From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun May 10 05:23:49 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D62F2D9BF3 for ; Sun, 10 May 2020 05:23:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexvpetrov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lj1-x22b.google.com (mail-lj1-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49KXY0285wz3FtB for ; Sun, 10 May 2020 05:23:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexvpetrov@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lj1-x22b.google.com with SMTP id o14so4840156ljp.4 for ; Sat, 09 May 2020 22:23:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:autocrypt:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uut2zxwROgpZGD5W0yXc9TcJV1gfn+3UFwiMt9a8M6I=; b=HeWo7WVWdbx3vXenDNBWhja2LeXGmNWn8GqX1x9SZe04N3yzx2dF9LjyP5A/Zmd04D 0C79DUagxDDcIMPMuyMAVotJwwaAkV0y2GQ0LxQWMNQUz7Msvw5IgMVopYGdF9qmnFis haFWQnjxVNLS0w54k3rbqXYcBsJ4uXzchMipJUJKxjwPeYd9lhIP/U5KK8eRbl4EN/4x KN+Fd2n1LgFn6Bd+cPaR5O862j3nrWlcZXjk9Wk83TzWJIBgd98IIngyWJok9caUXbsH 8pvUqumiVoQfRllIoq0ZVPVRkSR0ljismSr5TF7AZPCdkaAjEP8LJ97PkybEy+yYuLHr VV4Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:autocrypt:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=uut2zxwROgpZGD5W0yXc9TcJV1gfn+3UFwiMt9a8M6I=; b=Wx0yghzrJ1ikqrdUWdF5StVyPlkhlmQeDYhgwqT/AhK5nGIUsmZ/tjIGCu51Jxj3LK 09aZv1ddGKUqDujPqZigN6U/tJe/VgrFF3qb9RXP18GtKnnLka/IN+cqmacoIFq51HmW 4Sn++416l7x9MQg9PrdbmWZy3ovR2p380n6NNpVx/eOjBO1cGGeef1CCS8AKvHZSo/1V GVbFPMmPIIgMIeM9LXP9suvkRGCF+z9PhIDH2MPj1gZif/Gn9AbrLMEa5E+YntxA7gW6 1pRUU1iHE3TG25iS0cn0eqC98Eq3y3EPPWm3JLpbgkMmyzanW0YZ7CY4z8nbC7gDsCgh RQVQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ZT3pr7SB8mMDixPdPoFjcd72BuWCi6xocVheBXKywvnpc93R7 vn0/bJpH4M6JBzcdp7i1qXZHypXBudY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyMAlSGLSa/1czV4v8F1vNcaM9k1mC2D/OCqOv8dhDPxQYuux/Rg0gFp/CSum9mzP5QeMI1kA== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b6cf:: with SMTP id m15mr6154846ljo.168.1589088224885; Sat, 09 May 2020 22:23:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alex.super (stone.g-service.ru. [84.22.141.217]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id c20sm5795958ljk.59.2020.05.09.22.23.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 09 May 2020 22:23:44 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: darktable-3.0.0_3 error update To: Matthias Andree , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <0102ddab-47a4-1114-2c3a-85452585764d@gmx.de> <3831861f-2e51-7b3b-408f-82823128b2e9@gmx.de> From: "Alex V. Petrov" Autocrypt: addr=alexvpetrov@gmail.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBFr3oA0BEADMSXiVd/IwYhJPMQ6LXbZ7jTA/RXuzrGYaR++UENx5QJ6/HJ/3myTeMnZE nNa0Zme+oKw/9s5x7rBTP6mL5ta7VSYpnPX932mAjT9J4nS7iW/wWNBqcXn7wDCog2TV8Ww3 13SUP2YaKoJKJLxddiZD6AJrkafB9EE/AycMQ8XxMao1lVS+/KAo0yciOsnSlIJCWhF00b3j xDlHLvehrDa4S3EB13bF6uE0XU5nFfMNHtBav2mwD9t01hNioCNTV1hXwmsS/L1n5PR5FyJJ yYtjeohrAUiGKGJU9lJJ6tROBhzV/k3OsOGPyajFOVsW0vUueYfgw+IAPYdOZIAONgNdxkvs tRLQxYPCBMN1FvQ7GlIhq7ob+mxuA1imXx3xzlYy5tu4QzB383qZtLqQnZpysjYooAbHl+eN vB2ldvH9TZxm3fxxNL6zgYAXE/pNgFoqg/ILmhDwvvHzApHqVCKU3g6yii0KPxD7susaUWcL JYgrmt2BIE0RuiQRGWyS0L277D/YGmVnPNHxPi58DBs2iexDm7jw7PhlmfOw44N9w+O09D2S gqmBHySAtsq9Z5LoM81F+LrOoVmpYczZWErS917Gua1X7K3wrXoqQC8qcSiHZpEcBl/Uohii QWzjQJot5LT7rvfFHpnSOXAKgN7enVM7KxTJAYK1U343GGdepQARAQABtDZBbGV4VlBldHJv diAoZmlyc3QgZ2xvYmFsIGtleSkgPGFsZXh2cGV0cm92QGdtYWlsLmNvbT6JAk4EEwEIADgW IQRvKPTT2TJuh37ANx313p8aVpVkcAUCWvegDQIbAwULCQgHAgYVCgkICwIEFgIDAQIeAQIX gAAKCRD13p8aVpVkcLLeEADClYAElEInGGjtLfH4jdjvTDaQTsrwT5/1E5/h8yxI4yn7hCt1 Dh+iCSUNLdPO88nZV2jP8bMQXFBKSbC0nAJXd8O+8t9AfSWoUC6IMzncxKTK/jZuJTCToCUR XZ+47+uJaBp51rpw3pFX8UrFlYSF6Dz97dI2cGHfx3xAOnowKxyHfthxS8waKWgbMOceds78 BP2+Q0iLCpoC9rO4KDc+w+h8z21eHIE9VHadTHpnKVF82voPH8XWvznTOCpYrdBwUtIyD/DV XRb0xcFsOSkvmReYX7u4QuOPLSc86sEWh4hXTFLAOdfeTjrDTDmBcmFpltmW1j+5t4mI1dK8 gptREM8gMJVJw3jjcO6jADeXX9q5C8/lX0sEGz9uC4oU5nkOMyfzd9Anb+9bCs7pMxhqAKjA 8tqJPPkmJU8WzMCs+uudIiQ8W9qIETwUJWxizQ3kvlzLfWRz5n93Y9kzSmjw81aiIJK/HFY8 wsW5zNo6JBn57cMPx8nBC4E2zM09ffmqSpjDwXfvZF2IIR8L4VTiKi3ovwLglJP+Qbs5HXNn 6K40cPNqfnHzPLwXwd/co04B/VVr+cKZuE58kYGty9Xs9q/SEpObDnxnLxMNHUNJJuRgOiti TKDkteHuKm6NA8v05o3TDQ5HU9szEoE5uoi/3pQ1ktfA/K3LkDwbotXL+7kCDQRa96ANARAA w5+/xcaCP6iwsi2CFQ4pAWksdmPBEHA2VPn1ym3C6opjbyWUp6sn25eTWppdhA9rUqbM/zV/ hAFRT67oZJKBYNRaMoDdO8BsVZsg/u76QF/GuhbUjIk0tFFdpddMXl0zKAJJMCfDRxURRWv7 NW6sY/EZ4Dal5s4xOT+UrWGag3qoaIRdzw5bJRP+o75L90cE8pd7+Pd9cVJOOtTAwx0E4bPq dPSa6CPDSvzd9D3mw37dPzXysyQkQTy0OM7255E2wjYz3RbJxB3utybPVN3XJBD5EyA8IYeS ic1/03UrkRNv4XrLnlg7xLv96ZeCrf/BDNQW23iVwbISUAk4TXL7xs2TGYOmowZ89mMEcbfW ChX3YLAuAeWzgpMcrDC00izOxG0spkkrHL7/i1iSu2MKhv5qMTVgchlSktdd+KTba5keleHv ULQ3feGUKf9eTkKgES6q4rKrae0tIwByTLhhDVbkXqR6v8zrpJSscrvJ3tMNgquJKy5ATIUB nvUE2hMkSwtnJ2vQ/Z0zGt6c5KxI57/hsb148tXp1v3gAq9d6i8c8ChxSR/kUlqAvzl2QGcn CFVN6nfOzyNfBPZ61abNzkzjzyhOK4Gq4gQvx4QXhDp3jEME7rPM0Tqf0venb1Dp7SIHwggV yJglGApwoUvD4kKNIC7KDr+s/UjbBp4ExFMAEQEAAYkCNgQYAQgAIBYhBG8o9NPZMm6HfsA3 HfXenxpWlWRwBQJa96ANAhsMAAoJEPXenxpWlWRwAaEQAKm0imG5Fm37JZi+5faXJv/ZLZGl r4TVg4u1kMktdTQRrTXa3Qs0i3wTtOZe1p3xCCzPx+97iYETHragDTdAFUO+v+Llin26L1Zl z4huyIqgGSuTuekQfn6eoMZbcF+wzah4j/mvXQVpJBF2qQi1YdHSapWDlweuiuk01y8C3eHv 3qfFB/OJwXhwj0HKhkGkB2dLXuLtIk4GCXh4/g22tWz/SB0gsSXU7WhJFb0CyxETGR9YKxM8 CNl5tVRLqsBC6yQLvcAJgJci73PfMiHKnjxrz//+0xQO1TPeruWsd8nLYvziT38CyX42Mbaj 01WpvB0qOeTGtwGFmyyrnE8fYpd3CE0uAl9BnHqafAabl9+09x3wf+lEkkO2bK59akZz3BPU 8Lz2BAgskyS81WZCthQYUrUozFEx/31x8JJ95EQFNW9t8HBa51r4QhedSNKxLbT3Sx8hH0iq Z8wYkGw0og9U1DqgFzxE2HSGZSDG3I1DrPDqhcM/6Y0V98wS+XreuS88DYYck37+L7bTGiyZ WYFNZk1ChcIBk8hgKn5nFOCWO2rX06RI9zorzSpEg6lB2STae1Up5oEj8QqfYmfO3cp2Qhvj F3c2/i8KpWkJQkAgNrv428FIlx9SiPu9gvNTTYuLIOdZLQvInTmKs2uCoB6JDAW75axDhBbR FvM3Vpv/ Message-ID: <2b7933a6-e452-67f0-0cac-1ad3abf41e96@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 12:23:43 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3831861f-2e51-7b3b-408f-82823128b2e9@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: ru Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49KXY0285wz3FtB X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=HeWo7WVW; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of alexvpetrov@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::22b as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=alexvpetrov@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.00 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmx.de]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-9.18), ipnet: 2a00:1450::/32(-2.29), asn: 15169(-0.43), country: US(-0.05)]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[b.2.2.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.5.4.1.0.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 05:23:49 -0000 09.05.2020 23:56, Matthias Andree пишет: > Am 09.05.20 um 18:44 schrieb Matthias Andree: >> Am 09.05.20 um 18:32 schrieb Adam Weinberger: >>> On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 8:04 AM Matthias Andree wrote: >>>> Am 09.05.20 um 12:33 schrieb Alex V. Petrov: >>>> about graphics/darktable? >>> FTR, the build fix part of it can be committed anytime with or without >>> dumbbell's approval. >> Right, done in r534788 for head/, investigating if 2020Q2 merge needed. > MFH to 2020Q2: r534789 > - also done. > > Alex, darktable builds again for me. Let me know if it did not help. > > Regards > Matthias > All works. Thanks for job. -- ----- Alex. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun May 10 07:01:29 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D4E52DBCD1 for ; Sun, 10 May 2020 07:01:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49KZjj0N97z3KP1 for ; Sun, 10 May 2020 07:01:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 0CDEF2DBCCA; Sun, 10 May 2020 07:01:29 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CA8D2DBCC9 for ; Sun, 10 May 2020 07:01:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49KZjh6cvCz3KNy for ; Sun, 10 May 2020 07:01:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DED1C105F for ; Sun, 10 May 2020 07:01:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 04A71Spq009233 for ; Sun, 10 May 2020 07:01:28 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 04A71Suv009232; Sun, 10 May 2020 07:01:28 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202005100701.04A71Suv009232@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 07:01:28 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 07:01:29 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ games/odamex | 0.7.0 | 0.8.3 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun May 10 14:55:24 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5FDB2E993F; Sun, 10 May 2020 14:55:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: from mail-il1-f177.google.com (mail-il1-f177.google.com [209.85.166.177]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49KnDW58nWz4HMG; Sun, 10 May 2020 14:55:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: by mail-il1-f177.google.com with SMTP id x2so6001728ilp.13; Sun, 10 May 2020 07:55:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=cvoN9VjTXi4D2Mt2zCUU7BMhhgsVaYhoQxSpmGDoVas=; b=cif8GBHTWYVckEugdqUch9y8lUju83MIqzjBBucnjMv4f3ihvjm31ElSoicf8VWUMF mi9lxZycY0S0I1vG7Q0Rd+bYHyP8hHROF8b0COsDUHGKHZNK23q64SVmfj73nbXLKRp0 WwsegMsaD59yT+LJ+VFq8sxvJOYhoPpJz6WQTRbngTe+SWk04rvV44DElrHSZzm3XXeR lYLujiidC4Mo5XH+Ff20Kd7xs2Tsj82H6okoTy3J1vrBmWJo4OHBfgONiGqqG91W9DC0 paWkrxY5gAuaKLAuQUwRSxrUWiaQLDx8iGPbj6/RxE910oRpCp5s3907j2AEEDYQCtue z1ag== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYPxNo1KRXIHZlEkkuJcJWBOBcoAtns10pJOQnPiB36yrhaRA91 7pbaRKWs+rsvr/mxyyoY5vlPbX6188OCYhIC5O3nmZXSRgg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKcK0215EOluJHdlVCMp0syIfOGyasSk6y+f4ZuzYngHB5JZsWKrFpHp9q0Djqc4WYLIl46eTyIXeiyOw5832o= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:141:: with SMTP id j1mr12622288ilr.100.1589122521378; Sun, 10 May 2020 07:55:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ed Maste Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 10:55:10 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: HEADS-UP: obsolete GNU as 2.17.50 retirement for FreeBSD 13, expected 2020-05-31 To: FreeBSD Ports , FreeBSD Current Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49KnDW58nWz4HMG X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of carpeddiem@gmail.com designates 209.85.166.177 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=carpeddiem@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.53 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; IP_SCORE(-1.53)[ip: (-6.78), ipnet: 209.85.128.0/17(-0.39), asn: 15169(-0.43), country: US(-0.05)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[177.166.85.209.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[emaste@freebsd.org,carpeddiem@gmail.com]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[177.166.85.209.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[emaste@freebsd.org,carpeddiem@gmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 14:55:24 -0000 All architectures supported by FreeBSD now using Clang and lld, and tools from obsolete GNU binutils 2.17.50 have been retired one by one - most recently objdump, in r360698. There is one binutil tool left: GNU as. I plan to disable it at the end of the month, and then remove all of binutils some weeks later if no additional issues are found. We have two src.conf build knobs for as - WITH_BINUTILS, which determines whether /usr/bin/as exists in the built system, and WITH_BINUTILS_BOOTSTRAP, which controls whether as is built as a bootstrap tool to build the rest of the system. 1. WITH_BINUTILS (default on i386 and amd64) Turning this off means the installed system will not have /usr/bin/as. A ports exp-run without as is in PR 205250. On i386 the most recent run failed in: comms/libfec comms/syncterm devel/plan9port emulators/vmw games/dxx-rebirth graphics/vulkan-loader lang/hla lang/mit-scheme lang/ocaml lang/ocaml-nox11 math/ldouble multimedia/mencoder multimedia/mplayer amd64 has similar failures in an earlier run. There are generally two ways to address a ports need for an assembler: a) Add a dependency on devel/binutils to the port's Makefile: BUILD_DEPENDS+=as:devel/binutils b) Use Clang's integrated assembler, via the compiler driver (cc). This is what we do for all but one file in the base system. Option (b) is the nicer choice, as it doesn't introduce a new dependency, but takes some more work. Option (a) is straightforward, and I have a proposed initial set of patches at https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24739. My hope is that individual maintainers of affected ports can prepare their port for the upcoming as retirement in whichever way they find most suitable; I'll have BUILD_DEPENDS patches ready for whichever ones are not ready at the end of the month. 2. WITH_BINUTILS_BOOTSTRAP GNU as is built only on amd64, and is used to assemble one file, the optimized assembly version of the Skein cryptographic hash - skein_block_asm.s. Unfortunately it makes extensive use of macro features that are not yet supported by Clang's integrated assembler. There are some proposed methods of addressing (for example, committing an assembled .o, or translating the assembly into something that IAS can handle) but none of them are particularly palatable. Right now I expect the most likely path forward is that we revert to the somewhat slower C-language skein implementation. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns; I'm happy to help maintainers of affected ports find and test a solution. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon May 11 10:16:30 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43CFD2DD421 for ; Mon, 11 May 2020 10:16:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49LH0G0qWyz4M3T; Mon, 11 May 2020 10:16:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.j.mat.cc (owncloud.cube.mat.cc [79.143.240.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.mat.cc", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: mat/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F0BF310AC4; Mon, 11 May 2020 10:16:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@freebsd.org) Received: from aching.in.mat.cc (aching.in.mat.cc [IPv6:2a01:678:42:0:5e80:b6ff:fe2c:99e4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mat@mat.cc) by mail.j.mat.cc (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CE747942D81; Mon, 11 May 2020 10:16:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 12:16:27 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Leander Schaefer Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, portmaster@bsdforge.com Subject: Re: Poudriere - Compile ALL Ports Message-ID: <20200511101627.daabrvsgs3t5qxgp@aching.in.mat.cc> References: <43d5e0710e147420e3cdcfa1342122f7@udns.ultimatedns.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="t2aoq6fajuaaksam" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 10:16:30 -0000 --t2aoq6fajuaaksam Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 08:39:41PM +0200, Leander Schaefer wrote: > Hello Chris, >=20 > Hello List, >=20 > I have checked out ports-mgmt/synth unfortunately it would be a massive > downgrade compared to poudriere. Does anyone have the right clue about how > the FreeBSD package managment team provides a complete repository without > having these conflicts? There must be a way to do this with poudriere sin= ce > I am most certainly sure they also use poudriere. I do not understand, which port are you trying to build that fails because of those conflicts? --=20 Mathieu Arnold --t2aoq6fajuaaksam Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAABCgB9FiEEVhwchfRfuV0unqO5KesJApEdfgIFAl65JfdfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDU2 MUMxQzg1RjQ1RkI5NUQyRTlFQTNCOTI5RUIwOTAyOTExRDdFMDIACgkQKesJApEd fgK1ZBAAnYMy9iCAYDCNz1QatGSx3YtsKpIl4c1XUHayNTKjzqZXeOhaKtPBoe+d GWdNKK/We+3MACkO+EbQSyH2jamt7w3F2Cvyhlv1zOGQ406R1MPP1DBD9b6TB36r xOqF6sa0eBGRRPbe/WUE9kxzTQxhSEq6zJQlBMQYslk4UpUSbo/It1e2jNMjuHf9 /6AP0zrF1IRJUxjuWjxJQMzLXcFJ6k/1ZGxUPaf6OriXCym7DA1KAKzlerAW1mzH eQ1sw95GDyq3bWm1PCven+mF5Dtvu4u4kw4mWNRDsj1UI/jTTLqBnSR2eqTbqIJm sD9L3veuLn2Cwxn3wrWzkm5DvOMIVSHHUhWUc4En6DAcdL+y/94UTF37+wWYbdVR K/QQy95Y1QHRTMRWNxrLCvE+73sybgchsencT4l2aSp/C6XMrMXD76X9G+5Yo16S xIs6kkj/24Ns8tCuU3CACgseGcUDtY+Z3VrWPIwfTYPHBi5jfFQOe+424mCdBZSV YIRDj1EXpdaBrntkaxSjHAvgpTl+oy7rBkHN6BajrOGoJnYJZHYalxtl70y6cFhC dhS2gE/UcFl3ewkBZs6raexRo7Tyr47lYbPtQ6g9FNBzaiLNQSwMxRffwXOvbQo7 814hztuJHEi3fLoSJjxd1YJR33TjFvLV2vwSP1v9bsFlqpWtXDM= =LHvP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --t2aoq6fajuaaksam-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon May 11 11:05:00 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 075F72DE234 for ; Mon, 11 May 2020 11:05:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@dino.sk) Received: from mailhost.netlabit.sk (mailhost.netlabit.sk [84.245.65.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49LJ4B3qRFz4PTN for ; Mon, 11 May 2020 11:04:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@dino.sk) Received: from zeta.dino.sk (fw3.dino.sk [84.245.95.254]) (AUTH: LOGIN milan) by mailhost.netlabit.sk with ESMTPA; Mon, 11 May 2020 13:04:50 +0200 id 00F40498.5EB93152.0000B371 Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 13:04:49 +0200 From: Milan Obuch To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Conflicts with mail/courier port Message-ID: <20200511130449.15e9ee6f@zeta.dino.sk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.5 (GTK+ 2.24.32; i386-portbld-freebsd11.3) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49LJ4B3qRFz4PTN X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd-ports@dino.sk designates 84.245.65.72 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd-ports@dino.sk X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.99 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[dino.sk]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-1.69)[ip: (-8.15), ipnet: 84.245.64.0/18(-4.07), asn: 16160(3.68), country: SK(0.09)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16160, ipnet:84.245.64.0/18, country:SK]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 11:05:00 -0000 Hi, I am preparing new mail/courier port. There is an issue with conflicts, current port version is 0.65.3 and new one will be 1.0.13 (or higher, if upstream release comes sooner). Currently I found following lines in Makefiles for relevant ports: mail/courier-imap CONFLICTS= courier-[0-9]* imap-uw-[0-9]* panda-imap-[0-9]* mail/maildrop CONFLICTS= courier-0.65* libunicode-[0-9]* mail/meta1 CONFLICTS= smx-* CONFLICTS+= courier-0.* postfix-1.* postfix-2.* smail-3.* zmailer-2.* opensmtpd-* sendmail-* mail/panda-imap CONFLICTS_INSTALL= imap-uw-20* courier-0.65.* mail/postfix CONFLICTS_INSTALL?= courier-0.* opensmtpd-[0-9]* sendmail-8.* sendmail+*-8.* \ mail/postfix-current CONFLICTS_INSTALL?= courier-0.* opensmtpd-[0-9]* sendmail-8.* sendmail+*-8.* \ mail/sendmail CONFLICTS?= courier-0.* postfix-1.* postfix-2.* smail-3.* zmailer-2.* opensmtpd-* CONFLICTS+= sendmail-ldap-8.* sendmail-sasl2-8.* sendmail-tls-8.* CONFLICTS+= sendmail-sasl2-8.* sendmail-tls-8.* CONFLICTS+= sendmail-ldap-8.* sendmail-tls-8.* CONFLICTS+= sendmail-ldap-8.* sendmail-sasl2-8.* CONFLICTS2!= ${MAKE_PKGNAMES} | ${GREP} -v "${PORTNAME}${PKGNAMESUFFIX:S|${PKGNAMESUFFIX2}||}-8." CONFLICTS+= ${CONFLICTS2} mail/sendmail-devel CONFLICTS?= courier-0.* postfix-1.* postfix-2.* smail-3.* zmailer-2.* opensmtpd-* CONFLICTS+= sendmail-ldap-8.* sendmail-sasl2-8.* sendmail-tls-8.* CONFLICTS+= sendmail-sasl2-8.* sendmail-tls-8.* CONFLICTS+= sendmail-ldap-8.* sendmail-tls-8.* CONFLICTS+= sendmail-ldap-8.* sendmail-sasl2-8.* CONFLICTS2!= ${MAKE_PKGNAMES} | ${GREP} -v "${PORTNAME}${PKGNAMESUFFIX:S|${PKGNAMESUFFIX2}||}-8." CONFLICTS+= ${CONFLICTS2} I did not analyze the conflict itself, if you plan install mail/courier port, i. e. full mail server suite, it is not wise to install another mail server suite or some component. I just think it would be good to upgrade conflict expression in mentioned ports. This could be done now not taking into account new port is not yet submitted. Maybe simplest action would be just use what's in mail/courier-imap port, I think it is universal, but would like to hear second oppinion. Regards, Milan From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon May 11 17:04:43 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6D152E5CB8 for ; Mon, 11 May 2020 17:04:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic311-24.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic311-24.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.65.205]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49LS3G1Kykz3JJQ for ; Mon, 11 May 2020 17:04:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) X-YMail-OSG: dVUAY_AVM1nELeec4ehv03pdPsMBvkpbQrC.K3QaeLJHhTdibuAmghtZOJXIq6v 6S50Z3gRJKx6UKAfF2DFB.7BBuoDzSA_0Kbnw3ODR2XpM4XKQo5mW7xvHLPlcI1TTyu9UZCPWGd7 .hs1XjKcH9GIcK02XsU0qjvc_DkxGyOD8UP2UkvCLpGR2ll98XmCZ.QCK1zTgyocnW73glD_UMh4 E1u2kJyBZXUljM.w6AjJIBG6xNzGurMEfWex0X5Xj5JXpOBvfLW6n4qSxTS7SWZSQ4Z8.xAqzvY2 xzB6Gs0LCfO2pATMoaeSnVhTsn272EaiC31bpYrpQofj94aaeEONGJvTTtSuFUibe9nVoPOfstil c7aCNYHSV7hD3axpE4uLoT20qnozS8g_ZNkx50F.FS1ZsiszSNUOasAMV9qzBGUkL0ZUVHvEstK4 BxN6vubyQ1r6YwRn6hyWuTi41m4mUbFOcNsKlDRsnXZfKw1cuQAVNwRAu9qbCu4I6.4Sr2pL0F26 glzP1kaxk9NXJtx59BzdtYKFE.H_FP9URX7wkKb8vFR6JQQDp.BTxbOP96dNhIm_zn_bo3hsQhBA jFoBT5QSe2hJsiA6GyxDh3HR6BcYo9tSg.Y5bgAQyNQDW39GRlOClx4DcHXz.9Lo3.o7i6Wn1Uq5 jM_TstODCk9UkheOocMeLvJP62gshGB9zcrtDh06WKla7MUUV38eKEeM9ktLbI9K0usmp76sWM1_ kS71xCJBnS3p3r0c.uPjWYMb9d3imKfmvT0gmpiLn5NUViqie5Ot3CuPh4Wsbl3n4504RSjYWPWq 28x9XjVCc63zBWsppOORvJ53w_pMgbSWh_im5_wktU89UoX1U4Ol3GAuX2aYioh7i6wNXbbT8lIj 5diodEK_VcpSLrjEbBQ0JgnoGCIPWYxmXplgEDkuq75KXubu1U9bNAm6i5TM2c6XoOunPqZVs779 .D8U5fWHFODj5pRvKqFMnPTgTZGTqhAwHSfDjvgzO.KZBq0i4hIEiWsyCO58X8WUiFnRU64lwJ1. 9CrKmULE0asttgzbCrtRnGFm4Mf8fLZOBS9D2PnSDJO11mKMV8HUTHX89R0XsKw5bhMKCggZf.7I L.O6tI_Yb.QUJt9gV1Xo2k7veMAUJL9dSDx12TctyH81YOrJ0xslT2wJe6e7pP2C.mX63WYlI9sH BSHmvdP1rHRRu8jH8JPmEjuRYoTyvQSd4Nxld2HBC45tWH2PZW9iD6xuC1c.WAs9G87dLy4S4ccz PjPK43J3QXBNT0q4w8y0UDQpyTfc.A5fpir.ybZPDPNmxECs7RzCFhGw4peuaJovcN5g5XuLg_2e qEYT_GfHNSDgDsp59vIy3uFC0g9BkL22iXK3n38hZFmHvqaKIHDL6545695vmYiK4OxQUYJiFLwY 6upVc2oSOdVim_E7_Mw-- Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic311.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Mon, 11 May 2020 17:04:40 +0000 Received: by smtp427.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID d2d261ffaa4d60be4b215172735c8521; Mon, 11 May 2020 17:04:39 +0000 (UTC) From: Mark Millard Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\)) Subject: Re: Poudriere - Compile ALL Ports Message-Id: <625BBD86-9740-41D0-8199-CF1B3ACB5320@yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 10:04:36 -0700 To: "info@netocean.de " , FreeBSD ports X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2) References: <625BBD86-9740-41D0-8199-CF1B3ACB5320.ref@yahoo.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49LS3G1Kykz3JJQ X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.02 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/21, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.68)[-0.683,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.84)[-0.838,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (3.19), ipnet: 98.137.64.0/21(0.83), asn: 36647(0.66), country: US(-0.05)]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[205.65.137.98.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[205.65.137.98.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 17:04:43 -0000 Leander Schaefer info at NetOcean.de wrote on Tue May 5 20:38:49 UTC 2020 : > I have been dealing with Poudriere for quite a while and one of the = most=20 > issues I have is, that I have ports which won't compile along with=20 > another. Reason is mostly something like: >=20 > pkg-static: ImageMagick7-7.0.10.6 conflicts with = ImageMagick6-6.9.11.6,1=20 > (installs files into the same place). Problematic file:=20 > /usr/local/bin/Magick++-config >=20 > So in other words a newer version is going to place its binaries etc.=20= > into the same place as the previous version. I have read and used=20 > something like: >=20 > # Build several PHP versions parallel on the same server: > #=20 > https://github.com/freebsd/poudriere/issues/602 >=20 > PHP_ALT=3Dphp56 php70 php71 php72 php73 > .for port in ${PHP_ALT} > .if ${.CURDIR:M*/ports*/*/${port}*} > DISABLE_CONFLICTS=3DYES > PREFIX=3D/usr/local/${port} > PHPBASE=3D/usr/local/${port} > LOCALBASE=3D/usr/local > CONFIGURE_ARGS+=3D--datadir=3D/usr/local/${port}/share > CONFIGURE_ARGS+=3D--bindir=3D/usr/local/${port}/bin > CONFIGURE_ARGS+=3D--with-config-file-scan-dir=3D/usr/local/${port}/etc/p= hp > #CONFIGURE_ARGS+=3D--with-php-config=3D/usr/local/${port}/bin/php.conf > #CONFIGURE_ARGS+=3D--with-iconv=3D/usr/local > #CONFIGURE_ARGS+=3D--with-pcre-dir=3D/usr/local > .endif > .endfor >=20 > But I was wondering: How is the FreeBSD Team dealing with this, when=20= > they compile their packages for the public repository? Because we only=20= > use one official repository and all packages are there ... some even=20= > with differet options enabled. So how to deal with this? How can I=20 > compile the entire ports tree without issues and build a repository of=20= > it and some packages even with different options? Lets say one = OpenLDAP=20 > with SASL and another one with SASL? The only way I was able to do = this=20 > was building it in separate repositories. The following is based on a guess about what might be going on. In my context, for example, I have: # poudriere jail -l JAILNAME VERSION ARCH METHOD TIMESTAMP = PATH FBSDFSSDjail 13.0-CURRENT amd64 null 2018-11-09 = 08:58:53 /usr/obj/DESTDIRs/clang-amd64-installworld-poud I do not chroot into /usr/obj/DESTDIRs/clang-amd64-installworld-poud and install any ports there. Why? Because the installed port could conflict with whatever port(s) poudriere bulk might want to install temporarily. My /usr/obj/DESTDIRs/clang-amd64-installworld-poud/ is only for = poudriere's use. Having installed ports in = /usr/obj/DESTDIRs/clang-amd64-installworld-poud would also lead to poudriere using the installed port over instead installing ports that it is building. This can lead t using the wrong version of such an installed port. Also, I have: # ls -laT /usr/obj/DESTDIRs/clang-amd64-installworld-poud/usr/local/ total 8 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Mar 29 23:31:30 2020 . drwxr-xr-x 14 root wheel 512 Apr 29 11:57:28 2020 .. I do not make that a mount point for making /usr/local visible for chrooting into clang-amd64-installworld-poud. This is for the same reason as above: poudriere activity there could end up conflicting with any pre-existing content that as made visible in /usr/obj/DESTDIRs/clang-amd64-installworld-poud/usr/local/ . I do sometimes create other directory trees for use with chroot (but not as the PATH for a poudiere jail). In these I freely install ports. These notes apply to more than just "bulk -a" builds: smaller subsets built can have the same problems with having pre-existing material in an equivalent of my /usr/obj/DESTDIRs/clang-amd64-installworld-poud/usr/local/ area. =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon May 11 18:34:24 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C2232E788B for ; Mon, 11 May 2020 18:34:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from mail.punkt.de (mail.punkt.de [IPv6:2a00:b580:8000:11:1c6b:7032:35e9:5616]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49LV2k48DDz3NmQ for ; Mon, 11 May 2020 18:34:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from [217.29.46.82] (kagate.punkt.de [217.29.33.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.punkt.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 81F6820AAE; Mon, 11 May 2020 20:34:14 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.14\)) Subject: Re: Poudriere - Compile ALL Ports From: "Patrick M. Hausen" In-Reply-To: <625BBD86-9740-41D0-8199-CF1B3ACB5320@yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 20:34:10 +0200 Cc: "info@netocean.de" , FreeBSD ports Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <625BBD86-9740-41D0-8199-CF1B3ACB5320.ref@yahoo.com> <625BBD86-9740-41D0-8199-CF1B3ACB5320@yahoo.com> To: Mark Millard X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.14) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49LV2k48DDz3NmQ X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of hausen@punkt.de designates 2a00:b580:8000:11:1c6b:7032:35e9:5616 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=hausen@punkt.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.91 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:b580::/32]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[punkt.de]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.991,0]; IP_SCORE(-0.12)[asn: 16188(-0.58), country: DE(-0.02)]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[yahoo.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16188, ipnet:2a00:b580::/32, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 18:34:24 -0000 Hi all, I=E2=80=99m confused by this thread. isn=E2=80=99t the point of = Poudriere bulk builds to - start with a clean jail - build the first port in the list and all dependencies - store the packages for later incorporation into the pkg repo - clean out the jail completely - start with the next port in the list - =E2=80=A6 How can there ever be a build conflict unless there is a bug like port A depends on B and ImageMagick 7, while B is lagging somewhat behind and depends on ImageMagick 6? But if ImageMagick 6 and 7 are not dependencies but intended target packages, doesn=E2=80=99t Poudriere build each of them in a shiny new empty environment? At least that=E2=80=99s what I thought our Poudriere was doing all day and night and we never had a build conflict like this. Bugs like the aforementioned aside. Happy to get enlightened, Patrick --=20 punkt.de GmbH Patrick M. Hausen .infrastructure Kaiserallee 13a 76133 Karlsruhe Tel. +49 721 9109500 https://infrastructure.punkt.de info@punkt.de AG Mannheim 108285 Gesch=C3=A4ftsf=C3=BChrer: J=C3=BCrgen Egeling, Daniel Lienert, Fabian = Stein From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon May 11 20:40:40 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E8A72EB48F for ; Mon, 11 May 2020 20:40:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic305-21.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic305-21.