From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Apr 29 03:11:29 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D07AFC25F4 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 03:11:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xxjack12xx@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wr0-x22e.google.com (mail-wr0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A945871CAB for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 03:11:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xxjack12xx@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wr0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id q3-v6so5043106wrj.6 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2018 20:11:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XGZpBeBk9R0eMo6QfQp2yXfUv8sb5Fs+Z6TVepDKRig=; b=iWJbHMQwAkPgs+r4vVPcdOf4UGh9QyOCQsde2vWOh9tP/uwRlDhZVbwVVWJFHXlJAy x6oMVbBHfc8o0+oO+yDrer0ANnrfJvRekYatB5O8ts7RWLqhfwHT5R/dtEza940pfZ8g GO085wrd20+8GKptLBcyWxaZHfIUTl8i/QQqwJO8+K7t64M8DfrA3lN98eCWNq8Wx4gC 7mCgp3Y8EvjkOehY1IkQkB4yk2Ht4M108uhHscPTsEZfS9+p+fsXMhxbZzM11PgDYcqA px6g/7lgy7swsS0CBupnyLFfk+L8eTEwzjOWEMLbtVWrbiw7CSDuS7dwPMABnhoKCDjT dAmg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XGZpBeBk9R0eMo6QfQp2yXfUv8sb5Fs+Z6TVepDKRig=; b=WqmcwobROajpVud2gMXoUwKcUxz01ezYo6LO+SV1NFCItJV+Pa/+7yb7ozgqJbcBoE Dind7RoD4VmlF7hD+nLwzgGRsW9rrwYH3WerbCDXYwcLKNGrHsM/av+AXo4X/+SgdAWi bGPFykHaWULavgoTOvNEeN0oUiZsyxXGVwWKdEhiI7Bpna+8XJxiw5xrIpefDWyjxCDB +0fXCvBI+hxnOT2AkvbEQZu/Yy4Fq/dXOEFZVY0Hb+E6nva86xEPv5+wlu2VWZcOgQPs t/qf/TxEP1r9zPghNAtmfhM//MPNSuzYINk18xLYvoSxCOyXEQb6ro1Bteiu2WAfTpYJ uhMQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tBxuvc4it7RO9hO33qeFG8zNV+3uk/cAwqXSjCeVgVAWU3fQDO8 oe/j/LNq0+NvZRtXLM8IRocS6PX4071/NcaIrCM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZoyFOWZ1dvGTIhqjljF5KV9+oXD5ji2yP2Us7+0TAuoes9Bnun+8bdgeH2TN/mU8zzhbh++LaFKL8pfVH/QMOg= X-Received: by 2002:adf:9d15:: with SMTP id k21-v6mr5187134wre.213.1524971487539; Sat, 28 Apr 2018 20:11:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.171.232 with HTTP; Sat, 28 Apr 2018 20:10:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: "Jack L." Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2018 20:10:47 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How does a port require another to be built with a certain option? To: Dan Mahoney Cc: FBSD Ports Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2018 03:11:29 -0000 Maybe pkg-message? The port audacity I maintain also has the same problem with soundtouch having to be built a certain way also which I'd like to know how to handle as well. On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:49 PM, Dan Mahoney wrote: > All, > > I'm trying to make a port for Paul Wouters' hash-slinger tool. It requires > unbound built with the python bindings. > > If I understand correctly, the way this would need to happen is that there > would need to be a "flavor" of dns/unbound that includes python (now that > flavors are a thing). > > Worse, since it's python, I think this would result in two different > flavors. > > How does one specify that flavor as a dependency? > > Meta-question: Is it worth creating multiple flavors for this? > > -Dan > > -- > > --------Dan Mahoney-------- > Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek > Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC > FB: fb.com/DanielMahoneyIV > LI: linkedin.com/in/gushi > Site: http://www.gushi.org > --------------------------- > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Apr 29 07:51:18 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09146FA4544 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 07:51:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD2EA6C0BC for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 07:51:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 6BC00FA4540; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 07:51:17 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A770FA453F for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 07:51:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B18066C089 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 07:51:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (portscout.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8D93182D2 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 07:51:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w3T7pFNs014933 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 07:51:15 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w3T7pFdC014932; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 07:51:15 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201804290751.w3T7pFdC014932@portscout.ysv.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.ysv.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2018 07:51:15 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2018 07:51:18 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ games/childsplay | 2.6.5 | 3.3 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ net/py-pypcap | 1.2.0 | 1.2.1 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Apr 29 21:37:38 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30529FB9FE2 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 21:37:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andy@neu.net) Received: from mail.neu.net (neu.net [104.225.8.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freebsd-11-64", Issuer "freebsd-11-64" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D76A2794EF for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 21:37:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andy@neu.net) Received: from neu.net (neu.net [104.225.8.138]) by mail.neu.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w3TL8NVt013129 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 17:08:25 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from andy@neu.net) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2018 17:08:23 -0400 (EDT) From: AN To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Port directory not found: Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (BSF 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mail.neu.