Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2019 05:39:25 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 238796] ipfilter: failure to detect the same rules when arguments ordered differently Message-ID: <bug-238796-7501-QZawUYh9nm@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-238796-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-238796-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D238796 --- Comment #33 from Cy Schubert <cy@FreeBSD.org> --- Getting back to this PR, I discovered other problems related to this, i.e. = only space for 4 fr_ifnames. Put a fifth one in and the resulting structure beco= mes a mess without an error message. The whole concept of only four fr_ifnames = will need to be reconstructed and why an arbitrary limit of only four? Add to th= is, I don't know if a rule containing 2-4 interface names even works -- if it w= as a half-implemented idea that was never implemented properly in the first plac= e. I can see how multiple interfaces in a rule could be handy though. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-238796-7501-QZawUYh9nm>