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.64.84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49LXrP3QGXz46Mn for ; Mon, 11 May 2020 20:40:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) X-YMail-OSG: HGVJGoUVM1mrghAwREIpvZDwqjYZf.ypla6tQMDVHByiK3.iMMiNVAv_3we9tBU 8W1xezozDJcPMOuR1rfnty60pjpEGT4b_B.4kA0iS0vFPkLMVhxpNEbdMt2oWE_PovSxJCInqIr2 565A_RfvFi5kytvtueMdFKAigH57Sp9Mc0zisyj4gZ2haCclqysbcsT2Ngt0qflAVT_hw7ocwoTm .oHJQP_spkG1wc7wCa1UTabOLk_JdpIPYNceF8jDE9.nCuO0iSiDl94e0zlt3Xtrv9K4i71EB0U_ R_HzA2nwZZj2TgfpAjnGvXcPPM.CQROyhWKSyXKOJgQvR0ISCTy2iKf.tLXUBa7sb5QOMlfJsSBD limV37fm93cVE5YDJHzU1Sismw_PtyrAQ3xLjYnVO33ckjvB.GnqoN1jEA4IbRmyJvGNurP.W7IP IHqDudgUWShvl81rHETRoTQbP.OBPeKMWRHjje53p4t1qmQMLNN_L1WalGhbx0qNPdBD_qpXmwff VqF7thULeBrYnLR02GoOtBzgcqiaN6iCf0wMFRTbSlW_wrlw4nollrTfUkE4sd.9pND25s183cJs rR7HERxmkKvS05VgqucQGXAKRHD9brQ.EL1uIGioHJHKzIgzdK8b6qf8IjUbwRkd3p2EpYP4Wg7o XX66aDEL_u0tGacpSkO1lXpEsdjWvo0WCQ.ZfG_Cl8sD5QBo29BvdGASz4lISalDxkovle4eJsXE XEpD7UUDZZmOxtU637KWsybtRCwaPgYpL0ThgGaYD5oP3RoeEHKVrj.jLZsDp9M2qc3iEP6w7DEu dpm3IpXOigHrp8xLeTqSkyl5ngLDeI3Y0RnH2Z34wKH4kQXol8UPoJ7YUqMS7VtUc02bPLv4bEwV IE5yqcxiFjMAh.SncSvsnb0C7sCP63MJoFz2LShCxSH7QM_XBrLXmBWbR1zuBXq537G5XMucYK.U .AOa4wI2IgrN0neJ9Z9_bjbYTe5WNn4K43EyrJ_TB.Ww0_d4MO0c3HVBjDVBRUVkAb.gsqVihPCw AGgdm3EnqVz1EK.3qpEErtYNkwCWGEMlKCiuqLY5eEfmTW8x7.bIS2AgFhemRt.OFciyYxD3Mduc hNbKCqSPMWzwIC99gzx0TP7t38gB0XDMlU8XWQ2VmL4TrrxXxntwZq7c0GWLPyEAr83kgfuzpIwC hiSOvuyAgogbxutbosgEa1hVwd.8JnJBuIgTlI4jH3cphUSpS49.PCxTZOJsuAYpaQaYjAh8wwzF l_fufvGBLJiQuHg0b28TH9NR9XQ.pU0y5V468FkzdW6ooCYIC168HO.MPGWoAdiahcANmKR2JkIk sTPzpgLpqNqBeMRJDgn22Jq.rr30BnOgtjVKPlHDsFjS1oL99XC9jBbZckr.W.1uDH0sTCqUYiwn 3zD_NT_b_H8WfvLiWSLL5Bg-- Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic305.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Mon, 11 May 2020 20:40:34 +0000 Received: by smtp426.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 5a92c327b34723dc6de4200878519818; Mon, 11 May 2020 20:40:29 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\)) Subject: Re: Poudriere - Compile ALL Ports From: Mark Millard In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 13:40:27 -0700 Cc: "info@netocean.de" , FreeBSD ports Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <2611B3DD-43C3-420D-A909-A8C51EB7EC1E@yahoo.com> References: <625BBD86-9740-41D0-8199-CF1B3ACB5320.ref@yahoo.com> <625BBD86-9740-41D0-8199-CF1B3ACB5320@yahoo.com> To: "Patrick M. Hausen" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49LXrP3QGXz46Mn X-Spamd-Bar: - X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.94 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/21, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.60)[-0.600,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.84)[-0.842,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (3.48), ipnet: 98.137.64.0/21(0.83), asn: 36647(0.66), country: US(-0.05)]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[84.64.137.98.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[84.64.137.98.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 20:40:41 -0000 On 2020-May-11, at 11:34, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > I=E2=80=99m confused by this thread. isn=E2=80=99t the point of = Poudriere > bulk builds to When I listed: # poudriere jail -l JAILNAME VERSION ARCH METHOD TIMESTAMP = PATH FBSDFSSDjail 13.0-CURRENT amd64 null 2018-11-09 = 08:58:53 /usr/obj/DESTDIRs/clang-amd64-installworld-poud I probably should have explicitly pointed out the use of "METHOD" "null" as the type of context I was covering. Poudiere has many options. One of them for "poudriere jail" is: -m method Specifies which method to use to create the jail. = (default:http) . . . null This option can be used to import an = existing directory that already contains an = installed system. The path must be specified = with -M path. It is expected that this = directory be installed to with the following: /usr/src# make installworld = DESTDIR=3DPATH DB_FROM_SRC=3D1 /usr/src# make distrib-dirs = DESTDIR=3DPATH DB_FROM_SRC=3D1 /usr/src# make distribution = DESTDIR=3DPATH DB_FROM_SRC=3D1 The path will be null-mounted during = builds. It will not be copied at the time of = running jail. Deleting the jail will attempt = to re- vert any files changed by poudriere. . . . This is one way of testing development contexts that might not exist in svn yet (or ever). There is also src=3DPATH and tar=3DPATH and the like. Part of my guess was that such a "not from scratch" context might be in use. The guess could be wrong for all I know. The rest of the below is tied the the "-m null" sort of jail context: It is not covering all poudriere jail methods. > - start with a clean jail If one manually makes the jail unclean by doing chroot and things like installing ports, poudriere does not clean out what one did: it takes the jail (mostly) as-is and uses it to make the reference jail for the run. (That in turn is used to make the jails for jobs.) So it is the poudriere user's responsibility to have the jail's content clean before starting poudriere. (Remember: -m null as a poudriere jail context is the context being covered.) If started clean, poudriere will keep it clean. If started dirty, poudriere will keep it dirty. > - build the first port in the list and all dependencies The order is dependencies have their packages built first and dependencies are later used by being temporarily installed in the job's jail before building what was dependent. After the dependent package is packaged, the temporary material is eliminated before the next port is built in that jail. > - store the packages for later incorporation into the pkg repo Previously built packages are also used to install what a dependent port's build depends on, even in the same overall bulk run. > - clean out the jail completely There are multiple jails involved, especially for parallel jobs. poudriere makes a reference jail off the original user jail (off of /usr/obj/DESTDIRs/clang-amd64-installworld-poud in my example). It then makes jails for the parallel jobs off the reference jail as I understand. These are what get poudriere's equivalent of what a "clean out" would be (between jobs that reuse the specific temporary jail). For the most part poudriere leaves the likes of /usr/obj/DESTDIRs/clang-amd64-installworld-poud alone and works with its temporary reference and job jails. > - start with the next port in the list With parallel jobs and complicated dependencies, the concept of "next" is itself somewhat complicated but respects the dependency structure by not starting anything too early for what all it depends on to be available to be temporarily installed in job's jail. > - =E2=80=A6 >=20 > How can there ever be a build conflict unless there is a bug > like port A depends on B and ImageMagick 7, while B is > lagging somewhat behind and depends on ImageMagick 6? If one has poudriere create the build's reference jail from a user jail that already has ports installed, then the reference and job jails will also already have those ports installed. That in turn can lead to conflicts. > But if ImageMagick 6 and 7 are not dependencies but intended > target packages, doesn=E2=80=99t Poudriere build each of them in a = shiny > new empty environment? The new environment is only empty if the original user jail was already empty. (Again: the -m null poudriere jail context is the intended coverage of the statements.) > At least that=E2=80=99s what I thought our Poudriere was doing all day > and night and we never had a build conflict like this. Bugs like > the aforementioned aside. I do not think that the original report listed what options were in use for the poudriere jail involved, such as -m method. One way to show some of that is (using my example): # poudriere jail -jFBSDFSSDjail -i Jail name: FBSDFSSDjail Jail version: 13.0-CURRENT Jail arch: amd64 Jail method: null Jail mount: /usr/obj/DESTDIRs/clang-amd64-installworld-poud Jail fs: =20 Jail updated: 2018-11-09 08:58:53 I do a similar thing with the ports tree used: # poudriere ports -l PORTSTREE METHOD TIMESTAMP PATH default null 2017-08-14 21:07:05 /usr/ports Again a "null" METHOD where I'm supplying my own materials. Again it allows for testing development materials that are not checked into svn. =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 12 07:33:03 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 770E62E5324 for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 07:33:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49LqKC2g1Xz3Lqy for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 07:33:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 5B5FB2E5323; Tue, 12 May 2020 07:33:03 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B2512E5321 for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 07:33:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49LqKC1p1hz3Lqw for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 07:33:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38F3C4766 for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 07:33:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 04C7X3Xp044051 for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 07:33:03 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 04C7X3N8044050; Tue, 12 May 2020 07:33:03 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202005120733.04C7X3N8044050@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 07:33:03 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 07:33:03 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ net-mgmt/netdata | 1.21.1 | v1.22.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 12 16:01:25 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F238D2F3018 for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 16:01:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca) Received: from doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (doctor.nl2k.ab.ca [204.209.81.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49M2bm3026z4PpG for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 16:01:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca) Received: from doctor by doctor.nl2k.ab.ca with local (Exim 4.93.0.4 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1jYXMT-0001Dt-JG for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 12 May 2020 10:02:29 -0600 Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 10:02:29 -0600 From: The Doctor To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: kf5 issues Message-ID: <20200512160229.GB2303@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49M2bm3026z4PpG X-Spamd-Bar: / X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.70 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.79)[-0.788,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.97)[-0.966,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[nl2k.ab.ca,quarantine]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; INTRODUCTION(2.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6171, ipnet:204.209.81.0/24, country:CA]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-0.14)[ip: (-0.33), ipnet: 204.209.81.0/24(-0.16), asn: 6171(-0.13), country: CA(-0.09)]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 16:01:26 -0000 Just found the tip pf the iceberg. Script started on Tue May 12 09:58:45 2020 You have mail. root@doctor:/usr/ports/devel/kf5-kauth # make ===> kf5-kauth-5.69.0 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/cmake - found ===> kf5-kauth-5.69.0 depends on executable: ninja - found ===> kf5-kauth-5.69.0 depends on file: /usr/local/share/ECM/cmake/ECMConfig.cmake - found ===> kf5-kauth-5.69.0 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/qt5/bin/moc - found ===> kf5-kauth-5.69.0 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/qt5/bin/lrelease - found ===> kf5-kauth-5.69.0 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/qt5/bin/qmake - found ===> kf5-kauth-5.69.0 depends on shared library: libpolkit-qt5-core-1.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libpolkit-qt5-core-1.so) ===> kf5-kauth-5.69.0 depends on shared library: libKF5CoreAddons.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libKF5CoreAddons.so) ===> kf5-kauth-5.69.0 depends on shared library: libQt5Core.so - found (/usr/local/lib/qt5/libQt5Core.so) ===> kf5-kauth-5.69.0 depends on shared library: libQt5DBus.so - found (/usr/local/lib/qt5/libQt5DBus.so) ===> kf5-kauth-5.69.0 depends on shared library: libQt5Gui.so - found (/usr/local/lib/qt5/libQt5Gui.so) ===> kf5-kauth-5.69.0 depends on shared library: libQt5Widgets.so - found (/usr/local/lib/qt5/libQt5Widgets.so) ===> Configuring for kf5-kauth-5.69.0 ===> Performing out-of-source build /bin/mkdir -p /usr/ports/devel/kf5-kauth/work/.build -- CMake Error at /usr/local/lib/cmake/Qt5Gui/Qt5Gui_QDDSPlugin.cmake:4 (_populate_Gui_plugin_properties): _populate_Gui_plugin_properties Macro invoked with incorrect arguments for macro named: _populate_Gui_plugin_properties Call Stack (most recent call first): /usr/local/lib/cmake/Qt5Gui/Qt5GuiConfig.cmake:201 (include) /usr/local/lib/cmake/Qt5Widgets/Qt5WidgetsConfig.cmake:100 (find_package) /usr/local/lib/cmake/Qt5/Qt5Config.cmake:28 (find_package) CMakeLists.txt:18 (find_package) CMake Error at /usr/local/lib/cmake/Qt5Gui/Qt5Gui_QVirtualKeyboardPlugin.cmake:4 (_populate_Gui_plugin_properties): _populate_Gui_plugin_properties Macro invoked with incorrect arguments for macro named: _populate_Gui_plugin_properties Call Stack (most recent call first): /usr/local/lib/cmake/Qt5Gui/Qt5GuiConfig.cmake:201 (include) /usr/local/lib/cmake/Qt5Widgets/Qt5WidgetsConfig.cmake:100 (find_package) /usr/local/lib/cmake/Qt5/Qt5Config.cmake:28 (find_package) CMakeLists.txt:18 (find_package) -- Building PolkitQt5-1 KAuth backend -- The sip executable must be available to use PythonModuleGeneration. -- The following RECOMMENDED packages have been found: * PolkitQt5-1 (required version >= 0.99.0), PolicyKit API for Qt, Support for executing priviledged actions in a controlled way (KAuth). Either this or PolkitQt is required to make KAuth work, and hence enable certain workspace functionalities -- The following REQUIRED packages have been found: * ECM (required version >= 5.69.0), Extra CMake Modules., * Qt5DBus * Qt5Gui (required version >= 5.14.2) * Qt5Widgets * Qt5 (required version >= 5.12.0) * KF5CoreAddons (required version >= 5.69.0) * Qt5LinguistTools * Qt5Core -- The following features have been disabled: * QCH, API documentation in QCH format (for e.g. Qt Assistant, Qt Creator & KDevelop) -- The following OPTIONAL packages have not been found: * PythonModuleGeneration -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred! See also "/usr/ports/devel/kf5-kauth/work/.build/CMakeFiles/CMakeOutput.log". See also "/usr/ports/devel/kf5-kauth/work/.build/CMakeFiles/CMakeError.log". *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/ports/devel/kf5-kauth root@doctor:/usr/ports/devel/kf5-kauth # exit exit Script done on Tue May 12 09:58:54 2020 Hmmm ... Appearently __GLIBC__ not found . How can this be fixed? -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism No change on the outside will affect the problem within the heart. -unknown From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed May 13 07:09:45 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 252202EC20A for ; Wed, 13 May 2020 07:09:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49MQls0Bcgz4dbL for ; Wed, 13 May 2020 07:09:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 04DA32EC209; Wed, 13 May 2020 07:09:45 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 049B72EC208 for ; Wed, 13 May 2020 07:09:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49MQlr6QNfz4dbJ for ; Wed, 13 May 2020 07:09:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D76A51D98C for ; Wed, 13 May 2020 07:09:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 04D79iP6006087 for ; Wed, 13 May 2020 07:09:44 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 04D79ibX006086; Wed, 13 May 2020 07:09:44 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202005130709.04D79ibX006086@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 07:09:44 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 07:09:45 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ net-mgmt/netdata | 1.21.1 | v1.22.1 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed May 13 14:47:12 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 837562F85AB for ; Wed, 13 May 2020 14:47:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd01@dgmm.net) Received: from know-smtprelay-omd-5.server.virginmedia.net (know-smtprelay-omd-5.server.virginmedia.net [81.104.62.37]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Client", Issuer "Virgin Media Core Infrastructure Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49Mcvg2tdgz48NS for ; Wed, 13 May 2020 14:47:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd01@dgmm.net) Received: from amd.asgard.uk ([92.236.194.74]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPA id Ysf7jjD58SpzxYsf7jLwh8; Wed, 13 May 2020 15:47:09 +0100 X-Originating-IP: [92.236.194.74] X-Authenticated-User: crystalsinger@blueyonder.co.uk X-Authority: v=2.3 cv=XYunMrx5 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=X8sCwORSJZhUY8vvAW5pvw==:117 a=X8sCwORSJZhUY8vvAW5pvw==:17 a=r77TgQKjGQsHNAKrUKIA:9 a=am30p-MAXVYiLskEURgA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=4dZvYwWW3ph0sp_bZuAA:9 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 From: Dave To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Reply-To: freebsd01@dgmm.net Subject: Kodi 18.6 upgrade Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 15:47:09 +0100 Message-ID: <15738324.vxEf1mJfsr@amd.asgard.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfHPERXSygvuKE8se9lzAzHYwFvKrP96jVzM/eoQK8Vdgg5BJTHlvncfektnBwD1jwaU5A+m1rmvysuKZjjMF+b+QQKkSKbJMao2pEhx/+cdKtppzeuhW u0PytzTt638uSKh7rhT7Sob1pD121nKVEWH1kl8svQwzG8mecer0SS0ritflnb6gdRuCPUnnTjN+Kg== X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49Mcvg2tdgz48NS X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=softfail (mx1.freebsd.org: 81.104.62.37 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of freebsd01@dgmm.net) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd01@dgmm.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.57 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; HAS_XOIP(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.987,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[dgmm.net]; R_SPF_SOFTFAIL(0.00)[~all]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.983,0]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[37.62.104.81.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[74.194.236.92.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.11]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[37.62.104.81.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd01@dgmm.net]; IP_SCORE(-0.00)[ipnet: 81.104.0.0/15(0.18), asn: 5089(-0.13), country: GB(-0.07)]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; CTE_CASE(0.50)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:5089, ipnet:81.104.0.0/15, country:GB]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 14:47:12 -0000 Is anyone looking at upgrading the port of Kodi from the now rather old 17.6 to the current 18.6? I see there is a dev port for v19 which is still in alpha but no movement on v18 series. Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed May 13 16:01:07 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDD8A2F9F57; Wed, 13 May 2020 16:01:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adridg@freebsd.org) Received: from lb2-smtp-cloud7.xs4all.net (lb2-smtp-cloud7.xs4all.net [194.109.24.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.xs4all.net", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49MfXz2zl7z4DCk; Wed, 13 May 2020 16:01:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adridg@freebsd.org) Received: from beastie.bionicmutton.org ([62.251.92.29]) by smtp-cloud7.xs4all.net with ESMTP id YtoejHdcgtKAsYtofjzmZu; Wed, 13 May 2020 18:01:05 +0200 From: Adriaan de Groot To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org, The Doctor Subject: Re: kf5 issues (The Doctor) Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 18:00:58 +0200 Message-ID: <16801679.sFgvYJuXru@beastie.bionicmutton.org> Organization: FreeBSD In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart5299546.8gLySxXtyI"; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfFaz3mIIyJLzfn6koQKoYpjmyqidyCK+SM40ohjuc8qB0KtMZJH3gXE5CuB89xqk5PeU/RIlJyHz6mzueJnUfFo5BW/DimtVzjHPGyZTMl4YIR2WFRH0 PPyclf4tdnIST88H4VtwD8Qsmm4w5+9UwlklaqdwxXur2x7FWNyz3HZ8oq8+9TbuvvnXzVOvgIAsT34Ou+Ly3NoCCQwHqdNoNZeFgp7NS0D6b79p/e0UKzBH Ia8b+LvbUrKs0f/SF3oLAClFeyXct/1PJGryuI05l5M= X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49MfXz2zl7z4DCk X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.76 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.85)[-0.846,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:3265, ipnet:194.109.0.0/16, country:NL]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.91)[-0.911,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 16:01:07 -0000 --nextPart5299546.8gLySxXtyI Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" On Wednesday, 13 May 2020 14:00:02 CEST freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org wrote: > Just found the tip pf the iceberg. Gentoo kindly pointed me to a good explanation: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/tree/dev-qt/qtcore/files/ qtcore-5.14.1-cmake-macro-backward-compat.patch That's a patch we'll be adding to QtCore soon; your workaround right now is "remove Qt, build and install Qt, then build and install other things" or follow the supported-and-encouraged-by-kde@ path "build with poudriere". [ade] --nextPart5299546.8gLySxXtyI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEUq+pvuD+N8/vVW++WoDe9T7W/7IFAl68GboACgkQWoDe9T7W /7KI8RAAiS1ASKh+bnPTl2ANF+zeQRuR5E2JEd3sPijdAwPAsGOEKYPjiWgpnxeP r7cutccGj9gD07aVYOEU7z7LQX/2d33Khm+IA+sN93ommcQASLc8XWBaE2G5iSc9 YaKYe4aTLvi5hRHgmNT5MTAoz/Gbt6wcbnPQbIbxTZpz6gtmjhncJZdTNRKjEkDd hQm9rYfCSEbh3PHQSY9UZ3FD+M247uDZMo6HQiINzd/lxnViJTcHy8W7TT0UCWlp dTAd42dFfFZGPK+RIYN1xSQRyiTCrpk0WdkDqSHRFO9NmDw1YiaoyEtyWr1AhEwL UNdBTGCzCRaeZbqTXAGqbrsXWCl7/RHI2nywgVhyn6zZ2xGvoHRAHK8f5iDDVfbx tlo82a3ylgT32VxBVZJ+jDAMXhgx3liTO/reGsrQaiq3aW/kwpXuy6agDrJe8Azg A4x9IyR/nb7boItk7fY6Tu2IQtk5HRBQhOV5yfQ/vcqriWTJZgcmBmF9Q5NoM3PZ gXdQE5GUXsEdTJusIH6JKv5UqYodKMdVs/KLESlGiBTFGdWc/ZXEH0+1kFXu2sRr EAjN47+buj0rFS/tdTyKEUlNMy2Z+jCBOsUlr1yhx+9fxe4GRXTNPLRPIEzlx1dr 4IQ2aus/810Sbni5GLCwag9pW6WZTluwnagN4TBwB3FX0cEbMGQ= =D2nX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart5299546.8gLySxXtyI-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed May 13 23:27:23 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ADBC2DBABD for ; Wed, 13 May 2020 23:27:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mirror176@hotmail.com) Received: from omta013.useast.a.cloudfilter.net (omta013.useast.a.cloudfilter.net [34.195.253.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Client", Issuer "CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49MrRt0GrVz4m4K for ; Wed, 13 May 2020 23:27:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mirror176@hotmail.com) Received: from cxr.smtp.a.cloudfilter.net ([10.0.17.210]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id YnoCjazfK1rmwZ0mXji9o8; Wed, 13 May 2020 23:27:21 +0000 Received: from darkstar.l.net ([70.176.14.134]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPSA id Z0jZjZMVwVCnMZ0jajmx4j; Wed, 13 May 2020 23:24:19 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=df/+Ikfe c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=4ai8TP3hA4vd9VkDvDUf1g==:117 a=4ai8TP3hA4vd9VkDvDUf1g==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=x7bEGLp0ZPQA:10 a=GCTS3VqRtzAA:10 a=eQYZ3J7ZWp20g-sHcOEA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: "Edward Sanford Sutton, III" Subject: Are broken ports retested before performing scheduled removal? Autocrypt: addr=mirror176@hotmail.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mDMEWM/K1RYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAn3jE1XhdYDgbxPfc0yYoJ+SuRhOQCedHr/in1X5aZFG4 OARYz8rVEgorBgEEAZdVAQUBAQdAK9YHGy4GSwTihOMlklx3XljYQUrcFeBoh/B18li2giED AQgHiH4EGBYKACYCGwwWIQRcG7F5PMnFLs9QmH7pNfr2Xm5OKAUCXNCBywUJBeHqdgAKCRDp Nfr2Xm5OKNZIAQCIJeUPjP5F4a5xkqMyjhfsHP9HrN3xT9j8iocNZT8GjwD/UoyM2AlPH6Tc C8ikUXFMLoGv/ZNy6eW9DyyCcp0nFQE= Message-ID: Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 16:24:17 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfOW0OlwborMETzrwPYgJr/SKBBzL79zHiTQX7d+JItpCZvkulSNCMyg7b5hD1wlsSrjm1tHn+/ee9/B3rN2rFSAhFazGQwn4puB6zTpPB0rKnBn0qvL8 VPqI8mlIQKHTJaGaBsep23tGtoRQMfyOGCmm8NZD2IXKPnchZC6MvNDnU/g1DbrMj23lK6WeEGXgOw== X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49MrRt0GrVz4m4K X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF, No valid DKIM" header.from=hotmail.com (policy=none); spf=softfail (mx1.freebsd.org: 34.195.253.204 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of mirror176@hotmail.com) smtp.mailfrom=mirror176@hotmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.93 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.96)[-0.958,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[hotmail.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; R_SPF_SOFTFAIL(0.00)[~all]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.97)[-0.968,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[204.253.195.34.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.10.0]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-0.74), ipnet: 34.192.0.0/12(3.04), asn: 14618(-3.01), country: US(-0.05)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[hotmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:14618, ipnet:34.192.0.0/12, country:US]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[hotmail.com : No valid SPF, No valid DKIM,none] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 23:27:23 -0000 games/oneko was recently removed as it was marked broken due to being unfetchable. I tried an old copy of the ports tree I had where it was marked as such and `make fetch -DTRYBROKEN` succeeded. Was there an error recorded for this and was it ever retested? Is this just a side effect of having a failure and no maintainer? If being removed as unfetchable, wouldn't a better MOVED entry be to say it was unfetchable (for more than 6 months) instead of just broken for more than 6 months? Thanks for feedback From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu May 14 00:20:09 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C60892DCC22 for ; Thu, 14 May 2020 00:20:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portmaster@BSDforge.com) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (static-24-113-41-81.wavecable.com [24.113.41.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "ultimatedns.net", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49Mscn2q1bz4p5R for ; Thu, 14 May 2020 00:20:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portmaster@BSDforge.com) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (localhost [IPv6:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 04E0KKYt006489 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 13 May 2020 17:20:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from portmaster@BSDforge.com) X-Mailer: Cypht MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: In-Reply-To: From: Chris Reply-To: portmaster@BSDforge.com To: III Subject: Re: Are broken ports retested before performing scheduled removal? Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 17:20:27 -0700 Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49Mscn2q1bz4p5R X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.89 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.90)[-0.902,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.991,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11404, ipnet:24.113.0.0/16, country:US]; local_wl_ip(0.00)[24.113.41.81] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 00:20:09 -0000 On Wed, 13 May 2020 16:24:17 -0700 Edward Sanford Sutton, III mirror176@hot= mail=2Ecom said > games/oneko was recently removed as it was marked broken due to being > unfetchable=2E I tried an old copy of the ports tree I had where it was > marked as such and `make fetch -DTRYBROKEN` succeeded=2E Was there an > error recorded for this and was it ever retested? Is this just a side > effect of having a failure and no maintainer? > If being removed as unfetchable, wouldn't a better MOVED entry be to > say it was unfetchable (for more than 6 months) instead of just broken > for more than 6 months? > Thanks for feedback I just made an attempt with make -DBATCH fetch This was the output I recieved =3D=3D=3D> oneko-2=2E0b_5 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found =3D> oneko-2=2E0b=2Etar=2Egz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/oneko=2E =3D> Attempting to fetch http://www=2E3bit=2Eco=2Ejp/~sasaki/oneko/oneko-2=2E0b=2Etar= =2Egz oneko-2=2E0b=2Etar=2Egz 100% of 84 kB 111 kBps 00m= 00s =3D> oneko-2=2E0b-pop1=2E1-patch=2Etar=2Egz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/dis= tfiles/oneko=2E =3D> Attempting to fetch http://www=2E3bit=2Eco=2Ejp/~sasaki/oneko/oneko-2=2E0b-pop= 1=2E1-patch=2Etar=2Egz oneko-2=2E0b-pop1=2E1-patch=2Etar=2Egz 100% of 17 kB 50 kBps 00m= 00s =3D> oneko-2=2E0b-tip1=2E7=2Etar=2Egz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles= /oneko=2E =3D> Attempting to fetch http://www=2Enet24=2Ene=2Ejp/~ryo2/archives/oneko-2=2E0b-t= ip1=2E7=2Etar=2Egz fetch: http://www=2Enet24=2Ene=2Ejp/~ryo2/archives/oneko-2=2E0b-tip1=2E7=2Etar=2Egz: Not = Found =3D> Attempting to fetch http://distcache=2EFreeBSD=2Eorg/ports-distfiles/oneko= /oneko-2=2E0b-tip1=2E7=2Etar=2Egz oneko-2=2E0b-tip1=2E7=2Etar=2Egz 100% of 62 kB 1719 kBps 00m= 00s =3D> oneko-2=2E0b-sender0=2E5=2Etar=2Egz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfi= les/oneko=2E =3D> Attempting to fetch http://www2u=2Ebiglobe=2Ene=2Ejp/~hsaka/distfiles/oneko-= 2=2E0b-sender0=2E5=2Etar=2Egz oneko-2=2E0b-sender0=2E5=2Etar=2Egz 100% of 41 kB 154 kBps 00m= 00s =3D> oneko-2=2E0b-bsd0=2E2=2Etar=2Egz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles= /oneko=2E =3D> Attempting to fetch http://www2u=2Ebiglobe=2Ene=2Ejp/~hsaka/distfiles/oneko-= 2=2E0b-bsd0=2E2=2Etar=2Egz oneko-2=2E0b-bsd0=2E2=2Etar=2Egz 100% of 21 kB 159 kBps 00m= 00s =3D=3D=3D> Fetching all distfiles required by oneko-2=2E0b_5 for building As you can see, oneko-2=2E0b-tip1=2E7=2Etar=2Egz failed, and required freebsd's dis= cache=2E All the rest of them worked=2E :-) --Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu May 14 03:52:44 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDE412E3D9D for ; Thu, 14 May 2020 03:52:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yklaxds@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io1-xd35.google.com (mail-io1-xd35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d35]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49MyL36YPvz3Jkr for ; Thu, 14 May 2020 03:52:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yklaxds@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io1-xd35.google.com with SMTP id w25so4574iol.12 for ; Wed, 13 May 2020 20:52:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=x1OBiBWWj5bHuAgdZwRoiXdDIjWOhQUoGgveTKjKEEE=; b=aIdBUQDq2n7ml4LwfOLlp8J+ww3KNi56TI+uKr0RPFhF8tEMXKdl0hwtoqXxiO3Lnl DGGiQfSnVnpqMTBCvLMPOiychPXRkfaxLvLe16FN3e74SVmDnagz4C7Xn+6P6sYuyqWG b1sUv38Pf4DKOOGWP9lhu82D8Iz/A3lX9KhPuRApPrxRA93iu/+7tGfubY2ZpIHUF3/r thlpainP+V815kmaFC5tMXQOgaGgxs8sid3tTgvw6G8NzvwRlvgoDxJyUIyWlFSQo4YV cPxD7F3ts1qqNikodfkQgsRXy3LHQApfRcb+Hgj0KiPjgAjhVVyUASwBRdWHjGsLhPq7 wrTw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=x1OBiBWWj5bHuAgdZwRoiXdDIjWOhQUoGgveTKjKEEE=; b=UEX4xgcB/blltgndzIlJOK2QBrTJsJtuW/HWS/l1wOgJtPQaWWlLiVHbYd/tT38rb1 +Inr7HMGnEOPZjKzk+Q4d6ABpl4tk91k9yl/Wrj2CFNMvKy5LXn3CK6vYsp/9oYdco4Q TnBUpQCO35LHnhb4UV7zHpejeKlZqKjXSls045w07RUpGnNQbfhKEy94/StMRcJzFf0J JJH2kXNGTBZ2VWHzS+pul8AupPHRlPlT/7rK10aIqRWXeM0ZWgTmcwedTo7FL3+mY4Nh Hfc3por0dWAzzEMSK7LCqb1Zn59LrFoAQULwaZ2qE4jolil0qaROW8bSZlKuE0Eq7AVT V+GQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533FTPF3yKv142Q93VYXhUCGxlx6Pmc24pdhazU1DGR835KTYVbJ QbiAiD0yas+ZbagqHuAr7FHJDbtARrJxaIU0izN7zGFiPVs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxdeOZ6EtmpwY0VolDku0nZgtG+Fdrk9H4JmeM3ccu20VT1eDf9RNFk0f40TDtEpgSdjDAvJrbELBs54ee0oNI= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9604:: with SMTP id w4mr2399951iol.105.1589428362394; Wed, 13 May 2020 20:52:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a92:d904:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Wed, 13 May 2020 20:52:41 -0700 (PDT) From: ykla Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 11:52:41 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Mesa need to update 20 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49MyL36YPvz3Jkr X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=aIdBUQDq; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of yklaxds@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::d35 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=yklaxds@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.00 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-6.46), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-0.33), asn: 15169(-0.42), country: US(-0.05)]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[5.3.d.