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2018 21:37:38 -0000 Hi: FreeBSD BSD_12 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #29 r333091: Sun Apr 29 10:13:09 EDT 2018 root@BSD_12:/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/MYKERNEL amd64 1200062 I have been seeing this recently when upgrading ports, any suggestions how to fix would be appreciated. Thanks # portupgrade -va ---> Session started at: Sun, 29 Apr 2018 17:03:25 -0400 [Reading data from pkg(8) ... - 935 packages found - done] ** Port directory not found: devel/py-setuptools@py27 ** Port directory not found: graphics/py-cairo@py36 ** Port directory not found: devel/py-gobject3@py36 ** Port directory not found: devel/py-setuptools@py36 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Apr 29 21:43:11 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE470FBA359 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 21:43:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from hz.grosbein.net (unknown [IPv6:2a01:4f8:d12:604::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 518C37AE55 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 21:43:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (root@eg.sd.rdtc.ru [62.231.161.221] (may be forged)) by hz.grosbein.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w3TLh4Yu090258 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 29 Apr 2018 23:43:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: andy@neu.net Received: from [10.58.0.4] (dadv@[10.58.0.4]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w3TLgxsf078837 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 30 Apr 2018 04:42:59 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: Port directory not found: To: AN , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: <5AE63C63.50200@grosbein.net> Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 04:42:59 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DATE_IN_FUTURE_12_24, LOCAL_FROM,RDNS_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Report: * 3.2 DATE_IN_FUTURE_12_24 Date: is 12 to 24 hours after Received: date * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 1.9 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS * 2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains X-Spam-Level: ***** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on hz.grosbein.net X-Spam-Flag: YES X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2018 21:43:12 -0000 30.04.2018 4:08, AN wrote: > FreeBSD BSD_12 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #29 r333091: Sun Apr 29 10:13:09 EDT 2018 root@BSD_12:/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/MYKERNEL amd64 1200062 > > I have been seeing this recently when upgrading ports, any suggestions how to fix would be appreciated. > > Thanks > > > # portupgrade -va > ---> Session started at: Sun, 29 Apr 2018 17:03:25 -0400 > [Reading data from pkg(8) ... - 935 packages found - done] > ** Port directory not found: devel/py-setuptools@py27 > ** Port directory not found: graphics/py-cairo@py36 > ** Port directory not found: devel/py-gobject3@py36 > ** Port directory not found: devel/py-setuptools@py36 Make sure your pkg and portupgrade utilities have current versions. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Apr 29 21:48:19 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C4FFFBA5EE for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 21:48:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cmt@burggraben.net) Received: from smtp.burggraben.net (smtp.burggraben.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:140:50a2::3:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "ns.exwg.net", Issuer "Christoph Moench-Tegeder" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E67747C336 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 21:48:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cmt@burggraben.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.burggraben.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 713F06002EE for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 23:48:17 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Scanned: by amavisd-new at exwg.net Received: from smtp.burggraben.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ns.burggraben.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vflBhj-rhTuI for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 23:48:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from elch.exwg.net (elch.exwg.net [IPv6:2001:470:7120:1:127b:44ff:fe4f:148d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "elch.exwg.net", Issuer "Christoph Moench-Tegeder" (verified OK)) by smtp.burggraben.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 23:48:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: by elch.exwg.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7120A27310; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 23:48:07 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2018 23:48:07 +0200 From: Christoph Moench-Tegeder To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Port directory not found: Message-ID: <20180429214807.GA85409@elch.exwg.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.5 (2018-04-13) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2018 21:48:19 -0000 ## AN (andy@neu.net): > I have been seeing this recently when upgrading ports, any suggestions how > to fix would be appreciated. > > Thanks > > > # portupgrade -va > ---> Session started at: Sun, 29 Apr 2018 17:03:25 -0400 > [Reading data from pkg(8) ... - 935 packages found - done] > ** Port directory not found: devel/py-setuptools@py27 That looks like portupgrade doesn't know about FLAVOURS (and I can't find anything in it's changelog about that, so go figure). Alternatives are portmaster (se has added flavours support and is actively maintaining it (no personal experience on my side)) and poudriere (which tends to be a resource hog, but is _the_ ports build tool). Regards, Christoph -- Spare Space From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Apr 30 03:45:29 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDFB6FC1D57 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 03:45:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk0-x233.google.com (mail-vk0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AD886BCF4 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 03:45:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vk0-x233.google.com with SMTP id k67-v6so4352707vkd.3 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 20:45:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=k2W4KM2YNDyRFRZD+iFcz/1qBZLDPSLUrh57wJ1hgQs=; b=XmAAodPddACrxAfXBnyAMpRA66FsrES5LhlhsM0hSzMoVBmQfaOxF3O+oPx2ZwR3S1 jEekXFglbel8sz5kuDMNS8rNEhHYLwpOgksR/TYdlt7WTNWne3Iw6VJwOPqR6dNJEvy/ ASLbdZdJAnbi4Mb6TVTEt03MT6oq7Pwx0alAzmDXFyaqUMdMlfmCpS8LxMM6AAHL8eah EFbzl/XmAjg9h84LoMH4Bog9ZqrOHRLzDb6WZamvrgc0KHJWtf10d4AM8ezL+NKU2N1O 73DXbuC0BJSHW82X0ZDPg0yLf938VwsGoWeLnWuNVMKaxhaZiyFsZ0RVeYW+j/tc6K90 xSqQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=k2W4KM2YNDyRFRZD+iFcz/1qBZLDPSLUrh57wJ1hgQs=; b=CfUG6VxTYOH20bRfZJ6iTIayVkb9XQICA7RHo+VILM9Nz6fKQiFyYb8uVfQqUd6tJH rs33w4elv+wFsakxYXSPwD6xmjXk6MUF7WJipqS/AuHUnGmB22LDimIGwPMDWoQHf9r7 xuItZYlTrW3cfK0DKsoDiI9LRHyyaCO10q1XOXWBhQJXt5leIhCMW9vIL/NMklHK1Lch LRBkl8nyKHlQlu7MLYO7q+ytN2P5rcxiNwlPf0LzBiE1ld4B0fgAyxE+GcS+BdideXHN