From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Sat Aug 15 09:34:11 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 943CA3B3F5B for ; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 09:34:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net) Received: from puchar.net (puchar.net [194.1.144.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BTFW63XRqz3Zcn for ; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 09:34:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net) Received: Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by puchar.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 07F9Y737024964 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 11:34:07 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from puchar-wojtek@puchar.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=puchar.net; s=default; t=1597484047; bh=1MjaM0yN17wGsavgJyqd1BpY+EmHZJk308BYlj+h8t4=; h=Date:From:To:Subject; b=mmnyfNuCBuTZ7JG76tF+CDZX/kIwdxvwRP/ycg0jk179KeSytY5T3dMnNnvIMN6KH MMCY0jaSRX2XGOHOR0JN78XbadL56Mg0D/6s6dsEOv36sTm1TVIrof+OpPCMxMWM3H ZkUUFjiJzBTZxjgJXjQBRi2ohBKCuMJXV1JCkyz4= Received: from localhost (puchar-wojtek@localhost) by puchar.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id 07F9Y7Be024961 for ; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 11:34:07 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from puchar-wojtek@puchar.net) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2020 11:34:07 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: gmirror balance model "prefer" doesnt work properly Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BTFW63XRqz3Zcn X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=puchar.net header.s=default header.b=mmnyfNuC; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of wojtek@puchar.net designates 194.1.144.90 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=wojtek@puchar.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.34 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.92)[-0.916]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.89)[-0.887]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[puchar.net]; R_DKIM_REJECT(1.00)[puchar.net:s=default]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[puchar.net:-]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.23)[-0.233]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[194.1.144.90:from]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:43476, ipnet:194.1.144.0/24, country:PL]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2020 09:34:11 -0000 ada0p3 is partition on SSD, ada3p3 is partition on magnetic disk. Geom name: root State: COMPLETE Components: 2 Balance: prefer Slice: 2097152 Flags: NONE GenID: 0 SyncID: 1 ID: 3736675121 Type: AUTOMATIC Providers: 1. Name: mirror/root Mediasize: 107374181888 (100G) Sectorsize: 512 Stripesize: 4096 Stripeoffset: 0 Mode: r1w1e1 Consumers: 1. Name: ada0p3 Mediasize: 107374182400 (100G) Sectorsize: 512 Stripesize: 0 Stripeoffset: 525139968 Mode: r1w1e1 State: ACTIVE Priority: 1 Flags: (null) GenID: 0 SyncID: 1 ID: 3655477467 2. Name: ada3p3 Mediasize: 107374182400 (100G) Sectorsize: 512 Stripesize: 4096 Stripeoffset: 0 Mode: r1w1e1 State: ACTIVE Priority: 0 Flags: NONE GenID: 0 SyncID: 1 ID: 3836554217 according to manual reads should be preferred from device of higher priority. i've set priority 1 for ssd, 0 for hdd. but reads are from hdd only. tried reverse - 0 for ssd, 1 for hdd - too reads are from hdd. looking in code seems like it is not implemented at all LIST_FOREACH(disk, &sc->sc_disks, d_next) { if (disk->d_state == G_MIRROR_DISK_STATE_ACTIVE) break; } just take first active disk. why? From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Sat Aug 15 16:54:51 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D95453BF3EC for ; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 16:54:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markjdb@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qt1-x833.google.com (mail-qt1-x833.