From owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Mon Sep 11 01:20:17 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 974D3E0F992 for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 01:20:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-x235.google.com (mail-yw0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52A8668B17 for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 01:20:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-yw0-x235.google.com with SMTP id s62so18652536ywg.0 for ; Sun, 10 Sep 2017 18:20:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GqzFbrjBg7Cefrw2+0Fzdm+YVhQnhNc0yiOhApOGu7k=; b=bUikYDo4Qa/ox/VBsFgvDTiP4fu5AuusmgmwWFv7Yacuxv/Q6c6EFQa9l6rZ5L8Vo2 YBRF1j0Stk7gzwmTzCmozMWf/b8Yrhlvy6dJdSKGXELlFX5QgfaFNl8JEB5sBu8J6gAg GpUdUmqrdxmJRL9Kes5oMCLNRSfATJKy4mOckFX+J1RSepktcIMSBVtr/iuEvrCzi0V8 hrJdMyYpS0fOqiidwREygAbQURgidPJPcOjHm8LMhaRndUK5m29ehniQqC7GY58H06St ZYZAvSMYbnDggkb9vpQuc4HDOPvCEzqbrzjV5ZLdeLk20Uc93o7FdDCFceiEM0tXK45W 5AXg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GqzFbrjBg7Cefrw2+0Fzdm+YVhQnhNc0yiOhApOGu7k=; b=eDQGNNnYi6Rn1pioLQAtvGZUl0zN0qDHr+IMSTRF2sMcsSMjaHdSvrgFlXa8NbuLQS u+xlFbSMhwOM6wDlkX2XyTxKtSgpdx8LBSvFSkRmp24KeSh1PC0RXrtzgaDdqfKK9ntb czIVZPXVvVu+NnP8p6Yv/8CvGiHQZ+bhLhfqjQQ2zE2oYdL3/3SJ9+0wDHXvRI68DSDe m1wbjFRMZJp3YER8kZ0WJTrvKnbTJNjB4BqJ1s2G6sjaOxVBPoJXO+SIkFibJnJt1Po4 aa6LVgiQD++LW48e5eSu75+li7P5wgfrsaFkokv8lNIj/571vadPzNAyUrbdA3yE+Xye 2RBg== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUji52J77pqAUnE37TGjJmbhIQk24C3Lfx0JDBIQolXKNpZXsS3K GQDewwX1+ucD940n+D+LbjHpxJT4i1V5 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QC3tCHHf5x4aYRNqDsd4ETQYayn4vi4bRPT3Y7OchfFac+UEfYpn2QlV8m6rxDBX+rOv/L5XZr6d3njip1mppE= X-Received: by 10.37.128.6 with SMTP id m6mr3252017ybk.73.1505092815899; Sun, 10 Sep 2017 18:20:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.13.223.78 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Sep 2017 18:20:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Adrian Chadd Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2017 18:20:15 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Good board/router for testing TDMA? To: Goo Gle Cc: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 01:20:17 -0000 Hi, No, the single chip wifi SoCs aren't AR9280. It skipped those. -a On 8 September 2017 at 16:14, Goo Gle wrote: > Hi Adrian, > > Oh, I see. I'll look for some Intel based board with mPCIe. Maybe the > Minnowboard Turbot, Up Squared or the AMD based PC Engines boards Ruben > mentioned (thank you!). > > Since I'm still researching, I'd still like to continue searching for a > single SoC solution as well. Do you know of any SoCs that're AR9280 based? > > Thank you! > Alana > > On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Adrian Chadd > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I recommend experimenting with some intel CPU thing with mini-pcie and >> a mini-pcie AR9280. >> >> AR9331 is AR9380 based, so it won't work righ tnow, sorry! >> >> >> >> -a >> >> >> On 8 September 2017 at 10:58, Goo Gle wrote: >> > Hi Adrian, >> > >> > Thank you for the advice! Do you know of any boards that use the AR9280 >> > or >> > is it recommended to find a supported host board and install an AR9280 >> > mPCIe >> > card into it? >> > >> > I found the following pages: >> > https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-wifi-build/wiki/Carambola2 >> > http://shop.8devices.com/wifi4things/carambola2-DVK >> > >> > This board seems to be supported and can be purchased. However, it only >> > supports the 2.4 GHz band. Other than that, it seems great: >> > - Single AR9331 SoC that can run FreeBSD with built-in Wi-Fi. >> > - GPIO since I hope to control some switches from the board as well. >> > >> > Do you have experience with this board or do you know of anything >> > similar >> > that also supports 5 GHz? >> > >> > Thank you, >> > Alana >> > >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Adrian Chadd >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> hi! >> >> >> >> For now, stick with AR9280 devices. AR9380 and later doesn't work well >> >> due to chip design :( >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -adrian >> >> >> >> >> >> On 7 September 2017 at 20:42, Goo Gle wrote: >> >> > Hello, >> >> > >> >> > I'd like to test some long distance Wi-Fi links (a few kilometers) >> >> > and >> >> > heard that FreeBSD has built-in support for TDMA which enables these >> >> > types >> >> > of