From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sun Mar 8 05:34:33 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA8D825E2E2; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 05:34:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lwhsu@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48ZqmT1Y8jz4NRh; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 05:34:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lwhsu@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1129) id C27CB2236A; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 05:34:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2020 05:34:30 +0000 From: Li-Wen Hsu To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-03-01 Message-ID: <20200308053430.GA46059@freefall.freebsd.org> Reply-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2020 05:34:34 -0000 (Please send the followup to freebsd-testing@ and note Reply-To is set.) FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-03-01 =================================== Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period from 2020-02-24 to 2020-03-01. During this period, we have: * 1930 builds (87.4% (-0.3) passed, 12.6% (+0.3) failed) of buildworld and buildkernel (GENERIC and LINT) were executed on aarch64, amd64, armv6, armv7, i386, mips, mips64, powerpc, powerpc64, powerpcspe, riscv64, sparc64 architectures for head, stable/12, stable/11 branches. * 288 test runs (77.5% (+10.7) passed, 21.5% (-8.8) unstable, 1.0% (-1.9) exception) were executed on amd64, i386, riscv64 architectures for head, stable/12, stable/11 branches. * 17 doc and www builds (94.1% (-1.9) passed, 5.9% (+1.9) failed) Test case status (on 2020-03-01 23:59): | Branch/Architecture | Total | Pass | Fail | Skipped | | ------------------- | -------- | --------- | ------ | ------- | | head/amd64 | 7699 (0) | 7598 (-3) | 9 (+3) | 92 (0) | | head/i386 | 7697 (0) | 7590 (-3) | 9 (+3) | 98 (0) | | 12-STABLE/amd64 | 7501 (0) | 7452 (+8) | 0 (0) | 49 (-8) | | 12-STABLE/i386 | 7499 (0) | 7442 (-8) | 0 (0) | 57 (+8) | | 11-STABLE/amd64 | 6878 (0) | 6828 (-3) | 0 (0) | 50 (+3) | | 11-STABLE/i386 | 6876 (0) | 6827 (+3) | 0 (0) | 49 (-3) | (The statistics from experimental jobs are omitted) If any of the issues found by CI are in your area of interest or expertise please investigate the PRs listed below. The latest web version of this report is available at https://hackmd.io/@FreeBSD-CI/report-20200301 and archive is available at https://hackmd.io/@FreeBSD-CI/ , any help is welcome. ## Failed and Fixed tests * sys.netpfil.pf.fragmentation.v6 https://bugs.freebsd.org/244393 * 9 sys.audit. tests https://bugs.freebsd.org/244537 ## Regressions * fusefs tests fail when mac_bsdextended.ko is loaded https://bugs.freebsd.org/244229 * `dtrace -c` causes program dumps core after somewhere between (r357694, r357701] https://bugs.freebsd.org/244053 * Lock-order reversals triggered by tests under sys.net.if_lagg_test.* on i386 https://bugs.freebsd.org/244163 Discovered by newly endabled sys.net.* tests. ([r357857](https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/357857)) * sys.net.if_lagg_test.lacp_linkstate_destroy_stress panics i386 kernel https://bugs.freebsd.org/244168 Discovered by newly endabled sys.net.* tests. ([r357857](https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/357857)) * (test case) sys.geom.class.multipath.misc.fail_on_error (on 12-STABLE) https://bugs.freebsd.org/244158 ## Failing and Flaky tests (from experimental jobs) * https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-head-amd64-dtrace_test/ * cddl.usr.sbin.dtrace.common.misc.t_dtrace_contrib.tst_dynopt_d * https://bugs.freebsd.org/237641 * https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-head-amd64-test_zfs/ * There are ~13 failing and ~109 skipped cases, including flakey ones, see https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-head-amd64-test_zfs/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/ for more details * Work for cleaning these failing cass are in progress * https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-head-amd64-test_ltp/ * Total 3670 tests (0), 2285 success (-5), 579 failures (+5), 806 skipped (0) ## Disabled Tests * sys.fs.tmpfs.mount_test.large https://bugs.freebsd.org/212862 * sys.fs.tmpfs.link_test.kqueue https://bugs.freebsd.org/213662 * sys.kqueue.libkqueue.kqueue_test.main https://bugs.freebsd.org/233586 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__PT_KILL_competing_stop https://bugs.freebsd.org/220841 * lib.libc.regex.exhaust_test.regcomp_too_big (i386 only) https://bugs.freebsd.org/237450 * sys.netinet.socket_afinet.socket_afinet_bind_zero https://bugs.freebsd.org/238781 * sys.netpfil.pf.names.names * sys.netpfil.pf.synproxy.synproxy https://bugs.freebsd.org/238870 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__follow_fork_child_detached_unrelated_debugger https://bugs.freebsd.org/239292 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__follow_fork_both_attached_unrelated_debugger https://bugs.freebsd.org/239397 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__parent_sees_exit_after_child_debugger https://bugs.freebsd.org/239399 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__follow_fork_parent_detached_unrelated_debugger https://bugs.freebsd.org/239425 * lib.libc.gen.getmntinfo_test.getmntinfo_test https://bugs.freebsd.org/240049 * sys.sys.qmath_test.qdivq_s64q https://bugs.freebsd.org/240219 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__getppid https://bugs.freebsd.org/240510 * lib.libc.sys.stat_test.stat_socket https://bugs.freebsd.org/240621 * lib.libarchive.functional_test.test_write_filter_zstd https://bugs.freebsd.org/240683 * lib.libcasper.services.cap_dns.dns_test.main https://bugs.freebsd.org/241435 * local.kyua.* (31 cases) & local.lutok.* (3 cases) on 11-i386 https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-stable-11-i386-test/2278/testReport/ * sys.geom.class.multipath.failloop.failloop https://bugs.freebsd.org/242689 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__procdesc_reparent_wait_child https://bugs.freebsd.org/243605 * skip sys.geom.class.multipath.failloop.failloop https://bugs.freebsd.org/244053 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__parent_wait_after_attach https://bugs.freebsd.org/244055 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__parent_exits_before_child https://bugs.freebsd.org/244056 * sys.net.if_lagg_test.witness (i386) https://bugs.freebsd.org/244163 * PipePdfork.WildcardWait in sys.capsicum.capsicum-test.main https://bugs.freebsd.org/244165 * sys.net.if_lagg_test.lacp_linkstate_destroy_stress (i386) https://bugs.freebsd.org/244168 * sys.netinet6.frag6.frag6_07.frag6_07 https://bugs.freebsd.org/244170 * sys.netinet.fibs_test.udp_dontroute6 https://bugs.freebsd.org/244172 ## Issues ### Cause build fails * https://bugs.freebsd.org/233735 Possible build race: genoffset.o /usr/src/sys/sys/types.h: error: machine/endian.h: No such file or directory * https://bugs.freebsd.org/233769 Possible build race: ld: error: unable to find library -lgcc_s ### Cause kernel panics * https://bugs.freebsd.org/238870 sys.netpfil.pf.names.names and sys.netpfil.pf.synproxy.synproxy cause panic Patch exists: * https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20868 * https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20869 ### Open * https://bugs.freebsd.org/237403 Tests in sys/opencrypto should be converted to Python3 * https://bugs.freebsd.org/237641 Flakey test case: common.misc.t_dtrace_contrib.tst_dynopt_d * https://bugs.freebsd.org/237656 "Freed UMA keg (rtentry) was not empty (18 items). Lost 1 pages of memory." seen when running sys/netipsec tests * https://bugs.freebsd.org/238781 sys.netinet.socket_afinet.socket_afinet_bind_zero does not work when mac_portacl(4) loaded * https://bugs.freebsd.org/239292 Flakey test case: sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__follow_fork_child_detached_unrelated_debugger * https://bugs.freebsd.org/239397 Flakey test case: sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__follow_fork_both_attached_unrelated_debugger * https://bugs.freebsd.org/239399 Flakey test case: sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__parent_sees_exit_after_child_debugger * https://bugs.freebsd.org/239425 Flakey test case: sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__follow_fork_parent_detached_unrelated_debugger * https://bugs.freebsd.org/241662 Flakey test case: lib.libarchive.functional_test.test_fuzz_iso9660 ### Others * [Tickets related to testing@](https://preview.tinyurl.com/y9maauwg) From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sun Mar 8 10:31:58 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07B5E264D45 for ; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 10:31:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48ZyMd3S6Yz4Mbl for ; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 10:31:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:c4ea:bd49:619b:6cb3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: matthew/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 09DB81F67F for ; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 10:31:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from liminal.local (unknown [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:4c57:9df1:552a:4b34]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5FA1ED7B1 for ; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 10:31:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=FreeBSD.org Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/5FA1ED7B1; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral Subject: Re: Pkg repository is broken... To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <966320bd-cf2a-6168-9615-16ffd7e98555@umanwizard.com> <20200302175801.GA48484@lordsith.net> <20200304041614.GA92692@eureka.lemis.com> <20200306112944.GQ33086@e.0x20.net> <20200307003855.GG85938@eureka.lemis.com> <20200307164658.552c8548@bsd64.grem.de> <20200307223800.GA20478@eureka.lemis.com> From: Matthew Seaman Autocrypt: addr=matthew@FreeBSD.org; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBFJIL80BEADi7/VbnnErDU6pjEhI/SzEZ/HbDRkJ5g7HroAtqIRm6nj8ZwOAgZ/2ZnWn 5F+fXTuLsG0FLNtkd17FoVcuCi5e/GPliXI5cmamV7E1Yz4T8UsJ7RQolimyxVexccKd16Tc AA7B9bFlJSKkBUSD0buj7VjT07xWhRzu6Vgi5r0UjLALYJz977uZA0F1aOGOXREDEAOhdcNc kSNjynqAwDA6dCT1Elpi4key1fYjv4jyDF+GU/YXul2Y/rguA8FCkHd9vyym5eAsLQ5mG00V V9fkEHIpH5KorNVnl/ufHXnkZqmHAZVpFDcrshb7aZ/pL45PXyWgLj+e6etelgj3a2bZi0JF cVdXCnBZVP2oIyYblM11ugTbfCwodORU8a5KfPeztMdAtDr4e+32NTrPdPi5rLT+GUsYz+PL 3A3m3u8bdsFp40DlIrBtSByVjqERxcfhphrEB4J8BXHUG7OAtXkZMlW/PGKDwXJq0O6Z5Tcg YHAoEiSWbXiexHgXNJyP+sqnIlhLWhSJGeJ+C83wqI6oYlZUCW00NkPxcIHnQPV/z+5wQVci TMyaWC2YCIHz4Ljs+TnwWMz0E8PNFDfHVbQ0W4PRGV7gRAqxfL+yKufauIEGbEq8rNDbSwL3 bcUCxR4ZDlaUEUwT4J8naf7rjdgiEYHs2Ig3jeK1+ER4FPG1sQARAQABtCRNYXR0aGV3IFNl YW1hbiA8bWF0dGhld0BmcmVlYnNkLm9yZz6JAlQEEwEKAD4CGwMFCwkIBwMFFQoJCAsFFgMC AQACHgECF4AWIQRyz6whebywJLW1RZADb2ye5/OevwUCWttU6gUJDFmAlAAKCRADb2ye5/Oe v7D/EACF6YL98cq6u20rai9gDCS+XY7HDGxowreE2HTAZXQmJTatSaEgiJMJUXfjXn7U/L+q zFhjOC2kiOze1yIWrptoxFa29lSUi3jWHNv7BM2bA4i7jjtwR8Ep2wSvDDl99jewDc6Ewot4 p598S5tZt4my9yGLeaCiN44IPg4U2ftnjcoONtrBOVyIHvVK5QL5r+wyqfdlySbAs026kJAZ rkwAL2ZVy3m1xNSmM8MojwSeX/5puv5JG2FoFb+VphZKCpgaqoEAN2jCqoJW9nnbAth1bYiM djiVr+k8pQl4CltFgpzSKxGbxXUSdPmEpA67FsV0BLIq5xy5VkvzoM+SD1hd3EQgfCyvFlf5 ClSwb5aQRf9ZqiyFAkVEtEOgF7S9q7H6MHyVFzrLfGzmTdpzu7jCCoYbZ7dX1aniatAxLKl6 EBgZxtLRu5bqalguv0FV1C8qnGLuvUMqp8RoJzLd8sWBGMTsUl/GOf+cEZl5u0q9vg9pBJxg KLi2NX3V4Bk8vkOUJFuk8ll7kRQ/7rrGLBkZNfcadb970jB5bvsxMhoc9P/2dIa1YzsGnqbE vG+JrZ2475hvs1jPZ/gdLWEcquGAhGjekfArLBbagqfo6gsuHnUD1K+HfVGQBkKJl+lNhbOR guHGT5hx/4RSYBVakz1RpM5dnk271lH0LxWeE4okSrkCDQRSUUKTARAAt6FH3HbDFoumOWUu JlDgOQs3wdp2n3IKv7gqzbDdgaoWW7hDTvjO0Cb6p2PGUKEoxMQQoIdDO0pQ9rgr4Sh4VSVC 9WMO/fUwqdrIs2nACIg4OwvNhIccW08S+N72f+yuXWOQ/dv79cwruE26/BEXgIP09MYcOWwc UCXzOoUR3er+jzcsN9uFjcsBVUJLIEru1askHRzCUa5P9S9GAFBwN49HC5IJWEzdLP27FjjO G5UG3+QZahHrjG1i6S3bIYXtaGsqNyfkp9Is7Wpj2kk+s9Ua+YMG/V5YVlbANIexa1yr75p1 W9biqXpCWnB3TaHSfI0G1t9w8K2qhR/Z1/YLIcRzZ2aHJnvbzJYw5Cs1jfNpFytbASsxj0rb ReouftlBvVWFRxsZ+oG1ZXL64/SVKMZAnfBNxd1uajp+HtoQtYoTu88la6zcdnAhOD5JdOnt N2VF8iQnDfPgkidfuSZ1C059xaRPTSRJBgMRDtOlDxgz7Pxx/7L2jwxRY1dq6NGioflY7CCp Gc7bi1K6xnf3lBL8X2nGpRAVsg9Lx1ShIWkgNbTAcPXpXcXlJ1xqz8HS8Twadh6gIfk/RNch BIED9lkVCKHYp/XQb8T8vMwn/kTWUm5WlPkQUFQN4D1b6+dJw4bwn/wiRS8did1MU1OytJB6 tljfEUCx0uKkzqr+33MAEQEAAYkEuwQYAQoAJgIbAhYhBHLPrCF5vLAktbVFkANvbJ7n856/ BQJa21VJBQkMUG42AonBvSAEGQEKAGYFAlJRQpNfFIAAAAAALgAoaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3Rh dGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDE5RjE1NEVDQkYxMTJFNTA1NDRFM0Yz MDAwNTEzRjEwRTBBOUU0RTcACgkQAFE/EOCp5OdNFg//ZqeVdGoKkMvALPzZjGz84+6l0kcM xSN4TfWmec0YpSmDEzCw4/SZoGqHlZb8lcTevmNrNXg6c+wVw6P+Ycl20Nzb98Kt9C5sz+zG VmPPK+3O9gaPnEqlIKnnbxKXXNHQdd8Mf0UTpifMqX0IkWOqhe/tQKGoQ9+feKvLIaToIe/N josW6vJ9YAgFqZ0015zwbElhMNFmgDMOI2SgjBZ9ngP1U82Mqb7/7G9GxHtnwuJBSnPJgN8t av2O9uWPC0N8deyZBH4y9ERBPTFMc46wjkW030olcq7g4hZ55rpPIEyGQZCq4u1gGibbiQJZ EyUQT7BJm70/PeUr3uNjPlQODV/lF5TBvqGHEmlSQfo6Yb/QQx07CK9bvhUSO2XP3ybS8Jwo MZlgZzZcjiPiQF9ot6152/Cp/XrsKgtk+fg5ARZpyywRlQk1JCHRZvhgXIxqNYA04uwdPFcL I4vPiDaLS8mhXHLRZsSpHmIBqqrnam5Lq7iDc39UZrSJMM40oy3iAOI2B7AOCbzxRuEplJd3 E/tEqrnFGcPVN+h52ka74lEyfkwA2RrASWJJcXLN3/VsizEj8okepefzjU/UPnU8sirzeWWo 8Z4uKddovk//NwAPUJbee4vZLjYE6MWdpEoZP9CZXbtIPWuc9Djg16aHOgv44JPokDMaHA27 A4rw2KwJEANvbJ7n856/SPkP/1bGUde7lnRTNd8c0ZrUtEi+OOibKyh7BjLUpzlihj3rGl9l jAF0eCdBrL1We3MDDcyi+XO7VZLiecZTlG6LLXFvEFjYpyPRx3bXlWk1/ahEiBoLWxedseNd FrO+H5XX6ODmKFFLhXgpsXnAxtM6Mxmrx0CGW4qzfUi7Vsqj86gqlcet0/k5RqPMAhrGX5fN nQNWSAwumeFKM8UgDpKY0u7M2tS07B0ozXOSpqGTSJhX6Ld2Nl95CL3wbSGuh1pDUOysAnzK 5Rl/OQ9LtYpWomAKg6yn7gKYij5XmekAg/E+ybr5Gyx2PgMQUGtuNmBRWP1qKtVUbrOekiuN z7kpdrP7M2O7i/cxWjGpVtjDNWuGkFgY3c+sKKawBma81K4rg044nkGwFX98vfEHVGu+HOd3 D+Mv47nv4LQvzynBG/YflwaPmLhpw7HCPvpa4W7y8+5AKxDqWlM2NvrLwmwbmz9dQMGtjnNR m4uHfPX8AyzBoMtDrxNLIvDYlLqh+G2Q1shNNNdRNXn9Z1pvri6KAHmH9GlISuM/jQfItout +Gtx9QUlNX3aIsdScTLA3jnMOpHcALCGI+XMiBNaVuYUxHgHh+MNYhmjQZZqASBCvVj1Hyib DPZa/iQ4DBGBRlJb+8saPPqYVDQhosWSF20aJKwepZIIOFjpMgmCIqZAnqK4uQINBFJRQrgB EADUWFag56O3CaycayGght1rYWYz7P9/3s7OlqAuEAId8/kSz8jXzAb/Qb6t0247a2MD0gxn jgZQy2OiQOsOTrc31L6tUrLVATL5Q3oKIh9hOlNMA+cRjsgY3UmMaSw+Gftp64EJDBQwBXWT 7CSUEJw4PqzwMPiTHRkmqQfzdfNagFJVqZ0e+cznoLzI9WvkccwLW1kicBYEysX5yOXUQ9/P cKqRWcbxLFznJ16JsxL1DeUct5WRWUxECY2rM0t+AkNRa3NpzskiMUSzFhiGmJo9yyy1RS4d rjMhEn/IcM1sO21ZF/WWuUVkul65qngFnaFDDRQ5lU3AagWhLhmppmK/yabSVfqz38B1APoB WuldYprslTbAOJrL2xFtiH7m9VYbP2aGdwr9V/C27kiNWnm/lYzP9Z+dTFkxw2V+BOjiLWzD DD6pEE7YDhiPyoopadOyXtoJf3aK1OI+DBu3piBA/CDDDvavruM+3mjxUxcOo8w8rMaJzDUD LG0yOyhKWef3UW5ly3CKXe8+m/MZe0GavNBJt0ObLQpPmnn9b2kP/xS0ssszo8uzlfSMiGi9 AedAoRQ7vFXfI0MBb0M8gJ6Ht/+j1b5Al9ABeeA3PRuu+aBJwBRdFp4AV5BsCa0Qb3aqVJUP uBvtY56aWWB9sSfQ1qeu/loRxkJbHhaPJswscQARAQABiQI8BBgBCgAmAhsMFiEEcs+sIXm8 sCS1tUWQA29snufznr8FAlrbVUkFCQxQbhEACgkQA29snufznr+YBw//TJtAC9d/FYQQHKQg /QOEkcAL8Qx4HA2SICnhKqv64jPcYIUYocOO8Qayh+IVDa6MGkbsWdweUFuexMsW+17dqETf QjUApx32TUwF44WgIEfARLW2zRdRcXfsT4A2sQJCvNJrJnH3lywiJi+V848Q4sC3sSJREpcJ d07oc2jxSKZyYZ1DBPfK1MyiwcBt2uFCTXdyFMham2aYLDP2JYvFP08tjTUAIKhe4B0bPTtl dCf5sH5q8xrpaHnKHf0n7qMmK7NtGW/9R6WiCruiNsLnO95fms1tzKKfA4QXIYCEWl8XsRKw p51HZDjQu/KxPsjm6BL4eThnae9t3Zs5J0LiPxoFbN+pW7anft3YCeezB8+gus7I1Rn5yJMR yYRRVHtZZTBDQfoDqHgLY14GYtFGOT0IR/OuAzYM1CoMvVExgqVWixDwF5RH1OHO1TANqTGc rRm1lvasCWIphpoQVtkN4/PXGa+NhzsRmr/c5OUYxQNroE8cdsK8mOIBRz9D2JpF7d2nr1X+ vA4zk2JL61aCnc62BfSYNZWhCcOPJZUhFT9BqAkew0kkJzQ3jwHGAhfcfozTHoFsD08qAW0O UriEtH+EOXl+dYbjlNUjFPjJu49cZbtp/1TpsYOBdME1QLM1TPanYXa7tb+IrRZN+Oi9i9VV ym16DK7q21k3j0qRC0s= Message-ID: <6298ada0-66e6-688a-a1d5-51cb93ad4400@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2020 10:31:53 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200307223800.GA20478@eureka.lemis.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WZIvvO1pud5wdjCgRnjSIuEKT1lUGkBZC" X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2020 10:31:58 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --WZIvvO1pud5wdjCgRnjSIuEKT1lUGkBZC Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="TMWKdTMLo6cCCceCHpFywMcKgHKmfq0Dw" --TMWKdTMLo6cCCceCHpFywMcKgHKmfq0Dw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 07/03/2020 22:38, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: >> This was only an issue on the "latest" branch. If you don't alter >> "/etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf", you'll get packages from the "quarterly" >> branch, which fortunately wasn't affected. > No, this isn't necessarily correct. I have never modified this file, > but I ended up with a copy of /usr/src/usr.bin/pkg/FreeBSD.conf.latest > with this revision string: >=20 > # $FreeBSD: stable/11/etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf 263937 2014-03-30 15:24:17= Z bdrewery $ >=20 > Despite the age, this appears to identical to the current version, > according to svn blame. Arguably this should be the default anyway. >=20 Best practice is *not* to modify /etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf, but to create a supplemental file /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/FreeBSD.conf to override any of the default settings. So, for example, this in /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/FreeBSD.conf will switch to the 'latest' package set: ``` FreeBSD: { url: "pkg+http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/${ABI}/latest" } ``` and this will disable the FreeBSD pkg repos entirely: ``` FreeBSD: { enabled: no } ``` (presumably with an additional .../pkg/repos/foo.conf file to enable a custom local repository) The best way to confirm exactly what the resultant pkg(8) configuration comes out as is by: pkg -vv Cheers, Matthew --TMWKdTMLo6cCCceCHpFywMcKgHKmfq0Dw-- --WZIvvO1pud5wdjCgRnjSIuEKT1lUGkBZC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEEGfFU7L8RLlBUTj8wAFE/EOCp5OcFAl5kyZlfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDE5 RjE1NEVDQkYxMTJFNTA1NDRFM0YzMDAwNTEzRjEwRTBBOUU0RTcACgkQAFE/EOCp 5Odc1BAAlHnjAMV9GkPX9EfctdgZ0Guu4xsWganxmQLCijHdaM74BlvoCz2fEP9i SUsGuMBmMiEQMZtSblAKimQoJ61exvw90EFYkw7B6+0KxuS/zFBemLMjVf3rN9l6 pzC235T7+huTpr23ugkfpq9z66Yi9j8Tqvz7jFwmljNXeDzYwNlzWG+eajREZzYl f8HR03+IYo60bv4e6vUMtYqsNSl8OEQVZL8VRrV6oA9zmiN3zZjGNRgLWs1N4LZP Ny1QPBBgcBFnkkBhMIY/bAIM50A7VcuD+KtWS5PahBtGrSZgBtdOVqyHmXBWiKh7 R/OULmwqVcrK4Oe91CmrAIG0iYtVdTP9jrot590ZjKHOunjac4OPfMglkldJn6fH cRG/42WB3V3XThTaFi7JlMForcCfPs8oPlWc6qSQFcJf1a7KQRNVWbuAZLtES3V8 QDRiAXrtUzgF/iUmA84BF0htBLTfF71Ct5V0MxdaYgEY1kRc20AAjWcEXI3XNdwi lf4uaJUiZiJXv0FYTXU+2HPtzBfRdIFXlxxQBoebwx4yB4UIFG1KqvVsXYGIL0XL IDtI+A0keZyDxxZyPiBB7IRWlaY6lGEaJBwk6txUPNfQMDNejURRnQtij1QumrCo PfJ6VNQy7c2jsAasutRenuHd0XzbxxEsUxhkUX/DPX3NgsdkYZ8= =jFDo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WZIvvO1pud5wdjCgRnjSIuEKT1lUGkBZC-- From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sun Mar 8 16:37:25 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C9BE26DB20 for ; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 16:37:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (108-84-10-9.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.84.10.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "darth.immure.com", Issuer "darth.immure.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48b6TH6p0qz3JhS; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 16:37:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 028GbGPT080497 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 8 Mar 2020 11:37:16 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: (from bob@localhost) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 028GbGl7080496; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 11:37:16 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob) Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2020 11:37:16 -0500 From: Bob Willcox To: Conrad Meyer Cc: current list Subject: Re: Is amd automount still supported in 13.0 or not? Message-ID: <20200308163716.GE59792@rancor.immure.com> Reply-To: Bob Willcox References: <20200203232333.GA37109@rancor.immure.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48b6TH6p0qz3JhS X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bob@rancor.immure.com has no SPF policy when checking 108.84.10.9) smtp.mailfrom=bob@rancor.immure.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.53 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[bob@immure.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[immure.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[0.996,0]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.37)[ip: (0.18), ipnet: 108.64.0.0/11(0.09), asn: 7018(1.63), country: US(-0.05)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.97)[0.966,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[bob@immure.com,bob@rancor.immure.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7018, ipnet:108.64.0.0/11, country:US]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[bob@immure.com,bob@rancor.immure.com]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2020 16:37:25 -0000 On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 03:28:29PM -0800, Conrad Meyer wrote: > Yep, amd is deprecated for 13.0: > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=354902 , > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=354997 . Ok, I've spent a couple of hours trying to get autofs to do the simple task of mounting my file server's nfs filesystems. With amd in the past all I needed to do was to create symlinks like this in /: lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 20 Apr 22 2019 work -> host/vader/stor/work Been doing that for years and it did exactly what I needed. I see that autofs adds lots of features (which I don't need) but the added complexity that comes with the added features (and the seemingly obscure documentation) has really made this much more difficult to understand. So, can someone help me understand how I would achieve the above result with autofs? Thanks, Bob -- Bob Willcox | It's possible that the whole purpose of your life is to bob@immure.com | serve as a warning to others. Austin, TX | From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sun Mar 8 17:23:05 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9705D26F125 for ; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 17:23:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48b7V04N3fz4Vpl for ; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 17:23:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 5BA4326F124; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 17:23:04 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59FF726F123 for ; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 17:23:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (108-84-10-9.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.84.10.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "darth.immure.com", Issuer "darth.immure.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48b7Tz2w46z4VmC for ; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 17:23:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 028HN1E9080586 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 12:23:01 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: (from bob@localhost) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 028HN1i4080585 for current@freebsd.org; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 12:23:01 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob) Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2020 12:23:01 -0500 From: Bob Willcox To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is amd automount still supported in 13.0 or not? Message-ID: <20200308172301.GF59792@rancor.immure.com> Reply-To: Bob Willcox References: <20200203232333.GA37109@rancor.immure.com> <20200204.085435.139942824021996563.yasu@utahime.org> <20200204154650.GA39757@rancor.immure.com> <20200204161505.GN1309@albert.catwhisker.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200204161505.GN1309@albert.catwhisker.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48b7Tz2w46z4VmC X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bob@rancor.immure.com has no SPF policy when checking 108.84.10.9) smtp.mailfrom=bob@rancor.immure.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.51 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[bob@immure.com]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.37)[ip: (0.18), ipnet: 108.64.0.0/11(0.08), asn: 7018(1.63), country: US(-0.05)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[current@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[1.000,0]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.95)[0.947,0]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[immure.com]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[bob@immure.com,bob@rancor.immure.com]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7018, ipnet:108.64.0.0/11, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[bob@immure.com,bob@rancor.immure.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2020 17:23:05 -0000 On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 08:15:05AM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: > On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 09:46:50AM -0600, Bob Willcox wrote: > > ... > > > Amd is not build by default now and will be removed from base. But you > > > can continue using it by installing sysutils/am-utils from port. > > > > Thanks for the tip. I will likely go ahead and install the am-utils port as from looking > > at the setup and features of autofs it is way more complex and does more than I need or > > want. I've been using amd for decades now and it does exactly what I need w/o any special > > setup or configuration required. :) > > .... > > I had also used amd from back when I still used a SPARCStation 5 as my > home NFS (& yp) server, but switched with little fuss to autofs -- > primarily by using symlinks into /net/${host}/..., which works (for my > purposes) just as well with either (amd or autofs). > > Peace, > david Thanks for the tip! That worked for me. I guess from reading the documentation I didn't pick up on staying with the symlinks and simply changing host to net. Thanks! Bob > -- > David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org > "The Senate has abdicated its constitutional duty during the impeachment > trial of President Donald Trump." -- Alan S. Frumin, parliamentarian > emeritus of the US Senate > > See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. -- Bob Willcox | It's possible that the whole purpose of your life is to bob@immure.com | serve as a warning to others. Austin, TX | From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sun Mar 8 19:34:09 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C218B2734C1 for ; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 19:34:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48bBPF3vdsz3C5p for ; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 19:34:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 3F16E2734BC; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 19:34:09 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37E642734BA; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 19:34:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.daemonic.se (mail.daemonic.se [176.58.89.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48bBPC6Q6Lz3C30; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 19:34:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@freebsd.org) Received: from cid.daemonic.se (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48bBP30L40z3lvf; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 19:33:59 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daemonic.se Received: from mail.daemonic.se ([IPv6:::1]) (using TLS with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256) by cid.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10587) with ESMTPS id WB7xPhTHUU3K; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 19:33:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from garnet.daemonic.se (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:201:c079:be8f:8479:372c]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48bBP22Btcz3lcX; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 19:33:58 +0000 (UTC) To: x11@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Reply-To: x11@FreeBSD.org From: Niclas Zeising Subject: users of drm-legacy-kmod or drm drivers from base Message-ID: <6413dbc6-a64e-b69a-ffcc-9c555df24e71@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2020 20:33:55 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48bBPC6Q6Lz3C30 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.96)[-0.957,0]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.96)[0.961,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36236, ipnet:176.58.89.0/24, country:US] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2020 19:34:09 -0000 [ This is cross-posted across several mailing lists for maximum visibility. Please respect reply-to and keep replies to x11@FreeBSD.org . Thank you! ] In order to improve support for the new lkpi based graphics drivers (drm-kmod) and to improve the graphics stack we have switched mesa to prefer DRI3 over DRI2. This was done in r528071. For those using drm-kmod, this should improve performance somewhat, and more importantly alleviate the use of the FIXDRM option (now removed) in xorg-server. However, for those of you using graphics/drm-legacy-kmod or the drm drivers in base, this change can cause issues. If you are experiencing problems when running OpenGL applications, you can force the use of the DRI2 backend. To force mesa to use DRI2, set the environment variable LIBGL_DRI3_DISABLE to 1 before starting any OpenGL application. The easiest way to accomplish this is by adding it to either your shell startup file or ~/.xinitrc. As an example, for users of [t]csh, put setenv LIBGL_DRI3_DISABLE 1 in ~/.cshrc. For users of bourne type shells (sh, bash, ksh, zsh, ...) instead put export LIBGL_DRI3_DISABLE=1 in ~/.profile If you are using these legacy drivers, I'm also very interested in hearing what issues you are facing that prevents you from using the new lkpi based drivers. Regards -- Niclas Zeising FreeBSD Graphics Team From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Mar 9 07:00:05 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7088925A043; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 07:00:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sthaug@nethelp.no) Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (bizet.nethelp.no [IPv6:2001:8c0:9e04:500::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48bTcg3zdzz4S3X; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 07:00:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sthaug@nethelp.no) Received: from localhost (bizet.nethelp.no [IPv6:2001:8c0:9e04:500::1]) by bizet.nethelp.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F2C5E6079; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 07:59:55 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 07:59:55 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <20200309.075955.447156967.sthaug@nethelp.no> To: stb@lassitu.de Cc: grog@FreeBSD.org, lars.engels@0x20.net, marco+freebsd-current@lordsith.net, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Pkg repository is broken... From: sthaug@nethelp.no In-Reply-To: <53A16BDE-B0E1-4142-9A7A-7479F297CA4F@lassitu.de> References: <20200307003855.GG85938@eureka.lemis.com> <20200307.085046.39440897.sthaug@nethelp.no> <53A16BDE-B0E1-4142-9A7A-7479F297CA4F@lassitu.de> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 26 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48bTcg3zdzz4S3X X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of sthaug@nethelp.no designates 2001:8c0:9e04:500::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=sthaug@nethelp.no X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.34 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[nethelp.no]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[freebsd-current]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.20)[0.202,0]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[0.999,0]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:2116, ipnet:2001:8c0::/29, country:NO]; IP_SCORE(0.24)[asn: 2116(1.22), country: NO(-0.01)]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[]; ONCE_RECEIVED(0.10)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 07:00:05 -0000 >> I think a lot of people are waiting for some kind of guidance on how >> to fix these problems, if the repos are supposed to be okay now. > > It would be really great if someone in the know would send something to -announce or similar, with an ETR. Maybe even with suggestions for workarounds. > > A forum thread mentions a workaround for those that cannot easily start compiling their own ports: > https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/pkg-wrong-architecture-freebsd-12-0-amd64-instead-of-freebsd-12-amd64.74310/page-3 >> ALTABI thing must be added in /usr/local/etc/pkg.conf: ALTABI = "FreeBSD:12.0:amd64" After the repos were finally in sync, I was able to upgrade my servers. Some of them simply needed pkg upgrade while others needed pkg bootstrap -f pkg update -f pkg upgrade Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Mar 9 14:49:53 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B0ED264CA3 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 14:49:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48bh2k5k4Xz4bNV for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 14:49:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 97EF1264CA2; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 14:49:50 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97747264CA1 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 14:49:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: from mail-il1-f170.google.com (mail-il1-f170.google.com [209.85.166.170]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48bh2h3qwRz4bMp for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 14:49:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: by mail-il1-f170.google.com with SMTP id f5so8895342ilq.5 for ; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 07:49:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=T1u1z4O+VBmsC0WeTZOWvoTDlBB/IBPSRf1FF7n9Yc4=; b=EXllQ7cwds4T8+8hgnpY4F4RtgE/cw84QLt3ykzeDDi9ADfrUxPptRvnMD4rul2coV FgdIOoD3RXihni3CTsTacMeJ76Bfy3IieWpuZnu1P2l3vyWfl+mX+Delmp/zVZPoTtVD xpxHVIAyMIXTmd1fhWSFZ35yqzGnTWtM5D7C85hP9+U4pu/vkTVfm/gRF1BtzJgbiwJt kG1yWSu0su6ee+WinH0kM0mPG1IQS0P/LY083OUAIXzxg6//XVq/qV//6r3D72/vXHgk AwcwX08UKjPKHdOPgLCxHwc9d850ObFM3otlHutK2t/kBAObJAgZz7VI2rXrg4/7iYHb 785Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ21PFcZ3pKBjKToReSnDhHScnTEF/njkIITVtJPFDkCbE522DLW EO5OHslUFQUybhwhANSnq5r3/qoT3yNLOeRySK4pMq5o X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vv8mVBs9gHYcimkohRxCSgllGwfrq96i9kc6j+lPW8SmMOXPgGWtvl0L1Y1NkYDi69quLnwWf3aaPJrD0hzs9A= X-Received: by 2002:a92:cc45:: with SMTP id t5mr3265467ilq.182.1583765386519; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 07:49:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200203232333.GA37109@rancor.immure.com> <20200204.085435.139942824021996563.yasu@utahime.org> <20200204154650.GA39757@rancor.immure.com> <20200204161505.GN1309@albert.catwhisker.org> <20200308172301.GF59792@rancor.immure.com> In-Reply-To: <20200308172301.GF59792@rancor.immure.com> From: Ed Maste Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 10:49:34 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is amd automount still supported in 13.0 or not? To: Bob Willcox Cc: current Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48bh2h3qwRz4bMp X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of carpeddiem@gmail.com designates 209.85.166.170 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=carpeddiem@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.82 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[current@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[170.166.85.209.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-1.82)[ip: (-4.39), ipnet: 209.85.128.0/17(-2.98), asn: 15169(-1.65), country: US(-0.05)]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[emaste@freebsd.org,carpeddiem@gmail.com]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[emaste@freebsd.org,carpeddiem@gmail.com]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 14:49:53 -0000 On Sun, 8 Mar 2020 at 13:23, Bob Willcox wrote: > > Thanks for the tip! That worked for me. I guess from reading the documentation > I didn't pick up on staying with the symlinks and simply changing host to net. Glad it's working for you! Is there anything else that you found tricky or surprising in migrating? Perhaps we could produce a quick-reference transition guide. From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Mar 9 15:36:31 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A923265DC3 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 15:36:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48bj4Z6qvfz481X for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 15:36:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B16DD265DC2; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 15:36:30 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE66B265DC0 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 15:36:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (108-84-10-9.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.84.10.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "darth.immure.com", Issuer "darth.immure.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48bj4Z0PWhz47y4; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 15:36:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 029FaRJg083169 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 9 Mar 2020 10:36:27 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: (from bob@localhost) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 029FaRjZ083168; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 10:36:27 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 10:36:26 -0500 From: Bob Willcox To: Ed Maste Cc: current Subject: Re: Is amd automount still supported in 13.0 or not? Message-ID: <20200309153626.GA83139@rancor.immure.com> Reply-To: Bob Willcox References: <20200203232333.GA37109@rancor.immure.com> <20200204.085435.139942824021996563.yasu@utahime.org> <20200204154650.GA39757@rancor.immure.com> <20200204161505.GN1309@albert.catwhisker.org> <20200308172301.GF59792@rancor.immure.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48bj4Z0PWhz47y4 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.01 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.99)[0.987,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.996,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 15:36:31 -0000 On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 10:49:34AM -0400, Ed Maste wrote: > On Sun, 8 Mar 2020 at 13:23, Bob Willcox wrote: > > > > Thanks for the tip! That worked for me. I guess from reading the documentation > > I didn't pick up on staying with the symlinks and simply changing host to net. > > Glad it's working for you! Is there anything else that you found > tricky or surprising in migrating? Perhaps we could produce a > quick-reference transition guide. Not sure, perhaps it was just my unfamiliarity with the features of autofs, but when I tried setting up a map file I was unable to get it to work as it never mounted the filesystem. I tried following the example in the auto_master man page in the "INDIRECT VERSUS DIRECT MAPS" section and created a auto_fsmount file with this in it: /work -intr,nfsv4 10.1.132.8:/stor/work and added this to the auto_master file: /- auto_fsmount Created the /work directory but couldn't get it to actually mount the filesystem. Removing all of those changes and creating this symlink instead: lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 19 Mar 8 12:19 work -> net/vader/stor/work worked and it automatically mounted the filesystem on my first access: vader:/stor/work 30T 19G 30T 0% /net/vader/stor/work So perhaps documenting how to migrate drom amd to autofs, retaining the same operational characteristics would be a help for those of us coming from that environment. Thanks, Bob -- Bob Willcox | It's possible that the whole purpose of your life is to bob@immure.com | serve as a warning to others. Austin, TX | From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Mar 9 16:33:04 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 799D22670A6; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 16:33:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cy.schubert@cschubert.com) Received: from smtp-out-no.shaw.ca (smtp-out-no.shaw.ca [64.59.134.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Client", Issuer "CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48bkKp51Sjz4HKX; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 16:33:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cy.schubert@cschubert.com) Received: from spqr.komquats.com ([70.67.125.17]) by shaw.ca with ESMTPA id BLKrjl5yfnCigBLKtj7Pwr; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 10:33:00 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=cZisUULM c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=VFtTW3WuZNDh6VkGe7fA3g==:117 a=VFtTW3WuZNDh6VkGe7fA3g==:17 a=jpOVt7BSZ2e4Z31A5e1TngXxSK0=:19 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=SS2py6AdgQ4A:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=Yz_AizgaAAAA:8 a=YxBL1-UpAAAA:8 a=H8Yiat5SJYLl5NGmeMMA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=IjZwj45LgO3ly-622nXo:22 a=I2Jvbg7MX5LYCCMYw_0B:22 a=Ia-lj3WSrqcvXOmTRaiG:22 Received: from Resas-iPad.esitwifi.local (S0106788a207e2972.gv.shawcable.net [70.66.154.233]) by spqr.komquats.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BA08F545; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 09:32:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 08:35:58 -0700 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: References: <20200203232333.GA37109@rancor.immure.com> <20200204.085435.139942824021996563.yasu@utahime.org> <20200204154650.GA39757@rancor.immure.com> <20200204161505.GN1309@albert.catwhisker.org> <20200308172301.GF59792@rancor.immure.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Is amd automount still supported in 13.0 or not? To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Ed Maste , Bob Willcox CC: current From: Cy Schubert Message-ID: <23042BDF-0E61-4AF1-A95F-E8134D705A42@cschubert.com> X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfETmju4UYiyQ/bH/1sEjiT5ZjxzT99FPA4OggonW56cdIGNulue78kJx7DyGhAV0sHYtddKWTRul1vdW2U7vPsWou92urUGe3Sv8ZErIr+XJ2HEMT1CW HzNPCWUOBBRpcIVVu0cM2H/Q6JLo0+TTp2AvQN23tEECutMSoiffsCvEEphuKaYKWP7D9kEYHPcT72jgCLgpO/zb4oeJid8fl7IcHWoJ3i8BJ69+GJjcOkbG fRIGkEAf3yEEnDsVi+hjSml1qPcu4f89mmjt8xpB9es= X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48bkKp51Sjz4HKX X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of cy.schubert@cschubert.com has no SPF policy when checking 64.59.134.9) smtp.mailfrom=cy.schubert@cschubert.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.63 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[233.154.66.70.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.11,17.125.67.70.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.11]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-2.51)[ip: (-6.70), ipnet: 64.59.128.0/20(-3.24), asn: 6327(-2.53), country: CA(-0.09)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[9.134.59.64.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.18]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.92)[-0.921,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[9.134.59.64.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6327, ipnet:64.59.128.0/20, country:CA]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 16:33:04 -0000 On March 9, 2020 7:49:34 AM PDT, Ed Maste wrote: >On Sun, 8 Mar 2020 at 13:23, Bob Willcox wrote: >> >> Thanks for the tip! That worked for me=2E I guess from reading the >documentation >> I didn't pick up on staying with the symlinks and simply changing >host to net=2E > >Glad it's working for you! Is there anything else that you found >tricky or surprising in migrating? Perhaps we could produce a >quick-reference transition guide=2E >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-current@freebsd=2Eorg mailing list >https://lists=2Efreebsd=2Eorg/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd=2Eorg" /net and indirect maps should be simple conversations=2E Direct maps may o= r may not be easy=2E Autofs doesn't support nested direct maps like amd doe= s=2E You may need to mount elsewhere or use /net with symlinks=2E We do have a port as well=2E The port will be retired after a reasonable a= mount of time to allow people to convert=2E Amd upstream has told me he no = longer supports amd=2E His advice is to use autofs=2E --=20 Pardon the typos and autocorrect, small keyboard in use=2E=20 Cy Schubert FreeBSD UNIX: Web: https://www=2EFreeBSD=2Eorg The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few=2E Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail=2E Please excuse my brevity=2E From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Mar 9 17:26:49 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC6F5268308; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 17:26:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (108-84-10-9.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.84.10.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "darth.immure.com", Issuer "darth.immure.