From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mon Jul 29 15:04:29 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AA6FAD2B7 for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 15:04:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io1-f46.google.com (mail-io1-f46.google.com [209.85.166.46]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86E4787C17 for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 15:04:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io1-f46.google.com with SMTP id f4so120742426ioh.6 for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 08:04:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=JJRfKBfeO6Hz9vnzLFCiRt8t0rrYTJJsGh+TeUUGbC4=; b=Hdnw1+jnqLfLaqIjaoxp5VwsqrzB+NGonLQSg/pXn8yZKoKoF8RD634l+XX1Iw1cMW lmNLLeXsmNrDuNfudbsYOwBCJoz4TL+xHIAAQvQU6YC3scna6zBP9FkfZIGYc48s1tpw tVkvHZ7ghhHFDIWsOKBk1jJPQKP9nQmd8H51q/iw/Emr0KamrnUbph/aTCsc+XC2iYrO nFkneJtjFnPEytU8bCuFtgqTD1ThFBdwNjBQOF9kILNmWOdZANHYGWrMzB5h03TDppzs Pb9M9B+Ky0Y2E0tJm5r6B8WasV3WxSQm8J7f+BnzEnYtDJgk2GGZ1ncRpIZSmKFyxwyf xXgg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVzB9uSxNVO+mvvFpzgKesUOXqFcMnBNEqMVBTj+B24T9rs+FpS HcXaZsm3qlbmqyc0bcIsmEvIV5S00RJFpSl5HBaMnDAv X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxWqqQ67nPuP7Wbu77kbR3dZ3iNrJIdckbnUeby/ve9xV/8Qgct3+7mzQIHr4GQpX6ucE24VUWi0cjkK8ANIfw= X-Received: by 2002:a02:cb96:: with SMTP id u22mr113716212jap.118.1564412662120; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 08:04:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190727023830.GA53438@koitsu.org> In-Reply-To: <20190727023830.GA53438@koitsu.org> From: Ed Maste Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2019 21:07:40 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Buildworld times (was Re: svn commit: r350256 - in stable/12: . contrib/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common contrib/libunwind/src contrib/llvm/lib/DebugInfo/DWARF contrib/llvm/lib/MC contrib/llvm/lib/Object contrib/llvm/lib/Ta...) To: Jeremy Chadwick Cc: freebsd-stable stable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 86E4787C17 X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of carpeddiem@gmail.com designates 209.85.166.46 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=carpeddiem@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.71 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.997,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-stable@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; LONG_SUBJ(1.70)[227]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[46.166.85.209.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.89)[-0.889,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[emaste@freebsd.org,carpeddiem@gmail.com]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[emaste@freebsd.org,carpeddiem@gmail.com]; IP_SCORE(-2.52)[ip: (-6.67), ipnet: 209.85.128.0/17(-3.42), asn: 15169(-2.45), country: US(-0.05)]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 15:04:29 -0000 On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 at 22:44, Jeremy Chadwick via freebsd-stable wrote: > > TL;DR for lazy folks: > > stable/11 r350330 world + minimal clang = 1:29:34 > stable/11 r350330 world + full clang = 1:46:31 > stable/11 r350252 world + minimal clang = 56:52 > stable/11 r350252 world + full clang = 1:14:30 Yes, because you're currently running r349226, and the world build thus first builds its own toolchain. Try the same experiment running on a r349226 or later installed world. From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mon Jul 29 16:01:36 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93BCDAE5BC for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 16:01:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from targetexposz4@targetexposz.com) Received: from sonic304-26.consmr.mail.sg3.yahoo.com (sonic304-26.consmr.mail.sg3.yahoo.com [106.10.242.216]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11AD0895FC for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 16:01:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from targetexposz4@targetexposz.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1564416085; bh=7iG2Ch/Y41EtoopP0o7F7JycAnc2T1Yd2AG6ZXoWtS0=; h=From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:From:Subject; b=FH09eVahB7c/RmqqQG70Hb+HRJ20vVvgEKnWYSA9UstVCwy5E99eC2buCFLsUCVKJ/NgXdqYjUn8wbHtR/DA553EoJanb7bPd8VvrQiBqVpqvX/KaWQ5Hos16wfCCAuiJoNdKLRv2zqV1sa/ii/jrcFHw+5XcyjDtg9p4XKyUXkcDGCX0qUm6NwzrJS/gFuUAEa+01NhAba/CUXeR/j0nX2rUHeinflgUHlx/uDC71recw5CSMz6vf6PkGoxJU31yZHxNCRUZT+QYs4F4atOUcE6TvCd7sHg2gfD57PrZx8iiTMzTzvwGmFbs5cKti8tla9dRRScAW4d0WQkiwZDEw== X-YMail-OSG: uLHM7f0VM1nWfoJSbeiQ1c3oxc_GlBKzf5IcPWEB7TUvAlHSkAHcnEFXZWqKmG6 S0jv57yQkU7STVhZF_ONvTKi875NDmIFyvbSET3bAseW7TEhXHGa5x6pykTLnvYPBpAnP4ef85cR BUPXWpUcL0iZT2.7QcX2XJahEOl4gxQ2D2blvnVso91cnyuuJdGZqDo_vTi39qPMB0J470Xavynm FMbuUILChOcHl5G7DqUHFTu9QPj_g1ZuqMmQ2WQ1RqZjNxs0.TLPEorybaSrPZvD5tY2HTLXqKLU 0sCZrCOFNr4SDJwrQ4aJqC1daM3pQ7XH3sAqPPVpAVTxrHNe_.hBcRr_x9Eej9zkoVZOTmXu3Das ZLWO4PaslJhhpZ7L_E46wVA2tZYzBLndpeKCnWRd8Or2byzFZqcp4YDfe4tZYL5i3108s7LPfNh2 b_jidkNAqKtUaVnVRB6XMAu9EPa1UXXb8DUfOkHa0_jJ5TMcfed800csl7ZuSWGvDXvNS6vA1O1Y jCzsvoK28qgaAyXkrXp3s87xWDBURVMZZUjmsoff9GdU.lveE6yFhX44ZtdxT7mGCeHz_F7DQJCT WL2VQ8A8IpoxgVIqypFKZ0GV.SHTxsaxPYawpAzums8VuTu_TGxEratcT6Yi_SiE1LSnIsSrGHlZ 5Zm.0jFfIyzqsNX4NRvy4mqM8zCKwJz2dQ5kfA13V7gEqDGbPCrzxp16m8JarDUhV8kcMjwFADaF aCvAHJy.6dnKBPvCcbkUUfd.mhfnOyghzA19pgoHLEI_CsOyicblZbb2tKj3CryeaJlGXDW57D7T gwuBmpvkgxQKjAynQ57F4YUSNbXpIAWKiM6SUPQgE3MISkOw_IDQrXxKzDlLlFYWeBQB5WZI50h_ tNr69ebrvkN_FLzlSu2bMO7d00xFtaorYzkh6UtFdQaam8HydbN8Luodx9wzBxIHJvfu6vkdiz4s QVhqGPO_V9EGfOhznRZLEVYRdzFmkp.Mc1n1ltT48H5BfBNt.JG8z8dGg_AAD9vongHSKexkZrfe 5BFg4wwXZjkTtNtg_hnwQJ4mLGTMTijwaqFzgushbTng3WFQNbpZVnKCTeLzhCWijjmPIK3KE_kJ 6oIJGGiCUi53qFrNXP5TfJqC7SkQ3Sf0lZ..z6hkQvCX30yuvCIjQ35QVfPiKQPznAKRAcZCnUYX xs9dOGuEZp_2tAyFR.0CmrWysfqyfAv24KYM.jXckxDC7Kb5qq6YDV7aMbOGftxRewoiYPWk6GL5 qUiNMnZ1mQqYturdlsbQgbO5oZ1.Sjc0l3u4- Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic304.consmr.mail.sg3.yahoo.com with HTTP; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 16:01:25 +0000 Received: by smtp415.mail.sg3.yahoo.com (Oath Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 23f1e80aeaa093e43d728d56967b2aa7; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 15:51:12 +0000 (UTC) From: "Shron Smith" To: References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: Freebsd - Gartner Catalyst Conference 2019 - Register Portal List Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 11:50:24 -0700 Message-ID: <0d6001d5463e$95c351e0$c149f5a0$@targetexposz.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AdVD8Zugewceg5/qQA2o0ciT4MztmQCTE+Wg Content-Language: en-us X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 11AD0895FC X-Spamd-Bar: +++++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=yahoo.com header.s=s2048 header.b=FH09eVah X-Spamd-Result: default: False [7.83 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.99)[0.990,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[targetexposz.com]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.99)[0.990,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DATE_IN_FUTURE(4.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; IP_SCORE(1.16)[ip: (-1.46), ipnet: 106.10.224.0/19(3.98), asn: 56173(3.18), country: SG(0.08)]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[216.242.10.106.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:56173, ipnet:106.10.224.0/19, country:SG]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,body] X-Spam: Yes Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 16:01:36 -0000 Hi, I am just doing a follow up with my previous email to check whether you are interested in our Contact Lists. Please let me know your thoughts, so that I can get back to you with counts and pricing available for the same. Thank you and I Look forward to hearing from you. Regards, Shron Smith From: Shron Smith [mailto:targetexposz4@targetexposz.com] Sent: Friday, July 26, 2019 1:36 PM To: 'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org' Subject: Freebsd - Gartner Catalyst Conference 2019 - Register Portal List Dear Exhibitors, We wish you a great success in the forthcoming exhibition. Gartner Catalyst Conference August 12-15, 2019 updated attendees List is Now Available! Which enables you to showcase your company's pre-show and post-show marketing efforts with unlimited usage on the contact list (No restriction on usage). Attendees: Security & Risk Management, Application Management, BI, Analytics and Data Management, Enterprise Architecture, Technical, Solution Architects, Infrastructure, Operations, Mobile, Cloud and Data Project Managers, Software Developers, key decision makers and many more... Qualified Data Field includes: Company Name, Web Address, Contact Name, Job Title, Mailing Address, Phone Number, and Industry, SIC Code, Company Mailing address with Zip Code, Fax Number, Industry Classification, and Website URL along with verified business email address. These contact lists will be delivered in Excel format which can be used for telemarketing, direct marketing, and email marketing initiatives etc. Please let me know your thoughts, as it will be my pleasure to share you the counts and pricing of the lists. Looking back to hearing from you. Regards, Shron Smith Gartner Catalyst Conference -Event Specialist. August 12-15, 2019 | San Diego, CA From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mon Jul 29 17:17:14 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09812AFF35 for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 17:17:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D96C68BBFD; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 17:17:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from tensor.andric.com (tensor.andric.com [IPv6:2001:470:7a58:1::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "tensor.andric.com", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: dim) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A08C813F7B; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 17:17:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:7a58::cc2a:eba2:8dac:de5f] (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:7a58:0:cc2a:eba2:8dac:de5f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 721E63FA7B; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 19:17:11 +0200 (CEST) From: Dimitry Andric Message-Id: Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F9992795-0781-4337-9DDC-DD1D8E679B06"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Subject: Re: Buildworld times (was Re: svn commit: r350256 - in stable/12: . contrib/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common contrib/libunwind/src contrib/llvm/lib/DebugInfo/DWARF contrib/llvm/lib/MC contrib/llvm/lib/Object contrib/llvm/lib/Ta...) Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 19:17:10 +0200 In-Reply-To: Cc: Jeremy Chadwick , freebsd-stable stable To: Ed Maste References: <20190727023830.GA53438@koitsu.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: D96C68BBFD X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.97 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[FreeBSD.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.996,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.97)[-0.971,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:2610:1c1:1::/48, country:US] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 17:17:14 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_F9992795-0781-4337-9DDC-DD1D8E679B06 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On 29 Jul 2019, at 03:07, Ed Maste wrote: >=20 > On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 at 22:44, Jeremy Chadwick via freebsd-stable > wrote: >>=20 >> TL;DR for lazy folks: >>=20 >> stable/11 r350330 world + minimal clang =3D 1:29:34 >> stable/11 r350330 world + full clang =3D 1:46:31 >> stable/11 r350252 world + minimal clang =3D 56:52 >> stable/11 r350252 world + full clang =3D 1:14:30 >=20 > Yes, because you're currently running r349226, and the world build > thus first builds its own toolchain. Try the same experiment running > on a r349226 or later installed world. Indeed, that is the most likely explanation. Unfortunately stable/11's Makefile.inc1 does not explicitly show that it is going to bootstrap the toolchain, like in head and stable/12, which show this right at the start of buildworld: --- buildworld --- make[1]: "/usr/src/Makefile.inc1" line 349: SYSTEM_COMPILER: libclang = will be built for bootstrapping a cross-compiler. make[1]: "/usr/src/Makefile.inc1" line 354: SYSTEM_LINKER: libclang will = be built for bootstrapping a cross-linker. --- buildworld_prologue --- Instead, you can only check for the *absence* of the following message: "Determined that CC=3Dxxx matches the source tree. Not bootstrapping a = cross-compiler." -Dimitry --Apple-Mail=_F9992795-0781-4337-9DDC-DD1D8E679B06 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.2 iF0EARECAB0WIQR6tGLSzjX8bUI5T82wXqMKLiCWowUCXT8qFgAKCRCwXqMKLiCW o6pzAKCTLMpy+Jn2VjJBSLUNXVD45DMOLgCfVsIN2NRuP+pBRtcDnr4e1s+9LCY= =OLoE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_F9992795-0781-4337-9DDC-DD1D8E679B06-- From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mon Jul 29 17:44:05 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9B01B0690 for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 17:44:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from pyroxene.sentex.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:3::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "pyroxene.sentex.ca", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 491668C8E0 for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 17:44:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:346a:6987:6201:ec77] ([IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:346a:6987:6201:ec77]) by pyroxene.sentex.ca (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x6THi1aW060270 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 29 Jul 2019 13:44:02 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Subject: Re: Buildworld times (was Re: svn commit: r350256 - in stable/12: . contrib/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common contrib/libunwind/src contrib/llvm/lib/DebugInfo/DWARF contrib/llvm/lib/MC contrib/llvm/lib/Object contrib/llvm/lib/Ta...) To: Jeremy Chadwick , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20190727023830.GA53438@koitsu.org> From: mike tancsa Message-ID: <2929237d-220a-2efc-d658-ea0ed867a408@sentex.net> Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 13:44:01 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190727023830.GA53438@koitsu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 491668C8E0 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of mike@sentex.net designates 2607:f3e0:0:3::18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mike@sentex.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.73 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RDNS_NONE(1.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f3e0::/32]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.55)[-0.546,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[sentex.net]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.993,0]; LONG_SUBJ(1.70)[227]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: smtp.sentex.ca]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.90)[-0.901,0]; IP_SCORE(-1.72)[ipnet: 2607:f3e0::/32(-4.94), asn: 11647(-3.57), country: CA(-0.09)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11647, ipnet:2607:f3e0::/32, country:CA]; HFILTER_HOSTNAME_UNKNOWN(2.50)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 17:44:05 -0000 On 7/26/2019 10:38 PM, Jeremy Chadwick via freebsd-stable wrote: > (Please retain CCs, I am not subscribed to the list) > > Below is hard evidence of 3 things on stable/11 (not 12) after r350259: > > 1. r350259 adds *substantial* time to buildworld. Are you sure this is not the same as the issue in RELENG12 ? ie. the new version of clang is built as part of world since it differs from whats installed.  I had a RELENG11 box sitting around from July 4th (nanobsd2)# time make -j8 buildworld > /var/log/build.out 13421.587u 906.968s 1:01:36.13 387.6%   75193+900k 285907+3240194io 108879pf+0w 0(nanobsd2)# Updated to revision 350414. 0(nanobsd2)# time make -j8 buildworld > /var/log/build.out 18656.513u 1117.246s 1:23:53.24 392.8%  70122+916k 255703+3772612io 104343pf+0w 0(nanobsd2)# Did installworld/kernel. buildworld after that 0(nanobsd2)# time make -j8 buildworld > /var/log/build.out 12998.964u 649.697s 58:48.61 386.7%     75748+907k 358314+3247016io 108534pf+0w 0(nanobsd2)# Which is probably about the same as before the update build time wise > 2. WITHOUT_CLANG_EXTRAS+WITHOUT_CLANG_FULL+WITHOUT_LLDB can help improve > the situation after r350259, but it is still no where near as fast as > pre-r350259. > > 3. Kernel build times are fine; issue is with world. > > TL;DR for lazy folks: > > stable/11 r350330 world + minimal clang = 1:29:34 > stable/11 r350330 world + full clang = 1:46:31 > stable/11 r350252 world + minimal clang = 56:52 > stable/11 r350252 world + full clang = 1:14:30 > > I cannot even begin to tell you how big of an impact this has on my > low-end dual-core VPS box (world takes hours upon hours). > > We've been down this road before, many many times, since the > introduction of clang/LLVM. Here's just a few that went no where. I > couldn't find the more-useful one that had some concrete numbers in it, > dating back to pre-2016 (maybe sometime in 2014 or 2015?): > > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2017-January/thread.html#64431 > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2017-January/thread.html#86646 > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2016-November/thread.html#274684 > > Does anyone have a good/recent write-up on how to switch to gcc? :-) > > > System > ====== > * Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 2.83GHz > * 8GB ECC RAM > * Samsung SSD 840 EVO 250GB filesystem (UFS2 + SU (not SUJ) + TRIM) + 32GB swap > * Running stable/11 r349226 > * Misc notes > - r350330 happened to be what was "master" at the time of my test > - r350252 was the commit on stable/11 immediately before r350259 > - Switching to r350252 accomplished via: cd /usr/src && svnlite up -r350252 > - System uses kern.maxvnodes=856944, last tuned 2018/06/07 > > > Test #1, building r350330 minimal clang > ======================================= > # cat /etc/src.conf > WITHOUT_ATM=true > WITHOUT_BLUETOOTH=true > WITHOUT_DEBUG_FILES=true > WITHOUT_FLOPPY=true > WITHOUT_FREEBSD_UPDATE=true > WITHOUT_IPFILTER=true > WITHOUT_IPX=true > WITHOUT_LIB32=true > WITHOUT_NDIS=true > WITHOUT_NETGRAPH=true > WITHOUT_PPP=true > WITHOUT_SENDMAIL=true > WITHOUT_TESTS=true > WITHOUT_WIRELESS=true > WITH_OPENSSH_NONE_CIPHER=true > WITHOUT_CLANG_EXTRAS=true > WITHOUT_CLANG_FULL=true > WITHOUT_LLDB=true > WITHOUT_LLVM_TARGET_AARCH64=true > WITHOUT_LLVM_TARGET_ARM=true > WITHOUT_LLVM_TARGET_MIPS=true > WITHOUT_LLVM_TARGET_POWERPC=true > WITHOUT_LLVM_TARGET_SPARC=true > WITHOUT_REPRODUCIBLE_BUILD=true > # cat /etc/make.conf > KERNCONF=X7SBA_RELENG_11_amd64 > CPUTYPE?