:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA1462790 for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2016 20:03:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u64K31Z6034254 for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2016 20:03:01 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 210799] if_bwi broken Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2016 20:03:01 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: wireless X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: adrian@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2016 20:03:01 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D210799 --- Comment #3 from Adrian Chadd --- Yeah, but those defines are to do with physical IO for disks, not for vario= us network cards. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Mon Jul 4 20:23:32 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8023AB91749 for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2016 20:23:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6366C2F99 for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2016 20:23:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u64KNWwi075234 for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2016 20:23:32 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 210799] if_bwi broken Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2016 20:23:32 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: wireless X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: josla972@student.liu.se X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2016 20:23:32 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D210799 --- Comment #4 from josla972@student.liu.se --- 65536 is better than the current (broken) state. I think we should ask mav since he seems to have a strong opinion on define names ;). --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Mon Jul 4 21:28:16 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C6CEB919E2 for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2016 21:28:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CBC62FFC for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2016 21:28:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u64LSFA7056257 for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2016 21:28:16 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 210799] if_bwi broken Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2016 21:28:15 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: wireless X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: avos@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2016 21:28:16 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D210799 Andriy Voskoboinyk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |avos@freebsd.org --- Comment #5 from Andriy Voskoboinyk --- Hi! Try to apply fix from r283636 (there was similar issue with ndis(4)). --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=