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 03:52:44 -0000 Now mesa stop at 19.0.8. Mesa already update to 20. But update 19.0.8 on 2020-05-03 17:15:23. By the way, it build by python 2. In fact, it can be build with python3.5+. Please update it to last version. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu May 14 07:02:30 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F4782E748C for ; Thu, 14 May 2020 07:02:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49N2Y16lKPz3yVx for ; Thu, 14 May 2020 07:02:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E785E2E7487; Thu, 14 May 2020 07:02:29 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E750C2E7486 for ; Thu, 14 May 2020 07:02:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49N2Y15sFHz3yVv for ; Thu, 14 May 2020 07:02:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C160A6F73 for ; Thu, 14 May 2020 07:02:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 04E72TjE046197 for ; Thu, 14 May 2020 07:02:29 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 04E72TkD046196; Thu, 14 May 2020 07:02:29 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202005140702.04E72TkD046196@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 07:02:29 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 07:02:30 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ devel/caf | 0.17.4 | 0.17.5 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu May 14 08:06:55 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 192E52E8FE4 for ; Thu, 14 May 2020 08:06:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from gate.utahime.jp (gate.utahime.jp [183.180.29.210]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49N3zJ5Ysdz42nK for ; Thu, 14 May 2020 08:06:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from eastasia.home.utahime.org (eastasia.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by gate.utahime.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BC134687C for ; Thu, 14 May 2020 17:06:43 +0900 (JST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=utahime.org; s=maybe2019112701; t=1589443603; bh=4BYUhnNBlzTQYkAeYx/l/G/aQG68SK3U14mfM12gBlo=; h=Date:To:Subject:From; b=XMcVrn/9B7RCjFkPR/9svqcPO6zorI+TThRUOKItAC1x6GvS5j8XF9YlSDvmzDHyb TeTVvIP5v69hbtr1nrBCf9iWkB84KnCtAkr36cfU5H2VelEj6nc4QM6labbHGmFLsE ypbRYqVTfJo1IEJHG+ZmykT4uzrV6p2Jpqy3ZI/OnijHMCtoWmpG6iEXfqJOfdjJ+p jDIgrJmhkkjuyJMoXkex/uOFQiQ9hSjgJ0FjXRrS8c0SY6jWgEVheM7kPQQRAqa6I/ MqV81sjWEyZrrPOX5TdCc0o5BqGwEIK7ywafKw420KXh4zANnZeYe6LWmWYEoG4msl tIKqMxsSgQsQw== Received: from localhost (rolling.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by eastasia.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 06F7A28F26; Thu, 14 May 2020 17:06:41 +0900 (JST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.3 at eastasia.home.utahime.org Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 17:04:14 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20200514.170414.2224930171617974842.yasu@utahime.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: How to change PATH setting of poudriere From: Yasuhiro KIMURA X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49N3zJ5Ysdz42nK X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=utahime.org header.s=maybe2019112701 header.b=XMcVrn/9; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of yasu@utahime.org designates 183.180.29.210 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=yasu@utahime.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.40 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[utahime.org:s=maybe2019112701]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:spf-authorized.utahime.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.57)[0.570,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[utahime.org]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[utahime.org:+]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.13)[0.135,0]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; IP_SCORE(0.70)[ip: (0.20), ipnet: 183.180.0.0/16(0.10), asn: 2519(3.14), country: JP(0.05)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:2519, ipnet:183.180.0.0/16, country:JP]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 08:06:55 -0000 Hello. I would like to test non-default LOCALBASE build with poudriere and add 'LOCALBASE=/opt' in /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/make.conf. But build of some ports fails because /opt/bin is not included in value of PATH environment variable. How do I change PATH setting of poudriere? Best Regards. --- Yasuhiro KIMURA From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu May 14 15:37:56 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 931092F4E98 for ; Thu, 14 May 2020 15:37:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49NFzm3MNnz4Swl; Thu, 14 May 2020 15:37:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.j.mat.cc (owncloud.cube.mat.cc [IPv6:2a01:678:4:1::228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.mat.cc", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: mat/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 52F1EEF5B; Thu, 14 May 2020 15:37:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@freebsd.org) Received: from aching.in.mat.cc (unknown [IPv6:2a01:678:ab:50:5e80:b6ff:fe2c:99e4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mat@mat.cc) by mail.j.mat.cc (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 170D4942D81; Thu, 14 May 2020 15:37:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 17:37:51 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Yasuhiro KIMURA Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to change PATH setting of poudriere Message-ID: <20200514153751.dinsovp5rxfedomt@aching.in.mat.cc> References: <20200514.170414.2224930171617974842.yasu@utahime.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4tehyywkk3dc26nt" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200514.170414.2224930171617974842.yasu@utahime.org> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 15:37:56 -0000 --4tehyywkk3dc26nt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 05:04:14PM +0900, Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote: > Hello. >=20 > I would like to test non-default LOCALBASE build with poudriere and > add 'LOCALBASE=3D/opt' in /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/make.conf. But > build of some ports fails because /opt/bin is not included in value of > PATH environment variable. How do I change PATH setting of poudriere? I am not sure it is possible to set /opt precisely. If you simply want to test with a non standard LOCALBASE and PREFIX, you can use `poudriere testport -P` which will build with a non default PREFIX. --=20 Mathieu Arnold --4tehyywkk3dc26nt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAABCgB9FiEEVhwchfRfuV0unqO5KesJApEdfgIFAl69ZctfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDU2 MUMxQzg1RjQ1RkI5NUQyRTlFQTNCOTI5RUIwOTAyOTExRDdFMDIACgkQKesJApEd fgLu9Q/+Iv9mmjDR/eoPj8dNMXRF1H562urptRSg5SRhIRA1RFSusXp0OVcxpnBs jizONkHHehlaWQd0rD/OBKWNbHWejkzJhorwT4Hu0bz+JEDydezG6PR0dCzAYS3J f1DnhE+MGnDAcPiOMnfwU+PDVXiEmvzTSlruQ4b/AkauLPSY/wqNDdAzFyjPos8p bfoNBMgWTm00neMkN09dsWVR6ESsa9aV3HWugWkOceLeh+Xt5ZrQSRx2m0f0w9mg mvIKUyH7iIso06OtaFlJgqVhGPInraLGJ+GIspvr2CXlUakyFGb6JQfly7Hkt4vA uZxsA7nVphDl3QSgtZ+NLZtOsOgpdUND2oNpH9Yy450jHyEjtaNhlmJVf7F8LsSA Idy9erSe35ntD8ME7PvbtexQOfjr/eMNYy+bYKtE+xB2KpaAlCxk7BolLnxFC8xZ LFo/754gLjmv+VsTEKJCLVkxkMpX1iSdnRQH00TLoCw+fvdxUX+hC3OzSHFL/oWr RzB7bnJvvjb81kPkMCNpjCXiUjKxBfoc03lYJkSPlBMUbB+wbsPMbJ/U0BVv7cTM ruORQWFEacQwwzV33IVy2Epb9/nIxXooaRKKZz9tshvbxvxVR2ZcEmAeSMJGF16j CWYG5x2Unjzz0QOScHfpHieVsxsPHJ3PWBJLYbRD5euK+9QdLqw= =Q66K -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4tehyywkk3dc26nt-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu May 14 16:04:13 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C193F2F5B3A for ; Thu, 14 May 2020 16:04:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rcarter@pinyon.org) Received: from h2.pinyon.org (h2.pinyon.org [65.101.20.170]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49NGZ40yKTz4VYb for ; Thu, 14 May 2020 16:04:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rcarter@pinyon.org) Received: from [10.0.10.15] (unknown [10.0.10.15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by h2.pinyon.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A561523953 for ; Thu, 14 May 2020 09:04:05 -0700 (MST) To: FreeBSD Ports ML From: "Russell L. Carter" Subject: rspamd core dumps with current luajit Message-ID: <3bbdf48b-602e-4f75-ee87-a20ec567b491@pinyon.org> Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 09:04:05 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49NGZ40yKTz4VYb X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of rcarter@pinyon.org designates 65.101.20.170 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rcarter@pinyon.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.07 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[pinyon.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; IP_SCORE(-2.77)[ip: (-9.30), ipnet: 65.101.0.0/18(-4.33), asn: 209(-0.17), country: US(-0.05)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:209, ipnet:65.101.0.0/18, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 16:04:13 -0000 Hi, A couple of days ago rspamd starting coredumping on my three 12-stable servers on startup. After two days of intermittent tearing my hair out, I traced it to the luajit port. Reinstalling luajit fixes the problem. Hope this saves somebody else the annoyance. Although I have regained much of my basic knowledge of debugging coredumps with gdb, so there is that. Cheers, Russell From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri May 15 01:01:25 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E4432E5D4D for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 01:01:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from gate.utahime.jp (gate.utahime.jp [183.180.29.210]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49NVTt2Vdsz49c0 for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 01:01:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from eastasia.home.utahime.org (eastasia.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by gate.utahime.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D883946A77 for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 10:01:14 +0900 (JST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=utahime.org; s=maybe2019112701; t=1589504474; bh=m8JaAuWPRpStasYujMuQVLX5yoWdGxajCJmN1wrhDIQ=; h=Date:To:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:References; b=Um3tN6A7NYYnoPgO3VRNqeUHqIYznFbhgYi1wF7s9GSR0mG6UXUOomUVTI/UoLZqN hkAsDlHArklGRV23MpRh4FZEazbQMzBDqkPJAQk8e0Xq7R72ji6bj7EwonppDx8Eub ob8oWNqkl+hN6zd21GP5VeXkMN7412SUvtiDAMC6yzY5mhmD8Y6JowK0vLvBOnlXHA gVSIHbrEy/mJGqIzxiRJocI60v3c0lRrOcH9qKOCZIqumG6wm55lJ909ks2hpKgY6j HX7JhzH7CWUZtLS9fuf2VDxh7Sv8r7Oa5CIQ3lXrwjw63Dr65Sdn7aYVnEp1B727eJ lS1W+ZARGYIKQ== Received: from localhost (rolling.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by eastasia.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A0FC52ABE7; Fri, 15 May 2020 10:01:13 +0900 (JST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.3 at eastasia.home.utahime.org Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 10:00:32 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20200515.100032.2170535329108358923.yasu@utahime.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to change PATH setting of poudriere From: Yasuhiro KIMURA In-Reply-To: <1b409d0c-9e70-ba1a-c1dc-98f332d5f169@FreeBSD.org> References: <20200514.170414.2224930171617974842.yasu@utahime.org> <20200514.170414.2224930171617974842.yasu@utahime.org> <1b409d0c-9e70-ba1a-c1dc-98f332d5f169@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49NVTt2Vdsz49c0 X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=utahime.org header.s=maybe2019112701 header.b=Um3tN6A7; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of yasu@utahime.org designates 183.180.29.210 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=yasu@utahime.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.10 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[utahime.org:s=maybe2019112701]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:spf-authorized.utahime.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.61)[0.614,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.21)[-0.213,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[utahime.org]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[utahime.org:+]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; IP_SCORE(0.70)[ip: (0.20), ipnet: 183.180.0.0/16(0.10), asn: 2519(3.14), country: JP(0.05)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:2519, ipnet:183.180.0.0/16, country:JP]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 01:01:25 -0000 From: Bryan Drewery Subject: Re: How to change PATH setting of poudriere,Re: How to change PATH setting of poudriere Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 14:09:40 -0700 > But I think the make.conf method should work fine. PATH is passed down > in MAKE_ENV and CONFIGURE_ENV but exporting it might be needed. > > PATH:= ${PATH}:/opt/bin > .export PATH Thank you for reply. I added above lines to make.conf but resulted in error that "Variable PATH is recursive". So I changed as follwing. PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/opt/sbin:/opt/bin:${HOME}/bin .export PATH Then build progressed but failed in other port. And error seems to be nothing to do with PATH setting. So let me change my question. In general what settings are necessary to build and install ports with non default LOCALBASE? I though following 2 settings are sufficient. 1. Set LOCALBASE in make.conf 2. Change setting of PATH environment variable so it includes ${LOCALBASE}/bin (and ${LOCALBASE}/sbin too?) However, in reality, some ports failed to build with them. Then are any other settings necessary or does it caused by any other reason (e.g. problme of failed ports, some other setting for poudriere specific, etc.)? Best Regards. --- Yasuhiro KIMURA From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri May 15 04:30:07 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A69EB2E9755 for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 04:30:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (www.zefox.net [50.1.20.27]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "www.zefox.com", Issuer "www.zefox.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49Nb6k1dLkz4KsP for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 04:30:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 04F4TxKi051803 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 14 May 2020 21:29:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: (from fbsd@localhost) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 04F4TxlX051802; Thu, 14 May 2020 21:29:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd) Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 21:29:58 -0700 From: bob prohaska To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: bob prohaska Subject: Conflict on very first port (xorg) on rpi3 Message-ID: <20200515042958.GB51382@www.zefox.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49Nb6k1dLkz4KsP X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of fbsd@www.zefox.net has no SPF policy when checking 50.1.20.27) smtp.mailfrom=fbsd@www.zefox.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.67 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.51)[-0.509,0]; WWW_DOT_DOMAIN(0.50)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.05)[ip: (0.21), ipnet: 50.1.16.0/20(0.11), asn: 7065(-0.03), country: US(-0.05)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zefox.net]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.23)[0.230,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7065, ipnet:50.1.16.0/20, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_WWW(0.50)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 04:30:07 -0000 An attempt to compile x11/xorg on a new installation of 12.1 on a Pi3B resulted in a conflict: ===> Installing for py37-sphinx18-1.8.5_1,1 ===> Checking if py37-sphinx18 is already installed ===> Registering installation for py37-sphinx18-1.8.5_1,1 as automatic Installing py37-sphinx18-1.8.5_1,1... pkg-static: py37-sphinx18-1.8.5_1,1 conflicts with py37-sphinx-3.0.2,1 (installs files into the same place). Problematic file: /usr/local/bin/sphinx-apidoc-3.7 *** Error code 70 Had this been the umpteenth port compiled, I'd understand somewhat. As the _very_ first port compiled, I'm confounded...... Uname -a reports FreeBSD nemesis.zefox.com 12.1-STABLE FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE r361020 GENERIC arm64 Svnlite info /usr/ports reports: Path: /usr/ports Working Copy Root Path: /usr/ports URL: svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head Relative URL: ^/head Repository Root: svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports Repository UUID: 35697150-7ecd-e111-bb59-0022644237b5 Revision: 535263 Node Kind: directory Schedule: normal Last Changed Author: jkim Last Changed Rev: 535263 Last Changed Date: 2020-05-14 20:52:33 -0700 (Thu, 14 May 2020) Thanks for reading, bob prohaska From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri May 15 05:23:57 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84A0D2EA9E2 for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 05:23:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from gate.utahime.jp (gate.utahime.jp [183.180.29.210]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49NcJq60kpz4NW1 for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 05:23:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from eastasia.home.utahime.org (eastasia.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by gate.utahime.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AF1C46AD5 for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 14:23:49 +0900 (JST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=utahime.org; s=maybe2019112701; t=1589520229; bh=NqWkmb/AOgw182Gh7j3Jb/Av+adTGn8JPn05w2nP0Gs=; h=Date:To:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:References; b=KMYDInt0tgEzYxDO2g7o04ywmk3h5KTvKS0TqqMCt0Zonoi1X/WBU0t1p3h20rXEW u939ayoWO5yY5MgIWUJ3OsFWCNyzB6E+WViLSudufMDswhZATnHimlozSQkB9lj4DV bc9pVAFLTNAVVVrPuQ6h8g2dBQxkiE4szPc6UBpTDZeGBfOb2lOMiIKy1XWmQPnfGs VnN7qaNc6TtePjetzM8+XuzOchl6fuDZ6tOzriY+YkGO/tms0xEnR/0SNw3Z8ACXX2 RQNFjqijKmyNefhXN/A54GpwlLTXPnks37ZyNYkHAG92wGqBIv+xFiFHwn3Jj1LluJ 42W0g9UKQm3cg== Received: from localhost (rolling.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by eastasia.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 233882AE6A; Fri, 15 May 2020 14:23:46 +0900 (JST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.3 at eastasia.home.utahime.org Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 14:23:00 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20200515.142300.28161559058609585.yasu@utahime.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to change PATH setting of poudriere From: Yasuhiro KIMURA In-Reply-To: <20200515.100032.2170535329108358923.yasu@utahime.org> References: <20200514.170414.2224930171617974842.yasu@utahime.org> <1b409d0c-9e70-ba1a-c1dc-98f332d5f169@FreeBSD.org> <20200515.100032.2170535329108358923.yasu@utahime.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49NcJq60kpz4NW1 X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=utahime.org header.s=maybe2019112701 header.b=KMYDInt0; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of yasu@utahime.org designates 183.180.29.210 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=yasu@utahime.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.78 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[utahime.org:s=maybe2019112701]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:spf-authorized.utahime.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.73)[0.729,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[utahime.org]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[utahime.org:+]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.35)[0.353,0]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; IP_SCORE(0.70)[ip: (0.20), ipnet: 183.180.0.0/16(0.10), asn: 2519(3.13), country: JP(0.05)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:2519, ipnet:183.180.0.0/16, country:JP]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 05:23:57 -0000 From: Yasuhiro KIMURA Subject: Re: How to change PATH setting of poudriere Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 10:00:32 +0900 (JST) > Thank you for reply. I added above lines to make.conf but resulted in > error that "Variable PATH is recursive". So I changed as follwing. > > PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/opt/sbin:/opt/bin:${HOME}/bin > .export PATH > > Then build progressed but failed in other port. And error seems to be > nothing to do with PATH setting. So let me change my question. Let me provide detail of the problem. Environments: Host: 12.1-RELEASE-p5 amd64 Poudriere: 3.3.4 Jail: 12.1-RELEASE-p5 amd64 Ports tree: head r535191 I'm maintainer of security/clamav and would like to test attached patch of this bug report. Bug 246059 - security/clamav: fix build with non-default LOCALBASE, PREFIX https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246059 I added following lines in /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/make.conf, applied the patch to ports tree and tried test build of security/clamav from scratch. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- LOCALBASE=/opt PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/opt/sbin:/opt/bin:${HOME}/bin .export PATH ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Then test build failed with configure error of misc/help2man. And URL below is build log. https://www.utahime.org/FreeBSD/poudriere/data/logs/bulk/121amd64-test/2020-05-15_13h43m34s/logs/help2man-1.47.15.log According to it build failed because configure script couldn't find Locale::gettext perl module. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- =================================================== ===> Configuring for help2man-1.47.15 configure: loading site script /usr/ports/Templates/config.site checking for perl... perl checking for module Locale::gettext... no checking for msgfmt... /opt/bin/msgfmt checking for gcc... cc checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out checking for suffix of executables... checking whether we are cross compiling... no checking for suffix of object files... o checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes checking whether cc accepts -g... yes checking for cc option to accept ISO C89... none needed checking for library containing dlsym... none required checking for library containing bindtextdomain... -lintl configure: error: perl module Locale::gettext required ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. Rebuild lang/perl5.30 and devel/p5-Locale-gettext manually before contacting maintainer. *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/ports/misc/help2man ---------------------------------------------------------------------- But p5-Locale-gettext is surely installed at build-depends phase. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- =================================================== ===> help2man-1.47.15 depends on package: p5-Locale-gettext>=0 - not found ===> Installing existing package /packages/All/p5-Locale-gettext-1.07.txz [121amd64-test-job-01] Installing p5-Locale-gettext-1.07... [121amd64-test-job-01] `-- Installing gettext-runtime-0.20.2... [121amd64-test-job-01] | `-- Installing indexinfo-0.3.1... [121amd64-test-job-01] | `-- Extracting indexinfo-0.3.1: .... done [121amd64-test-job-01] `-- Extracting gettext-runtime-0.20.2: .......... done [121amd64-test-job-01] `-- Installing perl5-5.30.2... [121amd64-test-job-01] `-- Extracting perl5-5.30.2: .......... done [121amd64-test-job-01] Extracting p5-Locale-gettext-1.07: ........ done ===== Message from perl5-5.30.2: -- The /usr/bin/perl symlink has been removed starting with Perl 5.20. For shebangs, you should either use: #!/usr/local/bin/perl or #!/usr/bin/env perl The first one will only work if you have a /usr/local/bin/perl, the second will work as long as perl is in PATH. ===> help2man-1.47.15 depends on package: p5-Locale-gettext>=0 - found ===> Returning to build of help2man-1.47.15 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- So it seems something other than PATH setting causes this build error. --- Yasuhiro KIMURA From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri May 15 07:33:19 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7267D2ECDF7 for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 07:33:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic310-20.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic310-20.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.69.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49NgB52LZ5z4Tv5 for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 07:33:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) X-YMail-OSG: y6n.Q7QVM1nQN0XT16A0LUl8sV5dnIs5r5RnevjZvd5lgGvQCpe9yJHY_IA3klE LQR9mL1L2BviIuUi7eLZeUagw2gFAAVf62Z6ZfL2g0Gsj35R5UevC70a6_V2X6Bh9LED5.aEg8nX NkC6z6CTNnwjKZhFUHADcv4mzkM4xFsZ2Zqiw4WPyWxZbBDMNCL9okF4RHrumWMJ6BQ7_xAM_EVn TuVGOQfkk3rrw7qKpytKdbiQqTps7mnLZmYTpte3medaDKOBK1nPinGmMyk0xbidiMv5ayXK.Pbf hG7MYqqO7fxNHoJOHDyDxfm6lrOI0M8h.OaO4crprSh7l8QfQX82L5NaqyiysU7ziqZDyDUKNr_p TLn0bOCes3dHrozQvUdyrOQLdNhR0niVTadLwlji8CgKh_WaM3n_SbMEx0R7QwVcLMN5bw32pXn7 f7spQmFWUckQNRHk4Na2Gk6yaASRuHN3IE1NhxkOMT.i4N9ZbzecbIJZU1y4RAX6awmwLA8LC0Wh nfVyLbQschbUApwa5JUlL8SP__AZOXbeqsSkl0GPQMJzmCGMC5.TIrik.cWwIkfChrzaJB1CrA_9 eaBbmpF2tbcRqRdXFFPeGUbNwfrECeIYY8n.y6FlBA7LkgcGPjvCVuvE615HaPbhh4MNMn4xLY4I bzyg8K9J5oax0WoWzsi6mzlLI.oYf8NQBsVi6YYazyl57PJLcnq4jGvDp6WlxQ5FmaAZfnfYE89y h2ZAPL2.igqZtu01lRwj4qr4dLsIhwukQ7GIX_GZQpGgjzexJ82cOeyfy1I2ZUINYnO.bIBr0PIS RCMQD15_UkFt_3Hw1jMIIKEg0g2JnXIiw177xQR2L_NNEAdj_QlN_BWrRCSBIEANEAgCuzGUHj1j JGwpJbaR_VKqHdzFHb.vU_t2cr_xnbAO_YzzxNiKryfVbF5C6O1o.C39LO1YdZ9By2sYPKJhu9H7 iQ6Hgyrmf6dgQC8eYqdAgSAbHH5PiXhf5tDGHXPRr8zCPKTrWfrmnP6F54LL5fQ9.Cx4.iJYgZSi MBl8ZGbnac1NNoU8WMslehPLJVp_MvmyNhqwC9yOaisdMgqPabtczwYVv4i8eHexPRRF_nx_LXAT zw.mAj6uTIKeXB5_kcJmJBOIQ3eZGSVzgLFQt_XqgKXOPDYsOo31UoJdkwyySN1OMinMs_O5DPcO 5YJPLfkSh7DTOwN3H7elgN2EtoNbFpBygykXJ.9Ueq6jnjYMB8EvW8h4bbq3iD0Fhlx32jEhnpNt pK8KKOvQTnkm2hPByUtf9YAlfhIFCsxG68WyS6HK8CYBdCPJHMkolzwIVuSCVzcMwYhR.L5if.lL 39ojRFThLRLhw1UegZQ.rPWfkN5HJrUZeSyTF7n1yMAuxTg7lGU.fKASK2zyrPFX_6.DKUT7.CLR aOmNvX4EyOOA9v01Fq4w0GMheZ3w24IVHf9Pd5Tj6Ck9zzXeyNyOOtM8F1w2m Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic310.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Fri, 15 May 2020 07:33:15 +0000 Received: by smtp418.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 98fc58a1dd6a8c57ee2dcda95c307245; Fri, 15 May 2020 07:33:11 +0000 (UTC) From: Mark Millard Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\)) Subject: Re: Conflict on very first port (xorg) on rpi3 Message-Id: <4961F458-26EF-447F-8033-B00FA720C58F@yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 00:33:10 -0700 To: bob prohaska , FreeBSD ports X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2) References: <4961F458-26EF-447F-8033-B00FA720C58F.ref@yahoo.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49NgB52LZ5z4Tv5 X-Spamd-Bar: / X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.51 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/21, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.61)[-0.608,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (4.62), ipnet: 98.137.64.0/21(0.83), asn: 36647(0.66), country: US(-0.05)]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.60)[0.597,0]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[146.69.137.98.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[146.69.137.98.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 07:33:19 -0000 bob prohaska fbsd at www.zefox.net wrote on Fri May 15 04:30:07 UTC 2020 : > An attempt to compile x11/xorg on a new installation of 12.1 on a Pi3B = resulted in a > conflict: >=20 > =3D=3D=3D> Installing for py37-sphinx18-1.8.5_1,1 > =3D=3D=3D> Checking if py37-sphinx18 is already installed > =3D=3D=3D> Registering installation for py37-sphinx18-1.8.5_1,1 as = automatic > Installing py37-sphinx18-1.8.5_1,1... > pkg-static: py37-sphinx18-1.8.5_1,1 conflicts with py37-sphinx-3.0.2,1 = (installs files into the same place). Problematic file: = /usr/local/bin/sphinx-apidoc-3.7 > *** Error code 70 >=20 > Had this been the umpteenth port compiled, I'd understand somewhat.