From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 10 09:29:21 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA50D16A419; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 09:29:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Received: from sippysoft.com (gk.360sip.com [72.236.70.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F90713C48E; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 09:29:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.0.3] ([204.244.149.125]) (authenticated bits=0) by sippysoft.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lAA9TA2f056369 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 10 Nov 2007 01:29:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <47357937.6080400@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 01:26:15 -0800 From: Maxim Sobolev Organization: Sippy Software, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Evans References: <200711081945.lA8JjKcW080540@repoman.freebsd.org> <47337724.9040108@FreeBSD.org> <47337940.6040909@root.org> <47340B74.9070004@freebsd.org> <4734B13C.6050008@root.org> <4735008D.7030600@FreeBSD.org> <20071110190555.I35816@delplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <20071110190555.I35816@delplex.bde.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, Kris Kennaway , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Colin Percival , Nate Lawson Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/amd64/amd64 mp_machdep.c src/sys/i386/i386 mp_machdep.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 09:29:21 -0000 Bruce Evans wrote: > Off is a good default since hyperthreading seems to be a pessimization > in most casts. Well, actually it all depends on workload and scheduling. I believe ULE is expected to improve things quite a bit in scheduling department. However, even with ol'good SCHED_BSD we measured noticeable performance increase (15-25%) in CPU intensive real-world tasks with HTT enabled on 2-way SMP Xeon system. It was in 2004, both CPUs and schedules should have been improved since that time. -Maxim