Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 17 Feb 2025 18:43:25 +0000
From:      Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org>
To:        Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD Toolchain <freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Attempting llvm20 based poudriere(-devel) bulk -ca use got: "mesa-dri-24.1.7_4 depends on shared library: libLLVM-2.so - not found"; others get same sort of "depends on" message
Message-ID:  <Z7ODTc2Clj7kmTOC@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net>
In-Reply-To: <0A1E6DF5-0EAD-4368-938C-47FA82E5E51B@yahoo.com>
References:  <D18B6C38-223B-46C0-B13C-D7FB3D169525@yahoo.com> <5528E984-AEFF-4AEF-81F4-CBA99051F339@yahoo.com> <0A1E6DF5-0EAD-4368-938C-47FA82E5E51B@yahoo.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Feb 16, 2025 at 06:34:46AM -0800, Mark Millard wrote:
> On Feb 16, 2025, at 06:24, Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Feb 16, 2025, at 05:49, Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> I expect that should have been: libLLVM-20.so
> >> 
> >> So, analogous to:
> >> 
> >> # find -s / -name "libLLVM*.so*" -print | more
> >> /usr/local/llvm19/lib/libLLVM-19.so
> >> /usr/local/llvm19/lib/libLLVM.so
> >> /usr/local/llvm19/lib/libLLVM.so.19.1
> >> 
> >> At the moment I do not expect this to be an oddity of
> >> my personal environment unless it is just for -rc1 .
> > 
> > Looks to me like one example of code that may get
> > things wrong for llvm20 is in /usr/ports/Mk/Uses/llvm.mk :
> > 
> > . . .
> > .  if empty(_LLVM_MK_VERSION)
> > .    if ${LLVM_DEFAULT:N1[0-9]*}
> > _LLVM_MK_VERSION=       ${LLVM_DEFAULT:S/0$//}
> > .    else
> > _LLVM_MK_VERSION=       ${LLVM_DEFAULT}
> > .    endif
> > .  endif
> > . . .
> 
> Another area in /usr/ports/Mk/Uses/llvm.mk that may
> have related problems is tied to:
> 
> # === define helpers for the dependencies ===
> .  for _ver in ${_LLVM_MK_VALID_VERSIONS:N1[0-9]}
> _LLVM_MK_SUFFIX_${_ver}=        ${_ver}0
> .  endfor

I've removed these bits.  It was a leftover from supporting llvm[789]0.
I think it was also broken for llvm10.

Thanks,
Brooks



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Z7ODTc2Clj7kmTOC>