=20 >=20 > As the _very_ first port compiled, I'm confounded...... > Uname -a reports > FreeBSD nemesis.zefox.com 12.1-STABLE FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE r361020 = GENERIC arm64 > Svnlite info /usr/ports reports: > Path: /usr/ports > Working Copy Root Path: /usr/ports > URL:=20 > svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head >=20 > Relative URL: ^/head > Repository Root:=20 > svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports >=20 > Repository UUID: 35697150-7ecd-e111-bb59-0022644237b5 > Revision: 535263 > Node Kind: directory > Schedule: normal > Last Changed Author: jkim > Last Changed Rev: 535263 > Last Changed Date: 2020-05-14 20:52:33 -0700 (Thu, 14 May 2020) Both textproc/py-sphinx18 and textproc/py-sphinx require the following to have been built and installed already in order to build: lang/python37 devel/py-setuptools@py37 textproc/py-sphinx18 requires 3 more ports as well: devel/py-Jinja2@py37 textproc/py-docutils@py37 devel/py-six@py37 Some building and isntalling had to occur prior to the textproc/py-sphinx18 build attempt, possibly from prior session(s) of building and installing. textproc/py-sphinx18 is new as of 2020-May-11. The devel/llvm[16789]0 ports require textproc/py-sphinx18 . Only about 26 ports require textproc/py-sphinx18 but I'll not list the others. textproc/py-sphinx has been around longer and has 142 ports that require it. I'll not list them. textproc/py-sphinx18/Makefile lists: CONFLICTS_INSTALL=3D py*-sphinx textproc/py-sphinx/Makefile lists: CONFLICTS_INSTALL=3D py*-sphinx18 So, for example, indirectly the devel/llvm[16789]0 ports conflict with at least 142 other ports because of the textproc/py-sphinx* difference in requirements. The conflict is real and limits what combinations of ports you may have installed at the same time. =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri May 15 07:50:04 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A7642ED0EB for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 07:50:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic305-19.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic305-19.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.64.82]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49NgYR0BhLz4VMg for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 07:50:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) X-YMail-OSG: BTZrvnAVM1nQUdfoAeDwFjBPQEct.q.kvhITuDEXYP1JQJ1TXKXIOnDfVFZC2Ce e76l11cr4N4D_l0iPaLJlOPAqfNJ3t1C5Yky2BTPHNaroX1W4CQzOXBZoz.RdyTEKxUXIxomlFPP OB.6udVDatHk5cR9W2ULtJXkIQ3dIuNw1cztZH8kr56vt8tlJ3LSaugIb_Yv1c5YrJ5nPPxN.Jxw 0PdOaURdhOQmRyUhJHkjgolHBKhF.nmbW7qQms2Go_xH8GgO.TZyAKcZLmyMo4Y.8eBAIFFvfGJH vJ3LzM7iUKjwgM1CJbT2BxbqC.CRkhes5fKOw19B0sELS0AEzcOHyYPJZ.au7NTLL9ZEjkPjuA5m vGzhuHxC0V0byoEFzJ4SSwC.yiT3_sYYQuPBEVYO0Ln7nPnY1_OnxbJ3grCRZr.M0qKLmy5iPXaT 1Dh3VaNelnL4ZdvfffRmD9_r9Gx7KPndR7QQPmFbwW04_eSUNqEyCGuu26ATu9OrHWDLK07Z1kBC FRyttBssVMPJQfdj2GX.ghQObPJrdBpkc3rN9yWBVCkV0KrLrgtuEU2lEjVx5V05qir7KrXGFLdX zsjyQCbvBFG9yHcfEj_lQNZGnd2gG898XiKlxGwDB09rfsajrsa_iXh4vo0F.kImx1qFA4JY9Iac kkHZT3_rYGJ7V_CwxWGKfUp.EckFOAAeiZDbrzqM959n0Hijzco_v.fVXp43pjuIqFRW7cKANIWx ID8FmqFB5Rq5xTnG0IWjC31eHiz79PWVgQ_9pyx7rkzw05FLuYhh39eMjmskGnnzI3RQmR4VmWha ZsKwv00IbWpIUtmx82hktQ5NkchFP68gp12DFEnkX3WhYEezNJbRkvcSLuifcA4miSIGhl.LRqa8 wfv_fajOfwWF_hTcRjmRGiivqBVN_9IA0SDefYw4BtmoMPsS7G3eP_QN1_Kk44rMIvBCtfXb8TjZ fYAO5LmgSw1cuHsN6gJ57cxNYASeOzL1YzlL2plXoWPPmfRQyfD.gdYGYNb2NC2AKHgF606lUQ3b 7p2YNU0Cuc7TMBvIS3XoPYUQ4TgLvIVB2QpfA_prcy6eF8IYTnclsknoFslp1oJ18oRSRQi93Rre 33DDRX1EEeUYWVzE3Tw_8dSrMDZjcMtlxfqTmbrbgqwjNYoV18gXvf4Nck2VEGKokJUU5XGtzk0R B2vy5.ro78Vr6_lLFKy8Mb_OTlyqOdTi251P0X0bggNoNXt8LnXKj2G31sTzDQy5zmhYk9km3eUX HMHLyJojPXRRfDRjRD0U3YRCaZpHJmU8VEgX8KlSAP_95_nCruuyoo69O0zmHQPzJO_oAWw6cDbc eP3_mZya3LXnAnKGakL_d_.JYslQ2HWGYtnWtTcFXtIxMxOvXb9hNGYLq0UU73vuHPhqGyMMQ8uG VETuN85VUfej_0IdRFIm0SSeo7UcpkC82AP.3bcjZF4MQOJjfmqU3DkQs Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic305.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Fri, 15 May 2020 07:50:00 +0000 Received: by smtp426.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID ee28a6724e0f63312652b1c89c733bd9; Fri, 15 May 2020 07:49:55 +0000 (UTC) From: Mark Millard Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\)) Subject: Re: Conflict on very first port (xorg) on rpi3 Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 00:49:55 -0700 References: <4961F458-26EF-447F-8033-B00FA720C58F@yahoo.com> To: bob prohaska , FreeBSD ports In-Reply-To: <4961F458-26EF-447F-8033-B00FA720C58F@yahoo.com> Message-Id: <5564B9D1-DEAE-43FE-88CF-3C35593A1FA3@yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49NgYR0BhLz4VMg X-Spamd-Bar: / X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.12 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/21, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.33)[-0.333,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (6.03), ipnet: 98.137.64.0/21(0.83), asn: 36647(0.66), country: US(-0.05)]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.72)[0.717,0]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[82.64.137.98.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[82.64.137.98.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 07:50:04 -0000 On 2020-May-15, at 00:33, Mark Millard wrote: > bob prohaska fbsd at www.zefox.net wrote on > Fri May 15 04:30:07 UTC 2020 : >=20 >> An attempt to compile x11/xorg on a new installation of 12.1 on a = Pi3B resulted in a >> conflict: >>=20 >> =3D=3D=3D> Installing for py37-sphinx18-1.8.5_1,1 >> =3D=3D=3D> Checking if py37-sphinx18 is already installed >> =3D=3D=3D> Registering installation for py37-sphinx18-1.8.5_1,1 as = automatic >> Installing py37-sphinx18-1.8.5_1,1... >> pkg-static: py37-sphinx18-1.8.5_1,1 conflicts with = py37-sphinx-3.0.2,1 (installs files into the same place). Problematic = file: /usr/local/bin/sphinx-apidoc-3.7 >> *** Error code 70 >>=20 >> Had this been the umpteenth port compiled, I'd understand somewhat.=20= >>=20 >> As the _very_ first port compiled, I'm confounded...... >> Uname -a reports >> FreeBSD nemesis.zefox.com 12.1-STABLE FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE r361020 = GENERIC arm64 >> Svnlite info /usr/ports reports: >> Path: /usr/ports >> Working Copy Root Path: /usr/ports >> URL:=20 >> svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head >>=20 >> Relative URL: ^/head >> Repository Root:=20 >> svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports >>=20 >> Repository UUID: 35697150-7ecd-e111-bb59-0022644237b5 >> Revision: 535263 >> Node Kind: directory >> Schedule: normal >> Last Changed Author: jkim >> Last Changed Rev: 535263 >> Last Changed Date: 2020-05-14 20:52:33 -0700 (Thu, 14 May 2020) >=20 > Both textproc/py-sphinx18 and textproc/py-sphinx require > the following to have been built and installed already > in order to build: >=20 > lang/python37 > devel/py-setuptools@py37 >=20 > textproc/py-sphinx18 requires 3 more ports as well: >=20 > devel/py-Jinja2@py37 > textproc/py-docutils@py37 > devel/py-six@py37 >=20 > Some building and isntalling had to occur prior to the > textproc/py-sphinx18 build attempt, possibly from > prior session(s) of building and installing. >=20 >=20 > textproc/py-sphinx18 is new as of 2020-May-11. > The devel/llvm[16789]0 ports require textproc/py-sphinx18 . > Only about 26 ports require textproc/py-sphinx18 but > I'll not list the others. >=20 > textproc/py-sphinx has been around longer and has > 142 ports that require it. I'll not list them. >=20 >=20 > textproc/py-sphinx18/Makefile lists: >=20 > CONFLICTS_INSTALL=3D py*-sphinx >=20 > textproc/py-sphinx/Makefile lists: >=20 > CONFLICTS_INSTALL=3D py*-sphinx18 >=20 >=20 > So, for example, indirectly the devel/llvm[16789]0 > ports conflict with at least 142 other ports because > of the textproc/py-sphinx* difference in requirements. >=20 >=20 > The conflict is real and limits what combinations > of ports you may have installed at the same time. Note: I only counted "required for build", not "required for run" in my counts of "Require" status. (I also ignored deleted ports.) I'll note that devel/poudriere style building of ports should allow building without having the conflict (separate jails for each build, each with its own, local /usr/local/ like area). But Makefile use, portmaster use, and the like probably see the conflict because of installing everything built someplace under (typically) the system's /usr/local/ and leaving the installation there. Only 4 ports require textproc/py-sphinx18 "for run". 20 ports require textproc/py-sphinx "for run". devel/llvm[16789]0 do not require either "for run", just "for build". But that still leaves the conflict to manage unless a tool with poudriere-like properties is used to build them. =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri May 15 13:21:31 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE0C72F56CD for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 13:21:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=CREC=65=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49Npvt75S3z3L7r for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 13:21:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=CREC=65=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id F1A1E2F56CC; Fri, 15 May 2020 13:21:30 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F16892F56CB for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 13:21:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=CREC=65=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49Npvs3kdtz3L7j for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 13:21:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=CREC=65=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 220D4284AE for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 15:21:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from illbsd.quip.test (ip-62-24-92-232.net.upcbroadband.cz [62.24.92.232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 80574284A6 for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 15:21:15 +0200 (CEST) To: ports@freebsd.org From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Subject: poudriere overlays build failed with xargs: illegal option -- e Message-ID: <5563154c-18b6-33f7-b16b-9448abaedcdf@quip.cz> Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 15:21:09 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49Npvs3kdtz3L7j X-Spamd-Bar: +++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of SRS0=CREC=65=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz has no SPF policy when checking 94.124.105.4) smtp.mailfrom=SRS0=CREC=65=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz X-Spamd-Result: default: False [3.97 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.81)[ip: (0.26), ipnet: 94.124.104.0/21(0.13), asn: 42000(3.55), country: CZ(0.09)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.96)[0.963,0]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[0.999,0]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[quip.cz]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[000.fbsd@quip.cz,SRS0=CREC=65=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:42000, ipnet:94.124.104.0/21, country:CZ]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[000.fbsd@quip.cz,SRS0=CREC=65=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 13:21:32 -0000 I am trying to use port overlays with poudriere-devel. I have main tree with old quaterly branch from December 2019 (default). The overlay contains just a bunch of ports from current tree with updated versions of Apache, Python etc. and Mk from current ports tree. This is called mfh_overlay. I need this because I need to maintain some old SW not existing in current ports tree (phantomjs with old openssl for example) Some ports are building fine but when port needs to be patched it is failing: =>> Status lang/python27 | python27-2.7.18: extract-depends =================================================== =========================================================================== =>> Status lang/python27 | python27-2.7.18: extract =================================================== ===> NOTICE: This port is deprecated; you may wish to reconsider installing it: EOLed upstream. It is scheduled to be removed on or after 2020-12-31. ===> python27-2.7.18 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found ===> Fetching all distfiles required by python27-2.7.18 for building ===> Extracting for python27-2.7.18 => SHA256 Checksum OK for python/Python-2.7.18.tar.xz. =========================================================================== =>> Status lang/python27 | python27-2.7.18: patch-depends =================================================== =========================================================================== =>> Status lang/python27 | python27-2.7.18: patch =================================================== ===> Patching for python27-2.7.18 xargs: illegal option -- e usage: xargs [-0opt] [-E eofstr] [-I replstr [-R replacements] [-S replsize]] [-J replstr] [-L number] [-n number [-x]] [-P maxprocs] [-s size] [utility [argument ...]] *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /overlays/mfh_overlay/lang/python27 build of lang/python27 | python27-2.7.18 ended at Fri May 15 15:14:08 CEST 2020 build time: 00:00:03 !!! build failure encountered !!! [00:00:13] Error: Build failed in phase: patch [00:00:13] Logs: /vol0/poudriere/data/logs/bulk/11_3_amd64-default-php71m103/2020-05-15_15h13m56s [00:00:13] WWW: http://pkg.codelab.cz/build.html?mastername=11_3_amd64-default-php71m103&build=2020-05-15_15h13m56s [00:00:13] Cleaning up Does anybody know what is wrong with xargs and illegal option -e? I guess it is something in Mk but I don't know what is different in the current tree and the old one from December. I did my last successfull build few weeks ago where the the ports trees were manually merged in to one. But is has some other problems so I am trying to use overlays. Kind regards Miroslav Lachman From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri May 15 15:19:26 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FB652F8139 for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 15:19:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (www.zefox.net [50.1.20.27]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "www.zefox.com", Issuer "www.zefox.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49NsWw27Msz3ynL for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 15:19:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 04FFJNB7053879 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 15 May 2020 08:19:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: (from fbsd@localhost) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 04FFJMdA053878; Fri, 15 May 2020 08:19:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd) Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 08:19:22 -0700 From: bob prohaska To: Mark Millard Cc: FreeBSD ports Subject: Re: Conflict on very first port (xorg) on rpi3 Message-ID: <20200515151922.GC51382@www.zefox.net> References: <4961F458-26EF-447F-8033-B00FA720C58F.ref@yahoo.com> <4961F458-26EF-447F-8033-B00FA720C58F@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4961F458-26EF-447F-8033-B00FA720C58F@yahoo.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49NsWw27Msz3ynL X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of fbsd@www.zefox.net has no SPF policy when checking 50.1.20.27) smtp.mailfrom=fbsd@www.zefox.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.69 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.71)[-0.710,0]; WWW_DOT_DOMAIN(0.50)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.05)[ip: (0.21), ipnet: 50.1.16.0/20(0.11), asn: 7065(-0.03), country: US(-0.05)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zefox.net]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.45)[0.451,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[yahoo.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7065, ipnet:50.1.16.0/20, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_WWW(0.50)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 15:19:26 -0000 On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:33:10AM -0700, Mark Millard via freebsd-ports wrote: > > Some building and isntalling had to occur prior to the > textproc/py-sphinx18 build attempt, possibly from > prior session(s) of building and installing. > > In this case x11/xorg was the first port attempted in a new ports tree. The only "prior sessions" would have been within the dependencies of x11/xorg. Is that resolvable by poudriere? In compiling poudriere I tried to use the qemu option, since this is on and for a non-x86 architecture. It failed, as arm64 is apparently not supported. Is it required? > textproc/py-sphinx18 is new as of 2020-May-11. > The devel/llvm[16789]0 ports require textproc/py-sphinx18 . > Only about 26 ports require textproc/py-sphinx18 but > I'll not list the others. > > textproc/py-sphinx has been around longer and has > 142 ports that require it. I'll not list them. > > > textproc/py-sphinx18/Makefile lists: > > CONFLICTS_INSTALL= py*-sphinx > > textproc/py-sphinx/Makefile lists: > > CONFLICTS_INSTALL= py*-sphinx18 > > > So, for example, indirectly the devel/llvm[16789]0 > ports conflict with at least 142 other ports because > of the textproc/py-sphinx* difference in requirements. > > > The conflict is real and limits what combinations > of ports you may have installed at the same time. I'll try deinstalling the conflicting port and hope it won't be required later.... Thanks for writing! bob prohaska From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri May 15 16:14:21 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 726ED2F9827 for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 16:14:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic307-55.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic307-55.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.64.31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49NtlJ118rz441l for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 16:14:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) X-YMail-OSG: 2uigwQYVM1l666Q9f7V2k.knai_nghVXeKta8npniB3EKUJE1YX5AT87y6LgL7h Opmc36JSttlS_ZvlMhE7.JNFoi4xIZCzNkwT2cCEQ1f20m5VVfbdvK80BKzAIzf2hA0EGRxJenzu gSR3TeKxPgyFHnChac0FkNgQDUtcMIUOIl30QRJqZLANF66_t8Cw1RPwv7A0gwhymYnBwwYycUPV VF_7pQyseSkDyArMmFh_dSM1L9SSxtRcvWuBVJ2bnD3jODNhnEjVsn04dRbKUr9csobZmNLY7.eV GgL7Lg.T01W167ofTe1725Gvv5vUg9P_0vkBYCIlnK6U9teMi9YeGXYC1u06A3f81JJWVMrOisab GQ3NlK1A503OxMbHR2PU0rZZGom8lXBxNmnCTX6Lapy3ah.jmVQL2pkkHBELGy4uBJSI0.X4XZhz 3G6fe3uYOwISAKJ2Pa8V1YodKt3g1ME8KEsgJF0JaPm1GZLGRZl7B_r.qAZhCSWl_I79FXVhhjJD uf0ecYS9qqlWVb.9YbFJY3Q.dA.sUtW2pn86rjluJfNWwpro0o1tNbkFTZ1aWlgbsH_QSHYvxRnE 40g1VQI8AChscQT8Ooqp0AwReFIWikjN7G__jW6FZEyFAQPa50Prg.85N5bAvYlIoEVISYomHQF9 5oR5ljYGZ0FH5ej7IEc12rrZIG24rhEu4F_91fpmr2l.tx2UzYiGet_9kzzSRGviesG0FhVm5DEO rGXhmI3PCsNvX8fJ7ISGYVc7GzMc0uKCvEZplDV7FwObU1OYwWulVPajmeJVfXOCxy89RlL2Z3wR fTEEdl0lt8VHs5lVCgqmDueEQlKvbdmQnMoSCWTbbBVmAJLVHFdvq9BdSyp.eobDBJSAzfqPtBnP XvZNm4vKGlPj1evSe4U0ZEpnEZ4sJPJVcoNYyHRFNZo5VDbXCFCkYbRIF2C22wBJRgB6pEVhLWmb PQnrv9lI4Tc2XV7b1OqoHVd_5YV_HBUzN9VaGn3DoEA_XY7nuyMwGlNQX.swZkTjjM15._KZhWq0 Ck0nNpmh9KZ8HuvVHRZWwjGnN2wxUBY7bAA25baUko.SwzddwRZNmyDUQCUhjK5HUwN7cuO2pXvS k820setYDGAIMzoKzqDpi81RDP5DGXcMwMD9M2xbiaHvyBOjMbeVZFJ_XuSFgX6HDzvMl2r_JqAl hxf1ONAOGW38fPXoS1d6WSA2Xy5w3IfRUkMFPBNWTJRmnAjMudGSoZ9ccjc0w9VMHnDLgnAlfaYa BEwF.Yg.FvJuyR1V9XaS2Wbq10wOrW___w9m4VfhGGIK30F7Ve0n67PegNEcM1_nLv.9zoASQ4KG E0FIduO.IVWxc3VjZWkt1Q46HHDlGTi5JUqGzNziGRxkrT73yAIJquF5itYFqzQianrmKT3MuW5U lVzRe3saxF3KVEL0bQ369DoDdD5qV7SkAGTfEtfq3kTsRFquWBZJnrqE- Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic307.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Fri, 15 May 2020 16:14:17 +0000 Received: by smtp428.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 76eb8dc9589bac22090920f49d321c1e; Fri, 15 May 2020 16:14:16 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\)) Subject: Re: Conflict on very first port (xorg) on rpi3 From: Mark Millard In-Reply-To: <20200515151922.GC51382@www.zefox.net> Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 09:14:15 -0700 Cc: FreeBSD ports Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <8CF38A0D-3D53-4CC0-A6C2-B82F8DA77C40@yahoo.com> References: <4961F458-26EF-447F-8033-B00FA720C58F.ref@yahoo.com> <4961F458-26EF-447F-8033-B00FA720C58F@yahoo.com> <20200515151922.GC51382@www.zefox.net> To: bob prohaska X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49NtlJ118rz441l X-Spamd-Bar: - X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.01 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/21, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.88)[-0.877,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (2.85), ipnet: 98.137.64.0/21(0.83), asn: 36647(0.66), country: US(-0.05)]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.37)[0.365,0]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[31.64.137.98.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[31.64.137.98.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 16:14:21 -0000 On 2020-May-15, at 08:19, bob prohaska wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:33:10AM -0700, Mark Millard via = freebsd-ports wrote: >>=20 >> Some building and isntalling had to occur prior to the >> textproc/py-sphinx18 build attempt, possibly from >> prior session(s) of building and installing. >>=20 >>=20 >=20 > In this case x11/xorg was the first port attempted in a new > ports tree. The only "prior sessions" would have been within > the dependencies of x11/xorg. Is that resolvable by poudriere? poudriere builds packages. The pkg install for system use is a separate operation. During a poudriere package build, the jail involved only has the packages (internally!) installed that are needed for the particular build. No build conflict with unneeded ports (unneeded from the specific build's viewpoint). (That presumes not doing something odd in configuring poudriere.) poudriere does spend more time doing pkg installs and later clean-outs in order to avoid having unnecessary stuff installed during each package's build (that might conflict). After the builds, using pkg install still can not install two ports that have a conflicting "for run" requirements status. poudriere just avoids the build-time conflicts with ports not needed for the build. poudriere can not solve building a port that indicates it needs conflicting ports to run in order to build. It just avoids conflicts from ports/packages that are not needed for the build. > In compiling poudriere I tried to use the qemu option, since > this is on and for a non-x86 architecture. It failed, as arm64 > is apparently not supported. Is it required? I use poudriere on: armv7, aarch64, 32-bit powerpc, powerpc64, and amd64. I do have amd64 set up for also experimenting with cross builds to aarch64 and armv7. (Targeting armv7 does not work so well last I tried.) The only context were I have qemu involved is amd64 --and only because of the jails for cross-build experiments. Targeting amd64 (self targeting) does not use qemu on amd64. >> textproc/py-sphinx18 is new as of 2020-May-11. >> The devel/llvm[16789]0 ports require textproc/py-sphinx18 . >> Only about 26 ports require textproc/py-sphinx18 but >> I'll not list the others. >>=20 >> textproc/py-sphinx has been around longer and has >> 142 ports that require it. I'll not list them. >>=20 >>=20 >> textproc/py-sphinx18/Makefile lists: >>=20 >> CONFLICTS_INSTALL=3D py*-sphinx >>=20 >> textproc/py-sphinx/Makefile lists: >>=20 >> CONFLICTS_INSTALL=3D py*-sphinx18 >>=20 >>=20 >> So, for example, indirectly the devel/llvm[16789]0 >> ports conflict with at least 142 other ports because >> of the textproc/py-sphinx* difference in requirements. >>=20 >>=20 >> The conflict is real and limits what combinations >> of ports you may have installed at the same time. >=20 > I'll try deinstalling the conflicting port and hope > it won't be required later.... =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri May 15 16:49:27 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 350C22FA486 for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 16:49:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dbaio@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49NvWq0dl1z45qr; Fri, 15 May 2020 16:49:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dbaio@FreeBSD.org) Received: from t480.local (179.187.81.201.dynamic.adsl.gvt.net.br [179.187.81.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: dbaio/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3A71A1C6D5; Fri, 15 May 2020 16:49:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dbaio@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 13:49:21 -0300 From: "Danilo G. Baio" To: bob prohaska Cc: Mark Millard , FreeBSD ports Subject: Re: Conflict on very first port (xorg) on rpi3 Message-ID: <20200515164921.6zyiorfgnqhf5nls@t480.local> References: <4961F458-26EF-447F-8033-B00FA720C58F.ref@yahoo.com> <4961F458-26EF-447F-8033-B00FA720C58F@yahoo.com> <20200515151922.GC51382@www.zefox.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wjzworwgrbkyhgbk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200515151922.GC51382@www.zefox.net> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 16:49:27 -0000 --wjzworwgrbkyhgbk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 08:19:22AM -0700, bob prohaska wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:33:10AM -0700, Mark Millard via freebsd-ports = wrote: > >=20 > > Some building and isntalling had to occur prior to the > > textproc/py-sphinx18 build attempt, possibly from > > prior session(s) of building and installing. > >=20 > >=20 >=20 > In this case x11/xorg was the first port attempted in a new > ports tree. The only "prior sessions" would have been within > the dependencies of x11/xorg. Is that resolvable by poudriere? >=20 > In compiling poudriere I tried to use the qemu option, since > this is on and for a non-x86 architecture. It failed, as arm64 > is apparently not supported. Is it required? >=20 >=20 >=20 > > textproc/py-sphinx18 is new as of 2020-May-11. > > The devel/llvm[16789]0 ports require textproc/py-sphinx18 . > > Only about 26 ports require textproc/py-sphinx18 but > > I'll not list the others. > >=20 > > textproc/py-sphinx has been around longer and has > > 142 ports that require it. I'll not list them. > >=20 > >=20 > > textproc/py-sphinx18/Makefile lists: > >=20 > > CONFLICTS_INSTALL=3D py*-sphinx > >=20 > > textproc/py-sphinx/Makefile lists: > >=20 > > CONFLICTS_INSTALL=3D py*-sphinx18 > >=20 > >=20 > > So, for example, indirectly the devel/llvm[16789]0 > > ports conflict with at least 142 other ports because > > of the textproc/py-sphinx* difference in requirements. > >=20 > >=20 > > The conflict is real and limits what combinations > > of ports you may have installed at the same time. >=20 > I'll try deinstalling the conflicting port and hope > it won't be required later.... >=20 > Thanks for writing! >=20 > bob prohaska Hi. It seems that just devel/llvm80 is pulling sphinx18 when building x11/xorg. Try disabling DOCS option on devel/llvm80 for now. I've opened a PR to track this issue: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D246487 --=20 Danilo G. Baio (dbaio) --wjzworwgrbkyhgbk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAABCgB9FiEEORj0UTsjzCy+enIkmpN7LfMuiNcFAl6+yA5fFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDM5 MThGNDUxM0IyM0NDMkNCRTdBNzIyNDlBOTM3QjJERjMyRTg4RDcACgkQmpN7LfMu iNd8VQ//dazUzAlfTnr35ddk1jFwtLktBTOCeHSvdB98XIklfiyB9FSxBMoC5XlF f/3SbZtF676BeruMu3lxH9hAOtb+QouZ5lcHZYjZCa0p4Q0ywUCEK3ssoaRo3x8W 51S/FhllbWOJi8KVHMImPdHkKVTqzJsAReASbP64awSoWBA+JDh/LkKvLHg/F8Kc okFS0GF32RSKt7dMuG/M2wUcQGxkrwhWOg0mz1iVv6YKr6MUZ7FcMRWQllv8tzJW owtwNQ2M9l/a4f6kJOmzF/9IZ4bYYxoZDdFPdBlducTDq29s+sX6eqxoJRyHbhfl +BY7DK3FNRMZnwKl+u7bsoLX/kkOxT2keJEESiqs5hKTfoE84Q9SWsHTcWcOHKuu xQAsP5sHXPWeK0pfezE3/a6hRUZs4u2AI3fZRPgxJXb3Ch97W3u8FJeYcZr0ZDUQ 1faedMjuUhy0zLjpPQ3SVTJ351OJWwUymq0knSLLodfVeInd4OEokleLDSnhNxd9 6F/Pi4HDumch5jRTeTnEH/iC4RkcePq9Duvddi0SOzDNS3HE4beEaaLCoraSLbvi mdylOQCNgkxE8m2kw9CVj8sVw9siA8Q0OaUYpf81lxcldfgpXFrIZeSlyg4OW1GQ iq35Ig8XPpccn1IwN3Qp3gTYo/ucgIu1K3EVIHzV2u9Ethl1sYg= =MNR/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wjzworwgrbkyhgbk-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri May 15 17:36:20 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A22C2FB6D8 for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 17:36:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bryan-lists@shatow.net) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49NwYw0jr7z49xc for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 17:36:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bryan-lists@shatow.net) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 168132FB6D4; Fri, 15 May 2020 17:36:20 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 164652FB6D3 for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 17:36:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bryan-lists@shatow.net) Received: from mail.xzibition.com (mail.xzibition.com [52.11.127.251]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49NwYv1xkVz49xb for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 17:36:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bryan-lists@shatow.net) Received: from mail.xzibition.com (localhost [172.31.3.2]) by mail.xzibition.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EC961FC83; Fri, 15 May 2020 17:36:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.xzibition.com Received: from mail.xzibition.com ([172.31.3.2]) by mail.xzibition.com (mail.xzibition.com [172.31.3.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with LMTP id JSBjsda_kPZZ; Fri, 15 May 2020 17:36:07 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: poudriere overlays build failed with xargs: illegal option -- e DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 mail.xzibition.com 816351FC7B DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=shatow.net; s=mxc204805312015; t=1589564167; bh=ENB4TJN4h73vuqpn8by5FdGcwMDEAOfMo4I1I1ifmZ8=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=r371EiGw++avl1Nqdn99H5x5v5j7nsq72XhSxSsqVBhd3n9a0yrxrQI5rkyT+J1sb 8iuA/t/cvCSmknfRqNdlVBd+aGCEd7C9QTQHnhyurJz6z/PlYBDrBjDATMbnNb6txK W1tOV+Hzs+53jqsvoLemEgyfQ6m+ET2TDZo/66Rd5aFnncEQHx4H/cXDHpdZxGZwB5 dE2zCG6FkTwofFhupKdnGos1DdDs+Ktl8BXQ5mssnA811zGxKKJxMNIb391cwrsnSn 7MR4KIvWH+qRwMJOGfOw8sKN4+T1blgibX3iSvWtbPkxG2utqWdu3TNa62xq46esLc 9bW+h5p/nBU3A== To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>, ports@freebsd.org References: <5563154c-18b6-33f7-b16b-9448abaedcdf@quip.cz> From: Bryan Drewery Message-ID: Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 10:36:07 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5563154c-18b6-33f7-b16b-9448abaedcdf@quip.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49NwYv1xkVz49xb X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=shatow.net header.s=mxc204805312015 header.b=r371EiGw; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=shatow.net; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bryan-lists@shatow.net designates 52.11.127.251 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bryan-lists@shatow.