From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mon Jul 17 09:54:18 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DF28D6DF1E for ; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 09:54:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vlad-fbsd@acheronmedia.com) Received: from mx.irealone.hr (mx.irealone.hr [IPv6:2a01:4f8:212:2d90::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA34E7EBF1 for ; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 09:54:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vlad-fbsd@acheronmedia.com) Received: by mx.irealone.hr (Postfix, from userid 58) id 14DC37FAA; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 11:54:07 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on postfix.xoth.irealone.hr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from mail.irealone.com (unknown [10.0.0.10]) by mx.irealone.hr (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFC577FA6 for ; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 11:54:06 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 11:54:06 +0200 From: "Vlad K." To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: stack_guard hardening bsdinstall option in STABLE and 11.1 Organization: Acheron Media Message-ID: X-Sender: vlad-fbsd@acheronmedia.com User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 09:54:18 -0000 Hello list, the stack_guard hardening option in bsdinstall is now setting 512 pages of it in CURRENT, as of r320674. It's said to MFC after 1 day (on Jul 5th), but STABLE hasn't got it yet. Is this simply an omission (understandable as the RELEASE is being prepared so things are a bit hectic I guess), or is there another reason? Can we assume that in 11.1 the sysctl is integer and can we safely set >1 number of pages, say 512 like the installer in CURRENT suggests? Thanks! -- Vlad K.