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::833]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BTRHZ5q9lz4Pg3 for ; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 16:54:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markjdb@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qt1-x833.google.com with SMTP id s16so9311153qtn.7 for ; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 09:54:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=B23NEXk7+JGmwmzuYcHtL6zm97/MsVMVfIlt4yuwGHg=; b=MG1bNZ6TSfikvQ587Rps7h51RcBOGgblNh9DdnkF19tfCGqhA+U1mtEDCtsXg7HM57 zWJrjCJdiUAGCwqCcpZbR4sEXv0GTNmdyNGin3hQnCUqY+bpTg/sXDvy7meosaUF1z3h UdDFpNr3loviBb9cR/S4S4yjeuttp/z3FAsdfcxmTCS1knldaevnlwQoHmF/ZBH1gNIP cKdjxR7RzcZ8OBxqlUJQ5Q25zkNrj7qSOwMJkGjy4mx0XGVwKnKXRoM3rj+uX4PgnDd7 cmA0RDeqQp0+o6NHLqTKyClQUY8NjpPBIwuyd8eNfoWm91ZR9FT9vg3nBmVuTVCz8qLt fxqA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=B23NEXk7+JGmwmzuYcHtL6zm97/MsVMVfIlt4yuwGHg=; b=F4KDYSayDG2L+atfA3k+0AaXUr+EqOE4SRInaEcqhZyMv7Orx5ubJRCVu+Xt5rICbO dLlh4dquHJWETviJK7UXCcyVHru6F45f8ZGQ/pSkKS5Sw70Kb6fXnqaiwxj7uWf8Qc3r 7F7Zj0VkZXRAgdj/hP4GzMZs2ekYki65OASVyBL22E2f5xUBGocKhB3gbwUv0db71yj8 S48PjwAXfM+U82QMk9CHY9rB1Mzd2Msf56XVUVFtZMT1Jl/Ufu/Vi7u3DoT9YNktW4ny eOfIv4dlSwyo9ORpvJkfk7rGLdd+d99+TXidc9wqFNwx7OfnCzp3FbO0J1Bi/yFK0Ctw uU9Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533YdNmXNZNM2pOTmbl7DhrffkJHrteB5qRcHgGN3+kR5zcOs3tU uOq0qmzDu2QMeyCQALf2BgLqGOGJTTM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyqojY0Ek8nZY1VqHiunBksXCNgbZrcFqvqGMC04AGGmDxggy1jPLBXe6YaiYnScesC891BHw== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:6c49:: with SMTP id z9mr7150591qtu.110.1597510489562; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 09:54:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from raichu (toroon0560w-lp130-08-67-71-176-35.dsl.bell.ca. [67.71.176.35]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b131sm11836094qkc.121.2020.08.15.09.54.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 15 Aug 2020 09:54:48 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Mark Johnston Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2020 12:54:38 -0400 From: Mark Johnston To: Wojciech Puchar Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gmirror balance model "prefer" doesnt work properly Message-ID: <20200815165438.GA41502@raichu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1597510491; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:dkim-signature; bh=B23NEXk7+JGmwmzuYcHtL6zm97/MsVMVfIlt4yuwGHg=; b=FSylBBe5iUBuJeEm2hV2KI7T4AwT0u1E+QgjUkeT+YcZH1q86eatTUNB4r/oClkfPibWGv uk9BT0/kfOyG2PKwciPeWs0glWOHjG6zLfw6Vpqb1e57VDYmA/SrwooXrsSU5cy+0SigZi StUspvRpj3ZG8+jpmZw2NP5GMPuAxZbcjBGPJeg8Ji32lGAM3lNrWDKgbiZms49jhGJb0p N/5njWyMoVGnaRwV4m5W70eCpwgzgCVMb5Pm6p6VZ60fJhtzDnM+ZvlOJgXF5oHmZwom70 Nxs5sOzq/uHBGDFDVY6hpAqYRFhu6Elq8TbKzLFdW2xiABC+KTyMqVkiySb46Q== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1597510491; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=j0BcjaIKtofwN54WdpFCKofKWU7NOjt3T27ePTfy9smMg1LK1rH7+zwy5P1rpw3WHGHrJe /Xwwhul2Z/cBFgQefArzqtI5Ue3bR5GdgT68OmmCwydV03Nik+NFMy3yl++kFSUz0PCOtE raHMPWa9UHKg1kI7A4r1qdQ+bT6sEjYD3J4ySO0wErSwSUUg/JPPZru6LVR/XlqwI9yiy+ V1IOu5j5He5kMmT9KR3DjTtMuQLEw9MR8qrIQEwpClhZT0tFXaOQ0Wkud+DLffz6F2kkYT eCL8DAWg1LZuBTV0QWaSu++aQ3CrpLku+1yIqc0v5oTDQ1pKI4mCiL1H13p4AQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=MG1bNZ6T; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of markjdb@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::833 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=markjdb@gmail.com X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BTRHZ5q9lz4Pg3 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=MG1bNZ6T; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of markjdb@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::833 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=markjdb@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.36 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.004]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.984]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org]; ARC_SIGNED(0.00)[i=1]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::833:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.67)[-0.673]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[markj@freebsd.org,markjdb@gmail.