From owner-svn-src-all@freebsd.org Sun Dec 10 00:17:06 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89666E9D3A5; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 00:17:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B3C07B71C; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 00:17:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (unknown [192.168.55.3]) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9C4527374; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 00:17:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id vBA0H3kC073339 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 10 Dec 2017 00:17:04 GMT (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: (from phk@localhost) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id vBA0H312073338; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 00:17:03 GMT (envelope-from phk) To: Warner Losh cc: Mark Johnston , Andriy Gapon , src-committers , svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r326731 - head/sys/ufs/ffs In-reply-to: From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" References: <201712091544.vB9FiVUI096790@repo.freebsd.org> <20171209223713.GA15275@raichu> <73189.1512862030@critter.freebsd.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <73336.1512865023.1@critter.freebsd.dk> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 00:17:03 +0000 Message-ID: <73337.1512865023@critter.freebsd.dk> X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 00:17:06 -0000 -------- In message , Warner Losh writes: >That would be strange given that BIO_ORDERED is @gibbs baby ? > >Nah... I wrote the iosched code... and I find the concept somewhat flawed >since it is at the disk level, not the partition level, so it winds up >interfering with mixed traffic. And it really only makes sense for writes= , >but it affects reads. And it is a poor fit to Ata semantics, and not a lo= t >better for scsi. And for nvme it creates a bottleneck in hardware careful= ly >designed to be free of bottlenecks... Don't take my comment as an endorsement of BIO_ORDERED... I think ordering is strictly a consumer responsibility for exactly (and then some) of the reasons you mention. "End to end principle in systems design" and all that... -- = Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe = Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence= .