Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 19 Aug 1996 15:26:14 -0700
From:      David Greenman <dg@root.com>
To:        Tim Vanderhoek <hoek@freenet.hamilton.on.ca>
Cc:        Hal Snyder <hal@post.vale.com>, "'freebsd-chat@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Microsoft's overwhelmed FTP servers 
Message-ID:  <199608192226.PAA22381@root.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 19 Aug 1996 17:20:31 EDT." <Pine.SOL.3.91.960819171431.28324A-100000@james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> I remember around the time Quake came out someone (David Greenman?) posted
>> some impressive numbers.
>
>I believe it was 112MB transferred in one day.  Had it been one 24-hour 
>period, the numbers might well be even higher.  I think you're right, and 
>that was just after Quake came out and after a bug in wcarchives ftpd had 
>been fixed that effectively allowed unlimited users on at a time.
>
>If noone else's saved the numbers, I've still got them in my INBOX, but 
>I'm sure David Greenman has them, too.  Plus much more current ones that 
>include the load on the machine at the time, perhaps.

   I guess it's time for me to say something. The current 24 hour record
(3am-3am) is 115GB which was set on August 10th. A new version of Linux
Slackware was released around then. The totals were:

Archive Name       Bytes Transfered    Files Transfered    % Bytes  %Files
------------       ----------------    ----------------    -------  ------
...
Total                115,746,632 K             459,339    100.0    100.0

   459339 files/day is an _average_ of 19139 files per hour, or 5.316 files
per second. 115GB/day is an average of 4.823GB/hour or about 1.34MB/sec.
   The actual peaks are about twice this and would have been sustained through
most of the daytime hours (roughly 2.5MB/sec). I should point out that the
machine still could have done more than this if the load had stayed as high
through the early morning hours as it did during the daytime. I should also
point out that wcarchive currently has only a 150Mhz P6 and that this is with
FreeBSD 2.1.5. We have made major performance improvements since then (many of
which have been inspired from things learned from wcarchive). Some estimates
indicate that wcarchive may see as much as a 50% reduction in CPU time given
the same load under FreeBSD 2.2...and we're still working on more improvements.

-DG

David Greenman
Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199608192226.PAA22381>