ZgqG705IaWRb+ha/SNvmsLO/GMo5qF7+07NIwXGE176ox3w1IY7yfsV8UO0we/SKQjVr CyjA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tAsH9TXE/qwqOAiJn0k/+CRdUxS03JfSOQnoNXWYZqR1pa64DYe 03B+skmfHIh6CYYaP4nCKNVW/YiRyJryP35eYOMRHKbt X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZrbl9VZeCEaTohO+nHU57Td2hSIYnXjgPK/P+8Ww3ZF/K7x+ZzUz2u9RuIObqvW3UYlgDW6qqg30hZbufOOJnw= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:be4a:: with SMTP id o71-v6mr7435151vkf.134.1525059928522; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 20:45:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.103.81.15 with HTTP; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 20:45:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20180429214807.GA85409@elch.exwg.net> References: <20180429214807.GA85409@elch.exwg.net> From: Kevin Oberman Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2018 20:45:28 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: lLVz8KwUQ-LlHJkCtCtWsvpulKE Message-ID: Subject: Re: Port directory not found: To: Christoph Moench-Tegeder Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.25 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 03:45:30 -0000 On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 2:48 PM, Christoph Moench-Tegeder < cmt@burggraben.net> wrote: > ## AN (andy@neu.net): > > > I have been seeing this recently when upgrading ports, any suggestions > how > > to fix would be appreciated. > > > > Thanks > > > > > > # portupgrade -va > > ---> Session started at: Sun, 29 Apr 2018 17:03:25 -0400 > > [Reading data from pkg(8) ... - 935 packages found - done] > > ** Port directory not found: devel/py-setuptools@py27 > > That looks like portupgrade doesn't know about FLAVOURS (and > I can't find anything in it's changelog about that, so go figure). > Alternatives are portmaster (se has added flavours support and is > actively maintaining it (no personal experience on my side)) and > poudriere (which tends to be a resource hog, but is _the_ ports > build tool). > > Regards, > Christoph > > -- > Spare Space portmaster(8) operates very similarly to portupgrade(8). There are some differences that can bite you, though, so read the man page first. For updating a single port: portmaster PORTNAME (e.g. portmaster chromium-65.0.3325.181_1) Note that portmaster(8) treats when you type like there is an '*' at the end, so, e.g. "portmaster virtualbox-ose" will result in both virtualbox-ose and virtualbox-ose-kmod being updated. Very useful for updating multiple related ports such as "portmaster p5-" to update all p5 ports. If you are installing, you must include both the ports subdirectory/portdirectory. E.g. graphics/ImageMagick Options are similar, but not identical nd there are a lot of added ones. I find "-y --clean-dirtfiles" very handy. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Apr 30 07:42:09 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 961BFFC6B21 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 07:42:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from se@freebsd.org) Received: from mailout09.t-online.de (mailout09.t-online.de [194.25.134.84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mailout00.t-online.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 154DC7A67C for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 07:42:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from se@freebsd.org) Received: from fwd35.aul.t-online.de (fwd35.aul.t-online.de [172.20.27.145]) by mailout09.t-online.de (Postfix) with SMTP id BCDD04275B6B; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 09:33:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Stefans-MBP-LAN.fritz.box (bdcYmQZGohzV8A7F2vT8qFfyD+wQ9wccGh+hOsYIlpsh4Pmsqf+C4CtaT-QEtrQZlt@[87.151.216.55]) by fwd35.t-online.de with (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) esmtp id 1fD3Jp-0lTgYK0; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 09:33:53 +0200 Subject: portupgrade vs. portmaster (was: Re: Port directory not found:) To: Kevin Oberman , Christoph Moench-Tegeder Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML References: <20180429214807.GA85409@elch.exwg.net> From: Stefan Esser Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Autocrypt: addr=se@freebsd.org; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xsBNBFVxiRIBCADOLNOZBsqlplHUQ3tG782FNtVT33rQli9EjNt2fhFERHIo4NxHlWBpHLnU b0s4L/eItx7au0i7Gegv01A9LUMwOnAc9EFAm4EW3Wmoa6MYrcP7xDClohg/Y69f7SNpEs3x YATBy+L6NzWZbJjZXD4vqPgZSDuMcLU7BEdJf0f+6h1BJPnGuwHpsSdnnMrZeIM8xQ8PPUVQ L0GZkVojHgNUngJH6e21qDrud0BkdiBcij0M3TCP4GQrJ/YMdurfc8mhueLpwGR2U1W8TYB7 4UY+NLw0McThOCLCxXflIeF/Y7jSB0zxzvb/H3LWkodUTkV57yX9IbUAGA5RKRg9zsUtABEB AAHNLlN0ZWZhbiBFw59lciAoVC1PbmxpbmUpIDxzdC5lc3NlckB0LW9ubGluZS5kZT7CwH8E EwEIACkFAlhtTvQCGwMFCQWjmoAHCwkIBwMCAQYVCAIJCgsEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRBH67Xv Wv31RAn0B/9skuajrZxjtCiaOFeJw9l8qEOSNF6PKMN2i/wosqNK57yRQ9AS18x4+mJKXQtc mwyejjQTO9wasBcniKMYyUiie3p7iGuFR4kSqi4xG7dXKjMkYvArWH5DxeWBrVf94yPDexEV FnEG9t1sIXjL17iFR8ng5Kkya5yGWWmikmPdtZChj9OUq4NKHKR7/HGM2dxP3I7BheOwY9PF 4mhqVN2Hu1ZpbzzJo68N8GGBmpQNmahnTsLQ97lsirbnPWyMviWcbzfBCocI9IlepwTCqzlN FMctBpLYjpgBwHZVGXKucU+eQ/FAm+6NWatcs7fpGr7dN99S8gVxnCFX1Lzp/T1YzsBNBFVx iRIBCACxI/aglzGVbnI6XHd0MTP05VK/fJub4hHdc+LQpz1MkVnCAhFbY9oecTB/togdKtfi loavjbFrb0nJhJnx57K+3SdSuu+znaQ4SlWiZOtXnkbpRWNUeMm+gtTDMSvloGAfr76RtFHs kdDOLgXsHD70bKuMhlBxUCrSwGzHaD00q8iQPhJZ5itb3WPqz3B4IjiDAWTO2obD1wtAvSuH uUj/XJRsiKDKW3x13cfavkad81bZW4cpNwUv8XHLv/vaZPSAly+hkY7NrDZydMMXVNQ7AJQu fWuTJ0q7sImRcEZ5EIa98esJPey4O7C0vY405wjeyxpVZkpqThDMurqtQFn1ABEBAAHCwGUE GAEKAA8FAlVxiRICGwwFCQWjmoAACgkQR+u171r99UQEHAf/ZxNbMxwX1v/hXc2ytE6yCAil piZzOffT1VtS3ET66iQRe5VVKL1RXHoIkDRXP7ihm3WF7ZKy9yA9BafMmFxsbXR3+2f+oND6 nRFqQHpiVB/QsVFiRssXeJ2f0WuPYqhpJMFpKTTW/wUWhsDbytFAKXLLfesKdUlpcrwpPnJo KqtVbWAtQ2/o3y+icYOUYzUig+CHl/0pEPr7cUhdDWqZfVdRGVIk6oy00zNYYUmlkkVoU7MB V5D7ZwcBPtjs254P3ecG42szSiEo2cvY9vnMTCIL37tX0M5fE/rHub/uKfG2+JdYSlPJUlva RS1+ODuLoy1pzRd907hl8a7eaVLQWA== Message-ID: Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 09:33:53 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ID: bdcYmQZGohzV8A7F2vT8qFfyD+wQ9wccGh+hOsYIlpsh4Pmsqf+C4CtaT-QEtrQZlt X-TOI-MSGID: 10e157ef-146b-443e-a77b-7a106afd6947 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 07:42:09 -0000 Am 30.04.18 um 05:45 schrieb Kevin Oberman: > portmaster(8) operates very similarly to portupgrade(8). There are some > differences that can bite you, though, so read the man page first. I used to be a portupgrade user, long ago (years before the introduction of the new package tools), but then mobed over to using portmaster. When the package system (PKG-NG) war completely reworked, I heard that portupgrade was better adapted to the new tools, but did not verify that claim (and instead submitted a few