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48blWr04tMz3N4b; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 17:26:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 029HQbjT083335 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 9 Mar 2020 12:26:37 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: (from bob@localhost) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 029HQb5n083334; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 12:26:37 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 12:26:37 -0500 From: Bob Willcox To: Cy Schubert Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Ed Maste , current Subject: Re: Is amd automount still supported in 13.0 or not? Message-ID: <20200309172637.GB83139@rancor.immure.com> Reply-To: Bob Willcox References: <20200203232333.GA37109@rancor.immure.com> <20200204.085435.139942824021996563.yasu@utahime.org> <20200204154650.GA39757@rancor.immure.com> <20200204161505.GN1309@albert.catwhisker.org> <20200308172301.GF59792@rancor.immure.com> <23042BDF-0E61-4AF1-A95F-E8134D705A42@cschubert.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <23042BDF-0E61-4AF1-A95F-E8134D705A42@cschubert.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48blWr04tMz3N4b X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bob@rancor.immure.com has no SPF policy when checking 108.84.10.9) smtp.mailfrom=bob@rancor.immure.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.53 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[bob@immure.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.37)[ip: (0.18), ipnet: 108.64.0.0/11(0.08), asn: 7018(1.63), country: US(-0.05)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[immure.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[0.996,0]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.97)[0.969,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[bob@immure.com,bob@rancor.immure.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7018, ipnet:108.64.0.0/11, country:US]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[bob@immure.com,bob@rancor.immure.com]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 17:26:50 -0000 On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 08:35:58AM -0700, Cy Schubert wrote: > On March 9, 2020 7:49:34 AM PDT, Ed Maste wrote: > >On Sun, 8 Mar 2020 at 13:23, Bob Willcox wrote: > >> > >> Thanks for the tip! That worked for me. I guess from reading the > >documentation > >> I didn't pick up on staying with the symlinks and simply changing > >host to net. > > > >Glad it's working for you! Is there anything else that you found > >tricky or surprising in migrating? Perhaps we could produce a > >quick-reference transition guide. > >_______________________________________________ > >freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > >https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >"freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > /net and indirect maps should be simple conversations. Direct maps may or may not be easy. Autofs doesn't support nested direct maps like amd does. You may need to mount elsewhere or use /net with symlinks. > > We do have a port as well. The port will be retired after a reasonable amount of time to allow people to convert. Amd upstream has told me he no longer supports amd. His advice is to use autofs. Yes, and I considered installing the amd port but that just seemed like I'd be postponing the inevitable. Since I had a simple use case of just using symlinks to about four of my remote filesystems, switching from using the /host symlink to the /net symlink was pretty easy. -- Bob Willcox | It's possible that the whole purpose of your life is to bob@immure.com | serve as a warning to others. Austin, TX | From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Mar 9 17:50:48 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C34268DCC for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 17:50:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@dwall.in) Received: from mail-il1-x12e.google.com (mail-il1-x12e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48bm3W0888z3Q27 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 17:50:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@dwall.in) Received: by mail-il1-x12e.google.com with SMTP id p1so5493061ils.12 for ; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 10:50:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dwall-in.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=bnobMcksSQSUMSssoKKfi4HQiH9Hr/doLVxYQ3VE/RE=; b=Oi4eOj/3+NzQ5m/wLVc1MZM+pul7D8JMKAh226xr60jp5BEFD6EqM2SSsxqf3hch35 D8RMJdExNSq4oT1ycv0jV6WHbGNXTel1zeTlsxiGRez9JPApkoi9Fb+76ORRUNg83LYG XN4tqHmAuiq1t8WM4UqFUkC0erDLmASbFz5E0ZnUMRdjgAulaUg3UDe12p+76K8hCp7y hLN0cOkieY00IbnSvcZqk3ixq7fe40kJGXlORXMdAHyyBhZrnXWqPr0/BAKTYvm4DSpk PRCJ4TmnLR8WENZAhWTmXPVB7dyCTOIxEzokR/UZXnBU60xN72QyB/CvzvK2ELtRYC/Y 36bA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=bnobMcksSQSUMSssoKKfi4HQiH9Hr/doLVxYQ3VE/RE=; b=r5ETv9cwBC9nkcz5Oh0lv4QZKbTZpiPs779XkEiM/d0jgIIggh3YXaNYWfIBCoxxXU xDKpEZFZ2OfAVHMLlMp66Yt5PCQimvjIGtn0pBzVpZp4RwrInCI5aMdcgFn0rlnaeDTS mo29lQPy5Yk6IonBEWF+48eonVZYf4FPm6v56risP8I752p6PaDdfdQMXoNY4g1wUSnK qAc9GN7DAQozf6TJ20KRtki3hvr2N7ATUvInPwAnlW6TauTtL/UrfNSS48D5/poQM8dN h75ZLHk/6n+A3dX6Vax1hk7ysKijgVgqZldcEvRHhKilIu2ds8rUaav5adxKSdKRPCkO dbJQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0upqQdGSA9w+ATKJA7GKXm0VjLSr95CcEwG2lYI27lzGmnhMgj HYMjdWf0IWN9ed0D/QxggKT4AI3m4MD2CfREFPOa5A7RM74= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvCMO0vVy/ZoT6MFkzA2JHYIr7gzmW/eUuDBk6riZOSfKXbiCEJ/6UEjywZII5oW3zHHc5CTyDYoSB2fAd/oPg= X-Received: by 2002:a92:ca89:: with SMTP id t9mr15203210ilo.4.1583776244828; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 10:50:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: David Satime Wallin Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 18:54:27 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: ATH10K To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48bm3W0888z3Q27 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=dwall-in.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=Oi4eOj/3; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of david@dwall.in designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::12e as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=david@dwall.in X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.46 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[dwall-in.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[dwall.in]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[dwall-in.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[e.2.1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; SUBJ_ALL_CAPS(0.45)[6]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; IP_SCORE(-2.41)[ip: (-8.48), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-1.85), asn: 15169(-1.65), country: US(-0.05)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 17:50:48 -0000 Hi everyone, I'm not a regular on this list so please excuse me if this is the wrong forum for the following question. I have tried to find information about any progress on the ath10k (QCA6174) -wireless driver for *BSD. I read about some alpha -version drivers for FreeBSDas early as 2016. Further along there's been discussions about it throughout 2017, 2018 and 2019. Someone mentioned that a driver might were to be included in FreeBSD 12.0 that does not seem to be the case. So, just interested; Anyone got anything working or have any information about any work being done on a driver? Very best regards, David --=20 V=C3=A4nligen, David Satime Wallin From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Mar 9 22:56:50 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D49426F3FF; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 22:56:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lwhsu@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48btrf2GcZz45St; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 22:56:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lwhsu@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1129) id 297AA2736C; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 22:56:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 22:56:50 +0000 From: Li-Wen Hsu To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-03-08 Message-ID: <20200309225650.GB46059@freefall.freebsd.org> Reply-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 22:56:50 -0000 (Please send the followup to freebsd-testing@ and note Reply-To is set.) FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-03-08 =================================== Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period from 2020-03-02 to 2020-03-08. During this period, we have: * 2239 builds (48.2% (-39.2) passed, 51.8 (+39.2) failed) of buildworld and buildkernel (GENERIC and LINT) were executed on aarch64, amd64, armv6, armv7, i386, mips, mips64, powerpc, powerpc64, powerpcspe, riscv64, sparc64 architectures for head, stable/12, stable/11 branches. * 120 test runs (87.5% (+10.0) passed, 4.2% (-17.3) unstable, 8.3% (+7.3) exception) were executed on amd64, i386, riscv64 architectures for head, stable/12, stable/11 branches. * 29 doc and www builds (82.8% (-11.3) passed, 17.2% (+11.3) failed) Test case status (on 2020-03-08 23:59): | Branch/Architecture | Total | Pass | Fail | Skipped | | ------------------- | ---------- | ---------- | ------ | ------- | | head/amd64 | 7709 (+10) | 7617 (+19) | 0 (-9) | 92 (0) | | head/i386 | 7707 (+10) | 7609 (+19) | 0 (-9) | 98 (0) | | 12-STABLE/amd64 | 7501 (0) | 7452 (0) | 0 (0) | 49 (0) | | 12-STABLE/i386 | 7499 (0) | 7442 (0) | 0 (0) | 57 (0) | | 11-STABLE/amd64 | 6878 (0) | 6831 (+3) | 0 (0) | 47 (-3) | | 11-STABLE/i386 | 6876 (0) | 6824 (-3) | 0 (0) | 52 (+3) | (The statistics from experimental jobs are omitted) If any of the issues found by CI are in your area of interest or expertise please investigate the PRs listed below. The latest web version of this report is available at https://hackmd.io/@FreeBSD-CI/report-20200308 and archive is available at https://hackmd.io/@FreeBSD-CI/ , any help is welcome. ## Failing jobs * Most of the build was failed due to pkg repository ABI mismatching. (Fixed) For more details: https://bugs.freebsd.org/244549 * https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-head-mips64-build This job is using devel/gcc6@mips64 port (mips64-gcc6 pacakge) ``` ===> include/rpcsvc (includes) RPCGEN_CPP=/usr/local/bin/mips64-unknown-freebsd12.0-cpp6\ --sysroot=/usr/home/lwhsu/freebsd-obj-gcc6/usr/home/lwhsu/freebsd-src/mips.mips64/tmp\ -B/usr/local/mips64-unknown-freebsd12.0/bin/ rpcgen -C -h -DWANT_NFS3 /usr/home/lwhsu/freebsd-src/include/rpcsvc/mount.x -o mount.h /usr/home/lwhsu/freebsd-src/include/rpcsvc/mount.x:1:0: error: '-march=mips1' is not compatible with the selected ABI /*- *** [mount.h] Error code 1 make[4]: stopped in /usr/home/lwhsu/freebsd-src/include/rpcsvc 1 error ``` * https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-head-amd64-gcc6_build/ ``` --- all_subdir_usr.bin/clang/lldb --- /usr/local/bin/x86_64-unknown-freebsd12.1-ld: /tmp/obj/workspace/src/amd64.amd64/lib/clang/liblldb/liblldb.a(IOHandler.o): in function `curses::Window::Box(unsigned int, unsigned int)': /workspace/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Core/IOHandler.cpp:926: undefined reference to `box' /usr/local/bin/x86_64-unknown-freebsd12.1-ld: /workspace/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Core/IOHandler.cpp:926: undefined reference to `box' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status ``` * https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-head-amd64-test Usually panics when executing sys.netpfil.pf.nat.exhaust For more details: https://bugs.freebsd.org/244703 ## Regressions * fusefs tests fail when mac_bsdextended.ko is loaded https://bugs.freebsd.org/244229 * `dtrace -c` causes program dumps core after somewhere between (r357694, r357701] https://bugs.freebsd.org/244053 * Lock-order reversals triggered by tests under sys.net.if_lagg_test.* on i386 https://bugs.freebsd.org/244163 Discovered by newly endabled sys.net.* tests. ([r357857](https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/357857)) * sys.net.if_lagg_test.lacp_linkstate_destroy_stress panics i386 kernel https://bugs.freebsd.org/244168 Discovered by newly endabled sys.net.* tests. ([r357857](https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/357857)) * (test case) sys.geom.class.multipath.misc.fail_on_error (on 12-STABLE) https://bugs.freebsd.org/244158 ## Failing and Flaky tests (from experimental jobs) * https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-head-amd64-dtrace_test/ * cddl.usr.sbin.dtrace.common.misc.t_dtrace_contrib.tst_dynopt_d * https://bugs.freebsd.org/237641 * https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-head-amd64-test_zfs/ * There are ~13 failing and ~109 skipped cases, including flakey ones, see https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-head-amd64-test_zfs/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/ for more details * Work for cleaning these failing cass are in progress * https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-head-amd64-test_ltp/ * Total 3670 tests (0), 2285 success (-5), 579 failures (+5), 806 skipped (0) ## Disabled Tests * sys.fs.tmpfs.mount_test.large https://bugs.freebsd.org/212862 * sys.fs.tmpfs.link_test.kqueue https://bugs.freebsd.org/213662 * sys.kqueue.libkqueue.kqueue_test.main https://bugs.freebsd.org/233586 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__PT_KILL_competing_stop https://bugs.freebsd.org/220841 * lib.libc.regex.exhaust_test.regcomp_too_big (i386 only) https://bugs.freebsd.org/237450 * sys.netinet.socket_afinet.socket_afinet_bind_zero https://bugs.freebsd.org/238781 * sys.netpfil.pf.names.names * sys.netpfil.pf.synproxy.synproxy https://bugs.freebsd.org/238870 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__follow_fork_child_detached_unrelated_debugger https://bugs.freebsd.org/239292 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__follow_fork_both_attached_unrelated_debugger https://bugs.freebsd.org/239397 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__parent_sees_exit_after_child_debugger https://bugs.freebsd.org/239399 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__follow_fork_parent_detached_unrelated_debugger https://bugs.freebsd.org/239425 * lib.libc.gen.getmntinfo_test.getmntinfo_test https://bugs.freebsd.org/240049 * sys.sys.qmath_test.qdivq_s64q https://bugs.freebsd.org/240219 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__getppid https://bugs.freebsd.org/240510 * lib.libc.sys.stat_test.stat_socket https://bugs.freebsd.org/240621 * lib.libarchive.functional_test.test_write_filter_zstd https://bugs.freebsd.org/240683 * lib.libcasper.services.cap_dns.dns_test.main https://bugs.freebsd.org/241435 * local.kyua.* (31 cases) & local.lutok.* (3 cases) on 11-i386 https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-stable-11-i386-test/2278/testReport/ * sys.geom.class.multipath.failloop.failloop https://bugs.freebsd.org/242689 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__procdesc_reparent_wait_child https://bugs.freebsd.org/243605 * skip sys.geom.class.multipath.failloop.failloop https://bugs.freebsd.org/244053 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__parent_wait_after_attach https://bugs.freebsd.org/244055 * sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__parent_exits_before_child https://bugs.freebsd.org/244056 * sys.net.if_lagg_test.witness (i386) https://bugs.freebsd.org/244163 * PipePdfork.WildcardWait in sys.capsicum.capsicum-test.main https://bugs.freebsd.org/244165 * sys.net.if_lagg_test.lacp_linkstate_destroy_stress (i386) https://bugs.freebsd.org/244168 * sys.netinet6.frag6.frag6_07.frag6_07 https://bugs.freebsd.org/244170 * sys.netinet.fibs_test.udp_dontroute6 https://bugs.freebsd.org/244172 ## Issues ### Cause build fails * https://bugs.freebsd.org/233735 Possible build race: genoffset.o /usr/src/sys/sys/types.h: error: machine/endian.h: No such file or directory * https://bugs.freebsd.org/233769 Possible build race: ld: error: unable to find library -lgcc_s ### Cause kernel panics * https://bugs.freebsd.org/238870 sys.netpfil.pf.names.names and sys.netpfil.pf.synproxy.synproxy cause panic Patch exists: * https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20868 * https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20869 ### Open * https://bugs.freebsd.org/237403 Tests in sys/opencrypto should be converted to Python3 * https://bugs.freebsd.org/237641 Flakey test case: common.misc.t_dtrace_contrib.tst_dynopt_d * https://bugs.freebsd.org/237656 "Freed UMA keg (rtentry) was not empty (18 items). Lost 1 pages of memory." seen when running sys/netipsec tests * https://bugs.freebsd.org/238781 sys.netinet.socket_afinet.socket_afinet_bind_zero does not work when mac_portacl(4) loaded * https://bugs.freebsd.org/239292 Flakey test case: sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__follow_fork_child_detached_unrelated_debugger * https://bugs.freebsd.org/239397 Flakey test case: sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__follow_fork_both_attached_unrelated_debugger * https://bugs.freebsd.org/239399 Flakey test case: sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__parent_sees_exit_after_child_debugger * https://bugs.freebsd.org/239425 Flakey test case: sys.kern.ptrace_test.ptrace__follow_fork_parent_detached_unrelated_debugger * https://bugs.freebsd.org/241662 Flakey test case: lib.libarchive.functional_test.test_fuzz_iso9660 ### Others * [Tickets related to testing@](https://preview.tinyurl.com/y9maauwg) From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Mar 9 23:59:16 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 006BB250AF2 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 23:59:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from theron.tarigo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qk1-x72d.google.com (mail-qk1-x72d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48bwDc5CqKz4P5L for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 23:59:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from theron.tarigo@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qk1-x72d.google.com with SMTP id b5so11111996qkh.8 for ; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 16:59:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=ohkAKdb2QeC5aKsaJ0ASD58nnQWTAQSJ8De0YelKqJA=; b=izUpbIG1YDrh4sqA9okuP7uyZSetF4J3yR2bKryA5zl/PR5054cIPp2Rc1HmmcbVRb S5UPGV1c0NPzrJZdMxu+P0qDpgcjydi4jY56LkQsZAyP4CyBQbh4Et0RWUVm3oNk/4eh Fgb6R47mJCDlKLIvUcvKpc7EUIN1v/ptKGc5yF/z3YNnIYPiZ/HDdLneUHSo4GUE+Iz4 wU/ua+EwUHKXAcVQ0HhrbN6x1t84SQCRkHYScyIBK+YZLItz44Jx3npOjevH7/Ye/AAi b0tCrmiBEZh+dSZFIBzLGmz4wv7T6aHMrI2xpfXZTnpSVfyyOSWQyFghOlzF+Bg3C5CX /boA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:to:from:subject:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=ohkAKdb2QeC5aKsaJ0ASD58nnQWTAQSJ8De0YelKqJA=; b=nysf/AiV0bxHMC7Cj3X6FRN/cwe5cVS3YsdvFC/b2QkwgSVdFhepR3tydzyo3dF+BK NYMYpv47nkiOQrjHsqQjAY8iid0vd1J+ecaoc60ZgfSVDKCVLQzaMZgap3g1Xeev+1MI OCFBQ3yKWa1f8fOh1m/Xw4rgyd35tKBD9ncxmp4NW3JABuYbvF34N3dZECijny7N9nbS 6pq9b+N/Vu0j4MrSZxYX6Pj6KMnfIjaVVzCCJxTBfWKihH8v/Jkas6bTGL1qSQMIMB0m QgTZS9Wmvsc8XHXPlvGABvSZ5oLpIKhdzgByEYBM+lyRiP9/CROt0VEPgCYx7CH6IQYS /w2A== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ2xw8zC49tKmUjG6LOEaBzvRz3YBuTy9n5nfH7Jx2TnVOfBBlJZ QxDq5elPqJRceYekKS4QtcCEUMeV X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vs0rpIdkzCuf02H+txuX3Ueu0sFDSG8zURJQhuHGLWqPGO1f3yic8707jGCJkdK5agC7wkEew== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1186:: with SMTP id b6mr17358188qkk.59.1583798351366; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 16:59:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [168.122.152.42] (dhcp-resnet-168-122-152-42.bu.edu. [168.122.152.42]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9sm22583947qth.34.2020.03.09.16.59.10 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Mar 2020 16:59:10 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Theron Tarigo To: FreeBSD Current From: Theron Subject: System clock is slow Message-ID: <989cd36a-e015-940a-dfe2-851c6fdf4734@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 19:59:09 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48bwDc5CqKz4P5L X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=izUpbIG1; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of therontarigo@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::72d as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=therontarigo@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.99 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-9.24), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-1.85), asn: 15169(-1.65), country: US(-0.05)]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.990,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[d.2.7.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 23:59:16 -0000 Hi All, Since switching from 12.1-RELEASE to CURRENT I've noticed timing problems with audio applications.  It turns out that the problem is not with the audio drivers, but with the system clock driver, which now reports passage of time 0.3% too slow.  Although I discovered this only recently, it's been broken since r352684 made on Sept. 25.  Has anyone else noticed? I suppose it might only affect a specific processor: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700HQ CPU @ 2.60GHz. Bug: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244705 Theron From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Mar 10 01:12:53 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19363252AB7 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 01:12:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andy@neu.net) Received: from mail.neu.net (neu.net [104.225.8.138]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freebsd-11-64", Issuer "freebsd-11-64" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48bxsb5Fm5z3D7j for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 01:12:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andy@neu.net) Received: from neu.net (neu.net [104.225.8.138]) by mail.neu.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02A1Cnvm031478 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 21:12:50 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from andy@neu.net) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 21:12:49 -0400 (EDT) From: AN To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: mouse is broken Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.9999 (BSF 287 2018-06-16) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=2.9 tests=none autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mail.neu.net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48bxsb5Fm5z3D7j X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of andy@neu.net has no SPF policy when checking 104.225.8.138) smtp.mailfrom=andy@neu.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.12 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_SPACES(0.50)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.997,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.12)[0.121,0]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[neu.net]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36236, ipnet:104.225.8.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-0.51)[ip: (0.88), ipnet: 104.225.8.0/24(0.44), asn: 36236(-3.82), country: US(-0.05)]; ONCE_RECEIVED(0.10)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 01:12:53 -0000 After an update today to world, kernel, and ports my mouse no longer works. Mouse works on console. I use startx, mouse seems to break after startx is issued. Is any one else seeing anything similar? Any help is appreciated, thanks in advance. From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Mar 10 01:16:51 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 016602531CA for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 01:16:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rebecca@bsdio.com) Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com (out01.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48bxy94G9Fz3MWF for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 01:16:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rebecca@bsdio.com) Received: from in01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.51]) by out01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jBTVm-0008Kk-V9; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 19:16:47 -0600 Received: from mta2.zcs.xmission.com ([166.70.13.66]) by in01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1jBTVm-0003Qm-2k; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 19:16:46 -0600 Received: from mta2.zcs.xmission.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta2.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F0986001A0; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 19:16:45 -0600 (MDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta2.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78DC46000D3; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 19:16:45 -0600 (MDT) X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - mta2.zcs.xmission.com Received: from mta2.zcs.xmission.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta2.zcs.xmission.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id WilN9gWdFxAd; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 19:16:45 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [10.0.10.120] (c-174-52-16-57.hsd1.ut.comcast.net [174.52.16.57]) (Authenticated sender: rebecca@bsdio.com) by mta2.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4A93760009F; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 19:16:45 -0600 (MDT) To: AN , freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: From: Rebecca Cran Message-ID: <556d782b-0874-ef4f-8f8c-dc9fbd16f35c@bsdio.com> Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 19:16:44 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-XM-SPF: eid=1jBTVm-0003Qm-2k; ; ; mid=<556d782b-0874-ef4f-8f8c-dc9fbd16f35c@bsdio.com>; ; ; hst=in01.mta.xmission.com; ; ; ip=166.70.13.66; ; ; frm=rebecca@bsdio.com; ; ; spf=pass X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.13.66 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa07.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,TooManyTo_001,XM_B_Unicode autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.4999] * 0.3 TooManyTo_001 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 2x (uncommon) * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * 0.0 XM_B_Unicode BODY: Testing for specific types of unicode * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa07 1397; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1] [Fuz2=1] X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa07 1397; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;AN , freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 444 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.03 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 4.2 (0.9%), b_tie_ro: 3.4 (0.8%), parse: 1.00 (0.2%), extract_message_metadata: 4.0 (0.9%), get_uri_detail_list: 0.48 (0.1%), tests_pri_-1000: 2.4 (0.5%), tests_pri_-950: 1.28 (0.3%), tests_pri_-900: 1.02 (0.2%), tests_pri_-90: 17 (3.7%), check_bayes: 15 (3.4%), b_tokenize: 5 (1.1%), b_tok_get_all: 4.4 (1.0%), b_comp_prob: 1.70 (0.4%), b_tok_touch_all: 2.1 (0.5%), b_finish: 0.55 (0.1%), tests_pri_0: 403 (90.8%), check_dkim_signature: 0.85 (0.2%), check_dkim_adsp: 269 (60.4%), poll_dns_idle: 259 (58.4%), tests_pri_10: 2.2 (0.5%), tests_pri_500: 6 (1.4%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: mouse is broken X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48bxy94G9Fz3MWF X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of rebecca@bsdio.com designates 166.70.13.231 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.78 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[57.16.52.174.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.10]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:166.70.13.0/24]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.983,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bsdio.com]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[231.13.70.166.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.18]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.25)[0.247,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; IP_SCORE(0.36)[ip: (-1.68), ipnet: 166.70.0.0/16(1.96), asn: 6315(1.57), country: US(-0.05)]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[231.13.70.166.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6315, ipnet:166.70.0.0/16, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[7]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 01:16:51 -0000 On 3/9/2020 7:12 PM, AN wrote: > > After an update today to world, kernel, and ports my mouse no longer=20 > works.=C2=A0 Mouse works on console.=C2=A0 I use startx, mouse seems to= break=20 > after startx is issued. > > =C2=A0Is any one else seeing anything similar?=C2=A0 Any help is apprec= iated,=20 > thanks in advance. I saw something similar recently, but when using=20 "moused_nondefault_enable=3D"NO"" in /etc/rc.conf to disable moused. With= =20 moused disabled, Xorg would log something like "System mouse disabled"=20 in /var/log/Xorg.0.log, and the mouse didn't work. But when I enabled=20 moused, Xorg found and used it. --=20 Rebecca Cran From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Mar 10 01:25:25 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19B27253960 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 01:25:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andy@neu.net) Received: from mail.neu.net (neu.net [104.225.8.138]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freebsd-11-64", Issuer "freebsd-11-64" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48by833Zzrz3y4r for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 01:25:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andy@neu.net) Received: from neu.net (neu.net [104.225.8.138]) by mail.neu.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02A15O94031454 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 9 Mar 2020 21:05:25 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from andy@neu.net) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 21:05:24 -0400 (EDT) From: AN To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: xorg@freebsd.org Subject: mouse is broken Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.9999 (BSF 287 2018-06-16) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=2.9 tests=none autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mail.neu.net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48by833Zzrz3y4r X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of andy@neu.net has no SPF policy when checking 104.225.8.138) smtp.mailfrom=andy@neu.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.28 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.77)[-0.774,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.998,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[neu.net]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36236, ipnet:104.225.8.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-0.51)[ip: (0.88), ipnet: 104.225.8.0/24(0.44), asn: 36236(-3.82), country: US(-0.05)]; ONCE_RECEIVED(0.10)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 01:25:25 -0000 After an update today to world, kernel, and ports my mouse no longer works. Is any one else seeing anything similar? Any help is appreciated, thanks in advance. From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Mar 10 01:39:08 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C47D254110 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 01:39:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andy@neu.net) Received: from mail.neu.net (neu.net [104.225.8.138]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freebsd-11-64", Issuer "freebsd-11-64" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48byRs60Wyz4Ngs for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 01:39:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andy@neu.net) Received: from neu.net (neu.net [104.225.8.138]) by mail.neu.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02A1cepl031564 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 9 Mar 2020 21:38:42 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from andy@neu.net) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 21:38:39 -0400 (EDT) From: AN To: Rebecca Cran cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mouse is broken In-Reply-To: <556d782b-0874-ef4f-8f8c-dc9fbd16f35c@bsdio.com> Message-ID: References: <556d782b-0874-ef4f-8f8c-dc9fbd16f35c@bsdio.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.9999 (BSF 287 2018-06-16) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=2.9 tests=URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mail.neu.net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48byRs60Wyz4Ngs X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of andy@neu.net has no SPF policy when checking 104.225.8.138) smtp.mailfrom=andy@neu.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.11 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.982,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/mixed,text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[neu.net]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.61)[0.610,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; CTYPE_MIXED_BOGUS(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36236, ipnet:104.225.8.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-0.52)[ip: (0.85), ipnet: 104.225.8.0/24(0.42), asn: 36236(-3.82), country: US(-0.05)]; ONCE_RECEIVED(0.10)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 01:39:08 -0000 On Mon, 9 Mar 2020, Rebecca Cran wrote: > Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 19:16:44 -0600 > From: Rebecca Cran > To: AN , freebsd-current@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: mouse is broken > > On 3/9/2020 7:12 PM, AN wrote: > >> >> After an update today to world, kernel, and ports my mouse no longer >> works.  Mouse works on console.  I use startx, mouse seems to break after >> startx is issued. >> >>  Is any one else seeing anything similar?  Any help is appreciated, thanks >> in advance. > > > I saw something similar recently, but when using > "moused_nondefault_enable="NO"" in /etc/rc.conf to disable moused. With > moused disabled, Xorg would log something like "System mouse disabled" in > /var/log/Xorg.0.log, and the mouse didn't work. But when I enabled moused, > Xorg found and used it. > Thank you for the reply. I enabled moused in rc.conf. However mouse is still broken. I see the following: service moused restart moused not running? (check /var/run/moused.pid). Starting default mousedmoused: unable to open /dev/psm0: No such file or directory. # cat /var/run/moused.pid cat: /var/run/moused.pid: No such file or directory # ls -l /var/run/moused.pid ls: /var/run/moused.pid: No such file or directory From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Mar 10 01:57:23 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D1325479C for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 01:57:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rebecca@bsdio.com) Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com (out02.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48byrx2ZRZz3PZ2 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 01:57:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rebecca@bsdio.com) Received: from in01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.51]) by out02.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jBU91-00046C-6p; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 19:57:19 -0600 Received: from mta2.zcs.xmission.com ([166.70.13.66]) by in01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1jBU90-0008Kx-GU; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 19:57:19 -0600 Received: from mta2.zcs.xmission.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta2.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5817160019C; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 19:57:18 -0600 (MDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta2.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43997600196; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 19:57:18 -0600 (MDT) X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - mta2.zcs.xmission.com Received: from mta2.zcs.xmission.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta2.zcs.xmission.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id tyfue7ajgzJq; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 19:57:18 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [10.0.10.120] (muon.bluestop.org [65.103.231.193]) (Authenticated sender: rebecca@bsdio.com) by mta2.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 060E960006C; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 19:57:17 -0600 (MDT) To: AN Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <556d782b-0874-ef4f-8f8c-dc9fbd16f35c@bsdio.com> From: Rebecca Cran Message-ID: <290036ca-54f0-b258-7d0b-5e68204d4c17@bsdio.com> Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 19:57:17 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-XM-SPF: eid=1jBU90-0008Kx-GU; ; ; mid=<290036ca-54f0-b258-7d0b-5e68204d4c17@bsdio.com>; ; ; hst=in01.mta.xmission.com; ; ; ip=166.70.13.66; ; ; frm=rebecca@bsdio.com; ; ; spf=pass X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.13.66 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa03.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,XM_B_Unicode autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.4914] * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * 0.0 XM_B_Unicode BODY: Testing for specific types of unicode * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa03 1397; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1] [Fuz2=1] X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa03 1397; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;AN X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 222 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.04 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 3.3 (1.5%), b_tie_ro: 2.3 (1.1%), parse: 1.32 (0.6%), extract_message_metadata: 4.9 (2.2%), get_uri_detail_list: 0.56 (0.3%), tests_pri_-1000: 2.1 (1.0%), tests_pri_-950: 1.05 (0.5%), tests_pri_-900: 0.86 (0.4%), tests_pri_-90: 14 (6.3%), check_bayes: 13 (5.8%), b_tokenize: 4.1 (1.8%), b_tok_get_all: 4.1 (1.9%), b_comp_prob: 1.19 (0.5%), b_tok_touch_all: 1.92 (0.9%), b_finish: 0.63 (0.3%), tests_pri_0: 182 (81.9%), check_dkim_signature: 0.41 (0.2%), check_dkim_adsp: 52 (23.4%), poll_dns_idle: 44 (19.8%), tests_pri_10: 2.6 (1.2%), tests_pri_500: 7 (3.1%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: mouse is broken X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48byrx2ZRZz3PZ2 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of rebecca@bsdio.com designates 166.70.13.232 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.04 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.60)[-0.602,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:166.70.13.0/24]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bsdio.com]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[232.13.70.166.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.18]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; IP_SCORE(-0.04)[ip: (-3.36), ipnet: 166.70.0.0/16(1.79), asn: 6315(1.43), country: US(-0.05)]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[232.13.70.166.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6315, ipnet:166.70.0.0/16, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[7]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 01:57:23 -0000 On 3/9/2020 7:38 PM, AN wrote: > > Thank you for the reply.=C2=A0 I enabled moused in rc.conf.=C2=A0 Howev= er mouse=20 > is still broken. > > I see the following: > =C2=A0service moused restart > moused not running? (check /var/run/moused.pid). > > Starting default mousedmoused: unable to open /dev/psm0: No such file=20 > or directory. You most likely have a USB mouse, while the default is (still! why?) for=20 a PS/2 style mouse. So you probably need to set moused_port=3D"/dev/ums0"= =20 in /etc/rc.conf . -- Rebecca Cran From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Mar 10 02:42:08 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB16B2559E6 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 02:42:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48bzrc1vnvz4CDq for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 02:42:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E991F2559E5; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 02:42:07 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E95202559E4 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 02:42:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from shell1.rawbw.com (shell1.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48bzrZ50jrz4C9P for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 02:42:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from yv.noip.me (c-73-189-35-76.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.189.35.76]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id 02A2g43m012188 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 19:42:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host c-73-189-35-76.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.189.35.76] claimed to be yv.noip.me To: current From: Yuri Subject: rev.358827 beaks: error: use of undeclared identifier 'compiler_flags' Message-ID: Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 19:42:03 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48bzrZ50jrz4C9P X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of yuri@rawbw.com designates 198.144.192.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=yuri@rawbw.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.67 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[76.35.189.73.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.10]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:198.144.192.32/27]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[current@freebsd.org]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[rawbw.com]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[42.192.144.198.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.10.0]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.70)[-0.704,0]; IP_SCORE(-2.77)[ip: (-6.62), ipnet: 198.144.192.0/20(-3.56), asn: 7961(-3.61), country: US(-0.05)]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7961, ipnet:198.144.192.0/20, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 02:42:08 -0000 /usr/src/crypto/openssl/crypto/cversion.c:27:16: error: use of undeclared identifier 'compiler_flags'         return compiler_flags;                ^ Yuri From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Mar 10 04:33:13 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33543257CA1 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 04:33:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic308-8.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic308-8.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.68.32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48c2Jk02Cnz3Pd8 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 04:33:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) X-YMail-OSG: FsDZO0sVM1lv_r0Povxw1WvTxY71t73v6TT2b9QqdMN5VyDk4wD.bClsATAUaiQ wRp8NkTBf.LfUPft_WG6FqxPuz72MwbJpdkMgMFyxTq_zXp9GzbU5G47tnRGWrGYIOTHLq8YT1ou PzL3tfS.WOFMJNzPYZvT3Tk6aJI8_uTHsIhEQpVh8t0Qj48Nhk70RWGqR4BQFewLin0BbC34.l96 YNSkBWauyH.GIe29dWI4Rl_GJBN47o7eb2o3UEmLhPlWsLaE8gPXXEJz4ZHfIcHgyTJXKS_lyRH. luALyWceiSEWhXhufrRbyEwCKUtcxYrQVECGPrWsZX1w0Mn7vtkZEewSt6UJm3Ry7gZhqk6ck_on nXE4JwxOqTyfHs8EKOLEPyH63g3HDDJHZkqCkvogaikhDnc3Kdh.LOrG5fPPzBZXQTTqNPF71GHI U2rZOl.1TzLflGFDH6NTHW8hcB1JIVFOVcK6ZftPYPtKS_CdlfItciIGkVW58QdkT53TpDvnZeHh y7GQqFRGXe2gTWW.MmF33OYLTuGE3AaTF053yBT0Kn.9m5ol0kuYTQr_fwbh_isUyb1zNQul6Vxa MT8bZwrYXQSt_mWPffBSTKPo09bZy_izP0CG9fOVE3SyQqa88uihF7jewFV6dsGLh4p3eVoO8cjH VBE.BNacxA_y0oJ0eI0seI7Mt7aUWtRf0gPfBKfQ8vrXHaEcYfjngUQh5LFZbfZ.GXvBxN9OGrLj ReL6tNh_f0Nx_KjXqfUDVAxUFsT5aohN6Mplfxw_7piyBWcMK9Gkwvh3FQYBIqIxUF578fzgjrtl x5yG4sFGBOQrq6CDF_CxySGG.ai4MtkmBC6MrvKqrJq9QRvH9xpzZ6vpKnhJ0RX2ZXa99B8yAluG aM1woY35Wt9npt7uWun9fXJXxvo7yiUOUlIjupj_hJFCDu1kt._aqb.GBldtn1SDEIlaXquPYWLK ntRtbUDKS9ioX2_1CImDqcvLT2.j2wHvaTS_rZQpW0CLP_kl7Vj_jijO5oCGSI7mXVFEkfBtnjCt 9CQ7eZ9y2DwQHNuvxUb1Aai8q_mrenBqPGgGMd9_Zp3DfCNEzzZPLFEirN.AG0X7EYi76qjBwQgj SW7A0r4Loipe0B7smb04p8_uq7tFyxztwXnByyESee67J3QEu1ekuzsVsExgRQP4CbZYCPJtWhR8 fkIq1yBjQKmxYID6EvHz7jWKGUQ0QCETk2oN_9lG8fWyff8ItfoCUBd0FTv7DpK8syoN3dp_kops OsuBZ73ZE9U95ON.5u00J8KMA8YftpKmjpNsldtHc2aKdYzM9KltvSLorNqO5iowyc.eGZo1Rry5 VSj3ggNgFa9CVR0a_oIyDRAQIKC.ozx9NmAsY33.Js9a3QDDinS6.yYzMkU_Bj2cVFoHXWcsBXyq d3zeQN_0eq8p7IRnpYXItiCJihuVmaSF5mol8SRnOqws- Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic308.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 04:33:06 +0000 Received: by smtp417.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (Oath Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 6082a8a3eea028a2403693ad1022bdb6; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 04:33:03 +0000 (UTC) From: Mark Millard Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\)) Subject: GCC/gcc references in man src.conf output (as of head -r358510 anyway), more . . . Message-Id: <4FE06260-78B7-402E-9846-6BC835084721@yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 21:33:02 -0700 To: FreeBSD Current X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5) References: <4FE06260-78B7-402E-9846-6BC835084721.ref@yahoo.