Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:43:47 -0700 From: snowcrash <schneecrash+pf@gmail.com> To: "Jon Simola" <jsimola@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: why are pf-blocked ips 'leaking' thru to spamd? Message-ID: <70f41ba20704271143i962a7d3r821ddd34a4409f53@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8eea04080704271127g70d910bfg82ec652a0c6889bf@mail.gmail.com> References: <70f41ba20704271105m11fa5315kc7c3d715f2d63f61@mail.gmail.com> <8eea04080704271127g70d910bfg82ec652a0c6889bf@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hi jon, > Multiple tables in rules are tricky because they are not treated as > "sets" that can be arbitrarily compared (ie, IPs in table A that are > not in table B). well a big aha!+grumble on my part ... thanks! for the clarification. i did NOT understand that correctly :-( so, *IS* there a way to accomplish that? namely, match against a boolean-composite of tables?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?70f41ba20704271143i962a7d3r821ddd34a4409f53>