From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 16 04:56:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD0E105; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 04:56:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qc0-x22c.google.com (mail-qc0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 390352FC5; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 04:56:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f172.google.com with SMTP id c9so171084qcz.31 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 21:56:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=hd5nX5BXzJtkk2YCpU9wZMsHrBqb9FuR9aGLWuURcA4=; b=FySNpBtLOP6nSrSyGf0nGzHBx2CY8kKOwVh3YJ7b4d+OsZXx6ElrvWC0vsixsX81uB /5JbDX7JzihGsa6SSdgJo4S9MSXBsbdz9OAc4rbx5Mfxk5dDawOK68bM3ztmuYe5lp2g aoCNLDnDBDJSAd7jrfywzY/yj3bM2zBkX3xzSjTedz35IKkMclDLeLHRW4QQ8yKIgF8i jPCcelnJTtMx8+Pxp2k7T5NoCBQ13wX/ISoTPVIBeVw45IIRABN2KbC64Vbk/aNfKuTR QKPKfVRCHVyK5hUd3Fqap7HvJm8j+3tcEV+R3YkXzjRWFgZoR3M17V9dBrYKJZUvVpdq P33w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.63.199 with SMTP id c7mr2028856qai.74.1381899370324; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 21:56:10 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.224.207.66 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 21:56:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <002e01cec8f0$71c400e0$554c02a0$@info> References: <002701cebc6f$634c0040$29e400c0$@info> <003301cebdeb$fc941350$f5bc39f0$@info> <1381762883.2593.0.camel@localhost> <002e01cec8f0$71c400e0$554c02a0$@info> Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 21:56:10 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: WE3zXdla7ObQpIJzEf6ElFNG7Ds Message-ID: Subject: Re: [IWN] Review From: Adrian Chadd To: Cedric GROSS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 04:56:11 -0000 Ok, so what, I should test out split_8, get that into the tree, then merge in more stuff from you? -adrian On 14 October 2013 08:17, Cedric GROSS wrote: > > De : Sean Bruno [mailto:sean_bruno@yahoo.com] > > =C0 : Cedric GROSS > > Cc : 'Adrian Chadd'; freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org > > Objet : RE: [IWN] Review > > > > On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 16:47 +0200, Cedric GROSS wrote: > > > Hello, > > > I forgot your lastest commit but it?s done now. > > > > > > So split_6 and split_7 are sync with most recent ?HEAD. > > > Cedric > > > > Cedric: > Hi Sean, > > > > > Which branch should we be testing? > > > > As Adrian wish to smoothly include changes into FreeBSD repo, split_6 an > split_7 doesn't change big things regarding latest NIC. > > Instead Split_8, is minimal version for managing 2200 and so on NIC serie= s. > Could be a good idea to test this version with =E0 lot of NIC. > > > sean > > Thanks > Cedric > >