fixes for portmaster). I'm working on a complete rewrite on portmaster, since the original author has left the FreeBSD project, years ago, and I found it very hard to wrap my mind around his design when I implemented FLAVOR support in portmaster. My time is now spent on completing that new portmaster version, but I still fix problems reported in the current portmaster port (but will not implement any changes that are not bug-related, to be able to concentrate on the new version). > For updating a single port: portmaster PORTNAME (e.g. portmaster > chromium-65.0.3325.181_1) > Note that portmaster(8) treats when you type like there is an '*' at the > end, so, e.g. "portmaster virtualbox-ose" will result in both > virtualbox-ose and virtualbox-ose-kmod being updated. Very useful for > updating multiple related ports such as "portmaster p5-" to update all p5 > ports. I know that portmaster and portupgrade offer differing features and options, but do not have time to identify features missing in portmaster to make it a fully functional replacement of portmaster. I'd appreciate, if portupgrade users could let me know, what features or behaviour they miss in portmaster. The globbing performed by portmaster (as explained by Kevin) is one of the portmaster features that I find surprising at times, and I think I'll require "virtualbox-ose*" for the current behaviour - but I'll let the portmaster users decide, whether this is a useful change. > If you are installing, you must include both the ports > subdirectory/portdirectory. E.g. graphics/ImageMagick Does portupgrade locate the correct category for you, if you just specify the sub-directory within some category? That is something that I could add to portmaster, but currently the slash in a parameter signals, that a port directory is meant instead of a package name ... > Options are similar, but not identical nd there are a lot of added ones. I > find "-y --clean-dirtfiles" very handy. Those dirtfiles are distfiles, I assume ;-) That is one of the many features already re-implemented in my new version. Missing are special features like the temporary installation of pure build dependencies (say bison or some cross-gcc version) from packages (if those are available at the expected version level) and de-installation of those dependencies after a successful creation of packages that needed to be upgraded (e.g. for use by the nanobsd release builder). So, if you miss a portupgrade feature in portmaster, let me know or create a feature request on bugzilla. I'll consider those for the new version, that I hope to be able to release in a few weeks. Best regards, STefan From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Apr 30 08:30:02 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD943FC7BF8 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 08:30:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C10985881 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 08:30:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 33444FC7BF5; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 08:30:02 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20232FC7BF4 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 08:30:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B271D85876 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 08:30:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (portscout.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E395F251C8 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 08:30:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w3U8U0MH038871 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 08:30:00 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w3U8U0OD038870; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 08:30:00 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201804300830.w3U8U0OD038870@portscout.ysv.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.ysv.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 08:30:00 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 08:30:03 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ databases/mantis | 2.6.0 | release-2.14.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Apr 30 11:24:00 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3836BFA6445 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 11:24:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6722@twc.com) Received: from dnvrco-cmomta01.email.rr.com (dnvrco-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.73.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Client", Issuer "CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0EE182E93 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 11:23:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6722@twc.com) Received: from localhost ([74.134.208.22]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id D68FfPKYMDatMD68HfGtrP; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 10:34:10 +0000 Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 10:33:48 +0000 From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade vs. portmaster References: <20180429214807.GA85409@elch.exwg.net> X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfM/SF3PD2gh8ZPKtq26jBw7UPBUIse88br1mxO4JfJCRB1Cpj1GY//faRcI4lwuZkIkvMX3JwF18fyZxwRXnXRq++xbO3o/NNZHoSUdWI0VVZlDoLaZC wxjWuqCtc2MzvxQ417Vtf7cSoLuwAmH8Qho1ruFuj28fSd/DvfH03APU X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 11:24:00 -0000 from STefan Esser: > I used to be a portupgrade user, long ago (years before the introduction > of the new package tools), but then mobed over to using portmaster. > When the package system (PKG-NG) war completely reworked, I heard that > portupgrade was better adapted to the new tools, but did not verify that > claim (and instead submitted a few fixes for portmaster). > I'm working on a complete rewrite on portmaster, since the original author > has left the FreeBSD project, years ago, and I found it very hard to wrap > my mind around his design when I implemented FLAVOR support in portmaster. > My time is now spent on completing that new portmaster version, but I still > fix problems reported in the current portmaster port (but will not implement > any changes that are not bug-related, to be able to concentrate on the new > version). I'd like the opportunity to try out a new revamped portmaster, having fallen behind with my FreeBSD installations. Current portmaster, even before FLAVORS, was clumsy upgrading a large number of ports, especially when there is an upgrade of perl or png. I see hardly any mention of synth on the freebsd-ports list. Have synth users become disenchanted? One downside is that synth fails to install build dependencies, so I have to pkg install all of these separately, very annoying. I was bitten just yesterday trying to build cross-compiling tools for Haiku when make info was missing because texinfo was built but not installed. But I was able to recover with pkg install after checking my repository. With portmaster, I need to specify ports by category/portname rather than just portname, for example portmaster www/seamonkey On my other computer, with MSI Z77 MPOWER motherboard, synth just fumbles and crashes. Will both the old and revamped portmaster be maintained, and what will be the port names, since there can't be two ports both named portmaster? I used portupgrade before switching to portmaster. Tom From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Apr 30 12:14:58 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09231FA855E for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 12:14:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) Received: from NAM02-BL2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092003075.