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.48 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[shatow.net:s=mxc204805312015]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; IP_SCORE(-2.48)[ip: (-7.36), ipnet: 52.10.0.0/15(-4.05), asn: 16509(-0.94), country: US(-0.05)]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[shatow.net:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[shatow.net,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16509, ipnet:52.10.0.0/15, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 17:36:20 -0000 On 5/15/2020 6:21 AM, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > I am trying to use port overlays with poudriere-devel. > I have main tree with old quaterly branch from December 2019 (default). > The overlay contains just a bunch of ports from current tree with > updated versions of Apache, Python etc. and Mk from current ports tree. > This is called mfh_overlay. > I need this because I need to maintain some old SW not existing in > current ports tree (phantomjs with old openssl for example) > > Some ports are building fine but when port needs to be patched it is > failing: > > =>> Status   lang/python27 | python27-2.7.18: extract-depends > =================================================== > =========================================================================== > =>> Status   lang/python27 | python27-2.7.18: extract > =================================================== > ===>   NOTICE: > > This port is deprecated; you may wish to reconsider installing it: > > EOLed upstream. > > It is scheduled to be removed on or after 2020-12-31. > > ===>   python27-2.7.18 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found > ===> Fetching all distfiles required by python27-2.7.18 for building > ===>  Extracting for python27-2.7.18 > => SHA256 Checksum OK for python/Python-2.7.18.tar.xz. > =========================================================================== > =>> Status   lang/python27 | python27-2.7.18: patch-depends > =================================================== > =========================================================================== > =>> Status   lang/python27 | python27-2.7.18: patch > =================================================== > ===>  Patching for python27-2.7.18 > xargs: illegal option -- e > usage: xargs [-0opt] [-E eofstr] [-I replstr [-R replacements] [-S > replsize]] >              [-J replstr] [-L number] [-n number [-x]] [-P maxprocs] >              [-s size] [utility [argument ...]] > *** Error code 1 I suspect somewhere ${REINPLACE_CMD} or ${SED} or ${FRAMEWORK_REINPLACE_CMD} is misspelled or not set. Perhaps your overlay is outdated and one of these is not set. You could try this in your poudriere.conf to get more debugging (untested): PORT_FLAGS="-dlx" -- Regards, Bryan Drewery From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri May 15 18:05:56 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C7192FC81C for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 18:05:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (www.zefox.net [50.1.20.27]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "www.zefox.com", Issuer "www.zefox.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49NxD36sgKz4Dk3; Fri, 15 May 2020 18:05:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 04FI5t0d054250 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 15 May 2020 11:05:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: (from fbsd@localhost) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 04FI5tp6054249; Fri, 15 May 2020 11:05:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd) Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 11:05:54 -0700 From: bob prohaska To: "Danilo G. Baio" Cc: Mark Millard , FreeBSD ports Subject: Re: Conflict on very first port (xorg) on rpi3 Message-ID: <20200515180554.GD51382@www.zefox.net> References: <4961F458-26EF-447F-8033-B00FA720C58F.ref@yahoo.com> <4961F458-26EF-447F-8033-B00FA720C58F@yahoo.com> <20200515151922.GC51382@www.zefox.net> <20200515164921.6zyiorfgnqhf5nls@t480.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200515164921.6zyiorfgnqhf5nls@t480.local> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49NxD36sgKz4Dk3 X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.98 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.984,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 18:05:56 -0000 On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 01:49:21PM -0300, Danilo G. Baio wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 08:19:22AM -0700, bob prohaska wrote: > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:33:10AM -0700, Mark Millard via freebsd-ports wrote: > > > > > > Some building and isntalling had to occur prior to the > > > textproc/py-sphinx18 build attempt, possibly from > > > prior session(s) of building and installing. > > > > > > > > > > In this case x11/xorg was the first port attempted in a new > > ports tree. The only "prior sessions" would have been within > > the dependencies of x11/xorg. Is that resolvable by poudriere? > > > > > textproc/py-sphinx18 is new as of 2020-May-11. > > > The devel/llvm[16789]0 ports require textproc/py-sphinx18 . > > > Only about 26 ports require textproc/py-sphinx18 but > > > I'll not list the others. > > > > > > textproc/py-sphinx has been around longer and has > > > 142 ports that require it. I'll not list them. > > > > > > > > > textproc/py-sphinx18/Makefile lists: > > > > > > CONFLICTS_INSTALL= py*-sphinx > > > > > > textproc/py-sphinx/Makefile lists: > > > > > > CONFLICTS_INSTALL= py*-sphinx18 > > > > > > > > > So, for example, indirectly the devel/llvm[16789]0 > > > ports conflict with at least 142 other ports because > > > of the textproc/py-sphinx* difference in requirements. > > > > > > > > > The conflict is real and limits what combinations > > > of ports you may have installed at the same time. > > > > I'll try deinstalling the conflicting port and hope > > it won't be required later.... > > It seems that just devel/llvm80 is pulling sphinx18 when building > x11/xorg. > > Try disabling DOCS option on devel/llvm80 for now. > > I've opened a PR to track this issue: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246487 > Wish I'd known it was only the DOCS option! Too late now, sphinx18 is deinstalled and llvm80 is building. This is probably a dumb question, but is there some way to learn at the outset what conflicts need to be worked around? Something like a "make conflicts" target? Seemingly it could be done by hand, but that promises to be tedious. At best 8-) Thanks for writing! bob prohaska From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri May 15 18:59:34 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71A532FD94F for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 18:59:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic305-20.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic305-20.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.64.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49NyPx0p4xz4J4Z for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 18:59:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) X-YMail-OSG: dr58cmAVM1l9taToCmxPa2OquioQsiJyWllR7ydYhm.u7Sb2je.cQ33g3lzI9S7 pVx_hk_f.gFDHWmLsN9kUyiqb0ZDGl_LZj2D.r4c0w6sLxLLLUXK44RJeW0b18VU6n6bYNraxP8p bK4WfrvuIlKaWjqKNz5KxCu2CmoSj6PkI5MvirqRLaMs7oA3QawS9QiBwuZqnlYjxQWYX1.L6VGF YysWB7VeBhpqgM24oXeUN05sQVf5tHDQ.pf05SvceBHIW75nvkPM5P9fqtj8LcCsAjXdPupAhTB0 fkPLquo0YDcTQpIk7fTdSkgsSA4DTlR9JcH4XRJy4w8zIOSPgj6VgjIczsCdfrO8aABSLxaCeM5r 1FIeEXrIM2LVFWHKxG84v2tyguVmk.W.tjHAJ_.lueX.gthHe6qHBrifo9j1oX6sNkHVZZZNOUNp 0Bfq4ahlZE4AKUv8jg7KnrR0evMzQXxXLjbRHf2EGirm1RHmtfilrFxH1eV20XgZdSpvOEEc0cZi zQOxqxWOWE1VUFTeFzBoFCg_k_YNf6B9tIsKMctjLkXRNjB5RNKM86Z11yxPmlbA7_0JKLZcnM.5 f8btXjwd1ys0wh9TxABEjRXQn1CeeiWyrNfgQin4CpUqFIEHSLlmJqIy1o_oRIWWvoiZlVh448nr 3mZQW4wE3kau9JZSXCaXwnnIdp1IDLhjt0kQ0_hGbfVsc5iDz5rpnCV1PU_iDrpzmSi6AU.mJUEq jAPbZapuJl..8xKTwyV3UNIlPWyyjFf0ss5Adx75ONfIfiaBVAPHFEJkBlcYEyc8YSXt3.FHp_15 _pW8w8OaiEjw9nxg7_8GIJRV5CCeXZQbIqu_pez5vYPzxHYkl8Rzh9gzOB3Aqz0f5rX1ZfkdXIj3 FGc51A4QrAWgbTfAWM5IbLqRmIdq127VgVEKDB9K6YH500YkkEvEnhCrpY7pPW2PqYgHGx.gNG_9 PpTxa7mbbSU8q5gACC3Csz53ZtKrTnxl2B8T4jChOwc.rdq7DhAqiR6MWbr_U6zKsSf3iJYCeU65 E4X8e1mCrIa_LkQ8KuLRvTLllWjrNYdNOKOyvNMuJSmcodQcZ48wPYrOySKJ1SVrKZAJiIMZXPyH WyToq1nJT7.yFBzziX9rBx2oEgQGErDrreh1vSY4Y4PpS0Y9f8Deq6dPRl8KPlLkQ8o_PwO6NFfm kdW7l1Sjeei5JGDDhpb26oK12jKVDCuvly7CQRUblWKwur3z7k9EojYylqEGheurPQ8EzwYxlccK yOatJroV_wRYpPJGAgl_Bvbxu3Ft6vQGOtouAtUY3i5s9b42J8w2TKp414Iz8Vu7a4j8eUVfycG4 shkGNqMQJjejv8xdOgAN1Fvvyc480NEq.XO4BGanzywYQgaydZ_ELjwcPAOqKO2tlzkVhyUM.gDk hhJeYbk86WTC.y.o5CL72 Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic305.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Fri, 15 May 2020 18:59:30 +0000 Received: by smtp425.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 449f7a3d9aa7dcaa24aaa047eebce828; Fri, 15 May 2020 18:59:25 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\)) Subject: Re: Conflict on very first port (xorg) on rpi3 From: Mark Millard In-Reply-To: <20200515180554.GD51382@www.zefox.net> Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 11:59:24 -0700 Cc: FreeBSD ports Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <35F4EC61-AC55-4FA4-89D4-7742E449CC8A@yahoo.com> References: <4961F458-26EF-447F-8033-B00FA720C58F.ref@yahoo.com> <4961F458-26EF-447F-8033-B00FA720C58F@yahoo.com> <20200515151922.GC51382@www.zefox.net> <20200515164921.6zyiorfgnqhf5nls@t480.local> <20200515180554.GD51382@www.zefox.net> To: bob prohaska X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49NyPx0p4xz4J4Z X-Spamd-Bar: - X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.59 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/21, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.11)[-0.113,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.97)[-0.973,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (1.76), ipnet: 98.137.64.0/21(0.83), asn: 36647(0.66), country: US(-0.05)]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[83.64.137.98.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[83.64.137.98.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 18:59:34 -0000 On 2020-May-15, at 11:05, bob prohaska wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 01:49:21PM -0300, Danilo G. Baio wrote: >> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 08:19:22AM -0700, bob prohaska wrote: >>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:33:10AM -0700, Mark Millard via = freebsd-ports wrote: >>>>=20 >>>> Some building and isntalling had to occur prior to the >>>> textproc/py-sphinx18 build attempt, possibly from >>>> prior session(s) of building and installing. >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>> In this case x11/xorg was the first port attempted in a new >>> ports tree. The only "prior sessions" would have been within >>> the dependencies of x11/xorg. Is that resolvable by poudriere? >>>=20 >>>> textproc/py-sphinx18 is new as of 2020-May-11. >>>> The devel/llvm[16789]0 ports require textproc/py-sphinx18 . >>>> Only about 26 ports require textproc/py-sphinx18 but >>>> I'll not list the others. >>>>=20 >>>> textproc/py-sphinx has been around longer and has >>>> 142 ports that require it. I'll not list them. >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> textproc/py-sphinx18/Makefile lists: >>>>=20 >>>> CONFLICTS_INSTALL=3D py*-sphinx >>>>=20 >>>> textproc/py-sphinx/Makefile lists: >>>>=20 >>>> CONFLICTS_INSTALL=3D py*-sphinx18 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> So, for example, indirectly the devel/llvm[16789]0 >>>> ports conflict with at least 142 other ports because >>>> of the textproc/py-sphinx* difference in requirements. >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> The conflict is real and limits what combinations >>>> of ports you may have installed at the same time. >>>=20 >>> I'll try deinstalling the conflicting port and hope >>> it won't be required later.... >>=20 >> It seems that just devel/llvm80 is pulling sphinx18 when building >> x11/xorg. >>=20 >> Try disabling DOCS option on devel/llvm80 for now. >>=20 >> I've opened a PR to track this issue: >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D246487 >>=20 >=20 > Wish I'd known it was only the DOCS option! Too late now, > sphinx18 is deinstalled and llvm80 is building. What? llvm80 requires textproc/py-sphinx18 (when the options cause such), not textproc/py-sphinx . Deleting textproc/py-sphinx18 and building devel/llvm80 will try to rebuild/install textproc/py-sphinx18 unless the options are set to avoid needing textproc/py-sphinx18 . To build devel/llvm80 it would be textproc/py-sphinx that would be deinstalled first so that textproc/py-sphinx18 could be built and installed during the build. After devel/llvm80 is installed, textproc/py-sphinx18 would be uninstalled so that textproc/py-sphinx could be built/installed when xorg is re-tried with llvm80 already installed. > This is probably a dumb question, but is there some way > to learn at the outset what conflicts need to be worked > around? Something like a "make conflicts" target? Seemingly=20 > it could be done by hand, but that promises to be tedious.=20 Not that will tell you what combinations of options lead to what combinations of required build or run prerequisites: That could be a lot of combinations to cover. It is also dependent on poudriere-like-building vs. not for build prerequisites having conflicts involved or not. If one is familiar enough to see potential conflicts in lists of dependencies there are the makefile targets: run-depends-list, build-depends-list Print a list of all the compile and run dependencies, and dependencies of those dependencies, by port directory. all-depends-list Print a list of all dependencies for the port. pretty-print-run-depends-list, pretty-print-build-depends-list Print a list of all the compile and run dependencies, and dependencies of those dependencies, by port name and version. (but no "all" variant for pretty-print-* ?). What is listed would depend on the options specified. =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri May 15 19:33:08 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B171D2FE64B for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 19:33:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic307-55.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic307-55.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.64.31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49Nz8g1LkLz4L2q for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 19:33:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) X-YMail-OSG: M8Nj.QQVM1mCqClKcOdWiblLB..8tPjxV.lDfVKfeuUmBs21fYNVYLiJX.ZAWT0 VwvTsrKJMs6m3mPTgwma_Wx8OhwSK9nqaJWYrqj8WZDuYsUWNfFSSETy.8G79Kw0l7l9Ht2BT3Ae xJJVsP9Kn7pyy.tulep1yxg1NViwJu5DVzTgO9APJ.Y0nbOqjQvHKNDmB1Vi_S2xutQPkMfvOgJG FE7RHuv0qH7fey6SV.NRcDaRU4a8sQbz_K3KmeM66hvpsopcPz2.okcd3YfRxsQTxyVDOvviqfHP jXyijZZxplMtMWeqfY.lw2.XPBUEEbKhp1fZkyevvcQvfwopGGPmOFbzbYthEyTgkO7cmgao4KBK vxjddG0GsbijnpIfWx3wzBZ9rtndG5elRJImsqYkEViWWBD5kKfTwJu0pzygzlXJhWP00VIhmlHG 11JHkN2jo8vVorONIvi.0O1THG4gYXFj2ojkPqdzmdKVSY6YASaOGSdF98wcKGQLOv6iD.A3CqqM o0QyXaVdOhMiG3xDlFPhFOUPoGDPsHj2nIohh0Hij8p7yWxth51xk3ikdQPPqtVDXQcdAlnwiAtZ t4KVzEAb00GxkB5bDZdHCtAlzqUa6Z9mOLgu2idXbfky9mlZv62WggAHsWFAHkqQJWvci1gfOBua WkysgKLUuuQisUJUI0KcrkmSMGOE09Yv8HQ8m_oky1C3g0tlLn_bGCn5DBznRU.OKdtRQE4cK1v7 Xwe47edO1zY2IEHIicainrmqG.1IT2dHA7T0vDXXIHBfWr089iuJm3bm1R0WLFwnprLrNwdy1_7K KH8uZl6PFkYdKMqKQgIy2evpTQ5aLws6SMJrTFTBL2CalwP3Q27WGzv_eJIqQtyr3Xh15yecgHBB araun2L0AvxQE2xP5aLD3EsvAMoxRSjywlJCiP6kdlwWvQ1lT287Vf8J991nfTTmT8xZscWG8FpJ WLuouIQesHu.5D8k0SkWsPLH6gU7n57ODJq1DRSTYCvcXtDEjoPpvnG9DXUhXQv4BKhRu7bfTw2u sRbUSmTfCim8EOLjOHfrA568QX9h33C.JN7PQZwXBmJBRxATILOZ13gxi00Se9Tjc1i70PchfL_4 xJ1y1zrdCyC5UeyOLyhb92C69XyBEn2XAn7kYMCIIM.Nxdt187HKdO5QBaV7Y4Fi.OdNzNUUGZtz jX9J4RYQhshtuvlKNpz0RJAcZkHiB77ZV423WmuZCQvI74c.5y7VARiqQXwu_JeyW9R7he6kLfEb Jgj9.tGSTKpro4EF.9kfvECzR1w6idNLinEzF3P2qoqf2MMGH3hIZHODkR627g5yGfgkex_g7Fno 4zZaCRsdFjT77H4XDYL8f6.YfnIFGLgAMsQjQnfDMgqd1q1RQbSdTVYDB6OtT79MReeyliveCSYp sJp02.iW_iSf7L4ZM8feIEg-- Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic307.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Fri, 15 May 2020 19:33:05 +0000 Received: by smtp402.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID f7e03dceffbc8b98332c17e07b8fc56a; Fri, 15 May 2020 19:33:03 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\)) Subject: Re: Conflict on very first port (xorg) on rpi3 From: Mark Millard In-Reply-To: <35F4EC61-AC55-4FA4-89D4-7742E449CC8A@yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 12:33:02 -0700 Cc: FreeBSD ports Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <4961F458-26EF-447F-8033-B00FA720C58F.ref@yahoo.com> <4961F458-26EF-447F-8033-B00FA720C58F@yahoo.com> <20200515151922.GC51382@www.zefox.net> <20200515164921.6zyiorfgnqhf5nls@t480.local> <20200515180554.GD51382@www.zefox.net> <35F4EC61-AC55-4FA4-89D4-7742E449CC8A@yahoo.com> To: bob prohaska X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49Nz8g1LkLz4L2q X-Spamd-Bar: - X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.16 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/21, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.90)[-0.901,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (2.64), ipnet: 98.137.64.0/21(0.83), asn: 36647(0.66), country: US(-0.05)]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.24)[0.237,0]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[31.64.137.98.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[31.64.137.98.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 19:33:08 -0000 [Gack: devel/cmake needs devel/py-sphinx by default and devel/llvm80 needs both devel/cmake and devel/py-pshinx18 by default.] On 2020-May-15, at 11:59, Mark Millard wrote: >=20 > On 2020-May-15, at 11:05, bob prohaska wrote: >=20 >> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 01:49:21PM -0300, Danilo G. Baio wrote: >>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 08:19:22AM -0700, bob prohaska wrote: >>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:33:10AM -0700, Mark Millard via = freebsd-ports wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>> Some building and isntalling had to occur prior to the >>>>> textproc/py-sphinx18 build attempt, possibly from >>>>> prior session(s) of building and installing. >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> In this case x11/xorg was the first port attempted in a new >>>> ports tree. The only "prior sessions" would have been within >>>> the dependencies of x11/xorg. Is that resolvable by poudriere? >>>>=20 >>>>> textproc/py-sphinx18 is new as of 2020-May-11. >>>>> The devel/llvm[16789]0 ports require textproc/py-sphinx18 . >>>>> Only about 26 ports require textproc/py-sphinx18 but >>>>> I'll not list the others. >>>>>=20 >>>>> textproc/py-sphinx has been around longer and has >>>>> 142 ports that require it. I'll not list them. >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> textproc/py-sphinx18/Makefile lists: >>>>>=20 >>>>> CONFLICTS_INSTALL=3D py*-sphinx >>>>>=20 >>>>> textproc/py-sphinx/Makefile lists: >>>>>=20 >>>>> CONFLICTS_INSTALL=3D py*-sphinx18 >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> So, for example, indirectly the devel/llvm[16789]0 >>>>> ports conflict with at least 142 other ports because >>>>> of the textproc/py-sphinx* difference in requirements. >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> The conflict is real and limits what combinations >>>>> of ports you may have installed at the same time. >>>>=20 >>>> I'll try deinstalling the conflicting port and hope >>>> it won't be required later.... >>>=20 >>> It seems that just devel/llvm80 is pulling sphinx18 when building >>> x11/xorg. >>>=20 >>> Try disabling DOCS option on devel/llvm80 for now. >>>=20 >>> I've opened a PR to track this issue: >>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D246487 >>>=20 >>=20 >> Wish I'd known it was only the DOCS option! Too late now, >> sphinx18 is deinstalled and llvm80 is building. >=20 > What? llvm80 requires textproc/py-sphinx18 (when > the options cause such), not textproc/py-sphinx . > Deleting textproc/py-sphinx18 and building > devel/llvm80 will try to rebuild/install > textproc/py-sphinx18 unless the options are > set to avoid needing textproc/py-sphinx18 . >=20 > To build devel/llvm80 it would be > textproc/py-sphinx that would be deinstalled first > so that textproc/py-sphinx18 could be built and > installed during the build. >=20 > After devel/llvm80 is installed, textproc/py-sphinx18 > would be uninstalled so that textproc/py-sphinx could > be built/installed when xorg is re-tried with llvm80 > already installed. I did not trace down other dependencies but now looking a little (leaving options at defaults): devel/cmake needs devel/py-sphinx by default and devel/llvm80 needs both devel/cmake and devel/py-pshinx18 by default. (xorg need not bein involved: just building devel/llvm[16789]0 has the issue.) Thus the sequence for default options may need to be something like: *) Starting without textproc/py-sphinx18 installed A) build textproc/py-sphinx and devel/cmake and install devel/cmake ( py-sphinx can be via indirection through devel/cmake ) (cmake does not have a run-time dependency on textproc/py-sphinx as far as I can tell.) B) uninstall textproc/py-sphinx so that textproc/py-sphinx18 can be built and installed C) build textproc/py-shpyinx18 and devel/llvm80 and install devel/llvm80 ( py-sphinx18 can be via indirection through devel/llvm80 ) D) uninstall textproc/py-sphinx18 so that either textproc/py-sphinx* can be installed if needed E) build xorg. (Since I use devel/poudriere-develto build packages and then install just packages for things that I run, I do not have to do such explicit conflict management for build-time conflicts.) Of course, figuring out options to change the status of also may avoid having some of the dependencies and so avoid some conflicts. >> This is probably a dumb question, but is there some way >> to learn at the outset what conflicts need to be worked >> around? Something like a "make conflicts" target? Seemingly=20 >> it could be done by hand, but that promises to be tedious.=20 >=20 > Not that will tell you what combinations of > options lead to what combinations of required > build or run prerequisites: That could be > a lot of combinations to cover. It is also > dependent on poudriere-like-building vs. not > for build prerequisites having conflicts > involved or not. >=20 > If one is familiar enough to see potential > conflicts in lists of dependencies there are > the makefile targets: >=20 > run-depends-list, build-depends-list > Print a list of all the compile and run > dependencies, and dependencies of those > dependencies, by port directory. >=20 > all-depends-list Print a list of all dependencies for the = port. >=20 > pretty-print-run-depends-list, pretty-print-build-depends-list > Print a list of all the compile and run > dependencies, and dependencies of those > dependencies, by port name and version. >=20 > (but no "all" variant for pretty-print-* ?). > What is listed would depend on the options > specified. =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri May 15 19:59:43 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 509842FF0D8 for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 19:59:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portmaster@BSDforge.com) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (static-24-113-41-81.wavecable.com [24.113.41.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "ultimatedns.net", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49NzlM0v9zz4NKT; Fri, 15 May 2020 19:59:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portmaster@BSDforge.com) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (localhost [IPv6:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 04FJxxFe057521 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 15 May 2020 13:00:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from portmaster@BSDforge.com) X-Mailer: Cypht MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Mark Millard , "Danilo G. Baio" , In-Reply-To: <20200515180554.GD51382@www.zefox.net> From: Chris Reply-To: portmaster@BSDforge.com To: bob prohaska Subject: Re: Conflict on very first port (xorg) on rpi3 Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 13:00:05 -0700 Message-Id: <7999b60a10d3d7ac0a2142f87c2be34a@udns.ultimatedns.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49NzlM0v9zz4NKT X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.53 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.55)[-0.553,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.97)[-0.974,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11404, ipnet:24.113.0.0/16, country:US]; local_wl_ip(0.00)[24.113.41.81] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 19:59:43 -0000 On Fri, 15 May 2020 11:05:54 -0700 bob prohaska fbsd@www=2Ezefox=2Enet said > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 01:49:21PM -0300, Danilo G=2E Baio wrote: > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 08:19:22AM -0700, bob prohaska wrote: > > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:33:10AM -0700, Mark Millard via freebsd-po= rts > > wrote: > > > >=20 > > > > Some building and isntalling had to occur prior to the > > > > textproc/py-sphinx18 build attempt, possibly from > > > > prior session(s) of building and installing=2E > > > >=20 > > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > In this case x11/xorg was the first port attempted in a new > > > ports tree=2E The only "prior sessions" would have been within > > > the dependencies of x11/xorg=2E Is that resolvable by poudriere? > > >=20 > > > > textproc/py-sphinx18 is new as of 2020-May-11=2E > > > > The devel/llvm[16789]0 ports require textproc/py-sphinx18 =2E > > > > Only about 26 ports require textproc/py-sphinx18 but > > > > I'll not list the others=2E > > > >=20 > > > > textproc/py-sphinx has been around longer and has > > > > 142 ports that require it=2E I'll not list them=2E > > > >=20 > > > >=20 > > > > textproc/py-sphinx18/Makefile lists: > > > >=20 > > > > CONFLICTS_INSTALL=3D py*-sphinx > > > >=20 > > > > textproc/py-sphinx/Makefile lists: > > > >=20 > > > > CONFLICTS_INSTALL=3D py*-sphinx18 > > > >=20 > > > >=20 > > > > So, for example, indirectly the devel/llvm[16789]0 > > > > ports conflict with at least 142 other ports because > > > > of the textproc/py-sphinx* difference in requirements=2E > > > >=20 > > > >=20 > > > > The conflict is real and limits what combinations > > > > of ports you may have installed at the same time=2E > > >=20 > > > I'll try deinstalling the conflicting port and hope > > > it won't be required later=2E=2E=2E=2E > >=20 > > It seems that just devel/llvm80 is pulling sphinx18 when building > > x11/xorg=2E > >=20 > > Try disabling DOCS option on devel/llvm80 for now=2E > >=20 > > I've opened a PR to track this issue: > > https://bugs=2Efreebsd=2Eorg/bugzilla/show_bug=2Ecgi?id=3D246487 > >=20 >=20 > Wish I'd known it was only the DOCS option! Too late now, > sphinx18 is deinstalled and llvm80 is building=2E >=20 > This is probably a dumb question, but is there some way > to learn at the outset what conflicts need to be worked > around? Something like a "make conflicts" target? Seemingly=20 > it could be done by hand, but that promises to be tedious=2E I think run-depends-list, build-depends-list, or all-depends-list should give you what you seek=2E :-) --Chris >=20 > At best 8-) >=20 > Thanks for writing! >=20 > bob prohaska >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd=2Eorg mailing list > https://lists=2Efreebsd=2Eorg/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd=2Eorg" From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri May 15 20:04:02 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C0332FF636 for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 20:04:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (www.zefox.net [50.1.20.27]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "www.zefox.com", Issuer "www.zefox.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49NzrJ4W88z4P9g for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 20:03:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 04FK3xxX054617 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 15 May 2020 13:03:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: (from fbsd@localhost) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 04FK3w8n054616; Fri, 15 May 2020 13:03:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd) Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 13:03:58 -0700 From: bob prohaska To: Mark Millard Cc: FreeBSD ports Subject: Re: Conflict on very first port (xorg) on rpi3 Message-ID: <20200515200358.GA54521@www.zefox.net> References: <4961F458-26EF-447F-8033-B00FA720C58F.ref@yahoo.com> <4961F458-26EF-447F-8033-B00FA720C58F@yahoo.com> <20200515151922.GC51382@www.zefox.net> <20200515164921.6zyiorfgnqhf5nls@t480.local> <20200515180554.GD51382@www.zefox.net> <35F4EC61-AC55-4FA4-89D4-7742E449CC8A@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49NzrJ4W88z4P9g X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of fbsd@www.zefox.net has no SPF policy when checking 50.1.20.27) smtp.mailfrom=fbsd@www.zefox.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.08 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.33)[-0.332,0]; WWW_DOT_DOMAIN(0.50)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.05)[ip: (0.21), ipnet: 50.1.16.0/20(0.11), asn: 7065(-0.03), country: US(-0.05)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zefox.net]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.47)[0.467,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[yahoo.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7065, ipnet:50.1.16.0/20, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_WWW(0.50)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 20:04:02 -0000 On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:33:02PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > [Gack: devel/cmake needs devel/py-sphinx by default > and devel/llvm80 needs both devel/cmake and > devel/py-pshinx18 by default.] > > On 2020-May-15, at 11:59, Mark Millard wrote: > > > > On 2020-May-15, at 11:05, bob prohaska wrote: > > > >> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 01:49:21PM -0300, Danilo G. Baio wrote: > >>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 08:19:22AM -0700, bob prohaska wrote: > >>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:33:10AM -0700, Mark Millard via freebsd-ports wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Some building and isntalling had to occur prior to the > >>>>> textproc/py-sphinx18 build attempt, possibly from > >>>>> prior session(s) of building and installing. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> In this case x11/xorg was the first port attempted in a new > >>>> ports tree. The only "prior sessions" would have been within > >>>> the dependencies of x11/xorg. Is that resolvable by poudriere? > >>>> > >>>>> textproc/py-sphinx18 is new as of 2020-May-11. > >>>>> The devel/llvm[16789]0 ports require textproc/py-sphinx18 . > >>>>> Only about 26 ports require textproc/py-sphinx18 but > >>>>> I'll not list the others. > >>>>> > >>>>> textproc/py-sphinx has been around longer and has > >>>>> 142 ports that require it. I'll not list them. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> textproc/py-sphinx18/Makefile lists: > >>>>> > >>>>> CONFLICTS_INSTALL= py*-sphinx > >>>>> > >>>>> textproc/py-sphinx/Makefile lists: > >>>>> > >>>>> CONFLICTS_INSTALL= py*-sphinx18 > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> So, for example, indirectly the devel/llvm[16789]0 > >>>>> ports conflict with at least 142 other ports because > >>>>> of the textproc/py-sphinx* difference in requirements. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> The conflict is real and limits what combinations > >>>>> of ports you may have installed at the same time. > >>>> > >>>> I'll try deinstalling the conflicting port and hope > >>>> it won't be required later.... > >>> > >>> It seems that just devel/llvm80 is pulling sphinx18 when building > >>> x11/xorg. > >>> > >>> Try disabling DOCS option on devel/llvm80 for now. > >>> > >>> I've opened a PR to track this issue: > >>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246487 > >>> > >> > >> Wish I'd known it was only the DOCS option! Too late now, > >> sphinx18 is deinstalled and llvm80 is building. > > > > What? llvm80 requires textproc/py-sphinx18 (when > > the options cause such), not textproc/py-sphinx . > > Deleting textproc/py-sphinx18 and building > > devel/llvm80 will try to rebuild/install > > textproc/py-sphinx18 unless the options are > > set to avoid needing textproc/py-sphinx18 . > > > > To build devel/llvm80 it would be > > textproc/py-sphinx that would be deinstalled first > > so that textproc/py-sphinx18 could be built and > > installed during the build. Sorry, I mis-wrote. What you're describing is what I did..... > > > > After devel/llvm80 is installed, textproc/py-sphinx18 > > would be uninstalled so that textproc/py-sphinx could > > be built/installed when xorg is re-tried with llvm80 > > already installed. > > I did not trace down other dependencies but now > looking a little (leaving options at defaults): > > devel/cmake needs devel/py-sphinx by default > and devel/llvm80 needs both devel/cmake and > devel/py-pshinx18 by default. (xorg need not > bein involved: just building devel/llvm[16789]0 > has the issue.) > > Thus the sequence for default options may need > to be something like: > > *) Starting without textproc/py-sphinx18 > installed > > A) build textproc/py-sphinx and devel/cmake > and install devel/cmake ( py-sphinx can > be via indirection through devel/cmake ) > (cmake does not have a run-time dependency > on textproc/py-sphinx as far as I can tell.) > > B) uninstall textproc/py-sphinx so that > textproc/py-sphinx18 can be built and > installed > > C) build textproc/py-shpyinx18 and devel/llvm80 > and install devel/llvm80 ( py-sphinx18 can > be via indirection through devel/llvm80 ) > > D) uninstall textproc/py-sphinx18 so that > either textproc/py-sphinx* can be installed > if needed > > E) build xorg. > > (Since I use devel/poudriere-develto build > packages and then install just packages for > things that I run, I do not have to do such > explicit conflict management for build-time > conflicts.) > A brief look at the man page for devel/poudriere suggests that several GB of space will be required for each port to be built; is that the case in practice? Seems like that would lead to stupendous overhead for complex ports, like browsers. > Of course, figuring out options to change > the status of also may avoid having some > of the dependencies and so avoid some > conflicts. > > >> This is probably a dumb question, but is there some way > >> to learn at the outset what conflicts need to be worked > >> around? Something like a "make conflicts" target? Seemingly > >> it could be done by hand, but that promises to be tedious. > > > > Not that will tell you what combinations of > > options lead to what combinations of required > > build or run prerequisites: That could be > > a lot of combinations to cover. It is also > > dependent on poudriere-like-building vs. not > > for build prerequisites having conflicts > > involved or not. > > > > If one is familiar enough to see potential > > conflicts in lists of dependencies there are > > the makefile targets: > > > > run-depends-list, build-depends-list > > Print a list of all the compile and run > > dependencies, and dependencies of those > > dependencies, by port directory. > > > > all-depends-list Print a list of all dependencies for the port. > > > > pretty-print-run-depends-list, pretty-print-build-depends-list > > Print a list of all the compile and run > > dependencies, and dependencies of those > > dependencies, by port name and version. > > > > (but no "all" variant for pretty-print-* ?). > > What is listed would depend on the options > > specified. > It appears that simply deinstalling the existing port causing a conflict is the best short-term approach. Can't solve the run-time conflict issue that way, but it's a start... Thanks for writing! bob prohaska > From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri May 15 20:17:14 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0CAC2FFC0B for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 20:17:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=CREC=65=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49P07Z32g6z4Q4x for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 20:17:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=CREC=65=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 666472FFC0A; Fri, 15 May 2020 20:17:14 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 662682FFC09 for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 20:17:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=CREC=65=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49P07Y1B6nz4Q4w for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 20:17:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=CREC=65=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CEA62848C; Fri, 15 May 2020 22:17:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from illbsd.quip.test (ip-62-24-92-232.net.upcbroadband.cz [62.24.92.232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 936F02848A; Fri, 15 May 2020 22:17:07 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: poudriere overlays build failed with xargs: illegal option -- e To: Bryan Drewery , ports@freebsd.org References: <5563154c-18b6-33f7-b16b-9448abaedcdf@quip.cz> From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Message-ID: <0aaad930-4d73-205b-6bb9-1ae3ced58de2@quip.cz> Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 22:17:03 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49P07Y1B6nz4Q4w X-Spamd-Bar: +++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of SRS0=CREC=65=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz has no SPF policy when checking 94.124.105.4) smtp.mailfrom=SRS0=CREC=65=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz X-Spamd-Result: default: False [3.90 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.80)[ip: (0.25), ipnet: 94.124.104.0/21(0.13), asn: 42000(3.55), country: CZ(0.09)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[quip.cz]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.89)[0.894,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[0.999,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[000.fbsd@quip.cz,SRS0=CREC=65=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:42000, ipnet:94.124.104.0/21, country:CZ]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[000.fbsd@quip.cz,SRS0=CREC=65=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 20:17:14 -0000 On 2020-05-15 19:36, Bryan Drewery wrote: >> ===>  Patching for python27-2.7.18 >> xargs: illegal option -- e >> usage: xargs [-0opt] [-E eofstr] [-I replstr [-R replacements] [-S >> replsize]] >>              [-J replstr] [-L number] [-n number [-x]] [-P maxprocs] >>              [-s size] [utility [argument ...]] >> *** Error code 1 > > I suspect somewhere ${REINPLACE_CMD} or ${SED} or > ${FRAMEWORK_REINPLACE_CMD} is misspelled or not set. > > Perhaps your overlay is outdated and one of these is not set. > > You could try this in your poudriere.conf to get more debugging (untested): > PORT_FLAGS="-dlx" I completely removed Mk directory from overlay and now it works. I tried to diff old Mk with new Mk but didn't find the difference in REINPLACE commands. Now I am building 200 ports. I will try PORT_FLAGS next time. Thank you! Miroslav Lachman From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri May 15 21:24:46 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04F452DA5E1 for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 21:24:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic312-24.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic312-24.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.69.205]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49P1dQ5x2Tz4Tv5 for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 21:24:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) X-YMail-OSG: Pk4LC6IVM1k3.16MarbvaiVEddBiivSpUnZWUeY8yeg7MVna62Q9RGiyw6n_4EN 1bLEfgNfXAzILRfqZDajY9AMm_V19NcK_aK8_F.sJztUK9D.bqgqV_R3VgazujtovH6u.LBFEZO. zj4OtXvj3UfC.xZSYwSJYuMekQU9yX_K_OnrUt5PHdXTqT4PIBLplpoRgE86wM1YGBtq7PZJHBod suv3r7K2X2B8eLmJxPD6h2g1DVUcWg0IyOAovQmt08vKgiKbNEfLYLucfMfdv80csnnlBrNMCbS4 rIq1IHLRqv732s1P3R9QWeEcaD7_nZ5qXrkbcjd_FsGMeDzWWW7VNRXdbY._eA0GUMUBxWL0IcLV cEmuz88lfG5fy4ncqh8WLGcdHioAuPmvqjnFCR5ziOciko0w2yVV8hF_wkYF9oDR69rSpotCx75u X5wbPRKqXlCnzbamdQccpPNxWMGcZxHQTuJENG32OskA1iJ9OhrPoSMesMEZ_ugNqM80oG5IpyP6 WP_rP.ALQkLknrDJVxwLGAFN4t2wXMORrCZs3.nWBh0wJw7.Pc3npM3RqnJEq2DMH0w8rrZM2.xx VsFk1ZTZ1SkKwaajVp9ZfDYBtNI9jacRLyEPnNnpM.BiFExjEaCRYXJoAaU5bCZTZUJSIlu2.4Zx 2H.A5qIB4dxN6TJEJfzd0nGg8w8yQirlAR8ujfjKwtLpwkv1nIXKuo4YyzCI6rwUmYHfMmK7ccFU gA2gvUQKAU3_QjEhDKV6NlCuaJ_smkt2LT79L9YXmpGiI2zKX4b7H1zl8foHp_22wDrDKm_e_6hh VqpceQMLFruulExNtgEMUfrSVcbTShZ7Wu8p_EqTB1F8QO1xjsNRgNvBy4LsGITUXXyKuSnH4zHV 8SKT3aPGvMCZTFWRCqz5bNrpFHxUWwAaRT7ZeM2aQBxPEOkTOG5ueuM5jMFo89OcGGZLiq5NVgZG B4AVyCLSZ2EaolXDsTyfZX95_hh6E5UzlCe_0cfp8P2QmDEMwYbkBL2X4ziSv7IdGW2eI1QEkqpF IAG9QgJ5u7HQn.HEM51vjLsx5MobP_ozyxnD1cViw..4.G8r.lcoVm.13L2dR7Ki3ZN.m7OVOdVB Eu.pJVG7iP2ci9S.vzdaJLXA0tZsLeLgNaGlctNpB2cmfFaEM2aVh06WB894UKPZMygx9EGqOprk 9XQe2.GWynkk0Kp0qvbDKaiJxdBRZ0r6Csg0QN2Ie2iZ4tqtL8W1njyCBT.24q7rSheq.6Lk4_9s GsggAqOvELiZUZU2cw6.nNH481SEfuse2A0CyiN2Pb7zv7K28_.R6VhFygcjPScQ1JKxMPtjWOkl tBIDYEn57OTMMwFMFDs.7pUIc3UwMqNnot_XA_g3EZjRCSWsYJAvtjvVwIytyw4eSi3iIn.QYUHe 9SemZRHZ7NmCZI3MJxUJOrtCZvQ-- Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic312.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Fri, 15 May 2020 21:24:40 +0000 Received: by smtp421.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 9a23ccf7d7242987b0b8965f9b7ffcfb; Fri, 15 May 2020 21:24:36 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\)) Subject: Re: Conflict on very first port (xorg) on rpi3 From: Mark Millard In-Reply-To: <20200515200358.GA54521@www.zefox.net> Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 14:24:35 -0700 Cc: FreeBSD ports Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <6C824795-DF23-4F5C-BF19-256177448183@yahoo.com> References: <4961F458-26EF-447F-8033-B00FA720C58F.ref@yahoo.com> <4961F458-26EF-447F-8033-B00FA720C58F@yahoo.com> <20200515151922.GC51382@www.zefox.net> <20200515164921.6zyiorfgnqhf5nls@t480.local> <20200515180554.GD51382@www.zefox.net> <35F4EC61-AC55-4FA4-89D4-7742E449CC8A@yahoo.com> <20200515200358.GA54521@www.zefox.net> To: bob prohaska X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49P1dQ5x2Tz4Tv5 X-Spamd-Bar: - X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.41 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/21, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.95)[-0.951,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (1.83), ipnet: 98.137.64.0/21(0.83), asn: 36647(0.66), country: US(-0.05)]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.04)[0.040,0]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[205.69.137.98.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[205.69.137.98.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 21:24:47 -0000 On 2020-May-15, at 13:03, bob prohaska wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:33:02PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: >> [Gack: devel/cmake needs devel/py-sphinx by default >> and devel/llvm80 needs both devel/cmake and >> devel/py-pshinx18 by default.] >>=20 >> On 2020-May-15, at 11:59, Mark Millard wrote: >>>=20 >>> On 2020-May-15, at 11:05, bob prohaska = wrote: >>>=20 >>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 01:49:21PM -0300, Danilo G. Baio wrote: >>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 08:19:22AM -0700, bob prohaska wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:33:10AM -0700, Mark Millard via = freebsd-ports wrote: >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> Some building and isntalling had to occur prior to the >>>>>>> textproc/py-sphinx18 build attempt, possibly from >>>>>>> prior session(s) of building and installing. >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> In this case x11/xorg was the first port attempted in a new >>>>>> ports tree. The only "prior sessions" would have been within >>>>>> the dependencies of x11/xorg. Is that resolvable by poudriere? >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> textproc/py-sphinx18 is new as of 2020-May-11. >>>>>>> The devel/llvm[16789]0 ports require textproc/py-sphinx18 . >>>>>>> Only about 26 ports require textproc/py-sphinx18 but >>>>>>> I'll not list the others. >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> textproc/py-sphinx has been around longer and has >>>>>>> 142 ports that require it. I'll not list them. >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> textproc/py-sphinx18/Makefile lists: >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> CONFLICTS_INSTALL=3D py*-sphinx >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> textproc/py-sphinx/Makefile lists: >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> CONFLICTS_INSTALL=3D py*-sphinx18 >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> So, for example, indirectly the devel/llvm[16789]0 >>>>>>> ports conflict with at least 142 other ports because >>>>>>> of the textproc/py-sphinx* difference in requirements. >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> The conflict is real and limits what combinations >>>>>>> of ports you may have installed at the same time. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> I'll try deinstalling the conflicting port and hope >>>>>> it won't be required later.... >>>>>=20 >>>>> It seems that just devel/llvm80 is pulling sphinx18 when building >>>>> x11/xorg. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Try disabling DOCS option on devel/llvm80 for now. >>>>>=20 >>>>> I've opened a PR to track this issue: >>>>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D246487 >>>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> Wish I'd known it was only the DOCS option! Too late now, >>>> sphinx18 is deinstalled and llvm80 is building. >>>=20 >>> What? llvm80 requires textproc/py-sphinx18 (when >>> the options cause such), not textproc/py-sphinx . >>> Deleting textproc/py-sphinx18 and building >>> devel/llvm80 will try to rebuild/install >>> textproc/py-sphinx18 unless the options are >>> set to avoid needing textproc/py-sphinx18 . >>>=20 >>> To build devel/llvm80 it would be >>> textproc/py-sphinx that would be deinstalled first >>> so that textproc/py-sphinx18 could be built and >>> installed during the build. >=20 > Sorry, I mis-wrote. What you're describing is what I did..... Ahh. >>>=20 >>> After devel/llvm80 is installed, textproc/py-sphinx18 >>> would be uninstalled so that textproc/py-sphinx could >>> be built/installed when xorg is re-tried with llvm80 >>> already installed. >>=20 >> I did not trace down other dependencies but now >> looking a little (leaving options at defaults): >>=20 >> devel/cmake needs devel/py-sphinx by default >> and devel/llvm80 needs both devel/cmake and >> devel/py-pshinx18 by default. (xorg need not >> bein involved: just building devel/llvm[16789]0 >> has the issue.) >>=20 >> Thus the sequence for default options may need >> to be something like: >>=20 >> *) Starting without textproc/py-sphinx18 >> installed >>=20 >> A) build textproc/py-sphinx and devel/cmake >> and install devel/cmake ( py-sphinx can >> be via indirection through devel/cmake ) >> (cmake does not have a run-time dependency >> on textproc/py-sphinx as far as I can tell.) >>=20 >> B) uninstall textproc/py-sphinx so that >> textproc/py-sphinx18 can be built and >> installed >>=20 >> C) build textproc/py-shpyinx18 and devel/llvm80 >> and install devel/llvm80 ( py-sphinx18 can >> be via indirection through devel/llvm80 ) >>=20 >> D) uninstall textproc/py-sphinx18 so that >> either textproc/py-sphinx* can be installed >> if needed >>=20 >> E) build xorg. >>=20 >> (Since I use devel/poudriere-develto build >> packages and then install just packages for >> things that I run, I do not have to do such >> explicit conflict management for build-time >> conflicts.) >>=20 >=20 > A brief look at the man page for devel/poudriere suggests > that several GB of space will be required for each port > to be built; is that the case in practice? Seems like that > would lead to stupendous overhead for complex ports, like > browsers. Poudriere has tradeoffs. I'm only pointing out an issue it is designed to help avoid. In my context, being prepared for (having resources for) poudriere's tradeoffs was explicitly chosen and set up for. Do not take my references to dependency management as a claim that the choice in tradeoffs is not yours to make. I've used portmaster as my main ports-building-and-installing environment in the past, making different tradeoffs back then. I always managed to deal with the dependency issues and it was less machine-resources intensive than what I do now --by me managing details. I'm unsure what the proportional-to-number-of- ports-to-build judgment is tied to. It only runs so many jobs at once, and you can have that be one job. Separately, you can control the amount of parallelism in each job. (In effect, sort of like using -jN for buildworld buildkernel.) But that internal parallelism in a job does not lead to more chroot areas being live at the same time. However, ignoring the proportional-to-port-count point, there is more space involved overall. It normally does have a clean buildworld area involved (that need not match the host environment). The area can be separately built and then null mounted by poudriere. (I do this.) A similar point goes for null mounting a /usr/ports/ area. Also, the amount of storage for a job likely depends on the file system used. I'm odd in that I use UFS instead of ZFS everywhere, even machines with enough resources to well use ZFS without significant configuration changes (from defaults). There is how much is null-mounted vs. not. And so on. I'll not get into other details about that or other points about resource/cpu use. >> Of course, figuring out options to change >> the status of also may avoid having some >> of the dependencies and so avoid some >> conflicts. >>=20 >>>> This is probably a dumb question, but is there some way >>>> to learn at the outset what conflicts need to be worked >>>> around? Something like a "make conflicts" target? Seemingly=20 >>>> it could be done by hand, but that promises to be tedious.=20 >>>=20 >>> Not that will tell you what combinations of >>> options lead to what combinations of required >>> build or run prerequisites: That could be >>> a lot of combinations to cover. It is also >>> dependent on poudriere-like-building vs. not >>> for build prerequisites having conflicts >>> involved or not. >>>=20 >>> If one is familiar enough to see potential >>> conflicts in lists of dependencies there are >>> the makefile targets: >>>=20 >>> run-depends-list, build-depends-list >>> Print a list of all the compile and run >>> dependencies, and dependencies of those >>> dependencies, by port directory. >>>=20 >>> all-depends-list Print a list of all dependencies for the = port. >>>=20 >>> pretty-print-run-depends-list, pretty-print-build-depends-list >>> Print a list of all the compile and run >>> dependencies, and dependencies of those >>> dependencies, by port name and version. >>>=20 >>> (but no "all" variant for pretty-print-* ?). >>> What is listed would depend on the options >>> specified. >>=20 > It appears that simply deinstalling the existing port causing a > conflict is the best short-term approach. Can't solve the run-time > conflict issue that way, but it's a start... This works when the port is only needed at build time, not needed at run time. It is messier for conflicts in what is needed at run-time for the final configuration's intended use. =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri May 15 21:48:49 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8C852DAFB6 for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 21:48:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca) Received: from doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (doctor.nl2k.ab.ca [204.209.81.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49P29D4pxGz4W4d for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 21:48:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca) Received: from doctor by doctor.nl2k.ab.ca with local (Exim 4.93.0.4 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1jZiDj-0007BJ-3E for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 15 May 2020 15:50:19 -0600 Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 15:50:19 -0600 From: The Doctor To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Recommendation softether Message-ID: <20200515215019.GA26925@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49P29D4pxGz4W4d X-Spamd-Bar: + X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.61 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.54)[-0.541,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(0.00)[+a]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; BAD_REP_POLICIES(0.10)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; URIBL_PBL(0.02)[empire.kred]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(0.00)[nl2k.ab.ca,quarantine]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.27)[0.267,0]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; INTRODUCTION(2.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6171, ipnet:204.209.81.0/24, country:CA]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-0.14)[ip: (-0.32), ipnet: 204.209.81.0/24(-0.16), asn: 6171(-0.12), country: CA(-0.09)]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 21:48:50 -0000 This a VPN product yet to be ported to FreeBSD. IT is a open source and we can contribute. Originators: University of Tsukba, Japan. -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism Remember when life's path is steep to keep your mind even. -Horace From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri May 15 22:52:13 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1F152DC68E for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 22:52:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imb@protected-networks.net) Received: from mail.protected-networks.net (mail.protected-networks.net [IPv6:2001:470:8d59:1::8]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.protected-networks.net", Issuer "Protected Networks CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49P3ZN6Md6z4ZF0 for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 22:52:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imb@protected-networks.net) Received: from toshi.auburn.protected-networks.net (toshi.auburn.protected-networks.net [192.168.1.10]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: imb@mail.protected-networks.net) by mail.protected-networks.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 67B7133136; Fri, 15 May 2020 18:52:03 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: Recommendation softether To: The Doctor , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20200515215019.GA26925@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> From: Michael Butler Message-ID: <8020de39-c276-543e-cc65-bec1844a611d@protected-networks.net> Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 18:52:02 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200515215019.GA26925@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-NZ Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49P3ZN6Md6z4ZF0 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.35 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[protected-networks.net:s=201508]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[protected-networks.net:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[protected-networks.net,reject]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; IP_SCORE(-3.35)[ip: (-9.43), ipnet: 2001:470::/32(-4.10), asn: 6939(-3.15), country: US(-0.05)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6939, ipnet:2001:470::/32, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 22:52:14 -0000 On 5/15/20 5:50 PM, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote: > This a VPN product yet to be ported to FreeBSD. > > IT is a open source and we can contribute. Originators: > > University of Tsukba, Japan. > It's already there .. security/softether-devel Softether VPN 4 (stable beta version) security/softether SoftEther VPN 4 (RTM version) security/softether5 SoftEther VPN 5 (Developer Edition) imb From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat May 16 08:44:25 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 984182EA156 for ; Sat, 16 May 2020 08:44:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shoesoft@gmx.net) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass Class 2 CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49PJjh23Khz47Sq for ; Sat, 16 May 2020 08:44:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shoesoft@gmx.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1589618660; bh=xlyA3BN1MA3SBF3umfOUIXrm/juXv8Fl7Jam0Mw9AHg=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=JXPz0k8UrwQ76LxVkiRLX4MXtQmocb8ZhcJREWKOaVVXNT8pt4QJMcCvFqAD9zQ+G SsTrVrnmbqYuXcIPPa63OsFaVmmtkjcCFHapKkyJ4T4GWdQM8WQ5YjiH8dvAjMx/HJ J1odL7InANHQYJl5okGCjH5lLE8vcpf1bKDsYAq0= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from walrus.pepperland ([81.217.71.61]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M1Hdw-1jX8LG1mcU-002sPT; Sat, 16 May 2020 10:44:20 +0200 From: Stefan Ehmann To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: "Edward Sanford Sutton, III" Subject: Re: Are broken ports retested before performing scheduled removal? Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 10:44:19 +0200 Message-ID: <15810795.vxEf1mJfsr@walrus.pepperland> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:K0im4oSC4tyJGr77iRbU9VH4P5Ag2bL36vQ38OTboKVONVZUm5s ysO1R2B/gK8mgnroyM0amrlUtXbLiZVAQ6OgjY5A699rQXTN9nr4+PiExDvbHxod03QyGHQ P2CwwufG1miDxQpvZUSrvUtgeYPTCUmLtFEi6lfKIzrDT3fIUhuzopXh6vHngvHs/b/Vst6 bO1KFTuOl2Ve9/+8Pd4pg== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:Tv8tciTGRnw=:If1amTFXYj8Y22Zi3xETpH M5hsFWWV3X76WmZDH+cz0tgCnD2QPiTeKxCK8s0tY4vUQSZ8g5BZ5ihJkWrVREjcPVNDDzhEy hHVItoqpqNa9XD5q7wf1zVGxpC2SWc7K3NbRYWToj8xBwFl49nHnDd3LcgPtJkAkaQez6YYYq rv0xILpaAjgm/rvS4PlRE0PB1QBIqMMYZujR231JUc3oAWq/X63sk6f6ZbziqEs1T3sjPjSMV MpydsXyHAY6InymlUaJGhZR5vOyCkgmPWSWpV2EnJkHqrchPU8cFvGkyZhEUH2Vi9CAOhk0kT q59wll3ZaY0V5fNWBGeGcRua3qakbLIiBqSBW026YovsKDl6hArIS0XMrhoZY8j574HTLp14R MC2vwOx96Ied0/Q89oIyGcx4tjjcPgGJMJRE0gby+khwiuNT7Os+Yi4PlQ6SlDg4kkIbbOKFV Frr9GngOkeXK1Lr6RXiC3t/FyBGOa8tUNaIkiFvRaBOQeH0n8tgCy2KM3b59Jy4VEfEfMWpjW wV2rsqnn6TaUQ9KuXOP9hdIznBKZkLO55JyB1U7ux5vmcMqrrPdSDGLsoBceMQ1Sa3OAwyz89 X+jLDW+0x1VyHG7g0IMyv9OXoABzkktjqdEVHOMeTTn+MUfBYEmuejC0otvkfU5a3PTojQC01 tNR8YeRTnR5svy8gFgIT3ecGQhSubBbPEDPRBdboqGSFrifNsgIGjvYTbJjh6WNhysVhff7LQ hDF4fIq2ZW8DOC4Z6cyaK/ujRrVKL4iy8nY9CTEq6OGEWt8J+OwiogCPKWJH3JjKAwc3t9Q5/ xwNUH6anyc3xPj+UaPbG2PN49Dod7zlOlgxjW3xEPEjE14h9OvZW/ltX5JcFmOlg6gx8TwsoB 1I7+E+15UjZrdVWv/KLfIi6p9FvMYOvWVxXvjyTRxFS5VI6SAIrbAPDB2ga1apudOB31m6PdT NJgGN19CE6uDItzDMcsfv7JX7ACtExgI/Aj61gnrA/FxDzhzvl+Cw4b6X65NOEqlQjVNMuRy3 WhK+MCPUsZ8FB5cjabCAm+Frt27wEC4frW5UMYFJwafcc0i/Pe+500/JJlhKoageOfLU76Ip5 D5tLB6FWJlIWbb9fvvMaLBiwzd1RRRsZEow6VGn1e+yMDmka2b/HR9d8hrPiyZLJT/W6UXaom CuhS3APLWBeWKhgBCrrF5IMCLKSXflxUDLVzzVQtw9WJt0wCw5zzD7PbsqqWp4VlJsHYQl8OW cvUV5mC31nUA6F1yT X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49PJjh23Khz47Sq X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmx.net header.s=badeba3b8450 header.b=JXPz0k8U; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of shoesoft@gmx.net designates 212.227.15.15 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=shoesoft@gmx.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.60 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:212.227.15.0/25]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmx.net]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmx.net:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-7.37), ipnet: 212.227.0.0/16(-1.19), asn: 8560(2.00), country: DE(-0.02)]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[61.71.217.81.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.11]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmx.net]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[15.15.227.212.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.3.1]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmx.net:s=badeba3b8450]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmx.net.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.3.0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8560, ipnet:212.227.0.0/16, country:DE]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[gmx.net]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[15.15.227.212.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[hotmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 08:44:25 -0000 On Thursday, May 14, 2020 1:24:17 AM CEST Edward Sanford Sutton, III wrote= : > games/oneko was recently removed as it was marked broken due to being > unfetchable. I tried an old copy of the ports tree I had where it was > marked as such and `make fetch -DTRYBROKEN` succeeded. Was there an > error recorded for this and was it ever retested? Is this just a side > effect of having a failure and no maintainer? > If being removed as unfetchable, wouldn't a better MOVED entry be to > say it was unfetchable (for more than 6 months) instead of just broken > for more than 6 months? > Thanks for feedback I've recently asked myself the same question: multimedia/gpac-mp4box is flagged BROKEN=3Dunfetchable DEPRECATED=3DBroken for more than 6 months multimedia/gpac-libgpac uses the same distfile from the same mirror and is= not marked broken. I figured once a port is marked unfetchable, it will be deleted, even it i= s a transient failure. Of course, unless someone opens a bug report. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat May 16 09:21:26 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BCBB2EB11F for ; Sat, 16 May 2020 09:21:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from se@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49PKXQ2HNdz49BM; Sat, 16 May 2020 09:21:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from se@freebsd.org) Received: from Stefans-MacBook-Pro-449.fritz.box (p200300cd5f25d600e1ee2acd8656e83a.