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[markj@freebsd.org,markjdb@gmail.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2020 16:54:51 -0000 On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 11:34:07AM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > ada0p3 is partition on SSD, ada3p3 is partition on magnetic disk. > > > > Geom name: root > State: COMPLETE > Components: 2 > Balance: prefer > Slice: 2097152 > Flags: NONE > GenID: 0 > SyncID: 1 > ID: 3736675121 > Type: AUTOMATIC > Providers: > 1. Name: mirror/root > Mediasize: 107374181888 (100G) > Sectorsize: 512 > Stripesize: 4096 > Stripeoffset: 0 > Mode: r1w1e1 > Consumers: > 1. Name: ada0p3 > Mediasize: 107374182400 (100G) > Sectorsize: 512 > Stripesize: 0 > Stripeoffset: 525139968 > Mode: r1w1e1 > State: ACTIVE > Priority: 1 > Flags: (null) > GenID: 0 > SyncID: 1 > ID: 3655477467 > 2. Name: ada3p3 > Mediasize: 107374182400 (100G) > Sectorsize: 512 > Stripesize: 4096 > Stripeoffset: 0 > Mode: r1w1e1 > State: ACTIVE > Priority: 0 > Flags: NONE > GenID: 0 > SyncID: 1 > ID: 3836554217 > > > according to manual reads should be preferred from device of higher > priority. i've set priority 1 for ssd, 0 for hdd. but reads are from hdd > only. > > tried reverse - 0 for ssd, 1 for hdd - too reads are from hdd. > > looking in code seems like it is not implemented at all > > LIST_FOREACH(disk, &sc->sc_disks, d_next) { > if (disk->d_state == G_MIRROR_DISK_STATE_ACTIVE) > break; > } > > > just take first active disk. > > why? The highest priority disk is supposed to be first in the list. However, the list is only sorted once the mirror is started, which is arguably the bug. If you restart the mirror after adjusting the disk priorities, I'd expect the "prefer" algorithm to work properly. From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Sat Aug 15 19:30:23 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55B9B37C04B; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 19:30:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mmacy@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BTVl31fmWz4dCX; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 19:30:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mmacy@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-lf1-f51.google.com (mail-lf1-f51.google.com [209.85.167.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: mmacy) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 16CCF2CAB6; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 19:30:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mmacy@freebsd.org) Received: by mail-lf1-f51.google.com with SMTP id b30so6427224lfj.12; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 12:30:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533EWLk8oqkQAASaWwoWIZf+o/SsQSbD5HDdUf11LHYtlIugpAtM PE7mNyDUzVeabwLSASWPun1bneWs95yhUhoeKDY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxOrSmfJbJf/TGBvMgiRyCIsYfty5VK5vXpvADcYLaXpZB+m5OhuURb9jEhJzPb4xWkX0cnYxaOab96l925QUY= X-Received: by 2002:a19:189:: with SMTP id 131mr4003208lfb.128.1597519821598; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 12:30:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Matthew Macy Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2020 12:30:09 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: CFT for vendor openzfs - week 5 reminder + memdisk images To: Daniel Nebdal Cc: freebsd-current , freebsd-fs , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2020 19:30:23 -0000 > > Hi. I have some problems downloading the amd64 image: > > baymax /home/djn > fetch -a > https://people.freebsd.org/~freqlabs/freebsd-openzfs/latest/freebsd-openzfs-amd64-2020081100-memstick.img.xz > freebsd-openzfs-amd64-2020081100-memstick.img. 19% of 655 MB 2179 kBps 04m07s > fetch: freebsd-openzfs-amd64-2020081100-memstick.img.xz appears to be > truncated: 134152192/687158140 bytes > baymax /home/djn > fetch -ar > https://people.freebsd.org/~freqlabs/freebsd-openzfs/latest/freebsd-openzfs-amd64-2020081100-memstick.img.xz > freebsd-openzfs-amd64-2020081100-memstick.img. 20% of 655 MB 882 kBps 09m10s > fetch: freebsd-openzfs-amd64-2020081100-memstick.img.xz appears to be > truncated: 139132928/687158140 bytes > baymax /home/djn > fetch -ar > https://people.freebsd.org/~freqlabs/freebsd-openzfs/latest/freebsd-openzfs-amd64-2020081100-memstick.img.xz > freebsd-openzfs-amd64-2020081100-memstick.img. 20% of 655 MB 647 kBps 12m23s > fetch: freebsd-openzfs-amd64-2020081100-memstick.img.xz appears to be > truncated: 142065664/687158140 bytes > baymax /home/djn > > > It also fails using Firefox on windows on a different machine. (It's > also much slower from that machine, about 200 kB/sec. I have no idea > if that's relevant.) Yes, this appears to have been going on for at least the last week. The FreeBSD infrastructure directly available to developers appears to be unreliable for serving large files. Individuals with accounts on freefall have been able to scp the files. It's possible that we may just end up sharing images more widely by way of releng generated images after commit. I'll see if there's an alternative for the last week of the CFT. Cheers. -M > > -- > Daniel Nebdal From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Sat Aug 15 20:05:04 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABF4937D2A7 for ; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 20:05:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net) Received: from puchar.net (puchar.net [194.1.144.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BTWW41YLCz4gfC; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 20:05:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net) Received: Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by puchar.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 07FK4wFM082082 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 15 Aug 2020 22:04:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from puchar-wojtek@puchar.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=puchar.net; s=default; t=1597521899; bh=fEJpA9HNWbetj+MnLk9SurI2QCzG7YQ3J8MORY4VPwU=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=lnaYMQuqWTBPDE0kjC9Zzkg54ztq+/5hxY0xyR02hHScZOIMhEZJGxteHJkX3KSAb 1JAaFezdiVibwL7/DDIinZaw3TQDA4qGKKEyM1VoizHhRz7JBh8fHefXKGIWC4S0o5 dek8zeaBsxQ4ddKhWNZkjsd9iUJNDIO9rIiyT3Ho= Received: from localhost (puchar-wojtek@localhost) by puchar.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id 07FK4wU2082078; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 22:04:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from puchar-wojtek@puchar.net) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2020 22:04:58 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Mark Johnston cc: Wojciech Puchar , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gmirror balance model "prefer" doesnt work properly In-Reply-To: <20200815165438.GA41502@raichu> Message-ID: References: <20200815165438.GA41502@raichu> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BTWW41YLCz4gfC X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:43476, ipnet:194.1.144.0/24, country:PL] X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2020 20:05:04 -0000 >> LIST_FOREACH(disk, &sc->sc_disks, d_next) { >> if (disk->d_state == G_MIRROR_DISK_STATE_ACTIVE) >> break; >> } >> >> >> just take first active disk. >> >> why? > > The highest priority disk is supposed to be first in the list. However, > the list is only sorted once the mirror is started, which is arguably But is "higher priority" higher or lower number? > the bug. If you restart the mirror after adjusting the disk priorities, > I'd expect the "prefer" algorithm to work properly. > > From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Sat Aug 15 20:12:38 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1B0937D4F3 for ; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 20:12:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net) Received: from puchar.net (puchar.net [194.1.144.