From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Oct 18 09:58:05 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EED0C42CC60 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 09:58:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CDb1966Zpz4JyM for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 09:58:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id CFF4942CC5F; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 09:58:05 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE9C842C854 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 09:58:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CDb194q1Sz4K9b for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 09:58:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8427510C73 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 09:58:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09I9w5Gi033639 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 09:58:05 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09I9w5OZ033638 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 09:58:05 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 250360] [tcp] connections should be closed if a same packet without FIN is received after FIN received Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 09:58:05 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: Unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 09:58:06 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D250360 Michael Tuexen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|net@FreeBSD.org |tuexen@freebsd.org CC| |tuexen@freebsd.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Oct 18 10:01:26 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 569E442CFCA for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:01:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CDb521JKpz4KR6 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:01:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 17BFD42CCFA; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:01:26 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1788F42D07C for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:01:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CDb515LvWz4K2m for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:01:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BA491101B for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:01:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09IA1PFW037949 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:01:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09IA1Pom037948 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:01:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 250363] [tcp] data in syn_ack should be ignored Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:01:25 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: Unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:01:26 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D250363 Michael Tuexen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|net@FreeBSD.org |tuexen@freebsd.org CC| |tuexen@freebsd.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Oct 18 10:02:08 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFBF742D158 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:02:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CDb5r63n4z4KRm for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:02:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D01A442CFEC; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:02:08 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFE2142D270 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:02:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CDb5r5D3hz4Kgf for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:02:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9813E11029 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:02:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09IA28ZG039748 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:02:08 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09IA28bG039747 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:02:08 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 250357] [tcp] RFC 5961 is not implemented completely Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:02:08 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: Unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:02:09 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D250357 Michael Tuexen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|RFC 5961 is not implemented |[tcp] RFC 5961 is not |completely |implemented completely CC| |tuexen@freebsd.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Oct 18 10:02:53 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5E9D42D17C for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:02:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CDb6j4TVZz4Kkc for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:02:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 9988F42D491; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:02:53 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9951E42D31C for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:02:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CDb6j3fCwz4KQb for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:02:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 620A611186 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:02:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09IA2rnE040411 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:02:53 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09IA2r8s040410 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:02:53 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 250357] [tcp] RFC 5961 is not implemented completely Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:02:53 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: Unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:02:53 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D250357 Michael Tuexen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|net@FreeBSD.org |tuexen@freebsd.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Oct 18 10:35:47 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 084AB42DDF5 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:35:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CDbrf6Qkzz4LVK for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:35:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id DA85742DE8A; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:35:46 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D92B842DE89 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:35:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CDbrf54pKz4LVJ for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:35:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CC2D1150A for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:35:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09IAZkob078587 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:35:46 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09IAZkQS078586 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:35:46 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 250363] [tcp] data in syn_ack should be ignored Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:35:46 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: Unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:35:47 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D250363 Michael Tuexen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Oct 18 10:36:35 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 821F042E010 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:36:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CDbsb2tRlz4LSR for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:36:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 62DC442E080; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:36:35 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62A5D42DCF1 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:36:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CDbsb0gjZz4LQ9 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:36:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE9C811376 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:36:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09IAaYfR079402 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:36:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09IAaYlU079401 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:36:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 250357] [tcp] RFC 5961 is not implemented completely Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:36:35 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: Unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:36:35 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D250357 Michael Tuexen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Oct 18 10:36:59 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAD8342DF4C for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:36:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CDbt34WXGz4LW5 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:36:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 9B04742DF4B; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:36:59 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AC5E42E037 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:36:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CDbt33g4Kz4Ll3 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:36:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 623A81149A for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:36:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09IAaxwK079807 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:36:59 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09IAaxZ6079805 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:36:59 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 250360] [tcp] connections should be closed if a same packet without FIN is received after FIN received Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:36:59 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: Unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:36:59 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D250360 Michael Tuexen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Oct 18 15:41:34 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A5A94352C4 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 15:41:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CDkdV39fvz4dJX for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 15:41:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 6CE434354C0; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 15:41:34 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CAD14352C3 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 15:41:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CDkdV2JRDz4dGL for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 15:41:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3346414E1C for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 15:41:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09IFfYoc044135 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 15:41:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09IFfYwD044134 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 15:41:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 250436] Regression in 12.stable em driver Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 15:41:34 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 15:41:34 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D250436 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |IntelNetworking, regression Assignee|bugs@FreeBSD.org |net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Oct 18 15:51:00 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DBD043586C for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 15:51:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CDkrN04Jfz4dhl for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 15:51:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 00A514356D4; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 15:51:00 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 006D44355FC for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 15:51:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CDkrM4s1Pz4dhj for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 15:50:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A4961500D for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 15:50:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09IFoxvp052762 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 15:50:59 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09IFoxge052761 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 15:50:59 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 15:50:57 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: iflib, needs-qa, performance, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 15:51:00 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248652 --- Comment #19 from Vincenzo Maffione --- (In reply to Sylvain Galliano from comment #16) Thanks a lot. In the XL710 case, have you tried with lower values of the timer, such as 5= 0us down to 5 us? Is there any visible change? Also, have you looked at pkt-gen CPU utilization? That's something that tel= ls you if you are CPU limited (unlikely) or rather still limited by the "pseudo-interrupt rate" being too low. For, instance, how does pkt-gen CPU utilization look in the case of XL710 a= nd 1 queue (for simplicity, so that you have just a single thread)? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Oct 18 15:53:19 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6191B435E97 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 15:53:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CDkv31v4wz4fKr for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 15:53:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 3F467435CD1; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 15:53:19 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F0D4435DC9 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 15:53:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CDkv3102Bz4fCg for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 15:53:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0569C14CBC for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 15:53:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09IFrIZo076081 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 15:53:18 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09IFrIQ6076080 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 15:53:18 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 15:53:18 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: iflib, needs-qa, performance, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 15:53:19 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248652 --- Comment #20 from Vincenzo Maffione --- (In reply to vistalba from comment #17) Of course you will need to apply the attached patch before "make kernel", e= .g. $ cd /path/to/freebsd/kernel/sources $ patch -p1 < /path/to/attached/patch.diff --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Oct 18 17:10:37 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F07554372BB for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 17:10:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CDmcF6Ckxz4jPl for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 17:10:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D54E943731B; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 17:10:37 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D516943758B for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 17:10:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CDmcF5LSwz4jRr for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 17:10:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C49215D31 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 17:10:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09IHAbKh071635 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 17:10:37 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09IHAbe6071634 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 17:10:37 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 17:10:35 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: iflib, needs-qa, performance, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: sg@efficientip.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 17:10:38 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248652 --- Comment #21 from Sylvain Galliano --- (In reply to Vincenzo Maffione from comment #19) result using 1 queue: ixl1: PCI Express Bus: Speed 8.0GT/s Width x8 ixl1: netmap queues/slots: TX 1/1024, RX 1/1024 sysctl dev.ixl.0.iflib.nm_tx_tmr_us=3D50 194.333930 main_thread [2638] 11.896 Mpps (11.902 Mpkts 5.710 Gbps in 10004= 97 usec) 341.33 avg_batch 99999 min_space pkt-gen cpu usage: 35% sysctl dev.ixl.0.iflib.nm_tx_tmr_us=3D5 235.070929 main_thread [2638] 14.754 Mpps (15.543 Mpkts 7.082 Gbps in 10535= 21 usec) 390.14 avg_batch 99999 min_space pkt-gen cpu usage: 56% sysctl dev.ixl.0.iflib.nm_tx_tmr_us=3D1 266.392925 main_thread [2638] 14.748 Mpps (14.762 Mpkts 7.079 Gbps in 10009= 98 usec) 407.41 avg_batch 99999 min_space pkt-gen cpu usage: 66% Using 6 queues configured, max pps is 17Mpps, even when using low nm_tx_tmr= _us value (1 us) pkt-gen cpu usage: 82% --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Oct 18 20:36:37 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3705543B28F for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 20:36:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CDs9x0hNNz4vVT for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 20:36:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 17A0B43B28D; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 20:36:37 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1769D43B28B for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 20:36:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CDs9w6wV3z4vdH for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 20:36:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0D401870D for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 20:36:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09IKaagb019285 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 20:36:36 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09IKaaUh019283 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 20:36:36 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 20:36:35 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: iflib, needs-qa, performance, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 20:36:37 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248652 --- Comment #22 from Vincenzo Maffione --- Created attachment 218866 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D218866&action= =3Dedit Netmap tx timer + timely credits update A small extension of the previous patch, which adds up the timely update of= tx credits and timer start. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Oct 18 20:41:16 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC65443B61D for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 20:41:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CDsHJ58LWz3RT4 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 20:41:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B0B8143B052; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 20:41:16 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B081B43B2F7 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 20:41:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CDsHJ4KSpz4vw5 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 20:41:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7937118254 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 20:41:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09IKfG6j024961 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 20:41:16 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09IKfGms024960 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 20:41:16 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 20:41:15 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: iflib, needs-qa, performance, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 20:41:16 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248652 --- Comment #23 from Vincenzo Maffione --- (In reply to Sylvain Galliano from comment #21) Thanks. The CPU utilization at least tells us that we are not CPU bound. Could you please perform some tests with the second patch? It's basically the same as the first one, with a couple of changes that sho= uld ensure a more timely recovery of consumed TX slots (and a more timely timer firing). --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Oct 18 21:00:44 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79A6A43BCC6 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 21:00:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CDsjm2bHTz3Sg2 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 21:00:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 55C9D43BC67; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 21:00:44 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5542543BD48 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 21:00:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CDsjm0lJfz3SsD for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 21:00:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB2CB188B6 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 21:00:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09IL0h2b046602 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 21:00:43 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09IL0hqC046601 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 21:00:43 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202010182100.09IL0hqC046601@kenobi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Problem reports for net@FreeBSD.org that need special attention Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 21:00:43 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 21:00:44 -0000 To view an individual PR, use: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users, which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. Status | Bug Id | Description ------------+-----------+--------------------------------------------------- In Progress | 221146 | [ixgbe] Problem with second laggport In Progress | 235700 | oce(4) driver causes fatal trap 12 on boot with e New | 204438 | setsockopt() handling of kern.ipc.maxsockbuf limi New | 213410 | [carp] service netif restart causes hang only whe Open | 7556 | ppp: sl_compress_init() will fail if called anyth Open | 166724 | if_re(4): watchdog timeout Open | 187835 | ngctl(8) strange behavior when adding more than 5 Open | 193452 | Dell PowerEdge 210 II -- Kernel panic bce (broadc Open | 194453 | dummynet(4): pipe config bw parameter limited to Open | 200319 | Bridge+CARP crashes/freezes Open | 202510 | [CARP] advertisements sourced from CARP IP cause Open | 207261 | netmap: Doesn't do TX sync with kqueue Open | 217978 | dhclient: Support supersede statement for option Open | 220468 | libfetch: Does not handle 407 (proxy auth) when c Open | 222273 | igb(4): Kernel panic (fatal trap 12) due to netwo Open | 225438 | panic in6_unlink_ifa() due to race Open | 227720 | Kernel panic in ppp server Open | 230807 | if_alc(4): Driver not working for Killer Networki Open | 235524 | igb(4): Ethernet interface loses active link stat Open | 236888 | ppp daemon: Allow MTU to be overridden for PPPoE Open | 236983 | bnxt(4) VLAN not operational unless explicit "ifc Open | 237072 | netgraph(4): performance issue [on HardenedBSD]? Open | 237840 | Removed dummynet dependency on ipfw Open | 238324 | Add XG-C100C/AQtion AQC107 10GbE NIC driver Open | 240530 | netgraph/ng_source: Allow ng_source to inject int Open | 240944 | em(4): Crash with Intel 82571EB NIC with AMD Pile Open | 240969 | netinet6: Neighbour reachability detection broken Open | 241106 | tun/ppp: panic: vm_fault: fault on nofault entry Open | 241162 | Panic in closefp() triggered by nginx (uwsgi with Open | 243463 | ix0: Watchdog timeout Open | 244066 | divert: Add sysctls for divert socket send and re Open | 244706 | panic: NULL dereference inside __mtx_lock_sleep() Open | 118111 | rc: network.subr Add MAC address based interface 33 problems total for which you should take action. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Oct 19 04:26:14 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD803443FAD; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 04:26:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sardarsi@cisco.com) Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "iport.cisco.com", Issuer "HydrantID SSL ICA G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CF3bn4lCRz44Ly; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 04:26:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sardarsi@cisco.com) IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3A7j2krRfnuZvx5TnxhWsBm+u+lGMj4e+mNxMJ6p?= =?us-ascii?q?chl7NFe7ii+JKnJkHE+PFxlwaQDdf18f9JodH69af6Vj9I7ZWAtSUEd5pBH1?= =?us-ascii?q?8AhN4NlgMtSMiCFQXgLfHsYiB7eaYKVFJs83yhd0QAHsH4ag78uHC/xwU+XB?= =?us-ascii?q?LlOlk9KuH8AIWHicOx2qi78IHSZAMdgj27bPtyIRy6oB+XuNMRhN5pK706zV?= =?us-ascii?q?3CpX4bdg=3D=3D?= X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DaFQCtFI1f/4UNJK1gHAEBATwBAQQ?= =?us-ascii?q?EAQECAQEHAQGBZAKBIS9RB3BZLywKhDODSQONTZQLhG+BLoElA1ULAQEBDQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BIwoCBAEBhEoCF4F0AiU0CQ4CAwEBCwEBBQEBAQIBBgRthWEMhXIBAQEEEhE?= =?us-ascii?q?dAQE4DwIBCBEDAQIrAgICMB0IAgQBEiKDBAGBfk0DLQEBDqMSAoE5iGh2gTK?= =?us-ascii?q?DBAEBBYEzAYNzGIIQAwaBOAGCcYNuhlYbggCBOByCHy4+hF0NgmozgiyTUoc?= =?us-ascii?q?PnR0KgmqJBJFtAx+DFooJlDGTMYF7iHiVOgIEAgQFAg4BAQWBVDoqgS1wFWU?= =?us-ascii?q?Bgj5QFwINkhCFFIVCdDgCBgoBAQMJfIw7AYEQAQE?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,393,1596499200"; d="scan'208,217";a="586295194" Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 19 Oct 2020 04:26:12 +0000 Received: from XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (xch-aln-001.cisco.com [173.36.7.11]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 09J4QBXI002179 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 19 Oct 2020 04:26:12 GMT Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (173.36.7.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 23:26:11 -0500 Received: from xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 00:26:10 -0400 Received: from NAM04-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 23:26:10 -0500 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=BQeR9BpTzCZsuhIXvZJer47m6vbLulN8oA0t2Il22ms40njdThuUXsaTI8Fojt8lvTWLvghF51KHVo9/1eQSS7yWqp8vJNZFKHex2F4eYYec5BglusQ6g5YxYdyl2Iae1D+Eqz5M7X52+c9P7GoH6PJbD/fThrmoP1uFI09bXs/gWJ8YoPik/Noi4T03dThdTspqA1HLejzutOL2eL3nZIdnXGXduOaZc/RSW0tL+qVHNrO5fZPrvfFxGFGuQekAAZdluXmhLFxBCwIjKf6jE7rimRE83bhzdQUA5Ebofyd4eOs2qPesfPpzYUSg1Q3oUcADjgjbAKG0SyKUAR0ehA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=SD5x8CdKcAqVfz84eykvVmrJ0+utNDLhL2nJPPLUiSI=; b=PSGaHZu+AvHfESCJ9H5xHMXpHNiaPXgKmdKheGZMo+hZ9IzImgk7SW4r9gqZy/TIERd9FVhwQ1MOXXRwfsG0oIMg2BvJurZdGuyOXIrUsl21qGm58bNFURQhLcS4XDpfi3c5g7kyinRPB1ECBxQf0lwwrgacJ5lm+1WlcB1U1GODbcwwP4IiKnANkdS0IlQTl21v3tcnxQdDIh4fSNKRNq6wG63ZX9fCKKhBwnFxsAMA48pyzqQD9a7sK5qKD4SNdfxa3hVidDEwA9ZH/Ur5ltZlDniZLqm0t+FN4yX1DS/leBjtsyAQJOMHtXRU6LsFt31WjlLKYNYbnRocNIwQFw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none Received: from DM6PR11MB2988.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:63::23) by DM6PR11MB4723.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:2a0::16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3477.28; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 04:26:09 +0000 Received: from DM6PR11MB2988.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b5bc:d535:f418:d94c]) by DM6PR11MB2988.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b5bc:d535:f418:d94c%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3477.028; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 04:26:09 +0000 From: "Shamsher Singh (sardarsi)" To: "freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org" , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Query for KNI and user level tcp/ip stack support in FreeBSD ports Thread-Topic: Query for KNI and user level tcp/ip stack support in FreeBSD ports Thread-Index: AQHWosE1m2nrCPYc8UyHXImnLVE+mametp8A Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 04:26:09 +0000 Message-ID: References: <699E0527-C82D-4FDD-A0F0-15220C99D4D3@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <699E0527-C82D-4FDD-A0F0-15220C99D4D3@cisco.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-GB X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.42.20101102 x-originating-ip: [171.76.115.9] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 81c25343-545b-4aba-764e-08d873e71ad6 x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM6PR11MB4723: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508; x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: Mw+sGtqDf9ZIRzqJ9fEhfscsd4XqJUqp6kLLlcCFQFHEDLnSGq1lxpx54dt6L17w1DYOIb4Au+OlSdyrE1qBvvB5ngYcbj2FSFUpY98ZjnFx3F2H9Ffsd/4iY/Ph09iB/TeNtA2F1WO3htC1Bf3pA/Pb6lprqEV/SKjUVDUENjFJHDyqr+1IdT6cSdZdvIQAbopsu/CcWPV4V5F7ojq2ZPcntf8nA42lC0ado06d4xDWVIZ0qKYw/8cS0ubJu+GkWp0cv3kWM2DcPRd6xk4ll1ZhSF1UD7ami2F9FjaaJmkm9pqAlj1U3b6uqHv55v/8wmR6fEdnA6WMWxxR7fiyxP0UHUkUHjucewLom/gS+NqAszGoA1GNzUbHvMCfKt2u8MHn6ksNkU1lWjPcwc9z1Q== x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:DM6PR11MB2988.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(39860400002)(366004)(396003)(346002)(376002)(136003)(36756003)(110136005)(6512007)(86362001)(2616005)(71200400001)(53546011)(6506007)(186003)(316002)(26005)(66556008)(9326002)(478600001)(8936002)(966005)(5660300002)(76116006)(450100002)(4744005)(83380400001)(6486002)(91956017)(33656002)(8676002)(66946007)(2906002)(66476007)(166002)(66446008)(64756008); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: fFx0L/2Fzy+4hW2N9xVNs2pyzJzaalw+aqHNUz3jL+QuP8DXlYaETS7+QFNVDFRxaMM3IEtRJK3Uc2JkdE5uNSqV4N2zyjMS7jxlUA1lXzVw+tms4wlwOXKoWQZGDbpsKiu2hd+T+Sa+oxLuYU9ON4YejVmTw+lGYJphgXsx9USlihTz2DjXSQYORdTehh2vTJQWbQ98zP0AtdFD/8WdknmL2pqhl+Hnuv2piYL96+ACz8Oqm43bqqv1BjnBqtZbgj6CaIrwZbmDQXmVcX2q6uXN96PJFFilCiLc4XvBChL1v7nPHJW+ez0aPvL+xdnHiAncwbvLQfvSLQKvWEfEqAi4LCQivoN4TsKM3Dopzbb0uYD55HcnBtpWCPw0Hf89A0DzUvAlE+EL1lGgwuivLAWMc2nKQSkPSIDoMFDv1nayPRH7Ff4bw6qSWSh5Gd46PyKH55dUGn7f3e4RWBxB9cjN54d7TOh7xax2IAr1LHz49EOloVrcFVeN1CfMC8pHfWsMPeBXgeis80Wd3jYyZflUScmfW1yuaGhHGEO26eO41OTv9xKzCVohSDNDMC5utQQMJQl4xMxYHc6BBoSaOb39YDchJYUkprtHpsdhWQnUaHWco+BDg3HVQ9LyhJHHrBqiOnX39VO9FAn2azGBpA== x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DM6PR11MB2988.namprd11.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 81c25343-545b-4aba-764e-08d873e71ad6 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 19 Oct 2020 04:26:09.6578 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: 39VtIS/ac1Qvd1eNyqwmRreJusIxhB64quJRv9AGzADEKCSChYgA/F9yWtEy6odjxpB+EY7g60iMauGvKPotXA== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM6PR11MB4723 X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.11, xch-aln-001.cisco.com X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-11.cisco.com X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4CF3bn4lCRz44Ly X-Spamd-Bar: ------- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-7.95 / 15.00]; HAS_XOIP(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[173.37.142.89:from]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:173.37.142.64/26]; MIME_BASE64_TEXT_BOGUS(1.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[cisco.com:+,cisco.onmicrosoft.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[cisco.com,quarantine]; MIME_BASE64_TEXT(0.10)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.94)[-0.943]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[173.37.142.89:from]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ARC_ALLOW(-1.00)[microsoft.com:s=arcselector9901:i=1]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:109, ipnet:173.37.128.0/19, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.001]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[cisco.com:s=iport,cisco.onmicrosoft.com:s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.01)[-1.006]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[cisco.com:dkim]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_ALL(0.00)[]; WHITELIST_SPF_DKIM(-3.00)[cisco.com:d:+,cisco.com:s:+]; RCVD_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[8]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports,freebsd-net] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 04:26:14 -0000 SGksDQpNYXkgSSBrbm93IHRoZSB1cGRhdGUgcGxlYXNlPyBTbyB0aGF0IEkgY2FuIHBsYW4gbXkg cHJvamVjdCBhY2NvcmRpbmdseS4NCg0KVGhhbmtzICYgcmVnYXJkcw0KUyBTaGFtc2hlciBTaW5n aA0KDQpGcm9tOiAiU2hhbXNoZXIgU2luZ2ggKHNhcmRhcnNpKSIgPHNhcmRhcnNpQGNpc2NvLmNv bT4NCkRhdGU6IFRodXJzZGF5LCAxNSBPY3RvYmVyIDIwMjAgYXQgMTI6MzIgUE0NClRvOiAiZnJl ZWJzZC1uZXRARnJlZUJTRC5vcmciIDxmcmVlYnNkLW5ldEBGcmVlQlNELm9yZz4NClN1YmplY3Q6 IFF1ZXJ5IGZvciBLTkkgYW5kIHVzZXIgbGV2ZWwgdGNwL2lwIHN0YWNrIHN1cHBvcnQgaW4gRnJl ZUJTRCBwb3J0cw0KDQpIaSwNCklzIHRoZXJlIGFueSBwbGFuIHRvIHN1cHBvcnQgS05JIGRyaXZl ciBtb2R1bGUgaW4gRnJlZUJTRCA/DQoNCg0KQWxzbyBpcyBGcmVlQlNEIHN1cHBvcnQgYW55IG9w ZW4gc291cmNlIFRDUC9JUCBzdGFjayBhdCB1c2VyIHNwYWNlIHRvIGJlIHVzZWQgYWxvbmctd2l0 aCBkcGRrPw0KDQpMaWtlIEYtc3RhY2sgb3IgYW55IG90aGVyLg0KDQpOb3RlOiBHb3QgYmFzaWMg c3VwcG9ydCBpbmZvIGZyb20gaHR0cHM6Ly93aWtpLmZyZWVic2Qub3JnLzIwMTUxMVZlbmRvckRl dlN1bW1pdC9IYXZlTmVlZFdhbnQNCg0KVGhhbmtzICYgcmVnYXJkcw0KUyBTaGFtc2hlciBTaW5n aA0KVGVjaCBMZWFkDQpDaXNjbyBTeXN0ZW1zIHB2dCBsdGQNCg0K From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Oct 19 08:57:42 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDA8D449B18 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 08:57:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CF9d257f9z4KQb for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 08:57:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B0462449A47; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 08:57:42 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0110449747 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 08:57:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CF9d24GQ1z4KWB for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 08:57:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71D6A210A3 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 08:57:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09J8vgVb015403 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 08:57:42 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09J8vg25015402 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 08:57:42 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 08:57:42 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: iflib, needs-qa, performance, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: sg@efficientip.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 08:57:42 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248652 --- Comment #24 from Sylvain Galliano --- (In reply to Vincenzo Maffione from comment #23) After using 'Netmap tx timer + timely credits update' patch, I didn't notice any difference on results. Should I make some specific tests to confirm changes between 2 patches ? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Oct 19 21:05:21 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05D6E434C43 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 21:05:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CFTmc6JwTz4Csc for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 21:05:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D8B44434BFD; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 21:05:20 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8787434F60 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 21:05:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CFTmc5Qt9z4Cn0 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 21:05:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E60A9F4F for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 21:05:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09JL5KjL020637 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 21:05:20 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09JL5Krx020636 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 21:05:20 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 21:05:18 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: iflib, needs-qa, performance, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 21:05:21 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248652 --- Comment #25 from Vincenzo Maffione --- Sorry, my bad. I read the code the wrong way, so the second patch is indeed useless. Please forget about that. The patch is not ensuring timely TX slots recovery (as pointed out in comment #23). So it seems that the situation where we are losing against 11-stable is ixl with 6 queues (or more in general, with more than 1 queue). The other combinations (ix, or ixl/1q are on par). Is this correct? Now, focusing on the ixl/6q case, and using the first patch I provided, do = you see a significant difference in average batch (as reported by pkt-gen) and pkt-gen CPU utilization? The avg_batch metric tells us how many packets we were able to send for each txsync syscall. So the higher the better (at least up to 100/200). --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Oct 20 10:26:58 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AEF242C942 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:26:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CFqYZ0NQ2z47Jh for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:26:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 0CA3142C9E4; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:26:58 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C6B342C9E3 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:26:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CFqYY6g3Qz47P9 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:26:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF0F713635 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:26:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09KAQvZp013804 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:26:57 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09KAQvKW013802 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:26:57 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:26:57 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: iflib, needs-qa, performance, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: sg@efficientip.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:26:58 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248652 --- Comment #26 from Sylvain Galliano --- (In reply to Vincenzo Maffione from comment #25) you are correct, using 1 queue on both ix/ixl NIC + tuning new sysctl, we h= ave same result as FreeBSD 11 Regarding avg_batch values on ixl, they are very low, not in the range you expected: 6 queues, iflib.nm_tx_tmr_us=3D5 070.664142 main_thread [2639] 13.588 Mpps (13.602 Mpkts 6.522 Gbps in 10010= 00 usec) 20.87 avg_batch 99999 min_space cpu usage: 100% even with 1 queue I got a low value for avg_batch: 283.855379 main_thread [2639] 12.147 Mpps (12.757 Mpkts 5.831 Gbps in 10502= 45 usec) 13.97 avg_batch 99999 min_space cpu usage: 100% ix (X520) NIC have a good avg_batch (whatever the number of queue): 404.130120 main_thread [2639] 14.880 Mpps (14.895 Mpkts 7.143 Gbps in 10009= 99 usec) 436.04 avg_batch 99999 min_space I don't known if this can help you but I did another test specific to ixl N= IC: setting hw.ixl.enable_head_writeback=3D0 avg_batch is higher, pps a little better and we are not CPU bound this time: 6 queues: 603.651106 main_thread [2639] 17.384 Mpps (17.402 Mpkts 8.345 Gbps in 10010= 03 usec) 308.10 avg_batch 99999 min_space cpu usage: 71% 1 queue: 730.590104 main_thread [2639] 15.084 Mpps (15.416 Mpkts 7.241 Gbps in 10220= 04 usec) 442.64 avg_batch 99999 min_space cpu usage: 57% Same test but using more threads on pkt-gen (-p 6), 6 queues: 995.887010 main_thread [2639] 17.327 Mpps (17.339 Mpkts 8.317 Gbps in 10006= 93 usec) 286.35 avg_batch 599994 min_space cpu usage: 197% top -H: PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 70876 root -92 0 348M 16M select 3 0:23 35.46% pkt-gen{pkt-gen} 70876 root -92 0 348M 16M CPU4 4 0:23 33.58% pkt-gen{pkt-gen} 70876 root -92 0 348M 16M RUN 6 0:23 33.44% pkt-gen{pkt-gen} 70876 root -92 0 348M 16M select 2 0:23 31.69% pkt-gen{pkt-gen} 70876 root 45 0 348M 16M CPU9 9 0:23 31.64% pkt-gen{pkt-gen} 70876 root -92 0 348M 16M select 6 0:23 31.24% pkt-gen{pkt-gen} --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Oct 20 16:19:33 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E68FF434DC7 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 16:19:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CFzNP5lqLz4T8t for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 16:19:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id C56CE434F3D; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 16:19:33 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C52C1434F3B for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 16:19:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CFzNP3bN2z4TBw for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 16:19:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D92917ACB for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 16:19:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09KGJXsV059860 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 16:19:33 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09KGJXKZ059859 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 16:19:33 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 250366] [tcp] The ioctl of socket fd should return -1 after listen to avoid misusing. Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 16:19:33 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: Unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 16:19:34 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D250366 Michael Tuexen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |net@FreeBSD.org, | |tuexen@freebsd.org Assignee|net@FreeBSD.org |tuexen@freebsd.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Oct 20 20:58:46 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 844F643AABB for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 20:58:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from milosz.kaniewski@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ed1-x530.google.com (mail-ed1-x530.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::530]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CG5ZY4sjzz4ktB for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 20:58:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from milosz.kaniewski@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ed1-x530.google.com with SMTP id cq12so189094edb.2 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 13:58:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=4KEZIO43/tp7MrlknX+ljJEBNQRMogcvgpfx/YJWOGA=; b=Sn3UnxJ9CW1iXRIIA8SzsNso/zINiyjCXDR5tDnDceWxdhXxwUTq1BjEpFOIJ4HUNm d7Y3WOhimlE7Zvgj4j3qkWaBMtc/H+CLj3MYXEVHnwgOBIJShnMIw9A27ROEhpNmisqn JokVdkJwaE8FpWnhGHu85k83aF+5Pc6WO3mJFNDI/+ZRi+tNqE+pvMtoynlcK+Us1XHE 8qxxhrv58haTGbjED71AUUhie4FZl37jgFb+HmvvcT9dUoAU9tD8w9qjUkKubQ1HtbW2 t4vrNIDgGp00I+Qu7A8tSIa14TuNtGILq5Zd4orbF9L1nV47+GmDJbTu/WHXRVwdnlxD Z+6w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=4KEZIO43/tp7MrlknX+ljJEBNQRMogcvgpfx/YJWOGA=; b=caEfHENLr2uaINaN63I3LTKkJ3XljmK5K7iZ9JjUylOUEq3Fdm063NInUFDLCTJ/tu EUp9Iz9Ou2D+hVBcPfoOJP3ymMVwZqosEK3W1xTp1J3jtRR9LI7B/uji+FfdrGAq9Wnp lG5Z4W1JAsg9Ro91zjnWiXRh/707GLbQrhiAfrvuU9TTqVCCq3cmqLTr+vRCb2VN+5oK B0VbpkxFP6Z75rkwVspARt76BpDQqhM0M7af8Vz6S5mYjZSXBzOEd22g+75j4ZGyf0i1 kWvRJULOUvwbZOu1bIYDy13edc1rd89Rkj7FOsl7QfeFAQOcGCg5ARkU+1BH0fRkvjPb W8Mw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5305m42SF7J3QIw/Lokoxyu1xLXydtdGqxelSvO6gfq12Tsn/xTS nKIOy3tra3p3CIy8i2h/JJmzMPjFV48sWWXG+PzVXfedPXRHQw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxSy+JPWTDtbH7tSTp9WzW04ceeXSiiY2V+zsPFsyHsQN7oIEcyn9ih9aRLhfnEiBVOrYpMQCpStGmJrGSJGJM= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:dada:: with SMTP id x26mr4773862eds.167.1603227523758; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 13:58:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Mi=C5=82osz_Kaniewski?= Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 22:58:25 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: safe_pause_us() is always at least 1 millisecond long To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4CG5ZY4sjzz4ktB X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Sn3UnxJ9; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of miloszkaniewski@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::530 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=miloszkaniewski@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.29 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.02)[-1.016]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.03)[-1.029]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::530:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.25)[-0.247]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 20:58:46 -0000 Hi, I was recently doing some tests and found out that on the iflib e1000 driver I can do much less media status checks per second compared to the non-iflib driver. I found out that this is caused by the definition of safe_pause_us() which calls: pause("e1000_delay", max(1, x/(1000000/hz))); If I understand everything correctly then it means that safe_pase_us() is always at least 1 millisecond long (if a clock is 1000 Hz). Shouldn't it use min() instead? Thanks, Milosz From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Oct 20 21:14:07 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DA3D43AE45 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 21:14:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CG5wH3lnLz4ljn for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 21:14:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 80B5D43AE44; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 21:14:07 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 807E243B038 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 21:14:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CG5wH2t1lz4m7P for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 21:14:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4634B1B39D for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 21:14:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09KLE74p025662 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 21:14:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09KLE7iS025659 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 21:14:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 21:14:04 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: iflib, needs-qa, performance, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.isobsolete attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 21:14:07 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248652 Vincenzo Maffione changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #218866|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #27 from Vincenzo Maffione --- Created attachment 218932 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D218932&action= =3Dedit netmap tx timer + honor IPI_TX_INTR in ixl txd_encap Adds an unrelated fix on top of the first patch (218723). The new fix should remove a major regression introduced by the ixl porting = to iflib. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Oct 20 21:17:19 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CC2F43AE66 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 21:17:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CG5zz1NZmz4m0w for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 21:17:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 2D99443AEC4; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 21:17:19 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D5FF43AE65 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 21:17:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CG5zz0T28z4mH8 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 21:17:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3F881B39F for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 21:17:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09KLHI6Q029002 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 21:17:18 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09KLHIk7028999 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 21:17:18 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 21:17:19 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: iflib, needs-qa, performance, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 21:17:19 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248652 --- Comment #28 from Vincenzo Maffione --- (In reply to Sylvain Galliano from comment #26) Thanks. I just figured out that there may be a major flaw introduced by the porting= of ixl to iflib. This flaw should couse too many writebacks from the NIC to re= port completed transmissions, even if iflib asks for a writeback once in a while. Can you please run again your tests on ixl with the latest patch? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Oct 20 21:49:00 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77BD043B6FE for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 21:49:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CG6hX2fF8z4npS for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 21:49:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 5AC9F43BA8A; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 21:49:00 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A87F43B46A for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 21:49:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CG6hX1mzgz4npR for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 21:49:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 207011BA86 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 21:49:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09KLn0ux065857 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 21:49:00 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09KLn0mO065854 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 21:49:00 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 21:49:00 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: iflib, needs-qa, performance, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: sg@efficientip.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 21:49:00 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248652 --- Comment #29 from Sylvain Galliano --- (In reply to Vincenzo Maffione from comment #28) Yes, this is much better: 6 queues, nm_tx_tmr_us=3D5: 983.492185 main_thread [2639] 37.907 Mpps (37.945 Mpkts 18.196 Gbps in 1001= 000 usec) 512.00 avg_batch 99999 min_space cpu usage: 100% but with this patch, something is wrong when using 1 queue: 110.079117 main_thread [2639] 0.000 pps (0.000 pkts 0.000 bps in 1003920 us= ec) 0.00 avg_batch 99999 min_space 111.080184 main_thread [2639] 0.000 pps (0.000 pkts 0.000 bps in 1001066 us= ec) 0.00 avg_batch 99999 min_space 111.714181 sender_body [1663] poll error on queue 0: timeout 112.089179 main_thread [2639] 0.000 pps (0.000 pkts 0.000 bps in 1008996 us= ec) 0.00 avg_batch 99999 min_space 113.116178 main_thread [2639] 0.000 pps (0.000 pkts 0.000 bps in 1026999 us= ec) 0.00 avg_batch 99999 min_space (I've double checked by reverting with previous patch: no issue) same errors when using 6 queues and pkt-gen with 6 threads (-p 6) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 21 07:48:37 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 765FE445A15 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 07:48:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CGN0P2gJ8z41C7 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 07:48:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 59CCA44599C; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 07:48:37 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 598D74457A0 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 07:48:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CGN0P1hPhz416c for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 07:48:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1922A22717 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 07:48:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09L7ma6p080665 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 07:48:36 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09L7maD4080664 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 07:48:36 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 07:48:36 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: iflib, needs-qa, performance, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: krzysztof.galazka@intel.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 07:48:37 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248652 Krzysztof Galazka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |krzysztof.galazka@intel.com --- Comment #30 from Krzysztof Galazka --- (In reply to Vincenzo Maffione from comment #28) Hi Vincenzo, Good catch! Thanks a lot! The non-iflib version of ixl also sets a request status flag on all 'End of packet' descriptors. I'm guessing that the difference in performance is related to a dynamic interrupt moderation, whi= ch is disabled by default in iflib version of the driver. I'm a bit concerned though about the 1 queue case. It think it would be good to put this fix in= a separate review and let our validation team run some tests. Would you like = me to do it or do you prefer to do it yourself? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 21 10:13:50 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB30C44860F for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 10:13:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.netfence.it (net-2-44-121-52.cust.vodafonedsl.it [2.44.121.52]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CGRCx1CWHz47M5 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 10:13:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18]) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.netfence.it (8.16.1/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 09LADeYl010101 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 12:13:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be alamar.ventu From: Andrea Venturoli Subject: Help with VNET To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Message-ID: Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 12:13:38 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.3.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4CGRCx1CWHz47M5 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=netfence.it; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ml@netfence.it designates 2.44.121.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ml@netfence.it X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.88 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:2.44.121.52]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.93)[-0.929]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.15)[-0.146]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[netfence.it,none]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.01)[-1.005]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:30722, ipnet:2.44.0.0/16, country:IT]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 10:13:50 -0000 Hello. I've been using jails for years with ezjail. Now I'm trying to experiment with VNET. I've looked for a tutorial, but found scarce (and possibly outdated) info. Box is a 12.1/amd64. Basic configuration involves wlan0 configured via DHCP (192.168.133.26). Host networking works. For a start, let's get IPFW out of the way: #ipfw add 1 pass ip from any to any Then I setup the host: # ifconfig epair create (Now I see epair0a and epair0b) # ifconfig bridge create up # ifconfig bridge0 addm wlan0 addm epair0a Now I start the jail and I don't see epair0b anymore on the host. In the jail I issue: #ipfw add 1 pass ip from any to any #ifconfig epair0b 192.168.133.27 Now: _ pinging the host from the jail works; _ pinging the jail from the host works; _ pinging another host from the base system works; _ pinging another host from the jail does NOT work. tcpdump on wlan0 shows ARP packets from the jail (who tries to get the MAC address of the external host), but these do not reach the network (a tcpdump on the external host doesn't show them). IPFW logging shows that it's not blocking anything. Any hint? bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 21 10:19:26 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5733F4485B5 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 10:19:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meka@tilda.center) Received: from mail.tilda.center (mail.tilda.center [45.63.43.31]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CGRLP1szXz47nJ for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 10:19:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meka@tilda.center) Received: from localhost (unknown [109.92.19.191]) by mail.tilda.center (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 649F02133D; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 12:19:16 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 10:19:02 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Help with VNET To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org,Andrea Venturoli From: =?UTF-8?Q?Goran_Meki=C4=87?= Message-ID: <432738E4-FBC6-4768-A898-3F82CAFDB533@tilda.center> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4CGRLP1szXz47nJ X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.05 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[tilda.center:s=mail]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.005]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.02)[-1.022]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[tilda.center:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[tilda.center,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.85)[-0.853]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; R_MIXED_CHARSET(0.83)[subject]; ASN(0.00)[asn:20473, ipnet:45.63.40.0/22, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 10:19:26 -0000 On October 21, 2020 10:13:38 AM UTC, Andrea Venturoli wr= ote: >Hello=2E > >I've been using jails for years with ezjail=2E Now I'm trying to=20 >experiment with VNET=2E >I've looked for a tutorial, but found scarce (and possibly outdated) >info=2E > > > >Box is a 12=2E1/amd64=2E >Basic configuration involves wlan0 configured via DHCP >(192=2E168=2E133=2E26)=2E >Host networking works=2E >For a start, let's get IPFW out of the way: >#ipfw add 1 pass ip from any to any > >Then I setup the host: ># ifconfig epair create >(Now I see epair0a and epair0b) ># ifconfig bridge create up ># ifconfig bridge0 addm wlan0 addm epair0a > >Now I start the jail and I don't see epair0b anymore on the host=2E > >In the jail I issue: >#ipfw add 1 pass ip from any to any >#ifconfig epair0b 192=2E168=2E133=2E27 > > > >Now: >_ pinging the host from the jail works; >_ pinging the jail from the host works; >_ pinging another host from the base system works; >_ pinging another host from the jail does NOT work=2E > >tcpdump on wlan0 shows ARP packets from the jail (who tries to get the=20 >MAC address of the external host), but these do not reach the network >(a=20 >tcpdump on the external host doesn't show them)=2E > >IPFW logging shows that it's not blocking anything=2E > >Any hint? > > bye & Thanks > av=2E >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-net@freebsd=2Eorg mailing list >https://lists=2Efreebsd=2Eorg/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd=2Eorg" Did you setup NAT? --=20 Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail=2E Please excuse my brevity=2E From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 21 10:20:23 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37399448846 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 10:20:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kp@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CGRMW0mYGz47TW; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 10:20:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kp@FreeBSD.org) Received: from venus.codepro.be (venus.codepro.be [5.9.86.