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.3.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "Microsoft IT TLS CA 4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AB326BD91 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 12:14:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=kdnxGHIVm/2gMOM5Y9xsuYFEcYZw4vt8a0IayZKlRq0=; b=T0RTEzujoHpcjW6FP0NfADiPehzXNAjoJ+TaXJUKYfwN4BSjwTBbZ4RIihCjuh/Ellb7w2sbhXfkjpYLJepJhYSu+QiEpBKtbF4fQJ3V+ydMcrhGw5MyUN17DDYmtjMMsZtSzwEN3WRfYrSr5s05ps1teB8tJ8GGpDH9hB/TvPUA8lKrJiAjyQ1FCBJiOlb5hOcyEn/CMOMR+DIJ57dMBK/CgjPMKmj60BXAYTm06LEYg2y98pHOz97OZ0le13d8Sk2goHPd7mM0F8F+KyE7/G2xnTpztGao7Rp/6hQMa3wO6PuqxfJ3GECRfn0LKuhcTuaAUxEfSfGOb8eyKjLXhA== Received: from SN1NAM02FT060.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.72.60) by SN1NAM02HT207.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.73.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.696.11; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 12:14:56 +0000 Received: from BN6PR2001MB1730.namprd20.prod.outlook.com (10.152.72.56) by SN1NAM02FT060.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.72.192) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.20.715.13 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 12:14:56 +0000 Received: from BN6PR2001MB1730.namprd20.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c94d:d045:7aba:de0c]) by BN6PR2001MB1730.namprd20.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c94d:d045:7aba:de0c%7]) with mapi id 15.20.0715.023; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 12:14:56 +0000 From: Carmel NY To: FreeBSD Subject: Re: portupgrade vs. portmaster Thread-Topic: portupgrade vs. portmaster Thread-Index: AQHT4HzZB9m7lUeWski9t4l6sd0Jwg== Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 12:14:55 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20180429214807.GA85409@elch.exwg.net> In-Reply-To: Reply-To: FreeBSD Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-clientproxiedby: SN4PR0501CA0145.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:803:2c::23) To BN6PR2001MB1730.namprd20.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:405:1f::18) x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:F36BB8142480039E0B94EF561CCE95804853ED7B8CECE0A6043222FCBD124DBB; UpperCasedChecksum:674F15B7A2E7FB3AC5CCC3EAA947E3446C62D8887BB969E4944A6BA11B699D01; SizeAsReceived:7725; Count:50 x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-tmn: [zK24NsKueaf7QbM8Inse39fkFyo9s4oI] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; SN1NAM02HT207; 7:cERHRo9a3cGuSPWTN7hFNyUpBPdLPQXRD5nX1DB9csXJsxItxcA5f8II3P3zu4nDe9ggLKbqUoPrVd+WbvBnZD0pKbVrukLsDIVQBp3Od2M4TfxuvlVYKF8nPv6QBuDe1AElYxmOaIYqWqB2hfxZBLhWTZv7Gx83rmPZ63+8FlIidfJHN1uKLi4OK+zkjsWQerwNgXXvEile74xvsBNwP0G5kCt+5FD6UI/7w28QcoB7CkbJ4kkn8E48Si2Qdgpt x-incomingheadercount: 50 x-eopattributedmessage: 0 x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(201702061078)(5061506573)(5061507331)(1603103135)(2017031320274)(2017031324274)(2017031323274)(2017031322404)(1601125374)(1603101448)(1701031045); SRVR:SN1NAM02HT207; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: SN1NAM02HT207: x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(444000031); SRVR:SN1NAM02HT207; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:SN1NAM02HT207; x-forefront-prvs: 0658BAF71F x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(7070007)(98901004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1901; SCL:1; SRVR:SN1NAM02HT207; H:BN6PR2001MB1730.namprd20.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: YeFdJP1suDmHb6IRfoMEN/5TgkszHxsctqz5GbCLAeuzMEWwjlpNOp03MiJbmd2skCgJdjr99kJtI1BsG1kmubVjVUtiI5IaQ3giEWunY3P/znH3BN2NclhFLlW59vcO7D+616ZX6zATf9dP3pY62kPf66YiaMMUWrOkcJNulcmSJeT4YU0EBRFYHnNgqAAn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: be376064-e6b3-4da5-367a-08d5ae93fbe5 X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 9a4e3081-9524-43cf-bfc3-dcaef82d5da1 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: be376064-e6b3-4da5-367a-08d5ae93fbe5 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-rms-persistedconsumerorg: 9a4e3081-9524-43cf-bfc3-dcaef82d5da1 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 30 Apr 2018 12:14:55.9977 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN1NAM02HT207 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 12:14:58 -0000 On Mon, 30 Apr 2018 10:33:48 +0000, Thomas Mueller stated: >from STefan Esser: > >> I used to be a portupgrade user, long ago (years before the introduction >> of the new package tools), but then mobed over to using portmaster. =20 > >> When the package system (PKG-NG) war completely reworked, I heard that >> portupgrade was better adapted to the new tools, but did not verify that >> claim (and instead submitted a few fixes for portmaster). =20 > >> I'm working on a complete rewrite on portmaster, since the original auth= or >> has left the FreeBSD project, years ago, and I found it very hard to wra= p >> my mind around his design when I implemented FLAVOR support in portmaste= r. =20 > >> My time is now spent on completing that new portmaster version, but I st= ill >> fix problems reported in the current portmaster port (but will not imple= ment >> any changes that are not bug-related, to be able to concentrate on the n= ew >> version). =20 > >I'd like the opportunity to try out a new revamped portmaster, having fall= en >behind with my FreeBSD installations. > >Current portmaster, even before FLAVORS, was clumsy upgrading a large numb= er >of ports, especially when there is an upgrade of perl or png. > >I see hardly any mention of synth on the freebsd-ports list. Have synth >users become disenchanted? I have been using synth now for several months and have not experienced any problems. I have found it to be far more competent that either portmaster o= r portupgrade ever were. >One downside