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:cd:5f25:d600:e1ee:2acd:8656:e83a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: se/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C300E446D; Sat, 16 May 2020 09:21:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from se@freebsd.org) Subject: Re: Are broken ports retested before performing scheduled removal? To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: Stefan Ehmann , "Edward Sanford Sutton, III" References: <15810795.vxEf1mJfsr@walrus.pepperland> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Stefan_E=c3=9fer?= Autocrypt: addr=se@freebsd.org; keydata= mQENBFVxiRIBCADOLNOZBsqlplHUQ3tG782FNtVT33rQli9EjNt2fhFERHIo4NxHlWBpHLnU b0s4L/eItx7au0i7Gegv01A9LUMwOnAc9EFAm4EW3Wmoa6MYrcP7xDClohg/Y69f7SNpEs3x YATBy+L6NzWZbJjZXD4vqPgZSDuMcLU7BEdJf0f+6h1BJPnGuwHpsSdnnMrZeIM8xQ8PPUVQ L0GZkVojHgNUngJH6e21qDrud0BkdiBcij0M3TCP4GQrJ/YMdurfc8mhueLpwGR2U1W8TYB7 4UY+NLw0McThOCLCxXflIeF/Y7jSB0zxzvb/H3LWkodUTkV57yX9IbUAGA5RKRg9zsUtABEB AAG0J1N0ZWZhbiBFw59lciAoRnJlZUJTRCkgPHNlQGZyZWVic2Qub3JnPokBVAQTAQoAPgIb AwULCQgHAwUVCgkICwUWAwIBAAIeAQIXgBYhBKNx6mWcC+zIK3FTE0frte9a/fVEBQJa8u+q BQkLJQETAAoJEEfrte9a/fVEOeMH/icmdK1eZQvB3U8quJo9VMaZsaTuCMbUE4NThyfsIvIm MCd+rb/yULmMYwqNfjyKB1x4ikR4x+94l+yJoz7K0Usks+eNKDmMGJM6pWWssTigaJubFdVd hVVC+C1QJi7JshYSib08uONoPmO4lv5Az0TDYGtsMzsES2sIlc62c9go5WPGYhQFRbX3Lk6y V6m8OHh+G9XGSj3oPO4UteRwu+SzTdOLunZBWG1wu34+IeZm663D+2gOppQLWpLa2qaTerqw THu377ayZ2B2LPJ5JkvkZeHYPkwDQ+b5PGn0UhfkxPnDVYki5F7qKxvQ5uq1/q9YaCX7mmOl H2yO7tgVsrW5AQ0EVXGJEgEIALEj9qCXMZVucjpcd3QxM/TlUr98m5viEd1z4tCnPUyRWcIC EVtj2h5xMH+2iB0q1+KWhq+NsWtvScmEmfHnsr7dJ1K677OdpDhKVaJk61eeRulFY1R4yb6C 1MMxK+WgYB+vvpG0UeyR0M4uBewcPvRsq4yGUHFQKtLAbMdoPTSryJA+ElnmK1vdY+rPcHgi OIMBZM7ahsPXC0C9K4e5SP9clGyIoMpbfHXdx9q+Rp3zVtlbhyk3BS/xccu/+9pk9ICXL6GR js2sNnJ0wxdU1DsAlC59a5MnSruwiZFwRnkQhr3x6wk97Lg7sLS9jjTnCN7LGlVmSmpOEMy6 uq1AWfUAEQEAAYkBPAQYAQoAJgIbDBYhBKNx6mWcC+zIK3FTE0frte9a/fVEBQJa8u+rBQkL JQEZAAoJEEfrte9a/fVEuesH/2DNxGWnHvWwMyiyhlQtafvDKwEn/wAgR8gHJFodB7emf8rA TnukH7MVttCoHtjN5lvv9RSBHjNTZls5wR/ANlwdRuPQHd8ZGxLe3S6IuUB3zDSwFltLGurO N2kOMhs5mTGyypSa+uw3rtQbUAVYf1oPbiR4FLtiM8FLyEvE95hX5fPq9Qvx9FmN79kmCIEw jDKPqDaUf/OR2fEF0LSIbXHEk4tNqCEwx5DIJ0fp5/z5UzICUAmwxyRs5O/Hre1jzPsMVyud Ml9t7UTOJGKVWwRory1PMnOFxN+iz5/d4FhYSKXF7kfMiFgol4LuWaxJRwbBrr71VGBrRy2a L1nw6Bc= Message-ID: Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 11:21:22 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <15810795.vxEf1mJfsr@walrus.pepperland> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 09:21:26 -0000 Am 16.05.20 um 10:44 schrieb Stefan Ehmann: > On Thursday, May 14, 2020 1:24:17 AM CEST Edward Sanford Sutton, III wrote: >> games/oneko was recently removed as it was marked broken due to being >> unfetchable. I tried an old copy of the ports tree I had where it was >> marked as such and `make fetch -DTRYBROKEN` succeeded. Was there an >> error recorded for this and was it ever retested? Is this just a side >> effect of having a failure and no maintainer? >> If being removed as unfetchable, wouldn't a better MOVED entry be to >> say it was unfetchable (for more than 6 months) instead of just broken >> for more than 6 months? >> Thanks for feedback > > I've recently asked myself the same question: > > multimedia/gpac-mp4box is flagged > BROKEN=unfetchable > DEPRECATED=Broken for more than 6 months > > multimedia/gpac-libgpac uses the same distfile from the same mirror and is not > marked broken. > > I figured once a port is marked unfetchable, it will be deleted, even it is a > transient failure. Of course, unless someone opens a bug report. I have also had to resurrect ports that had been deleted as unfetchable (and which were prerequisites of ports I was working on) and found that they were either available from the MASTER_SITE given in the port (i.e., have most probably been only temporarily unavailablet) or had been moved to Github (or some other repository) and now have better accessibility than before, after an update of the ports' master sites. IMHO, it shows disrespect to the creator or maintainer of a port, if it is marked broken and deleted, in such a case, especially since there is no guarantee that the maintainer receives a notification for ports marked broken (for any reason, often easily fixed, but noted only when the port is deleted if the maintainer has no need to update or rebuild it during the time of deprecation). Regards, STefan From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat May 16 10:55:36 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E83E42ED97A for ; Sat, 16 May 2020 10:55:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49PMd30KNrz4Kdh for ; Sat, 16 May 2020 10:55:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id C04F72ED950; Sat, 16 May 2020 10:55:32 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBF342ED94F for ; Sat, 16 May 2020 10:55:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49PMcy0VL9z4KZ6 for ; Sat, 16 May 2020 10:55:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C52C5CC92 for ; Sat, 16 May 2020 10:55:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 04GAtOQG044291 for ; Sat, 16 May 2020 10:55:24 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 04GAtOWL044290; Sat, 16 May 2020 10:55:24 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202005161055.04GAtOWL044290@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 10:55:24 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 10:55:37 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ graphics/py-glfw | 1.11.0 | 1.11.1 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ net/grpcurl | 1.4.0 | v1.6.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat May 16 13:47:40 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 627672F2FDE for ; Sat, 16 May 2020 13:47:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakob@grimstveit.no) Received: from mail-ot1-x330.google.com (mail-ot1-x330.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::330]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49PRRb0nr6z4X3v for ; Sat, 16 May 2020 13:47:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakob@grimstveit.no) Received: by mail-ot1-x330.google.com with SMTP id z3so2610122otp.9 for ; Sat, 16 May 2020 06:47:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=grimstveit.no; s=google; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=tfX019J6/X0+f4UGiS9TzVhprVR1+l6mmh3X9tzLybY=; b=XrlujQXMKWigZIBQ/yccLO7HGeatdPssPvEAUkn/rnWQgFK/FxU5W+e0Vi5CUjXLVS s3sXcyoQn94EHUbm8K1LavVcd2ypNfQa1dv4+5VpAih+YJoT+8gNfC5png9IaL4kcgnL 3un+Xm1mjHaUF9yvHm4YrnkncERIYRxtKuD78= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=tfX019J6/X0+f4UGiS9TzVhprVR1+l6mmh3X9tzLybY=; b=fSRDx/ujXfHkQ7a2CM7EDP60of+Og1YY8CI8aYRSJP9Zt49m8urRYDAQDZ/wZsfBex UVXFzhXC6OvGN31juBasRKFGcZwCe2JBAPIJMwXzMto4s048DbZB3bU0c3QUrJGEh/BB pZ9DUy09DG8J4CvG91WT4tNAHvXsLWYpiQSSHZNR/eMVqZpiYQ2iUfwBb+2AERu8c3/L +hYh0UfeezWp0JJ6cDaMGNpJuWU1kf2d30yVW+72LXVfXQ+BCHtVNPyJfxqtKYW1K5UO utc4jo5x7MVE6MWxBN4XsnulbRU4xGNP3Cjehmlxsvru8EzglsiqiGoAMfPHvdPLr00q 9MCA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ipHGPGLBybxJ4BjLgopwhM7LWRJ+2zhe2/m4WKrq1+SsvQcBR 1kydlMloIe28yAJX9cRj3Ux3RQZJk+wJaWSX8dyh8Q0EGi8wjw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxGeL5e1Astz3wwNuA1dRrm0gVbN2YrAhzbZWYBs0n9uc8wVarjMAQW5B9ZFQ/a9ya8z0DrRTPoC4BjjAYDJSc= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:24e5:: with SMTP id z92mr4667515ota.345.1589636856742; Sat, 16 May 2020 06:47:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Jakob Breivik Grimstveit Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 15:47:20 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Build error net/librsync (unable to find library -lpopt) To: FreeBSD Ports mailing list X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49PRRb0nr6z4X3v X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=grimstveit.no header.s=google header.b=XrlujQXM; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=grimstveit.no; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jakob@grimstveit.no designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::330 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jakob@grimstveit.no X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.75 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[grimstveit.no:s=google]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[grimstveit.no:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[grimstveit.no,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[0.3.3.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; IP_SCORE(-1.75)[ip: (-7.93), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-0.33), asn: 15169(-0.42), country: US(-0.05)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 13:47:40 -0000 Problems building net/librsync, please advice :-) Looking forward to having duplicity installed! :) # uname -a FreeBSD core24.grimstveit.no 12.1-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 12.1-RELEASE-p5 3135379a043(releng/12.1) CORE24 amd64 `make` in /usr/ports/net/librsync gives me this error: [29/69] /usr/bin/cc -Drsync_EXPORTS -Isrc -I/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src/blake2 -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -std=c99 -pedantic -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -MD -MT CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/emit.c.o -MF CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/emit.c.o.d -o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/emit.c.o -c /usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src/emit.c [30/69] /usr/bin/cc -Drsync_EXPORTS -Isrc -I/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src/blake2 -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -std=c99 -pedantic -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -MD -MT CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/fileutil.c.o -MF CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/fileutil.c.o.d -o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/fileutil.c.o -c /usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src/fileutil.c [31/69] /usr/bin/cc -Drsync_EXPORTS -Isrc -I/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src/blake2 -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -std=c99 -pedantic -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -MD -MT CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/hashtable.c.o -MF CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/hashtable.c.o.d -o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/hashtable.c.o -c /usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src/hashtable.c [32/69] /usr/bin/cc -Drsync_EXPORTS -Isrc -I/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src/blake2 -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -std=c99 -pedantic -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -MD -MT CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/hex.c.o -MF CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/hex.c.o.d -o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/hex.c.o -c /usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src/hex.c [33/69] /usr/bin/cc -Drsync_EXPORTS -Isrc -I/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src/blake2 -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -std=c99 -pedantic -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -MD -MT CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/job.c.o -MF CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/job.c.o.d -o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/job.c.o -c /usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src/job.c [34/69] /usr/bin/cc -Drsync_EXPORTS -Isrc -I/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src/blake2 -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -std=c99 -pedantic -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -MD -MT CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/mdfour.c.o -MF CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/mdfour.c.o.d -o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/mdfour.c.o -c /usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src/mdfour.c [35/69] /usr/bin/cc -Drsync_EXPORTS -Isrc -I/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src/blake2 -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -std=c99 -pedantic -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -MD -MT CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/mksum.c.o -MF CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/mksum.c.o.d -o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/mksum.c.o -c /usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src/mksum.c [36/69] /usr/bin/cc -Drsync_EXPORTS -Isrc -I/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src/blake2 -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -std=c99 -pedantic -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -MD -MT CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/msg.c.o -MF CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/msg.c.o.d -o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/msg.c.o -c /usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src/msg.c [37/69] /usr/bin/cc -Drsync_EXPORTS -Isrc -I/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src/blake2 -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -std=c99 -pedantic -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -MD -MT CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/netint.c.o -MF CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/netint.c.o.d -o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/netint.c.o -c /usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src/netint.c [38/69] /usr/bin/cc -Drsync_EXPORTS -Isrc -I/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src/blake2 -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -std=c99 -pedantic -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -MD -MT CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/patch.c.o -MF CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/patch.c.o.d -o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/patch.c.o -c /usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src/patch.c [39/69] /usr/bin/cc -Drsync_EXPORTS -Isrc -I/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src/blake2 -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -std=c99 -pedantic -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -MD -MT CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/readsums.c.o -MF CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/readsums.c.o.d -o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/readsums.c.o -c /usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src/readsums.c [40/69] /usr/bin/cc -Drsync_EXPORTS -Isrc -I/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src/blake2 -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -std=c99 -pedantic -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -MD -MT CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/rollsum.c.o -MF CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/rollsum.c.o.d -o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/rollsum.c.o -c /usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src/rollsum.c [41/69] /usr/bin/cc -Drsync_EXPORTS -Isrc -I/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src/blake2 -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -std=c99 -pedantic -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -MD -MT CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/scoop.c.o -MF CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/scoop.c.o.d -o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/scoop.c.o -c /usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src/scoop.c [42/69] /usr/bin/cc -Drsync_EXPORTS -Isrc -I/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src/blake2 -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -std=c99 -pedantic -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -MD -MT CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/stats.c.o -MF CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/stats.c.o.d -o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/stats.c.o -c /usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src/stats.c [43/69] /usr/bin/cc -Drsync_EXPORTS -Isrc -I/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src/blake2 -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -std=c99 -pedantic -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -MD -MT CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/stream.c.o -MF CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/stream.c.o.d -o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/stream.c.o -c /usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src/stream.c [44/69] /usr/bin/cc -Drsync_EXPORTS -Isrc -I/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src/blake2 -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -std=c99 -pedantic -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -MD -MT CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/sumset.c.o -MF CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/sumset.c.o.d -o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/sumset.c.o -c /usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src/sumset.c [45/69] /usr/bin/cc -Drsync_EXPORTS -Isrc -I/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src/blake2 -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -std=c99 -pedantic -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -MD -MT CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/trace.c.o -MF CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/trace.c.o.d -o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/trace.c.o -c /usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src/trace.c [46/69] /usr/bin/cc -Drsync_EXPORTS -Isrc -I/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src/blake2 -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -std=c99 -pedantic -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -MD -MT CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/tube.c.o -MF CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/tube.c.o.d -o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/tube.c.o -c /usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src/tube.c [47/69] /usr/bin/cc -Drsync_EXPORTS -Isrc -I/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src/blake2 -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -std=c99 -pedantic -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -MD -MT CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/util.c.o -MF CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/util.c.o.d -o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/util.c.o -c /usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src/util.c [48/69] /usr/bin/cc -Drsync_EXPORTS -Isrc -I/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src/blake2 -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -std=c99 -pedantic -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -MD -MT CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/version.c.o -MF CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/version.c.o.d -o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/version.c.o -c /usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src/version.c [49/69] /usr/bin/cc -Drsync_EXPORTS -Isrc -I/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src/blake2 -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -std=c99 -pedantic -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -MD -MT CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/whole.c.o -MF CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/whole.c.o.d -o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/whole.c.o -c /usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src/whole.c [50/69] /usr/bin/cc -Drsync_EXPORTS -Isrc -I/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src/blake2 -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -std=c99 -pedantic -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -MD -MT CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/blake2/blake2b-ref.c.o -MF CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/blake2/blake2b-ref.c.o.d -o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/blake2/blake2b-ref.c.o -c /usr/ports/net/librsync/work/librsync-2.3.0/src/blake2/blake2b-ref.c [51/69] : && /usr/bin/cc -fPIC -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -std=c99 -pedantic -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -fstack-protector-strong -shared -Wl,-soname,librsync.so.2 -o librsync.so.2.3.0 CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/prototab.c.o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/base64.c.o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/buf.c.o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/checksum.c.o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/command.c.o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/delta.c.o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/emit.c.o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/fileutil.c.o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/hashtable.c.o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/hex.c.o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/job.c.o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/mdfour.c.o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/mksum.c.o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/msg.c.o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/netint.c.o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/patch.c.o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/readsums.c.o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/rollsum.c.o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/scoop.c.o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/stats.c.o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/stream.c.o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/sumset.c.o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/trace.c.o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/tube.c.o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/util.c.o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/version.c.o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/whole.c.o CMakeFiles/rsync.dir/src/blake2/blake2b-ref.c.o && : [52/69] /usr/local/bin/cmake -E cmake_symlink_library librsync.so.2.3.0 librsync.so.2 librsync.so && : [53/69] : && /usr/bin/cc -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -std=c99 -pedantic -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -fstack-protector-strong CMakeFiles/rdiff.dir/src/rdiff.c.o CMakeFiles/rdiff.dir/src/isprefix.c.o -o rdiff -Wl,-rpath,/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/.build: librsync.so.2.3.0 -lpopt && : FAILED: rdiff : && /usr/bin/cc -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -std=c99 -pedantic -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -fstack-protector-strong CMakeFiles/rdiff.dir/src/rdiff.c.o CMakeFiles/rdiff.dir/src/isprefix.c.o -o rdiff -Wl,-rpath,/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/.build: librsync.so.2.3.0 -lpopt && : ld: error: unable to find library -lpopt cc: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation) ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed. *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/ports/net/librsync -- Vyrdsam helsing, Jakob Breivik Grimstveit | +47 482 98 152 http://grimstveit.no/jakob From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat May 16 14:01:03 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAC002F368F for ; Sat, 16 May 2020 14:01:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakob@grimstveit.no) Received: from mail-oi1-x22d.google.com (mail-oi1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49PRl25yn3z4Xpf for ; Sat, 16 May 2020 14:01:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakob@grimstveit.no) Received: by mail-oi1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id j145so4945974oib.5 for ; Sat, 16 May 2020 07:01:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=grimstveit.no; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Vq/TIiNmOhM/AJ287bdeiLXxDWrLrZavQRMQO3OyQKg=; b=SYGELmYwvq3l0+jc4p2thfEV+qUQnWMidqR4iIL+1wpKu7X+dakKPcHjoVEOC6tRck 4h6NSWjcoAXHM2zkKbPQenfraFw1E5w5ieNEeXpnxOFPKd1IYbRvDMCeRYiTfKjNnLTw jFMHLtYmDiNOfZI/+bZEIBDzms5GFl3PSPvGU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Vq/TIiNmOhM/AJ287bdeiLXxDWrLrZavQRMQO3OyQKg=; b=PZcG+dMbDN+YlrADpc+spju8ufIYS0URMB4hpXKthz1OEO8T5VUmrb+DZj7GxYZtRU jyrAv3oic597fxVF3i61PJJOkm3rUF6Fn++gdG7k8U3T42xrXIMtkMMvM2mcUzMARM3Q 404suO8whm/t8fWoERGWdieQbP+oUSIIPImV9F3F60D0cPUPXLg4+aUH5pJw2TelhR22 poD7F0sLkF2TuVhms6c/nRwjOKmlDx47qIpAyDK+BzlrVGZWs3Hgsyi/CKBnXfRQCH91 0hXXogloIMwmk2GZgUcahpdQKUsBgDjo/9Km6KQGT6FODT0WFUcq98TGBpk5IgKeUHMQ HtLQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533fWfn0Js34ybzZlLolOP0dYngs6+VJIe2AtqY0N4sgfblkSR3U tV2e0nZHdKwJTiXvqhgr3Ct6HAaQrfuMMZ6Nd8phB+HqOAU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxdHv89j23ETXLaAXuce+NxbAv/vN+WE5GVWdLwE61ICJvXtIwWSV8P6zPkssem3BaRhoJbaNFNBp48zFw7SQc= X-Received: by 2002:aca:1e0f:: with SMTP id m15mr5510417oic.23.1589637661315; Sat, 16 May 2020 07:01:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Jakob Breivik Grimstveit Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 16:00:45 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: net/librsync does not build To: Xavier Humbert Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49PRl25yn3z4Xpf X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=grimstveit.no header.s=google header.b=SYGELmYw; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=grimstveit.no; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jakob@grimstveit.no designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::22d as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jakob@grimstveit.no X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.79 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[grimstveit.no:s=google]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[grimstveit.no:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[d.2.2.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[grimstveit.no,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; IP_SCORE(-1.79)[ip: (-8.15), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-0.33), asn: 15169(-0.42), country: US(-0.05)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 14:01:04 -0000 Hi, I seem to have the same problem - did you find a solution? -- Vyrdsam helsing, Jakob Breivik Grimstveit | +47 482 98 152 http://grimstveit.no/jakob tor. 23. apr. 2020 kl. 18:54 skrev Xavier Humbert : > Hi, > > net/librsync apparently can't find libpopt : > > > [root@numenor librsync]# MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes make > > ===> Building for librsync-2.3.0 > > [1/1] : && /usr/bin/cc -O2 -pipe -g -march=core2 -fstack-protector-strong > > -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -std=c99 -pedantic -O2 -pipe -g -march=core2 > > -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -fstack-protector-strong > > CMakeFiles/rdiff.dir/src/rdiff.c.o > CMakeFiles/rdiff.dir/src/isprefix.c.o > > -o rdiff -Wl,-rpath,/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/.build: > > librsync.so.2.3.0 -lpopt && : > > FAILED: rdiff > > : && /usr/bin/cc -O2 -pipe -g -march=core2 -fstack-protector-strong > > -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -std=c99 -pedantic -O2 -pipe -g -march=core2 > > -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -fstack-protector-strong > > CMakeFiles/rdiff.dir/src/rdiff.c.o > CMakeFiles/rdiff.dir/src/isprefix.c.o > > -o rdiff -Wl,-rpath,/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/.build: > > librsync.so.2.3.0 -lpopt && : > > ld: error: unable to find library -lpopt > > cc: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see > > invocation) > > ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop. > > make: stopped in /usr/ports/net/librsync > > > However : > > > [root@numenor librsync]# ll /usr/local/lib/libpopt.* > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 73960 Apr 19 02:58 /usr/local/lib/libpopt.a > > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 16 Apr 19 02:58 > > /usr/local/lib/libpopt.so@ -> libpopt.so.0.0.0 > > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 16 Apr 19 02:58 > > /usr/local/lib/libpopt.so.0@ -> libpopt.so.0.0.0 > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 56832 Apr 19 02:58 > > /usr/local/lib/libpopt.so.0.0.0* > What is the problem ? > > Thxs > > Regards > > Xavier > > -- > Xavier HUMBERT - Unix/Win/MacOSX Sysadmin/Network Engineer > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat May 16 14:06:02 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4C712F384B for ; Sat, 16 May 2020 14:06:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49PRrp4t1Gz4Y7X for ; Sat, 16 May 2020 14:06:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.92.3 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1jZxRv-000GkQ-37; Sat, 16 May 2020 16:05:59 +0200 Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 16:05:59 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Jakob Breivik Grimstveit Cc: FreeBSD Ports mailing list Subject: Re: Build error net/librsync (unable to find library -lpopt) Message-ID: <20200516140559.GX39563@home.opsec.eu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49PRrp4t1Gz4Y7X X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.51 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.54)[-0.541,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.97)[-0.971,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 14:06:02 -0000 Hi! > Problems building net/librsync, please advice :-) > > Looking forward to having duplicity installed! :) Please try to use poudriere to build it. I tested it, works fine. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat May 16 15:14:00 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC1C32F4BE6 for ; Sat, 16 May 2020 15:14:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias.andree@gmx.de) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass Class 2 CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49PTMC4VFfz4byg; Sat, 16 May 2020 15:13:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias.andree@gmx.de) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1589642036; bh=6/Zkupv3WwQYRSgu+aAxc6PI2dMtN6vsuGV6/Of2RNQ=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=M0plDEWBY55To7vxCs6EbO07ow6T7Zk0MdyaZmSmIZHuLJHtvmDz6A7VLkpAfqTJE 63z0RwHO/9c1HW1p72gvu1uMRcphhV5KKIVnVK1QaRSjXkDZYmrfOU9536HSAGPawC R30o4QptGQLGYzjaII/9f2AQb7WdX4M2RbOiNKIs= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from mandree.no-ip.org ([79.229.36.159]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M5QFB-1jbLxB3B3t-001SzL; Sat, 16 May 2020 17:13:56 +0200 Received: from ryzen.an3e.de (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ryzen.an3e.