From owner-cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 12 11:41:28 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9B1F16A4CE; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 11:41:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from redqueen.evilcoder-services.org (redqueen.evilcoder-services.org [217.148.169.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A49143D1F; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 11:41:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from remko@elvandar.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])A5666295480; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 12:41:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from redqueen.evilcoder-services.org ([127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 63564-02; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 12:41:25 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <420DEB6B.5090206@elvandar.org> Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 12:41:31 +0100 From: Remko Lodder User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Macintosh/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Denis Peplin References: <200502101204.j1AC42Il077257@repoman.freebsd.org> <420B587C.4000201@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <420B587C.4000201@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by the evilcoder-services.org maildomain cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/firewalls chapter.sgml X-BeenThere: cvs-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the doc and www trees List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 11:41:29 -0000 Denis Peplin wrote: > Hello! > > Denis Peplin wrote: > >> den 2005-02-10 12:04:02 UTC >> >> FreeBSD doc repository >> >> Modified files: >> en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/firewalls chapter.sgml Log: >> Improve "Building the Rule Script" section by adding description of >> converting script to rule list (the example already contain this way, >> but it was not described). > > It seems that it is better to rename "Building the Rule Script" > to something like "Building the Rule Script with Symbolic Substitution", > or simply "Symbolic Substitution", > because: > > "The rules are not important in this example; how the Symbolic > substitution field are populated and used are." > > What do you think? Hi Den, I think: "Building the Rule Script with Symbolic Substitution" Is the best option of the 2 :-). cheers ! :) -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder ** remko@elvandar.org Reporter DSINET ** remko@DSINet.org Founder Tienervaders ** remko@tienervaders.org FreeBSD Documentation Project ** remko@FreeBSD.org