From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jul  3 12:25:00 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76E7B37B401
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu,  3 Jul 2003 12:25:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alpha.siliconlandmark.com (alpha.siliconlandmark.com
	[209.69.98.4])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA9DB44042
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu,  3 Jul 2003 12:24:59 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com)
Received: from alpha.siliconlandmark.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	h63JOrl3029773;	Thu, 3 Jul 2003 15:24:53 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com)
Received: from localhost (andy@localhost)h63JOqqG029770;
	Thu, 3 Jul 2003 15:24:53 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: alpha.siliconlandmark.com: andy owned process doing
	-bs
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 15:24:52 -0400 (EDT)
From: Andre Guibert de Bruet <andy@siliconlandmark.com>
To: Danny Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il>
In-Reply-To: <E19Y5r3-0001DS-00@cs.huji.ac.il>
Message-ID: <20030703152208.F29753@alpha.siliconlandmark.com>
References: <E19Y5r3-0001DS-00@cs.huji.ac.il>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: tunning 5.1
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2003 19:25:00 -0000


On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Danny Braniss wrote:

> 	i run a small program that writes to file, these are the numbers
>
> 	Fbsd	local disk	nfs
> 	----	----------	----
> 	4.8	44.86		42.54
> 	5.1	34.37		16.42
>
> are these values (MB/s) acceptable? comments?
> while disk io is less that 30% slower, network is over 60% slower!

Do have any kernel debugging options enabled on the 5.1 install? If so,
the additional sanity checking is what's causing the discrepency.

Regards,

> Andre Guibert de Bruet | Enterprise Software Consultant >
> Silicon Landmark, LLC. | http://siliconlandmark.com/    >