is that synth fails to install build dependencies, so I have = to >pkg install all of these separately, very annoying. I don't understand your problem. Why install something that is not needed? >I was bitten just yesterday trying to build cross-compiling tools for Haik= u >when make info was missing because texinfo was built but not installed. I don't cross-compile, so I have no knowledge of this phenomena. Have you tried to contact the author and voice your concerns? >But I was able to recover with pkg install after checking my repository. > >With portmaster, I need to specify ports by category/portname rather than >just portname, for example portmaster www/seamonkey > >On my other computer, with MSI Z77 MPOWER motherboard, synth just fumbles = and >crashes. > >Will both the old and revamped portmaster be maintained, and what will be = the >port names, since there can't be two ports both named portmaster? > >I used portupgrade before switching to portmaster. > >Tom --=20 Carmel From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Apr 30 19:24:32 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73924FB4422 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 19:24:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: from mail-wm0-x22a.google.com (mail-wm0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE71E6FCE5 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 19:24:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: by mail-wm0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id m70so14574021wma.2 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 12:24:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chen-org-nz.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=iAxfCszUsA6uMQjBQm9t3xVbjVW8B06aMo7WqiddtgQ=; b=lq83NcRSbQV9T82SMyGiiFnNxd+COk9zA8SZAiyHcx9FDySi3QjOyYUNeCPxWGreia JJURoqy7FcquadlwcQS35kgnfY+K/nd4kDGcxiWckIakPN2qIFyV9Z8XRItixi+sYzIq OX5pDyPRHcHSp9Ml3QX2Tj1Le91a95gcl8Rl/xUVW77hb6IEiAceV/lX1zqqEdDoUvnR g6QbtPoWrcLwKNWdrvJAFQNcXkjFZQ+sSrQkazHKi82HKfpUtlp7mApYgMBICU4YNnlB nJYXjfll9f/NghDxzzgE/vpiwHc+2dKYWFIeOaPU3CLcpHbFiOWXvl/inS89uW59AUsM 7h7g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=iAxfCszUsA6uMQjBQm9t3xVbjVW8B06aMo7WqiddtgQ=; b=ddCK5LV1DRvOHKfKHHrQvxBe/yPqYfGtI2S06nXwr6b16LM78M+UfMXE8OrveEEkU5 fJOCWeaavQ8HVo+kAiTmZjxAZ2Y+VaDwdbNccGKTrfVIsXqVGDWo/zm39HCW8SuOdwqq +WzDxWGjUzUDYt4DR8oBPXlNn1cWpsIHKo60t/HSLlFd3j0qTjl6jcICEBOUWMLZun3B igxmxfz+GUD7bKKzFoGlVLY2ee17pLIyLbo14SvY9T5sHnSDjzzR2lkJRU+5bnxBHfiv Hl9fjegwGMB/UeUVH4n4xQvR79BHUSTNw9GJTA/nwbdDKAdra7PSqin6PeVHWrfqHS8A YW7g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tBloyqaUMOvRm5Dpd7aRzzvF5tpqbsk/yo/xK7V57fnpx2zPYMp R44Gyou8m7xxMoODp46lkAliVY+SE5tjIuOdAR5vWw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZrREVTufCqpTNDKE8h8yLqIVY4K5UAVj4MPh662fPg78ojZcMThASTm7e5uG6XX3G2wKERq6RLz/JmClOxuSWE= X-Received: by 2002:a50:f4b5:: with SMTP id s50-v6mr17893155edm.262.1525116269757; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 12:24:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.80.216.9 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 12:24:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [203.99.129.1] In-Reply-To: <5ae6fd65.1c69fb81.a1193.4d74SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> References: <20180429214807.GA85409@elch.exwg.net> <5ae6fd65.1c69fb81.a1193.4d74SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> From: Jonathan Chen Date: Tue, 1 May 2018 07:24:29 +1200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: portupgrade vs. portmaster To: Thomas Mueller Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 19:24:32 -0000 On 30 April 2018 at 22:33, Thomas Mueller wrote: [...] > I see hardly any mention of synth on the freebsd-ports list. Have synth users become disenchanted? There are a growing number of synth users. They just don't appear on the list 'cause the software just works. > One downside is that synth fails to install build dependencies, so I have to pkg install all of these separately, very annoying. Why should build dependencies be installed? Their only purpose is for building the port. > I was bitten just yesterday trying to build cross-compiling tools for Haiku when make info was missing because texinfo was built but not installed. > > But I was able to recover with pkg install after checking my repository. > > With portmaster, I need to specify ports by category/portname rather than just portname, for example > portmaster www/seamonkey > > On my other computer, with MSI Z77 MPOWER motherboard, synth just fumbles and crashes. I would suspect you have hardware issues instead. synth builds tend to strain the machine - it's a good test of machine hardiness. Cheers. -- Jonathan Chen From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Apr 30 20:02:09 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D3D8FB566A for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 20:02:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from se@freebsd.org) Received: from mailout05.t-online.de (mailout05.t-online.de [194.25.134.82]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mailout00.t-online.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA68678AA8 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 20:02:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from se@freebsd.org) Received: from fwd20.aul.t-online.de (fwd20.aul.t-online.de [172.20.26.140]) by mailout05.t-online.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 35D15427A106; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 22:02:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Stefans-MBP-10.fritz.box (Vydrv8ZHYhPe+0Z-3aN8+cD6Wnw8Owr+XHU7saqPDRb4DhEbzHcSGf+RyfEH1t5wzL@[87.151.216.55]) by fwd20.t-online.de with (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) esmtp id 1fDEzm-0irAeG0; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 22:01:58 +0200 Subject: portmaster plans (was: Re: portupgrade vs. portmaster) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20180429214807.GA85409@elch.exwg.net> <20180430113403.AF3FF13BA@StefanEsser.freebsd.org> Cc: Thomas Mueller From: Stefan Esser Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Autocrypt: addr=se@freebsd.org; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xsBNBFVxiRIBCADOLNOZBsqlplHUQ3tG782FNtVT33rQli9EjNt2fhFERHIo4NxHlWBpHLnU b0s4L/eItx7au0i7Gegv01A9LUMwOnAc9EFAm4EW3Wmoa6MYrcP7xDClohg/Y69f7SNpEs3x YATBy+L6NzWZbJjZXD4vqPgZSDuMcLU7BEdJf0f+6h1BJPnGuwHpsSdnnMrZeIM8xQ8PPUVQ L0GZkVojHgNUngJH6e21qDrud0BkdiBcij0M3TCP4GQrJ/YMdurfc8mhueLpwGR2U1W8TYB7 4UY+NLw0McThOCLCxXflIeF/Y7jSB0zxzvb/H3LWkodUTkV57yX9IbUAGA5RKRg9zsUtABEB AAHNLlN0ZWZhbiBFw59lciAoVC1PbmxpbmUpIDxzdC5lc3NlckB0LW9ubGluZS5kZT7CwH8E EwEIACkFAlhtTvQCGwMFCQWjmoAHCwkIBwMCAQYVCAIJCgsEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRBH67Xv