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BTWgn4XZMz4h3Y for ; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 20:12:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net) Received: Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by puchar.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 07FKCZOE083720 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 22:12:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from puchar-wojtek@puchar.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=puchar.net; s=default; t=1597522355; bh=banH+ecP5F7kl4dwPuE24JHX1/Fxoes2VQ+2XCKhig4=; h=Date:From:To:Subject; b=aoqGPQyDWX2WyZckAR03yRu20D92yLKJIdanPirWNYFI1qDnFAevCgOsv9U9Qd7OJ oE2QW/s5wzLuYP0miFmCdxR3KgFksRqWXAgE2u2S9YLzb9uVGc6dB6n1m4SiCaaXPR Z/WYrtq2qTE7XqiwwlgEthqs74qO8ecvUQDvgIb4= Received: from localhost (puchar-wojtek@localhost) by puchar.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id 07FKCZhO083717 for ; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 22:12:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from puchar-wojtek@puchar.net) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2020 22:12:35 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: mount_smbfs no longer works Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1597522358; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: dkim-signature; bh=banH+ecP5F7kl4dwPuE24JHX1/Fxoes2VQ+2XCKhig4=; b=WsbCPYdd4n6/xPutcy7nHrWP5n8PyNAswUV+swiMDNrU0S+c75u/HH42FUuozDbwXvyTiQ NCNpBp5RtwFm5G2ZnF1tSMagwuJienKvd+hUsUA6j9pRmiHJGz0FV0BPT2XkdIJ9vWUh+B lDyMhYYk1JQgJTZRUCWyXANDf9Z8VRhxo5DSwsjyS/j/hIn2ZptG++YWsR+oJTqsyYmTaB CaY4uhSSovEAP2gsBnbPtwJC+fJrLDE8E6uu3IxXTUmMQxbK4SBgOI5HGaCiSo/yEGK1c8 EddSKPKDt3Bg8k/I+zPie1Yf+sJpCw06tfCGtPkk3jE1KaVSXEwD4mx9TJi4pw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1597522358; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=C1/a2ZAeiBPxDV0ANwR/WIOkkIyaH6scsuMmxeo3Ts31TlfSlGRF32CU8IDM1ebg1ZtuVW 43J9oF8UK6jMLdVw/+EsawBZRWxqlFO2fxT4Bgx+gpwrnVZs/1I5WavZhwY3Lo7L6Mwb8l st2P5xAyncu+DctK2wOdb1UdeerR6EWeh40KKFdWu4lHeU1/y41L/5kf57nJTHvgoeTn0b q3t6dQYczM4//ORyubq62svtbrFnnJbZ0E26oiTcgmEHNoQ1vWCo+AcWhPwMCI2138ualU 1mtJ1hWizpmBrQ3hfcoudSKhEfgb6PYeq2Psd8I07ZyhDRTe9BMFJD+ZXYzw/A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=puchar.net header.s=default header.b=aoqGPQyD; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of wojtek@puchar.net designates 194.1.144.90 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=wojtek@puchar.net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BTWgn4XZMz4h3Y X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=puchar.net header.s=default header.b=aoqGPQyD; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of wojtek@puchar.net designates 194.1.144.90 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=wojtek@puchar.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.55 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.91)[-0.909]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.91)[-0.915]; ARC_SIGNED(0.00)[i=1]; R_DKIM_REJECT(1.00)[puchar.net:s=default]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[puchar.net:-]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.43)[-0.426]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[194.1.144.90:from]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[puchar.net]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:43476, ipnet:194.1.144.0/24, country:PL]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2020 20:12:38 -0000 i upgraded samba to version 4.10 on server side. Windows see it well. all works both shares, domain server, roaming profiles. Mac OS mounts it FreeBSD doesn't. passwords are fine in .nsmbrc i have //wojtek@SERWER/wojtek /dgs-wojtek smbfs rw,noauto,-u=1003,-g=1003,-N,-I192.168.0.241,-T60,-WDGS,-Eutf8:utf8 0 0 in /etc/fstab and [192.168.0.241:WOJTEK] password=xxxxx worked before change. now i'm getting mount_smbfs: unable to open connection: syserr = Authentication error is something special needed to make it work? From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Sat Aug 15 21:07:57 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A284837EB48 for ; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 21:07:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c2c:26d8::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BTXvb6n9Rz4kbV for ; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 21:07:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eg.sd.rdtc.ru [IPv6:2a03:3100:c:13:0:0:0:5]) by hz.grosbein.