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx1.codepro.be", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: kp) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D8DE62BCFA; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 10:20:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kp@FreeBSD.org) Received: by venus.codepro.be (Postfix, authenticated sender kp) id 0540F20F9B; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 12:20:20 +0200 (CEST) From: "Kristof Provost" To: "Andrea Venturoli" Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help with VNET Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 12:20:20 +0200 X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.2r5673) Message-ID: <40361B2B-50AD-474B-A5A7-654F5A958FE2@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 10:20:23 -0000 On 21 Oct 2020, at 12:13, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Hello. > > I've been using jails for years with ezjail. Now I'm trying to > experiment with VNET. > I've looked for a tutorial, but found scarce (and possibly outdated) > info. > > > > Box is a 12.1/amd64. > Basic configuration involves wlan0 configured via DHCP > (192.168.133.26). > Host networking works. > For a start, let's get IPFW out of the way: > #ipfw add 1 pass ip from any to any > > Then I setup the host: > # ifconfig epair create > (Now I see epair0a and epair0b) > # ifconfig bridge create up > # ifconfig bridge0 addm wlan0 addm epair0a > This is your problem. You can’t bridge over wifi interfaces. That’s a limitation of station mode wifi. Try routing, or try with a wired interface. Best regards, Kristof From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 21 11:34:40 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 641B1449BD9 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 11:34:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.netfence.it (net-2-44-121-52.cust.vodafonedsl.it [2.44.121.52]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CGT1B3LGrz4DNd for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 11:34:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18]) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.netfence.it (8.16.1/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 09LBYWmw019839 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 21 Oct 2020 13:34:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be alamar.ventu Subject: Re: Help with VNET To: =?UTF-8?Q?Goran_Meki=c4=87?= , freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <432738E4-FBC6-4768-A898-3F82CAFDB533@tilda.center> From: Andrea Venturoli Message-ID: <030f462e-26a6-cb2a-a1c2-88b1f0e189c6@netfence.it> Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 13:34:32 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.3.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <432738E4-FBC6-4768-A898-3F82CAFDB533@tilda.center> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4CGT1B3LGrz4DNd X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=netfence.it; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ml@netfence.it designates 2.44.121.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ml@netfence.it X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.52 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:2.44.121.52]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.01)[-1.010]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.71)[-0.709]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[netfence.it,none]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.01)[-1.006]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:30722, ipnet:2.44.0.0/16, country:IT]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 11:34:40 -0000 On 10/21/20 12:19 PM, Goran Mekić wrote: > Did you setup NAT? No. Should I? Why? The IP I gave to the jail is in the same subnet as the host. BTW, I have similar (working) setups with bhyve (using tap instead of epair) and I didn't setup NAT there. bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 21 11:36:21 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF7F3449D07 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 11:36:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.netfence.it (net-2-44-121-52.cust.vodafonedsl.it [2.44.121.52]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CGT394XWlz4DFg; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 11:36:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18]) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.netfence.it (8.16.1/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 09LBaJRh020050 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 21 Oct 2020 13:36:19 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be alamar.ventu Subject: Re: Help with VNET To: Kristof Provost Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <40361B2B-50AD-474B-A5A7-654F5A958FE2@FreeBSD.org> From: Andrea Venturoli Message-ID: <799e33d6-c286-3a06-19e1-af87b541645a@netfence.it> Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 13:36:19 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.3.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <40361B2B-50AD-474B-A5A7-654F5A958FE2@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4CGT394XWlz4DFg X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:30722, ipnet:2.44.0.0/16, country:IT] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 11:36:22 -0000 On 10/21/20 12:20 PM, Kristof Provost wrote: > This is your problem. You can’t bridge over wifi interfaces. > That’s a limitation of station mode wifi. I had the suspect... Is this documented somewhere? Is this a bug or feature? > Try routing, or try with a wired interface. I'll try and get back if that doesn't work. bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 21 11:37:58 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54A21449ADB for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 11:37:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kp@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CGT521Z49z4DXG; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 11:37:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kp@FreeBSD.org) Received: from venus.codepro.be (venus.codepro.be [5.9.86.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx1.codepro.be", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: kp) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F3B462C79C; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 11:37:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kp@FreeBSD.org) Received: by venus.codepro.be (Postfix, authenticated sender kp) id 7AD3F241A4; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 13:37:56 +0200 (CEST) From: "Kristof Provost" To: "Andrea Venturoli" Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help with VNET Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 13:37:52 +0200 X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.2r5673) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <799e33d6-c286-3a06-19e1-af87b541645a@netfence.it> References: <40361B2B-50AD-474B-A5A7-654F5A958FE2@FreeBSD.org> <799e33d6-c286-3a06-19e1-af87b541645a@netfence.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed; markup=markdown Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 11:37:58 -0000 On 21 Oct 2020, at 13:36, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > On 10/21/20 12:20 PM, Kristof Provost wrote: > >> This is your problem. You can’t bridge over wifi interfaces. >> That’s a limitation of station mode wifi. > > I had the suspect... > Is this documented somewhere? Is this a bug or feature? > That’s inherent to how wifi is designed. It’s arguably a bug, but if so it’s one in the 802.11 spec, not in the implementation. Best regards, Kristof From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 21 11:51:09 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4567A449F23 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 11:51:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from mail.punkt.de (mail.punkt.de [IPv6:2a00:b580:8000:11:1c6b:7032:35e9:5616]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CGTND3lJRz4Dwv; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 11:51:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from [217.29.46.80] (kagate.punkt.de [217.29.33.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.punkt.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3407E131D5; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 13:51:00 +0200 (CEST) From: "Patrick M. Hausen" Message-Id: <136B0049-8F69-4CED-91DD-C3F6D9EAC9A5@punkt.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_80A51E6C-C045-4634-9B61-EBA55DBCA24A"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.17\)) Subject: Re: Help with VNET Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 13:50:58 +0200 In-Reply-To: Cc: Andrea Venturoli , freebsd-net@freebsd.org To: Kristof Provost References: <40361B2B-50AD-474B-A5A7-654F5A958FE2@FreeBSD.org> <799e33d6-c286-3a06-19e1-af87b541645a@netfence.it> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.17) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4CGTND3lJRz4Dwv X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of hausen@punkt.de designates 2a00:b580:8000:11:1c6b:7032:35e9:5616 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=hausen@punkt.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.05 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:b580::/32]; HAS_ATTACHMENT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[punkt.de]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.001]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.14)[-0.138]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.01)[-1.011]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16188, ipnet:2a00:b580::/32, country:DE]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 11:51:09 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_80A51E6C-C045-4634-9B61-EBA55DBCA24A Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Hi all, > Am 21.10.2020 um 13:37 schrieb Kristof Provost : >=20 > On 21 Oct 2020, at 13:36, Andrea Venturoli wrote: >> On 10/21/20 12:20 PM, Kristof Provost wrote: >>=20 >>> This is your problem. You can=E2=80=99t bridge over wifi interfaces. >>> That=E2=80=99s a limitation of station mode wifi. >>=20 >> I had the suspect... >> Is this documented somewhere? Is this a bug or feature? >>=20 > That=E2=80=99s inherent to how wifi is designed. It=E2=80=99s arguably = a bug, but if so it=E2=80=99s one in the 802.11 spec, not in the = implementation. Well, VMware Workstation and Fusion can do it. But they rewrite MAC addresses or some such - it's ugly. Kind regards, Patrick -- punkt.de GmbH Patrick M. Hausen .infrastructure Kaiserallee 13a 76133 Karlsruhe Tel. +49 721 9109500 https://infrastructure.punkt.de info@punkt.de AG Mannheim 108285 Gesch=C3=A4ftsf=C3=BChrer: J=C3=BCrgen Egeling, Daniel Lienert, Fabian = Stein --Apple-Mail=_80A51E6C-C045-4634-9B61-EBA55DBCA24A Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEgzqrjO/mj9CSsTg2kG8u4u3aiVwFAl+QIKIACgkQkG8u4u3a iVxOlwf/X9eoX29WIc6SI8wxlAjRTDUk5f/k+mlSmYD2Z+w+POzIBqjdKQjM96pl fNTGiqBQrZ/1NdUNNFwaYbCa3QBEBkgdgUX2xwIohfutbeiU5DOuYBm4IWNhjO/+ GQuyXevyybC4bzT4G2ajHN3zDUKko7qgaWCdVux2Jyc8hbra6tK8V6MAconvFc0a rDozrfKHO5PnHl417i7xsrQftlbccHuHWbVRvzlxVPJBextExfJKBN3+LOYAAZXH xhUJN65dQVoqYiSbsu/y/GEXu8xWAY9tYaMUu9IdclP+8rrrm9V9vZaOHAvoOEFN 5ESMVaPN2weqhXOgmzCO86bovQtZ8w== =+Ez/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_80A51E6C-C045-4634-9B61-EBA55DBCA24A-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 21 11:57:48 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 193DA449F4B for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 11:57:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kp@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CGTWv6rWvz4FQX; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 11:57:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kp@FreeBSD.org) Received: from venus.codepro.be (venus.codepro.be [5.9.86.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx1.codepro.be", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: kp) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B40D62CC65; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 11:57:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kp@FreeBSD.org) Received: by venus.codepro.be (Postfix, authenticated sender kp) id 6DC0624157; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 13:57:46 +0200 (CEST) From: "Kristof Provost" To: "Patrick M. Hausen" Cc: "Andrea Venturoli" , freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help with VNET Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 13:57:45 +0200 X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.2r5673) Message-ID: <704712D8-5013-491B-B720-F7E76A7ABFD6@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <136B0049-8F69-4CED-91DD-C3F6D9EAC9A5@punkt.de> References: <40361B2B-50AD-474B-A5A7-654F5A958FE2@FreeBSD.org> <799e33d6-c286-3a06-19e1-af87b541645a@netfence.it> <136B0049-8F69-4CED-91DD-C3F6D9EAC9A5@punkt.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 11:57:48 -0000 On 21 Oct 2020, at 13:50, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > Hi all, > >> Am 21.10.2020 um 13:37 schrieb Kristof Provost : >> >> On 21 Oct 2020, at 13:36, Andrea Venturoli wrote: >>> On 10/21/20 12:20 PM, Kristof Provost wrote: >>> >>>> This is your problem. You can’t bridge over wifi interfaces. >>>> That’s a limitation of station mode wifi. >>> >>> I had the suspect... >>> Is this documented somewhere? Is this a bug or feature? >>> >> That’s inherent to how wifi is designed. It’s arguably a bug, but >> if so it’s one in the 802.11 spec, not in the implementation. > > Well, VMware Workstation and Fusion can do it. > But they rewrite MAC addresses or some such - it's ugly. > Yeah, L2 NAT is the hack to work around that limitation. But … No. Just … No. I also don’t think we have a layer-2 NAT solution in FreeBSD. I have a vague recollection of OpenBSD doing something with L2 and pf (or something that looks like pf on L2), but I can’t immediately find that again. Kristof From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 21 15:01:33 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 544ED44E244 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 15:01:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CGYbx1bS8z4PSZ for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 15:01:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 36A7D44E243; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 15:01:33 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3562944E242 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 15:01:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CGYbx0bNMz4Pd7 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 15:01:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC20E275CA for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 15:01:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09LF1WmE078373 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 15:01:32 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09LF1Wuu078372 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 15:01:32 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 250499] [tcp] Should we reject the packet with timestamp if no timestamp in SYN and SYN_ACK? Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 15:01:32 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 15:01:33 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D250499 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|bugs@FreeBSD.org |net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 21 16:09:42 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 965EC44F7B6 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:09:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dkandula@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ot1-x32e.google.com (mail-ot1-x32e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CGb6Y1t6Tz4TlF for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:09:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dkandula@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ot1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id f37so2291507otf.12 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 09:09:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3wTiQ30tDfxigdtq0SPUmOSm+gVB9xsbSQyTqviLLGI=; b=ggUDiUD2PfTLbAyah+ozQUtxuem7TpXj5gqjI2IHBU0GCUk58CNixtDW5BasDpufBj 6q3NASePNIwBBq6dP+5OObnLYaFjHlkBNnUPhu+pjpvvNpO4Vg2JnOCafK8mH+801Ql/ K7M58o53eLn5BffY3qucbi8uPZeaRbCHa0ncrjGZvVzlxRZu1K4N6Q/KnPcsahSy8J2T VPCTJbCe8+M32QQcBYbZJH9zXatfGBXduqjuE8ZoONqOn6ojmeJQLA+10jzqasflEICB auh7dsdXmaLpfpw+OeDFgPZ7I0WZIDS6Fos+e8cGEoQehQzL1uZ0kO4BKpSosXpm/vgJ Ivlw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3wTiQ30tDfxigdtq0SPUmOSm+gVB9xsbSQyTqviLLGI=; b=l5hii9PIivvzXMJ66+31/sDheL/uvc61nOEGgBOidWuP+nQH67pwJrYWb/PndlTKNF SqOciqLs0SycQVKtm8UaIUuKQ/T6C+n7mB8xOIazU0YMLPauDjdte2gfaP56X9yI8ViI hRGLZ3f1kkUKfjFyIdC5wiClMaS8TMXoK0pyeKmpLZLcq/KIh/efW/qEanLReq++R5ps 0TqTwXbB6z8xxRolJX9oBHpla0Zcgk8nhYfsIUv50O2liLspnbBwl6XSm2l25vhYnnsh HZZt5bgVt47WI1VuxikkIzMlf8lvngQMshIvPowEq3gm3nfgibufjwL6/6yFRrGM//gl FOsw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5339LUVGKtkesCN1x38IvpOC71WSSfjbPyU7SN7b58s9O/k5vr5O AnGPDSx5t3ipnFHdwC9py3Lt8EcF0NEmozK7bi+GSsNvATI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwJZDqJ8SfTKt71gZl2bX5kUyOUfM9y8yxEbwJgA8NsCAO8BJbhPddmDtLom16EUScasO6xevoBjxYWO3+WpsU= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:53cc:: with SMTP id i12mr2982772oth.215.1603296579838; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 09:09:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5f8b19d0-f833-0566-2336-d75ce0881ffa@selasky.org> In-Reply-To: From: Dheeraj Kandula Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 12:09:28 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ims_merge in in_mcast.c To: Hans Petter Selasky Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4CGb6Y1t6Tz4TlF X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=ggUDiUD2; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of dkandula@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::32e as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=dkandula@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.82 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.01)[-1.010]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.002]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::32e:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.80)[-0.804]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:09:42 -0000 The ims_merge function is invoked only when the imsl_st[0] and imsl_st[1] are different i.e. a filter mode change. The new filter mode is updated in ims_st[1]. Thanks for the clarification. Thanks Dheeraj On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 9:58 AM Dheeraj Kandula wrote: > Thanks, HPS for the response. I think the index 0 is for a state (previous > to current) and 1 indicates the current state. I am still trying to figure > out what they really mean. Maybe reading the RFC will shed some light on > the intention. > > My understanding is that the state transition is from index 0 to index 1. > Hence when we are reverting, the state has to be reverted from index 1 to > index 0. Isn't it? > > For a regular non-rollback scenario, the operation of -1 on line (987 or > 991) and +1 (997 or 1001) adds up to 0. What are we trying to achieve here? > Maybe that will help me to understand this code better. > > Dheeraj > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 4:18 AM Hans Petter Selasky > wrote: > >> On 2020-10-12 19:11, Dheeraj Kandula wrote: >> > On line 987 and 991 shouldn't the index be 0 instead of 1. >> > >> > i.e. ims->ims_st[0].ex -= n; >> > and >> > ims->ims_st[0].in -= n; >> > >> > On a rollback, the entry at index 0 is incremented and the entry at >> index 1 >> > is decremented. >> > >> > On a non-rollback merge, the entry at index 0 is decremented and the >> entry >> > at index 1 is incremented. >> >> Hi, >> >> If you look at inm_commit() you see that [0] is overwritten by [1], so I >> believe the current code is correct. Same goes for both IPv4 and IPv6. >> Are you seeing an issue with multicast investigating this issue? >> >> --HPS >> > From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 21 16:40:55 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D82DE42818A for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:40:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CGbpb5TzDz4WCN for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:40:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id BBE1344FC6B; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:40:55 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBA914280AF for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:40:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CGbpb4gSFz4WFn for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:40:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84A18885B for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:40:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09LGetQM012608 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:40:55 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09LGetA3012604 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:40:55 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 250499] [tcp] Should we reject the packet with timestamp if no timestamp in SYN and SYN_ACK? Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:40:55 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:40:55 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D250499 Michael Tuexen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|net@FreeBSD.org |tuexen@freebsd.org CC| |net@FreeBSD.org, | |tuexen@freebsd.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 21 19:21:42 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABB8642B58E for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 19:21:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rysto32@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ed1-x532.google.com (mail-ed1-x532.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::532]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CGgN54Gh3z4fr7 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 19:21:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rysto32@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ed1-x532.google.com with SMTP id p13so3705052edi.7 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 12:21:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=14FI7ktGa4Q1Wb+/e9bu57LW7Pc5Dqav2ZFbjqE1tEk=; b=reWqxJTy0ptR62OU0qXmi48LG/HPTJhTL6ZNjetK6HbPuAZ/1b+wj2XqD/2vhUbjfV 2PbgDzlDU62yObG2jLSHBo8jru16BKnrvBGNppxFtNiBEKd3Sj3WORkwh1X7Ihmy0gbv q4cxarX6MgRm4Uoy5Cl6RNLEY576C7sNyjfy5kw083gcojquJ6zGVrdWrZGuMAG1zdk3 nIaMFkcz2v24/RwEpbM7twhOyjG6YVfF/qFUrvflLYvu9jDK/wQNbsEAm8EaphHirMx2 N7q35Oi4xI5esruHRbMLXsfSMtnve7cUmffOsp8dhGEaLoeQqspFeWT4S1fl+mBJvft8 QQNw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=14FI7ktGa4Q1Wb+/e9bu57LW7Pc5Dqav2ZFbjqE1tEk=; b=Aa+o1H9JfJnrfWPqouw0W863ll3vpfGnrvDanjOumHaFWdAK5PD8WS1jnagE4wTqOB Ds0QEAAb9d37VfvSU7hW3LWeMuB/zOpkKScd/LIt/mRcb5UPNiRqa+Tes7isV/mMr2Zx 7kuoGrcStyPbvYyNc4Ga22r4i2xCOcipVbT2WnyOaC7byCWEPjui1UBjSdJSamoItZa0 TR8dAnW7/kmyrL+tJq7qf8fIWDUpmgZ+0iHu7kQRm3mCjL4ySkdgWU/htGLnnKUmDcq5 w7YN3m9lw0jPytLdJ5ATrDsbHa/ufw18wDdN6klAkAF9kO7QpLqqgiDDErzF/PhCuXsl gYqg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531zS9c6hksaA6DLknWkBPBi77PPKEXCS8pQhySsaSwkEuQBTLZu TWkCv7458hm21FZv7EvtTFvImsLn1iaBQcBX6L4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwdk9EsHeaEqILHpaDPax3nMDkE7LAnIGON6i0jFVY0+HujMnltCQ0p50fQQLgM/8w8x5K1Fpa2//7AYR8C6oY= X-Received: by 2002:a50:ef0a:: with SMTP id m10mr4636587eds.116.1603308099167; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 12:21:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Ryan Stone Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 15:21:28 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: safe_pause_us() is always at least 1 millisecond long To: =?UTF-8?Q?Mi=C5=82osz_Kaniewski?= Cc: freebsd-net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4CGgN54Gh3z4fr7 X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=reWqxJTy; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of rysto32@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::532 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rysto32@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.94 / 15.00]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.93)[-0.926]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.02)[-1.017]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.997]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::532:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 19:21:42 -0000 Using min is definitely not correct. That would ensure that you either got a pause of 1 tick or 0 ticks. This may get you better granularity, depending on the system. pause_sbt("e1000_delay", x * SBT_1US, x < 1000 ? 100 * SBT_1US : SBT_1MS, 0); From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 21 20:53:55 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2B8942D64A for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 20:53:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CGjQW4r6mz3XNw for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 20:53:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A458E42D649; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 20:53:55 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A420C42D648 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 20:53:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CGjQW3wqGz3X94 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 20:53:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A278BC26 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 20:53:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09LKrtJX097733 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 20:53:55 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09LKrtu1097732 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 20:53:55 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 20:53:53 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: iflib, needs-qa, performance, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 20:53:55 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248652 --- Comment #31 from Vincenzo Maffione --- (In reply to Krzysztof Galazka from comment #30) Hi Krzysztof, I agree, and created a separate review for this possible change: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26896 It would be nice if you guys could run some tests to validate the change against normal TCP/IP stack usage (e.g. non-netmap). Speaking about the non-iflib driver, I guess it is acceptable for the ixl_x= mit routine to always set the report flag on the EOP packet. However, this is not acceptable for netmap, and indeed the non-iflib netmap= ixl driver is only setting it twice per ring (see https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/blob/stable/11/sys/dev/netmap/if_ixl_net= map.h#L221-L223). This is, in my opinion, what explains the huge difference in performance between non-iflib and iflib for ixl. If my understanding is correct, and according to our past experience with netmap, the report flag will cause the NIC to initiate a DMA transaction to either set the DD bit in the descriptor, or perform a memory write to update the shadow TDH. This is particularly expensive in netmap when done for each descriptor, specially because netmap uses single-descriptor packets. Interrupt moderation can also help a lot to mitigate the CPU overhead, but = as far as I see it does not limit the writeback DMA transactions, and therefor= e it does not help in the netmap use-case. Moreover, my understanding is that if= lib is not using hardware interrupts on ixl (nor ix), but rather is using "softirqs", so I guess that interrupt moderation does not play a role here.= I may be wrong on this last point. I suspect the 1-queue pkt-gen hang problem may be due to something else, ra= ther than the report flag change. As a matter of facts, the same logic was worki= ng fine on the non-iflib driver. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 21 21:18:51 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA4842DAD6 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 21:18:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CGjzH017gz3Y3l for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 21:18:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id F279B42DAD5; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 21:18:50 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F130342DE88 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 21:18:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CGjzG5zVWz3Y3k for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 21:18:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0F9BBDD1 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 21:18:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09LLIoeP026676 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 21:18:50 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09LLIoWN026675 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 21:18:50 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 21:18:49 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: iflib, needs-qa, performance, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 21:18:51 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248652 --- Comment #32 from Vincenzo Maffione --- (In reply to Sylvain Galliano from comment #29) Thanks again for your tests. I'm inclined to think that the pkt-gen hang issue that you see is not direc= tly caused by the ixl patch. Would you please try to test what happens if you only apply the ixl patch (discarding all the changes related to the netmap timer)? In the very end the change to ixl is orthogonal to the netmap timer issue. Also, it would be useful to understand whether the hang problem comes from = some sort of race condition or not. For this purpose, you may try to use the -R argument of pkt-gen (this time with the timer+ixl patch) to specify a maxim= um rate in packets per second (pps). E.g. you could start from 1000 pps, check that it does not hang, double the rate and repeat the process until you fin= d a critical rate that causes the hang. Unless this is not a race condition and= the hang happens at any rate. When the hang happens, it may help to see the ring state, e.g. with the following patch to pkt-gen. I expect to see head, cur and tail having the s= ame value.=20 diff --git a/apps/pkt-gen/pkt-gen.c b/apps/pkt-gen/pkt-gen.c index ef876f4f..19497fe9 100644 --- a/apps/pkt-gen/pkt-gen.c +++ b/apps/pkt-gen/pkt-gen.c @@ -1675,6 +1675,10 @@ sender_body(void *data) break; D("poll error on queue %d: %s", targ->me, rv ? strerror(errno) : "timeout"); + for (i =3D targ->nmd->first_tx_ring; i <=3D targ->nmd->last_tx_ring; i++) { + txring =3D NETMAP_TXRING(nifp, i); + D("txring %u %u %u", txring->head, txring->= cur, txring->tail); + } // goto quit; } if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) { --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 21 22:05:06 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 692A242F06B for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 22:05:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rysto32@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ed1-x542.google.com (mail-ed1-x542.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::542]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CGl0d6HYXz3bN1 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 22:05:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rysto32@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ed1-x542.google.com with SMTP id l16so4127949eds.3 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 15:05:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=OKuST+K01ev7xsxzh4aX3LoSmD5qxcOfx2ciexncdNg=; b=op8NEwmNWjduKJ5AfnksmhWEcozmFP3/HCTuDUGt+z6bQpV6434TTAPunAlcWvz2vW Oct8CO2QbvXjOkTz3O0o3sabysV9ntjDQGRsSB0LPNgSJfyhcqRbqlQdy6xSYBIrEb+X tmyP1hKBhW5XgCxbZjjhzFtrV+n3taVctJ3pzwLDJnFVuUdPBIpmnCDh87O9e+nYbyoZ aFMWpxy9VTbnkZPSown3f4EhgdkhRjOisXWYp/QtVYcZkFKjdlOymyinJcThlKsIqpZw fADvf2KHkghknOgNXlgUQScTmtrjOX9pc6OsB28eQJND5YTae8IjbcTIeINmciKmUeu4 oK/A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=OKuST+K01ev7xsxzh4aX3LoSmD5qxcOfx2ciexncdNg=; b=VyjbM+Es3w3U5LBN6lS9CyzYilStT9TJyqPUeAuRYrXWnv/7/NyV9PxixhQffGDe48 Gqnom0RgW75R9ufGLXhlAWCzL5ZATME/pJDDD35aplfnfD0/6sQTK3ApcbBnQLV+X9td shwkt84wt8+OMOCfQcZ+LokKJ8mXTyJ1jp8OybHKxXgNUn2Q70gojx6BVzM+YeJe0X5q 6HS1aADhk2wM5Y5bEICNE2JuZ1ad0gHwwB2m/1uMfHUDBxye+soWA2O4uYFQWo7Fp3pG pUEgLza+zIQCQAZxJrgfBmjHp0CzFIeL/RL2KgtwaYks5I6daEP3Ls6xx/SXMSEEzK1D 6Osg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530P03FQKPBOx366upa0txXO9mtfgFkWf0bWsQ1p62P1gfui1m1r PvP2MfnQN8GYJETXwaGCCSzfPFDN9mpMckqvTgMMdydQf84= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyuROXwlXAvz04X0XQgt2ia3If/QGWK3zOfOfNwgu63sprPXHeonMb5X57Op9KQRb8+jEhhH58AtTeKPKfP5Z4= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1cbb:: with SMTP id cz27mr4889158edb.38.1603317903954; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 15:05:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ryan Stone Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 18:04:52 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Panic in in6_joingroup_locked To: freebsd-net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4CGl0d6HYXz3bN1 X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=op8NEwmN; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of rysto32@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::542 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rysto32@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.13 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.979]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.991]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2a00:1450:4864:20::542:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.16)[-0.160]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 22:05:06 -0000 Today at $WORK we saw a panic due to a race between in6_joingroup_locked and if_detach_internal. This happened on a branch that's about 2 years behind head, but the relevant code in head does not appear to have changed. The backtrace of the panic was this: panic: Fatal trap 9: general protection fault while in kernel mode Stack: -------------------------------------------------- kernel:trap_fatal+0x96 kernel:trap+0x76 kernel:in6_joingroup_locked+0x2c7 kernel:in6_joingroup+0x46 kernel:in6_update_ifa+0x18e5 kernel:in6_ifattach+0x4d0 kernel:in6_if_up+0x99 kernel:if_up+0x7d kernel:ifhwioctl+0xcea kernel:ifioctl+0x2c9 kernel:kern_ioctl+0x29b kernel:sys_ioctl+0x16d kernel:amd64_syscall+0x327 We panic'ed here, because the memory pointed to by ifma has been freed and filled with 0xdeadc0de: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/netinet6/in6_mcast.c?revision=365071&view=markup#l421 Another thread was in the process of trying to destroy the same interface. It had the following backtrace at the time of the panic: #0 sched_switch (td=0xfffffea654845aa0, newtd=0xfffffea266fa9aa0, flags=) at /b/mnt/src/sys/kern/sched_ule.c:2423 #1 0xffffffff80643071 in mi_switch (flags=, newtd=0x0) at /b/mnt/src/sys/kern/kern_synch.c:605 #2 0xffffffff80693234 in sleepq_switch (wchan=0xffffffff8139cc90 , pri=0) at /b/mnt/src/sys/kern/subr_sleepqueue.c:612 #3 0xffffffff806930c3 in sleepq_wait (wchan=0xffffffff8139cc90 , pri=0) at /b/mnt/src/sys/kern/subr_sleepqueue.c:691 #4 0xffffffff8063fcb3 in _sx_xlock_hard (sx=, x=, opts=0, timo=0, file=, line=) at /b/mnt/src/sys/kern/kern_sx.c:936 #5 0xffffffff8063f313 in _sx_xlock (sx=0xffffffff8139cc90 , opts=0, timo=, file=0xffffffff80ba6d2a "/b/mnt/src/sys/net/i f_vlan.c", line=668) at /b/mnt/src/sys/kern/kern_sx.c:352 #6 0xffffffff807558b2 in vlan_ifdetach (arg=, ifp=0xfffff8049b2ce000) at /b/mnt/src/sys/net/if_vlan.c:668 #7 0xffffffff80747676 in if_detach_internal (vmove=0, ifp=, ifcp=) at /b/mnt/src/sys/net/if.c:1203 #8 if_detach (ifp=0xfffff8049b2ce000) at /b/mnt/src/sys/net/if.c:1060 #9 0xffffffff80756521 in vlan_clone_destroy (ifc=0xfffff802f29dbe80, ifp=0xfffff8049b2ce000) at /b/mnt/src/sys/net/if_vlan.c:1102 #10 0xffffffff8074dc57 in if_clone_destroyif (ifc=0xfffff802f29dbe80, ifp=0xfffff8049b2ce000) at /b/mnt/src/sys/net/if_clone.c:330 #11 0xffffffff8074dafe in if_clone_destroy (name=) at /b/mnt/src/sys/net/if_clone.c:288 #12 0xffffffff8074b2fd in ifioctl (so=0xfffffea6363806d0, cmd=2149607801, data=, td=0xfffffea654845aa0) at /b/mnt/src/sys/net/if. c:3077 #13 0xffffffff806aab1c in fo_ioctl (fp=, com=, active_cred=, td=, data= ) at /b/mnt/src/sys/sys/file.h:396 #14 kern_ioctl (td=0xfffffea654845aa0, fd=4, com=, data=) at /b/mnt/src/sys/kern/sys_generic.c:938 #15 0xffffffff806aa7fe in sys_ioctl (td=0xfffffea654845aa0, uap=0xfffffea653441b30) at /b/mnt/src/sys/kern/sys_generic.c:846 #16 0xffffffff809ceab8 in syscallenter (td=) at /b/mnt/src/sys/amd64/amd64/../../kern/subr_syscall.c:187 #17 amd64_syscall (td=0xfffffea654845aa0, traced=0) at /b/mnt/src/sys/amd64/amd64/trap.c:1196 #18 fast_syscall_common () at /b/mnt/src/sys/amd64/amd64/exception.S:505 Frame 7 was at this point in if_detach_internal https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/net/if.c?revision=366230&view=markup#l1206 As you can see, a couple of lines up if_purgemaddrs() was called and freed all multicast addresses assigned to the interface, which destroyed the multicast address being added out from under in6_joingroup_locked. I see two potential paths forward: either the wacky locking in in6_getmulti() gets fixed so that we don't have to do the "drop the lock to call a function that acquires that lock again" dance that opens up this race condition, or we fix if_addmulti so that it adds an additional reference to the address if retifma is non-NULL. The second option would be a KPI change that would have a nasty side effect of leaking the address if an existing caller wasn't fixed, but on the other hand the current interface seems pretty useless if it can't actually guarantee that the address you asked for will exist when you get around to trying to manipulate it. Does anybody have any thoughts on this? From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 21 22:10:55 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C98ED430AFC for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 22:10:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CGl7M530Wz3cqw for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 22:10:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id AD035430AFB; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 22:10:55 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACC56430819 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 22:10:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CGl7M48YGz3clN for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 22:10:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D630C997 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 22:10:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09LMAtDT085006 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 22:10:55 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09LMAtpm085003 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 22:10:55 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 250366] [tcp] The ioctl of socket fd should return -1 after listen to avoid misusing. Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 22:10:55 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: Unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 22:10:55 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D250366 Michael Tuexen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|New |In Progress --- Comment #2 from Michael Tuexen --- A fix is under review D26897. Avoiding accessing the send and receive buffe= rs is necessary. Instead of returning an error, one could return 0 in all case= s. Right now, I prefer to return an error. Let's see how the discussion of the review goes... --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 21 22:11:51 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A54F430B71 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 22:11:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CGl8Q4MTRz3dB8 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 22:11:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 7C566430C16; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 22:11:50 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 614E5430DDD for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 22:11:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CGl8Q0Hmjz3dB7 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 22:11:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6306C6FE for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 22:11:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09LMBnKi088642 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 22:11:49 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09LMBnhu088641 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 22:11:49 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 250366] [tcp] The ioctl of socket fd should return -1 after listen to avoid misusing. Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 22:11:49 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: Unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: flagtypes.name Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 22:11:52 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D250366 Michael Tuexen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |mfc-stable12? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Oct 22 09:56:32 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5671144414F for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 09:56:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CH2nX1hL7z4fBy for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 09:56:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 3748E444329; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 09:56:32 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D9B444392 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 09:56:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CH2nX0YHRz4fPt for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 09:56:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB9FC14FA1 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 09:56:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09M9uV3Y020317 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 09:56:31 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09M9uVkW020316 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 09:56:31 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 09:56:29 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: iflib, needs-qa, performance, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: sg@efficientip.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 09:56:32 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248652 --- Comment #33 from Sylvain Galliano --- (In reply to Vincenzo Maffione from comment #32) Here are the results: ixl only patch, 6 queues, pkt-get WITHOUT -R: 710.623764 main_thread [2642] 38.621 Mpps (38.698 Mpkts 18.538 Gbps in 1002= 000 usec) 512.00 avg_batch 99999 min_space ixl only patch, 1 queue, pkt-get WITHOUT -R: 670.168017 main_thread [2642] 0.000 pps (0.000 pkts 0.000 bps in 1009185 us= ec) 0.00 avg_batch 99999 min_space 671.181833 main_thread [2642] 0.000 pps (0.000 pkts 0.000 bps in 1013816 us= ec) 0.00 avg_batch 99999 min_space 672.171832 sender_body [1662] poll error on queue 0: timeout 672.171838 sender_body [1665] txring 513 513 513 672.191833 main_thread [2642] 0.000 pps (0.000 pkts 0.000 bps in 1010000 us= ec) 0.00 avg_batch 99999 min_space ixl only patch, 1 queue, pkt-get WITH -R: -R 1000: 813.372070 main_thread [2642] 1.001 Kpps (1.002 Kpkts 480.718 Kbps in 10005= 03 usec) 3.00 avg_batch 99999 min_space -R 2000: 860.807010 main_thread [2642] 2.006 Kpps (2.010 Kpkts 962.692 Kbps in 10021= 90 usec) 6.00 avg_batch 99999 min_space ... (all intermediate -R value worked) ... -R 17000000: 057.160242 main_thread [2642] 17.001 Mpps (18.072 Mpkts 8.160 Gbps in 10630= 00 usec) 512.00 avg_batch 99999 min_space -R 18000000: 030.167994 sender_body [1662] poll error on queue 0: timeout 030.168001 sender_body [1665] txring 513 513 513 ixl + timer patches, 1 queue, pkt-get WITH -R: sysctl nm_tx_tmr_us=3D5 -R 1000: 261.886507 main_thread [2642] 1.001 Kpps (1.065 Kpkts 480.679 Kbps in 10634= 96 usec) 3.00 avg_batch 99999 min_space -R 2000: 279.365024 main_thread [2642] 2.000 Kpps (2.034 Kpkts 960.219 Kbps in 10167= 68 usec) 6.00 avg_batch 99999 min_space ... (all intermediate -R value worked) ... -R 17000000 388.372451 main_thread [2642] 17.000 Mpps (18.079 Mpkts 8.160 Gbps in 10634= 31 usec) 512.00 avg_batch 99999 min_space -R 18000000 894.421917 main_thread [2642] 18.000 Mpps (18.036 Mpkts 8.640 Gbps in 10020= 01 usec) 512.00 avg_batch 99999 min_space and sometime an error -R 19000000 991.012912 sender_body [1662] poll error on queue 0: timeout 991.012920 sender_body [1665] txring 513 513 513 another run: 968.011919 sender_body [1662] poll error on queue 0: timeout 968.011926 sender_body [1665] txring 235 235 235 and another one: 112.008840 sender_body [1662] poll error on queue 0: timeout 112.008848 sender_body [1665] txring 95 95 95 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Oct 22 13:10:07 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32F014484E7 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:10:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CH74v0fkMz3bdb for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:10:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 14BD24484E6; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:10:07 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13553448507 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:10:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CH74t6jn7z3bPl for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:10:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB39C16ED6 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:10:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09MDA6a2027754 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:10:06 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09MDA6GB027753 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:10:06 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 224218] [sctp] Kernel panic in SCTP/IpV6 server mode Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:10:05 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:10:07 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D224218 Michael Tuexen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Kernel panic in SCTP/IpV6 |[sctp] Kernel panic in |server mode |SCTP/IpV6 server mode --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Oct 22 22:08:19 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8846442C0D9 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 22:08:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: from forward500o.mail.yandex.net (forward500o.mail.yandex.net [37.140.190.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CHM1s3jJPz4YTW for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 22:08:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: from mxback15o.mail.yandex.net (mxback15o.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1a2d::66]) by forward500o.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 1069660059; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 01:08:14 +0300 (MSK) Received: from localhost (localhost [::1]) by mxback15o.mail.yandex.net (mxback/Yandex) with ESMTP id jsxRKMqg1v-8DC0tOf3; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 01:08:13 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipfw.ru; s=mail; t=1603404493; bh=B2fbmrnwT3WIEf5E8t8wIw6j2//b/JJVrKZHyu7WFPg=; h=References:Date:Message-Id:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From; b=pPHztj9FfHtE9EYm/FDFxx1FeMebthijmKd9pDbbnfbz0QYrcwga+CQgnua0+8KWo jdmvKQg84xXR4owysKZ0Rfk82R2BeTiKz59Xlh6KQlwWaBSmnzkApLG/rNr2D9NZzu iRBRWkJKRSF9t6oGQ3rBRTH9oZQpwzd4Mzq1qzEE= Received: by iva4-b954b1b05fd9.qloud-c.yandex.net with HTTP; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 01:08:13 +0300 From: Alexander V. Chernikov To: Ryan Stone , freebsd-net In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: Panic in in6_joingroup_locked X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 23:08:13 +0100 Message-Id: <296251603404389@mail.yandex.ru> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4CHM1s3jJPz4YTW X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=ipfw.ru header.s=mail header.b=pPHztj9F; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of melifaro@ipfw.ru designates 37.140.190.195 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=melifaro@ipfw.ru X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.83 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_VERYGOOD(0.00)[37.140.190.195:from]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[ipfw.ru:s=mail]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[melifaro]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:37.140.128.0/18]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.980]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[ipfw.ru]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.992]; MIME_BASE64_TEXT_BOGUS(1.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[ipfw.ru:+]; MIME_BASE64_TEXT(0.10)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.65)[-0.655]; MIME_HTML_ONLY(0.20)[]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com,freebsd.org]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:~]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13238, ipnet:37.140.128.0/18, country:RU]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[37.140.190.195:from] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 22:08:19 -0000 From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Oct 22 22:10:59 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B4C842C5DA for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 22:10:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: from forward501o.mail.yandex.net (forward501o.mail.yandex.net [37.140.190.203]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CHM4y1KPJz4Yrr for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 22:10:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: from mxback3o.mail.yandex.net (mxback3o.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1a2d::1d]) by forward501o.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id A9CF61E800D5; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 01:10:55 +0300 (MSK) Received: from localhost (localhost [::1]) by mxback3o.mail.yandex.net (mxback/Yandex) with ESMTP id y4jX5wXI8z-AtlucM6L; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 01:10:55 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipfw.ru; s=mail; t=1603404655; bh=tfm+WwEjOobnWifHRw02/alGsHXQFWDV4jdn7DXML20=; h=References:Date:Message-Id:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From; b=LQLhfZpBOS3ndDJV262ZgElJImuaWE9G+cTnTHHvecyvzV8054NtNjkgklbJ41ydD MFgSJZVft+P2qQ+Wp1m87wB58OFmgFAMZkCs5WnOSvRIn4FtLZ3Q0/1/Kdghe8gpen MFHG/+onCl+4CA2lTdF2bEq/LASYhSWFKIz4tb70= Received: by sas1-8f5b4ec544f6.qloud-c.yandex.net with HTTP; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 01:10:55 +0300 From: Alexander V. Chernikov To: Ryan Stone , freebsd-net In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: Panic in in6_joingroup_locked MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 23:10:55 +0100 Message-Id: <244891603404616@mail.yandex.ru> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4CHM4y1KPJz4Yrr X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=ipfw.ru header.s=mail header.b=LQLhfZpB; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of melifaro@ipfw.ru designates 37.140.190.203 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=melifaro@ipfw.ru X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.67 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.981]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[ipfw.ru:s=mail]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[melifaro]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[37.140.190.203:from]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:37.140.128.0/18:c]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.983]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[ipfw.ru]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[ipfw.ru:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.11)[-1.111]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com,freebsd.org]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13238, ipnet:37.140.128.0/18, country:RU]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[37.140.190.203:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 22:10:59 -0000 21.10.2020, 23:05, "Ryan Stone" : > Today at $WORK we saw a panic due to a race between > in6_joingroup_locked and if_detach_internal. This happened on a > branch that's about 2 years behind head, but the relevant code in head > does not appear to have changed. > > The backtrace of the panic was this: > > panic: Fatal trap 9: general protection fault while in kernel mode > Stack: -------------------------------------------------- > kernel:trap_fatal+0x96 > kernel:trap+0x76 > kernel:in6_joingroup_locked+0x2c7 > kernel:in6_joingroup+0x46 > kernel:in6_update_ifa+0x18e5 > kernel:in6_ifattach+0x4d0 > kernel:in6_if_up+0x99 > kernel:if_up+0x7d > kernel:ifhwioctl+0xcea > kernel:ifioctl+0x2c9 > kernel:kern_ioctl+0x29b > kernel:sys_ioctl+0x16d > kernel:amd64_syscall+0x327 > > We panic'ed here, because the memory pointed to by ifma has been freed > and filled with 0xdeadc0de: > > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/netinet6/in6_mcast.c?revision=365071&view=markup#l421 > > Another thread was in the process of trying to destroy the same > interface. It had the following backtrace at the time of the panic: > > #0 sched_switch (td=0xfffffea654845aa0, newtd=0xfffffea266fa9aa0, > flags=) at /b/mnt/src/sys/kern/sched_ule.c:2423 > #1 0xffffffff80643071 in mi_switch (flags=, newtd=0x0) > at /b/mnt/src/sys/kern/kern_synch.c:605 > #2 0xffffffff80693234 in sleepq_switch (wchan=0xffffffff8139cc90 > , pri=0) at /b/mnt/src/sys/kern/subr_sleepqueue.c:612 > #3 0xffffffff806930c3 in sleepq_wait (wchan=0xffffffff8139cc90 > , pri=0) at /b/mnt/src/sys/kern/subr_sleepqueue.c:691 > #4 0xffffffff8063fcb3 in _sx_xlock_hard (sx=, > x=, opts=0, timo=0, file=, > line=) at > /b/mnt/src/sys/kern/kern_sx.c:936 > #5 0xffffffff8063f313 in _sx_xlock (sx=0xffffffff8139cc90 , > opts=0, timo=, file=0xffffffff80ba6d2a > "/b/mnt/src/sys/net/i > f_vlan.c", line=668) at /b/mnt/src/sys/kern/kern_sx.c:352 > #6 0xffffffff807558b2 in vlan_ifdetach (arg=, > ifp=0xfffff8049b2ce000) at /b/mnt/src/sys/net/if_vlan.c:668 > #7 0xffffffff80747676 in if_detach_internal (vmove=0, ifp= out>, ifcp=) at /b/mnt/src/sys/net/if.c:1203 > #8 if_detach (ifp=0xfffff8049b2ce000) at /b/mnt/src/sys/net/if.c:1060 > #9 0xffffffff80756521 in vlan_clone_destroy (ifc=0xfffff802f29dbe80, > ifp=0xfffff8049b2ce000) at /b/mnt/src/sys/net/if_vlan.c:1102 > #10 0xffffffff8074dc57 in if_clone_destroyif (ifc=0xfffff802f29dbe80, > ifp=0xfffff8049b2ce000) at /b/mnt/src/sys/net/if_clone.c:330 > #11 0xffffffff8074dafe in if_clone_destroy (name=) at > /b/mnt/src/sys/net/if_clone.c:288 > #12 0xffffffff8074b2fd in ifioctl (so=0xfffffea6363806d0, > cmd=2149607801, data=, td=0xfffffea654845aa0) at > /b/mnt/src/sys/net/if. > c:3077 > #13 0xffffffff806aab1c in fo_ioctl (fp=, com= out>, active_cred=, td=, data= out> > ) at /b/mnt/src/sys/sys/file.h:396 > #14 kern_ioctl (td=0xfffffea654845aa0, fd=4, com=, > data=) at /b/mnt/src/sys/kern/sys_generic.c:938 > #15 0xffffffff806aa7fe in sys_ioctl (td=0xfffffea654845aa0, > uap=0xfffffea653441b30) at /b/mnt/src/sys/kern/sys_generic.c:846 > #16 0xffffffff809ceab8 in syscallenter (td=) at > /b/mnt/src/sys/amd64/amd64/../../kern/subr_syscall.c:187 > #17 amd64_syscall (td=0xfffffea654845aa0, traced=0) at > /b/mnt/src/sys/amd64/amd64/trap.c:1196 > #18 fast_syscall_common () at /b/mnt/src/sys/amd64/amd64/exception.S:505 > > Frame 7 was at this point in if_detach_internal > > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/net/if.c?revision=366230&view=markup#l1206 > > As you can see, a couple of lines up if_purgemaddrs() was called and > freed all multicast addresses assigned to the interface, which > destroyed the multicast address being added out from under > in6_joingroup_locked. [sorry, re-posting in plain text] I don't have a solution w.r.t. multicast locking spaghetti, but from looking into a code, it looks like that extending network epoch to the whole in6_getmulti() would fix this panic? > > I see two potential paths forward: either the wacky locking in > in6_getmulti() gets fixed so that we don't have to do the "drop the > lock to call a function that acquires that lock again" dance that > opens up this race condition, or we fix if_addmulti so that it adds an > additional reference to the address if retifma is non-NULL. > > The second option would be a KPI change that would have a nasty side > effect of leaking the address if an existing caller wasn't fixed, but > on the other hand the current interface seems pretty useless if it > can't actually guarantee that the address you asked for will exist > when you get around to trying to manipulate it. > > Does anybody have any thoughts on this? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Oct 22 23:19:13 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8258C42D45D for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 23:19:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from mx1.sbone.de (mx1.sbone.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:13b:39f::9f:25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx1.sbone.de", Issuer "SBone.DE" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CHNbg6kWxz4cCH for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 23:19:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from mail.sbone.de (mail.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:587]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1ACDC8D4A156; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 23:19:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from content-filter.sbone.de (content-filter.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:2742]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98336E707BC; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 23:19:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sbone.de Received: from mail.sbone.de ([IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:587]) by content-filter.sbone.de (content-filter.sbone.de [fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:2742]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kpiirD42jd5H; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 23:19:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [169.254.148.91] (unknown [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:4902:b484:32a4:9b73:866b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9A945E707B0; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 23:19:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" To: "Alexander V. Chernikov" Cc: "Ryan Stone" , freebsd-net Subject: Re: Panic in in6_joingroup_locked Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 23:19:04 +0000 X-Mailer: MailMate (2.0BETAr6151) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <244891603404616@mail.yandex.ru> References: <244891603404616@mail.yandex.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4CHNbg6kWxz4cCH X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net designates 2a01:4f8:13b:39f::9f:25 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.66 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_MISSING_CHARSET(2.