Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 20:57:06 -0500 (CDT) From: Robert Bonomi <bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why Clang Message-ID: <201206210157.q5L1v6qE030445@mail.r-bonomi.com> In-Reply-To: <20120621003335.ce64ea73.freebsd@edvax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jun 20 17:37:45 2012 > Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 00:33:35 +0200 > From: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de.r-bonomi.com> > To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> > Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>, > Antonio Olivares <olivares14031@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: Why Clang > > On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 00:25:22 +0200 (CEST), Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > > You're being paid to write a program for a customer. You > > > > i don't talk that case, but if i am hired to write some part of program as > > an employer in software company. > > Sorry, I misread the situation. > This is a situation addressed _specifically_ in Berne Convention copyright law, under the heading of 'work done for hire'. For _anything_ that falls under the 'work done for hire' clause(s), copyright (and _title_) reses with the party who 'hired' the work done. Work done by a 'contractor' under a 'purchase of services' contract is generally _not_ 'work done for hire' (although it -may- be, depending on the language of the contract), and thus, genenrall, copyright, etc. remains with the person who did the work, -- *unless* the contract specifies otherwise.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201206210157.q5L1v6qE030445>