Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 08 Sep 2019 11:10:44 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        office@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 240069] editors/libreoffice: Fails to package with GTK3 enabled
Message-ID:  <bug-240069-25061-WRbZmCQ3Ep@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-240069-25061@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-240069-25061@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240069

--- Comment #3 from dal36@gmx.co.uk ---
I've tried this again with a make.conf which is empty apart from assigning =
the
GTK2/GTK3/JAVA options listed below for editors/libreoffice (using
_SET/_UNSET). When building editors/libreoffice and dependencies from scrat=
ch
with this make.conf, the port build works as expected.

The make.conf that produced the error also assigns DEFAULT_VERSIONS for var=
ious
languages/tools and assigns various options with _SET/_UNSET, including
dependencies of editors/libreoffice. Only ports-related options are set in =
the
make.conf (no complier flags, etc.). Using this longer make.conf and an upd=
ated
ports tree, I still get the same error when building editors/libreoffice.

I'm currently investigating this further to try to determine something clos=
er
to a minimal make.conf that reproduces the issue. Given the observations ab=
ove,
it seems that the issue might be due to using a particular combination of p=
orts
options when building the ports that editors/libreoffice depends upon.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-240069-25061-WRbZmCQ3Ep>