Wv31RAn0B/9skuajrZxjtCiaOFeJw9l8qEOSNF6PKMN2i/wosqNK57yRQ9AS18x4+mJKXQtc mwyejjQTO9wasBcniKMYyUiie3p7iGuFR4kSqi4xG7dXKjMkYvArWH5DxeWBrVf94yPDexEV FnEG9t1sIXjL17iFR8ng5Kkya5yGWWmikmPdtZChj9OUq4NKHKR7/HGM2dxP3I7BheOwY9PF 4mhqVN2Hu1ZpbzzJo68N8GGBmpQNmahnTsLQ97lsirbnPWyMviWcbzfBCocI9IlepwTCqzlN FMctBpLYjpgBwHZVGXKucU+eQ/FAm+6NWatcs7fpGr7dN99S8gVxnCFX1Lzp/T1YzsBNBFVx iRIBCACxI/aglzGVbnI6XHd0MTP05VK/fJub4hHdc+LQpz1MkVnCAhFbY9oecTB/togdKtfi loavjbFrb0nJhJnx57K+3SdSuu+znaQ4SlWiZOtXnkbpRWNUeMm+gtTDMSvloGAfr76RtFHs kdDOLgXsHD70bKuMhlBxUCrSwGzHaD00q8iQPhJZ5itb3WPqz3B4IjiDAWTO2obD1wtAvSuH uUj/XJRsiKDKW3x13cfavkad81bZW4cpNwUv8XHLv/vaZPSAly+hkY7NrDZydMMXVNQ7AJQu fWuTJ0q7sImRcEZ5EIa98esJPey4O7C0vY405wjeyxpVZkpqThDMurqtQFn1ABEBAAHCwGUE GAEKAA8FAlVxiRICGwwFCQWjmoAACgkQR+u171r99UQEHAf/ZxNbMxwX1v/hXc2ytE6yCAil piZzOffT1VtS3ET66iQRe5VVKL1RXHoIkDRXP7ihm3WF7ZKy9yA9BafMmFxsbXR3+2f+oND6 nRFqQHpiVB/QsVFiRssXeJ2f0WuPYqhpJMFpKTTW/wUWhsDbytFAKXLLfesKdUlpcrwpPnJo KqtVbWAtQ2/o3y+icYOUYzUig+CHl/0pEPr7cUhdDWqZfVdRGVIk6oy00zNYYUmlkkVoU7MB V5D7ZwcBPtjs254P3ecG42szSiEo2cvY9vnMTCIL37tX0M5fE/rHub/uKfG2+JdYSlPJUlva RS1+ODuLoy1pzRd907hl8a7eaVLQWA== Message-ID: <7b5364d5-daf3-69ce-f727-a42c52e47441@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 22:01:57 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180430113403.AF3FF13BA@StefanEsser.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ID: Vydrv8ZHYhPe+0Z-3aN8+cD6Wnw8Owr+XHU7saqPDRb4DhEbzHcSGf+RyfEH1t5wzL X-TOI-MSGID: 1553cd99-d6ab-4f05-9cc5-f3f70e20ebc5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 20:02:09 -0000 Am 30.04.18 um 12:33 schrieb Thomas Mueller: > Current portmaster, even before FLAVORS, was clumsy upgrading a large number of ports, especially when there is an upgrade of perl or png. The author of portmaster decided to abort the upgrade of all remaining ports, if any dependency failed for any one port (i.e. did not try to build further independent ports, in that case). Or is there some other problem with e.g. perl upgrades? I plan to introduce new build options, e.g. to rebuild all ports that depend on libraries in some compat directory, or which have installed files in some path (e.g. the perl ports that install in a sub-directory that depends on the perl version). What other criteria might be useful to select ports for upgrading? > I see hardly any mention of synth on the freebsd-ports list. Have synth users become disenchanted? I do not know how much development is occurring for synth. It is written in a language that is only supported on amd64 (and i386?) and I'd rather use a tool that works on all platforms. > One downside is that synth fails to install build dependencies, so I have to pkg install all of these separately, very annoying. Pure build dependencies should not be required on a system, outside the build process. If you need some compiler or build tool, then it is just a normal program selected by the user. > I was bitten just yesterday trying to build cross-compiling tools for Haiku when make info was missing because texinfo was built but not installed. This might be a problem with the specification of dependencies in the port. > But I was able to recover with pkg install after checking my repository. With correct dependencies, this should not have been necessary. > With portmaster, I need to specify ports by category/portname rather than just portname, for example > portmaster www/seamonkey Yes, this is intentional. It could easily be changed, but currently only a parameter with / in it can lead to a new port being permanently installed (instead of as a dependency that might be automatically deleted when no longer required). What is the proposed semantic of a parameter that might select a port origin or some installed package, say if I invoke "portmaster bash" with or without bash being installed? > Will both the old and revamped portmaster be maintained, and what will be the port names, since there can't be two ports both named portmaster? I plan to create a portmaster-devel port, once the main-functionality of the existing portmaster port is complete. That version is meant for testing and as development version for new features. It should replace the current version after a few (say 3 to 6) months of testing. I'm willing to consider feature requests for the new version. My goal for now is to make it automatically deal with situations like the recent KDE4 port and package renaming, but also with scenarios not covered by the current version, where an indirect dependency must be considered. I'd like to implement a feature that builds all ports in a clean environment, as synth does. But this is not a priority, since we have poudriere and that is the official tool to build your own package repository. But a low overhead mode that works without setup effort on a subset of what poudriere offers might be quite useful. (And synth might offer that if it was written in a more portable language and if it was guaranteed to be well supported and maintained over the coming years.) Best regards, STefan From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 1 04:07:02 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78835FC40BD for ; Tue, 1 May 2018 04:07:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "troutmask", Issuer "troutmask" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B4777FE1C for ; Tue, 1 May 2018 04:07:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w413eMFj025459 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 20:40:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w413eMZE025458 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 20:40:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 20:40:22 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: math/suitesparse is broken Message-ID: <20180501034022.GA25448@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Reply-To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 May 2018 04:07:02 -0000 Can someone fix math/suitesparse? % make config > > % make > ... > > h/suitesparse/work/SuiteSparse/lib/libcholmod.so.3.0.12 -lm -lamd -lcolamd -lsuitesparseconfig -lccolamd -lcamd -L/usr/local/lib -lmetis -Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc7 -L/usr/local/lib/gcc7 -B/usr/local/bin -L/usr/local/lib -fstack-protector -Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc7 -L/usr/local/lib/gcc7 -llapack -lopenblas > /usr/local/bin/ld: cannot find -lopenblas > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status > gmake[5]: *** [Makefile:544: /usr/ports/math/suitesparse/work/SuiteSparse/lib/libcholmod.so.3.0.12] Error 1 > gmake[5]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/math/suitesparse/work/SuiteSparse/CHOLMOD/Lib' > gmake[4]: *** [Makefile:31: library] Error 2 > gmake[4]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/math/suitesparse/work/SuiteSparse/CHOLMOD/Lib' > gmake[3]: *** [Makefile:14: all] Error 2 > gmake[3]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/math/suitesparse/work/SuiteSparse/CHOLMOD' > gmake[2]: *** [Makefile:21: go] Error 2 > gmake[2]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/math/suitesparse/work/SuiteSparse' > *** Error code 2 > > openblas is not Netlib BLAS. > > Hi Steve, For this error it should be sufficient to deinstall the old port. before you build and install the new one. In some cases, there are further breaks [1]. HTH, Rainer [1] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227791 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 1 12:12:18 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F86BFAA3F8 for ; Tue, 1 May 2018 12:12:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 902B7767EA for ; Tue, 1 May 2018 12:12:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 4ECC0FAA3F0; Tue, 1 May 2018 12:12:17 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 100CCFAA3EF for ; Tue, 1 May 2018 12:12:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from land.berklix.org (land.berklix.org [144.76.10.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "land.berklix.org", Issuer "land.berklix.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96F2B767E1; Tue, 1 May 2018 12:12:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (pD9FA290C.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.250.41.12]) (authenticated bits=0) by land.berklix.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w41CAWDK076053 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 1 May 2018 12:10:36 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id w41CC87T059847; Tue, 1 May 2018 14:12:09 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id w41CBW1A003843; Tue, 1 May 2018 14:12:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Message-Id: <201805011212.w41CBW1A003843@fire.js.berklix.net> To: ports@FreeBSD.org cc: Kurt Jaeger , Alexander Leidinger , Tijl Coosemans , Julian Elischer , blubee blubeeme , Don Lewis Subject: Re: reccomendation for a building architecture schematic diagram editor ? From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.eu BSD Unix Linux Consultants, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.eu/free/ X-From: http://www.berklix.eu/~jhs/ In-reply-to: Your message "Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:21:20 +0200." <201804160821.w3G8LKnb002779@lapr.no.berklix.net> Date: Tue, 01 May 2018 14:11:32 +0200 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 May 2018 12:12:18 -0000 I wrote Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:21:20 +0200 > Hi ports@freebsd.org people, > Might any of you have a FreeBSD ports/ reccomendation for a building > architecture schematic diagram editor, please ? To plan eg big house room > layouts { furniture moves, building sale / rent} etc ? > > I'm not looking for professional architects or structural engineers > tools to plan new buildings. I'm not looking for millimetre precise > kitchen layout programs if such exist, I'm just looking to produce > the sort of plan one gets from estate agents, and on landlord/ > tenant rental contracts etc. > > I searched, but nothing from https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi > > Only port I can think of is xfig, which I've used for other things > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/graphics/xfig/ > but wondering if something else more appropriate exists ? > > Looking for something to tart up my hand sketches & a raft of > measurements hand written on them, taken from a laser measurer. > > I'm not looking to include a bluetooth professional laser measurer > to PC/android data transfer, though they exist, I just bought a > much cheaper simple laser measurer, & content to hand edit. Thanks to all respondents. Summary since: Probably best for my purpose /usr/ports/cad/sweethome3d make package builds on 12.0-CURRENT & 9.2-RELEASE, make package-recursive breaks, ** To be retried later. Supports MS users & use live on web too. http://www.sweethome3d.com Mouse clicks can set to metric. Possibly: /usr/ports/cad/librecad make install OK on 12.0-CURRENT & 9.2-RELEASE make package failed on 12.0-CURRENT, RUNNING unsetenv NOCLEANDEPENDS make clean make package-recursive Mouse: Failed from 9.2-RELEASE X display host to remote 12.0-CURRENT librecad host. Mouse OK on 9.2-RELEASE with local screen & librecad. http://librecad.org/ a free Open Source CAD application for Windows, Apple and Linux. Supports MS users too Other Like Xfig, useable but perhaps not ideal for requirement : /usr/ports/graphics/xfig /usr/ports/graphics/dia make package OK on 12.0-CURRENT No units to set to metric or imperial. /usr/ports/graphics/tgif make package OK Like xfig. Mouse switch to metric grid. Broken on my 12.0-CURRENT & 9.2-RELEASE hosts /usr/ports/cad/brlcad http://www.brlcad.org/ On 9.2-RELEASE Running unsetenv NOCLEANDEPENDS; make clean; make No executable, Just libraries: /usr/ports/graphics/kdiagram http://projects.kde.org/kdiagram Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, Computer Consultant, Systems Engineer, BSD Linux Unix, Munich Brexit Referendum stole 3,700,000 votes, inc. 700,000 from British in EU. UK Govt. lied it's "democratic" in Article 50 letter to EU paragraph 3. Petition for votes: http://berklix.eu/queen/ From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 1 13:42:59 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1090FFAC41B for ; Tue, 1 May 2018 13:42:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "troutmask", Issuer "troutmask" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F83F68E16 for ; Tue, 1 May 2018 13:42:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w41DgvXM027590 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 1 May 2018 06:42:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w41DguoI027589; Tue, 1 May 2018 06:42:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Tue, 1 May 2018 06:42:56 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: Rainer Hurling Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: math/suitesparse is broken Message-ID: <20180501134256.GA25793@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Reply-To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu References: <20180501034022.GA25448@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <7c29e5ba-a0b2-85f5-1aec-80487664aed6@gwdg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7c29e5ba-a0b2-85f5-1aec-80487664aed6@gwdg.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 May 2018 13:42:59 -0000 On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 08:39:42AM +0200, Rainer Hurling wrote: > Am 01.05.2018 um 05:40 schrieb Steve Kargl: > > Can someone fix math/suitesparse? > > > > % make config > >