From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 24 16:42:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37FB216A4CE for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 16:42:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dong.ci0.org (cognet.ci0.org [80.65.224.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C246643D1F for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 16:42:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mlfbsd@dong.ci0.org) Received: from dong.ci0.org (localhost.ci0.org [127.0.0.1]) by dong.ci0.org (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iAOHWgxR038439; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 18:32:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mlfbsd@dong.ci0.org) Received: (from mlfbsd@localhost) by dong.ci0.org (8.13.1/8.12.11/Submit) id iAOHWg48038438; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 18:32:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mlfbsd) Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 18:32:42 +0100 From: Olivier Houchard To: Jia-Shiun Li Message-ID: <20041124173242.GA38286@ci0.org> References: <41939C6D.5010400@sitetronics.com> <20041112010144.GA36319@ci0.org> <1d6d20bc04111811434a86bc7b@mail.gmail.com> <20041118214602.GA6230@ci0.org> <1d6d20bc041124080974e4eb3e@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1d6d20bc041124080974e4eb3e@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Current status and further development X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 16:42:18 -0000 On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 12:09:30AM +0800, Jia-Shiun Li wrote: > On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 22:46:02 +0100, Olivier Houchard wrote: > > It seems it my fault, partially. Apparently specifying DESTDIR for any other > > target than install is not a good idea (although some .depend files looks > > right, go figure). > > So instead you have to do > > make TARGET_ARCH=arm TOOLS_PREFIX=/usr/cross depend all > > make TARGET_ARCH=arm TOOLS_PREFIX=/usr/cross DESTDIR=/usr/cross install > > I tried again, despite some directories under /usr/cross missing > during installation, the second step to build binutils still failed > somewhere, so I decided to do some lary try. :) > > I checked /usr/src/Makefile to see how it works to crossbuild for > other platform, and executed > make -DNOCLEAN buildworld TARGET_ARCH=arm TARGET=arm __MAKE_CONF=/dev/null > and it failed at the same place. Looks like that as.h was included > twice. But buildworld will work for other platforms, at least I tried > IA64. > Wild guess : didn't you try to re-apply the patch after cvsup-ing ? I remember getting hit by that before, because instead of re-creating the files, patch will happen the diffs to the existing files, effectively duplicating it. There may be a patch option to tell it not to create files that already exists, but I don't know it. When I have to re-apply the patches I usually remove src/gnu, src/contrib/gcc and src/contrib/binutils. > BTW why is there two binutils & cc, under gnu/ and contrib/ ? i > thought they were the same? > contrib/ contains the bits from FSF almost verbatim. gnu/ contains our build bits. Cheers, Olivier