From owner-freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Wed Oct 21 07:04:22 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA1EB444B48 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 07:04:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guimaxali@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lj1-x236.google.com (mail-lj1-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::236]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CGM1L17pfz3yMf for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 07:04:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guimaxali@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lj1-x236.google.com with SMTP id 23so1417868ljv.7 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 00:04:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=C3BZ2c8goskKLq5ZwXkRFA9vWGes7cM0ZqBRnZ4tEuc=; b=hUQL9GeLEKMjFsKPpmyZug6+ls21IuFqVne9ShSYvFVah4NsS6xtFmXtKnsN/AVPMR vBaqv5AJSF79WJL9iGKu2e3ydFXiRHaWQ6Qhdq2iS7ovRD+lax2A0MvkEkFnxEE71Efn Dgdnhj7AozoCjiTHnw6MA3QkQXfeVUNRSsJBqS8nx0h6B8zUMSTYx8pTwUv6X86EMZmy 5flXEZbi+TjnyeT/AdudQ2zGW4XbKWgAgcl2OsHURoi0PDPPAbmX2bSGhsyJcWZFEv1b uLpTl/Wq2H1VYcF+wMn20dOnhWRYy07qasU4DFeI+clfLgVtwCEHCWbmBZs1mnUrWF2l edWw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=C3BZ2c8goskKLq5ZwXkRFA9vWGes7cM0ZqBRnZ4tEuc=; b=PC+rukxXp5GwrXlXA4U8uboFj41dMmsnTJ9H1l66mqcFKAkXnNjyW+o2epV8TT92rp 6hPsn/fkynbR50YE7XqB0r77tPlKXvoyW/DmipntAZ8vnyLtK3IabmOEmuv5cglLKNqK NrQDzQ6iKWkfoZ4ESDHw6Qf3UPTrBJ4ka74QO0/sUE2+UN5K8Cn9IpZP1+XmoIhmjEvL XsLyElOxkCMVf/BSqYBc25kai9vacLLW5pktVwQsL3UoY4gnQHOuenJwcVXYV7EKQWBo 9rdi+Ph9KjE+Idoy2VGD4KLafiTKOxDbURyv81yLpw0mXo+WuxTmOYG/hRjWjXTxk0x4 swrA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530clbUt4X6AcEjMRPWbqEILqhQ+3fWCWRuS1hXF2Yf0eNv5ESf6 7yQIe3lRyfUE+GvUj1eGjEI8GdmO2npS4eB0uLbbnQ0B X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy/wWf1KksvZpRtg0gOMlVNUKvTVQsKiziYS0OypLHUnR3B4ekQeuFbqe7cNiyPtxlEXEQKsF3QOyC+NCc9K88= X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:291:: with SMTP id b17mr800157ljo.177.1603263860093; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 00:04:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 375924807269 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 00:04:19 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Max Ali Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 00:04:19 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Port for djbdns To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4CGM1L17pfz3yMf X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=hUQL9GeL; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of guimaxali@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::236 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guimaxali@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.80 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.02)[-1.020]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.03)[-1.030]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::236:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.75)[-0.750]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-amd64]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 07:04:22 -0000 Hi, Just to ask if it's still needed to put the SRV option in the makefile for djbdns port. The file isn't in the /usr/port/distfiles and disappeared from the internet still 2017. Regards Blastrider From owner-freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Thu Oct 22 13:15:17 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB5A0448850 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:15:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CH7Bs61Lvz3c7C for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:15:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id CCB3944884F; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:15:17 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: amd64@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC7A84487B4 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:15:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CH7Bs54xrz3btQ for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:15:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74A63175D8 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:15:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09MDFHlp034374 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:15:17 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09MDFH2a034373 for amd64@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:15:17 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: amd64@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 163710] setjump in userboot.so causes stack corruption Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:15:17 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: amd64 X-Bugzilla-Version: Unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: abhkamal0512@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: amd64@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:15:18 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D163710 DontWorry changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |abhkamal0512@gmail.com --- Comment #16 from DontWorry --- (In reply to peter from comment #7) On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Russell Cattelan wr= =3D ote: > The following reply was made to PR amd64/163710; it has been noted by GNA= =3D TS. [..] > =3DA0Does the last patch seem acceptable? > > =3DA0Can we close this issue out? Sadly not, +no-machine: + rm -f ${.CURDIR}/../../ficl/machine .. this is definitely bogus no matter what. This attempts to modify the source tree which may be read only, and should never even have a "machine->..." symlink in it to remove in the first place. I see sys/boot/userboot/ficl/Makefile has commented out the code that sets up the ./machine links in its ${.OBJDIR} and there's -I paths all over the place so my guess is that it's picking up some of the i386 machine links rather than setting up its own. You probably need to look at the userboot/ficl/Makefile code and make sure its setting up the correct links rather than accidently using one belonging to something else. Or your source tree is contaminated somehow with a machine-> link somewhere that it isn't supposed to be. --=3D20 Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; https://www.manganelo.link/; peter@yahoo-inc.c= om; KI6FJV "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 "If Java had true garbage collection, most programs would delete themselves upon execution." -- Robert Sewell --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Well let me explain this again. If the build is done from scratch things work because boot/userboot/ficl is built before boot/ficl. If an incremental build is done (e.g. when doing devel on the userboot lib) boot/userboot/ficl will end up picking up i386 header files due to the symlink that was created by boot/ficl/Makefile I'll will grant you this bug isn't hit by a normal full build due to way the build it ordered. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=