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a01:4f8:13b:39f::9f:25]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zabbadoz.net]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.03)[-1.029]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.87)[-0.874]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.96)[-0.956]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:2a01:4f8::/29, country:DE]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[gmail.com,freebsd.org]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 23:19:13 -0000 On 22 Oct 2020, at 22:10, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote: > 21.10.2020, 23:05, "Ryan Stone" : >> Today at $WORK we saw a panic due to a race between >> in6_joingroup_locked and if_detach_internal. This happened on a >> branch that's about 2 years behind head, but the relevant code in = >> head >> does not appear to have changed. >> >> The backtrace of the panic was this: >> >> panic: Fatal trap 9: general protection fault while in kernel mode >> Stack: -------------------------------------------------- >> kernel:trap_fatal+0x96 >> kernel:trap+0x76 >> kernel:in6_joingroup_locked+0x2c7 >> kernel:in6_joingroup+0x46 >> kernel:in6_update_ifa+0x18e5 >> kernel:in6_ifattach+0x4d0 >> kernel:in6_if_up+0x99 >> kernel:if_up+0x7d >> kernel:ifhwioctl+0xcea >> kernel:ifioctl+0x2c9 >> kernel:kern_ioctl+0x29b >> kernel:sys_ioctl+0x16d >> kernel:amd64_syscall+0x327 >> >> We panic'ed here, because the memory pointed to by ifma has been = >> freed >> and filled with 0xdeadc0de: >> >> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/netinet6/in6_mcast.c?revision= =3D365071&view=3Dmarkup#l421 >> >> Another thread was in the process of trying to destroy the same >> interface. It had the following backtrace at the time of the panic: >> >> #0 sched_switch (td=3D0xfffffea654845aa0, newtd=3D0xfffffea266fa9aa0, >> flags=3D) at /b/mnt/src/sys/kern/sched_ule.c:2423 >> #1 0xffffffff80643071 in mi_switch (flags=3D, newtd=3D0= x0) >> at /b/mnt/src/sys/kern/kern_synch.c:605 >> #2 0xffffffff80693234 in sleepq_switch (wchan=3D0xffffffff8139cc90 >> , pri=3D0) at /b/mnt/src/sys/kern/subr_sleepqueue.c:612 >> #3 0xffffffff806930c3 in sleepq_wait (wchan=3D0xffffffff8139cc90 >> , pri=3D0) at /b/mnt/src/sys/kern/subr_sleepqueue.c:691 >> #4 0xffffffff8063fcb3 in _sx_xlock_hard (sx=3D, >> x=3D, opts=3D0, timo=3D0, file=3D, >> line=3D) at >> /b/mnt/src/sys/kern/kern_sx.c:936 >> #5 0xffffffff8063f313 in _sx_xlock (sx=3D0xffffffff8139cc90 , >> opts=3D0, timo=3D, file=3D0xffffffff80ba6d2a >> "/b/mnt/src/sys/net/i >> f_vlan.c", line=3D668) at /b/mnt/src/sys/kern/kern_sx.c:352 >> #6 0xffffffff807558b2 in vlan_ifdetach (arg=3D, >> ifp=3D0xfffff8049b2ce000) at /b/mnt/src/sys/net/if_vlan.c:668 >> #7 0xffffffff80747676 in if_detach_internal (vmove=3D0, ifp=3D> out>, ifcp=3D) at /b/mnt/src/sys/net/if.c:1203 >> #8 if_detach (ifp=3D0xfffff8049b2ce000) at /b/mnt/src/sys/net/if.c:106= 0 >> #9 0xffffffff80756521 in vlan_clone_destroy (ifc=3D0xfffff802f29dbe80,= >> ifp=3D0xfffff8049b2ce000) at /b/mnt/src/sys/net/if_vlan.c:1102 >> #10 0xffffffff8074dc57 in if_clone_destroyif (ifc=3D0xfffff802f29dbe80= , >> ifp=3D0xfffff8049b2ce000) at /b/mnt/src/sys/net/if_clone.c:330 >> #11 0xffffffff8074dafe in if_clone_destroy (name=3D) at= >> /b/mnt/src/sys/net/if_clone.c:288 >> #12 0xffffffff8074b2fd in ifioctl (so=3D0xfffffea6363806d0, >> cmd=3D2149607801, data=3D, td=3D0xfffffea654845aa0) at >> /b/mnt/src/sys/net/if. >> c:3077 >> #13 0xffffffff806aab1c in fo_ioctl (fp=3D, = >> com=3D> out>, active_cred=3D, td=3D, data=3D> out> >> ) at /b/mnt/src/sys/sys/file.h:396 >> #14 kern_ioctl (td=3D0xfffffea654845aa0, fd=3D4, com=3D= , >> data=3D) at /b/mnt/src/sys/kern/sys_generic.c:938 >> #15 0xffffffff806aa7fe in sys_ioctl (td=3D0xfffffea654845aa0, >> uap=3D0xfffffea653441b30) at /b/mnt/src/sys/kern/sys_generic.c:846 >> #16 0xffffffff809ceab8 in syscallenter (td=3D) at >> /b/mnt/src/sys/amd64/amd64/../../kern/subr_syscall.c:187 >> #17 amd64_syscall (td=3D0xfffffea654845aa0, traced=3D0) at >> /b/mnt/src/sys/amd64/amd64/trap.c:1196 >> #18 fast_syscall_common () at = >> /b/mnt/src/sys/amd64/amd64/exception.S:505 >> >> Frame 7 was at this point in if_detach_internal >> >> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/net/if.c?revision=3D366230&vi= ew=3Dmarkup#l1206 >> >> As you can see, a couple of lines up if_purgemaddrs() was called and >> freed all multicast addresses assigned to the interface, which >> destroyed the multicast address being added out from under >> in6_joingroup_locked. > [sorry, re-posting in plain text] > I don't have a solution w.r.t. multicast locking spaghetti, but from = > looking into a code, it looks like that > extending network epoch to the whole in6_getmulti() would fix this = > panic? would that introduce even more recursions? >> I see two potential paths forward: either the wacky locking in >> in6_getmulti() gets fixed so that we don't have to do the "drop the >> lock to call a function that acquires that lock again" dance that >> opens up this race condition, or we fix if_addmulti so that it adds = >> an >> additional reference to the address if retifma is non-NULL. >> >> The second option would be a KPI change that would have a nasty side >> effect of leaking the address if an existing caller wasn't fixed, but >> on the other hand the current interface seems pretty useless if it >> can't actually guarantee that the address you asked for will exist >> when you get around to trying to manipulate it. >> >> Does anybody have any thoughts on this? >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = >> "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Oct 23 13:14:20 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBBF94468F8 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 13:14:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@prt.org) Received: from smtp1.mail.clearhost.co.uk (smtp1.mail.clearhost.co.uk [IPv6:2001:1420::25:101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.mail.clearhost.co.uk", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CHl7H575Xz46ch for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 13:14:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@prt.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=prt.org; s=dkim1; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=3VaDEBs4JFaxCK3Sb5pjzo/ClViPPd9vYOMX1WC8FFM=; b=fO2+uNwlNwdltSk5qdakxVcrwH wdUDGJ9osTBfazdKv5sG25kN/1+OPkDmtQtxv0dHUZGP+9xpY3PjGmLDcNmA4JkSwYwT0HEXJ/b4r t7qplt25CV1igaCAI3MOe31KBN0AZOtYfF4S3sstsR6j7p5qwcjmRp+nhxTWg750Zulk=; Received: from [2001:1420:c:1:1407:e634:f1a5:d12a] (port=50211 helo=242-lan.arccan.com) by smtp1.mail.clearhost.co.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kVwtX-0004wf-14 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 13:14:11 +0000 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: Paul Thornton Subject: Getting netgraph stats Message-ID: <3b933e75-1ef2-cb80-dc9e-2426cddc4e21@prt.org> Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 14:14:10 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClearHost-AuthUser: paul@prt.org X-ClearHost-AuthDomain: prt.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4CHl7H575Xz46ch X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=prt.org header.s=dkim1 header.b=fO2+uNwl; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of paul@prt.org designates 2001:1420::25:101 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=paul@prt.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.74 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[prt.org:s=dkim1]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[paul]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.986]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[prt.org]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:smtp.mail.clearhost.co.uk]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[prt.org:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.32)[-0.316]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.94)[-0.941]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8676, ipnet:2001:1420::/32, country:GB]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 13:14:20 -0000 I am having a problem monitoring network stats on jails on a host. Scenario: One host, FreeBSD 12.1, with a small number of vnet jails. I'm using netgraph to bridge two or more VLANs from physical NICs into each jail - so each jail has at least 2 ngether interfaces which are the only NICs in the jail. All of this works well. And then I wanted to see what each of my ngethX interface statistics were doing - from my host. snmpd only sees the physical NICs (of course, because the ngeth ones don't appear any more since the jails are started - they all moved to the jails). As another approach, is there any way for me to get the network stats (in/out packets and in/out bytes) from my ngeth netgraph nodes directly? Or have I missed some other way? I really need to monitor the jails from the outside as I cannot guarantee I can reach snmpd running inside the jail (think of the jail as being a private environment where I cannot route my SNMP requests to). Thanks Paul. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Oct 23 15:01:58 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 492E8448371 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:01:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CHnWV1F7bz4DlL for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:01:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 2A93A448370; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:01:58 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A58344861D for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:01:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CHnWV0N2Dz4FFx for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:01:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E467494F7 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:01:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09NF1vbY014697 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:01:57 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09NF1viw014696 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:01:57 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 250499] [tcp] Should we reject the packet with timestamp if no timestamp in SYN and SYN_ACK? Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:01:57 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:01:58 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D250499 Michael Tuexen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|New |In Progress --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Oct 23 15:13:03 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DD67448B77 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:13:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CHnmH00xGz4Fnl for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:13:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 002A944865F; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:13:03 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F4182448471 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:13:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CHnmG6HVcz4Fb3 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:13:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BADBB9729 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:13:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09NFD2Fr029696 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:13:02 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09NFD2pj029695 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:13:02 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 214558] [tcp] Improve descriptions for sysctl net.inet.tcp.keepinit Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:13:02 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:13:03 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D214558 Michael Tuexen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Improve descriptions for |[tcp] Improve descriptions |sysctl |for sysctl |net.inet.tcp.keepinit |net.inet.tcp.keepinit CC| |tuexen@freebsd.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Oct 23 15:14:41 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 952BB44896F for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:14:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CHnp93NVZz4FxP for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:14:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 74107448861; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:14:41 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73D52448860 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:14:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CHnp92WVsz4FrT for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:14:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B38296A7 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:14:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09NFEfwN031082 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:14:41 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09NFEf88031081 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:14:41 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 234444] [tcp] cc_htcp + TCP_RFC7413 panic Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:14:41 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.2-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:14:41 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D234444 Michael Tuexen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|cc_htcp + TCP_RFC7413 panic |[tcp] cc_htcp + TCP_RFC7413 | |panic --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Oct 23 15:19:52 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D660A44887D for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:19:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CHnw85Pn6z4G1T for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:19:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B7AAC448C4E; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:19:52 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B76DC448CA4 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:19:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CHnw84TVnz4FvW for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:19:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E90E9811 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:19:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09NFJqvO035642 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:19:52 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09NFJq1g035641 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:19:52 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 217214] [tcp] frequent panics in tcp_output/sbsndptr Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:19:51 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:19:52 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D217214 Michael Tuexen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|frequent panics in |[tcp] frequent panics in |tcp_output/sbsndptr |tcp_output/sbsndptr CC| |tuexen@freebsd.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Oct 23 15:21:20 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0530448DB7 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:21:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CHnxr5j4wz4FwH for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:21:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id C3BD1448DB5; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:21:20 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3881448D39 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:21:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CHnxr4pP5z4Fqf for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:21:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 885CA96B5 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:21:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09NFLKOq037627 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:21:20 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09NFLKwm037626 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:21:20 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 242492] [tcp] TCP fast open observability Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:21:20 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:21:20 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D242492 Michael Tuexen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|TCP fast open observability |[tcp] TCP fast open | |observability --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Oct 23 15:21:59 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F2C4448CD3 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:21:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CHnyb1VWbz4GX3 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:21:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 3379F44910D; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:21:59 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33441448DCE for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:21:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CHnyb0h9Yz4GCW for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:21:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0359974C for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:21:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09NFLw15038908 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:21:58 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09NFLwaC038907 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:21:58 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 238741] [tcp] RACK stack causes connections to hang Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:21:58 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:21:59 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D238741 Michael Tuexen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|RACK tcpip stack causes |[tcp] RACK stack causes |connections to hang |connections to hang CC| |tuexen@freebsd.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Oct 23 15:23:19 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98283448CE9 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:23:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CHp073Vn7z4GdR for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:23:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 784E6448CE8; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:23:19 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7819C448E46 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:23:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CHp072fKKz4GDF for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:23:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EEA09A1C for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:23:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09NFNJIQ040926 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:23:19 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09NFNJRf040925 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:23:19 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240416] [tcp] Windows scaling (net.inet.tcp.rfc1323=1) does not start the TCP connection to some systems Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:23:18 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:23:19 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240416 Michael Tuexen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Windows scaling |[tcp] Windows scaling |(net.inet.tcp.rfc1323=3D1) |(net.inet.tcp.rfc1323=3D= 1) |does not start the TCP |does not start the TCP |connection to some systems |connection to some systems CC| |tuexen@freebsd.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Oct 23 15:24:18 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2BF1448FC5 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:24:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CHp1G5l8lz4GVm for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:24:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id C4E68448F74; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:24:18 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4AAF4491A5 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:24:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CHp1G4mXYz4GSB for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:24:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86F7796C4 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:24:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09NFOIhm041760 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:24:18 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09NFOIYT041759 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:24:18 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240946] [tcp] Check for ipv6_zoneid in tcp_hc_lookup() alongside inc6_faddr Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:24:18 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc short_desc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:24:18 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240946 Michael Tuexen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tuexen@freebsd.org Summary|netinet: Check for |[tcp] Check for ipv6_zoneid |ipv6_zoneid in |in tcp_hc_lookup() |tcp_hc_lookup() alongside |alongside inc6_faddr |inc6_faddr | --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Oct 23 16:58:08 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C6EC44AE3F for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 16:58:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CHr5X2Hjyz4MfP for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 16:58:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 4EAE344AE94; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 16:58:08 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E7A444AF12 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 16:58:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CHr5X1QMfz4MWb for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 16:58:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15290AA9B for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 16:58:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09NGw7Yt067344 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 16:58:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09NGw7eU067342 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 16:58:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 250552] [net] [fib] dangling route table entry after destroying interface Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 16:58:07 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 16:58:08 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D250552 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|bugs@FreeBSD.org |net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Oct 23 18:02:45 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C89E244BD40 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:02:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CHsX550w1z4Qph for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:02:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id AB6BA44BD3F; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:02:45 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA1F744BEB4 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:02:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CHsX545PYz4QmM for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:02:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F942B6DA for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:02:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09NI2jMb039290 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:02:45 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09NI2jJN039289 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:02:45 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 219991] [tcp][PATCH] TCP process bogus packets with too large ACK Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:02:43 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:02:45 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D219991 Michael Tuexen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[PATCH] TCP process bogus |[tcp][PATCH] TCP process |packets with too large ACK |bogus packets with too | |large ACK --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Oct 23 18:04:45 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC8A544BEDB for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:04:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CHsZP5bjBz4R4k for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:04:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id BFC8F44BD57; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:04:45 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF81444BD56 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:04:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CHsZP4mB9z4R4j for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:04:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81935B6DC for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:04:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09NI4jr3040851 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:04:45 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09NI4jWO040850 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:04:45 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 61744] [tcp] [patch] TCP hangs onto mbufs with no tcp data unnecessily under certain error conditions Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:04:44 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: Unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:04:46 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D61744 Michael Tuexen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[netinet] [patch] TCP hangs |[tcp] [patch] TCP hangs |onto mbufs with no tcp data |onto mbufs with no tcp data |unnecessily under certain |unnecessily under certain |error conditions |error conditions CC| |tuexen@freebsd.