Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 14:33:39 +0330 From: mokhi <mokhi64@gmail.com> To: freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org Subject: C11 conformance of casinl-like functions. Message-ID: <CAByVWPUvbG78nUoxQQAOTTY9dJa1agjCZo9oO3dShv2U8Q=y0A@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi. I recently saw bunch of PRs opened about C11 lack of conformance in FreeBSD on Bugzilla, complaining cosinl, acosinl, ... not implemented. I've searched about these and I found documents about them too[2][3]. Do you think we should implement them? Or standards doesn't have suggestions on these? If yes (you think we should implement them), would you suggest simply `strong aliasing symbols of FUNC_l to FUNC`? or implementing FUNC_l from scratch? I've made some patch based on my idea of aliasing symbols, If you agree I like to work on this and probably can start a review on phabricator for that. Thanks and best wishes, Mokhi. ========================================== [2] https://www.gnu.org/software/gnulib/manual/gnulib.html [3] http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/casinhl.html and many more like this on opengroup.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAByVWPUvbG78nUoxQQAOTTY9dJa1agjCZo9oO3dShv2U8Q=y0A>