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48c2Jk02Cnz3Pd8 X-Spamd-Bar: / X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.94 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/21, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.97)[-0.970,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (0.29), ipnet: 98.137.64.0/21(0.83), asn: 36647(0.67), country: US(-0.05)]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.53)[0.534,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[32.68.137.98.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[32.68.137.98.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 04:33:13 -0000 The following 2 references to GCC or gcc may not be intended any more: The CCACHE_CPP2 option is used for Clang but not GCC. To be able to build the system, either gcc or clang bootstrap must be enabled unless an alternate = compiler is provided via XCC. (That is it for GCC/gcc.) The WITH_BINUTILS is interesting in that for: arm/armv6, arm/armv7, i386/i386, mips/mipsel, mips/mips, mips/mips64el, = mips/mips64, mips/mipsn32, mips/mipselhf, mips/mipshf, mips/mips64elhf, mips/mips64hf the description would seem to imply the same result for them as for WITHOUT_BINUTILS: as, objdump, and ld.bfd not built and installed. Whatever the internal mechanism, I think it would be clearer to list the above under WITHOUT_BINUTILS for their default handling. The text: WITHOUT_ELFTOOLCHAIN_BOOTSTRAP Set to not build ELF Tool Chain tools (addr2line, nm, size, strings and strip) as part of the bootstrap process. An alternate bootstrap tool chain must be provided. gives no hint how to provide an alternate bootstrap tool chain that has those programs. The issue is somewhat wider in that only XCC and XLD are mentioned anywhere. (For example, no XCXX, XCPP either.) Of course when the C/C++ compiler command lines are used to run the linker the likes of XLD do not help redirect what is attempted. The text: WITH_LLVM_TARGET_SPARC Set to build LLVM target support for SPARC. The = LLVM_TARGET_ALL option should be used rather than this in most cases. still is SPARC material. As I remember, the text: WITH_REPRODUCIBLE_BUILD Set to exclude build metadata (such as the build time, = user, or host) from the kernel, boot loaders, and uname output, so = that builds produce bit-for-bit identical output. suggests more control than the option actually gives (most of the time). The text: WITHOUT_UNIFIED_OBJDIR Set to use the historical object directory format for = build(7) targets. For native-builds and builds done directly in = sub- directories the format of ${MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX}/${.CURDIR} is = used, while for cross-builds ${MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX}/${TARGET}.${TARGET_ARCH}/${.CURDIR} is = used. This option is transitional and will be removed before the = 12.0 release, at which time will be enabled permanently. This must be set in the environment, make command line, or /etc/src-env.conf, not /etc/src.conf. mentions that the option was to be removed before 12.0 . (It also says that the to-be-removed option will be enabled when removed.) =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Mar 10 05:39:01 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A3BC258FAA for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 05:39:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@rulingia.com) Received: from vtr.rulingia.com (vtr.rulingia.com [IPv6:2001:19f0:5801:ebe:5400:1ff:fe53:30fd]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "vtr.rulingia.com", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48c3md5647z4Fdb for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 05:38:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@rulingia.com) Received: from server.rulingia.com (ppp239-208.static.internode.on.net [59.167.239.208]) by vtr.rulingia.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02A5cdUA019118 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 10 Mar 2020 16:38:44 +1100 (AEDT) (envelope-from peter@rulingia.com) X-Bogosity: Ham, spamicity=0.000000 Received: from server.rulingia.com (localhost.rulingia.com [127.0.0.1]) by server.rulingia.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02A5cXi9013480 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 10 Mar 2020 16:38:33 +1100 (AEDT) (envelope-from peter@server.rulingia.com) Received: (from peter@localhost) by server.rulingia.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 02A5cXtB013479; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 16:38:33 +1100 (AEDT) (envelope-from peter) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 16:38:33 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy To: Theron Cc: FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: System clock is slow Message-ID: <20200310053833.GD3091@server.rulingia.com> References: <989cd36a-e015-940a-dfe2-851c6fdf4734@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8NvZYKFJsRX2Djef" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <989cd36a-e015-940a-dfe2-851c6fdf4734@gmail.com> X-PGP-Key: http://www.rulingia.com/keys/peter.pgp User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48c3md5647z4Fdb X-Spamd-Bar: ------- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of peter@rulingia.com designates 2001:19f0:5801:ebe:5400:1ff:fe53:30fd as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=peter@rulingia.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-7.48 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.980,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[rulingia.com]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:20473, ipnet:2001:19f0:5800::/38, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-3.10)[ip: (-9.50), ipnet: 2001:19f0:5800::/38(-4.13), asn: 20473(-1.83), country: US(-0.05)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 05:39:01 -0000 --8NvZYKFJsRX2Djef Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2020-Mar-09 19:59:09 -0400, Theron wrote: >Since switching from 12.1-RELEASE to CURRENT I've noticed timing=20 >problems with audio applications.=A0 It turns out that the problem is not= =20 >with the audio drivers, but with the system clock driver, which now=20 >reports passage of time 0.3% too slow.=A0 Although I discovered this only= =20 >recently, it's been broken since r352684 made on Sept. 25.=A0 Has anyone= =20 >else noticed? Note that r352684 was MFC'd to both 11-stable (r353007) and 12-stable (r353006) in early October and I don't recall seeing any adverse reports before this. Are you running NTP? If so, is NTP maintaining lock and what is the reported PLL frequency (ntpq -c kerni)? What does "sysctl kern.timecounter" report and have you tried using any of the alternative timecounters listed in kern.timecounter.choice? Are you overclocking your CPU (or doing anything else non-standard)? --=20 Peter Jeremy --8NvZYKFJsRX2Djef Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEE7rKYbDBnHnTmXCJ+FqWXoOSiCzQFAl5nJ9NfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEVF QjI5ODZDMzA2NzFFNzRFNjVDMjI3RTE2QTU5N0EwRTRBMjBCMzQACgkQFqWXoOSi CzQGqg//TYmdlVgaxpZT35Ck8XhLYvqtJA1taUVLe6jaQntsoRiE2aQmEpp2UlN2 QU4YKqv7WngZc0n0m7drS/4mqeYXKOhaDJQEvBYf9q/iDJDQrzqAz2Wv7vGM/TUL vJ5SWBu3Z/Vz3mJwcd1MCF4lcCbE8jiAu+dZFkDVhjyx+oGV27DmadBUo1ZtJtPn kgeawlctXNI3Mfof2ZhNOrdGWIouNL+kmKQRCM6AeJXBtECXNgqYM5sGU+F9v0E3 CbpgTGaVv8vIXoiq7bvfvUeoVigYgNrSUd5IELDSAXRbZV7RPDhlL9w9OWu0TuJg i8PpX4CFGMeOA944WFLeBYbrNkCftkWOaR0JWsgLLfq/dMekvt/piW3Rag03LeAi mrn7ai6ao63zw9gZnSd/9PGg1nRr0Dp3x7Dm984LAeH5nlpQE+cgx8JpX+TAaKvo ZDfHWqlZra3RCQ71w46F3nS8VJm4wVzDzvdsyN4C5UpALuCpgUQFEXFREZ6Uzdpo yqWH7XLnUNQcfpDh8u5P8FdyoHNK3yxi0Mrd1OGTAR2NvOwZPJihCmIxe+vld272 0yqq9oojwRrDf4dOJM15LLB8WN9qFMP7bc+gqcP+gdi9kl5hWTKKWqlDYluFKzUb aYG9a3oJDSO9EWzTdLH4UPI2ZGFzsuFUv2m0S1fC4IuRjx7t22Q= =i4Cr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8NvZYKFJsRX2Djef-- From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Mar 10 08:34:47 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65B1C25C415 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 08:34:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Krasznai.Andras@mands.hu) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48c7gV5l7Nz40cd for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 08:34:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Krasznai.Andras@mands.hu) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A4D9825C411; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 08:34:46 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C62C25C410; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 08:34:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Krasznai.Andras@mands.hu) Received: from mail2.mands.hu (mail2.mands.hu [93.189.114.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.mands.hu", Issuer "e-Szigno SSL CA 2014" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48c7gR5gvgz40Tb; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 08:34:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Krasznai.Andras@mands.hu) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=26S_-_Krasznai_Andr=E1s?= To: "x11@FreeBSD.org" , "current@FreeBSD.org" , "stable@FreeBSD.org" , "ports@FreeBSD.org" Subject: RE: users of drm-legacy-kmod or drm drivers from base Thread-Topic: users of drm-legacy-kmod or drm drivers from base Thread-Index: AQHV9YC2b5jNz3SiP0OZRFHByovKCqhBdriA Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 08:34:40 +0000 Message-ID: <1dae33245df940288786a19a658d01bf@MSEXCH13.mands.hu> References: <6413dbc6-a64e-b69a-ffcc-9c555df24e71@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <6413dbc6-a64e-b69a-ffcc-9c555df24e71@freebsd.org> Accept-Language: en-US, hu-HU Content-Language: hu-HU X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [192.168.4.90] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48c7gR5gvgz40Tb X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of Krasznai.Andras@mands.hu designates 93.189.114.146 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=Krasznai.Andras@mands.hu X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.15 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.87)[-0.869,0]; HAS_XOIP(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[mands.hu]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.990,0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[146.114.189.93.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.10.0]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:47116, ipnet:93.189.112.0/21, country:HU]; IP_SCORE(0.01)[country: HU(0.03)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 08:34:47 -0000 Hi I am experiencing the following: Firefox, Chrome, LibreOffice freezes my Fr= eeBSD-CURRENT after a few seconds (the disk is used intensivey but nor keyb= oard nor mouse is working, I can move the mouse pointer but nothing happens= when I click with any of the buttons), nothing is written on the screen. A= s the mouse seems to not work I am not able to start any other application = after starting the above programs. before starting those programs xterm, cl= ang, etc is running correctly. Ctrl-Alt-Del kills the xorg server, and the laptop returns to the character= based screen. I can start X again with startx, and it behaves in the same= manner.=20 A week ago when the above first happened then (as it was recommended in pkg= -message) recompiling xorg-server with the FIXDRM option corrected the prob= lem, but as FIXDRM is now removed I am not able to use those applications. I tried to force the usage of dri3 as recommended, but did not help. The system is a Lenovo T510 laptop, Intel I5-M520 CPU, integrated Intel Gra= phics , FreeBSD-CURRENT #358833, ports installed from pkg repository.=20 best regards Andras Krasznai -----Eredeti =FCzenet----- Felad=F3: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-current@f= reebsd.org] Meghatalmaz=F3 Niclas Zeising K=FCldve: 2020. m=E1rcius 8. 20:34 C=EDmzett: x11@FreeBSD.org; current@FreeBSD.org; stable@FreeBSD.org; ports@= FreeBSD.org T=E1rgy: users of drm-legacy-kmod or drm drivers from base [ This is cross-posted across several mailing lists for maximum=20 visibility. Please respect reply-to and keep replies to x11@FreeBSD.org=20 . Thank you! ] In order to improve support for the new lkpi based graphics drivers=20 (drm-kmod) and to improve the graphics stack we have switched mesa to=20 prefer DRI3 over DRI2. This was done in r528071. For those using=20 drm-kmod, this should improve performance somewhat, and more importantly=20 alleviate the use of the FIXDRM option (now removed) in xorg-server. However, for those of you using graphics/drm-legacy-kmod or the drm=20 drivers in base, this change can cause issues. If you are experiencing=20 problems when running OpenGL applications, you can force the use of the=20 DRI2 backend. To force mesa to use DRI2, set the environment variable=20 LIBGL_DRI3_DISABLE to 1 before starting any OpenGL application. The=20 easiest way to accomplish this is by adding it to either your shell=20 startup file or ~/.xinitrc. As an example, for users of [t]csh, put setenv LIBGL_DRI3_DISABLE 1 in ~/.cshrc. For users of bourne type shells (sh, bash, ksh, zsh, ...) instead put export LIBGL_DRI3_DISABLE=3D1 in ~/.profile If you are using these legacy drivers, I'm also very interested in=20 hearing what issues you are facing that prevents you from using the new=20 lkpi based drivers. Regards --=20 Niclas Zeising FreeBSD Graphics Team _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Mar 10 09:17:56 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27B0A25DA20; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:17:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from kabab.cs.huji.ac.il (kabab.cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.116.210]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48c8dF5fMFz4SdM; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:17:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cs.huji.ac.il; s=57791128; h=References:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:From; bh=bPPrl8uv49B78f3qWREuZuuJ4SkjRgOUqyTj7eeFjNU=; b=fjNsY0bgGHOcIGqcgG+baJILOdNF1gay2KJRUmop/8f9/jOorBGCZ0XIH5l9Gs1selvGl7bAJcGDQwggYOHZhZBqF+x5hVp0iekGOxCB5EOZxwhTyLat+Myi7T5XJzHTJ0NNvif9r6eT548yZwg9lHATJDVNszextrMYhBVk/ZcbfcUqApHkKYM/NgBL3KifPEMJAumQWB5wla+hP6c5Qik+6rTHx3QfZUl5DMApoBzkuQPiZVgx+Q6qJHyKIzbF9CAiH0c9SBgALPmSARHahN4wwJSFfhGCvZpd84pni3w0y5IA61NhnzOstTb1Qgh1Y1VHIogAYn6KKWKxPqKVjA==; Received: from bach.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.20]) by kabab.cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 1jBb1J-0001fE-Ei; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:17:49 +0200 From: Daniel Braniss Message-Id: <893EB073-5AEA-41D6-AEC6-89AC9CFE38AC@cs.huji.ac.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\)) Subject: Re: Is amd automount still supported in 13.0 or not? Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:17:48 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20200309172637.GB83139@rancor.immure.com> Cc: Cy Schubert , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Ed Maste , current To: Bob Willcox References: <20200203232333.GA37109@rancor.immure.com> <20200204.085435.139942824021996563.yasu@utahime.org> <20200204154650.GA39757@rancor.immure.com> <20200204161505.GN1309@albert.catwhisker.org> <20200308172301.GF59792@rancor.immure.com> <23042BDF-0E61-4AF1-A95F-E8134D705A42@cschubert.com> <20200309172637.GB83139@rancor.immure.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48c8dF5fMFz4SdM X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=cs.huji.ac.il header.s=57791128 header.b=fjNsY0bg; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=huji.ac.il; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of danny@cs.huji.ac.il has no SPF policy when checking 132.65.116.210) smtp.mailfrom=danny@cs.huji.ac.il X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.59 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[cs.huji.ac.il:s=57791128]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[cs.huji.ac.il:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[huji.ac.il,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[210.116.65.132.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.10.0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:378, ipnet:132.64.0.0/13, country:IL]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-2.29)[ip: (-5.93), ipnet: 132.64.0.0/13(-3.10), asn: 378(-2.48), country: IL(0.05)]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:17:56 -0000 > On 9 Mar 2020, at 19:26, Bob Willcox wrote: >=20 > On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 08:35:58AM -0700, Cy Schubert wrote: >> On March 9, 2020 7:49:34 AM PDT, Ed Maste wrote: >>> On Sun, 8 Mar 2020 at 13:23, Bob Willcox wrote: >>>>=20 >>>> Thanks for the tip! That worked for me. I guess from reading the >>> documentation >>>> I didn't pick up on staying with the symlinks and simply changing >>> host to net. >>>=20 >>> Glad it's working for you! Is there anything else that you found >>> tricky or surprising in migrating? Perhaps we could produce a >>> quick-reference transition guide. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list >>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>> "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>=20 >> /net and indirect maps should be simple conversations. Direct maps = may or may not be easy. Autofs doesn't support nested direct maps like = amd does. You may need to mount elsewhere or use /net with symlinks. >>=20 >> We do have a port as well. The port will be retired after a = reasonable amount of time to allow people to convert. Amd upstream has = told me he no longer supports amd. His advice is to use autofs. >=20 > Yes, and I considered installing the amd port but that just seemed = like I'd be postponing > the inevitable. Since I had a simple use case of just using symlinks = to about four of my > remote filesystems, switching from using the /host symlink to the /net = symlink was pretty > easy. >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Bob Willcox | It's possible that the whole purpose of your life is = to > bob@immure.com | serve as a warning to others. > Austin, TX | > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org = mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current = > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org = =E2=80=9D short version: www.cs.huji.ac.il/~danny/autofs.py = is a python script that = converts old hesiod based am-utils maps to autofs and has been in used for several years now. long version: we have been using amd (later am-utils) since sunos days, when we moved = to BSD, there was no NIS support, so we switched to hesiod (clever move then since we were all the time = getting =E2=80=99NIS server not responding=E2=80=99) with am-utils we had some issues, so when autofs finally made it to = Linux, and then to FreeBSD, it has been very solid indeed!=20 BTW, autofs is heavily used here, for home directories, binaries etc. my 2cents. danny From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Mar 10 12:35:56 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A1F5262561 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 12:35:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca) Received: from doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (doctor.nl2k.ab.ca [204.209.81.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48cF1k1g06z4PQM for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 12:35:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca) Received: from doctor by doctor.nl2k.ab.ca with local (Exim 4.93.0.4 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1jBe85-000MSL-46; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 06:37:01 -0600 Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 06:37:01 -0600 From: The Doctor To: AN Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mouse is broken Message-ID: <20200310123701.GA83714@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48cF1k1g06z4PQM X-Spamd-Bar: ++ X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.42 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(0.00)[+a]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.55)[0.553,0]; BAD_REP_POLICIES(0.10)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; URIBL_PBL(0.02)[empire.kred]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(0.00)[nl2k.ab.ca,quarantine]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.01)[0.014,0]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; INTRODUCTION(2.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6171, ipnet:204.209.81.0/24, country:CA]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-0.17)[ip: (-0.40), ipnet: 204.209.81.0/24(-0.20), asn: 6171(-0.16), country: CA(-0.09)]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 12:35:56 -0000 On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 09:12:49PM -0400, AN wrote: > > After an update today to world, kernel, and ports my mouse no longer works. > Mouse works on console. I use startx, mouse seems to break after startx is > issued. > > Is any one else seeing anything similar? Any help is appreciated, thanks > in advance. I have the same issue. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism An enlightened soul would not demand of another to believe lies. -unknown From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Mar 10 13:11:30 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34BBF2633AA for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 13:11:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trond.endrestol@ximalas.info) Received: from enterprise.ximalas.info (enterprise.ximalas.info [IPv6:2001:700:1100:1::8]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "ximalas.info", Issuer "Hostmaster ximalas.info" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48cFpm3G1qz3FK4 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 13:11:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trond.endrestol@ximalas.info) Received: from enterprise.ximalas.info (Ximalas@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by enterprise.ximalas.info (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02ADAnvd046930 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 10 Mar 2020 14:10:49 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from trond.endrestol@ximalas.info) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ximalas.info; s=default; t=1583845850; bh=9NVQ+eMYDSKC0DkhtS8RCGGtNdHJRe8BjuZNY5UExOM=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=G/RBY1jfwvAwtSsEQ1l685nwmN2JFvVxu4YcVcGLu64GEfyw8h4ezhPW5crvF4sWm K3rvt4VjIbzE18OWNJY3ggts25L9M6Xp9USgpDXxWr9WX+UJDUui7/in3VpXVV6Ygp P9G7YLALWLVueYu7tpgTsvFWdF21Y1MXJjsQI0LLD8ztPX9WaTMaAjvwkyDcjMA+oQ 1VwXFKJTKespKrqLYHXuoNnp68f9tySuBAYQC/F49uIRtE42kPA4cozZWZwLTZduIE 14BA/zKHmlNAE/llzyVmx9jkpaFHlVVZxQLvGl4/JD3W7bUBy3C9kAxHOn/o3Efb1v evuegM3+UAT6Q== Received: from localhost (trond@localhost) by enterprise.ximalas.info (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id 02ADAn42046927; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 14:10:49 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from trond.endrestol@ximalas.info) X-Authentication-Warning: enterprise.ximalas.info: trond owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 14:10:49 +0100 (CET) From: =?UTF-8?Q?Trond_Endrest=C3=B8l?= Sender: Trond.Endrestol@ximalas.info To: The Doctor cc: AN , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mouse is broken In-Reply-To: <20200310123701.GA83714@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> Message-ID: References: <20200310123701.GA83714@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (BSF 395 2020-01-19) OpenPGP: url=http://ximalas.info/about/tronds-openpgp-public-key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on enterprise.ximalas.info X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48cFpm3G1qz3FK4 X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=ximalas.info header.s=default header.b=G/RBY1jf; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=ximalas.info; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of trond.endrestol@ximalas.info designates 2001:700:1100:1::8 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=trond.endrestol@ximalas.info X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.09 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[ximalas.info:s=default]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[ximalas.info:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[ximalas.info,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:224, ipnet:2001:700::/32, country:NO]; IP_SCORE(-2.09)[ip: (-8.26), ipnet: 2001:700::/32(-1.43), asn: 224(-0.77), country: NO(-0.01)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 13:11:30 -0000 On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 06:37-0600, The Doctor wrote: > On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 09:12:49PM -0400, AN wrote: > > > > After an update today to world, kernel, and ports my mouse no longer works. > > Mouse works on console. I use startx, mouse seems to break after startx is > > issued. > > > > Is any one else seeing anything similar? Any help is appreciated, thanks > > in advance. > > I have the same issue. You might be missing x11-drivers/xf86-input-evdev and/or x11-drivers/xf86-input-libinput. -- Trond. From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Mar 10 14:35:59 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 820CB265838 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 14:35:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from db@db.net) Received: from tfm.com (mtbaker.tfm.com [192.231.224.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.tfm.com", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48cHhF6rnhz49vZ for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 14:35:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from db@db.net) Received: from night.db.net (DB-DSL.ServerNorth.com [98.124.61.131]) (authenticated bits=0) by tfm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 02AEZLWC000517 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 10 Mar 2020 07:35:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 10:35:18 -0400 From: Diane Bruce To: The Doctor Cc: AN , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mouse is broken Message-ID: <20200310143518.GA92514@night.db.net> References: <20200310123701.GA83714@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200310123701.GA83714@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48cHhF6rnhz49vZ X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of db@db.net has no SPF policy when checking 192.231.224.2) smtp.mailfrom=db@db.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.03 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.997,0]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[db.net]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:10488, ipnet:192.231.224.0/22, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; IP_SCORE(-0.93)[ip: (-2.42), ipnet: 192.231.224.0/22(-1.21), asn: 10488(-0.97), country: US(-0.05)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 14:35:59 -0000 On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 06:37:01AM -0600, The Doctor wrote: > On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 09:12:49PM -0400, AN wrote: > > > > After an update today to world, kernel, and ports my mouse no longer works. > > Mouse works on console. I use startx, mouse seems to break after startx is > > issued. > > > > Is any one else seeing anything similar? Any help is appreciated, thanks > > in advance. > > I have the same issue. Check the UPDATING file in /usr/ports/UPDATING 20200220: read the entry on x11. -- - db@FreeBSD.org db@db.net http://www.db.net/~db From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Mar 10 16:24:28 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E6162693F7 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 16:24:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from theron.tarigo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qt1-x841.google.com (mail-qt1-x841.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::841]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48cL5R34hyz3M5C; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 16:24:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from theron.tarigo@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qt1-x841.google.com with SMTP id n5so6463174qtv.7; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:24:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:subject:to:cc:references:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=PX9bNpbBoxLDiJ4J4SvgoREIaOcJvRCmIoad74xYB0c=; b=qMcIkCKQQbLenPIDHpiYYk55xt41bjDPudCuCzFxPnCPAhTxC9HmmzYlZuFznlTUWf upKcZIIWLOav7sgZdisa0BTkfNL+c8b9TkB8aZdOH4EFA0vMlosIgeDOXaAyD8IHTbsK 1OE2S8Beb/S/Q1xvwOgfVJl+TA2YwOey1stq9FHB9me/l3HzW/BK0BBdbrZL73haiSwR VZV2z93TB0cZIMwDajq3R6FHkOt0QVAkzax+goGS26R8SjWdaBcCKit5lIVEBZG5WWvo EgzAoCcOlqZSzs15UWGW4mo5S4jcL4HskMyRL1ZEY2ZKFTDbx+3m/HWv6CIwq6RvzR+R 4K6w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:subject:to:cc:references:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=PX9bNpbBoxLDiJ4J4SvgoREIaOcJvRCmIoad74xYB0c=; b=pOz9673dsbhUphqH+A71PeJyIQAfc7Hg/UTP832SrNXhr3Bk5J2MvQr6nzHAyx+DtX D8tu1Knuh2CkUwonfJWRZD6kJ97CrEUu30FSQrIL5XWZbbzRh1V0GUyP6o1jpSvH+0v2 SzCDxUv3bvlF0VgZIorX7eLoVgCPq3b8XsaDJqO+HmbUZbaUg6Kdv5DNgpLN9BXJwoxM Zh9PSINKdW3v/2lXO2PRYywDnEKDV0lnVn/4qgZK5nKR0HQeD83NGLWH09zG+bsv+e2u e0T4E9p9cKyGG/DQXYP6qzGF11XM/EfVD3zm/4LMGTjrMVDGT0BLZuOjvTpJ7ysmm7ZB z2iA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0ok7sk3qkhcNuK6h7t+APQMn13u4Y8MJ2Kxu9GjYG2HqJ9xikD yHud1gwEcmZNvzvTFpDR2XWgFBmB9OA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vsjEieNKvN1Be4GX84P+/kc1bMgfpVlqEALvRXWZNii5g3Pf1XyVEEYm3ULnp0FVT9XPWbtGw== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:1194:: with SMTP id d20mr19680623qtj.243.1583857465879; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:24:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [168.122.152.42] (dhcp-resnet-168-122-152-42.bu.edu. [168.122.152.42]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v126sm7108665qkb.107.2020.03.10.09.24.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:24:25 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Theron Tarigo From: Theron Subject: Re: System clock is slow To: Peter Jeremy Cc: FreeBSD Current , kib@freebsd.org, neel@neelc.org References: <989cd36a-e015-940a-dfe2-851c6fdf4734@gmail.com> <20200310053833.GD3091@server.rulingia.com> Message-ID: Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 12:24:24 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200310053833.GD3091@server.rulingia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48cL5R34hyz3M5C X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=qMcIkCKQ; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of therontarigo@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::841 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=therontarigo@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.00 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (2.00), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-1.85), asn: 15169(-1.65), country: US(-0.05)]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.998,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[1.4.8.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 16:24:28 -0000 On 2020-03-10 01:38, Peter Jeremy wrote: > Are you running NTP? If so, is NTP maintaining lock and what is the > reported PLL frequency (ntpq -c kerni)? Didn't show any useful difference, "kernel status: pll unsync" when I tested this. > What does "sysctl kern.timecounter" report and have you tried using > any of the alternative timecounters listed in kern.timecounter.choice? Indeed that reveals the problem:     kern.timecounter.hardware: TSC-low (before regression)     kern.timecounter.tc.TSC-low.frequency: 1296053807 (after regression)     kern.timecounter.tc.TSC-low.frequency: 1300000000 (why are these tsc_freq divided by two?) Through some printf's in tsc.c I've determined that the 2.6e9 value is from 0x16 CPUID which Intel says is only a nominal value not to be used, whereas 2.592e9 value is from calibration. /*  * Calculate TSC frequency using information from the CPUID leaf 0x15  * 'Time Stamp Counter and Nominal Core Crystal Clock'.  If leaf 0x15  * is not functional, as it is on Skylake/Kabylake, try 0x16 'Processor  * Frequency Information'.  Leaf 0x16 is described in the SDM as  * informational only, but if 0x15 did not work, and TSC calibration  * is disabled, it is the best we can get at all.  It should still be  * an improvement over the parsing of the CPU model name in  * tsc_freq_intel(), when available.  */ The implementation logic for when to use tsc_freq_cpuid() looks wrong to me; it doesn't match what this comment implies.  Fallback to calibration when calibration is unspecified should proceed when 0x15 fails regardless of what 0x16 does.  (CC'd the authors). Switching to HPET or ACPI-fast gives the expected results.  Would there be any reason to not use HPET provided I can cope with the performance implications? The name of the ACPI option varies haphazardly between "ACPI-fast" and "ACPI-safe" between reboots, I guess it is sensitive to some buggy vendor firmware. > Are you overclocking your CPU (or doing anything else non-standard)? I had previously used powerd to let the CPU underclock to 700MHz when idle.  Now, I've lost all control over CPU frequency (either by powerd or by sysctl) since there is some in-kernel cpufreq driver which I can't figure out how to disable.  It's very much an annoyance, but I think unrelated to the timecounter problem. Theron From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Mar 10 17:34:00 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59CFF26B138 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 17:34:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cse.cem@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ot1-f51.google.com (mail-ot1-f51.google.com [209.85.210.51]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48cMdg145Nz4N84 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 17:33:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cse.cem@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ot1-f51.google.com with SMTP id f21so13934424otp.12 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 10:33:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fiY5dLkpQjjH+BHCyMe+/BQFxXkpCJb01o7uvpISgbo=; b=b/5O3hNQbKCIfAF0X79inQfLusJoGUx7/sHm1CwEdKYhBnqoWKltiboqftA1foKJ0F xPfRvDVQUYSZxk9f+o3iuT14vOws7GPyiRK9j6K0eVkoTjqOb8BJSLj/ygPL5amVrO2K JCuHVo8p/3fa4Lh0Gk31MHQ5286aR2rHDsyjMNmUa/bbOfzUsvt5ZOHoYp0aLaw4wvbY 6T7whot0dhwOMkNbAdl4+NrX0J9yttUNI4zC9e5b3llpMhTzTowHTxKCC6CINWImqAuX hcxhsiKjhHaZMyhwJwQT7yj6vz39EKs3N29zS50Z3LXBrNeUBGe2ID0fVj1Orx/BoGqC fz7g== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ1LCWH0Ml2O3kUfK1akvP+NYqMFBaIEbdm6J5L86g7zGD0onxIt WLTPu+28M/9vAxEu6rA45bzht4i5 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvkYzm3/iXOllIAEtDfz2K2QFAGmOk0i19YKPewS9jUv3bMAgHyppggeu8Xa8vt8+TTCknlJg== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:2c69:: with SMTP id f96mr9305717otb.62.1583861637270; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 10:33:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-oi1-f181.google.com (mail-oi1-f181.google.com. [209.85.167.181]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l19sm2091452otj.69.2020.03.10.10.33.56 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Mar 2020 10:33:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi1-f181.google.com with SMTP id p125so14693790oif.10 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 10:33:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:289:: with SMTP id z9mr1937218oic.48.1583861636722; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 10:33:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <989cd36a-e015-940a-dfe2-851c6fdf4734@gmail.com> <20200310053833.GD3091@server.rulingia.com> In-Reply-To: Reply-To: cem@freebsd.org From: Conrad Meyer Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 10:33:45 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: System clock is slow To: Theron Cc: FreeBSD Current Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48cMdg145Nz4N84 X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of csecem@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.51 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=csecem@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.13 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[cem@freebsd.org]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[51.210.85.209.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.18]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17:c]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[cem@freebsd.org,csecem@gmail.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[cem@freebsd.org,csecem@gmail.com]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[51.210.85.209.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; IP_SCORE(-1.13)[ip: (-0.99), ipnet: 209.85.128.0/17(-2.98), asn: 15169(-1.65), country: US(-0.05)]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 17:34:00 -0000 On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 9:24 AM Theron wrote: > I had previously used powerd to let the CPU underclock to 700MHz when > idle. Now, I've lost all control over CPU frequency (either by powerd > or by sysctl) since there is some in-kernel cpufreq driver which I can't > figure out how to disable. It's hwpstate_intel(4). You can add 'hint.hwpstate_intel.0.disabled="1"' in loader.conf or device.hints to disable and use est(4), if you prefer. The idea of the device is that hardware can do a better job managing the frequency / power states rapidly than daemons like powerd. But if you like powerd/est, feel free to disable it. Future models of Intel CPU may not provide est(4). If you leave it enabled, you can control the energy efficiency / performance trade-off of hwpstate_intel on a per-core basis (or per-package, if not disabled and hardware supports package-level control) with 'dev.hwpstate_intel..epp=0-100' (sysctl or tunable); the CPU uses this knob to control how biased it is towards low frequency states. 100 is most efficient, 0 is most performant. The default is 50. Best, Conrad From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Mar 10 17:52:38 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97CF126B795 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 17:52:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bakul@bitblocks.com) Received: from mail.bitblocks.com (ns1.bitblocks.com [173.228.5.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48cN3804Tbz4DRl; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 17:52:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bakul@bitblocks.com) Received: from mob.bitblocks.com (mob.bitblocks.com [192.168.125.11]) by mail.bitblocks.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FA6A156E45D; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 10:51:53 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Subject: Re: System clock is slow From: Bakul Shah In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 10:51:52 -0700 Cc: Peter Jeremy , FreeBSD Current , kib@freebsd.org, neel@neelc.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <26FD35E4-DA43-4963-A5ED-9FE6FB0E0FCA@bitblocks.com> References: <989cd36a-e015-940a-dfe2-851c6fdf4734@gmail.com> <20200310053833.GD3091@server.rulingia.com> To: Theron X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48cN3804Tbz4DRl X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bakul@bitblocks.com designates 173.228.5.8 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bakul@bitblocks.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.61 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:173.228.5.8/29]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bitblocks.com]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-1.91)[ip: (-5.95), ipnet: 173.228.0.0/20(-2.98), asn: 46375(-0.55), country: US(-0.05)]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:46375, ipnet:173.228.0.0/20, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 17:52:38 -0000 On Mar 10, 2020, at 9:24 AM, Theron wrote: >=20 > On 2020-03-10 01:38, Peter Jeremy wrote: >> Are you running NTP? If so, is NTP maintaining lock and what is the >> reported PLL frequency (ntpq -c kerni)? >=20 > Didn't show any useful difference, "kernel status: pll unsync" when I = tested this. May take a while. ntpq -c peer should show a line with a leading *. Though likely unrelated to your problem. >> What does "sysctl kern.timecounter" report and have you tried using >> any of the alternative timecounters listed in = kern.timecounter.choice? >=20 > Indeed that reveals the problem: > kern.timecounter.hardware: TSC-low > (before regression) > kern.timecounter.tc.TSC-low.frequency: 1296053807 > (after regression) > kern.timecounter.tc.TSC-low.frequency: 1300000000 In an old (amd 8150) -12.1 machine I see kern.timecounter.hardware: TSC-low kern.timecounter.tc.TSC-low.frequency: 1806045908 machdep.tsc_freq: 3612091816 In a new ryzen -current machine: kern.timecounter.hardware: TSC kern.timecounter.tc.TSC.frequency: 2096123148 machdep.tsc_freq: 2096123148 > Through some printf's in tsc.c I've determined that the 2.6e9 value is = from 0x16 CPUID which Intel says is only a nominal value not to be used, = whereas 2.592e9 value is from calibration. >=20 > /* > * Calculate TSC frequency using information from the CPUID leaf 0x15 > * 'Time Stamp Counter and Nominal Core Crystal Clock'. If leaf 0x15 > * is not functional, as it is on Skylake/Kabylake, try 0x16 = 'Processor > * Frequency Information'. Leaf 0x16 is described in the SDM as > * informational only, but if 0x15 did not work, and TSC calibration > * is disabled, it is the best we can get at all. It should still be > * an improvement over the parsing of the CPU model name in > * tsc_freq_intel(), when available. > */ >=20 > The implementation logic for when to use tsc_freq_cpuid() looks wrong = to me; it doesn't match what this comment implies. Fallback to = calibration when calibration is unspecified should proceed when 0x15 = fails regardless of what 0x16 does. (CC'd the authors). As I understand it, if the user doesn't *explicitly* disable frequency calibration, it must be calibrated. It may still be skipped if there are no legacy devices. See around tsc.c:300. What does sysctl machdep.disable_tsc_calibration return? Do you see a line like the following in dmesg? Skipping TSC calibration since no legacy devices reported by FADT and = CPUID works The Commit log says this: x86: Fall back to leaf 0x16 if TSC frequency is obtained by CPUID = and leaf 0x15 is not functional. This should improve automatic TSC frequency determination on Skylake/Kabylake/... families, where 0x15 exists but does not = provide all necessary information. SDM contains relatively strong wording against such uses of 0x16, but Intel does not give us any other way = to obtain the frequency. Linux did the same in the commit 604dc9170f2435d27da5039a3efd757dceadc684. Based on submission by: Neel Chauhan PR: 240475 Reviewed by: markj Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation MFC after: 1 week Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21777 > Switching to HPET or ACPI-fast gives the expected results. Would = there be any reason to not use HPET provided I can cope with the = performance implications? Have you looked at hpet(4), timecounters(4), clocks(7) manpages? I don't know how up-to-date these manpages are....= From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Mar 10 18:57:53 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50AA426D3BE for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 18:57:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from kib.kiev.ua (kib.kiev.ua [IPv6:2001:470:d5e7:1::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48cPVR0wjdz4R8n for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 18:57:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from tom.home (kib@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kib.kiev.ua (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02AIvf8q046848 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 10 Mar 2020 20:57:44 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 kib.kiev.ua 02AIvf8q046848 Received: (from kostik@localhost) by tom.home (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 02AIve8B046847; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 20:57:40 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: tom.home: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 20:57:40 +0200 From: Konstantin Belousov To: Theron Cc: Peter Jeremy , FreeBSD Current , neel@neelc.org Subject: Re: System clock is slow Message-ID: <20200310185740.GA1992@kib.kiev.ua> References: <989cd36a-e015-940a-dfe2-851c6fdf4734@gmail.com> <20200310053833.GD3091@server.rulingia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,FREEMAIL_FROM, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on tom.home X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48cPVR0wjdz4R8n X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF, No valid DKIM" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=softfail (mx1.freebsd.org: 2001:470:d5e7:1::1 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of kostikbel@gmail.com) smtp.mailfrom=kostikbel@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.00 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.998,0]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; R_SPF_SOFTFAIL(0.00)[~all:c]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-3.10), ipnet: 2001:470::/32(-4.65), asn: 6939(-3.59), country: US(-0.05)]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6939, ipnet:2001:470::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[gmail.com : No valid SPF, No valid DKIM,none] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 18:57:53 -0000 On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 12:24:24PM -0400, Theron wrote: > On 2020-03-10 01:38, Peter Jeremy wrote: > > Are you running NTP? If so, is NTP maintaining lock and what is the > > reported PLL frequency (ntpq -c kerni)? > > Didn't show any useful difference, "kernel status: pll unsync" when I tested > this. > > > What does "sysctl kern.timecounter" report and have you tried using > > any of the alternative timecounters listed in kern.timecounter.choice? > > Indeed that reveals the problem: >     kern.timecounter.hardware: TSC-low > (before regression) >     kern.timecounter.tc.TSC-low.frequency: 1296053807 > (after regression) >     kern.timecounter.tc.TSC-low.frequency: 1300000000 > > (why are these tsc_freq divided by two?) Because it is TSC-low, not TSC timecounter. > > Through some printf's in tsc.c I've determined that the 2.6e9 value is from > 0x16 CPUID which Intel says is only a nominal value not to be used, whereas > 2.592e9 value is from calibration. > > /* >  * Calculate TSC frequency using information from the CPUID leaf 0x15 >  * 'Time Stamp Counter and Nominal Core Crystal Clock'.  