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 07FL7Xb0090903 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 15 Aug 2020 21:07:34 GMT (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: wojtek@puchar.net Received: from [10.58.0.10] (dadvw [10.58.0.10]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 07FL7dYn033437 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Sun, 16 Aug 2020 04:07:39 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: mount_smbfs no longer works To: Wojciech Puchar , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: <4c2b797e-c430-cd68-0f79-7904ced02841@grosbein.net> Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2020 04:07:33 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOCAL_FROM, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record * 2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains * -0.0 NICE_REPLY_A Looks like a legit reply (A) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on hz.grosbein.net ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1597525676; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=cuv4kGo1SYPxymEWYDu+eC6ZdUFiqZ8qNZ37JC8Pz5o=; b=r6k/0nI5nNWpZhrcVPbcisBezFwAF1vOXU3NibCBtw8SLTFrpslJLSgIkm1dodUk9VX236 XVhNvN8HvNAP9hEQaV6vPBis602fOSoM1ok2bujl16lCvs/S+kG0JQJs/05nS0dl2pj0a5 /oXMJAC1ho/clIgluLsNDCfoqUaNNpx34r0Ou2BFRjCFs9YvqLaDNUupDCI4TTWkIPqyt6 nzfm14OXHQiU189AcdgS0ooU9Ah6tuuAIxKLMtJcHLBjY/yAM/yI527vmXhcCnmOAdk9IH fEQspzk9yLI04UKOoox7WWXgMVE73oMoZ6F85WrXVKQoCuZJYvsn0dRC7NwiMA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1597525676; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Wewzy0sC1DUisEbjeMydJ9YWXdyOzdX8iq4eNj1MVXn7E5aQYqVVQs/gBNIG3ttCq0gDwx o+3BKr5ZQZe6fBWky6pYIdjMeDrErHv/mR2CyFwXjpTbRvKsbgzvT0jZShEAx2SpfPLKdg m3PE/Ar9vamTRansXc6JSPkgZLKPn87Wh/KPyeyVrdTklNEBT+r1kE3UCQHTxXsi7SCb8R sepE0i8SahU80pH3B6ADXZo6js35I8u8ORTgNQCH1YD0JlBqVskh0L/7i4QuTeFlppCrTV FzQVtkOJoI9KJMLZfyH4RVh9T/l/N+XNRE4TfDCaMDtrbjUcpgFULoh6TpWO6w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; spf=permerror (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of eugen@grosbein.net uses mechanism not recognized by this client) smtp.mailfrom=eugen@grosbein.net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BTXvb6n9Rz4kbV X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=permerror (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of eugen@grosbein.net uses mechanism not recognized by this client) smtp.mailfrom=eugen@grosbein.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.41 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.26)[-0.263]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.90)[-0.897]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; ARC_SIGNED(0.00)[i=1]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grosbein.net]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_PERMFAIL(0.00)[empty SPF record]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.15)[-0.151]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:2a01:4f8::/29, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2020 21:07:57 -0000 16.08.2020 3:12, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > i upgraded samba to version 4.10 on server side. mount_smbfs only supports SMBv1 presently. Make sure your server still enables SMBv1 support. From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Sat Aug 15 21:11:34 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 832E137ECD7 for ; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 21:11:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c2c:26d8::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BTXzn2sjyz4kXV; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 21:11:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eg.sd.rdtc.ru [IPv6:2a03:3100:c:13:0:0:0:5]) by hz.grosbein.