=core2 > SVN_UPDATE=yes > STRIP= > CFLAGS+= -fno-omit-frame-pointer > > Result: > # rm -fr /usr/obj/* > # cd /usr/src > # time make -j4 buildworld > 19906.874u 1280.928s 1:29:33.51 394.3% 57966+778k 23504+14200io 13867pf+0w > # time make -j4 buildkernel > 1592.460u 196.047s 7:36.61 391.6% 48704+614k 6627+18158io 7361pf+0w > > > Test #2, building r350330 full clang > ==================================== > "full clang" means same as Test #1 but with these 3 src.conf lines > commented out, i.e. CLANG_EXTRAS, CLANG_FULL, and LLDB are ENABLED: > > WITHOUT_CLANG_EXTRAS=true > WITHOUT_CLANG_FULL=true > WITHOUT_LLDB=true > > Result: > # rm -fr /usr/obj/* > # cd /usr/src > # time make -j4 buildworld > 23779.674u 1463.156s 1:46:30.75 394.9% 57621+783k 20093+15423io 7283pf+0w > # time make -j4 buildkernel > 1594.079u 194.345s 7:36.48 391.7% 48707+614k 5301+18013io 5342pf+0w > > > Test #3, building r350252 minimal clang > ======================================= > Same configs as Test #1 > > Result: > # rm -fr /usr/obj/* > # cd /usr/src > # time make -j4 buildworld > 12582.693u 882.543s 56:52.35 394.6% 62698+760k 21432+9694io 6923pf+0w > # time make -j4 buildkernel > 1649.559u 184.934s 7:48.01 391.9% 57053+622k 7566+18291io 5402pf+0w > > > Test #4, building r350252 full clang > ==================================== > Same configs as Test #2 > > # rm -fr /usr/obj/* > # cd /usr/src > # time make -j4 buildworld > 16600.975u 1068.754s 1:14:29.53 395.3% 63271+774k 8683+10876io 4707pf+0w > # time make -j4 buildkernel > 1650.654u 183.966s 7:47.47 392.4% 57117+623k 2829+17951io 1926pf+0w > From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mon Jul 29 18:31:36 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D226FB1D79 for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 18:31:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdc@koitsu.org) Received: from mambo.koitsu.org (mambo.koitsu.org [172.81.177.231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7C688E70C for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 18:31:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdc@koitsu.org) Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 11:31:26 -0700 From: Jeremy Chadwick To: mike tancsa Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Buildworld times (was Re: svn commit: r350256 - in stable/12: . contrib/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common contrib/libunwind/src contrib/llvm/lib/DebugInfo/DWARF contrib/llvm/lib/MC contrib/llvm/lib/Object contrib/llvm/lib/Ta...) Message-ID: <20190729183126.GA61160@koitsu.org> References: <20190727023830.GA53438@koitsu.org> <2929237d-220a-2efc-d658-ea0ed867a408@sentex.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <2929237d-220a-2efc-d658-ea0ed867a408@sentex.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: E7C688E70C X-Spamd-Bar: +++ X-Spamd-Result: default: False [3.37 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:172.81.177.231]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.90)[0.900,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; IP_SCORE(0.34)[asn: 174(1.73), country: US(-0.05)]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.53)[0.532,0]; LONG_SUBJ(1.70)[227]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mambo.koitsu.org]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[koitsu.org,quarantine]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.71)[0.707,0]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:174, ipnet:172.81.176.0/21, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 18:31:36 -0000 On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 01:44:01PM -0400, mike tancsa wrote: > On 7/26/2019 10:38 PM, Jeremy Chadwick via freebsd-stable wrote: > > (Please retain CCs, I am not subscribed to the list) > > > > Below is hard evidence of 3 things on stable/11 (not 12) after r350259: > > > > 1. r350259 adds *substantial* time to buildworld. > > Are you sure this is not the same as the issue in RELENG12 ? ie. the new > version of clang is built as part of world since it differs from whats > installed.  I had a RELENG11 box sitting around from July 4th By "on stable/11 (not 12)" I meant: I do not run stable/12, thus I cannot speak on its behalf. -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc@koitsu.org | | UNIX Systems Administrator PGP 0x2A389531 | | Making life hard for others since 1977. | From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Tue Jul 30 18:23:58 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E99F0A9BA9 for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 18:23:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from targetexposz4@targetexposz.com) Received: from sonic304-26.consmr.mail.sg3.yahoo.com (sonic304-26.consmr.mail.sg3.yahoo.com [106.10.242.216]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90AA36C06A for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 18:23:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from targetexposz4@targetexposz.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1564511032; bh=6+UmmSFXB9gF4xmxOVy/Er4NcMK9mc0tCdZr58rg6DU=; h=From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:From:Subject; b=LcOiV5cAxhIEX6q5kdTqvP7yCF9B7v7Q81gi1hKy6Wkryuqmr84pJOShNm+39tPAFEvzsBZKyjnp8vP9vbZf0YqpI483lWKXHYu7+4SPAjfdSyv6PqYXrXyPMFDgwuTX56XszQs/uqipxf26SP60tXb5V5v5NTrlJ/BMIIMSSCR081KAl3KDjOQzjZ6qLO+brnYk+ULA440FqjgsSCMstYIz9XMyoKtZRMbQWXFqgkRvY1dIj2fTzeMy9O2Qq3rIDWD9QT3hgxhkS0n1OFRaivH3oJDXDpuX/wHxlSlFjQVeN+pz+7HLAsz7iuZCA8vwM8J5DsfdIdiweJEUF5jkIg== X-YMail-OSG: J4gsDuoVM1l9Q6CokjxLMCsVdkozsynuHyB9MVcn0Dg7WYmveiPhxTJUuEhaVDu HQ6fWt3V.25UP3uA6ygXqnwVF6kVF70k4Z0dF1RlPYQDtrvGbRgHWPZKRpG2XamOl9.nPQ0sIr1Q UyVPbkc.H0vHiRpd5aPC1IRIqVdrnC6CmtRuI00xG2ItuVPmGBx2Y33S_RBr_a4OeWmWAyJZiOMm Qy7u.IZ5RZfB9d6GJnm3s70WPGpcEcP97I_aH3DDjFphXpr8RFCTrsVUIHk9he9rfcUYoTdJYmVS b8Hzd.0OFVXomBwDzvYg8hynUtWNARdd5nKtUJBOQlZpTNUcHGh.IOFF6i18rOrt06oshWj5FD6T Eqqex6vjVxIZHkooHT3_vn_skJKUmtQJDPDi0xw2voiwyNu1la16CgOF8Fn0p2O0CQM0z3IjO0VU ur7ZI4di0tgWvVRgyXQvMil8zr7aqzWUH1v9qYK2RDHHHB4HCk23uxnUp5tCuMVsaXcmILVOimVL 7dncwptovkY4ONWK0wA_IQqlBfFVqQXM1kA.4BJaj3gdDJwMWZx6RHDjyMenLpjjDu2idipiKBCY QUD3DhJYBuxKLF3BH55CF5bvNmRAafgotHcibKFYFb14.1WCPmc7gqWv_DyIBEm_RGzVYuWtTs9f jXPHf8o3SqClfK5JP6EvFJ32TupXYZ0zPcpa56N9oXmmCOAPeJKa18pyYOj3D6bazqltidT0Fcok Dlqsjtqxit6vezt2txUGfs7E5kKOsTHRs250Qlvu1sHiq7vhNntognJ_oYyarFtlEY6HeWoyt4H2 zez4wjGLnjh0ywLyEFeWJBAvOGCCj0iEQ84QHo7YEZp32KV2ZuXrZ2CvXjqNTOR.4YPvvW6m0Qus pD7zP5Mosi_5FDJg740F_wEqaAfLTjRjoUVv0PtphRVSMxjau1ysFTBRyIgxspdTWA7pNzmJ6vhT OHG4KLCETpSfRNOza.EjiW8OOp_iY9gj.ClqOuw.GFhgjCgHHxgCo5QiqlTrokK0EBUETLcHExok aeVlPQeSEaRtpMNEf9GGI91sX5i6Ai_d7_pGvhyTvcB63fkuQs7QznXgvMs43bukpmcxM2kmYvH0 G5RrUteu9.OFCHBVUL8Q4HN6IoeI.cPlBL3XQWbdR3ZKE7Q.I6Vgoj4WUQSDpLsJG2SlwJ9KVxiK CfDju.j5wXGfSNVSMY7PwAcuBtrRxwSrj4.fAjKj3tPEDv4dxa0AzeoV9hJxE53XsZDUOjjWAVVL oCgNPHVzufsoF7iLgudWCdW_c4lK4ijhV Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic304.consmr.mail.sg3.yahoo.com with HTTP; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 18:23:52 +0000 Received: by smtp411.mail.sg3.yahoo.com (Oath Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 4cc825c789d727c3622506355074c2a5; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 18:13:35 +0000 (UTC) From: "Shron Smith" To: References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: Freebsd - Gartner Catalyst Conference 2019 - Register Portal List Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 14:12:47 -0700 Message-ID: <13cb01d5471b$a3cce160$eb66a420$@targetexposz.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AdVD8Zugewceg5/qQA2o0ciT4MztmQDKZWkg Content-Language: en-us X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 90AA36C06A X-Spamd-Bar: +++++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=yahoo.com header.s=s2048 header.b=LcOiV5cA X-Spamd-Result: default: False [7.83 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.96)[0.960,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[targetexposz.com]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[0.996,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DATE_IN_FUTURE(4.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; IP_SCORE(1.19)[ip: (-1.29), ipnet: 106.10.224.0/19(3.97), asn: 56173(3.18), country: SG(0.08)]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[216.242.10.106.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:56173, ipnet:106.10.224.0/19, country:SG]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,body] X-Spam: Yes Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 18:23:59 -0000 Hi, I am just doing a follow up with my previous email to check whether you are interested in our Contact Lists. Please let me know your thoughts, so that I can get back to you with counts and pricing available for the same. Thank you and I Look forward to hearing from you. Regards, Shron Smith From: Shron Smith [mailto:targetexposz4@targetexposz.com] Sent: Friday, July 26, 2019 1:36 PM To: 'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org' Subject: Freebsd - Gartner Catalyst Conference 2019 - Register Portal List Dear Exhibitors, We wish you a great success in the forthcoming exhibition. Gartner Catalyst Conference August 12-15, 2019 updated attendees List is Now Available! Which enables you to showcase your company's pre-show and post-show marketing efforts with unlimited usage on the contact list (No restriction on usage). Attendees: Security & Risk Management, Application Management, BI, Analytics and Data Management, Enterprise Architecture, Technical, Solution Architects, Infrastructure, Operations, Mobile, Cloud and Data Project Managers, Software Developers, key decision makers and many more... Qualified Data Field includes: Company Name, Web Address, Contact Name, Job Title, Mailing Address, Phone Number, and Industry, SIC Code, Company Mailing address with Zip Code, Fax Number, Industry Classification, and Website URL along with verified business email address. These contact lists will be delivered in Excel format which can be used for telemarketing, direct marketing, and email marketing initiatives etc. Please let me know your thoughts, as it will be my pleasure to share you the counts and pricing of the lists. Looking back to hearing from you. Regards, Shron Smith Gartner Catalyst Conference -Event Specialist. August 12-15, 2019 | San Diego, CA From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Wed Jul 31 15:30:54 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A999A1934 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 15:30:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from pyroxene.sentex.