If leaf 0x15 >  * is not functional, as it is on Skylake/Kabylake, try 0x16 'Processor >  * Frequency Information'.  Leaf 0x16 is described in the SDM as >  * informational only, but if 0x15 did not work, and TSC calibration >  * is disabled, it is the best we can get at all.  It should still be >  * an improvement over the parsing of the CPU model name in >  * tsc_freq_intel(), when available. >  */ > > The implementation logic for when to use tsc_freq_cpuid() looks wrong to me; > it doesn't match what this comment implies.  Fallback to calibration when > calibration is unspecified should proceed when 0x15 fails regardless of what > 0x16 does.  (CC'd the authors). Problem is that there are enough machines in wild that do not have ISA clock in chipset, or BIOS did not bothered configuring the chipset to make 8254 emulation operational. Worse, the supposedly intended way for BIOS to report the absense of the PC AT hardware through the FADT legacy devices flag is broken on every machine I looked at. The result of calibration on machine without ISA timer makes the machine unusable at all. The removal of 8254 emulation coincides with addition of the 0x15/0x16 CPUID leafs, so our choice is to do the configuration based on the widest possible compatibility. I was told that fallback to 0x16 is also used by Linux. You can set machdep.disable_tsc_calibration tunable to 0 to force calibration if it works for you. > > Switching to HPET or ACPI-fast gives the expected results.  Would there be > any reason to not use HPET provided I can cope with the performance > implications? > The name of the ACPI option varies haphazardly between "ACPI-fast" and > "ACPI-safe" between reboots, I guess it is sensitive to some buggy vendor > firmware. Use HPET if you want, again by manual enable. BTW, please install sysutils/x86info and provide the output of x86info -r > > > Are you overclocking your CPU (or doing anything else non-standard)? > > I had previously used powerd to let the CPU underclock to 700MHz when idle.  > Now, I've lost all control over CPU frequency (either by powerd or by > sysctl) since there is some in-kernel cpufreq driver which I can't figure > out how to disable.  It's very much an annoyance, but I think unrelated to > the timecounter problem. > > Theron From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Mar 10 20:49:44 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6157E270018 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 20:49:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48cRzX20qsz4L7l; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 20:49:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from John-Baldwins-MacBook-Pro-7.local (ralph.baldwin.cx [66.234.199.215]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: jhb) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF1B81BCDA; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 20:49:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Subject: Re: Emacs tramp mode doesn't work with CURRENT To: John F Carr , "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" References: Cc: Baptiste Daroussin From: John Baldwin Autocrypt: addr=jhb@FreeBSD.org; keydata= mQGiBETQ+XcRBADMFybiq69u+fJRy/0wzqTNS8jFfWaBTs5/OfcV7wWezVmf9sgwn8TW0Dk0 c9MBl0pz+H01dA2ZSGZ5fXlmFIsee1WEzqeJzpiwd/pejPgSzXB9ijbLHZ2/E0jhGBcVy5Yo /Tw5+U/+laeYKu2xb0XPvM0zMNls1ah5OnP9a6Ql6wCgupaoMySb7DXm2LHD1Z9jTsHcAQMD /1jzh2BoHriy/Q2s4KzzjVp/mQO5DSm2z14BvbQRcXU48oAosHA1u3Wrov6LfPY+0U1tG47X 1BGfnQH+rNAaH0livoSBQ0IPI/8WfIW7ub4qV6HYwWKVqkDkqwcpmGNDbz3gfaDht6nsie5Z pcuCcul4M9CW7Md6zzyvktjnbz61BADGDCopfZC4of0Z3Ka0u8Wik6UJOuqShBt1WcFS8ya1 oB4rc4tXfSHyMF63aPUBMxHR5DXeH+EO2edoSwViDMqWk1jTnYza51rbGY+pebLQOVOxAY7k do5Ordl3wklBPMVEPWoZ61SdbcjhHVwaC5zfiskcxj5wwXd2E9qYlBqRg7QeSm9obiBCYWxk d2luIDxqaGJARnJlZUJTRC5vcmc+iGAEExECACAFAkTQ+awCGwMGCwkIBwMCBBUCCAMEFgID AQIeAQIXgAAKCRBy3lIGd+N/BI6RAJ9S97fvbME+3hxzE3JUyUZ6vTewDACdE1stFuSfqMvM jomvZdYxIYyTUpC5Ag0ERND5ghAIAPwsO0B7BL+bz8sLlLoQktGxXwXQfS5cInvL17Dsgnr3 1AKa94j9EnXQyPEj7u0d+LmEe6CGEGDh1OcGFTMVrof2ZzkSy4+FkZwMKJpTiqeaShMh+Goj XlwIMDxyADYvBIg3eN5YdFKaPQpfgSqhT+7El7w+wSZZD8pPQuLAnie5iz9C8iKy4/cMSOrH YUK/tO+Nhw8Jjlw94Ik0T80iEhI2t+XBVjwdfjbq3HrJ0ehqdBwukyeJRYKmbn298KOFQVHO EVbHA4rF/37jzaMadK43FgJ0SAhPPF5l4l89z5oPu0b/+5e2inA3b8J3iGZxywjM+Csq1tqz hltEc7Q+E08AAwUIAL+15XH8bPbjNJdVyg2CMl10JNW2wWg2Q6qdljeaRqeR6zFus7EZTwtX sNzs5bP8y51PSUDJbeiy2RNCNKWFMndM22TZnk3GNG45nQd4OwYK0RZVrikalmJY5Q6m7Z16 4yrZgIXFdKj2t8F+x613/SJW1lIr9/bDp4U9tw0V1g3l2dFtD3p3ZrQ3hpoDtoK70ioIAjjH aIXIAcm3FGZFXy503DOA0KaTWwvOVdYCFLm3zWuSOmrX/GsEc7ovasOWwjPn878qVjbUKWwx Q4QkF4OhUV9zPtf9tDSAZ3x7QSwoKbCoRCZ/xbyTUPyQ1VvNy/mYrBcYlzHodsaqUDjHuW+I SQQYEQIACQUCRND5ggIbDAAKCRBy3lIGd+N/BCO8AJ9j1dWVQWxw/YdTbEyrRKOY8YZNwwCf afMAg8QvmOWnHx3wl8WslCaXaE8= Message-ID: Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 13:49:42 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 20:49:44 -0000 On 1/28/20 8:57 AM, John F Carr wrote: > I use emacs tramp mode, which opens an ssh connection to a remote machine for file access. It works to Linux and FreeBSD 12.1, but not to CURRENT. There has been a change in the way characters are echoed by the shell, with 12.1 treating a consecutive run of backspace as an atomic unit and CURRENT processing them one at a time. This is not necessarily a bug, but it is a nuisance and independently it is suboptimal. I have the same breakage with an amd64 laptop running HEAD (and using tramp-mode from emacs on a 12.x host) Have you been able to bisect it at all? I think libedit is probably a good candidate as well. What I see is that tramp-mode just hangs until I kill the ssh session it is using, and then I see the same output you had below in the debug window showing the extraneous newlines. -- John Baldwin From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Wed Mar 11 00:20:13 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D3E42747F0 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 00:20:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48cXfP1KtBz4HN3 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 00:20:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 249AE2747ED; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 00:20:13 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 245AF2747EC for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 00:20:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48cXfM3t1Xz4HMN for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 00:20:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (v-critter.freebsd.dk [192.168.55.3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4075C1AF103 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 00:20:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02B0K31O006764 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 00:20:03 GMT (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: (from phk@localhost) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 02B0K3Wt006763; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 00:20:03 GMT (envelope-from phk) To: current@freebsd.org Subject: New Xorg - different key-codes From: Poul-Henning Kamp MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <6761.1583886003.1@critter.freebsd.dk> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 00:20:03 +0000 Message-ID: <6762.1583886003@critter.freebsd.dk> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48cXfM3t1Xz4HMN X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of phk@critter.freebsd.dk designates 130.225.244.222 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=phk@critter.freebsd.dk X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.03 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[current@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.98)[0.980,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.988,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.dk]; IP_SCORE(0.04)[ip: (0.06), ipnet: 130.225.0.0/16(0.07), asn: 1835(0.08), country: EU(-0.01)]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[phk@phk.freebsd.dk,phk@critter.freebsd.dk]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:1835, ipnet:130.225.0.0/16, country:EU]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[phk@phk.freebsd.dk,phk@critter.freebsd.dk]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 00:20:13 -0000 I just updated my laptop from source, and somewhere along the way the key-codes Xorg sees changed. I have the right Alt key mapped to "Multi_key", which is now keycode 108 instead of 113, which is now arrow left instead. I hope this email saves somebody else from the frustrating morning I had... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Wed Mar 11 00:46:46 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 821E3275635; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 00:46:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from lax.lemis.com (www.lemis.com [45.32.70.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48cYF008dFz446M; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 00:46:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from eureka.lemis.com (aussie-gw.lemis.com [167.179.139.35]) by lax.lemis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F9502809E; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 00:46:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eureka.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id A6BA8263595; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 11:46:35 +1100 (AEDT) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 11:46:35 +1100 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: FreeBSD current users , FreeBSD Stable Users Subject: Re: New Xorg - different key-codes Message-ID: <20200311004635.GB89512@eureka.lemis.com> References: <6762.1583886003@critter.freebsd.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Pd0ReVV5GZGQvF3a" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6762.1583886003@critter.freebsd.dk> Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-3-5309-0418 Mobile: +61-490-494-038. Use only as instructed. WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48cYF008dFz446M X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of grog@lemis.com designates 45.32.70.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=grog@lemis.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.49 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:www.lemis.com]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[FreeBSD.org]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[grog@FreeBSD.org,grog@lemis.com]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:20473, ipnet:45.32.64.0/19, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[grog@FreeBSD.org,grog@lemis.com]; IP_SCORE(-2.49)[ip: (-7.92), ipnet: 45.32.64.0/19(-2.65), asn: 20473(-1.83), country: US(-0.05)]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 00:46:46 -0000 --Pd0ReVV5GZGQvF3a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday, 11 March 2020 at 0:20:03 +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: [originally sent to current@] > I just updated my laptop from source, and somewhere along the way > the key-codes Xorg sees changed. Indeed. This doesn't just affect -CURRENT: it happened to me on -STABLE last week, so I'm copying that list too. See http://www.lemis.com/grog/diary-mar2020.php?topics=c&subtitle=Daily%20teevee%20update&article=D-20200306-002910#D-20200306-002910 , not the first entry on the subject. > I have the right Alt key mapped to "Multi_key", which is now > keycode 108 instead of 113, which is now arrow left instead. Interesting. Mine wandered from 117 to 147, with PageDown ("Next") as collateral damage. It seems that there are a lot of strange new key bindings (partial output of xmodmap -pk): 117 0xff56 (Next) 0x0000 (NoSymbol) 0xff56 (Next) 130 0xff31 (Hangul) 0x0000 (NoSymbol) 0xff31 (Hangul) 131 0xff34 (Hangul_Hanja) 0x0000 (NoSymbol) 0xff34 (Hangul_Hanja) 135 0xff67 (Menu) 0x0000 (NoSymbol) 0xff67 (Menu) 147 0x1008ff65 (XF86MenuKB) 0x0000 (NoSymbol) 0x1008ff65 (XF86MenuKB) Some of these may reflect other remappings that I have done. > I hope this email saves somebody else from the frustrating > morning I had... Sorry. I should have thought of reporting it. For me, with a number of other issues, it was a frustrating week,some of which are still not resolved. Greg -- Sent from my desktop computer. Finger grog@FreeBSD.org for PGP public key. See complete headers for address and phone numbers. This message is digitally signed. If your Microsoft mail program reports problems, please read http://lemis.com/broken-MUA --Pd0ReVV5GZGQvF3a Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAl5oNOsACgkQIubykFB6QiP79wCfbHCkyNiwyZm6lqXCZo5tml1Z EQ8An0s7ArllC+6etMGrFaQnchzFe2+4 =Y8jz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Pd0ReVV5GZGQvF3a-- From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Wed Mar 11 07:57:28 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E96AA25726B for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 07:57:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartmann@walstatt.org) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass Class 2 CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48cknz3mBSz4JH5 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 07:57:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartmann@walstatt.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1583913445; bh=GZPj79dJyEo0jk7RJ3kg6LSBjv4KxAGZGp6o03GNLBU=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:Subject; b=YI4jganC0VBa0OQH/Kx6McrI2EmZnllkoCqZMJTs50SuKuXxepF6+vxcYKP2sQ5Nh ptd0HhqxABIUUJEPdFm6hNucOHdgkbYcvN8LroPnr8jitjr8gsQcuGFGwlDqvUmgbR ogatVYltbI4RnVu+Q5odpJKzgQ3QosREbFQQbKHo= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from freyja ([79.192.162.249]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MatRT-1jjcEg0Mg7-00cNIZ for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 08:57:25 +0100 Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 08:57:22 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" To: freebsd-current Subject: r358858: ipfw: bad destination address any Message-ID: <20200311085718.009a7f44@freyja> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:A1szYl/WKrW+Q/5a1Y2lFePUftMnO66f/HXRDd9THvLYRbQzHuW OA4NvqZRswTMK5OWCRRnE7VtA7TNgjGX0JuD3e3x0I8VPxHjK/Y8wMSa+3/pPCZj880GhL1 wgguzJ7nAXY+gMxB+/nR67QQnnL4NpmM2hP/SH7MRBZ2rt+LH5S8KBfiCKu9DOKo/3BftqC IqUXIsGCd/DrbIMMkKyHg== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:dfHj30EsPPc=:GfTbb7PrwD4Tk4t7ISP5Vz CvK0HkFJVBUyaHEGEYAiIFw3Kg50Y/l/5u6pP6VpTLyjTUIilHE7igLhIMuhDXwWbUoT1q3I5 DyS6JP8CKP9UtmB553s8tV+0PI60NlOluceUnZ77O9vxQ1JztHoFQaa3LtaadblWtdhs8sbto xRbLQJXVbhiCv1TySoXqjEBqoX2+PEqFQadVJ4qM5XWDxRLe3SaKTfZU0EKIXJJURF3t91Q5o 4c5sO85kaefIWfXlewvsFXE6ytyCWxUInguu+Met4NHBuKU/GR9WAeY6EDEa114gXhBmKWg/0 lLILA2M8ZxXVXS/N5mWGkECMVSd1dBt/bHxABTljB42GlItWknTaTbb+loGkcT8dsW85/uzZi yp05cvnJXjCccspQ5r6U/0f5dwjyggxkPeSEECFarnEa+xvVTl0YHleMnGFwyvuEDtte/rqf6 syLyLUyN2l2MQDuEcJUOp8t33m8I2yvqalDyld9QIYoAa3Ib1+263sr87DIYbpZ4GHYiPocBr LZM7ZUdY/EkNlmfAr43to/k+RFP//uE5evZFXFbUk7AHHo7Ct8PNZ/Z6eQBpUCv1w8usUM37/ qf6X/o9wEJ2el4xVMlUN1MVVaaejfK+eRTYeD4oP/xLUdccJoy1cSxutzbsPmMBDgOEuUE6X/ ckj00jzgIVtkPauHvEmNvYf7AEpjqIUP0qPVxtLix9E7bt5ybCis4QJscBm9cE7LKHvCrG1fP Ru5aCGoneNedwJzybc1DIEWZ/k6Rp0n7zRlw40hHSh8vKe9brXEMecDfFlgmN+ctJC+jBaOHK JZn7SfDP6ysn6Ip2VemeIffzNGOcTPJXSXTEoy02qBMxyJjhqvXgrpY0bKmHqiPasCdpM3nrZ NM7G7Xz+DE15D5pNt/7yNbzXrcvvxmkYUydpEU6J82h7xEQ8vegCjhoXDIXNwjdA6mMVN7ZbR UjiajNFg3YL46XFHOZPt1sz3y9RytODsPRYHAedz01vEg+dm9jNzeu1u3/QtwuXe5fQ+m+low SSkPhm98mx2PMxfG/SI4l5a0JXvNYQQY10N5exx0GfNzW7WfR4f456GKwYd38D2T+G++IRoun v8xNra1SbP6ode3zh0hY+V7NKP271GJUkGCEZKK2NzfEHWyKGuFdkuHZUgHL40Nx1OEk0aEek 2zY9ufCmXt6G6ioZanYveGZWKhowVpz7S+OEzyEQ4ObWyWaOsnLrybkpSclW8Pt8DhjkchubV Kp6DSczUlWOFO4pwc X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48cknz3mBSz4JH5 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmx.net header.s=badeba3b8450 header.b=YI4jganC; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ohartmann@walstatt.org has no SPF policy when checking 212.227.17.22) smtp.mailfrom=ohartmann@walstatt.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.20 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmx.net:s=badeba3b8450]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[249.162.192.79.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.10]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[walstatt.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE(-1.00)[ip: (-6.04), ipnet: 212.227.0.0/16(-1.12), asn: 8560(2.17), country: DE(-0.02)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmx.net:+]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.30)[-0.300,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[22.17.227.212.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.3.1]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8560, ipnet:212.227.0.0/16, country:DE]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 07:57:29 -0000 After upgrading to r358858, CURRENT boxes secured by IPFW failed to handle keyword "any" as source and destination and rc script fails to init the filter correctly: [...] ipfw: bad destination address any [...] This renders any box running CURRENT and ipfw startig filter rules via rc.conf or using own scripts containing "any" as keyword for either source or destination to brick the system. Kind regards, O. Hartmann From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Wed Mar 11 09:27:50 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D701625A82A; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:27:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Mark.Martinec+freebsd@ijs.si) Received: from mail.ijs.si (mail.ijs.si [193.2.4.66]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48cmpD2L8yz4CG6; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:27:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Mark.Martinec+freebsd@ijs.si) Received: from amavis-ori.ijs.si (localhost [IPv6:::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48cmp558gszxh1; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:27:41 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ijs.si; h= user-agent:message-id:references:in-reply-to:organization :subject:subject:from:from:date:date:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:mime-version:received:received :received:received; s=jakla4; t=1583918858; x=1586510859; bh=A6b hXXjDl+K7/fjWiLiHu8t27drjiIf5vI7bVf0oOB0=; b=iWXaUTOa7pXXxyQA0A1 a1eVXM7tqn69YYBi0b5rrwEnmA2YNWGX34p/NR3q2Di7UgujhuT0Hl4M9/SR+O+r M/tyTTi0AMU288d8U4hYBDDmhrhlPyq23VVxHZkg50SlYD7ZTG17txn+Mz4wa17K HNhantrt5TO01UDNgKEC8LRw= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ijs.si Received: from mail.ijs.si ([IPv6:::1]) by amavis-ori.ijs.si (mail.ijs.si [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with LMTP id fxmqiBAExKfA; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:27:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from mildred.ijs.si (mailbox.ijs.si [IPv6:2001:1470:ff80::143:1]) by mail.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48cmp25sVBzxgv; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:27:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from nabiralnik.ijs.si (nabiralnik.ijs.si [IPv6:2001:1470:ff80::80:16]) by mildred.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48cmp25bbTz15h; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:27:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from 2001:1470:ff80:e001:6d4:c4ff:fe4b:7c23 by nabiralnik.ijs.si with HTTP (HTTP/2.0 POST); Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:27:38 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:27:38 +0100 From: Mark Martinec To: FreeBSD-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New Xorg - different key-codes Organization: Jozef Stefan Institute In-Reply-To: <20200311004635.GB89512@eureka.lemis.com> References: <6762.1583886003@critter.freebsd.dk> <20200311004635.GB89512@eureka.lemis.com> Message-ID: X-Sender: Mark.Martinec+freebsd@ijs.si User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.1 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48cmpD2L8yz4CG6 X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=ijs.si header.s=jakla4 header.b=iWXaUTOa; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=ijs.si; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of Mark.Martinec@ijs.si designates 193.2.4.66 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=Mark.Martinec@ijs.si X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.78 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.992,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[ijs.si:s=jakla4]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:193.2.4.66]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[ijs.si.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.11.1]; IP_SCORE(-1.08)[ipnet: 193.2.0.0/16(-2.53), asn: 2107(-2.89), country: SI(0.01)]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[66.4.2.193.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.11.2]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[ijs.si:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[ijs.si,none]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:2107, ipnet:193.2.0.0/16, country:SI]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[freebsd] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:27:50 -0000 >> I just updated my laptop from source, and somewhere along the way >> the key-codes Xorg sees changed. > > Indeed. This doesn't just affect -CURRENT: it happened to me on > -STABLE last week, so I'm copying that list too. And a "Down" key now opens and closes a KDE "Application Launcher", alternatively with its original function (which makes editing a frustration). https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244354 Mark From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Wed Mar 11 09:29:13 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDBA125AB24; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:29:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.daemonic.se (mail.daemonic.se [176.58.89.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48cmqr5d4fz4G61; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:29:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@freebsd.org) Received: from cid.daemonic.se (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48cmqp11lFz3lwh; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:29:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daemonic.se Received: from mail.daemonic.se ([IPv6:::1]) (using TLS with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256) by cid.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10587) with ESMTPS id Rtsb7kT7AFhr; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:29:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from garnet.daemonic.se (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:201:8ff:f59:bc1f:9dc8]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48cmqm46r7z3lvf; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:29:08 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: New Xorg - different key-codes To: Greg 'groggy' Lehey , Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: FreeBSD current users , FreeBSD Stable Users References: <6762.1583886003@critter.freebsd.dk> <20200311004635.GB89512@eureka.lemis.com> From: Niclas Zeising Message-ID: Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:29:08 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200311004635.GB89512@eureka.lemis.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48cmqr5d4fz4G61 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.05 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.96)[-0.961,0]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.91)[0.910,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36236, ipnet:176.58.89.0/24, country:US] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:29:13 -0000 On 2020-03-11 01:46, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > > On Wednesday, 11 March 2020 at 0:20:03 +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > [originally sent to current@] >> I just updated my laptop from source, and somewhere along the way >> the key-codes Xorg sees changed. > > Indeed. This doesn't just affect -CURRENT: it happened to me on > -STABLE last week, so I'm copying that list too. See > http://www.lemis.com/grog/diary-mar2020.php?topics=c&subtitle=Daily%20teevee%20update&article=D-20200306-002910#D-20200306-002910 > , not the first entry on the subject. > >> I have the right Alt key mapped to "Multi_key", which is now >> keycode 108 instead of 113, which is now arrow left instead. > > Interesting. Mine wandered from 117 to 147, with PageDown ("Next") as > collateral damage. It seems that there are a lot of strange new key > bindings (partial output of xmodmap -pk): > > 117 0xff56 (Next) 0x0000 (NoSymbol) 0xff56 (Next) > 130 0xff31 (Hangul) 0x0000 (NoSymbol) 0xff31 (Hangul) > 131 0xff34 (Hangul_Hanja) 0x0000 (NoSymbol) 0xff34 (Hangul_Hanja) > 135 0xff67 (Menu) 0x0000 (NoSymbol) 0xff67 (Menu) > 147 0x1008ff65 (XF86MenuKB) 0x0000 (NoSymbol) 0x1008ff65 (XF86MenuKB) > > Some of these may reflect other remappings that I have done. > >> I hope this email saves somebody else from the frustrating >> morning I had... > > Sorry. I should have thought of reporting it. For me, with a number > of other issues, it was a frustrating week,some of which are still not > resolved. > This has to do with switching to using evdev to handle input devices on FreeBSD 12 and CURRENT. There's been several reports, and suggested solutions to this, as well as an UPDATING entry detailing the change. I'm sorry that it has caused fallout, but it is something that needs to be done in order to keep up with upstream graphics stack, and to improve FreeBSD desktop support in general. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196678 has some discussions regarding input devices, as does the x11@ mailing list archives. Regards -- Niclas Zeising FreeBSD Graphics Team From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Wed Mar 11 09:31:41 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 775CE25B07B; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:31:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.daemonic.se (mail.daemonic.se [IPv6:2607:f740:d:20::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48cmth5pNlz4LnW; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:31:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@freebsd.org) Received: from cid.daemonic.se (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48cmtY080Jz3lvf; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:31:33 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daemonic.se Received: from mail.daemonic.se ([127.0.0.1]) (using TLS with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256) by cid.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10587) with ESMTPS id K05qpyXilQiZ; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:31:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from garnet.daemonic.se (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:201:8ff:f59:bc1f:9dc8]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48cmtX45YZz3lcX; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:31:32 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: New Xorg - different key-codes To: Mark Martinec , FreeBSD-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <6762.1583886003@critter.freebsd.dk> <20200311004635.GB89512@eureka.lemis.com> From: Niclas Zeising Message-ID: Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:31:31 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48cmth5pNlz4LnW X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.01 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.97)[-0.974,0]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[freebsd]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.97)[0.966,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36236, ipnet:2607:f740:d::/48, country:US] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:31:41 -0000 On 2020-03-11 10:27, Mark Martinec wrote: >>> I just updated my laptop from source, and somewhere along the way >>> the key-codes Xorg sees changed. >> >> Indeed.=C2=A0 This doesn't just affect -CURRENT: it happened to me on >> -STABLE last week, so I'm copying that list too. >=20 > And a "Down" key now opens and closes a KDE "Application Launcher", > alternatively with its original function (which makes editing a=20 > frustration). >=20 > =C2=A0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D244354 >=20 And that PR has a suggested solution for at least KDE users. Regards --=20 Niclas Zeising From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Wed Mar 11 09:34:38 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A8A25B640; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:34:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.daemonic.se (mail.daemonic.se [176.58.89.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48cmy64CTvz4T3R; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:34:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@freebsd.org) Received: from cid.daemonic.se (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48cmy46w0rz3lvf; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:34:36 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daemonic.se Received: from mail.daemonic.se ([127.0.0.1]) (using TLS with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256) by cid.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10587) with ESMTPS id PwYqxW_-P5Zo; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:34:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from garnet.daemonic.se (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:201:8ff:f59:bc1f:9dc8]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48cmy428Jpz3lcX; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:34:36 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: New Xorg - different key-codes From: Niclas Zeising To: Greg 'groggy' Lehey , Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: FreeBSD current users , FreeBSD Stable Users References: <6762.1583886003@critter.freebsd.dk> <20200311004635.GB89512@eureka.lemis.com> Message-ID: <8dc42d72-3507-0b7e-274b-8955233dfdfc@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:34:36 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48cmy64CTvz4T3R X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.15 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.81)[0.813,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36236, ipnet:176.58.89.0/24, country:US]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.96)[-0.958,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:34:38 -0000 On 2020-03-11 10:29, Niclas Zeising wrote: > On 2020-03-11 01:46, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: >> Sorry.=C2=A0 I should have thought of reporting it.=C2=A0 For me, with= a number >> of other issues, it was a frustrating week,some of which are still not >> resolved. As a side note, if it's not reported, it's very hard for us to be aware=20 of issues, and to help out in resolving them. Regards --=20 Niclas Zeising From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Wed Mar 11 09:37:33 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 548BF25B996; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:37:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48cn1R2R8cz4ZbX; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:37:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (v-critter.freebsd.dk [192.168.55.3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9F851AF103; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:37:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02B9bRPJ008846 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:37:27 GMT (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: (from phk@localhost) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 02B9bR8T008845; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:37:27 GMT (envelope-from phk) To: Niclas Zeising cc: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" , FreeBSD current users , FreeBSD Stable Users Subject: Re: New Xorg - different key-codes In-reply-to: From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" References: <6762.1583886003@critter.freebsd.dk> <20200311004635.GB89512@eureka.lemis.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <8843.1583919447.1@critter.freebsd.dk> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:37:27 +0000 Message-ID: <8844.1583919447@critter.freebsd.dk> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48cn1R2R8cz4ZbX X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of phk@critter.freebsd.dk designates 130.225.244.222 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=phk@critter.freebsd.dk X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.86 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.dk]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.97)[-0.970,0]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.08)[0.075,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; IP_SCORE(0.04)[ip: (0.06), ipnet: 130.225.0.0/16(0.07), asn: 1835(0.08), country: EU(-0.01)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[phk@phk.freebsd.dk,phk@critter.freebsd.dk]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:1835, ipnet:130.225.0.0/16, country:EU]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[phk@phk.freebsd.dk,phk@critter.freebsd.dk]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:37:33 -0000 -------- In message , Niclas Zeis= ing w rites: >This has to do with switching to using evdev to handle input devices on = >FreeBSD 12 and CURRENT. There's been several reports, and suggested = >solutions to this, as well as an UPDATING entry detailing the change. I don't think I would have thought the rather counter-intuitive behaviour I saw yesterday, even if you had told me in those very words that the scan-codes had changed :-) -- = Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe = Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence= . From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Wed Mar 11 13:49:40 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACA4D261861; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 13:49:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: from mail.evolve.de (mail.evolve.de [213.239.217.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.evolve.de", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48ctcL6JSsz4qJT; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 13:49:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 110a4bf5; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 13:49:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=grem.de; h=date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=20180501; bh=5R crPE0naQTfmrSe1DC9UzEh9OM=; b=d8v3g2lO+MWcSdXy+WM0SopGpANmMfX3c1 iZkdryaMkhCkzBW5ZealNk+f1K6wv4bFbjokK0oP9+ckit8YZPmibrdyR15PCRR+ 8JTS3Aj7YY5GRX1YTlq2DVmahAITBJVb3SIzXPn6IqD00K8Q16S6bdt0MEy1jNfY ByW7Hq3FrlzQGraunsu3+T9zAZxcEBeJYe4Gxnh854O5UYwXIN05294RFOh4oIgD rL35jUT/HbAG5HGOHclzhwuHxhagYn6Tlobg80GhmAp53+YOxWpx5dSTIPNYomqJ lAoiMF4/U31FUmP82JeNnLj1GQv4YGgGxIVr5nI8L5XgJCoUjIpw== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=grem.de; h=date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=20180501; b= eXyK1iiKXOD1ZfC7DKXPVVltXs+S3qFL3BgufKt8hoV4O0pHLbEs1Rh+Nf/KaCSA K9opvH+u2BMUb8srsHs5zTRV55dqh9cZi2y3uod+ckyl5cl4YjDqtWxVowlmPodt mTn7XMkcPpthqwxrSIy01Y75E9zRMg3rS654X+TDkVoeWg0h1HuKE8pqJLSYDj0g q4BXr5qcIv1n0sUU4pCLHtzY5mGXRnpYC4EU4jPI0dbI0Pe3L3U6a+LrWNFmHHLc 3wRHjSoS0itEkE2iAi06uN4nNABbvOzKcBbiJ14BNiyQBywJ9m9ZiNvEVmlQhXnn tphKwzNfon/EY8UlqCF/cQ== Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 50edfad3 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:256:NO); Wed, 11 Mar 2020 13:49:25 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 14:48:56 +0100 From: Michael Gmelin To: Mark Martinec Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New Xorg - different key-codes Message-ID: <6897965B-8B8A-4B18-A4BB-BEC77D3D6DC7@grem.de> X-Face: $wrgCtfdVw_H9WAY?S&9+/F"!41z'L$uo*WzT8miX?kZ~W~Lr5W7v?j0Sde\mwB&/ypo^}> +a'4xMc^^KroE~+v^&^#[B">soBo1y6(TW6#UZiC]o>C6`ej+i Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEWJBwe5BQDl LASZU0/LTEWEfHbyj0Txi32+sKrp1Mv944X8/fm1rS+cAAAACXBIWXMAAAsTAAAL EwEAmpwYAAAAB3RJTUUH3wESCxwC7OBhbgAAACFpVFh0Q29tbWVudAAAAAAAQ3Jl YXRlZCB3aXRoIFRoZSBHSU1QbbCXAAAAAghJREFUOMu11DFvEzEUAGCfEhBVFzuq AKkLd0O6VrIQsLXVSZXoWE5N1K3DobBBA9fQpRWc8OkWouaIjedWKiyREOKs+3PY fvalCNjgLVHeF7/3bMtBzV8C/VsQ8tecEgCcDgrzjekwKZ7TwsJZd/ywEKwwP+ZM 8P3drTsAwWn2mpWuDDuYiK1bFs6De0KUUFw0tWxm+D4AIhuuvZqtyWYeO7jQ4Aea 7jUqI+ixhQoHex4WshEvSXdood7stlv4oSuFOC4tqGcr0NjEqXgV4mMJO38nld4+ xKNxRDon7khyKVqY7YR4d+Cg0OMrkWXZOM7YDkEfKiilCn1qYv4mighZiynuHHOA Wq9QJq+BIES7lMFUtcikMnkDGHUoncA+uHgrP0ctIEqfwLHzeSo+eUA66AqzwN6n 2ZHJhw6Qh/PoyC/QENyEyC/AyNjq74Bs+3UH0xYwzDUC4B97HgLocg1QLYgDDO1v f3UX9Y307Ew4AHh67YAFFsxEpkXwpXY3eIgMhAAE3R19L919nNnuD2wlPcDE3UeT L2ytEICQib9BXgS2fU8PrD82ToYO1OEmMSnYTjSqSv9wdC0tPYC+rQRQD9ESnldF CyqfmiYW+tlALt8gH2xrMdC/youbjzPXEun+/ReXsMCDyve3dZc09fn2Oas8oXGc Jj6/fOeK5UmSMPmf/jL+GD8BEj0k/Fn6IO4AAAAASUVORK5CYII= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="MP_/nXSavz+Y6OTF046c5AeBa=/" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48ctcL6JSsz4qJT X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=grem.de header.s=20180501 header.b=d8v3g2lO; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@grem.de designates 213.239.217.29 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@grem.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.49 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FAKE_REPLY(1.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[grem.de:s=20180501]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:213.239.217.29/32]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[freebsd]; HAS_ATTACHMENT(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grem.de]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/mixed,text/plain]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[grem.de:+]; CTYPE_MIXED_BOGUS(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; IP_SCORE(-1.99)[ip: (-8.31), ipnet: 213.239.192.0/18(-0.04), asn: 24940(-1.56), country: DE(-0.02)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:213.239.192.0/18, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 13:49:40 -0000 --MP_/nXSavz+Y6OTF046c5AeBa=/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline =EF=BB=BF >> On 11. Mar 2020, at 10:29, Mark Martinec >> wrote: > =EF=BB=BF >>=20 >>> I just updated my laptop from source, and somewhere along the way >>> the key-codes Xorg sees changed. >> Indeed. This doesn't just affect -CURRENT: it happened to me on >> -STABLE last week, so I'm copying that list too. >=20 > And a "Down" key now opens and closes a KDE "Application Launcher", > alternatively with its original function (which makes editing a > frustration). >=20 > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D244354 >=20 >=20 This *might* help you: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11/2020-February/025046.html (Short version: run setxkbmap in ~/.xinitrc, e.g., setxkbmap -model pc105 -layout de) -m --MP_/nXSavz+Y6OTF046c5AeBa=/ Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Original html part" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" --MP_/nXSavz+Y6OTF046c5AeBa=/-- From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Wed Mar 11 18:54:11 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7457267836; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 18:54:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@rulingia.com) Received: from vtr.rulingia.com (vtr.rulingia.com [IPv6:2001:19f0:5801:ebe:5400:1ff:fe53:30fd]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "vtr.rulingia.com", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48d1Mh0Nsqz4YGf; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 18:54:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@rulingia.com) Received: from server.rulingia.com (ppp239-208.static.internode.on.net [59.167.239.208]) by vtr.rulingia.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02BIrpRT031992 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 12 Mar 2020 05:53:56 +1100 (AEDT) (envelope-from peter@rulingia.com) X-Bogosity: Ham, spamicity=0.000000 Received: from server.rulingia.com (localhost.rulingia.com [127.0.0.1]) by server.rulingia.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02BIrjEi054997 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 12 Mar 2020 05:53:45 +1100 (AEDT) (envelope-from peter@server.rulingia.com) Received: (from peter@localhost) by server.rulingia.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 02BIrj7E054996; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 05:53:45 +1100 (AEDT) (envelope-from peter) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 05:53:45 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy To: Niclas Zeising Cc: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" , Poul-Henning Kamp , FreeBSD current users , FreeBSD Stable Users Subject: Re: New Xorg - different key-codes Message-ID: <20200311185345.GG3091@server.rulingia.com> References: <6762.1583886003@critter.freebsd.dk> <20200311004635.GB89512@eureka.lemis.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OzxllxdKGCiKxUZM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key: http://www.rulingia.com/keys/peter.pgp User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48d1Mh0Nsqz4YGf X-Spamd-Bar: ------- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of peter@rulingia.com designates 2001:19f0:5801:ebe:5400:1ff:fe53:30fd as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=peter@rulingia.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-7.50 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.993,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[rulingia.com]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:20473, ipnet:2001:19f0:5800::/38, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-3.11)[ip: (-9.51), ipnet: 2001:19f0:5800::/38(-4.15), asn: 20473(-1.84), country: US(-0.05)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 18:54:12 -0000 --OzxllxdKGCiKxUZM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2020-Mar-11 10:29:08 +0100, Niclas Zeising wrote: >This has to do with switching to using evdev to handle input devices on=20 >FreeBSD 12 and CURRENT. There's been several reports, and suggested=20 >solutions to this, as well as an UPDATING entry detailing the change. The UPDATING entry says that it's switched from devd to udev. There's no mention of evdev or that the keycodes have been roto-tilled. It's basically a vanilla "things have been changed, see the documentation" entry. Given that entry, it's hardly surprising that people are confused. --=20 Peter Jeremy --OzxllxdKGCiKxUZM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEE7rKYbDBnHnTmXCJ+FqWXoOSiCzQFAl5pM7RfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEVF QjI5ODZDMzA2NzFFNzRFNjVDMjI3RTE2QTU5N0EwRTRBMjBCMzQACgkQFqWXoOSi CzQWvw//Y5SjpYDjD10syVxXnqe85pUsKTPMQ4WBsUcM5JOOjI16pT7ICM68xxE4 TPtf+RhIoKEHV81FPFMeHeEHj4KesOtqOXcoO9rE4tFds49UsKrzyQI6rmd4X/dW 1qZ4jfd8pTGhsYqrkz2GdW/m1KBiccnURVKih5fRXq3C0pMULskLjrDXfcddK1o6 h6vJvaS98zs+3HImM60xFr7d+u76r7lDyUrw99Eix9sj4Ey7OwjLAa2SgPYIT1ob i/b5Pa9REPzojA2otCZpVqSIQCAn//q2MKMCJxXaImD5leVGAr6sM4v98eTa68oT D1GnnFwyRCLhGeotxaW4+mTMr/de1gt5V3xaofhuob8yPrQtODfupWQlGr1uKm/X KthCkTjSi2C4dlm/zx4uGBCVjxr+MhOVMSoHSrxl6GQKodADO5xc9IpiGFEhHmhV BUO2WyN6HJJvYjEdOoDYc6g/OW9XldzgdQQ2VeE+tGyBIJ3eYbcP1YpfBWHiPILM IvOrjDGdQsGX+faysaEct0hWSEunCax+OLf6gXqZz6yIM+jXqeGQS1fx1eSr39iI ahXEesaC1Jzyuyl1WwOaNdM8/M3cnIWb2PH1z5K5WoB7A3E+65FGAvwWc0zBOmFI 5OYzv0t0os8+ha15kYfbBk7t5f/b/MdKfVpHUEKJinue+gECpOQ= =8Q1d -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OzxllxdKGCiKxUZM-- From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Wed Mar 11 18:57:23 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 945B7267B9E; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 18:57:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48d1RQ573Wz4g2T; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 18:57:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.92.3 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1jC6XX-000Joj-Ng; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 19:57:11 +0100 Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 19:57:11 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Peter Jeremy Cc: Niclas Zeising , Greg 'groggy' Lehey , Poul-Henning Kamp , FreeBSD current users , FreeBSD Stable Users Subject: Re: New Xorg - different key-codes Message-ID: <20200311185711.GY37073@home.opsec.eu> References: <6762.1583886003@critter.freebsd.dk> <20200311004635.GB89512@eureka.lemis.com> <20200311185345.GG3091@server.rulingia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200311185345.GG3091@server.rulingia.