From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Apr 29 16:33:45 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA05204 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Wed, 29 Apr 1998 16:33:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gdi.uoregon.edu (gdi.uoregon.edu [128.223.170.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA04922 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 1998 16:32:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by gdi.uoregon.edu (8.8.7/8.8.8) with SMTP id QAA13621; Wed, 29 Apr 1998 16:31:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 1998 16:31:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White Reply-To: Doug White To: Jeff Ehrenkrantz cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: possible netmask problem In-Reply-To: <017601bd72c0$f2923f80$3042f5cf@tvmaster1.whyy.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 28 Apr 1998, Jeff Ehrenkrantz wrote: > I have an entry found in a routed trace that I can't seem to figure out. > Perhaps someone can tell me why I get it. > > Where I am: > $ ifconfig -a > ed0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > inet 207.8.142.138 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 207.8.142.255 > ether 02:60:8c:db:d6:51 > tun0: flags=8010 mtu 1500 > sl0: flags=c010 mtu 552 > lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 Ok to here. > inet 207.8.142.145 netmask 0xffffffff No, take out this alias. A loopback route will be added automatically. Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message