From owner-freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Thu Nov 2 14:35:15 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 538B9E5B62A for ; Thu, 2 Nov 2017 14:35:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agapon@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pg0-f48.google.com (mail-pg0-f48.google.com [74.125.83.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31F0680E0A for ; Thu, 2 Nov 2017 14:35:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agapon@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id s2so5284793pge.10 for ; Thu, 02 Nov 2017 07:35:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PhD8FvbHMgmji/jYfbAMJLo7Pextvs3vG3pE/X2aehk=; b=KOWh+23gE2pOXLBjvAskUdNPdfSR1nrK+Dr4JatTk6E1a71PHetesVHqkM9Gtfow7F HrkjASbXjO9mvmGScEEqBHupmiS0rhdXRYafbDqzUbxk0djws7z+r/9WwRNH8bZGYbM1 fh8rL3T2EXZv/6Bl8wMzRVA0NBMtYFu33yRZeWIlGUB2jxrcRi0IyFHgi8An2+mXpkXs Qc4mrYwTQIr9goQfMNnKa1RDGn012YQ2NGOYuF6D9dNAZ1lMNPOJ4yYnKjVg+7R/OHI9 P8mGIAoGzVe6Byy8I2QpcZ+wRKZr9QXrhMshOLBETbZq8kL2NDsYl2OKQkdcd8nDZvxD 35Tg== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaUrmyrlrFqAcRsr/01KdgtYwge+SYtPNKW565j80q07/c8d7UQy 4cfY0HOhROqAIF6CqbPqNuqrFk5a X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+T8qjslNnnIL+nqUXowK32+4i6nvyHkAj2OgvQSxDNu4RioYofkp7RHTyCZ4D0Oiuq6pTwfVA== X-Received: by 10.99.43.71 with SMTP id r68mr3871869pgr.348.1509633308380; Thu, 02 Nov 2017 07:35:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.88] (east.meadow.volia.net. [93.72.151.96]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id f3sm5817445pgn.91.2017.11.02.07.35.06 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 02 Nov 2017 07:35:07 -0700 (PDT) To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org From: Andriy Gapon Subject: g_retaste -> g_retaste_event -> g_wither_geom ?? Message-ID: <66fcf6d9-5dd0-d598-11e2-3980c1e397a1@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 16:35:04 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2017 14:35:15 -0000 I wonder why g_retaste_event() directly calls g_wither_geom() on a geom (of the class that we want do the tasting) that is attached to a provider that can be re-tasted. Would it be more appropriate to call the geom's orphan method? Any ideas? Thank you. -- Andriy Gapon