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Oct 23 18:06:53 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F3A244BD7B for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:06:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CHscs2rl3z4RJR for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:06:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 61BF644BD7A; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:06:53 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6187644C491 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:06:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CHscs20Rbz4RGv for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:06:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28F19B904 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:06:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09NI6rXj042614 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:06:53 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09NI6rno042613 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:06:53 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 237720] [tcp] tcpip network stack seized for six hours after large high-throughput file transfer Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:06:52 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:06:53 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D237720 Michael Tuexen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|tcpip network stack seized |[tcp] tcpip network stack |for six hours after large |seized for six hours after |high-throughput file |large high-throughput file |transfer |transfer --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Oct 23 18:10:52 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA15C44C68A for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:10:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CHsjS562Cz4RbC for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:10:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id AF24744C5E5; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:10:52 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEE8F44C80A for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:10:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CHsjS4Bqxz4RYB for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:10:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74017B983 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:10:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09NIAqlQ046536 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:10:52 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09NIAqG9046535 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:10:52 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 125845] [tcp] [patch] tcp_lro_rx() should make use of hardware IP cksum assistance when available Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:10:51 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: Unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:10:52 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D125845 Michael Tuexen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[netinet] [patch] |[tcp] [patch] tcp_lro_rx() |tcp_lro_rx() should make |should make use of hardware |use of hardware IP cksum |IP cksum assistance when |assistance when available |available CC| |tuexen@freebsd.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Oct 23 18:30:05 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E481C44CCBE for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:30:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CHt7d5rYdz4SRm for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:30:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id C6F0C44CCBD; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:30:05 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6B7844CBE3 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:30:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CHt7d4y0Fz4SMk for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:30:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D5E8B9E5 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:30:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09NIU55P073117 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:30:05 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09NIU5YF073116 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:30:05 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 125845] [tcp] [patch] tcp_lro_rx() should make use of hardware IP cksum assistance when available Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:30:05 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: Unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: hselasky@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:30:06 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D125845 --- Comment #4 from Hans Petter Selasky --- Change looks good to me. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Oct 23 20:57:31 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8D8A44ED22 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 20:57:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CHxPl46Bjz4Zs1 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 20:57:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 8AEA344ED21; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 20:57:31 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8986444EF80 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 20:57:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CHxPl2wJjz4ZpK for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 20:57:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49023D3D0 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 20:57:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09NKvV7T051890 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 20:57:31 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09NKvVoc051889 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 20:57:31 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 20:57:30 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: iflib, needs-qa, performance, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? mfc-stable11- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 20:57:31 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248652 --- Comment #34 from Vincenzo Maffione --- (In reply to Sylvain Galliano from comment #33) Ok, thanks. At this point it's clear that there are two indipendent issues = that slow down netmap-iflib on ix/ixl. The first is the lack of a per-tx-queue netmap timer (or taskqueue). The second is the lack of descriptor writeback moderation in ixl. We can start by merging the timer patch, and then work on the separate ixl issue. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Oct 23 23:02:47 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8490428EB4 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 23:02:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CJ0BH51JDz3SXG for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 23:02:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id AA6014290B3; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 23:02:47 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA247428E1D for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 23:02:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CJ0BH42p3z3SZ2 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 23:02:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E2F9EBBD for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 23:02:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09NN2lUo092890 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 23:02:47 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09NN2lCY092889 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 23:02:47 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 125845] [tcp] [patch] tcp_lro_rx() should make use of hardware IP cksum assistance when available Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 23:02:47 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: Unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: np@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: Overcome By Events X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 23:02:47 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D125845 Navdeep Parhar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Open |Closed Resolution|--- |Overcome By Events --- Comment #5 from Navdeep Parhar --- The LRO code has been modified extensively since this bug was filed. The latest code does take CSUM_IP_CHECKED and CSUM_IP_VALID into account. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Oct 24 01:00:42 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 332B142A856; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 01:00:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dewayne.geraghty@heuristicsystems.com.au) Received: from hermes.heuristicsystems.com.au (hermes.heuristicsystems.com.au [203.41.22.115]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2560 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "hermes.heuristicsystems.com.au", Issuer "Heuristic Systems Type 4 Host CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CJ2pJ2x1sz3XV9; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 01:00:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dewayne.geraghty@heuristicsystems.com.au) Received: from [10.0.5.3] (noddy.hs [10.0.5.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by hermes.heuristicsystems.com.au (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 09O0woi1094942 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 24 Oct 2020 11:58:51 +1100 (AEDT) (envelope-from dewayne.geraghty@heuristicsystems.com.au) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=heuristicsystems.com.au; s=hsa; t=1603501131; x=1604105932; bh=Xv6l2z8cAbTRfP4eVgvJZoU9QKizrY4BmXkMYy5Oy1Y=; h=Subject:To:From:Message-ID:Date; b=NmDWeUgWxN03ERR8UdBysjOVEN9xQjwvEM33HHPodCpW6CfDeOOvou9kaGusZwGqS yKo+MeDhpBnRFHi7gymPxAKDAHS+vNuvzi2T8ypJyLvsD4hqtB1DNQTPLRDa1vF16G s1PKYZ1QZgx165Dv39n7dSo4q6FyOjhMaVDjTbwewtlzs8nVYO4vC X-Authentication-Warning: b3.hs: Host noddy.hs [10.0.5.3] claimed to be [10.0.5.3] Subject: Re: Allow PING(8) in jails without raw socket access permissions To: carlos antonio neira bustos , freebsd-net , FreeBSD Hackers References: From: Dewayne Geraghty Message-ID: <9ffe565d-65cb-cbfa-f0dc-189ee8d7215e@heuristicsystems.com.au> Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 11:50:05 +1100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.3.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4CJ2pJ2x1sz3XV9 X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=heuristicsystems.com.au header.s=hsa header.b=NmDWeUgW; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of dewayne.geraghty@heuristicsystems.com.au designates 203.41.22.115 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=dewayne.geraghty@heuristicsystems.com.au X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.60 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; R_DKIM_REJECT(1.00)[heuristicsystems.com.au:s=hsa]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[heuristicsystems.com.au]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.83)[-0.825]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[203.41.22.115:from]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[heuristicsystems.com.au:-]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.54)[-0.539]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.74)[-0.739]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com,freebsd.org]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:1221, ipnet:203.40.0.0/13, country:AU]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-hackers,freebsd-net] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 01:00:42 -0000 On 15/10/2020 9:00 am, carlos antonio neira bustos wrote: > Hello, > > I have currently a patch in review with jamie which is the current jail > maintainer and kyle evans, if anyone else could comment/review this patch : > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26782 > > What has been done is the following : > > Raw socket access is allowed for ICMP protocol as is required by > PING(8) but option IP_HDRINCL is not allowed. to accomplish this > a new privilege PRIV_NETINET_ICMP_ACCESS has been added by default for > jails. > > > Bests > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Thanks for the heads-up Carlos. I have a use for allowing only icmp traffic, so its beneficial. However I do agree with BZ that it should not be enabled by default, as it weakens the security model, enabling a broken jail to more easily enumerate the wider network environment. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Oct 24 10:47:32 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A5F444DBF for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 10:47:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CJHqS2764z4NtJ for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 10:47:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 48F43444E91; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 10:47:32 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48C1D444F0D for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 10:47:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CJHqS1Hkhz4NXB for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 10:47:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10F9817694 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 10:47:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09OAlVDe013346 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 10:47:31 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09OAlVYV013345 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 10:47:31 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 250552] [net] [fib] dangling route table entry after destroying interface Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 10:47:31 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: zlei.huang@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 10:47:32 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D250552 --- Comment #1 from Zhenlei Huang --- Created attachment 219032 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D219032&action= =3Dedit Draft patch to fix 12 STABLE --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Oct 24 13:11:40 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14CF2448FBC for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 13:11:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CJM1l6s9Tz4XL9 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 13:11:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id EB5D2448F60; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 13:11:39 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB296448DE0 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 13:11:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CJM1l62x1z4X8r for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 13:11:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B45E919097 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 13:11:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09ODBdam076842 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 13:11:39 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09ODBdD7076841 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 13:11:39 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 211106] [net][fib][loopback][route] loopback route added only to interface fib, even if net.add_addr_allfibs = 1 Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 13:11:39 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: zlei.huang@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 13:11:40 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D211106 --- Comment #2 from Zhenlei Huang --- This can be reproduced on stable/12 . --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Oct 24 13:14:43 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B2E4449405 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 13:14:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CJM5G706Vz4XrT for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 13:14:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id EFF284493BC; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 13:14:42 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFBC04492D1 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 13:14:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CJM5G6964z4XS0 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 13:14:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B606F190A3 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 13:14:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09ODEgQ4079326 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 13:14:42 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09ODEgmR079325 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 13:14:42 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 211106] [net][fib][loopback][route] loopback route added only to interface fib, even if net.add_addr_allfibs = 1 Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 13:14:42 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: zlei.huang@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 13:14:43 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D211106 --- Comment #3 from Zhenlei Huang --- Created attachment 219036 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D219036&action= =3Dedit Draft patch for stable/12 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=