From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 10 10:52:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF1C616A4CE; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 10:52:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F79443D3F; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 10:52:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i3AHpaPq083108; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 13:51:36 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (robert@localhost)i3AHpZC9083105; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 13:51:36 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 13:51:35 -0400 (EDT) From: Robert Watson X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Mark Murray In-Reply-To: <200404100859.i3A8xj0w066454@grimreaper.grondar.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: Colin Percival Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/modules/random Makefile src/sys/dev/random harvest.c hash.c hash.h nehemiah.c nehemiah.h probe.c randomdev.c randomdev.h randomdev_soft.c randomdev_soft.h yar X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 17:52:04 -0000 On Sat, 10 Apr 2004, Mark Murray wrote: > Colin Percival writes: > > Is there any reason we can't just have an rc.conf variable > > entropy_trust_the_spooks = "YES" > > which allows users to choose between optimal performance and > > possible problems if the entropy source isn't as good as the > > vendor claims? > > Sure, that is possible, but I have an aversion to building something > that is too complicated, because sooner-or-later someone is going to > stumble over a previously unthought-of combination and create an > embarrassing incident. I'd rather keep it simple. Sounds like what you need RandomGraph so you can arbitrarily plug and play processing on sources of entropy :-). Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert@fledge.watson.org Senior Research Scientist, McAfee Research