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:3::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "pyroxene.sentex.ca", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45zHSM5jhlz3xpB for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 15:30:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:4a9:e86e:cf88:1178] ([IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:4a9:e86e:cf88:1178]) by pyroxene.sentex.ca (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x6VFUe2q054829 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 11:30:41 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: mike tancsa Subject: extremely slow boot of RELENG_10 Message-ID: <9f30d6b9-81bb-769c-1a03-1e81277ae07d@sentex.net> Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 11:30:43 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 45zHSM5jhlz3xpB X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of mike@sentex.net designates 2607:f3e0:0:3::18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mike@sentex.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.33 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RDNS_NONE(1.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f3e0::/32]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-stable@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[sentex.net]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[smtp.sentex.ca]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.14)[-0.135,0]; IP_SCORE(-1.72)[ipnet: 2607:f3e0::/32(-4.94), asn: 11647(-3.57), country: CA(-0.09)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11647, ipnet:2607:f3e0::/32, country:CA]; HFILTER_HOSTNAME_UNKNOWN(2.50)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 15:30:54 -0000 While moving a pair of ZFS disks from an *very* old motherboard to a new one, I ran into an odd problem I had not seen before.  The box was running just fine RELENG_10 from FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #18 r279918 on 10yr old MB. Boots normally and expected speeds for old hardware/CPU.  But on the new one, as soon as the |\-/|\ starts spinning, it looks like its 1/100th of the speed it should be.  Unfortunately, we didnt have the luxury to wait for it to boot up all the way.  We put the disks back in the old motherboard, did the RELENG_11 upgrade which included putting in the new boot blocks after zpool upgrade and then the disks booted just fine in the new box.  We at first thought it was a hardware issue, but same behaviour on another new MB, new SATA cables etc etc. Any idea what was going on behind the scenes that might have caused it ?  Is there something about the way the old boot blocks would interact poorly with new motherboards (in this case, a SuperMicro X11SSH-F) ?     ---Mike From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Wed Jul 31 15:59:47 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA8A1A25D7 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 15:59:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c2c:26d8::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45zJ5j3hVXz40c8 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 15:59:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eg.sd.rdtc.ru [IPv6:2a03:3100:c:13:0:0:0:5]) by hz.grosbein.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x6VFxPYU045781 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 31 Jul 2019 15:59:26 GMT (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: mike@sentex.net Received: from [10.58.0.4] ([10.58.0.4]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x6VFxLbK028373 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 31 Jul 2019 22:59:21 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: extremely slow boot of RELENG_10 To: mike tancsa , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <9f30d6b9-81bb-769c-1a03-1e81277ae07d@sentex.net> From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: <776e2f46-7a9e-c299-1c41-f2ca1ee90c32@grosbein.net> Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 22:59:16 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9f30d6b9-81bb-769c-1a03-1e81277ae07d@sentex.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOCAL_FROM, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record * 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record * 2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on hz.grosbein.net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 45zJ5j3hVXz40c8 X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=permerror (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of eugen@grosbein.net uses mechanism not recognized by this client) smtp.mailfrom=eugen@grosbein.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.24 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MX_INVALID(0.50)[greylisted]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grosbein.net]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_PERMFAIL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.89)[-0.893,0]; IP_SCORE(-0.75)[ipnet: 2a01:4f8::/29(-1.92), asn: 24940(-1.82), country: DE(-0.01)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:2a01:4f8::/29, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 15:59:48 -0000 31.07.2019 22:30, mike tancsa wrote: > While moving a pair of ZFS disks from an *very* old motherboard to a new > one, I ran into an odd problem I had not seen before. The box was > running just fine RELENG_10 from FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #18 r279918 on 10yr > old MB. Boots normally and expected speeds for old hardware/CPU. But on > the new one, as soon as the |\-/|\ starts spinning, it looks like its > 1/100th of the speed it should be. Unfortunately, we didnt have the > luxury to wait for it to boot up all the way. We put the disks back in > the old motherboard, did the RELENG_11 upgrade which included putting in > the new boot blocks after zpool upgrade and then the disks booted just > fine in the new box. We at first thought it was a hardware issue, but > same behaviour on another new MB, new SATA cables etc etc. > > Any idea what was going on behind the scenes that might have caused it > ? Is there something about the way the old boot blocks would interact > poorly with new motherboards (in this case, a SuperMicro X11SSH-F) ? Maybe it attempted dual-console boot involving output to serial port... From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Wed Jul 31 16:06:21 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FCA0A2922 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 16:06:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from pyroxene.sentex.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:3::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "pyroxene.sentex.ca", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45zJFS73wJz412R for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 16:06:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:4a9:e86e:cf88:1178] ([IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:4a9:e86e:cf88:1178]) by pyroxene.sentex.ca (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x6VG6Jpk057333 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 31 Jul 2019 12:06:19 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Subject: Re: extremely slow boot of RELENG_10 To: Eugene Grosbein , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <9f30d6b9-81bb-769c-1a03-1e81277ae07d@sentex.net> <776e2f46-7a9e-c299-1c41-f2ca1ee90c32@grosbein.net> From: mike tancsa Message-ID: <46347af6-aa9f-a596-ef40-8693e3d1fcd7@sentex.net> Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 12:06:22 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <776e2f46-7a9e-c299-1c41-f2ca1ee90c32@grosbein.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 45zJFS73wJz412R X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of mike@sentex.net designates 2607:f3e0:0:3::18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mike@sentex.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.89 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RDNS_NONE(1.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f3e0::/32]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[sentex.net]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: smtp.sentex.ca]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.58)[-0.581,0]; IP_SCORE(-1.72)[ipnet: 2607:f3e0::/32(-4.94), asn: 11647(-3.57), country: CA(-0.09)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11647, ipnet:2607:f3e0::/32, country:CA]; HFILTER_HOSTNAME_UNKNOWN(2.50)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 16:06:21 -0000 On 7/31/2019 11:59 AM, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 31.07.2019 22:30, mike tancsa wrote: > >> While moving a pair of ZFS disks from an *very* old motherboard to a new >> one, I ran into an odd problem I had not seen before. The box was >> running just fine RELENG_10 from FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #18 r279918 on 10yr >> old MB. Boots normally and expected speeds for old hardware/CPU. But on >> the new one, as soon as the |\-/|\ starts spinning, it looks like its >> 1/100th of the speed it should be. Unfortunately, we didnt have the >> luxury to wait for it to boot up all the way. We put the disks back in >> the old motherboard, did the RELENG_11 upgrade which included putting in >> the new boot blocks after zpool upgrade and then the disks booted just >> fine in the new box. We at first thought it was a hardware issue, but >> same behaviour on another new MB, new SATA cables etc etc. >> >> Any idea what was going on behind the scenes that might have caused it >> ? Is there something about the way the old boot blocks would interact >> poorly with new motherboards (in this case, a SuperMicro X11SSH-F) ? > Maybe it attempted dual-console boot involving output to serial port... > As upgrading to RELENG_11 and upgrading the boot blocks fixed the issue for this particular instance, I dont have the image anymore to boot / test from. However, it was just as slow on serial console as it was on the regular console.  