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48d1RQ573Wz4g2T X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.43 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.54)[-0.538,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.89)[-0.888,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 18:57:23 -0000 Hi! > On 2020-Mar-11 10:29:08 +0100, Niclas Zeising wrote: > >This has to do with switching to using evdev to handle input devices on > >FreeBSD 12 and CURRENT. There's been several reports, and suggested > >solutions to this, as well as an UPDATING entry detailing the change. > > The UPDATING entry says that it's switched from devd to udev. There's no > mention of evdev or that the keycodes have been roto-tilled. It's basically > a vanilla "things have been changed, see the documentation" entry. Given > that entry, it's hardly surprising that people are confused. Thanks. I was wondering myself, what/where there's mention of this. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ? From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Wed Mar 11 21:55:03 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA5AE26B648; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 21:55:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ot1-x32b.google.com (mail-ot1-x32b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48d5NQ38Pgz47gs; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 21:55:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ot1-x32b.google.com with SMTP id s15so3818268otq.8; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 14:55:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=I4kDrVcv+D5tWylqhFh6JruZUIXb9+0xSmSUCi/1X3c=; b=Lrre1a9+SL95X+9aYtDznSGySwJvvTv37TalVcSWaMYP4iKFl4yM0axGE7dfPsChbI Cm535x31LrWLhhySwgEOL6A7VBQdo7J41rJTQ+dxLREeF3cJuQRfECNyxY8+K8vO+yvl CnsscolpfNXViG42wJos8Q4fuAqX4FDvXjzAFbFYQm3estDdONNp1WAtdOOKGZiPy2kF qcemJCmZTIv75f8TFIwwSLe731mdusjRjD3RM7t0Snfbg79ZqaLMwQXOWsnttc7Zmg1t aQamd8GY3vk+WHHQAt65i4E6PTJd2MxkQX0268DPzbzK/hvZT3q6z4bQqD6HRCYw3L9h Tr6Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=I4kDrVcv+D5tWylqhFh6JruZUIXb9+0xSmSUCi/1X3c=; b=s0kQNcCTDDhyplK1JKDoG3FUV68qou3XbqxA6/19AIxoeIS89n7Do7iaAWWjlBPVKi 9sjfaWZK2d6aBs7KB8EqQ2ZSi1PokioHU/lbsYbNkYXLBXmGTe+P5itN4eJm00Z1d5eO v10ObmFDoeWebU2ePIyne1qtRYDd/W5lQu5DY2B5i0aRTmXLnz90pw2QUnuFY1N6tbAt QySCMPBIZiu/tfrpcJ/JwyFmIWXG8YnOFQ0yMVO0GjHqPVuEKi+iYw49E7/ZIL6rHN2H 64ffLcDhjs4MMbRtgTjd5hcRn+wrdKgA1rhso7kZNm/Cyx0K7xnQJbyB/15cvWPNE8ZK uYzg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ2Z3mGTuDKZamqypbFDDj8MT/Hu5pl9VNTMWYXnR7yu1OV5waWf F1wvfu8B+xR/P31BadVNlwWBBn37bq/+kJmsPc2exQzP X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vu7Oy7yj5YvJpcUMcX03FBbq0CmWqNdQXUJRdoJqtuA2A8zKPAr0oetJdl3hv2kGpoh+4O3fIR2rQLAWu+4LMU= X-Received: by 2002:a4a:d0c7:: with SMTP id u7mr1791360oor.83.1583963700400; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 14:55:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <6762.1583886003@critter.freebsd.dk> <20200311185345.GG3091@server.rulingia.com> <1938208.uJW0cDvVUg@no.place.like.home> In-Reply-To: <1938208.uJW0cDvVUg@no.place.like.home> From: Kevin Oberman Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 14:54:43 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: New Xorg - different key-codes To: Greg Rivers Cc: FreeBSD current users , FreeBSD Stable Users X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48d5NQ38Pgz47gs X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Lrre1a9+; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kob6558@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::32b as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kob6558@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.70 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[freebsd-stable]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[b.2.3.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-8.19), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-1.85), asn: 15169(-1.65), country: US(-0.05)]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[rkoberman@gmail.com,kob6558@gmail.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[rkoberman@gmail.com,kob6558@gmail.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 21:55:03 -0000 On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 1:51 PM Greg Rivers wrote: > On Wednesday, 11 March 2020 13:53:45 CDT Peter Jeremy wrote: > > On 2020-Mar-11 10:29:08 +0100, Niclas Zeising > wrote: > > >This has to do with switching to using evdev to handle input devices on > > >FreeBSD 12 and CURRENT. There's been several reports, and suggested > > >solutions to this, as well as an UPDATING entry detailing the change. > > > > The UPDATING entry says that it's switched from devd to udev. There's no > > mention of evdev or that the keycodes have been roto-tilled. It's > basically > > a vanilla "things have been changed, see the documentation" entry. Given > > that entry, it's hardly surprising that people are confused. > > > Indeed, the change has been a bit inconvenient and time consuming to deal > with. > > But I don't think we should let this overshadow the dedication and very > hard work that Niclas and the graphics team have done and continue to do to > keep FreeBSD relevant on the desktop. I for one am very grateful for that. > > -- > Greg > And the people involved have been very active in helping people resolve the problems. In particular, Michael Gmelin had been very helpful in providing a workaround for the failure of the brightness control buttons on my rather ancient T520. He has also provided a solution for the failure of the volume control buttons that I've had since the last update to MATE. I have yet to try it as something else (no idea what) had magically fixed this after a couple of months of them not working. I can't figure out what "fixed" this, but it just started working a couple of weeks ago. Until/unless it fails, I'm not touching things. Also, my apologies to Michael as I have not responded to him with a status update for WAY too long. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Wed Mar 11 21:58:41 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C79026B9C5; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 21:58:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (108-84-10-9.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.84.10.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "darth.immure.com", Issuer "darth.immure.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48d5Sb098gz4FcT; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 21:58:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02BLvTjp005903 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 11 Mar 2020 16:57:29 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: (from bob@localhost) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 02BLvS4I005902; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 16:57:28 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 16:57:28 -0500 From: Bob Willcox To: Michael Gmelin Cc: Mark Martinec , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New Xorg - different key-codes Message-ID: <20200311214930.GC5435@rancor.immure.com> Reply-To: Bob Willcox References: <6897965B-8B8A-4B18-A4BB-BEC77D3D6DC7@grem.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6897965B-8B8A-4B18-A4BB-BEC77D3D6DC7@grem.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48d5Sb098gz4FcT X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bob@rancor.immure.com has no SPF policy when checking 108.84.10.9) smtp.mailfrom=bob@rancor.immure.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.96 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[bob@immure.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.37)[ip: (0.18), ipnet: 108.64.0.0/11(0.08), asn: 7018(1.62), country: US(-0.05)]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[freebsd]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[immure.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.90)[0.902,0]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[0.995,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[bob@immure.com,bob@rancor.immure.com]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7018, ipnet:108.64.0.0/11, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[bob@immure.com,bob@rancor.immure.com]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 21:58:41 -0000 On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 02:48:56PM +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote: > ??? > >> On 11. Mar 2020, at 10:29, Mark Martinec > >> wrote: > > ??? > >> > >>> I just updated my laptop from source, and somewhere along the way > >>> the key-codes Xorg sees changed. > >> Indeed. This doesn't just affect -CURRENT: it happened to me on > >> -STABLE last week, so I'm copying that list too. > > > > And a "Down" key now opens and closes a KDE "Application Launcher", > > alternatively with its original function (which makes editing a > > frustration). > > > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244354 > > > > > > This *might* help you: > > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11/2020-February/025046.html > > (Short version: run setxkbmap in ~/.xinitrc, e.g., > setxkbmap -model pc105 -layout de) Will running that command return my key mappings back to what they use to be? -- Bob Willcox | It's possible that the whole purpose of your life is to bob@immure.com | serve as a warning to others. Austin, TX | From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Wed Mar 11 22:04:26 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFFF126BF04; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 22:04:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: from mail.evolve.de (mail.evolve.de [213.239.217.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.evolve.de", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48d5bF49QBz4LBH; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 22:04:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 7a9f62c5; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 22:04:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=grem.de; h=content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:message-id:references:to; s=20180501; bh=3CJ7u4MHg4+dsb p4/ZB2o+qr71k=; b=n81eyrJ0YgnhISVpDuuK47LW1lTW2ouCkloeSqcOJxGsBD pIKiip3ZyFaEx3CeMRiMZMX8HY173Ge1xwzcwxmVdYLTfgw37IzDabSx0Or6HUCr RRvAvFZENMvvUmS9YF17saCOBeFtg/hZFS6rzcad8qkVDZYmhE3Up5imnhcEg7GE r0znDoXQdW/FUm4eec1ZfhVQ2Z694mpKUxzlUt2EDR2EJiwOPtr0IjRQrp16OSwU J97u7PCZd+EJDhG8lfCfaxw049WsPbznEDB1MZWniNkw5/Z5BrZBDMG1fWjVVCwi LpH5AFUFlWsYcRoffjPIxXd/NUVLup82aWA+rLdw== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=grem.de; h=content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:message-id:references:to; q=dns; s=20180501; b=qdylDYE2 W5oPK8Q/e/s6Vrdl4i9gjKnktPttBQ7WoKBLH/tLjqaM3jh7N+2SLC57Q6yOFxoz SXOS1thV82uOoG9AzihjvVwmhIZ4IKgOqzI6Kxr0d54cW07Dbknh0TTIGzRL+LcT oj9PsRDEO6yW63/igBxahrtD8p0nw8xamcZLjg7W801h1IO3r2T6b9DD7XVyb8Bm w/0eHm71vocEjk+SVvT7FSrrQ1zQQKLGVu/UzGmRycfwyoO3N0tnal5+L/AssiDI qi3uU1y3N8lsV8zAg4IDRB+vwjugnexJkw5XIp/nC5KLVQjH/KIq1GshxDrscBNG rMbL6yZWV6iPhQ== Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id fa92b2bf (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:256:NO); Wed, 11 Mar 2020 22:04:19 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: New Xorg - different key-codes From: Michael Gmelin In-Reply-To: <20200311214930.GC5435@rancor.immure.com> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 23:04:18 +0100 Cc: Mark Martinec , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-Id: References: <20200311214930.GC5435@rancor.immure.com> To: Bob Willcox X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17D50) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48d5bF49QBz4LBH X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=grem.de header.s=20180501 header.b=n81eyrJ0; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@grem.de designates 213.239.217.29 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@grem.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.49 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[grem.de:s=20180501]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:213.239.217.29/32]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[freebsd]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grem.de]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[grem.de:+]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; IP_SCORE(-1.99)[ip: (-8.31), ipnet: 213.239.192.0/18(-0.04), asn: 24940(-1.56), country: DE(-0.02)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:213.239.192.0/18, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 22:04:26 -0000 > On 11. Mar 2020, at 22:58, Bob Willcox wrote: >=20 > =EF=BB=BFOn Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 02:48:56PM +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote: >> ??? >>>> On 11. Mar 2020, at 10:29, Mark Martinec >>>> wrote: >>> ??? >>>>=20 >>>>> I just updated my laptop from source, and somewhere along the way >>>>> the key-codes Xorg sees changed. >>>> Indeed. This doesn't just affect -CURRENT: it happened to me on >>>> -STABLE last week, so I'm copying that list too. >>>=20 >>> And a "Down" key now opens and closes a KDE "Application Launcher", >>> alternatively with its original function (which makes editing a >>> frustration). >>>=20 >>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D244354 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 >> This *might* help you: >>=20 >> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11/2020-February/025046.html= >>=20 >> (Short version: run setxkbmap in ~/.xinitrc, e.g., >> setxkbmap -model pc105 -layout de) >=20 > Will running that command return my key mappings back to what they use to b= e? >=20 It might fix the =E2=80=9CDown key opens application launcher=E2=80=9D probl= em by applying the correct keymap (you have to select the correct one, =E2=80= =9Cde=E2=80=9D probably won=E2=80=99t cut it for you). At least it did with x= fce, where it was important to run it before the wm starts - you could also t= ry running it afterwards to see if it makes a difference. Best, Michael From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Wed Mar 11 22:24:39 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10BB126C6DD; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 22:24:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (108-84-10-9.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.84.10.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "darth.immure.com", Issuer "darth.immure.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48d62Y0B6bz3xcN; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 22:24:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02BMNSRD006020 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 11 Mar 2020 17:23:28 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: (from bob@localhost) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 02BMNSdq006019; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 17:23:28 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 17:23:28 -0500 From: Bob Willcox To: Michael Gmelin Cc: Mark Martinec , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New Xorg - different key-codes Message-ID: <20200311222327.GD5435@rancor.immure.com> Reply-To: Bob Willcox References: <20200311214930.GC5435@rancor.immure.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48d62Y0B6bz3xcN X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bob@rancor.immure.com has no SPF policy when checking 108.84.10.9) smtp.mailfrom=bob@rancor.immure.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.96 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[bob@immure.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.37)[ip: (0.18), ipnet: 108.64.0.0/11(0.08), asn: 7018(1.62), country: US(-0.05)]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[freebsd]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[immure.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.90)[0.901,0]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[0.995,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[bob@immure.com,bob@rancor.immure.com]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7018, ipnet:108.64.0.0/11, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[bob@immure.com,bob@rancor.immure.com]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 22:24:39 -0000 On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 11:04:18PM +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > > > On 11. Mar 2020, at 22:58, Bob Willcox wrote: > > > > ???On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 02:48:56PM +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote: > >> ??? > >>>> On 11. Mar 2020, at 10:29, Mark Martinec > >>>> wrote: > >>> ??? > >>>> > >>>>> I just updated my laptop from source, and somewhere along the way > >>>>> the key-codes Xorg sees changed. > >>>> Indeed. This doesn't just affect -CURRENT: it happened to me on > >>>> -STABLE last week, so I'm copying that list too. > >>> > >>> And a "Down" key now opens and closes a KDE "Application Launcher", > >>> alternatively with its original function (which makes editing a > >>> frustration). > >>> > >>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244354 > >>> > >>> > >> > >> This *might* help you: > >> > >> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11/2020-February/025046.html > >> > >> (Short version: run setxkbmap in ~/.xinitrc, e.g., > >> setxkbmap -model pc105 -layout de) > > > > Will running that command return my key mappings back to what they use to be? > > > > It might fix the ???Down key opens application launcher??? problem by applying the correct keymap (you have to select the correct one, ???de??? probably won???t cut it for you). At least it did with xfce, where it was important to run it before the wm starts - you could also try running it afterwards to see if it makes a difference. I don't know about that problem. What I'm experiencing is the Alt-up,down,left,right keys don't work as they used to in my ctwm window manager. They used to move the current window to the closest boundry in the direction indicated by the key that is also pressed (while holding the Alt key down). Also, Alt-shift-up,down,left,right would expand the window in the direction indicated by the key. These actions seem to do nothing now. Bob -- Bob Willcox | It's possible that the whole purpose of your life is to bob@immure.com | serve as a warning to others. Austin, TX | From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Wed Mar 11 22:46:58 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D0E26D0BE; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 22:46:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: from mail.evolve.de (mail.evolve.de [213.239.217.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.evolve.de", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48d6XJ3VmBz4pK1; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 22:46:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id f0cc4a23; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 22:46:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=grem.de; h=content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:message-id:references:to; s=20180501; bh=ZFxZ+EvmI3IlMg BzZz4GQZdOpa8=; b=O6j+pj+qt/4aBfOxgoFBWPyDgMPDdp8KFAmFk65gucv4Ly NkYYk2eDhdBb6paY+pjeRZM1O98zTuus+1G7QP0TitNSkuw1zIIwiBxoj87zXewu IjNXl/0Iv2LHG2gJuaeUUCemqorX2AjJXsOnnj4Fe9LgLxpN0EGx8NH6N3H3bEMo 6f3etw86Dm2hEEt0T4wXtWXLdkis1lUGRYiF9iPQHG4s+W82Fycz0jXKZd2SHFxy ELZAiFCOqJ1t1ESgpHdoeUINRRur3ZdoyTlz4QHfEfiPa1SXU3O+42Ba88Dp18UC Ilva9gpCJx7H3Vr4KjtH0/qL10ToKp8jJr5OHQCA== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=grem.de; h=content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:message-id:references:to; q=dns; s=20180501; b=TeyuYfwg NY4VFHE1LdLpKCoRcIdqFw3/+QGJPOrAbR6AZdsUvSRjnwY2AMYP2QCExzu7G7Ra dRDLp/vfl/lLmtslvR5VO00UiShldnHnRz6gwL0yt1B4VN4NivXmOHFvb5K0k5eb Fz8mD6r8l9v1ZYH8Lgak7aA8Hvybag/4tamg8CxxuM8nzdbIXhz10P53TpTu5jHT SQ2cD1VWRt51jk2Cg5VFVTGBnbfKcVmL3q5pwUDupw0KYvfBvwvMcjZlF0LjAl0y qHNg+S3zjNiggTvQuwIhnPgM97Q1pth8jPUlXl44PI1oYfQp/F1IAn+fVpdzVZ+X 1V8n1ERs9fxSPA== Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 5bba311b (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:256:NO); Wed, 11 Mar 2020 22:46:49 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: New Xorg - different key-codes From: Michael Gmelin In-Reply-To: <20200311222327.GD5435@rancor.immure.com> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 23:46:49 +0100 Cc: Mark Martinec , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-Id: <9674EB7F-393B-43DB-9892-83B4F1C88451@grem.de> References: <20200311222327.GD5435@rancor.immure.com> To: Bob Willcox X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17D50) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48d6XJ3VmBz4pK1 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=grem.de header.s=20180501 header.b=O6j+pj+q; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@grem.de designates 213.239.217.29 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@grem.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.41 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[grem.de:s=20180501]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:213.239.217.29/32]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[freebsd]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grem.de]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[grem.de:+]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; IP_SCORE(-1.91)[ip: (-7.94), ipnet: 213.239.192.0/18(-0.04), asn: 24940(-1.56), country: DE(-0.02)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:213.239.192.0/18, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 22:46:58 -0000 > On 11. Mar 2020, at 23:25, Bob Willcox wrote: >=20 > =EF=BB=BFOn Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 11:04:18PM +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote: >>=20 >>=20 >>>> On 11. Mar 2020, at 22:58, Bob Willcox wrote: >>>=20 >>> ???On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 02:48:56PM +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote: >>>> ??? >>>>>> On 11. Mar 2020, at 10:29, Mark Martinec >>>>>> wrote: >>>>> ??? >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> I just updated my laptop from source, and somewhere along the way >>>>>>> the key-codes Xorg sees changed. >>>>>> Indeed. This doesn't just affect -CURRENT: it happened to me on >>>>>> -STABLE last week, so I'm copying that list too. >>>>>=20 >>>>> And a "Down" key now opens and closes a KDE "Application Launcher", >>>>> alternatively with its original function (which makes editing a >>>>> frustration). >>>>>=20 >>>>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D244354 >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> This *might* help you: >>>>=20 >>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11/2020-February/025046.ht= ml >>>>=20 >>>> (Short version: run setxkbmap in ~/.xinitrc, e.g., >>>> setxkbmap -model pc105 -layout de) >>>=20 >>> Will running that command return my key mappings back to what they use t= o be? >>>=20 >>=20 >> It might fix the ???Down key opens application launcher??? problem by app= lying the correct keymap (you have to select the correct one, ???de??? proba= bly won???t cut it for you). At least it did with xfce, where it was importa= nt to run it before the wm starts - you could also try running it afterwards= to see if it makes a difference. >=20 > I don't know about that problem. What I'm experiencing is the Alt-up,down,= left,right keys > don't work as they used to in my ctwm window manager. They used to move th= e current window > to the closest boundry in the direction indicated by the key that is also p= ressed (while > holding the Alt key down). Also, Alt-shift-up,down,left,right would expand= the window in > the direction indicated by the key. These actions seem to do nothing now. >=20 I don=E2=80=99t know much about ctwm, but why don=E2=80=99t you give it a sh= ot? -m From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Wed Mar 11 23:01:52 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC92026D78B; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 23:01:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steffen@sdaoden.eu) Received: from sdaoden.eu (sdaoden.eu [217.144.132.164]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48d6sW5PfTz49K6; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 23:01:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steffen@sdaoden.eu) Received: by sdaoden.eu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A6F1416054; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 00:01:44 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 00:01:43 +0100 From: Steffen Nurpmeso To: Bob Willcox Cc: Michael Gmelin , Mark Martinec , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New Xorg - different key-codes Message-ID: <20200311230143.0jnF_%steffen@sdaoden.eu> In-Reply-To: <20200311214930.GC5435@rancor.immure.com> References: <6897965B-8B8A-4B18-A4BB-BEC77D3D6DC7@grem.de> <20200311214930.GC5435@rancor.immure.com> Mail-Followup-To: Bob Willcox , Michael Gmelin , Mark Martinec , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org User-Agent: s-nail v14.9.17-52-g56288e6a OpenPGP: id=EE19E1C1F2F7054F8D3954D8308964B51883A0DD; url=https://ftp.sdaoden.eu/steffen.asc; preference=signencrypt BlahBlahBlah: Any stupid boy can crush a beetle. But all the professors in the world can make no bugs. X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48d6sW5PfTz49K6 X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of steffen@sdaoden.eu designates 217.144.132.164 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=steffen@sdaoden.eu X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.77 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.73)[-0.727,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[freebsd]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[sdaoden.eu]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.99)[0.987,0]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15987, ipnet:217.144.128.0/20, country:DE]; IP_SCORE(0.31)[asn: 15987(1.56), country: DE(-0.02)]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 23:01:52 -0000 Bob Willcox wrote in <20200311214930.GC5435@rancor.immure.com>: |On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 02:48:56PM +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote: |>>> On 11. Mar 2020, at 10:29, Mark Martinec |>>> wrote: ... |>>>> I just updated my laptop from source, and somewhere along the way |>>>> the key-codes Xorg sees changed. ... |> This *might* help you: |> |> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11/2020-February/025046.html |> |> (Short version: run setxkbmap in ~/.xinitrc, e.g., |> setxkbmap -model pc105 -layout de) | |Will running that command return my key mappings back to what they \ |use to be? I for one am totally baffled that you all "just can go". My ~/.xinitrc is (in parts) if command -v setxkbmap >/dev/null 2>&1; then if [ -f ~/.${HOSTNAME}.xkbmap ]; then setxkbmap `cat ~/.${HOSTNAME}.xkbmap` elif [ -f ~/.xkbmap ]; then setxkbmap `cat ~/.xkbmap` fi fi if command -v xmodmap >/dev/null 2>&1; then [ -f ~/.xmodmaprc ] && xmodmap ~/.xmodmaprc [ -f ~/.${HOSTNAME}.xmodmaprc ] && xmodmap ~/.${HOSTNAME}.xmodmaprc fi if command -v xrdb >/dev/null 2>&1; then [ -f ~/.Xdefaults ] && xrdb -merge ~/.Xdefaults [ -f ~/.${HOSTNAME}.Xdefaults ] && xrdb -merge ~/.${HOSTNAME}.Xdefaults fi and i (i think ever) had to _have_ those (former being 'de(nodeadkeys)', the middle one too long to paste, but also works around the "g" key of that Lenovo notebook ever since that stopped working). --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt) From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Thu Mar 12 07:58:10 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C42027790A for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 07:58:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-lists@klop.ws) Received: from smarthost1.greenhost.nl (smarthost1.greenhost.nl [195.190.28.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48dLmH7561z4HPx for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 07:58:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-lists@klop.ws) Received: from smtp.greenhost.nl ([213.108.110.112]) by smarthost1.greenhost.nl with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jCIjC-0000dM-Vx for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 08:58:04 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 08:58:03 +0100 Subject: llvm 10 libomp build error MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Ronald Klop" Message-ID: User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.16 (FreeBSD) X-Authenticated-As-Hash: 398f5522cb258ce43cb679602f8cfe8b62a256d1 X-Virus-Scanned: by clamav at smarthost1.samage.net X-Spam-Level: / X-Spam-Score: -0.2 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Scan-Signature: a350ae07b5350cdad28cef237d2e7179 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48dLmH7561z4HPx X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ronald-lists@klop.ws designates 195.190.28.88 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ronald-lists@klop.ws X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.50 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:195.190.28.64/27]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[klop.ws]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.02)[0.021,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; IP_SCORE(-0.72)[ip: (-0.65), ipnet: 195.190.28.0/24(-0.26), asn: 47172(-2.72), country: NL(0.03)]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[88.28.190.195.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.10.0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:47172, ipnet:195.190.28.0/24, country:NL]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 07:58:10 -0000 Hi, Clean build after svn update gives: cc: error: no such file or directory: '/data/src/freebsd-current/contrib/llvm-pr oject/openmp/runtime/src/thirdparty/ittnotify/ittnotify_static.c' cc: error: no input files *** [ittnotify_static.pico] Error code 1 make[5]: stopped in /data/src/freebsd-current/lib/libomp The file ittnotify_static.c does indeed not exist. A .cpp version does exist. [builder@sjakie ~]$ more /etc/src.conf KERNCONF?=GENERIC-NODEBUG # Don't build these WITHOUT_LLVM_TARGET_ALL=true WITHOUT_LPR=true WITHOUT_PROFILE=true WITHOUT_SENDMAIL=true WITHOUT_TESTS=true What is the advice? Currently rebuilding with -j 1, but that will hours for building the new clang again. Ronald. From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Thu Mar 12 09:13:49 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DF5A259DDE for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 09:13:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from filippomore@yahoo.com) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48dNRc2xJmz4Hhj for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 09:13:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from filippomore@yahoo.com) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id F3A42259DDB; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 09:13:46 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F31DC259DDA for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 09:13:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from filippomore@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic304-20.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (sonic304-20.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [66.163.191.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48dNRX4Dxvz4HZf for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 09:13:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from filippomore@yahoo.com) X-YMail-OSG: hhRo6lgVM1kGB0FYY5fM3Jf9CVjD75Sbn8iWIyrZIjpki8KTsy9ozJdZurz36_h h61LsHBmhF3uIWQ7tpRsLWLOIlivSxQ1vtg2NMAvhBH2Wak6SoPqNN79T9gWgkyi4I9UZ4mDPIbN 11bwnjY.mn2HlgVjBDUmn.aOOsopRhc5rnSIgHDo7O1LLrz5zXsoFoQLUUoE3GxSx4g17OG74n2a q8GuljYD0JlPk9ad6ZSuiuZKyrhX6tb5qvNswFE.3pUeRBzV2YQTzGiGgP0AAmWA5cXQr00ig0w_ _7AFnFojurqg4_8nzf.7XspsmKEPGsC6rQTANdWhG0O6XGJDaJiPZZ7LDL7egT9YsFWpFWFqmJcM CSGRbtkveWgIWy3ZbA.BUDrjkbcYhA5q1b5zui56iuDuhKddvbQV4AkjphGNIXKhfEjXb6SlKgju R52k9KmmwiooNJaPeYqrQB0gCh92WCLjrpy7l_zGXLeJZT2IqG0KCbdsFtg0DhT3nloh3gFCwzJp 451qd3f5aMqGjYtsAYQfYfBkDOWzW5O31.q5bMiv1.IlIbt3dRPrCg1QkoHdq0sTHaYXEpMXjUoG lvKAojP1tK1xldGMpyGNtN3A0KyXIASmE995IcH4efyYV0O2Uy4.BhEKGwW7Mc4nhjcilLgnRrhq WbDoQxIdk6UrxK0KarMNovbB8oEQtrorIYk5S3pbBN72YaanT1S_XQadTUs23o3dzCTAxtjnp9iV m9Nm5jjJOFs3bYQas4TBorGOiq7EuQS91OvkWhFuNj6nwON4ZXiMWMbdGI5WBS9U0pxjqNPW6ZPo 8tAm05BtjYgyQ87k2cSF77CtiV3.kD.VZ_7W.8MIV_Pbrw3dolm4ytTdyzTvbC7SmCYfKg.yhexI _UyvSBmbzBASHNI8gohI9scBk1OkDoeYQE2a4STX70Vw7bDYaxGPzJGFMHp82wYkZehN46kmmW_f XPCGrtagj_.5TSTpR0QZydhobX_kGAqoWlUNAcP75v3FzPtaPLS6mKJRCLUMz_2P4VRql55Yq45X VXVsaDDo2agd1AuMjYAOWFc.K.fjVa_FNQS4a0iXzxjixmPAMb0ThPgnMGxZkvBCC5XzccsxzXmU qeRayEv1zvq9Mgp4j4zXtxntPZxD1V9htlrpU0_IPjH0KmnozWeoXkoFGj4c95zXh8MlV0xwTxMH 6JpMJAEAoIADmOJYufK5L2smPd39D1tvSA.DPyCi4nQfrFFDkDXyvBLW37W1PspKYKttB2R__nBv XMjLQ7_pk9XIP19yGd0S1nbOO20jdg1K2q4nnZDcs0s17lm4aY3lzI0rG6WOuOUdwc4Zb85n_9DG 9G38aNrWdjlcFnA-- Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic304.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 09:13:42 +0000 Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 09:13:38 +0000 (UTC) From: Filippo Moretti To: Ronald Klop Cc: Current Message-ID: <1955230332.657304.1584004418962@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: llvm 10 libomp build error MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.15342 YMailNorrin Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:73.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/73.0 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48dNRX4Dxvz4HZf X-Spamd-Bar: + X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.65 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.89)[0.894,0]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[3]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[146.191.163.66.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (4.14), ipnet: 66.163.184.0/21(1.18), asn: 36646(0.95), country: US(-0.05)]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.75)[0.751,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36646, ipnet:66.163.184.0/21, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 09:13:49 -0000 Same problem yesterdayFilippo On Thursday, March 12, 2020, 08:59:17 AM GMT+1, Ronald Klop wrote: =20 =20 Hi, Clean build after svn update gives: cc: error: no such file or directory:=C2=A0=20 '/data/src/freebsd-current/contrib/llvm-pr oject/openmp/runtime/src/thirdparty/ittnotify/ittnotify_static.c' cc: error: no input files *** [ittnotify_static.pico] Error code 1 make[5]: stopped in /data/src/freebsd-current/lib/libomp The file ittnotify_static.c does indeed not exist. A .cpp version does=C2= =A0=20 exist. [builder@sjakie ~]$ more /etc/src.conf KERNCONF?=3DGENERIC-NODEBUG # Don't build these WITHOUT_LLVM_TARGET_ALL=3Dtrue WITHOUT_LPR=3Dtrue WITHOUT_PROFILE=3Dtrue WITHOUT_SENDMAIL=3Dtrue WITHOUT_TESTS=3Dtrue What is the advice? Currently rebuilding with -j 1, but that will hours=C2= =A0=20 for building the new clang again. Ronald. _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" =20 From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Thu Mar 12 09:32:27 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED00925AB71; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 09:32:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from mailgate.Leidinger.net (mailgate.leidinger.net [IPv6:2a00:1828:2000:313::1:5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48dNs520mMz44P8; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 09:32:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from outgoing.leidinger.net (p5B165A40.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [91.22.90.64]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mailgate.Leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 649483615; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 10:32:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.8.242.239] (unknown [194.154.203.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: Alexander@Leidinger.net) by outgoing.leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9969A358D; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 10:31:41 +0100 (CET) From: Alexander Leidinger To: Bob Willcox , Michael Gmelin CC: Mark Martinec , , Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 10:31:40 +0100 Message-ID: <170ce15cc60.27fa.fa4b1493b064008fe79f0f905b8e5741@Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20200311214930.GC5435@rancor.immure.com> References: <6897965B-8B8A-4B18-A4BB-BEC77D3D6DC7@grem.de> <20200311214930.GC5435@rancor.immure.com> Subject: Re: New Xorg - different key-codes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48dNs520mMz44P8 X-Spamd-Bar: ----- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.23 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[leidinger.net:s=outgoing-alex]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[freebsd]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.997,0]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[leidinger.net:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[Leidinger.net,quarantine]; IP_SCORE(-3.73)[ip: (-9.83), ipnet: 2a00:1828::/32(-4.91), asn: 34240(-3.91), country: DE(-0.02)]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[64.90.22.91.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.10]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:34240, ipnet:2a00:1828::/32, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 09:32:27 -0000 Hi, This command sets the keyboard layout. You are supposed to set the keyboard layout which matches the physical layout of the hardware. This hadn't changed, it's a fundamental part of X11 since I know it (X11 6.5) and even before... For those which had an explicit setting in xorg.conf (like me) but switched now to nothing or the "match" snippets for mouse or kbd: you can specify this already in the config. Here is what I use: ---snip--- Donnerstag, 12. März 2020, 10:21:40 {1} [video:/] (201) root@ttypts/1 # cat /usr/local/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/kbd.conf Section "InputClass" Identifier "Keyboard0" MatchIsKeyboard "on" MatchDevicePath "/dev/input/event*" Driver "libinput" Option "XkbModel" "pc105" Option "XkbLayout" "de" Option "XkbRules" "evdev" EndSection Donnerstag, 12. März 2020, 10:22:05 {0} [video:/] (202) root@ttypts/1 # cat /usr/local/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/mouse.conf Section "InputClass" Identifier "Mouse0" MatchIsPointer "on" MatchDevicePath "/dev/input/event*" Driver "libinput" # Option "Protocol" "auto" # Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse" Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5 6 7" EndSection ---snip--- Note, I use this in sysctl.conf: ---snip--- # enable hardware devices in evdev kern.evdev.rcpt_mask=12 ---snip--- When I did that, I just validated that I was able to login to KDE (the particular X11 is feeding a home-cinema setup and is not used often, I just decided to update it as long as I remembered there was a change to xorg with a config impact). I didn't check any up/down/umlauts, I just plain assumed it works (and I still assume it does). The above is just meant to provide some info how to make it work globally instead of having a setting in each local startup per user. Bye, Alexander. -- Send from a mobile device, please forgive brevity and misspellings. Am 11. März 2020 23:07:55 schrieb Bob Willcox : > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 02:48:56PM +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote: >> ??? >> >> On 11. Mar 2020, at 10:29, Mark Martinec >> >> wrote: >> > ??? >> >> >> >>> I just updated my laptop from source, and somewhere along the way >> >>> the key-codes Xorg sees changed. >> >> Indeed. This doesn't just affect -CURRENT: it happened to me on >> >> -STABLE last week, so I'm copying that list too. >> > >> > And a "Down" key now opens and closes a KDE "Application Launcher", >> > alternatively with its original function (which makes editing a >> > frustration). >> > >> > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244354 >> > >> > >> >> This *might* help you: >> >> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11/2020-February/025046.html >> >> (Short version: run setxkbmap in ~/.xinitrc, e.g., >> setxkbmap -model pc105 -layout de) > > Will running that command return my key mappings back to what they use to be? > > > > -- > Bob Willcox | It's possible that the whole purpose of your life is to > bob@immure.com | serve as a warning to others. > Austin, TX | > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Thu Mar 12 10:12:36 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3665025BAB7; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 10:12:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: from mail.evolve.de (mail.evolve.de [213.239.217.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.evolve.de", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48dPlQ2KLsz4TbR; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 10:12:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 394adb4b; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 10:12:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=grem.de; h=date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=20180501; bh=wB1zmdzY lULVqKitdlmyGFrfC0s=; b=fVG4RU74pphyhdgaB87IQcjMdXBH5UwMfyhydz36 DG82+i6tnn29yUc+0I4yIvQ2IHY/TMhRkLdX4P9Cgs3h+LQIKwVaWsx91NnVJX8u +D4z4WG5hFNrc9Hmdp8mNX4R+J6CuYZI+VCGWMYnRENwrWHsInswEq64CEzc+bT2 eDfx7WjflbcHBxNb6b7ERqWSIYbw4cNIfozmyYERdV94j4jG0qc0/vIkUXYoBaut cl3z2gXISeUuFrYnuNBTf0XTfzjtQH6Uy+UEQI8QfW7cdFG2V5Nd9r2AQTKoGqTF Et9xMAFh6ePKV/iBozbdbLtPb9voI/S2IPuOUVX2RbpNzA== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=grem.de; h=date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=20180501; b=uU bGFT3VCRO1vJPhaIZZgCsQ3UowyyBygfltmY6EaNrUaN7EhgHeYJxMZ2r8+KKZoy 42OZm0kXAFpORSwp70NjHHU6r3Vpq7l/befJPhFSplM5JmScMAcn/G/H6jEZs/9T q0LEeXMn7HytFoheTyX7mPH9QMdUohteNzK8XmGtHxd1rUAP2lsYyuu+89qn2nKg be1fPXUOrsU1Pm8E8wwUmOc+1OXVrJdUefhmFCx1ZklrhU9eQcuzQAIwKBM/u/Wx P1rQu9NElrr/Avf5AZDVqU5Q9E8GRxss7I6sGalm8fop6OJwOaD4vkmkqYiUsAkv 65zYrInPAVu8PCqFD22g== Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 101ff74d (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:256:NO); Thu, 12 Mar 2020 10:12:25 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 11:11:53 +0100 From: Michael Gmelin To: Alexander Leidinger Cc: Bob Willcox , Mark Martinec , , Subject: Re: New Xorg - different key-codes Message-ID: <20200312111153.687dd887@bsd64.grem.de> In-Reply-To: <170ce15cc60.27fa.fa4b1493b064008fe79f0f905b8e5741@Leidinger.net> References: <6897965B-8B8A-4B18-A4BB-BEC77D3D6DC7@grem.de> <20200311214930.GC5435@rancor.immure.com> <170ce15cc60.27fa.fa4b1493b064008fe79f0f905b8e5741@Leidinger.net> X-Face: $wrgCtfdVw_H9WAY?S&9+/F"!41z'L$uo*WzT8miX?kZ~W~Lr5W7v?j0Sde\mwB&/ypo^}> +a'4xMc^^KroE~+v^&^#[B">soBo1y6(TW6#UZiC]o>C6`ej+i Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEWJBwe5BQDl LASZU0/LTEWEfHbyj0Txi32+sKrp1Mv944X8/fm1rS+cAAAACXBIWXMAAAsTAAAL EwEAmpwYAAAAB3RJTUUH3wESCxwC7OBhbgAAACFpVFh0Q29tbWVudAAAAAAAQ3Jl YXRlZCB3aXRoIFRoZSBHSU1QbbCXAAAAAghJREFUOMu11DFvEzEUAGCfEhBVFzuq AKkLd0O6VrIQsLXVSZXoWE5N1K3DobBBA9fQpRWc8OkWouaIjedWKiyREOKs+3PY fvalCNjgLVHeF7/3bMtBzV8C/VsQ8tecEgCcDgrzjekwKZ7TwsJZd/ywEKwwP+ZM 8P3drTsAwWn2mpWuDDuYiK1bFs6De0KUUFw0tWxm+D4AIhuuvZqtyWYeO7jQ4Aea 7jUqI+ixhQoHex4WshEvSXdood7stlv4oSuFOC4tqGcr0NjEqXgV4mMJO38nld4+ xKNxRDon7khyKVqY7YR4d+Cg0OMrkWXZOM7YDkEfKiilCn1qYv4mighZiynuHHOA Wq9QJq+BIES7lMFUtcikMnkDGHUoncA+uHgrP0ctIEqfwLHzeSo+eUA66AqzwN6n 2ZHJhw6Qh/PoyC/QENyEyC/AyNjq74Bs+3UH0xYwzDUC4B97HgLocg1QLYgDDO1v f3UX9Y307Ew4AHh67YAFFsxEpkXwpXY3eIgMhAAE3R19L919nNnuD2wlPcDE3UeT L2ytEICQib9BXgS2fU8PrD82ToYO1OEmMSnYTjSqSv9wdC0tPYC+rQRQD9ESnldF CyqfmiYW+tlALt8gH2xrMdC/youbjzPXEun+/ReXsMCDyve3dZc09fn2Oas8oXGc Jj6/fOeK5UmSMPmf/jL+GD8BEj0k/Fn6IO4AAAAASUVORK5CYII= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48dPlQ2KLsz4TbR X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=grem.de header.s=20180501 header.b=fVG4RU74; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@grem.de designates 213.239.217.29 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@grem.