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B3761215CB; Sat, 16 May 2020 17:13:56 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Build error net/librsync (unable to find library -lpopt) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20200516140559.GX39563@home.opsec.eu> Cc: Xavier Humbert , Jakob Breivik Grimstveit , Kurt Jaeger From: Matthias Andree Message-ID: <36af14f0-de6b-d0a5-cf65-ec153ad8445a@gmx.de> Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 17:13:56 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200516140559.GX39563@home.opsec.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: en-US X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Y8oXk8SJhKY4LkpuWLZ4JmSGuMtByKaPf2FDWKOKD84+1pVC5yc c/Ze0barD6JztPt9oLzHdZ0+/Z4P/PRyE8kE3PO5vNaH5uR6CVFt8neS5WMl3OW1wR2jrEo MUYDVCnIU3ZBzW5GEVbCP3PEopXCiGlGmyRWUk88T9CVhqv5C4pApKhgqszDZsNFIILzKNi 8TUnrKOIl9n77m/GQmAEA== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:PpxdXHbO3cw=:UodJo6lS3SQvVWvLYPux9U niv2y6BOhNO+KYeH9wV7TZRWsPnWUquSkywbtTR2DQv5dSFOV+Qo6+1wNlNxTCWUTzPvxNb9o ABbF2X/M/zPFvvm0UprpfD4wqKv1b72WyDX/t/Gq2ddLSToD5QVhsEUiV13BnRHD2ampgAUyt seeVgg1lMUTjQkP3ihv4tLChR5WBwjfSlRXcjZvWZag2fuV+RM019E34aCF+q6B3FFPL/vCe2 QcxzB96zKEJjkUsEGszZzGTaXhMHbpt3VHKTSqBEQf9KZeHGSASWbOEM4b9uB+/zl6vSlKfY4 Kvl0hUgvG47vvNbzVh6N6vE4B486El4Lev417tqSvwx1RlldFCVx6UYcT0pcdmPLMXz46vAOP +ViQa7glGqIrZqox6Ux6faNOnErhmfJoRP83rp4DeQcXGosniW83PH/ThzvJ96/TktBfYwajc +/DbMVqUsJDljSyBOPMP1ahWisu7J/l96sPwupdfNoM37AMsabmZUlZuPm75gxQ/5nQnCs+yu rSMUQYrNrtQBo8ewRi2K9+HzGHVShjBK7RDgO9Tyd5Obx67kaauIGmsRO4vw5xmTKFqbp0H3O FTn7KhVzBfIFLwAoDCFLqdtzXICgVZelAzZTvX2PH2xQjHXTHokVZHNN8aIotW3OGrfRlrkSV CwT39DVpfbgSouFzTixBJodW17aWbxEMh21ALNm+vjrDa8lW+1mZH8GXissiO06PIPGGY5FAe MjsbueYvGUY+uzXbWPEZH4li+9GaRiDkEkHxEo8hq+QUzleW1LzBOz1KBx9vQTzm2szdnnI2r fPn83XBS8F7UZ8AEcmGCuBw6oBxHgVzB5t8byKCq0P3NYe808arnBeCIww72LWj7ISAdn8sjK mM2TPGlXdXbPU1KSNLSoOZCr2/+C3P/l5E+loDg91dSXg8SIRp4UTDbmnp4SK1RVbPdOJ7tZU oZWvJaRjJX0IDDh2osXSUZDrO41jVDNR3xsL86BmBTciGyYCKqYeck8CEbRk9rqWgREXUDczk zWnCwjSHqhAFec7s8YKBm7k+kNX08/NlrOzZ2KLI1PM2EE8NwLNbhmkZoMqK9ETPmXnrNdzP8 BsjjLYjX789erslEUqbU66RRQBDBiUO2JYkUCvJrubVVnjshoQohzapkWCyn4B0AL9+4vzpV3 Hn6AnO1b6s9JsbquFZ7PTWqD1Y26X3Wah0sInDyPhpNWos/DMjymJa0Asl/Zw42TlfTdPpeRe FAxKFfbJZj9g5IaxP X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49PTMC4VFfz4byg X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmx.net header.s=badeba3b8450 header.b=M0plDEWB; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of matthias.andree@gmx.de designates 212.227.17.22 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=matthias.andree@gmx.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.60 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:212.227.17.0/27]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmx.de]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmx.net:+]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[22.17.227.212.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.3.1]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmx.de]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8560, ipnet:212.227.0.0/16, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[159.36.229.79.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.10]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmx.net:s=badeba3b8450]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-6.50), ipnet: 212.227.0.0/16(-1.20), asn: 8560(1.99), country: DE(-0.02)]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[gmx.de]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[22.17.227.212.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 15:14:00 -0000 Am 16.05.20 um 16:05 schrieb Kurt Jaeger: > Hi! > >> Problems building net/librsync, please advice :-) >> >> Looking forward to having duplicity installed! :) > Please try to use poudriere to build it. I tested it, works fine. > Kurt, That's reaching too short. I can see that it build in poudriere, but it appears to do something differently from a live system: > =C2=A0=3D=3D=3D>=C2=A0 Performing out-of-source build > -/bin/mkdir -p /usr/ports.svn/net/librsync/work/.build > +/bin/mkdir -p /wrkdirs/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/.build > =C2=A0-- The C compiler identification is Clang 8.0.1 > =C2=A0-- Check for working C compiler: /usr/local/libexec/ccache/cc > =C2=A0-- Check for working C compiler: /usr/local/libexec/ccache/cc - wo= rks > [...] > --- CMAKE_SYSTEM =3D FreeBSD-12.1-RELEASE-p5 > +-- CMAKE_SYSTEM =3D FreeBSD-12.1-RELEASE-p4 > +-- Found POPT: /usr/local/lib/libpopt.so =C2=A0 > =C2=A0-- Found components for POPT > =C2=A0-- POPT_ROOT_DIR=C2=A0 =3D /usr/local > =C2=A0-- POPT_INCLUDE_DIRS=C2=A0 =3D /usr/local/include > --- POPT_LIBRARIES =3D popt > +-- POPT_LIBRARIES =3D /usr/local/lib/libpopt.so > =C2=A0-- Found BZip2: /usr/lib/libbz2.so (found version "1.0.8") > =C2=A0-- Looking for BZ2_bzCompressInit > =C2=A0-- Looking for BZ2_bzCompressInit - found And the POPT_LIBRARIES=3D... difference is breaking the build. Adding LDFLAGS+=3D-L${LOCALBASE}/lib fixes the ports build for me. Now let's go for the root cause... From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat May 16 15:45:04 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AA5F2F56EB for ; Sat, 16 May 2020 15:45:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (www.zefox.net [50.1.20.27]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "www.zefox.com", Issuer "www.zefox.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49PV325QCsz4dwh for ; Sat, 16 May 2020 15:45:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 04GFiuUZ057316 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 16 May 2020 08:44:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: (from fbsd@localhost) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 04GFiuwV057315; Sat, 16 May 2020 08:44:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd) Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 08:44:55 -0700 From: bob prohaska To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: bob prohaska Subject: LLVM target 'amdgpu' not enabled Was: Re: Conflict on very first port (xorg) on rpi3 Message-ID: <20200516154455.GA57280@www.zefox.net> References: <4961F458-26EF-447F-8033-B00FA720C58F.ref@yahoo.com> <4961F458-26EF-447F-8033-B00FA720C58F@yahoo.com> <20200515151922.GC51382@www.zefox.net> <20200515164921.6zyiorfgnqhf5nls@t480.local> <20200515180554.GD51382@www.zefox.net> <35F4EC61-AC55-4FA4-89D4-7742E449CC8A@yahoo.com> <20200515200358.GA54521@www.zefox.net> <6C824795-DF23-4F5C-BF19-256177448183@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6C824795-DF23-4F5C-BF19-256177448183@yahoo.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49PV325QCsz4dwh X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of fbsd@www.zefox.net has no SPF policy when checking 50.1.20.27) smtp.mailfrom=fbsd@www.zefox.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.60 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.78)[-0.783,0]; WWW_DOT_DOMAIN(0.50)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.05)[ip: (0.21), ipnet: 50.1.16.0/20(0.11), asn: 7065(-0.03), country: US(-0.05)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zefox.net]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.43)[0.435,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7065, ipnet:50.1.16.0/20, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_WWW(0.50)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 15:45:04 -0000 Deinstalling the conflicting port made considerable progress toward a build of x11/xorg, but now make is stopping with: configure: error: LLVM target 'amdgpu' not enabled in your LLVM build. Required by radv. I've tried turning off Wayland support in graphics/mesa-dri but that didn't help. Since this is on a Raspberry Pi3B, one wouldn't really expect to find an AMD GPU, If there's a workaround please give me a hint.... Thanks for reading, bob prohaska From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat May 16 16:08:23 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86E1D2F6117 for ; Sat, 16 May 2020 16:08:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49PVYz2vbNz4gKq; Sat, 16 May 2020 16:08:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from tensor.andric.com (tensor.andric.com [87.251.56.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "tensor.andric.com", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: dim) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3BA687445; Sat, 16 May 2020 16:08:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:7a58::f873:486e:6934:8ecd] (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:7a58:0:f873:486e:6934:8ecd]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 66C16584E4; Sat, 16 May 2020 18:08:21 +0200 (CEST) From: Dimitry Andric Message-Id: <27748E8E-9A52-41CD-A635-E3A65CF14205@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E79321F4-8796-4B35-A0EE-871DD5444DDB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.14\)) Subject: Re: LLVM target 'amdgpu' not enabled Was: Re: Conflict on very first port (xorg) on rpi3 Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 18:08:13 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20200516154455.GA57280@www.zefox.net> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org To: bob prohaska References: <4961F458-26EF-447F-8033-B00FA720C58F.ref@yahoo.com> <4961F458-26EF-447F-8033-B00FA720C58F@yahoo.com> <20200515151922.GC51382@www.zefox.net> <20200515164921.6zyiorfgnqhf5nls@t480.local> <20200515180554.GD51382@www.zefox.net> <35F4EC61-AC55-4FA4-89D4-7742E449CC8A@yahoo.com> <20200515200358.GA54521@www.zefox.net> <6C824795-DF23-4F5C-BF19-256177448183@yahoo.com> <20200516154455.GA57280@www.zefox.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.14) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 16:08:23 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_E79321F4-8796-4B35-A0EE-871DD5444DDB Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On 16 May 2020, at 17:44, bob prohaska wrote: >=20 > Deinstalling the conflicting port made considerable progress toward a = build of > x11/xorg, but now make is stopping with: >=20 > configure: error: LLVM target 'amdgpu' not enabled in your LLVM build. = Required by radv. >=20 > I've tried turning off Wayland support in graphics/mesa-dri but that = didn't help. >=20 > Since this is on a Raspberry Pi3B, one wouldn't really expect to find = an AMD GPU, >=20 > If there's a workaround please give me a hint.... It seems to be required by the ATI/AMD Radeon drivers, and there is no option to turn these drivers off, as far as I can see. You could attempt to edit graphics/mesa-dri/Makefile, and fiddle with the ALL_DRI_DRIVERS, ALL_GALLIUM_DRIVERS and ALL_VULKAN_DRIVERS lines. But this is going to be very fragile, the best solution is really to rebuild the llvm port with AMDGPU support. -Dimitry --Apple-Mail=_E79321F4-8796-4B35-A0EE-871DD5444DDB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.2 iF0EARECAB0WIQR6tGLSzjX8bUI5T82wXqMKLiCWowUCXsAP7QAKCRCwXqMKLiCW o/11AKD8e6t0fS1+XFyIUNd/Xf2Hc7fCrgCcCm1posC9ZEcnbab7T1HQ7nTqWWY= =nchd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_E79321F4-8796-4B35-A0EE-871DD5444DDB-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat May 16 16:10:47 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08FA02F6223 for ; Sat, 16 May 2020 16:10:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias.andree@gmx.de) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass Class 2 CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49PVcj6hd4z3Bsn; Sat, 16 May 2020 16:10:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias.andree@gmx.de) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1589645443; bh=2VcjCb/yYZRbF/6/Ns0E/ww45Fg6T1foTayMswjOEsM=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:References:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To; b=CjnCS3N6kPwHpG+MdzGwal1CGOJsOWZod8EaMzT5Jkl/aY+aLy+/XuVeQmw5v9cyF qTdLknE6YKWHrN9ySve06kfCs1bLOIxswspwTo7VsjZANsKpxVqee8T8GnZodD4MMY tiHLz9Sxe9Kmotgz8+mEnL9XmeIL4ZVWdna738lc= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from mandree.no-ip.org ([79.229.36.159]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MfHAB-1j8LcW25N5-00gqGR; Sat, 16 May 2020 18:10:43 +0200 Received: from ryzen.an3e.de (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ryzen.an3e.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF4471212CA; Sat, 16 May 2020 18:10:42 +0200 (CEST) From: Matthias Andree To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: Xavier Humbert , Jakob Breivik Grimstveit , Kurt Jaeger , Po-Chuan Hsieh References: <20200516140559.GX39563@home.opsec.eu> <36af14f0-de6b-d0a5-cf65-ec153ad8445a@gmx.de> Subject: Re: Build error net/librsync (unable to find library -lpopt) Message-ID: <2561e742-ba01-393a-29e4-33907de2413f@gmx.de> Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 18:10:42 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <36af14f0-de6b-d0a5-cf65-ec153ad8445a@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: en-US X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:2jirlKZflgDxCEuP4hr4VypOu6HBo0IljZfeRSP045y2SQO1Ubq wV9v81cCE4T6NZ4MM7anW33FKGoh4JTI0wjZ1gcBtRoHoh1KYQBTW4ma6MYqthpq1UDQ/Ug pf2K1JMeQKAOUFNpJdCPH3nY3YeMgRlMftC2z982uiLe6VffqxY5SMPoQDFJEy1OVNbMR7F ib2XuQR0/5FD1P/HNRPCA== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:Pby4wO5gC9s=:Pxwtliv1gN3pHxyknexiAO n6Mr43OIuyV9hfHAG82DC+6/LVHR/XFPcFlMeGr7jqVY+meGGkTgl1D2gQA3kBWLGdx2KmMW8 7l9yWJwcdG/djiByehKsBuOsrIVr4nhtbEz72feetxGLLZdUlUmIGr97Fch+msdWSU74K44Zu CiLemzkaDETTN9ns6LGxDyt4qpaK1M/4yXapw2sVYnJCvlqq8WBVuTP/MS6SuvLnLurYsyErv BYZdJm0LuJFfkhCvV0ij7p7sSjrob/JQtGUqNR8Ox3y7PYWC4XSEqZzXZ3uB9407cmDZUS/jz H/F+l7DP4Y351NOSXLL57WQEycfuwnspC55BXApyTmLZXHSnPXXSHD3BUF5pqLqbGsO07En2O AoCsxBDKMAUqi+YLGtjsH2LmY1YUKSXNDvAA9+26ww7bfbWt7WcCtEg6uU+gxTJ5UpjUVLP0I WysvX+SeZFtMtLEBAJ+2iC6+/lQJY+ZXOS6UDA4V7Z3ItKAFdPGl9jfgFjDqvW60H5mJFL5s1 OaD4VIxSys+FGrBZQl64ZlaqrOuNH9CgUqXHgFMf40CaIu8QXU16N0Kn2NKycL61IHWrR+4pp Uhp91ZjCs6MWJxybRlTXy1PhjzR3k2eswZzVWFu4kgJn04gl3iGmPzyfAZkFd5nmRTkIWJSOO gooMOTkl4zFtmddBrH9KY1ZinDLxT0ymtm/f70crmufz1YmVL8OZ+bSKSC5KH3ZWonTdR4X3V bgytnOOkSGYp2DvGt5+2Xh38SutXvmC5MilN9wCkWxQPwrh1Ao7QnaXTm09G6f1MBA8OH+ND2 K+jIIlQdpoa+B/5poPJMytYD2reP7iaJ6KN13algVTu/6uzjQnZCLvI0KJvyP0DKX+y6eer8J /D7uToBq2oGL11LairNMrCpy2rY8Fm9eN+df3YzvsnxtCp916X8JlW2k/a1W0Zgs2+/sO8f7v SqI2pCy6tHCVneW3DciSqte5gv2AvfvZlxrQgyV54q3hKjgZHPJfrgOlDa6VCtugzAGCvDq5h z2pIC8DnOiO2aC/rRSk54TYTBgOyX3fXDbChIDQ+04HeX2Qc3mEtB5XjJ2ZNkQ+fdP38aAq+N RxWNfO3tip/xyut3fv1QQPA3q/d5FrRPXJWlf+zfHKC8Tsk+Ex73SfFBcE6+iIA0P4Qyq29no JpUUxUEoaGpOhLm8FZZrz2Bn1Bf9qGE+gFPXIX8PeR0XSx2D2fVGlJ1i4q8eKOnijSRDvqrzH PNlh8blglA0fsM71V X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49PVcj6hd4z3Bsn X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmx.net header.s=badeba3b8450 header.b=CjnCS3N6; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of matthias.andree@gmx.de designates 212.227.17.21 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=matthias.andree@gmx.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.60 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:212.227.17.0/27]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmx.de]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmx.net:+]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[159.36.229.79.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.10]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[21.17.227.212.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.3.1]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-6.77), ipnet: 212.227.0.0/16(-1.20), asn: 8560(1.99), country: DE(-0.02)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8560, ipnet:212.227.0.0/16, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmx.de]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmx.net:s=badeba3b8450]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[gmx.de]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[21.17.227.212.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 16:10:47 -0000 Am 16.05.20 um 17:13 schrieb Matthias Andree: > Am 16.05.20 um 16:05 schrieb Kurt Jaeger: >> Hi! >> >>> Problems building net/librsync, please advice :-) >>> >>> Looking forward to having duplicity installed! :) >> Please try to use poudriere to build it. I tested it, works fine. >> > Kurt, > > That's reaching too short. I can see that it build in poudriere, but it= > appears to do something differently from a live system: > >> =C2=A0=3D=3D=3D>=C2=A0 Performing out-of-source build >> -/bin/mkdir -p /usr/ports.svn/net/librsync/work/.build >> +/bin/mkdir -p /wrkdirs/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/.build >> =C2=A0-- The C compiler identification is Clang 8.0.1 >> =C2=A0-- Check for working C compiler: /usr/local/libexec/ccache/cc >> =C2=A0-- Check for working C compiler: /usr/local/libexec/ccache/cc - = works >> [...] >> --- CMAKE_SYSTEM =3D FreeBSD-12.1-RELEASE-p5 >> +-- CMAKE_SYSTEM =3D FreeBSD-12.1-RELEASE-p4 >> +-- Found POPT: /usr/local/lib/libpopt.so =C2=A0 >> =C2=A0-- Found components for POPT >> =C2=A0-- POPT_ROOT_DIR=C2=A0 =3D /usr/local >> =C2=A0-- POPT_INCLUDE_DIRS=C2=A0 =3D /usr/local/include >> --- POPT_LIBRARIES =3D popt >> +-- POPT_LIBRARIES =3D /usr/local/lib/libpopt.so >> =C2=A0-- Found BZip2: /usr/lib/libbz2.so (found version "1.0.8") >> =C2=A0-- Looking for BZ2_bzCompressInit >> =C2=A0-- Looking for BZ2_bzCompressInit - found > And the POPT_LIBRARIES=3D... difference is breaking the build. Adding > LDFLAGS+=3D-L${LOCALBASE}/lib fixes the ports build for me. Now let's g= o > for the root cause... > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " Update: (sunpoet@ I hope you don't mind my fixing your port) - we've had an older bug report from 2020-04-10, =C2=A0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D245514 - Franco Fichtner had provided a similar fix as of 2020-04-29, =C2=A0 the maintainer (sunpoet@, on Cc:) hadn't responded since, =C2=A0 so I was permitted to commit; fix committed in r535475. =C2=A0 You can tell that you have the current version if after update =C2=A0 you can see a ${CHMOD} near pre-test: at the end of =C2=A0 net/librsync/Makefile. - upstream bug report filed against what I believe to be the culprit, =C2=A0 the upstream file cmake/FindPOPT.cmake seems to be broken =C2=A0 in case pkgconf or pkg-config or equivalent are found =C2=A0 during "make configure" (i. e. while cmake is running). HTH. If not, please reopen and follow up on Bug 245514 above. Regards Matthias From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat May 16 17:18:55 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D9EA2F77E3 for ; Sat, 16 May 2020 17:18:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (www.zefox.net [50.1.20.27]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "www.zefox.com", Issuer "www.zefox.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49PX7M1Xybz3GZM; Sat, 16 May 2020 17:18:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 04GHIs5l057633 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 16 May 2020 10:18:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: (from fbsd@localhost) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 04GHIsq8057632; Sat, 16 May 2020 10:18:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd) Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 10:18:54 -0700 From: bob prohaska To: Dimitry Andric Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: LLVM target 'amdgpu' not enabled Was: Re: Conflict on very first port (xorg) on rpi3 Message-ID: <20200516171854.GB57280@www.zefox.net> References: <4961F458-26EF-447F-8033-B00FA720C58F@yahoo.com> <20200515151922.GC51382@www.zefox.net> <20200515164921.6zyiorfgnqhf5nls@t480.local> <20200515180554.GD51382@www.zefox.net> <35F4EC61-AC55-4FA4-89D4-7742E449CC8A@yahoo.com> <20200515200358.GA54521@www.zefox.net> <6C824795-DF23-4F5C-BF19-256177448183@yahoo.com> <20200516154455.GA57280@www.zefox.net> <27748E8E-9A52-41CD-A635-E3A65CF14205@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <27748E8E-9A52-41CD-A635-E3A65CF14205@FreeBSD.org> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49PX7M1Xybz3GZM X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.99 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.992,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 17:18:55 -0000 On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 06:08:13PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 16 May 2020, at 17:44, bob prohaska wrote: > > > > Deinstalling the conflicting port made considerable progress toward a build of > > x11/xorg, but now make is stopping with: > > > > configure: error: LLVM target 'amdgpu' not enabled in your LLVM build. Required by radv. > > > > I've tried turning off Wayland support in graphics/mesa-dri but that didn't help. > > > > Since this is on a Raspberry Pi3B, one wouldn't really expect to find an AMD GPU, > > > > If there's a workaround please give me a hint.... > > It seems to be required by the ATI/AMD Radeon drivers, and there is no > option to turn these drivers off, as far as I can see. You could attempt > to edit graphics/mesa-dri/Makefile, and fiddle with the ALL_DRI_DRIVERS, > ALL_GALLIUM_DRIVERS and ALL_VULKAN_DRIVERS lines. But this is going to > be very fragile, the best solution is really to rebuild the llvm port > with AMDGPU support. > > -Dimitry > Is it known what driver the Pi3B will use? That would at least tell me what to keep, though I appreciate it might not be enough for internal consistency. Quite a few failed attempts will be faster than rebuilding llvm80.... Thanks for writing! bob prohaska From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat May 16 20:32:15 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0939E2FCB0F for ; Sat, 16 May 2020 20:32:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@passap.ru) Received: from forward106o.mail.yandex.net (forward106o.mail.yandex.net [37.140.190.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49PcQP3kpVz40xf for ; Sat, 16 May 2020 20:32:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@passap.ru) Received: from forward103q.mail.yandex.net (forward103q.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c0e:50:0:640:b21c:d009]) by forward106o.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id EB1B15061088 for ; Sat, 16 May 2020 23:32:08 +0300 (MSK) Received: from mxback5q.mail.yandex.net (mxback5q.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c0e:1ba:0:640:b716:ad89]) by forward103q.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id E751A61E000A for ; Sat, 16 May 2020 23:32:08 +0300 (MSK) Received: from vla1-61ce7aa04735.qloud-c.yandex.net (vla1-61ce7aa04735.qloud-c.yandex.net [2a02:6b8:c0d:3e86:0:640:61ce:7aa0]) by mxback5q.mail.yandex.net (mxback/Yandex) with ESMTP id qxRA1ekOG1-W8iC2598; Sat, 16 May 2020 23:32:08 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=passap.ru; s=mail; t=1589661128; bh=wcvtbCopkAHJpEzp//HnRdORZEgzMlYUlfiONPMDGss=; h=Subject:From:To:Date:Message-ID; b=LfEU6pzf/oKiX1KEigWrB/P+nVdpqOEnOTgoqhytWmWsL8elO+5N+4/4wZ+ujs6MO MncvtVAGn9P/UeyMrK7Xx+VLNUNlh89rd2oxSC2pKLrIYrmLQ6knykLrxuiLedytik bKDOSi3mBav9327JDYP5MVzZgPiyGaQiZ/YO40bU= Received: by vla1-61ce7aa04735.qloud-c.yandex.net (smtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id nw8MZ1opnC-W8XKd5H9; Sat, 16 May 2020 23:32:08 +0300 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client certificate not present) To: FreeBSD ports From: Boris Samorodov Subject: vscode and extensions Message-ID: <4abc86e7-8adc-453a-917f-2c60429bea79@passap.ru> Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 23:32:11 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49PcQP3kpVz40xf X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=passap.ru header.s=mail header.b=LfEU6pzf; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bsam@passap.ru designates 37.140.190.187 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bsam@passap.ru X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.30 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[passap.ru:s=mail]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:37.140.128.0/18]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[passap.ru]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[passap.ru:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[187.190.140.37.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_VERYGOOD(0.00)[187.190.140.37.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.19]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13238, ipnet:37.140.128.0/18, country:RU]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-3.70)[ip: (-9.75), ipnet: 37.140.128.0/18(-4.89), asn: 13238(-3.86), country: RU(0.01)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 20:32:15 -0000 Hi All, I've just installed at FreeBSD-12.1 vscode-1.43.1 and the MS C/C++ extension. Seems that it doesn't work. And I've noticed at ~/.vscode-oss/extensions/ms-vscode.cpptools-0.28.0 Windows binaries. Should extensions work at FreeBSD? -- WBR, bsam From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat May 16 20:45:07 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84F6D2FD21B for ; Sat, 16 May 2020 20:45:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakob@grimstveit.no) Received: from mail-oo1-xc2e.google.com (mail-oo1-xc2e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c2e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49PcjG5CTVz41Zd for ; Sat, 16 May 2020 20:45:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakob@grimstveit.no) Received: by mail-oo1-xc2e.google.com with SMTP id s139so1228134oos.1 for ; Sat, 16 May 2020 13:45:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=grimstveit.no; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=jVWYlkwy/ZLVLNMPo0mc3T3020mbVDABExifAFenflg=; b=SDV/oUjPLvYxe8dWNQnstA/+85LsRUvyElnkNhm9OLI6yYmjFKjjIWS3niaFw2OXQt DflJh0gTtPas940lVIvUixYjFXN++2sahWp0cLHAo3l+zTWzP4wUlPkWDxbFFjZtiGAi 6WPemH04RTOvFdK+nU4QtP4THJ4PblnR7IoMs= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jVWYlkwy/ZLVLNMPo0mc3T3020mbVDABExifAFenflg=; b=HSS7zAHR7urnlS94hfPSfzfi5e9vkQjJj7Jc6hhBydj71wrl1pbDB6aIGXErCsTNE7 fPstKp+AbrYVpXx8MctXJYQDV+cnZZ9fo6WeA5P0dzz8Pg2wLCnRUh01okngqMS7DHop G1rKabHm7v1t89BW2qSHkBI84K5APkRXH8b6GL+Ng6JceCq5/6Ae8HaZBZ6+neQ8dkc2 040oqCnEifxR/1nrgE5Z0y3UVC0tI52VROKHjT+Eg0ym43B+T0ApjQxqlHbaVWV2qw0f XZwDb7QAeppSJ2qNjFSE4fjNAxUpwlEm6Vtk3/YfqreUb7wZzQrCvUFuntUoMZrkZv+l MXZA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53296s9e34sU5rEVOPZ8tmwlq52a8CWhYk+jg3FIKqb7+IV9I51U ZQ1W8sHsO8cOJgC101Kn4QLoG5KzRItD/eCGXGPR9A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyDmua8qfATm0i6ECqu8BWJhxQvaP7UwVisUZiDKn9l2RyKzwXhHGphemyOV8joEmlUWRyPy8upu13ZFoE7G0U= X-Received: by 2002:a4a:1dc5:: with SMTP id 188mr7511265oog.76.1589661905157; Sat, 16 May 2020 13:45:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200516140559.GX39563@home.opsec.eu> <36af14f0-de6b-d0a5-cf65-ec153ad8445a@gmx.de> <2561e742-ba01-393a-29e4-33907de2413f@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <2561e742-ba01-393a-29e4-33907de2413f@gmx.de> From: Jakob Breivik Grimstveit Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 22:44:54 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Build error net/librsync (unable to find library -lpopt) To: Matthias Andree Cc: Kurt Jaeger , Po-Chuan Hsieh , Xavier Humbert , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49PcjG5CTVz41Zd X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=grimstveit.no header.s=google header.b=SDV/oUjP; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=grimstveit.no; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jakob@grimstveit.no designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::c2e as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jakob@grimstveit.no X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.97 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[grimstveit.no:s=google]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[9]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[grimstveit.no:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[grimstveit.no,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[e.2.c.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmx.de]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; IP_SCORE(-1.97)[ip: (-9.05), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-0.33), asn: 15169(-0.42), country: US(-0.05)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 20:45:07 -0000 Much appreciated, fix works great, now able to install duplicity without any problems =F0=9F=98=8E=F0=9F=91=8D=F0=9F=8F=BB l=C3=B8r. 16. mai 2020 kl. 18:10 skrev Matthias Andree : > Am 16.05.20 um 17:13 schrieb Matthias Andree: > > Am 16.05.20 um 16:05 schrieb Kurt Jaeger: > >> Hi! > >> > >>> Problems building net/librsync, please advice :-) > >>> > >>> Looking forward to having duplicity installed! :) > >> Please try to use poudriere to build it. I tested it, works fine. > >> > > Kurt, > > > > That's reaching too short. I can see that it build in poudriere, but it > > appears to do something differently from a live system: > > > >> =3D=3D=3D> Performing out-of-source build > >> -/bin/mkdir -p /usr/ports.svn/net/librsync/work/.build > >> +/bin/mkdir -p /wrkdirs/usr/ports/net/librsync/work/.build > >> -- The C compiler identification is Clang 8.0.1 > >> -- Check for working C compiler: /usr/local/libexec/ccache/cc > >> -- Check for working C compiler: /usr/local/libexec/ccache/cc - works > >> [...] > >> --- CMAKE_SYSTEM =3D FreeBSD-12.1-RELEASE-p5 > >> +-- CMAKE_SYSTEM =3D FreeBSD-12.1-RELEASE-p4 > >> +-- Found POPT: /usr/local/lib/libpopt.so > >> -- Found components for POPT > >> -- POPT_ROOT_DIR =3D /usr/local > >> -- POPT_INCLUDE_DIRS =3D /usr/local/include > >> --- POPT_LIBRARIES =3D popt > >> +-- POPT_LIBRARIES =3D /usr/local/lib/libpopt.so > >> -- Found BZip2: /usr/lib/libbz2.so (found version "1.0.8") > >> -- Looking for BZ2_bzCompressInit > >> -- Looking for BZ2_bzCompressInit - found > > And the POPT_LIBRARIES=3D... difference is breaking the build. Adding > > LDFLAGS+=3D-L${LOCALBASE}/lib fixes the ports build for me. Now let's g= o > > for the root cause... > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " > > Update: > > (sunpoet@ I hope you don't mind my fixing your port) > > - we've had an older bug report from 2020-04-10, > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D245514 > > - Franco Fichtner had provided a similar fix as of 2020-04-29, > the maintainer (sunpoet@, on Cc:) hadn't responded since, > so I was permitted to commit; fix committed in r535475. > You can tell that you have the current version if after update > you can see a ${CHMOD} near pre-test: at the end of > net/librsync/Makefile. > > - upstream bug report filed against what I believe to be the culprit, > the upstream file cmake/FindPOPT.cmake seems to be broken > in case pkgconf or pkg-config or equivalent are found > during "make configure" (i. e. while cmake is running). > > HTH. > > If not, please reopen and follow up on Bug 245514 above. > > Regards > Matthias > > > -- --=20 Jakob Breivik Grimstveit 48298152 / http://grimstveit.no/jakob