I do have the files on an old snapshot #cd /.zfs/snapshot/7/boot # ls -l | egrep "pmb|boot" -r--r--r--   1 root  wheel  uarch   8192 Mar 12  2015 boot -r--r--r--   1 root  wheel  uarch    512 Mar 12  2015 boot0 -r--r--r--   1 root  wheel  uarch    512 Mar 12  2015 boot0sio -r--r--r--   1 root  wheel  uarch    512 Mar 12  2015 boot1 -r-xr-xr-x   1 root  wheel  uarch  33811 Mar 12  2015 boot1.efi -r--r--r--   1 root  wheel  uarch 819200 Mar 12  2015 boot1.efifat -r--r--r--   1 root  wheel  uarch   7680 Mar 12  2015 boot2 -r--r--r--   1 root  wheel  uarch   1185 Mar 12  2015 cdboot -r--r--r--   1 root  wheel  uarch  16016 Mar 12  2015 gptboot -r--r--r--   1 root  wheel  uarch  42128 Mar 12  2015 gptzfsboot -r--r--r--   1 root  wheel  uarch    512 Mar 12  2015 pmbr -r--r--r--   1 root  wheel  uarch 264192 Mar 12  2015 pxeboot -r--r--r--   1 root  wheel  uarch 300290 Mar 12  2015 userboot.so -r--r--r--   1 root  wheel  uarch  66048 Mar 12  2015 zfsboot I am more just trying to understand what might have been going on. I have a couple of other old RELENG_10 boxes in production still. If I had to swap out hardware without being able to do an OS upgrade, I want to understand how best to work around this issue (whatever it is) if possible     ---Mike From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Wed Jul 31 17:45:01 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4095A4838 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 17:45:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=E8ak=V4=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45zLRK19Hjz46lp for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 17:45:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=E8ak=V4=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F5628423; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 19:39:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from illbsd.quip.test (ip-62-24-92-232.net.upcbroadband.cz [62.24.92.232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C918F28422; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 19:39:41 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: extremely slow boot of RELENG_10 To: mike tancsa , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <9f30d6b9-81bb-769c-1a03-1e81277ae07d@sentex.net> From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Message-ID: <8764e554-8d53-bab6-83d4-cab075f7a8e7@quip.cz> Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 19:39:41 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9f30d6b9-81bb-769c-1a03-1e81277ae07d@sentex.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 45zLRK19Hjz46lp X-Spamd-Bar: +++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of SRS0=E8ak=V4=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz has no SPF policy when checking 94.124.105.4) smtp.mailfrom=SRS0=E8ak=V4=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz X-Spamd-Result: default: False [3.09 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.97)[0.973,0]; IP_SCORE(0.93)[ip: (0.50), ipnet: 94.124.104.0/21(0.25), asn: 42000(3.81), country: CZ(0.08)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[quip.cz]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: elsa.codelab.cz]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[4.105.124.94.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.10.0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[000.fbsd@quip.cz,SRS0=E8ak=V4=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:42000, ipnet:94.124.104.0/21, country:CZ]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[000.fbsd@quip.cz,SRS0=E8ak=V4=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 17:45:01 -0000 mike tancsa wrote on 2019/07/31 17:30: > While moving a pair of ZFS disks from an *very* old motherboard to a new > one, I ran into an odd problem I had not seen before.  The box was > running just fine RELENG_10 from FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #18 r279918 on 10yr > old MB. Boots normally and expected speeds for old hardware/CPU.  But on > the new one, as soon as the |\-/|\ starts spinning, it looks like its > 1/100th of the speed it should be.  Unfortunately, we didnt have the > luxury to wait for it to boot up all the way.  We put the disks back in > the old motherboard, did the RELENG_11 upgrade which included putting in > the new boot blocks after zpool upgrade and then the disks booted just > fine in the new box.  We at first thought it was a hardware issue, but > same behaviour on another new MB, new SATA cables etc etc. > > Any idea what was going on behind the scenes that might have caused it > ?  Is there something about the way the old boot blocks would interact > poorly with new motherboards (in this case, a SuperMicro X11SSH-F) ? I have SuperMicro X11SSH-F and X11SSW-F too and I found this slow boot very annoying. We were running 10.x on them for about 2 years and as I found it was able to boot 10.x system with 11.x loader I deployed 11.x loader on all of them to workaround this issue. (must be redeployed after each 10.x update) My original notes include these links: http://smyck.net/2016/06/15/freebsd-slow-zfs-bootloader/ https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2016-June/084863.html Jan Bramkamp said: "The bootloader disk caching. The old code doesn't work (well) on modern UEFI implementations. You can get acceptable bootloader performance with the FreeBSD 10.3 EFI bootloader on such boards. Even the UEFI install images contain fallback BIOS bootcode and some boards prefer the old BIOS bootcode. On such boards you have to suffer through the slow boot process once to install FreeBSD." Miroslav Lachman From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Wed Jul 31 20:18:19 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86818A7934 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 20:18:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from susan.jackson@oceandigihub.com) Received: from n1nlsmtp01.shr.prod.ams1.secureserver.net (n1nlsmtp01.shr.prod.ams1.secureserver.net [188.121.43.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "relay-hosting.secureserver.net", Issuer "Starfield Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45zPr94Rkbz4HpT for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 20:18:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from susan.jackson@oceandigihub.com) Received: from n3plcpnl0282.prod.ams3.secureserver.net ([160.153.155.37]) by : HOSTING RELAY : with ESMTP id sv2Bh9qW8nVY2sv2BhgJLg; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 13:17:15 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oceandigihub.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date: Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Sender:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=WZ9rXjAeht3tIIkqW6em40CJFYpgEF+HB+ficx22GdM=; b=LGWf8O0xOqLEuMknbTxjRZWhY/ PlRwD/QclVGPtwcur4wpjorZuahjYJn3FSG5I0L8Oi07OdBL8PPid1k1oYWQ3w7Wpfb3NuiLNYGLB fF7vbKn7Xl3JZx8m4AVln16yWGi/vlv7xOF1+dZW8t8Be9HqoAgV5MhUa6Nfo9tNnI9PFQ/P65GKm xr8uCQOmZypK6T2ojmLy2S+zLdlacxqUgmWeoQ7ZxIfnHqq206E/lCpuOmsgBGFkQZwQTAwjEyiLD 7KY9yJe5b/qe4SrbuPp1AXpBWbLqzR+hsrkTCfmcm8Lp4tj/+72bSi5Ze+hnuSU1tkcUfTmZyGWxD WcDENEuQ==; Received: from [89.238.178.46] (port=56988 helo=WS56) by n3plcpnl0282.prod.ams3.secureserver.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1hsuZW-00Fxpj-1c for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 12:47:39 -0700 Reply-To: From: "Susan Jackson" To: Subject: Cisco Firewall Potential Business Lead Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 01:16:51 +0530 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 1 (Highest) X-MSMail-Priority: High X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Thread-Index: AdVH2LDkGJtjGyUFT0GM7GFuHirwIQ== Importance: High Content-Language: en-us X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - n3plcpnl0282.prod.ams3.secureserver.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - oceandigihub.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: n3plcpnl0282.prod.ams3.secureserver.net: authenticated_id: susan.jackson@oceandigihub.com X-Authenticated-Sender: n3plcpnl0282.prod.ams3.secureserver.net: susan.jackson@oceandigihub.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfKfioAwnaidW4J9xf5yEMMhZ3ZmOpIVBgbuznAGIf7dqqfoQJgzIRMrt0IFsg3jTkQlA/OWto3Qdx7KJb1RwDtcM4f6jvjhQZ9W3V1v0LBy2F4Lmr+1a xU/4gwD9PQswiqefrOppCSYRJglgfnbXXgRguKPuwgI/kvHDEb808MIiGHDYdG7QyXcESQ7pO/aZCWiYMiGjySq08XGZh89ay6JcbXdf/gmwLMieEnTas91D X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 45zPr94Rkbz4HpT X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none (invalid DKIM record) header.d=oceandigihub.com header.s=default header.b=LGWf8O0x; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of susan.jackson@oceandigihub.com has no SPF policy when checking 188.121.43.201) smtp.mailfrom=susan.jackson@oceandigihub.