From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Feb 26 10:44:51 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA24900 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 26 Feb 1997 10:44:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA24893 for ; Wed, 26 Feb 1997 10:44:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from rover.village.org [127.0.0.1] by rover.village.org with esmtp (Exim 0.56 #1) id E0vzoKJ-0000h5-00; Wed, 26 Feb 1997 11:43:39 -0700 To: Adam David Subject: Re: make -k oddities Cc: asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami), freebsd-ports@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 26 Feb 1997 08:18:18 GMT." <199702260818.IAA08085@veda.is> References: <199702260818.IAA08085@veda.is> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 11:43:39 -0700 From: Warner Losh Message-Id: Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message <199702260818.IAA08085@veda.is> Adam David writes: : Fundamental command paradigm : : user: do this : unix: (ok) : : :) silence is golden :) Yes, but this is currently broken. make -k says not to build things that depend on those things that caused the error: -k Continue processing after errors are encountered, but only on those targets that do not depend on the target whose creation caused the error. which implies that if you do a make -k as a submake, it should return an error if anything it ran caused an error (excluding those things explicitly ignored). Warner