From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Apr 14 7: 0: 7 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AF1A37B42C for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2001 07:00:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f3EE04t53212; Sat, 14 Apr 2001 07:00:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2001 07:00:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200104141400.f3EE04t53212@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Peter Pentchev Subject: Re: ports/26122: Update port: graphics/netpbm to 9.12 Reply-To: Peter Pentchev Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/26122; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Peter Pentchev To: tkato@prontomail.ne.jp Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/26122: Update port: graphics/netpbm to 9.12 Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2001 16:56:44 +0300 Hi, On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 10:21:36AM -0800, tkato@prontomail.ne.jp wrote: > > >Number: 26122 > >Category: ports > >Synopsis: Update port: graphics/netpbm to 9.12 > >Originator: KATO Tsuguru > >Release: 4.2-RELEASE i386 > >Organization: > >Environment: > >Description: > - Update to version 9.12 > > New file: > files/patch-ct There's a little problem with this: the patch-ct in your PR seems to be identical to patch-ce; at the same time, ppm/411topbm.c fails to compile. Are you sure you did not mean to add a patch to 411topbm.c, instead of resubmitting the already-existing patch-ce, adding options parsing to ppm/ppmchange.c? G'luck, Peter -- Hey, out there - is it *you* reading me, or is it someone else? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message