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.50 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[susan.jackson@oceandigihub.com]; MX_INVALID(0.50)[cached]; HAS_X_SOURCE(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[oceandigihub.com:~]; HAS_X_ANTIABUSE(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; HAS_X_PRIO_ONE(0.00)[1]; ASN(0.00)[asn:26496, ipnet:188.121.40.0/22, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; HAS_X_AS(0.00)[susan.jackson@oceandigihub.com]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.84)[0.838,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[oceandigihub.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE(0.26)[ip: (0.66), ipnet: 188.121.40.0/22(0.50), asn: 26496(0.20), country: US(-0.05)]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[201.43.121.188.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; R_DKIM_PERMFAIL(0.00)[oceandigihub.com:s=default]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_X_GMSV(0.00)[susan.jackson@oceandigihub.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 20:18:19 -0000 Hi, I'm Curious to know if you would be interested in a Records of Cisco Firewall Users List for your sales and marketing campaigns. We also have related technology users like: Sonicwall, Pfsense, Fortinrt, Juniper, Palo Alto, Router, Checkpoint, Acl, Sophos and many more. Note: We would provide any industry any job title of contact lists as per your requirements. Let me know if you are Interested So that I can get back to you with counts and pricing details for your review. Regards Susan Jackson Sr. Marketing Manager If you are not interested please reply with "Not Interested" In the Subject Line. From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Thu Aug 1 06:03:00 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26A66A342E for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 06:03:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ari@stonepile.fi) Received: from dmx.stonepile.fi (dmx.stonepile.fi [84.22.101.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45zfpp65Pfz4FTD for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 06:02:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ari@stonepile.fi) Received: from dmx.stonepile.fi (dmx.stonepile.fi [192.168.64.10]) by dmx.stonepile.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1216027394C for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 09:02:50 +0300 (EEST) Received: from dmx.stonepile.fi ([192.168.64.10]) by dmx.stonepile.fi (dmx.stonepile.fi [192.168.64.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id Oaw52vk8Q1YC for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 09:02:47 +0300 (EEST) Received: from [192.168.2.242] (unknown [194.136.144.131]) by dmx.stonepile.fi (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 13242273020 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 09:02:46 +0300 (EEST) To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Ari Suutari Subject: ipfw jail keyword broken in 11.3 by jail_getid changes Message-ID: <8ef12e33-583e-5b5c-a602-155e396a6a45@stonepile.fi> Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 09:03:12 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 45zfpp65Pfz4FTD X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.76 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[stonepile.fi:s=k2]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.998,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-stable@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; IP_SCORE(-0.76)[asn: 196752(-3.79), country: NL(0.01)]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[dmx.stonepile.fi]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[stonepile.fi:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[stonepile.fi,quarantine]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.992,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:196752, ipnet:84.22.96.0/19, country:NL]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 06:03:00 -0000 Hi, We have a lot of servers using jails and ipfw rules with numeric jail ids to limit acess between them (something like 'allow tcp from from me to me 8086 jail 1 keep-state'). This has been working very well for ages. Yesterday, we upgraded first of these servers to 11.3. During boot there are now messages like 'ipfw: jail 1 not found' and the rules are not loaded. I tracked this down to: https://reviews.freebsd.org/rS348304 ipfw calls jail_getid, which used to just return the id without checking if string was numeric. In 11.3, the function has been changed to actually check if the jail with given id exists. This doesn't really work in ipfw's context as the rules are loaded before the jails are actually created.    Ari S. From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Thu Aug 1 13:44:26 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFE1CBE38F for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 13:44:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevans@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45zs3G67Tlz4fPM; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 13:44:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevans@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-wr1-f53.google.com (mail-wr1-f53.google.com [209.85.221.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: kevans) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 874B71307D; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 13:44:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevans@freebsd.org) Received: by mail-wr1-f53.google.com with SMTP id r1so73638003wrl.7; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 06:44:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVmwbKRbsuStHaApr3/te4Hld1lKa/jl7Tl80mE/BNPkTMW1U2o 0AvSKKfQ8FSdu/Qin3P+Ch/F/LXhbc/m4OTtshk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz8mp3vHVWoHNQe+/KK4xgyMM1XDNX5IQR3RYVuUnuO7BS6BJ2j/4JOc5Uhqc/J5i3haEUz4R4WzajtnpXHoqA= X-Received: by 2002:adf:ce8d:: with SMTP id r13mr48757095wrn.37.1564667065429; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 06:44:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <8ef12e33-583e-5b5c-a602-155e396a6a45@stonepile.fi> In-Reply-To: <8ef12e33-583e-5b5c-a602-155e396a6a45@stonepile.fi> From: Kyle Evans Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 08:43:42 -0500 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: ipfw jail keyword broken in 11.3 by jail_getid changes To: Ari Suutari Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , "Andrey V. Elsukov" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 45zs3G67Tlz4fPM X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.02 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.00)[-0.002,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.02)[-0.019,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:2610:1c1:1::/48, country:US] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 13:44:27 -0000 On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 1:38 AM Ari Suutari via freebsd-stable wrote: > > Hi, > > We have a lot of servers using jails and ipfw rules with > numeric jail ids to limit acess between them (something > like 'allow tcp from from me to me 8086 jail 1 keep-state'). > > This has been working very well for ages. Yesterday, we upgraded > first of these servers to 11.3. During boot there are now messages > like 'ipfw: jail 1 not found' and the rules are not loaded. > > I tracked this down to: > https://reviews.freebsd.org/rS348304 > > ipfw calls jail_getid, which used to just return the id without checking > if string was numeric. In 11.3, the function has been changed to actually > check if the jail with given id exists. > > This doesn't really work in ipfw's context as the rules are loaded before > the jails are actually created. > > Ari S. Hi, I've CC'd Andrey, who tends to work in this area. Apologies for not catching the breakage- I'll whip up a patch unless Andrey objects, but this area feels a bit finnicky. I think a couple of things need to happen: 1.) To fix things -right now-, ipfw should fall back to strtoul if jail_getid fails and only error out if strtoul fails. This restores the functional status quo and still uses jail_getid properly, which is documented to return -1 if the jail does not exist. 2.) One of these: - a.) ipfw(8) needs revision, or - b.) the kernel interface needs to change a bit #2 options are mutually exclusive, I think- the problem is that jail jid/name rules will be usable at different times, and it's not immediately clear when that is to someone (me) who has never used ipfw before. jid historically works at all times and operates on any jail that ends up having that jid. name can only be functional if the jail's already running when the rule is processed by ipfw(8) and applies to whatever jid has that name at that time. If the jail gets restarted with a different jid, it won't apply to the jid that that name has after the restart unless the rule is reprocessed. Thanks, Kyle Evans From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Thu Aug 1 18:20:33 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E763C4DBA for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 18:20:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevans@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45zz9s0wHTz43Mn; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 18:20:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevans@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-wm1-f41.google.com (mail-wm1-f41.google.com [209.85.128.