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.84 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[grem.de:s=20180501]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:213.239.217.29/32]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[freebsd]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grem.de]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[grem.de:+]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; IP_SCORE(-1.84)[ip: (-7.58), ipnet: 213.239.192.0/18(-0.04), asn: 24940(-1.56), country: DE(-0.02)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:213.239.192.0/18, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 10:12:36 -0000 On Thu, 12 Mar 2020 10:31:40 +0100 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Hi, > > This command sets the keyboard layout. You are supposed to set the > keyboard layout which matches the physical layout of the hardware. > This hadn't changed, it's a fundamental part of X11 since I know it > (X11 6.5) and even before... > [snip] Exactly. I just personally prefer to use setxkbmap, as all my setups are single user (one unprivileged user per machine that runs X, no shared machines) and customization happens in $HOME that way. Makes it a bit easier to setup a new machine (no digging in Xorg configs) and reading ~/.xinitrc basically tells me all about my current config. Plus, setxkbmap makes it easy to experiment, as it's applies changes while X is running, even if one makes the those changes permanently in an xorg config file later. And the resulting command is just one line (in my case as short as "setxkbmap -model pc105 -layout de"), makes it easier to support people. Another useful application of the command is for debugging: "setxkbmap -query" will tell you what's currently configured (regardless how that configuration was done), e.g., On a machine running xorg 1.18: # setxkbmap -query rules: base model: pc105 layout: de On a machine running xorg 1.20: rules: evdev model: pc105 layout: de In both cases the same setxkbmap command was used in ~/.xinitrc to set model and layout. Rules were taken from Xorg's default config, which changed to evdev in 1.20. Cheers, Michael -- Michael Gmelin From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Thu Mar 12 10:35:32 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38E6A25C2BF for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 10:35:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48dQFv3Bs1z4Kbm for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 10:35:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 1AD5025C2BE; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 10:35:31 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A76925C2BD for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 10:35:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from mx.catwhisker.org (mx.catwhisker.org [107.204.234.170]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48dQFs3L6xz4KWd for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 10:35:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 02CAZMcU048213; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 10:35:22 GMT (envelope-from david@albert.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 02CAZLio048212; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 03:35:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 03:35:21 -0700 From: David Wolfskill To: Filippo Moretti Cc: Ronald Klop , Current Subject: Re: llvm 10 libomp build error Message-ID: <20200312103521.GU1339@albert.catwhisker.org> Reply-To: current@freebsd.org Mail-Followup-To: current@freebsd.org, Filippo Moretti , Ronald Klop References: <1955230332.657304.1584004418962@mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hWA99UP51iQRyIL4" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1955230332.657304.1584004418962@mail.yahoo.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48dQFs3L6xz4KWd X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of david@catwhisker.org designates 107.204.234.170 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=david@catwhisker.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.99 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[current@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:107.204.234.170]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[catwhisker.org]; REPLYTO_DOM_NEQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[yahoo.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7018, ipnet:107.192.0.0/12, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; IP_SCORE(-2.59)[ip: (-9.68), ipnet: 107.192.0.0/12(-4.84), asn: 7018(1.61), country: US(-0.05)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 10:35:32 -0000 --hWA99UP51iQRyIL4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 09:13:38AM +0000, Filippo Moretti wrote: > Same problem yesterdayFilippo >=20 > On Thursday, March 12, 2020, 08:59:17 AM GMT+1, Ronald Klop wrote: =20 > =20 > Hi, >=20 > Clean build after svn update gives: >=20 > cc: error: no such file or directory:=A0=20 > '/data/src/freebsd-current/contrib/llvm-pr > oject/openmp/runtime/src/thirdparty/ittnotify/ittnotify_static.c' > cc: error: no input files > *** [ittnotify_static.pico] Error code 1 > .... I had no issues, updating from r358830 to r358872. Peace, david --=20 David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org "Trump has signaled that even in matters of life and death, he is either incapable or unwilling to lead." -- Samantha Vinograd See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. --hWA99UP51iQRyIL4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGTBAEBCgB9FiEE4owz2QxMJyaxAefyQLJg+bY2PckFAl5qEGlfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEUy OEMzM0Q5MEM0QzI3MjZCMTAxRTdGMjQwQjI2MEY5QjYzNjNEQzkACgkQQLJg+bY2 PclGngf+NcbOPB36Bj10KnHt8Sk6wWkFjdC1Cxog6mo2yroGQ/AozhYFqILyfC17 RiECyhecCFBQhFYRHcs00V6P1a9HNbw1sSisULIdZQIUQ+5KTcHfsEvSJ/iOze+F vRXmi0eGZG9vdKTlPiy49Lyht8pGhlMUsPt1FhEQZqwpGrM8I1NoNQYgSc6oSlp7 g9jOP+mXGEuMNaeaXqvzhTWN7zWNyhfbchDY4BSGufp2dPGwQzGPHcc3oHnUPRLa tu6ZW5K0rH+UQ1vEu2VdEScbwh7JEoazTpLofNk8P/K0GlL9bQXpe4lzJLBaUARH dnsjVvggXTG0Pf9NfnJBMGG+VR8/jw== =7ksl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hWA99UP51iQRyIL4-- From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Thu Mar 12 10:38:13 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA0AA25C507 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 10:38:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kp@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48dQK05wdcz4RL1; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 10:38:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kp@FreeBSD.org) Received: from venus.codepro.be (venus.codepro.be [5.9.86.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx1.codepro.be", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: kp) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4AE624F67; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 10:38:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kp@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [10.10.132.12] (i180-63-87-27.s41.a027.ap.plala.or.jp [180.63.87.27]) (Authenticated sender: kp) by venus.codepro.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 012E33949A; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 11:38:09 +0100 (CET) From: "Kristof Provost" To: "Ronald Klop" Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: llvm 10 libomp build error Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 19:38:05 +0900 X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.1r5671) Message-ID: <28152202-B38B-4944-95B7-FFA0AA71E462@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 10:38:14 -0000 On 12 Mar 2020, at 16:58, Ronald Klop wrote: > Hi, > > Clean build after svn update gives: > > cc: error: no such file or directory: > '/data/src/freebsd-current/contrib/llvm-pr > oject/openmp/runtime/src/thirdparty/ittnotify/ittnotify_static.c' > cc: error: no input files > *** [ittnotify_static.pico] Error code 1 > > make[5]: stopped in /data/src/freebsd-current/lib/libomp > > The file ittnotify_static.c does indeed not exist. A .cpp version does > exist. > > > [builder@sjakie ~]$ more /etc/src.conf > KERNCONF?=GENERIC-NODEBUG > # Don't build these > WITHOUT_LLVM_TARGET_ALL=true > WITHOUT_LPR=true > WITHOUT_PROFILE=true > WITHOUT_SENDMAIL=true > WITHOUT_TESTS=true > > > What is the advice? Currently rebuilding with -j 1, but that will > hours for building the new clang again. > Try removing /usr/obj/* (or whatever your object directory is) and rebuilding. That worked for me. Best, Kristof From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Thu Mar 12 11:41:09 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C779625DBE9 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 11:41:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48dRjd1fjnz4Pjv; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 11:41:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from tensor.andric.com (tensor.andric.com [IPv6:2001:470:7a58:1::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "tensor.andric.com", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: dim) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B73DE57AF; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 11:41:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:7a58::d178:a053:437e:4918] (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:7a58:0:d178:a053:437e:4918]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1D88D2D3A3; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 12:41:07 +0100 (CET) From: Dimitry Andric Message-Id: <67DEDF04-E84D-48B8-A4CE-02FD92CDFE9D@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C35C1C61-9BDB-4855-80E6-1B72382A684B"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Subject: Re: llvm 10 libomp build error Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 12:41:00 +0100 In-Reply-To: <28152202-B38B-4944-95B7-FFA0AA71E462@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Ronald Klop , freebsd-current@freebsd.org To: Kristof Provost References: <28152202-B38B-4944-95B7-FFA0AA71E462@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 11:41:09 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_C35C1C61-9BDB-4855-80E6-1B72382A684B Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On 12 Mar 2020, at 11:38, Kristof Provost wrote: >=20 > On 12 Mar 2020, at 16:58, Ronald Klop wrote: ... >> cc: error: no such file or directory: = '/data/src/freebsd-current/contrib/llvm-pr >> oject/openmp/runtime/src/thirdparty/ittnotify/ittnotify_static.c' >> cc: error: no input files >> *** [ittnotify_static.pico] Error code 1 ... > Try removing /usr/obj/* (or whatever your object directory is) and = rebuilding. > That worked for me. This has now been worked around in r358907. -Dimitry --Apple-Mail=_C35C1C61-9BDB-4855-80E6-1B72382A684B Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.2 iF0EARECAB0WIQR6tGLSzjX8bUI5T82wXqMKLiCWowUCXmofzAAKCRCwXqMKLiCW o+BLAKDtmuBcP21krxm8KE36U9MzhWdw+ACgmBERYU49fdDjpOrR22Q5bRa3qUs= =KkGv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_C35C1C61-9BDB-4855-80E6-1B72382A684B-- From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Thu Mar 12 12:26:15 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D25BA25F86C; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 12:26:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (108-84-10-9.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.84.10.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "darth.immure.com", Issuer "darth.immure.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48dSjd4TnMz3PND; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 12:26:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02CCOgpV007576 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 12 Mar 2020 07:24:42 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: (from bob@localhost) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 02CCOgMZ007575; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 07:24:42 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 07:24:42 -0500 From: Bob Willcox To: Michael Gmelin Cc: Mark Martinec , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New Xorg - different key-codes Message-ID: <20200312122416.GB1053@rancor.immure.com> Reply-To: Bob Willcox References: <20200311222327.GD5435@rancor.immure.com> <9674EB7F-393B-43DB-9892-83B4F1C88451@grem.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9674EB7F-393B-43DB-9892-83B4F1C88451@grem.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48dSjd4TnMz3PND X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bob@rancor.immure.com has no SPF policy when checking 108.84.10.9) smtp.mailfrom=bob@rancor.immure.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.96 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[bob@immure.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.37)[ip: (0.18), ipnet: 108.64.0.0/11(0.08), asn: 7018(1.62), country: US(-0.05)]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[freebsd]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[immure.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.90)[0.901,0]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[0.995,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[bob@immure.com,bob@rancor.immure.com]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7018, ipnet:108.64.0.0/11, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[bob@immure.com,bob@rancor.immure.com]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 12:26:15 -0000 On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 11:46:49PM +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > > > On 11. Mar 2020, at 23:25, Bob Willcox wrote: > > > > ???On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 11:04:18PM +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote: > >> > >> > >>>> On 11. Mar 2020, at 22:58, Bob Willcox wrote: > >>> > >>> ???On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 02:48:56PM +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote: > >>>> ??? > >>>>>> On 11. Mar 2020, at 10:29, Mark Martinec > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>> ??? > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> I just updated my laptop from source, and somewhere along the way > >>>>>>> the key-codes Xorg sees changed. > >>>>>> Indeed. This doesn't just affect -CURRENT: it happened to me on > >>>>>> -STABLE last week, so I'm copying that list too. > >>>>> > >>>>> And a "Down" key now opens and closes a KDE "Application Launcher", > >>>>> alternatively with its original function (which makes editing a > >>>>> frustration). > >>>>> > >>>>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244354 > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> This *might* help you: > >>>> > >>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11/2020-February/025046.html > >>>> > >>>> (Short version: run setxkbmap in ~/.xinitrc, e.g., > >>>> setxkbmap -model pc105 -layout de) > >>> > >>> Will running that command return my key mappings back to what they use to be? > >>> > >> > >> It might fix the ???Down key opens application launcher??? problem by applying the correct keymap (you have to select the correct one, ???de??? probably won???t cut it for you). At least it did with xfce, where it was important to run it before the wm starts - you could also try running it afterwards to see if it makes a difference. > > > > I don't know about that problem. What I'm experiencing is the Alt-up,down,left,right keys > > don't work as they used to in my ctwm window manager. They used to move the current window > > to the closest boundry in the direction indicated by the key that is also pressed (while > > holding the Alt key down). Also, Alt-shift-up,down,left,right would expand the window in > > the direction indicated by the key. These actions seem to do nothing now. > > > > I don???t know much about ctwm, but why don???t you give it a shot? I plan to sometime today when I get into the office. But since it's my work system and I am dependent on it to do my job, I've just been a little hesitant. Bob -- Bob Willcox | It's possible that the whole purpose of your life is to bob@immure.com | serve as a warning to others. Austin, TX | From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Thu Mar 12 14:24:14 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E149262107 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 14:24:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48dWKn56J1z4d2X; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 14:24:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@freebsd.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 670511A2F9; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 14:24:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@freebsd.org) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 14:24:11 +0000 From: Glen Barber To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: emulators/qemu-user-static linker error on 13-CURRENT r358890 Message-ID: <20200312142411.GT9584@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Vl2Kt1BVI5g15hg1" Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 14:24:14 -0000 --Vl2Kt1BVI5g15hg1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline 13-CURRENT aarch64 GENERIC builds failed this week due to the dependent port emulators/qemu-user-static failing to build, which is used by the targets that create the cloud provider images (EC2, GCE, etc.). The error output from the port build is: ===> Configuring for qemu-user-static-2.11.50.g20191211_3 ERROR: We need to link the QEMU user mode binaries at a specific text address. Unfortunately your linker doesn't support either the -Ttext-segment option or printing the default linker script with --verbose. If you don't want the user mode binaries, pass the --disable-user option to configure. The machine was upgraded yesterday from r356986 to r358890, and there does not seem to be any relevant change to the port. Any ideas? Glen --Vl2Kt1BVI5g15hg1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEjRJAPC5sqwhs9k2jAxRYpUeP4pMFAl5qRgsACgkQAxRYpUeP 4pMGfQ//ZiUsuYgap0Jx06kQUUZxSzqHplDgQn5BCrwe5WBCvT2bB5Cc7e3Enx1k wR3asRU+8YKzwQuTqwHC7sXbff43kBJ5qE5QiAi62GkmNOt4JYieln/4yCOF/Y1w yuwcNwsPx2OsTBx5MjDT5opljdS8OtXJw1f9fT3NWKJgHo7XYyVigjtcblMBXdss AA3DU7zSvoXXyB5wJICQ4Gr/qSOIiOuuC9FkZ98+8shx2QRBmRt7qvvX5SEajllW 2UPEG8jmvuHyvmbAT+m9I+239BXTvC6An7vVcFtFemk71RzvX8mN07/Zq2nyRugN crb4zSbOEqxmzyTI2DaDD5b3wYR6vG5w+nC5MzhJMNDHiZCiqZAQHGXTJdUSehSC cSf51z2/mRU4h22T8nJQT+huuX6yGky0CqcCHA89BBkLtz+NKu+5zr0vnNg3FL5h dJ5q2wtmRLZ3z5NosvaDNH5clPGywNNEhwyYUjAIAO7st5TB9AqvVbsuFAritIZM +EObbrHUEso86dRIn4UxwjL7eR7dKX7bcieCfg1NUDuy08Xee6gjRv3Fah9KslQj dHrsNKUJH3sA/B6Sr+G7VAOcYtCHopmZX4zAn2w58tt7HVi64tv5bACpx9S9Z8tO bv9SPHNhwdHFzAQgMy1h1M0rEKwz7Po6EYXTV7cH8xANZ+qbQ0M= =TtKm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Vl2Kt1BVI5g15hg1-- From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Thu Mar 12 14:35:37 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A640F262626 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 14:35:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: from mail-qt1-x82a.google.com (mail-qt1-x82a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48dWZv47GTz48Qd for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 14:35:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: by mail-qt1-x82a.google.com with SMTP id h16so4471529qtr.11 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 07:35:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=IFQ7cp8PD7gMTTxin4dkbssFK1fp7UkrxhUyJSvdqBw=; b=KWqRdpL6yTyB8l5Nenm/o6AAf3OKK3DTmpLH6mESTihcQBapOcA6Ir7Wcwq30czmGp SROCBSdVgewtuCMUGcgOAcWwX3au5iubwyCXjaI0zbXQjdIIefTptViMQnRhJO0N3iex qYVa4ZvC0f0mDlaemCMZD9nV80O64HNYQqt/35wy1PhPW2L1HcyaNZ/qi5mIqp+L1gwq WN0pbxdx87uUIXEHHh9tWRwn09Zi4+rhrPCQfvo9FgNkt/8uXT0tHsqXvmka6dPN5/8D OoweWbwQgzkr7sTtYQptQk/8gJPR8E3ckSJVkyH6wgKQxNl6gnAOlA4nwx9OPsOvdJaY 5oCQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=IFQ7cp8PD7gMTTxin4dkbssFK1fp7UkrxhUyJSvdqBw=; b=ua8++HBGPVyfPC0P2qf5/vUdU3e0t4yZh6Ts0ACL8tt+P7k30TyVwiO/EaoeoZ9ApL os55b7ISqO59FZ9wc6FcJsRpChaNWR58p/Alknu8fJAETfdlRzaVz8AgF2xpvY39F4id N+6skl4331XmNL8JCsXYNMRxcbwzbM+KZC2ea/cH3r9dwqjhg1voOktkgqImxfxteevg dB15DKwcDAFio2ZhANSmf9L23fjG7R8Y4Tn0PrDzKO+H7aVGjULbu2DV38ADaCQJW99X pX4lei0tixRI5+aafYU+Ze1a8hYO7EyVPenXmCwTNAGkPFYic62L7IyxHKzwfV2ya3vn HlJw== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3CcDYEhcxsyOOvE8k/2Vu0JFxyjVAD0pr+3koFH/mq0H84MCWS xHerJe2qzo009DpHf0R96auf5prJ6Znt5W1lArYxCQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtlSEyuqJqSX0sG+nDpCzHlhhRpdwa6epqSLqFzofXCibmcAuMXQmnyHBT1CVst5lM05cCw3dN7NOEao8XlQPA= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:1e08:: with SMTP id n8mr7603613qtl.175.1584023733609; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 07:35:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200312142411.GT9584@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20200312142411.GT9584@FreeBSD.org> From: Warner Losh Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 08:35:22 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: emulators/qemu-user-static linker error on 13-CURRENT r358890 To: Glen Barber Cc: FreeBSD Current X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48dWZv47GTz48Qd X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=KWqRdpL6; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of wlosh@bsdimp.com has no SPF policy when checking 2607:f8b0:4864:20::82a) smtp.mailfrom=wlosh@bsdimp.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.58 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bsdimp.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[a.2.8.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[imp@bsdimp.com,wlosh@bsdimp.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; IP_SCORE(-2.58)[ip: (-9.33), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-1.85), asn: 15169(-1.65), country: US(-0.05)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[imp@bsdimp.com,wlosh@bsdimp.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 14:35:37 -0000 On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 8:24 AM Glen Barber wrote: > 13-CURRENT aarch64 GENERIC builds failed this week due to the dependent > port emulators/qemu-user-static failing to build, which is used by the > targets that create the cloud provider images (EC2, GCE, etc.). > > The error output from the port build is: > > ===> Configuring for qemu-user-static-2.11.50.g20191211_3 > > ERROR: We need to link the QEMU user mode binaries at a > specific text address. Unfortunately your linker > doesn't support either the -Ttext-segment option or > printing the default linker script with --verbose. > If you don't want the user mode binaries, pass the > --disable-user option to configure. > > The machine was upgraded yesterday from r356986 to r358890, and there > does not seem to be any relevant change to the port. > > Any ideas? > Force it to use ld.bfd? This may be lld fallout. Warner From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Thu Mar 12 15:38:22 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90FB4263C05; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 15:38:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (108-84-10-9.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.84.10.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "darth.immure.com", Issuer "darth.immure.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48dXzJ4VDvz4HRY; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 15:38:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02CFaio1007927 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 12 Mar 2020 10:36:44 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: (from bob@localhost) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 02CFagWf007926; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 10:36:42 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 10:36:42 -0500 From: Bob Willcox To: Michael Gmelin Cc: Mark Martinec , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New Xorg - different key-codes Message-ID: <20200312153629.GA7853@rancor.immure.com> Reply-To: Bob Willcox References: <20200311222327.GD5435@rancor.immure.com> <9674EB7F-393B-43DB-9892-83B4F1C88451@grem.de> <20200312122416.GB1053@rancor.immure.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200312122416.GB1053@rancor.immure.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48dXzJ4VDvz4HRY X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bob@rancor.immure.com has no SPF policy when checking 108.84.10.9) smtp.mailfrom=bob@rancor.immure.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.97 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[bob@immure.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.37)[ip: (0.18), ipnet: 108.64.0.0/11(0.08), asn: 7018(1.62), country: US(-0.05)]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[freebsd]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[immure.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.91)[0.907,0]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[0.996,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[bob@immure.com,bob@rancor.immure.com]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7018, ipnet:108.64.0.0/11, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[bob@immure.com,bob@rancor.immure.com]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 15:38:22 -0000 On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 07:24:42AM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 11:46:49PM +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > > > > > > On 11. Mar 2020, at 23:25, Bob Willcox wrote: > > > > > > ???On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 11:04:18PM +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >>>> On 11. Mar 2020, at 22:58, Bob Willcox wrote: > > >>> > > >>> ???On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 02:48:56PM +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > >>>> ??? > > >>>>>> On 11. Mar 2020, at 10:29, Mark Martinec > > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>> ??? > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> I just updated my laptop from source, and somewhere along the way > > >>>>>>> the key-codes Xorg sees changed. > > >>>>>> Indeed. This doesn't just affect -CURRENT: it happened to me on > > >>>>>> -STABLE last week, so I'm copying that list too. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> And a "Down" key now opens and closes a KDE "Application Launcher", > > >>>>> alternatively with its original function (which makes editing a > > >>>>> frustration). > > >>>>> > > >>>>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244354 > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> This *might* help you: > > >>>> > > >>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11/2020-February/025046.html > > >>>> > > >>>> (Short version: run setxkbmap in ~/.xinitrc, e.g., > > >>>> setxkbmap -model pc105 -layout de) > > >>> > > >>> Will running that command return my key mappings back to what they use to be? > > >>> > > >> > > >> It might fix the ???Down key opens application launcher??? problem by applying the correct keymap (you have to select the correct one, ???de??? probably won???t cut it for you). At least it did with xfce, where it was important to run it before the wm starts - you could also try running it afterwards to see if it makes a difference. > > > > > > I don't know about that problem. What I'm experiencing is the Alt-up,down,left,right keys > > > don't work as they used to in my ctwm window manager. They used to move the current window > > > to the closest boundry in the direction indicated by the key that is also pressed (while > > > holding the Alt key down). Also, Alt-shift-up,down,left,right would expand the window in > > > the direction indicated by the key. These actions seem to do nothing now. > > > > > > > I don???t know much about ctwm, but why don???t you give it a shot? > > I plan to sometime today when I get into the office. But since it's my work system and I > am dependent on it to do my job, I've just been a little hesitant. Ok, I added this to my ~/.xinitrc file: setxkbmap -model pc105 -layout us and my ctwm window adjustment hot keys are working again. :) I do wonder why it was deemed ok to change the default behavior for the key mappings? Couldn't the default mappings have remained the same with change to evdev? This change certainly violated the "principle of least surprise" for me. > > Bob > > -- > Bob Willcox | It's possible that the whole purpose of your life is to > bob@immure.com | serve as a warning to others. > Austin, TX | -- Bob Willcox | It's possible that the whole purpose of your life is to bob@immure.com | serve as a warning to others. Austin, TX | From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Thu Mar 12 15:54:16 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFEF82643EC; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 15:54:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: from mail.evolve.de (mail.evolve.de [213.239.217.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.evolve.de", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48dYKf4Hp2z3yqJ; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 15:54:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 5c58249b; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 15:54:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=grem.de; h=date:from:cc :subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=20180501; bh=brwvWf26 nfW+bhmv+XK/yx0JuvU=; b=tp8+wFREog9MWDbamych1mTwtpsLqEcUA9+GL/vC sV3lsvj7RKxR6MXDqzSmi5+OPulg3HyzkJKK2jG/3GHsZzmQZIt7BROwsMHVCAJm S/KLgL6OSzVPnU9YRPXj897fwiLYhrPepRdGDJzN12m596f/UC+Acav7tDnJyslX edtzJE2HDTm/qplp/leBfJYhhMAbjXtNoxxbjBSFbYU9m1tZHbKieLG+D5CJhoHz 8lM4TJF0MgVcAN45xW0SzDUptbNuA8HhZ8mwHXxVRUiZ39ctPOyDBHLHWq1LKU61 PVWIQ2RS1iCEThN/teyLQwjBbW3CcwHwA72kewSwXZeJ0g== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=grem.de; h=date:from:cc :subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=20180501; b=RS 6DhMDtXDyWWBahF3X3qg7tLtaUbfzmQ6XbiNBf0Jn4n7TDD8begXjiYD4AhEXefz m9KU3Wc2H4O3Dc1w5IoRvdUYZW8ik7ZyIRhYlX3R/xhLz+vigO9ppbWYRSdH719W sv2nFlS2lWFR9QV/Q0CrREwv0aOXI9jLOxPdxnY3xDMRJPXzQWnVSt/zpfz30yDs +GUoo6rKKFcNEnf6pe1feERnIL4HSwyc6mMgRE8aKK1KdfuwgboNL1V87X6mty2e of3/TzPRHS5rfVMEdnWFfk+X/g6fDvL1tNHNQM6pzzsUPCG0CuD2PFeGmW8AfdwD lTLhEyw9mI+DGs8TMWIQ== Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 8158bc19 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:256:NO); Thu, 12 Mar 2020 15:54:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:53:32 +0100 From: Michael Gmelin Cc: Bob Willcox , Mark Martinec , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New Xorg - different key-codes Message-ID: <20200312165332.58af13f7@bsd64.grem.de> In-Reply-To: <20200312153629.GA7853@rancor.immure.com> References: <20200311222327.GD5435@rancor.immure.com> <9674EB7F-393B-43DB-9892-83B4F1C88451@grem.de> <20200312122416.GB1053@rancor.immure.com> <20200312153629.GA7853@rancor.immure.com> X-Face: $wrgCtfdVw_H9WAY?S&9+/F"!41z'L$uo*WzT8miX?kZ~W~Lr5W7v?j0Sde\mwB&/ypo^}> +a'4xMc^^KroE~+v^&^#[B">soBo1y6(TW6#UZiC]o>C6`ej+i Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEWJBwe5BQDl LASZU0/LTEWEfHbyj0Txi32+sKrp1Mv944X8/fm1rS+cAAAACXBIWXMAAAsTAAAL EwEAmpwYAAAAB3RJTUUH3wESCxwC7OBhbgAAACFpVFh0Q29tbWVudAAAAAAAQ3Jl YXRlZCB3aXRoIFRoZSBHSU1QbbCXAAAAAghJREFUOMu11DFvEzEUAGCfEhBVFzuq AKkLd0O6VrIQsLXVSZXoWE5N1K3DobBBA9fQpRWc8OkWouaIjedWKiyREOKs+3PY fvalCNjgLVHeF7/3bMtBzV8C/VsQ8tecEgCcDgrzjekwKZ7TwsJZd/ywEKwwP+ZM 8P3drTsAwWn2mpWuDDuYiK1bFs6De0KUUFw0tWxm+D4AIhuuvZqtyWYeO7jQ4Aea 7jUqI+ixhQoHex4WshEvSXdood7stlv4oSuFOC4tqGcr0NjEqXgV4mMJO38nld4+ xKNxRDon7khyKVqY7YR4d+Cg0OMrkWXZOM7YDkEfKiilCn1qYv4mighZiynuHHOA Wq9QJq+BIES7lMFUtcikMnkDGHUoncA+uHgrP0ctIEqfwLHzeSo+eUA66AqzwN6n 2ZHJhw6Qh/PoyC/QENyEyC/AyNjq74Bs+3UH0xYwzDUC4B97HgLocg1QLYgDDO1v f3UX9Y307Ew4AHh67YAFFsxEpkXwpXY3eIgMhAAE3R19L919nNnuD2wlPcDE3UeT L2ytEICQib9BXgS2fU8PrD82ToYO1OEmMSnYTjSqSv9wdC0tPYC+rQRQD9ESnldF CyqfmiYW+tlALt8gH2xrMdC/youbjzPXEun+/ReXsMCDyve3dZc09fn2Oas8oXGc Jj6/fOeK5UmSMPmf/jL+GD8BEj0k/Fn6IO4AAAAASUVORK5CYII= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48dYKf4Hp2z3yqJ X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=grem.de header.s=20180501 header.b=tp8+wFRE; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@grem.de designates 213.239.217.29 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@grem.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.77 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[grem.de:s=20180501]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:213.239.217.29/32]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[freebsd]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grem.de]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[grem.de:+]; MISSING_TO(2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; IP_SCORE(-1.77)[ip: (-7.24), ipnet: 213.239.192.0/18(-0.04), asn: 24940(-1.56), country: DE(-0.02)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:213.239.192.0/18, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 15:54:17 -0000 On Thu, 12 Mar 2020 10:36:42 -0500 Bob Willcox wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 07:24:42AM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 11:46:49PM +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > > > > > > > > SNIP SNAP > > > >> It might fix the ???Down key opens application launcher??? > > > >> problem by applying the correct keymap (you have to select the > > > >> correct one, ???de??? probably won???t cut it for you). At > > > >> least it did with xfce, where it was important to run it > > > >> before the wm starts - you could also try running it > > > >> afterwards to see if it makes a difference. > > > > > > > > I don't know about that problem. What I'm experiencing is the > > > > Alt-up,down,left,right keys don't work as they used to in my > > > > ctwm window manager. They used to move the current window to > > > > the closest boundry in the direction indicated by the key that > > > > is also pressed (while holding the Alt key down). Also, > > > > Alt-shift-up,down,left,right would expand the window in the > > > > direction indicated by the key. These actions seem to do > > > > nothing now. > > > > > > I don???t know much about ctwm, but why don???t you give it a > > > shot? > > > > I plan to sometime today when I get into the office. But since it's > > my work system and I am dependent on it to do my job, I've just > > been a little hesitant. > > Ok, I added this to my ~/.xinitrc file: > > setxkbmap -model pc105 -layout us > > and my ctwm window adjustment hot keys are working again. :) > > I do wonder why it was deemed ok to change the default behavior for > the key mappings? Couldn't the default mappings have remained the > same with change to evdev? This change certainly violated the > "principle of least surprise" for me. > > I think the change was unavoidable, but it could've been communicated better. Then again, time and resources are limited and I'm quite grateful the graphics team finally made that necessary push forward. I'm curious how people set their keyboard layout in the past though, is it possible that the defaults just worked for US users? I always had to set it explicitly (setxkbmap or in Xorg.conf), so I was never really affected by this change. -m p.s. What does "setxkbmap -query" show if you start X without setting the keymap in .xinitrc? -- Michael Gmelin From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Thu Mar 12 16:02:46 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41A42264A01; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:02:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (108-84-10-9.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.84.10.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "darth.immure.com", Issuer "darth.immure.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48dYWT2vdqz4BKQ; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:02:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02CG19s3008006 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 12 Mar 2020 11:01:09 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: (from bob@localhost) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 02CG19o9008005; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 11:01:09 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 11:01:09 -0500 From: Bob Willcox To: Michael Gmelin Cc: Mark Martinec , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New Xorg - different key-codes Message-ID: <20200312160109.GB7853@rancor.immure.com> Reply-To: Bob Willcox References: <20200311222327.GD5435@rancor.immure.com> <9674EB7F-393B-43DB-9892-83B4F1C88451@grem.de> <20200312122416.GB1053@rancor.immure.com> <20200312153629.GA7853@rancor.immure.com> <20200312165332.58af13f7@bsd64.grem.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200312165332.58af13f7@bsd64.grem.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48dYWT2vdqz4BKQ X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bob@rancor.immure.com has no SPF policy when checking 108.84.10.9) smtp.mailfrom=bob@rancor.immure.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.98 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[bob@immure.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.37)[ip: (0.18), ipnet: 108.64.0.0/11(0.08), asn: 7018(1.62), country: US(-0.05)]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[freebsd]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[immure.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.92)[0.920,0]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[0.996,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[bob@immure.com,bob@rancor.immure.com]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7018, ipnet:108.64.0.0/11, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[bob@immure.com,bob@rancor.immure.com]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:02:46 -0000 On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 04:53:32PM +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > > On Thu, 12 Mar 2020 10:36:42 -0500 > Bob Willcox wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 07:24:42AM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 11:46:49PM +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > SNIP SNAP > > > > >> It might fix the ???Down key opens application launcher??? > > > > >> problem by applying the correct keymap (you have to select the > > > > >> correct one, ???de??? probably won???t cut it for you). At > > > > >> least it did with xfce, where it was important to run it > > > > >> before the wm starts - you could also try running it > > > > >> afterwards to see if it makes a difference. > > > > > > > > > > I don't know about that problem. What I'm experiencing is the > > > > > Alt-up,down,left,right keys don't work as they used to in my > > > > > ctwm window manager. They used to move the current window to > > > > > the closest boundry in the direction indicated by the key that > > > > > is also pressed (while holding the Alt key down). Also, > > > > > Alt-shift-up,down,left,right would expand the window in the > > > > > direction indicated by the key. These actions seem to do > > > > > nothing now. > > > > > > > > I don???t know much about ctwm, but why don???t you give it a > > > > shot? > > > > > > I plan to sometime today when I get into the office. But since it's > > > my work system and I am dependent on it to do my job, I've just > > > been a little hesitant. > > > > Ok, I added this to my ~/.xinitrc file: > > > > setxkbmap -model pc105 -layout us > > > > and my ctwm window adjustment hot keys are working again. :) > > > > I do wonder why it was deemed ok to change the default behavior for > > the key mappings? Couldn't the default mappings have remained the > > same with change to evdev? This change certainly violated the > > "principle of least surprise" for me. > > > > > > I think the change was unavoidable, but it could've been communicated > better. Then again, time and resources are limited and I'm quite > grateful the graphics team finally made that necessary push forward. > > I'm curious how people set their keyboard layout in the past though, > is it possible that the defaults just worked for US users? I always had > to set it explicitly (setxkbmap or in Xorg.conf), so I was never really > affected by this change. > > -m > > p.s. What does "setxkbmap -query" show if you start X without setting > the keymap in .xinitrc? I'll have to try that when I get home tonight on one of my other systems as I really can't afford to take the time to restart X on this system now...got to get some work done. :) Bob > > -- > Michael Gmelin -- Bob Willcox | It's possible that the whole purpose of your life is to bob@immure.com | serve as a warning to others. Austin, TX | From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Thu Mar 12 21:03:26 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34F5D26BC48 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 21:03:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48dhBQ0hvLz416T; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 21:03:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from tensor.andric.com (tensor.andric.com [87.251.56.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "tensor.andric.com", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: dim) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C004B9A73; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 21:03:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:7a58::d178:a053:437e:4918] (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:7a58:0:d178:a053:437e:4918]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C97962D3C0; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 22:03:21 +0100 (CET) From: Dimitry Andric Message-Id: <57D7ABA8-274A-496F-B30E-02C6DC747BCE@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E03F4D78-AA20-4365-8303-FE1EE5936F39"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Subject: Re: emulators/qemu-user-static linker error on 13-CURRENT r358890 Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 22:03:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: Cc: Glen Barber , FreeBSD Current To: Warner Losh References: <20200312142411.GT9584@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 21:03:26 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_E03F4D78-AA20-4365-8303-FE1EE5936F39 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On 12 Mar 2020, at 15:35, Warner Losh wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 8:24 AM Glen Barber wrote: >> 13-CURRENT aarch64 GENERIC builds failed this week due to the dependent >> port emulators/qemu-user-static failing to build, which is used by the >> targets that create the cloud provider images (EC2, GCE, etc.). >> >> The error output from the port build is: >> >> ===> Configuring for qemu-user-static-2.11.50.g20191211_3 >> >> ERROR: We need to link the QEMU user mode binaries at a >> specific text address. Unfortunately your linker >> doesn't support either the -Ttext-segment option or >> printing the default linker script with --verbose. >> If you don't want the user mode binaries, pass the >> --disable-user option to configure. >> >> The machine was upgraded yesterday from r356986 to r358890, and there >> does not seem to be any relevant change to the port. >> >> Any ideas? > > Force it to use ld.bfd? This may be lld fallout. Indeed it is due to lld 10.0.0. For the emulators/qemu-sbruno port, which is the master for the qemu-user-static port, I have submitted a fix in https://bugs.freebsd.org/244772. Fixes for other qemu ports: https://bugs.freebsd.org/244768 (qemu-cheri) https://bugs.freebsd.org/244769 (qemu-devel) https://bugs.freebsd.org/244770 (qemu) https://bugs.freebsd.org/244771 (qemu-powernv) https://bugs.freebsd.org/244773 (qemu30) https://bugs.freebsd.org/244774 (qemu31) https://bugs.freebsd.org/244775 (qemu40) And while typing this, I see there is yet *another* qemu port, namely qemu-user-static-devel. -Dimitry P.S.: WTF do we have so many qemu ports? :) --Apple-Mail=_E03F4D78-AA20-4365-8303-FE1EE5936F39 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.2 iF0EARECAB0WIQR6tGLSzjX8bUI5T82wXqMKLiCWowUCXmqjkgAKCRCwXqMKLiCW o9jjAKCb7KpBSWk9x/m8VgLPlSStu9mhzgCfZUxjJmcrHgvMVwPLA5UlJsc8H9M= =cBYl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_E03F4D78-AA20-4365-8303-FE1EE5936F39-- From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Fri Mar 13 12:48:14 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0483025EAF6; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 12:48:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (108-84-10-9.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.84.10.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "darth.immure.com", Issuer "darth.immure.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48f58X4SYyz3FXr; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 12:48:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02DCjwF6010299 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 13 Mar 2020 07:45:58 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: (from bob@localhost) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 02DCjtcO010298; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 07:45:55 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 07:45:55 -0500 From: Bob Willcox To: Michael Gmelin Cc: Alexander Leidinger , Mark Martinec , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New Xorg - different key-codes Message-ID: <20200313124546.GC1053@rancor.immure.com> Reply-To: Bob Willcox References: <6897965B-8B8A-4B18-A4BB-BEC77D3D6DC7@grem.de> <20200311214930.GC5435@rancor.immure.com> <170ce15cc60.27fa.fa4b1493b064008fe79f0f905b8e5741@Leidinger.net> <20200312111153.687dd887@bsd64.grem.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200312111153.687dd887@bsd64.grem.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48f58X4SYyz3FXr X-Spamd-Bar: +++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bob@rancor.immure.com has no SPF policy when checking 108.84.10.9) smtp.mailfrom=bob@rancor.immure.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [5.05 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[bob@immure.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.36)[ip: (0.17), ipnet: 108.64.0.0/11(0.08), asn: 7018(1.62), country: US(-0.05)]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[freebsd]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[immure.