From owner-freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org Sat Nov 18 14:58:50 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-numerics@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C4C6DBD15F for ; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 14:58:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dimpase@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf0-x241.google.com (mail-lf0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E16E3729DF for ; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 14:58:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dimpase@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf0-x241.google.com with SMTP id m1so5652381lfj.9 for ; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 06:58:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=aoCrDZezyw28qbEiFSI7kP0GnzV8OkiEO1DhEmi6nNA=; b=P4zFCLq+IZUM1BDYNuLesQjqjNHZXvR8xGsvdqPSkNt1XBl1x8TdmeHrlDvpFpLfAa djCvJLDrx/D6gf8F/hb/F5OB1SSBfqvhJACa5I/lP/9Hjbh2bKAulITV0rGzlQgPTqby jQW9iys7UoL5j8ldktBqOsSuh/VG/EB1fLjpTjs5wAwUBVVJ3D6p/hpPSY84Py0w1QCv pFWU2gBKA2Uhe5f+rAQs3QgpJAQFdk8XFFkbmy+7VNZSt/VqCTEdUkNsnn2jkF2DhYVY kH7sjxyFB3tUE57TngwPF15uq88XV6jAue/3aBt0+1ZXs5CaRZh8NzjkvOxowAIReoY4 xCNA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=aoCrDZezyw28qbEiFSI7kP0GnzV8OkiEO1DhEmi6nNA=; b=lfaAIIq6GvoLjps4gmuSx4tfGjdCe2egIkgtBoRZ+16Wh+AySyxrIEEMFcJ4CcUXjp 1rM8BO2xhqculn08jQmP84EvsvMHzJsZOwf6BFVfLnI/DOfhMJGnF7TOWiDdSlvABBSw xMuIxO0MIG7LvSoYY3QeGoeMANieIvbzsi3I7wp3W6O9ErJnYYRUpy2M+xH4HZeXSo3F HJwjWFvCjh9xbYw7ygJ+neoWlVw8eatqFKt7XaepNaQ1F/CK8uL/3m8y/iDdZie+TcNZ jmanclTM2iq48PXIOZfWa3jEQlHSQmZpTleWtKYCupcTdJTlMB3VdPrz9BjBqL6k+1X1 nwkw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX6FX46vvVCiqtw7tpvPGj/ZsZT0b8pQyQy4XJIjNOgs7ap2ZHHz +/MPA9VCL+Ws/mgNAwX651kQPyceKQNQG3AuHdA8bQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMZBkP2UCpTc7fpcaOqZWxfgz72cGG82yWxZL23vy0mk1sNT/1Ml2rGnXAPCDtqaQSlmOJUx7ssMoayqtwYy5a8= X-Received: by 10.25.0.149 with SMTP id 143mr1710941lfa.206.1511017127180; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 06:58:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.46.4.129 with HTTP; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 06:58:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20171109012259.GA6402@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20171106194937.GA87725@freebird> <20171106204121.GB37361@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20171106213308.GA73787@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20171108061501.GA51059@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20171108150302.GA53567@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20171109012259.GA6402@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> From: Dima Pasechnik Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 14:58:46 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: cpow and clog To: Steve Kargl Cc: "Montgomery-Smith, Stephen" , Eitan Adler , "freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of high quality implementation of libm functions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 14:58:50 -0000 On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 1:22 AM, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 07:03:02AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 11:00:40AM +0000, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> > >> > A patch not tagged by a version control system surely rots very quickly, >> > as noone except the submitter knows the exact state of the source tree it >> > is made against, especially if the tree is also not under a revision >> > control system. >> > And surely the submitter's memory is not perfect, either. >> >> The patch is against trunk on the day it was submitted. >> The patch was created under the officical revision control >> system used by FreeBSD. Sorry, I have overlooked "revision" field in bugzilla patch, my bad. Can this be committed now? Thanks, Dima >> > > I just updated my patch in bugzilla. > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216863 > > I have no idea what Dima's problems were with the original > patch that was attached to bugzilla as I applied that > patch to up-to-date trunk without issue. > > svn info > Path: . > Working Copy Root Path: /usr/home/kargl/freebsd/src > URL: svn+ssh://kargl@svn.freebsd.org/base/head > Relative URL: ^/head > Repository Root: svn+ssh://kargl@svn.freebsd.org/base > Repository UUID: ccf9f872-aa2e-dd11-9fc8-001c23d0bc1f > Revision: 325568 > > HTH > > -- > Steve > 20170425 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWUpyCsUKR4 > 20161221 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IbCHE-hONow From owner-freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org Sat Nov 18 17:48:46 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-numerics@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16DE6DC06A4 for ; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 17:48:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "troutmask", Issuer "troutmask" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA1F3772A5 for ; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 17:48:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id vAIHZLqF075779 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 18 Nov 2017 09:35:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id vAIHZLj5075778; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 09:35:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 09:35:21 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: Dima Pasechnik Cc: "Montgomery-Smith, Stephen" , Eitan Adler , "freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: cpow and clog Message-ID: <20171118173521.GA75757@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Reply-To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu References: <20171106194937.GA87725@freebird> <20171106204121.GB37361@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20171106213308.GA73787@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20171108061501.GA51059@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20171108150302.GA53567@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20171109012259.GA6402@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) X-BeenThere: freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of high quality implementation of libm functions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 17:48:46 -0000 On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 02:58:46PM +0000, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 1:22 AM, Steve Kargl > wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 07:03:02AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 11:00:40AM +0000, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > >> > > >> > A patch not tagged by a version control system surely rots very quickly, > >> > as noone except the submitter knows the exact state of the source tree it > >> > is made against, especially if the tree is also not under a revision > >> > control system. > >> > And surely the submitter's memory is not perfect, either. > >> > >> The patch is against trunk on the day it was submitted. > >> The patch was created under the officical revision control > >> system used by FreeBSD. > > Sorry, I have overlooked "revision" field in bugzilla patch, my bad. > Can this be committed now? > IMO, yes. -- Steve