From owner-freebsd-uboot@freebsd.org Mon Jan 20 09:48:40 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-uboot@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB8B1F3F88 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 09:48:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-uboot@dino.sk) Received: from mailhost.netlabit.sk (mailhost.netlabit.sk [84.245.65.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 481Rgq5v7Zz4JQw for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 09:48:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-uboot@dino.sk) Received: from zeta.dino.sk (fw3.dino.sk [84.245.95.254]) (AUTH: LOGIN milan) by mailhost.netlabit.sk with ESMTPA; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 10:48:35 +0100 id 00E5483E.5E257773.0000ABD4 Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 10:48:35 +0100 From: Milan Obuch To: Emmanuel Vadot Cc: freebsd-uboot@freebsd.org Subject: Re: u-boot for Zynq Zybo-Z7 board Message-ID: <20200120104835.60b872cc@zeta.dino.sk> In-Reply-To: <20200109125918.07da2be47103650577356b40@bidouilliste.com> References: <20190722143005.152779f3@zeta.dino.sk> <20190722174807.eb64f11514b20808ee6b4ca3@bidouilliste.com> <20190722193411.350ad34e@zeta.dino.sk> <20190722195039.c0ab5b4d756791115a9093c0@bidouilliste.com> <20200109115249.234ae93f@zeta.dino.sk> <20200109120844.e8819f5d6c7f9747e70a8baf@bidouilliste.com> <20200109121748.30d4b3af@zeta.dino.sk> <20200109124116.1dbe322144e14f61e695e3f5@bidouilliste.com> <20200109125006.647f593d@zeta.dino.sk> <20200109125918.07da2be47103650577356b40@bidouilliste.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; i386-portbld-freebsd11.3) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 481Rgq5v7Zz4JQw X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd-uboot@dino.sk designates 84.245.65.72 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd-uboot@dino.sk X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.08 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[dino.sk]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[72.65.245.84.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.10.0]; IP_SCORE(-2.78)[ip: (-8.12), ipnet: 84.245.64.0/18(-4.06), asn: 16160(-1.80), country: SK(0.09)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16160, ipnet:84.245.64.0/18, country:SK]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-uboot@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of uboot with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 09:48:40 -0000 On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 12:59:18 +0100 Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 12:50:06 +0100 > Milan Obuch wrote: > > > On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 12:41:16 +0100 > > Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 12:17:48 +0100 > > > Milan Obuch wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 12:08:44 +0100 > > > > Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 11:54:02 +0100 > > > > > Milan Obuch wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 19:50:39 +0200 > > > > > > Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 19:34:11 +0200 > > > > > > > Milan Obuch wrote: > > > > [ snip ] > > > > > > > > New port is just submitted, see > > > > > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243211 > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Milan > > > > > > > > > > I don't like having patches, do you plan to upstream the > > > > > change for board/xilinx/zynq/zynq-zybo-z7/ps7_init_gpl.c ? > > > > > For the defconfig patch, please use a fragment. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Both issues are reported upstream with patches suggested to fix > > > > them. I have no idea how long it takes for them to accept them. > > > > My mails are currently waiting in moderator's queue for > > > > approval. > > > > > > > > That being written, in my oppinion patches are good method to > > > > fix issue now for us, immediatelly, after fix is accepted > > > > upstream, they are simple to remove. > > > > > > I don't see any patch for zybo upstream, what is the patchwork > > > link? > > > > Issues were just reported today, messages are waiting for approval. > > I can't do anything at the moment. How could a patchwork be > > created? Can it do I or this needs to be done by upstream? > > It's created automatically when you submit a patch upstream. > Then you can use PATCHFILES+= /raw in the makefile > instead of using a local patch. > After a while patches are in mainstream u-boot source tree, I modified my port to use them and uploaded new shar file to bugzilla. Binaries produced are tested on hardware with recent snapshot image from ftp, FreeBSD-13.0-CURRENT-arm-armv7-GENERICSD-20200116-r356767.img.xz and boots OK. By the way, how could bug's assigne be changed from freebsd-ports-bugs to freebsd-uboot? I think this would be reasonable... Regards, Milan