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.98)[0.984,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[bob@immure.com,bob@rancor.immure.com]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7018, ipnet:108.64.0.0/11, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[bob@immure.com,bob@rancor.immure.com]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 12:48:14 -0000 On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 11:11:53AM +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > > On Thu, 12 Mar 2020 10:31:40 +0100 > Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > This command sets the keyboard layout. You are supposed to set the > > keyboard layout which matches the physical layout of the hardware. > > This hadn't changed, it's a fundamental part of X11 since I know it > > (X11 6.5) and even before... > > [snip] > > Exactly. I just personally prefer to use setxkbmap, as all my setups are > single user (one unprivileged user per machine that runs X, no shared > machines) and customization happens in $HOME that way. Makes it a > bit easier to setup a new machine (no digging in Xorg configs) and > reading ~/.xinitrc basically tells me all about my current config. > > Plus, setxkbmap makes it easy to experiment, as it's applies changes > while X is running, even if one makes the those changes permanently in > an xorg config file later. And the resulting command is just one line > (in my case as short as "setxkbmap -model pc105 -layout de"), makes it > easier to support people. > > Another useful application of the command is for debugging: > "setxkbmap -query" will tell you what's currently configured (regardless > how that configuration was done), e.g., > > On a machine running xorg 1.18: > > # setxkbmap -query > rules: base > model: pc105 > layout: de > > On a machine running xorg 1.20: > rules: evdev > model: pc105 > layout: de > > In both cases the same setxkbmap command was used in ~/.xinitrc to set > model and layout. Rules were taken from Xorg's default config, which > changed to evdev in 1.20. I ran "setxkbmap -query" on my home workstation that hasn't had X updated on it yet and this is what I got: rules: base model: pc105 layout: us So presumably that was the default setting from when I installed the system last April. I plan to run this again after I update xorg on this system, but not too sure when I'll get to that. Bob -- Bob Willcox | It's possible that the whole purpose of your life is to bob@immure.com | serve as a warning to others. Austin, TX | From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Fri Mar 13 17:04:57 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2259B2647B3 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 17:04:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io1-f47.google.com (mail-io1-f47.google.com [209.85.166.47]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48fBrm0SMKz4QmM for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 17:04:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io1-f47.google.com with SMTP id k4so10120734ior.4 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 10:04:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=3M8/EzfjrKV5Z0m7q1zaiO4BMe08SB3PZNgiY3aaPJ0=; b=g0buBHndmG17iZpNh/IwY/ZbRET2U/pNddErxXIJ28U6uH3KVoo+Xv5bOIgZc+VMH0 mXU4nxLJj6uKPBA1VE6Exy3WnRvwsgYoghOG6oDe6OIVCis0MeIZ3C1YEt4Q0+wGNlXk uWzjG4RcNoSO8D/EOuYQyZu0RCim6epc5frJYpP0w5FAI9IKdG5tGegfKIySvhfQewPg aCKXhRP5EKIC6u2Nb7PJBzwtAlWlpjnkdnqxYfqiI3DDfXB4kR5plrCMuNr1ozXqlKv2 sV4mpNm1ehkJjm/H6+6pVEt6J5/uHyrSseCOJWuMAHB+ABGfEOVVxTzHWNuY0CyvjWNt GMoQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0FxjPfiCq7X0viv3ngqlZYfkxnRA0kdeKiSrygPSl0mDbCMbAe yjHK7l3qu4KT7zmvHL5+3W+3pAIvdIcWCU1LeCE01A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vv0U8X7udLgTKcrPg+3xuQqeZQiePiVfE7eA+V7IJoyTyjdW6pIu7QnzWPuaXeNnWV3t24Qoot3FMtHGO9umIs= X-Received: by 2002:a02:ac09:: with SMTP id a9mr14025491jao.128.1584119094039; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 10:04:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ed Maste Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 13:04:42 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Any a.out users? To: FreeBSD Current Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48fBrm0SMKz4QmM X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of carpeddiem@gmail.com designates 209.85.166.47 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=carpeddiem@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.85 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[47.166.85.209.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; IP_SCORE(-1.85)[ip: (-4.57), ipnet: 209.85.128.0/17(-2.97), asn: 15169(-1.65), country: US(-0.05)]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[emaste@freebsd.org,carpeddiem@gmail.com]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[47.166.85.209.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[emaste@freebsd.org,carpeddiem@gmail.com]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_DOM_EQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 17:04:57 -0000 While looking at other things we came across ldconfig's a.out support, which hasn't been used by anything in the FreeBSD base system in ~2 decades. I know there are (or at least recently were) folks using a.out binaries on contemporary FreeBSD. Most likely statically linked proprietary software. I'd be curious to know if anyone is still using this. As far as ldconfig goes I don't see the value in generating a.out hints; if someone is using a.out shared libraries (from FreeBSD 2.x) it seems that they can also just use FreeBSD 2.x ldconfig to generate the hints file. Is there any reason we shouldn't deprecate ldconfig a.out support? From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Fri Mar 13 17:22:28 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD7EE2653B7 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 17:22:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ian@freebsd.org) Received: from outbound2m.ore.mailhop.org (outbound2m.ore.mailhop.org [54.149.155.156]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48fCDz3lfbz3Qlw for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 17:22:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ian@freebsd.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1584120144; cv=none; d=outbound.mailhop.org; s=arc-outbound20181012; b=El33hULk1wylAD4OUItAbnytwDu6B6DZsg50gvOUaDRoAUGrFH+GXGmjR5jC4jJI1bW2kKFxlAjrY YdSMG/Rgxg93bcTWF6rJvFHEHtVURlz7hyWAMp8oyJGzTweSXEZmAzUzIRvH8hcd3mB2aO6UTJ2YA/ QvuXOI1FgCvBTYbBFJqmchK5s0ntL3cDQ4A5Pz2FXXmEYoNm+7eK4APmjp13ZwzTLSHo0T1Dp3Wsnb 8CAAHBJ813xFuePiMaDoAu8834PkFyqcdWlazGQX+lcwEpf1DjVFX8toTizPmVnUreB4a+eaGS29ER ippauGS5C20py0NuNF0EBVzcRTN7RZw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outbound.mailhop.org; s=arc-outbound20181012; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:content-type:references:in-reply-to: date:to:from:subject:message-id:dkim-signature:from; bh=sjSjQQCRwsuxJUbrU5NHbl/yNF7dnhtC912kQO1DLW4=; b=HXc7jtAuCoHiW9TXEMA0MNS66sCT+h1WmHLP3RL5q0larBpooYZxHKFwlj1eGNehYYRG7o1UyNfmU pjKJhdxi1G3Ze745tpefID9LrF/vW6De4HjwcVu5o5eOL+kIwkK/eIiuUzEW3Q3MVqxiD5ss48hMHY yjZ6Epgmsv2/Q6wkrQc8HRduPXuvAiHNMA98NsWDp47vbSQY1Tzh9njfulfErR0wDTZ48Mo2RiadnJ fzA5Uik4pldsSvwOKpnhsnWikyvJmTKDZyIzWo2Hy/pr5XtguJpsLRaj5YcdAD7D02EimUQyeKREbN wTP5QPvMLcj2+lbkNMs6HesTHaq2TsQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; outbound4.ore.mailhop.org; spf=softfail smtp.mailfrom=freebsd.org smtp.remote-ip=67.177.211.60; dmarc=none header.from=freebsd.org; arc=none header.oldest-pass=0; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outbound.mailhop.org; s=dkim-high; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:content-type:references:in-reply-to: date:to:from:subject:message-id:from; bh=sjSjQQCRwsuxJUbrU5NHbl/yNF7dnhtC912kQO1DLW4=; b=CsD0L+QC5pWqrCfCBb+0y3kMcQI+SDWjtKxWPePUGQDWDoeTeVvHwk1BgYvBastbb34x5uCrg732Q JmvyU7lZX07Vtu5sXWfb8KzH4Qb8u9NU5RRL3SWGtiN8weErfVGP8PWAlcKGHctsrkETQlIyys4eAR j8lziLKkG8s/cQkMjG/e7JuJ6DTCL9RwgskiNVj6kdlMdPufeSTlS4MHAY8W6E/OdFHdV5gKeubnr4 1+bd5HO7n17sL8BlU0WLyki7cb8jE8aHGS0puzqLG9cADVMfeMg0v2h0muK7dhEyzc4DF6SqmIZLG5 T0dLx2+yDQUGsYz6VYkdFgrKQQaC8Zg== X-MHO-RoutePath: aGlwcGll X-MHO-User: 3365260b-654f-11ea-9eb3-25e2dfa9fa8d X-Report-Abuse-To: https://support.duocircle.com/support/solutions/articles/5000540958-duocircle-standard-smtp-abuse-information X-Originating-IP: 67.177.211.60 X-Mail-Handler: DuoCircle Outbound SMTP Received: from ilsoft.org (unknown [67.177.211.60]) by outbound4.ore.mailhop.org (Halon) with ESMTPSA id 3365260b-654f-11ea-9eb3-25e2dfa9fa8d; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 17:22:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rev (rev [172.22.42.240]) by ilsoft.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 02DHMMkc057456; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 11:22:22 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from ian@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <177f99391d35483369bd43a2be1e994d07697e17.camel@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Any a.out users? From: Ian Lepore To: Ed Maste , FreeBSD Current Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 11:22:22 -0600 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ASCII" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 FreeBSD GNOME Team Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48fCDz3lfbz3Qlw X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.09 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.17)[-0.174,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16509, ipnet:54.148.0.0/15, country:US]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.91)[-0.911,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 17:22:28 -0000 On Fri, 2020-03-13 at 13:04 -0400, Ed Maste wrote: > While looking at other things we came across ldconfig's a.out > support, > which hasn't been used by anything in the FreeBSD base system in ~2 > decades. > > I know there are (or at least recently were) folks using a.out > binaries on contemporary FreeBSD. Most likely statically linked > proprietary software. I'd be curious to know if anyone is still using > this. > > As far as ldconfig goes I don't see the value in generating a.out > hints; if someone is using a.out shared libraries (from FreeBSD 2.x) > it seems that they can also just use FreeBSD 2.x ldconfig to generate > the hints file. Is there any reason we shouldn't deprecate ldconfig > a.out support? Could a.out support be a kernel config option that's off by default? And could its presence be indicated via sysctl in some way, so that ldconfig could do a.out hints only if support for them is available? -- Ian From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Fri Mar 13 17:35:09 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E02CF2658CC for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 17:35:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io1-f50.google.com (mail-io1-f50.google.com [209.85.166.50]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48fCWd1h8Kz4MS2; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 17:35:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io1-f50.google.com with SMTP id v3so10202295iom.13; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 10:35:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=DjKbGlsX5gWCYWx41jo44rHfM7fp5ijjRDla2uJvNcQ=; b=EV7A2eIpdB8/j1wGZROIn+3wj4DemVW785j7BeScCVzYgZJm1z0dQzGKW6mgzKSZNy dX33oT7AH2+ObvAaKZJdux73DYyJDXCQoi69VyQy0d97I/of5LmXXgE2V3mJQ5CQvHhq G7wKOfqcMTXqqFpI4W552xF0dmlNU9HiKoJ5BJSt1pRca1d+EShu28ZmnPBb9/HrYrwl WLUGUxoN6U3gxJEUrCFc+V1WCesRt4tQoZcXBlJluoOZnox2KIXKNeDQxEC0hsTb74u1 3Z05GoO4uRVEqXrYn6QHjGWfrPoO5rjZczFsb+JpyZKpc7N+hMn5btDxKDZklmy+MdNi FSaQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0IuxwIs3byE39Qr1JPbsGez7kN8BXd2xREZW7hvSIqyzmB05xz jYI2yD7MJw4FZBjJoug+kuqVWVxGSzl+RfAKLyrW/w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vsoxxIGsmp5OTXXVSHdVgDmXgQ15+uIoQcFNKRIpsn2EwOlr3KMdPf5GLheCTvy8GA2nM6OIAdDnViaOVBeb8U= X-Received: by 2002:a02:ac90:: with SMTP id x16mr13723775jan.12.1584120905472; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 10:35:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <177f99391d35483369bd43a2be1e994d07697e17.camel@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <177f99391d35483369bd43a2be1e994d07697e17.camel@freebsd.org> From: Ed Maste Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 13:34:53 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Any a.out users? To: Ian Lepore Cc: FreeBSD Current Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48fCWd1h8Kz4MS2 X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.00 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 17:35:10 -0000 On Fri, 13 Mar 2020 at 13:22, Ian Lepore wrote: > > Could a.out support be a kernel config option that's off by default? Probably. That seems reasonable to me. > And could its presence be indicated via sysctl in some way, so that > ldconfig could do a.out hints only if support for them is available? But why does ldconfig need to know about a.out files at all? Assuming this support still works we can just provide an a.out ldconfig along with a.out shared libraries. From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Fri Mar 13 17:43:13 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22B82265C37 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 17:43:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ian@freebsd.org) Received: from outbound3d.ore.mailhop.org (outbound3d.ore.mailhop.org [54.186.57.195]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48fChw37zgz3FR1 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 17:43:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ian@freebsd.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1584121390; cv=none; d=outbound.mailhop.org; s=arc-outbound20181012; b=KxKhBmIwJIeSHA0UyuPr3t8GnJ42cx2Yyjli4XkOZA9Nb2z904gEY9sMHqTP9OFlBYH+NzeAsMAHB 7gmre//7HOWGF1qcdWDknPTf7luJoXvMi9ULyQgmYGRYfspH3WSFyTxyxpaW8+g6I6vnDhJGxz/hEK 3jaoTh/FJiXgwhYMa9V9JPuAoDbkr1K0fq5i7ATDdtEyqbRdz8di8fOO4vEnam97CYsHTBnwC5WDUp ON7MY1LjsBL3aHVpdPoV36VXoJeh3f/d4j4MA+xlhME4NVaUCybxDAXZINohTR4TmUJqU2F3wjAe5B HUHvF4fLDdSvPdZ5ZPwHgmKM2++eloQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outbound.mailhop.org; s=arc-outbound20181012; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:content-type:references:in-reply-to: date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:dkim-signature:from; bh=dGtDFuU4CNgGkS3eTk6gkFUjOouCHauZ+qLo2tESh/c=; b=E7F/AeoBU4hcKZuXgajPXcJT136feUveuwPlkTnwerKe5539us/sttX0Pp5/pCaAnn0yj8R3sY1xL /XQCiD1Y4+/p1dqMPtxoxAb/Iq8kngNcu2p3uKGZEGh78fAyn+PK6an6Cgx8ToIn7yzuL3FPf2kqQe 4SWEt1fn/HbqNFkOLtkUBojv2pWeZvs1YfCyvbzzoCHJ4J+bC0mO/7AmkOF8ojfL/LxVTh71DI828a 0VQaf4QVWRGHBEekivOrf8A55VyEGLDkF3y3e0XY5hZ3D994jb0GMZSHHRjKDP1AZ5aBDANFMeFqwS fUlc6cnt2/yZg6i7+V12d8Q3FsRQW1A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; outbound3.ore.mailhop.org; spf=softfail smtp.mailfrom=freebsd.org smtp.remote-ip=67.177.211.60; dmarc=none header.from=freebsd.org; arc=none header.oldest-pass=0; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outbound.mailhop.org; s=dkim-high; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:content-type:references:in-reply-to: date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:from; bh=dGtDFuU4CNgGkS3eTk6gkFUjOouCHauZ+qLo2tESh/c=; b=c94EzIImEPmmoWZXh+ttcv8t+1fYmL56nEpMouQDaw9euDYf/GzWBC2JKL6SliIfsGLy8i6dBvH6f yGWBgy2xOJsjqb3lXm1cAUCgDHtGVWCfoESRK2sWKwnekFgKOLgMmG8V33EATGd4KHUYaOz/i9hgCB cMbC6cWV3Haq192mgjevw4x/sh58rdAv5LRbb6+oxmepU9NlPipQkkLIFyI100sM7Oap/WZAuvnLFR zEWyL27LJJYJ4FrjAz4d8x1a9i3EwzMBquv0P4KeWVbrFqUvJJLA05i+k8sGB+5kpTVexml/gcrwIJ iRACR8FNAzfHzmUfU4+HA4lAOLgEsQQ== X-MHO-RoutePath: aGlwcGll X-MHO-User: 19f91d55-6552-11ea-b80e-052b4a66b6b2 X-Report-Abuse-To: https://support.duocircle.com/support/solutions/articles/5000540958-duocircle-standard-smtp-abuse-information X-Originating-IP: 67.177.211.60 X-Mail-Handler: DuoCircle Outbound SMTP Received: from ilsoft.org (unknown [67.177.211.60]) by outbound3.ore.mailhop.org (Halon) with ESMTPSA id 19f91d55-6552-11ea-b80e-052b4a66b6b2; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 17:43:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rev (rev [172.22.42.240]) by ilsoft.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 02DHh8GT057519; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 11:43:08 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from ian@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <344ed2da70379a40198353271cdb23beb455096e.camel@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Any a.out users? From: Ian Lepore To: Ed Maste Cc: FreeBSD Current Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 11:43:08 -0600 In-Reply-To: References: <177f99391d35483369bd43a2be1e994d07697e17.camel@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ASCII" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 FreeBSD GNOME Team Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48fChw37zgz3FR1 X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.09 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.17)[-0.174,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16509, ipnet:54.186.0.0/15, country:US]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.91)[-0.911,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 17:43:13 -0000 On Fri, 2020-03-13 at 13:34 -0400, Ed Maste wrote: > On Fri, 13 Mar 2020 at 13:22, Ian Lepore wrote: > > > > Could a.out support be a kernel config option that's off by > > default? > > Probably. That seems reasonable to me. > > > And could its presence be indicated via sysctl in some way, so that > > ldconfig could do a.out hints only if support for them is > > available? > > But why does ldconfig need to know about a.out files at all? Assuming > this support still works we can just provide an a.out ldconfig along > with a.out shared libraries. > Oh, that makes sense... if the libs are conditionally installed, an ldconfig_aout could also be conditionally installed. -- Ian From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Fri Mar 13 17:57:28 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 155842660BD for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 17:57:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cmt@burggraben.net) Received: from smtp.burggraben.net (smtp.burggraben.net [88.198.69.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.burggraben.net", Issuer "Christoph Moench-Tegeder" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48fD1L2tTVz4Nhf; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 17:57:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cmt@burggraben.net) Received: from elch.exwg.net (elch.exwg.net [IPv6:2001:470:7120:1:127b:44ff:fe4f:148d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "elch.exwg.net", Issuer "Christoph Moench-Tegeder" (not verified)) by smtp.burggraben.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C74DBC00309; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 18:57:23 +0100 (CET) Received: by elch.exwg.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 70CB0139851; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 18:57:23 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 18:57:23 +0100 From: Christoph Moench-Tegeder To: Ian Lepore Cc: Ed Maste , FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: Any a.out users? Message-ID: <20200313175723.GA48616@elch.exwg.net> References: <177f99391d35483369bd43a2be1e994d07697e17.camel@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <177f99391d35483369bd43a2be1e994d07697e17.camel@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.13.4 (2020-02-15) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48fD1L2tTVz4Nhf X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of cmt@burggraben.net designates 88.198.69.140 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=cmt@burggraben.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.98 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.979,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:88.198.69.140]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[burggraben.net]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; IP_SCORE(-1.50)[ip: (-9.67), ipnet: 88.198.0.0/16(3.73), asn: 24940(-1.56), country: DE(-0.02)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[140.69.198.88.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.6.2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:88.198.0.0/16, country:DE]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 17:57:28 -0000 ## Ian Lepore (ian@freebsd.org): > And could its presence be indicated via sysctl in some way, so that > ldconfig could do a.out hints only if support for them is available? Less code, not more. Regards, Christoph -- Spare Space From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Fri Mar 13 20:56:18 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97997269BB2 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 20:56:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from kib.kiev.ua (kib.kiev.ua [IPv6:2001:470:d5e7:1::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48fHzj6dYzz4FM3; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 20:56:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from tom.home (kib@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kib.kiev.ua (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02DKu5sX091864 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 13 Mar 2020 22:56:08 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 kib.kiev.ua 02DKu5sX091864 Received: (from kostik@localhost) by tom.home (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 02DKu4Ku091863; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 22:56:04 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: tom.home: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 22:56:04 +0200 From: Konstantin Belousov To: Ed Maste Cc: FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: Any a.out users? Message-ID: <20200313205604.GL1992@kib.kiev.ua> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,FREEMAIL_FROM, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on tom.home X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48fHzj6dYzz4FM3 X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.97 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.97)[-0.974,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.994,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 20:56:18 -0000 On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 01:04:42PM -0400, Ed Maste wrote: > While looking at other things we came across ldconfig's a.out support, > which hasn't been used by anything in the FreeBSD base system in ~2 > decades. > > I know there are (or at least recently were) folks using a.out > binaries on contemporary FreeBSD. Most likely statically linked > proprietary software. I'd be curious to know if anyone is still using > this. > > As far as ldconfig goes I don't see the value in generating a.out > hints; if someone is using a.out shared libraries (from FreeBSD 2.x) > it seems that they can also just use FreeBSD 2.x ldconfig to generate > the hints file. Is there any reason we shouldn't deprecate ldconfig > a.out support? There is also ldd(1) to clean if doing such cleanup. I agree with the statement that if you need to do anything that requires ldd/ldconfig for a.out, you really need to have the chroot with FreeBSD 2.2.x world around. From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Fri Mar 13 21:08:16 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2311726A1A1 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 21:08:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (108-84-10-9.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.84.10.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "darth.immure.com", Issuer "darth.immure.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48fJFT4ttMz4XkV for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 21:08:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02DL80Mi011070 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 16:08:00 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: (from bob@localhost) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 02DL80rS011069 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 16:08:00 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob) Resent-From: Bob Willcox Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 16:08:00 -0500 Resent-Message-ID: <20200313210800.GE1053@rancor.immure.com> Resent-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 15:57:29 -0500 From: Bob Willcox To: frebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Build failed compiling ittnotify_static.pico Message-ID: <20200313205706.GD1053@rancor.immure.com> Reply-To: Bob Willcox MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48fJFT4ttMz4XkV X-Spamd-Bar: +++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bob@rancor.immure.com has no SPF policy when checking 108.84.10.9) smtp.mailfrom=bob@rancor.immure.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [3.56 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[bob@immure.com]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[immure.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[1.000,0]; IP_SCORE(0.36)[ip: (0.17), ipnet: 108.64.0.0/11(0.08), asn: 7018(1.62), country: US(-0.05)]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[0.998,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[bob@immure.com,bob@rancor.immure.com]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7018, ipnet:108.64.0.0/11, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[bob@immure.com,bob@rancor.immure.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS(0.00)[frebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 21:08:16 -0000 My 13.0-current system (just updated about 2 hours ago) that is failing wit= h this error when trying to do a 'make makeworld' --- ittnotify_static.pico --- cc -target x86_64-unknown-freebsd13.0 --sysroot=3D/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.am= d64/tmp -B/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/usr/bin -fpic -DPIC -O2 -pipe = -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -I/u= sr/src/lib/libomp -I/usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/openmp/runtime/src -I/usr= /src/contrib/llvm-project/openmp/runtime/src/thirdparty/ittnotify -ffunctio= n-sections -fdata-sections -g -MD -MF.depend.ittnotify_static.pico -MTittn= otify_static.pico -std=3Dgnu99 -Wno-format-zero-length -fstack-protector-st= rong -Wno-atomic-alignment -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wno-pointer-sign -Wno-= empty-body -Wno-string-plus-int -Wno-unused-const-variable -Wno-tautologica= l-compare -Wno-unused-value -Wno-parentheses-equality -Wno-unused-function = -Wno-enum-conversion -Wno-unused-local-typedef -Wno-address-of-packed-membe= r -Wno-switch -Wno-switch-enum -Wno-knr-promoted-parameter -Wno-parentheses= -Qunused-arguments -c /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/openmp/runtime/src= /thirdparty/ittnotify/ittnotify_static.c -o ittnotify_static.pico cc: error: no such file or directory: '/usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/openmp= /runtime/src/thirdparty/ittnotify/ittnotify_static.c' cc: error: no input files *** [ittnotify_static.pico] Error code 1 Anyone else seeing this? Any suggestions for a fix? Thanks, Bob --=20 Bob Willcox | It's possible that the whole purpose of your life is to bob@immure.com | serve as a warning to others. Austin, TX | From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Fri Mar 13 21:49:35 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1751126AE47 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 21:49:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from waitman@waitman.net) Received: from mx12-out7.antispamcloud.com (mx12-out7.antispamcloud.com [46.165.232.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48fK974hYhz4QBd for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 21:49:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from waitman@waitman.net) Received: from yo.nortado.com ([178.128.145.22]) by mx168.antispamcloud.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jCsBG-0003NF-71 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 22:49:28 +0100 Received: from nortado.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by yo.nortado.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 957DD260E63 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 21:49:16 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 17:49:16 -0400 From: Waitman Gobble To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Build failed compiling ittnotify_static.pico Reply-To: waitman@waitman.net In-Reply-To: <20200313205706.GD1053@rancor.immure.com> References: <20200313205706.GD1053@rancor.immure.com> User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.2 Message-ID: <8740b5f9fef5ce417ea8968543de2992@waitman.net> X-Sender: waitman@waitman.net Organization: Waitman Gobble X-Originating-IP: 178.128.145.22 X-EuropeanMX-Domain: waitman.net X-EuropeanMX-Username: wago X-EuropeanMX-Outgoing-Class: ham X-EuropeanMX-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.03) X-Recommended-Action: accept X-Filter-ID: Mvzo4OR0dZXEDF/gcnlw0dyF9K2ilaF/JaNUYHaAo6qpSDasLI4SayDByyq9LIhVT68tpK92GdHt OItcTRG0/UTNWdUk1Ol2OGx3IfrIJKywOmJyM1qr8uRnWBrbSAGDx6IOtttBWgPYza5Lun6B7LNt WyfKuzLBS5jlSy+O1N0BcORxfCojcTOpEjtvWHp2ITEC8iEVyWQSk0P67YYbbzg9YkzbMy6DOYhG 3MUcvhqJQEkugO94dCBjOL1Kawzzlpua8xroXQS1maGmCgbsX1plp3RUv9DKeEUCVtPfovzDXArz 9jLKvilgL5XaZl0nBnrB5iBLOq4raHGySpe/LwMAmlPiSl7iQ2ty2njzDhUDAGFgqgEwLhlua1cs KBGiXJbYBr5BnZigA6mrgHPz8AzcLiPibp7eiMkmZ+TDXbkvTRxdebmKLQZvPPRB7w6pA1aO0ASg ODHLSquIn2D3FxUS9itywBHw11Tnbe8A27rGJ7hFVksSjB21NM5DTNxBCXkQoXT7arsAnMWr516+ Cu09NmV3aEMTLP/4jhOBZYYgr/U0flMcy2Vi/IcBgY4aCN1vmHLh3z+T5GW+QPsBOahnaR+eDmt1 fCO+lThL5cCFVHWJ3UYsockG/KOUjXDUqVHKPTCfYseGmiNuxuojCAgJZaaXPzICphiHNT2DCtCC uZI3iWeiQOCloMRmYPNnOP52O34w3zllKFfKAmLfAzf9bG4oCE8tXKfGDzsW4pDsxBoFbdIyTZwD 0tTyhMSs6g3SCpQRm+tnAkiPz4thdJxMPnetLBJMh51NiRRoHIA3Fi+/WLmLrSSeAmfaS3AJmiK7 x42VjdzChZMe6O/DiQO+ZXw0PCO1f4VsYh9MiLqmg9EN4OBYA47nCMoHA+hw7w+TOsy6gVMAmLTF vkba8HHP5/ErHxLjW32pc4hkkBfeNHk15VolAGHS5rCXQKDyCQUljhSWDhWh87HBSLhNUo4qiB0X MVQG2R7iUfOzATaZzYSImWwnnMP++lHF94mSoISwo0GKqs+vO7OcgwJMkA== X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@quarantine12.antispamcloud.com X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48fK974hYhz4QBd X-Spamd-Bar: + X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.69 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[waitman@waitman.net]; HAS_XOIP(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[waitman.net:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(0.00)[waitman.net,reject]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW_WITH_FAILURES(-0.50)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.64)[ipnet: 46.165.192.0/18(1.91), asn: 28753(1.33), country: DE(-0.02)]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[177.232.165.46.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.3.1]; ASN(0.00)[asn:28753, ipnet:46.165.192.0/18, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_SPF_FAIL(0.00)[-all]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[waitman.net:s=eueu]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[0.999,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.94)[0.943,0]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 21:49:35 -0000 On 2020-03-13 16:57, Bob Willcox wrote: > My 13.0-current system (just updated about 2 hours ago) that is > failing with this > error when trying to do a 'make makeworld' > > --- ittnotify_static.pico --- > cc -target x86_64-unknown-freebsd13.0 > --sysroot=/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp > -B/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/usr/bin -fpic -DPIC -O2 -pipe > -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS > -I/usr/src/lib/libomp > -I/usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/openmp/runtime/src > -I/usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/openmp/runtime/src/thirdparty/ittnotify > -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -g -MD > -MF.depend.ittnotify_static.pico -MTittnotify_static.pico -std=gnu99 > -Wno-format-zero-length -fstack-protector-strong -Wno-atomic-alignment > -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wno-pointer-sign -Wno-empty-body > -Wno-string-plus-int -Wno-unused-const-variable > -Wno-tautological-compare -Wno-unused-value -Wno-parentheses-equality > -Wno-unused-function -Wno-enum-conversion -Wno-unused-local-typedef > -Wno-address-of-packed-member -Wno-switch -Wno-switch-enum > -Wno-knr-promoted-parameter -Wno-parentheses -Qunused-arguments -c > /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/openmp/runtime/src/thirdparty/ittnotify/ittno > tify_static.c -o ittnotify_static.pico > cc: error: no such file or directory: > '/usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/openmp/runtime/src/thirdparty/ittnotify/ittnotify_static.c' > cc: error: no input files > *** [ittnotify_static.pico] Error code 1 > > > Anyone else seeing this? Any suggestions for a fix? > > Thanks, > Bob I've been getting the same thing since yesterday. I think the file is actually ittnotify_static.cpp -- Waitman Gobble From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Fri Mar 13 22:59:19 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D89726C8A7 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 22:59:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from waitman@waitman.net) Received: from mx12-out7.antispamcloud.com (mx12-out7.antispamcloud.com [46.165.232.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48fLjb4xx9z42tc for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 22:59:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from waitman@waitman.net) Received: from yo.nortado.com ([178.128.145.22]) by mx169.antispamcloud.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jCtGj-000TwJ-Bm for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 23:59:12 +0100 Received: from nortado.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by yo.nortado.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 444A0260E64 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 22:58:57 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 18:58:57 -0400 From: Waitman Gobble To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Build failed compiling ittnotify_static.pico Reply-To: waitman@waitman.net In-Reply-To: <8740b5f9fef5ce417ea8968543de2992@waitman.net> References: <20200313205706.GD1053@rancor.immure.com> <8740b5f9fef5ce417ea8968543de2992@waitman.net> User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.2 Message-ID: <14a5e39b65511d7ab4ffe370717d57e5@waitman.net> X-Sender: waitman@waitman.net Organization: Waitman Gobble X-Originating-IP: 178.128.145.22 X-EuropeanMX-Domain: waitman.net X-EuropeanMX-Username: wago X-EuropeanMX-Outgoing-Class: ham X-EuropeanMX-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.06) X-Recommended-Action: accept X-Filter-ID: Mvzo4OR0dZXEDF/gcnlw0c21/ZGerkmA2qMAhBYlqympSDasLI4SayDByyq9LIhVkYpFgb3Yz/ZB vw7JgIhmY0TNWdUk1Ol2OGx3IfrIJKywOmJyM1qr8uRnWBrbSAGDx6IOtttBWgPYza5Lun6B7LNt WyfKuzLBS5jlSy+O1N0BcORxfCojcTOpEjtvWHp2oGT2g4YVLMmRR8nzSfRFIjg9YkzbMy6DOYhG 3MUcvhqJQEkugO94dCBjOL1Kawzzlpua8xroXQS1maGmCgbsX1plp3RUv9DKeEUCVtPfovxS4ifw JCH1KjwhFWowkdFSBnrB5iBLOq4raHGySpe/LwMAmlPiSl7iQ2ty2njzDhUDAGFgqgEwLhlua1cs KBGiXJbYBr5BnZigA6mrgHPz8AzcLiPibp7eiMkmZ+TDXbkvTRxdebmKLQZvPPRB7w6pA1aO0ASg ODHLSquIn2D3FxUS9itywBHw11Tnbe8A27rGJ7hFVksSjB21NM5DTNxBCXkQoXT7arsAnMWr516+ Cu09NmV3aEMTLP/4jhOBZYYgr/U0flMcy2Vi/IcBgY4aCN1vmHLh3z+T5GW+QPsBOahnaR+eDmt1 fCO+lThL5cCwmp6WbGq2WiyEaRKgPJmRyULmcPXIlvKdWkqchNtyf5i9rZBnYLRlr8OtIqJftkEq WOZxjpCjWT4Y91j2DfuTXOul2APZbJR7+nEYZ6JOnBByEd7BgVAES+JtUTFD1VURFZ4oobg8BBg3 Jq+ntzj0hPcA56XsNWmOHsJgwB1Iil2jZAOanSBpz6Rja2u/0jL0e6NYvKahXtwt+YMziyRLXuOC NVnzzJmBXHC/Ot8dvYYFtvO3D2nTFkY8YEKzhfZGbsvqS8oHTcAIG/fs9dyhJOYIJd4MvQ0Nf4Ec bvHO1eoN0gqUEZvrZwJIj8+LYXQ2BnTTFGX5/yI4Ky+1ZJcbGqc5H4PEZHeoI/d6LWFf332z7LMw LGdoi9FMQ5j9dQVQj/360iFWI+eksIPWx1XwXSMGUEmguIWhoW6kfSJuzg== X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@quarantine12.antispamcloud.com X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48fLjb4xx9z42tc X-Spamd-Bar: + X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.67 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[waitman@waitman.net]; HAS_XOIP(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[waitman.net:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(0.00)[waitman.net,reject]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW_WITH_FAILURES(-0.50)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.64)[ipnet: 46.165.192.0/18(1.91), asn: 28753(1.33), country: DE(-0.02)]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[177.232.165.46.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.3.1]; ASN(0.00)[asn:28753, ipnet:46.165.192.0/18, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_SPF_FAIL(0.00)[-all]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[waitman.net:s=eueu]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[0.999,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.93)[0.931,0]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 22:59:19 -0000 On 2020-03-13 17:49, Waitman Gobble wrote: > On 2020-03-13 16:57, Bob Willcox wrote: >> My 13.0-current system (just updated about 2 hours ago) that is >> failing with this >> error when trying to do a 'make makeworld' >> >> --- ittnotify_static.pico --- >> cc -target x86_64-unknown-freebsd13.0 >> --sysroot=/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp >> -B/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/usr/bin -fpic -DPIC -O2 -pipe >> -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS >> -I/usr/src/lib/libomp >> -I/usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/openmp/runtime/src >> -I/usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/openmp/runtime/src/thirdparty/ittnotify >> -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -g -MD >> -MF.depend.ittnotify_static.pico -MTittnotify_static.pico -std=gnu99 >> -Wno-format-zero-length -fstack-protector-strong -Wno-atomic-alignment >> -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wno-pointer-sign -Wno-empty-body >> -Wno-string-plus-int -Wno-unused-const-variable >> -Wno-tautological-compare -Wno-unused-value -Wno-parentheses-equality >> -Wno-unused-function -Wno-enum-conversion -Wno-unused-local-typedef >> -Wno-address-of-packed-member -Wno-switch -Wno-switch-enum >> -Wno-knr-promoted-parameter -Wno-parentheses -Qunused-arguments -c >> /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/openmp/runtime/src/thirdparty/ittnotify/ittno >> tify_static.c -o ittnotify_static.pico >> cc: error: no such file or directory: >> '/usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/openmp/runtime/src/thirdparty/ittnotify/ittnotify_static.c' >> cc: error: no input files >> *** [ittnotify_static.pico] Error code 1 >> >> >> Anyone else seeing this? Any suggestions for a fix? >> >> Thanks, >> Bob > > I've been getting the same thing since yesterday. I think the file is > actually > ittnotify_static.cpp This is supposed to handle the rename, for some reason it's not happening on my machine. Makefile.inc1 # 20200310 r358851 rename of openmp's ittnotify_static.c to .cpp .for f in ittnotify_static @if [ -e "${OBJTOP}/lib/libomp/.depend.${f}.pico" ] && \ egrep -qw '${f}\.c' ${OBJTOP}/lib/libomp/.depend.${f}.pico; then \ echo "Removing stale dependencies for ${f}"; \ rm -f ${OBJTOP}/lib/libomp/.depend.${f}.* \ ${OBJTOP}/obj-lib32/lib/libomp/.depend.${f}.* \ ${LIBCOMPAT:D${LIBCOMPAT_OBJTOP}/lib/libomp/.depend.${f}.*}; \ fi .endfor -- Waitman Gobble From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Fri Mar 13 23:01:54 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 501DA26CB33 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 23:01:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic314-20.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic314-20.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.69.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48fLmd0vg5z45cZ for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 23:01:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) X-YMail-OSG: J27SNhsVM1nxrIMVew3vPuE14oBiV6wALbg0kcJ0GoLPCcoaM8ddXEv48fD_GqD 8YaeOSmgv8BQbB1NjuyvfEJNdPNWRIle2Y.HHB7xcb7lpscc6gTXKcCEcK1P7xvOSxF2jUVPTaz8 xlpv75hcYTz6gxt7DNksZbVpC0wK7qIukxGWzmm.7sUj8cx0hEojlb8.XqPf0DpcL2ikPIm2.Rl1 1rTanyRJXGB1crB8k7RP53uK4FfjMJXT2bo1owr3Q0TrgtNsQzvXZcIDQsaB8FwEj5LULgOdGKI1 1fjfcT6t7fataa4w.FDoclHTwnH4E8za5Bza.eQvZnxAFma2FjuLBLliIv9HD1FhP2trlQ9Nohwz wJkpy2of1vYh4uetw5a8pMyEtX6jscnqustOeFofjuhX5wFJb3vyupscW8LoWzqdvsTIDui1SXSp l6I3fFJs2DjSdtePhzbJ8PJYdNY0O0qFOFvRqq8BrAJAtyoO.sYjibH_apxDIWmdbjF1aWIR1P.W v3POfCnrjUL3lZQLjdsf88TLQuBmfT.GJO0ZL7uUxK1Se2Ww07hKrLRzraOjT8jiUM6hU2H_dZCB .lkRGt9OuLADoktneFo9iAYKYedW5ihyL7y8GXPWdZbtT2UTHGG6kM2ulBYUQ3GsMi.LSQUqfAGf B9VvljXl4voTKmSe42LwFZum28M7op_k.6bYO.1ToI3KmhE27OPn8J9tBlDrQxkOQcmnonnurtdZ qZ0TNBPfu1S72uvTmPgsffSD3UBhlb_fmscfZ9Y9sdH3qu5jg.ue2UycJMVcQi3Xpbyn.7ZLd2xn FMSs6zbd2TeNM6yTLl1A5F9Dhp8CFQxLLhT9984UktwPOqeYp1hllgqeAQGh4C4Q7Wv3ivqQ0dIK DhBVR.M2HN9HV3g4hHCVsmrE64LStg4qTDWXm0nB5Kb7.V1Du.p5TGiWIysg3LAgg0RTMybIE1pn bA8.ew60UqKeJjH2hYd5ult5JHdtM7v8ZILd3lH4Lq7Fy5lbz4RpjMaIVd1x7HLCQ5v5hC9sm5Y1 wyHYZ3Y9t34kPDwFewmrq6iX4GGHkqRqfp8goMEQRCJL2SZ2FVrP2RO3SqSZkgrLV.AUE6fhhl8N e_I2fMrAllstBlJQsOcRaRb5jxKodeMxx1Msy8N9r21CoDGeY5HqBdCiG96tFeUzfXhu.wcu8MMc S1UhCAvL4dmyIro7EyvC9ZlR3iTbWwDzo7mvEHYOQUb.xkyn75zSqmmqkClsHLwEbJco5j8FaZhP 2tYmgpS7IPxhzvVGZZEa_cDcNysbFU7r91Do7XYiKDfnB_V_LWy0g2V.ZTOc6byJtHZVXFbK1Ofh ODQAc7kKfIeIWbUL3BrF50qeCJbldTL5fUnOi5yssNzrQRfivS6gT896m4Bs096Zh_g0K3orKMq8 M6viynZ.fLaaOf2VZnpE_6zBZmGUsdp8o3M1ByPvPndZk9gvQpFy29NNLF0od Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic314.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 23:01:51 +0000 Received: by smtp410.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (Oath Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 7dc73bb06a71aae9cdac7321de10b640; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 23:01:45 +0000 (UTC) From: Mark Millard Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\)) Subject: Re: Build failed compiling ittnotify_static.pico Message-Id: <84F40BA3-ABFE-4567-B76D-54FDCBC57B32@yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 16:01:43 -0700 Cc: waitman@waitman.net To: bob@immure.com, FreeBSD Current X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5) References: <84F40BA3-ABFE-4567-B76D-54FDCBC57B32.ref@yahoo.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48fLmd0vg5z45cZ X-Spamd-Bar: + X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.37 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.96)[0.963,0]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[83.69.137.98.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.91)[0.906,0]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/21, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (5.08), ipnet: 98.137.64.0/21(0.83), asn: 36647(0.66), country: US(-0.05)]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 23:01:54 -0000 Bob Willcox bob at immure.com wrote on Fri Mar 13 21:08:16 UTC 2020 : > My 13.0-current system (just updated about 2 hours ago) that is = failing with this > error when trying to do a 'make makeworld' >=20 > --- ittnotify_static.pico --- > cc -target x86_64-unknown-freebsd13.0 = --sysroot=3D/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp = -B/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/usr/bin -fpic -DPIC -O2 -pipe = -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS = -I/usr/src/lib/libomp -I/usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/openmp/runtime/src = -I/usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/openmp/runtime/src/thirdparty/ittnotify = -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -g -MD = -MF.depend.ittnotify_static.pico -MTittnotify_static.pico -std=3Dgnu99 = -Wno-format-zero-length -fstack-protector-strong -Wno-atomic-alignment = -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wno-pointer-sign -Wno-empty-body = -Wno-string-plus-int -Wno-unused-const-variable = -Wno-tautological-compare -Wno-unused-value -Wno-parentheses-equality = -Wno-unused-function -Wno-enum-conversion -Wno-unused-local-typedef = -Wno-address-of-packed-member -Wno-switch -Wno-switch-enum = -Wno-knr-promoted-parameter -Wno-parentheses -Qunused-arguments -c = /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/openmp/runtime/src/thirdparty/ittnotify/ittn= otify_static.c -o ittnotify_static.pico > cc: error: no such file or directory: = '/usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/openmp/runtime/src/thirdparty/ittnotify/itt= notify_static.c' > cc: error: no input files > *** [ittnotify_static.pico] Error code 1 >=20 >=20 > Anyone else seeing this? Any suggestions for a fix? The problem introduced in head -r358851 was supposed to be fixed by head -r358907: QUOTE Dimitry Andric dim at FreeBSD.org=20 Thu Mar 12 11:39:07 UTC 2020 =E2=80=A2 Previous message (by thread): svn commit: r358906 - = head/stand/i386/libi386 =E2=80=A2 Next message (by thread): svn commit: r358908 - in = head/sys: conf modules powerpc/conf =E2=80=A2 Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ = author ] Author: dim Date: Thu Mar 12 11:39:04 2020 New Revision: 358907 URL:=20 https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/358907 Log: Allow -DNO_CLEAN build across r358851. =20 The openmp 10.0.0 import renamed one .c file to .cpp, and this is something our dependency system does not handle correctly. Add = another ad-hoc cleanup to get rid of the stale dependency. =20 PR: 244251 MFC after: 6 weeks X-MFC-With: 358851 Modified: head/Makefile.inc1 Modified: head/Makefile.inc1 = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D --- head/Makefile.inc1 Thu Mar 12 06:45:08 2020 (r358906) +++ head/Makefile.inc1 Thu Mar 12 11:39:04 2020 (r358907) @@ -924,6 +924,15 @@ _sanity_check: .PHONY .MAKE _cleanobj_fast_depend_hack: .PHONY # Syscall stubs rewritten in C and obsolete MD assembly implementations # Date SVN Rev Syscalls/Changes +# 20200310 r358851 rename of openmp's ittnotify_static.c to .cpp +.for f in ittnotify_static + @if [ -e "${OBJTOP}/lib/libomp/.depend.