Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 4 May 2019 17:54:39 -0700
From:      Anish <akgupt3@gmail.com>
Cc:        "Bapat, Udayan" <Udayan.Bapat@netapp.com>,  "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: BSD11 vs BSD12 KVM performance
Message-ID:  <CALnRwMSAje_SWxWPk%2BaHcJH3gjXaWoQbjHnUMkKkLdZjiAyPBA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <b83b1234-6359-2b26-d9ce-9eb261861eda@omnilan.de>
References:  <D2BA45B3-5156-424F-A74A-C41FE0E20CEC@netapp.com> <b83b1234-6359-2b26-d9ce-9eb261861eda@omnilan.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Udayan,

Intel VM-x and AMD SVM allow hypervisor to intercept TSC access for
save/restore of VM migration, so when these intercepts are enabled, rdtsc
will require switch between root and non-root mode which is expensive and
may cost few hundreds of cpu cycles. Is it possible that one has these
intercepts always enabled even when migration is not started?

-Anish



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CALnRwMSAje_SWxWPk%2BaHcJH3gjXaWoQbjHnUMkKkLdZjiAyPBA>