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 07FLBKVk090978 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 15 Aug 2020 21:11:21 GMT (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: wojtek@puchar.net Received: from [10.58.0.10] (dadvw [10.58.0.10]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 07FLBR0C033462 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Sun, 16 Aug 2020 04:11:27 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: gmirror balance model "prefer" doesnt work properly To: Wojciech Puchar , Mark Johnston References: <20200815165438.GA41502@raichu> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: <6db8e18e-875e-2cfa-3820-8b89e9c9b7dc@grosbein.net> Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2020 04:11:21 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOCAL_FROM, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record * 2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains * -0.0 NICE_REPLY_A Looks like a legit reply (A) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on hz.grosbein.net ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1597525893; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=O+oTn65Lg+Rc4J5CBZjTYPYp2rqUVuFJ+d3Ffc7Inos=; b=RDpqu1Ma90GP0AwdrT/O//SOW23LxLFI1IuQvQZJYNi91kW80HIO6qFwUhczCoglHanVhc gTomfEBYwoaZsfmEGRReoFXUjdpMgBb5ZUlPgO1u4wq5wbQyjJ2/9WZ63QmRFPBhmdq4uD YN+grKdm8uKBavCE5gNcHnZpC14UCA5Zny4Lw4CaB+BQ83Eq0cYXvp99VzAr1okMhyJJRk DrX2fB48x82qYiLeWLY+p3p1Va+iQBxgCIQ0bFHFVuyRqfwKI1svmb2wDfT3PKwEGPL9rl TaaUHMnLTV81f3godfyJfB360EN/yNBgplFi6E2ybqxZi5PLjGbjgPwTbBHExA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1597525893; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=XBgIDPjmR1paeoZMD/fwCXaKDiV8IkQ8XBrTfVobSImoVwUeTi9UR+R6AdkOKMjt6tJNMJ UEDJBoIKATe181yFW+cL7ITUSKNHkGM+6D5Sty5AMAusMCSmBl/zjsmvr4yn8MYrviUk6t 4MPcSEJYLykLcsLgMJTAi20H74yJHwaopo5sTrsWg/F2xohlhMLLEUuc+qJPGYfyqlylzH 0O9ej0KAd7xQoR+OmH5Au3iWHsoadmm0zWz+BtDkQUI8C19rD+EMklazkZYHe6a2o1zEBk H1W6QgoZtR4Db2J/iKyxhq8Tu6WwuYBEfWrc04o6/Mk754LypP4rpS8vvvPVnw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=permerror (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of eugen@grosbein.net uses mechanism not recognized by this client) smtp.mailfrom=eugen@grosbein.net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BTXzn2sjyz4kXV X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=permerror (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of eugen@grosbein.net uses mechanism not recognized by this client) smtp.mailfrom=eugen@grosbein.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.14 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.19)[-0.195]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.85)[-0.850]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grosbein.net]; ARC_SIGNED(0.00)[i=1]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.00)[0.000]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_PERMFAIL(0.00)[empty SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:2a01:4f8::/29, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2020 21:11:34 -0000 16.08.2020 3:04, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >>> LIST_FOREACH(disk, &sc->sc_disks, d_next) { >>> if (disk->d_state == G_MIRROR_DISK_STATE_ACTIVE) >>> break; >>> } >>> >>> >>> just take first active disk. >>> >>> why? >> >> The highest priority disk is supposed to be first in the list. However, >> the list is only sorted once the mirror is started, which is arguably > > But is "higher priority" higher or lower number? gmirror(8) manual page specifically says "biggest" is preferred (higher). From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Sat Aug 15 21:51:52 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFCF237F8E3 for ; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 21:51:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net) Received: from puchar.net (puchar.net [194.1.144.