${f}.pico" ] && \ + egrep -qw '${f}\.c' ${OBJTOP}/lib/libomp/.depend.${f}.pico; = then \ + echo "Removing stale dependencies for ${f}"; \ + rm -f ${OBJTOP}/lib/libomp/.depend.${f}.* \ + = ${LIBCOMPAT:D${LIBCOMPAT_OBJTOP}/lib/libomp/.depend.${f}.*}; \ + fi +.endfor # 20191009 r353340 removal of opensolaris_atomic.S (also r353381) .if ${MACHINE} !=3D i386 .for f in opensolaris_atomic END QUOTE I've not upgraded to a lvm10 based vintage yet. I found the above while looking into if updating looked reasonable. So I've no direct evidence of if the change served its purpose or not. But it does suggest that removing any stale files from the build area that have names matching: .depend.ittnotify_static.* is supposed to be sufficient to get rid of old ittnotify_static.c file references for the following build attempts. It looks like two separate lib/libomp/ areas may have such files. =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sat Mar 14 00:00:22 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE9AF26DC02 for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 00:00:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48fN464zffz4VwY; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 00:00:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from tensor.andric.com (tensor.andric.com [87.251.56.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "tensor.andric.com", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: dim) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8A9C517598; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 00:00:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:7a58::34b5:a088:3751:3c70] (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:7a58:0:34b5:a088:3751:3c70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A60E72D3C6; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 01:00:20 +0100 (CET) From: Dimitry Andric Message-Id: Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9A18802F-C60F-44A7-A657-CA4D5B92AD37"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Subject: Re: Build failed compiling ittnotify_static.pico Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 01:00:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: <14a5e39b65511d7ab4ffe370717d57e5@waitman.net> Cc: FreeBSD Current To: waitman@waitman.net References: <20200313205706.GD1053@rancor.immure.com> <8740b5f9fef5ce417ea8968543de2992@waitman.net> <14a5e39b65511d7ab4ffe370717d57e5@waitman.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 00:00:22 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_9A18802F-C60F-44A7-A657-CA4D5B92AD37 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On 13 Mar 2020, at 23:58, Waitman Gobble wrote: >=20 > On 2020-03-13 17:49, Waitman Gobble wrote: >> On 2020-03-13 16:57, Bob Willcox wrote: ... >>> cc: error: no such file or directory: >>> = '/usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/openmp/runtime/src/thirdparty/ittnotify/itt= notify_static.c' >>> cc: error: no input files >>> *** [ittnotify_static.pico] Error code 1 >>> Anyone else seeing this? Any suggestions for a fix? >>> Thanks, >>> Bob >> I've been getting the same thing since yesterday. I think the file is = actually >> ittnotify_static.cpp >=20 >=20 > This is supposed to handle the rename, for some reason it's not = happening on my machine. >=20 > Makefile.inc1 >=20 > # 20200310 r358851 rename of openmp's ittnotify_static.c to .cpp > .for f in ittnotify_static > @if [ -e "${OBJTOP}/lib/libomp/.depend.${f}.pico" ] && \ > egrep -qw '${f}\.c' ${OBJTOP}/lib/libomp/.depend.${f}.pico; = then \ > echo "Removing stale dependencies for ${f}"; \ > rm -f ${OBJTOP}/lib/libomp/.depend.${f}.* \ > ${OBJTOP}/obj-lib32/lib/libomp/.depend.${f}.* \ > = ${LIBCOMPAT:D${LIBCOMPAT_OBJTOP}/lib/libomp/.depend.${f}.*}; \ > fi > .endfor Hm, so during your buildworld, does it show "Removing stale dependencies for ittnotify_static" or not? And is the .depend file there? Can you check /usr/obj for the file .depend.ittnotify_static.pico, and list its permissions? -Dimitry --Apple-Mail=_9A18802F-C60F-44A7-A657-CA4D5B92AD37 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.2 iF0EARECAB0WIQR6tGLSzjX8bUI5T82wXqMKLiCWowUCXmwejgAKCRCwXqMKLiCW owxGAJ9DX+Esn5VaLZ4jpOociRDAa8wb5gCgj0j4UUUx35T4mOkUXBaY/I28Wsw= =bloj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_9A18802F-C60F-44A7-A657-CA4D5B92AD37-- From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sat Mar 14 00:07:55 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEE2B26E251 for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 00:07:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from waitman@waitman.net) Received: from mx12-out7.antispamcloud.com (mx12-out7.antispamcloud.com [46.165.232.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48fNDn0dQ1z4ZxK for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 00:07:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from waitman@waitman.net) Received: from yo.nortado.com ([178.128.145.22]) by mx148.antispamcloud.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jCuL9-000Jdw-0B for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 01:07:49 +0100 Received: from nortado.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by yo.nortado.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CD234260E63 for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 00:07:14 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 20:07:14 -0400 From: Waitman Gobble To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Build failed compiling ittnotify_static.pico Reply-To: waitman@waitman.net In-Reply-To: References: <20200313205706.GD1053@rancor.immure.com> <8740b5f9fef5ce417ea8968543de2992@waitman.net> <14a5e39b65511d7ab4ffe370717d57e5@waitman.net> User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.2 Message-ID: <5606b11ff31f576b48458a15d224f8b1@waitman.net> X-Sender: waitman@waitman.net Organization: Waitman Gobble X-Originating-IP: 178.128.145.22 X-EuropeanMX-Domain: waitman.net X-EuropeanMX-Username: wago X-EuropeanMX-Outgoing-Class: unsure X-EuropeanMX-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.23) X-Recommended-Action: accept X-Filter-ID: Mvzo4OR0dZXEDF/gcnlw0c21/ZGerkmA2qMAhBYlqympSDasLI4SayDByyq9LIhVQ8nBRNOIkc6D 3rw/ZArcMkTNWdUk1Ol2OGx3IfrIJKywOmJyM1qr8uRnWBrbSAGDx6IOtttBWgPYza5Lun6B7LNt WyfKuzLBS5jlSy+O1N0BcORxfCojcTOpEjtvWHp2SQrJLEmwj/tNCB2KVrn4Yzg9YkzbMy6DOYhG 3MUcvhqJQEkugO94dCBjOL1Kawzzlpua8xroXQS1maGmCgbsX1plp3RUv9DKeEUCVtPfovy5Vz8F 1TR811IGSNbCfO97BnrB5iBLOq4raHGySpe/LzCgJPEsrB5Nu4n7X3OzIdW9oxNJA7hnx9mpXVgw S6/t1ZrCs8pLrG3xDXwwXiVyWNO9Z5Oc3jQNmPAct+DaFyF7Qxsz5L7I5LIMtMpLFh0ldDr2WLJq FULjiIcCiyuiCgTQeC2dL1Bxyk8yV+29SYS0kEOL0o9EBIpturfzKMtFybGwt9QOOIPzjDJtMPpu ONG5tr1naPLrD+uYvNqtQnWYBq6S+OMHcfXl6o0I271KKTjECb0PwpN4olPuA0AI937kIM09yvSV B0zYhsH8AJtrqa2/r3dhc0ZeLZuA3xjzSksmfZ4v4nbiS36fM49Dljzo+/roA49MmC8tn+ht0IMH mFDqewO9xyOqCYO8P1aHj1t2n4JU+yWqaEwe4n5zUiIQ5HPeglIPwXkT6IrnKzhwTY/1CLn9zEKU ZVC4+FDI7ekmLkgL2oDf3J1YtZGmjGzHeQ5qQdnVvggJXDxpOwElM+c7fJgF1YSnt4lRMc5qPAlb DjazCbhs7qBpykynMgfQV1hcShPFjpy06qfiOfYQuVc+U51KvU3RDHMOYCRK4wnrtDpkhsa+1pil ecRw09guL1t2IZXjCsDvWlkPjTYTiSzBvtjMqHJKbcoJ3LAWa8Mrc8quJ4btPpt/2FLuFDHRLWyH Qs+3RVQ97CmIM6/DnD4nrUSjVTPwQhH4RCrjPV011TSt4Aq+mc5xKg4oeQ== X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@quarantine12.antispamcloud.com X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48fNDn0dQ1z4ZxK X-Spamd-Bar: + X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.68 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[waitman@waitman.net]; HAS_XOIP(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[waitman.net:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(0.00)[waitman.net,reject]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW_WITH_FAILURES(-0.50)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.64)[ipnet: 46.165.192.0/18(1.91), asn: 28753(1.33), country: DE(-0.02)]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[177.232.165.46.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.3.1]; ASN(0.00)[asn:28753, ipnet:46.165.192.0/18, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_SPF_FAIL(0.00)[-all]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[waitman.net:s=eueu]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[0.999,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.94)[0.939,0]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 00:07:56 -0000 On 2020-03-13 20:00, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 13 Mar 2020, at 23:58, Waitman Gobble wrote: >> >> On 2020-03-13 17:49, Waitman Gobble wrote: >>> On 2020-03-13 16:57, Bob Willcox wrote: > ... >>>> cc: error: no such file or directory: >>>> '/usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/openmp/runtime/src/thirdparty/ittnotify/ittnotify_static.c' >>>> cc: error: no input files >>>> *** [ittnotify_static.pico] Error code 1 >>>> Anyone else seeing this? Any suggestions for a fix? >>>> Thanks, >>>> Bob >>> I've been getting the same thing since yesterday. I think the file is >>> actually >>> ittnotify_static.cpp >> >> >> This is supposed to handle the rename, for some reason it's not >> happening on my machine. >> >> Makefile.inc1 >> >> # 20200310 r358851 rename of openmp's ittnotify_static.c to .cpp >> .for f in ittnotify_static >> @if [ -e "${OBJTOP}/lib/libomp/.depend.${f}.pico" ] && \ >> egrep -qw '${f}\.c' ${OBJTOP}/lib/libomp/.depend.${f}.pico; >> then \ >> echo "Removing stale dependencies for ${f}"; \ >> rm -f ${OBJTOP}/lib/libomp/.depend.${f}.* \ >> ${OBJTOP}/obj-lib32/lib/libomp/.depend.${f}.* \ >> >> ${LIBCOMPAT:D${LIBCOMPAT_OBJTOP}/lib/libomp/.depend.${f}.*}; \ >> fi >> .endfor > > Hm, so during your buildworld, does it show "Removing stale > dependencies > for ittnotify_static" or not? And is the .depend file there? Can you > check /usr/obj for the file .depend.ittnotify_static.pico, and list its > permissions? > > -Dimitry OK, I'll check it out. I was looking in /usr/src and now realize my mistake. OBJTOP should have been a queue, but I missed it. I just did a make cleanworld, and now rebuilding. So I'll see what happens. The Makefile for libomp specifies the .cpp so I'm not quite sure why it's looking for .c anyway. -- Waitman Gobble From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sat Mar 14 01:28:24 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E993A270A96 for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 01:28:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) Received: from CAN01-TO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr670047.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.67.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48fQ1g68hdz46fQ for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 01:28:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=jMxCn6CinyoUb/GzMf+ZMElc+SpImv5wWEiq+ya8DigrpP9I7Ir3Xw1rgW+rZzwJTZMbhhZ1BPTSb48NSLCo/KU9OcLUnCoGp0UIGSZtPYAYepR41q5st3+hAe+bPCuSKFbRcZh/3HsXez2vaBhmIVbzQ5Ha9aya7a6ZU/kOzLwYRjK3Dh3ASCqd9qHniw5mVNX8w4zO2Z+w4VKtCigu/YJW5ApoasehQ1/mQZERmGanvLGE3lFmZr2dYSQMF4o/3EqnxIFTcMdY1kKBhlRDatnuzgpOoDXR/JqxzpPbdEc2kbNZGMTfpwhRHWZJeG71eiaNyIRloiH/VMfgCe8WtA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=ZYre3uJmCvkq6YV+cPt7EujBpgFYoJ1drFaoTXJAW+8=; b=NRfKU4bjiy67XFI2mDQxYTeQlPcmuOE/CtUD+4qDgxGtpOzjj7GVydiStHocrOGsALfuX3dyD4M8CCcNSrjQV+v9p6176J2+ot5OoiEymZKqdehRiw2gSL+tokRSjYUgJH7b1ty+OEvFz78NvWtPvvC9s+q4rkkoJe53g9sqd9ZBnpUHD6mbvYjg/kJPX0L79ggfENW+v+VYEzaAlcsltc4fWmIM+l+7F0Tu9H/JMBy2MyDIZ4EVSB5Th1LuPp0jD3FX2BwspICiQL4845b3pEllSUqt1yq7w4rinmAK/OphUDWjxY5168KQ2iNIgt22fJzhaF/AUDuQ/mIAUE2Mkg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=uoguelph.ca; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=uoguelph.ca; dkim=pass header.d=uoguelph.ca; arc=none Received: from YTBPR01MB3374.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (10.255.46.82) by YTBPR01MB3807.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (10.255.46.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2793.16; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 01:28:22 +0000 Received: from YTBPR01MB3374.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::a50d:6237:4074:f9c4]) by YTBPR01MB3374.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::a50d:6237:4074:f9c4%6]) with mapi id 15.20.2814.018; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 01:28:22 +0000 From: Rick Macklem To: "freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org" Subject: when does a server need to use SSL_CTX_set_client_CA_list()? Thread-Topic: when does a server need to use SSL_CTX_set_client_CA_list()? Thread-Index: AQHV+Z9BqmBxwqP+PUqf7mEWx47LjQ== Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 01:28:22 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 576f8a9b-822f-4878-0bfb-08d7c7b6fc17 x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: YTBPR01MB3807: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8882; x-forefront-prvs: 034215E98F x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(396003)(39860400002)(346002)(136003)(376002)(366004)(199004)(71200400001)(2906002)(478600001)(66446008)(55016002)(4744005)(64756008)(52536014)(6506007)(76116006)(66476007)(66946007)(5660300002)(66556008)(6916009)(8676002)(8936002)(86362001)(81156014)(33656002)(186003)(786003)(7696005)(316002)(9686003)(81166006); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:YTBPR01MB3807; H:YTBPR01MB3374.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: uoguelph.ca does not designate permitted sender hosts) x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: xT5dThgXwE2FPfrOZ6ik4/PdCOHDh4eu1W9iWsZJPN4OtgSqQFhf30yvowf92v1+MtgLp/f7WeeXwnpqhl7NMQigqRMXGUs/cRv54YRyBxVPDnkro8chw5IHtL6y+V1AnhKvwmtMwgRCCVJUKEx5dNjxw9/NENnooB59S36Srg+kNecGOCUglRXZ6hCbex9CSPZCM1ucFGWnwBsW431lieWMes2EKon/PqHT/UAr7tl7yEFa7bmtYCvPeP+9jiTDbksbdzS1hk2O3YeaL6R41NBiY2XCNN78oCwANkOEmrElgk7a86mcn/DLbNGX7xQKitv6Sk8NxCFypRvRh3HzlFmEa6VgSJ9PurzPrv0cPml2VYdMV4RGpj5bXC45UmUoLUOZZxc4raYPTE1m9YzyrHgnr1uKxxAdXy5efU6lkUl8cRLoc/8kBdkSkjpvmH4+ x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: DeXbbAC2DUYnH6cAI07W40dEFjs1h6i9MYyC9sHkLFhcWrB8jy+xwIQP1o4dO4Le4POo0w7tISkCi58OScxLOHvsER7esHg1EflcwESm6rohnjPUYqcZChMkw2X4S5wDlqsLX7OdOr47Y0K1DS1JiggLdP6nLIctAwMwUpMtTwEw4RHX9A/v441Espi5rMwIsb+iLHKxlwb1sF0uczFfCw== x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: uoguelph.ca X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 576f8a9b-822f-4878-0bfb-08d7c7b6fc17 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 14 Mar 2020 01:28:22.2779 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: be62a12b-2cad-49a1-a5fa-85f4f3156a7d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: LZTfxVnZGxo9+xFtl6MOd25F7hWKqDrUzBAxdJC0wYgCge8bGSuYF2Cv2UCrd1flDKIRbQzJNLyKhVvaEU6rLA== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: YTBPR01MB3807 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48fQ1g68hdz46fQ X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of rmacklem@uoguelph.ca designates 40.107.67.47 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rmacklem@uoguelph.ca X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.57 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.88)[-0.882,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:40.107.0.0/16]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[uoguelph.ca]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; IP_SCORE(-1.38)[ipnet: 40.64.0.0/10(-3.77), asn: 8075(-3.10), country: US(-0.05)]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[47.67.107.40.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.3.0]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8075, ipnet:40.64.0.0/10, country:US]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ARC_ALLOW(-1.00)[i=1] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 01:28:25 -0000 Hi,=0A= =0A= Since it is done in sample code, I have an option in the RPC-over-TLS=0A= server daemon that does the SSL_CTX_set_client_CA_list() call.=0A= When I test, I have not used this option and the code seems to work.=0A= Maybe this is because the client only has a single certificate?=0A= =0A= Here's the lame description I have in the man page for the option:=0A= .It Fl C Ar client_cafile=0A= If this option is specified, the server calls=0A= .Dq SSL_CTX_set_client_CA_list(ctx,SSL_load_client_CA_file(``client_cafile'= '))=0A= during TLS context configuration.=0A= I do not know when this is needed, but it appears to be required for=0A= certain TLS configurations.=0A= =0A= Does someone know when this call is needed?=0A= Can you explain it? (Just about anything is better than the above;-)=0A= =0A= Thanks, rick=0A= From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sat Mar 14 02:59:22 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01E1F274E40 for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 02:59:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from waitman@waitman.net) Received: from mx6-out7.antispamcloud.com (mx6-out7.antispamcloud.com [95.211.2.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48fS2Z4wZZz425Z for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 02:59:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from waitman@waitman.net) Received: from yo.nortado.com ([178.128.145.22]) by mx37.antispamcloud.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jCx11-0004yx-NR for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 03:59:15 +0100 Received: from nortado.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by yo.nortado.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 381F6260E64 for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 02:59:01 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 22:59:01 -0400 From: Waitman Gobble To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Build failed compiling ittnotify_static.pico Reply-To: waitman@waitman.net In-Reply-To: <5606b11ff31f576b48458a15d224f8b1@waitman.net> References: <20200313205706.GD1053@rancor.immure.com> <8740b5f9fef5ce417ea8968543de2992@waitman.net> <14a5e39b65511d7ab4ffe370717d57e5@waitman.net> <5606b11ff31f576b48458a15d224f8b1@waitman.net> User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.2 Message-ID: <6973b60ef1e9ef142bf9b8fd8f2f3b41@waitman.net> X-Sender: waitman@waitman.net Organization: Waitman Gobble X-Originating-IP: 178.128.145.22 X-EuropeanMX-Domain: waitman.net X-EuropeanMX-Username: wago X-EuropeanMX-Outgoing-Class: unsure X-EuropeanMX-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.23) X-Recommended-Action: accept X-Filter-ID: Mvzo4OR0dZXEDF/gcnlw0c21/ZGerkmA2qMAhBYlqympSDasLI4SayDByyq9LIhVUTYTBKYbG5NU 3Sn1+F5AgUTNWdUk1Ol2OGx3IfrIJKywOmJyM1qr8uRnWBrbSAGDx6IOtttBWgPYza5Lun6B7LNt WyfKuzLBS5jlSy+O1N0BcORxfCojcTOpEjtvWHp21HZw7/P/7tp0OjvgxnsPXzg9YkzbMy6DOYhG 3MUcvhqJQEkugO94dCBjOL1Kawzzlpua8xroXQS1maGmCgbsXybVoYqBEWqaNmPFmh+LPitzQiRE 6ZriV55YoU5oUDAYvKZ72V1knu41d+D8Z9Lx9S8/8vmsKocOwpkz7FrWLAnfaDLTf0MZr/X6FyDp COmCEoMGAhlHBG0plKcdFGGwiZKDcNF1LrVoVLXP90si9LxEozyv0Y0npPwcFeA3apMBboZD5vPF e84pJQGk5dfbFPdfcXgLzsY3kBHC+ZTZl3S5+IwAWiarTQyLhmI9lhnrh7faeZooFfsCmWTDBwz2 qxEfRPm7RhvF5NbroBPxVOCfU642KNtk4n/u8nyV2xsjehIqUczFWeS6sE8e1b5/Uj/i4hYVfUxI FxiN15g3w5ztl++p6nAnYA9rKrnTjXwVV/kO1XjgrR+pENmQtAsLck5GM1X0ZAbYa9ucBXkuE61l Hxcj6VdI1+oVpg83Rw4SqyV5OBiAaVcpreXCDD2HoVp7/Kmr4kFmhc2FzNwaRbe+ZJ+PVbiCJEuT GiJWPPPrQII2J6h04YtI/SAQcJI5qZ3/gO2ZkD5tm22rPSDq+z6ylt8SR60PVddDkjNqeGQUXPWl FdaGOH191uXjgjQN/aKYkHOwrbVRZs08xnVcRXKbxYYdlQLFWzP0ad5U99GNI6QrXb5OYSiAG+Pg 6Ji7Y7/PnshYC7hrSFNVQBfjqHybO+8nMRYL9kekVL4dhx06ifnL+9wgoTj4ygNPw1XfN0zsCG5v xMF5WG1gYscNCfJfeKHGyEOBSS2ApfmbatbdcrC/6+bvN+u2Zr8J/el+Mw== X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@quarantine12.antispamcloud.com X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48fS2Z4wZZz425Z X-Spamd-Bar: + X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.09 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[waitman@waitman.net]; HAS_XOIP(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[waitman.net:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(0.00)[waitman.net,reject]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW_WITH_FAILURES(-0.50)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.37)[ipnet: 95.211.0.0/16(0.94), asn: 60781(0.87), country: NL(0.03)]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[198.2.211.95.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.3.1]; ASN(0.00)[asn:60781, ipnet:95.211.0.0/16, country:NL]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_SPF_FAIL(0.00)[-all]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[waitman.net:s=eueu]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[0.997,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.63)[0.628,0]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 02:59:22 -0000 On 2020-03-13 20:07, Waitman Gobble wrote: > On 2020-03-13 20:00, Dimitry Andric wrote: >> On 13 Mar 2020, at 23:58, Waitman Gobble wrote: >>> >>> On 2020-03-13 17:49, Waitman Gobble wrote: >>>> On 2020-03-13 16:57, Bob Willcox wrote: >> ... >>>>> cc: error: no such file or directory: >>>>> '/usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/openmp/runtime/src/thirdparty/ittnotify/ittnotify_static.c' >>>>> cc: error: no input files >>>>> *** [ittnotify_static.pico] Error code 1 >>>>> Anyone else seeing this? Any suggestions for a fix? >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Bob >>>> I've been getting the same thing since yesterday. I think the file >>>> is actually >>>> ittnotify_static.cpp >>> >>> >>> This is supposed to handle the rename, for some reason it's not >>> happening on my machine. >>> >>> Makefile.inc1 >>> >>> # 20200310 r358851 rename of openmp's ittnotify_static.c to .cpp >>> .for f in ittnotify_static >>> @if [ -e "${OBJTOP}/lib/libomp/.depend.${f}.pico" ] && \ >>> egrep -qw '${f}\.c' >>> ${OBJTOP}/lib/libomp/.depend.${f}.pico; then \ >>> echo "Removing stale dependencies for ${f}"; \ >>> rm -f ${OBJTOP}/lib/libomp/.depend.${f}.* \ >>> ${OBJTOP}/obj-lib32/lib/libomp/.depend.${f}.* \ >>> >>> ${LIBCOMPAT:D${LIBCOMPAT_OBJTOP}/lib/libomp/.depend.${f}.*}; \ >>> fi >>> .endfor >> >> Hm, so during your buildworld, does it show "Removing stale >> dependencies >> for ittnotify_static" or not? And is the .depend file there? Can you >> check /usr/obj for the file .depend.ittnotify_static.pico, and list >> its >> permissions? >> >> -Dimitry > > OK, I'll check it out. I was looking in /usr/src and now realize my > mistake. OBJTOP should have been a queue, but I missed it. > > I just did a make cleanworld, and now rebuilding. So I'll see what > happens. > > The Makefile for libomp specifies the .cpp so I'm not quite sure why > it's looking for .c anyway. 'make cleanworld' solved it, build without error. I used to always delete obj for years, but I've not done that for a couple of years without any problems I've noticed. -- Waitman Gobble From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sat Mar 14 03:53:51 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA696275E94 for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 03:53:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ish@amail.plala.or.jp) Received: from msc11.plala.or.jp (msc11.plala.or.jp [IPv6:2400:7800:0:502e::21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48fTFS1fM0z4rQp for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 03:53:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ish@amail.plala.or.jp) Received: from localhost ([2400:4050:9320:7a00::5]) by msc11.plala.or.jp with ESMTP id <20200314035337.CXCA610.msc11.plala.or.jp@localhost> for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 12:53:37 +0900 Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 12:53:21 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20200314.125321.1799337201319868712.ish@amail.plala.or.jp> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Build failed compiling ittnotify_static.pico From: Masachika ISHIZUKA In-Reply-To: <6973b60ef1e9ef142bf9b8fd8f2f3b41@waitman.net> References: <5606b11ff31f576b48458a15d224f8b1@waitman.net> <6973b60ef1e9ef142bf9b8fd8f2f3b41@waitman.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-VirusScan: Outbound; mvir-ac11; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 12:53:37 +0900 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48fTFS1fM0z4rQp X-Spamd-Bar: +++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ish@amail.plala.or.jp designates 2400:7800:0:502e::21 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ish@amail.plala.or.jp X-Spamd-Result: default: False [3.30 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2400:7800:0:502e::/60]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.88)[0.882,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[plala.or.jp]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.99)[0.988,0]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.13)[ipnet: 2400:7800::/32(-0.88), asn: 4713(1.47), country: JP(0.04)]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:4713, ipnet:2400:7800::/32, country:JP]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 03:53:52 -0000 >>>>>> cc: error: no such file or directory: >>>>>> '/usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/openmp/runtime/src/thirdparty/ittnotify/ittnotify_static.c' >>>>>> cc: error: no input files >>>>>> *** [ittnotify_static.pico] Error code 1 > > 'make cleanworld' solved it, build without error. > I used to always delete obj for years, but I've not done that for a > couple of years without any problems I've noticed. Thank you for information. I'll try it. -- Masachika ISHIZUKA From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sat Mar 14 08:04:10 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1B9027A909 for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 08:04:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ish@amail.plala.or.jp) Received: from msc12.plala.or.jp (msc12.plala.or.jp [IPv6:2400:7800:0:502e::22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48fZpJ2YKFz4bn2 for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 08:04:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ish@amail.plala.or.jp) Received: from localhost ([2400:4050:9320:7a00::5]) by msc12.plala.or.jp with ESMTP id <20200314080359.CWXG20542.msc12.plala.or.jp@localhost> for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 17:03:59 +0900 Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 17:03:50 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20200314.170350.1821811661491714465.ish@amail.plala.or.jp> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Build failed compiling ittnotify_static.pico From: Masachika ISHIZUKA In-Reply-To: <20200314.125321.1799337201319868712.ish@amail.plala.or.jp> References: <5606b11ff31f576b48458a15d224f8b1@waitman.net> <6973b60ef1e9ef142bf9b8fd8f2f3b41@waitman.net> <20200314.125321.1799337201319868712.ish@amail.plala.or.jp> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-VirusScan: Outbound; mvir-ac12; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 17:03:59 +0900 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48fZpJ2YKFz4bn2 X-Spamd-Bar: +++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ish@amail.plala.or.jp designates 2400:7800:0:502e::22 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ish@amail.plala.or.jp X-Spamd-Result: default: False [3.30 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2400:7800:0:502e::/60]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.88)[0.881,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[plala.or.jp]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.99)[0.988,0]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.13)[ipnet: 2400:7800::/32(-0.88), asn: 4713(1.47), country: JP(0.04)]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:4713, ipnet:2400:7800::/32, country:JP]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 08:04:10 -0000 >>>>>>> cc: error: no such file or directory: >>>>>>> '/usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/openmp/runtime/src/thirdparty/ittnotify/ittnotify_static.c' >>>>>>> cc: error: no input files >>>>>>> *** [ittnotify_static.pico] Error code 1 >> >> 'make cleanworld' solved it, build without error. >> I used to always delete obj for years, but I've not done that for a >> couple of years without any problems I've noticed. > > Thank you for information. > I'll try it. After 'make cleanworld', it was able to make buildworld successfulley. Thanks. -- Masachika ISHIZUKA From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sat Mar 14 08:16:07 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB16A27ADCC for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 08:16:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48fb471v47z41sj; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 08:16:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from tensor.andric.com (tensor.andric.com [87.251.56.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "tensor.andric.com", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: dim) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A7F8C1B0DF; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 08:16:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:7a58::34b5:a088:3751:3c70] (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:7a58:0:34b5:a088:3751:3c70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 74C2E2D4E7; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 09:16:05 +0100 (CET) From: Dimitry Andric Message-Id: Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F00CCD9E-E011-4524-9B31-9C1B42DA4D9E"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Subject: Re: Build failed compiling ittnotify_static.pico Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 09:15:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20200314.125321.1799337201319868712.ish@amail.plala.or.jp> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org To: Masachika ISHIZUKA References: <5606b11ff31f576b48458a15d224f8b1@waitman.net> <6973b60ef1e9ef142bf9b8fd8f2f3b41@waitman.net> <20200314.125321.1799337201319868712.ish@amail.plala.or.jp> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 08:16:08 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_F00CCD9E-E011-4524-9B31-9C1B42DA4D9E Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On 14 Mar 2020, at 04:53, Masachika ISHIZUKA = wrote: >=20 >>>>>>> cc: error: no such file or directory: >>>>>>> = '/usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/openmp/runtime/src/thirdparty/ittnotify/itt= notify_static.c' >>>>>>> cc: error: no input files >>>>>>> *** [ittnotify_static.pico] Error code 1 >>=20 >> 'make cleanworld' solved it, build without error. >> I used to always delete obj for years, but I've not done that for a >> couple of years without any problems I've noticed. >=20 > Thank you for information. > I'll try it. Obviously, cleaning up your /usr/obj will always help, but that is not the point of the fix. It should always be possible to do an incremental buildworld, but there is a deficiency in our dependency tracking system. When a file changes extension, but its basename stays the same, the tracking does not notice it. Assuming amd64 and the default /usr/src and /usr/obj setup, all the fix has to do is to remove the file /usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/lib/libomp/.depend.ittnotify_static.pico, since that will have a "stale" dependency on the old ittnotify_static.c file in it. It would still have been interesting to see why it did not work correctly for the original posters. -Dimitry --Apple-Mail=_F00CCD9E-E011-4524-9B31-9C1B42DA4D9E Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.2 iF0EARECAB0WIQR6tGLSzjX8bUI5T82wXqMKLiCWowUCXmySvgAKCRCwXqMKLiCW ozS3AJ9vXxhKGXVBnx+b7bnwnvAWDRAO/QCfWML731lufObcxR00qQl1B/suuoA= =YxWQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_F00CCD9E-E011-4524-9B31-9C1B42DA4D9E-- From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sat Mar 14 16:24:44 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA3425DDBB for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 16:24:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bogorodskiy@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lj1-x22c.google.com (mail-lj1-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48fnvv3h14z3xH6; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 16:24:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bogorodskiy@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lj1-x22c.google.com with SMTP id f10so13941645ljn.6; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 09:24:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=t7v9Yg+xNKkYhi+CRKXNz+3Hr107o2+s6GYcjhl3Y7I=; b=ZtpUXefy4LkpeQ0hjD0IQwrrC6jT8KYWfDukF44DSc+ry4frsASZIjQlJ0dlSQRby7 s9cIWb0ZOGqT0FhW7udBJy/dBVNVvvoLWfHbfDvRdU/iboznW7AqIirW2e34K5JSwxSz t/BPOmMmcIRmHFSg0BVyxyV0szEF3NCpCqyIBy+X/aOLf/wm27hVCG6nnkL7mhyDJ01p DbOngPkb7PVXQIQHviWhYu6v5hyBkDHYvX2MIqZjCjMT66WVYeNN+s4nbXVyI6/f+n5a PhjuDZMJGwORmMwnHyNZiCiQeSQ0WwGmVZf+C4rXZRfyoZlsbBwXvPa6cUsrriyzMhWr r8Yg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=t7v9Yg+xNKkYhi+CRKXNz+3Hr107o2+s6GYcjhl3Y7I=; b=ivfxlgDU/oP+tuE5c34tL4WFhHoTfZNwq48SmxM7oUTj0fBRq+hkFq9cvFyyo2mjKK u4myrzszBmV86yGNZZ/8bJMkNKCkQ6DAB4l9LyqbTD7gIWezcqLypcA5PiMOpc3wgKc0 SPdmP80Od+SIkHU/JpntM8Oli2fyslbXzNn1BX0eqDLILSMotWOpWIy+Et4hyY99In2t EWwBfNz5aTtBoydAcILtIKK7aai5bFQCxDfI4QbgW3ZWVHB0wirz/zCJf32bGTNUVGtU U8Rcu13uVMFRNIWqinRlqXmJhZ9jdL5OT+6kS3kwwR+GspexaQ1RdBqfZt/QuHbvh8A9 H+pQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ1klK/QsKbnBGh0mB+Z1UHk2GlrXoK7f9yVQmMrg9YjmOLa41SZ CEPVX8gjnGBGzSqDVqOUyA5oOsHdAtc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtiU0LOkph4dHtXo0frBe7hf3B7Xorycjjchvioh+PKrXG3P56U1SJOIQje004Gbpt2T11WAg== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:7a0c:: with SMTP id v12mr9149311ljc.274.1584203079965; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 09:24:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kloomba ([31.29.228.135]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u21sm1564939lfo.37.2020.03.14.09.24.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 14 Mar 2020 09:24:39 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Roman Bogorodskiy Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 20:24:29 +0400 From: Roman Bogorodskiy To: Dimitry Andric Cc: waitman@waitman.net, FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: Build failed compiling ittnotify_static.pico Message-ID: <20200314162429.GA47907@kloomba> References: <20200313205706.GD1053@rancor.immure.com> <8740b5f9fef5ce417ea8968543de2992@waitman.net> <14a5e39b65511d7ab4ffe370717d57e5@waitman.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zhXaljGHf11kAtnf" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48fnvv3h14z3xH6 X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.00 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 16:24:44 -0000 --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 13 Mar 2020, at 23:58, Waitman Gobble wrote: > >=20 > > On 2020-03-13 17:49, Waitman Gobble wrote: > >> On 2020-03-13 16:57, Bob Willcox wrote: > ... > >>> cc: error: no such file or directory: > >>> '/usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/openmp/runtime/src/thirdparty/ittnotif= y/ittnotify_static.c' > >>> cc: error: no input files > >>> *** [ittnotify_static.pico] Error code 1 > >>> Anyone else seeing this? Any suggestions for a fix? > >>> Thanks, > >>> Bob > >> I've been getting the same thing since yesterday. I think the file is = actually > >> ittnotify_static.cpp > >=20 > >=20 > > This is supposed to handle the rename, for some reason it's not happeni= ng on my machine. > >=20 > > Makefile.inc1 > >=20 > > # 20200310 r358851 rename of openmp's ittnotify_static.c to .cpp > > .for f in ittnotify_static > > @if [ -e "${OBJTOP}/lib/libomp/.depend.${f}.pico" ] && \ > > egrep -qw '${f}\.c' ${OBJTOP}/lib/libomp/.depend.${f}.pico; = then \ > > echo "Removing stale dependencies for ${f}"; \ > > rm -f ${OBJTOP}/lib/libomp/.depend.${f}.* \ > > ${OBJTOP}/obj-lib32/lib/libomp/.depend.${f}.* \ > > ${LIBCOMPAT:D${LIBCOMPAT_OBJTOP}/lib/libomp/.depend.$= {f}.*}; \ > > fi > > .endfor >=20 > Hm, so during your buildworld, does it show "Removing stale dependencies > for ittnotify_static" or not? And is the .depend file there? Can you > check /usr/obj for the file .depend.ittnotify_static.pico, and list its > permissions? >=20 > -Dimitry >=20 I have the same issue updating one of my poudriere jails. I don't see "Removing stale dependencies ..." messages. I see a couple of ittnotify_static related messages: make[5]: /usr/obj/workspace/poudriere/jails/current/usr/src/amd64.amd64/obj= -lib32/lib/libomp/.depend.ittnotify_static.pico, 43: ignoring stale .depend= for /workspace/poudriere/jails/current/usr/src/contrib/openmp/runtime/src/= thirdparty/ittnotify/ittnotify_static.c =2E.. make[5]: /usr/obj/workspace/poudriere/jails/current/usr/src/amd64.amd64/obj= -lib32/lib/libomp/.depend.ittnotify_static.pico, 43: ignoring stale .depend= for /workspace/poudriere/jails/current/usr/src/contrib/openmp/runtime/src/= thirdparty/ittnotify/ittnotify_static.h $ ls -al /usr/obj/workspace/poudriere/jails/current/usr/src/amd64.amd64/lib= /libomp/.depend.ittnotify_static.pico -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 6565 Mar 14 19:30 /usr/obj/workspace/poudriere/j= ails/current/usr/src/amd64.amd64/lib/libomp/.depend.ittnotify_static.pico $ Roman Bogorodskiy --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCAAdFiEEi6TfKtFPmbY34ABwyW1f/gjCImoFAl5tBTkACgkQyW1f/gjC ImqyDgf/QTRKvxPcebKRxEJ4blAXEmXkmrb5uR/vDJusAT1W9wJ0eMBM1A7OLhR4 BvwKVXBXNRX1atWmQWDhLo6524SWtAy24hg0WjQzaLVpFVkPRn2FG99vUHEt648q 5N990Wdx500YHHeAwK21kXdQJzRR15Ip6c/FLbYfVhXHYFyQ7Q3GIiSoZCYKN5kE cf1Knl6eT3Tw0AMk4Bi27/nP59dcp80JL9fOvNwdTMd/bmGd0VKrG938/7fvZqxV doC0AeyTruhTMXnCm8qrrNitgZURhCiaedJt1LYWlyMwd0kLW5up5kuMaRKAJQ/a 6+sPW/pxmMwxBbETxZZuAL0aK5WeDA== =bqtx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf-- From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sat Mar 14 17:14:19 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 037F525F389 for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 17:14:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48fq164y95z4fNc; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 17:14:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from tensor.andric.com (tensor.andric.com [87.251.56.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "tensor.andric.com", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: dim) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6CF4D1F672; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 17:14:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:7a58::8491:7c47:a5ce:39ed] (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:7a58:0:8491:7c47:a5ce:39ed]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2812E2D4EA; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 18:14:17 +0100 (CET) From: Dimitry Andric Message-Id: Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_CC300B32-F14F-44F1-88FB-C65412C7024E"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Subject: Re: Build failed compiling ittnotify_static.pico Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 18:14:08 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20200314162429.GA47907@kloomba> Cc: waitman@waitman.net, FreeBSD Current To: Roman Bogorodskiy References: <20200313205706.GD1053@rancor.immure.com> <8740b5f9fef5ce417ea8968543de2992@waitman.net> <14a5e39b65511d7ab4ffe370717d57e5@waitman.net> <20200314162429.GA47907@kloomba> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 17:14:19 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_CC300B32-F14F-44F1-88FB-C65412C7024E Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On 14 Mar 2020, at 17:24, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote: >=20 > Dimitry Andric wrote: >> On 13 Mar 2020, at 23:58, Waitman Gobble wrote: >>>=20 >>> On 2020-03-13 17:49, Waitman Gobble wrote: >>>> On 2020-03-13 16:57, Bob Willcox wrote: >> ... >>>>> cc: error: no such file or directory: >>>>> = '/usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/openmp/runtime/src/thirdparty/ittnotify/itt= notify_static.c' >>>>> cc: error: no input files >>>>> *** [ittnotify_static.pico] Error code 1 >>>>> Anyone else seeing this? Any suggestions for a fix? >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Bob >>>> I've been getting the same thing since yesterday. I think the file = is actually >>>> ittnotify_static.cpp >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> This is supposed to handle the rename, for some reason it's not = happening on my machine. >>>=20 >>> Makefile.inc1 >>>=20 >>> # 20200310 r358851 rename of openmp's ittnotify_static.c to .cpp >>> .for f in ittnotify_static >>> @if [ -e "${OBJTOP}/lib/libomp/.depend.${f}.pico" ] && \ >>> egrep -qw '${f}\.c' = ${OBJTOP}/lib/libomp/.depend.${f}.pico; then \ >>> echo "Removing stale dependencies for ${f}"; \ >>> rm -f ${OBJTOP}/lib/libomp/.depend.${f}.* \ >>> ${OBJTOP}/obj-lib32/lib/libomp/.depend.${f}.* \ >>> = ${LIBCOMPAT:D${LIBCOMPAT_OBJTOP}/lib/libomp/.depend.${f}.*}; \ >>> fi >>> .endfor >>=20 >> Hm, so during your buildworld, does it show "Removing stale = dependencies >> for ittnotify_static" or not? And is the .depend file there? Can = you >> check /usr/obj for the file .depend.ittnotify_static.pico, and list = its >> permissions? >>=20 >> -Dimitry >>=20 >=20 > I have the same issue updating one of my poudriere jails. > I don't see "Removing stale dependencies ..." messages. >=20 > I see a couple of ittnotify_static related messages: >=20 > make[5]: = /usr/obj/workspace/poudriere/jails/current/usr/src/amd64.amd64/obj-lib32/l= ib/libomp/.depend.ittnotify_static.pico, 43: ignoring stale .depend for = /workspace/poudriere/jails/current/usr/src/contrib/openmp/runtime/src/thir= dparty/ittnotify/ittnotify_static.c > ... > make[5]: = /usr/obj/workspace/poudriere/jails/current/usr/src/amd64.amd64/obj-lib32/l= ib/libomp/.depend.ittnotify_static.pico, 43: ignoring stale .depend for = /workspace/poudriere/jails/current/usr/src/contrib/openmp/runtime/src/thir= dparty/ittnotify/ittnotify_static.h These are for the 32-bit stage. The initial fix I committed in r358907 worked for the main buildword stage, but apparently not for the 32-bit stage, which stores its object files in a slightly different directory (e.g. the obj-lib32 subpath). Ed Maste tried to fix that up in r358909, but maybe it does not work in all situations, for example with custom MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX settings? > $ ls -al = /usr/obj/workspace/poudriere/jails/current/usr/src/amd64.amd64/lib/libomp/= .depend.ittnotify_static.pico > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 6565 Mar 14 19:30 = /usr/obj/workspace/poudriere/jails/current/usr/src/amd64.amd64/lib/libomp/= .depend.ittnotify_static.pico What is in the first two lines of that file? -Dimitry --Apple-Mail=_CC300B32-F14F-44F1-88FB-C65412C7024E Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.2 iF0EARECAB0WIQR6tGLSzjX8bUI5T82wXqMKLiCWowUCXm0Q4AAKCRCwXqMKLiCW o8W6AKCWCH2f6qOjD7hS9JpVxHECOcftEACgh+f3fzX9kuxTx0J14Di6trsPbjE= =T5gb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_CC300B32-F14F-44F1-88FB-C65412C7024E-- From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sat Mar 14 21:27:03 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9933264C55 for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 21:27:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: from mail-il1-f180.google.com (mail-il1-f180.google.com [209.85.166.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48fwcl3nnCz47Jc; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 21:27:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: by mail-il1-f180.google.com with SMTP id p1so12557139ils.12; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 14:27:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=r8/8G/rXlofLVMBLZC5AsNZMkRlGi0LyX8ole4dzEsU=; b=JcwOP+HSVTAFqSRhlWtrXk2Wv7nVmxHmtpy9b9tvM7Jpgba8G+9hTwBF7j90wOnsuH h4hGMbRccwqdT20v+H5xEyzt4aqsppHDsTCIW1pDpqnUW26CSVMYT7QC61SWyeEEPVNS nx7GFIAmMNskHbti/nctiLcrNZ9PYZYVirhwz87YC50jyIMJmmgcmKH8Ksakts9Jz1ja 04Y0bnrGWqvSsjss8rTffOz1n7qbF2wImIHcPOGNvB9lAE5nSiRiA8Rpzex/6/NL7RvQ Rn+9BNVVYXgsO8W8iq6DDstHzS28Ej0+04QE8t5yIb8hz1AkqY5wuQpqBs6XYbuPsEe9 uusQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0Kopn/SH0L9MRzNZRVGhCzPu6/H+Bi5SJxWKSIhWeMEf+zMQrb QCzKJgW51xQotEmraGGuYr2Qjjw2x/cBY1r+kad3j8YP X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvgQ9YK9WKX+A9tEL9PCiRvNKM9mKFJ+y+bdkGJ4f0KN5WJX5ADGusFZMcTMl8ft2bppOVbWIIsTS+cZ5OQzrE= X-Received: by 2002:a92:c110:: with SMTP id p16mr20805322ile.100.1584221221485; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 14:27:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200313205706.GD1053@rancor.immure.com> <8740b5f9fef5ce417ea8968543de2992@waitman.net> <14a5e39b65511d7ab4ffe370717d57e5@waitman.net> <20200314162429.GA47907@kloomba> In-Reply-To: From: Ed Maste Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 17:26:38 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Build failed compiling ittnotify_static.pico To: Dimitry Andric Cc: Roman Bogorodskiy , waitman@waitman.net, FreeBSD Current Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48fwcl3nnCz47Jc X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.00 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 21:27:03 -0000 On Sat, 14 Mar 2020 at 13:14, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > These are for the 32-bit stage. The initial fix I committed in r358907 > worked for the main buildword stage, but apparently not for the 32-bit > stage, which stores its object files in a slightly different directory > (e.g. the obj-lib32 subpath). > > Ed Maste tried to fix that up in r358909, but maybe it does not work in > all situations, for example with custom MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX settings? My change in r358909 will definitely not be effective if you already had a failed build between r358907 and r358909.