Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 12:46:02 +0000 From: Dima Pasechnik <dimpase+freebsd@gmail.com> To: Dima Pasechnik <dimpase+freebsd@gmail.com> Cc: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>, =?UTF-8?Q?T=C4=B3l_Coosemans?= <tijl@freebsd.org>, Diane Bruce <db@db.net>, gerald@freebsd.org, Dave Horsfall <dave@horsfall.org>, FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//libgcc_s.so.1 Message-ID: <CAAWYfq1YNYDdkSP9TJcZZZ3FPn3WBEV5wisAnmwCsf2A=qRe-Q@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAAWYfq2LUVCRNQUo31LCWWDPwg5o17Eko_O2%2BA6ZXBnNn_ZoOA@mail.gmail.com> References: <416689e6-37f9-17ec-54d8-0d224c26f30f@pinyon.org> <20190217151604.GB68620@night.db.net> <20190221180515.39c79ce6@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <092b17f0-6fbf-662e-1061-403442248abd@pinyon.org> <20190222140407.2145c11e@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <alpine.BSF.2.21.9999.1902230913380.84718@aneurin.horsfall.org> <20190223000620.GA12700@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <CAAWYfq20PgO9RoaN2esyqf-dc2xyqfmkLVaSe8yrx-X4E1s=ZQ@mail.gmail.com> <20190223183117.GA65065@night.db.net> <20190224142150.685debe4@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20190224200914.GA26706@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <CAAWYfq2LUVCRNQUo31LCWWDPwg5o17Eko_O2%2BA6ZXBnNn_ZoOA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 1:58 AM Dima Pasechnik <dimpase+freebsd@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 8:09 PM Steve Kargl > <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > > > > On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 02:21:50PM +0100, T=C4=B3l Coosemans wrote: > > > On Sat, 23 Feb 2019 13:31:17 -0500 Diane Bruce <db@db.net> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 10:52:03AM +0000, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > >> On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 12:07 AM Steve Kargl > > > >> <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > > > >>> On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 09:19:01AM +1100, Dave Horsfall wrote: > > > >>>> On Fri, 22 Feb 2019, T=C4=B3l Coosemans wrote: > > > >>>>> If I were the lang/gcc maintainer this -rpath problem would be = my > > > >>>>> number one priority. The current maintainer has never proposed > > > >>>>> any solutions and when I submit patches he always resists. I'm > > > >>>>> done wasting my time fighting him. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> I'm late to this discussion (not being a Fortran/Python user) bu= t > > > >>>> is there any way to remove a recalcitrant maintainer? > > > >>> > > > >>> Can you explain what you mean? The maintainer of the lang/gcc > > > >>> ports is a long-time member of the GCC steering committee > > > >>> and a long-time maintainer of all gcc FreeBSD ports. There > > > >>> are very few FreeBSD users (like 3 of us) who have commit access > > > >>> to the gcc tree. Seems like a dubious idea to remove one of > > > >>> those 3. > > > >> > > > >> Given the amount of time unsuspecting and half-suspecting users wa= sted > > > >> on making Fortran code (often in form of a Python extension) worki= ng > > > >> on FreeBSD (e.g. I probably wasted weeks), time is high to do > > > >> something, e.g. commit the said patches---there is an agreement th= at > > > >> they are correct, right? > > > > > > > > Dima, gerald has always been very helpful in all my communications > > > > with him. Have you filed a PR for the fix? dropped him an email? > > > > > > > > I know we (gerald and ?? can't remember) tried a static lib change > > > > a few years ago. I believe it didn't work at the time due to missin= g > > > > symbols which we have since added. > > > > > > This cannot be entirely correct. I don't see what missing symbols th= is > > > would have been. I attached my patch to bug 208120 on 2017-02-09 and > > > you responded it was the best idea. mmel then discovered it didn't > > > entirely fix the problem on ARM where _Unwind_Backtrace has version > > > GCC_4.3.0 instead of GCC_3.3.0. The gcc commit that changed this > > > doesn't explain why this was done, but we'll have to make the same > > > change in FreeBSD ARM libgcc_s to be ABI compatible (since _Unwind* i= s > > > part of the ABI). This isn't a blocker for the patch. > > > > > > I emailed the patch to gerald on 2017-02-21. He responded in the usu= al > > > way that he prefers patches submitted upstream and because I thought = the > > > patch would not be accepted upstream he proposed an alternative solut= ion > > > where gcc would always add -rpath on FreeBSD so you didn't have to > > > specify it on the command line. I responded this wouldn't fix the ca= se > > > where clang was used as a linker (e.g. to combine fortran and c++ cod= e > > > in one program) and that the FAQ on the gcc website said it was a bad > > > idea for other reasons. I also said upstream might accept my patch i= f > > > it was a configure option but that the gcc configure scripts are > > > complicated and I didn't know where to add it exactly. Then silence. > > > This is typical for all my conversations with him over the years so I > > > stopped caring. > > > > > > > I do find the above paragraph to be somewhat ironic. It seems > > that python importing Fortran compiled code runs into this > > problem. I have sent 3 or 4 patches to freebsd-ports@, freebsd-python, > > and created a PR to fix a conflict with the symbol sinpi (which I > > intend to add to libm), and I have been told to upstream my patch. > > The patch ought to be upstream, for your patch is quite meaningful > outside of FreeBSD ports. > > > > > > Well, I checked. I would need to create an account on a python > > site to send a 2-line patch. > > GitHub is hardly a "python site" (or rather CPython, as we talk about > - yes, you need to do a PR at their GitHub repo, which is totally > standard practice nowadays. > https://devguide.python.org/ > OK, if you need someone to do such a PR on your behalf, surely this > can be arranged. This is now https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/12027 Naturally it will take time to get through. Steve, where is your sinpi() et. al implementation, so that it can be mentioned there explicitly? Dima > > > Given that I actually don't > > program in python, that certainly seems to be an unreasonable > > request from the python maintainers. > > If I were a Python maintainer I might have pointed out to you that > IEEE-754 speaks about sinPi(), not sinpi(), and if you added > sinPi() to libm, it would have been fine without a patch. > (although this might be breaking naming taboos :-)) > > Dima > > > > > BTW, I am a gfortran maintainer. gfortran is the only Fortran > > compiler available for FreeBSD that actually implements most > > of the Fortran standards. I've spent 15+ years making sure > > gfortran works on FreeBSD and that changes to GCC don't cause > > regression. This is first time I've seen your patch. AFAICT, > > the file libgfortran/Makefile.am needs a patch, and then a > > around of automake, autoconf, aclocal needs to be done. Just > > need to figure out what needs to change and ensure that it > > does not break the rest of the computing world. > > > > -- > > Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAAWYfq1YNYDdkSP9TJcZZZ3FPn3WBEV5wisAnmwCsf2A=qRe-Q>