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BTYtH5hwhz4mK3 for ; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 21:51:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net) Received: Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by puchar.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 07FLplAg004147 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 15 Aug 2020 23:51:48 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from puchar-wojtek@puchar.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=puchar.net; s=default; t=1597528308; bh=vb76dYYBkYnZQfcec/Y0mnyND7G9A2hedhaNXOuhGdY=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=hYrUdOH02C/VfWwlhXANol/S/GEZW3kNhfEmLj7kAzcZgUamCChyF+aGScEu6Cuvi yZ3alr2D9okeA/Or9ohQ5bif1XmJ1lL9tTHI2C7b2sCXMSI974XiI9g4NHr0zAzylu 3m3YUr/YZDUYUDna3B4WB7AqytFvrKDYWhXTB8nA= Received: from localhost (puchar-wojtek@localhost) by puchar.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id 07FLplFj004144; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 23:51:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from puchar-wojtek@puchar.net) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2020 23:51:47 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Eugene Grosbein cc: Wojciech Puchar , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mount_smbfs no longer works In-Reply-To: <4c2b797e-c430-cd68-0f79-7904ced02841@grosbein.net> Message-ID: References: <4c2b797e-c430-cd68-0f79-7904ced02841@grosbein.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1597528312; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=vb76dYYBkYnZQfcec/Y0mnyND7G9A2hedhaNXOuhGdY=; b=hKdzsUo/Ma3o4Dj7lDQkE25Cos69vBVxobZTasq7hE88WajIdMiXh+sjEfNrKSuVHRu8+5 ReP0p2DqeXpOzkj5b3nZKGT1+3sKK4PdhUKyuvxlrwrhlHyt+dLHOHrwmHozwaL5VGhFAy 6nmOlpNjq1ogy03Czo6u+RsJAomGgOfugg3x8g7akQ9BasXbkpuXhPybk0KQOWltZWgNbJ BCvQazQLmWzzmIuKKkYJHRe2A2iu8yra2LwMgHBDzkOnbxdLWmMNVCkuepicyCiMREOs00 BZqB/eHNWAvmuLqc06oAm6Jnjo2Mpml5M5SLoGQC4baXqLqZZbyCUFoziaDXKA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1597528312; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=lHXK0ytzYrOdjkRCbNYzsX7/gxBk7W6MWDR6sKvKq1cqx/rRrDqxtrt1VFI26oY+A96BSs NNODvxFOKiRdZm/cEHF9prlVejQAIKq2VL2bZJ3pdEzGMFzPAYzEuODOhQzGsgt/O1FUa1 iFqXmIQYO7by+6Dz+G62pOori1AszKmI1R+9LqLPOrxb7V94q10baHeD1T2EGnlUzuvImq /+P9B2k94hTYS1Hl7hj3gIiTFetfKb6orHzUj9M2hTdD1aH2Qi6RzN6HXcMrUgV6CTjOu7 R/6kEVt/kd6UvHukkWrrNjODPdIcsXXLQFz7hwdbGVrBO57KYh63Pf6Bbj0OOw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=puchar.net header.s=default header.b=hYrUdOH0; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of wojtek@puchar.net designates 194.1.144.90 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=wojtek@puchar.net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BTYtH5hwhz4mK3 X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=puchar.net header.s=default header.b=hYrUdOH0; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of wojtek@puchar.net designates 194.1.144.90 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=wojtek@puchar.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.86 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.998]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:c]; R_DKIM_REJECT(1.00)[puchar.net:s=default]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; ARC_SIGNED(0.00)[i=1]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[puchar.net]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.003]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[puchar.net:-]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.56)[-0.564]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[194.1.144.90:from]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:43476, ipnet:194.1.144.0/24, country:PL]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2020 21:51:52 -0000 > >> i upgraded samba to version 4.10 on server side. > > mount_smbfs only supports SMBv1 presently. Make sure your server still enables SMBv1 support. > yes this was the problem