Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 20:09:28 +0200 From: Michael Osipov <1983-01-06@gmx.net> To: lev@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why do I need JDK on my router? Message-ID: <29709882-7043-d8e0-3a14-42233d5323af@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <901792e9-c475-585b-fa9b-c89299bdf6b4@FreeBSD.org> References: <2b663b66-1516-9ff0-b534-c1b18cfff4a6@gmx.net> <901792e9-c475-585b-fa9b-c89299bdf6b4@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 2018-06-18 um 15:26 schrieb Lev Serebryakov: > On 15.06.2018 23:43, Michael Osipov wrote: > >> took a quick look at snappy-java. Unfortnately, this is not pure Java, >> but a JNI wrapper around a C++ implementation. I assume that the port >> maintainer wanted to replace with a locally compiled version for FreeBSD >> only. The default JAR is 64 bit only for Intel. > Yes, it is right. It explain, why `snappy-java' needs *JDK* for > *build*. It doesn't explain, why does it need *JDK* for *run* It doesn't, but I consider it as a shortcoming in the Makefile. >> Moreover, looking at the debian package, this software is pure crap: > All your points about unifi5 are valid, but it is only software to > manage one of the best APs on the market. > > Only Cisco hardware is better, but it almost ten times more expensive. Sadly, yes. I was evaluating Ubiquiti, but that software scared me off. Devices w/o any Web interface is just too risky. Some other AP vendors have similiar software. I am sure that there is some crappy Asian OEM producing this junk and Ubiquiti et al. are buying it.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?29709882-7043-d8e0-3a14-42233d5323af>