From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 23 11:19:01 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A76516A4CE for ; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 11:19:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from arginine.spc.org (arginine.spc.org [195.206.69.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5480743D53 for ; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 11:19:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bms@spc.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DB186538E for ; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 19:18:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from arginine.spc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arginine.spc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 21843-05-5 for ; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 19:18:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from saboteur.dek.spc.org (82-147-18-36.dsl.uk.rapidplay.com [82.147.18.36]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE54965371 for ; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 19:18:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: by saboteur.dek.spc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0F15B2E; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 19:18:56 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 19:18:56 +0000 From: Bruce M Simpson To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031223191856.GE8370@saboteur.dek.spc.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <20031223165439.GA23721@ussenterprise.ufp.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031223165439.GA23721@ussenterprise.ufp.org> Subject: Re: natd + ipfw question X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 19:19:01 -0000 On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 11:54:39AM -0500, Leo Bicknell wrote: > doesn't? Yes, I want to do something fancier treating inbound and > outbound traffic differently, but this basic case doesn't seem to > work, and it seems to me like it should. What am I missing? Have you configured IPFW2 (if running 4.x) into the kernel and rebuilt the appropriate pieces of world? BMS