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: kevans) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C7DD61504B; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 18:20:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevans@freebsd.org) Received: by mail-wm1-f41.google.com with SMTP id x15so65564973wmj.3; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 11:20:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV7bc5Hlgwblo8vip1w8dxyfkAUDUqiz84SygXDazmjg2y8CRu9 i4XzUZm4jbdld7SPQMRfC3sbXg6qyVl+smst7cM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwmeNht1SpKQpMkmusuXGX1qrAjh5g0T8vzkfU/CjakmJ28eKFJZEH00nDbnUhkJCLg1AKmMfZ8oV/z19Z86Iw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:c6:: with SMTP id u6mr60957wmm.153.1564683631690; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 11:20:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <8ef12e33-583e-5b5c-a602-155e396a6a45@stonepile.fi> In-Reply-To: From: Kyle Evans Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 13:19:49 -0500 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: ipfw jail keyword broken in 11.3 by jail_getid changes To: Ari Suutari Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , "Andrey V. Elsukov" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 18:20:33 -0000 On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 8:43 AM Kyle Evans wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 1:38 AM Ari Suutari via freebsd-stable > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > We have a lot of servers using jails and ipfw rules with > > numeric jail ids to limit acess between them (something > > like 'allow tcp from from me to me 8086 jail 1 keep-state'). > > > > This has been working very well for ages. Yesterday, we upgraded > > first of these servers to 11.3. During boot there are now messages > > like 'ipfw: jail 1 not found' and the rules are not loaded. > > > > I tracked this down to: > > https://reviews.freebsd.org/rS348304 > > > > ipfw calls jail_getid, which used to just return the id without checking > > if string was numeric. In 11.3, the function has been changed to actually > > check if the jail with given id exists. > > > > This doesn't really work in ipfw's context as the rules are loaded before > > the jails are actually created. > > > > Ari S. > > Hi, > > I've CC'd Andrey, who tends to work in this area. Apologies for not > catching the breakage- I'll whip up a patch unless Andrey objects, but > this area feels a bit finnicky. I think a couple of things need to > happen: > > 1.) To fix things -right now-, ipfw should fall back to strtoul if > jail_getid fails and only error out if strtoul fails. This restores > the functional status quo and still uses jail_getid properly, which is > documented to return -1 if the jail does not exist. > I've created a review for this at [0] -- I can't test it, though, so some testing would be appreciated. Thanks, Kyle Evans [0] https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21128 From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Fri Aug 2 05:50:44 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE1A9AA5D4 for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 05:50:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ari@stonepile.fi) Received: from dmx.stonepile.fi (dmx.stonepile.fi [84.22.101.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 460GVC4ylpz4fNb for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 05:50:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ari@stonepile.fi) Received: from dmx.stonepile.fi (dmx.stonepile.fi [192.168.64.10]) by dmx.stonepile.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C60F2735C8 for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 08:50:41 +0300 (EEST) Received: from dmx.stonepile.fi ([192.168.64.10]) by dmx.stonepile.fi (dmx.stonepile.fi [192.168.64.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id mSl_AEM2JxUT for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 08:50:38 +0300 (EEST) Received: from [192.168.2.242] (unknown [194.136.144.131]) by dmx.stonepile.fi (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A0F69273040 for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 08:50:38 +0300 (EEST) Subject: Re: ipfw jail keyword broken in 11.3 by jail_getid changes To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <8ef12e33-583e-5b5c-a602-155e396a6a45@stonepile.fi> From: Ari Suutari Message-ID: <47adcb23-b2d5-c70d-beb8-c8bbde6a2973@stonepile.fi> Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 08:51:01 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 460GVC4ylpz4fNb X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.73 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[stonepile.fi:s=k2]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-stable@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; IP_SCORE(-0.76)[asn: 196752(-3.80), country: NL(0.01)]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[stonepile.fi:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[stonepile.fi,quarantine]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.97)[-0.975,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:196752, ipnet:84.22.96.0/19, country:NL]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 05:50:44 -0000 Hi, I tested your change and can confirm that it fixes the issue.     Ari S. On 1.8.2019 21.19, Kyle Evans wrote: > On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 8:43 AM Kyle Evans wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 1:38 AM Ari Suutari via freebsd-stable >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> We have a lot of servers using jails and ipfw rules with >>> numeric jail ids to limit acess between them (something >>> like 'allow tcp from from me to me 8086 jail 1 keep-state'). >>> >>> This has been working very well for ages. Yesterday, we upgraded >>> first of these servers to 11.3. During boot there are now messages >>> like 'ipfw: jail 1 not found' and the rules are not loaded. >>> >>> I tracked this down to: >>> https://reviews.freebsd.org/rS348304 >>> >>> ipfw calls jail_getid, which used to just return the id without checking >>> if string was numeric. In 11.3, the function has been changed to actually >>> check if the jail with given id exists. >>> >>> This doesn't really work in ipfw's context as the rules are loaded before >>> the jails are actually created. >>> >>> Ari S. >> Hi, >> >> I've CC'd Andrey, who tends to work in this area. Apologies for not >> catching the breakage- I'll whip up a patch unless Andrey objects, but >> this area feels a bit finnicky. I think a couple of things need to >> happen: >> >> 1.) To fix things -right now-, ipfw should fall back to strtoul if >> jail_getid fails and only error out if strtoul fails. This restores >> the functional status quo and still uses jail_getid properly, which is >> documented to return -1 if the jail does not exist. >> > I've created a review for this at [0] -- I can't test it, though, so > some testing would be appreciated. > > Thanks, > > Kyle Evans > > [0] https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21128 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Fri Aug 2 14:57:32 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DBCEB4DE4 for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 14:57:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danielle.james@itaudiencesonline.com) Received: from mail-io1-xd2f.google.com (mail-io1-xd2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 460Vd75s2Zz48x6 for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 14:57:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danielle.james@itaudiencesonline.com) Received: by mail-io1-xd2f.google.com with SMTP id z3so11640340iog.0 for ; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 07:57:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=itaudiencesonline.com; s=google; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=RatcvoO82WbB2/i6tu+JuDxquxKPjHxXWX6W6mzVtjc=; b=OemSBy8yKlhNAkbKKkMJFzxoEkGMODwDSzalekbHN/JAtQn43gf80jgsC4UNvFaR1c at9iUFkrrNO8/Tg8IY/Eo8SCmUsd1fm7L4MCSW1Euh+L29aBKnNz9FSHsssNgFkAjYJ8 tKJ4heaYbqqDkfQnzIj9fwj5Ldi85IaKiXTkBCuavmMAp8QvV5WOmu/OCM8ZVKfzhwZ9 nLXkM6W4QIUFRY3cBCpPh+Mu7l6Lp/eQzc6TmamDJDLy+WBoy4C+Uuzw7sC77D0BFuSS x+PE4nDFK2SYLKcOiTeHTL8CXfIuXVmvXkg7Ew4Y7ZVgwO2oocMhH9jFKcOnbElsz2cq p2Tw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject :to; bh=RatcvoO82WbB2/i6tu+JuDxquxKPjHxXWX6W6mzVtjc=; b=HaGZf4np66esqM3XgaLRlMmPX9bjKwxXE9+hFl7jE5QhEAiRhBJqERuqsetZUoEzHp uB+tuOphg77YgaK6rHmGv+yEAL2WdIJo2Q/dpbk6Na5bKUgDLSodZvHeZtyEnlWhR33h HZOJkSBTEtLptFrGTmnS9CPsCXJwmefnTlWOB7gArRrFbpXUj0MbNrHnZeowzFTQzboq AUMV39VWjBEpsO0McPmyuBenWrlVFOtrKlTTipTvfcyHvunE2FiHCjANI4CD6HyQS4os 6JOuD/11Burq8GCLmvcCEB5f4QNJmqeseEYNGqfl742XLEhgu2ZoB9pH+gU/Pq2z88Zv eYLA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUaBpmBfzFhN8/zU75jFTsoxFq4F08MNirj4E5+3NCcTKzQeurm 1sMVoUPEfw/OdlUFHnvcRqxR5zKb3x2C8JHslomOl/h6 X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqymo+xX123/T9n0TfMBxlzSg6J6nUK5HsT6bptvFb2CRzQL31OiJACYA0VbT2G7BokcbR75PX1ux9iNAlpmN+A= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:8702:: with SMTP id u2mr108069163iom.228.1564757850225; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 07:57:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 41451425009 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 09:57:29 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: danielle.james@itaudiencesonline.com From: danielle.james@itaudiencesonline.com Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 09:57:29 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: KW2lOH5JojcjPFIeYDYvfk6EgoE Message-ID: Subject: Companies using Microsoft Azure and Amazon AWS Install Base To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 460Vd75s2Zz48x6 X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=itaudiencesonline.com header.s=google header.b=OemSBy8y; dmarc=none; spf=softfail (mx1.freebsd.org: 2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2f is neither permitted nor denied by domain of danielle.james@itaudiencesonline.com) smtp.mailfrom=danielle.james@itaudiencesonline.