links. I'm admittedly new to FreeBSD and would like to know what's >> >> > a >> >> > good board/router that's well supported by FreeBSD. Something >> >> > relatively >> >> > cheap and supports at least 802.11n (both 2.4 and 5 GHz) would be >> >> > great! >> >> > I'm based in USA if it affects availability. >> >> > >> >> > Thank you, >> >> > Alana >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list >> >> > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless >> >> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> >> > "freebsd-wireless-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > >> > > > From owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Mon Sep 11 18:51:10 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32C91E1CFCF for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 18:51:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gsync2@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf0-x235.google.com (mail-lf0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92BE66D8BB for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 18:51:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gsync2@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf0-x235.google.com with SMTP id q132so20826587lfe.5 for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 11:51:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=0H1nfDCfpp5gE05iwAP8ppRbSzLJQ3Ppz4KKCL9/0DM=; b=PnqirhTfLpBOJnHXF+WFzZFQhq6qTHwVQJLStGw0azAmlgS+1GCuI76xJT79PWOGhl OW8rpgj8j0CKq/GLKmX4lDVB6Y5I9tTafOsz7ohMYW+q/anwup2+7jS5ECQfAcY4NAhX dPYTCwL7P4S7NkZ9zfQRJRrldemd2cRVTtHbG4NbnlgbyBPuQSkdW4OkbQ6ZRad51TUR B2OtiJfuI3gGBE2SN9A7DQE8xTmNRjP9gWwf7gDZ9AdA40h/kXPHLsC/ZF01KyLuesen N0xAwdoOA+RaNAEf6ZLGKN3me2pcQTKPedFHdSUmMITpC0RbsdBAnB6cSiTdrdPIjplI Dbvw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0H1nfDCfpp5gE05iwAP8ppRbSzLJQ3Ppz4KKCL9/0DM=; b=UTkgc+l0rpV6PeVft3w24oE5bDyAaH/IRuDWzq9TM1KQz3LbxUosRaEbXByyfHrOUm 7uJby9sLzZEtkprdyvcFbHqjBxD1sFbqdSuJPuAfc1yLY8CZOuQThzDHfuV6AndpqHEG rZMEjoF6XykBz5iuU48Xx3Z47hP5YR3+ePsKYvkICJyBWQ8HHMzkhZqyj8VlWdlT/mrS FvlK+LpSZWWy4WvyzMhzSL+5gFRw4sMsHYAlrcGdzDldlJfa0yu0Uzwnvcz2qyDdt5B3 lWujWuiRWVtxAk7yuRcFXKhBShf1uG0YJwYua5ca0Qf4+wiC6Fn6P+Ux7DuquO4otgZG riHQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUiXJEEQ69ygSiExugV7TPnTJ+Lp7LF3ski5LT7T4LPz6yVroDpm 6PVLu5aY1fFRcj0grVB9ZRtVnEfYFg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QAHjQilI9PNIA7JhYfPGI3UPcVHW7C03VjgY3Dl34zIKPqU9+Ii+MwPY1JDAqcW5KJnDMDGXiHkxhEApIR6C28= X-Received: by 10.25.26.130 with SMTP id a124mr3647559lfa.28.1505155867722; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 11:51:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.142.20 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 11:51:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Goo Gle Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 11:51:07 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Good board/router for testing TDMA? To: Adrian Chadd Cc: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 18:51:10 -0000 Hi Adrian, Oh I see. Thank you. I guess I'll see if I can find cheaper x86 boards. Otherwise, I'll go with the previously recommended PC Engines boards. Thank you for all the help! -Alana On Sunday, September 10, 2017, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Hi, > > No, the single chip wifi SoCs aren't AR9280. It skipped those. > > -a > > > On 8 September 2017 at 16:14, Goo Gle > > wrote: > > Hi Adrian, > > > > Oh, I see. I'll look for some Intel based board with mPCIe. Maybe the > > Minnowboard Turbot, Up Squared or the AMD based PC Engines boards Ruben > > mentioned (thank you!). > > > > Since I'm still researching, I'd still like to continue searching for a > > single SoC solution as well. Do you know of any SoCs that're AR9280 > based? > > > > Thank you! > > Alana > > > > On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Adrian Chadd > > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I recommend experimenting with some intel CPU thing with mini-pcie and > >> a mini-pcie AR9280. > >> > >> AR9331 is AR9380 based, so it won't work righ tnow, sorry! > >> > >> > >> > >> -a > >> > >> > >> On 8 September 2017 at 10:58, Goo Gle > > wrote: > >> > Hi Adrian, > >> > > >> > Thank you for the advice! Do you know of any boards that use the > AR9280 > >> > or > >> > is it recommended to find a supported host board and install an AR9280 > >> > mPCIe > >> > card into it? > >> > > >> > I found the following pages: > >> > https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-wifi-build/wiki/Carambola2 > >> > http://shop.8devices.com/wifi4things/carambola2-DVK > >> > > >> > This board seems to be supported and can be purchased. However, it > only > >> > supports the 2.4 GHz band. Other than that, it seems great: > >> > - Single AR9331 SoC that can run FreeBSD with built-in Wi-Fi. > >> > - GPIO since I hope to control some switches from the board as well. > >> > > >> > Do you have experience with this board or do you know of anything > >> > similar > >> > that also supports 5 GHz? > >> > > >> > Thank you, > >> > Alana > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Adrian Chadd > > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> hi! > >> >> > >> >> For now, stick with AR9280 devices. AR9380 and later doesn't work > well > >> >> due to chip design :( > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -adrian > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On 7 September 2017 at 20:42, Goo Gle > wrote: > >> >> > Hello, > >> >> > > >> >> > I'd like to test some long distance Wi-Fi links (a few kilometers) > >> >> > and > >> >> > heard that FreeBSD has built-in support for TDMA which enables > these > >> >> > types > >> >> > of links. I'm admittedly new to FreeBSD and would like to know > what's > >> >> > a > >> >> > good board/router that's well supported by FreeBSD. Something > >> >> > relatively > >> >> > cheap and supports at least 802.11n (both 2.4 and 5 GHz) would be > >> >> > great! > >> >> > I'm based in USA if it affects availability. > >> >> > > >> >> > Thank you, > >> >> > Alana > >> >> > _______________________________________________ > >> >> > freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list > >> >> > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless > >> >> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >> >> > "freebsd-wireless-unsubscribe@freebsd.org " > >> > > >> > > > > > > From owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Fri Sep 15 01:13:56 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E5E0E19F1D for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 01:13:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CE5371E12 for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 01:13:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v8F1Dt7V042619 for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 01:13:56 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 219865] [Regulatory] 2.4Ghz ETSI max power too high Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 01:13:55 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: wireless X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: emaste@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 01:13:56 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D219865 Ed Maste changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |emaste@freebsd.org --- Comment #1 from Ed Maste --- Bugzilla does not want to show the patch correctly; can you paste it inline? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Fri Sep 15 08:46:40 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 601EEE07DA4 for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 08:46:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DBA98279A for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 08:46:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v8F8keCI031057 for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 08:46:40 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 219865] [Regulatory] 2.4Ghz ETSI max power too high Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 08:46:40 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: wireless X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: valentin.vergez@stormshield.eu X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.isobsolete attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 08:46:40 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D219865 valentin.vergez@stormshield.eu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #183330|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #2 from valentin.vergez@stormshield.eu --- Created attachment 186408 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D186408&action= =3Dedit Change ETSI 2.4GHz maxpower from 30dBm to 20dBm in /etc/regdomain.xml It was probably due to the xml extension, I just re-uploaded the patch with another name. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=