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.49 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[itaudiencesonline.com:s=google]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-stable@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; R_SPF_SOFTFAIL(0.00)[~all]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[itaudiencesonline.com]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[itaudiencesonline.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.97)[-0.974,0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[f.2.d.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; IP_SCORE(-2.21)[ip: (-5.46), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-3.09), asn: 15169(-2.46), country: US(-0.05)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 14:57:32 -0000 Hi, I was wondering if you would be interested in the updated contact information from the below mentioned applications users and *MSP=E2=80=99s,= MSSP=E2=80=99s, ISV=E2=80=99s, SI=E2=80=99s* and *CSP=E2=80=99s *for your Channel Marketing= Strategy. *Significant users list includes:* *Technology* *Category* *Amazon Web Services* *PaaS Clouds* *Microsoft Azure* *Cloud Software Defined Storage* *Google Cloud Platform* *Cloud Storage Gateways* *Adobe* *Cloud Management* *VMware* *Cloud Access Security Brokers* *IBM Cloud* *Converged Infrastructure* *Rackspace* *Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)* *Red Hat* *Contact Center as a Service (CCaaS)* *Salesforce* *Cloud ERP* *Oracle Cloud* *Cloud Storage* *SAP* *Cloud Backup* *Verizon Cloud* *Cloud HCM* *Navisite* *Cloud Analytics* *Dropbox* *Cloud Security Services* *Egnyte* *Cloud Workload Security* *Workday* *Cloud Data Integration* *Citrix* *Cloud Monitoring Software* *Huawei* *Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS)* *Dell EMC * *Cloud and Data Center Security* *Cisco* *Hosted and Cloud Based VoIP* Our *terms of business* are simple. =C2=B7 Customized lists as per your requirements =C2=B7 Upfront guarantees and refund policies (in case of dissatisfaction) =C2=B7 Timely and seamless delivery =C2=B7 Continued customer support Thanks, *Danielle James| **Software Intelligence Data Specialist* *Data Coverage- Global (North America, EMEA, APAC & LATAM)* *If you wish to not to receive further emails, change the subject line to Unsubscribe* From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Sat Aug 3 19:34:36 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B286B8BDD; Sat, 3 Aug 2019 19:34:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lwhsu@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 461DkN3dDkz4bZP; Sat, 3 Aug 2019 19:34:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lwhsu@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1129) id 5CD01C03; Sat, 3 Aug 2019 19:34:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2019 19:34:36 +0000 From: Li-Wen Hsu To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2019-07-28 Message-ID: <20190803193436.GA39017@freefall.freebsd.org> Reply-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2019 19:34:36 -0000 (Please send the followup to freebsd-testing@ and note Reply-To is set.) FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2019-07-28 =================================== Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period from 2019-07-22 to 2019-07-28. During this period, we have: * 1689 builds (97.1% (+0.4) passed, 2.9% (-0.4) failed) were executed on aarch64, amd64, armv6, armv7, i386, mips, mips64, powerpc, powerpc64, powerpcspe, riscv64, sparc64 architectures for head, stable/12, stable/11 branches. * 317 test runs (80.8% (+24.6) passed, 18.9% (-24.2) unstable, 0.3% (-0.4) exception) were executed on amd64, i386, riscv64 architectures for head, stable/12, stable/11 branches. * 36 doc builds (100% (+0) passed) Test case status (on 2019-07-28 23:59): | Branch/Architecture | Total | Pass | Fail | Skipped | | ------------------- | ---------- | --------- | ------- | -------- | | head/amd64 | 7460 (+0) | 7409 (-2) | 0 (+0) | 51 (+2) | | head/i386 | 7458 (+0) | 7400 (-6) | 0 (+0) | 58 (+10) | | 12-STABLE/amd64 | 7388 (+0) | 7344 (+3) | 0 (+0) | 44 (-3) | | 12-STABLE/i386 | 7386 (+0) | 7335 (+0) | 0 (-5) | 51 (+5) | | 11-STABLE/amd64 | 6845 (+0) | 6797 (-3) | 1 (+1) | 47 (+2) | | 11-STABLE/i386 | 6843 (+0) | 6759 (+0) | 35 (+1) | 49 (-1) | (The statistics from experimental jobs are omitted) If any of the issues found by CI are in your area of interest or expertise please investigate the PRs listed below. The latest web version of this report is available at https://hackmd.io/s/r1l5zGmMH and archive is available at http://hackfoldr.org/freebsd-ci-report/, any help is welcome. ## News * [FCP 20190401-ci_policy: CI policy ](https://github.com/freebsd/fcp/blob/master/fcp-20190401-ci_policy.md) is in "feedback" state, please check and provide comments. * This week we disabled most unstable test cases in CI runs to let the real error caused by the commit can be noticed more easier. ## Fixed Tests * https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-stable-11-i386-test/ * sys.opencrypto.runtests.main https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/350209 ## Failing Tests * https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-stable-11-i386-test/ * local.kyua.* (31 cases) * local.lutok.* (3 cases) ## Failing and Flaky Tests (from experimental jobs) * https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-head-amd64-dtrace_test/ * Flakey test case: common.misc.t_dtrace_contrib.tst_dynopt_d https://bugs.freebsd.org/237641 * https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-head-amd64-test_zfs/ * There are ~60 failing cases, including flakey ones, see https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-head-amd64-test_zfs/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/ for more details ## Disabled Tests * lib.libc.sys.mmap_test.mmap_truncate_signal https://bugs.freebsd.org/211924 * sys.fs.tmpfs.mount_test.large https://bugs.freebsd.org/212862 * sys.fs.tmpfs.link_test.kqueue https://bugs.freebsd.org/213662 * sys.kqueue.libkqueue.kqueue_test.main https://bugs.freebsd.org/233586 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__PT_KILL_competing_stop https://bugs.freebsd.org/220841 * usr.bin.procstat.procstat_test.command_loogle.com/ine_arguments https://bugs.freebsd.org/233587 * usr.bin.procstat.procstat_test.environment https://bugs.freebsd.org/233588 * lib.libc.regex.exhaust_test.regcomp_too_big (i386 only) https://bugs.freebsd.org/237450 * sys.netinet.socket_afinet.socket_afinet_bind_zero (new) https://bugs.freebsd.org/238781 * sys.netpfil.pf.names.names * sys.netpfil.pf.synproxy.synproxy https://bugs.freebsd.org/238870 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__follow_fork_child_detached_unrelated_debugger https://bugs.freebsd.org/239292 * sys.netpfil.pf.forward.v4 (i386 only) * sys.netpfil.pf.forward.v6 (i386 only) * sys.netpfil.pf.set_tos.v4 (i386 only) https://bugs.freebsd.org/239380 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__follow_fork_both_attached_unrelated_debugger https://bugs.freebsd.org/239397 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__parent_sees_exit_after_child_debugger https://bugs.freebsd.org/239399 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__follow_fork_parent_detached_unrelated_debugger https://bugs.freebsd.org/239425 ## Issues ### Cause build fails * https://bugs.freebsd.org/233735 Possible build race: genoffset.o /usr/src/sys/sys/types.h: error: machine/endian.h: No such file or directory * https://bugs.freebsd.org/233769 Possible build race: ld: error: unable to find library -lgcc_s * https://bugs.freebsd.org/238828 Possible build race: lib/libsysdecode/tables.h:948: error: 'IPV6_MIN_MEMBERSHIPS' undeclared Patch available: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21069 ### Cause kernel panics * https://bugs.freebsd.org/238870 sys.netpfil.pf.names.names and sys.netpfil.pf.synproxy.synproxy cause panic Patch exists: * https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20868 * https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20869 ### Open * https://bugs.freebsd.org/237077 possible race in build: /usr/src/sys/amd64/linux/linux_support.s:38:2: error: expected relocatable expression * https://bugs.freebsd.org/237403 Tests in sys/opencrypto should be converted to Python3 * https://bugs.freebsd.org/237641 Flakey test case: common.misc.t_dtrace_contrib.tst_dynopt_d * https://bugs.freebsd.org/237652 tests.hotspare.hotspare_test.hotspare_snapshot_001_pos timeout since somewhere in (r346814, r 346845] * https://bugs.freebsd.org/237655 Non-deterministic panic when running pf tests in interface ioctl code (NULL passed to strncmp) * https://bugs.freebsd.org/237656 "Freed UMA keg (rtentry) was not empty (18 items). Lost 1 pages of memory." seen when running sys/netipsec tests * https://bugs.freebsd.org/237657 sys.kern.pdeathsig.signal_delivered_ptrace timing out periodically on i386 * https://bugs.freebsd.org/238781 sys.netinet.socket_afinet.socket_afinet_bind_zero does not work when mac_portacl(4) loaded * https://bugs.freebsd.org/239292 Flakey test case: sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__follow_fork_child_detached_unrelated_debugger * https://bugs.freebsd.org/239380 sys.netpfil.pf.forward.{v4,v6} and sys.netpfil.pf.set_tos.v4 fail on i386 * https://bugs.freebsd.org/239397 Flakey test case: sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__follow_fork_both_attached_unrelated_debugger * https://bugs.freebsd.org/239399 Flakey test case: sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__parent_sees_exit_after_child_debugger * https://bugs.freebsd.org/239425 Flakey test case: sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__follow_fork_parent_detached_unrelated_debugger ### Others * [Tickets related to testing@](https://preview.tinyurl.com/y9maauwg) * https://bugs.freebsd.org/235356 Help on how to reproduce and analyze is wanted.